license: cc-by-4.0
language:
- en
tags:
- numeric-formats
- floating-point
- conformance
- audit-disclosed
size_categories:
- n<1K
numeric-format-catalog v2 (audit-disclosed)
Version: v2.0 (2026-06-10) -- supersedes v1 (count=77, withdrawn).
Count: 81 formats across 13 clusters.
Honest count-drift disclosure
This dataset is shipped with a known count-drift across four artefacts:
| Source | Count | Status |
|---|---|---|
arXiv:2606.09686 Table 1 (paper #3) |
84 | aspirational, MXFP6 split + standalone E8M0 |
specs/numeric/formats_catalog.t27 SSOT raw // CATALOG: lines |
83 | live ground truth |
| THIS DATASET (codegen LIVE re-run) | 81 | parser drops gf512 + gf1024 on bias-formula int() cast |
gen/numeric/formats_catalog.json (committed in repo) |
77 | stale, pre-#1051 snapshot |
| v1 of this dataset (uploaded 2026-06-10 AM) | 77 | inherited stale gen |
Why 81 and not 83 or 84: the codegen tools/gen_formats_catalog.py cannot evaluate bias formulas of the form 2^N-1, which are the canonical bias values for gf512 and gf1024. Those two rows are silently dropped. We ship what the codegen actually produces, not a cherry-picked number. Patch tracked in t27#1064.
Why ship 81 today instead of waiting for the patch: because v1 shipped 77 yesterday. Replacing a stale 77 with an honest 81 + full audit is closer to the truth than leaving 77 up while the patch lands.
What's in the dataset
- 81 row entries, each carrying:
id,name,bits,s(sign bits),e(exponent bits),m(mantissa bits),bias,phi_distance,storage,cluster,status,standard,use_case,source - 13 cluster groupings: IEEE754 binary, IEEE754 decimal, MLLowPrecision, GoldenFloat, Posit/Unum III, OCP MX, LNS, IntegerFixed, HistoricalVendor, Theoretical, Compression, Extended, QuantTuned
- Source SSOT:
gHashTag/t27specs/numeric/formats_catalog.t27HEAD6ecad30 - Regen output SHA-256:
546ba6fff1daec0b64483f599778ab63a9410405592c2e9dbc9d90dbb63bc48a
Known gaps vs paper #3 (arXiv:2606.09686)
| Cluster | Paper says | This dataset | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|
| GoldenFloat | 16 | 16 | 0 (both pre-#1051; current SSOT has 22, of which gen lifts 20) |
| OCP MX | 5 | 3 | -2 (no MXFP6 E2M3/E3M2 split; no standalone E8M0 block) |
| MLLowPrecision | 8 | 7 | -1 (NF4 placement) |
| Total | 84 | 81 | -3 |
Reconciliation
- t27#1064 -- tracking issue, five-step plan: parser patch -> regen -> CI invariant -> HF re-upload v3 -> arXiv erratum if needed
- Expected v3 ship count after parser patch: 83
- Expected v4 ship count after MXFP6/E8M0 reconciliation with paper: 84 (or paper erratum to whatever codegen produces)
Citation
If you use this dataset, please cite the paper it accompanies:
@misc{vasilev2026numeric,
title={An 84-Format Numeric Catalog with Bit-Exact Conformance Vectors},
author={Vasilev, Dmitrii},
year={2026},
eprint={2606.09686},
archivePrefix={arXiv},
primaryClass={cs.MS}
}
Note: paper claims 84; this dataset ships 81 due to the parser bug. See "Honest count-drift disclosure" above.
Provenance
- Uploader:
playra(Dmitrii Vasilev, ORCID0009-0008-4294-6159) - Affiliation: Trinity S3AI
- Repo:
gHashTag/t27 - License: CC BY 4.0
- Generated: 2026-06-10 +07 from HEAD
6ecad30