text stringlengths 1 81 | start float64 0 10.1k | duration float64 0 24.9 |
|---|---|---|
many we have conditionals in our | 1,864.96 | 4.8 |
vocabulary already via which we can now | 1,866.88 | 4.88 |
express that well let me pause here and | 1,869.76 | 4.08 |
see if there's any questions now on how | 1,871.76 | 4 |
we handled the error before with the | 1,873.84 | 4.24 |
index error or how now we're just | 1,875.76 | 5.12 |
proactively avoiding all index errors | 1,878.08 | 5.52 |
all together by just checking first is | 1,880.88 | 4.639 |
it too few is it too many or is it | 1,883.6 | 4.72 |
exactly what we want oh yeah thank you | 1,885.519 | 4.961 |
um so i was wondering you you touched | 1,888.32 | 5.28 |
upon kind of using your full name um | 1,890.48 | 5.84 |
could we could we then um | 1,893.6 | 4.16 |
is there a way | 1,896.32 | 4.16 |
going forwards that perhaps we | 1,897.76 | 4.32 |
have people that want their full names | 1,900.48 | 3.6 |
and want their just their first name | 1,902.08 | 4.319 |
that we separate that into like oh this | 1,904.08 | 4.719 |
person has full name this person has | 1,906.399 | 4.64 |
just the one name | 1,908.799 | 4.88 |
absolutely and allow me to | 1,911.039 | 4.48 |
allow me to propose we come back to that | 1,913.679 | 3.84 |
support for multiple names | 1,915.519 | 3.681 |
but indeed we could do that and i should | 1,917.519 | 4.561 |
know too though we can support full | 1,919.2 | 5.199 |
names right now if i do this instead of | 1,922.08 | 4.719 |
typing in david spacemailin which is | 1,924.399 | 4.481 |
problematic because again by definition | 1,926.799 | 5.521 |
of how argv works each word ends up in a | 1,928.88 | 5.84 |
specific location in the list but if i | 1,932.32 | 4.4 |
add quotes single quotes or double | 1,934.72 | 4.559 |
quotes at the command line now python | 1,936.72 | 4.4 |
will view this as two total things the | 1,939.279 | 3.921 |
name of the file and this full name and | 1,941.12 | 3.679 |
now when i hit enter i don't see the | 1,943.2 | 3.92 |
quotes the whole thing is passed in as | 1,944.799 | 4.321 |
my full name and if i want to adapt this | 1,947.12 | 3.679 |
further for multiple people we'll be | 1,949.12 | 3.84 |
able to do that as well other questions | 1,950.799 | 5.441 |
now on this version with if elif else or | 1,952.96 | 5.839 |
on accept before | 1,956.24 | 4.96 |
i want to i want to ask you | 1,958.799 | 5.201 |
can we use multiple else statement can | 1,961.2 | 4.8 |
you use multiple else's statements no | 1,964 | 4 |
else is the last catch-all statement | 1,966 | 4.24 |
that you can have you can have multiple | 1,968 | 5.039 |
l if statements in the middle but not | 1,970.24 | 6.279 |
multiple elses | 1,973.039 | 3.48 |
all right | 1,976.799 | 2.48 |
all right well let's turn our attention | 1,977.84 | 2.8 |
back now to this code and see if we | 1,979.279 | 3.361 |
can't refine it a bit more by adding in | 1,980.64 | 3.759 |
some additional functionality that we | 1,982.64 | 4.24 |
get with modules like the sys module one | 1,984.399 | 4.081 |
of the things i don't love about this | 1,986.88 | 3.36 |
version of the code even though arguably | 1,988.48 | 3.919 |
it is now correct | 1,990.24 | 4.48 |
is that the essence of my program which | 1,992.399 | 4.481 |
is just to print out the name tag is | 1,994.72 | 4.559 |
kind of relegated to this else clause | 1,996.88 | 5.2 |
and that's fine logically it's correct | 1,999.279 | 5.12 |
but generally speaking there's something | 2,002.08 | 4.4 |
nice about keeping all of your error | 2,004.399 | 5.28 |
handling separate from the code that you | 2,006.48 | 5.36 |
really care about having all of these | 2,009.679 | 4.161 |
ifs lifts perhaps at the top of your | 2,011.84 | 4.16 |
code that are checking to make sure that | 2,013.84 | 4.24 |
all of the data is as expected but then | 2,016 | 4.48 |
it would be nice if only for design's | 2,018.08 | 4.88 |
sake not to sort of hide in this else | 2,020.48 | 4.559 |
statement the actual code that you care | 2,022.96 | 4.16 |
about i would prefer for instance to do | 2,025.039 | 4.48 |
something logically like this i could | 2,027.12 | 4.64 |
check for errors up top | 2,029.519 | 4.961 |
and then down here print the name tags | 2,031.76 | 4.08 |
it would be nice if those are sort of | 2,034.48 | 3.84 |
distinct blocks of code all of which are | 2,035.84 | 4.559 |
here left aligned but there's a problem | 2,038.32 | 4.16 |
with what i've just done here | 2,040.399 | 5.201 |
logically what bug did i just introduced | 2,042.48 | 5.52 |
by getting rid of the else | 2,045.6 | 5.2 |
and introducing line 10 on its own with | 2,048 | 5.04 |
no indentation outside of the | 2,050.8 | 3.76 |
conditional | 2,053.04 | 3.44 |
what bug have i just introduced what | 2,054.56 | 4.799 |
mistake to be clear | 2,056.48 | 5.919 |
um name error ironically it's a name | 2,059.359 | 5.601 |
error but not a name error exception | 2,062.399 | 5.52 |
it's an error with my name but | 2,064.96 | 5.439 |
i think you're frozen for me it's going | 2,067.919 | 4.641 |
to raise an exception because even | 2,070.399 | 3.921 |
though i'm checking the length of | 2,072.56 | 4.319 |
sys.rgv up top and even though i'm | 2,074.32 | 4.48 |
checking it again for being greater than | 2,076.879 | 3.841 |
two not just less than two but greater | 2,078.8 | 4.319 |
i'm still then blindly and incorrectly | 2,080.72 | 4.56 |
assuming it's now going to exist so just | 2,083.119 | 4.56 |
to be clear if i run python of name dot | 2,085.28 | 4.799 |
pi and i don't type any arguments i've | 2,087.679 | 4.72 |
got too few i think i'm going to see | 2,090.079 | 4.721 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.