judgment stringlengths 1.54k 793k | summary stringlengths 980 16.4k | judgment_lex stringlengths 1.54k 792k | summary_lex stringlengths 980 16.3k | judgment_bleu float64 0.69 1 | judgment_rouge float64 0.98 1 | summary_bleu float64 0.99 1 | summary_rouge float64 1 1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2. These appeals take exception to the common Judgment and
decree of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh 1,
dated 27.05.2019 in R.S.A. Nos. 2901/2012 and 3881/2012,
for short, “the High Court”
whereby the High Court reversed the concurrent findings of the
trial Court and the first appellate Cour... | The Supreme Court has again stated that if a document is officially registered, it is generally considered real. The person who claims it is fake is responsible for proving that it is not.
In a lawsuit started in 2001, the plaintiff claimed that in 1990, the defendants tricked her into signing blank papers. They said ... | 2. These appeals take exception to the common Judgment and decree of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh 1, dated 27.05.2019 in R.S.A. Nos. 2901/2012 and 3881/2012, for short, “the High Court” whereby the High Court reversed the concurrent findings of the trial Court and the first appellate Court and dec... | The Supreme Court has again stated that if a document is officially registered, it is generally considered real. The person who claims it is fake is responsible for proving that it is not.
In a lawsuit started in 2001, the plaintiff claimed that in 1990, the defendants tricked her into signing blank papers. They said ... | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Case :- PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 17 of 2022
Counsel for Petitioner :- Rama Kant Dixit,Asok Pande,Shraddha Tripathi
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
In the pre-lunch session today, after hearing the parties’
counsel we had passed the following order:
“Heard Sri Ashok Pandey and Ms. Shraddha
Tripathi, learn... | The Allahabad High Court recently decided not to hear a special public lawsuit, known as a Public Interest Litigation (PIL). This lawsuit had asked the court to delay the elections for the Uttar Pradesh state government, which were planned for February-March 2022, due to a sharp increase in COVID-19 cases.
Two judges,... | Case :- PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 17 of 2022
Counsel for Petitioner :- Rama Kant Dixit,Asok Pande,Shraddha Tripathi
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
In the pre-lunch session today, after hearing the parties’
counsel we had passed the following order:
“Heard Sri Ashok Pandey and Ms. Shraddha
Tripathi, learn... | The Allahabad High Court recently decided not to hear a special public lawsuit, known as a Public Interest Litigation (PIL). This lawsuit had asked the court to delay the elections for the Uttar Pradesh state government, which were planned for February-March 2022, due to a sharp increase in COVID-19 cases.
Two judges,... | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
"1. Exemption is allowed, subject to all just exceptions.\n2. The application is disposed of(...TRUNCATED) | "The Delhi High Court has rejected a case that questioned Delhi University's system for assigning se(...TRUNCATED) | "1. Exemption is allowed, subject to all just exceptions.\n2. The application is disposed of(...TRUNCATED) | "The Delhi High Court has rejected a case that questioned Delhi University's system for assigning se(...TRUNCATED) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
"2. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 13.11.2019\npassed by the High Cour(...TRUNCATED) | "The Supreme Court stated that charging a husband's relatives with a crime based on vague and genera(...TRUNCATED) | "2. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 13.11.2019 passed by the High Court(...TRUNCATED) | "The Supreme Court stated that charging a husband's relatives with a crime based on vague and genera(...TRUNCATED) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
"Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Medical Health And Ors.\nCounsel for Petitioner :- Sh(...TRUNCATED) | "On Monday, the Allahabad High Court stated that low-level government workers, called Class-IV emplo(...TRUNCATED) | "Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Medical Health And Ors.\nCounsel for Petitioner :- Sh(...TRUNCATED) | "On Monday, the Allahabad High Court stated that low-level government workers, called Class-IV emplo(...TRUNCATED) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
"The petitioners are before this Court calling in question\nentire proceedings in Criminal Miscellan(...TRUNCATED) | "The Karnataka High Court has made it clear that official permission to file a lawsuit, as required (...TRUNCATED) | "The petitioners are before this Court calling in question entire proceedings in Criminal Miscellane(...TRUNCATED) | "The Karnataka High Court has made it clear that official permission to file a lawsuit, as required (...TRUNCATED) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
"In the night of 17.09.2010, Hasina Khatun suffered burn injuries\nat her matrimonial home. Five yea(...TRUNCATED) | "A high court in Calcutta recently overturned a murder conviction against a man. The court decided t(...TRUNCATED) | "In the night of 17.09.2010, Hasina Khatun suffered burn injuries at her matrimonial home. Five year(...TRUNCATED) | "A high court in Calcutta recently overturned a murder conviction against a man. The court decided t(...TRUNCATED) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
"Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 48444 of\nCase :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No.(...TRUNCATED) | "The Allahabad High Court today refused to let two police officers from Uttar Pradesh out of jail. T(...TRUNCATED) | "Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 48444 of Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. (...TRUNCATED) | "The Allahabad High Court today refused to let two police officers from Uttar Pradesh out of jail. T(...TRUNCATED) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
"1. A horrendous tragedy occurred on the night of 2nd and 3rd December 1984, due to\nthe escape(...TRUNCATED) | "A special group of Supreme Court judges recently rejected a legal appeal from the Indian government(...TRUNCATED) | "1. A horrendous tragedy occurred on the night of 2nd and 3rd December 1984, due to the escape of de(...TRUNCATED) | "A special group of Supreme Court judges recently rejected a legal appeal from the Indian government(...TRUNCATED) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
"This petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the\nConstitution of India read with Section 4(...TRUNCATED) | "The Karnataka High Court stated that no religion has a basic legal right to insult or put down othe(...TRUNCATED) | "This petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the\nConstitution of India read with Section 4(...TRUNCATED) | "The Karnataka High Court stated that no religion has a basic legal right to insult or put down othe(...TRUNCATED) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
End of preview. Expand in Data Studio
README.md exists but content is empty.
- Downloads last month
- 1