puffy310/yandset · Datasets at Hugging Face

text stringlengths 0 339
In contrast to RNN sequence-to-sequence models [37], the Transformer outperforms the BerkeleyParser [29] even when training only on the WSJ training set of 40K sentences.
7 Conclusion
In this work, we presented the Transformer, the first sequence transduction model based entirely on
attention, replacing the recurrent layers most commonly used in encoder-decoder architectures with
multi-headed self-attention.
For translation tasks, the Transformer can be trained significantly faster than architectures based
on recurrent or convolutional layers. On both WMT 2014 English-to-German and WMT 2014
English-to-French translation tasks, we achieve a new state of the art. In the former task our best
model outperforms even all previously reported ensembles.
We are excited about the future of attention-based models and plan to apply them to other tasks. We
plan to extend the Transformer to problems involving input and output modalities other than text and
to investigate local, restricted attention mechanisms to efficiently handle large inputs and outputs
such as images, audio and video. Making generation less sequential is another research goals of ours.
The code we used to train and evaluate our models is available at https://github.com/
tensorflow/tensor2tensor.
Acknowledgements We are grateful to Nal Kalchbrenner and Stephan Gouws for their fruitful
comments, corrections and inspiration.
Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Code
Mark Chen * 1 Jerry Tworek * 1 Heewoo Jun * 1 Qiming Yuan * 1 Henrique Ponde de Oliveira Pinto * 1
Jared Kaplan * 2 Harri Edwards 1 Yuri Burda 1 Nicholas Joseph 2 Greg Brockman 1 Alex Ray 1 Raul Puri 1
Gretchen Krueger 1 Michael Petrov 1 Heidy Khlaaf 3 Girish Sastry 1 Pamela Mishkin 1 Brooke Chan 1
Scott Gray 1 Nick Ryder 1 Mikhail Pavlov 1 Alethea Power 1 Lukasz Kaiser 1 Mohammad Bavarian 1
Clemens Winter 1 Philippe Tillet 1 Felipe Petroski Such 1 Dave Cummings 1 Matthias Plappert 1
Fotios Chantzis 1 Elizabeth Barnes 1 Ariel Herbert-Voss 1 William Hebgen Guss 1 Alex Nichol 1 Alex Paino 1
Nikolas Tezak 1 Jie Tang 1
Igor Babuschkin 1 Suchir Balaji 1 Shantanu Jain 1 William Saunders 1
Christopher Hesse 1 Andrew N. Carr 1 Jan Leike 1 Josh Achiam 1 Vedant Misra 1 Evan Morikawa 1
Alec Radford 1 Matthew Knight 1 Miles Brundage 1 Mira Murati 1 Katie Mayer 1 Peter Welinder 1
Bob McGrew 1 Dario Amodei 2 Sam McCandlish 2
Ilya Sutskever 1 Wojciech Zaremba 1
Abstract
We introduce Codex, a GPT language model finetuned on publicly available code from GitHub,
and study its Python code-writing capabilities.
A distinct production version of Codex powers
GitHub Copilot. On HumanEval, a new evaluation set we release to measure functional correctness for synthesizing programs from docstrings,
our model solves 28.8% of the problems, while
GPT-3 solves 0% and GPT-J solves 11.4%. Furthermore, we find that repeated sampling from the
model is a surprisingly effective strategy for producing working solutions to difficult prompts. Using this method, we solve 70.2% of our problems
with 100 samples per problem. Careful investigation of our model reveals its limitations, including
difficulty with docstrings describing long chains
of operations and with binding operations to variables. Finally, we discuss the potential broader
impacts of deploying powerful code generation
technologies, covering safety, security, and economics.
*Equal contribution
1OpenAI, San Francisco, California, USA.
2Anthropic AI, San Francisco, California, USA. Work performed while at OpenAI.
3Zipline, South San Francisco, California, USA. Work performed while at OpenAI.
Correspondence to: Mark Chen <mark@openai.com>,
Jerry Tworek <jt@openai.com>, Heewoo Jun <heewoo@openai.com>, Qiming Yuan <qiming@openai.com>.
1. Introduction
Scalable sequence prediction models (Graves, 2014;
Vaswani et al., 2017; Child et al., 2019) have become a
general-purpose method for generation and representation
learning in many domains, including natural language processing (Mikolov et al., 2013; Sutskever et al., 2014; Dai &
Le, 2015; Peters et al., 2018; Radford et al., 2018; Devlin
et al., 2018), computer vision (Van Oord et al., 2016; Menick
& Kalchbrenner, 2018; Chen et al., 2020; Bao et al., 2021),
audio and speech processing (Oord et al., 2016; 2018; Dhariwal et al., 2020; Baevski et al., 2020), biology (Alley et al.,
2019; Rives et al., 2021), and even across multiple modalities (Das et al., 2017; Lu et al., 2019; Ramesh et al., 2021;
Zellers et al., 2021). More recently, language models have
also fueled progress towards the longstanding challenge
of program synthesis (Simon, 1963; Manna & Waldinger,
1971), spurred by the presence of code in large datasets
(Husain et al., 2019; Gao et al., 2020) and the resulting programming capabilities of language models trained on these
datasets (Wang & Komatsuzaki, 2021). Popular language
modeling objectives like masked language modeling (Devlin
et al., 2018) and span prediction (Raffel et al., 2020) have
also been adapted to train their programming counterparts
CodeBERT (Feng et al., 2020) and PyMT5 (Clement et al.,
2020).
Similarly, our early investigation of GPT-3 (Brown et al.,
2020) revealed that it could generate simple programs from
Python docstrings. While rudimentary, this capability was
exciting because GPT-3 was not explicitly trained for code
generation. Given the considerable success of large language models in other modalities and the abundance of
publicly available code, we hypothesized that a specialized
GPT model, called Codex, could excel at a variety of coding
tasks. This paper describes several early Codex models,
whose descendants power GitHub Copilot and the Codex
models in the OpenAI API.
arXiv:2107.03374v2 [cs.LG] 14 Jul 2021
Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Code
Figure 1. Pass rates of our models on the HumanEval dataset as a
function of model size. When a single sample is generated for each
problem, GPT-12B solves no problems, but Codex (fine-tuned
on code) solves 28.8% of the problems, and Codex-S (further
fine-tuned on correctly implemented standalone functions) solves
37.7% of the problems. From here, further gains can be realized by
generating 100 samples per problem and selecting the sample with
the highest mean log-probability (44.5% solved) or by selecting
the sample that passes the unit tests (77.5% solved). All samples
are generated with temperature 0.8.
In this work, we focus on the task of generating standalone Python functions from docstrings, and evaluate the
correctness of code samples automatically through unit
tests. This is in contrast to natural language generation,
where samples are typically evaluated by heuristics or by
human evaluators. To accurately benchmark our model,
we create a dataset of 164 original programming problems
with unit tests. These problems assess language comprehension, algorithms, and simple mathematics, with some
comparable to simple software interview questions. We

