url
stringclasses
147 values
commit
stringclasses
147 values
file_path
stringlengths
7
101
full_name
stringlengths
1
94
start
stringlengths
6
10
end
stringlengths
6
11
tactic
stringlengths
1
11.2k
state_before
stringlengths
3
2.09M
state_after
stringlengths
6
2.09M
input
stringlengths
73
2.09M
https://github.com/girving/ray.git
0be790285dd0fce78913b0cb9bddaffa94bd25f9
Ray/AnalyticManifold/OneDimension.lean
mfderiv_ne_zero_eventually
[355, 1]
[363, 58]
have ga : HolomorphicAt II I (uncurry g) (c, z) := by have e : uncurry g = f ∘ fun p ↦ p.2 := rfl; rw [e] apply HolomorphicAt.comp_of_eq fa holomorphicAt_snd; simp only
S : Type inst✝⁵ : TopologicalSpace S cs : ChartedSpace ℂ S inst✝⁴ : AnalyticManifold I S T : Type inst✝³ : TopologicalSpace T ct : ChartedSpace ℂ T inst✝² : AnalyticManifold I T U : Type inst✝¹ : TopologicalSpace U cu : ChartedSpace ℂ U inst✝ : AnalyticManifold I U f : S → T z : S fa : HolomorphicAt I I f z f0 : mfderiv I I f z ≠ 0 c : ℂ := 0 g : ℂ → S → T := fun x z => f z ⊢ ∀ᶠ (w : S) in 𝓝 z, mfderiv I I f w ≠ 0
S : Type inst✝⁵ : TopologicalSpace S cs : ChartedSpace ℂ S inst✝⁴ : AnalyticManifold I S T : Type inst✝³ : TopologicalSpace T ct : ChartedSpace ℂ T inst✝² : AnalyticManifold I T U : Type inst✝¹ : TopologicalSpace U cu : ChartedSpace ℂ U inst✝ : AnalyticManifold I U f : S → T z : S fa : HolomorphicAt I I f z f0 : mfderiv I I f z ≠ 0 c : ℂ := 0 g : ℂ → S → T := fun x z => f z ga : HolomorphicAt (I.prod I) I (uncurry g) (c, z) ⊢ ∀ᶠ (w : S) in 𝓝 z, mfderiv I I f w ≠ 0
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: S : Type inst✝⁵ : TopologicalSpace S cs : ChartedSpace ℂ S inst✝⁴ : AnalyticManifold I S T : Type inst✝³ : TopologicalSpace T ct : ChartedSpace ℂ T inst✝² : AnalyticManifold I T U : Type inst✝¹ : TopologicalSpace U cu : ChartedSpace ℂ U inst✝ : AnalyticManifold I U f : S → T z : S fa : HolomorphicAt I I f z f0 : mfderiv I I f z ≠ 0 c : ℂ := 0 g : ℂ → S → T := fun x z => f z ⊢ ∀ᶠ (w : S) in 𝓝 z, mfderiv I I f w ≠ 0 TACTIC:
https://github.com/girving/ray.git
0be790285dd0fce78913b0cb9bddaffa94bd25f9
Ray/AnalyticManifold/OneDimension.lean
mfderiv_ne_zero_eventually
[355, 1]
[363, 58]
have pc : Tendsto (fun z ↦ (c, z)) (𝓝 z) (𝓝 (c, z)) := continuousAt_const.prod continuousAt_id
S : Type inst✝⁵ : TopologicalSpace S cs : ChartedSpace ℂ S inst✝⁴ : AnalyticManifold I S T : Type inst✝³ : TopologicalSpace T ct : ChartedSpace ℂ T inst✝² : AnalyticManifold I T U : Type inst✝¹ : TopologicalSpace U cu : ChartedSpace ℂ U inst✝ : AnalyticManifold I U f : S → T z : S fa : HolomorphicAt I I f z f0 : mfderiv I I f z ≠ 0 c : ℂ := 0 g : ℂ → S → T := fun x z => f z ga : HolomorphicAt (I.prod I) I (uncurry g) (c, z) ⊢ ∀ᶠ (w : S) in 𝓝 z, mfderiv I I f w ≠ 0
S : Type inst✝⁵ : TopologicalSpace S cs : ChartedSpace ℂ S inst✝⁴ : AnalyticManifold I S T : Type inst✝³ : TopologicalSpace T ct : ChartedSpace ℂ T inst✝² : AnalyticManifold I T U : Type inst✝¹ : TopologicalSpace U cu : ChartedSpace ℂ U inst✝ : AnalyticManifold I U f : S → T z : S fa : HolomorphicAt I I f z f0 : mfderiv I I f z ≠ 0 c : ℂ := 0 g : ℂ → S → T := fun x z => f z ga : HolomorphicAt (I.prod I) I (uncurry g) (c, z) pc : Tendsto (fun z => (c, z)) (𝓝 z) (𝓝 (c, z)) ⊢ ∀ᶠ (w : S) in 𝓝 z, mfderiv I I f w ≠ 0
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: S : Type inst✝⁵ : TopologicalSpace S cs : ChartedSpace ℂ S inst✝⁴ : AnalyticManifold I S T : Type inst✝³ : TopologicalSpace T ct : ChartedSpace ℂ T inst✝² : AnalyticManifold I T U : Type inst✝¹ : TopologicalSpace U cu : ChartedSpace ℂ U inst✝ : AnalyticManifold I U f : S → T z : S fa : HolomorphicAt I I f z f0 : mfderiv I I f z ≠ 0 c : ℂ := 0 g : ℂ → S → T := fun x z => f z ga : HolomorphicAt (I.prod I) I (uncurry g) (c, z) ⊢ ∀ᶠ (w : S) in 𝓝 z, mfderiv I I f w ≠ 0 TACTIC:
https://github.com/girving/ray.git
0be790285dd0fce78913b0cb9bddaffa94bd25f9
Ray/AnalyticManifold/OneDimension.lean
mfderiv_ne_zero_eventually
[355, 1]
[363, 58]
exact pc.eventually (mfderiv_ne_zero_eventually' ga f0)
S : Type inst✝⁵ : TopologicalSpace S cs : ChartedSpace ℂ S inst✝⁴ : AnalyticManifold I S T : Type inst✝³ : TopologicalSpace T ct : ChartedSpace ℂ T inst✝² : AnalyticManifold I T U : Type inst✝¹ : TopologicalSpace U cu : ChartedSpace ℂ U inst✝ : AnalyticManifold I U f : S → T z : S fa : HolomorphicAt I I f z f0 : mfderiv I I f z ≠ 0 c : ℂ := 0 g : ℂ → S → T := fun x z => f z ga : HolomorphicAt (I.prod I) I (uncurry g) (c, z) pc : Tendsto (fun z => (c, z)) (𝓝 z) (𝓝 (c, z)) ⊢ ∀ᶠ (w : S) in 𝓝 z, mfderiv I I f w ≠ 0
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: S : Type inst✝⁵ : TopologicalSpace S cs : ChartedSpace ℂ S inst✝⁴ : AnalyticManifold I S T : Type inst✝³ : TopologicalSpace T ct : ChartedSpace ℂ T inst✝² : AnalyticManifold I T U : Type inst✝¹ : TopologicalSpace U cu : ChartedSpace ℂ U inst✝ : AnalyticManifold I U f : S → T z : S fa : HolomorphicAt I I f z f0 : mfderiv I I f z ≠ 0 c : ℂ := 0 g : ℂ → S → T := fun x z => f z ga : HolomorphicAt (I.prod I) I (uncurry g) (c, z) pc : Tendsto (fun z => (c, z)) (𝓝 z) (𝓝 (c, z)) ⊢ ∀ᶠ (w : S) in 𝓝 z, mfderiv I I f w ≠ 0 TACTIC:
https://github.com/girving/ray.git
0be790285dd0fce78913b0cb9bddaffa94bd25f9
Ray/AnalyticManifold/OneDimension.lean
mfderiv_ne_zero_eventually
[355, 1]
[363, 58]
have e : uncurry g = f ∘ fun p ↦ p.2 := rfl
S : Type inst✝⁵ : TopologicalSpace S cs : ChartedSpace ℂ S inst✝⁴ : AnalyticManifold I S T : Type inst✝³ : TopologicalSpace T ct : ChartedSpace ℂ T inst✝² : AnalyticManifold I T U : Type inst✝¹ : TopologicalSpace U cu : ChartedSpace ℂ U inst✝ : AnalyticManifold I U f : S → T z : S fa : HolomorphicAt I I f z f0 : mfderiv I I f z ≠ 0 c : ℂ := 0 g : ℂ → S → T := fun x z => f z ⊢ HolomorphicAt (I.prod I) I (uncurry g) (c, z)
S : Type inst✝⁵ : TopologicalSpace S cs : ChartedSpace ℂ S inst✝⁴ : AnalyticManifold I S T : Type inst✝³ : TopologicalSpace T ct : ChartedSpace ℂ T inst✝² : AnalyticManifold I T U : Type inst✝¹ : TopologicalSpace U cu : ChartedSpace ℂ U inst✝ : AnalyticManifold I U f : S → T z : S fa : HolomorphicAt I I f z f0 : mfderiv I I f z ≠ 0 c : ℂ := 0 g : ℂ → S → T := fun x z => f z e : uncurry g = f ∘ fun p => p.2 ⊢ HolomorphicAt (I.prod I) I (uncurry g) (c, z)
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: S : Type inst✝⁵ : TopologicalSpace S cs : ChartedSpace ℂ S inst✝⁴ : AnalyticManifold I S T : Type inst✝³ : TopologicalSpace T ct : ChartedSpace ℂ T inst✝² : AnalyticManifold I T U : Type inst✝¹ : TopologicalSpace U cu : ChartedSpace ℂ U inst✝ : AnalyticManifold I U f : S → T z : S fa : HolomorphicAt I I f z f0 : mfderiv I I f z ≠ 0 c : ℂ := 0 g : ℂ → S → T := fun x z => f z ⊢ HolomorphicAt (I.prod I) I (uncurry g) (c, z) TACTIC:
https://github.com/girving/ray.git
0be790285dd0fce78913b0cb9bddaffa94bd25f9
Ray/AnalyticManifold/OneDimension.lean
mfderiv_ne_zero_eventually
[355, 1]
[363, 58]
rw [e]
S : Type inst✝⁵ : TopologicalSpace S cs : ChartedSpace ℂ S inst✝⁴ : AnalyticManifold I S T : Type inst✝³ : TopologicalSpace T ct : ChartedSpace ℂ T inst✝² : AnalyticManifold I T U : Type inst✝¹ : TopologicalSpace U cu : ChartedSpace ℂ U inst✝ : AnalyticManifold I U f : S → T z : S fa : HolomorphicAt I I f z f0 : mfderiv I I f z ≠ 0 c : ℂ := 0 g : ℂ → S → T := fun x z => f z e : uncurry g = f ∘ fun p => p.2 ⊢ HolomorphicAt (I.prod I) I (uncurry g) (c, z)
S : Type inst✝⁵ : TopologicalSpace S cs : ChartedSpace ℂ S inst✝⁴ : AnalyticManifold I S T : Type inst✝³ : TopologicalSpace T ct : ChartedSpace ℂ T inst✝² : AnalyticManifold I T U : Type inst✝¹ : TopologicalSpace U cu : ChartedSpace ℂ U inst✝ : AnalyticManifold I U f : S → T z : S fa : HolomorphicAt I I f z f0 : mfderiv I I f z ≠ 0 c : ℂ := 0 g : ℂ → S → T := fun x z => f z e : uncurry g = f ∘ fun p => p.2 ⊢ HolomorphicAt (I.prod I) I (f ∘ fun p => p.2) (c, z)
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: S : Type inst✝⁵ : TopologicalSpace S cs : ChartedSpace ℂ S inst✝⁴ : AnalyticManifold I S T : Type inst✝³ : TopologicalSpace T ct : ChartedSpace ℂ T inst✝² : AnalyticManifold I T U : Type inst✝¹ : TopologicalSpace U cu : ChartedSpace ℂ U inst✝ : AnalyticManifold I U f : S → T z : S fa : HolomorphicAt I I f z f0 : mfderiv I I f z ≠ 0 c : ℂ := 0 g : ℂ → S → T := fun x z => f z e : uncurry g = f ∘ fun p => p.2 ⊢ HolomorphicAt (I.prod I) I (uncurry g) (c, z) TACTIC:
https://github.com/girving/ray.git
0be790285dd0fce78913b0cb9bddaffa94bd25f9
Ray/AnalyticManifold/OneDimension.lean
mfderiv_ne_zero_eventually
[355, 1]
[363, 58]
apply HolomorphicAt.comp_of_eq fa holomorphicAt_snd
S : Type inst✝⁵ : TopologicalSpace S cs : ChartedSpace ℂ S inst✝⁴ : AnalyticManifold I S T : Type inst✝³ : TopologicalSpace T ct : ChartedSpace ℂ T inst✝² : AnalyticManifold I T U : Type inst✝¹ : TopologicalSpace U cu : ChartedSpace ℂ U inst✝ : AnalyticManifold I U f : S → T z : S fa : HolomorphicAt I I f z f0 : mfderiv I I f z ≠ 0 c : ℂ := 0 g : ℂ → S → T := fun x z => f z e : uncurry g = f ∘ fun p => p.2 ⊢ HolomorphicAt (I.prod I) I (f ∘ fun p => p.2) (c, z)
S : Type inst✝⁵ : TopologicalSpace S cs : ChartedSpace ℂ S inst✝⁴ : AnalyticManifold I S T : Type inst✝³ : TopologicalSpace T ct : ChartedSpace ℂ T inst✝² : AnalyticManifold I T U : Type inst✝¹ : TopologicalSpace U cu : ChartedSpace ℂ U inst✝ : AnalyticManifold I U f : S → T z : S fa : HolomorphicAt I I f z f0 : mfderiv I I f z ≠ 0 c : ℂ := 0 g : ℂ → S → T := fun x z => f z e : uncurry g = f ∘ fun p => p.2 ⊢ (c, z).2 = z
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: S : Type inst✝⁵ : TopologicalSpace S cs : ChartedSpace ℂ S inst✝⁴ : AnalyticManifold I S T : Type inst✝³ : TopologicalSpace T ct : ChartedSpace ℂ T inst✝² : AnalyticManifold I T U : Type inst✝¹ : TopologicalSpace U cu : ChartedSpace ℂ U inst✝ : AnalyticManifold I U f : S → T z : S fa : HolomorphicAt I I f z f0 : mfderiv I I f z ≠ 0 c : ℂ := 0 g : ℂ → S → T := fun x z => f z e : uncurry g = f ∘ fun p => p.2 ⊢ HolomorphicAt (I.prod I) I (f ∘ fun p => p.2) (c, z) TACTIC:
https://github.com/girving/ray.git
0be790285dd0fce78913b0cb9bddaffa94bd25f9
Ray/AnalyticManifold/OneDimension.lean
mfderiv_ne_zero_eventually
[355, 1]
[363, 58]
simp only
S : Type inst✝⁵ : TopologicalSpace S cs : ChartedSpace ℂ S inst✝⁴ : AnalyticManifold I S T : Type inst✝³ : TopologicalSpace T ct : ChartedSpace ℂ T inst✝² : AnalyticManifold I T U : Type inst✝¹ : TopologicalSpace U cu : ChartedSpace ℂ U inst✝ : AnalyticManifold I U f : S → T z : S fa : HolomorphicAt I I f z f0 : mfderiv I I f z ≠ 0 c : ℂ := 0 g : ℂ → S → T := fun x z => f z e : uncurry g = f ∘ fun p => p.2 ⊢ (c, z).2 = z
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: S : Type inst✝⁵ : TopologicalSpace S cs : ChartedSpace ℂ S inst✝⁴ : AnalyticManifold I S T : Type inst✝³ : TopologicalSpace T ct : ChartedSpace ℂ T inst✝² : AnalyticManifold I T U : Type inst✝¹ : TopologicalSpace U cu : ChartedSpace ℂ U inst✝ : AnalyticManifold I U f : S → T z : S fa : HolomorphicAt I I f z f0 : mfderiv I I f z ≠ 0 c : ℂ := 0 g : ℂ → S → T := fun x z => f z e : uncurry g = f ∘ fun p => p.2 ⊢ (c, z).2 = z TACTIC:
https://github.com/girving/ray.git
0be790285dd0fce78913b0cb9bddaffa94bd25f9
Ray/AnalyticManifold/OneDimension.lean
isOpen_noncritical
[366, 1]
[368, 89]
rw [isOpen_iff_eventually]
S : Type inst✝⁵ : TopologicalSpace S cs : ChartedSpace ℂ S inst✝⁴ : AnalyticManifold I S T : Type inst✝³ : TopologicalSpace T ct : ChartedSpace ℂ T inst✝² : AnalyticManifold I T U : Type inst✝¹ : TopologicalSpace U cu : ChartedSpace ℂ U inst✝ : AnalyticManifold I U f : ℂ → S → T fa : Holomorphic (I.prod I) I (uncurry f) ⊢ IsOpen {p | ¬Critical (f p.1) p.2}
S : Type inst✝⁵ : TopologicalSpace S cs : ChartedSpace ℂ S inst✝⁴ : AnalyticManifold I S T : Type inst✝³ : TopologicalSpace T ct : ChartedSpace ℂ T inst✝² : AnalyticManifold I T U : Type inst✝¹ : TopologicalSpace U cu : ChartedSpace ℂ U inst✝ : AnalyticManifold I U f : ℂ → S → T fa : Holomorphic (I.prod I) I (uncurry f) ⊢ ∀ x ∈ {p | ¬Critical (f p.1) p.2}, ∀ᶠ (y : ℂ × S) in 𝓝 x, y ∈ {p | ¬Critical (f p.1) p.2}
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: S : Type inst✝⁵ : TopologicalSpace S cs : ChartedSpace ℂ S inst✝⁴ : AnalyticManifold I S T : Type inst✝³ : TopologicalSpace T ct : ChartedSpace ℂ T inst✝² : AnalyticManifold I T U : Type inst✝¹ : TopologicalSpace U cu : ChartedSpace ℂ U inst✝ : AnalyticManifold I U f : ℂ → S → T fa : Holomorphic (I.prod I) I (uncurry f) ⊢ IsOpen {p | ¬Critical (f p.1) p.2} TACTIC:
https://github.com/girving/ray.git
0be790285dd0fce78913b0cb9bddaffa94bd25f9
Ray/AnalyticManifold/OneDimension.lean
isOpen_noncritical
[366, 1]
[368, 89]
intro ⟨c, z⟩ m
S : Type inst✝⁵ : TopologicalSpace S cs : ChartedSpace ℂ S inst✝⁴ : AnalyticManifold I S T : Type inst✝³ : TopologicalSpace T ct : ChartedSpace ℂ T inst✝² : AnalyticManifold I T U : Type inst✝¹ : TopologicalSpace U cu : ChartedSpace ℂ U inst✝ : AnalyticManifold I U f : ℂ → S → T fa : Holomorphic (I.prod I) I (uncurry f) ⊢ ∀ x ∈ {p | ¬Critical (f p.1) p.2}, ∀ᶠ (y : ℂ × S) in 𝓝 x, y ∈ {p | ¬Critical (f p.1) p.2}
S : Type inst✝⁵ : TopologicalSpace S cs : ChartedSpace ℂ S inst✝⁴ : AnalyticManifold I S T : Type inst✝³ : TopologicalSpace T ct : ChartedSpace ℂ T inst✝² : AnalyticManifold I T U : Type inst✝¹ : TopologicalSpace U cu : ChartedSpace ℂ U inst✝ : AnalyticManifold I U f : ℂ → S → T fa : Holomorphic (I.prod I) I (uncurry f) c : ℂ z : S m : (c, z) ∈ {p | ¬Critical (f p.1) p.2} ⊢ ∀ᶠ (y : ℂ × S) in 𝓝 (c, z), y ∈ {p | ¬Critical (f p.1) p.2}
