Datasets:

ppak10
/

Agentic-SLS-ASTM

Tags:

License:

Dataset card Files Files and versions

xet

Community

Agentic-SLS-ASTM / README.md

ppak10

Datasets update 7/23 (#8)

386cb7b about 1 hour ago

preview code

Raw

History Blame Contribute Delete

14.8 kB

metadata

license: mit
tags:
  - astm
  - mechanical-testing
  - tensile
  - flex
  - sls
  - 3d-printing
  - additive-manufacturing
  - inova-mk1
configs:
  - config_name: D638
    data_files:
      - split: train
        path: data/D638/*.jsonl
    default: true
  - config_name: D790
    data_files:
      - split: train
        path: data/D790/*.jsonl

Agentic-SLS-ASTM

ASTM mechanical-test specimens (D638 tensile, D790 flex) printed on the Inova Mk1 SLS printer and pulled on an MTS / TestWorks Instron. Each row is a single specimen with full geometry, scalar results, stress–strain + raw DAQ curves, and — for SLS rows — FK references and an embedded snapshot of the upstream print profile from ppak10/Agentic-SLS-Database.

Rows are self-contained for ML use: the full PrintProfile JSON is inlined, so features (material/energy profile) and target (mechanical response) live on the same row.

from datasets import load_dataset
tensile = load_dataset("ppak10/Agentic-SLS-ASTM", "D638", split="train")
flex    = load_dataset("ppak10/Agentic-SLS-ASTM", "D790", split="train")

Composite stress–strain

Every specimen overlaid on one plot per standard. Colors are batch labels (A–N); solid gray lines are FormLabs PA12GF benchtop controls. Batch M mixes two ASTM D638 specimen types from the same print — its 12 Type IV (narrow-section) specimens are broken out into their own figure (D638_type_iv.png) rather than overlaid with its 5 Type I specimens, since the geometries aren't mechanically comparable. PLA/PETG filament controls (D638 only) print at much higher stress and strain than either PA12 material, so they're also broken out into their own figure to keep the main composite readable — same treatment for the FormLabs Nylon 12 White control, which gets its own figure(s) rather than joining the main comparison.

D638 (tensile)	D790 (three-point flex)

PLA/PETG controls (D638 only — D790 has no filament controls):

FormLabs Nylon 12 White control:

D638 (tensile)	D790 (three-point flex)

The D638 export is a raw load/extension curve with no gauge length in the file itself — strain/stress are derived using a user-confirmed 25mm extensometer starting length (gauge_length_mm set explicitly in 31_2026_07_23_tensile_nylon12white_fl.py, not read from the xlsx).

Batch M Type IV (narrow-section) tensile specimens, D638 only — each of the 12 specimens is individually labeled (1-6, 8-11, 13-14; specimen numbers 7 and 12 aren't part of this xlsx export, per the lab's own numbering) rather than grouped into one legend entry:

Regenerate with uv run scripts/plots/01_composite.py.

Batch averages (SLS Nylon 12 GF only)

One mean stress-strain curve per SLS batch, ± 1 sample standard deviation across specimens (error bars), for our own Inova Mk1 SLS Nylon 12 GF prints — PLA/PETG/FormLabs benchtop controls are excluded (they have no batch_label). Each specimen's curve is linearly interpolated onto a common strain grid bounded by the shortest specimen's max strain in that batch, so every point in the mean is backed by the same specimen count. See scripts/plots/02_batch_averages.py for the full averaging method (including why one D790 specimen — a degenerate 3-point curve — is dropped from its batch's average).

D638 (tensile)	D790 (three-point flex)

The same mean ± 1 SD banding is also rendered for the FormLabs Nylon 12 White control on its own (excluded from the figure above for the same reason as its raw-curve figure — see Composite stress–strain):

D638 (tensile)	D790 (three-point flex)

Regenerate with uv run scripts/plots/02_batch_averages.py.

Configs

Config	Description	Files
`D638` (default)	Tensile specimens (ASTM D638 Type I, plus 12 Type IV specimens in batch M). 87 SLS (batches A–N) + 3 PLA + 3 PETG + 5 FormLabs PA12GF + 5 FormLabs Nylon 12 White = 103 rows. Batches A–J/J_MB have Database FKs; K–N don't yet (print jobs not backfilled).	`data/D638/*.jsonl` (one row per file)
`D790`	Three-point flex specimens (ASTM D790 Procedure A). 71 SLS rows (batches C–N) + 5 FormLabs PA12GF + 5 FormLabs Nylon 12 White = 81 rows. Batches C–J/J_MB have Database FKs; K–N don't yet.	`data/D790/*.jsonl` (one row per file)

One JSONL file per specimen — SLS rows are named after their sample_id (e.g. data/D638/A1.jsonl, data/D790/E10.jsonl); non-SLS controls use {material}_TSR{n}.jsonl (e.g. data/D638/PLA_TSR6.jsonl, data/D790/PA12GF_FL_TSR1.jsonl). Both configs share the same row schema and are produced by the per-session scripts under scripts/specimens/.

Specimens are labeled with a sample_id of the form {batch_label}{seq} (e.g. A1, C7), where the batch label identifies the print batch they came from. Batch labels are usually a single letter, but J / J_MB are the same 2026-07-06 print batch split by post-processing: J specimens were tested as-printed, J_MB specimens were media blasted before testing. The same sample_id may appear in both configs — C1 in D638 and C1 in D790 are different physical specimens that came from the same Batch C print.

Source Layout

source/
  2026_05_26/          # one folder per test session
    *.tsproj           # TestWorks project pointer
    *.xlsx             # TestWorks Excel export, one sheet per specimen
    TST1.Test/
      TestRuns/
        TSR{n}.TestRun/
          Data/DaqTaskActivity1.h5            # raw DAQ scans (10 Hz)
          AnalysisRuns/ANR1.AnalysisRun/
            persistent.h5                     # analyzed scalars + curves

Test sessions covered:

Session folder	Specimens	Standard	Batch	Source print job (Database)
`2026_05_26/`	5	D638	A	2026-05-25 (d638_type1)
`2026_06_01/`	5	D638	B	2026-05-30 (d638_type1_engraved)
`2026_06_03/`	7	D638	C	2026-06-02 (d638_type1_engraved)
`2026_06_08/`	5	D638	D	2026-06-07 (d638_type1_engraved)
`2026_06_10/Tensile Testing/`	5 SLS + 3 PLA + 3 PETG	D638	E (SLS only)	SLS: 2026-06-07 (d638_type1_engraved)
`2026_06_10/Batch C 3pt test/`	9	D790	C	2026-06-02 (d790_flex_specimen)
`2026_06_10/Batch D 3pt test/`	8	D790	D	2026-06-07 (d790_flex_specimen)
`2026_06_10/Batch E 3pt test/`	10	D790	E	2026-06-07 (d790_flex_specimen, same print as Batch D)
`2026_06_16/Tensile FormLabs Samples/`	5 (PA12GF_FL)	D638	— (control, printed vertically)	n/a — benchtop comparison filament
`2026_06_16/Bending FormLabs Samples/`	5 (PA12GF_FL)	D790	— (control)	n/a — benchtop comparison filament
`2026_06_25/Tensile Data/`	5	D638	F	2026-06-13 (d638_type1_engraved, Recycled Powder)
`2026_06_25/Flexural Data/`	9	D790	F	2026-06-13 (d790_flex_specimen_shorter, Recycled Powder)
`2026_06_26/Tensile/`	5	D638	G	2026-06-09 (d638_type1_engraved, Cards)
`2026_06_26/Flexural/`	4	D790	G	2026-06-09 (d790_flex_specimen_shorter, Cards)
`2026_06_30/Tensile/` (TST1.Test)	3	D638	H	2026-06-24 (Recycled Powder, `2a3ba702` 24mJ/mm)
`2026_06_30/Tensile/` (TST2.Test)	5	D638	I	2026-06-25 (Recycled Powder, `60999faa` 28mJ/mm)
`2026_06_30/Flex 6-30/` (TST1.Test)	5	D790	I	2026-06-25 (Recycled Powder, `60999faa` 28mJ/mm)
`2026_06_30/Flex 6-30/` (xlsx only, no TestRuns folder)	5	D790	H	2026-06-24 (Recycled Powder, `2a3ba702` 24mJ/mm)
`2026_07_06/Tensile/`	4	D638	J (not media blasted)	2026-06-27 (`D790 and D638 and other objects`, `2be9f3cd` 32mJ/mm higher temp)
`2026_07_06/Flex/`	2	D790	J (not media blasted)	2026-06-27 (same as J tensile)
`2026_07_08/Tensile/`	5	D638	J_MB (media blasted)	same 2026-06-27 print as J
`2026_07_08/Flex/`	2	D790	J_MB (media blasted)	same 2026-06-27 print as J
`2026_07_15/Tensile/`	5	D638	K	not yet in Database
`2026_07_15/Tensile/`	6	D638	L	not yet in Database
`2026_07_15/Flexural/`	3	D790	K	not yet in Database
`2026_07_15/Flexural/`	4	D790	L	not yet in Database
`2026_07_21/tensile/` (`tensile_m.xlsx`, Type I)	5	D638	M	not yet in Database
`2026_07_21/tensile/` (`tensile_m_t4.xlsx`, Type IV)	12	D638	M	not yet in Database
`2026_07_21/flex/`	5	D790	M	not yet in Database
`2026_07_23/tensile/`	5	D638	N	not yet in Database
`2026_07_23/flex/`	5	D790	N	not yet in Database
`2026_07_23/tensile/` (`tensile_nylon12white_fl.xlsx`)	5 (NYLON12_WHITE_FL)	D638	— (control)	n/a — benchtop comparison material
`2026_07_23/flex/` (`flex_nylon12white_fl.xlsx`)	5 (NYLON12_WHITE_FL)	D790	— (control)	n/a — benchtop comparison material

TSR11 in Batch E 3pt test/ exists on disk but has empty Data/ (aborted run, no DAQ scans) and no corresponding xlsx sheet — it is excluded from the JSONL. TSR4 in Batch I flex (Flex 6-30/) is excluded for a similar reason: test_end_reason is "Test Stopped" rather than a detected break.

Batches K, L, M, and N (2026-07-15 through 2026-07-23) have no raw TestRuns//h5 folders at all — only TestWorks xlsx exports were handed off, so all of these rows are xlsx_only (see scripts/specimens/_lib.py's build_row_from_xlsx). Batch M's 12 Type IV specimens are a narrow-section ASTM D638 geometry (6mm × 4.15mm vs Type I's 12.8mm × 3.1mm) from the same print as its 5 Type I specimens — same batch_label, distinguished by astm.type. The FormLabs Nylon 12 White tensile control's xlsx export is a raw load/extension curve with no gauge length in the file — strain/stress_pa are derived using a user-confirmed 25mm extensometer gauge length declared in the script itself (see Composite stress–strain above); its flex counterpart derives normally via the D790 chord formulas.

Batch H's 5 flex specimens (2026_06_30/Flex 6-30/) don't have a raw TestRuns folder — it looks like it was overwritten when the Batch I TestWorks project reused the same default TST1.Test name in the same directory. flex_h_6.30.xlsx is the only surviving record, so those 5 rows are built from that xlsx export alone: the raw load/extension curve (curves.load_n/curves.extension_m) comes from its embedded columns, but curves.strain/curves.stress_pa are empty and several metrics fields (modulus_pa, strain_at_peak, strain_at_yield, etc.) are null, since deriving them requires the support span, which this export doesn't surface. See each row's notes field.

Row shape

{
  "sample_id": "A1",
  "batch_label": "A",
  "specimen_id": "2026_05_26/TSR1",
  "test_date": "2026-05-26",
  "session_folder": "2026_05_26",
  "test_run_name": "TSR1",
  "specimen_index": 1,

  "material_class": "SLS",
  "astm": { "standard": "D638", "type": "Type I", "year": "2022" },
  "test_end_reason": "Break Detected",

  "geometry": {
    "width_mm": 12.9, "thickness_mm": 3.2,
    "area_mm2": 41.28, "gauge_length_mm": 103.0
  },

  "job_id":           "ba17a5ba-a5f6-4d60-8832-b6c13a2dfa67",
  "print_date":       "2026-05-25",
  "print_profile_id": "52715389-d580-4be9-9194-ed300bdf911b",
  "object_hash":      "E4251951376A82B4303394F832996A2E9883EAB0",
  "session_id":       null,

  "print_profile_snapshot": { "...full PrintProfile JSON..." },

  "metrics": {
    "modulus_pa": 341090566.27,
    "peak_load_n": null, "peak_stress_pa": null, "strain_at_peak": null,
    "load_at_break_n": null, "stress_at_break_pa": null, "strain_at_break": null,
    "energy_to_break_j": null,
    "yield_stress_pa": null, "strain_at_yield": null
  },

  "curves": {
    "time_s":      [/* N */],
    "extension_m": [/* N */],
    "load_n":      [/* N */],
    "strain":      [/* N */],
    "stress_pa":   [/* N */]
  },

  "notes": "",

  "source_paths": {
    "persistent_h5": "source/2026_05_26/TST1.Test/TestRuns/TSR1.TestRun/AnalysisRuns/ANR1.AnalysisRun/persistent.h5",
    "daq_h5":        "source/2026_05_26/TST1.Test/TestRuns/TSR1.TestRun/Data/DaqTaskActivity1.h5",
    "xlsx":          "source/2026_05_26/tensile_testing_5.26.xlsx",
    "xlsx_sheet":    "Sheet1"
  }
}

Notes on results

sample_id and batch_label are null for non-SLS control rows (PLA, PETG, FormLabs PA12GF — they didn't come from an SLS print batch). Filter on material_class == "SLS" to get the rows that link back to Database.
Batches E–I currently have job_id, print_profile_id, object_hash, and print_profile_snapshot all null — their source print jobs aren't in Database yet. The mechanical results are still valid.
metrics.peak_* and metrics.*_at_break are often null in the D638 tensile rows because TestWorks did not detect a peak/break point on those runs. D790 flex rows have these fields more consistently populated. The curves.stress_pa / curves.strain arrays are populated regardless, so consumers can re-derive peak/break with their own criteria.
Batch H's flex rows (data/D790/H1.jsonl–H5.jsonl) are the one exception: their raw TestRuns folder is missing (see Test sessions covered above), so they're built from the TestWorks xlsx export alone. curves.strain/curves.stress_pa are empty and most metrics fields are null for these 5 rows specifically — check notes on a row before assuming a null metric means TestWorks failed to detect it.
notes is a free-text field, empty for most rows; it's used to flag exceptions like the Batch H flex sourcing above or the FormLabs vertical-print orientation.
metrics.modulus_pa matches the kN/mm² value in the TestWorks xlsx after unit conversion (e.g. tensile 0.341 kN/mm² → 3.41 × 10⁸ Pa). For D790, TestWorks computes the flexural modulus via the 3-point-bend formula directly; values may look unintuitive compared to the tensile modulus.
DAQ scans are in SI units (m, N, s); stress is Pa and strain is dimensionless.
For D790, geometry.gauge_length_mm is always null (gauge length is a tensile concept; flex uses support span which is not surfaced).