judgment stringlengths 19.1k 793k | summary stringlengths 1.77k 16.4k | original_judgment stringlengths 19.1k 793k | processed_judgment stringlengths 838 19.9k | original_summary stringlengths 1.77k 16.4k | processed_summary stringlengths 1.77k 4.92k | judgment_bleu float64 0 0.05 | judgment_rouge float64 0.05 0.4 | summary_bleu float64 0.06 1 | summary_rouge float64 0.42 1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2. These appeals take exception to the common Judgment and
decree of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh 1,
dated 27.05.2019 in R.S.A. Nos. 2901/2012 and 3881/2012,
for short, “the High Court”
whereby the High Court reversed the concurrent findings of the
trial Court and the first appellate Cour... | The Supreme Court has again stated that if a document is officially registered, it is generally considered real. The person who claims it is fake is responsible for proving that it is not.
In a lawsuit started in 2001, the plaintiff claimed that in 1990, the defendants tricked her into signing blank papers. They said ... | 2. These appeals take exception to the common Judgment and
decree of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh 1,
dated 27.05.2019 in R.S.A. Nos. 2901/2012 and 3881/2012,
for short, “the High Court”
whereby the High Court reversed the concurrent findings of the
trial Court and the first appellate Cour... | These appeals take exception to the common Judgment and
decree of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh 1,
dated 27.05.2019 in R.S.A. Nos. 4 and the step sisterinlaw of the plaintiff. Harbans Singh was the owner of various stretches of land at
Nawanshahr, Jalandhar and Hoshiarpur which, upon his death
fo... | The Supreme Court has again stated that if a document is officially registered, it is generally considered real. The person who claims it is fake is responsible for proving that it is not.
In a lawsuit started in 2001, the plaintiff claimed that in 1990, the defendants tricked her into signing blank papers. They said ... | The Supreme Court has again stated that if a document is officially registered, it is generally considered real. The person who claims it is fake is responsible for proving that it is not.
In a lawsuit started in 2001, the plaintiff claimed that in 1990, the defendants tricked her into signing blank papers. They said ... | 0.010536 | 0.308098 | 1 | 1 |
"1. The technological age has produced digital platforms – not like the\nrailway platforms whe(...TRUNCATED) | "The Supreme Court said that social media manipulation puts elections and voting at risk. This was p(...TRUNCATED) | "1. The technological age has produced digital platforms – not like the\nrailway platforms whe(...TRUNCATED) | "The technological age has produced digital platforms – not like the\nrailway platforms where trai(...TRUNCATED) | "The Supreme Court said that social media manipulation puts elections and voting at risk. This was p(...TRUNCATED) | "The Supreme Court said that social media manipulation puts elections and voting at risk. This was p(...TRUNCATED) | 0.000007 | 0.143969 | 1 | 1 |
"1. Steel products were supplied by the respondent to one M/s.\nDiamond Engineering Pvt. Ltd. [(...TRUNCATED) | "The Supreme Court has said that legal cases about bouncing checks are \"quasi-criminal\" in nature.(...TRUNCATED) | "1. Steel products were supplied by the respondent to one M/s.\nDiamond Engineering Pvt. Ltd. [(...TRUNCATED) | "Steel products were supplied by the respondent to one M/s.\nDiamond Engineering Pvt. SS/690/2017 da(...TRUNCATED) | "The Supreme Court has said that legal cases about bouncing checks are \"quasi-criminal\" in nature.(...TRUNCATED) | "The Supreme Court has said that legal cases about bouncing checks are \"quasi-criminal\" in nature.(...TRUNCATED) | 0.000001 | 0.130042 | 0.524137 | 0.76263 |
"2. This appeal challenges the judgment and order dated\n29.9.2021 passed by the High Court(...TRUNCATED) | "The Supreme Court changed the death sentence of a person convicted of murder. They did this because(...TRUNCATED) | "2. This appeal challenges the judgment and order dated\n29.9.2021 passed by the High Court(...TRUNCATED) | "This appeal challenges the judgment and order dated\n29.9.2021 passed by the High Court of Karnatak(...TRUNCATED) | "The Supreme Court changed the death sentence of a person convicted of murder. They did this because(...TRUNCATED) | "The Supreme Court changed the death sentence of a person convicted of murder. They did this because(...TRUNCATED) | 0.04655 | 0.399328 | 1 | 1 |
"1. These two sets of appeals are being disposed of by this\ncommon judgment.\n2. In the fir(...TRUNCATED) | "The Supreme Court decided that if schools ask for money for things students didn't use during the l(...TRUNCATED) | "1. These two sets of appeals are being disposed of by this\ncommon judgment.\n2. In the fir(...TRUNCATED) | "These two sets of appeals are being disposed of by this\ncommon judgment. 5470 and 5589 of 2020\n3 (...TRUNCATED) | "The Supreme Court decided that if schools ask for money for things students didn't use during the l(...TRUNCATED) | "The Supreme Court decided that if schools ask for money for things students didn't use during the l(...TRUNCATED) | 0.000015 | 0.154585 | 1 | 1 |
"This judgment has been divided into the following sections to facilitate analysis:\nD.1 Ineligibi(...TRUNCATED) | "The Supreme Court recently decided that a person who is not allowed to submit a rescue plan for a s(...TRUNCATED) | "This judgment has been divided into the following sections to facilitate analysis:\nD.1 Ineligibi(...TRUNCATED) | "The judgment was rendered in an appeal5 filed by\nJindal Steel and Power Limited6, an unsecured cre(...TRUNCATED) | "The Supreme Court recently decided that a person who is not allowed to submit a rescue plan for a s(...TRUNCATED) | "The Supreme Court recently decided that a person who is not allowed to submit a rescue plan for a s(...TRUNCATED) | 0.000087 | 0.176239 | 0.375347 | 0.67386 |
"2. This appeal is against a judgment and order dated 17th September 2021 passed by\nthe Dharwad Ben(...TRUNCATED) | "Two judges in the Supreme Court disagreed on a key point. They couldn't decide if a certain rule, S(...TRUNCATED) | "2. This appeal is against a judgment and order dated 17th September 2021 passed by\nthe Dharwad Ben(...TRUNCATED) | "This appeal is against a judgment and order dated 17th September 2021 passed by\nthe Dharwad Bench (...TRUNCATED) | "Two judges in the Supreme Court disagreed on a key point. They couldn't decide if a certain rule, S(...TRUNCATED) | "Two judges in the Supreme Court disagreed on a key point. Section 23 of the POCSO Act makes it a cr(...TRUNCATED) | 0.017128 | 0.330627 | 0.345505 | 0.656481 |
"Appellant :- Babu Pasi alias Babu Lal Pasi and another\nRespondent :- State of U.P.\nCounsel for Ap(...TRUNCATED) | "The High Court in Allahabad, which held its hearing in Lucknow, has overturned a murder conviction (...TRUNCATED) | "Appellant :- Babu Pasi alias Babu Lal Pasi and another\nRespondent :- State of U.P.\nCounsel for Ap(...TRUNCATED) | "Appellant :- Babu Pasi alias Babu Lal Pasi and another\nRespondent :- State of U.P.\nCounsel for Ap(...TRUNCATED) | "The High Court in Allahabad, which held its hearing in Lucknow, has overturned a murder conviction (...TRUNCATED) | "The High Court in Allahabad, which held its hearing in Lucknow, has overturned a murder conviction (...TRUNCATED) | 0.00136 | 0.234539 | 1 | 1 |
"The petitioner is before this Court calling in question the\nproceedings in C.C.No.2610 of 2020 pen(...TRUNCATED) | "The Karnataka High Court has decided that a formal, official message shared only between two people(...TRUNCATED) | "The petitioner is before this Court calling in question the\nproceedings in C.C.No.2610 of 2020 pen(...TRUNCATED) | "The petitioner is before this Court calling in question the\nproceedings in C.C.No.2610 of 2020 pen(...TRUNCATED) | "The Karnataka High Court has decided that a formal, official message shared only between two people(...TRUNCATED) | "The Karnataka High Court has decided that a formal, official message shared only between two people(...TRUNCATED) | 0.009226 | 0.321107 | 0.585179 | 0.793541 |
"On 03.02.2022, a news item appeared in Mathrubumi\ndaily that the Travancore Devaswom Board has lea(...TRUNCATED) | "The Kerala High Court announced on Wednesday that courts have a duty to protect the property of rel(...TRUNCATED) | "On 03.02.2022, a news item appeared in Mathrubumi\ndaily that the Travancore Devaswom Board has lea(...TRUNCATED) | "On 03.02.2022, a news item appeared in Mathrubumi\ndaily that the Travancore Devaswom Board has lea(...TRUNCATED) | "The Kerala High Court announced on Wednesday that courts have a duty to protect the property of rel(...TRUNCATED) | "The Kerala High Court announced on Wednesday that courts have a duty to protect the property of rel(...TRUNCATED) | 0.020842 | 0.343735 | 1 | 1 |
End of preview. Expand in Data Studio
README.md exists but content is empty.
- Downloads last month
- 4