url
stringclasses
147 values
commit
stringclasses
147 values
file_path
stringlengths
7
101
full_name
stringlengths
1
94
start
stringlengths
6
10
end
stringlengths
6
11
tactic
stringlengths
1
11.2k
state_before
stringlengths
3
2.09M
state_after
stringlengths
6
2.09M
input
stringlengths
73
2.09M
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2010/A1/A1Monoid.lean
IMOSL.IMO2010A1.MonoidGood.solution_of_fract_map_one_pos
[103, 1]
[134, 68]
rw [if_pos (by rwa [Set.mem_setOf_eq]), map_eq_map_one_mul_floor hf, this, Int.cast_one, mul_one]
R : Type u_1 M : Type u_2 inst✝² : LinearOrderedRing R inst✝¹ : FloorRing R inst✝ : MulOneClass M f : M → R hf : MonoidGood f h : ⌊f 1⌋ = 1 h0 : 0 < Int.fract (f 1) h1 : ∀ (x : M), 0 ≤ ⌊f x⌋ h2 : ¬∀ (k : ℕ), k • Int.fract (f 1) < 1 x : M h3 : ¬⌊f x⌋ = 0 this : ⌊f x⌋ = 1 ⊢ f x = if x ∈ {x | ⌊f x⌋ ≠ 0} then f 1 else 0
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: R : Type u_1 M : Type u_2 inst✝² : LinearOrderedRing R inst✝¹ : FloorRing R inst✝ : MulOneClass M f : M → R hf : MonoidGood f h : ⌊f 1⌋ = 1 h0 : 0 < Int.fract (f 1) h1 : ∀ (x : M), 0 ≤ ⌊f x⌋ h2 : ¬∀ (k : ℕ), k • Int.fract (f 1) < 1 x : M h3 : ¬⌊f x⌋ = 0 this : ⌊f x⌋ = 1 ⊢ f x = if x ∈ {x | ⌊f x⌋ ≠ 0} then f 1 else 0 TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2010/A1/A1Monoid.lean
IMOSL.IMO2010A1.MonoidGood.solution_of_fract_map_one_pos
[103, 1]
[134, 68]
rwa [Set.mem_setOf_eq]
R : Type u_1 M : Type u_2 inst✝² : LinearOrderedRing R inst✝¹ : FloorRing R inst✝ : MulOneClass M f : M → R hf : MonoidGood f h : ⌊f 1⌋ = 1 h0 : 0 < Int.fract (f 1) h1 : ∀ (x : M), 0 ≤ ⌊f x⌋ h2 : ¬∀ (k : ℕ), k • Int.fract (f 1) < 1 x : M h3 : ¬⌊f x⌋ = 0 this : ⌊f x⌋ = 1 ⊢ x ∈ {x | ⌊f x⌋ ≠ 0}
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: R : Type u_1 M : Type u_2 inst✝² : LinearOrderedRing R inst✝¹ : FloorRing R inst✝ : MulOneClass M f : M → R hf : MonoidGood f h : ⌊f 1⌋ = 1 h0 : 0 < Int.fract (f 1) h1 : ∀ (x : M), 0 ≤ ⌊f x⌋ h2 : ¬∀ (k : ℕ), k • Int.fract (f 1) < 1 x : M h3 : ¬⌊f x⌋ = 0 this : ⌊f x⌋ = 1 ⊢ x ∈ {x | ⌊f x⌋ ≠ 0} TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2010/A1/A1Monoid.lean
IMOSL.IMO2010A1.MonoidGood.solution
[144, 1]
[166, 38]
simp only [Set.mem_empty_iff_false, and_self]
R : Type u_1 M : Type u_2 inst✝² : LinearOrderedRing R inst✝¹ : FloorRing R inst✝ : MulOneClass M f : M → R hf : MonoidGood f h : f = 0 x✝¹ x✝ : M ⊢ x✝¹ * x✝ ∈ ∅ ↔ x✝¹ ∈ ∅ ∧ x✝ ∈ ∅
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: R : Type u_1 M : Type u_2 inst✝² : LinearOrderedRing R inst✝¹ : FloorRing R inst✝ : MulOneClass M f : M → R hf : MonoidGood f h : f = 0 x✝¹ x✝ : M ⊢ x✝¹ * x✝ ∈ ∅ ↔ x✝¹ ∈ ∅ ∧ x✝ ∈ ∅ TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2010/A1/A1Monoid.lean
IMOSL.IMO2010A1.MonoidGood.solution
[144, 1]
[166, 38]
rw [Set.mem_empty_iff_false, if_false, h]
R : Type u_1 M : Type u_2 inst✝² : LinearOrderedRing R inst✝¹ : FloorRing R inst✝ : MulOneClass M f : M → R hf : MonoidGood f h : f = 0 x : M ⊢ f x = if x ∈ ∅ then 1 else 0
R : Type u_1 M : Type u_2 inst✝² : LinearOrderedRing R inst✝¹ : FloorRing R inst✝ : MulOneClass M f : M → R hf : MonoidGood f h : f = 0 x : M ⊢ 0 x = 0
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: R : Type u_1 M : Type u_2 inst✝² : LinearOrderedRing R inst✝¹ : FloorRing R inst✝ : MulOneClass M f : M → R hf : MonoidGood f h : f = 0 x : M ⊢ f x = if x ∈ ∅ then 1 else 0 TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2010/A1/A1Monoid.lean
IMOSL.IMO2010A1.MonoidGood.solution
[144, 1]
[166, 38]
rfl
R : Type u_1 M : Type u_2 inst✝² : LinearOrderedRing R inst✝¹ : FloorRing R inst✝ : MulOneClass M f : M → R hf : MonoidGood f h : f = 0 x : M ⊢ 0 x = 0
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: R : Type u_1 M : Type u_2 inst✝² : LinearOrderedRing R inst✝¹ : FloorRing R inst✝ : MulOneClass M f : M → R hf : MonoidGood f h : f = 0 x : M ⊢ 0 x = 0 TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2010/A1/A1Monoid.lean
IMOSL.IMO2010A1.MonoidGood.solution
[144, 1]
[166, 38]
rw [h3, ← Int.cast_one, ← h, Int.floor_add_fract]
R : Type u_1 M : Type u_2 inst✝² : LinearOrderedRing R inst✝¹ : FloorRing R inst✝ : MulOneClass M f : M → R hf : MonoidGood f h : ⌊f 1⌋ = 1 h0 : 0 < Int.fract (f 1) x✝ : Infinitesimal (Int.fract (f 1)) ∧ ∃ φ, ∀ (x : M), f x = f 1 * ↑(φ x) h1 : Infinitesimal (Int.fract (f 1)) h2 : ∃ φ, ∀ (x : M), f x = f 1 * ↑(φ x) φ : M →* ℕ h3 : ∀ (x : M), f x = f 1 * ↑(φ x) y : M ⊢ f y = (1 + Int.fract (f 1)) * ↑(φ y)
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: R : Type u_1 M : Type u_2 inst✝² : LinearOrderedRing R inst✝¹ : FloorRing R inst✝ : MulOneClass M f : M → R hf : MonoidGood f h : ⌊f 1⌋ = 1 h0 : 0 < Int.fract (f 1) x✝ : Infinitesimal (Int.fract (f 1)) ∧ ∃ φ, ∀ (x : M), f x = f 1 * ↑(φ x) h1 : Infinitesimal (Int.fract (f 1)) h2 : ∃ φ, ∀ (x : M), f x = f 1 * ↑(φ x) φ : M →* ℕ h3 : ∀ (x : M), f x = f 1 * ↑(φ x) y : M ⊢ f y = (1 + Int.fract (f 1)) * ↑(φ y) TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2010/A1/A1Monoid.lean
IMOSL.IMO2010A1.MonoidGood.solution
[144, 1]
[166, 38]
rcases hf with ⟨φ, rfl⟩ | ⟨ε, hε, hε0, φ, rfl⟩ | ⟨A, hA, C, hC, rfl⟩
R : Type u_1 M : Type u_2 inst✝² : LinearOrderedRing R inst✝¹ : FloorRing R inst✝ : MulOneClass M f : M → R hf : (∃ φ, f = fun x => ↑(φ x)) ∨ (∃ ε, ∃ (_ : 0 < ε) (_ : Infinitesimal ε), ∃ φ, f = fun x => (1 + ε) * ↑(φ x)) ∨ ∃ A, ∃ (_ : ∀ (m n : M), m * n ∈ A ↔ m ∈ A ∧ n ∈ A), ∃ C, ∃ (_ : ⌊C⌋ = 1), f = fun x => if x ∈ A then C else 0 ⊢ MonoidGood f
case inl.intro R : Type u_1 M : Type u_2 inst✝² : LinearOrderedRing R inst✝¹ : FloorRing R inst✝ : MulOneClass M φ : M →* ℤ ⊢ MonoidGood fun x => ↑(φ x) case inr.inl.intro.intro.intro.intro R : Type u_1 M : Type u_2 inst✝² : LinearOrderedRing R inst✝¹ : FloorRing R inst✝ : MulOneClass M ε : R hε : 0 < ε hε0 : Infinitesimal ε φ : M →* ℕ ⊢ MonoidGood fun x => (1 + ε) * ↑(φ x) case inr.inr.intro.intro.intro.intro R : Type u_1 M : Type u_2 inst✝² : LinearOrderedRing R inst✝¹ : FloorRing R inst✝ : MulOneClass M A : Set M hA : ∀ (m n : M), m * n ∈ A ↔ m ∈ A ∧ n ∈ A C : R hC : ⌊C⌋ = 1 ⊢ MonoidGood fun x => if x ∈ A then C else 0
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: R : Type u_1 M : Type u_2 inst✝² : LinearOrderedRing R inst✝¹ : FloorRing R inst✝ : MulOneClass M f : M → R hf : (∃ φ, f = fun x => ↑(φ x)) ∨ (∃ ε, ∃ (_ : 0 < ε) (_ : Infinitesimal ε), ∃ φ, f = fun x => (1 + ε) * ↑(φ x)) ∨ ∃ A, ∃ (_ : ∀ (m n : M), m * n ∈ A ↔ m ∈ A ∧ n ∈ A), ∃ C, ∃ (_ : ⌊C⌋ = 1), f = fun x => if x ∈ A then C else 0 ⊢ MonoidGood f TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2010/A1/A1Monoid.lean
IMOSL.IMO2010A1.MonoidGood.solution
[144, 1]
[166, 38]
exacts [castMonoidHom_is_MonoidGood φ.toMulHom, one_add_infinitesimal_mul_is_MonoidGood φ.toMulHom hε.le hε0, indicator_const_is_good hA hC]
case inl.intro R : Type u_1 M : Type u_2 inst✝² : LinearOrderedRing R inst✝¹ : FloorRing R inst✝ : MulOneClass M φ : M →* ℤ ⊢ MonoidGood fun x => ↑(φ x) case inr.inl.intro.intro.intro.intro R : Type u_1 M : Type u_2 inst✝² : LinearOrderedRing R inst✝¹ : FloorRing R inst✝ : MulOneClass M ε : R hε : 0 < ε hε0 : Infinitesimal ε φ : M →* ℕ ⊢ MonoidGood fun x => (1 + ε) * ↑(φ x) case inr.inr.intro.intro.intro.intro R : Type u_1 M : Type u_2 inst✝² : LinearOrderedRing R inst✝¹ : FloorRing R inst✝ : MulOneClass M A : Set M hA : ∀ (m n : M), m * n ∈ A ↔ m ∈ A ∧ n ∈ A C : R hC : ⌊C⌋ = 1 ⊢ MonoidGood fun x => if x ∈ A then C else 0
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case inl.intro R : Type u_1 M : Type u_2 inst✝² : LinearOrderedRing R inst✝¹ : FloorRing R inst✝ : MulOneClass M φ : M →* ℤ ⊢ MonoidGood fun x => ↑(φ x) case inr.inl.intro.intro.intro.intro R : Type u_1 M : Type u_2 inst✝² : LinearOrderedRing R inst✝¹ : FloorRing R inst✝ : MulOneClass M ε : R hε : 0 < ε hε0 : Infinitesimal ε φ : M →* ℕ ⊢ MonoidGood fun x => (1 + ε) * ↑(φ x) case inr.inr.intro.intro.intro.intro R : Type u_1 M : Type u_2 inst✝² : LinearOrderedRing R inst✝¹ : FloorRing R inst✝ : MulOneClass M A : Set M hA : ∀ (m n : M), m * n ∈ A ↔ m ∈ A ∧ n ∈ A C : R hC : ⌊C⌋ = 1 ⊢ MonoidGood fun x => if x ∈ A then C else 0 TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2012/A5/A5Answers/SqSubOneMap.lean
IMOSL.IMO2012A5.sq_sub_one_is_good
[50, 1]
[51, 18]
ring
R : Type u_1 inst✝ : CommRing R x✝¹ x✝ : R ⊢ (fun x => x ^ 2 - 1) (x✝¹ * x✝ + 1) = (fun x => x ^ 2 - 1) x✝¹ * (fun x => x ^ 2 - 1) x✝ + (fun x => x ^ 2 - 1) (x✝¹ + x✝)
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: R : Type u_1 inst✝ : CommRing R x✝¹ x✝ : R ⊢ (fun x => x ^ 2 - 1) (x✝¹ * x✝ + 1) = (fun x => x ^ 2 - 1) x✝¹ * (fun x => x ^ 2 - 1) x✝ + (fun x => x ^ 2 - 1) (x✝¹ + x✝) TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/Extra/NatSequence/OfList.lean
IMOSL.Extra.NatSeq_of_singleton
[32, 1]
[33, 62]
rw [NatSeq_ofList, List.length_singleton, Nat.mod_one]
α : Type u_1 inst✝ : Inhabited α c : α n : ℕ ⊢ NatSeq_ofList [c] n = c
α : Type u_1 inst✝ : Inhabited α c : α n : ℕ ⊢ [c].getI 0 = c
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: α : Type u_1 inst✝ : Inhabited α c : α n : ℕ ⊢ NatSeq_ofList [c] n = c TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/Extra/NatSequence/OfList.lean
IMOSL.Extra.NatSeq_of_singleton
[32, 1]
[33, 62]
rfl
α : Type u_1 inst✝ : Inhabited α c : α n : ℕ ⊢ [c].getI 0 = c
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: α : Type u_1 inst✝ : Inhabited α c : α n : ℕ ⊢ [c].getI 0 = c TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/Extra/NatSequence/OfList.lean
IMOSL.Extra.NatSeq_ofList_of_PeriodicNatSeq_eq
[49, 1]
[55, 58]
replace hN := List.length_pos.mp <| hN.trans_eq (List_ofNatSeq_length a N).symm
α : Type u_1 inst✝ : Inhabited α N : ℕ hN : 0 < N a : ℕ → α ha : Function.Periodic a N n : ℕ ⊢ NatSeq_ofList (List_ofNatSeq a N) n = a n
α : Type u_1 inst✝ : Inhabited α N : ℕ a : ℕ → α ha : Function.Periodic a N n : ℕ hN : List_ofNatSeq a N ≠ [] ⊢ NatSeq_ofList (List_ofNatSeq a N) n = a n
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: α : Type u_1 inst✝ : Inhabited α N : ℕ hN : 0 < N a : ℕ → α ha : Function.Periodic a N n : ℕ ⊢ NatSeq_ofList (List_ofNatSeq a N) n = a n TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/Extra/NatSequence/OfList.lean
IMOSL.Extra.NatSeq_ofList_of_PeriodicNatSeq_eq
[49, 1]
[55, 58]
rw [NatSeq_nonempty_eq_get hN]
α : Type u_1 inst✝ : Inhabited α N : ℕ a : ℕ → α ha : Function.Periodic a N n : ℕ hN : List_ofNatSeq a N ≠ [] ⊢ NatSeq_ofList (List_ofNatSeq a N) n = a n
α : Type u_1 inst✝ : Inhabited α N : ℕ a : ℕ → α ha : Function.Periodic a N n : ℕ hN : List_ofNatSeq a N ≠ [] ⊢ (List_ofNatSeq a N).get ⟨n % (List_ofNatSeq a N).length, ⋯⟩ = a n