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: S : Type inst✝⁵ : TopologicalSpace S cs : ChartedSpace ℂ S inst✝⁴ : AnalyticManifold I S T : Type inst✝³ : TopologicalSpace T ct : ChartedSpace ℂ T inst✝² : AnalyticManifold I T U : Type inst✝¹ : TopologicalSpace U cu : ChartedSpace ℂ U inst✝ : AnalyticManifold I U f : ℂ → S → T fa : Holomorphic (I.prod I) I (uncurry f) ⊢ ∀ x ∈ {p | ¬Critical (f p.1) p.2}, ∀ᶠ (y : ℂ × S) in 𝓝 x, y ∈ {p | ¬Critical (f p.1) p.2} TACTIC:
https://github.com/girving/ray.git
0be790285dd0fce78913b0cb9bddaffa94bd25f9
Ray/AnalyticManifold/OneDimension.lean
isOpen_noncritical
[366, 1]
[368, 89]
exact mfderiv_ne_zero_eventually' (fa _) m
S : Type inst✝⁵ : TopologicalSpace S cs : ChartedSpace ℂ S inst✝⁴ : AnalyticManifold I S T : Type inst✝³ : TopologicalSpace T ct : ChartedSpace ℂ T inst✝² : AnalyticManifold I T U : Type inst✝¹ : TopologicalSpace U cu : ChartedSpace ℂ U inst✝ : AnalyticManifold I U f : ℂ → S → T fa : Holomorphic (I.prod I) I (uncurry f) c : ℂ z : S m : (c, z) ∈ {p | ¬Critical (f p.1) p.2} ⊢ ∀ᶠ (y : ℂ × S) in 𝓝 (c, z), y ∈ {p | ¬Critical (f p.1) p.2}
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: S : Type inst✝⁵ : TopologicalSpace S cs : ChartedSpace ℂ S inst✝⁴ : AnalyticManifold I S T : Type inst✝³ : TopologicalSpace T ct : ChartedSpace ℂ T inst✝² : AnalyticManifold I T U : Type inst✝¹ : TopologicalSpace U cu : ChartedSpace ℂ U inst✝ : AnalyticManifold I U f : ℂ → S → T fa : Holomorphic (I.prod I) I (uncurry f) c : ℂ z : S m : (c, z) ∈ {p | ¬Critical (f p.1) p.2} ⊢ ∀ᶠ (y : ℂ × S) in 𝓝 (c, z), y ∈ {p | ¬Critical (f p.1) p.2} TACTIC:
https://github.com/girving/ray.git
0be790285dd0fce78913b0cb9bddaffa94bd25f9
Ray/AnalyticManifold/OneDimension.lean
isClosed_critical
[371, 1]
[374, 49]
have c := (isOpen_noncritical fa).isClosed_compl
S : Type inst✝⁵ : TopologicalSpace S cs : ChartedSpace ℂ S inst✝⁴ : AnalyticManifold I S T : Type inst✝³ : TopologicalSpace T ct : ChartedSpace ℂ T inst✝² : AnalyticManifold I T U : Type inst✝¹ : TopologicalSpace U cu : ChartedSpace ℂ U inst✝ : AnalyticManifold I U f : ℂ → S → T fa : Holomorphic (I.prod I) I (uncurry f) ⊢ IsClosed {p | Critical (f p.1) p.2}
S : Type inst✝⁵ : TopologicalSpace S cs : ChartedSpace ℂ S inst✝⁴ : AnalyticManifold I S T : Type inst✝³ : TopologicalSpace T ct : ChartedSpace ℂ T inst✝² : AnalyticManifold I T U : Type inst✝¹ : TopologicalSpace U cu : ChartedSpace ℂ U inst✝ : AnalyticManifold I U f : ℂ → S → T fa : Holomorphic (I.prod I) I (uncurry f) c : IsClosed {p | ¬Critical (f p.1) p.2}ᶜ ⊢ IsClosed {p | Critical (f p.1) p.2}
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: S : Type inst✝⁵ : TopologicalSpace S cs : ChartedSpace ℂ S inst✝⁴ : AnalyticManifold I S T : Type inst✝³ : TopologicalSpace T ct : ChartedSpace ℂ T inst✝² : AnalyticManifold I T U : Type inst✝¹ : TopologicalSpace U cu : ChartedSpace ℂ U inst✝ : AnalyticManifold I U f : ℂ → S → T fa : Holomorphic (I.prod I) I (uncurry f) ⊢ IsClosed {p | Critical (f p.1) p.2} TACTIC:
https://github.com/girving/ray.git
0be790285dd0fce78913b0cb9bddaffa94bd25f9
Ray/AnalyticManifold/OneDimension.lean
isClosed_critical
[371, 1]
[374, 49]
simp only [compl_setOf, not_not] at c
S : Type inst✝⁵ : TopologicalSpace S cs : ChartedSpace ℂ S inst✝⁴ : AnalyticManifold I S T : Type inst✝³ : TopologicalSpace T ct : ChartedSpace ℂ T inst✝² : AnalyticManifold I T U : Type inst✝¹ : TopologicalSpace U cu : ChartedSpace ℂ U inst✝ : AnalyticManifold I U f : ℂ → S → T fa : Holomorphic (I.prod I) I (uncurry f) c : IsClosed {p | ¬Critical (f p.1) p.2}ᶜ ⊢ IsClosed {p | Critical (f p.1) p.2}
S : Type inst✝⁵ : TopologicalSpace S cs : ChartedSpace ℂ S inst✝⁴ : AnalyticManifold I S T : Type inst✝³ : TopologicalSpace T ct : ChartedSpace ℂ T inst✝² : AnalyticManifold I T U : Type inst✝¹ : TopologicalSpace U cu : ChartedSpace ℂ U inst✝ : AnalyticManifold I U f : ℂ → S → T fa : Holomorphic (I.prod I) I (uncurry f) c : IsClosed {a | Critical (f a.1) a.2} ⊢ IsClosed {p | Critical (f p.1) p.2}
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: S : Type inst✝⁵ : TopologicalSpace S cs : ChartedSpace ℂ S inst✝⁴ : AnalyticManifold I S T : Type inst✝³ : TopologicalSpace T ct : ChartedSpace ℂ T inst✝² : AnalyticManifold I T U : Type inst✝¹ : TopologicalSpace U cu : ChartedSpace ℂ U inst✝ : AnalyticManifold I U f : ℂ → S → T fa : Holomorphic (I.prod I) I (uncurry f) c : IsClosed {p | ¬Critical (f p.1) p.2}ᶜ ⊢ IsClosed {p | Critical (f p.1) p.2} TACTIC:
https://github.com/girving/ray.git
0be790285dd0fce78913b0cb9bddaffa94bd25f9
Ray/AnalyticManifold/OneDimension.lean
isClosed_critical
[371, 1]
[374, 49]
exact c
S : Type inst✝⁵ : TopologicalSpace S cs : ChartedSpace ℂ S inst✝⁴ : AnalyticManifold I S T : Type inst✝³ : TopologicalSpace T ct : ChartedSpace ℂ T inst✝² : AnalyticManifold I T U : Type inst✝¹ : TopologicalSpace U cu : ChartedSpace ℂ U inst✝ : AnalyticManifold I U f : ℂ → S → T fa : Holomorphic (I.prod I) I (uncurry f) c : IsClosed {a | Critical (f a.1) a.2} ⊢ IsClosed {p | Critical (f p.1) p.2}
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: S : Type inst✝⁵ : TopologicalSpace S cs : ChartedSpace ℂ S inst✝⁴ : AnalyticManifold I S T : Type inst✝³ : TopologicalSpace T ct : ChartedSpace ℂ T inst✝² : AnalyticManifold I T U : Type inst✝¹ : TopologicalSpace U cu : ChartedSpace ℂ U inst✝ : AnalyticManifold I U f : ℂ → S → T fa : Holomorphic (I.prod I) I (uncurry f) c : IsClosed {a | Critical (f a.1) a.2} ⊢ IsClosed {p | Critical (f p.1) p.2} TACTIC:
https://github.com/girving/ray.git
0be790285dd0fce78913b0cb9bddaffa94bd25f9
Ray/AnalyticManifold/OneDimension.lean
osgoodManifold
[379, 1]
[404, 60]
rw [holomorphic_iff]
S : Type inst✝⁵ : TopologicalSpace S cs : ChartedSpace ℂ S inst✝⁴ : AnalyticManifold I S T : Type inst✝³ : TopologicalSpace T ct : ChartedSpace ℂ T inst✝² : AnalyticManifold I T U : Type inst✝¹ : TopologicalSpace U cu : ChartedSpace ℂ U inst✝ : AnalyticManifold I U f : S × T → U fc : Continuous f f0 : ∀ (x : S) (y : T), HolomorphicAt I I (fun x => f (x, y)) x f1 : ∀ (x : S) (y : T), HolomorphicAt I I (fun y => f (x, y)) y ⊢ Holomorphic (I.prod I) I f
S : Type inst✝⁵ : TopologicalSpace S cs : ChartedSpace ℂ S inst✝⁴ : AnalyticManifold I S T : Type inst✝³ : TopologicalSpace T ct : ChartedSpace ℂ T inst✝² : AnalyticManifold I T U : Type inst✝¹ : TopologicalSpace U cu : ChartedSpace ℂ U inst✝ : AnalyticManifold I U f : S × T → U fc : Continuous f f0 : ∀ (x : S) (y : T), HolomorphicAt I I (fun x => f (x, y)) x f1 : ∀ (x : S) (y : T), HolomorphicAt I I (fun y => f (x, y)) y ⊢ Continuous f ∧ ∀ (x : S × T), AnalyticAt ℂ (↑(extChartAt I (f x)) ∘ f ∘ ↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) x).symm) (↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) x) x)
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: S : Type inst✝⁵ : TopologicalSpace S cs : ChartedSpace ℂ S inst✝⁴ : AnalyticManifold I S T : Type inst✝³ : TopologicalSpace T ct : ChartedSpace ℂ T inst✝² : AnalyticManifold I T U : Type inst✝¹ : TopologicalSpace U cu : ChartedSpace ℂ U inst✝ : AnalyticManifold I U f : S × T → U fc : Continuous f f0 : ∀ (x : S) (y : T), HolomorphicAt I I (fun x => f (x, y)) x f1 : ∀ (x : S) (y : T), HolomorphicAt I I (fun y => f (x, y)) y ⊢ Holomorphic (I.prod I) I f TACTIC:
https://github.com/girving/ray.git
0be790285dd0fce78913b0cb9bddaffa94bd25f9
Ray/AnalyticManifold/OneDimension.lean
osgoodManifold
[379, 1]
[404, 60]
use fc
S : Type inst✝⁵ : TopologicalSpace S cs : ChartedSpace ℂ S inst✝⁴ : AnalyticManifold I S T : Type inst✝³ : TopologicalSpace T ct : ChartedSpace ℂ T inst✝² : AnalyticManifold I T U : Type inst✝¹ : TopologicalSpace U cu : ChartedSpace ℂ U inst✝ : AnalyticManifold I U f : S × T → U fc : Continuous f f0 : ∀ (x : S) (y : T), HolomorphicAt I I (fun x => f (x, y)) x f1 : ∀ (x : S) (y : T), HolomorphicAt I I (fun y => f (x, y)) y ⊢ Continuous f ∧ ∀ (x : S × T), AnalyticAt ℂ (↑(extChartAt I (f x)) ∘ f ∘ ↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) x).symm) (↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) x) x)
case right S : Type inst✝⁵ : TopologicalSpace S cs : ChartedSpace ℂ S inst✝⁴ : AnalyticManifold I S T : Type inst✝³ : TopologicalSpace T ct : ChartedSpace ℂ T inst✝² : AnalyticManifold I T U : Type inst✝¹ : TopologicalSpace U cu : ChartedSpace ℂ U inst✝ : AnalyticManifold I U f : S × T → U fc : Continuous f f0 : ∀ (x : S) (y : T), HolomorphicAt I I (fun x => f (x, y)) x f1 : ∀ (x : S) (y : T), HolomorphicAt I I (fun y => f (x, y)) y ⊢ ∀ (x : S × T), AnalyticAt ℂ (↑(extChartAt I (f x)) ∘ f ∘ ↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) x).symm) (↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) x) x)
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: S : Type inst✝⁵ : TopologicalSpace S cs : ChartedSpace ℂ S inst✝⁴ : AnalyticManifold I S T : Type inst✝³ : TopologicalSpace T ct : ChartedSpace ℂ T inst✝² : AnalyticManifold I T U : Type inst✝¹ : TopologicalSpace U cu : ChartedSpace ℂ U inst✝ : AnalyticManifold I U f : S × T → U fc : Continuous f f0 : ∀ (x : S) (y : T), HolomorphicAt I I (fun x => f (x, y)) x f1 : ∀ (x : S) (y : T), HolomorphicAt I I (fun y => f (x, y)) y ⊢ Continuous f ∧ ∀ (x : S × T), AnalyticAt ℂ (↑(extChartAt I (f x)) ∘ f ∘ ↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) x).symm) (↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) x) x) TACTIC:
https://github.com/girving/ray.git
0be790285dd0fce78913b0cb9bddaffa94bd25f9
Ray/AnalyticManifold/OneDimension.lean
osgoodManifold
[379, 1]
[404, 60]
intro p
case right S : Type inst✝⁵ : TopologicalSpace S cs : ChartedSpace ℂ S inst✝⁴ : AnalyticManifold I S T : Type inst✝³ : TopologicalSpace T ct : ChartedSpace ℂ T inst✝² : AnalyticManifold I T U : Type inst✝¹ : TopologicalSpace U cu : ChartedSpace ℂ U inst✝ : AnalyticManifold I U f : S × T → U fc : Continuous f f0 : ∀ (x : S) (y : T), HolomorphicAt I I (fun x => f (x, y)) x f1 : ∀ (x : S) (y : T), HolomorphicAt I I (fun y => f (x, y)) y ⊢ ∀ (x : S × T), AnalyticAt ℂ (↑(extChartAt I (f x)) ∘ f ∘ ↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) x).symm) (↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) x) x)
case right S : Type inst✝⁵ : TopologicalSpace S cs : ChartedSpace ℂ S inst✝⁴ : AnalyticManifold I S T : Type inst✝³ : TopologicalSpace T ct : ChartedSpace ℂ T inst✝² : AnalyticManifold I T U : Type inst✝¹ : TopologicalSpace U cu : ChartedSpace ℂ U inst✝ : AnalyticManifold I U f : S × T → U fc : Continuous f f0 : ∀ (x : S) (y : T), HolomorphicAt I I (fun x => f (x, y)) x f1 : ∀ (x : S) (y : T), HolomorphicAt I I (fun y => f (x, y)) y p : S × T ⊢ AnalyticAt ℂ (↑(extChartAt I (f p)) ∘ f ∘ ↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p).symm) (↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p) p)
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case right S : Type inst✝⁵ : TopologicalSpace S cs : ChartedSpace ℂ S inst✝⁴ : AnalyticManifold I S T : Type inst✝³ : TopologicalSpace T ct : ChartedSpace ℂ T inst✝² : AnalyticManifold I T U : Type inst✝¹ : TopologicalSpace U cu : ChartedSpace ℂ U inst✝ : AnalyticManifold I U f : S × T → U fc : Continuous f f0 : ∀ (x : S) (y : T), HolomorphicAt I I (fun x => f (x, y)) x f1 : ∀ (x : S) (y : T), HolomorphicAt I I (fun y => f (x, y)) y ⊢ ∀ (x : S × T), AnalyticAt ℂ (↑(extChartAt I (f x)) ∘ f ∘ ↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) x).symm) (↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) x) x) TACTIC:
https://github.com/girving/ray.git
0be790285dd0fce78913b0cb9bddaffa94bd25f9
Ray/AnalyticManifold/OneDimension.lean
osgoodManifold
[379, 1]
[404, 60]
apply osgood_at'
case right S : Type inst✝⁵ : TopologicalSpace S cs : ChartedSpace ℂ S inst✝⁴ : AnalyticManifold I S T : Type inst✝³ : TopologicalSpace T ct : ChartedSpace ℂ T inst✝² : AnalyticManifold I T U : Type inst✝¹ : TopologicalSpace U cu : ChartedSpace ℂ U inst✝ : AnalyticManifold I U f : S × T → U fc : Continuous f f0 : ∀ (x : S) (y : T), HolomorphicAt I I (fun x => f (x, y)) x f1 : ∀ (x : S) (y : T), HolomorphicAt I I (fun y => f (x, y)) y p : S × T ⊢ AnalyticAt ℂ (↑(extChartAt I (f p)) ∘ f ∘ ↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p).symm) (↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p) p)
case right.h S : Type inst✝⁵ : TopologicalSpace S cs : ChartedSpace ℂ S inst✝⁴ : AnalyticManifold I S T : Type inst✝³ : TopologicalSpace T ct : ChartedSpace ℂ T inst✝² : AnalyticManifold I T U : Type inst✝¹ : TopologicalSpace U cu : ChartedSpace ℂ U inst✝ : AnalyticManifold I U f : S × T → U fc : Continuous f f0 : ∀ (x : S) (y : T), HolomorphicAt I I (fun x => f (x, y)) x f1 : ∀ (x : S) (y : T), HolomorphicAt I I (fun y => f (x, y)) y p : S × T ⊢ ∀ᶠ (x : ℂ × ℂ) in 𝓝 (↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p) p), ContinuousAt (↑(extChartAt I (f p)) ∘ f ∘ ↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p).symm) x ∧ AnalyticAt ℂ (fun z => (↑(extChartAt I (f p)) ∘ f ∘ ↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p).symm) (z, x.2)) x.1 ∧ AnalyticAt ℂ (fun z => (↑(extChartAt I (f p)) ∘ f ∘ ↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p).symm) (x.1, z)) x.2
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case right S : Type inst✝⁵ : TopologicalSpace S cs : ChartedSpace ℂ S inst✝⁴ : AnalyticManifold I S T : Type inst✝³ : TopologicalSpace T ct : ChartedSpace ℂ T inst✝² : AnalyticManifold I T U : Type inst✝¹ : TopologicalSpace U cu : ChartedSpace ℂ U inst✝ : AnalyticManifold I U f : S × T → U fc : Continuous f f0 : ∀ (x : S) (y : T), HolomorphicAt I I (fun x => f (x, y)) x f1 : ∀ (x : S) (y : T), HolomorphicAt I I (fun y => f (x, y)) y p : S × T ⊢ AnalyticAt ℂ (↑(extChartAt I (f p)) ∘ f ∘ ↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p).symm) (↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p) p) TACTIC:
