Judgement stringlengths 6 48.2k | Summary stringlengths 13 13.2k | original_judgment stringlengths 6 48.2k | processed_judgment stringlengths 6 18.9k | original_summary stringlengths 13 13.2k | processed_summary stringlengths 13 5.18k | judgment_bleu float64 0.05 1 | judgment_rouge float64 0.41 1 | summary_bleu float64 0.11 1 | summary_rouge float64 0.48 1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. The instant bail application under Section 483 BNSS has been filed on behalf of the petitioner who is in custody in connection with FIR No.276/2024 registered at Police Station Mansarovar Jaipur for offence under Section 8/22 of the NDPS Act.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner has fal... | The Rajasthan High Court heard a request to release a person from jail temporarily. This request was made under a law called the NDPS Act, which deals with illegal drugs. The person argued that the amount of illegal drugs found was less than what is considered a large amount for selling. A single judge, Anil Kumar Upma... | 1. The instant bail application under Section 483 BNSS has been filed on behalf of the petitioner who is in custody in connection with FIR No.276/2024 registered at Police Station Mansarovar Jaipur for offence under Section 8/22 of the NDPS Act.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner has fal... | 1. The instant bail application under Section 483 BNSS has been filed on behalf of the petitioner who is in custody in connection with FIR No.276/2024 registered at Police Station Mansarovar Jaipur for offence under Section 8/22 of the NDPS Act.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner has fal... | The Rajasthan High Court heard a request to release a person from jail temporarily. This request was made under a law called the NDPS Act, which deals with illegal drugs. The person argued that the amount of illegal drugs found was less than what is considered a large amount for selling. A single judge, Anil Kumar Upma... | The Rajasthan High Court heard a request to release a person from jail temporarily. This request was made under a law called the NDPS Act, which deals with illegal drugs. The person argued that the amount of illegal drugs found was less than what is considered a large amount for selling. A single judge, Anil Kumar Upma... | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.G.ARUN
CRIME NO.RC /CB/2014 OF CENTRAL BUREAU OF
INVESTIGATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM,
AGAINST THE ORDER DATED IN CRMP IN CC
SPE/CBI COURT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
PETITIONER:
ALEX C JOSEPH,
S/O C A JOSEPH, PRESENTLY RESIDING AT D-27, SOUTH
EXTENSION,... | The Kerala High Court recently looked at a special legal case. This case was about a decision made by a lower court judge. That judge had said no to a request from someone accused of a crime. The accused person wanted to question the witnesses against him using video calls, because of health issues and because his lawy... | IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.G.ARUN
CRIME NO.RC /CB/2014 OF CENTRAL BUREAU OF
INVESTIGATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM,
AGAINST THE ORDER DATED IN CRMP IN CC
SPE/CBI COURT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
PETITIONER:
ALEX C JOSEPH,
S/O C A JOSEPH, PRESENTLY RESIDING AT D-27, SOUTH
EXTENSION,... | IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.G.ARUN
CRIME NO.RC /CB/2014 OF CENTRAL BUREAU OF
INVESTIGATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM,
AGAINST THE ORDER DATED IN CRMP IN CC
SPE/CBI COURT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
PETITIONER:
ALEX C JOSEPH,
S/O C A JOSEPH, PRESENTLY RESIDING AT D-27, SOUTH
EXTENSION,... | The Kerala High Court recently looked at a special legal case. This case was about a decision made by a lower court judge. That judge had said no to a request from someone accused of a crime. The accused person wanted to question the witnesses against him using video calls, because of health issues and because his lawy... | The Kerala High Court recently looked at a special legal case. This case was about a decision made by a lower court judge. That judge had said no to a request from someone accused of a crime. The accused person wanted to question the witnesses against him using video calls, because of health issues and because his lawy... | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Rajiv Sarin & Ors vs Directorate Of Estates & Ors on 2 May, 2025