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: α : Type u_1 inst✝ : Inhabited α N : ℕ a : ℕ → α ha : Function.Periodic a N n : ℕ hN : List_ofNatSeq a N ≠ [] ⊢ NatSeq_ofList (List_ofNatSeq a N) n = a n TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/Extra/NatSequence/OfList.lean
IMOSL.Extra.NatSeq_ofList_of_PeriodicNatSeq_eq
[49, 1]
[55, 58]
unfold List_ofNatSeq
α : Type u_1 inst✝ : Inhabited α N : ℕ a : ℕ → α ha : Function.Periodic a N n : ℕ hN : List_ofNatSeq a N ≠ [] ⊢ (List_ofNatSeq a N).get ⟨n % (List_ofNatSeq a N).length, ⋯⟩ = a n
α : Type u_1 inst✝ : Inhabited α N : ℕ a : ℕ → α ha : Function.Periodic a N n : ℕ hN : List_ofNatSeq a N ≠ [] ⊢ (List.map a (List.range N)).get ⟨n % (List.map a (List.range N)).length, ⋯⟩ = a n
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: α : Type u_1 inst✝ : Inhabited α N : ℕ a : ℕ → α ha : Function.Periodic a N n : ℕ hN : List_ofNatSeq a N ≠ [] ⊢ (List_ofNatSeq a N).get ⟨n % (List_ofNatSeq a N).length, ⋯⟩ = a n TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/Extra/NatSequence/OfList.lean
IMOSL.Extra.NatSeq_ofList_of_PeriodicNatSeq_eq
[49, 1]
[55, 58]
rw [List.get_map, List.get_range, Fin.val_mk, List.length_map, List.length_range, ha.map_mod_nat]
α : Type u_1 inst✝ : Inhabited α N : ℕ a : ℕ → α ha : Function.Periodic a N n : ℕ hN : List_ofNatSeq a N ≠ [] ⊢ (List.map a (List.range N)).get ⟨n % (List.map a (List.range N)).length, ⋯⟩ = a n
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: α : Type u_1 inst✝ : Inhabited α N : ℕ a : ℕ → α ha : Function.Periodic a N n : ℕ hN : List_ofNatSeq a N ≠ [] ⊢ (List.map a (List.range N)).get ⟨n % (List.map a (List.range N)).length, ⋯⟩ = a n TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/Extra/CharTwo/Hom.lean
IMOSL.Extra.CharTwo.pullback_of_inj
[22, 1]
[23, 71]
rw [φ.map_add, φ.map_zero, CharTwo.add_self_eq_zero]
R : Type u_1 R' : Type u_2 inst✝² : AddMonoid R inst✝¹ : CharTwo R inst✝ : AddMonoid R' φ : R' →+ R h : Function.Injective ⇑φ x : R' ⊢ φ (x + x) = φ 0
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: R : Type u_1 R' : Type u_2 inst✝² : AddMonoid R inst✝¹ : CharTwo R inst✝ : AddMonoid R' φ : R' →+ R h : Function.Injective ⇑φ x : R' ⊢ φ (x + x) = φ 0 TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/Extra/CharTwo/Hom.lean
IMOSL.Extra.CharTwo.forward_of_surj
[25, 1]
[26, 86]
rw [← h0, ← φ.map_add, add_self_eq_zero, φ.map_zero]
R : Type u_2 R' : Type u_1 inst✝² : AddMonoid R inst✝¹ : CharTwo R inst✝ : AddMonoid R' φ : R →+ R' h : Function.Surjective ⇑φ x : R' c : R h0 : φ c = x ⊢ x + x = 0
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: R : Type u_2 R' : Type u_1 inst✝² : AddMonoid R inst✝¹ : CharTwo R inst✝ : AddMonoid R' φ : R →+ R' h : Function.Surjective ⇑φ x : R' c : R h0 : φ c = x ⊢ x + x = 0 TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2015/A2/A2.lean
IMOSL.IMO2015A2.final_solution
[20, 1]
[51, 20]
refine Iff.symm ⟨λ h x y ↦ ?_, λ h ↦ ?_⟩
f : ℤ → ℤ ⊢ (∀ (x y : ℤ), f (x - f y) = f (f x) - f y - 1) ↔ (f = fun x => -1) ∨ f = fun x => x + 1
case refine_1 f : ℤ → ℤ h : (f = fun x => -1) ∨ f = fun x => x + 1 x y : ℤ ⊢ f (x - f y) = f (f x) - f y - 1 case refine_2 f : ℤ → ℤ h : ∀ (x y : ℤ), f (x - f y) = f (f x) - f y - 1 ⊢ (f = fun x => -1) ∨ f = fun x => x + 1
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: f : ℤ → ℤ ⊢ (∀ (x y : ℤ), f (x - f y) = f (f x) - f y - 1) ↔ (f = fun x => -1) ∨ f = fun x => x + 1 TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2015/A2/A2.lean
IMOSL.IMO2015A2.final_solution
[20, 1]
[51, 20]
rcases h with rfl | rfl
case refine_1 f : ℤ → ℤ h : (f = fun x => -1) ∨ f = fun x => x + 1 x y : ℤ ⊢ f (x - f y) = f (f x) - f y - 1
case refine_1.inl x y : ℤ ⊢ (fun x => -1) (x - (fun x => -1) y) = (fun x => -1) ((fun x => -1) x) - (fun x => -1) y - 1 case refine_1.inr x y : ℤ ⊢ (fun x => x + 1) (x - (fun x => x + 1) y) = (fun x => x + 1) ((fun x => x + 1) x) - (fun x => x + 1) y - 1
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case refine_1 f : ℤ → ℤ h : (f = fun x => -1) ∨ f = fun x => x + 1 x y : ℤ ⊢ f (x - f y) = f (f x) - f y - 1 TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2015/A2/A2.lean
IMOSL.IMO2015A2.final_solution
[20, 1]
[51, 20]
rw [sub_sub, neg_add_self, sub_zero]
case refine_1.inl x y : ℤ ⊢ (fun x => -1) (x - (fun x => -1) y) = (fun x => -1) ((fun x => -1) x) - (fun x => -1) y - 1
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case refine_1.inl x y : ℤ ⊢ (fun x => -1) (x - (fun x => -1) y) = (fun x => -1) ((fun x => -1) x) - (fun x => -1) y - 1 TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2015/A2/A2.lean
IMOSL.IMO2015A2.final_solution
[20, 1]
[51, 20]
rw [sub_sub, add_sub_add_right_eq_sub, add_sub_right_comm]
case refine_1.inr x y : ℤ ⊢ (fun x => x + 1) (x - (fun x => x + 1) y) = (fun x => x + 1) ((fun x => x + 1) x) - (fun x => x + 1) y - 1
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case refine_1.inr x y : ℤ ⊢ (fun x => x + 1) (x - (fun x => x + 1) y) = (fun x => x + 1) ((fun x => x + 1) x) - (fun x => x + 1) y - 1 TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2015/A2/A2.lean
IMOSL.IMO2015A2.final_solution
[20, 1]
[51, 20]
have h0 := h 0 (f 0)
case refine_2 f : ℤ → ℤ h : ∀ (x y : ℤ), f (x - f y) = f (f x) - f y - 1 ⊢ (f = fun x => -1) ∨ f = fun x => x + 1
case refine_2 f : ℤ → ℤ h : ∀ (x y : ℤ), f (x - f y) = f (f x) - f y - 1 h0 : f (0 - f (f 0)) = f (f 0) - f (f 0) - 1 ⊢ (f = fun x => -1) ∨ f = fun x => x + 1
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case refine_2 f : ℤ → ℤ h : ∀ (x y : ℤ), f (x - f y) = f (f x) - f y - 1 ⊢ (f = fun x => -1) ∨ f = fun x => x + 1 TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2015/A2/A2.lean
IMOSL.IMO2015A2.final_solution
[20, 1]
[51, 20]
rw [sub_self, zero_sub 1] at h0
case refine_2 f : ℤ → ℤ h : ∀ (x y : ℤ), f (x - f y) = f (f x) - f y - 1 h0 : f (0 - f (f 0)) = f (f 0) - f (f 0) - 1 ⊢ (f = fun x => -1) ∨ f = fun x => x + 1
case refine_2 f : ℤ → ℤ h : ∀ (x y : ℤ), f (x - f y) = f (f x) - f y - 1 h0 : f (0 - f (f 0)) = -1 ⊢ (f = fun x => -1) ∨ f = fun x => x + 1
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case refine_2 f : ℤ → ℤ h : ∀ (x y : ℤ), f (x - f y) = f (f x) - f y - 1 h0 : f (0 - f (f 0)) = f (f 0) - f (f 0) - 1 ⊢ (f = fun x => -1) ∨ f = fun x => x + 1 TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2015/A2/A2.lean
IMOSL.IMO2015A2.final_solution
[20, 1]
[51, 20]
replace h0 x : f (x + 1) = f (f x) := by have h1 := h x (0 - f (f 0)) rwa [h0, sub_neg_eq_add (f (f x)), add_sub_cancel_right] at h1
case refine_2 f : ℤ → ℤ h : ∀ (x y : ℤ), f (x - f y) = f (f x) - f y - 1 h0 : f (0 - f (f 0)) = -1 ⊢ (f = fun x => -1) ∨ f = fun x => x + 1
case refine_2 f : ℤ → ℤ h : ∀ (x y : ℤ), f (x - f y) = f (f x) - f y - 1 h0 : ∀ (x : ℤ), f (x + 1) = f (f x) ⊢ (f = fun x => -1) ∨ f = fun x => x + 1
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case refine_2 f : ℤ → ℤ h : ∀ (x y : ℤ), f (x - f y) = f (f x) - f y - 1 h0 : f (0 - f (f 0)) = -1 ⊢ (f = fun x => -1) ∨ f = fun x => x + 1 TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2015/A2/A2.lean
IMOSL.IMO2015A2.final_solution
[20, 1]
[51, 20]
have h1 : ∀ n, f n = (f (-1) + 1) * n + f 0 := by refine Extra.IntIntLinearSolverAlt λ n ↦ ?_ have h1 := h0 (n - f n - 1) rw [sub_add_cancel, sub_right_comm, h, ← h0, h (n - 1), ← h0, sub_add_cancel, sub_self, zero_sub, sub_eq_iff_eq_add] at h1 exact eq_add_of_sub_eq h1
case refine_2 f : ℤ → ℤ h : ∀ (x y : ℤ), f (x - f y) = f (f x) - f y - 1 h0 : ∀ (x : ℤ), f (x + 1) = f (f x) ⊢ (f = fun x => -1) ∨ f = fun x => x + 1
case refine_2 f : ℤ → ℤ h : ∀ (x y : ℤ), f (x - f y) = f (f x) - f y - 1 h0 : ∀ (x : ℤ), f (x + 1) = f (f x) h1 : ∀ (n : ℤ), f n = (f (-1) + 1) * n + f 0 ⊢ (f = fun x => -1) ∨ f = fun x => x + 1
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case refine_2 f : ℤ → ℤ h : ∀ (x y : ℤ), f (x - f y) = f (f x) - f y - 1 h0 : ∀ (x : ℤ), f (x + 1) = f (f x) ⊢ (f = fun x => -1) ∨ f = fun x => x + 1 TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2015/A2/A2.lean
IMOSL.IMO2015A2.final_solution
[20, 1]
[51, 20]
refine (eq_or_ne (f (-1) + 1) 0).imp (λ h2 ↦ funext λ x ↦ ?_) (λ h2 ↦ funext λ x ↦ ?_)
case refine_2 f : ℤ → ℤ h : ∀ (x y : ℤ), f (x - f y) = f (f x) - f y - 1 h0 : ∀ (x : ℤ), f (x + 1) = f (f x) h1 : ∀ (n : ℤ), f n = (f (-1) + 1) * n + f 0 ⊢ (f = fun x => -1) ∨ f = fun x => x + 1
case refine_2.refine_1 f : ℤ → ℤ h : ∀ (x y : ℤ), f (x - f y) = f (f x) - f y - 1 h0 : ∀ (x : ℤ), f (x + 1) = f (f x) h1 : ∀ (n : ℤ), f n = (f (-1) + 1) * n + f 0 h2 : f (-1) + 1 = 0 x : ℤ ⊢ f x = -1 case refine_2.refine_2 f : ℤ → ℤ h : ∀ (x y : ℤ), f (x - f y) = f (f x) - f y - 1 h0 : ∀ (x : ℤ), f (x + 1) = f (f x) h1 : ∀ (n : ℤ), f n = (f (-1) + 1) * n + f 0 h2 : f (-1) + 1 ≠ 0 x : ℤ ⊢ f x = x + 1
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case refine_2 f : ℤ → ℤ h : ∀ (x y : ℤ), f (x - f y) = f (f x) - f y - 1 h0 : ∀ (x : ℤ), f (x + 1) = f (f x) h1 : ∀ (n : ℤ), f n = (f (-1) + 1) * n + f 0 ⊢ (f = fun x => -1) ∨ f = fun x => x + 1 TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2015/A2/A2.lean
IMOSL.IMO2015A2.final_solution
[20, 1]
[51, 20]
have h1 := h x (0 - f (f 0))
f : ℤ → ℤ h : ∀ (x y : ℤ), f (x - f y) = f (f x) - f y - 1 h0 : f (0 - f (f 0)) = -1 x : ℤ ⊢ f (x + 1) = f (f x)
f : ℤ → ℤ h : ∀ (x y : ℤ), f (x - f y) = f (f x) - f y - 1 h0 : f (0 - f (f 0)) = -1 x : ℤ h1 : f (x - f (0 - f (f 0))) = f (f x) - f (0 - f (f 0)) - 1 ⊢ f (x + 1) = f (f x)
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: f : ℤ → ℤ h : ∀ (x y : ℤ), f (x - f y) = f (f x) - f y - 1 h0 : f (0 - f (f 0)) = -1 x : ℤ ⊢ f (x + 1) = f (f x) TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2015/A2/A2.lean
IMOSL.IMO2015A2.final_solution
[20, 1]
[51, 20]
rwa [h0, sub_neg_eq_add (f (f x)), add_sub_cancel_right] at h1
f : ℤ → ℤ h : ∀ (x y : ℤ), f (x - f y) = f (f x) - f y - 1 h0 : f (0 - f (f 0)) = -1 x : ℤ h1 : f (x - f (0 - f (f 0))) = f (f x) - f (0 - f (f 0)) - 1 ⊢ f (x + 1) = f (f x)
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: f : ℤ → ℤ h : ∀ (x y : ℤ), f (x - f y) = f (f x) - f y - 1 h0 : f (0 - f (f 0)) = -1 x : ℤ h1 : f (x - f (0 - f (f 0))) = f (f x) - f (0 - f (f 0)) - 1 ⊢ f (x + 1) = f (f x) TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2015/A2/A2.lean
IMOSL.IMO2015A2.final_solution
[20, 1]
[51, 20]
refine Extra.IntIntLinearSolverAlt λ n ↦ ?_
f : ℤ → ℤ h : ∀ (x y : ℤ), f (x - f y) = f (f x) - f y - 1 h0 : ∀ (x : ℤ), f (x + 1) = f (f x) ⊢ ∀ (n : ℤ), f n = (f (-1) + 1) * n + f 0
f : ℤ → ℤ h : ∀ (x y : ℤ), f (x - f y) = f (f x) - f y - 1 h0 : ∀ (x : ℤ), f (x + 1) = f (f x) n : ℤ ⊢ f (n + 1) = f (-1) + 1 + f n
