text stringlengths 1 81 | start float64 0 10.1k | duration float64 0 24.9 |
|---|---|---|
And I can stop here, leaving me
with just five potential problems. | 2,044.38 | 3.042 |
And then you can see
where this is going. | 2,047.422 | 1.708 |
2 and 1? | 2,049.13 | 0.5 |
Let's swap. | 2,049.63 | 0.97 |
2 and 3? | 2,050.6 | 0.5 |
You're good. | 2,051.1 | 0.43 |
3 and 4? | 2,051.53 | 0.55 |
You're good. | 2,052.08 | 0.67 |
We already solved these problems. | 2,052.75 | 1.42 |
So let me go back. | 2,054.17 | 1.61 |
And now, 1 and 2? | 2,055.78 | 1.22 |
You're good. | 2,057 | 0.84 |
2 and 3? | 2,057.84 | 0.54 |
You're good. | 2,058.38 | 0.56 |
3 and 4, 4 and 5, 5 and
6, 6 and 7, 7 and 8. | 2,058.94 | 3.14 |
What do I know now as the computer? | 2,062.08 | 3.61 |
What's that? | 2,065.69 | 0.56 |
AUDIENCE: It's sorted. | 2,066.25 | 0.31 |
SPEAKER 1: It's sorted. | 2,066.56 | 0.958 |
Why? | 2,067.518 | 0.911 |
AUDIENCE: Because everything's in order | 2,068.429 | 1.901 |
SPEAKER 1: Everything is in order. | 2,070.33 | 0.889 |
But what does that mean? | 2,071.219 | 1 |
We humans can see that, but the computer
can only look at individual values | 2,072.219 | 3.171 |
at a time. | 2,075.39 | 0.499 |
It can't take a step back
and say, yep, sorted. | 2,075.889 | 2.966 |
AUDIENCE: [INAUDIBLE]. | 2,078.855 | 2.229 |
SPEAKER 1: Good. | 2,081.084 | 0.666 |
At a lower level implementation
detail, I did no swaps. | 2,081.75 | 3.46 |
There were no two numbers
that were out of order. | 2,085.21 | 2.08 |
So it would just be
foolish of me and wasteful | 2,087.29 | 3.31 |
for me to bother doing another pass. | 2,090.6 | 1.78 |
Because assuming the numbers
are not changing on their own, | 2,092.38 | 2.67 |
I'm just going to do the same
thing again and again otherwise. | 2,095.05 | 2.583 |
So I can just stop. | 2,097.633 | 1.227 |
And indeed, the bubble sort
allows us to stop like this. | 2,098.86 | 2.53 |
Let's do one last approach. | 2,101.39 | 1.29 |
If you could, let me toss the
starting points on the board again. | 2,102.68 | 4.04 |
Let's reset one last time to this. | 2,106.72 | 3.589 |
And let me propose-- let me
draw inspiration, actually, | 2,110.309 | 2.291 |
from the approach you took
with the blue books, which was | 2,112.6 | 2.374 |
a little different from how we began. | 2,114.974 | 1.706 |
Which was recall that you took
the problem on your left hand | 2,116.68 | 3.572 |
and you just dealt
with it one at a time. | 2,120.252 | 1.708 |
You didn't go sifting
through looking for A. | 2,121.96 | 1.83 |
You didn't go sifting
through looking for B. | 2,123.79 | 1.7 |
You didn't go sifting through
looking for C, which would really | 2,125.49 | 2.11 |
be the analog of what you
proposed a moment ago. | 2,127.6 | 2.12 |
Instead, you just dealt with
each problem as it came. | 2,129.72 | 2.23 |
And this is our third
and final algorithm | 2,131.95 | 1.94 |
for sorting called insertion sort. | 2,133.89 | 2.53 |
Take each problem one at a time and
just deal with it then and there. | 2,136.42 | 3.85 |
Don't postpone. | 2,140.27 | 1.1 |
So here's 4. | 2,141.37 | 0.923 |
You know what? | 2,142.293 | 1.167 |
Done. | 2,143.46 | 0.58 |
I now claim that this list, which
we'll visually make a little separate, | 2,144.04 | 3.7 |
is sorted. | 2,147.74 | 0.85 |
So I'm going to mentally divide my
list into a left half and a right half. | 2,148.59 | 3.14 |
And now I just claim trivially-- I
mean, almost silly-- this is sorted. | 2,151.73 | 4.31 |
Because it is. | 2,156.04 | 0.83 |
But now the right half
of my list remains. | 2,156.87 | 1.88 |
So let's go ahead and do this. | 2,158.75 | 1.249 |
So number 2. | 2,159.999 | 0.931 |
OK, where does this belong? | 2,160.93 | 1.17 |
So if you want to go ahead
and pick up the number. | 2,162.1 | 2.083 |
The stand can stay. | 2,164.183 | 1.297 |
Number 2 goes where? | 2,165.48 | 1.79 |
Here's my left list. | 2,167.27 | 1.045 |
And we'll make a little more
space here just to be clear. | 2,168.315 | 2.375 |
It goes over to this side. | 2,170.69 | 1.6 |
So what has to happen? | 2,172.29 | 2.74 |
So this time, we do
need to shift you over. | 2,175.03 | 2.84 |
So let's take 2 out. | 2,177.87 | 1.37 |
Let's shift 4 over. | 2,179.24 | 2.017 |
And now we won't move the stand. | 2,181.257 | 1.333 |
We'll just assume now that
my left half is of size 2 | 2,182.59 | 3.25 |
and the right half is of size 6. | 2,185.84 | 1.445 |
But now, the left half of
the list is still sorted, | 2,187.285 | 2.125 |
but it costs me a little bit of work. | 2,189.41 | 1.541 |
I had to move 4 over. | 2,190.951 | 1.32 |
All right, let me deal with 6. | 2,192.271 | 1.249 |
Where does 6 go? | 2,193.52 | 1.684 |
It's already in order. | 2,195.204 | 0.916 |
I don't need to shift anyone. | 2,196.12 | 1.208 |
Where does 8 go? | 2,197.328 | 0.792 |
Phew, it doesn't need to go anywhere. | 2,198.12 | 1.541 |
It's already in order. | 2,199.661 | 0.935 |
Uh-oh, 1. | 2,200.596 | 0.774 |
Where does it go? | 2,201.37 | 0.94 |
Now we incur a good amount of cost. | 2,202.31 | 2.052 |
So let's do this. | 2,204.362 | 0.708 |
Where do you go? | 2,205.07 | 1.19 |
One shift, two shift,
three shifts, four shifts. | 2,206.26 | 3.8 |
Feels-- yep-- as bad as
our original approach. | 2,210.06 | 3.49 |
But notice I only have
4 more problems left. | 2,213.55 | 1.979 |
I don't have to keep going
back through the list. | 2,215.529 | 2.041 |
So where does 3 go? | 2,217.57 | 0.75 |
All right, let's pop you out. | 2,218.32 | 1.208 |
Shift you in there. | 2,219.528 | 1.862 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.