https://github.com/girving/ray.git
0be790285dd0fce78913b0cb9bddaffa94bd25f9
Ray/AnalyticManifold/OneDimension.lean
osgoodManifold
[379, 1]
[404, 60]
have fm : ∀ᶠ q in 𝓝 (extChartAt II p p), f ((extChartAt II p).symm q) ∈ (extChartAt I (f p)).source := by refine (fc.continuousAt.comp (continuousAt_extChartAt_symm II p)).eventually_mem ((isOpen_extChartAt_source I (f p)).mem_nhds ?_) simp only [Function.comp, (extChartAt II p).left_inv (mem_extChartAt_source _ _)] apply mem_extChartAt_source
case right.h S : Type inst✝⁵ : TopologicalSpace S cs : ChartedSpace ℂ S inst✝⁴ : AnalyticManifold I S T : Type inst✝³ : TopologicalSpace T ct : ChartedSpace ℂ T inst✝² : AnalyticManifold I T U : Type inst✝¹ : TopologicalSpace U cu : ChartedSpace ℂ U inst✝ : AnalyticManifold I U f : S × T → U fc : Continuous f f0 : ∀ (x : S) (y : T), HolomorphicAt I I (fun x => f (x, y)) x f1 : ∀ (x : S) (y : T), HolomorphicAt I I (fun y => f (x, y)) y p : S × T ⊢ ∀ᶠ (x : ℂ × ℂ) in 𝓝 (↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p) p), ContinuousAt (↑(extChartAt I (f p)) ∘ f ∘ ↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p).symm) x ∧ AnalyticAt ℂ (fun z => (↑(extChartAt I (f p)) ∘ f ∘ ↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p).symm) (z, x.2)) x.1 ∧ AnalyticAt ℂ (fun z => (↑(extChartAt I (f p)) ∘ f ∘ ↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p).symm) (x.1, z)) x.2
case right.h S : Type inst✝⁵ : TopologicalSpace S cs : ChartedSpace ℂ S inst✝⁴ : AnalyticManifold I S T : Type inst✝³ : TopologicalSpace T ct : ChartedSpace ℂ T inst✝² : AnalyticManifold I T U : Type inst✝¹ : TopologicalSpace U cu : ChartedSpace ℂ U inst✝ : AnalyticManifold I U f : S × T → U fc : Continuous f f0 : ∀ (x : S) (y : T), HolomorphicAt I I (fun x => f (x, y)) x f1 : ∀ (x : S) (y : T), HolomorphicAt I I (fun y => f (x, y)) y p : S × T fm : ∀ᶠ (q : ℂ × ℂ) in 𝓝 (↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p) p), f (↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p).symm q) ∈ (extChartAt I (f p)).source ⊢ ∀ᶠ (x : ℂ × ℂ) in 𝓝 (↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p) p), ContinuousAt (↑(extChartAt I (f p)) ∘ f ∘ ↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p).symm) x ∧ AnalyticAt ℂ (fun z => (↑(extChartAt I (f p)) ∘ f ∘ ↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p).symm) (z, x.2)) x.1 ∧ AnalyticAt ℂ (fun z => (↑(extChartAt I (f p)) ∘ f ∘ ↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p).symm) (x.1, z)) x.2
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case right.h S : Type inst✝⁵ : TopologicalSpace S cs : ChartedSpace ℂ S inst✝⁴ : AnalyticManifold I S T : Type inst✝³ : TopologicalSpace T ct : ChartedSpace ℂ T inst✝² : AnalyticManifold I T U : Type inst✝¹ : TopologicalSpace U cu : ChartedSpace ℂ U inst✝ : AnalyticManifold I U f : S × T → U fc : Continuous f f0 : ∀ (x : S) (y : T), HolomorphicAt I I (fun x => f (x, y)) x f1 : ∀ (x : S) (y : T), HolomorphicAt I I (fun y => f (x, y)) y p : S × T ⊢ ∀ᶠ (x : ℂ × ℂ) in 𝓝 (↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p) p), ContinuousAt (↑(extChartAt I (f p)) ∘ f ∘ ↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p).symm) x ∧ AnalyticAt ℂ (fun z => (↑(extChartAt I (f p)) ∘ f ∘ ↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p).symm) (z, x.2)) x.1 ∧ AnalyticAt ℂ (fun z => (↑(extChartAt I (f p)) ∘ f ∘ ↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p).symm) (x.1, z)) x.2 TACTIC:
https://github.com/girving/ray.git
0be790285dd0fce78913b0cb9bddaffa94bd25f9
Ray/AnalyticManifold/OneDimension.lean
osgoodManifold
[379, 1]
[404, 60]
apply ((isOpen_extChartAt_target II p).eventually_mem (mem_extChartAt_target II p)).mp
case right.h S : Type inst✝⁵ : TopologicalSpace S cs : ChartedSpace ℂ S inst✝⁴ : AnalyticManifold I S T : Type inst✝³ : TopologicalSpace T ct : ChartedSpace ℂ T inst✝² : AnalyticManifold I T U : Type inst✝¹ : TopologicalSpace U cu : ChartedSpace ℂ U inst✝ : AnalyticManifold I U f : S × T → U fc : Continuous f f0 : ∀ (x : S) (y : T), HolomorphicAt I I (fun x => f (x, y)) x f1 : ∀ (x : S) (y : T), HolomorphicAt I I (fun y => f (x, y)) y p : S × T fm : ∀ᶠ (q : ℂ × ℂ) in 𝓝 (↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p) p), f (↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p).symm q) ∈ (extChartAt I (f p)).source ⊢ ∀ᶠ (x : ℂ × ℂ) in 𝓝 (↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p) p), ContinuousAt (↑(extChartAt I (f p)) ∘ f ∘ ↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p).symm) x ∧ AnalyticAt ℂ (fun z => (↑(extChartAt I (f p)) ∘ f ∘ ↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p).symm) (z, x.2)) x.1 ∧ AnalyticAt ℂ (fun z => (↑(extChartAt I (f p)) ∘ f ∘ ↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p).symm) (x.1, z)) x.2
case right.h S : Type inst✝⁵ : TopologicalSpace S cs : ChartedSpace ℂ S inst✝⁴ : AnalyticManifold I S T : Type inst✝³ : TopologicalSpace T ct : ChartedSpace ℂ T inst✝² : AnalyticManifold I T U : Type inst✝¹ : TopologicalSpace U cu : ChartedSpace ℂ U inst✝ : AnalyticManifold I U f : S × T → U fc : Continuous f f0 : ∀ (x : S) (y : T), HolomorphicAt I I (fun x => f (x, y)) x f1 : ∀ (x : S) (y : T), HolomorphicAt I I (fun y => f (x, y)) y p : S × T fm : ∀ᶠ (q : ℂ × ℂ) in 𝓝 (↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p) p), f (↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p).symm q) ∈ (extChartAt I (f p)).source ⊢ ∀ᶠ (x : ℂ × ℂ) in 𝓝 (↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p) p), x ∈ (extChartAt (I.prod I) p).target → ContinuousAt (↑(extChartAt I (f p)) ∘ f ∘ ↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p).symm) x ∧ AnalyticAt ℂ (fun z => (↑(extChartAt I (f p)) ∘ f ∘ ↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p).symm) (z, x.2)) x.1 ∧ AnalyticAt ℂ (fun z => (↑(extChartAt I (f p)) ∘ f ∘ ↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p).symm) (x.1, z)) x.2
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case right.h S : Type inst✝⁵ : TopologicalSpace S cs : ChartedSpace ℂ S inst✝⁴ : AnalyticManifold I S T : Type inst✝³ : TopologicalSpace T ct : ChartedSpace ℂ T inst✝² : AnalyticManifold I T U : Type inst✝¹ : TopologicalSpace U cu : ChartedSpace ℂ U inst✝ : AnalyticManifold I U f : S × T → U fc : Continuous f f0 : ∀ (x : S) (y : T), HolomorphicAt I I (fun x => f (x, y)) x f1 : ∀ (x : S) (y : T), HolomorphicAt I I (fun y => f (x, y)) y p : S × T fm : ∀ᶠ (q : ℂ × ℂ) in 𝓝 (↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p) p), f (↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p).symm q) ∈ (extChartAt I (f p)).source ⊢ ∀ᶠ (x : ℂ × ℂ) in 𝓝 (↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p) p), ContinuousAt (↑(extChartAt I (f p)) ∘ f ∘ ↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p).symm) x ∧ AnalyticAt ℂ (fun z => (↑(extChartAt I (f p)) ∘ f ∘ ↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p).symm) (z, x.2)) x.1 ∧ AnalyticAt ℂ (fun z => (↑(extChartAt I (f p)) ∘ f ∘ ↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p).symm) (x.1, z)) x.2 TACTIC:
https://github.com/girving/ray.git
0be790285dd0fce78913b0cb9bddaffa94bd25f9
Ray/AnalyticManifold/OneDimension.lean
osgoodManifold
[379, 1]
[404, 60]
refine fm.mp (eventually_of_forall fun q fm m ↦ ⟨?_, ?_, ?_⟩)
case right.h S : Type inst✝⁵ : TopologicalSpace S cs : ChartedSpace ℂ S inst✝⁴ : AnalyticManifold I S T : Type inst✝³ : TopologicalSpace T ct : ChartedSpace ℂ T inst✝² : AnalyticManifold I T U : Type inst✝¹ : TopologicalSpace U cu : ChartedSpace ℂ U inst✝ : AnalyticManifold I U f : S × T → U fc : Continuous f f0 : ∀ (x : S) (y : T), HolomorphicAt I I (fun x => f (x, y)) x f1 : ∀ (x : S) (y : T), HolomorphicAt I I (fun y => f (x, y)) y p : S × T fm : ∀ᶠ (q : ℂ × ℂ) in 𝓝 (↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p) p), f (↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p).symm q) ∈ (extChartAt I (f p)).source ⊢ ∀ᶠ (x : ℂ × ℂ) in 𝓝 (↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p) p), x ∈ (extChartAt (I.prod I) p).target → ContinuousAt (↑(extChartAt I (f p)) ∘ f ∘ ↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p).symm) x ∧ AnalyticAt ℂ (fun z => (↑(extChartAt I (f p)) ∘ f ∘ ↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p).symm) (z, x.2)) x.1 ∧ AnalyticAt ℂ (fun z => (↑(extChartAt I (f p)) ∘ f ∘ ↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p).symm) (x.1, z)) x.2
case right.h.refine_1 S : Type inst✝⁵ : TopologicalSpace S cs : ChartedSpace ℂ S inst✝⁴ : AnalyticManifold I S T : Type inst✝³ : TopologicalSpace T ct : ChartedSpace ℂ T inst✝² : AnalyticManifold I T U : Type inst✝¹ : TopologicalSpace U cu : ChartedSpace ℂ U inst✝ : AnalyticManifold I U f : S × T → U fc : Continuous f f0 : ∀ (x : S) (y : T), HolomorphicAt I I (fun x => f (x, y)) x f1 : ∀ (x : S) (y : T), HolomorphicAt I I (fun y => f (x, y)) y p : S × T fm✝ : ∀ᶠ (q : ℂ × ℂ) in 𝓝 (↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p) p), f (↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p).symm q) ∈ (extChartAt I (f p)).source q : ℂ × ℂ fm : f (↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p).symm q) ∈ (extChartAt I (f p)).source m : q ∈ (extChartAt (I.prod I) p).target ⊢ ContinuousAt (↑(extChartAt I (f p)) ∘ f ∘ ↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p).symm) q case right.h.refine_2 S : Type inst✝⁵ : TopologicalSpace S cs : ChartedSpace ℂ S inst✝⁴ : AnalyticManifold I S T : Type inst✝³ : TopologicalSpace T ct : ChartedSpace ℂ T inst✝² : AnalyticManifold I T U : Type inst✝¹ : TopologicalSpace U cu : ChartedSpace ℂ U inst✝ : AnalyticManifold I U f : S × T → U fc : Continuous f f0 : ∀ (x : S) (y : T), HolomorphicAt I I (fun x => f (x, y)) x f1 : ∀ (x : S) (y : T), HolomorphicAt I I (fun y => f (x, y)) y p : S × T fm✝ : ∀ᶠ (q : ℂ × ℂ) in 𝓝 (↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p) p), f (↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p).symm q) ∈ (extChartAt I (f p)).source q : ℂ × ℂ fm : f (↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p).symm q) ∈ (extChartAt I (f p)).source m : q ∈ (extChartAt (I.prod I) p).target ⊢ AnalyticAt ℂ (fun z => (↑(extChartAt I (f p)) ∘ f ∘ ↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p).symm) (z, q.2)) q.1 case right.h.refine_3 S : Type inst✝⁵ : TopologicalSpace S cs : ChartedSpace ℂ S inst✝⁴ : AnalyticManifold I S T : Type inst✝³ : TopologicalSpace T ct : ChartedSpace ℂ T inst✝² : AnalyticManifold I T U : Type inst✝¹ : TopologicalSpace U cu : ChartedSpace ℂ U inst✝ : AnalyticManifold I U f : S × T → U fc : Continuous f f0 : ∀ (x : S) (y : T), HolomorphicAt I I (fun x => f (x, y)) x f1 : ∀ (x : S) (y : T), HolomorphicAt I I (fun y => f (x, y)) y p : S × T fm✝ : ∀ᶠ (q : ℂ × ℂ) in 𝓝 (↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p) p), f (↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p).symm q) ∈ (extChartAt I (f p)).source q : ℂ × ℂ fm : f (↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p).symm q) ∈ (extChartAt I (f p)).source m : q ∈ (extChartAt (I.prod I) p).target ⊢ AnalyticAt ℂ (fun z => (↑(extChartAt I (f p)) ∘ f ∘ ↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p).symm) (q.1, z)) q.2
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case right.h S : Type inst✝⁵ : TopologicalSpace S cs : ChartedSpace ℂ S inst✝⁴ : AnalyticManifold I S T : Type inst✝³ : TopologicalSpace T ct : ChartedSpace ℂ T inst✝² : AnalyticManifold I T U : Type inst✝¹ : TopologicalSpace U cu : ChartedSpace ℂ U inst✝ : AnalyticManifold I U f : S × T → U fc : Continuous f f0 : ∀ (x : S) (y : T), HolomorphicAt I I (fun x => f (x, y)) x f1 : ∀ (x : S) (y : T), HolomorphicAt I I (fun y => f (x, y)) y p : S × T fm : ∀ᶠ (q : ℂ × ℂ) in 𝓝 (↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p) p), f (↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p).symm q) ∈ (extChartAt I (f p)).source ⊢ ∀ᶠ (x : ℂ × ℂ) in 𝓝 (↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p) p), x ∈ (extChartAt (I.prod I) p).target → ContinuousAt (↑(extChartAt I (f p)) ∘ f ∘ ↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p).symm) x ∧ AnalyticAt ℂ (fun z => (↑(extChartAt I (f p)) ∘ f ∘ ↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p).symm) (z, x.2)) x.1 ∧ AnalyticAt ℂ (fun z => (↑(extChartAt I (f p)) ∘ f ∘ ↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p).symm) (x.1, z)) x.2 TACTIC:
https://github.com/girving/ray.git
0be790285dd0fce78913b0cb9bddaffa94bd25f9
Ray/AnalyticManifold/OneDimension.lean
osgoodManifold
[379, 1]
[404, 60]
refine (fc.continuousAt.comp (continuousAt_extChartAt_symm II p)).eventually_mem ((isOpen_extChartAt_source I (f p)).mem_nhds ?_)
S : Type inst✝⁵ : TopologicalSpace S cs : ChartedSpace ℂ S inst✝⁴ : AnalyticManifold I S T : Type inst✝³ : TopologicalSpace T ct : ChartedSpace ℂ T inst✝² : AnalyticManifold I T U : Type inst✝¹ : TopologicalSpace U cu : ChartedSpace ℂ U inst✝ : AnalyticManifold I U f : S × T → U fc : Continuous f f0 : ∀ (x : S) (y : T), HolomorphicAt I I (fun x => f (x, y)) x f1 : ∀ (x : S) (y : T), HolomorphicAt I I (fun y => f (x, y)) y p : S × T ⊢ ∀ᶠ (q : ℂ × ℂ) in 𝓝 (↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p) p), f (↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p).symm q) ∈ (extChartAt I (f p)).source