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: f : ℤ → ℤ h : ∀ (x y : ℤ), f (x - f y) = f (f x) - f y - 1 h0 : ∀ (x : ℤ), f (x + 1) = f (f x) ⊢ ∀ (n : ℤ), f n = (f (-1) + 1) * n + f 0 TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2015/A2/A2.lean
IMOSL.IMO2015A2.final_solution
[20, 1]
[51, 20]
have h1 := h0 (n - f n - 1)
f : ℤ → ℤ h : ∀ (x y : ℤ), f (x - f y) = f (f x) - f y - 1 h0 : ∀ (x : ℤ), f (x + 1) = f (f x) n : ℤ ⊢ f (n + 1) = f (-1) + 1 + f n
f : ℤ → ℤ h : ∀ (x y : ℤ), f (x - f y) = f (f x) - f y - 1 h0 : ∀ (x : ℤ), f (x + 1) = f (f x) n : ℤ h1 : f (n - f n - 1 + 1) = f (f (n - f n - 1)) ⊢ f (n + 1) = f (-1) + 1 + f n
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: f : ℤ → ℤ h : ∀ (x y : ℤ), f (x - f y) = f (f x) - f y - 1 h0 : ∀ (x : ℤ), f (x + 1) = f (f x) n : ℤ ⊢ f (n + 1) = f (-1) + 1 + f n TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2015/A2/A2.lean
IMOSL.IMO2015A2.final_solution
[20, 1]
[51, 20]
rw [sub_add_cancel, sub_right_comm, h, ← h0, h (n - 1), ← h0, sub_add_cancel, sub_self, zero_sub, sub_eq_iff_eq_add] at h1
f : ℤ → ℤ h : ∀ (x y : ℤ), f (x - f y) = f (f x) - f y - 1 h0 : ∀ (x : ℤ), f (x + 1) = f (f x) n : ℤ h1 : f (n - f n - 1 + 1) = f (f (n - f n - 1)) ⊢ f (n + 1) = f (-1) + 1 + f n
f : ℤ → ℤ h : ∀ (x y : ℤ), f (x - f y) = f (f x) - f y - 1 h0 : ∀ (x : ℤ), f (x + 1) = f (f x) n : ℤ h1 : f (n + 1) - f n = f (-1) + 1 ⊢ f (n + 1) = f (-1) + 1 + f n
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: f : ℤ → ℤ h : ∀ (x y : ℤ), f (x - f y) = f (f x) - f y - 1 h0 : ∀ (x : ℤ), f (x + 1) = f (f x) n : ℤ h1 : f (n - f n - 1 + 1) = f (f (n - f n - 1)) ⊢ f (n + 1) = f (-1) + 1 + f n TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2015/A2/A2.lean
IMOSL.IMO2015A2.final_solution
[20, 1]
[51, 20]
exact eq_add_of_sub_eq h1
f : ℤ → ℤ h : ∀ (x y : ℤ), f (x - f y) = f (f x) - f y - 1 h0 : ∀ (x : ℤ), f (x + 1) = f (f x) n : ℤ h1 : f (n + 1) - f n = f (-1) + 1 ⊢ f (n + 1) = f (-1) + 1 + f n
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: f : ℤ → ℤ h : ∀ (x y : ℤ), f (x - f y) = f (f x) - f y - 1 h0 : ∀ (x : ℤ), f (x + 1) = f (f x) n : ℤ h1 : f (n + 1) - f n = f (-1) + 1 ⊢ f (n + 1) = f (-1) + 1 + f n TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2015/A2/A2.lean
IMOSL.IMO2015A2.final_solution
[20, 1]
[51, 20]
rw [h1, h2, Int.zero_mul, zero_add, ← eq_neg_of_add_eq_zero_left h2]
case refine_2.refine_1 f : ℤ → ℤ h : ∀ (x y : ℤ), f (x - f y) = f (f x) - f y - 1 h0 : ∀ (x : ℤ), f (x + 1) = f (f x) h1 : ∀ (n : ℤ), f n = (f (-1) + 1) * n + f 0 h2 : f (-1) + 1 = 0 x : ℤ ⊢ f x = -1
case refine_2.refine_1 f : ℤ → ℤ h : ∀ (x y : ℤ), f (x - f y) = f (f x) - f y - 1 h0 : ∀ (x : ℤ), f (x + 1) = f (f x) h1 : ∀ (n : ℤ), f n = (f (-1) + 1) * n + f 0 h2 : f (-1) + 1 = 0 x : ℤ ⊢ f 0 = f (-1)
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case refine_2.refine_1 f : ℤ → ℤ h : ∀ (x y : ℤ), f (x - f y) = f (f x) - f y - 1 h0 : ∀ (x : ℤ), f (x + 1) = f (f x) h1 : ∀ (n : ℤ), f n = (f (-1) + 1) * n + f 0 h2 : f (-1) + 1 = 0 x : ℤ ⊢ f x = -1 TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2015/A2/A2.lean
IMOSL.IMO2015A2.final_solution
[20, 1]
[51, 20]
specialize h1 (-1)
case refine_2.refine_1 f : ℤ → ℤ h : ∀ (x y : ℤ), f (x - f y) = f (f x) - f y - 1 h0 : ∀ (x : ℤ), f (x + 1) = f (f x) h1 : ∀ (n : ℤ), f n = (f (-1) + 1) * n + f 0 h2 : f (-1) + 1 = 0 x : ℤ ⊢ f 0 = f (-1)
case refine_2.refine_1 f : ℤ → ℤ h : ∀ (x y : ℤ), f (x - f y) = f (f x) - f y - 1 h0 : ∀ (x : ℤ), f (x + 1) = f (f x) h2 : f (-1) + 1 = 0 x : ℤ h1 : f (-1) = (f (-1) + 1) * -1 + f 0 ⊢ f 0 = f (-1)
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case refine_2.refine_1 f : ℤ → ℤ h : ∀ (x y : ℤ), f (x - f y) = f (f x) - f y - 1 h0 : ∀ (x : ℤ), f (x + 1) = f (f x) h1 : ∀ (n : ℤ), f n = (f (-1) + 1) * n + f 0 h2 : f (-1) + 1 = 0 x : ℤ ⊢ f 0 = f (-1) TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2015/A2/A2.lean
IMOSL.IMO2015A2.final_solution
[20, 1]
[51, 20]
rw [h2, Int.zero_mul, zero_add] at h1
case refine_2.refine_1 f : ℤ → ℤ h : ∀ (x y : ℤ), f (x - f y) = f (f x) - f y - 1 h0 : ∀ (x : ℤ), f (x + 1) = f (f x) h2 : f (-1) + 1 = 0 x : ℤ h1 : f (-1) = (f (-1) + 1) * -1 + f 0 ⊢ f 0 = f (-1)
case refine_2.refine_1 f : ℤ → ℤ h : ∀ (x y : ℤ), f (x - f y) = f (f x) - f y - 1 h0 : ∀ (x : ℤ), f (x + 1) = f (f x) h2 : f (-1) + 1 = 0 x : ℤ h1 : f (-1) = f 0 ⊢ f 0 = f (-1)
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case refine_2.refine_1 f : ℤ → ℤ h : ∀ (x y : ℤ), f (x - f y) = f (f x) - f y - 1 h0 : ∀ (x : ℤ), f (x + 1) = f (f x) h2 : f (-1) + 1 = 0 x : ℤ h1 : f (-1) = (f (-1) + 1) * -1 + f 0 ⊢ f 0 = f (-1) TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2015/A2/A2.lean
IMOSL.IMO2015A2.final_solution
[20, 1]
[51, 20]
exact h1.symm
case refine_2.refine_1 f : ℤ → ℤ h : ∀ (x y : ℤ), f (x - f y) = f (f x) - f y - 1 h0 : ∀ (x : ℤ), f (x + 1) = f (f x) h2 : f (-1) + 1 = 0 x : ℤ h1 : f (-1) = f 0 ⊢ f 0 = f (-1)
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case refine_2.refine_1 f : ℤ → ℤ h : ∀ (x y : ℤ), f (x - f y) = f (f x) - f y - 1 h0 : ∀ (x : ℤ), f (x + 1) = f (f x) h2 : f (-1) + 1 = 0 x : ℤ h1 : f (-1) = f 0 ⊢ f 0 = f (-1) TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2015/A2/A2.lean
IMOSL.IMO2015A2.final_solution
[20, 1]
[51, 20]
specialize h0 x
case refine_2.refine_2 f : ℤ → ℤ h : ∀ (x y : ℤ), f (x - f y) = f (f x) - f y - 1 h0 : ∀ (x : ℤ), f (x + 1) = f (f x) h1 : ∀ (n : ℤ), f n = (f (-1) + 1) * n + f 0 h2 : f (-1) + 1 ≠ 0 x : ℤ ⊢ f x = x + 1
case refine_2.refine_2 f : ℤ → ℤ h : ∀ (x y : ℤ), f (x - f y) = f (f x) - f y - 1 h1 : ∀ (n : ℤ), f n = (f (-1) + 1) * n + f 0 h2 : f (-1) + 1 ≠ 0 x : ℤ h0 : f (x + 1) = f (f x) ⊢ f x = x + 1
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case refine_2.refine_2 f : ℤ → ℤ h : ∀ (x y : ℤ), f (x - f y) = f (f x) - f y - 1 h0 : ∀ (x : ℤ), f (x + 1) = f (f x) h1 : ∀ (n : ℤ), f n = (f (-1) + 1) * n + f 0 h2 : f (-1) + 1 ≠ 0 x : ℤ ⊢ f x = x + 1 TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2015/A2/A2.lean
IMOSL.IMO2015A2.final_solution
[20, 1]
[51, 20]
rw [h1, h1 (f x), add_left_inj, Int.mul_eq_mul_left_iff h2] at h0
case refine_2.refine_2 f : ℤ → ℤ h : ∀ (x y : ℤ), f (x - f y) = f (f x) - f y - 1 h1 : ∀ (n : ℤ), f n = (f (-1) + 1) * n + f 0 h2 : f (-1) + 1 ≠ 0 x : ℤ h0 : f (x + 1) = f (f x) ⊢ f x = x + 1
case refine_2.refine_2 f : ℤ → ℤ h : ∀ (x y : ℤ), f (x - f y) = f (f x) - f y - 1 h1 : ∀ (n : ℤ), f n = (f (-1) + 1) * n + f 0 h2 : f (-1) + 1 ≠ 0 x : ℤ h0 : x + 1 = f x ⊢ f x = x + 1
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case refine_2.refine_2 f : ℤ → ℤ h : ∀ (x y : ℤ), f (x - f y) = f (f x) - f y - 1 h1 : ∀ (n : ℤ), f n = (f (-1) + 1) * n + f 0 h2 : f (-1) + 1 ≠ 0 x : ℤ h0 : f (x + 1) = f (f x) ⊢ f x = x + 1 TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2015/A2/A2.lean
IMOSL.IMO2015A2.final_solution
[20, 1]
[51, 20]
exact h0.symm
case refine_2.refine_2 f : ℤ → ℤ h : ∀ (x y : ℤ), f (x - f y) = f (f x) - f y - 1 h1 : ∀ (n : ℤ), f n = (f (-1) + 1) * n + f 0 h2 : f (-1) + 1 ≠ 0 x : ℤ h0 : x + 1 = f x ⊢ f x = x + 1
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case refine_2.refine_2 f : ℤ → ℤ h : ∀ (x y : ℤ), f (x - f y) = f (f x) - f y - 1 h1 : ∀ (n : ℤ), f n = (f (-1) + 1) * n + f 0 h2 : f (-1) + 1 ≠ 0 x : ℤ h0 : x + 1 = f x ⊢ f x = x + 1 TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2013/N2/N2.lean
IMOSL.IMO2013N2.good_two_mul_add_one
[40, 1]
[60, 73]
intro n h0
k c : ℕ h : good k c ⊢ good (k + 1) (2 * c + 1)
k c : ℕ h : good k c n : ℕ h0 : 0 < n ⊢ ∃ S, card S = k + 1 ∧ (∀ m ∈ S, 0 < m) ∧ ↑(n + (2 * c + 1)) / ↑n = (map (fun m => ↑(m + 1) / ↑m) S).prod
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: k c : ℕ h : good k c ⊢ good (k + 1) (2 * c + 1) TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2013/N2/N2.lean
IMOSL.IMO2013N2.good_two_mul_add_one
[40, 1]
[60, 73]
rcases n.even_or_odd' with ⟨t, rfl | rfl⟩
k c : ℕ h : good k c n : ℕ h0 : 0 < n ⊢ ∃ S, card S = k + 1 ∧ (∀ m ∈ S, 0 < m) ∧ ↑(n + (2 * c + 1)) / ↑n = (map (fun m => ↑(m + 1) / ↑m) S).prod
case intro.inl k c : ℕ h : good k c t : ℕ h0 : 0 < 2 * t ⊢ ∃ S, card S = k + 1 ∧ (∀ m ∈ S, 0 < m) ∧ ↑(2 * t + (2 * c + 1)) / ↑(2 * t) = (map (fun m => ↑(m + 1) / ↑m) S).prod case intro.inr k c : ℕ h : good k c t : ℕ h0 : 0 < 2 * t + 1 ⊢ ∃ S, card S = k + 1 ∧ (∀ m ∈ S, 0 < m) ∧ ↑(2 * t + 1 + (2 * c + 1)) / ↑(2 * t + 1) = (map (fun m => ↑(m + 1) / ↑m) S).prod
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: k c : ℕ h : good k c n : ℕ h0 : 0 < n ⊢ ∃ S, card S = k + 1 ∧ (∀ m ∈ S, 0 < m) ∧ ↑(n + (2 * c + 1)) / ↑n = (map (fun m => ↑(m + 1) / ↑m) S).prod TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2013/N2/N2.lean
IMOSL.IMO2013N2.good_two_mul_add_one
[40, 1]
[60, 73]
replace h0 := pos_of_mul_pos_right h0 (Nat.zero_le 2)
case intro.inl k c : ℕ h : good k c t : ℕ h0 : 0 < 2 * t ⊢ ∃ S, card S = k + 1 ∧ (∀ m ∈ S, 0 < m) ∧ ↑(2 * t + (2 * c + 1)) / ↑(2 * t) = (map (fun m => ↑(m + 1) / ↑m) S).prod
case intro.inl k c : ℕ h : good k c t : ℕ h0 : 0 < t ⊢ ∃ S, card S = k + 1 ∧ (∀ m ∈ S, 0 < m) ∧ ↑(2 * t + (2 * c + 1)) / ↑(2 * t) = (map (fun m => ↑(m + 1) / ↑m) S).prod
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case intro.inl k c : ℕ h : good k c t : ℕ h0 : 0 < 2 * t ⊢ ∃ S, card S = k + 1 ∧ (∀ m ∈ S, 0 < m) ∧ ↑(2 * t + (2 * c + 1)) / ↑(2 * t) = (map (fun m => ↑(m + 1) / ↑m) S).prod TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2013/N2/N2.lean
IMOSL.IMO2013N2.good_two_mul_add_one
[40, 1]
[60, 73]
rcases h t h0 with ⟨T, rfl, h1, h2⟩
case intro.inl k c : ℕ h : good k c t : ℕ h0 : 0 < t ⊢ ∃ S, card S = k + 1 ∧ (∀ m ∈ S, 0 < m) ∧ ↑(2 * t + (2 * c + 1)) / ↑(2 * t) = (map (fun m => ↑(m + 1) / ↑m) S).prod
case intro.inl.intro.intro.intro c t : ℕ h0 : 0 < t T : Multiset ℕ h : good (card T) c h1 : ∀ m ∈ T, 0 < m h2 : ↑(t + c) / ↑t = (map (fun m => ↑(m + 1) / ↑m) T).prod ⊢ ∃ S, card S = card T + 1 ∧ (∀ m ∈ S, 0 < m) ∧ ↑(2 * t + (2 * c + 1)) / ↑(2 * t) = (map (fun m => ↑(m + 1) / ↑m) S).prod
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case intro.inl k c : ℕ h : good k c t : ℕ h0 : 0 < t ⊢ ∃ S, card S = k + 1 ∧ (∀ m ∈ S, 0 < m) ∧ ↑(2 * t + (2 * c + 1)) / ↑(2 * t) = (map (fun m => ↑(m + 1) / ↑m) S).prod TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2013/N2/N2.lean
IMOSL.IMO2013N2.good_two_mul_add_one
[40, 1]
[60, 73]
have X := t.add_pos_left h0 c
case intro.inl.intro.intro.intro c t : ℕ h0 : 0 < t T : Multiset ℕ h : good (card T) c h1 : ∀ m ∈ T, 0 < m h2 : ↑(t + c) / ↑t = (map (fun m => ↑(m + 1) / ↑m) T).prod ⊢ ∃ S, card S = card T + 1 ∧ (∀ m ∈ S, 0 < m) ∧ ↑(2 * t + (2 * c + 1)) / ↑(2 * t) = (map (fun m => ↑(m + 1) / ↑m) S).prod
case intro.inl.intro.intro.intro c t : ℕ h0 : 0 < t T : Multiset ℕ h : good (card T) c h1 : ∀ m ∈ T, 0 < m h2 : ↑(t + c) / ↑t = (map (fun m => ↑(m + 1) / ↑m) T).prod X : 0 < t + c ⊢ ∃ S, card S = card T + 1 ∧ (∀ m ∈ S, 0 < m) ∧ ↑(2 * t + (2 * c + 1)) / ↑(2 * t) = (map (fun m => ↑(m + 1) / ↑m) S).prod
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case intro.inl.intro.intro.intro c t : ℕ h0 : 0 < t T : Multiset ℕ h : good (card T) c h1 : ∀ m ∈ T, 0 < m h2 : ↑(t + c) / ↑t = (map (fun m => ↑(m + 1) / ↑m) T).prod ⊢ ∃ S, card S = card T + 1 ∧ (∀ m ∈ S, 0 < m) ∧ ↑(2 * t + (2 * c + 1)) / ↑(2 * t) = (map (fun m => ↑(m + 1) / ↑m) S).prod TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2013/N2/N2.lean
IMOSL.IMO2013N2.good_two_mul_add_one
[40, 1]
[60, 73]
refine ⟨(2 * (t + c)) ::ₘ T, card_cons _ T, forall_mem_cons.mpr ⟨mul_pos (Nat.succ_pos 1) X, h1⟩, ?_⟩
case intro.inl.intro.intro.intro c t : ℕ h0 : 0 < t T : Multiset ℕ h : good (card T) c h1 : ∀ m ∈ T, 0 < m h2 : ↑(t + c) / ↑t = (map (fun m => ↑(m + 1) / ↑m) T).prod X : 0 < t + c ⊢ ∃ S, card S = card T + 1 ∧ (∀ m ∈ S, 0 < m) ∧ ↑(2 * t + (2 * c + 1)) / ↑(2 * t) = (map (fun m => ↑(m + 1) / ↑m) S).prod
case intro.inl.intro.intro.intro c t : ℕ h0 : 0 < t T : Multiset ℕ h : good (card T) c h1 : ∀ m ∈ T, 0 < m h2 : ↑(t + c) / ↑t = (map (fun m => ↑(m + 1) / ↑m) T).prod X : 0 < t + c ⊢ ↑(2 * t + (2 * c + 1)) / ↑(2 * t) = (map (fun m => ↑(m + 1) / ↑m) (2 * (t + c) ::ₘ T)).prod
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case intro.inl.intro.intro.intro c t : ℕ h0 : 0 < t T : Multiset ℕ h : good (card T) c h1 : ∀ m ∈ T, 0 < m h2 : ↑(t + c) / ↑t = (map (fun m => ↑(m + 1) / ↑m) T).prod X : 0 < t + c ⊢ ∃ S, card S = card T + 1 ∧ (∀ m ∈ S, 0 < m) ∧ ↑(2 * t + (2 * c + 1)) / ↑(2 * t) = (map (fun m => ↑(m + 1) / ↑m) S).prod TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2013/N2/N2.lean
IMOSL.IMO2013N2.good_two_mul_add_one
[40, 1]
[60, 73]
rw [map_cons, prod_cons, ← h2, ← add_assoc, ← mul_add, div_mul_div_comm, Nat.cast_mul, Nat.cast_mul, mul_right_comm]
case intro.inl.intro.intro.intro c t : ℕ h0 : 0 < t T : Multiset ℕ h : good (card T) c h1 : ∀ m ∈ T, 0 < m h2 : ↑(t + c) / ↑t = (map (fun m => ↑(m + 1) / ↑m) T).prod X : 0 < t + c ⊢ ↑(2 * t + (2 * c + 1)) / ↑(2 * t) = (map (fun m => ↑(m + 1) / ↑m) (2 * (t + c) ::ₘ T)).prod
case intro.inl.intro.intro.intro c t : ℕ h0 : 0 < t T : Multiset ℕ h : good (card T) c h1 : ∀ m ∈ T, 0 < m h2 : ↑(t + c) / ↑t = (map (fun m => ↑(m + 1) / ↑m) T).prod X : 0 < t + c ⊢ ↑(2 * (t + c) + 1) / (↑2 * ↑t) = ↑(2 * (t + c) + 1) * ↑(t + c) / (↑2 * ↑t * ↑(t + c))
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case intro.inl.intro.intro.intro c t : ℕ h0 : 0 < t T : Multiset ℕ h : good (card T) c h1 : ∀ m ∈ T, 0 < m h2 : ↑(t + c) / ↑t = (map (fun m => ↑(m + 1) / ↑m) T).prod X : 0 < t + c ⊢ ↑(2 * t + (2 * c + 1)) / ↑(2 * t) = (map (fun m => ↑(m + 1) / ↑m) (2 * (t + c) ::ₘ T)).prod TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2013/N2/N2.lean
IMOSL.IMO2013N2.good_two_mul_add_one
[40, 1]
[60, 73]
exact (mul_div_mul_right _ _ <| Nat.cast_ne_zero.mpr X.ne.symm).symm
case intro.inl.intro.intro.intro c t : ℕ h0 : 0 < t T : Multiset ℕ h : good (card T) c h1 : ∀ m ∈ T, 0 < m h2 : ↑(t + c) / ↑t = (map (fun m => ↑(m + 1) / ↑m) T).prod X : 0 < t + c ⊢ ↑(2 * (t + c) + 1) / (↑2 * ↑t) = ↑(2 * (t + c) + 1) * ↑(t + c) / (↑2 * ↑t * ↑(t + c))
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case intro.inl.intro.intro.intro c t : ℕ h0 : 0 < t T : Multiset ℕ h : good (card T) c h1 : ∀ m ∈ T, 0 < m h2 : ↑(t + c) / ↑t = (map (fun m => ↑(m + 1) / ↑m) T).prod X : 0 < t + c ⊢ ↑(2 * (t + c) + 1) / (↑2 * ↑t) = ↑(2 * (t + c) + 1) * ↑(t + c) / (↑2 * ↑t * ↑(t + c)) TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2013/N2/N2.lean
IMOSL.IMO2013N2.good_two_mul_add_one
[40, 1]
[60, 73]
have X := t.succ_pos
case intro.inr k c : ℕ h : good k c t : ℕ h0 : 0 < 2 * t + 1 ⊢ ∃ S, card S = k + 1 ∧ (∀ m ∈ S, 0 < m) ∧ ↑(2 * t + 1 + (2 * c + 1)) / ↑(2 * t + 1) = (map (fun m => ↑(m + 1) / ↑m) S).prod
case intro.inr k c : ℕ h : good k c t : ℕ h0 : 0 < 2 * t + 1 X : 0 < t.succ ⊢ ∃ S, card S = k + 1 ∧ (∀ m ∈ S, 0 < m) ∧ ↑(2 * t + 1 + (2 * c + 1)) / ↑(2 * t + 1) = (map (fun m => ↑(m + 1) / ↑m) S).prod
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case intro.inr k c : ℕ h : good k c t : ℕ h0 : 0 < 2 * t + 1 ⊢ ∃ S, card S = k + 1 ∧ (∀ m ∈ S, 0 < m) ∧ ↑(2 * t + 1 + (2 * c + 1)) / ↑(2 * t + 1) = (map (fun m => ↑(m + 1) / ↑m) S).prod TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2013/N2/N2.lean
IMOSL.IMO2013N2.good_two_mul_add_one
[40, 1]
[60, 73]
rcases h (t + 1) X with ⟨T, rfl, h1, h2⟩
case intro.inr k c : ℕ h : good k c t : ℕ h0 : 0 < 2 * t + 1 X : 0 < t.succ ⊢ ∃ S, card S = k + 1 ∧ (∀ m ∈ S, 0 < m) ∧ ↑(2 * t + 1 + (2 * c + 1)) / ↑(2 * t + 1) = (map (fun m => ↑(m + 1) / ↑m) S).prod
case intro.inr.intro.intro.intro c t : ℕ h0 : 0 < 2 * t + 1 X : 0 < t.succ T : Multiset ℕ h : good (card T) c h1 : ∀ m ∈ T, 0 < m h2 : ↑(t + 1 + c) / ↑(t + 1) = (map (fun m => ↑(m + 1) / ↑m) T).prod ⊢ ∃ S, card S = card T + 1 ∧ (∀ m ∈ S, 0 < m) ∧ ↑(2 * t + 1 + (2 * c + 1)) / ↑(2 * t + 1) = (map (fun m => ↑(m + 1) / ↑m) S).prod
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case intro.inr k c : ℕ h : good k c t : ℕ h0 : 0 < 2 * t + 1 X : 0 < t.succ ⊢ ∃ S, card S = k + 1 ∧ (∀ m ∈ S, 0 < m) ∧ ↑(2 * t + 1 + (2 * c + 1)) / ↑(2 * t + 1) = (map (fun m => ↑(m + 1) / ↑m) S).prod TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2013/N2/N2.lean
IMOSL.IMO2013N2.good_two_mul_add_one
[40, 1]
[60, 73]
refine ⟨(2 * t + 1) ::ₘ T, card_cons _ T, forall_mem_cons.mpr ⟨(2 * t).succ_pos, h1⟩, ?_⟩
case intro.inr.intro.intro.intro c t : ℕ h0 : 0 < 2 * t + 1 X : 0 < t.succ T : Multiset ℕ h : good (card T) c h1 : ∀ m ∈ T, 0 < m h2 : ↑(t + 1 + c) / ↑(t + 1) = (map (fun m => ↑(m + 1) / ↑m) T).prod ⊢ ∃ S, card S = card T + 1 ∧ (∀ m ∈ S, 0 < m) ∧ ↑(2 * t + 1 + (2 * c + 1)) / ↑(2 * t + 1) = (map (fun m => ↑(m + 1) / ↑m) S).prod
case intro.inr.intro.intro.intro c t : ℕ h0 : 0 < 2 * t + 1 X : 0 < t.succ T : Multiset ℕ h : good (card T) c h1 : ∀ m ∈ T, 0 < m h2 : ↑(t + 1 + c) / ↑(t + 1) = (map (fun m => ↑(m + 1) / ↑m) T).prod ⊢ ↑(2 * t + 1 + (2 * c + 1)) / ↑(2 * t + 1) = (map (fun m => ↑(m + 1) / ↑m) ((2 * t + 1) ::ₘ T)).prod
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case intro.inr.intro.intro.intro c t : ℕ h0 : 0 < 2 * t + 1 X : 0 < t.succ T : Multiset ℕ h : good (card T) c h1 : ∀ m ∈ T, 0 < m h2 : ↑(t + 1 + c) / ↑(t + 1) = (map (fun m => ↑(m + 1) / ↑m) T).prod ⊢ ∃ S, card S = card T + 1 ∧ (∀ m ∈ S, 0 < m) ∧ ↑(2 * t + 1 + (2 * c + 1)) / ↑(2 * t + 1) = (map (fun m => ↑(m + 1) / ↑m) S).prod TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2013/N2/N2.lean
IMOSL.IMO2013N2.good_two_mul_add_one
[40, 1]
[60, 73]
rw [map_cons, prod_cons, ← h2, add_add_add_comm, add_right_comm, add_assoc (2 * t) 1, ← mul_add_one (α := ℕ), ← mul_add, div_mul_div_comm, Nat.cast_mul, Nat.cast_mul, mul_right_comm]
case intro.inr.intro.intro.intro c t : ℕ h0 : 0 < 2 * t + 1 X : 0 < t.succ T : Multiset ℕ h : good (card T) c h1 : ∀ m ∈ T, 0 < m h2 : ↑(t + 1 + c) / ↑(t + 1) = (map (fun m => ↑(m + 1) / ↑m) T).prod ⊢ ↑(2 * t + 1 + (2 * c + 1)) / ↑(2 * t + 1) = (map (fun m => ↑(m + 1) / ↑m) ((2 * t + 1) ::ₘ T)).prod
case intro.inr.intro.intro.intro c t : ℕ h0 : 0 < 2 * t + 1 X : 0 < t.succ T : Multiset ℕ h : good (card T) c h1 : ∀ m ∈ T, 0 < m h2 : ↑(t + 1 + c) / ↑(t + 1) = (map (fun m => ↑(m + 1) / ↑m) T).prod ⊢ ↑2 * ↑(t + 1 + c) / ↑(2 * t + 1) = ↑2 * ↑(t + 1 + c) * ↑(t + 1) / (↑(2 * t + 1) * ↑(t + 1))
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case intro.inr.intro.intro.intro c t : ℕ h0 : 0 < 2 * t + 1 X : 0 < t.succ T : Multiset ℕ h : good (card T) c h1 : ∀ m ∈ T, 0 < m h2 : ↑(t + 1 + c) / ↑(t + 1) = (map (fun m => ↑(m + 1) / ↑m) T).prod ⊢ ↑(2 * t + 1 + (2 * c + 1)) / ↑(2 * t + 1) = (map (fun m => ↑(m + 1) / ↑m) ((2 * t + 1) ::ₘ T)).prod TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2013/N2/N2.lean
IMOSL.IMO2013N2.good_two_mul_add_one
[40, 1]
[60, 73]
exact (mul_div_mul_right _ _ <| Nat.cast_ne_zero.mpr X.ne.symm).symm
case intro.inr.intro.intro.intro c t : ℕ h0 : 0 < 2 * t + 1 X : 0 < t.succ T : Multiset ℕ h : good (card T) c h1 : ∀ m ∈ T, 0 < m h2 : ↑(t + 1 + c) / ↑(t + 1) = (map (fun m => ↑(m + 1) / ↑m) T).prod ⊢ ↑2 * ↑(t + 1 + c) / ↑(2 * t + 1) = ↑2 * ↑(t + 1 + c) * ↑(t + 1) / (↑(2 * t + 1) * ↑(t + 1))
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case intro.inr.intro.intro.intro c t : ℕ h0 : 0 < 2 * t + 1 X : 0 < t.succ T : Multiset ℕ h : good (card T) c h1 : ∀ m ∈ T, 0 < m h2 : ↑(t + 1 + c) / ↑(t + 1) = (map (fun m => ↑(m + 1) / ↑m) T).prod ⊢ ↑2 * ↑(t + 1 + c) / ↑(2 * t + 1) = ↑2 * ↑(t + 1 + c) * ↑(t + 1) / (↑(2 * t + 1) * ↑(t + 1)) TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2013/N2/N2.lean
IMOSL.IMO2013N2.final_solution
[63, 1]
[71, 61]
rw [pow_zero, Nat.sub_self, add_zero]
n : ℕ h : 0 < n ⊢ ↑(n + (2 ^ 0 - 1)) / ↑n = (map (fun m => ↑(m + 1) / ↑m) 0).prod
n : ℕ h : 0 < n ⊢ ↑n / ↑n = (map (fun m => ↑(m + 1) / ↑m) 0).prod
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: n : ℕ h : 0 < n ⊢ ↑(n + (2 ^ 0 - 1)) / ↑n = (map (fun m => ↑(m + 1) / ↑m) 0).prod TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2013/N2/N2.lean
IMOSL.IMO2013N2.final_solution
[63, 1]
[71, 61]
exact div_self (Nat.cast_ne_zero.mpr h.ne.symm)
n : ℕ h : 0 < n ⊢ ↑n / ↑n = (map (fun m => ↑(m + 1) / ↑m) 0).prod
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: n : ℕ h : 0 < n ⊢ ↑n / ↑n = (map (fun m => ↑(m + 1) / ↑m) 0).prod TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2013/N2/N2.lean
IMOSL.IMO2013N2.final_solution
[63, 1]
[71, 61]
have h := good_two_mul_add_one (final_solution k)
k : ℕ ⊢ good (k + 1) (2 ^ (k + 1) - 1)
k : ℕ h : good (k + 1) (2 * (2 ^ k - 1) + 1) ⊢ good (k + 1) (2 ^ (k + 1) - 1)
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: k : ℕ ⊢ good (k + 1) (2 ^ (k + 1) - 1) TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2013/N2/N2.lean
IMOSL.IMO2013N2.final_solution
[63, 1]
[71, 61]
have h0 := k.one_le_pow 2 (Nat.succ_pos 1)
k : ℕ h : good (k + 1) (2 * (2 ^ k - 1) + 1) ⊢ good (k + 1) (2 ^ (k + 1) - 1)
k : ℕ h : good (k + 1) (2 * (2 ^ k - 1) + 1) h0 : 1 ≤ 2 ^ k ⊢ good (k + 1) (2 ^ (k + 1) - 1)
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: k : ℕ h : good (k + 1) (2 * (2 ^ k - 1) + 1) ⊢ good (k + 1) (2 ^ (k + 1) - 1) TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2013/N2/N2.lean
IMOSL.IMO2013N2.final_solution
[63, 1]
[71, 61]
rwa [two_mul, add_assoc, Nat.sub_add_cancel h0, add_comm _ (2 ^ k), ← Nat.add_sub_assoc h0, ← two_mul, ← pow_succ'] at h
