text
stringlengths 1
81
| start
float64 0
10.1k
| duration
float64 0
24.9
|
|---|---|---|
that we can't delete
Unidentified artist, because it's
| 3,062.48
| 3.03
|
referenced in the created table.
| 3,065.51
| 1.92
|
What we should maybe first do is delete
this row delete their affiliation
| 3,067.43
| 4.8
|
with their work, and then
delete the artist so we don't
| 3,072.23
| 3.87
|
run into this FOREIGN KEY constraint.
| 3,076.1
| 2.8
|
So let's try this in
our SQLite environment.
| 3,078.9
| 3.62
|
Come back to my computer.
| 3,082.52
| 2.26
|
And again, our plan was to first delete
the artists affiliation with their work
| 3,084.78
| 5.54
|
from the created table.
| 3,090.32
| 1.89
|
So let me show you
first the created table.
| 3,092.21
| 2.25
|
I'll say SELECT
[? star ?] from "created,"
| 3,094.46
| 3.78
|
and see how it's exactly like
the table we just visualized.
| 3,098.24
| 3.84
|
Now, let me try delete this artist
affiliation with their work.
| 3,102.08
| 4.74
|
I'm not deleting the artist.
| 3,106.82
| 2.05
|
I'm deleting their affiliation
with their authorship,
| 3,108.87
| 3.41
|
their [? artist ?] [? ship, ?] whatever
you want to call it for their work.
| 3,112.28
| 3.43
|
Now, I'll say DELETE FROM--
| 3,115.71
| 4.1
|
let's say, DELETE FROM "artists"
WHERE the "artist_id" is equal to
| 3,119.81
| 7.5
|
or equals 3.
| 3,127.31
| 3.29
|
Well, I could do this.
| 3,130.6
| 2.17
|
But there's probably a better way,
like I know the id, and that's fine.
| 3,132.77
| 4.07
|
But we could also use, as
we saw a little bit ago,
| 3,136.84
| 2.53
|
which were [? subqueries, ?]
a way to write a query that
| 3,139.37
| 3.14
|
returns me the result. And that
result gets included in another query
| 3,142.51
| 3.45
|
altogether.
| 3,145.96
| 0.88
|
So let's try that instead.
| 3,146.84
| 1.43
|
Let's say I don't know the artist_id.
| 3,148.27
| 2.76
|
What I could do is
make a [? subquery. ?]
| 3,151.03
| 2.1
|
I could say inside of this, let me
select the "id" FROM the "artists"
| 3,153.13
| 6.3
|
table WHERE, in this case, the "name"
equals "Unidentified artist," and then,
| 3,159.43
| 9.12
|
let me close out this
query, hit a semicolon.
| 3,168.55
| 2.58
|
And I already see a typo in this,
but I'm just going to try it anyway.
| 3,171.13
| 3.21
|
I will go ahead, and hit Enter.
| 3,174.34
| 2.7
|
And let's see if I type SELECT
[? star ?] FROM "artists," Enter,
| 3,177.04
| 6.66
|
I still see Unidentified artist.
| 3,183.7
| 2.85
|
And I think my typo here was as follows.
| 3,186.55
| 1.93
|
If I up my query using the
up arrow on my keyboard,
| 3,188.48
| 2.57
|
I see DELETE from "artists," where the
"artist_id" equals some value here.
| 3,191.05
| 5.25
|
But do I want to delete from artists?
| 3,196.3
| 2.97
|
I don't.
| 3,199.27
| 0.72
|
I actually can't delete from artists.
| 3,199.99
| 1.62
|
What I should do instead is
delete from the created table.
| 3,201.61
| 3.73
|
So let's try this.
| 3,205.34
| 1.01
|
I'll say DELETE FROM
"created," making sure I only
| 3,206.35
| 4.29
|
have double quotes
around created, then I'll
| 3,210.64
| 2.73
|
say WHERE the artist_id
equals, let's say, either 3--
| 3,213.37
| 5.1
|
but it could also be the
result of this [? subquery. ?]
| 3,218.47
| 3.06
|
I'll say 1, 2, 3, 4,
and then SELECT the "id"
| 3,221.53
| 5.88
|
FROM the "artist" table WHERE the
"name" equals "Unidentified artist."
| 3,227.41
| 8.47
|
Then I'll close this [? subquery, ?]
hitting semicolon, hit Enter.
| 3,235.88
| 4.35
|
And now, if I say SELECT [? star ?]