S : Type inst✝⁵ : TopologicalSpace S cs : ChartedSpace ℂ S inst✝⁴ : AnalyticManifold I S T : Type inst✝³ : TopologicalSpace T ct : ChartedSpace ℂ T inst✝² : AnalyticManifold I T U : Type inst✝¹ : TopologicalSpace U cu : ChartedSpace ℂ U inst✝ : AnalyticManifold I U f : S × T → U fc : Continuous f f0 : ∀ (x : S) (y : T), HolomorphicAt I I (fun x => f (x, y)) x f1 : ∀ (x : S) (y : T), HolomorphicAt I I (fun y => f (x, y)) y p : S × T ⊢ (f ∘ ↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p).symm) (↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p) p) ∈ (extChartAt I (f p)).source
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: S : Type inst✝⁵ : TopologicalSpace S cs : ChartedSpace ℂ S inst✝⁴ : AnalyticManifold I S T : Type inst✝³ : TopologicalSpace T ct : ChartedSpace ℂ T inst✝² : AnalyticManifold I T U : Type inst✝¹ : TopologicalSpace U cu : ChartedSpace ℂ U inst✝ : AnalyticManifold I U f : S × T → U fc : Continuous f f0 : ∀ (x : S) (y : T), HolomorphicAt I I (fun x => f (x, y)) x f1 : ∀ (x : S) (y : T), HolomorphicAt I I (fun y => f (x, y)) y p : S × T ⊢ ∀ᶠ (q : ℂ × ℂ) in 𝓝 (↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p) p), f (↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p).symm q) ∈ (extChartAt I (f p)).source TACTIC:
https://github.com/girving/ray.git
0be790285dd0fce78913b0cb9bddaffa94bd25f9
Ray/AnalyticManifold/OneDimension.lean
osgoodManifold
[379, 1]
[404, 60]
simp only [Function.comp, (extChartAt II p).left_inv (mem_extChartAt_source _ _)]
S : Type inst✝⁵ : TopologicalSpace S cs : ChartedSpace ℂ S inst✝⁴ : AnalyticManifold I S T : Type inst✝³ : TopologicalSpace T ct : ChartedSpace ℂ T inst✝² : AnalyticManifold I T U : Type inst✝¹ : TopologicalSpace U cu : ChartedSpace ℂ U inst✝ : AnalyticManifold I U f : S × T → U fc : Continuous f f0 : ∀ (x : S) (y : T), HolomorphicAt I I (fun x => f (x, y)) x f1 : ∀ (x : S) (y : T), HolomorphicAt I I (fun y => f (x, y)) y p : S × T ⊢ (f ∘ ↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p).symm) (↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p) p) ∈ (extChartAt I (f p)).source
S : Type inst✝⁵ : TopologicalSpace S cs : ChartedSpace ℂ S inst✝⁴ : AnalyticManifold I S T : Type inst✝³ : TopologicalSpace T ct : ChartedSpace ℂ T inst✝² : AnalyticManifold I T U : Type inst✝¹ : TopologicalSpace U cu : ChartedSpace ℂ U inst✝ : AnalyticManifold I U f : S × T → U fc : Continuous f f0 : ∀ (x : S) (y : T), HolomorphicAt I I (fun x => f (x, y)) x f1 : ∀ (x : S) (y : T), HolomorphicAt I I (fun y => f (x, y)) y p : S × T ⊢ f p ∈ (extChartAt I (f p)).source
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: S : Type inst✝⁵ : TopologicalSpace S cs : ChartedSpace ℂ S inst✝⁴ : AnalyticManifold I S T : Type inst✝³ : TopologicalSpace T ct : ChartedSpace ℂ T inst✝² : AnalyticManifold I T U : Type inst✝¹ : TopologicalSpace U cu : ChartedSpace ℂ U inst✝ : AnalyticManifold I U f : S × T → U fc : Continuous f f0 : ∀ (x : S) (y : T), HolomorphicAt I I (fun x => f (x, y)) x f1 : ∀ (x : S) (y : T), HolomorphicAt I I (fun y => f (x, y)) y p : S × T ⊢ (f ∘ ↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p).symm) (↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p) p) ∈ (extChartAt I (f p)).source TACTIC:
https://github.com/girving/ray.git
0be790285dd0fce78913b0cb9bddaffa94bd25f9
Ray/AnalyticManifold/OneDimension.lean
osgoodManifold
[379, 1]
[404, 60]
apply mem_extChartAt_source
S : Type inst✝⁵ : TopologicalSpace S cs : ChartedSpace ℂ S inst✝⁴ : AnalyticManifold I S T : Type inst✝³ : TopologicalSpace T ct : ChartedSpace ℂ T inst✝² : AnalyticManifold I T U : Type inst✝¹ : TopologicalSpace U cu : ChartedSpace ℂ U inst✝ : AnalyticManifold I U f : S × T → U fc : Continuous f f0 : ∀ (x : S) (y : T), HolomorphicAt I I (fun x => f (x, y)) x f1 : ∀ (x : S) (y : T), HolomorphicAt I I (fun y => f (x, y)) y p : S × T ⊢ f p ∈ (extChartAt I (f p)).source
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: S : Type inst✝⁵ : TopologicalSpace S cs : ChartedSpace ℂ S inst✝⁴ : AnalyticManifold I S T : Type inst✝³ : TopologicalSpace T ct : ChartedSpace ℂ T inst✝² : AnalyticManifold I T U : Type inst✝¹ : TopologicalSpace U cu : ChartedSpace ℂ U inst✝ : AnalyticManifold I U f : S × T → U fc : Continuous f f0 : ∀ (x : S) (y : T), HolomorphicAt I I (fun x => f (x, y)) x f1 : ∀ (x : S) (y : T), HolomorphicAt I I (fun y => f (x, y)) y p : S × T ⊢ f p ∈ (extChartAt I (f p)).source TACTIC:
https://github.com/girving/ray.git
0be790285dd0fce78913b0cb9bddaffa94bd25f9
Ray/AnalyticManifold/OneDimension.lean
osgoodManifold
[379, 1]
[404, 60]
exact (continuousAt_extChartAt' I fm).comp_of_eq (fc.continuousAt.comp (continuousAt_extChartAt_symm'' _ m)) rfl
case right.h.refine_1 S : Type inst✝⁵ : TopologicalSpace S cs : ChartedSpace ℂ S inst✝⁴ : AnalyticManifold I S T : Type inst✝³ : TopologicalSpace T ct : ChartedSpace ℂ T inst✝² : AnalyticManifold I T U : Type inst✝¹ : TopologicalSpace U cu : ChartedSpace ℂ U inst✝ : AnalyticManifold I U f : S × T → U fc : Continuous f f0 : ∀ (x : S) (y : T), HolomorphicAt I I (fun x => f (x, y)) x f1 : ∀ (x : S) (y : T), HolomorphicAt I I (fun y => f (x, y)) y p : S × T fm✝ : ∀ᶠ (q : ℂ × ℂ) in 𝓝 (↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p) p), f (↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p).symm q) ∈ (extChartAt I (f p)).source q : ℂ × ℂ fm : f (↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p).symm q) ∈ (extChartAt I (f p)).source m : q ∈ (extChartAt (I.prod I) p).target ⊢ ContinuousAt (↑(extChartAt I (f p)) ∘ f ∘ ↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p).symm) q
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case right.h.refine_1 S : Type inst✝⁵ : TopologicalSpace S cs : ChartedSpace ℂ S inst✝⁴ : AnalyticManifold I S T : Type inst✝³ : TopologicalSpace T ct : ChartedSpace ℂ T inst✝² : AnalyticManifold I T U : Type inst✝¹ : TopologicalSpace U cu : ChartedSpace ℂ U inst✝ : AnalyticManifold I U f : S × T → U fc : Continuous f f0 : ∀ (x : S) (y : T), HolomorphicAt I I (fun x => f (x, y)) x f1 : ∀ (x : S) (y : T), HolomorphicAt I I (fun y => f (x, y)) y p : S × T fm✝ : ∀ᶠ (q : ℂ × ℂ) in 𝓝 (↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p) p), f (↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p).symm q) ∈ (extChartAt I (f p)).source q : ℂ × ℂ fm : f (↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p).symm q) ∈ (extChartAt I (f p)).source m : q ∈ (extChartAt (I.prod I) p).target ⊢ ContinuousAt (↑(extChartAt I (f p)) ∘ f ∘ ↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p).symm) q TACTIC:
https://github.com/girving/ray.git
0be790285dd0fce78913b0cb9bddaffa94bd25f9
Ray/AnalyticManifold/OneDimension.lean
osgoodManifold
[379, 1]
[404, 60]
apply HolomorphicAt.analyticAt I I
case right.h.refine_2 S : Type inst✝⁵ : TopologicalSpace S cs : ChartedSpace ℂ S inst✝⁴ : AnalyticManifold I S T : Type inst✝³ : TopologicalSpace T ct : ChartedSpace ℂ T inst✝² : AnalyticManifold I T U : Type inst✝¹ : TopologicalSpace U cu : ChartedSpace ℂ U inst✝ : AnalyticManifold I U f : S × T → U fc : Continuous f f0 : ∀ (x : S) (y : T), HolomorphicAt I I (fun x => f (x, y)) x f1 : ∀ (x : S) (y : T), HolomorphicAt I I (fun y => f (x, y)) y p : S × T fm✝ : ∀ᶠ (q : ℂ × ℂ) in 𝓝 (↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p) p), f (↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p).symm q) ∈ (extChartAt I (f p)).source q : ℂ × ℂ fm : f (↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p).symm q) ∈ (extChartAt I (f p)).source m : q ∈ (extChartAt (I.prod I) p).target ⊢ AnalyticAt ℂ (fun z => (↑(extChartAt I (f p)) ∘ f ∘ ↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p).symm) (z, q.2)) q.1
case right.h.refine_2 S : Type inst✝⁵ : TopologicalSpace S cs : ChartedSpace ℂ S inst✝⁴ : AnalyticManifold I S T : Type inst✝³ : TopologicalSpace T ct : ChartedSpace ℂ T inst✝² : AnalyticManifold I T U : Type inst✝¹ : TopologicalSpace U cu : ChartedSpace ℂ U inst✝ : AnalyticManifold I U f : S × T → U fc : Continuous f f0 : ∀ (x : S) (y : T), HolomorphicAt I I (fun x => f (x, y)) x f1 : ∀ (x : S) (y : T), HolomorphicAt I I (fun y => f (x, y)) y p : S × T fm✝ : ∀ᶠ (q : ℂ × ℂ) in 𝓝 (↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p) p), f (↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p).symm q) ∈ (extChartAt I (f p)).source q : ℂ × ℂ fm : f (↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p).symm q) ∈ (extChartAt I (f p)).source m : q ∈ (extChartAt (I.prod I) p).target ⊢ HolomorphicAt I I (fun z => (↑(extChartAt I (f p)) ∘ f ∘ ↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p).symm) (z, q.2)) q.1
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case right.h.refine_2 S : Type inst✝⁵ : TopologicalSpace S cs : ChartedSpace ℂ S inst✝⁴ : AnalyticManifold I S T : Type inst✝³ : TopologicalSpace T ct : ChartedSpace ℂ T inst✝² : AnalyticManifold I T U : Type inst✝¹ : TopologicalSpace U cu : ChartedSpace ℂ U inst✝ : AnalyticManifold I U f : S × T → U fc : Continuous f f0 : ∀ (x : S) (y : T), HolomorphicAt I I (fun x => f (x, y)) x f1 : ∀ (x : S) (y : T), HolomorphicAt I I (fun y => f (x, y)) y p : S × T fm✝ : ∀ᶠ (q : ℂ × ℂ) in 𝓝 (↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p) p), f (↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p).symm q) ∈ (extChartAt I (f p)).source q : ℂ × ℂ fm : f (↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p).symm q) ∈ (extChartAt I (f p)).source m : q ∈ (extChartAt (I.prod I) p).target ⊢ AnalyticAt ℂ (fun z => (↑(extChartAt I (f p)) ∘ f ∘ ↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p).symm) (z, q.2)) q.1 TACTIC:
https://github.com/girving/ray.git
0be790285dd0fce78913b0cb9bddaffa94bd25f9
Ray/AnalyticManifold/OneDimension.lean
osgoodManifold
[379, 1]
[404, 60]
refine (HolomorphicAt.extChartAt fm).comp_of_eq ?_ rfl
case right.h.refine_2 S : Type inst✝⁵ : TopologicalSpace S cs : ChartedSpace ℂ S inst✝⁴ : AnalyticManifold I S T : Type inst✝³ : TopologicalSpace T ct : ChartedSpace ℂ T inst✝² : AnalyticManifold I T U : Type inst✝¹ : TopologicalSpace U cu : ChartedSpace ℂ U inst✝ : AnalyticManifold I U f : S × T → U fc : Continuous f f0 : ∀ (x : S) (y : T), HolomorphicAt I I (fun x => f (x, y)) x f1 : ∀ (x : S) (y : T), HolomorphicAt I I (fun y => f (x, y)) y p : S × T fm✝ : ∀ᶠ (q : ℂ × ℂ) in 𝓝 (↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p) p), f (↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p).symm q) ∈ (extChartAt I (f p)).source q : ℂ × ℂ fm : f (↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p).symm q) ∈ (extChartAt I (f p)).source m : q ∈ (extChartAt (I.prod I) p).target ⊢ HolomorphicAt I I (fun z => (↑(extChartAt I (f p)) ∘ f ∘ ↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p).symm) (z, q.2)) q.1
case right.h.refine_2 S : Type inst✝⁵ : TopologicalSpace S cs : ChartedSpace ℂ S inst✝⁴ : AnalyticManifold I S T : Type inst✝³ : TopologicalSpace T ct : ChartedSpace ℂ T inst✝² : AnalyticManifold I T U : Type inst✝¹ : TopologicalSpace U cu : ChartedSpace ℂ U inst✝ : AnalyticManifold I U f : S × T → U fc : Continuous f f0 : ∀ (x : S) (y : T), HolomorphicAt I I (fun x => f (x, y)) x f1 : ∀ (x : S) (y : T), HolomorphicAt I I (fun y => f (x, y)) y p : S × T fm✝ : ∀ᶠ (q : ℂ × ℂ) in 𝓝 (↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p) p), f (↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p).symm q) ∈ (extChartAt I (f p)).source q : ℂ × ℂ fm : f (↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p).symm q) ∈ (extChartAt I (f p)).source m : q ∈ (extChartAt (I.prod I) p).target ⊢ HolomorphicAt I I (fun z => (f ∘ ↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p).symm) (z, q.2)) q.1
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case right.h.refine_2 S : Type inst✝⁵ : TopologicalSpace S cs : ChartedSpace ℂ S inst✝⁴ : AnalyticManifold I S T : Type inst✝³ : TopologicalSpace T ct : ChartedSpace ℂ T inst✝² : AnalyticManifold I T U : Type inst✝¹ : TopologicalSpace U cu : ChartedSpace ℂ U inst✝ : AnalyticManifold I U f : S × T → U fc : Continuous f f0 : ∀ (x : S) (y : T), HolomorphicAt I I (fun x => f (x, y)) x f1 : ∀ (x : S) (y : T), HolomorphicAt I I (fun y => f (x, y)) y p : S × T fm✝ : ∀ᶠ (q : ℂ × ℂ) in 𝓝 (↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p) p), f (↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p).symm q) ∈ (extChartAt I (f p)).source q : ℂ × ℂ fm : f (↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p).symm q) ∈ (extChartAt I (f p)).source m : q ∈ (extChartAt (I.prod I) p).target ⊢ HolomorphicAt I I (fun z => (↑(extChartAt I (f p)) ∘ f ∘ ↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p).symm) (z, q.2)) q.1 TACTIC:
https://github.com/girving/ray.git
0be790285dd0fce78913b0cb9bddaffa94bd25f9
Ray/AnalyticManifold/OneDimension.lean
osgoodManifold
[379, 1]
[404, 60]
rw [extChartAt_prod] at m
case right.h.refine_2 S : Type inst✝⁵ : TopologicalSpace S cs : ChartedSpace ℂ S inst✝⁴ : AnalyticManifold I S T : Type inst✝³ : TopologicalSpace T ct : ChartedSpace ℂ T inst✝² : AnalyticManifold I T U : Type inst✝¹ : TopologicalSpace U cu : ChartedSpace ℂ U inst✝ : AnalyticManifold I U f : S × T → U fc : Continuous f f0 : ∀ (x : S) (y : T), HolomorphicAt I I (fun x => f (x, y)) x f1 : ∀ (x : S) (y : T), HolomorphicAt I I (fun y => f (x, y)) y p : S × T fm✝ : ∀ᶠ (q : ℂ × ℂ) in 𝓝 (↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p) p), f (↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p).symm q) ∈ (extChartAt I (f p)).source q : ℂ × ℂ fm : f (↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p).symm q) ∈ (extChartAt I (f p)).source m : q ∈ (extChartAt (I.prod I) p).target ⊢ HolomorphicAt I I (fun z => (f ∘ ↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p).symm) (z, q.2)) q.1
case right.h.refine_2 S : Type inst✝⁵ : TopologicalSpace S cs : ChartedSpace ℂ S inst✝⁴ : AnalyticManifold I S T : Type inst✝³ : TopologicalSpace T ct : ChartedSpace ℂ T inst✝² : AnalyticManifold I T U : Type inst✝¹ : TopologicalSpace U cu : ChartedSpace ℂ U inst✝ : AnalyticManifold I U f : S × T → U fc : Continuous f f0 : ∀ (x : S) (y : T), HolomorphicAt I I (fun x => f (x, y)) x f1 : ∀ (x : S) (y : T), HolomorphicAt I I (fun y => f (x, y)) y p : S × T fm✝ : ∀ᶠ (q : ℂ × ℂ) in 𝓝 (↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p) p), f (↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p).symm q) ∈ (extChartAt I (f p)).source q : ℂ × ℂ fm : f (↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p).symm q) ∈ (extChartAt I (f p)).source m : q ∈ ((extChartAt I p.1).prod (extChartAt I p.2)).target ⊢ HolomorphicAt I I (fun z => (f ∘ ↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p).symm) (z, q.2)) q.1
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case right.h.refine_2 S : Type inst✝⁵ : TopologicalSpace S cs : ChartedSpace ℂ S inst✝⁴ : AnalyticManifold I S T : Type inst✝³ : TopologicalSpace T ct : ChartedSpace ℂ T inst✝² : AnalyticManifold I T U : Type inst✝¹ : TopologicalSpace U cu : ChartedSpace ℂ U inst✝ : AnalyticManifold I U f : S × T → U fc : Continuous f f0 : ∀ (x : S) (y : T), HolomorphicAt I I (fun x => f (x, y)) x f1 : ∀ (x : S) (y : T), HolomorphicAt I I (fun y => f (x, y)) y p : S × T fm✝ : ∀ᶠ (q : ℂ × ℂ) in 𝓝 (↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p) p), f (↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p).symm q) ∈ (extChartAt I (f p)).source q : ℂ × ℂ fm : f (↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p).symm q) ∈ (extChartAt I (f p)).source m : q ∈ (extChartAt (I.prod I) p).target ⊢ HolomorphicAt I I (fun z => (f ∘ ↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p).symm) (z, q.2)) q.1 TACTIC:
https://github.com/girving/ray.git
0be790285dd0fce78913b0cb9bddaffa94bd25f9
Ray/AnalyticManifold/OneDimension.lean
osgoodManifold
[379, 1]
[404, 60]
simp only [Function.comp, extChartAt_prod, PartialEquiv.prod_symm, PartialEquiv.prod_coe, PartialEquiv.prod_target, mem_prod_eq] at m ⊢
case right.h.refine_2 S : Type inst✝⁵ : TopologicalSpace S cs : ChartedSpace ℂ S inst✝⁴ : AnalyticManifold I S T : Type inst✝³ : TopologicalSpace T ct : ChartedSpace ℂ T inst✝² : AnalyticManifold I T U : Type inst✝¹ : TopologicalSpace U cu : ChartedSpace ℂ U inst✝ : AnalyticManifold I U f : S × T → U fc : Continuous f f0 : ∀ (x : S) (y : T), HolomorphicAt I I (fun x => f (x, y)) x f1 : ∀ (x : S) (y : T), HolomorphicAt I I (fun y => f (x, y)) y p : S × T fm✝ : ∀ᶠ (q : ℂ × ℂ) in 𝓝 (↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p) p), f (↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p).symm q) ∈ (extChartAt I (f p)).source q : ℂ × ℂ fm : f (↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p).symm q) ∈ (extChartAt I (f p)).source m : q ∈ ((extChartAt I p.1).prod (extChartAt I p.2)).target ⊢ HolomorphicAt I I (fun z => (f ∘ ↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p).symm) (z, q.2)) q.1
case right.h.refine_2 S : Type inst✝⁵ : TopologicalSpace S cs : ChartedSpace ℂ S inst✝⁴ : AnalyticManifold I S T : Type inst✝³ : TopologicalSpace T ct : ChartedSpace ℂ T inst✝² : AnalyticManifold I T U : Type inst✝¹ : TopologicalSpace U cu : ChartedSpace ℂ U inst✝ : AnalyticManifold I U f : S × T → U fc : Continuous f f0 : ∀ (x : S) (y : T), HolomorphicAt I I (fun x => f (x, y)) x f1 : ∀ (x : S) (y : T), HolomorphicAt I I (fun y => f (x, y)) y p : S × T fm✝ : ∀ᶠ (q : ℂ × ℂ) in 𝓝 (↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p) p), f (↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p).symm q) ∈ (extChartAt I (f p)).source q : ℂ × ℂ fm : f (↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p).symm q) ∈ (extChartAt I (f p)).source m : q.1 ∈ (extChartAt I p.1).target ∧ q.2 ∈ (extChartAt I p.2).target ⊢ HolomorphicAt I I (fun z => f (↑(extChartAt I p.1).symm z, ↑(extChartAt I p.2).symm q.2)) q.1
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case right.h.refine_2 S : Type inst✝⁵ : TopologicalSpace S cs : ChartedSpace ℂ S inst✝⁴ : AnalyticManifold I S T : Type inst✝³ : TopologicalSpace T ct : ChartedSpace ℂ T inst✝² : AnalyticManifold I T U : Type inst✝¹ : TopologicalSpace U cu : ChartedSpace ℂ U inst✝ : AnalyticManifold I U f : S × T → U fc : Continuous f f0 : ∀ (x : S) (y : T), HolomorphicAt I I (fun x => f (x, y)) x f1 : ∀ (x : S) (y : T), HolomorphicAt I I (fun y => f (x, y)) y p : S × T fm✝ : ∀ᶠ (q : ℂ × ℂ) in 𝓝 (↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p) p), f (↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p).symm q) ∈ (extChartAt I (f p)).source q : ℂ × ℂ fm : f (↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p).symm q) ∈ (extChartAt I (f p)).source m : q ∈ ((extChartAt I p.1).prod (extChartAt I p.2)).target ⊢ HolomorphicAt I I (fun z => (f ∘ ↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p).symm) (z, q.2)) q.1 TACTIC:
https://github.com/girving/ray.git
0be790285dd0fce78913b0cb9bddaffa94bd25f9
Ray/AnalyticManifold/OneDimension.lean
osgoodManifold
[379, 1]
[404, 60]
exact (f0 _ _).comp (HolomorphicAt.extChartAt_symm m.1)
case right.h.refine_2 S : Type inst✝⁵ : TopologicalSpace S cs : ChartedSpace ℂ S inst✝⁴ : AnalyticManifold I S T : Type inst✝³ : TopologicalSpace T ct : ChartedSpace ℂ T inst✝² : AnalyticManifold I T U : Type inst✝¹ : TopologicalSpace U cu : ChartedSpace ℂ U inst✝ : AnalyticManifold I U f : S × T → U fc : Continuous f f0 : ∀ (x : S) (y : T), HolomorphicAt I I (fun x => f (x, y)) x f1 : ∀ (x : S) (y : T), HolomorphicAt I I (fun y => f (x, y)) y p : S × T fm✝ : ∀ᶠ (q : ℂ × ℂ) in 𝓝 (↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p) p), f (↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p).symm q) ∈ (extChartAt I (f p)).source q : ℂ × ℂ fm : f (↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p).symm q) ∈ (extChartAt I (f p)).source m : q.1 ∈ (extChartAt I p.1).target ∧ q.2 ∈ (extChartAt I p.2).target ⊢ HolomorphicAt I I (fun z => f (↑(extChartAt I p.1).symm z, ↑(extChartAt I p.2).symm q.2)) q.1
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case right.h.refine_2 S : Type inst✝⁵ : TopologicalSpace S cs : ChartedSpace ℂ S inst✝⁴ : AnalyticManifold I S T : Type inst✝³ : TopologicalSpace T ct : ChartedSpace ℂ T inst✝² : AnalyticManifold I T U : Type inst✝¹ : TopologicalSpace U cu : ChartedSpace ℂ U inst✝ : AnalyticManifold I U f : S × T → U fc : Continuous f f0 : ∀ (x : S) (y : T), HolomorphicAt I I (fun x => f (x, y)) x f1 : ∀ (x : S) (y : T), HolomorphicAt I I (fun y => f (x, y)) y p : S × T fm✝ : ∀ᶠ (q : ℂ × ℂ) in 𝓝 (↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p) p), f (↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p).symm q) ∈ (extChartAt I (f p)).source q : ℂ × ℂ fm : f (↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p).symm q) ∈ (extChartAt I (f p)).source m : q.1 ∈ (extChartAt I p.1).target ∧ q.2 ∈ (extChartAt I p.2).target ⊢ HolomorphicAt I I (fun z => f (↑(extChartAt I p.1).symm z, ↑(extChartAt I p.2).symm q.2)) q.1 TACTIC:
https://github.com/girving/ray.git
0be790285dd0fce78913b0cb9bddaffa94bd25f9
Ray/AnalyticManifold/OneDimension.lean
osgoodManifold
[379, 1]
[404, 60]
apply HolomorphicAt.analyticAt I I
case right.h.refine_3 S : Type inst✝⁵ : TopologicalSpace S cs : ChartedSpace ℂ S inst✝⁴ : AnalyticManifold I S T : Type inst✝³ : TopologicalSpace T ct : ChartedSpace ℂ T inst✝² : AnalyticManifold I T U : Type inst✝¹ : TopologicalSpace U cu : ChartedSpace ℂ U inst✝ : AnalyticManifold I U f : S × T → U fc : Continuous f f0 : ∀ (x : S) (y : T), HolomorphicAt I I (fun x => f (x, y)) x f1 : ∀ (x : S) (y : T), HolomorphicAt I I (fun y => f (x, y)) y p : S × T fm✝ : ∀ᶠ (q : ℂ × ℂ) in 𝓝 (↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p) p), f (↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p).symm q) ∈ (extChartAt I (f p)).source q : ℂ × ℂ fm : f (↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p).symm q) ∈ (extChartAt I (f p)).source m : q ∈ (extChartAt (I.prod I) p).target ⊢ AnalyticAt ℂ (fun z => (↑(extChartAt I (f p)) ∘ f ∘ ↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p).symm) (q.1, z)) q.2
case right.h.refine_3 S : Type inst✝⁵ : TopologicalSpace S cs : ChartedSpace ℂ S inst✝⁴ : AnalyticManifold I S T : Type inst✝³ : TopologicalSpace T ct : ChartedSpace ℂ T inst✝² : AnalyticManifold I T U : Type inst✝¹ : TopologicalSpace U cu : ChartedSpace ℂ U inst✝ : AnalyticManifold I U f : S × T → U fc : Continuous f f0 : ∀ (x : S) (y : T), HolomorphicAt I I (fun x => f (x, y)) x f1 : ∀ (x : S) (y : T), HolomorphicAt I I (fun y => f (x, y)) y p : S × T fm✝ : ∀ᶠ (q : ℂ × ℂ) in 𝓝 (↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p) p), f (↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p).symm q) ∈ (extChartAt I (f p)).source q : ℂ × ℂ fm : f (↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p).symm q) ∈ (extChartAt I (f p)).source m : q ∈ (extChartAt (I.prod I) p).target ⊢ HolomorphicAt I I (fun z => (↑(extChartAt I (f p)) ∘ f ∘ ↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p).symm) (q.1, z)) q.2
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case right.h.refine_3 S : Type inst✝⁵ : TopologicalSpace S cs : ChartedSpace ℂ S inst✝⁴ : AnalyticManifold I S T : Type inst✝³ : TopologicalSpace T ct : ChartedSpace ℂ T inst✝² : AnalyticManifold I T U : Type inst✝¹ : TopologicalSpace U cu : ChartedSpace ℂ U inst✝ : AnalyticManifold I U f : S × T → U fc : Continuous f f0 : ∀ (x : S) (y : T), HolomorphicAt I I (fun x => f (x, y)) x f1 : ∀ (x : S) (y : T), HolomorphicAt I I (fun y => f (x, y)) y p : S × T fm✝ : ∀ᶠ (q : ℂ × ℂ) in 𝓝 (↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p) p), f (↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p).symm q) ∈ (extChartAt I (f p)).source q : ℂ × ℂ fm : f (↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p).symm q) ∈ (extChartAt I (f p)).source m : q ∈ (extChartAt (I.prod I) p).target ⊢ AnalyticAt ℂ (fun z => (↑(extChartAt I (f p)) ∘ f ∘ ↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p).symm) (q.1, z)) q.2 TACTIC:
https://github.com/girving/ray.git
0be790285dd0fce78913b0cb9bddaffa94bd25f9
Ray/AnalyticManifold/OneDimension.lean
osgoodManifold
[379, 1]
[404, 60]
refine (HolomorphicAt.extChartAt fm).comp_of_eq ?_ rfl
case right.h.refine_3 S : Type inst✝⁵ : TopologicalSpace S cs : ChartedSpace ℂ S inst✝⁴ : AnalyticManifold I S T : Type inst✝³ : TopologicalSpace T ct : ChartedSpace ℂ T inst✝² : AnalyticManifold I T U : Type inst✝¹ : TopologicalSpace U cu : ChartedSpace ℂ U inst✝ : AnalyticManifold I U f : S × T → U fc : Continuous f f0 : ∀ (x : S) (y : T), HolomorphicAt I I (fun x => f (x, y)) x f1 : ∀ (x : S) (y : T), HolomorphicAt I I (fun y => f (x, y)) y p : S × T fm✝ : ∀ᶠ (q : ℂ × ℂ) in 𝓝 (↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p) p), f (↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p).symm q) ∈ (extChartAt I (f p)).source q : ℂ × ℂ fm : f (↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p).symm q) ∈ (extChartAt I (f p)).source m : q ∈ (extChartAt (I.prod I) p).target ⊢ HolomorphicAt I I (fun z => (↑(extChartAt I (f p)) ∘ f ∘ ↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p).symm) (q.1, z)) q.2
case right.h.refine_3 S : Type inst✝⁵ : TopologicalSpace S cs : ChartedSpace ℂ S inst✝⁴ : AnalyticManifold I S T : Type inst✝³ : TopologicalSpace T ct : ChartedSpace ℂ T inst✝² : AnalyticManifold I T U : Type inst✝¹ : TopologicalSpace U cu : ChartedSpace ℂ U inst✝ : AnalyticManifold I U f : S × T → U fc : Continuous f f0 : ∀ (x : S) (y : T), HolomorphicAt I I (fun x => f (x, y)) x f1 : ∀ (x : S) (y : T), HolomorphicAt I I (fun y => f (x, y)) y p : S × T fm✝ : ∀ᶠ (q : ℂ × ℂ) in 𝓝 (↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p) p), f (↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p).symm q) ∈ (extChartAt I (f p)).source q : ℂ × ℂ fm : f (↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p).symm q) ∈ (extChartAt I (f p)).source m : q ∈ (extChartAt (I.prod I) p).target ⊢ HolomorphicAt I I (fun z => (f ∘ ↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p).symm) (q.1, z)) q.2
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case right.h.refine_3 S : Type inst✝⁵ : TopologicalSpace S cs : ChartedSpace ℂ S inst✝⁴ : AnalyticManifold I S T : Type inst✝³ : TopologicalSpace T ct : ChartedSpace ℂ T inst✝² : AnalyticManifold I T U : Type inst✝¹ : TopologicalSpace U cu : ChartedSpace ℂ U inst✝ : AnalyticManifold I U f : S × T → U fc : Continuous f f0 : ∀ (x : S) (y : T), HolomorphicAt I I (fun x => f (x, y)) x f1 : ∀ (x : S) (y : T), HolomorphicAt I I (fun y => f (x, y)) y p : S × T fm✝ : ∀ᶠ (q : ℂ × ℂ) in 𝓝 (↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p) p), f (↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p).symm q) ∈ (extChartAt I (f p)).source q : ℂ × ℂ fm : f (↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p).symm q) ∈ (extChartAt I (f p)).source m : q ∈ (extChartAt (I.prod I) p).target ⊢ HolomorphicAt I I (fun z => (↑(extChartAt I (f p)) ∘ f ∘ ↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p).symm) (q.1, z)) q.2 TACTIC:
https://github.com/girving/ray.git
0be790285dd0fce78913b0cb9bddaffa94bd25f9
Ray/AnalyticManifold/OneDimension.lean
osgoodManifold
[379, 1]
[404, 60]
rw [extChartAt_prod] at m
case right.h.refine_3 S : Type inst✝⁵ : TopologicalSpace S cs : ChartedSpace ℂ S inst✝⁴ : AnalyticManifold I S T : Type inst✝³ : TopologicalSpace T ct : ChartedSpace ℂ T inst✝² : AnalyticManifold I T U : Type inst✝¹ : TopologicalSpace U cu : ChartedSpace ℂ U inst✝ : AnalyticManifold I U f : S × T → U fc : Continuous f f0 : ∀ (x : S) (y : T), HolomorphicAt I I (fun x => f (x, y)) x f1 : ∀ (x : S) (y : T), HolomorphicAt I I (fun y => f (x, y)) y p : S × T fm✝ : ∀ᶠ (q : ℂ × ℂ) in 𝓝 (↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p) p), f (↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p).symm q) ∈ (extChartAt I (f p)).source q : ℂ × ℂ fm : f (↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p).symm q) ∈ (extChartAt I (f p)).source m : q ∈ (extChartAt (I.prod I) p).target ⊢ HolomorphicAt I I (fun z => (f ∘ ↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p).symm) (q.1, z)) q.2
case right.h.refine_3 S : Type inst✝⁵ : TopologicalSpace S cs : ChartedSpace ℂ S inst✝⁴ : AnalyticManifold I S T : Type inst✝³ : TopologicalSpace T ct : ChartedSpace ℂ T inst✝² : AnalyticManifold I T U : Type inst✝¹ : TopologicalSpace U cu : ChartedSpace ℂ U inst✝ : AnalyticManifold I U f : S × T → U fc : Continuous f f0 : ∀ (x : S) (y : T), HolomorphicAt I I (fun x => f (x, y)) x f1 : ∀ (x : S) (y : T), HolomorphicAt I I (fun y => f (x, y)) y p : S × T fm✝ : ∀ᶠ (q : ℂ × ℂ) in 𝓝 (↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p) p), f (↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p).symm q) ∈ (extChartAt I (f p)).source q : ℂ × ℂ fm : f (↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p).symm q) ∈ (extChartAt I (f p)).source m : q ∈ ((extChartAt I p.1).prod (extChartAt I p.2)).target ⊢ HolomorphicAt I I (fun z => (f ∘ ↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p).symm) (q.1, z)) q.2
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case right.h.refine_3 S : Type inst✝⁵ : TopologicalSpace S cs : ChartedSpace ℂ S inst✝⁴ : AnalyticManifold I S T : Type inst✝³ : TopologicalSpace T ct : ChartedSpace ℂ T inst✝² : AnalyticManifold I T U : Type inst✝¹ : TopologicalSpace U cu : ChartedSpace ℂ U inst✝ : AnalyticManifold I U f : S × T → U fc : Continuous f f0 : ∀ (x : S) (y : T), HolomorphicAt I I (fun x => f (x, y)) x f1 : ∀ (x : S) (y : T), HolomorphicAt I I (fun y => f (x, y)) y p : S × T fm✝ : ∀ᶠ (q : ℂ × ℂ) in 𝓝 (↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p) p), f (↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p).symm q) ∈ (extChartAt I (f p)).source q : ℂ × ℂ fm : f (↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p).symm q) ∈ (extChartAt I (f p)).source m : q ∈ (extChartAt (I.prod I) p).target ⊢ HolomorphicAt I I (fun z => (f ∘ ↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p).symm) (q.1, z)) q.2 TACTIC:
https://github.com/girving/ray.git
0be790285dd0fce78913b0cb9bddaffa94bd25f9
Ray/AnalyticManifold/OneDimension.lean
osgoodManifold
[379, 1]
[404, 60]
simp only [Function.comp, extChartAt_prod, PartialEquiv.prod_symm, PartialEquiv.prod_coe, PartialEquiv.prod_target, mem_prod_eq] at m ⊢
case right.h.refine_3 S : Type inst✝⁵ : TopologicalSpace S cs : ChartedSpace ℂ S inst✝⁴ : AnalyticManifold I S T : Type inst✝³ : TopologicalSpace T ct : ChartedSpace ℂ T inst✝² : AnalyticManifold I T U : Type inst✝¹ : TopologicalSpace U cu : ChartedSpace ℂ U inst✝ : AnalyticManifold I U f : S × T → U fc : Continuous f f0 : ∀ (x : S) (y : T), HolomorphicAt I I (fun x => f (x, y)) x f1 : ∀ (x : S) (y : T), HolomorphicAt I I (fun y => f (x, y)) y p : S × T fm✝ : ∀ᶠ (q : ℂ × ℂ) in 𝓝 (↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p) p), f (↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p).symm q) ∈ (extChartAt I (f p)).source q : ℂ × ℂ fm : f (↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p).symm q) ∈ (extChartAt I (f p)).source m : q ∈ ((extChartAt I p.1).prod (extChartAt I p.2)).target ⊢ HolomorphicAt I I (fun z => (f ∘ ↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p).symm) (q.1, z)) q.2
case right.h.refine_3 S : Type inst✝⁵ : TopologicalSpace S cs : ChartedSpace ℂ S inst✝⁴ : AnalyticManifold I S T : Type inst✝³ : TopologicalSpace T ct : ChartedSpace ℂ T inst✝² : AnalyticManifold I T U : Type inst✝¹ : TopologicalSpace U cu : ChartedSpace ℂ U inst✝ : AnalyticManifold I U f : S × T → U fc : Continuous f f0 : ∀ (x : S) (y : T), HolomorphicAt I I (fun x => f (x, y)) x f1 : ∀ (x : S) (y : T), HolomorphicAt I I (fun y => f (x, y)) y p : S × T fm✝ : ∀ᶠ (q : ℂ × ℂ) in 𝓝 (↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p) p), f (↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p).symm q) ∈ (extChartAt I (f p)).source q : ℂ × ℂ fm : f (↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p).symm q) ∈ (extChartAt I (f p)).source m : q.1 ∈ (extChartAt I p.1).target ∧ q.2 ∈ (extChartAt I p.2).target ⊢ HolomorphicAt I I (fun z => f (↑(extChartAt I p.1).symm q.1, ↑(extChartAt I p.2).symm z)) q.2
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case right.h.refine_3 S : Type inst✝⁵ : TopologicalSpace S cs : ChartedSpace ℂ S inst✝⁴ : AnalyticManifold I S T : Type inst✝³ : TopologicalSpace T ct : ChartedSpace ℂ T inst✝² : AnalyticManifold I T U : Type inst✝¹ : TopologicalSpace U cu : ChartedSpace ℂ U inst✝ : AnalyticManifold I U f : S × T → U fc : Continuous f f0 : ∀ (x : S) (y : T), HolomorphicAt I I (fun x => f (x, y)) x f1 : ∀ (x : S) (y : T), HolomorphicAt I I (fun y => f (x, y)) y p : S × T fm✝ : ∀ᶠ (q : ℂ × ℂ) in 𝓝 (↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p) p), f (↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p).symm q) ∈ (extChartAt I (f p)).source q : ℂ × ℂ fm : f (↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p).symm q) ∈ (extChartAt I (f p)).source m : q ∈ ((extChartAt I p.1).prod (extChartAt I p.2)).target ⊢ HolomorphicAt I I (fun z => (f ∘ ↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p).symm) (q.1, z)) q.2 TACTIC:
https://github.com/girving/ray.git
0be790285dd0fce78913b0cb9bddaffa94bd25f9
Ray/AnalyticManifold/OneDimension.lean
osgoodManifold
[379, 1]
[404, 60]
exact (f1 _ _).comp (HolomorphicAt.extChartAt_symm m.2)
case right.h.refine_3 S : Type inst✝⁵ : TopologicalSpace S cs : ChartedSpace ℂ S inst✝⁴ : AnalyticManifold I S T : Type inst✝³ : TopologicalSpace T ct : ChartedSpace ℂ T inst✝² : AnalyticManifold I T U : Type inst✝¹ : TopologicalSpace U cu : ChartedSpace ℂ U inst✝ : AnalyticManifold I U f : S × T → U fc : Continuous f f0 : ∀ (x : S) (y : T), HolomorphicAt I I (fun x => f (x, y)) x f1 : ∀ (x : S) (y : T), HolomorphicAt I I (fun y => f (x, y)) y p : S × T fm✝ : ∀ᶠ (q : ℂ × ℂ) in 𝓝 (↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p) p), f (↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p).symm q) ∈ (extChartAt I (f p)).source q : ℂ × ℂ fm : f (↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p).symm q) ∈ (extChartAt I (f p)).source m : q.1 ∈ (extChartAt I p.1).target ∧ q.2 ∈ (extChartAt I p.2).target ⊢ HolomorphicAt I I (fun z => f (↑(extChartAt I p.1).symm q.1, ↑(extChartAt I p.2).symm z)) q.2
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case right.h.refine_3 S : Type inst✝⁵ : TopologicalSpace S cs : ChartedSpace ℂ S inst✝⁴ : AnalyticManifold I S T : Type inst✝³ : TopologicalSpace T ct : ChartedSpace ℂ T inst✝² : AnalyticManifold I T U : Type inst✝¹ : TopologicalSpace U cu : ChartedSpace ℂ U inst✝ : AnalyticManifold I U f : S × T → U fc : Continuous f f0 : ∀ (x : S) (y : T), HolomorphicAt I I (fun x => f (x, y)) x f1 : ∀ (x : S) (y : T), HolomorphicAt I I (fun y => f (x, y)) y p : S × T fm✝ : ∀ᶠ (q : ℂ × ℂ) in 𝓝 (↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p) p), f (↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p).symm q) ∈ (extChartAt I (f p)).source q : ℂ × ℂ fm : f (↑(extChartAt (I.prod I) p).symm q) ∈ (extChartAt I (f p)).source m : q.1 ∈ (extChartAt I p.1).target ∧ q.2 ∈ (extChartAt I p.2).target ⊢ HolomorphicAt I I (fun z => f (↑(extChartAt I p.1).symm q.1, ↑(extChartAt I p.2).symm z)) q.2 TACTIC:
https://github.com/girving/ray.git
0be790285dd0fce78913b0cb9bddaffa94bd25f9
Ray/Dynamics/Multibrot/Specific.lean
exp_ofNat_lt
[14, 1]
[18, 84]
rw [←Real.exp_one_pow a]
a : ℕ b : ℝ a0 : autoParam (a ≠ 0) _auto✝ h0 : autoParam (2.7182818286 ^ a < b) _auto✝ ⊢ (↑a).exp < b
a : ℕ b : ℝ a0 : autoParam (a ≠ 0) _auto✝ h0 : autoParam (2.7182818286 ^ a < b) _auto✝ ⊢ exp 1 ^ a < b
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: a : ℕ b : ℝ a0 : autoParam (a ≠ 0) _auto✝ h0 : autoParam (2.7182818286 ^ a < b) _auto✝ ⊢ (↑a).exp < b TACTIC:
https://github.com/girving/ray.git
0be790285dd0fce78913b0cb9bddaffa94bd25f9
Ray/Dynamics/Multibrot/Specific.lean
exp_ofNat_lt
[14, 1]
[18, 84]
exact _root_.trans (pow_lt_pow_left Real.exp_one_lt_d9 (Real.exp_nonneg _) a0) h0
a : ℕ b : ℝ a0 : autoParam (a ≠ 0) _auto✝ h0 : autoParam (2.7182818286 ^ a < b) _auto✝ ⊢ exp 1 ^ a < b
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: a : ℕ b : ℝ a0 : autoParam (a ≠ 0) _auto✝ h0 : autoParam (2.7182818286 ^ a < b) _auto✝ ⊢ exp 1 ^ a < b TACTIC:
https://github.com/girving/ray.git
0be790285dd0fce78913b0cb9bddaffa94bd25f9
Ray/Dynamics/Multibrot/Specific.lean
exp_neg_ofNat_lt
[20, 1]
[26, 13]
rw [Real.exp_neg, inv_lt, ←Real.exp_one_pow a]
a : ℕ b : ℝ a0 : autoParam (a ≠ 0) _auto✝ b0 : autoParam (0 < b) _auto✝ h0 : autoParam (b⁻¹ < 2.7182818283 ^ a) _auto✝ ⊢ (-↑a).exp < b
a : ℕ b : ℝ a0 : autoParam (a ≠ 0) _auto✝ b0 : autoParam (0 < b) _auto✝ h0 : autoParam (b⁻¹ < 2.7182818283 ^ a) _auto✝ ⊢ b⁻¹ < exp 1 ^ a case ha a : ℕ b : ℝ a0 : autoParam (a ≠ 0) _auto✝ b0 : autoParam (0 < b) _auto✝ h0 : autoParam (b⁻¹ < 2.7182818283 ^ a) _auto✝ ⊢ 0 < (↑a).exp case hb a : ℕ b : ℝ a0 : autoParam (a ≠ 0) _auto✝ b0 : autoParam (0 < b) _auto✝ h0 : autoParam (b⁻¹ < 2.7182818283 ^ a) _auto✝ ⊢ 0 < b
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: a : ℕ b : ℝ a0 : autoParam (a ≠ 0) _auto✝ b0 : autoParam (0 < b) _auto✝ h0 : autoParam (b⁻¹ < 2.7182818283 ^ a) _auto✝ ⊢ (-↑a).exp < b TACTIC:
https://github.com/girving/ray.git
0be790285dd0fce78913b0cb9bddaffa94bd25f9
Ray/Dynamics/Multibrot/Specific.lean
exp_neg_ofNat_lt
[20, 1]
[26, 13]
exact _root_.trans h0 (pow_lt_pow_left Real.exp_one_gt_d9 (by norm_num) a0)
a : ℕ b : ℝ a0 : autoParam (a ≠ 0) _auto✝ b0 : autoParam (0 < b) _auto✝ h0 : autoParam (b⁻¹ < 2.7182818283 ^ a) _auto✝ ⊢ b⁻¹ < exp 1 ^ a
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: a : ℕ b : ℝ a0 : autoParam (a ≠ 0) _auto✝ b0 : autoParam (0 < b) _auto✝ h0 : autoParam (b⁻¹ < 2.7182818283 ^ a) _auto✝ ⊢ b⁻¹ < exp 1 ^ a TACTIC:
https://github.com/girving/ray.git
0be790285dd0fce78913b0cb9bddaffa94bd25f9
Ray/Dynamics/Multibrot/Specific.lean
exp_neg_ofNat_lt
[20, 1]
[26, 13]
norm_num
a : ℕ b : ℝ a0 : autoParam (a ≠ 0) _auto✝ b0 : autoParam (0 < b) _auto✝ h0 : autoParam (b⁻¹ < 2.7182818283 ^ a) _auto✝ ⊢ 0 ≤ 2.7182818283
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: a : ℕ b : ℝ a0 : autoParam (a ≠ 0) _auto✝ b0 : autoParam (0 < b) _auto✝ h0 : autoParam (b⁻¹ < 2.7182818283 ^ a) _auto✝ ⊢ 0 ≤ 2.7182818283 TACTIC:
https://github.com/girving/ray.git
0be790285dd0fce78913b0cb9bddaffa94bd25f9
Ray/Dynamics/Multibrot/Specific.lean
exp_neg_ofNat_lt
[20, 1]
[26, 13]
exact Real.exp_pos _
case ha a : ℕ b : ℝ a0 : autoParam (a ≠ 0) _auto✝ b0 : autoParam (0 < b) _auto✝ h0 : autoParam (b⁻¹ < 2.7182818283 ^ a) _auto✝ ⊢ 0 < (↑a).exp
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case ha a : ℕ b : ℝ a0 : autoParam (a ≠ 0) _auto✝ b0 : autoParam (0 < b) _auto✝ h0 : autoParam (b⁻¹ < 2.7182818283 ^ a) _auto✝ ⊢ 0 < (↑a).exp TACTIC:
https://github.com/girving/ray.git
0be790285dd0fce78913b0cb9bddaffa94bd25f9
Ray/Dynamics/Multibrot/Specific.lean
exp_neg_ofNat_lt
[20, 1]
[26, 13]
exact b0
case hb a : ℕ b : ℝ a0 : autoParam (a ≠ 0) _auto✝ b0 : autoParam (0 < b) _auto✝ h0 : autoParam (b⁻¹ < 2.7182818283 ^ a) _auto✝ ⊢ 0 < b
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case hb a : ℕ b : ℝ a0 : autoParam (a ≠ 0) _auto✝ b0 : autoParam (0 < b) _auto✝ h0 : autoParam (b⁻¹ < 2.7182818283 ^ a) _auto✝ ⊢ 0 < b TACTIC:
https://github.com/girving/ray.git
0be790285dd0fce78913b0cb9bddaffa94bd25f9
Ray/Dynamics/Multibrot/Specific.lean
lt_exp_ofNat
[28, 1]
[32, 78]
rw [←Real.exp_one_pow a]
a : ℕ b : ℝ a0 : autoParam (a ≠ 0) _auto✝ h0 : autoParam (b < 2.7182818283 ^ a) _auto✝ ⊢ b < (↑a).exp
a : ℕ b : ℝ a0 : autoParam (a ≠ 0) _auto✝ h0 : autoParam (b < 2.7182818283 ^ a) _auto✝ ⊢ b < exp 1 ^ a
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: a : ℕ b : ℝ a0 : autoParam (a ≠ 0) _auto✝ h0 : autoParam (b < 2.7182818283 ^ a) _auto✝ ⊢ b < (↑a).exp TACTIC:
https://github.com/girving/ray.git
0be790285dd0fce78913b0cb9bddaffa94bd25f9
Ray/Dynamics/Multibrot/Specific.lean
lt_exp_ofNat
[28, 1]
[32, 78]
exact _root_.trans h0 (pow_lt_pow_left Real.exp_one_gt_d9 (by norm_num) a0)
a : ℕ b : ℝ a0 : autoParam (a ≠ 0) _auto✝ h0 : autoParam (b < 2.7182818283 ^ a) _auto✝ ⊢ b < exp 1 ^ a
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: a : ℕ b : ℝ a0 : autoParam (a ≠ 0) _auto✝ h0 : autoParam (b < 2.7182818283 ^ a) _auto✝ ⊢ b < exp 1 ^ a TACTIC:
https://github.com/girving/ray.git
0be790285dd0fce78913b0cb9bddaffa94bd25f9
Ray/Dynamics/Multibrot/Specific.lean
lt_exp_ofNat
[28, 1]
[32, 78]
norm_num
a : ℕ b : ℝ a0 : autoParam (a ≠ 0) _auto✝ h0 : autoParam (b < 2.7182818283 ^ a) _auto✝ ⊢ 0 ≤ 2.7182818283
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: a : ℕ b : ℝ a0 : autoParam (a ≠ 0) _auto✝ h0 : autoParam (b < 2.7182818283 ^ a) _auto✝ ⊢ 0 ≤ 2.7182818283 TACTIC:
https://github.com/girving/ray.git
0be790285dd0fce78913b0cb9bddaffa94bd25f9
Ray/Dynamics/Multibrot/Specific.lean
lt_exp_div
[34, 1]
[44, 60]
have e : exp (a/b : ℝ) = exp 1 ^ (a / b : ℝ) := by rw [Real.exp_one_rpow]
a b : ℕ c : ℝ a0 : autoParam (a ≠ 0) _auto✝ b0 : autoParam (b ≠ 0) _auto✝ c0 : autoParam (0 < c) _auto✝ h0 : autoParam (c ^ b < 2.7182818283 ^ a) _auto✝ ⊢ c < (↑a / ↑b).exp
a b : ℕ c : ℝ a0 : autoParam (a ≠ 0) _auto✝ b0 : autoParam (b ≠ 0) _auto✝ c0 : autoParam (0 < c) _auto✝ h0 : autoParam (c ^ b < 2.7182818283 ^ a) _auto✝ e : (↑a / ↑b).exp = exp 1 ^ (↑a / ↑b) ⊢ c < (↑a / ↑b).exp
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: a b : ℕ c : ℝ a0 : autoParam (a ≠ 0) _auto✝ b0 : autoParam (b ≠ 0) _auto✝ c0 : autoParam (0 < c) _auto✝ h0 : autoParam (c ^ b < 2.7182818283 ^ a) _auto✝ ⊢ c < (↑a / ↑b).exp TACTIC:
https://github.com/girving/ray.git
0be790285dd0fce78913b0cb9bddaffa94bd25f9
Ray/Dynamics/Multibrot/Specific.lean
lt_exp_div
[34, 1]
[44, 60]
rw [e, div_eq_mul_inv, Real.rpow_mul (Real.exp_nonneg _), Real.lt_rpow_inv_iff_of_pos, Real.rpow_natCast, Real.rpow_natCast]
a b : ℕ c : ℝ a0 : autoParam (a ≠ 0) _auto✝ b0 : autoParam (b ≠ 0) _auto✝ c0 : autoParam (0 < c) _auto✝ h0 : autoParam (c ^ b < 2.7182818283 ^ a) _auto✝ e : (↑a / ↑b).exp = exp 1 ^ (↑a / ↑b) ⊢ c < (↑a / ↑b).exp
a b : ℕ c : ℝ a0 : autoParam (a ≠ 0) _auto✝ b0 : autoParam (b ≠ 0) _auto✝ c0 : autoParam (0 < c) _auto✝ h0 : autoParam (c ^ b < 2.7182818283 ^ a) _auto✝ e : (↑a / ↑b).exp = exp 1 ^ (↑a / ↑b) ⊢ c ^ b < exp 1 ^ a case hx a b : ℕ c : ℝ a0 : autoParam (a ≠ 0) _auto✝ b0 : autoParam (b ≠ 0) _auto✝ c0 : autoParam (0 < c) _auto✝ h0 : autoParam (c ^ b < 2.7182818283 ^ a) _auto✝ e : (↑a / ↑b).exp = exp 1 ^ (↑a / ↑b) ⊢ 0 ≤ c case hy a b : ℕ c : ℝ a0 : autoParam (a ≠ 0) _auto✝ b0 : autoParam (b ≠ 0) _auto✝ c0 : autoParam (0 < c) _auto✝ h0 : autoParam (c ^ b < 2.7182818283 ^ a) _auto✝ e : (↑a / ↑b).exp = exp 1 ^ (↑a / ↑b) ⊢ 0 ≤ exp 1 ^ ↑a case hz a b : ℕ c : ℝ a0 : autoParam (a ≠ 0) _auto✝ b0 : autoParam (b ≠ 0) _auto✝ c0 : autoParam (0 < c) _auto✝ h0 : autoParam (c ^ b < 2.7182818283 ^ a) _auto✝ e : (↑a / ↑b).exp = exp 1 ^ (↑a / ↑b) ⊢ 0 < ↑b
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: a b : ℕ c : ℝ a0 : autoParam (a ≠ 0) _auto✝ b0 : autoParam (b ≠ 0) _auto✝ c0 : autoParam (0 < c) _auto✝ h0 : autoParam (c ^ b < 2.7182818283 ^ a) _auto✝ e : (↑a / ↑b).exp = exp 1 ^ (↑a / ↑b) ⊢ c < (↑a / ↑b).exp TACTIC:
https://github.com/girving/ray.git
0be790285dd0fce78913b0cb9bddaffa94bd25f9
Ray/Dynamics/Multibrot/Specific.lean
lt_exp_div
[34, 1]
[44, 60]
rw [Real.exp_one_rpow]
a b : ℕ c : ℝ a0 : autoParam (a ≠ 0) _auto✝ b0 : autoParam (b ≠ 0) _auto✝ c0 : autoParam (0 < c) _auto✝ h0 : autoParam (c ^ b < 2.7182818283 ^ a) _auto✝ ⊢ (↑a / ↑b).exp = exp 1 ^ (↑a / ↑b)
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: a b : ℕ c : ℝ a0 : autoParam (a ≠ 0) _auto✝ b0 : autoParam (b ≠ 0) _auto✝ c0 : autoParam (0 < c) _auto✝ h0 : autoParam (c ^ b < 2.7182818283 ^ a) _auto✝ ⊢ (↑a / ↑b).exp = exp 1 ^ (↑a / ↑b) TACTIC:
https://github.com/girving/ray.git
0be790285dd0fce78913b0cb9bddaffa94bd25f9
Ray/Dynamics/Multibrot/Specific.lean
lt_exp_div
[34, 1]
[44, 60]
exact _root_.trans h0 (pow_lt_pow_left Real.exp_one_gt_d9 (by norm_num) a0)
a b : ℕ c : ℝ a0 : autoParam (a ≠ 0) _auto✝ b0 : autoParam (b ≠ 0) _auto✝ c0 : autoParam (0 < c) _auto✝ h0 : autoParam (c ^ b < 2.7182818283 ^ a) _auto✝ e : (↑a / ↑b).exp = exp 1 ^ (↑a / ↑b) ⊢ c ^ b < exp 1 ^ a
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: a b : ℕ c : ℝ a0 : autoParam (a ≠ 0) _auto✝ b0 : autoParam (b ≠ 0) _auto✝ c0 : autoParam (0 < c) _auto✝ h0 : autoParam (c ^ b < 2.7182818283 ^ a) _auto✝ e : (↑a / ↑b).exp = exp 1 ^ (↑a / ↑b) ⊢ c ^ b < exp 1 ^ a TACTIC:
https://github.com/girving/ray.git
0be790285dd0fce78913b0cb9bddaffa94bd25f9
Ray/Dynamics/Multibrot/Specific.lean
lt_exp_div
[34, 1]
[44, 60]
norm_num
a b : ℕ c : ℝ a0 : autoParam (a ≠ 0) _auto✝ b0 : autoParam (b ≠ 0) _auto✝ c0 : autoParam (0 < c) _auto✝ h0 : autoParam (c ^ b < 2.7182818283 ^ a) _auto✝ e : (↑a / ↑b).exp = exp 1 ^ (↑a / ↑b) ⊢ 0 ≤ 2.7182818283
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: a b : ℕ c : ℝ a0 : autoParam (a ≠ 0) _auto✝ b0 : autoParam (b ≠ 0) _auto✝ c0 : autoParam (0 < c) _auto✝ h0 : autoParam (c ^ b < 2.7182818283 ^ a) _auto✝ e : (↑a / ↑b).exp = exp 1 ^ (↑a / ↑b) ⊢ 0 ≤ 2.7182818283 TACTIC:
https://github.com/girving/ray.git
0be790285dd0fce78913b0cb9bddaffa94bd25f9
Ray/Dynamics/Multibrot/Specific.lean
lt_exp_div
[34, 1]
[44, 60]
exact c0.le
case hx a b : ℕ c : ℝ a0 : autoParam (a ≠ 0) _auto✝ b0 : autoParam (b ≠ 0) _auto✝ c0 : autoParam (0 < c) _auto✝ h0 : autoParam (c ^ b < 2.7182818283 ^ a) _auto✝ e : (↑a / ↑b).exp = exp 1 ^ (↑a / ↑b) ⊢ 0 ≤ c
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case hx a b : ℕ c : ℝ a0 : autoParam (a ≠ 0) _auto✝ b0 : autoParam (b ≠ 0) _auto✝ c0 : autoParam (0 < c) _auto✝ h0 : autoParam (c ^ b < 2.7182818283 ^ a) _auto✝ e : (↑a / ↑b).exp = exp 1 ^ (↑a / ↑b) ⊢ 0 ≤ c TACTIC:
https://github.com/girving/ray.git
0be790285dd0fce78913b0cb9bddaffa94bd25f9
Ray/Dynamics/Multibrot/Specific.lean
lt_exp_div
[34, 1]
[44, 60]
apply Real.rpow_nonneg (Real.exp_nonneg _)
case hy a b : ℕ c : ℝ a0 : autoParam (a ≠ 0) _auto✝ b0 : autoParam (b ≠ 0) _auto✝ c0 : autoParam (0 < c) _auto✝ h0 : autoParam (c ^ b < 2.7182818283 ^ a) _auto✝ e : (↑a / ↑b).exp = exp 1 ^ (↑a / ↑b) ⊢ 0 ≤ exp 1 ^ ↑a
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case hy a b : ℕ c : ℝ a0 : autoParam (a ≠ 0) _auto✝ b0 : autoParam (b ≠ 0) _auto✝ c0 : autoParam (0 < c) _auto✝ h0 : autoParam (c ^ b < 2.7182818283 ^ a) _auto✝ e : (↑a / ↑b).exp = exp 1 ^ (↑a / ↑b) ⊢ 0 ≤ exp 1 ^ ↑a TACTIC:
https://github.com/girving/ray.git
0be790285dd0fce78913b0cb9bddaffa94bd25f9
Ray/Dynamics/Multibrot/Specific.lean
lt_exp_div
[34, 1]
[44, 60]
simp only [Nat.cast_pos, Nat.pos_iff_ne_zero]
case hz a b : ℕ c : ℝ a0 : autoParam (a ≠ 0) _auto✝ b0 : autoParam (b ≠ 0) _auto✝ c0 : autoParam (0 < c) _auto✝ h0 : autoParam (c ^ b < 2.7182818283 ^ a) _auto✝ e : (↑a / ↑b).exp = exp 1 ^ (↑a / ↑b) ⊢ 0 < ↑b
case hz a b : ℕ c : ℝ a0 : autoParam (a ≠ 0) _auto✝ b0 : autoParam (b ≠ 0) _auto✝ c0 : autoParam (0 < c) _auto✝ h0 : autoParam (c ^ b < 2.7182818283 ^ a) _auto✝ e : (↑a / ↑b).exp = exp 1 ^ (↑a / ↑b) ⊢ b ≠ 0
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case hz a b : ℕ c : ℝ a0 : autoParam (a ≠ 0) _auto✝ b0 : autoParam (b ≠ 0) _auto✝ c0 : autoParam (0 < c) _auto✝ h0 : autoParam (c ^ b < 2.7182818283 ^ a) _auto✝ e : (↑a / ↑b).exp = exp 1 ^ (↑a / ↑b) ⊢ 0 < ↑b TACTIC:
https://github.com/girving/ray.git
0be790285dd0fce78913b0cb9bddaffa94bd25f9
Ray/Dynamics/Multibrot/Specific.lean
lt_exp_div
[34, 1]
[44, 60]
exact b0
case hz a b : ℕ c : ℝ a0 : autoParam (a ≠ 0) _auto✝ b0 : autoParam (b ≠ 0) _auto✝ c0 : autoParam (0 < c) _auto✝ h0 : autoParam (c ^ b < 2.7182818283 ^ a) _auto✝ e : (↑a / ↑b).exp = exp 1 ^ (↑a / ↑b) ⊢ b ≠ 0
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case hz a b : ℕ c : ℝ a0 : autoParam (a ≠ 0) _auto✝ b0 : autoParam (b ≠ 0) _auto✝ c0 : autoParam (0 < c) _auto✝ h0 : autoParam (c ^ b < 2.7182818283 ^ a) _auto✝ e : (↑a / ↑b).exp = exp 1 ^ (↑a / ↑b) ⊢ b ≠ 0 TACTIC:
https://github.com/girving/ray.git
0be790285dd0fce78913b0cb9bddaffa94bd25f9
Ray/Dynamics/Multibrot/Specific.lean
exp_div_lt
[46, 1]
[56, 60]
have e : exp (a/b : ℝ) = exp 1 ^ (a / b : ℝ) := by rw [Real.exp_one_rpow]
a b : ℕ c : ℝ a0 : autoParam (a ≠ 0) _auto✝ b0 : autoParam (b ≠ 0) _auto✝ c0 : autoParam (0 < c) _auto✝ h0 : autoParam (2.7182818286 ^ a < c ^ b) _auto✝ ⊢ (↑a / ↑b).exp < c
a b : ℕ c : ℝ a0 : autoParam (a ≠ 0) _auto✝ b0 : autoParam (b ≠ 0) _auto✝ c0 : autoParam (0 < c) _auto✝ h0 : autoParam (2.7182818286 ^ a < c ^ b) _auto✝ e : (↑a / ↑b).exp = exp 1 ^ (↑a / ↑b) ⊢ (↑a / ↑b).exp < c
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: a b : ℕ c : ℝ a0 : autoParam (a ≠ 0) _auto✝ b0 : autoParam (b ≠ 0) _auto✝ c0 : autoParam (0 < c) _auto✝ h0 : autoParam (2.7182818286 ^ a < c ^ b) _auto✝ ⊢ (↑a / ↑b).exp < c TACTIC:
https://github.com/girving/ray.git
0be790285dd0fce78913b0cb9bddaffa94bd25f9
Ray/Dynamics/Multibrot/Specific.lean
exp_div_lt
[46, 1]
[56, 60]
rw [e, div_eq_mul_inv, Real.rpow_mul (Real.exp_nonneg _), Real.rpow_inv_lt_iff_of_pos, Real.rpow_natCast, Real.rpow_natCast]
a b : ℕ c : ℝ a0 : autoParam (a ≠ 0) _auto✝ b0 : autoParam (b ≠ 0) _auto✝ c0 : autoParam (0 < c) _auto✝ h0 : autoParam (2.7182818286 ^ a < c ^ b) _auto✝ e : (↑a / ↑b).exp = exp 1 ^ (↑a / ↑b) ⊢ (↑a / ↑b).exp < c
a b : ℕ c : ℝ a0 : autoParam (a ≠ 0) _auto✝ b0 : autoParam (b ≠ 0) _auto✝ c0 : autoParam (0 < c) _auto✝ h0 : autoParam (2.7182818286 ^ a < c ^ b) _auto✝ e : (↑a / ↑b).exp = exp 1 ^ (↑a / ↑b) ⊢ exp 1 ^ a < c ^ b case hx a b : ℕ c : ℝ a0 : autoParam (a ≠ 0) _auto✝ b0 : autoParam (b ≠ 0) _auto✝ c0 : autoParam (0 < c) _auto✝ h0 : autoParam (2.7182818286 ^ a < c ^ b) _auto✝ e : (↑a / ↑b).exp = exp 1 ^ (↑a / ↑b) ⊢ 0 ≤ exp 1 ^ ↑a case hy a b : ℕ c : ℝ a0 : autoParam (a ≠ 0) _auto✝ b0 : autoParam (b ≠ 0) _auto✝ c0 : autoParam (0 < c) _auto✝ h0 : autoParam (2.7182818286 ^ a < c ^ b) _auto✝ e : (↑a / ↑b).exp = exp 1 ^ (↑a / ↑b) ⊢ 0 ≤ c case hz a b : ℕ c : ℝ a0 : autoParam (a ≠ 0) _auto✝ b0 : autoParam (b ≠ 0) _auto✝ c0 : autoParam (0 < c) _auto✝ h0 : autoParam (2.7182818286 ^ a < c ^ b) _auto✝ e : (↑a / ↑b).exp = exp 1 ^ (↑a / ↑b) ⊢ 0 < ↑b
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: a b : ℕ c : ℝ a0 : autoParam (a ≠ 0) _auto✝ b0 : autoParam (b ≠ 0) _auto✝ c0 : autoParam (0 < c) _auto✝ h0 : autoParam (2.7182818286 ^ a < c ^ b) _auto✝ e : (↑a / ↑b).exp = exp 1 ^ (↑a / ↑b) ⊢ (↑a / ↑b).exp < c TACTIC:
https://github.com/girving/ray.git
0be790285dd0fce78913b0cb9bddaffa94bd25f9
Ray/Dynamics/Multibrot/Specific.lean
exp_div_lt
[46, 1]
[56, 60]
rw [Real.exp_one_rpow]
a b : ℕ c : ℝ a0 : autoParam (a ≠ 0) _auto✝ b0 : autoParam (b ≠ 0) _auto✝ c0 : autoParam (0 < c) _auto✝ h0 : autoParam (2.7182818286 ^ a < c ^ b) _auto✝ ⊢ (↑a / ↑b).exp = exp 1 ^ (↑a / ↑b)
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: a b : ℕ c : ℝ a0 : autoParam (a ≠ 0) _auto✝ b0 : autoParam (b ≠ 0) _auto✝ c0 : autoParam (0 < c) _auto✝ h0 : autoParam (2.7182818286 ^ a < c ^ b) _auto✝ ⊢ (↑a / ↑b).exp = exp 1 ^ (↑a / ↑b) TACTIC:
https://github.com/girving/ray.git
0be790285dd0fce78913b0cb9bddaffa94bd25f9
Ray/Dynamics/Multibrot/Specific.lean
exp_div_lt
[46, 1]
[56, 60]
exact _root_.trans (pow_lt_pow_left Real.exp_one_lt_d9 (Real.exp_nonneg _) a0) h0
a b : ℕ c : ℝ a0 : autoParam (a ≠ 0) _auto✝ b0 : autoParam (b ≠ 0) _auto✝ c0 : autoParam (0 < c) _auto✝ h0 : autoParam (2.7182818286 ^ a < c ^ b) _auto✝ e : (↑a / ↑b).exp = exp 1 ^ (↑a / ↑b) ⊢ exp 1 ^ a < c ^ b
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: a b : ℕ c : ℝ a0 : autoParam (a ≠ 0) _auto✝ b0 : autoParam (b ≠ 0) _auto✝ c0 : autoParam (0 < c) _auto✝ h0 : autoParam (2.7182818286 ^ a < c ^ b) _auto✝ e : (↑a / ↑b).exp = exp 1 ^ (↑a / ↑b) ⊢ exp 1 ^ a < c ^ b TACTIC:
https://github.com/girving/ray.git
0be790285dd0fce78913b0cb9bddaffa94bd25f9
Ray/Dynamics/Multibrot/Specific.lean
exp_div_lt
[46, 1]
[56, 60]
apply Real.rpow_nonneg (Real.exp_nonneg _)
case hx a b : ℕ c : ℝ a0 : autoParam (a ≠ 0) _auto✝ b0 : autoParam (b ≠ 0) _auto✝ c0 : autoParam (0 < c) _auto✝ h0 : autoParam (2.7182818286 ^ a < c ^ b) _auto✝ e : (↑a / ↑b).exp = exp 1 ^ (↑a / ↑b) ⊢ 0 ≤ exp 1 ^ ↑a
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case hx a b : ℕ c : ℝ a0 : autoParam (a ≠ 0) _auto✝ b0 : autoParam (b ≠ 0) _auto✝ c0 : autoParam (0 < c) _auto✝ h0 : autoParam (2.7182818286 ^ a < c ^ b) _auto✝ e : (↑a / ↑b).exp = exp 1 ^ (↑a / ↑b) ⊢ 0 ≤ exp 1 ^ ↑a TACTIC:
https://github.com/girving/ray.git
0be790285dd0fce78913b0cb9bddaffa94bd25f9
Ray/Dynamics/Multibrot/Specific.lean
exp_div_lt
[46, 1]
[56, 60]
exact c0.le
case hy a b : ℕ c : ℝ a0 : autoParam (a ≠ 0) _auto✝ b0 : autoParam (b ≠ 0) _auto✝ c0 : autoParam (0 < c) _auto✝ h0 : autoParam (2.7182818286 ^ a < c ^ b) _auto✝ e : (↑a / ↑b).exp = exp 1 ^ (↑a / ↑b) ⊢ 0 ≤ c
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case hy a b : ℕ c : ℝ a0 : autoParam (a ≠ 0) _auto✝ b0 : autoParam (b ≠ 0) _auto✝ c0 : autoParam (0 < c) _auto✝ h0 : autoParam (2.7182818286 ^ a < c ^ b) _auto✝ e : (↑a / ↑b).exp = exp 1 ^ (↑a / ↑b) ⊢ 0 ≤ c TACTIC:
https://github.com/girving/ray.git
0be790285dd0fce78913b0cb9bddaffa94bd25f9
Ray/Dynamics/Multibrot/Specific.lean
exp_div_lt
[46, 1]
[56, 60]
simp only [Nat.cast_pos, Nat.pos_iff_ne_zero]
case hz a b : ℕ c : ℝ a0 : autoParam (a ≠ 0) _auto✝ b0 : autoParam (b ≠ 0) _auto✝ c0 : autoParam (0 < c) _auto✝ h0 : autoParam (2.7182818286 ^ a < c ^ b) _auto✝ e : (↑a / ↑b).exp = exp 1 ^ (↑a / ↑b) ⊢ 0 < ↑b
case hz a b : ℕ c : ℝ a0 : autoParam (a ≠ 0) _auto✝ b0 : autoParam (b ≠ 0) _auto✝ c0 : autoParam (0 < c) _auto✝ h0 : autoParam (2.7182818286 ^ a < c ^ b) _auto✝ e : (↑a / ↑b).exp = exp 1 ^ (↑a / ↑b) ⊢ b ≠ 0
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case hz a b : ℕ c : ℝ a0 : autoParam (a ≠ 0) _auto✝ b0 : autoParam (b ≠ 0) _auto✝ c0 : autoParam (0 < c) _auto✝ h0 : autoParam (2.7182818286 ^ a < c ^ b) _auto✝ e : (↑a / ↑b).exp = exp 1 ^ (↑a / ↑b) ⊢ 0 < ↑b TACTIC:
https://github.com/girving/ray.git
0be790285dd0fce78913b0cb9bddaffa94bd25f9
Ray/Dynamics/Multibrot/Specific.lean
exp_div_lt
[46, 1]
[56, 60]
exact b0
case hz a b : ℕ c : ℝ a0 : autoParam (a ≠ 0) _auto✝ b0 : autoParam (b ≠ 0) _auto✝ c0 : autoParam (0 < c) _auto✝ h0 : autoParam (2.7182818286 ^ a < c ^ b) _auto✝ e : (↑a / ↑b).exp = exp 1 ^ (↑a / ↑b) ⊢ b ≠ 0
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case hz a b : ℕ c : ℝ a0 : autoParam (a ≠ 0) _auto✝ b0 : autoParam (b ≠ 0) _auto✝ c0 : autoParam (0 < c) _auto✝ h0 : autoParam (2.7182818286 ^ a < c ^ b) _auto✝ e : (↑a / ↑b).exp = exp 1 ^ (↑a / ↑b) ⊢ b ≠ 0 TACTIC:
https://github.com/girving/ray.git
0be790285dd0fce78913b0cb9bddaffa94bd25f9
Ray/Dynamics/Multibrot/Specific.lean
exp_neg_div_lt
[58, 1]
[63, 45]
rw [Real.exp_neg, inv_lt (Real.exp_pos _) c0]
a b : ℕ c : ℝ a0 : autoParam (a ≠ 0) _auto✝ b0 : autoParam (b ≠ 0) _auto✝ c0 : autoParam (0 < c) _auto✝ h0 : autoParam (c⁻¹ ^ b < 2.7182818283 ^ a) _auto✝ ⊢ (-(↑a / ↑b)).exp < c
a b : ℕ c : ℝ a0 : autoParam (a ≠ 0) _auto✝ b0 : autoParam (b ≠ 0) _auto✝ c0 : autoParam (0 < c) _auto✝ h0 : autoParam (c⁻¹ ^ b < 2.7182818283 ^ a) _auto✝ ⊢ c⁻¹ < (↑a / ↑b).exp
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: a b : ℕ c : ℝ a0 : autoParam (a ≠ 0) _auto✝ b0 : autoParam (b ≠ 0) _auto✝ c0 : autoParam (0 < c) _auto✝ h0 : autoParam (c⁻¹ ^ b < 2.7182818283 ^ a) _auto✝ ⊢ (-(↑a / ↑b)).exp < c TACTIC:
https://github.com/girving/ray.git
0be790285dd0fce78913b0cb9bddaffa94bd25f9
Ray/Dynamics/Multibrot/Specific.lean
exp_neg_div_lt
[58, 1]
[63, 45]
exact lt_exp_div a0 b0 (inv_pos.mpr c0) h0
a b : ℕ c : ℝ a0 : autoParam (a ≠ 0) _auto✝ b0 : autoParam (b ≠ 0) _auto✝ c0 : autoParam (0 < c) _auto✝ h0 : autoParam (c⁻¹ ^ b < 2.7182818283 ^ a) _auto✝ ⊢ c⁻¹ < (↑a / ↑b).exp
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: a b : ℕ c : ℝ a0 : autoParam (a ≠ 0) _auto✝ b0 : autoParam (b ≠ 0) _auto✝ c0 : autoParam (0 < c) _auto✝ h0 : autoParam (c⁻¹ ^ b < 2.7182818283 ^ a) _auto✝ ⊢ c⁻¹ < (↑a / ↑b).exp TACTIC:
https://github.com/girving/ray.git
0be790285dd0fce78913b0cb9bddaffa94bd25f9
Ray/Dynamics/Multibrot/Specific.lean
lt_exp_neg_div
[65, 1]
[70, 45]
rw [Real.exp_neg, lt_inv c0 (Real.exp_pos _)]
a b : ℕ c : ℝ a0 : autoParam (a ≠ 0) _auto✝ b0 : autoParam (b ≠ 0) _auto✝ c0 : autoParam (0 < c) _auto✝ h0 : autoParam (2.7182818286 ^ a < c⁻¹ ^ b) _auto✝ ⊢ c < (-(↑a / ↑b)).exp
a b : ℕ c : ℝ a0 : autoParam (a ≠ 0) _auto✝ b0 : autoParam (b ≠ 0) _auto✝ c0 : autoParam (0 < c) _auto✝ h0 : autoParam (2.7182818286 ^ a < c⁻¹ ^ b) _auto✝ ⊢ (↑a / ↑b).exp < c⁻¹
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: a b : ℕ c : ℝ a0 : autoParam (a ≠ 0) _auto✝ b0 : autoParam (b ≠ 0) _auto✝ c0 : autoParam (0 < c) _auto✝ h0 : autoParam (2.7182818286 ^ a < c⁻¹ ^ b) _auto✝ ⊢ c < (-(↑a / ↑b)).exp TACTIC:
https://github.com/girving/ray.git
0be790285dd0fce78913b0cb9bddaffa94bd25f9
Ray/Dynamics/Multibrot/Specific.lean
lt_exp_neg_div
[65, 1]
[70, 45]
exact exp_div_lt a0 b0 (inv_pos.mpr c0) h0
a b : ℕ c : ℝ a0 : autoParam (a ≠ 0) _auto✝ b0 : autoParam (b ≠ 0) _auto✝ c0 : autoParam (0 < c) _auto✝ h0 : autoParam (2.7182818286 ^ a < c⁻¹ ^ b) _auto✝ ⊢ (↑a / ↑b).exp < c⁻¹
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: a b : ℕ c : ℝ a0 : autoParam (a ≠ 0) _auto✝ b0 : autoParam (b ≠ 0) _auto✝ c0 : autoParam (0 < c) _auto✝ h0 : autoParam (2.7182818286 ^ a < c⁻¹ ^ b) _auto✝ ⊢ (↑a / ↑b).exp < c⁻¹ TACTIC:
https://github.com/girving/ray.git
0be790285dd0fce78913b0cb9bddaffa94bd25f9
Ray/Dynamics/Multibrot/Specific.lean
lt_log_2
[77, 1]
[79, 29]
rw [Real.lt_log_iff_exp_lt (by norm_num)]
⊢ 0.693 < log 2
⊢ exp 0.693 < 2
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: ⊢ 0.693 < log 2 TACTIC:
https://github.com/girving/ray.git
0be790285dd0fce78913b0cb9bddaffa94bd25f9
Ray/Dynamics/Multibrot/Specific.lean
lt_log_2
[77, 1]
[79, 29]
norm_num
⊢ exp 0.693 < 2
⊢ (693 / 1000).exp < 2
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: ⊢ exp 0.693 < 2 TACTIC:
https://github.com/girving/ray.git
0be790285dd0fce78913b0cb9bddaffa94bd25f9
Ray/Dynamics/Multibrot/Specific.lean
lt_log_2
[77, 1]
[79, 29]
exact exp_div_lt
⊢ (693 / 1000).exp < 2
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: ⊢ (693 / 1000).exp < 2 TACTIC:
https://github.com/girving/ray.git
0be790285dd0fce78913b0cb9bddaffa94bd25f9
Ray/Dynamics/Multibrot/Specific.lean
lt_log_2
[77, 1]
[79, 29]
norm_num
⊢ 0 < 2
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: ⊢ 0 < 2 TACTIC:
https://github.com/girving/ray.git
0be790285dd0fce78913b0cb9bddaffa94bd25f9
Ray/Dynamics/Multibrot/Specific.lean
lt_log_3
[80, 1]
[82, 29]
rw [Real.lt_log_iff_exp_lt (by norm_num)]
⊢ 1.098 < log 3
⊢ exp 1.098 < 3
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: ⊢ 1.098 < log 3 TACTIC:
https://github.com/girving/ray.git
0be790285dd0fce78913b0cb9bddaffa94bd25f9
Ray/Dynamics/Multibrot/Specific.lean
lt_log_3
[80, 1]
[82, 29]
norm_num
⊢ exp 1.098 < 3
⊢ (549 / 500).exp < 3
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: ⊢ exp 1.098 < 3 TACTIC:
https://github.com/girving/ray.git
0be790285dd0fce78913b0cb9bddaffa94bd25f9
Ray/Dynamics/Multibrot/Specific.lean
lt_log_3
[80, 1]
[82, 29]
exact exp_div_lt
⊢ (549 / 500).exp < 3
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: ⊢ (549 / 500).exp < 3 TACTIC:
https://github.com/girving/ray.git
0be790285dd0fce78913b0cb9bddaffa94bd25f9
Ray/Dynamics/Multibrot/Specific.lean
lt_log_3
[80, 1]
[82, 29]
norm_num
⊢ 0 < 3
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: ⊢ 0 < 3 TACTIC:
https://github.com/girving/ray.git
0be790285dd0fce78913b0cb9bddaffa94bd25f9
Ray/Dynamics/Multibrot/Specific.lean
log_3_lt
[83, 1]
[85, 29]
rw [Real.log_lt_iff_lt_exp (by norm_num)]
⊢ log 3 < 1.099
⊢ 3 < exp 1.099
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: ⊢ log 3 < 1.099 TACTIC:
https://github.com/girving/ray.git
0be790285dd0fce78913b0cb9bddaffa94bd25f9
Ray/Dynamics/Multibrot/Specific.lean
log_3_lt
[83, 1]
[85, 29]
norm_num
⊢ 3 < exp 1.099
⊢ 3 < (1099 / 1000).exp
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: ⊢ 3 < exp 1.099 TACTIC:
https://github.com/girving/ray.git
0be790285dd0fce78913b0cb9bddaffa94bd25f9
Ray/Dynamics/Multibrot/Specific.lean
log_3_lt
[83, 1]
[85, 29]
exact lt_exp_div
⊢ 3 < (1099 / 1000).exp
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: ⊢ 3 < (1099 / 1000).exp TACTIC:
https://github.com/girving/ray.git
0be790285dd0fce78913b0cb9bddaffa94bd25f9
Ray/Dynamics/Multibrot/Specific.lean
log_3_lt
[83, 1]
[85, 29]
norm_num
⊢ 0 < 3
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: ⊢ 0 < 3 TACTIC:
https://github.com/girving/ray.git
0be790285dd0fce78913b0cb9bddaffa94bd25f9
Ray/Dynamics/Multibrot/Specific.lean
lt_log_4
[86, 1]
[88, 29]
rw [Real.lt_log_iff_exp_lt (by norm_num)]
⊢ 1.386 < log 4
⊢ exp 1.386 < 4
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: ⊢ 1.386 < log 4 TACTIC:
https://github.com/girving/ray.git
0be790285dd0fce78913b0cb9bddaffa94bd25f9
Ray/Dynamics/Multibrot/Specific.lean
lt_log_4
[86, 1]
[88, 29]
norm_num
⊢ exp 1.386 < 4
⊢ (693 / 500).exp < 4
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: ⊢ exp 1.386 < 4 TACTIC:
https://github.com/girving/ray.git
0be790285dd0fce78913b0cb9bddaffa94bd25f9
Ray/Dynamics/Multibrot/Specific.lean
lt_log_4
[86, 1]
[88, 29]
exact exp_div_lt
⊢ (693 / 500).exp < 4
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: ⊢ (693 / 500).exp < 4 TACTIC:
https://github.com/girving/ray.git
0be790285dd0fce78913b0cb9bddaffa94bd25f9
Ray/Dynamics/Multibrot/Specific.lean
lt_log_4
[86, 1]
[88, 29]
norm_num
⊢ 0 < 4
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: ⊢ 0 < 4 TACTIC:
https://github.com/girving/ray.git
0be790285dd0fce78913b0cb9bddaffa94bd25f9
Ray/Dynamics/Multibrot/Specific.lean
log_4_lt
[89, 1]
[91, 29]
rw [Real.log_lt_iff_lt_exp (by norm_num)]
⊢ log 4 < 1.387
⊢ 4 < exp 1.387
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: ⊢ log 4 < 1.387 TACTIC:
https://github.com/girving/ray.git
0be790285dd0fce78913b0cb9bddaffa94bd25f9
Ray/Dynamics/Multibrot/Specific.lean
log_4_lt
[89, 1]
[91, 29]
norm_num
⊢ 4 < exp 1.387
⊢ 4 < (1387 / 1000).exp
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: ⊢ 4 < exp 1.387 TACTIC:
https://github.com/girving/ray.git
0be790285dd0fce78913b0cb9bddaffa94bd25f9
Ray/Dynamics/Multibrot/Specific.lean
log_4_lt
[89, 1]
[91, 29]
exact lt_exp_div
⊢ 4 < (1387 / 1000).exp
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: ⊢ 4 < (1387 / 1000).exp TACTIC:
https://github.com/girving/ray.git
0be790285dd0fce78913b0cb9bddaffa94bd25f9
Ray/Dynamics/Multibrot/Specific.lean
log_4_lt
[89, 1]
[91, 29]
norm_num
⊢ 0 < 4
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: ⊢ 0 < 4 TACTIC:
https://github.com/girving/ray.git
0be790285dd0fce78913b0cb9bddaffa94bd25f9
Ray/Dynamics/Multibrot/Specific.lean
neg_log_one_sub_lt
[93, 1]
[102, 33]
rw [neg_lt, Real.lt_log_iff_exp_lt (lt_of_lt_of_le (by norm_num) le)]
x : ℝ x3 : 3 ≤ x le : 2 / 3 ≤ 1 - 1 / x ⊢ -(1 - 1 / x).log < 0.41
x : ℝ x3 : 3 ≤ x le : 2 / 3 ≤ 1 - 1 / x ⊢ (-0.41).exp < 1 - 1 / x
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: x : ℝ x3 : 3 ≤ x le : 2 / 3 ≤ 1 - 1 / x ⊢ -(1 - 1 / x).log < 0.41 TACTIC:
https://github.com/girving/ray.git
0be790285dd0fce78913b0cb9bddaffa94bd25f9
Ray/Dynamics/Multibrot/Specific.lean
neg_log_one_sub_lt
[93, 1]
[102, 33]
refine lt_of_lt_of_le ?_ le
x : ℝ x3 : 3 ≤ x le : 2 / 3 ≤ 1 - 1 / x ⊢ (-0.41).exp < 1 - 1 / x
x : ℝ x3 : 3 ≤ x le : 2 / 3 ≤ 1 - 1 / x ⊢ (-0.41).exp < 2 / 3
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: x : ℝ x3 : 3 ≤ x le : 2 / 3 ≤ 1 - 1 / x ⊢ (-0.41).exp < 1 - 1 / x TACTIC:
https://github.com/girving/ray.git
0be790285dd0fce78913b0cb9bddaffa94bd25f9
Ray/Dynamics/Multibrot/Specific.lean
neg_log_one_sub_lt
[93, 1]
[102, 33]
norm_num
x : ℝ x3 : 3 ≤ x le : 2 / 3 ≤ 1 - 1 / x ⊢ (-0.41).exp < 2 / 3
x : ℝ x3 : 3 ≤ x le : 2 / 3 ≤ 1 - 1 / x ⊢ (-(41 / 100)).exp < 2 / 3
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: x : ℝ x3 : 3 ≤ x le : 2 / 3 ≤ 1 - 1 / x ⊢ (-0.41).exp < 2 / 3 TACTIC:
https://github.com/girving/ray.git
0be790285dd0fce78913b0cb9bddaffa94bd25f9
Ray/Dynamics/Multibrot/Specific.lean
neg_log_one_sub_lt
[93, 1]
[102, 33]
exact exp_neg_div_lt
x : ℝ x3 : 3 ≤ x le : 2 / 3 ≤ 1 - 1 / x ⊢ (-(41 / 100)).exp < 2 / 3
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: x : ℝ x3 : 3 ≤ x le : 2 / 3 ≤ 1 - 1 / x ⊢ (-(41 / 100)).exp < 2 / 3 TACTIC:
https://github.com/girving/ray.git
0be790285dd0fce78913b0cb9bddaffa94bd25f9
Ray/Dynamics/Multibrot/Specific.lean
neg_log_one_sub_lt
[93, 1]
[102, 33]
rw [le_tsub_iff_le_tsub (by norm_num), one_div, inv_le (by positivity)]
x : ℝ x3 : 3 ≤ x ⊢ 2 / 3 ≤ 1 - 1 / x
x : ℝ x3 : 3 ≤ x ⊢ (1 - 2 / 3)⁻¹ ≤ x x : ℝ x3 : 3 ≤ x ⊢ 0 < 1 - 2 / 3 x : ℝ x3 : 3 ≤ x ⊢ 1 / x ≤ 1
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: x : ℝ x3 : 3 ≤ x ⊢ 2 / 3 ≤ 1 - 1 / x TACTIC:
https://github.com/girving/ray.git
0be790285dd0fce78913b0cb9bddaffa94bd25f9
Ray/Dynamics/Multibrot/Specific.lean
neg_log_one_sub_lt
[93, 1]
[102, 33]
norm_num
x : ℝ x3 : 3 ≤ x ⊢ 2 / 3 ≤ 1
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: x : ℝ x3 : 3 ≤ x ⊢ 2 / 3 ≤ 1 TACTIC:
https://github.com/girving/ray.git
0be790285dd0fce78913b0cb9bddaffa94bd25f9
Ray/Dynamics/Multibrot/Specific.lean
neg_log_one_sub_lt
[93, 1]
[102, 33]
positivity
x : ℝ x3 : 3 ≤ x ⊢ 0 < x
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: x : ℝ x3 : 3 ≤ x ⊢ 0 < x TACTIC:
https://github.com/girving/ray.git
0be790285dd0fce78913b0cb9bddaffa94bd25f9
Ray/Dynamics/Multibrot/Specific.lean
neg_log_one_sub_lt
[93, 1]
[102, 33]
exact le_trans (by norm_num) x3
x : ℝ x3 : 3 ≤ x ⊢ (1 - 2 / 3)⁻¹ ≤ x
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: x : ℝ x3 : 3 ≤ x ⊢ (1 - 2 / 3)⁻¹ ≤ x TACTIC:
https://github.com/girving/ray.git
0be790285dd0fce78913b0cb9bddaffa94bd25f9
Ray/Dynamics/Multibrot/Specific.lean
neg_log_one_sub_lt
[93, 1]
[102, 33]
norm_num
x : ℝ x3 : 3 ≤ x ⊢ (1 - 2 / 3)⁻¹ ≤ 3
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: x : ℝ x3 : 3 ≤ x ⊢ (1 - 2 / 3)⁻¹ ≤ 3 TACTIC:
https://github.com/girving/ray.git
0be790285dd0fce78913b0cb9bddaffa94bd25f9
Ray/Dynamics/Multibrot/Specific.lean
neg_log_one_sub_lt
[93, 1]
[102, 33]
norm_num
x : ℝ x3 : 3 ≤ x ⊢ 0 < 1 - 2 / 3
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: x : ℝ x3 : 3 ≤ x ⊢ 0 < 1 - 2 / 3 TACTIC:
https://github.com/girving/ray.git
0be790285dd0fce78913b0cb9bddaffa94bd25f9
Ray/Dynamics/Multibrot/Specific.lean
neg_log_one_sub_lt
[93, 1]
[102, 33]
rw [one_div, inv_le_one_iff]
x : ℝ x3 : 3 ≤ x ⊢ 1 / x ≤ 1
x : ℝ x3 : 3 ≤ x ⊢ x ≤ 0 ∨ 1 ≤ x
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: x : ℝ x3 : 3 ≤ x ⊢ 1 / x ≤ 1 TACTIC:
https://github.com/girving/ray.git
0be790285dd0fce78913b0cb9bddaffa94bd25f9
Ray/Dynamics/Multibrot/Specific.lean
neg_log_one_sub_lt
[93, 1]
[102, 33]
right
x : ℝ x3 : 3 ≤ x ⊢ x ≤ 0 ∨ 1 ≤ x
case h x : ℝ x3 : 3 ≤ x ⊢ 1 ≤ x
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: x : ℝ x3 : 3 ≤ x ⊢ x ≤ 0 ∨ 1 ≤ x TACTIC:
https://github.com/girving/ray.git
0be790285dd0fce78913b0cb9bddaffa94bd25f9
Ray/Dynamics/Multibrot/Specific.lean
neg_log_one_sub_lt
[93, 1]
[102, 33]
exact le_trans (by norm_num) x3
case h x : ℝ x3 : 3 ≤ x ⊢ 1 ≤ x
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h x : ℝ x3 : 3 ≤ x ⊢ 1 ≤ x TACTIC:
https://github.com/girving/ray.git
0be790285dd0fce78913b0cb9bddaffa94bd25f9
Ray/Dynamics/Multibrot/Specific.lean
neg_log_one_sub_lt
[93, 1]
[102, 33]
norm_num
x : ℝ x3 : 3 ≤ x ⊢ 1 ≤ 3
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: x : ℝ x3 : 3 ≤ x ⊢ 1 ≤ 3 TACTIC:
https://github.com/girving/ray.git
0be790285dd0fce78913b0cb9bddaffa94bd25f9
Ray/Dynamics/Multibrot/Specific.lean
neg_log_one_sub_lt
[93, 1]
[102, 33]
norm_num
x : ℝ x3 : 3 ≤ x le : 2 / 3 ≤ 1 - 1 / x ⊢ 0 < 2 / 3
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: x : ℝ x3 : 3 ≤ x le : 2 / 3 ≤ 1 - 1 / x ⊢ 0 < 2 / 3 TACTIC: