processvenue/SARCASM_VS_NON_SARCASM · Datasets at Hugging Face

S.No int64 1 6k	Sentence stringlengths 38 957	Annotator 1 stringclasses 2 values	Annotator 2 stringclasses 2 values	IAA stringclasses 2 values
101	Explained away means what? If you don't agree with the mainstream you are wrong. He has not been refuted and he has lots of pictures. Why not go to his site and look?	Sarcastic	Sarcastic	Agree
102	i love it when 'heathens' try to tell me what my religion does or doesn't do. emoticonxrolleyes ah yes, here come the personal attacks. duo must be getting desperate again.	Sarcastic	Sarcastic	Agree
103	From the Catholic Educators Resource Center...Yeah...I am sure there would be no myths in there...sure you're right. emoticonXRolleyes	Sarcastic	Sarcastic	Agree
104	I looked it up and apparently there is a synthetic form of THC on the market, (generically known as Dronabinol and sold under the trade name Marinol). But it is only allowed under restricted prescription (it's a Schedule II controlled substance, the same as morphine or cocaine) and is far less effective than plant-derived THC.	Sarcastic	Non-Sarcastic	Disagree
105	Well, we have our head in the sand in more ways than one.	Sarcastic	Sarcastic	Agree
106	As I mentioned above, science curriculums follow paths. One's worldview plays heavily on one's interpretation of scientific data. An agnostic, or atheist teaching establishment can become satisfied with one path of scientific theories without searching for others. There may be more to be discovered about thermodynamics, cell structure, irreducible complexity, the decay rate of the earth's magnetic field, radiometric dating, the fossil record, and countless other things that a teaching establishment may not be interested in exploring, if it's comfortable with it's interpretation of current data's indications that the happenstance origins worldview is correct. It goes back to what we touched on before - teaching students HOW to think, not WHAT to think.	Non-Sarcastic	Non-Sarcastic	Agree
107	Pure conjecture on your part. As a father of three, I have as much vested interest in my kids as my wife has. To suggest otherwise is BS. But, maybe you don't understand that because you haven't walked a mile in a father's shoes. emoticonXRolleyes	Sarcastic	Sarcastic	Agree
108	You also need to borrow a new insult. Did you get that one from Crim?	Sarcastic	Non-Sarcastic	Disagree
109	O they don't make space anymore. They'll just put him in a cell with pot growers and crack addicts. He'll be lucky if he gets a spot on the floor to sleep on.	Sarcastic	Sarcastic	Agree
110	Listen, I have forgotten more than you will ever learn about what is real and true in this world, so either back up your insults with facts or get lost because It is becoming painfully obvious that attempting to reason with you is an exercise in futility. kind of like trying to travel from point A to point B on a merry-go-round.	Non-Sarcastic	Sarcastic	Disagree
111	i love how your sources never support your point. well, i wasn't able to find out about the rebellions of christianity from your source, but it did show some positive points, so i guess that was good.	Sarcastic	Sarcastic	Agree
112	maybe he'll unban himself on the third day (or was that three days and three nights...)	Sarcastic	Sarcastic	Agree
113	wow, what a cool suggestion! yes, this has happened to me before. thank you for the idea! would the individual clarify in the debate itself or in a separate argument/posting?	Sarcastic	Sarcastic	Agree
114	did i happen to say that genes had no influence on who you are? no? please read what i said earlier, there's more to you than your enviroment or genes, there's also your personal choices and beliefs.	Non-Sarcastic	Sarcastic	Disagree
115	Well, this guy is so bad ad arguing and so good at alienating people that if we sent him into the abortion forum, it is likely, he'd be so ineffective at defending his pro-life position thathe'd actually be contributing to the pro-choice position...	Sarcastic	Sarcastic	Agree
116	How is that a strawman? Your challenge directly relies upon something you assume to be proven, but has not been. Therefore even in a hypothetical stance, your underlying arguments are invalid, thus leading to everything else being invalid. You're not doing so well on this forum.	Sarcastic	Sarcastic	Agree
117	Since you bring it up, I do think that you are a nut. But your site is even nuttier. Not one shred of evidence that I found - just assertion. Moreover, the author doesn't seem to know the difference between an hypothesis and a theory.	Non-Sarcastic	Sarcastic	Disagree
118	Well, this comes from the same people who invented the death pannels. The truth is that all the developed countries (all of Europe, Canada, Japan, Australia, New Zealand, Taiwan, Israel) have universal healthcare. Their COST per capita is about half of ours. They have better outcomes.Universal healthcare has been tried in many places and it does work. What does not work is our current system. Wellpoint has just increased premiums by 30% even wiyhout a reform bill. They spend 30% on administrative costs.BTW, do you oppose the bill that would force them to limit the administrative costs to 20%?	Non-Sarcastic	Non-Sarcastic	Agree
119	That "brilliant" statement has absolutely NOTHING to do with the original point. ...later	Sarcastic	Non-Sarcastic	Disagree
120	But how can we make rules without legal lines in sand? At least its better than an illegal line.	Sarcastic	Sarcastic	Agree
121	Other than the Soldini firearms were purchased legally there is no proof that he had a concealed carry permit. If he had the AP and the rest of the left-tard media (redundancy alert) would still be shouting it from the roof tops. Just because the Brady bunch-VPC says so doesn't make it true. Then what else can we expect from a self confessed torturer of helpless small animals and arsonist?	Sarcastic	Non-Sarcastic	Disagree
122	lol, what did you mean by that? i'm not sure, and dont want to assume the tone you infer with. i thought it was funny but wanted to clarify. ps; i have never called anyone a 'fetus worshiper', although at least that label does not elicit the same evil connotations 'pr-abortion does'. @ simone, no worries hun :)	Non-Sarcastic	Sarcastic	Disagree
123	That's the best you could do? There's the other three and here's a bonus one: 'To disarm the people is the best, most effectual way, to enslave them.' - George Mason	Non-Sarcastic	Non-Sarcastic	Agree