FROM "created" semicolon,
| 3,240.23
| 5.52
|
I should see that this artist's
affiliation with their work
| 3,245.75
| 3.75
|
no longer exists.
| 3,249.5
| 2.1
|
And because it no longer exists.
| 3,251.6
| 1.51
|
I can now delete them
from the artists table.
| 3,253.11
| 2.88
|
I don't have this FOREIGN
KEY artist_id referencing
| 3,255.99
| 4.22
|
the primary key of this artist.
| 3,260.21
| 2.31
|
So let's now try that.
| 3,262.52
| 1.38
|
I could say SELECT
[? star ?] FROM "artists,"
| 3,263.9
| 3.06
|
I see that Unidentified
artist is still in here.
| 3,266.96
| 3.69
|
But let's delete them now.
| 3,270.65
| 1.86
|
I'll say delete from,
let's say, "artists" WHERE
| 3,272.51
| 3.78
|
the "name" equals "Unidentified artist,"
closing my quotes, semicolon, hit
| 3,276.29
| 6.33
|
Enter.
| 3,282.62
| 0.66
|
And now if I Select [? star ?]
FROM "artists" semicolon,
| 3,283.28
| 4.5
|
I should see they're no longer in
this table to our earlier example.
| 3,287.78
| 4.74
|
This becomes a 2-step process.
| 3,292.52
| 2.23
|
First delete their affiliation,
then delete their name.
| 3,294.75
| 4.73
|
OK, So let's try this yet again,
but now using some additional tools
| 3,299.48
| 8.43
|
that we have at our disposal.
| 3,307.91
| 2.23
|
So let's look back at this FOREIGN KEY
constraint that existed in this table.
| 3,310.14
| 6.72
|
If you remember, it
looked a bit like this.
| 3,316.86
| 2.36
|
In my created table, I had this line.
| 3,319.22
| 2.76
|
FOREIGN KEY, artist_id, REFERENCES
the "id" column in "artists."
| 3,321.98
| 6.24
|
Well, if that is the case, I can't
delete the artist with the id
| 3,328.22
| 6.21
|
referenced by this [? foreign ?]
[? key. ?] But it turns out that I
| 3,334.43
| 4.74
|
could specify some alternative action
that happens when I try to delete
| 3,339.17
| 5.22
|
the id that is referenced by this
[? foreign ?] [? key. ?] I can specify
| 3,344.39
| 4.2
|
that using a keyword called ON DELETE.
| 3,348.59
| 3.45
|
So after FOREIGN KEY REFERENCES
[? "artist id," ?] I could say
| 3,352.04
| 2.82
|
afterwards ON DELETE, and then specify
some action I want to actually happen
| 3,354.86
| 4.74
|
when I tried to delete the primary
key referenced by this [? foreign ?]
| 3,359.6
| 3.9
|
[? key. ?]
| 3,363.5
| 0.93
|
One thing I could use
would be RESTRICT, which
| 3,364.43
| 3.57
|
is kind of like what we saw before.
| 3,368
| 1.98
|
If I try to delete a primary key is
[? referenced ?] by this [? foreign ?]
| 3,369.98
| 4.62
|
[? key, ?] I will not
be allowed to do it.
| 3,374.6
| 2.49
|
That action is restricted.
| 3,377.09
| 2.63
|
I could also decide to take NO ACTION.
| 3,379.72
| 3.69
|
In this case, I could delete the
primary key [? referenced ?] by this
| 3,383.41
| 4.74
|
[? foreign ?] [? key, ?]
and nothing would happen.
| 3,388.15
| 2.41
|
I would actually be allowed to do that,
which may be unwise in some cases,
| 3,390.56
| 4.73
|
but I could give myself that power.
| 3,395.29
| 2.76
|
I could also decide to SET NULL.
| 3,398.05
| 3.54
|
That is if I delete the primary key
that is [? referenced ?] by this
| 3,401.59
| 4.74
|
[? foreign ?] [? key, ?] what I'll do
is set the [? foreign ?] [? key ?] to be
| 3,406.33
| 3.36
|
NULL, meaning that
value no longer exists.
| 3,409.69
| 3.967
|
I can alternatively [? set ?] it to a
[? default ?] value for that column.
| 3,413.657
| 3.083
|
Or perhaps, most compellingly, I
could try to CASCADE the deletion.
| 3,416.74
| 6.03
|
Where CASCADE means if I delete
the artist, for instance,
| 3,422.77
| 3.82
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.