text stringlengths 1 81 | start float64 0 10.1k | duration float64 0 24.9 |
|---|---|---|
that we can't delete
Unidentified artist, because it's | 3,062.48 | 3.03 |
referenced in the created table. | 3,065.51 | 1.92 |
What we should maybe first do is delete
this row delete their affiliation | 3,067.43 | 4.8 |
with their work, and then
delete the artist so we don't | 3,072.23 | 3.87 |
run into this FOREIGN KEY constraint. | 3,076.1 | 2.8 |
So let's try this in
our SQLite environment. | 3,078.9 | 3.62 |
Come back to my computer. | 3,082.52 | 2.26 |
And again, our plan was to first delete
the artists affiliation with their work | 3,084.78 | 5.54 |
from the created table. | 3,090.32 | 1.89 |
So let me show you
first the created table. | 3,092.21 | 2.25 |
I'll say SELECT
[? star ?] from "created," | 3,094.46 | 3.78 |
and see how it's exactly like
the table we just visualized. | 3,098.24 | 3.84 |
Now, let me try delete this artist
affiliation with their work. | 3,102.08 | 4.74 |
I'm not deleting the artist. | 3,106.82 | 2.05 |
I'm deleting their affiliation
with their authorship, | 3,108.87 | 3.41 |
their [? artist ?] [? ship, ?] whatever
you want to call it for their work. | 3,112.28 | 3.43 |
Now, I'll say DELETE FROM-- | 3,115.71 | 4.1 |
let's say, DELETE FROM "artists"
WHERE the "artist_id" is equal to | 3,119.81 | 7.5 |
or equals 3. | 3,127.31 | 3.29 |
Well, I could do this. | 3,130.6 | 2.17 |
But there's probably a better way,
like I know the id, and that's fine. | 3,132.77 | 4.07 |
But we could also use, as
we saw a little bit ago, | 3,136.84 | 2.53 |
which were [? subqueries, ?]
a way to write a query that | 3,139.37 | 3.14 |
returns me the result. And that
result gets included in another query | 3,142.51 | 3.45 |
altogether. | 3,145.96 | 0.88 |
So let's try that instead. | 3,146.84 | 1.43 |
Let's say I don't know the artist_id. | 3,148.27 | 2.76 |
What I could do is
make a [? subquery. ?] | 3,151.03 | 2.1 |
I could say inside of this, let me
select the "id" FROM the "artists" | 3,153.13 | 6.3 |
table WHERE, in this case, the "name"
equals "Unidentified artist," and then, | 3,159.43 | 9.12 |
let me close out this
query, hit a semicolon. | 3,168.55 | 2.58 |
And I already see a typo in this,
but I'm just going to try it anyway. | 3,171.13 | 3.21 |
I will go ahead, and hit Enter. | 3,174.34 | 2.7 |
And let's see if I type SELECT
[? star ?] FROM "artists," Enter, | 3,177.04 | 6.66 |
I still see Unidentified artist. | 3,183.7 | 2.85 |
And I think my typo here was as follows. | 3,186.55 | 1.93 |
If I up my query using the
up arrow on my keyboard, | 3,188.48 | 2.57 |
I see DELETE from "artists," where the
"artist_id" equals some value here. | 3,191.05 | 5.25 |
But do I want to delete from artists? | 3,196.3 | 2.97 |
I don't. | 3,199.27 | 0.72 |
I actually can't delete from artists. | 3,199.99 | 1.62 |
What I should do instead is
delete from the created table. | 3,201.61 | 3.73 |
So let's try this. | 3,205.34 | 1.01 |
I'll say DELETE FROM
"created," making sure I only | 3,206.35 | 4.29 |
have double quotes
around created, then I'll | 3,210.64 | 2.73 |
say WHERE the artist_id
equals, let's say, either 3-- | 3,213.37 | 5.1 |
but it could also be the
result of this [? subquery. ?] | 3,218.47 | 3.06 |
I'll say 1, 2, 3, 4,
and then SELECT the "id" | 3,221.53 | 5.88 |
FROM the "artist" table WHERE the
"name" equals "Unidentified artist." | 3,227.41 | 8.47 |
Then I'll close this [? subquery, ?]
hitting semicolon, hit Enter. | 3,235.88 | 4.35 |
And now, if I say SELECT [? star ?]
FROM "created" semicolon, | 3,240.23 | 5.52 |
I should see that this artist's
affiliation with their work | 3,245.75 | 3.75 |
no longer exists. | 3,249.5 | 2.1 |
And because it no longer exists. | 3,251.6 | 1.51 |
I can now delete them
from the artists table. | 3,253.11 | 2.88 |
I don't have this FOREIGN
KEY artist_id referencing | 3,255.99 | 4.22 |
the primary key of this artist. | 3,260.21 | 2.31 |
So let's now try that. | 3,262.52 | 1.38 |
I could say SELECT
[? star ?] FROM "artists," | 3,263.9 | 3.06 |
I see that Unidentified
artist is still in here. | 3,266.96 | 3.69 |
But let's delete them now. | 3,270.65 | 1.86 |
I'll say delete from,
let's say, "artists" WHERE | 3,272.51 | 3.78 |
the "name" equals "Unidentified artist,"
closing my quotes, semicolon, hit | 3,276.29 | 6.33 |
Enter. | 3,282.62 | 0.66 |
And now if I Select [? star ?]
FROM "artists" semicolon, | 3,283.28 | 4.5 |
I should see they're no longer in
this table to our earlier example. | 3,287.78 | 4.74 |
This becomes a 2-step process. | 3,292.52 | 2.23 |
First delete their affiliation,
then delete their name. | 3,294.75 | 4.73 |
OK, So let's try this yet again,
but now using some additional tools | 3,299.48 | 8.43 |
that we have at our disposal. | 3,307.91 | 2.23 |
So let's look back at this FOREIGN KEY
constraint that existed in this table. | 3,310.14 | 6.72 |
If you remember, it
looked a bit like this. | 3,316.86 | 2.36 |
In my created table, I had this line. | 3,319.22 | 2.76 |
FOREIGN KEY, artist_id, REFERENCES
the "id" column in "artists." | 3,321.98 | 6.24 |
Well, if that is the case, I can't
delete the artist with the id | 3,328.22 | 6.21 |
referenced by this [? foreign ?]
[? key. ?] But it turns out that I | 3,334.43 | 4.74 |
could specify some alternative action
that happens when I try to delete | 3,339.17 | 5.22 |
the id that is referenced by this
[? foreign ?] [? key. ?] I can specify | 3,344.39 | 4.2 |
that using a keyword called ON DELETE. | 3,348.59 | 3.45 |
So after FOREIGN KEY REFERENCES
[? "artist id," ?] I could say | 3,352.04 | 2.82 |
afterwards ON DELETE, and then specify
some action I want to actually happen | 3,354.86 | 4.74 |
when I tried to delete the primary
key referenced by this [? foreign ?] | 3,359.6 | 3.9 |
[? key. ?] | 3,363.5 | 0.93 |
One thing I could use
would be RESTRICT, which | 3,364.43 | 3.57 |
is kind of like what we saw before. | 3,368 | 1.98 |
If I try to delete a primary key is
[? referenced ?] by this [? foreign ?] | 3,369.98 | 4.62 |
[? key, ?] I will not
be allowed to do it. | 3,374.6 | 2.49 |
That action is restricted. | 3,377.09 | 2.63 |
I could also decide to take NO ACTION. | 3,379.72 | 3.69 |
In this case, I could delete the
primary key [? referenced ?] by this | 3,383.41 | 4.74 |
[? foreign ?] [? key, ?]
and nothing would happen. | 3,388.15 | 2.41 |
I would actually be allowed to do that,
which may be unwise in some cases, | 3,390.56 | 4.73 |
but I could give myself that power. | 3,395.29 | 2.76 |
I could also decide to SET NULL. | 3,398.05 | 3.54 |
That is if I delete the primary key
that is [? referenced ?] by this | 3,401.59 | 4.74 |
[? foreign ?] [? key, ?] what I'll do
is set the [? foreign ?] [? key ?] to be | 3,406.33 | 3.36 |
NULL, meaning that
value no longer exists. | 3,409.69 | 3.967 |
I can alternatively [? set ?] it to a
[? default ?] value for that column. | 3,413.657 | 3.083 |
Or perhaps, most compellingly, I
could try to CASCADE the deletion. | 3,416.74 | 6.03 |
Where CASCADE means if I delete
the artist, for instance, | 3,422.77 | 3.82 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.