124	Dragons and Dinosaurs coexisting only recently? hmm when they did dissapear? Maybe Conan the Barbarian killed them all!	Sarcastic	Sarcastic	Agree
125	And it could have been liberal ALIENS as well!Oooh. Can we make them gay illegal immigrants? I like that slant!Maybe they were talking about how he was "terrorizing" people with his fashion sense? Or maybe the "terrorist" comment wasn't even with regards to anything Palin said either. Maybe one of the guys thought he saw Osama bin Laden in the audience!YOU DON'T KNOW!emoticonXDonno	Non-Sarcastic	Sarcastic	Disagree
126	Well, yes, the idea of an omnipotent being with a definable physical (or even mental) form has always struck me as a little... odd.	Sarcastic	Sarcastic	Agree
127	I think that's a good question. I also wonder how long the medical establishment has had this rule? Since there must be some long-standing procedures in executions in the United States that require, by law, a doctor's supervision.	Sarcastic	Sarcastic	Agree
128	so you argue that for some women, abortion is the 'easy way out', and that those women choose to abort, take the easy way out as you say, for arbitrary reasons? could you please reiterate these reasons here (preferably in an enumerated list) and explain why they should be considered arbitrary? indeed. but we've established that supposing a higher profile in the media in no way entails an actual increase in incidents. so i'll repeat the question, hearsay aside, upon what evidence do you base the assertion that more women are abandoning infants?	Sarcastic	Sarcastic	Agree
129	If that's truly what the organization says, then it's a hypocrite of an organization.	Sarcastic	Sarcastic	Agree
130	So what this guy is saying is that he believes in natural selection but not evolution?	Sarcastic	Sarcastic	Agree
131	now isn't that a terribly socialistic position to take? but, i'm confused by it at the same time, for socialists like you don't really want to kill the goose that lays the golden eggs now do you? emoticonxrolleyes when logic fails, there's alway ad hominem, right? and the ad hominen continues..... we're larger, more diverse, more litigious, need i go on? leaving the continued ad hominem aside, one of the causes for our high healthcare costs is litigation. since the dnc survives on the money derived from the blood-sucking trial lawyers lobby, i don't see real reform occurring until we cut those purse strings along with the big pharma's.	Non-Sarcastic	Non-Sarcastic	Agree
132	Oh I hated being pregnant. However I am not really arguing whether pregnancy in and of itself is punishment, I suspect that is an opinion matter - there are some crazy women who actually liked pregnancy. ;) Julie - however clearly feels that it is acceptable to use a pregnancy and parenting in a punitive matter against women she feels are irresponsible.	Sarcastic	Sarcastic	Agree
133	i heard there were star trek cartoons back in the 70s. i'm surprised tv land or the cartoon network hasn't shown them.	Sarcastic	Non-Sarcastic	Disagree
134	ok, but a government can't grant benefits/priviledges based on statistical likelihood of an action. blacks are far more likely to be incarcerated than whites, does that mean we can premptively throw them all in jail? no, we create responses based on what people actually do. thus, if a heterosexual or homosexual decides to have children, they should get a tax credit for it. or you can go the reverse, that every married couple gets a tax credit, regardless of whether they have children or not (my personal advocacy). but granted benefits based on statistics is absurdly unfair, if only because people deserve to be treated as individuals, not numbers.	Non-Sarcastic	Sarcastic	Disagree
135	Which is why the "medical establishment" endorses smoking, drinking heavily and a fatty diet, with no excercise, because they believe we are predestined by our genes, right? Why do you persist with these blatant lies?	Sarcastic	Non-Sarcastic	Disagree
136	no, you just live on delusions. you can't argue the merits of creationism on their own because they don't exist. Creationism is a fraud regardless of the existance of evolution.	Sarcastic	Sarcastic	Agree
137	Pretty good considering Darwin wasn't aware of genetics. Too bad Wells is stuck in 1859. The modern synthesis provides perfectly legitimate mechanisms.	Non-Sarcastic	Sarcastic	Disagree
138	Instant Tea Blog Archive Divorce rates higher in states with amendments banning gay marriage Check out the stats at the above link.	Sarcastic	Sarcastic	Agree
139	Thats another subject. In all, you have not answered the OP. The insane suggestion that abortion cannot be murder, because murder is illegal and abortion legal.	Non-Sarcastic	Sarcastic	Disagree
140	So what? That means in a firefight with police, the criminal will run out of ammunition in a matter of seconds and be ripe for the picking.	Sarcastic	Sarcastic	Agree
141	Ah so you forfeit! YEAH, yea have little faith. Make me understand. Answer my valid questions! Or run and pray, but you'd be better off reading a Physics textbookemoticonXKill	Sarcastic	Sarcastic	Agree
142	In my lifetime, we've made huge strides, but there's a lot more to learn.	Sarcastic	Sarcastic	Agree
143	well, i am a north european. i thought all europeans opened presents on christmas eve, i thought opening them the morning on 25th was an american thing. but i guess i was wrong.	Sarcastic	Sarcastic	Agree
144	Na. Probably from smokin the Bovine Excrement they are trying to pedal! emoticonXSmilie	Sarcastic	Non-Sarcastic	Disagree
145	So wait, Phunting's good deeds will get he or she a higher position in heaven...but (Phunt, what sex are you?) he or she is going to hell anyway...gotta love Christian logic.	Non-Sarcastic	Sarcastic	Disagree
146	So let me get this right. To counter Accipiter's statement that you have the intellectual maturity of a 10 y/o, you string together a bunch of words that you don't understand in context that makes absolutely no sense? Point - set - match Accipiter.	Non-Sarcastic	Non-Sarcastic	Agree
147	it depends on what kind of faith you are talking about. do you mean 'having faith' in actual things? if so, then most definately. although the world can sometimes be a cruel and horrible place, it can also be a fantastic one, and seeing that (as i'm an athiest) gives me some kind of 'faith' in the human capacity, society, etc (where as a religious person may well have the same reaction for their faith in god).	Sarcastic	Sarcastic	Agree