k : ℕ h : good (k + 1) (2 * (2 ^ k - 1) + 1) h0 : 1 ≤ 2 ^ k ⊢ good (k + 1) (2 ^ (k + 1) - 1)
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: k : ℕ h : good (k + 1) (2 * (2 ^ k - 1) + 1) h0 : 1 ≤ 2 ^ k ⊢ good (k + 1) (2 ^ (k + 1) - 1) TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2012/A5/A5Cases/Case3.lean
IMOSL.IMO2012A5.Case3.Eq1
[38, 1]
[40, 61]
rw [hf.is_good, add_add_cancel_left, hf.map_one, add_zero]
R : Type u_2 S : Type u_1 inst✝³ : Semiring R inst✝² : CharTwo R inst✝¹ : Ring S inst✝ : NoZeroDivisors S f : R → S hf : NontrivialGood f x : R ⊢ f (x * (x + 1) + 1) = f x * f (x + 1)
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: R : Type u_2 S : Type u_1 inst✝³ : Semiring R inst✝² : CharTwo R inst✝¹ : Ring S inst✝ : NoZeroDivisors S f : R → S hf : NontrivialGood f x : R ⊢ f (x * (x + 1) + 1) = f x * f (x + 1) TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2012/A5/A5Cases/Case3.lean
IMOSL.IMO2012A5.Case3.Eq2
[42, 1]
[44, 69]
rw [sq, hf.is_good, add_self_eq_zero, hf.map_zero, sub_eq_add_neg]
R : Type u_2 S : Type u_1 inst✝³ : Semiring R inst✝² : CharTwo R inst✝¹ : Ring S inst✝ : NoZeroDivisors S f : R → S hf : NontrivialGood f x : R ⊢ f (x * x + 1) = f x ^ 2 - 1
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: R : Type u_2 S : Type u_1 inst✝³ : Semiring R inst✝² : CharTwo R inst✝¹ : Ring S inst✝ : NoZeroDivisors S f : R → S hf : NontrivialGood f x : R ⊢ f (x * x + 1) = f x ^ 2 - 1 TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2012/A5/A5Cases/Case3.lean
IMOSL.IMO2012A5.Case3.Eq2_v2
[46, 1]
[47, 56]
rw [← Eq2 hf, add_one_mul_self, add_add_cancel_right]
R : Type u_2 S : Type u_1 inst✝³ : Semiring R inst✝² : CharTwo R inst✝¹ : Ring S inst✝ : NoZeroDivisors S f : R → S hf : NontrivialGood f x : R ⊢ f (x * x) = f (x + 1) ^ 2 - 1
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: R : Type u_2 S : Type u_1 inst✝³ : Semiring R inst✝² : CharTwo R inst✝¹ : Ring S inst✝ : NoZeroDivisors S f : R → S hf : NontrivialGood f x : R ⊢ f (x * x) = f (x + 1) ^ 2 - 1 TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2012/A5/A5Cases/Case3.lean
IMOSL.IMO2012A5.Case3.Eq3
[49, 1]
[54, 90]
have h : x * (x + 1) = x * x + x := mul_add_one x x
R : Type u_2 S : Type u_1 inst✝³ : Semiring R inst✝² : CharTwo R inst✝¹ : Ring S inst✝ : NoZeroDivisors S f : R → S hf : NontrivialGood f x : R ⊢ f x * f (x * x + x) = (f (x + 1) ^ 2 - 1) * (f (x + 1) - 1) + f x * f (x + 1)
R : Type u_2 S : Type u_1 inst✝³ : Semiring R inst✝² : CharTwo R inst✝¹ : Ring S inst✝ : NoZeroDivisors S f : R → S hf : NontrivialGood f x : R h : x * (x + 1) = x * x + x ⊢ f x * f (x * x + x) = (f (x + 1) ^ 2 - 1) * (f (x + 1) - 1) + f x * f (x + 1)
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: R : Type u_2 S : Type u_1 inst✝³ : Semiring R inst✝² : CharTwo R inst✝¹ : Ring S inst✝ : NoZeroDivisors S f : R → S hf : NontrivialGood f x : R ⊢ f x * f (x * x + x) = (f (x + 1) ^ 2 - 1) * (f (x + 1) - 1) + f x * f (x + 1) TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2012/A5/A5Cases/Case3.lean
IMOSL.IMO2012A5.Case3.Eq3
[49, 1]
[54, 90]
rw [← Eq2_v2 hf, ← Eq1 hf, mul_sub_one, ← add_sub_right_comm, h, add_assoc, ← hf.is_good, mul_assoc, hf.is_good, h, add_add_cancel_middle₁, add_sub_cancel_right]
R : Type u_2 S : Type u_1 inst✝³ : Semiring R inst✝² : CharTwo R inst✝¹ : Ring S inst✝ : NoZeroDivisors S f : R → S hf : NontrivialGood f x : R h : x * (x + 1) = x * x + x ⊢ f x * f (x * x + x) = (f (x + 1) ^ 2 - 1) * (f (x + 1) - 1) + f x * f (x + 1)
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: R : Type u_2 S : Type u_1 inst✝³ : Semiring R inst✝² : CharTwo R inst✝¹ : Ring S inst✝ : NoZeroDivisors S f : R → S hf : NontrivialGood f x : R h : x * (x + 1) = x * x + x ⊢ f x * f (x * x + x) = (f (x + 1) ^ 2 - 1) * (f (x + 1) - 1) + f x * f (x + 1) TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2012/A5/A5Cases/Case3.lean
IMOSL.IMO2012A5.Case3.Eq3_v2
[56, 1]
[59, 78]
have h := Eq3 hf (x + 1)
R : Type u_2 S : Type u_1 inst✝³ : Semiring R inst✝² : CharTwo R inst✝¹ : Ring S inst✝ : NoZeroDivisors S f : R → S hf : NontrivialGood f x : R ⊢ f (x + 1) * f (x * x + x) = (f x ^ 2 - 1) * (f x - 1) + f (x + 1) * f x
R : Type u_2 S : Type u_1 inst✝³ : Semiring R inst✝² : CharTwo R inst✝¹ : Ring S inst✝ : NoZeroDivisors S f : R → S hf : NontrivialGood f x : R h : f (x + 1) * f ((x + 1) * (x + 1) + (x + 1)) = (f (x + 1 + 1) ^ 2 - 1) * (f (x + 1 + 1) - 1) + f (x + 1) * f (x + 1 + 1) ⊢ f (x + 1) * f (x * x + x) = (f x ^ 2 - 1) * (f x - 1) + f (x + 1) * f x
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: R : Type u_2 S : Type u_1 inst✝³ : Semiring R inst✝² : CharTwo R inst✝¹ : Ring S inst✝ : NoZeroDivisors S f : R → S hf : NontrivialGood f x : R ⊢ f (x + 1) * f (x * x + x) = (f x ^ 2 - 1) * (f x - 1) + f (x + 1) * f x TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2012/A5/A5Cases/Case3.lean
IMOSL.IMO2012A5.Case3.Eq3_v2
[56, 1]
[59, 78]
rwa [add_add_cancel_right, add_one_mul_self, add_add_add_cancel_right] at h
R : Type u_2 S : Type u_1 inst✝³ : Semiring R inst✝² : CharTwo R inst✝¹ : Ring S inst✝ : NoZeroDivisors S f : R → S hf : NontrivialGood f x : R h : f (x + 1) * f ((x + 1) * (x + 1) + (x + 1)) = (f (x + 1 + 1) ^ 2 - 1) * (f (x + 1 + 1) - 1) + f (x + 1) * f (x + 1 + 1) ⊢ f (x + 1) * f (x * x + x) = (f x ^ 2 - 1) * (f x - 1) + f (x + 1) * f x
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: R : Type u_2 S : Type u_1 inst✝³ : Semiring R inst✝² : CharTwo R inst✝¹ : Ring S inst✝ : NoZeroDivisors S f : R → S hf : NontrivialGood f x : R h : f (x + 1) * f ((x + 1) * (x + 1) + (x + 1)) = (f (x + 1 + 1) ^ 2 - 1) * (f (x + 1 + 1) - 1) + f (x + 1) * f (x + 1 + 1) ⊢ f (x + 1) * f (x * x + x) = (f x ^ 2 - 1) * (f x - 1) + f (x + 1) * f x TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2012/A5/A5Cases/Case3.lean
IMOSL.IMO2012A5.Case3.CommCase.Thm1_ring_id1
[74, 1]
[77, 63]
ring
R : Type ?u.23673 S : Type u_1 inst✝³ : CommSemiring R inst✝² : CharTwo R inst✝¹ : CommRing S inst✝ : NoZeroDivisors S f : R → S hf : NontrivialGood f a b : S ⊢ a * ((a ^ 2 - 1) * (a - 1) + b * a) - b * ((b ^ 2 - 1) * (b - 1) + a * b) = (a ^ 2 + b ^ 2 - 1) * (a + b - 1) * (a - b)
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: R : Type ?u.23673 S : Type u_1 inst✝³ : CommSemiring R inst✝² : CharTwo R inst✝¹ : CommRing S inst✝ : NoZeroDivisors S f : R → S hf : NontrivialGood f a b : S ⊢ a * ((a ^ 2 - 1) * (a - 1) + b * a) - b * ((b ^ 2 - 1) * (b - 1) + a * b) = (a ^ 2 + b ^ 2 - 1) * (a + b - 1) * (a - b) TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2012/A5/A5Cases/Case3.lean
IMOSL.IMO2012A5.Case3.CommCase.Thm1_ring_id2
[79, 1]
[82, 45]
ring
R : Type ?u.29081 S : Type u_1 inst✝³ : CommSemiring R inst✝² : CharTwo R inst✝¹ : CommRing S inst✝ : NoZeroDivisors S f : R → S hf : NontrivialGood f a : S ⊢ a ^ 2 * ((a ^ 2 - 1) ^ 2 + 1) - ((a ^ 2 - 1) * (a - 1) + a * a) ^ 2 = (1 - 2 * a) * (a ^ 2 - 1)
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: R : Type ?u.29081 S : Type u_1 inst✝³ : CommSemiring R inst✝² : CharTwo R inst✝¹ : CommRing S inst✝ : NoZeroDivisors S f : R → S hf : NontrivialGood f a : S ⊢ a ^ 2 * ((a ^ 2 - 1) ^ 2 + 1) - ((a ^ 2 - 1) * (a - 1) + a * a) ^ 2 = (1 - 2 * a) * (a ^ 2 - 1) TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2012/A5/A5Cases/Case3.lean
IMOSL.IMO2012A5.Case3.CommCase.Thm1
[85, 1]
[106, 7]
have h := Thm1_ring_id1 (f x) (f (x + 1))
R : Type u_2 S : Type u_1 inst✝³ : CommSemiring R inst✝² : CharTwo R inst✝¹ : CommRing S inst✝ : NoZeroDivisors S f : R → S hf : NontrivialGood f x : R ⊢ f x ^ 2 + f (x + 1) ^ 2 = 1 ∨ f x + f (x + 1) = 1
R : Type u_2 S : Type u_1 inst✝³ : CommSemiring R inst✝² : CharTwo R inst✝¹ : CommRing S inst✝ : NoZeroDivisors S f : R → S hf : NontrivialGood f x : R h : f x * ((f x ^ 2 - 1) * (f x - 1) + f (x + 1) * f x) - f (x + 1) * ((f (x + 1) ^ 2 - 1) * (f (x + 1) - 1) + f x * f (x + 1)) = (f x ^ 2 + f (x + 1) ^ 2 - 1) * (f x + f (x + 1) - 1) * (f x - f (x + 1)) ⊢ f x ^ 2 + f (x + 1) ^ 2 = 1 ∨ f x + f (x + 1) = 1
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: R : Type u_2 S : Type u_1 inst✝³ : CommSemiring R inst✝² : CharTwo R inst✝¹ : CommRing S inst✝ : NoZeroDivisors S f : R → S hf : NontrivialGood f x : R ⊢ f x ^ 2 + f (x + 1) ^ 2 = 1 ∨ f x + f (x + 1) = 1 TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2012/A5/A5Cases/Case3.lean
IMOSL.IMO2012A5.Case3.CommCase.Thm1
[85, 1]
[106, 7]
rw [← Eq3 hf, ← Eq3_v2 hf, mul_left_comm, sub_self, zero_eq_mul, mul_eq_zero, sub_eq_zero, sub_eq_zero, sub_eq_zero] at h
R : Type u_2 S : Type u_1 inst✝³ : CommSemiring R inst✝² : CharTwo R inst✝¹ : CommRing S inst✝ : NoZeroDivisors S f : R → S hf : NontrivialGood f x : R h : f x * ((f x ^ 2 - 1) * (f x - 1) + f (x + 1) * f x) - f (x + 1) * ((f (x + 1) ^ 2 - 1) * (f (x + 1) - 1) + f x * f (x + 1)) = (f x ^ 2 + f (x + 1) ^ 2 - 1) * (f x + f (x + 1) - 1) * (f x - f (x + 1)) ⊢ f x ^ 2 + f (x + 1) ^ 2 = 1 ∨ f x + f (x + 1) = 1
R : Type u_2 S : Type u_1 inst✝³ : CommSemiring R inst✝² : CharTwo R inst✝¹ : CommRing S inst✝ : NoZeroDivisors S f : R → S hf : NontrivialGood f x : R h : (f x ^ 2 + f (x + 1) ^ 2 = 1 ∨ f x + f (x + 1) = 1) ∨ f x = f (x + 1) ⊢ f x ^ 2 + f (x + 1) ^ 2 = 1 ∨ f x + f (x + 1) = 1
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: R : Type u_2 S : Type u_1 inst✝³ : CommSemiring R inst✝² : CharTwo R inst✝¹ : CommRing S inst✝ : NoZeroDivisors S f : R → S hf : NontrivialGood f x : R h : f x * ((f x ^ 2 - 1) * (f x - 1) + f (x + 1) * f x) - f (x + 1) * ((f (x + 1) ^ 2 - 1) * (f (x + 1) - 1) + f x * f (x + 1)) = (f x ^ 2 + f (x + 1) ^ 2 - 1) * (f x + f (x + 1) - 1) * (f x - f (x + 1)) ⊢ f x ^ 2 + f (x + 1) ^ 2 = 1 ∨ f x + f (x + 1) = 1 TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2012/A5/A5Cases/Case3.lean
IMOSL.IMO2012A5.Case3.CommCase.Thm1
[85, 1]
[106, 7]
cases h with | inl h => exact h | inr h => ?_
R : Type u_2 S : Type u_1 inst✝³ : CommSemiring R inst✝² : CharTwo R inst✝¹ : CommRing S inst✝ : NoZeroDivisors S f : R → S hf : NontrivialGood f x : R h : (f x ^ 2 + f (x + 1) ^ 2 = 1 ∨ f x + f (x + 1) = 1) ∨ f x = f (x + 1) ⊢ f x ^ 2 + f (x + 1) ^ 2 = 1 ∨ f x + f (x + 1) = 1
case inr R : Type u_2 S : Type u_1 inst✝³ : CommSemiring R inst✝² : CharTwo R inst✝¹ : CommRing S inst✝ : NoZeroDivisors S f : R → S hf : NontrivialGood f x : R h : f x = f (x + 1) ⊢ f x ^ 2 + f (x + 1) ^ 2 = 1 ∨ f x + f (x + 1) = 1
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: R : Type u_2 S : Type u_1 inst✝³ : CommSemiring R inst✝² : CharTwo R inst✝¹ : CommRing S inst✝ : NoZeroDivisors S f : R → S hf : NontrivialGood f x : R h : (f x ^ 2 + f (x + 1) ^ 2 = 1 ∨ f x + f (x + 1) = 1) ∨ f x = f (x + 1) ⊢ f x ^ 2 + f (x + 1) ^ 2 = 1 ∨ f x + f (x + 1) = 1 TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2012/A5/A5Cases/Case3.lean