In contrast to RNN sequence-to-sequence models [37], the Transformer outperforms the BerkeleyParser [29] even when training only on the WSJ training set of 40K sentences.

7 Conclusion

In this work, we presented the Transformer, the first sequence transduction model based entirely on

attention, replacing the recurrent layers most commonly used in encoder-decoder architectures with

multi-headed self-attention.

For translation tasks, the Transformer can be trained significantly faster than architectures based

on recurrent or convolutional layers. On both WMT 2014 English-to-German and WMT 2014

English-to-French translation tasks, we achieve a new state of the art. In the former task our best

model outperforms even all previously reported ensembles.

We are excited about the future of attention-based models and plan to apply them to other tasks. We

plan to extend the Transformer to problems involving input and output modalities other than text and

to investigate local, restricted attention mechanisms to efficiently handle large inputs and outputs

such as images, audio and video. Making generation less sequential is another research goals of ours.

The code we used to train and evaluate our models is available at https://github.com/

tensorflow/tensor2tensor.

Acknowledgements We are grateful to Nal Kalchbrenner and Stephan Gouws for their fruitful

comments, corrections and inspiration.

Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Code

Mark Chen * 1 Jerry Tworek * 1 Heewoo Jun * 1 Qiming Yuan * 1 Henrique Ponde de Oliveira Pinto * 1

Jared Kaplan * 2 Harri Edwards 1 Yuri Burda 1 Nicholas Joseph 2 Greg Brockman 1 Alex Ray 1 Raul Puri 1

Gretchen Krueger 1 Michael Petrov 1 Heidy Khlaaf 3 Girish Sastry 1 Pamela Mishkin 1 Brooke Chan 1

Scott Gray 1 Nick Ryder 1 Mikhail Pavlov 1 Alethea Power 1 Lukasz Kaiser 1 Mohammad Bavarian 1

Clemens Winter 1 Philippe Tillet 1 Felipe Petroski Such 1 Dave Cummings 1 Matthias Plappert 1

Fotios Chantzis 1 Elizabeth Barnes 1 Ariel Herbert-Voss 1 William Hebgen Guss 1 Alex Nichol 1 Alex Paino 1

Nikolas Tezak 1 Jie Tang 1

Igor Babuschkin 1 Suchir Balaji 1 Shantanu Jain 1 William Saunders 1

Christopher Hesse 1 Andrew N. Carr 1 Jan Leike 1 Josh Achiam 1 Vedant Misra 1 Evan Morikawa 1

Alec Radford 1 Matthew Knight 1 Miles Brundage 1 Mira Murati 1 Katie Mayer 1 Peter Welinder 1

Bob McGrew 1 Dario Amodei 2 Sam McCandlish 2

Ilya Sutskever 1 Wojciech Zaremba 1

Abstract

We introduce Codex, a GPT language model finetuned on publicly available code from GitHub,

and study its Python code-writing capabilities.

A distinct production version of Codex powers

GitHub Copilot. On HumanEval, a new evaluation set we release to measure functional correctness for synthesizing programs from docstrings,

our model solves 28.8% of the problems, while

GPT-3 solves 0% and GPT-J solves 11.4%. Furthermore, we find that repeated sampling from the

model is a surprisingly effective strategy for producing working solutions to difficult prompts. Using this method, we solve 70.2% of our problems

with 100 samples per problem. Careful investigation of our model reveals its limitations, including

difficulty with docstrings describing long chains

of operations and with binding operations to variables. Finally, we discuss the potential broader

impacts of deploying powerful code generation

technologies, covering safety, security, and economics.

*Equal contribution

1OpenAI, San Francisco, California, USA.

2Anthropic AI, San Francisco, California, USA. Work performed while at OpenAI.

3Zipline, South San Francisco, California, USA. Work performed while at OpenAI.

Correspondence to: Mark Chen <mark@openai.com>,

Jerry Tworek <jt@openai.com>, Heewoo Jun <heewoo@openai.com>, Qiming Yuan <qiming@openai.com>.

1. Introduction

Scalable sequence prediction models (Graves, 2014;

Vaswani et al., 2017; Child et al., 2019) have become a

general-purpose method for generation and representation

learning in many domains, including natural language processing (Mikolov et al., 2013; Sutskever et al., 2014; Dai &

Le, 2015; Peters et al., 2018; Radford et al., 2018; Devlin

et al., 2018), computer vision (Van Oord et al., 2016; Menick

& Kalchbrenner, 2018; Chen et al., 2020; Bao et al., 2021),

audio and speech processing (Oord et al., 2016; 2018; Dhariwal et al., 2020; Baevski et al., 2020), biology (Alley et al.,

2019; Rives et al., 2021), and even across multiple modalities (Das et al., 2017; Lu et al., 2019; Ramesh et al., 2021;

Zellers et al., 2021). More recently, language models have

also fueled progress towards the longstanding challenge

of program synthesis (Simon, 1963; Manna & Waldinger,

1971), spurred by the presence of code in large datasets

(Husain et al., 2019; Gao et al., 2020) and the resulting programming capabilities of language models trained on these

datasets (Wang & Komatsuzaki, 2021). Popular language

modeling objectives like masked language modeling (Devlin

et al., 2018) and span prediction (Raffel et al., 2020) have

also been adapted to train their programming counterparts

CodeBERT (Feng et al., 2020) and PyMT5 (Clement et al.,

2020).

Similarly, our early investigation of GPT-3 (Brown et al.,

2020) revealed that it could generate simple programs from

Python docstrings. While rudimentary, this capability was

exciting because GPT-3 was not explicitly trained for code

generation. Given the considerable success of large language models in other modalities and the abundance of

publicly available code, we hypothesized that a specialized

GPT model, called Codex, could excel at a variety of coding

tasks. This paper describes several early Codex models,

whose descendants power GitHub Copilot and the Codex

models in the OpenAI API.

arXiv:2107.03374v2 [cs.LG] 14 Jul 2021

Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Code

Figure 1. Pass rates of our models on the HumanEval dataset as a

function of model size. When a single sample is generated for each

problem, GPT-12B solves no problems, but Codex (fine-tuned

on code) solves 28.8% of the problems, and Codex-S (further

fine-tuned on correctly implemented standalone functions) solves

37.7% of the problems. From here, further gains can be realized by

generating 100 samples per problem and selecting the sample with

the highest mean log-probability (44.5% solved) or by selecting

the sample that passes the unit tests (77.5% solved). All samples

are generated with temperature 0.8.

In this work, we focus on the task of generating standalone Python functions from docstrings, and evaluate the

correctness of code samples automatically through unit

tests. This is in contrast to natural language generation,

where samples are typically evaluated by heuristics or by

human evaluators. To accurately benchmark our model,

we create a dataset of 164 original programming problems

with unit tests. These problems assess language comprehension, algorithms, and simple mathematics, with some

comparable to simple software interview questions. We