148	I think you mean to say is hunters not liberal democrat hunters. Actualy I know of very few hunters that only have rifles or shot guns they usualy also have pistols to since you can hunt with them also.	Sarcastic	Sarcastic	Agree
149	You know what the funny thing is about all of the "links" that they have found between ape and man? I could easily find people today that look exactly like the "links" that scientists have found. Maybe you should try picking one "link" from the site that you gave me. I could give you creationist sites, but that wouldn't prove anything more than your site proved. Here's an alternative theory: creation by God.	Sarcastic	Sarcastic	Agree
150	You bet. Got a Scriptural problem with that, 'O "jesus"? Or are you not familiar with your own inspired Word?	Non-Sarcastic	Non-Sarcastic	Agree
151	If we did not have criminals, we wouldnt have "shoot outs" as you so call them.	Non-Sarcastic	Sarcastic	Disagree
152	The process of evolution has no scientifically known teleology and follows no known predestined plan. It does not teach that there cannot be any such things as teleology or forethought. This is where your mistake lies.	Non-Sarcastic	Sarcastic	Disagree
153	i'm not incredulous because miller isn't here, i'm incredulous that not a single one of the 'millions of other religious evolutionists' are here.	Non-Sarcastic	Sarcastic	Disagree
154	He was referring to the mimivirus which does NOT act like any other virus. Some of you people need to study a little harder :)	Sarcastic	Sarcastic	Agree
155	Because when something passes every experiment thrown at it and when something fits observation better than anything else, then it's as near as damnit fact. We can get pedantic over this if you want, but the conclusion that reaches is that there are no facts.	Sarcastic	Sarcastic	Agree
156	He is a hell of a lot wiser than thee.	Sarcastic	Sarcastic	Agree
157	i love how what you 'personally' feel is in direct conflict with acedemic studies. science says force = mass times acceleration, but i personally feel that force = velocity times volume, so that must be the right answer.	Sarcastic	Sarcastic	Agree
158	There ya go S&p, make sure you crumble under their combined criticisms of your honest opinion. Make sure you always say nothing that offends their gay sensibilities. You may think that's how to be excepted by them but it isn't. It's just the way people of the world like you float through without ever defending any absolute truths at all.	Non-Sarcastic	Non-Sarcastic	Agree
159	no? i've looked up your name, and once separated from the historical galileo figure, yours seems to be exclusively on boards talking about gun control, and you always seem to be using the actions of criminals as grounds for calling for evermore gun control.	Non-Sarcastic	Sarcastic	Disagree
160	Actually, that honour is reserved for the usual representations of those who advocate young earth creationism.	Non-Sarcastic	Sarcastic	Disagree
161	>_> one would think pulling the power, breaking into someone's house, and having raped her once and been reported would have been proof enough. What do you want a video of him raping her or something?	Sarcastic	Sarcastic	Agree
162	The bible account is incomplete - Noah had two boats, the ark, and the arkuarium.	Sarcastic	Sarcastic	Agree
163	Actually I didn't even read it (and doubt I ever will). Don't get all worked up over it.	Non-Sarcastic	Sarcastic	Disagree
164	Exactly. If you are a child rapist and someone pops you in the head than you should go to jail for murder. Sorry, two wrongs don't make a right.	Non-Sarcastic	Sarcastic	Disagree
165	Do you know why gay sex sinners refuse to repent? Because they have an idol - gay sex.	Non-Sarcastic	Sarcastic	Disagree
166	So I am not intitled to my opinions? Your statement is so ironic because it seems that others also suffer from pot and kettleism and don't realize it.	Sarcastic	Sarcastic	Agree
167	But recognition of the big bang as a very good explanation of cosmology isn't limited to evolutionsits. In fact, most other scientists also believe so, most especially cosmologists and astrophysicists, who are directly concerned with the early universe. Evolutionists, even though the origin of matter and time are irrelevant to the study of evolution, are also educated in science and probably accept the work done by these other scientists.	Non-Sarcastic	Non-Sarcastic	Agree
168	But you are ok with a woman deciding what is right for someone else's own body...specifically the babies? Seems to me a woman isn't more qualified to deal with the issue of abortion than a man. In fact, it could be said that the man has the only independent perspective.	Non-Sarcastic	Sarcastic	Disagree
169	There is some truth here. Did you ever see "Independence Day"? They were taking pot-shots at the alien ships when they first arrived. It didn't stop the aliens... sure only a film... let's look at real life...modern - Iraq - Sadaam gave guns out to the people just before Gulf War IInot so modern - Boer War - Dutch farmers in South Africa were all excellent marksmen - Britain still invaded.US Civil War - I believe that the Confederate States were pretty well armed as far as the white citizens were concerned. US still invaded.	Sarcastic	Sarcastic	Agree
170	Hey, I'm from Joisey. Youz guys better watch what you say about us or you'll be sleeping with the fishes. emoticonXKill	Sarcastic	Sarcastic	Agree
171	Thats funny, because these scrambled eggs sure don't taste like KFC to me.	Non-Sarcastic	Sarcastic	Disagree
172	But if this was a republican program, you'd have no problem with it. You are a rightwing hypocrite, Archie Baby.	Non-Sarcastic	Sarcastic	Disagree
173	Er... Well, I guess she's hot for being in her 40s. Sounds like Antonia needs a tampon right now.	Non-Sarcastic	Non-Sarcastic	Agree
174	How do you define evolution? If you don't see any, then you aren't using the definition used by evolutionary biologists. The question is who should define the vocabulary of evolutionary biologist, evolutionary biologists or creationists?	Sarcastic	Sarcastic	Agree
175	pro-choice - i agree but first trimester only pro-euthanasia - i agree pro-environmentalism - mmmm? depends pro-gay rights - again... depends pro-immigration ( to an extent) - legal? yes! illegal? no. pro-free healthcare - disagree anti-military action/intervention - mmmm... less, yes but depends anti-globalisation - agree anti-death penalty - disagree pro-stem-cell research - agree pro-gun control - disagree pro-welfare. - disagree pro-marijuana legalisation - agree pro-tobacco illigalisation - disgree i'm surprised you're anti-globalization	Sarcastic	Sarcastic	Agree
176	What a foolish, foolish thing to say.I have any number of Swedish relatives who own incredibly lovely homes, each of which would probably take close to a million dollars or more to replicate in the United States. They own summer cabins as well, and automobiles and oodles of stuff not visible and not my business to know about.Where is this idiotic claptrap coming from?? Furthermore, my Swedish relatives have a far higher standard of living and ease than any of my struggling American relatives, especially in a time of Bushwhackedeconomics.	Non-Sarcastic	Sarcastic	Disagree
177	so you are into pommy bashing now? mae honey, is there anybody you don't like? emoticonXRolleyes	Sarcastic	Sarcastic	Agree
178	No surprises that an unemployed former public servant would support increasing the amount he leeches off everyone else. It's a joke this is even something people would think about at this point. The titanic's sinking and you're thinking about whether to ask for a room with lilac lampshades.	Non-Sarcastic	Sarcastic	Disagree
179	Dunno about that. It looks pretty danged cozy for the corporate socialist. The American people, however, look to be shat upon by the Republicorps screaming and bawling in the streets.	Non-Sarcastic	Non-Sarcastic	Agree
180	I think we should not spend inordinate amount of resources on trying to determine who is homeless and if it his own fault. Anyway, whose business is it where someone lives?	Non-Sarcastic	Sarcastic	Disagree
181	Most people are not pro-abortion, they are pro-choice. No one here is going around demanding that women must have abortions.	Non-Sarcastic	Non-Sarcastic	Agree
182	You can do so, and if I don't check your source I guess I'm SOL, eh? I've seen the story many places, but this is beyond simply a site dedicated to outing Bush since its a radio show :P	Non-Sarcastic	Sarcastic	Disagree
183	This coming from someone that is very choosy in the question that they answeremoticonXRolleyes	Non-Sarcastic	Sarcastic	Disagree
184	oh really? is that apparently so? i don't believe that. allow me to show you error in your beliefs. god knows everything,correct?	Sarcastic	Sarcastic	Agree
185	Oh, really? Does that mean that pesticides will be OK on marijuana plants? NO.	Sarcastic	Sarcastic	Agree
186	Because Africa isn't one big homogeneous ecosystem. There are jungles, plains, deserts, swamps. Himps living in the jungle weren't in competition with himps that started migrating out onto the plains. Their food sources are different, their territories are different. The more suited to plains-dwelling we became, the less attractive a prospect it was to return to the jungle. Pretty straightforward, really.	Non-Sarcastic	Sarcastic	Disagree
187	Then for you, you made the right decision at the time. I'd personally have been leary of not getting to work or go to school easily from the doctors statements, especially in regards to keeping the child.	Non-Sarcastic	Sarcastic	Disagree
188	WOW are we seeing the softer, gentiler Jyoshu? Your snoopy avatar must be afecting you :) :p	Non-Sarcastic	Non-Sarcastic	Agree
189	Well, since a working definition of "insanity" would be denying observable reality, I would say that your argument is insanity. On a side note, how have you not been banned yet? Any particular reason admin?	Non-Sarcastic	Sarcastic	Disagree
190	No, you wouldn't have. I'd have a better chance of winning the lottery without buying a ticket.	Sarcastic	Non-Sarcastic	Disagree
191	This seems to conflict with some of your earlier posts wherein you support terrorists.	Sarcastic	Sarcastic	Agree
192	Bad Religion or misapplied Religion has been in every century, country and culture.	Sarcastic	Sarcastic	Agree
193	I know we know a great deal but even if it is from a taxonomy point of view I still don't think there is conclusive evidence.	Sarcastic	Sarcastic	Agree
194	But you know it is more then just that. The poster gave a specific date that is relevant to when abortion was legalized. It shows the poster is being selective and may hold prejudice to fetuses who arent aborted by legal abortions. You see, it is the pro-life movement's selective outrages that makes me think they aren't serious about abortion as a whole.	Sarcastic	Sarcastic	Agree
195	you said, and i quote, 'she banned me, how dare she. i am judas.' that, my dear adversary, is not a logical argument. ;)	Sarcastic	Non-Sarcastic	Disagree
196	Heart bypass, prostate cancer.......I have a couple of Canadian friends who needed those surgeries and one was told he had a 4 month wait and the other a 6 month wait so they both came down to Bellingham Wash and had the Surgery within 2 weeks............	Non-Sarcastic	Sarcastic	Disagree
197	Oh, I hear you. I am covered by my partner's insurance here as well. I would not have been able to get the insurance if we were not legally a union. It's amazing. And I am REALLY greatful for that!	Sarcastic	Sarcastic	Agree
198	So then how do you know that abortion isn't in the plan then? If as you say we have "VERY LIMITED PERSPECTIVE"	Non-Sarcastic	Sarcastic	Disagree
199	were it so simple. for the agents to 'freely assemble' among us they, or their superiors, must conclude that we are some sort of threat. would that make you feel loved? on a side note, i'm always surprised at how 'conservatives', normally so worried about government waste, take such a waste of taxpayer dollars so glibly. fbi investigating kiss-ins? joining subversive 'terrorist' xxxx biker groups?	Sarcastic	Sarcastic	Agree
200	Fetal Homocide? Toddler Homicide? A human in different stages of development.....Why/or What is the difference?And if someone wanted this legal( Toddler Homicide) ...I don't see much anybody could do legally to stop it.. When women kill their tots they are locked up/ and branded with a criminal record vs the female who callously kills durning the fetal stage.(Double standard?) I have a couple friends, who have aborted more than once, because they didn't want to lose their girly figure(trivial). I find it eerie and disturbion.....	Sarcastic	Sarcastic	Agree

101

Explained away means what? If you don't agree with the mainstream you are wrong. He has not been refuted and he has lots of pictures. Why not go to his site and look?

Sarcastic

Agree

102

i love it when 'heathens' try to tell me what my religion does or doesn't do. emoticonxrolleyes ah yes, here come the personal attacks. duo must be getting desperate again.

Sarcastic

Agree

103

From the Catholic Educators Resource Center...Yeah...I am sure there would be no myths in there...sure you're right. emoticonXRolleyes

Sarcastic

Agree

104

I looked it up and apparently there is a synthetic form of THC on the market, (generically known as Dronabinol and sold under the trade name Marinol). But it is only allowed under restricted prescription (it's a Schedule II controlled substance, the same as morphine or cocaine) and is far less effective than plant-derived THC.

Sarcastic

Non-Sarcastic

Disagree

105

Well, we have our head in the sand in more ways than one.

Sarcastic

Agree

106

As I mentioned above, science curriculums follow paths. One's worldview plays heavily on one's interpretation of scientific data. An agnostic, or atheist teaching establishment can become satisfied with one path of scientific theories without searching for others. There may be more to be discovered about thermodynamics, cell structure, irreducible complexity, the decay rate of the earth's magnetic field, radiometric dating, the fossil record, and countless other things that a teaching establishment may not be interested in exploring, if it's comfortable with it's interpretation of current data's indications that the happenstance origins worldview is correct. It goes back to what we touched on before - teaching students HOW to think, not WHAT to think.

Non-Sarcastic

Agree

107

Pure conjecture on your part. As a father of three, I have as much vested interest in my kids as my wife has. To suggest otherwise is BS. But, maybe you don't understand that because you haven't walked a mile in a father's shoes. emoticonXRolleyes

Sarcastic

Agree

108

You also need to borrow a new insult. Did you get that one from Crim?

Sarcastic

Non-Sarcastic

Disagree

109

O they don't make space anymore. They'll just put him in a cell with pot growers and crack addicts. He'll be lucky if he gets a spot on the floor to sleep on.

Sarcastic

Agree

110

Listen, I have forgotten more than you will ever learn about what is real and true in this world, so either back up your insults with facts or get lost because It is becoming painfully obvious that attempting to reason with you is an exercise in futility. kind of like trying to travel from point A to point B on a merry-go-round.

Non-Sarcastic

Sarcastic

Disagree

111

i love how your sources never support your point. well, i wasn't able to find out about the rebellions of christianity from your source, but it did show some positive points, so i guess that was good.

Sarcastic

Agree

112

maybe he'll unban himself on the third day (or was that three days and three nights...)

Sarcastic

Agree

113

wow, what a cool suggestion! yes, this has happened to me before. thank you for the idea! would the individual clarify in the debate itself or in a separate argument/posting?

Sarcastic

Agree

114

did i happen to say that genes had no influence on who you are? no? please read what i said earlier, there's more to you than your enviroment or genes, there's also your personal choices and beliefs.

Non-Sarcastic

Sarcastic

Disagree

115

Well, this guy is so bad ad arguing and so good at alienating people that if we sent him into the abortion forum, it is likely, he'd be so ineffective at defending his pro-life position thathe'd actually be contributing to the pro-choice position...

Sarcastic

Agree

116

How is that a strawman? Your challenge directly relies upon something you assume to be proven, but has not been. Therefore even in a hypothetical stance, your underlying arguments are invalid, thus leading to everything else being invalid. You're not doing so well on this forum.

Sarcastic

Agree

117

Since you bring it up, I do think that you are a nut. But your site is even nuttier. Not one shred of evidence that I found - just assertion. Moreover, the author doesn't seem to know the difference between an hypothesis and a theory.

Non-Sarcastic

Sarcastic

Disagree

118

Well, this comes from the same people who invented the death pannels. The truth is that all the developed countries (all of Europe, Canada, Japan, Australia, New Zealand, Taiwan, Israel) have universal healthcare. Their COST per capita is about half of ours. They have better outcomes.Universal healthcare has been tried in many places and it does work. What does not work is our current system. Wellpoint has just increased premiums by 30% even wiyhout a reform bill. They spend 30% on administrative costs.BTW, do you oppose the bill that would force them to limit the administrative costs to 20%?

Non-Sarcastic

Agree

119

That "brilliant" statement has absolutely NOTHING to do with the original point. ...later

Sarcastic

Non-Sarcastic

Disagree

120

But how can we make rules without legal lines in sand? At least its better than an illegal line.

Sarcastic

Agree

121

Other than the Soldini firearms were purchased legally there is no proof that he had a concealed carry permit. If he had the AP and the rest of the left-tard media (redundancy alert) would still be shouting it from the roof tops. Just because the Brady bunch-VPC says so doesn't make it true. Then what else can we expect from a self confessed torturer of helpless small animals and arsonist?

Sarcastic

Non-Sarcastic

Disagree

122

lol, what did you mean by that? i'm not sure, and dont want to assume the tone you infer with. i thought it was funny but wanted to clarify. ps; i have never called anyone a 'fetus worshiper', although at least that label does not elicit the same evil connotations 'pr-abortion does'. @ simone, no worries hun :)

Non-Sarcastic

Sarcastic

Disagree

123

That's the best you could do? There's the other three and here's a bonus one: 'To disarm the people is the best, most effectual way, to enslave them.' - George Mason

Non-Sarcastic

Agree

124

Dragons and Dinosaurs coexisting only recently? hmm when they did dissapear? Maybe Conan the Barbarian killed them all!

Sarcastic

Agree

125

And it could have been liberal ALIENS as well!Oooh. Can we make them gay illegal immigrants? I like that slant!Maybe they were talking about how he was "terrorizing" people with his fashion sense? Or maybe the "terrorist" comment wasn't even with regards to anything Palin said either. Maybe one of the guys thought he saw Osama bin Laden in the audience!YOU DON'T KNOW!emoticonXDonno

Non-Sarcastic

Sarcastic

Disagree

126

Well, yes, the idea of an omnipotent being with a definable physical (or even mental) form has always struck me as a little... odd.

Sarcastic

Agree

127

I think that's a good question. I also wonder how long the medical establishment has had this rule? Since there must be some long-standing procedures in executions in the United States that require, by law, a doctor's supervision.

Sarcastic

Agree

128

so you argue that for some women, abortion is the 'easy way out', and that those women choose to abort, take the easy way out as you say, for arbitrary reasons? could you please reiterate these reasons here (preferably in an enumerated list) and explain why they should be considered arbitrary? indeed. but we've established that supposing a higher profile in the media in no way entails an actual increase in incidents. so i'll repeat the question, hearsay aside, upon what evidence do you base the assertion that more women are abandoning infants?

Sarcastic

Agree

129

If that's truly what the organization says, then it's a hypocrite of an organization.

Sarcastic

Agree

130

So what this guy is saying is that he believes in natural selection but not evolution?

Sarcastic

Agree

131

now isn't that a terribly socialistic position to take? but, i'm confused by it at the same time, for socialists like you don't really want to kill the goose that lays the golden eggs now do you? emoticonxrolleyes when logic fails, there's alway ad hominem, right? and the ad hominen continues..... we're larger, more diverse, more litigious, need i go on? leaving the continued ad hominem aside, one of the causes for our high healthcare costs is litigation. since the dnc survives on the money derived from the blood-sucking trial lawyers lobby, i don't see real reform occurring until we cut those purse strings along with the big pharma's.

Non-Sarcastic

Agree

132

Oh I hated being pregnant. However I am not really arguing whether pregnancy in and of itself is punishment, I suspect that is an opinion matter - there are some crazy women who actually liked pregnancy. ;) Julie - however clearly feels that it is acceptable to use a pregnancy and parenting in a punitive matter against women she feels are irresponsible.

Sarcastic

Agree

133

i heard there were star trek cartoons back in the 70s. i'm surprised tv land or the cartoon network hasn't shown them.

Sarcastic

Non-Sarcastic

Disagree

134

ok, but a government can't grant benefits/priviledges based on statistical likelihood of an action. blacks are far more likely to be incarcerated than whites, does that mean we can premptively throw them all in jail? no, we create responses based on what people actually do. thus, if a heterosexual or homosexual decides to have children, they should get a tax credit for it. or you can go the reverse, that every married couple gets a tax credit, regardless of whether they have children or not (my personal advocacy). but granted benefits based on statistics is absurdly unfair, if only because people deserve to be treated as individuals, not numbers.

Non-Sarcastic

Sarcastic

Disagree

135

Which is why the "medical establishment" endorses smoking, drinking heavily and a fatty diet, with no excercise, because they believe we are predestined by our genes, right? Why do you persist with these blatant lies?

Sarcastic

Non-Sarcastic

Disagree

136

no, you just live on delusions. you can't argue the merits of creationism on their own because they don't exist. Creationism is a fraud regardless of the existance of evolution.

Sarcastic

Agree

137

Pretty good considering Darwin wasn't aware of genetics. Too bad Wells is stuck in 1859. The modern synthesis provides perfectly legitimate mechanisms.

Non-Sarcastic

Sarcastic

Disagree

138

Instant Tea Blog Archive Divorce rates higher in states with amendments banning gay marriage Check out the stats at the above link.

Sarcastic

Agree

139

Thats another subject. In all, you have not answered the OP. The insane suggestion that abortion cannot be murder, because murder is illegal and abortion legal.

Non-Sarcastic

Sarcastic

Disagree

140

So what? That means in a firefight with police, the criminal will run out of ammunition in a matter of seconds and be ripe for the picking.

Sarcastic

Agree

141

Ah so you forfeit! YEAH, yea have little faith. Make me understand. Answer my valid questions! Or run and pray, but you'd be better off reading a Physics textbookemoticonXKill

Sarcastic

Agree

142

In my lifetime, we've made huge strides, but there's a lot more to learn.

Sarcastic

Agree

143

well, i am a north european. i thought all europeans opened presents on christmas eve, i thought opening them the morning on 25th was an american thing. but i guess i was wrong.

Sarcastic

Agree

144

Na. Probably from smokin the Bovine Excrement they are trying to pedal! emoticonXSmilie

Sarcastic

Non-Sarcastic

Disagree

145

So wait, Phunting's good deeds will get he or she a higher position in heaven...but (Phunt, what sex are you?) he or she is going to hell anyway...gotta love Christian logic.

Non-Sarcastic

Sarcastic

Disagree

146

So let me get this right. To counter Accipiter's statement that you have the intellectual maturity of a 10 y/o, you string together a bunch of words that you don't understand in context that makes absolutely no sense? Point - set - match Accipiter.

Non-Sarcastic

Agree

147

it depends on what kind of faith you are talking about. do you mean 'having faith' in actual things? if so, then most definately. although the world can sometimes be a cruel and horrible place, it can also be a fantastic one, and seeing that (as i'm an athiest) gives me some kind of 'faith' in the human capacity, society, etc (where as a religious person may well have the same reaction for their faith in god).

Sarcastic

Agree

148

I think you mean to say is hunters not liberal democrat hunters. Actualy I know of very few hunters that only have rifles or shot guns they usualy also have pistols to since you can hunt with them also.

Sarcastic

Agree

149

You know what the funny thing is about all of the "links" that they have found between ape and man? I could easily find people today that look exactly like the "links" that scientists have found. Maybe you should try picking one "link" from the site that you gave me. I could give you creationist sites, but that wouldn't prove anything more than your site proved. Here's an alternative theory: creation by God.

Sarcastic

Agree

150

You bet. Got a Scriptural problem with that, 'O "jesus"? Or are you not familiar with your own inspired Word?

Non-Sarcastic

Agree

151

If we did not have criminals, we wouldnt have "shoot outs" as you so call them.

Non-Sarcastic

Sarcastic

Disagree

152

The process of evolution has no scientifically known teleology and follows no known predestined plan. It does not teach that there cannot be any such things as teleology or forethought. This is where your mistake lies.

Non-Sarcastic

Sarcastic

Disagree

153

i'm not incredulous because miller isn't here, i'm incredulous that not a single one of the 'millions of other religious evolutionists' are here.

Non-Sarcastic

Sarcastic

Disagree

154

He was referring to the mimivirus which does NOT act like any other virus. Some of you people need to study a little harder :)

Sarcastic

Agree

155

Because when something passes every experiment thrown at it and when something fits observation better than anything else, then it's as near as damnit fact. We can get pedantic over this if you want, but the conclusion that reaches is that there are no facts.

Sarcastic

Agree

156

He is a hell of a lot wiser than thee.

Sarcastic

Agree

157

i love how what you 'personally' feel is in direct conflict with acedemic studies. science says force = mass times acceleration, but i personally feel that force = velocity times volume, so that must be the right answer.

Sarcastic

Agree

158

There ya go S&p, make sure you crumble under their combined criticisms of your honest opinion. Make sure you always say nothing that offends their gay sensibilities. You may think that's how to be excepted by them but it isn't. It's just the way people of the world like you float through without ever defending any absolute truths at all.

Non-Sarcastic

Agree

159

no? i've looked up your name, and once separated from the historical galileo figure, yours seems to be exclusively on boards talking about gun control, and you always seem to be using the actions of criminals as grounds for calling for evermore gun control.

Non-Sarcastic

Sarcastic

Disagree

160

Actually, that honour is reserved for the usual representations of those who advocate young earth creationism.

Non-Sarcastic

Sarcastic

Disagree

161

>_> one would think pulling the power, breaking into someone's house, and having raped her once and been reported would have been proof enough. What do you want a video of him raping her or something?

Sarcastic

Agree

162

The bible account is incomplete - Noah had two boats, the ark, and the arkuarium.

Sarcastic

Agree

163

Actually I didn't even read it (and doubt I ever will). Don't get all worked up over it.

Non-Sarcastic

Sarcastic

Disagree

164

Exactly. If you are a child rapist and someone pops you in the head than you should go to jail for murder. Sorry, two wrongs don't make a right.

Non-Sarcastic

Sarcastic

Disagree

165

Do you know why gay sex sinners refuse to repent? Because they have an idol - gay sex.

Non-Sarcastic

Sarcastic

Disagree

166

So I am not intitled to my opinions? Your statement is so ironic because it seems that others also suffer from pot and kettleism and don't realize it.

Sarcastic

Agree

167

But recognition of the big bang as a very good explanation of cosmology isn't limited to evolutionsits. In fact, most other scientists also believe so, most especially cosmologists and astrophysicists, who are directly concerned with the early universe. Evolutionists, even though the origin of matter and time are irrelevant to the study of evolution, are also educated in science and probably accept the work done by these other scientists.

Non-Sarcastic

Agree

168

But you are ok with a woman deciding what is right for someone else's own body...specifically the babies? Seems to me a woman isn't more qualified to deal with the issue of abortion than a man. In fact, it could be said that the man has the only independent perspective.

Non-Sarcastic

Sarcastic

Disagree

169

There is some truth here. Did you ever see "Independence Day"? They were taking pot-shots at the alien ships when they first arrived. It didn't stop the aliens... sure only a film... let's look at real life...modern - Iraq - Sadaam gave guns out to the people just before Gulf War IInot so modern - Boer War - Dutch farmers in South Africa were all excellent marksmen - Britain still invaded.US Civil War - I believe that the Confederate States were pretty well armed as far as the white citizens were concerned. US still invaded.

Sarcastic

Agree

170

Hey, I'm from Joisey. Youz guys better watch what you say about us or you'll be sleeping with the fishes. emoticonXKill

Sarcastic

Agree

171

Thats funny, because these scrambled eggs sure don't taste like KFC to me.

Non-Sarcastic

Sarcastic

Disagree

172

But if this was a republican program, you'd have no problem with it. You are a rightwing hypocrite, Archie Baby.

Non-Sarcastic

Sarcastic

Disagree

173

Er... Well, I guess she's hot for being in her 40s. Sounds like Antonia needs a tampon right now.

Non-Sarcastic

Agree

174

How do you define evolution? If you don't see any, then you aren't using the definition used by evolutionary biologists. The question is who should define the vocabulary of evolutionary biologist, evolutionary biologists or creationists?

Sarcastic

Agree

175

pro-choice - i agree but first trimester only pro-euthanasia - i agree pro-environmentalism - mmmm? depends pro-gay rights - again... depends pro-immigration ( to an extent) - legal? yes! illegal? no. pro-free healthcare - disagree anti-military action/intervention - mmmm... less, yes but depends anti-globalisation - agree anti-death penalty - disagree pro-stem-cell research - agree pro-gun control - disagree pro-welfare. - disagree pro-marijuana legalisation - agree pro-tobacco illigalisation - disgree i'm surprised you're anti-globalization

Sarcastic

Agree

176

What a foolish, foolish thing to say.I have any number of Swedish relatives who own incredibly lovely homes, each of which would probably take close to a million dollars or more to replicate in the United States. They own summer cabins as well, and automobiles and oodles of stuff not visible and not my business to know about.Where is this idiotic claptrap coming from?? Furthermore, my Swedish relatives have a far higher standard of living and ease than any of my struggling American relatives, especially in a time of Bushwhackedeconomics.

Non-Sarcastic

Sarcastic

Disagree

177

so you are into pommy bashing now? mae honey, is there anybody you don't like? emoticonXRolleyes

Sarcastic

Agree

178

No surprises that an unemployed former public servant would support increasing the amount he leeches off everyone else. It's a joke this is even something people would think about at this point. The titanic's sinking and you're thinking about whether to ask for a room with lilac lampshades.

Non-Sarcastic

Sarcastic

Disagree

179

Dunno about that. It looks pretty danged cozy for the corporate socialist. The American people, however, look to be shat upon by the Republicorps screaming and bawling in the streets.

Non-Sarcastic

Agree

180

I think we should not spend inordinate amount of resources on trying to determine who is homeless and if it his own fault. Anyway, whose business is it where someone lives?

Non-Sarcastic

Sarcastic

Disagree

181

Most people are not pro-abortion, they are pro-choice. No one here is going around demanding that women must have abortions.

Non-Sarcastic

Agree

182

You can do so, and if I don't check your source I guess I'm SOL, eh? I've seen the story many places, but this is beyond simply a site dedicated to outing Bush since its a radio show :P

Non-Sarcastic

Sarcastic

Disagree

183

This coming from someone that is very choosy in the question that they answeremoticonXRolleyes

Non-Sarcastic

Sarcastic

Disagree

184

oh really? is that apparently so? i don't believe that. allow me to show you error in your beliefs. god knows everything,correct?

Sarcastic

Agree

185

Oh, really? Does that mean that pesticides will be OK on marijuana plants? NO.

Sarcastic

Agree

186

Because Africa isn't one big homogeneous ecosystem. There are jungles, plains, deserts, swamps. Himps living in the jungle weren't in competition with himps that started migrating out onto the plains. Their food sources are different, their territories are different. The more suited to plains-dwelling we became, the less attractive a prospect it was to return to the jungle. Pretty straightforward, really.

Non-Sarcastic

Sarcastic

Disagree

187

Then for you, you made the right decision at the time. I'd personally have been leary of not getting to work or go to school easily from the doctors statements, especially in regards to keeping the child.

Non-Sarcastic

Sarcastic

Disagree

188

WOW are we seeing the softer, gentiler Jyoshu? Your snoopy avatar must be afecting you :) :p

Non-Sarcastic

Agree

189

Well, since a working definition of "insanity" would be denying observable reality, I would say that your argument is insanity. On a side note, how have you not been banned yet? Any particular reason admin?

Non-Sarcastic

Sarcastic

Disagree

190

No, you wouldn't have. I'd have a better chance of winning the lottery without buying a ticket.

Sarcastic

Non-Sarcastic

Disagree

191

This seems to conflict with some of your earlier posts wherein you support terrorists.

Sarcastic

Agree

192

Bad Religion or misapplied Religion has been in every century, country and culture.

Sarcastic

Agree

193

I know we know a great deal but even if it is from a taxonomy point of view I still don't think there is conclusive evidence.

Sarcastic

Agree

194

But you know it is more then just that. The poster gave a specific date that is relevant to when abortion was legalized. It shows the poster is being selective and may hold prejudice to fetuses who arent aborted by legal abortions. You see, it is the pro-life movement's selective outrages that makes me think they aren't serious about abortion as a whole.

Sarcastic

Agree

195

you said, and i quote, 'she banned me, how dare she. i am judas.' that, my dear adversary, is not a logical argument. ;)

Sarcastic

Non-Sarcastic

Disagree

196

Heart bypass, prostate cancer.......I have a couple of Canadian friends who needed those surgeries and one was told he had a 4 month wait and the other a 6 month wait so they both came down to Bellingham Wash and had the Surgery within 2 weeks............

Non-Sarcastic

Sarcastic

Disagree

197

Oh, I hear you. I am covered by my partner's insurance here as well. I would not have been able to get the insurance if we were not legally a union. It's amazing. And I am REALLY greatful for that!

Sarcastic

Agree

198

So then how do you know that abortion isn't in the plan then? If as you say we have "VERY LIMITED PERSPECTIVE"

Non-Sarcastic

Sarcastic

Disagree

199

were it so simple. for the agents to 'freely assemble' among us they, or their superiors, must conclude that we are some sort of threat. would that make you feel loved? on a side note, i'm always surprised at how 'conservatives', normally so worried about government waste, take such a waste of taxpayer dollars so glibly. fbi investigating kiss-ins? joining subversive 'terrorist' xxxx biker groups?

Sarcastic

Agree

200

Fetal Homocide? Toddler Homicide? A human in different stages of development.....Why/or What is the difference?And if someone wanted this legal( Toddler Homicide) ...I don't see much anybody could do legally to stop it.. When women kill their tots they are locked up/ and branded with a criminal record vs the female who callously kills durning the fetal stage.(Double standard?) I have a couple friends, who have aborted more than once, because they didn't want to lose their girly figure(trivial). I find it eerie and disturbion.....

Sarcastic

Agree