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV
The instant civil suit seeks for damages of mesne profits, loss of market rent and the damages arising out of outstanding property tax, along with pendente lite and futu... | Delhi High Court: In a case where people (called "plaintiffs") were asking for money because of illegal property use, lost rent, and unpaid property tax, along with interest, Justice Purushaindra Kumar Yadav stated that the plaintiffs successfully proved the first defendant (Defendant 1) illegally occupied their proper... | IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Rajiv Sarin & Ors vs Directorate Of Estates & Ors on 2 May, 2025
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV
The instant civil suit seeks for damages of mesne profits, loss of market rent and the damages arising out of outstanding property tax, along with pendente lite and futu... | IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Rajiv Sarin & Ors vs Directorate Of Estates & Ors on 2 May, 2025
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV
The instant civil suit seeks for damages of mesne profits, loss of market rent and the damages arising out of outstanding property tax, along with pendente lite and futu... | Delhi High Court: In a case where people (called "plaintiffs") were asking for money because of illegal property use, lost rent, and unpaid property tax, along with interest, Justice Purushaindra Kumar Yadav stated that the plaintiffs successfully proved the first defendant (Defendant 1) illegally occupied their proper... | Delhi High Court: In a case where people (called "plaintiffs") were asking for money because of illegal property use, lost rent, and unpaid property tax, along with interest, Justice Purushaindra Kumar Yadav stated that the plaintiffs successfully proved the first defendant (Defendant 1) illegally occupied their proper... | 1 | 1 | 0.350745 | 0.660972 |
1. Vide this common order, I intend to dispose of CRR No.5082 of 2015 and CRR No.11 of 2016, as common questions of law and facts are involved for adjudication. For the sake of convenience, facts are taken from CRR No.5082 of 2015.
2. The petitioner(s) prays for setting-aside the judgment dated 25.08.2014, passed by l... | Punjab and Haryana High Court: The Punjab and Haryana High Court looked at two requests from two teachers who had been found guilty of crimes under specific sections (294 and 357) of India's main criminal law, called the Penal Code, 1860 (IPC). They were asking the court to review the decision that found them guilty, a... | 1. Vide this common order, I intend to dispose of CRR No.5082 of 2015 and CRR No.11 of 2016, as common questions of law and facts are involved for adjudication. For the sake of convenience, facts are taken from CRR No.5082 of 2015.
2. The petitioner(s) prays for setting-aside the judgment dated 25.08.2014, passed by l... | 1. Vide this common order, I intend to dispose of CRR No.5082 of 2015 and CRR No.11 of 2016, as common questions of law and facts are involved for adjudication. For the sake of convenience, facts are taken from CRR No.5082 of 2015.
2. The petitioner(s) prays for setting-aside the judgment dated 25.08.2014, passed by l... | Punjab and Haryana High Court: The Punjab and Haryana High Court looked at two requests from two teachers who had been found guilty of crimes under specific sections (294 and 357) of India's main criminal law, called the Penal Code, 1860 (IPC). They were asking the court to review the decision that found them guilty, a... | Punjab and Haryana High Court: The Punjab and Haryana High Court looked at two requests from two teachers who had been found guilty of crimes under specific sections (294 and 357) of India's main criminal law, called the Penal Code, 1860 (IPC). They were asking the court to review the decision that found them guilty, a... | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
"HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT\nArvind Kumar S/o Bal Ram,\nVersus\n1. The Union Of India(...TRUNCATED) | "The Rajasthan High Court heard a case where a person, called the petitioner, sued because he was tu(...TRUNCATED) | "HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT\nArvind Kumar S/o Bal Ram,\nVersus\n1. The Union Of India(...TRUNCATED) | "HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT\nArvind Kumar S/o Bal Ram,\nVersus\n1. The Union Of India(...TRUNCATED) | "The Rajasthan High Court heard a case where a person, called the petitioner, sued because he was tu(...TRUNCATED) | "The Rajasthan High Court heard a case where a person, called the petitioner, sued because he was tu(...TRUNCATED) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
"HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR\nWPS No. 8212 of 2023\nYaad Das Sahu versus\n1 - State of Ch(...TRUNCATED) | "The Chhattisgarh High Court looked at a case where an employee, a Village Employment Assistant (cal(...TRUNCATED) | "HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR\nWPS No. 8212 of 2023\nYaad Das Sahu versus\n1 - State of Ch(...TRUNCATED) | "HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR\nWPS No. 8212 of 2023\nYaad Das Sahu versus\n1 - State of Ch(...TRUNCATED) | "The Chhattisgarh High Court looked at a case where an employee, a Village Employment Assistant (cal(...TRUNCATED) | "The Chhattisgarh High Court looked at a case where an employee, a Village Employment Assistant (cal(...TRUNCATED) | 0.884871 | 0.947888 | 1 | 1 |
"IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBA\nAmol Samadhan Nikam v. State of Maharashtra, 2025\nCORAM:(...TRUNCATED) | "The Bombay High Court: Two judges, Vibha Kankanwadi and Sanjay A. Deshmukh, noticed that police off(...TRUNCATED) | "IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBA\nAmol Samadhan Nikam v. State of Maharashtra, 2025\nCORAM:(...TRUNCATED) | "IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBA\nAmol Samadhan Nikam v. State of Maharashtra, 2025\nCORAM:(...TRUNCATED) | "The Bombay High Court: Two judges, Vibha Kankanwadi and Sanjay A. Deshmukh, noticed that police off(...TRUNCATED) | "The Bombay High Court: Two judges, Vibha Kankanwadi and Sanjay A. Deshmukh, noticed that police off(...TRUNCATED) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
"IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY\nCRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION\nCRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATI(...TRUNCATED) | "The Bombay High Court looked at a request for bail from a 24-year-old man. He had been in jail for (...TRUNCATED) | "IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY\nCRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION\nCRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATI(...TRUNCATED) | "IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY\nCRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION\nCRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATI(...TRUNCATED) | "The Bombay High Court looked at a request for bail from a 24-year-old man. He had been in jail for (...TRUNCATED) | "The Bombay High Court looked at a request for bail from a 24-year-old man. He had been in jail for (...TRUNCATED) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
"Delhi High Court\nPuja Manorama Dilip Khedkar vs The State Of Nct Of Delhi & Anr. on 23 December, 2(...TRUNCATED) | "The Delhi High Court made a decision about a request for bail. Puja Khedkar, who used to be trainin(...TRUNCATED) | "Delhi High Court\nPuja Manorama Dilip Khedkar vs The State Of Nct Of Delhi & Anr. on 23 December, 2(...TRUNCATED) | "Delhi High Court\nPuja Manorama Dilip Khedkar vs The State Of Nct Of Delhi & Anr. The instant appli(...TRUNCATED) | "The Delhi High Court made a decision about a request for bail. Puja Khedkar, who used to be trainin(...TRUNCATED) | "The Delhi High Court made a decision about a request for bail. This kind of bail means she wanted t(...TRUNCATED) | 0.234846 | 0.584812 | 0.367874 | 0.673357 |
"Wipro Enterprises Private Limited vs Wipro Gas Service & Anr on 24 December, 2024\n$~6\n* IN THE HI(...TRUNCATED) | "Delhi High Court: In a lawsuit started by Wipro Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. (called ‘Wipro’), the com(...TRUNCATED) | "Wipro Enterprises Private Limited vs Wipro Gas Service & Anr on 24 December, 2024\n$~6\n* IN THE HI(...TRUNCATED) | "Wipro Enterprises Private Limited vs Wipro Gas Service & Anr on 24 December, 2024\n$~6\n* IN THE HI(...TRUNCATED) | "Delhi High Court: In a lawsuit started by Wipro Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. (called ‘Wipro’), the com(...TRUNCATED) | "Delhi High Court: In a lawsuit started by Wipro Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. (called ‘Wipro’), the com(...TRUNCATED) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
End of preview. Expand in Data Studio
README.md exists but content is empty.
- Downloads last month
- 5