IMOSL.IMO2012A5.Case3.CommCase.Thm1
[85, 1]
[106, 7]
right
case inr R : Type u_2 S : Type u_1 inst✝³ : CommSemiring R inst✝² : CharTwo R inst✝¹ : CommRing S inst✝ : NoZeroDivisors S f : R → S hf : NontrivialGood f x : R h : f x = f (x + 1) ⊢ f x ^ 2 + f (x + 1) ^ 2 = 1 ∨ f x + f (x + 1) = 1
case inr.h R : Type u_2 S : Type u_1 inst✝³ : CommSemiring R inst✝² : CharTwo R inst✝¹ : CommRing S inst✝ : NoZeroDivisors S f : R → S hf : NontrivialGood f x : R h : f x = f (x + 1) ⊢ f x + f (x + 1) = 1
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case inr R : Type u_2 S : Type u_1 inst✝³ : CommSemiring R inst✝² : CharTwo R inst✝¹ : CommRing S inst✝ : NoZeroDivisors S f : R → S hf : NontrivialGood f x : R h : f x = f (x + 1) ⊢ f x ^ 2 + f (x + 1) ^ 2 = 1 ∨ f x + f (x + 1) = 1 TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2012/A5/A5Cases/Case3.lean
IMOSL.IMO2012A5.Case3.CommCase.Thm1
[85, 1]
[106, 7]
rw [← h, ← two_mul]
case inr.h R : Type u_2 S : Type u_1 inst✝³ : CommSemiring R inst✝² : CharTwo R inst✝¹ : CommRing S inst✝ : NoZeroDivisors S f : R → S hf : NontrivialGood f x : R h : f x = f (x + 1) ⊢ f x + f (x + 1) = 1
case inr.h R : Type u_2 S : Type u_1 inst✝³ : CommSemiring R inst✝² : CharTwo R inst✝¹ : CommRing S inst✝ : NoZeroDivisors S f : R → S hf : NontrivialGood f x : R h : f x = f (x + 1) ⊢ 2 * f x = 1
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case inr.h R : Type u_2 S : Type u_1 inst✝³ : CommSemiring R inst✝² : CharTwo R inst✝¹ : CommRing S inst✝ : NoZeroDivisors S f : R → S hf : NontrivialGood f x : R h : f x = f (x + 1) ⊢ f x + f (x + 1) = 1 TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2012/A5/A5Cases/Case3.lean
IMOSL.IMO2012A5.Case3.CommCase.Thm1
[85, 1]
[106, 7]
have h0 : _ ^ 2 = _ ^ 2 := congrArg (λ x ↦ x ^ 2) (Eq3 hf x)
case inr.h R : Type u_2 S : Type u_1 inst✝³ : CommSemiring R inst✝² : CharTwo R inst✝¹ : CommRing S inst✝ : NoZeroDivisors S f : R → S hf : NontrivialGood f x : R h : f x = f (x + 1) ⊢ 2 * f x = 1
case inr.h R : Type u_2 S : Type u_1 inst✝³ : CommSemiring R inst✝² : CharTwo R inst✝¹ : CommRing S inst✝ : NoZeroDivisors S f : R → S hf : NontrivialGood f x : R h : f x = f (x + 1) h0 : (f x * f (x * x + x)) ^ 2 = ((f (x + 1) ^ 2 - 1) * (f (x + 1) - 1) + f x * f (x + 1)) ^ 2 ⊢ 2 * f x = 1
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case inr.h R : Type u_2 S : Type u_1 inst✝³ : CommSemiring R inst✝² : CharTwo R inst✝¹ : CommRing S inst✝ : NoZeroDivisors S f : R → S hf : NontrivialGood f x : R h : f x = f (x + 1) ⊢ 2 * f x = 1 TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2012/A5/A5Cases/Case3.lean
IMOSL.IMO2012A5.Case3.CommCase.Thm1
[85, 1]
[106, 7]
rw [mul_pow, ← add_eq_of_eq_sub (Eq2 hf (x * x + x)), ← h, add_mul_self, ← mul_add_one (x * x), Eq1 hf, Eq2 hf, Eq2_v2 hf, ← h, ← sub_eq_zero, ← sq, Thm1_ring_id2, mul_eq_zero] at h0
case inr.h R : Type u_2 S : Type u_1 inst✝³ : CommSemiring R inst✝² : CharTwo R inst✝¹ : CommRing S inst✝ : NoZeroDivisors S f : R → S hf : NontrivialGood f x : R h : f x = f (x + 1) h0 : (f x * f (x * x + x)) ^ 2 = ((f (x + 1) ^ 2 - 1) * (f (x + 1) - 1) + f x * f (x + 1)) ^ 2 ⊢ 2 * f x = 1
case inr.h R : Type u_2 S : Type u_1 inst✝³ : CommSemiring R inst✝² : CharTwo R inst✝¹ : CommRing S inst✝ : NoZeroDivisors S f : R → S hf : NontrivialGood f x : R h : f x = f (x + 1) h0 : 1 - 2 * f x = 0 ∨ f x ^ 2 - 1 = 0 ⊢ 2 * f x = 1
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case inr.h R : Type u_2 S : Type u_1 inst✝³ : CommSemiring R inst✝² : CharTwo R inst✝¹ : CommRing S inst✝ : NoZeroDivisors S f : R → S hf : NontrivialGood f x : R h : f x = f (x + 1) h0 : (f x * f (x * x + x)) ^ 2 = ((f (x + 1) ^ 2 - 1) * (f (x + 1) - 1) + f x * f (x + 1)) ^ 2 ⊢ 2 * f x = 1 TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2012/A5/A5Cases/Case3.lean
IMOSL.IMO2012A5.Case3.CommCase.Thm1
[85, 1]
[106, 7]
cases h0 with | inl h0 => exact (eq_of_sub_eq_zero h0).symm | inr h0 => ?_
case inr.h R : Type u_2 S : Type u_1 inst✝³ : CommSemiring R inst✝² : CharTwo R inst✝¹ : CommRing S inst✝ : NoZeroDivisors S f : R → S hf : NontrivialGood f x : R h : f x = f (x + 1) h0 : 1 - 2 * f x = 0 ∨ f x ^ 2 - 1 = 0 ⊢ 2 * f x = 1
case inr.h.inr R : Type u_2 S : Type u_1 inst✝³ : CommSemiring R inst✝² : CharTwo R inst✝¹ : CommRing S inst✝ : NoZeroDivisors S f : R → S hf : NontrivialGood f x : R h : f x = f (x + 1) h0 : f x ^ 2 - 1 = 0 ⊢ 2 * f x = 1
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case inr.h R : Type u_2 S : Type u_1 inst✝³ : CommSemiring R inst✝² : CharTwo R inst✝¹ : CommRing S inst✝ : NoZeroDivisors S f : R → S hf : NontrivialGood f x : R h : f x = f (x + 1) h0 : 1 - 2 * f x = 0 ∨ f x ^ 2 - 1 = 0 ⊢ 2 * f x = 1 TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2012/A5/A5Cases/Case3.lean
IMOSL.IMO2012A5.Case3.CommCase.Thm1
[85, 1]
[106, 7]
have h1 : f (x * x) = 0 := by rw [Eq2_v2 hf, ← h, h0]
case inr.h.inr R : Type u_2 S : Type u_1 inst✝³ : CommSemiring R inst✝² : CharTwo R inst✝¹ : CommRing S inst✝ : NoZeroDivisors S f : R → S hf : NontrivialGood f x : R h : f x = f (x + 1) h0 : f x ^ 2 - 1 = 0 ⊢ 2 * f x = 1
case inr.h.inr R : Type u_2 S : Type u_1 inst✝³ : CommSemiring R inst✝² : CharTwo R inst✝¹ : CommRing S inst✝ : NoZeroDivisors S f : R → S hf : NontrivialGood f x : R h : f x = f (x + 1) h0 : f x ^ 2 - 1 = 0 h1 : f (x * x) = 0 ⊢ 2 * f x = 1
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case inr.h.inr R : Type u_2 S : Type u_1 inst✝³ : CommSemiring R inst✝² : CharTwo R inst✝¹ : CommRing S inst✝ : NoZeroDivisors S f : R → S hf : NontrivialGood f x : R h : f x = f (x + 1) h0 : f x ^ 2 - 1 = 0 ⊢ 2 * f x = 1 TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2012/A5/A5Cases/Case3.lean
IMOSL.IMO2012A5.Case3.CommCase.Thm1
[85, 1]
[106, 7]
replace h := Eq3_v2 hf (x * x)
case inr.h.inr R : Type u_2 S : Type u_1 inst✝³ : CommSemiring R inst✝² : CharTwo R inst✝¹ : CommRing S inst✝ : NoZeroDivisors S f : R → S hf : NontrivialGood f x : R h : f x = f (x + 1) h0 : f x ^ 2 - 1 = 0 h1 : f (x * x) = 0 ⊢ 2 * f x = 1
case inr.h.inr R : Type u_2 S : Type u_1 inst✝³ : CommSemiring R inst✝² : CharTwo R inst✝¹ : CommRing S inst✝ : NoZeroDivisors S f : R → S hf : NontrivialGood f x : R h0 : f x ^ 2 - 1 = 0 h1 : f (x * x) = 0 h : f (x * x + 1) * f (x * x * (x * x) + x * x) = (f (x * x) ^ 2 - 1) * (f (x * x) - 1) + f (x * x + 1) * f (x * x) ⊢ 2 * f x = 1
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case inr.h.inr R : Type u_2 S : Type u_1 inst✝³ : CommSemiring R inst✝² : CharTwo R inst✝¹ : CommRing S inst✝ : NoZeroDivisors S f : R → S hf : NontrivialGood f x : R h : f x = f (x + 1) h0 : f x ^ 2 - 1 = 0 h1 : f (x * x) = 0 ⊢ 2 * f x = 1 TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2012/A5/A5Cases/Case3.lean
IMOSL.IMO2012A5.Case3.CommCase.Thm1
[85, 1]
[106, 7]
rw [h1, mul_zero, add_zero, sq, zero_mul, zero_sub, neg_mul_neg, one_mul, Eq2 hf, h0, zero_mul] at h
case inr.h.inr R : Type u_2 S : Type u_1 inst✝³ : CommSemiring R inst✝² : CharTwo R inst✝¹ : CommRing S inst✝ : NoZeroDivisors S f : R → S hf : NontrivialGood f x : R h0 : f x ^ 2 - 1 = 0 h1 : f (x * x) = 0 h : f (x * x + 1) * f (x * x * (x * x) + x * x) = (f (x * x) ^ 2 - 1) * (f (x * x) - 1) + f (x * x + 1) * f (x * x) ⊢ 2 * f x = 1
case inr.h.inr R : Type u_2 S : Type u_1 inst✝³ : CommSemiring R inst✝² : CharTwo R inst✝¹ : CommRing S inst✝ : NoZeroDivisors S f : R → S hf : NontrivialGood f x : R h0 : f x ^ 2 - 1 = 0 h1 : f (x * x) = 0 h : 0 = 1 ⊢ 2 * f x = 1
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case inr.h.inr R : Type u_2 S : Type u_1 inst✝³ : CommSemiring R inst✝² : CharTwo R inst✝¹ : CommRing S inst✝ : NoZeroDivisors S f : R → S hf : NontrivialGood f x : R h0 : f x ^ 2 - 1 = 0 h1 : f (x * x) = 0 h : f (x * x + 1) * f (x * x * (x * x) + x * x) = (f (x * x) ^ 2 - 1) * (f (x * x) - 1) + f (x * x + 1) * f (x * x) ⊢ 2 * f x = 1 TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2012/A5/A5Cases/Case3.lean
IMOSL.IMO2012A5.Case3.CommCase.Thm1
[85, 1]
[106, 7]
rw [← mul_one (2 * f x), ← h, mul_zero]
case inr.h.inr R : Type u_2 S : Type u_1 inst✝³ : CommSemiring R inst✝² : CharTwo R inst✝¹ : CommRing S inst✝ : NoZeroDivisors S f : R → S hf : NontrivialGood f x : R h0 : f x ^ 2 - 1 = 0 h1 : f (x * x) = 0 h : 0 = 1 ⊢ 2 * f x = 1
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case inr.h.inr R : Type u_2 S : Type u_1 inst✝³ : CommSemiring R inst✝² : CharTwo R inst✝¹ : CommRing S inst✝ : NoZeroDivisors S f : R → S hf : NontrivialGood f x : R h0 : f x ^ 2 - 1 = 0 h1 : f (x * x) = 0 h : 0 = 1 ⊢ 2 * f x = 1 TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2012/A5/A5Cases/Case3.lean
IMOSL.IMO2012A5.Case3.CommCase.Thm1
[85, 1]
[106, 7]
exact h
case inl R : Type u_2 S : Type u_1 inst✝³ : CommSemiring R inst✝² : CharTwo R inst✝¹ : CommRing S inst✝ : NoZeroDivisors S f : R → S hf : NontrivialGood f x : R h : f x ^ 2 + f (x + 1) ^ 2 = 1 ∨ f x + f (x + 1) = 1 ⊢ f x ^ 2 + f (x + 1) ^ 2 = 1 ∨ f x + f (x + 1) = 1
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case inl R : Type u_2 S : Type u_1 inst✝³ : CommSemiring R inst✝² : CharTwo R inst✝¹ : CommRing S inst✝ : NoZeroDivisors S f : R → S hf : NontrivialGood f x : R h : f x ^ 2 + f (x + 1) ^ 2 = 1 ∨ f x + f (x + 1) = 1 ⊢ f x ^ 2 + f (x + 1) ^ 2 = 1 ∨ f x + f (x + 1) = 1 TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2012/A5/A5Cases/Case3.lean
IMOSL.IMO2012A5.Case3.CommCase.Thm1
[85, 1]
[106, 7]
exact (eq_of_sub_eq_zero h0).symm
case inr.h.inl R : Type u_2 S : Type u_1 inst✝³ : CommSemiring R inst✝² : CharTwo R inst✝¹ : CommRing S inst✝ : NoZeroDivisors S f : R → S hf : NontrivialGood f x : R h : f x = f (x + 1) h0 : 1 - 2 * f x = 0 ⊢ 2 * f x = 1
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case inr.h.inl R : Type u_2 S : Type u_1 inst✝³ : CommSemiring R inst✝² : CharTwo R inst✝¹ : CommRing S inst✝ : NoZeroDivisors S f : R → S hf : NontrivialGood f x : R h : f x = f (x + 1) h0 : 1 - 2 * f x = 0 ⊢ 2 * f x = 1 TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2012/A5/A5Cases/Case3.lean
IMOSL.IMO2012A5.Case3.CommCase.Thm1
[85, 1]
[106, 7]
rw [Eq2_v2 hf, ← h, h0]
R : Type u_2 S : Type u_1 inst✝³ : CommSemiring R inst✝² : CharTwo R inst✝¹ : CommRing S inst✝ : NoZeroDivisors S f : R → S hf : NontrivialGood f x : R h : f x = f (x + 1) h0 : f x ^ 2 - 1 = 0 ⊢ f (x * x) = 0
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: R : Type u_2 S : Type u_1 inst✝³ : CommSemiring R inst✝² : CharTwo R inst✝¹ : CommRing S inst✝ : NoZeroDivisors S f : R → S hf : NontrivialGood f x : R h : f x = f (x + 1) h0 : f x ^ 2 - 1 = 0 ⊢ f (x * x) = 0 TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2012/A5/A5Cases/Case3.lean
IMOSL.IMO2012A5.Case3.CommCase.SCharTwo_map_add_one
[109, 1]
[111, 83]
have h := Thm1 hf x
R : Type u_2 S : Type u_1 inst✝⁴ : CommSemiring R inst✝³ : CharTwo R inst✝² : CommRing S inst✝¹ : NoZeroDivisors S f : R → S hf : NontrivialGood f inst✝ : CharTwo S x : R ⊢ f (x + 1) = f x + 1
R : Type u_2 S : Type u_1 inst✝⁴ : CommSemiring R inst✝³ : CharTwo R inst✝² : CommRing S inst✝¹ : NoZeroDivisors S f : R → S hf : NontrivialGood f inst✝ : CharTwo S x : R h : f x ^ 2 + f (x + 1) ^ 2 = 1 ∨ f x + f (x + 1) = 1 ⊢ f (x + 1) = f x + 1
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: R : Type u_2 S : Type u_1 inst✝⁴ : CommSemiring R inst✝³ : CharTwo R inst✝² : CommRing S inst✝¹ : NoZeroDivisors S f : R → S hf : NontrivialGood f inst✝ : CharTwo S x : R ⊢ f (x + 1) = f x + 1 TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2012/A5/A5Cases/Case3.lean
IMOSL.IMO2012A5.Case3.CommCase.SCharTwo_map_add_one
[109, 1]
[111, 83]
rwa [← CharTwo.add_sq, CharTwo.sq_eq_one_iff, or_self, add_eq_iff_eq_add''] at h
R : Type u_2 S : Type u_1 inst✝⁴ : CommSemiring R inst✝³ : CharTwo R inst✝² : CommRing S inst✝¹ : NoZeroDivisors S f : R → S hf : NontrivialGood f inst✝ : CharTwo S x : R h : f x ^ 2 + f (x + 1) ^ 2 = 1 ∨ f x + f (x + 1) = 1 ⊢ f (x + 1) = f x + 1
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: R : Type u_2 S : Type u_1 inst✝⁴ : CommSemiring R inst✝³ : CharTwo R inst✝² : CommRing S inst✝¹ : NoZeroDivisors S f : R → S hf : NontrivialGood f inst✝ : CharTwo S x : R h : f x ^ 2 + f (x + 1) ^ 2 = 1 ∨ f x + f (x + 1) = 1 ⊢ f (x + 1) = f x + 1 TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2012/A5/A5Cases/Case3.lean
IMOSL.IMO2012A5.Case3.CommCase.pow_four_Eq1
[113, 1]
[114, 76]
rw [← add_add_cancel_right (x ^ 2) 1, add_one_sq, sq, sq, Eq2 hf, Eq2 hf]
R : Type u_2 S : Type u_1 inst✝³ : CommSemiring R inst✝² : CharTwo R inst✝¹ : CommRing S inst✝ : NoZeroDivisors S f : R → S hf : NontrivialGood f x : R ⊢ f ((x ^ 2) ^ 2) = (f x ^ 2 - 1) ^ 2 - 1
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: R : Type u_2 S : Type u_1 inst✝³ : CommSemiring R inst✝² : CharTwo R inst✝¹ : CommRing S inst✝ : NoZeroDivisors S f : R → S hf : NontrivialGood f x : R ⊢ f ((x ^ 2) ^ 2) = (f x ^ 2 - 1) ^ 2 - 1 TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2012/A5/A5Cases/Case3.lean
IMOSL.IMO2012A5.Case3.CommCase.pow_four_Eq2
[116, 1]
[117, 49]
rw [← pow_four_Eq1 hf, add_one_sq, add_one_sq]
R : Type u_2 S : Type u_1 inst✝³ : CommSemiring R inst✝² : CharTwo R inst✝¹ : CommRing S inst✝ : NoZeroDivisors S f : R → S hf : NontrivialGood f x : R ⊢ f ((x ^ 2) ^ 2 + 1) = (f (x + 1) ^ 2 - 1) ^ 2 - 1
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: R : Type u_2 S : Type u_1 inst✝³ : CommSemiring R inst✝² : CharTwo R inst✝¹ : CommRing S inst✝ : NoZeroDivisors S f : R → S hf : NontrivialGood f x : R ⊢ f ((x ^ 2) ^ 2 + 1) = (f (x + 1) ^ 2 - 1) ^ 2 - 1 TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2012/A5/A5Cases/Case3.lean
IMOSL.IMO2012A5.Case3.CommCase.SCharNeTwo_main_ring_id
[119, 1]
[122, 55]
ring
R : Type ?u.57818 S : Type u_1 inst✝³ : CommSemiring R inst✝² : CharTwo R inst✝¹ : CommRing S inst✝ : NoZeroDivisors S f : R → S hf : NontrivialGood f a b : S ⊢ ((a - 1) ^ 2 - 1) * ((b - 1) ^ 2 - 1) - ((a * b - 1) ^ 2 - 1) = 2 * (a * b * (2 + 1 - (a + b)))
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: R : Type ?u.57818 S : Type u_1 inst✝³ : CommSemiring R inst✝² : CharTwo R inst✝¹ : CommRing S inst✝ : NoZeroDivisors S f : R → S hf : NontrivialGood f a b : S ⊢ ((a - 1) ^ 2 - 1) * ((b - 1) ^ 2 - 1) - ((a * b - 1) ^ 2 - 1) = 2 * (a * b * (2 + 1 - (a + b))) TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2012/A5/A5Cases/Case3.lean
IMOSL.IMO2012A5.Case3.CommCase.SCharNeTwo_cases
[125, 1]
[140, 56]
have h0 := pow_four_Eq2 hf (x * (x + 1))
R : Type u_2 S : Type u_1 inst✝³ : CommSemiring R inst✝² : CharTwo R inst✝¹ : CommRing S inst✝ : NoZeroDivisors S f : R → S hf : NontrivialGood f h : 2 ≠ 0 x : R ⊢ (f x = 0 ∨ f (x + 1) = 0) ∨ f x + f (x + 1) = 1 ∧ f x * f (x + 1) = -1
R : Type u_2 S : Type u_1 inst✝³ : CommSemiring R inst✝² : CharTwo R inst✝¹ : CommRing S inst✝ : NoZeroDivisors S f : R → S hf : NontrivialGood f h : 2 ≠ 0 x : R h0 : f (((x * (x + 1)) ^ 2) ^ 2 + 1) = (f (x * (x + 1) + 1) ^ 2 - 1) ^ 2 - 1 ⊢ (f x = 0 ∨ f (x + 1) = 0) ∨ f x + f (x + 1) = 1 ∧ f x * f (x + 1) = -1
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: R : Type u_2 S : Type u_1 inst✝³ : CommSemiring R inst✝² : CharTwo R inst✝¹ : CommRing S inst✝ : NoZeroDivisors S f : R → S hf : NontrivialGood f h : 2 ≠ 0 x : R ⊢ (f x = 0 ∨ f (x + 1) = 0) ∨ f x + f (x + 1) = 1 ∧ f x * f (x + 1) = -1 TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2012/A5/A5Cases/Case3.lean
IMOSL.IMO2012A5.Case3.CommCase.SCharNeTwo_cases
[125, 1]
[140, 56]
rw [Eq1 hf, mul_pow, mul_pow, add_one_sq, add_one_sq, Eq1 hf, pow_four_Eq1 hf, pow_four_Eq2 hf, ← sub_eq_zero, mul_pow, SCharNeTwo_main_ring_id, mul_eq_zero, or_iff_right h, mul_eq_zero, ← mul_pow, sq_eq_zero_iff] at h0
R : Type u_2 S : Type u_1 inst✝³ : CommSemiring R inst✝² : CharTwo R inst✝¹ : CommRing S inst✝ : NoZeroDivisors S f : R → S hf : NontrivialGood f h : 2 ≠ 0 x : R h0 : f (((x * (x + 1)) ^ 2) ^ 2 + 1) = (f (x * (x + 1) + 1) ^ 2 - 1) ^ 2 - 1 ⊢ (f x = 0 ∨ f (x + 1) = 0) ∨ f x + f (x + 1) = 1 ∧ f x * f (x + 1) = -1
R : Type u_2 S : Type u_1 inst✝³ : CommSemiring R inst✝² : CharTwo R inst✝¹ : CommRing S inst✝ : NoZeroDivisors S f : R → S hf : NontrivialGood f h : 2 ≠ 0 x : R h0 : f x * f (x + 1) = 0 ∨ 2 + 1 - (f x ^ 2 + f (x + 1) ^ 2) = 0 ⊢ (f x = 0 ∨ f (x + 1) = 0) ∨ f x + f (x + 1) = 1 ∧ f x * f (x + 1) = -1
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: R : Type u_2 S : Type u_1 inst✝³ : CommSemiring R inst✝² : CharTwo R inst✝¹ : CommRing S inst✝ : NoZeroDivisors S f : R → S hf : NontrivialGood f h : 2 ≠ 0 x : R h0 : f (((x * (x + 1)) ^ 2) ^ 2 + 1) = (f (x * (x + 1) + 1) ^ 2 - 1) ^ 2 - 1 ⊢ (f x = 0 ∨ f (x + 1) = 0) ∨ f x + f (x + 1) = 1 ∧ f x * f (x + 1) = -1 TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2012/A5/A5Cases/Case3.lean
IMOSL.IMO2012A5.Case3.CommCase.SCharNeTwo_cases
[125, 1]
[140, 56]
revert h0
R : Type u_2 S : Type u_1 inst✝³ : CommSemiring R inst✝² : CharTwo R inst✝¹ : CommRing S inst✝ : NoZeroDivisors S f : R → S hf : NontrivialGood f h : 2 ≠ 0 x : R h0 : f x * f (x + 1) = 0 ∨ 2 + 1 - (f x ^ 2 + f (x + 1) ^ 2) = 0 ⊢ (f x = 0 ∨ f (x + 1) = 0) ∨ f x + f (x + 1) = 1 ∧ f x * f (x + 1) = -1
R : Type u_2 S : Type u_1 inst✝³ : CommSemiring R inst✝² : CharTwo R inst✝¹ : CommRing S inst✝ : NoZeroDivisors S f : R → S hf : NontrivialGood f h : 2 ≠ 0 x : R ⊢ f x * f (x + 1) = 0 ∨ 2 + 1 - (f x ^ 2 + f (x + 1) ^ 2) = 0 → (f x = 0 ∨ f (x + 1) = 0) ∨ f x + f (x + 1) = 1 ∧ f x * f (x + 1) = -1
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: R : Type u_2 S : Type u_1 inst✝³ : CommSemiring R inst✝² : CharTwo R inst✝¹ : CommRing S inst✝ : NoZeroDivisors S f : R → S hf : NontrivialGood f h : 2 ≠ 0 x : R h0 : f x * f (x + 1) = 0 ∨ 2 + 1 - (f x ^ 2 + f (x + 1) ^ 2) = 0 ⊢ (f x = 0 ∨ f (x + 1) = 0) ∨ f x + f (x + 1) = 1 ∧ f x * f (x + 1) = -1 TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2012/A5/A5Cases/Case3.lean
IMOSL.IMO2012A5.Case3.CommCase.SCharNeTwo_cases
[125, 1]
[140, 56]
refine Or.imp mul_eq_zero.mp λ h0 ↦ ?_
R : Type u_2 S : Type u_1 inst✝³ : CommSemiring R inst✝² : CharTwo R inst✝¹ : CommRing S inst✝ : NoZeroDivisors S f : R → S hf : NontrivialGood f h : 2 ≠ 0 x : R ⊢ f x * f (x + 1) = 0 ∨ 2 + 1 - (f x ^ 2 + f (x + 1) ^ 2) = 0 → (f x = 0 ∨ f (x + 1) = 0) ∨ f x + f (x + 1) = 1 ∧ f x * f (x + 1) = -1
R : Type u_2 S : Type u_1 inst✝³ : CommSemiring R inst✝² : CharTwo R inst✝¹ : CommRing S inst✝ : NoZeroDivisors S f : R → S hf : NontrivialGood f h : 2 ≠ 0 x : R h0 : 2 + 1 - (f x ^ 2 + f (x + 1) ^ 2) = 0 ⊢ f x + f (x + 1) = 1 ∧ f x * f (x + 1) = -1
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: R : Type u_2 S : Type u_1 inst✝³ : CommSemiring R inst✝² : CharTwo R inst✝¹ : CommRing S inst✝ : NoZeroDivisors S f : R → S hf : NontrivialGood f h : 2 ≠ 0 x : R ⊢ f x * f (x + 1) = 0 ∨ 2 + 1 - (f x ^ 2 + f (x + 1) ^ 2) = 0 → (f x = 0 ∨ f (x + 1) = 0) ∨ f x + f (x + 1) = 1 ∧ f x * f (x + 1) = -1 TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2012/A5/A5Cases/Case3.lean
IMOSL.IMO2012A5.Case3.CommCase.SCharNeTwo_cases
[125, 1]
[140, 56]
rw [sub_eq_zero, eq_comm] at h0
R : Type u_2 S : Type u_1 inst✝³ : CommSemiring R inst✝² : CharTwo R inst✝¹ : CommRing S inst✝ : NoZeroDivisors S f : R → S hf : NontrivialGood f h : 2 ≠ 0 x : R h0 : 2 + 1 - (f x ^ 2 + f (x + 1) ^ 2) = 0 ⊢ f x + f (x + 1) = 1 ∧ f x * f (x + 1) = -1
R : Type u_2 S : Type u_1 inst✝³ : CommSemiring R inst✝² : CharTwo R inst✝¹ : CommRing S inst✝ : NoZeroDivisors S f : R → S hf : NontrivialGood f h : 2 ≠ 0 x : R h0 : f x ^ 2 + f (x + 1) ^ 2 = 2 + 1 ⊢ f x + f (x + 1) = 1 ∧ f x * f (x + 1) = -1
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: R : Type u_2 S : Type u_1 inst✝³ : CommSemiring R inst✝² : CharTwo R inst✝¹ : CommRing S inst✝ : NoZeroDivisors S f : R → S hf : NontrivialGood f h : 2 ≠ 0 x : R h0 : 2 + 1 - (f x ^ 2 + f (x + 1) ^ 2) = 0 ⊢ f x + f (x + 1) = 1 ∧ f x * f (x + 1) = -1 TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2012/A5/A5Cases/Case3.lean
IMOSL.IMO2012A5.Case3.CommCase.SCharNeTwo_cases
[125, 1]
[140, 56]
refine (Thm1 hf x).elim (λ h1 ↦ Not.elim h ?_) (λ h1 ↦ ⟨h1, ?_⟩)
R : Type u_2 S : Type u_1 inst✝³ : CommSemiring R inst✝² : CharTwo R inst✝¹ : CommRing S inst✝ : NoZeroDivisors S f : R → S hf : NontrivialGood f h : 2 ≠ 0 x : R h0 : f x ^ 2 + f (x + 1) ^ 2 = 2 + 1 ⊢ f x + f (x + 1) = 1 ∧ f x * f (x + 1) = -1
case refine_1 R : Type u_2 S : Type u_1 inst✝³ : CommSemiring R inst✝² : CharTwo R inst✝¹ : CommRing S inst✝ : NoZeroDivisors S f : R → S hf : NontrivialGood f h : 2 ≠ 0 x : R h0 : f x ^ 2 + f (x + 1) ^ 2 = 2 + 1 h1 : f x ^ 2 + f (x + 1) ^ 2 = 1 ⊢ 2 = 0 case refine_2 R : Type u_2 S : Type u_1 inst✝³ : CommSemiring R inst✝² : CharTwo R inst✝¹ : CommRing S inst✝ : NoZeroDivisors S f : R → S hf : NontrivialGood f h : 2 ≠ 0 x : R h0 : f x ^ 2 + f (x + 1) ^ 2 = 2 + 1 h1 : f x + f (x + 1) = 1 ⊢ f x * f (x + 1) = -1
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: R : Type u_2 S : Type u_1 inst✝³ : CommSemiring R inst✝² : CharTwo R inst✝¹ : CommRing S inst✝ : NoZeroDivisors S f : R → S hf : NontrivialGood f h : 2 ≠ 0 x : R h0 : f x ^ 2 + f (x + 1) ^ 2 = 2 + 1 ⊢ f x + f (x + 1) = 1 ∧ f x * f (x + 1) = -1 TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2012/A5/A5Cases/Case3.lean
IMOSL.IMO2012A5.Case3.CommCase.SCharNeTwo_cases
[125, 1]
[140, 56]
apply congrArg (λ y ↦ y ^ 2) at h1
case refine_2 R : Type u_2 S : Type u_1 inst✝³ : CommSemiring R inst✝² : CharTwo R inst✝¹ : CommRing S inst✝ : NoZeroDivisors S f : R → S hf : NontrivialGood f h : 2 ≠ 0 x : R h0 : f x ^ 2 + f (x + 1) ^ 2 = 2 + 1 h1 : f x + f (x + 1) = 1 ⊢ f x * f (x + 1) = -1
case refine_2 R : Type u_2 S : Type u_1 inst✝³ : CommSemiring R inst✝² : CharTwo R inst✝¹ : CommRing S inst✝ : NoZeroDivisors S f : R → S hf : NontrivialGood f h : 2 ≠ 0 x : R h0 : f x ^ 2 + f (x + 1) ^ 2 = 2 + 1 h1 : (f x + f (x + 1)) ^ 2 = 1 ^ 2 ⊢ f x * f (x + 1) = -1
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case refine_2 R : Type u_2 S : Type u_1 inst✝³ : CommSemiring R inst✝² : CharTwo R inst✝¹ : CommRing S inst✝ : NoZeroDivisors S f : R → S hf : NontrivialGood f h : 2 ≠ 0 x : R h0 : f x ^ 2 + f (x + 1) ^ 2 = 2 + 1 h1 : f x + f (x + 1) = 1 ⊢ f x * f (x + 1) = -1 TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2012/A5/A5Cases/Case3.lean
IMOSL.IMO2012A5.Case3.CommCase.SCharNeTwo_cases
[125, 1]
[140, 56]
rw [one_pow, add_sq', h0, add_right_comm, add_left_eq_self, mul_assoc, ← mul_one_add (2 : S), mul_eq_zero] at h1
case refine_2 R : Type u_2 S : Type u_1 inst✝³ : CommSemiring R inst✝² : CharTwo R inst✝¹ : CommRing S inst✝ : NoZeroDivisors S f : R → S hf : NontrivialGood f h : 2 ≠ 0 x : R h0 : f x ^ 2 + f (x + 1) ^ 2 = 2 + 1 h1 : (f x + f (x + 1)) ^ 2 = 1 ^ 2 ⊢ f x * f (x + 1) = -1
case refine_2 R : Type u_2 S : Type u_1 inst✝³ : CommSemiring R inst✝² : CharTwo R inst✝¹ : CommRing S inst✝ : NoZeroDivisors S f : R → S hf : NontrivialGood f h : 2 ≠ 0 x : R h0 : f x ^ 2 + f (x + 1) ^ 2 = 2 + 1 h1 : 2 = 0 ∨ 1 + f x * f (x + 1) = 0 ⊢ f x * f (x + 1) = -1
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case refine_2 R : Type u_2 S : Type u_1 inst✝³ : CommSemiring R inst✝² : CharTwo R inst✝¹ : CommRing S inst✝ : NoZeroDivisors S f : R → S hf : NontrivialGood f h : 2 ≠ 0 x : R h0 : f x ^ 2 + f (x + 1) ^ 2 = 2 + 1 h1 : (f x + f (x + 1)) ^ 2 = 1 ^ 2 ⊢ f x * f (x + 1) = -1 TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2012/A5/A5Cases/Case3.lean
IMOSL.IMO2012A5.Case3.CommCase.SCharNeTwo_cases
[125, 1]
[140, 56]
exact eq_neg_of_add_eq_zero_right (h1.resolve_left h)
case refine_2 R : Type u_2 S : Type u_1 inst✝³ : CommSemiring R inst✝² : CharTwo R inst✝¹ : CommRing S inst✝ : NoZeroDivisors S f : R → S hf : NontrivialGood f h : 2 ≠ 0 x : R h0 : f x ^ 2 + f (x + 1) ^ 2 = 2 + 1 h1 : 2 = 0 ∨ 1 + f x * f (x + 1) = 0 ⊢ f x * f (x + 1) = -1
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case refine_2 R : Type u_2 S : Type u_1 inst✝³ : CommSemiring R inst✝² : CharTwo R inst✝¹ : CommRing S inst✝ : NoZeroDivisors S f : R → S hf : NontrivialGood f h : 2 ≠ 0 x : R h0 : f x ^ 2 + f (x + 1) ^ 2 = 2 + 1 h1 : 2 = 0 ∨ 1 + f x * f (x + 1) = 0 ⊢ f x * f (x + 1) = -1 TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2012/A5/A5Cases/Case3.lean
IMOSL.IMO2012A5.Case3.CommCase.SCharNeTwo_cases
[125, 1]
[140, 56]
rwa [h0, add_left_eq_self] at h1
case refine_1 R : Type u_2 S : Type u_1 inst✝³ : CommSemiring R inst✝² : CharTwo R inst✝¹ : CommRing S inst✝ : NoZeroDivisors S f : R → S hf : NontrivialGood f h : 2 ≠ 0 x : R h0 : f x ^ 2 + f (x + 1) ^ 2 = 2 + 1 h1 : f x ^ 2 + f (x + 1) ^ 2 = 1 ⊢ 2 = 0
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case refine_1 R : Type u_2 S : Type u_1 inst✝³ : CommSemiring R inst✝² : CharTwo R inst✝¹ : CommRing S inst✝ : NoZeroDivisors S f : R → S hf : NontrivialGood f h : 2 ≠ 0 x : R h0 : f x ^ 2 + f (x + 1) ^ 2 = 2 + 1 h1 : f x ^ 2 + f (x + 1) ^ 2 = 1 ⊢ 2 = 0 TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2012/A5/A5Cases/Case3.lean
IMOSL.IMO2012A5.Case3.SCharTwo.solution
[153, 1]
[161, 60]
rcases CommSubring.oneVarCommLiftDomain_exists hf x with ⟨R', R'comm, φ, hφ, ⟨x, rfl⟩, S', S'comm, S'nzd, ρ, hρ, f', h, hf'⟩
R : Type u_2 S : Type u_1 inst✝⁴ : Ring R inst✝³ : CharTwo R inst✝² : Ring S inst✝¹ : NoZeroDivisors S inst✝ : CharTwo S f : R → S hf : NontrivialGood f x : R ⊢ f (x + 1) = f x + 1
case intro.intro.intro.intro.intro.intro.intro.intro.intro.intro.intro.intro.intro R : Type u_2 S : Type u_1 inst✝⁴ : Ring R inst✝³ : CharTwo R inst✝² : Ring S inst✝¹ : NoZeroDivisors S inst✝ : CharTwo S f : R → S hf : NontrivialGood f R' : Type u_2 R'comm : CommRing R' φ : R' →+* R hφ : Function.Injective ⇑φ x : R' S' : Type u_1 S'comm : CommRing S' S'nzd : NoZeroDivisors S' ρ : S' →+* S hρ : Function.Injective ⇑ρ f' : R' → S' h : ∀ (a : R'), f (φ a) = ρ (f' a) hf' : NontrivialGood f' ⊢ f (φ x + 1) = f (φ x) + 1
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: R : Type u_2 S : Type u_1 inst✝⁴ : Ring R inst✝³ : CharTwo R inst✝² : Ring S inst✝¹ : NoZeroDivisors S inst✝ : CharTwo S f : R → S hf : NontrivialGood f x : R ⊢ f (x + 1) = f x + 1 TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2012/A5/A5Cases/Case3.lean
IMOSL.IMO2012A5.Case3.SCharTwo.solution
[153, 1]
[161, 60]
have R'char := pullback_of_inj φ.toAddMonoidHom hφ
case intro.intro.intro.intro.intro.intro.intro.intro.intro.intro.intro.intro.intro R : Type u_2 S : Type u_1 inst✝⁴ : Ring R inst✝³ : CharTwo R inst✝² : Ring S inst✝¹ : NoZeroDivisors S inst✝ : CharTwo S f : R → S hf : NontrivialGood f R' : Type u_2 R'comm : CommRing R' φ : R' →+* R hφ : Function.Injective ⇑φ x : R' S' : Type u_1 S'comm : CommRing S' S'nzd : NoZeroDivisors S' ρ : S' →+* S hρ : Function.Injective ⇑ρ f' : R' → S' h : ∀ (a : R'), f (φ a) = ρ (f' a) hf' : NontrivialGood f' ⊢ f (φ x + 1) = f (φ x) + 1
case intro.intro.intro.intro.intro.intro.intro.intro.intro.intro.intro.intro.intro R : Type u_2 S : Type u_1 inst✝⁴ : Ring R inst✝³ : CharTwo R inst✝² : Ring S inst✝¹ : NoZeroDivisors S inst✝ : CharTwo S f : R → S hf : NontrivialGood f R' : Type u_2 R'comm : CommRing R' φ : R' →+* R hφ : Function.Injective ⇑φ x : R' S' : Type u_1 S'comm : CommRing S' S'nzd : NoZeroDivisors S' ρ : S' →+* S hρ : Function.Injective ⇑ρ f' : R' → S' h : ∀ (a : R'), f (φ a) = ρ (f' a) hf' : NontrivialGood f' R'char : CharTwo R' ⊢ f (φ x + 1) = f (φ x) + 1
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case intro.intro.intro.intro.intro.intro.intro.intro.intro.intro.intro.intro.intro R : Type u_2 S : Type u_1 inst✝⁴ : Ring R inst✝³ : CharTwo R inst✝² : Ring S inst✝¹ : NoZeroDivisors S inst✝ : CharTwo S f : R → S hf : NontrivialGood f R' : Type u_2 R'comm : CommRing R' φ : R' →+* R hφ : Function.Injective ⇑φ x : R' S' : Type u_1 S'comm : CommRing S' S'nzd : NoZeroDivisors S' ρ : S' →+* S hρ : Function.Injective ⇑ρ f' : R' → S' h : ∀ (a : R'), f (φ a) = ρ (f' a) hf' : NontrivialGood f' ⊢ f (φ x + 1) = f (φ x) + 1 TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2012/A5/A5Cases/Case3.lean
IMOSL.IMO2012A5.Case3.SCharTwo.solution
[153, 1]
[161, 60]
have S'char := pullback_of_inj ρ.toAddMonoidHom hρ
case intro.intro.intro.intro.intro.intro.intro.intro.intro.intro.intro.intro.intro R : Type u_2 S : Type u_1 inst✝⁴ : Ring R inst✝³ : CharTwo R inst✝² : Ring S inst✝¹ : NoZeroDivisors S inst✝ : CharTwo S f : R → S hf : NontrivialGood f R' : Type u_2 R'comm : CommRing R' φ : R' →+* R hφ : Function.Injective ⇑φ x : R' S' : Type u_1 S'comm : CommRing S' S'nzd : NoZeroDivisors S' ρ : S' →+* S hρ : Function.Injective ⇑ρ f' : R' → S' h : ∀ (a : R'), f (φ a) = ρ (f' a) hf' : NontrivialGood f' R'char : CharTwo R' ⊢ f (φ x + 1) = f (φ x) + 1
case intro.intro.intro.intro.intro.intro.intro.intro.intro.intro.intro.intro.intro R : Type u_2 S : Type u_1 inst✝⁴ : Ring R inst✝³ : CharTwo R inst✝² : Ring S inst✝¹ : NoZeroDivisors S inst✝ : CharTwo S f : R → S hf : NontrivialGood f R' : Type u_2 R'comm : CommRing R' φ : R' →+* R hφ : Function.Injective ⇑φ x : R' S' : Type u_1 S'comm : CommRing S' S'nzd : NoZeroDivisors S' ρ : S' →+* S hρ : Function.Injective ⇑ρ f' : R' → S' h : ∀ (a : R'), f (φ a) = ρ (f' a) hf' : NontrivialGood f' R'char : CharTwo R' S'char : CharTwo S' ⊢ f (φ x + 1) = f (φ x) + 1
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case intro.intro.intro.intro.intro.intro.intro.intro.intro.intro.intro.intro.intro R : Type u_2 S : Type u_1 inst✝⁴ : Ring R inst✝³ : CharTwo R inst✝² : Ring S inst✝¹ : NoZeroDivisors S inst✝ : CharTwo S f : R → S hf : NontrivialGood f R' : Type u_2 R'comm : CommRing R' φ : R' →+* R hφ : Function.Injective ⇑φ x : R' S' : Type u_1 S'comm : CommRing S' S'nzd : NoZeroDivisors S' ρ : S' →+* S hρ : Function.Injective ⇑ρ f' : R' → S' h : ∀ (a : R'), f (φ a) = ρ (f' a) hf' : NontrivialGood f' R'char : CharTwo R' ⊢ f (φ x + 1) = f (φ x) + 1 TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2012/A5/A5Cases/Case3.lean
IMOSL.IMO2012A5.Case3.SCharTwo.solution
[153, 1]
[161, 60]
rw [h, ← φ.map_one, ← φ.map_add, h, ← ρ.map_one, ← ρ.map_add]
case intro.intro.intro.intro.intro.intro.intro.intro.intro.intro.intro.intro.intro R : Type u_2 S : Type u_1 inst✝⁴ : Ring R inst✝³ : CharTwo R inst✝² : Ring S inst✝¹ : NoZeroDivisors S inst✝ : CharTwo S f : R → S hf : NontrivialGood f R' : Type u_2 R'comm : CommRing R' φ : R' →+* R hφ : Function.Injective ⇑φ x : R' S' : Type u_1 S'comm : CommRing S' S'nzd : NoZeroDivisors S' ρ : S' →+* S hρ : Function.Injective ⇑ρ f' : R' → S' h : ∀ (a : R'), f (φ a) = ρ (f' a) hf' : NontrivialGood f' R'char : CharTwo R' S'char : CharTwo S' ⊢ f (φ x + 1) = f (φ x) + 1
case intro.intro.intro.intro.intro.intro.intro.intro.intro.intro.intro.intro.intro R : Type u_2 S : Type u_1 inst✝⁴ : Ring R inst✝³ : CharTwo R inst✝² : Ring S inst✝¹ : NoZeroDivisors S inst✝ : CharTwo S f : R → S hf : NontrivialGood f R' : Type u_2 R'comm : CommRing R' φ : R' →+* R hφ : Function.Injective ⇑φ x : R' S' : Type u_1 S'comm : CommRing S' S'nzd : NoZeroDivisors S' ρ : S' →+* S hρ : Function.Injective ⇑ρ f' : R' → S' h : ∀ (a : R'), f (φ a) = ρ (f' a) hf' : NontrivialGood f' R'char : CharTwo R' S'char : CharTwo S' ⊢ ρ (f' (x + 1)) = ρ (f' x + 1)
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case intro.intro.intro.intro.intro.intro.intro.intro.intro.intro.intro.intro.intro R : Type u_2 S : Type u_1 inst✝⁴ : Ring R inst✝³ : CharTwo R inst✝² : Ring S inst✝¹ : NoZeroDivisors S inst✝ : CharTwo S f : R → S hf : NontrivialGood f R' : Type u_2 R'comm : CommRing R' φ : R' →+* R hφ : Function.Injective ⇑φ x : R' S' : Type u_1 S'comm : CommRing S' S'nzd : NoZeroDivisors S' ρ : S' →+* S hρ : Function.Injective ⇑ρ f' : R' → S' h : ∀ (a : R'), f (φ a) = ρ (f' a) hf' : NontrivialGood f' R'char : CharTwo R' S'char : CharTwo S' ⊢ f (φ x + 1) = f (φ x) + 1 TACTIC: