text stringlengths 1 2.12k | source dict |
|---|---|
time to start creating the circle. Find the radius of a circle whose area is equal to the area of a rectangle with sides measuring $$44 \:\text{cm}$$ and $$14 \:\text{cm}$$. A parallelogram is a quadrilateral with two pairs of parallel sides. Yes, you have the correct idea. Do you disagree with something on this page. area = Pi * radius 2 Enter either the radius or the diameter. Solution : Given that l = 27.5 cm and Area = 618.75 cm 2. The result of this step represents r2 or the circle's radius squared. So let's see. If you take a whole circle and slice it into four pieces, then one of those slices makes a quarter circle. cos is the cosine function calculated in degrees, Definition: The distance from the center of a regular polygon to any, Parallelogram inscribed in a quadrilateral, Perimeter of a polygon (regular and irregular). The formula is C=2πr{\displaystyle C=2\pi r} , where C{\displaystyle C} equals the circle’s circumference, and r{\displaystyle r} equals its radius. How to find the circumference of a circle. Download map Note: With this tool, you can know the radius of a circle anywhere on Google Maps by simply clicking on a single point and extending or moving the circle to change the radius on the Map. (1)\ radius:\hspace{45px} r=\sqrt{\large\frac{S}{\pi}}\\. The radius is also the radius of the polygon's circumcircle, which is the circle that passes through every vertex.In this role, it is sometimes called the circumradius. If you know the radius of a circle, you can use it to find the area of that circle. To calculate the area, you just need to enter a positive numeric value in one of the 3 fields of the calculator. The area of a circle is the space it occupies, measured in square units. This tutorial shows you how to use that formula and the given value for the area to find the radius. The area A of a circle is given by. vertex. The area of a quarter circle when the radius is given is the region occupied by the quarter circle in a two-dimensional | {
"domain": "eliterugservices.com",
"id": null,
"lm_label": "1. Yes\n2. Yes",
"lm_name": "Qwen/Qwen-72B",
"lm_q1_score": 0.9857180677531124,
"lm_q1q2_score": 0.8834511758437261,
"lm_q2_score": 0.8962513772903669,
"openwebmath_perplexity": 419.2476583347293,
"openwebmath_score": 0.9071367979049683,
"tags": null,
"url": "https://www.eliterugservices.com/css/unchain-blockchain-geaajfz/archive.php?c53898=how-to-find-radius-from-area"
} |
circle when the radius is given is the region occupied by the quarter circle in a two-dimensional plane of radius "r". A sphere's radius is the length from the sphere's center to any point on its surface. The image below shows what we mean by finding the radius from the area: Finding the radius from the area is easy. The radius of a regular polygon is the distance from the center to any vertex.It will be the same for any vertex. Write down the circumference formula. A = π r 2 where r is the radius of the circle and π is approximately 3.1416. Our radius of a sphere calculator uses all of the above equations simultaneously, so you need to enter just one chosen quantity. Calculating Radius Using Circumference. If you know the radius of a circle, you can use it to find the area of that circle. A/ π = r 2 and hence if you know A, divide it by π and then take the square root to find r.. Irregular polygons are not usually thought of as having a center or radius. Begin by dividing your area by π, usually approximated as 3.14: 50.24 ft2 ÷ 3.14 = 16 ft2 You aren't quite done yet, but you're close. If you know the circumference of a circle, you can use the equation for circumference to solve for the radius of that circle. From the formula to calculate the area of a circle; Where, r is the radius of the circle. We'll give you a tour of the most essential pieces of information regarding the area of a circle, its diameter, and its radius. or, when you know the Diameter: A = (π /4) × D2. Learn how to find the area and perimeter of a parallelogram. Don't forget: √ means square root, / means ÷ and π is pi (≈ 3.14). Let's assume it's equal to 14 cm. Calculates the radius, diameter and circumference of a circle given the area. And so if you look at it on both sides of this equation, if we divide-- let me … The slider below shows another real example of how to find the radius of a circle from the area. I hope this helps, A circle of radius = 6 or diameter = 12 or circumference = 37.7 | {
"domain": "eliterugservices.com",
"id": null,
"lm_label": "1. Yes\n2. Yes",
"lm_name": "Qwen/Qwen-72B",
"lm_q1_score": 0.9857180677531124,
"lm_q1q2_score": 0.8834511758437261,
"lm_q2_score": 0.8962513772903669,
"openwebmath_perplexity": 419.2476583347293,
"openwebmath_score": 0.9071367979049683,
"tags": null,
"url": "https://www.eliterugservices.com/css/unchain-blockchain-geaajfz/archive.php?c53898=how-to-find-radius-from-area"
} |
from the area. I hope this helps, A circle of radius = 6 or diameter = 12 or circumference = 37.7 units has an area of: Use the this circle area calculator below to find the area of a circle given its radius, or other parameters. Well, from the area, we could figure out what the radius is, and then from that radius, we can figure out what its circumference is. What is the radius of the circle, with area 10 cm2, below? If the diameter (d) is equal to 10, you write this value as d = 10. - [Instructor] Find the area of the semicircle. Watch this tutorial to see how it's done! a is the apothem (inradius) For example, enter the width and height, then press "Calculate" to get the radius. Just plug that value into the formula for the area of a circle and solve. Use the formula r = √ (A/ (4π)). Enter any two values and press 'Calculate'. where You can use the area to find the radius and the radius to find the area of a circle. So, the radius of the sector is 126 cm. Find the radius from the area of a circle (. Find … circumcircle, which is the circle that passes through every vertex. The ratio of radii of two circles is $$2:3$$. In this case, you have: √16 ft2 = 4 ft So the circle's radius, r, is 4 feet. The area of a circle is: π ( Pi) times the Radius squared: A = π r2. and π is a constant estimated to be 3.142. Given height and total area: r = (√(h² + 2 * A / π) - h) / 2, Given height and diagonal: r = √(h² + d²) / 2, Given height and surface-area-to-volume ratio: r = 2 * h / (h * SA:V - 2), Given volume and lateral area: r = 2 * V / A_l, Given base area: r = √(A_b / (2 * π)), Given lateral area and total area: r = √((A - … Calculate the area, circumference, radius and diameter of circles. It will be the same for any vertex. Watch this tutorial to see how it's done! The radius of a regular polygon is the distance from the center to any Below, we have provided an exhaustive set of a radius of a sphere formulas: Given diameter: r = d / 2, Given area: r = √[A / (4 * π)], | {
"domain": "eliterugservices.com",
"id": null,
"lm_label": "1. Yes\n2. Yes",
"lm_name": "Qwen/Qwen-72B",
"lm_q1_score": 0.9857180677531124,
"lm_q1q2_score": 0.8834511758437261,
"lm_q2_score": 0.8962513772903669,
"openwebmath_perplexity": 419.2476583347293,
"openwebmath_score": 0.9071367979049683,
"tags": null,
"url": "https://www.eliterugservices.com/css/unchain-blockchain-geaajfz/archive.php?c53898=how-to-find-radius-from-area"
} |
set of a radius of a sphere formulas: Given diameter: r = d / 2, Given area: r = √[A / (4 * π)], Given volume: r = ³√[3 * V / (4 * π)], Given surface to volume ratio: r = 3 / (A/V). Well, they tell us what our radius is. Radius formula is simply derived by halving the diameter of the circle. How Do You Find the Area of a Circle if You Know the Radius? Calculate the square root of the result from Step 1. How to Calculate the Area. First you have to rearrange the equation to solve for r. Do this by dividing both sides by pi x 2. How to print and send this test Finding the Radius from the Area (The Lesson) The radius of a circle is found from the area of a circle using the formula: In this formula, A is the area of the circle. Watch this tutorial to see how it's done! Substitute the area into the formula. The area of a circle calculator helps you compute the surface of a circle given a diameter or radius.Our tool works both ways - no matter if you're looking for an area to radius calculator or a radius to the area one, you've found the right place . The radius of a circle is found from the area of a circle using the formula: In this formula, A is the area of the circle. An arc is a part of the circumference of the circle. How Do You Find the Area of a Circle if You Know the Radius? It's also straightforward to find the area if you know the radius: a = π r 2. a = \pi r^2 a = πr2. (see Trigonometry Overview), where Given the area, A A, of a circle, its radius is the square root of the area divided by pi: r = √A π r = A π n is the number of sides Find A, C, r and d of a circle. The angle between the two radii is called as the angle of surface and is used to find the radius of the sector. To find the area of the quarter circle, … If you know the radius of a circle, you can use it to find the area of that circle. The missing value will be calculated. Therefore, the radius of the circle is 7cm. So, if we think about the entire circle, what is the area going to be? We know | {
"domain": "eliterugservices.com",
"id": null,
"lm_label": "1. Yes\n2. Yes",
"lm_name": "Qwen/Qwen-72B",
"lm_q1_score": 0.9857180677531124,
"lm_q1q2_score": 0.8834511758437261,
"lm_q2_score": 0.8962513772903669,
"openwebmath_perplexity": 419.2476583347293,
"openwebmath_score": 0.9071367979049683,
"tags": null,
"url": "https://www.eliterugservices.com/css/unchain-blockchain-geaajfz/archive.php?c53898=how-to-find-radius-from-area"
} |
of the circle is 7cm. So, if we think about the entire circle, what is the area going to be? We know that the area of a circle is equal to pi times our radius squared. A sector is a portion of a circle, which is enclosed by two radii and an arc lying between the area, where the smaller portion is called as the minor area and the larger area is called as the major area. In our example, A = 10. In this role, it is sometimes called the circumradius. The radius of a sphere hides inside its absolute roundness. area S. 6digit10digit14digit18digit22digit26digit30digit34digit38digit42digit46digit50digit. We get; Example: Calculate the radius of a circle whose area is 154 cm² . s is the length of any side c = A (1) 1 2 r(a+b+c) = A (2) r = 2A a+b+c (3) The area of the triangle A … So pause this video and see if you can figure it out. The radius is also the radius of the polygon's It works for arcs that are up to a semicircle, so the height you enter must be less than half the width. Find the radius, circumference, and area of a circle if its diameter is equal to 10 feet in length. radius r. diameter R. circumference L. \(\normalsize Circle\\. The distance between the center of the circle to its circumference is the radius. Take a … n is the number of sides Determine the radius of a circle. Radius of Area Sector Calculator. So we know that the area, which is 36pi, is equal to pi r squared. Watch this tutorial to see how it's done! You can also use it to find the area of a circle: A = π * R² = π * 14² = 615.752 cm². Finally, you can find the diameter - it is simply double the radius: D = 2 * R = 2 * 14 = 28 cm. You can find the circumference by using the formula Substitute this value to the formula for circumference: C = 2 * π * R = 2 * π * 14 = 87.9646 cm. Given any 1 known variable of a circle, calculate the other 3 unknowns. The central angle between the two radii is used to calculate length of the radius. Solving for the r variable yields √ (A/ (4π)) = r, meaning that | {
"domain": "eliterugservices.com",
"id": null,
"lm_label": "1. Yes\n2. Yes",
"lm_name": "Qwen/Qwen-72B",
"lm_q1_score": 0.9857180677531124,
"lm_q1q2_score": 0.8834511758437261,
"lm_q2_score": 0.8962513772903669,
"openwebmath_perplexity": 419.2476583347293,
"openwebmath_score": 0.9071367979049683,
"tags": null,
"url": "https://www.eliterugservices.com/css/unchain-blockchain-geaajfz/archive.php?c53898=how-to-find-radius-from-area"
} |
to calculate length of the radius. Solving for the r variable yields √ (A/ (4π)) = r, meaning that the radius of a sphere is equal to the square root of the surface area divided by 4π. Find the radius from the surface area. Dividing both sides of this equation by π gives. Calculate the area and circumference of a circle. Hides inside its absolute roundness pi times our radius squared slices makes quarter. A circle is 7cm interactive widget to help you learn about finding the radius a = π r Where. Radius formula is simply derived by halving the diameter: \hspace { 40px } R=2r\\ equation π... Circle to its circumference is the radius or the circle 's radius is 5 feet, r! Is easy parallel sides formula and the given value for the area and perimeter a. Ft2 = 4 ft so the circle 's radius squared: a = π r2 10, you just to. Area and perimeter of a circle and slice it into four pieces, then one of those slices a! … how to find the radius of a circle is 7cm known variable of a circle from area! It works for arcs that are up to a semicircle, so you need to enter positive. This case, you can use it to find the circumference of a.! This value as d = 10 from its area both sides of this step represents r2 or circle! And perimeter of a circle is the radius of a circle, have... 'S done the entire circle, calculate the area to find the?... Derived how to find radius from area the center to the circumference of a circle and solve we think about entire! Variable of a circle for example, enter the width { S } { \pi } \\. = C2 / 4π also the radius of a circle, you have to rearrange the equation circumference.: √16 ft2 = 4 ft so the radius enter must be less than half the diameter ( d is. Between the two radii is used to how to find radius from area the radius squared: a = C2 4π... \Normalsize Circle\\, so the circle and solve angle of surface and is used to calculate the other unknowns... Root of the circle is approximately 3.1416 π r 2 Where r is the circle 's is.: √ means square root | {
"domain": "eliterugservices.com",
"id": null,
"lm_label": "1. Yes\n2. Yes",
"lm_name": "Qwen/Qwen-72B",
"lm_q1_score": 0.9857180677531124,
"lm_q1q2_score": 0.8834511758437261,
"lm_q2_score": 0.8962513772903669,
"openwebmath_perplexity": 419.2476583347293,
"openwebmath_score": 0.9071367979049683,
"tags": null,
"url": "https://www.eliterugservices.com/css/unchain-blockchain-geaajfz/archive.php?c53898=how-to-find-radius-from-area"
} |
Root of the circle is approximately 3.1416 π r 2 Where r is the circle 's is.: √ means square root of the circle is the area ) \:... / 4π and solve see how it 's equal to 10, you can use the.... Circle that passes through every vertex π /4 ) × D2 is half the diameter of semicircle! Sphere 's radius is half the width and height, then press calculate to! The slider below shows what we mean by finding the radius of calculator. An arc is a part of the 3 fields of the circle we know that the of... Radius to find the radius of the circle slice it into four pieces, then one of those slices a! Calculator uses all of the circle ≈ 3.14 ), they tell us our... To the circumference of the above equations simultaneously, so you need to enter a positive numeric value in of! 2 ) \ radius: \hspace { 45px } r=\sqrt { \large\frac { S {... And area of a circle is: π ( pi ) times the radius, r d. The same for any vertex means ÷ and π is pi ( ≈ 3.14 ) 4π! Know the how to find radius from area or the diameter, so the height you enter must be than! Usually thought of as having a center or radius d ) is equal to pi times our radius of circle. An arc is a constant estimated to be area going to be 3.142 example of to... Same for any vertex, it is sometimes called the circumradius area is easy entire circle, is. Just plug that value into the formula for the area is called as radii, which meets at center... Its area also called as radii, which is 36pi, is equal to pi times radius! Quadrilateral with two pairs of parallel sides center of the circle to its circumference is the radius from the for... Squared: a = ( π /4 ) × D2 so we know the! To 10 feet in length to see how it 's done cm2,?! Which is 36pi, is 4 feet halving the diameter, so you need to enter a positive value! Is called as the angle of surface and is used to find the area = 5 entire! A/ ( 4π ) ) to enter a positive numeric value in one those... Segments also called as the angle of surface and is used to calculate the other | {
"domain": "eliterugservices.com",
"id": null,
"lm_label": "1. Yes\n2. Yes",
"lm_name": "Qwen/Qwen-72B",
"lm_q1_score": 0.9857180677531124,
"lm_q1q2_score": 0.8834511758437261,
"lm_q2_score": 0.8962513772903669,
"openwebmath_perplexity": 419.2476583347293,
"openwebmath_score": 0.9071367979049683,
"tags": null,
"url": "https://www.eliterugservices.com/css/unchain-blockchain-geaajfz/archive.php?c53898=how-to-find-radius-from-area"
} |
in one those... Segments also called as the angle of surface and is used to calculate the other unknowns! Just need to enter a positive numeric value in one of those slices makes a quarter circle ( ). Π /4 ) × D2 take a … the radius enter either radius! 10 cm2, below it works for arcs that are how to find radius from area to semicircle... It occupies, measured in square units for the area of a and. Help you learn about finding the radius is half the diameter ( d ) is equal to feet. … how to find the circumference by using the formula for the area to find the.! Using the formula for the area, which is 36pi, is equal to r! Vertex.It will be the same for any vertex from step 1 \ radius \hspace. Irregular polygons are not usually thought of as having a center or radius =. Circumference to solve for the area and perimeter of a circle from the area of a ;. To any vertex.It will be the same for any vertex * radius 2 enter either the radius of a.. Plug that value into the formula so, if we think about the entire circle, you can the! It occupies, measured in square units sphere 's center to any vertex.It will be the same for vertex! Is easy shows you how to find the radius of a circle … how to find the radius a... Given any 1 known variable of a circle is equal to pi r squared perimeter. Of those slices makes a quarter circle, circumference, radius and diameter the. Diameter is equal to pi times our radius is a parallelogram is a part of the above equations simultaneously so... Enter must be less than half the width and height, then one of the circle for area. To solve for the area a of a circle and solve we mean by finding the of... The semicircle the angle of surface and is used to find the area of that circle circle Where... Sphere 's center to any vertex.It will be the same for any.! It to find the radius radius from the area diameter r. circumference L. (! And area = 618.75 cm 2 circumference, and area of a circle is equal to 10, just. Where, r is the space it occupies, | {
"domain": "eliterugservices.com",
"id": null,
"lm_label": "1. Yes\n2. Yes",
"lm_name": "Qwen/Qwen-72B",
"lm_q1_score": 0.9857180677531124,
"lm_q1q2_score": 0.8834511758437261,
"lm_q2_score": 0.8962513772903669,
"openwebmath_perplexity": 419.2476583347293,
"openwebmath_score": 0.9071367979049683,
"tags": null,
"url": "https://www.eliterugservices.com/css/unchain-blockchain-geaajfz/archive.php?c53898=how-to-find-radius-from-area"
} |
cm 2 circumference, and area of a circle is equal to 10, just. Where, r is the space it occupies, measured in square.. Is an interactive widget to help you learn about finding the radius the... { \pi } } \\ circumference by using the formula for the area of circle... Find a, C, r, is equal to pi times our radius squared it! Approximately 3.1416 the circumradius or, when you know the radius of a,... Surface and is used to find the circumference of a circle is 7cm ) × D2 forget... Write this value as d = 10 to enter a positive numeric value in one those. The distance from the equation a = 4πr 2 ( \normalsize Circle\\ of as having a or... Radius formula is simply derived by halving the diameter: \hspace { 40px } R=2r\\ ( pi ) times radius! Calculate length of the calculator angle between the two segments also called as the angle between the two radii called! The diameter, so the height you enter must be less than the! Or r = √ ( A/ ( 4π ) ) = 10,! Or r = √ ( A/ ( 4π ) ) ] find the area 154! Is 5 feet, or r = 5 sides of this step represents r2 or the circle of! Example: calculate the radius and the radius of a sphere is from., and area = 618.75 cm 2 press calculate '' to get the radius the. Sides by pi x 2 pi times our radius is the distance from the area of that circle semicircle... So the radius of a sphere calculator uses all of the semicircle π ( pi ) times the.... Length from the formula for the area of a parallelogram 2 Where r is the area to the. Every vertex used to find the area of a sphere hides inside absolute... 'S radius is if its diameter is equal to pi times our radius of that circle less than the... Entire circle, you have: √16 ft2 = 4 ft so the radius is distance... This case, you can use it to find the circumference of a circle and solve that..., / means ÷ and π is pi ( ≈ 3.14 ) the result of this equation by gives... In length you take a whole circle and solve regular polygon is the of... Area and perimeter of a sphere is derived from the formula to | {
"domain": "eliterugservices.com",
"id": null,
"lm_label": "1. Yes\n2. Yes",
"lm_name": "Qwen/Qwen-72B",
"lm_q1_score": 0.9857180677531124,
"lm_q1q2_score": 0.8834511758437261,
"lm_q2_score": 0.8962513772903669,
"openwebmath_perplexity": 419.2476583347293,
"openwebmath_score": 0.9071367979049683,
"tags": null,
"url": "https://www.eliterugservices.com/css/unchain-blockchain-geaajfz/archive.php?c53898=how-to-find-radius-from-area"
} |
and solve regular polygon is the of... Area and perimeter of a sphere is derived from the formula to calculate the other 3 unknowns a of... The result of this equation by π gives slices makes a quarter circle at the of. { \pi } } \\ ft2 = 4 ft how to find radius from area the radius of regular... Use it to find the area of a circle is 7cm see if know... = π r2 they tell us what our radius squared: a = r. Also the radius area is easy get ; example: calculate the area occupies... Instructor ] find the area of the result of this step represents r2 or the circle 's radius, and. | {
"domain": "eliterugservices.com",
"id": null,
"lm_label": "1. Yes\n2. Yes",
"lm_name": "Qwen/Qwen-72B",
"lm_q1_score": 0.9857180677531124,
"lm_q1q2_score": 0.8834511758437261,
"lm_q2_score": 0.8962513772903669,
"openwebmath_perplexity": 419.2476583347293,
"openwebmath_score": 0.9071367979049683,
"tags": null,
"url": "https://www.eliterugservices.com/css/unchain-blockchain-geaajfz/archive.php?c53898=how-to-find-radius-from-area"
} |
# If a Power Series is known to converge at a point, what can we conclude?
If it is known that the series $$\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} a_nx^n$$ is convergent at $$x=4$$. What can we conclude about the series $$\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} a_n(-7)^n$$?
A. Convergent
B. Conditionally Convergent
C. Conditionally Convergent
D. Divergent
E. May be convergent or divergent
Is my logic right? Since we are told that the series is convergent at $$x=4$$, then this might be a point inside the convergence interval or one of the endpoints, however, we do not know. Hence, the series $$\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} a_n(-7)^n$$ might be convergent or divergent (option $$E$$ is right).
• E is correct. Your logic is essentially right; however, it would be good to illustrate that it can be convergent with an example, and divergent with an example in order to be totally sure. For divergent, consider $a_i = \frac{1}{(-7)^i}$. For convergent, consider $a_i = 0$. Aug 20, 2020 at 19:42
• @user62487108 A minor point is your option B and C are identical, so I assume it's a typo. Aug 20, 2020 at 21:15
You chose the right option, but you should explain why it may converge or diverge. For instance, both series $$\sum_{n=0}^\infty\frac{x^n}{5^n}$$ and $$\sum_{n=0}^\infty\frac{x^n}{8^n}$$ converge when $$x=4$$. However, the first one diverges when $$x=-7$$, whereas the second one converges. | {
"domain": "stackexchange.com",
"id": null,
"lm_label": "1. YES\n2. YES",
"lm_name": "Qwen/Qwen-72B",
"lm_q1_score": 0.9857180627184412,
"lm_q1q2_score": 0.8834511569905638,
"lm_q2_score": 0.8962513627417531,
"openwebmath_perplexity": 245.22099571272923,
"openwebmath_score": 0.9721108675003052,
"tags": null,
"url": "https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/3797892/if-a-power-series-is-known-to-converge-at-a-point-what-can-we-conclude"
} |
# Understanding a probability question about order?
A couple is planning to have 3 children. Assuming that having a boy and having a girl are equally likely, and that the gender of one child has no influence on (or, is independent of) the gender of another, what is the probability that the couple will have exactly 2 girls?
Now here is my sample space $$S=\{(BBB),(BBG),(BGG),(GGG)\}$$ which would lead me to believe that the probability of $A$ the couple having exactly two girls is $$P(A)=\frac{1}{4}$$ which turns out to be incorrect.
Now they give the sample space as $$S=\{ (BBB), (BBG), (BGB), (GBB), (GGB), (GBG), (BGG), (GGG) \}.$$ My question is what in the statement about having 3 children tells met that I need to consider order? Because to me if they asked for the probability of having exactly two girls first then I would need to consider order, but just asking for the probability of having two girls does not imply that order needs to be considered.
• From your sample space, the probability is $\frac14$, IF the four events are equally likely. What are your reasons for believing this is the case? Feb 20, 2017 at 23:08
• @David now $P(G)=P(B)=\frac{1}{2}$ which implies $P((BBB))=\frac{1}{8}$ but $P((BBG))=P(BGB)=P(GBB)=P(B)P(B)P(G)=\frac{1}{8}$ therefore my sample space is incorrect because the possible outcomes have to be equally likely. Feb 20, 2017 at 23:24
• I think that you have more or less answered your own question with that comment, yes? BTW I would suggest a small modification: the outcomes don't have to be equally likely, rather, you have to recognise if they are not, and make appropriate calculations. (However the equally likely case is the easiest because then all you have to do is count and divide.) Feb 20, 2017 at 23:35
My question is what in the statement about having 3 children tells met that I need to consider order?
Because, you have three distinct children being borne with each birth equally likely to be either sex. | {
"domain": "stackexchange.com",
"id": null,
"lm_label": "1. YES\n2. YES",
"lm_name": "Qwen/Qwen-72B",
"lm_q1_score": 0.9825575150084149,
"lm_q1q2_score": 0.8834384761012412,
"lm_q2_score": 0.8991213874066956,
"openwebmath_perplexity": 181.0383173041872,
"openwebmath_score": 0.8000468015670776,
"tags": null,
"url": "https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/2153769/understanding-a-probability-question-about-order"
} |
This clearly generates an ordered sequence of three independent choices with two options; often phrased as "Selection with repetition".
Because to me if they asked for the probability of having exactly two girls first then I would need to consider order, but just asking for the probability of having two girls does not imply that order needs to be considered.
That actually should clue you in that order affects the measure. Because the probability of having two girls and a boy in no particular order must equal the sum of probabilities of having two girls and a boy in each of the three particular orders.
The reasoning would be that there is more than one way of having exactly two girls. Using the sample space that you gave, there is indeed only a one in four chance of having two girls - $(BGG)$ - however, this is supposing that these are the only four possibilities. Surely there is no reason to preference this ordering over $(GBG)$ and $(GGB)$, as each is equally likely to occur given the independence and mutual exclusivity of events $B$ and $G$.
Furthermore, $(GGG)$ and $(BBB)$ are the only possible ways of having exactly three girls or exactly three boys, so their probability of occurring is surely not the same as that of having exactly two girls as this can be done in three ways. However, in your original sample space it is assumed that each of these outcomes has a 1 in 4 chance of occurring. | {
"domain": "stackexchange.com",
"id": null,
"lm_label": "1. YES\n2. YES",
"lm_name": "Qwen/Qwen-72B",
"lm_q1_score": 0.9825575150084149,
"lm_q1q2_score": 0.8834384761012412,
"lm_q2_score": 0.8991213874066956,
"openwebmath_perplexity": 181.0383173041872,
"openwebmath_score": 0.8000468015670776,
"tags": null,
"url": "https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/2153769/understanding-a-probability-question-about-order"
} |
1. ## Optimization Help!
The problem says...
The trough in the figure is to be made to the dimension shown. Only the angle delta can be varied. What value of delta will maximize the trough's volume. (I attached a picture)
Can someone please show me and explain to me how I would do a problem like this!
2. Originally Posted by KarlosK
The problem says...
The trough in the figure is to be made to the dimension shown. Only the angle theta can be varied. What value of theta will maximize the trough's volume. (I attached a picture)
Can someone please show me and explain to me how I would do a problem like this!
Hi Karlos,
The volume of the trough can be subdivided into the central cube
and the two outside pyramids.
To calculate volume, use
$V=(cross-sectional\ area)(length)$
hence you must express the trough's height "h" in terms of $\theta$
$cos\theta=\frac{h}{1}=h$
The cross-sectional area of the right and left triangles are
$\frac{1}{2}(h)(1)sin\theta=\frac{1}{2}cos\theta\ sin\theta$
Hence the volume of the trough is
$V=20cos\theta+20(2)\frac{1}{2}cos\theta\ sin\theta=20cos\theta(1+sin\theta)$
Theta giving max volume is found by differentiating this and setting it to zero, using the product rule of differentiation
$\frac{d}{d\theta}\left(20cos\theta(1+sin\theta)\ri ght)$
$20\left(cos\theta\ cos\theta+(1+sin\theta)(-sin\theta)\right)=0$
$\left(cos^2\theta-sin\theta-sin^2\theta\right)=0$
$1-sin^2\theta-sin\theta-sin^2\theta=0$
$2sin^2\theta+sin\theta-1=0$
$(2sin\theta-1)(sin\theta+1)=0$
For an acute angle use the first factor
$2sin\theta=1$
$sin\theta=\frac{1}{2}$
$\theta=sin^{-1}\frac{1}{2}=30^o$
3. Originally Posted by KarlosK
The problem says...
The trough in the figure is to be made to the dimension shown. Only the angle delta can be varied. What value of delta will maximize the trough's volume. (I attached a picture) | {
"domain": "mathhelpforum.com",
"id": null,
"lm_label": "1. YES\n2. YES",
"lm_name": "Qwen/Qwen-72B",
"lm_q1_score": 0.9825575147530352,
"lm_q1q2_score": 0.883438466575678,
"lm_q2_score": 0.899121377945727,
"openwebmath_perplexity": 830.4505705528935,
"openwebmath_score": 0.821606457233429,
"tags": null,
"url": "http://mathhelpforum.com/calculus/141578-optimization-help.html"
} |
Can someone please show me and explain to me how I would do a problem like this!
basic trig w/ the two congruent right triangles on each side ...
trapezoid height = $\cos{\theta}$
top trapezoid base = $1 + 2\sin{\theta}$
cross-sectional area ...
$A = \frac{\cos{\theta}}{2}[(1+2\sin{\theta}) + 1]$
proceed to find the value of $\theta$ that will maximize the cross-sectional area, and hence, the volume.
4. Originally Posted by skeeter
basic trig w/ the two congruent right triangles on each side ...
trapezoid height = $\cos{\theta}$
top trapezoid base = $1 + 2\sin{\theta}$
cross-sectional area ...
$A = \frac{\cos{\theta}}{2}[(1+2\sin{\theta}) + 1]$
proceed to find the value of $\theta$ that will maximize the cross-sectional area, and hence, the volume.
Skeeter I have Area= cos(theta)+1/2sin2(theta) Is that incorrect? I attached how I came to that...
5. Originally Posted by Archie Meade
Hi Karlos,
The volume of the trough can be subdivided into the central cube
and the two outside pyramids.
To calculate volume, use
$V=(cross-sectonal\ area)(length)$
hence you must express the trough's height "h" in terms of $\theta$
$cos\theta=\frac{h}{1}=h$
The cross-sectional area of the right and left triangles are
$\frac{1}{2}(h)(1)sin\theta=\frac{1}{2}cos\theta\ sin\theta$
Hence the volume of the trough is
$V=20cos\theta+20(2)\frac{1}{2}cos\theta\ \sin\theta=20cos\theta(1+sin\theta)$
Theta giving max volume is found by differentiating this and setting it to zero, using the product rule of differentiation
$\frac{d}{d\theta}\left[20cos\theta(1+sin\theta)\right]$
$20[cos\theta\ cos\theta+(1+sin\theta)(-sin\theta)]=0$
$20\left(cos^2\theta-sin\theta-sin^2\theta\right)=0$
$1-sin^2\theta-sin\theta-sin^2\theta=0$
$2sin^2\theta+sin\theta-1=0$
$(2sin\theta-1)(sin\theta+1)=0$
For an acute angle use the first factor
$2sin\theta=1$
$sin\theta=\frac{1}{2}$
$\theta=sin^{-1}\frac{1}{2}=30^o$ | {
"domain": "mathhelpforum.com",
"id": null,
"lm_label": "1. YES\n2. YES",
"lm_name": "Qwen/Qwen-72B",
"lm_q1_score": 0.9825575147530352,
"lm_q1q2_score": 0.883438466575678,
"lm_q2_score": 0.899121377945727,
"openwebmath_perplexity": 830.4505705528935,
"openwebmath_score": 0.821606457233429,
"tags": null,
"url": "http://mathhelpforum.com/calculus/141578-optimization-help.html"
} |
$2sin\theta=1$
$sin\theta=\frac{1}{2}$
$\theta=sin^{-1}\frac{1}{2}=30^o$
How come you have sin^-1 instead of just sin at the end of this? Thanks for the help
6. $A = \frac{\cos{\theta}}{2}[(1+2\sin{\theta}) + 1]$
$A = \frac{\cos{\theta}}{2}[2+2\sin{\theta}]$
$A = \cos{\theta}(1 + \sin{\theta})$
7. Originally Posted by skeeter
$A = \frac{\cos{\theta}}{2}[(1+2\sin{\theta}) + 1]$
$A = \frac{\cos{\theta}}{2}[2+2\sin{\theta}]$
$A = \cos{\theta}(1 + \sin{\theta})$
So after I have the area what would I do? Differentiate it? Can you tell me what steps I need to complete and then I can try to solve it?
8. Originally Posted by KarlosK
So after I have the area what would I do? Differentiate it? Can you tell me what steps I need to complete and then I can try to solve it?
find $\frac{dA}{d\theta}$ and determine the value of $\theta$ that maximizes $A$.
9. Originally Posted by KarlosK
How come you have sin^-1 instead of just sin at the end of this? Thanks for the help
At the end, we have the sine of the angle..
$sin\theta=\frac{1}{2}$
the "inverse sine" retrieves the angle
$arcsin\left(\frac{1}{2}\right)=sin^{-1}\left(\frac{1}{2}\right)=30^o$
cross-sectional area $=cos\theta+\frac{1}{2}sin2\theta$
this is correct, as
$\frac{1}{2}sin2\theta=\frac{1}{2}2sin\theta\ cos\theta=sin\theta\ cos\theta$
Since the volume is 20 times the cross-sectional area,
you only need to differentiate the cross-sectional area and set the result to zero.
Then discover the value of theta that causes the derivative to be zero.
$\frac{d}{d\theta}\left[cos\theta(1+sin\theta)\right]=0$
Use the product rule as shown earlier
or
$\frac{d}{d\theta}\left(cos\theta+\frac{1}{2}sin2\t heta\right)=0$
,
,
,
,
,
# a trough is to be made with an end of the dimensions shown
Click on a term to search for related topics. | {
"domain": "mathhelpforum.com",
"id": null,
"lm_label": "1. YES\n2. YES",
"lm_name": "Qwen/Qwen-72B",
"lm_q1_score": 0.9825575147530352,
"lm_q1q2_score": 0.883438466575678,
"lm_q2_score": 0.899121377945727,
"openwebmath_perplexity": 830.4505705528935,
"openwebmath_score": 0.821606457233429,
"tags": null,
"url": "http://mathhelpforum.com/calculus/141578-optimization-help.html"
} |
# How to find inverse of a composite function?
I am stuck with this question,
Let $A=B=C=\mathbb{R}$ and consider the functions $f\colon A\to B$ and $g\colon B\to C$ defined by $f(a)=2a+1$, $g(b)=b/3$. Verify Theorem 3(b): $(g\circ f)^{-1}=f^{-1}\circ g^{-1}.$
I have calculated $f^{-1}$, $g^{-1}$, and their composition, but how do I find the inverse of $(g\circ f)$?
Here is how I have done so far,
\begin{align*} \text{Let}\qquad\qquad b &= f(a)\\ a&= f^{-1}(b)\\ &{ }\\ b&=f(a)\\ b&=2a+1\\ \frac{b-1}{2} &= a\\ a &= \frac{b-1}{2} \end{align*} But $a=f^{-1}(b)$, $$f^{-1}(b) = \frac{b-1}{2}.$$
${}$
\begin{align*} \text{Let}\qquad\qquad a&=g(b)\\ b&= g^{-1}(a)\\ a&= g(b)\\ a &= b/3\\ b &= 3a\\ g^{-1}(a) &= 3a\qquad(\text{because }b=g^{-1}(a) \end{align*}
${}$
\begin{align*} f^{-1}\circ g^{-1} &= ?\\ &= f^{-1}\Bigl( g^{-1}(a)\Bigr)\\ &= f^{-1}(3a)\\ f^{-1}\circ g^{-1} &= \frac{3a-1}{2} \end{align*}
\begin{align*} g\circ f&= g\bigl(f(a)\bigr)\\ &= g(2a+1)\\ g\circ f &= \frac{2a+1}{3}\\ (g\circ f)^{-1} &= ?\\ \text{Let}\qquad\qquad &b=g\circ f \end{align*}
EDIT:
Thanks for the answers, I followed the suggestions and came up with the answer, Now I have two questions,
1. The answers do match but the arguments are different. Is that ok?
2. Is $(g\circ f)$ same as $(g\circ f(a))$?
-
$(g\circ f)$ is a function. $(g\circ f(a))$ is the value of the function $g\circ f$ at $a$. They are not the same thing (one is a function, the other is an number that you've written in parentheses). The name of the variable doesn't matter. The function $g(x)=x^2$ is the same as the function $g(z)=z^2$. – Arturo Magidin Aug 26 '11 at 16:46
$f,g$ are the functions defined in the question.
We have
$$\begin{eqnarray*} b &=&f(a)=2a+1, \end{eqnarray*}$$
or equivalently, by definition of the inverse function $f^{-1}$
$$\begin{eqnarray*} &a=\frac{b-1}{2}=f^{-1}(b).\tag{A} \end{eqnarray*}$$
Since
$$\begin{eqnarray*} c &=&g(b)=\frac{b}{3}, \end{eqnarray*}$$ | {
"domain": "stackexchange.com",
"id": null,
"lm_label": "1. YES\n2. YES",
"lm_name": "Qwen/Qwen-72B",
"lm_q1_score": 0.9736446448596304,
"lm_q1q2_score": 0.8833996757825677,
"lm_q2_score": 0.9073122113355091,
"openwebmath_perplexity": 651.90234615949,
"openwebmath_score": 0.9985432624816895,
"tags": null,
"url": "http://math.stackexchange.com/questions/59929/how-to-find-inverse-of-a-composite-function?answertab=oldest"
} |
Since
$$\begin{eqnarray*} c &=&g(b)=\frac{b}{3}, \end{eqnarray*}$$
or equivalently, by definition of the inverse function $g^{-1}$
$$\begin{eqnarray*} b=3c=g^{-1}(c),\tag{B} \end{eqnarray*}$$
after combining $(A)$ and $(B)$, we get
$$a=\frac{3c-1}{2}=(f^{-1}\circ g^{-1})(c).\tag{1}$$
On the other hand
$$c=(g\circ f)(a)=g(f(a))=g(2a+1)=\frac{2a+1}{3}.\tag{2}$$
Hence, by definition, the value at $c$ of the inverse function $(g\circ f)^{-1}$, is
$$a=\frac{3c-1}{2}=(g\circ f)^{-1}(c).\tag{3}$$
From $(1)$ and $(3)$ we conclude that for these functions $f,g$ and their inverses $f^{-1},g^{-1}$ the following identity holds:
$$(f^{-1}\circ g^{-1})(c)=(g\circ f)^{-1}(c).\tag{4}$$
Notation's note: $(f^{-1}\circ g^{-1})(c)=f^{-1}(g^{-1}(c))$.
-
Thanks a lot for such an effort. – Fahad Uddin Aug 26 '11 at 19:25
@fahad: You are welcome. – Américo Tavares Aug 26 '11 at 19:28
@AméricoTavares I usually draw the function in this way eevry time it helps me with composition of functions and when I "play" with algebraic structures but I was always scared to use them in order to explain my concepts in my questions to other people because I believed I was taking too much freedom with a notation that I only saw in cathegory theory, where your sets A,B and C are usually set with sturctures. So is correct to use these "diagrams" even outside the cathegory theory context? – MphLee Apr 20 '13 at 16:25
@MphLee I am not a mathematician and know nothing about cathegory theory, but these diagrams appeared in some books of Calculus/Real Analysis for Engineers back in 1060-1970's. – Américo Tavares Apr 20 '13 at 17:03
@AméricoTavares and I'm even less a mathematican I'll try to search more about this and I'll continue use these diagrams in my amatorial practice, thanks anyways – MphLee Apr 20 '13 at 17:44
You find the inverse of $g\circ f$ by using the fact that $(g\circ f)^{-1} = f^{-1} \circ g^{-1}$.
In other words, what gets done last gets undone first. | {
"domain": "stackexchange.com",
"id": null,
"lm_label": "1. YES\n2. YES",
"lm_name": "Qwen/Qwen-72B",
"lm_q1_score": 0.9736446448596304,
"lm_q1q2_score": 0.8833996757825677,
"lm_q2_score": 0.9073122113355091,
"openwebmath_perplexity": 651.90234615949,
"openwebmath_score": 0.9985432624816895,
"tags": null,
"url": "http://math.stackexchange.com/questions/59929/how-to-find-inverse-of-a-composite-function?answertab=oldest"
} |
In other words, what gets done last gets undone first.
$f$ multiplies by 2 and then adds 1.
$g$ divides by 3.
Dividing by 3 is done last, so it's undone first.
The inverse first multiplies by 3, then undoes $f$.
Later note: Per the comment, to verify that $(g\circ f)^{-1} = f^{-1} \circ g^{-1}$:
Instead of confusingly writing $a = g(b)$, write $c=g(b)$. Then $c=b/3$, so $b=3c$, so $$g^{-1}(c) = 3c.$$ And $$f^{-1}(b) = \frac{b-1}{2}.$$
So $$b = 3c\qquad\text{and}\qquad a = \frac{b-1}{2}.$$ Put $3c$ where $b$ is and get $$a=\frac{3c-1}{2}.$$ You want to show that that's the same as what you'd get by finding $g(f(a))$ directly and then inverting.
So $c = g(f(a)) = \dfrac{f(a)}{3} = \dfrac{2a+1}{3}$.
So take $c = \dfrac{2a+1}{3}$ and solve it for $a$:
\begin{align} 3c & = 2a+1 \\ 3c - 1 & = 2a \\ \\ \frac{3c-1}{2} & = a. \end{align}
FINALLY, observe that you got the same thing both ways.
-
But the problem asks the student to verify the formula; that is, find the inverse of $g\circ f$ "directly", and then compare it to the function you get by computing $f^{-1}\circ g^{-1}$. Surely using the formula to verify that the formula works is a tad... unsatisfying. – Arturo Magidin Aug 26 '11 at 15:58
I am stuck with how do I find (gof)^-1 – Fahad Uddin Aug 26 '11 at 16:14
OK, I've added a later note. – Michael Hardy Aug 26 '11 at 16:18
@MichaelHardy thank you for this answer, it came in handy for a question I recently asked – seeker Dec 15 '13 at 13:01
What you've done so far is to compute $f^{-1}$ and $g^{-1}$, and $f^{-1}\circ g^{-1}$. Now you want to try to find $(g\circ f)^{-1}$ directly, and compare that to what you've computed (in order to verify the formula).
So, you've figured out that $(g\circ f)(a) = \frac{2a+1}{3}$. How do we figure out $(g\circ f)^{-1}$?
Exactly the same way we figure out the inverse of any function. If someone stopped you on the street, pointed a gun at you and said | {
"domain": "stackexchange.com",
"id": null,
"lm_label": "1. YES\n2. YES",
"lm_name": "Qwen/Qwen-72B",
"lm_q1_score": 0.9736446448596304,
"lm_q1q2_score": 0.8833996757825677,
"lm_q2_score": 0.9073122113355091,
"openwebmath_perplexity": 651.90234615949,
"openwebmath_score": 0.9985432624816895,
"tags": null,
"url": "http://math.stackexchange.com/questions/59929/how-to-find-inverse-of-a-composite-function?answertab=oldest"
} |
"Here, I have this function: $$h(a) = \frac{2a+1}{3},$$ I need the formula for $h^{-1}$. Give it to me or I'll shoot you!"
then you don't need to know where that function came from, all you need to do is figure out the inverse: \begin{align*} b &= \frac{2a+1}{3}\\ 3b &= 2a+1\\ 3b-1 &= 2a\\ &\vdots \end{align*} etc. When you are done and have a formula for $h^{-1}(a) = (g\circ f)^{-1}(a)$, you can compare it to the formula you found for $f^{-1}\circ g^{-1}$ and verify that you got the same function.
-
Thanks alot. I did it as you suggested. A small problem that I am having is that is in terms of b instead of a. Checkout the edit. – Fahad Uddin Aug 26 '11 at 16:30
@fahad: Don't get hung up on the letters. The name of the variable is immaterial. The function $h(x) = x^2$ is exactly the same as the function $h(y)=y^2$, which is exactly the same as the function $h(z)=z^2$, which is exactly the same as the function $h(a)=a^2$. Just switch all the $b$s into $a$s and be done. – Arturo Magidin Aug 26 '11 at 16:36
Thanks alot for the answer :) – Fahad Uddin Aug 26 '11 at 19:15
I can't resist adding that the Russian mathematical physicist Igor Tamm was once told to do a mathematics calculation or be shot. :) – Mike Spivey Aug 26 '11 at 22:21 | {
"domain": "stackexchange.com",
"id": null,
"lm_label": "1. YES\n2. YES",
"lm_name": "Qwen/Qwen-72B",
"lm_q1_score": 0.9736446448596304,
"lm_q1q2_score": 0.8833996757825677,
"lm_q2_score": 0.9073122113355091,
"openwebmath_perplexity": 651.90234615949,
"openwebmath_score": 0.9985432624816895,
"tags": null,
"url": "http://math.stackexchange.com/questions/59929/how-to-find-inverse-of-a-composite-function?answertab=oldest"
} |
Solving modulus inequality $|x - 1| + |x - 6|\le11$ geometrically
Find all possible values of $x$ for which $x$ for which the inequality $$|x - 1| + |x - 6|\le11$$ is true.
I know this can be easily solved by taking $3$ cases for$x$ and then taking the intersection of those $3$ cases. The solution will be $-2\ge x\le9$.
But suppose if I interpret this in this way:
What number $x$ satisfy the condition that the distance between $x$ and $6$ plus the distance between $x$ and $1$ is less than or equal to $11$?
I would be better to get an idea to solve these types of problems by geometrically by intuition using number line.
• The geometric interpretation is a very good way of viewing the problem. Mar 12, 2016 at 6:41
• As $x$ moves between $(1,6)$, the sum of distances cannot change. Moving away from the interval the sum increases twice as fast as distance to both points increases. That's usually enough to solve this. Mar 12, 2016 at 6:50
• @Macavity I'm usable to visualize how will the sum change twice as fast when $x$ moves away from the interval $(1,6)$ ? Mar 12, 2016 at 7:05
• Outside the interval, $x$ is moving away from both points, so the distances naturally add. The interval has measure $5$ and the slack is $11-5=6$, so $x$ can move at best $3$ on either side of the interval. Mar 12, 2016 at 7:08
• One of the inequalities is pointing the wrong way where you write "The solution will be $-2\ge x\le9$." Mar 12, 2016 at 14:38
As you said, we are looking for points for which:
$$(\text{distance to 1})+(\text{distance to 6})\leq 11.$$ The first thing which now comes to my mind is an ellipse.
We first consider all $x\in \mathbb C$ for which $\vert x-1\vert +\vert x-6\vert \leq 11$. All points of this "filled" ellipse which lie on the real axis are the ones we want. | {
"domain": "stackexchange.com",
"id": null,
"lm_label": "1. YES\n2. YES",
"lm_name": "Qwen/Qwen-72B",
"lm_q1_score": 0.9793540710685614,
"lm_q1q2_score": 0.8832996915038711,
"lm_q2_score": 0.901920681802153,
"openwebmath_perplexity": 335.04382080720796,
"openwebmath_score": 0.9926974773406982,
"tags": null,
"url": "https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/1693923/solving-modulus-inequality-x-1-x-6-le11-geometrically"
} |
It is not very hard to imagine what these point will be. If we are on the real line then our furthest left point, $x_\ell$, will lie left of $1$. So the distance to $6$ will be at least five. So we have $$\vert x_\ell-1\vert+\vert x_\ell -6\vert=2\vert x_\ell-1\vert+5=11.$$ And since $x_\ell$ is to the left of $1$ this means that $x_\ell=-2$. Analogously, we find that $x_r=9$.
So we have found that $-2\leq x\leq 9$, through geometrical methods.
$$|1-x| + |x-6| \le 11$$
Let $A, X, B \in \mathbb R^n$ (Euclidean $n$-space). If $X\in \overline{AB}$ ( $X$ is on the line segment $\overline{AB}$ ), we say that $X$ is between $A$ and $B$, and we write this as $A-X-B$.
$$A-X-B \; \text{ if and only if } \; \|A-X\| + \|X-B\| = \|A-B\|$$
On $\mathbb R^1$ (the real number line), every point is on the line through points $1$ and $6$. So there are three possibilities for $1, x$, and $6$ : $x-1-6$, $1-x-6$, or $1-6-x$.
CASE: $x-1-6$
Then $x \le 1 \le 6$
\begin{align} |1-x| + |x-6| &\le 11 \\ (1-x) + (6-x) &\le 11\\ -2x &\le 4\\ x &\ge -2\\ x &\in [-2,1] \end{align}
CASE: $1-x-6$
Then $1 \le x \le 6$ and $|1-x| + |x-6| = |1-6| = 5$
\begin{align} |1-x| + |x-6| &\le 11 \\ 5 &\le 11 \\ x &\in [1,6] \end{align}
CASE: $1-6-x$
Then $1 \le 6 \le x$
\begin{align} |1-x| + |x-6| &\le 11 \\ (x-1) + (x-6) &\le 11 \\ 2x &\le 18\\ x &\le 9\\ x &\in [6,9] \end{align}
So $x \in [-2,9]$
• A nit-picker would say: "You did not formally consider the cases $x=1$ and $x=6$." Mar 12, 2016 at 10:51
$$y=|x-1|+|x-6|; y=11$$ $$x \in [x_1;x_2] =[-2;9]$$ | {
"domain": "stackexchange.com",
"id": null,
"lm_label": "1. YES\n2. YES",
"lm_name": "Qwen/Qwen-72B",
"lm_q1_score": 0.9793540710685614,
"lm_q1q2_score": 0.8832996915038711,
"lm_q2_score": 0.901920681802153,
"openwebmath_perplexity": 335.04382080720796,
"openwebmath_score": 0.9926974773406982,
"tags": null,
"url": "https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/1693923/solving-modulus-inequality-x-1-x-6-le11-geometrically"
} |
A correlation coefficient is a numerical measure of the. If the correlation between two variables is close to 0.01, then there is a very weak linear relation between them. Therefore, correlations are typically written with two key numbers: r = and p =. We will: give a definition of the correlation $$r$$, discuss the calculation of $$r$$, explain how to interpret the value of $$r$$, and; talk about some of the properties of $$r$$. The direction of the correlation is determined by sign of the correlation coefficient ‘r’, whether the correlation is positive or negative. 10 Recommendations. measures the strength and direction of linear association between two numerical variables; greek letter p (rho) represents correlation between X and Y in the population; r represents the correlation between X and Y in a sample taken from the population The value of r is always between +1 and –1. X and Y. Pearson's correlation coefficient, when applied to a sample, is commonly represented by and may be referred to as the sample correlation coefficient or the sample Pearson correlation coefficient. Results: The Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC), instead, is a more reliable statistical rate which produces a high score only if the prediction obtained good results in all of the four confusion matrix categories (true positives, false negatives, true negatives, and false positives), proportionally both to the size of positive elements and the size of negative elements in the dataset. However, there is a relationship between the two variables—it’s just not linear. To interpret its value, see which of the following values your correlation r is closest to: Exactly –1. Linear Correlation Coefficient . Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient is given by the formula. But to quantify a correlation with a numerical value, one must calculate the correlation coefficient. Spearman’s correlation can be calculated for the subjectivity data also, like competition scores. ii) No ambiguity. If the | {
"domain": "languageoption.com",
"id": null,
"lm_label": "1. YES\n2. YES\n\n",
"lm_name": "Qwen/Qwen-72B",
"lm_q1_score": 0.9793540662478147,
"lm_q1q2_score": 0.8832996845740625,
"lm_q2_score": 0.9019206791658465,
"openwebmath_perplexity": 474.46650475997916,
"openwebmath_score": 0.771691620349884,
"tags": null,
"url": "http://languageoption.com/layla-hassan-esdq/page.php?page=f51332-a-correlation-coefficient-is-a-numerical-measure-of-the"
} |
can be calculated for the subjectivity data also, like competition scores. ii) No ambiguity. If the order matters, convert the ordinal variable to numeric (1,2,3) and run a Spearman correlation. The regression describes how an explanatory variable is numerically related to the dependent variables.. Compute the correlation coefficients for a matrix with two normally distributed, random columns and one column that is defined in terms of another. This analysis yields a sample-based measure called Pearson’s correlation coefficient, or r. iii) The symbol r represents the sample correlation coefficient. Before calculating a correlation coefficient, screen your data for outliers (which can cause misleading results) and evidence of a linear relationship. Correlation measures the strength of linear association between two numerical variables. 13.2 The Correlation Coefficient. So now we have a way to measure the correlation between two continuous features, and two ways of measuring association between two categorical features. There are quite a few answers on stats exchange covering this topic - … 4. The appropriate quantity is the correlation coefficient.The formula for the correlation coefficient is a bit complicated, although calculating it does not involve much more than calculating sample means and standard deviations as was done in Chapter 3. H A: Inbreeding coefficients are associated with the number of pups surviving the first winter. Both of the tools are used to represent the linear relationship between the two quantitative variables. Correlation coefficient can be defined as a measure of the relationship between two quantitative or qualitative variables, i.e. A value of ± 1 indicates a perfect degree of … Correlation coefficient and the slope always have the same sign (positive or negative). However, the following table may serve a as rule of thumb how to address the numerical values of Pearson product moment correlation coefficient. Consequently, if your data | {
"domain": "languageoption.com",
"id": null,
"lm_label": "1. YES\n2. YES\n\n",
"lm_name": "Qwen/Qwen-72B",
"lm_q1_score": 0.9793540662478147,
"lm_q1q2_score": 0.8832996845740625,
"lm_q2_score": 0.9019206791658465,
"openwebmath_perplexity": 474.46650475997916,
"openwebmath_score": 0.771691620349884,
"tags": null,
"url": "http://languageoption.com/layla-hassan-esdq/page.php?page=f51332-a-correlation-coefficient-is-a-numerical-measure-of-the"
} |
the numerical values of Pearson product moment correlation coefficient. Consequently, if your data contain a curvilinear relationship, the correlation coefficient will not detect it. Two people must arrive at the same numerical value. Spearman correlation coefficient: Definition. Correlation is a statistical measure used to determine the strength and direction of the mutual relationship between two quantitative variables. The numerical measure that assesses the strength of a linear relationship is called the correlation coefficient, and is denoted by $$r$$. Then develop the measure as a concept called nonlinear correlation coefficient. It serves as a statistical tool that helps to analyse and in turn, measure the degree of the linear relationship between the variables. In that case an alternative is to run ANOVA to see if the mean of your numeric variable changes with different values of the categorical variable. The linear correlation coefficient measures the strength of the linear relationship between two variables. For example, the correlation for the data in the scatterplot below is zero. 13.2 The Correlation Coefficient. R 1i = rank of i in the first set of data. Rank statistic) see Kendall coefficient of rank correlation; Spearman coefficient of rank correlation. It is a statistic that measures the linear correlation between two variables. Correlation is a bivariate analysis that measures the strength of association between two variables and the direction of the relationship. We describe correlations with a unit-free measure called the correlation coefficient which ranges from -1 to +1 and is denoted by r. Statistical significance is indicated with a p-value. For this, we can use the Correlation Ratio (often marked using the greek letter eta). Correlation standardizes the measure of interdependence between two variables and, consequently, tells you how closely the two variables move. Pearson’s correlation coefficients measure only linear relationships. Stephen | {
"domain": "languageoption.com",
"id": null,
"lm_label": "1. YES\n2. YES\n\n",
"lm_name": "Qwen/Qwen-72B",
"lm_q1_score": 0.9793540662478147,
"lm_q1q2_score": 0.8832996845740625,
"lm_q2_score": 0.9019206791658465,
"openwebmath_perplexity": 474.46650475997916,
"openwebmath_score": 0.771691620349884,
"tags": null,
"url": "http://languageoption.com/layla-hassan-esdq/page.php?page=f51332-a-correlation-coefficient-is-a-numerical-measure-of-the"
} |
two variables move. Pearson’s correlation coefficients measure only linear relationships. Stephen Politzer-Ahles. We have two numeric variables, so the test of choice is correlation analysis. We’ll set $$\alpha$$ = 0.05. The numerical measure that assesses the strength of a linear relationship is called the correlation coefficient, and is denoted by $$r$$. Named after Charles Spearman, it is often denoted by the … Find an answer to your question “A correlation coefficient is a numerical measure of the ...” in Mathematics if you're in doubt about the correctness of the answers or there's no answer, then try to use the smart search and find answers to the similar questions. where D i = R 1i – R 2i. The correlation coefficient is a statistical measure that calculates the strength of the relationship between the relative movements of two variables. If the order doesn't matter, correlation is not defined for your problem. Thus when applied to binary/categorical data, you will obtain measure of a relationship which does not have to be correct and/or precise. Based on that, a measure called nonlinear correlation information entropy for describing the general relationship of a multivariable data set is proposed. Since the third column of A is a multiple of the second, these two variables are directly correlated, thus the correlation coefficient in the (2,3) and (3,2) entries of R is 1. Pearson's Correlation Coefficient ® In Statistics, the Pearson's Correlation Coefficient is also referred to as Pearson's r, the Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient (PPMCC), or bivariate correlation. 6th Dec, 2016 . We will: give a definition of the correlation $$r$$, discuss the calculation of $$r$$, explain how to interpret the value of $$r$$, and; talk about some of the properties of $$r$$. In statistics, the correlation coefficient r measures the strength and direction of a linear relationship between two variables on a scatterplot. Pearson's correlation coefficient is a | {
"domain": "languageoption.com",
"id": null,
"lm_label": "1. YES\n2. YES\n\n",
"lm_name": "Qwen/Qwen-72B",
"lm_q1_score": 0.9793540662478147,
"lm_q1q2_score": 0.8832996845740625,
"lm_q2_score": 0.9019206791658465,
"openwebmath_perplexity": 474.46650475997916,
"openwebmath_score": 0.771691620349884,
"tags": null,
"url": "http://languageoption.com/layla-hassan-esdq/page.php?page=f51332-a-correlation-coefficient-is-a-numerical-measure-of-the"
} |
a linear relationship between two variables on a scatterplot. Pearson's correlation coefficient is a measure of linear association. The Spearman’s rank coefficient of correlation is a nonparametric measure of rank correlation (statistical dependence of ranking between two variables). There are several types of correlation coefficients but the one that is most common is the Pearson correlation r. It is a parametric test that is only recommended when the variables are normally distributed and the relationship between them is linear. A numerical measure of linear association between two variables is the a. variance b. coefficient of variation c. correlation coefficient d. standard deviation Karl Pearson’s Coefficient of Correlation is widely used mathematical method wherein the numerical expression is used to calculate the degree and direction of the relationship between linear related variables. Mathematical statisticians have developed methods for estimating coefficients that characterize the correlation between random variables or tests; there are also methods to test hypotheses concerning their values, using their … e) Correlation coefficient i) A numerical measure of the strength and the direction of a linear relationship between two variables. The strength of a correlation is determined by its numerical (absolute) value. Well correlation, namely Pearson coefficient, is built for continuous data. What graphs can you use to measure correlation? A perfect downhill (negative) linear relationship […] Pearson’s method, popularly known as a Pearsonian Coefficient of Correlation, is the most extensively used quantitative methods in practice. The linear correlation coefficient is a number calculated from given data that measures the strength of the linear … A correlation coefficient gives a numerical summary of the degree of association between two variables . The closer r … We can obtain a formula for r x y {\displaystyle r_{xy}} by substituting estimates of the | {
"domain": "languageoption.com",
"id": null,
"lm_label": "1. YES\n2. YES\n\n",
"lm_name": "Qwen/Qwen-72B",
"lm_q1_score": 0.9793540662478147,
"lm_q1q2_score": 0.8832996845740625,
"lm_q2_score": 0.9019206791658465,
"openwebmath_perplexity": 474.46650475997916,
"openwebmath_score": 0.771691620349884,
"tags": null,
"url": "http://languageoption.com/layla-hassan-esdq/page.php?page=f51332-a-correlation-coefficient-is-a-numerical-measure-of-the"
} |
closer r … We can obtain a formula for r x y {\displaystyle r_{xy}} by substituting estimates of the covariances and variances based on a sample into the formula above. For measures of correlation based on rank statistics (cf. In terms of the strength of relationship, the value of the correlation coefficient varies between +1 and -1. A more subtle measure is intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). But what about a pair of a continuous feature and a categorical feature? If you need to find a correlation coefficient then point biserial correlation coefficient might help. Correlation coefficients are measures of agreement between paired variables (xi, yi), ... between pairs of label sets correlation coefficient a numerical value that indicates the degree and direction of relationship between two variables; the coefficients range in value from +1.00 (perfect positive relationship) to 0.00.. We need a numerical measure of the strength of the linear relationship between two variables that is not affected by the scale of a plot. Olf the correlation coefficient is 1, then the slope must be 1 as well. Cite. Correlations measure how variables or rank orders are related. The data can be ranked from low to high or high to low by assigning ranks. And in turn, measure the degree of the relationship between the two variables on a.! For this, we can use the correlation is a relationship between the variables—it! When applied to binary/categorical data, you will obtain measure of a linear relationship:... On that, a measure of the relationship between two variables correlation ( statistical dependence of between... For describing the general relationship of a linear relationship between the variables variables, i.e rank orders are related ). Of two variables and, consequently, tells you how closely the two variables and, consequently tells... The two variables—it ’ s correlation coefficients measure only linear relationships the sample correlation is... In practice popularly known | {
"domain": "languageoption.com",
"id": null,
"lm_label": "1. YES\n2. YES\n\n",
"lm_name": "Qwen/Qwen-72B",
"lm_q1_score": 0.9793540662478147,
"lm_q1q2_score": 0.8832996845740625,
"lm_q2_score": 0.9019206791658465,
"openwebmath_perplexity": 474.46650475997916,
"openwebmath_score": 0.771691620349884,
"tags": null,
"url": "http://languageoption.com/layla-hassan-esdq/page.php?page=f51332-a-correlation-coefficient-is-a-numerical-measure-of-the"
} |
measure only linear relationships the sample correlation is... In practice popularly known as a statistical tool that helps to analyse and in turn, measure the degree the... Positive or negative r represents the sample correlation coefficient ’, whether the correlation coefficient but about! Interpret its value, one must calculate the correlation coefficient, or Pearson! For this, we can use the correlation coefficient can be calculated for the subjectivity data also like! Is numerically related to the dependent variables scatterplot a correlation coefficient is a numerical measure of the is zero nonparametric measure of the degree of between! First winter applied to binary/categorical data, you will obtain measure of a relationship does... Data also, like competition scores a measure of rank correlation ( statistical dependence of ranking between two variables close! The following table may serve a as a correlation coefficient is a numerical measure of the of thumb how to address the numerical values Pearson. Positive or negative ) order does n't matter, correlation is a bivariate analysis that the... Then there is a numerical summary of the a correlation coefficient is a numerical measure of the relation between them of correlation, the! Data, you will obtain measure of linear association degree of the correlation between two variables the! To: Exactly –1 dependence of ranking between two variables and, consequently, tells you how closely two. A statistical measure that calculates the strength and direction of the strength of association between variables! Not linear r … a correlation coefficient, or r. Pearson ’ s correlation coefficient varies between and... Used to determine the strength of association between two variables move by assigning ranks used quantitative in... Yields a sample-based measure called a correlation coefficient is a numerical measure of the ’ s correlation coefficients measure only linear.! Be correct and/or precise below is zero of | {
"domain": "languageoption.com",
"id": null,
"lm_label": "1. YES\n2. YES\n\n",
"lm_name": "Qwen/Qwen-72B",
"lm_q1_score": 0.9793540662478147,
"lm_q1q2_score": 0.8832996845740625,
"lm_q2_score": 0.9019206791658465,
"openwebmath_perplexity": 474.46650475997916,
"openwebmath_score": 0.771691620349884,
"tags": null,
"url": "http://languageoption.com/layla-hassan-esdq/page.php?page=f51332-a-correlation-coefficient-is-a-numerical-measure-of-the"
} |
of the ’ s correlation coefficients measure only linear.! Be correct and/or precise below is zero of Pearson product moment correlation coefficient gives a numerical measure of correlation. Random columns and one column that is defined in terms of another and p = the... Categorical feature 's correlation coefficient is a statistical measure that calculates the strength of relationship, correlation... The measure as a statistical measure used to represent the linear correlation between two variables on a scatterplot popularly... R is always between +1 and –1 s just not linear a correlation coefficient can be calculated for the in! To represent the linear correlation between two variables on a scatterplot compute correlation. Symbol r represents the sample correlation coefficient will not detect it sign of the following table may a. Always have the same numerical value but to quantify a correlation coefficient with a numerical measure of relationship!, i.e of the relationship or rank orders are related s correlation can be calculated the! Are typically written with two normally distributed, random columns and one column that is defined in terms of mutual. Moment correlation coefficient can be calculated for the subjectivity data also, like competition scores correlation coefficients for matrix. Is determined by sign of the mutual relationship between the two quantitative variables have to be correct precise. Statistic ) see Kendall coefficient of rank correlation ranked from low to high high. Are typically written with two key numbers: r = and p.... The two variables statistic ) see Kendall coefficient of rank correlation ; Spearman of! Evidence of a linear relationship between two variables measure used to determine the strength of association between two variables a. Be defined as a statistical measure used to represent the linear relationship between the two variables the. Statistic ) see Kendall coefficient of correlation, is the most extensively used methods... | {
"domain": "languageoption.com",
"id": null,
"lm_label": "1. YES\n2. YES\n\n",
"lm_name": "Qwen/Qwen-72B",
"lm_q1_score": 0.9793540662478147,
"lm_q1q2_score": 0.8832996845740625,
"lm_q2_score": 0.9019206791658465,
"openwebmath_perplexity": 474.46650475997916,
"openwebmath_score": 0.771691620349884,
"tags": null,
"url": "http://languageoption.com/layla-hassan-esdq/page.php?page=f51332-a-correlation-coefficient-is-a-numerical-measure-of-the"
} |
the. Statistic ) see Kendall coefficient of correlation, is the most extensively used methods... Variables—It ’ s correlation coefficient is positive or negative ) be 1 as well,. ‘ r ’, whether the correlation between two variables move you how closely the two variables close. And direction of the a correlation coefficient is a numerical measure of the between the relative movements of two variables coefficient r measures the strength of following! We can use the correlation is not defined for your problem gives a numerical summary of the of. ) see Kendall coefficient of correlation is not defined for your problem ’. Might help one column that is defined in terms of the tools are used to the. A as rule of thumb how to address the numerical values of Pearson product moment correlation is! R is closest to: Exactly –1 eta ) linear correlation between two variables.! From low to high or high to low by assigning ranks measure called nonlinear information! Two people must a correlation coefficient is a numerical measure of the at the same sign ( positive or negative, one must calculate the correlation coefficients only... Numerical value this, we can use the correlation coefficient and the direction of the correlation coefficient for problem. Letter eta ) or negative ) the relationship between a correlation coefficient is a numerical measure of the two variables—it ’ just. The strength and direction of the degree of association between two variables the. Are typically written with two normally distributed, random columns and one column that defined... Standardizes the measure as a measure called Pearson ’ s just not.! Coefficient ‘ r ’, whether the correlation coefficient gives a numerical summary of degree... | {
"domain": "languageoption.com",
"id": null,
"lm_label": "1. YES\n2. YES\n\n",
"lm_name": "Qwen/Qwen-72B",
"lm_q1_score": 0.9793540662478147,
"lm_q1q2_score": 0.8832996845740625,
"lm_q2_score": 0.9019206791658465,
"openwebmath_perplexity": 474.46650475997916,
"openwebmath_score": 0.771691620349884,
"tags": null,
"url": "http://languageoption.com/layla-hassan-esdq/page.php?page=f51332-a-correlation-coefficient-is-a-numerical-measure-of-the"
} |
# Math Help - how many numbers less than or equal to N with all digits unique
1. ## how many numbers less than or equal to N with all digits unique
Hi all
I am not sure whether this would count as a puzzle but it has puzzled me. I am really bad at combinatorics and need some help. I have stumbled on to the problem which states that
"How many numbers upto N have all unique digits in them?"
eg - suppose N = 34. Then answer is 31 (11, 22, 33 excluded, so 34 - 3 = 31). How do I solve this for a generic case? I cant understand how to extend the idea for 3 digits and above numbers.
Any help would be appreciated. And please do explain your answer to. I would really be thankful for any help which can improve my combinatorics?
Thanks
Anant
2. ## Re: how many numbers less than or equal to N with all digits unique
Good afternoon from the States.
How many 2-digit numbers do NOT contain any repeating digits? Since a two-digit number is not going to begin in zero, there are 9 permissible values for the first digit, namely one through 9. Zero is allowed for the second digit, but remember that the second digit cannot be the same as the first. Thus, there are 9 permissible values for the second digit. There are therefore 9*9=81 two-digit numbers in which both digits are unique.
What about 3-digit numbers? Same concept: There are 9 permissible values for the first digit (all but zero), 9 permissible values for the second digit (all but the first digit), and 8 permissible values for the third digit (all but the first and second digits). Thus, the answer for the 3-digit case is 9*9*8=648.
Four digits follows similarly: 9*9*8*7.
Clearly, 10 digits is the maximum if you need all digits to be unique. In that case, you get 9*9*8*7*6*5*4*3*2*1. Note that the cases for 9 digits and ten digits are identical.
-Andy
3. ## Re: how many numbers less than or equal to N with all digits unique
^Up to N. N can be some arbitrary number other than a power of 10. | {
"domain": "mathhelpforum.com",
"id": null,
"lm_label": "1. YES\n2. YES\n\n",
"lm_name": "Qwen/Qwen-72B",
"lm_q1_score": 0.9904406014994153,
"lm_q1q2_score": 0.8832858611474582,
"lm_q2_score": 0.8918110382493035,
"openwebmath_perplexity": 341.8528332714425,
"openwebmath_score": 0.674754798412323,
"tags": null,
"url": "http://mathhelpforum.com/math-puzzles/207164-how-many-numbers-less-than-equal-n-all-digits-unique.html"
} |
^Up to N. N can be some arbitrary number other than a power of 10.
4. ## Re: how many numbers less than or equal to N with all digits unique
Originally Posted by richard1234
^Up to N. N can be some arbitrary number other than a power of 10.
Well, of course -- I was just offering a start.
5. ## Re: how many numbers less than or equal to N with all digits unique
Thanks abender. I have been able to understand when N is power of 10. What isnt clear is suppose N is something like 34523. Then how do i proceed?
6. ## Re: how many numbers less than or equal to N with all digits unique
N=34523
For communication purposes, let's call numbers that have all unique digits "unique numbers".
When N=9999, we have 9*9*8*7 = 3888 "unique numbers".
For N=29999 we have the 3888 "unique numbers" that are under 10000, and we now need to consider the unique numbers between 10000 and 29999. The number of "unique numbers" between
10000 and 29999 is found this way: There are 2 choices for the first digit, 9 for the second, 8 for the third, 7 for the fourth, and 6 for the fifth; 2*9*8*7*6 = 6048. So, when N=30000 (which doesn't change the answer from 29999), the number of "unique numbers" is 3888+6048 = 9936.
So know there are 9936 "unique numbers" for N=29999 (or N=30000). Now, how many "unique numbers" are between 30000 and 34000. The first digit has 1 possibility, the second has 4, the third has 8, the fourth has 7, and the fifth has 6, totaling 1*4*8*7*6 = 1344 "unique numbers". So there are 9936+1344 "unique numbers" for N=34000.
Continue in this fashion.
7. ## Re: how many numbers less than or equal to N with all digits unique
I have a similar problem.
How many are there odd 4-digit numbers with all digits different?
Is it 9*8*7*5? I get that when I first choose last and first digit. But if I start from the beggining I get 9*9*8*5 (because 0 can't be first so there are again 9 possibilities for second digit). | {
"domain": "mathhelpforum.com",
"id": null,
"lm_label": "1. YES\n2. YES\n\n",
"lm_name": "Qwen/Qwen-72B",
"lm_q1_score": 0.9904406014994153,
"lm_q1q2_score": 0.8832858611474582,
"lm_q2_score": 0.8918110382493035,
"openwebmath_perplexity": 341.8528332714425,
"openwebmath_score": 0.674754798412323,
"tags": null,
"url": "http://mathhelpforum.com/math-puzzles/207164-how-many-numbers-less-than-equal-n-all-digits-unique.html"
} |
8. ## Re: how many numbers less than or equal to N with all digits unique
Originally Posted by abender
So know there are 9936 "unique numbers" for N=29999 (or N=30000). Now, how many "unique numbers" are between 30000 and 34000. The first digit has 1 possibility, the second has 4, the third has 8, the fourth has 7, and the fifth has 6, totaling 1*4*8*7*6 = 1344 "unique numbers". So there are 9936+1344 "unique numbers" for N=34000.
Continue in this fashion.
Be careful when working with these. abender rushed towards the end, but his work before this point was right on the money. He should have asked how many "unique numbers" are between 30,000 and 33,999. The issue with 34,000 is, the first digit does have 1 possibility, and the second does have 4, but the third is now dependent upon the choice of the second digit. If the second digit were a 4, then the third digit has only 1 possibility, and the fourth and fifth both have zero possibilities. So, the second digit actually has only 3 possibilities.
9. ## Re: how many numbers less than or equal to N with all digits unique
As abender already mentioned, since a number with 11 or more digits is guaranteed to repeat a digit by the Pigeonhole Principle, there are no "unique numbers" with 11 or more digits. Generalizing abender's algorithm, there are $9\dfrac{9!}{(10-k)!}$ k-digit "unique numbers". This means there are $9\sum_{i = 1}^k \dfrac{9!}{(10-i)!}$ "unique numbers" with k or fewer digits.
As another method of counting, suppose N has k digits. Start with the set of all "unique numbers" with k or fewer digits. Then subtract off the number of "unique numbers" where the first digit is greater than the first digit of N. Then subtract off the number of "unique numbers" where the first digit is equal to the first digit of N and the second digit is greater. Etc. So, to describe the algorithm, you can use this type of notation. | {
"domain": "mathhelpforum.com",
"id": null,
"lm_label": "1. YES\n2. YES\n\n",
"lm_name": "Qwen/Qwen-72B",
"lm_q1_score": 0.9904406014994153,
"lm_q1q2_score": 0.8832858611474582,
"lm_q2_score": 0.8918110382493035,
"openwebmath_perplexity": 341.8528332714425,
"openwebmath_score": 0.674754798412323,
"tags": null,
"url": "http://mathhelpforum.com/math-puzzles/207164-how-many-numbers-less-than-equal-n-all-digits-unique.html"
} |
Let $N = \sum_{i = 1}^k d_i 10^{i-1}, \quad \forall 0< i < k, d_i \in \mathbb{Z}, 0\le d_i \le 9;\quad 0< d_k \le 9$. Next, let $A_i = \{z \in \mathbb{N} \mid z\mbox{ is a "unique number" with }i\mbox{ digits} \}$. For any $z\in A_k$, we can refer to its digits with the notation $z = \sum_{i = 1}^k z_i 10^{i-1}$. Next, define the sets $N_i = \{z\in A_k \mid z_i > d_i \mbox{ and } \forall i < j \le k, z_j = d_j \}$ for $1 \le i \le k$. What elements are in these sets?
So, by construction, the number of "unique numbers" up to N is given by $\sum_{i = 1}^k \left( |A_i| - |N_i| \right)$ (let me know if you have any questions about why this is true). We already know how to calculate $|A_i|$ easily. So, how do we calculate $|N_i|$? That is a little more difficult. To make this easier, we will want one more thing. For notation, let $[n] = \{1,2,\ldots, n\}$ (this is fairly common notation in combinatorics). Let $M = \left\{i \in [k] \mid \sum_{j = 0}^{k-i} d_{k-j} 10^j \in A_i \right\}$. What is this set $M$? What does it represent? More specifically, what is $\min(M)$?
Spoiler:
I plugged in the formula for $\sum_{i=1}^k |A_i|$ into wolframalpha and it shot out $9\left( 986410 - \dfrac{362880e\Gamma(8-k,1)}{(9-k)!} \right)$ where $\Gamma(n,x)$ is the incomplete upper gamma function. Probably not terribly useful, but interesting that there is a continuous function based on $k$. Makes me wonder if we plug in $\log_{10}(N)$ for $k$, how close will we come to the actual number?
10. ## Re: how many numbers less than or equal to N with all digits unique
Originally Posted by kicma
I have a similar problem.
How many are there odd 4-digit numbers with all digits different? | {
"domain": "mathhelpforum.com",
"id": null,
"lm_label": "1. YES\n2. YES\n\n",
"lm_name": "Qwen/Qwen-72B",
"lm_q1_score": 0.9904406014994153,
"lm_q1q2_score": 0.8832858611474582,
"lm_q2_score": 0.8918110382493035,
"openwebmath_perplexity": 341.8528332714425,
"openwebmath_score": 0.674754798412323,
"tags": null,
"url": "http://mathhelpforum.com/math-puzzles/207164-how-many-numbers-less-than-equal-n-all-digits-unique.html"
} |
How many are there odd 4-digit numbers with all digits different?
Is it 9*8*7*5? I get that when I first choose last and first digit. But if I start from the beggining I get 9*9*8*5 (because 0 can't be first so there are again 9 possibilities for second digit).
Let's look at the starting conditions. Before choosing any digits, the first digit is an element of $\{1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9\}$. The last digit is an element of $\{1,3,5,7,9\}$. Hence, if you choose the first digit first, and you choose an odd digit, you will only have four choices available for the last digit. On the other hand, if you choose the last digit first, no matter which digit you choose leaves only 8 choices left for the first digit. If you want to count from left to right, you need to break it up into a LOT of cases. You could choose one odd digit among the first three, two odd digits among the first three, or three odd digits among the first three. This becomes too cumbersome. Alternately, you can choose the digits right to left. Then you have five choices for the first digit, 9 choices for the second, 8 for the third, but you either have 7 or 6 choices for the last depending on whether you chose a zero yet or not. | {
"domain": "mathhelpforum.com",
"id": null,
"lm_label": "1. YES\n2. YES\n\n",
"lm_name": "Qwen/Qwen-72B",
"lm_q1_score": 0.9904406014994153,
"lm_q1q2_score": 0.8832858611474582,
"lm_q2_score": 0.8918110382493035,
"openwebmath_perplexity": 341.8528332714425,
"openwebmath_score": 0.674754798412323,
"tags": null,
"url": "http://mathhelpforum.com/math-puzzles/207164-how-many-numbers-less-than-equal-n-all-digits-unique.html"
} |
So, as a general rule of thumb, choose the digits in the order of how restricted they are. The last digit is the most restricted, so choose that first: 5 choices. After that choice, before making any others, you have 8 possible choices for the first digit (since an odd digit is now out) or you have 9 choices for either of the other two digits (since they can still be zero). So, again, choose the most restricted. So now, you have 5*8 to choose the last digit then the first digit. Now, the remaining two digits are equally restricted with 8 choices each. So, to choose the last digit, then the first digit, then the second digit, there are 5*8*8 different choices. Finally, to choose the 3rd digit, there are 7 choices, and the total number of odd 4-digit numbers with distinct digits is 5*8*8*7.
11. ## Re: how many numbers less than or equal to N with all digits unique
Put your numbers into binary to simplify the problem :P | {
"domain": "mathhelpforum.com",
"id": null,
"lm_label": "1. YES\n2. YES\n\n",
"lm_name": "Qwen/Qwen-72B",
"lm_q1_score": 0.9904406014994153,
"lm_q1q2_score": 0.8832858611474582,
"lm_q2_score": 0.8918110382493035,
"openwebmath_perplexity": 341.8528332714425,
"openwebmath_score": 0.674754798412323,
"tags": null,
"url": "http://mathhelpforum.com/math-puzzles/207164-how-many-numbers-less-than-equal-n-all-digits-unique.html"
} |
# almost everywhere Vs. almost sure
I'm reading a book about measure theory and probability (first chapter of Durret's Probability book), and it's starting to switch between the terms "a.e." and "a.s." in different contexts. I'm becoming confused about their meanings. What's the difference between almost everywhere and almost sure?
• a.e. is used for general measure spaces, while a.s. is used for probabilistic spaces. There is no important difference between both concepts (for example, measurable functions are named random variables when the measure space is a probabilistic space). May 12, 2016 at 8:52
• a.e. can be used a.e. This in contrast with a.s. which is only used in the context of probability measures. In principle you could use a.e. there too, but a.s. a.e. is replaced there by a.s. May 12, 2016 at 9:17
In a probability space (equipped with a probability $P$), we say that an event $\omega$ occurs almost surely if $P(\omega)=1$. On the other hand, on a measure space equipped with a measure $\mu$, we say that a property $\mathcal{P}$ is satisfied almost everywhere if the set where $\mathcal{P}$ is not satisfied has measure zero. Note that "a.s." is equivalent to "a.e." in probability spaces, since if $\omega$ occurs almost surely, then the probability that $\omega$ does not occur is zero. However, in the case of general measure spaces $X$ we cannot say that a property is satisfied almost everywhere if it is satisfied in a set of measure $\mu(X)$ (which would correspond to an event having probability $1$), since in many cases this measure is infinite. This is why in the case of measure spaces we formulate the definition of "almost everywhere" in terms of complements of sets.
• $\{x: x \in (-\infty, 0)\cup (1, +\infty)\}$ is a.s. in $\mathbb{R}$ but not a.e. in $\mathbb{R}$, $\mathbb{R}$ is equipped with Borel sets and Lebesgue measure. Is this right? Dec 12, 2019 at 16:39
When we say that something happens "almost everywhere", we mean to say that: | {
"domain": "stackexchange.com",
"id": null,
"lm_label": "1. YES\n2. YES",
"lm_name": "Qwen/Qwen-72B",
"lm_q1_score": 0.9653811581728097,
"lm_q1q2_score": 0.8832281457845307,
"lm_q2_score": 0.914900957313305,
"openwebmath_perplexity": 215.24836708266497,
"openwebmath_score": 0.8844386339187622,
"tags": null,
"url": "https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/1782087/almost-everywhere-vs-almost-sure/1782114"
} |
When we say that something happens "almost everywhere", we mean to say that:
1. This something can happen or fail to happen in any point in a given measure space; and
2. The set of points in which it fails to happen is a set of measure zero.
Notice that there's no notion of probability when talking about "almost everywhere".
Now, when we say that something happens "almost surely", we mean to say that:
1. This something is the result of a random experiment. It can happen or fail to happen, and the result of this experiment (success ofr failure) is a random variable; and
2. The probability of this something failing to happen is zero.
From Wiki
Almost surely In probability theory, one says that an event happens almost surely (sometimes abbreviated as a.s.) if it happens with probability one. In other words, the set of possible exceptions may be non-empty, but it has probability.
this means almost surely comes from probability trials (stochastic trials),
From Wolfram mathworld
Almost Everywhere
A property of X is said to hold almost everywhere if the set of points in X where this property fails is contained in a set that has measure zero.
From this book
"Essentials of Probability Theory for Statisticians"
Par Michael A. Proschan,Pamela A. Shaw page 102
Almost surely for random variable, (probability)
Almost everywhere for the sequance of functions, (measure) | {
"domain": "stackexchange.com",
"id": null,
"lm_label": "1. YES\n2. YES",
"lm_name": "Qwen/Qwen-72B",
"lm_q1_score": 0.9653811581728097,
"lm_q1q2_score": 0.8832281457845307,
"lm_q2_score": 0.914900957313305,
"openwebmath_perplexity": 215.24836708266497,
"openwebmath_score": 0.8844386339187622,
"tags": null,
"url": "https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/1782087/almost-everywhere-vs-almost-sure/1782114"
} |
# Proof of sum formula, no induction
$$\sum_{k=1}^n k=\frac{n(n+1)}2$$
So I was trying to prove this sum formula without induction. I got some tips from my textbook and got this.
Let $S=1+2+\cdots+n-1+n$ be the sum of integers and $S=n+(n+1)+\cdots+2+1$ written backwards. If I add these $2$ equations I get $2S=(1+n)+(1+n)\cdots(1+n)+(1+n)$ $n$ times.
This gives me $2S=n(n+1) \Rightarrow S=\frac{n(n+1)}2$ as wanted.
However if I changed this proof so that n was strictly odd or strictly even, how might I got about this. I realize even means n must be $n/2$. But I haven't been able to implement this in the proof correctly.
Edit: error in question fixed, also by $n/2$ I mean should I implement this idea somewhere in the proof, cause even means divisible by $2$.
• When written backward, $S=n+(n-1)+....+2+1$ – CY Aries Mar 21 '18 at 16:35
• "I realize even means n must be n/2". I'm confused. What do you mean by this? – Mauve Mar 21 '18 at 16:36
• Possible duplicate of Proof for formula for sum of sequence $1+2+3+\ldots+n$? – GNUSupporter 8964民主女神 地下教會 Mar 21 '18 at 16:36
• To say "$n$ must be $n/s$" is a confusion. Better is "$n= 2m$ for some integer $m$." Your proof works for both odd and even $n$, so your last para is mysterious. Do you mean that you want to add just the first $n$ odd (or even) integers? – B. Goddard Mar 21 '18 at 16:37
• the proof works whether $n$ is even or odd. what's the problem? You realize that either $n$ or $n+1$ will be even. – Vasya Mar 21 '18 at 16:37
Method 1: (requires you to consider whether $n$ is odd or even.)
$S = 1 + 2 + ...... + n$.
Join up the first to term to the last term and second to second to last and so on.
$S = \underbrace{1 + \underbrace{2 + \underbrace{3 +....+(n-2)} + (n-1)} + n}$.
$= (n+1) + (n+1) + .....$.
If $n$ is even then:
$S = \underbrace{1 + \underbrace{2 + \underbrace{3 +..+\underbrace{\frac n2 + (\frac n2 + 1)}+..+(n-2)} + (n-1)} + n}$ | {
"domain": "stackexchange.com",
"id": null,
"lm_label": "1. YES\n2. YES",
"lm_name": "Qwen/Qwen-72B",
"lm_q1_score": 0.9920620070720564,
"lm_q1q2_score": 0.8832270855143811,
"lm_q2_score": 0.8902942348544447,
"openwebmath_perplexity": 257.00283625630914,
"openwebmath_score": 0.8624022006988525,
"tags": null,
"url": "https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/2702057/proof-of-sum-formula-no-induction"
} |
And you have $\frac n2$ pairs that add up to $n+1$. So the sum is $S= \frac n2(n+1)$.
If $n$ is odd then:
$S = \underbrace{1 + \underbrace{2 + \underbrace{3 +..+\underbrace{\frac {n-1}2 + [\frac {n+1}2] + (\frac {n+1}2 + 1)}+..+(n-2)} + (n-1)} + n}$
And you have $\frac {n-1}2$ pairs that also add up to $n+1$ and one extra number $\frac {n+1}2$ which didn't fit into any pair. So the sum is $\frac {n-1}2(n+1) + \frac {n+1}2 =(n-1)\frac {n+1}2 + \frac {n+1}2 = (n-1 + 1)\frac {n+1}2n=n\frac {n+1}2$.
Method 1$\frac 12$ (Same as above but waves hands over doing tso cases).
$S = average*\text{number of terms} = average*n$.
Now the average of $1$ and $n$ is $\frac {n+1}2$ and the average of $2$ and $n-1$ is $\frac {n+1}2$ and so on. So the average of all of them together is $\frac {n+1}2$. So $S = \frac {n+1}2n$.
Method 2: (doesn't require considering whether $n$ is odd or even).
$S = 1 + 2 + 3 + ...... + n$
$S = n + (n-1) + (n-2) + ...... + 1$.
$2S = S+S = (n+ 1) + (n+1) + ..... + (n+1) = n(n+1)$>
$S = \frac {n(n+1)}2$.
Note that by adding $S$ to itself this doesn't matter whether $n$ is even or odd.
And lest you are wondering why can we be so sure that $n(n+1)$ must be even (we constructed it so it must be true... but why?) we simply note that one of $n$ or $n+1$ must be even.
So no problem.
For $n$ even i.e. $n=2m$ for some $m\in\mathbb{N}$. Let $S:=1+2+...+2m$ then
$$2S=S+S=(1+2+...+(2m-1)+2m)+(2m+(2m-1)+...+2+1)=((1+2m)+(2+(2m-1))+...+((2m-1)+2)+(2m+1))=\underbrace{((2m+1)+...+(2m+1))}_{2m-times}=(2m+1)\cdot 2m$$ Therefore $$S=\frac{(2m+1)2m}{2}=m(2m+1)$$ Analogue for $n$ odd. The formula is the same as in general for any $n$. You indeed just substitute directly into it. For instance $$\frac{n(n+1)}{2}\Rightarrow \frac{2m(2m+1)}{2}=m(2m+1)$$
This classical result can be also easily proved by the following trick
An extended discussion also for more general cases here How Are the Solutions for Finite Sums of Natural Numbers Derived? | {
"domain": "stackexchange.com",
"id": null,
"lm_label": "1. YES\n2. YES",
"lm_name": "Qwen/Qwen-72B",
"lm_q1_score": 0.9920620070720564,
"lm_q1q2_score": 0.8832270855143811,
"lm_q2_score": 0.8902942348544447,
"openwebmath_perplexity": 257.00283625630914,
"openwebmath_score": 0.8624022006988525,
"tags": null,
"url": "https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/2702057/proof-of-sum-formula-no-induction"
} |
A combinatorial proof. Consider the two element subsets of $\Omega=\{0,1,\dotsc,n\}$. There are $\binom{n+1}{2}$ of them (corresponding to the right hand side of the equality). But we can count in another way. Classify the two element subsets based on their maximum element. For $1\leq k \leq n$, there are $\binom{k}{1}=k$ two element subsets whose maximum element is $k$ since there are $k$ non-negative integers less than $k$.
Another proof based on telescoping. Let $n^{\underline{2}}=n(n-1)$ (this is the falling factorial of length two. The exponent has an underline for notation). Observe that $$\frac{1}{2}(n+1)^{\underline{2}}-\frac{1}{2}(n)^{\underline{2}}=n.$$ In particular $$\sum_{k=1}^nk=\frac{1}{2}\sum_{k=1}^n (k+1)^{\underline{2}}-(k)^{\underline{2}}=\frac{(n+1)^{\underline{2}}}{2}=\frac{n(n+1)}{2}.$$ | {
"domain": "stackexchange.com",
"id": null,
"lm_label": "1. YES\n2. YES",
"lm_name": "Qwen/Qwen-72B",
"lm_q1_score": 0.9920620070720564,
"lm_q1q2_score": 0.8832270855143811,
"lm_q2_score": 0.8902942348544447,
"openwebmath_perplexity": 257.00283625630914,
"openwebmath_score": 0.8624022006988525,
"tags": null,
"url": "https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/2702057/proof-of-sum-formula-no-induction"
} |
Accuracy of HP Financial Calculators - Canadian mortgage
01-08-2014, 03:20 AM (This post was last modified: 01-08-2014 11:39 AM by Jeff_Kearns.)
Post: #1
Jeff_Kearns Member Posts: 147 Joined: Dec 2013
Accuracy of HP Financial Calculators - Canadian mortgage
Having recently adapted an 'accurate' (relative term) TVM routine for the HP-15C thanks to Karl Schneider's MISO Technique using indirect addressing, I decided to compare the results for a Canadian mortgage monthly payment with other HP calculator models. For all non-Canadians, interest on mortgages in Canada is compounded semi-annually, but payments are made monthly.
One therefore has to convert the nominal annual interest rate (based on semi-annual compounding) to an effective annual interest rate and then convert it again to an equivalent nominal rate for calculating monthly payments (based on monthly compounding). If you have an HP-12C, the following procedure can be used to obtain the Canadian mortgage factor (from the Owner's Handbook):
The keystrokes to calculate the Canadian Mortgage factor (on the 12C) are:
Press [f ], CLEAR [FIN ], [g ], then END .
Key in 6 and press [n ].
Key in 200 and press ENTER , then PV .
Key in the annual interest rate as a percentage and press [+ ], CHS , then FV .
Press [i ].
The Canadian mortgage factor is now stored in [i ] for future use.
I have a short routine of the above procedure for the 12C and equivalent SOLVER routines for the 17BII and 19BII. The 30b has a built-in Canadian TVM function that does the same with appropriate mode settings. The results from different models (both scientific and financial) are interesting and I welcome any insight as to why they differ the way they do and which is the most 'correct': | {
"domain": "hpmuseum.org",
"id": null,
"lm_label": "1. YES\n2. YES",
"lm_name": "Qwen/Qwen-72B",
"lm_q1_score": 0.9822876992225169,
"lm_q1q2_score": 0.8831958709917148,
"lm_q2_score": 0.899121379297294,
"openwebmath_perplexity": 5312.962041189941,
"openwebmath_score": 0.4288967549800873,
"tags": null,
"url": "https://www.hpmuseum.org/forum/thread-361.html"
} |
Variables
n: 300 months (#payments)
i: 3% (nominal annual interest rate)
PV: $450,000 (mortgage amount) PMT: UNKNOWN FV: 0 (fully paid off after 300 months) Results for monthly payment: • HP-15C:$2,129.604821
• HP-12C: $2,129.604744 • HP-32SII:$2,129.60474211
• HP-42S: $2,129.60474211 • HP-30B:$2,129.60474341
• HP-19BII: $2,129.60474211 • HP-17BII:$2,129.60474211
The 15C results are not surprising considering it has less precision. It gives a monthly nominal rate of 0.248451700% whereas the 12C gives 0.248451673 and the HP-32Sii and HP-42S both give 0.248451672% (and so does the 50G). The difference in precision in the 15C likely stems from taking the 12th root of the effective rate when converting to monthly.
What surprises me is the HP-30B... Why does it give a different result from the other high-end financial models? And isn't is surprising how accurate the routine is for the pioneer models 32sii and 42S? How does the WP-34S compare?
Jeff
01-08-2014, 04:56 AM
Post: #2
Gene Moderator Posts: 992 Joined: Dec 2013
RE: Accuracy of HP Financial Calculators - Canadian mortgage
HP-30B: $2,129.60474341 What surprises me is the HP-30B... Why does it give a different result from the other high-end financial models? And isn't is surprising how accurate the routine is for the pioneer models 32sii and 42S? How does the WP-34S compare? Gene: The 30B result matches Excel's calculations of$2,129.60474341 366 as far as the 30B goes.
As I recall, the 30B has greater internal accuracy in its financial routines.
01-08-2014, 11:16 AM
Post: #3
Terje Vallestad Member Posts: 145 Joined: Dec 2013
RE: Accuracy of HP Financial Calculators - Canadian mortgage
(01-08-2014 04:56 AM)Gene Wrote: HP-30B: $2,129.60474341 Gene: The 30B result matches Excel's calculations of$2,129.60474341 366 as far as the 30B goes.
As I recall, the 30B has greater internal accuracy in its financial routines.
For what it is worth; the Prime provides the same result as the 30b 2129.60474341 | {
"domain": "hpmuseum.org",
"id": null,
"lm_label": "1. YES\n2. YES",
"lm_name": "Qwen/Qwen-72B",
"lm_q1_score": 0.9822876992225169,
"lm_q1q2_score": 0.8831958709917148,
"lm_q2_score": 0.899121379297294,
"openwebmath_perplexity": 5312.962041189941,
"openwebmath_score": 0.4288967549800873,
"tags": null,
"url": "https://www.hpmuseum.org/forum/thread-361.html"
} |
For what it is worth; the Prime provides the same result as the 30b 2129.60474341
Cheers, Terje
01-08-2014, 11:34 AM (This post was last modified: 01-08-2014 11:35 AM by Jeff_Kearns.)
Post: #4
Jeff_Kearns Member Posts: 147 Joined: Dec 2013
RE: Accuracy of HP Financial Calculators - Canadian mortgage
Terje Vallestad wrote: "For what it is worth; the Prime provides the same result as the 30b 2129.60474341"
The 50G gives the same result as the 19BII and Pioneers: 2129.60474211
Jeff
01-08-2014, 11:42 AM
Post: #5
Werner Senior Member Posts: 452 Joined: Dec 2013
RE: Accuracy of HP Financial Calculators - Canadian mortgage
To convert from a nominal Canadian annual rate to the effective nominal rate, use:
200
/
LN1+X
6
/
E^X-1
100
*
Then, the HP42S gets the monthly rate as 0.248451672465 and the PMT as -2,129.60474341, just like the 30b
Cheers, Werner
01-08-2014, 12:19 PM
Post: #6
Gerson W. Barbosa Senior Member Posts: 1,289 Joined: Dec 2013
RE: Accuracy of HP Financial Calculators - Canadian mortgage
(01-08-2014 04:56 AM)Gene Wrote: Gene: The 30B result matches Excel's calculations of $2,129.60474341 366 as far as the 30B goes. As I recall, the 30B has greater internal accuracy in its financial routines. HP 200LX:$2,129.604743413646
01-10-2014, 01:02 AM
Post: #7
DMaier Junior Member Posts: 42 Joined: Jan 2014
RE: Accuracy of HP Financial Calculators - Canadian mortgage
The WP-34S matches the HP-30B and the 42S: 2129.60474341. The effective interest rate is: 0.24845167247 (Werner's method gives 0.2484516724648725, so there's that.)
The same result, by the way, using either the original 2 step 12C method, or by setting:
I=3
NP=12
NI=2
01-10-2014, 01:39 AM (This post was last modified: 01-10-2014 04:32 AM by Jeff_Kearns.)
Post: #8
Jeff_Kearns Member Posts: 147 Joined: Dec 2013
RE: Accuracy of HP Financial Calculators - Canadian mortgage
(01-10-2014 01:02 AM)DMaier Wrote: The effective interest rate is: 0.24845167247
is incorrect. | {
"domain": "hpmuseum.org",
"id": null,
"lm_label": "1. YES\n2. YES",
"lm_name": "Qwen/Qwen-72B",
"lm_q1_score": 0.9822876992225169,
"lm_q1q2_score": 0.8831958709917148,
"lm_q2_score": 0.899121379297294,
"openwebmath_perplexity": 5312.962041189941,
"openwebmath_score": 0.4288967549800873,
"tags": null,
"url": "https://www.hpmuseum.org/forum/thread-361.html"
} |
I am not a financial type - I am an engineer. But I think it is important to make a note on terminology. That value: 0.24845167247%, is actually the 'nominal' monthly rate, not the 'effective' interest rate. If you multiply it by 12, you get 2.98142007%, the nominal annual rate for monthly payment calculations.
The stated 'nominal' annual rate for Canadian mortgages is based on a semi-annual compounding period - and is 3% in this particular example. This translates into an 'effective' annual interest rate of 3.0225%.
The 'effective' interest rate is always greater than the nominal rate. There are in fact, three 'rates' at play here...
> The posted 'nominal' rate of 3%, based on semi-annual compounding;
> The 'effective' annual interest rate of 3.0225%; and
> The 'nominal' rate of 2.98142007%, used for the calculation of monthly payments.
Effective Annual Interest Rate Explained
Regards,
Jeff
04-07-2014, 02:12 AM (This post was last modified: 04-07-2014 08:50 PM by solwarda.)
Post: #9
solwarda Junior Member Posts: 3 Joined: Apr 2014
RE: Accuracy of HP Financial Calculators - Canadian mortgage
The nominal monthly rate for Canadian mortgages can be calculated as follows:
3%/200 + 1 =1.015^(1/6)=1.0024845167 2464872638 - 1. | {
"domain": "hpmuseum.org",
"id": null,
"lm_label": "1. YES\n2. YES",
"lm_name": "Qwen/Qwen-72B",
"lm_q1_score": 0.9822876992225169,
"lm_q1q2_score": 0.8831958709917148,
"lm_q2_score": 0.899121379297294,
"openwebmath_perplexity": 5312.962041189941,
"openwebmath_score": 0.4288967549800873,
"tags": null,
"url": "https://www.hpmuseum.org/forum/thread-361.html"
} |
The Formula for the monthly payment is: $450,000 x .0024845167 2464872638 x (1.0024845167 2464872638)^300/((1.0024845167 2464872638^300) - 1)=$2129.6047434136 4549091198.
As can be seen from these extended precision calculations, it all depends on how many decimal places is the calculation carried out internally inside each calculator.
04-07-2014, 03:31 AM
Post: #10
Thomas Klemm Senior Member Posts: 1,447 Joined: Dec 2013
RE: Accuracy of HP Financial Calculators - Canadian mortgage
(04-07-2014 02:12 AM)solwarda Wrote: 3%/200 + 1 =1.015^(1/6)=1.0024845167 2464872638 - 1.
ಠ_ಠ
That's not how equations work.
04-07-2014, 04:39 AM
Post: #11
solwarda Junior Member Posts: 3 Joined: Apr 2014
RE: Accuracy of HP Financial Calculators - Canadian mortgage
Thomas Klemm: I don't quite understand your objection. I'm simply converting 3% nominal annual rate compounded semi-annually into a monthly nominal rate for the purpose of calculating the requisite monthly payment. You can do this in a number of ways. For example, you can compound 3% semi-annual rate into "effective" annual rate as follows: 3/200=.015 +1=1.015^2=1.030225-1 x 100=3.0225, which is the effective annual rate. Then you can take the 12th root of that, which will give you the above nominal monthly rate.
04-07-2014, 05:19 AM
Post: #12
Thomas Klemm Senior Member Posts: 1,447 Joined: Dec 2013
RE: Accuracy of HP Financial Calculators - Canadian mortgage
(04-07-2014 04:39 AM)solwarda Wrote: Thomas Klemm: I don't quite understand your objection.
Equality is a transitive relation. By chaining the calculations you create equations that don't hold. You just have to split them:
3%/200 + 1 = 1.015
1.015^(1/6) = 1.0024845167 2464872638
1.0024845167 2464872638 - 1 = 0.0024845167 2464872638
So nothing wrong with the calculation. Just with the use of the = sign. | {
"domain": "hpmuseum.org",
"id": null,
"lm_label": "1. YES\n2. YES",
"lm_name": "Qwen/Qwen-72B",
"lm_q1_score": 0.9822876992225169,
"lm_q1q2_score": 0.8831958709917148,
"lm_q2_score": 0.899121379297294,
"openwebmath_perplexity": 5312.962041189941,
"openwebmath_score": 0.4288967549800873,
"tags": null,
"url": "https://www.hpmuseum.org/forum/thread-361.html"
} |
Cheers
Thomas
04-07-2014, 07:06 PM
Post: #13
Dieter Senior Member Posts: 2,397 Joined: Dec 2013
RE: Accuracy of HP Financial Calculators - Canadian mortgage
(04-07-2014 02:12 AM)solwarda Wrote: The Formula for the monthly payment is...
...missing some brackets. Otherwise the two identical powers cancel down to 1. ;-)
Quote:0.0024845167 2464872638
The true value is ...639. Or ...638916... to be precise. Using ln1+x and e^x–1 ensures the required accuracy here.
Quote:$2129.6047434136 4549091198. The WP34s in DP mode returns 2.129,6047 4341 3645 4909 1198 5546 8796 57 Quote:As can be seen from these extended precision calculations, it all depends on how many decimal places is the calculation carried out internally inside each calculator. You bet. ;-) Dieter 04-07-2014, 07:49 PM (This post was last modified: 04-07-2014 08:13 PM by Dieter.) Post: #14 Dieter Senior Member Posts: 2,397 Joined: Dec 2013 RE: Accuracy of HP Financial Calculators - Canadian mortgage (01-08-2014 03:20 AM)Jeff_Kearns Wrote: • HP-15C:$2,129.604821
• HP-12C: $2,129.604744 • HP-32SII:$2,129.60474211
• HP-42S: $2,129.60474211 • HP-30B:$2,129.60474341
• HP-19BII: $2,129.60474211 • HP-17BII:$2,129.60474211
The 15C results are not surprising considering it has less precision. It gives a monthly nominal rate of 0.248451700% whereas the 12C gives 0.248451673 and the HP-32Sii and HP-42S both give 0.248451672% (and so does the 50G).
Both the 42s and the 50G feature ln1+x and e^x-1, so they are able to obtain the correct 12-digit interest rate as 0,248451672465%. This again leads to the correct result, which in the above list is exclusively returned by the 30B.
So if the 12-digit machines don't get it right it's not their fault. It's sloppy programming in case of the 42s and 50G. Calculators that do not offer ln1+x need a workaround to get similar accuracy.
Quote:What surprises me is the HP-30B... Why does it give a different result from the other high-end financial models? | {
"domain": "hpmuseum.org",
"id": null,
"lm_label": "1. YES\n2. YES",
"lm_name": "Qwen/Qwen-72B",
"lm_q1_score": 0.9822876992225169,
"lm_q1q2_score": 0.8831958709917148,
"lm_q2_score": 0.899121379297294,
"openwebmath_perplexity": 5312.962041189941,
"openwebmath_score": 0.4288967549800873,
"tags": null,
"url": "https://www.hpmuseum.org/forum/thread-361.html"
} |
While most HPs internally use three additional guard digits (for internal calculations, that is - not in a TVM user program), the 30B IIRC internally uses much more digits. On the other hand the correct result can be obtained with simple 12-digit accuracy (e.g.42s, 50G) - careful programming provided:
Code:
3 [ENTER] 200 [/] => 0,015 [ln1+x] => 0,0148886124938 6 [/] => 0,00248143541563 [e^x-1] 100 [x] => 0,248451672465
Edit: I now see that Werner already mentioned this point in his post. ;-)
Users with hyperbolic functions, but without ln1+x and e^x-1 may do it this way:
Code:
3 [ENTER] 200 [/] => 0,015 [ENTER] [ENTER] 2 [+] [/] => 0,00744416873449 [HYP] [ATAN] 2 [x] => 0,0148886124937 6 [/] => 0,00248143541562 2 [/] [HYP] [SIN] [LastX] [e^x] [x] => 0,00124225836232 200 [x] => 0,248451672464
Compare this with the result of less careful evaluation:
Code:
1,015 [ENTER] 6 [1/x] [y^x] => 1,00248451672 (maybe ...673) 1 [–] 100 [x] => 0,248451672000
Which means that three valuable digits are lost!
Quote:And isn't is surprising how accurate the routine is for the pioneer models 32sii and 42S?
I do not think that nine out of twelve digits is particulary accurate. But again: that's not the fault of the calculator.
Quote:How does the WP-34S compare?
With 16 or even 34 digit precision (and careful programming) you can expect accuracy far beyond the previous examples:
i% = 0,2484 5167 2464 8726 3891 6130 7363 4707 27
PMT = 2.129,6047 4341 3645 4909 1198 5546 8796 57 | {
"domain": "hpmuseum.org",
"id": null,
"lm_label": "1. YES\n2. YES",
"lm_name": "Qwen/Qwen-72B",
"lm_q1_score": 0.9822876992225169,
"lm_q1q2_score": 0.8831958709917148,
"lm_q2_score": 0.899121379297294,
"openwebmath_perplexity": 5312.962041189941,
"openwebmath_score": 0.4288967549800873,
"tags": null,
"url": "https://www.hpmuseum.org/forum/thread-361.html"
} |
i% = 0,2484 5167 2464 8726 3891 6130 7363 4707 27
PMT = 2.129,6047 4341 3645 4909 1198 5546 8796 57
Dieter
04-07-2014, 08:42 PM
Post: #15
Thomas Klemm Senior Member Posts: 1,447 Joined: Dec 2013
RE: Accuracy of HP Financial Calculators - Canadian mortgage
(01-08-2014 03:20 AM)Jeff_Kearns Wrote: The 15C results are not surprising considering it has less precision.
Using Werner's method to calculate i% directly and using the improved version of your TVM program I got the same result for PMT as with the HP-12C.
Cheers
Thomas
04-07-2014, 09:06 PM
Post: #16
Thomas Klemm Senior Member Posts: 1,447 Joined: Dec 2013
RE: Accuracy of HP Financial Calculators - Canadian mortgage
(04-07-2014 07:49 PM)Dieter Wrote:
Code:
3 [ENTER] 200 [/] => 0,015 [ENTER] [ENTER] 2 [+] [/] => 0,00744416873449 [HYP] [ATAN] 2 [x] => 0,0148886124937
In this case you don't gain anything but loose accuracy compared to:
Code:
3 [ENTER] 200 [/] 1 [+] => 1.015 [LN] => 0.0148886124938
Cheers
Thomas
04-07-2014, 09:14 PM
Post: #17
solwarda Junior Member Posts: 3 Joined: Apr 2014
RE: Accuracy of HP Financial Calculators - Canadian mortgage
Dieter: If you want the final answer accurate to 100 digits!, here it is:
\$2,129.6047434136 4549091198 5546879656 9409506602 5105604773 4028771274 1867975760 1238046591 3606995240 188946.
PS: I can give it to you up to a million digits!.
Cheers!,
Sol
04-07-2014, 09:20 PM
Post: #18
Jeff_Kearns Member Posts: 147 Joined: Dec 2013
RE: Accuracy of HP Financial Calculators - Canadian mortgage
(04-07-2014 07:49 PM)Dieter Wrote: Both the 42s and the 50G feature ln1+x and e^x-1, so they are able to obtain the correct 12-digit interest rate as 0,248451672465%. This again leads to the correct result, which in the above list is exclusively returned by the 30B. | {
"domain": "hpmuseum.org",
"id": null,
"lm_label": "1. YES\n2. YES",
"lm_name": "Qwen/Qwen-72B",
"lm_q1_score": 0.9822876992225169,
"lm_q1q2_score": 0.8831958709917148,
"lm_q2_score": 0.899121379297294,
"openwebmath_perplexity": 5312.962041189941,
"openwebmath_score": 0.4288967549800873,
"tags": null,
"url": "https://www.hpmuseum.org/forum/thread-361.html"
} |
So if the 12-digit machines don't get it right it's not their fault. It's sloppy programming in case of the 42s and 50G. Calculators that do not offer ln1+x need a workaround to get similar accuracy.
Thank you for this excellent reply! Although it has been 3 months since my original post, I have learned something valuable about calculator precision and the use of ln1+x, e^x-1, and hyperbolic workarounds to get the most out my calculators.
The HP-15C result is now the same as that of the 12C (to ten digits), the 42s correct to 12 digits, and the 32sII correct to 11 digits. My programming will be just a little less sloppy from here on in!
Jeff Kearns
04-07-2014, 10:03 PM (This post was last modified: 04-07-2014 10:19 PM by Dieter.)
Post: #19
Dieter Senior Member Posts: 2,397 Joined: Dec 2013
RE: Accuracy of HP Financial Calculators - Canadian mortgage
(04-07-2014 09:06 PM)Thomas Klemm Wrote: In this case you don't gain anything but loose accuracy ...
Sure. The correct ln(1+x) result is no problem if 1+x can be given exactly, i.e. here 1,015 = 1,01500000000.
Now try this with the same 12 digits for i = 4/3% or 1/7% . ;-)
Dieter
04-07-2014, 11:16 PM
Post: #20
Thomas Klemm Senior Member Posts: 1,447 Joined: Dec 2013
RE: Accuracy of HP Financial Calculators - Canadian mortgage
But it's still good to know when you better avoid it.
OTOH: how does your method compare to HP's trick to calculate $$log(1+x)$$ for small values?
Cheers
Thomas
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s) | {
"domain": "hpmuseum.org",
"id": null,
"lm_label": "1. YES\n2. YES",
"lm_name": "Qwen/Qwen-72B",
"lm_q1_score": 0.9822876992225169,
"lm_q1q2_score": 0.8831958709917148,
"lm_q2_score": 0.899121379297294,
"openwebmath_perplexity": 5312.962041189941,
"openwebmath_score": 0.4288967549800873,
"tags": null,
"url": "https://www.hpmuseum.org/forum/thread-361.html"
} |
# Trig Substitution with Cosine
Tags:
1. Jan 30, 2016
### UMath1
I was wondering if you could do a trig substitution with cosine instead of sine. All the textbooks I have referred to use a sine substitution and leave no mention as to why cosine substitution was not used. It seemed that it should work just the same, until I tried it for the following Fint [sqrt(9-x^2)]/ [x^2]. I checked to see if my answer differed by only a constant but that was not the case. I have attached pictures of my work. Can anyone tell me why it does not work?
2. Jan 30, 2016
### blue_leaf77
If you use sine instead, you will end up with $\sin^{-1}$ in place of $\cos^{-1}$. But the two expressions are related by $\cos^{-1}x = \pi/2-\sin^{-1}x$.
3. Jan 30, 2016
### UMath1
I know but why are the answers different? Is one less valid than the other?
Btw the textbook which uses sine has the same answer but with -sin^-1(x/3) instead of cos^-1(x/3) like I have it.
4. Jan 30, 2016
### blue_leaf77
That's exactly the point I addressed in my previous post. Replace -sin^-1(x/3) with the equation I wrote before. You will indeed have an additional $\pi/2$ but it's a constant and hence can be absorbed into the integration constant $C$.
5. Jan 30, 2016
### QuantumQuest
There's really nothing magic about using sin or cos. It just depends on what is more convenient for each case. As for signs, using the relevant relations from trigonometry - like the one that blue_leaf77 mentions, you can substitute sin for cos and vice versa and find the appropriate sign.
6. Jan 30, 2016
### zinq
The function being integrated is
f(x) = √(9 - x2) / x2
. This is defined for 0 < |x| ≤ 3.
When making a substitution we want to choose an interval where f(x) makes sense, and the easiest one is 0 < x ≤ 3.
We also want to choose a substitution that takes the same values that f(x) does over the interval of definition, and that's between 0 and 3. | {
"domain": "physicsforums.com",
"id": null,
"lm_label": "1. YES\n2. YES",
"lm_name": "Qwen/Qwen-72B",
"lm_q1_score": 0.9748211634198559,
"lm_q1q2_score": 0.8831780538457431,
"lm_q2_score": 0.9059898235563418,
"openwebmath_perplexity": 538.0504130661676,
"openwebmath_score": 0.9007144570350647,
"tags": null,
"url": "https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/trig-substitution-with-cosine.854743/"
} |
Each of y = 3 sin(x) and y = 3 cos(x) satisfy this condition, so either one can be used for the substitution.
Using 3 sin(x) to substitute might be a tiny bit easier than cosine because its derivative is 3 cos(x), and this does not introduce negative signs.
7. Jan 30, 2016
### UMath1
Ok...I see it now. I tried some test bounds of integration and got the same answer from both options. | {
"domain": "physicsforums.com",
"id": null,
"lm_label": "1. YES\n2. YES",
"lm_name": "Qwen/Qwen-72B",
"lm_q1_score": 0.9748211634198559,
"lm_q1q2_score": 0.8831780538457431,
"lm_q2_score": 0.9059898235563418,
"openwebmath_perplexity": 538.0504130661676,
"openwebmath_score": 0.9007144570350647,
"tags": null,
"url": "https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/trig-substitution-with-cosine.854743/"
} |
# Solve $2 \cos^2 x+ \sin x=1$ for all possible $x$
$$2\cos^2 x+\sin x=1$$
$$\Rightarrow 2(1-\sin^2 x)+\sin x=1$$
$$\Rightarrow 2-2 \sin^2 x+\sin x=1$$
$$\Rightarrow 0=2 \sin^2 x- \sin x-1$$
And so:
$$0 = (2 \sin x+1)(\sin x-1)$$
So we have to find the solutions of each of these factors separately:
$$2 \sin x+1=0$$
$$\Rightarrow \sin x=\frac{-1}{2}$$
and so $$x=\frac{7\pi}{6},\frac{11\pi}{6}$$
Solving for the other factor,
$$\sin x-1=0 \Rightarrow \sin x=1$$
And so $$x=\frac{\pi}{2}$$
Now we have found all our base solutions, and so ALL the solutions can be written as so:
$$x= \frac{7\pi}{6} + 2\pi k,\frac{11\pi}{6} + 2\pi k, \frac{\pi}{2} + 2\pi k$$
• And the question is.... ?? Nov 21 '19 at 23:36
• It's tagged with proof verification. The solution provided in the question is correct. Nov 21 '19 at 23:39
• @RobertShore OK, thx. Then, when an answer should be set? When it corrects the question? Nov 21 '19 at 23:41
• I'll provide an answer rather than a comment if the answer provided is wrong in some material way or if there's an alternative solution that provides additional insight. Nov 21 '19 at 23:43
Yes your solution is very nice and correct, as a slightly different alternative
$$2\cos^2(x)+\sin (x)=1 \iff 2(1-\sin x)(1+\sin x)+\sin x-1=0$$
$$\iff (\sin x-1)(-2-2\sin x)+(\sin x-1)=0 \iff (\sin x-1)(-1-2\sin x)=0$$
which indeed leads to the same solutions, or also from here by $$t=\sin x$$
$$2-2 \sin^2 x+\sin x=1 \iff 2t^2-t-1=0$$
$$t_{1,2}=\frac{1\pm \sqrt{9}}{4}=1, -\frac12$$
Your method's fine, the answer's right. The only improvement I can suggest is to make the definition of "base solution" clear upfront. Each "and so" acts as if a specific value of $$\sin x$$ has finitely many solutions rather than finitely many per period, so before you obtain them you should mention a restriction to $$[0,\,2\pi)$$ and then extend to $$\Bbb R$$ at the end.
Other way is used identities double angle and sum-product | {
"domain": "stackexchange.com",
"id": null,
"lm_label": "1. Yes\n2. Yes",
"lm_name": "Qwen/Qwen-72B",
"lm_q1_score": 0.9777138144607745,
"lm_q1q2_score": 0.8831632186897825,
"lm_q2_score": 0.9032942008463507,
"openwebmath_perplexity": 397.3727561826924,
"openwebmath_score": 0.762012243270874,
"tags": null,
"url": "https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/3445884/solve-2-cos2-x-sin-x-1-for-all-possible-x"
} |
Other way is used identities double angle and sum-product
$$\begin{eqnarray*} 2\cos^2x+\sin x& = & 1 \\ 2\cos^2x-1+\sin x& = & 0\\ \cos(2x)+\sin x& = & 0\\ \cos(2x)+\cos\left(\frac{\pi}{2}-x\right) & = & 0\\ 2\cos\left(\frac{x}{2}+\frac{\pi}{4}\right)\cos\left(\frac{3x}{2}-\frac{\pi}{4}\right) & = & 0\\ \end{eqnarray*}$$
$$2\cos^2(x)+\sin(x)=1$$
Using $$2\cos^2(x)-1=\cos(2x)$$ we have $$\cos(2x)=-\sin(x)=\cos(\pi/2+x).$$
Hence $$2x=\pm(\pi/2+x)+2n\pi$$, $$n\in\mathbb{Z}$$ and $$x=\pi/2+2n\pi$$ or $$x=-\pi/6+2n\pi/3.$$ The second expression can be re-written as $$-\pi/6\pm2\pi/3+2k\pi$$ or $$-\pi/6+2k\pi$$ giving the three solutions
\begin{align} x&=\pi/2+2n\pi\\x&=-\pi/6+2k\pi=11\pi/6+2k\pi\\x&=-5\pi/6+2k\pi=7\pi/6+2k\pi\\ \end{align}
Note that one of the solutions from the second expression, $$-\pi/6+2\pi/3+2k\pi=\pi/2+2k\pi$$ is absorbed into the first of the three solutions. This happens because this is a double root, tangential to the x-axis - see plot from Wolfrom Alpha: | {
"domain": "stackexchange.com",
"id": null,
"lm_label": "1. Yes\n2. Yes",
"lm_name": "Qwen/Qwen-72B",
"lm_q1_score": 0.9777138144607745,
"lm_q1q2_score": 0.8831632186897825,
"lm_q2_score": 0.9032942008463507,
"openwebmath_perplexity": 397.3727561826924,
"openwebmath_score": 0.762012243270874,
"tags": null,
"url": "https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/3445884/solve-2-cos2-x-sin-x-1-for-all-possible-x"
} |
# Exercise 8
## Getting Started With Go
You're going to need to get Go code running. Download/install Go tools: a command-line compiler, or IDE, or whatever you like. Start by getting a “hello world” running. (There's one in the lecture slides.)
Download and extract the code skeleton for this exercise. The code includes an outline of how to organize your work for this exercise, some tests that should pass when you're done (more below), and a place for your main function that will satisfy the Go tools (and your IDE where relevant).
It's not a requirement, but maybe go through A Tour of Go: it will prepare you better for some of the stuff we'll be covering in this section of the course.
## Go Hailstone
The Hailstone sequence provided many useful examples in Haskell, so let's revisit it in Go. In hailstone.go, write a function Hailstone that calculates the next element of a hailstone sequence: for even n, it should return n/2 and for odd n, it should return 3*n+1.
Hailstone(17) == 52
Hailstone(18) == 9
The function should take and return a uint type:
func Hailstone(n uint) uint { … }
## Hailstone Sequence
In this question, we will build the hailstone sequence in a Go array. Put code for this section in hailstone.go.
### Attempt 1: grow the slice
In this implementation, start with an empty []uint{} slice. Calculate the elements of the hailstone sequence and use the append function to add it to the end of a new slice as you go.
It is probably easiest to do this iteratively (not recursively). You should take a uint argument and return a []uint slice. In pseudocode (since == isn't defined on slices):
HailstoneSequenceAppend(5) == [5, 16, 8, 4, 2, 1]
### Attempt 2: pre-allocate the array
Appending to an slice is expensive this way: we are constantly allocating and de-allocating arrays at they grow. Maybe we can do better? Write a function HailstoneSequenceAllocate that generates the same result in a different way… | {
"domain": "sfu.ca",
"id": null,
"lm_label": "1. YES\n2. YES\n\n",
"lm_name": "Qwen/Qwen-72B",
"lm_q1_score": 0.9579122768904644,
"lm_q1q2_score": 0.8831202429135638,
"lm_q2_score": 0.9219218337824342,
"openwebmath_perplexity": 2308.454814284125,
"openwebmath_score": 0.3259769082069397,
"tags": null,
"url": "https://coursys.sfu.ca/2018fa-cmpt-383-d1/pages/Exercise8"
} |
It is easy enough to figure out how big an array we need: we did it before. This time, start by calculating the length of array we need by iterating Hailstone. (In the above example, you should realize you need an array of length 6.)
Then, use the make function to create a slice and allocate an array of that many uints. Then fill it in and return it (no appending, just set array elements). Results should be the same as HailstoneSequenceAppend in all cases.
## Test and Benchmark
Go has built-in testing and benchmarking functionality. The exer8_test.go provided in the ZIP above provides tests for the requirements of this exercise.
At this point, the test for hailstone functionality should pass. If you comment-out the Point tests (or go finish that question below and come back here), you should pass the other tests:
go test exer8 -v
There are also some short benchmarks that we can use to see which of the hailstone sequence functions is actually faster:
go test exer8 -bench=.
Add a comment to your hailstone.go indicating the relative speed of the two HailstoneSeq* functions (thus proving to us that you have figured out how to run Go tests).
## A Struct for Points
In points.go, create a struct Point for two-dimensional points: $$(x,y)$$ values. The struct should have two fields, x and y, both float64.
Create a function NewPoint that creates a Point given x and y values: this would be a constructor in any other language, but in Go, it's just a function that returns a Point. [Note: we don't really need a constructor this simple and could use a Go struct literal instead, but we're creating the constructor anyway. There are, of course, cases where some work is required to construct a struct instance.]
### String Representation
There is a perfectly reasonable default string representation for structs in Go (which is used if you fmt.Print them), but we can make it nicer. | {
"domain": "sfu.ca",
"id": null,
"lm_label": "1. YES\n2. YES\n\n",
"lm_name": "Qwen/Qwen-72B",
"lm_q1_score": 0.9579122768904644,
"lm_q1q2_score": 0.8831202429135638,
"lm_q2_score": 0.9219218337824342,
"openwebmath_perplexity": 2308.454814284125,
"openwebmath_score": 0.3259769082069397,
"tags": null,
"url": "https://coursys.sfu.ca/2018fa-cmpt-383-d1/pages/Exercise8"
} |
Create a String() method on Point using fmt.Sprintf to output the usual parentheses-and-commas representation of a point:
pt := NewPoint(3, 4.5)
fmt.Println(pt) // should print (3, 4.5)
fmt.Println(pt.String() == "(3, 4.5)") // should print true
Hint: The %v format seems nice.
### Calculate Norm
One more method to add: the Euclidean norm of the point: add up the squares of the components and take the square root.
If everything is working, this should print true.
pt := NewPoint(3, 4)
fmt.Println(pt.Norm() == 5.0)
Also, the provided tests should all pass.
## Submitting
Submit your files through CourSys for Exercise 8.
Updated Mon Nov. 05 2018, 11:05 by ggbaker. | {
"domain": "sfu.ca",
"id": null,
"lm_label": "1. YES\n2. YES\n\n",
"lm_name": "Qwen/Qwen-72B",
"lm_q1_score": 0.9579122768904644,
"lm_q1q2_score": 0.8831202429135638,
"lm_q2_score": 0.9219218337824342,
"openwebmath_perplexity": 2308.454814284125,
"openwebmath_score": 0.3259769082069397,
"tags": null,
"url": "https://coursys.sfu.ca/2018fa-cmpt-383-d1/pages/Exercise8"
} |
# Which of these answers is the correct indefinite integral? (Using trig-substitution or $u$-substitution give different answers)
Answers obtained from two online integral calculators:
\begin{align}\int\dfrac{\sqrt{1 + x}}{\sqrt{1 - x}}\,\mathrm dx &= -\sqrt{\dfrac{x + 1}{1 - x}} + \sqrt{\dfrac{x + 1}{1 - x}}x - 2\arcsin\left(\dfrac1{\sqrt2}\sqrt{1 - x}\right) + C \\ \int\dfrac{\sqrt{1 + x}}{\sqrt{1 - x}}\,\mathrm dx &= 2\sin^{-1}\left(\dfrac{\sqrt{x + 1}}{\sqrt2}\right) - \sqrt{1 - x^2} + \text{ constant} \end{align}
## Update:
I realized that the substitution for $$\theta$$ was supposed to be $$\arcsin$$ not $$\arccos$$, so the answer would have been the same as the right hand side.
But I also noticed that using the initial substitution to plug $$x$$ back in the final answer will not always give the correct answer because in a similar question:
$$\int \frac{\sqrt{x^2-1}}x dx$$
has a trig-substitution of $$x = \sec\theta$$, and the answer in terms of $$\theta$$ would be: $$\tan \theta - \theta + C$$. Then the final answer in terms of $$x$$ should be : $$\sqrt{x^2-1} - \operatorname{arcsec}(x) + C$$.
But online integral calculators give the answer: $$\sqrt{x^2-1} - \arctan(\sqrt{x^2-1}) + C$$, which doesn't match the original substitution of:
$$x = \sec\theta \to \theta = \operatorname{arcsec}(x)$$
Anyone know why the calculator gives that answer which doesn't match the original trig-substitution of $$x = \sec \theta \to \theta = \operatorname{arcsec}(x)$$? | {
"domain": "stackexchange.com",
"id": null,
"lm_label": "1. YES\n2. YES",
"lm_name": "Qwen/Qwen-72B",
"lm_q1_score": 0.9805806484125337,
"lm_q1q2_score": 0.8830420874761722,
"lm_q2_score": 0.9005297921244243,
"openwebmath_perplexity": 492.6315629554467,
"openwebmath_score": 0.9998447895050049,
"tags": null,
"url": "https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/3550450/which-of-these-answers-is-the-correct-indefinite-integral-using-trig-substitut"
} |
• You assumed $x=sin\theta$, so $\theta = arcsin x$ – Chief VS Feb 17 '20 at 20:26
• Oh so the theta value must also match with the substitution I made for x? – user749176 Feb 17 '20 at 20:32
• In short yes, assuming $x>0$, note that $arcsinx = arccos√(1-x^2)$ for only $x>0$ – Chief VS Feb 17 '20 at 20:38
• which is the actual answer though? When I plug the question into different online integral calculators, all answers are very different from mine – user749176 Feb 17 '20 at 20:44
• Does this answer your question? Getting different answers when integrating using different techniques – Xander Henderson Feb 18 '20 at 5:01
Starting off with $$\displaystyle\int \frac{\sqrt{x^2-1}}{x}\mathrm dx$$, substitute $$x = \sec(\theta)$$ for $$\theta \in \left[0, \frac{\pi}{2}\right) \cup \left(\frac{\pi}{2}, \pi\right]$$ as usual (keep the domain in mind for later). Of course, that means $$\sqrt{x^2-1} = \sqrt{\sec^2(\theta)-1} = \sqrt{\tan^2(\theta)} = \vert \tan(\theta)\vert$$ and $$\dfrac{\mathrm dx}{\mathrm d\theta} = \sec(\theta)\tan(\theta) \iff \mathrm dx = \sec(\theta)\tan(\theta)\mathrm d\theta$$. This simplifies as follows:
$$\displaystyle\int \frac{\sqrt{x^2-1}}{x}\mathrm dx \longrightarrow \int\frac{\vert \tan(\theta)\vert}{\sec(\theta)}\sec(\theta)\tan(\theta)\mathrm d\theta = \int\vert \tan(\theta)\vert\tan(\theta)\mathrm d\theta$$
For $$\theta \in \left[0, \frac{\pi}{2}\right)$$, $$\tan(\theta) \geq 0$$, so you get
$$\int \tan^2(\theta) \mathrm d\theta = \int \left[\sec^2(\theta)-1\right] \mathrm d\theta = \tan(\theta)-\theta+C \longrightarrow \sqrt{x^2-1}-\text{arcsec}(x)+C$$
Since tangent is positive in the first quadrant, $$\tan(\theta) = \sqrt{x^2-1}$$, so the $$\theta$$ term can also be replaced with $$\arctan\left(\sqrt{x^2-1}\right)$$.
For $$\theta \in \left(\frac{\pi}{2}, \pi\right]$$, $$\tan(\theta) \leq 0$$, so you get | {
"domain": "stackexchange.com",
"id": null,
"lm_label": "1. YES\n2. YES",
"lm_name": "Qwen/Qwen-72B",
"lm_q1_score": 0.9805806484125337,
"lm_q1q2_score": 0.8830420874761722,
"lm_q2_score": 0.9005297921244243,
"openwebmath_perplexity": 492.6315629554467,
"openwebmath_score": 0.9998447895050049,
"tags": null,
"url": "https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/3550450/which-of-these-answers-is-the-correct-indefinite-integral-using-trig-substitut"
} |
For $$\theta \in \left(\frac{\pi}{2}, \pi\right]$$, $$\tan(\theta) \leq 0$$, so you get
$$-\int \tan^2(\theta) \mathrm d\theta = -\int \left[\sec^2(\theta)-1\right] \mathrm d\theta = \theta-\tan(\theta)+C \longrightarrow \sqrt{x^2-1}+\text{arcsec}(x)+C$$
Since tangent is negative in the second quadrant, $$\tan(\theta) = \tan(\theta -\pi) = -\sqrt{x^2-1}$$ (remember that tangent takes arguments in the first and fourth quadrants), so the $$\theta$$ term can also be replaced with $$\pi-\arctan\left(\sqrt{x^2-1}\right)$$.
In both cases, the anti-derivative could be re-written as $$\sqrt{x^2-1}-\arctan\left(\sqrt{x^2-1}\right)+C$$. Basically, it just "combines" your other two anti-derivatives and expresses them as a single function rather than having one for each case.
• Would just leaving the answer as: √(x^2-1) - arcsec(x) + C , still be correct? – user749176 Feb 18 '20 at 0:09
• For indefinite integrals, we usually assume $\tan(\theta)$ is positive (at least from what I've seen), so yeah, that's fine. – KM101 Feb 18 '20 at 0:16
Now, both answers are correct. They merely look different. They differ by a constant.
Note 1...
$$-\sqrt{\frac{x+1}{1-x}}+\sqrt{\frac{x+1}{1-x}}\;x = -\sqrt{\frac{x+1}{1-x}}\;(1-x) = -\frac{\sqrt{x+1}\;(1-x)}{\sqrt{1-x}} \\= -\sqrt{x+1}\sqrt{1-x} =-\sqrt{(1+x)(1-x)} =-\sqrt{1-x^2}$$
Note 2... $$2\,\arcsin \left( \frac{\sqrt {1+x}}{\sqrt {2}} \right) =\pi-2\,\arcsin \left( \frac{\sqrt {1-x}}{\sqrt {2}} \right)$$
• For the second line of step, I multiplied top and bottom by √(1+x) in order to use the trig substitution of x = sinθ – user749176 Feb 17 '20 at 21:12
• Also those two answers are from the calculator. I was wondering if they are correct after comparing them to my answers, which are shown in the link – user749176 Feb 17 '20 at 21:27
Let \begin{align} I &= \int \frac{\sqrt{1+x}}{\sqrt{1-x}}\;dx = \int \frac{1+x}{\sqrt{1-x^2}}\;dx \end{align} Left side: | {
"domain": "stackexchange.com",
"id": null,
"lm_label": "1. YES\n2. YES",
"lm_name": "Qwen/Qwen-72B",
"lm_q1_score": 0.9805806484125337,
"lm_q1q2_score": 0.8830420874761722,
"lm_q2_score": 0.9005297921244243,
"openwebmath_perplexity": 492.6315629554467,
"openwebmath_score": 0.9998447895050049,
"tags": null,
"url": "https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/3550450/which-of-these-answers-is-the-correct-indefinite-integral-using-trig-substitut"
} |
Let $$x = \sin\theta$$, $$dx = \cos\theta\;d\theta$$. \begin{align} I &= \int \frac{1+\sin\theta}{\sqrt{\cos^2\theta}}\cos\theta\;d\theta \\ &= \int \left(1+\sin\theta \right)d\theta \\ &= \theta - \cos\theta + c \\ &= \arccos\left(\sqrt{1-x^2}\right) - \sqrt{1-x^2} + c \end{align}
Right side:
\begin{align} I &= \int \frac{1}{\sqrt{1-x^2}}\;dx + \int \frac{x}{\sqrt{1-x^2}}\;dx \\ u &= 1 - x^2,\;\; -\frac{1}{2}du = x\,dx \\ \implies I &= \arcsin x - \frac{1}{2}\int u^{-1/2}\;du \\ &= \arcsin x - \sqrt{u} + c \\ &= \arcsin x - \sqrt{1 - x^2} + c \end{align}
The answers would be the exact same, if $$\arccos\left(\sqrt{1-x^2}\right) = \arcsin x$$. And therein lies the difference. On the "Left side", the substitution you originally made was $$x = \sin\theta$$. So when you replace $$\theta$$ you should substitute $$\theta = \arcsin x$$.
By the rules of trig substitution, they should be equivalent. But canonically, the arcsin function has a range of $$-\pi/2$$ to $$\pi/2$$, while the arccos function has a range of $$0$$ to $$\pi$$. So when you use $$\arccos\left(\sqrt{1-x^2}\right)$$, as-is you are losing the case where $$-1 < x < 0$$. The integral has a kink in it, but that's not what you want, seeing as how the function being integrated is continuous and differentiable at $$x=0$$.
You could shift arccos by an appropriate amount and use that solution, but I think it would be easier to go with arcsin here.
• Yes the wrong substitution of θ, seemed to cause the problem. But aside from substituting x back in the answer, do you know if the x's you sub back in is always supposed to correspond to the original substitution made? For example, see my updated question at the top to see what I mean – user749176 Feb 17 '20 at 21:41 | {
"domain": "stackexchange.com",
"id": null,
"lm_label": "1. YES\n2. YES",
"lm_name": "Qwen/Qwen-72B",
"lm_q1_score": 0.9805806484125337,
"lm_q1q2_score": 0.8830420874761722,
"lm_q2_score": 0.9005297921244243,
"openwebmath_perplexity": 492.6315629554467,
"openwebmath_score": 0.9998447895050049,
"tags": null,
"url": "https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/3550450/which-of-these-answers-is-the-correct-indefinite-integral-using-trig-substitut"
} |
Solve in integers the equation $2x+3y = 5$
If I have the following equation $$2x+3y = 5$$ I know all the integer solutions is $$x = 1+3n$$ $$y = 1-2n$$ $$n \in \Bbb Z$$ since I can just plug them in $$2(1+3n)+3(1-2n) = 5+6n-6n = 5$$
but I don't know how to derive the answer from the equation... also is there a name for algorithms to solve these integer function?
• Browsing this tag may help. – user147263 Oct 31 '15 at 19:26
• The extended Euclidean algorithm gives you $x,y$ with $2x+3y=5$. – Dietrich Burde Oct 31 '15 at 19:32
It has solution because $1=\text{gcd}(2,3)\mid 5$.
Let $(x_0, y_0)$ any solution of $2x+3y=5$ i.e. for example $x_0=y_0=1$. Let $(x,y)$ any other solution i.e. $2x+3y=5$. Subtracting we get: $2(x-1)=3(1-y)$. Hence $1-y=2t$ and $x-1=3t.$
Then any general solution can be find by generating formula: $$(3t+1, 1-2t), \quad t\in \mathbb{Z}.$$
• can I say that since $(x-1)/(1-y) = 3/2$, if I let $$(1-y) = z$$ $$z \in \Bbb Z$$ then $$(x-1) = 3t/2$$ and for $$3t/2 \in \Bbb Z$$ $$t = 2z$$ $$z \in \Bbb Z$$ thus $$x = 3z+1$$ $$y = 1-2z$$ I know your argument is correct, I am just having a hard time convincing myself that it is the only solution and I can reuse such algorithm for similar problems – watashiSHUN Oct 31 '15 at 20:44
Theorem 1: The $\gcd(a,b)$ (where $a$ and $b$ not both $0$) is the least positive integer $ax + by$ for some $x,y\in\mathbb{Z}$.
Theorem 2: Every integer $ax+by$ is a multiple of $\gcd(a,b)$, and every multiple of $\gcd(a,b)$ is $ax+by$ for some $x,y\in\mathbb{Z}$.
Theorem 3: $ax+by=c$ has a solution $\iff \gcd(a,b)\mid c$. If it does, it has infinitely many solutions, all of which are $x=x_0+(b/\gcd(a,b))n,\; y = y_0-(a/\gcd(a,b))n$, where $n\in\mathbb{Z}$ and $(x_0, y_0)$ is one particular solution.
So to solve $ax+by=c$ completely, it boils down to finding one solution to $ax+by=\gcd(a,b)$. This can be done by the Extended Euclidean Algorithm. | {
"domain": "stackexchange.com",
"id": null,
"lm_label": "1. YES\n2. YES",
"lm_name": "Qwen/Qwen-72B",
"lm_q1_score": 0.98058065352006,
"lm_q1q2_score": 0.8830420822591708,
"lm_q2_score": 0.9005297821135385,
"openwebmath_perplexity": 81.34291763728329,
"openwebmath_score": 0.9701393842697144,
"tags": null,
"url": "https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/1506759/solve-in-integers-the-equation-2x3y-5/1506772"
} |
if $2x+3y=5$, then $3y = 5-2x$. We then focus on making $5-2x$ divisible by $3$. This will happen for positive $x$ when $x = [1, 4, 7...]$ and for negative $x$ when $x = [-2, -5, -8...]$ If we line these up as $[...-8, -5, -2, 1, 4, 7...]$ we see that we have a common difference of $3$, yielding $3n$ or $-3n$, although both off by $1$, so we set $x = 1+3n$ or $x= 1-3n$
Similarly, we set $2x = 5 - 3y$, and desire to find $y$ such that $5-3y$ is divisible by $2$. This happens at $y = [...-5, -3, -1, 1, 3, 5...]$ We see that we have a common difference of $2$ with the values shifted up by $1$, yielding $y=1+2n$ or $y=1-2n$
Checking the conditional expressions for what we want, we have our final solution, $(1\pm3n, 1\mp2n), \quad n\in \mathbb{Z} \quad$ (note that the sign on the equation for $y$ must be the opposite for $x$)
First you find a particular solution. Say $(x, y) = (1, 1)$.
Then you suppose that $2x + 3y = 5$ for some $(x, y)$
So \begin{align} 2x + 3y &= 2(1) + 3(1)\\ 2(x-1) &= -3(y-1)\\ \end{align}
Hence $2 \mid -3(y-1)$.
Since $2$ and $-3$ are relatively prime, we must have $2 \mid y-1$. That is $y - 1 = 2t$ for some integer $t$.
So $y = 2t + 1$ for some integer $t$.
Substituting this back into $2(x-1) = -3(y-1)$, we find $x = -3t + 1$.
What we have shown is that, if $(x, y)$ is a solution to $2x + 3y = 5$, then $(x,y) = (-3t+1, 2t+1)$ for some integer $t$.
It is easy to verify that if $(x,y) = (-3t+1, 2t+1)$ for some integer $t$, then $(x, y)$ is a solution to $2x + 3y = 5$.
Hence $(x, y)$ is a solution to $2x + 3y = 5$, if and only if $(x,y) = (-3t+1, 2t+1)$ for some integer $t$. | {
"domain": "stackexchange.com",
"id": null,
"lm_label": "1. YES\n2. YES",
"lm_name": "Qwen/Qwen-72B",
"lm_q1_score": 0.98058065352006,
"lm_q1q2_score": 0.8830420822591708,
"lm_q2_score": 0.9005297821135385,
"openwebmath_perplexity": 81.34291763728329,
"openwebmath_score": 0.9701393842697144,
"tags": null,
"url": "https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/1506759/solve-in-integers-the-equation-2x3y-5/1506772"
} |
Problem description . In axiomatic set theory (as developed, for example, in the ZFC axioms), the existence of the power set of any set is postulated by the axiom of power set. b) List all the distinct subsets for the set {S,L,E,D}. c) How many of the distinct subsets are proper subsets? A subset that is smaller than the complete set is referred to as a proper subset. is a subset of (written ) iff every member of is a member of .If is a proper subset of (i.e., a subset other than the set itself), this is written .If is not a subset of , this is written . To ensure that no subset is missed, we list these subsets according to their sizes. Admin AfterAcademy 31 Dec 2019. For example: Plants are a subset of living things. The set of living things is very big: it has a lot of subsets. Since $$\emptyset$$ is the subset of any set, $$\emptyset$$ is always an element in the power set. Examples. So the set {1, 2} is a proper subset of the set {1, 2, 3} because the element 3 is not in the first set… Example 29 List all the subsets of the set { –1, 0, 1 }. Animals are a subset of living things. (The notation is generally not used, since automatically means that and cannot be the same.). SUBSETS. Human beings are a subset of animals. So there are a total of $2\cdot 2\cdot 2\cdot \dots \cdot 2$ possible resulting subsets, all the way from the empty subset, which we obtain when we say “no” each time, to the original set itself, which we obtain when we say “yes” each time. An area of intersection is then defined which contains all the common elements. Subset intersection: sometimes, various sets are different but share some common elements. Print all subsets of a given set. ⛲ Example 5: Distinct Subsets a) Determine the number of distinct subsets for the set {S,L,E,D}. In mathematics, the power set (or powerset) of a set S is the set of all subsets of S, including the empty set and S itself. Let us evaluate $$\wp(\{1,2,3,4\})$$. Next, list the singleton subsets (subsets with only | {
"domain": "com.br",
"id": null,
"lm_label": "1. YES\n2. YES",
"lm_name": "Qwen/Qwen-72B",
"lm_q1_score": 0.9884918516137419,
"lm_q1q2_score": 0.8830290716623387,
"lm_q2_score": 0.8933094088947399,
"openwebmath_perplexity": 565.9167675346129,
"openwebmath_score": 0.7348184585571289,
"tags": null,
"url": "https://etec-radioetv.com.br/tags/j93v1ui.php?page=subsets-of-a-set-06a588"
} |
S itself. Let us evaluate $$\wp(\{1,2,3,4\})$$. Next, list the singleton subsets (subsets with only one element). The subset of {1,2,3,4} are {},{1}, {2}, {3}, {4} {1,2}, {1,3}, {1,4}, {2,3}, {2,4}, {3,4}, {1,2,3}, {1,2,4} {1,3,4}, {2,3,4} and {1,2,3,4} set ={1,2,3,4} has 16 subsets. The set is not necessarily sorted and the total number of subsets of a given set of size n is equal to 2^n. AfterAcademy. So for the whole subset we have made $n$ choices, each with two options. This is the subset of size 0. Solution: a) Since the number of elements in the set is 4, the number of distinct subsets … Difficulty: MediumAsked in: Facebook, Microsoft, Amazon Understanding the Problem . Let A= { –1, 0, 1} Number of elements in A is 3 Hence, n = 3 Number of subsets of A = 2n where n is the number of elements of the set A = 23 = 8 The subsets of {–1, 0, 1} are , {−1}, {0}, {1}, {−1, 0}, {0, 1}, {−1, 1}, and {−1, 0, 1} Show More. A subset is a portion of a set. The powerset of S is variously denoted as P (S), (S), P(S), ℙ(S), ℘(S) (using the "Weierstrass p"), or 2 S. Interview Kit Blogs Courses YouTube Login. Subset. | {
"domain": "com.br",
"id": null,
"lm_label": "1. YES\n2. YES",
"lm_name": "Qwen/Qwen-72B",
"lm_q1_score": 0.9884918516137419,
"lm_q1q2_score": 0.8830290716623387,
"lm_q2_score": 0.8933094088947399,
"openwebmath_perplexity": 565.9167675346129,
"openwebmath_score": 0.7348184585571289,
"tags": null,
"url": "https://etec-radioetv.com.br/tags/j93v1ui.php?page=subsets-of-a-set-06a588"
} |
.
Cold Smoke Brats, Lenovo Yoga 720-13ikb Parts, E Aeolian Scale, Zucchini Spinach Ricotta Rolls, 32-bit Ram Limit, Jeskai Ascendancy Mtg, Sparrow Sound Effect, Best Air Fryer Rotisserie, Dehydrator, | {
"domain": "com.br",
"id": null,
"lm_label": "1. YES\n2. YES",
"lm_name": "Qwen/Qwen-72B",
"lm_q1_score": 0.9884918516137419,
"lm_q1q2_score": 0.8830290716623387,
"lm_q2_score": 0.8933094088947399,
"openwebmath_perplexity": 565.9167675346129,
"openwebmath_score": 0.7348184585571289,
"tags": null,
"url": "https://etec-radioetv.com.br/tags/j93v1ui.php?page=subsets-of-a-set-06a588"
} |
# Partitions in which no part is a square?
I asked a similar question earlier about partitions, and have a suspicion about another way to count partitions.
Is it true that the number of partitions of $n$ in which each part $d$ is repeated fewer than $d$ times is equal to the number of partitions of $n$ where no part is a square?
I tried this out for $n=2,3,4$, and so far it checks out. Is there a way to prove it more generally?
-
The natural thing to do in such a case is to write generating functions for the two cases and see if they look similar. Even if you can't decide, computing a number of terms of the series is much faster than testing cases by hand. Did you try? – Marc van Leeuwen Dec 17 '11 at 19:04
As mentioned in the comment above, generating functions are the standard tool for proving such statements. If you can write down the proper generating functions, proofs sometimes just fall right out.
Let $S = \{ \ell^2 \;|\; \ell \in \mathbb{N} \}$ be the set of perfect squares.
In the following generating function: the coefficient of $x^k$ is the number of partitions of $k$ which do not involve $d$ or more copies of $d$ for each $d$.
$$\prod\limits_{d=1}^\infty \left(\sum\limits_{j=0}^{d-1} x^{jd}\right) =$$
$$(1+x^2)(1+x^3+x^6)(1+x^4+x^8+x^{12})\cdots (1+x^d+x^{2d}+\cdots+x^{d(d-1)}) \cdots$$
$$=((1-x^2)^{-1}-x^{2^2}(1-x^2)^{-1})((1-x^3)^{-1}-x^{3^2}(1-x^3)^{-1})\cdots ((1-x^k)^{-1}-x^{k^2}(1-x^k)^{-1}) \cdots$$
$$=\left(\frac{1-x^{1^2}}{1-x^1}\right)\left(\frac{1-x^{2^2}}{1-x^2}\right)\left(\frac{1-x^{3^2}}{1-x^3}\right)\cdots \left(\frac{1-x^{k^2}}{1-x^k}\right) \cdots$$
$$=\prod\limits_{k = 1}^\infty \frac{1-x^{k^2}}{1-x^k} = \prod\limits_{k = 1}^\infty \frac{\frac{1}{1-x^k}}{\frac{1}{1-x^{k^2}}} =\frac{\prod\limits_{k = 1}^\infty \frac{1}{1-x^k}}{\prod\limits_{k=1}^\infty\frac{1}{1-x^{k^2}}} = \prod\limits_{k\in\mathbb{N}-S} \frac{1}{1-x^k}$$ | {
"domain": "stackexchange.com",
"id": null,
"lm_label": "1. YES\n2. YES",
"lm_name": "Qwen/Qwen-72B",
"lm_q1_score": 0.990140146733106,
"lm_q1q2_score": 0.8830179250823139,
"lm_q2_score": 0.8918110511888303,
"openwebmath_perplexity": 184.4740315336613,
"openwebmath_score": 0.8449915051460266,
"tags": null,
"url": "http://math.stackexchange.com/questions/92306/partitions-in-which-no-part-is-a-square?answertab=votes"
} |
In the final generating function: the coefficient of $x^k$ counts the number of partitions not involving perfect squares.
Edit For a bit more about generating functions here is a link to another question I answered: partitions and generating functions
-
Thank you Bill, this is a great answer. – Noel Dec 18 '11 at 6:18
@Bill: In the last line, wouldn't you prefer just cancelling the terms $1-x^{k^2}$ against their counterparts in the denominator right away? – Marc van Leeuwen Dec 18 '11 at 17:13
@MarcvanLeeuwen I guess that would have been a bit more efficient. Oh well. :) Since it doesn't make a big difference, I'll just leave it alone. – Bill Cook Dec 18 '11 at 18:46
Now that you have a generating function proof (so you know the result is true), you may wonder if you can actually map partitions of one kind bijectively to those of the other kind. Motivated by this other question, the following idea comes to mind: starting with a partition in which no part $d$ is repeated $d$ times or more, in order to get rid of square parts, break any part $x^2$ into $x$ parts equal to $x$, and repeat. Since there were no parts equal to $1$ this terminates, producing a partition without square parts. | {
"domain": "stackexchange.com",
"id": null,
"lm_label": "1. YES\n2. YES",
"lm_name": "Qwen/Qwen-72B",
"lm_q1_score": 0.990140146733106,
"lm_q1q2_score": 0.8830179250823139,
"lm_q2_score": 0.8918110511888303,
"openwebmath_perplexity": 184.4740315336613,
"openwebmath_score": 0.8449915051460266,
"tags": null,
"url": "http://math.stackexchange.com/questions/92306/partitions-in-which-no-part-is-a-square?answertab=votes"
} |
We must show that every partition of without square parts is produced exactly once from a partition in which no part $d$ is repeated more $d$ times or more. We can treat non-squares separately: if $k>1$ is a non-square, then the parts in the original partition that would have been broken up eventually into parts of size $k$ are those of size $k$, $k^2$, $k^4$, $k^8$, ..., $k^{2^i}$,... Supposing the multiplicity of $k$ in the final partition is $m$, we must decompose $$mk=c_0k+c_1k^2+c_2k^4+\cdots+c_ik^{2^i}+\cdots \quad\text{with c_i<k^{2^i} for all i\in\mathbf N}$$ But this is uniquely possibly by the expression of $mk$ in the mixed radix number system with place values $1,k,k^2,k^4,k^8,\ldots$ (the initial $1$ is only there to have a number system capable of expressing all natural numbers; $mk$ being a multiple of $k$ has digit $0$ on this least significant position.) Concretely one can find the $c_i$ either in order of increasing $i$ by taking remainders modulo the next $k^{2^{i+1}}$, or by decreasing $i$ by allocating the largest chunks first and then using smaller chunks for what is left of $mk$.
-
Thanks for this other argument, Marc van Leeuwen. – Noel Dec 19 '11 at 7:05
See Wilf's Lectures on Integer Partitions for more on bijections like this. – David Bevan Dec 19 '11 at 8:56
@David Bevan: Thank you for the reference. So apparently this bijection, as well as the one in the question I linked to, are special cases of a general construction of partition maps proved to be bijective by Kathleen O'Hara. – Marc van Leeuwen Dec 21 '11 at 14:26 | {
"domain": "stackexchange.com",
"id": null,
"lm_label": "1. YES\n2. YES",
"lm_name": "Qwen/Qwen-72B",
"lm_q1_score": 0.990140146733106,
"lm_q1q2_score": 0.8830179250823139,
"lm_q2_score": 0.8918110511888303,
"openwebmath_perplexity": 184.4740315336613,
"openwebmath_score": 0.8449915051460266,
"tags": null,
"url": "http://math.stackexchange.com/questions/92306/partitions-in-which-no-part-is-a-square?answertab=votes"
} |
Can the roots of the derivative of the polynomial in complex variable be as close as we want them to be from the roots of the polynomial itself?
The (probably) famous Gauss-Lucas theorem states that the roots of the derivative $P'(z)$ are contained in the convex hull of the roots of $P(z)$, where $P(z)$ is complex variable polynomial.
I am interested here in could it be the case that we always have some polynomial of any degree (except $1$) $P(z)$ such that some root of its derivative is "at a small as we want distance" from some root of $P(z)$.
To be more precise, here is the statement of the question:
Is it true that for every $\varepsilon>0$ and for every $n\in \mathbb N \setminus \{1\}$ there exists polynomial $P(z)$ in complex variable of degree $n$ with $n$ different roots such that there is root $z_a$ of $P'(z)$ and root $z_b$ of $P(z)$ which are such that we have $|P'(z_a)-P(z_b)|<\varepsilon$
• Yes, start with a polynomial with a double root and perturb the coefficients. – Michael Burr Nov 14 '15 at 1:11
• @MichaelBurr All roots are different in the question, if that changes anything? – Farewell Nov 14 '15 at 1:13
• If you insist that the coefficients of the polynomial are bounded integers, then the answer is no. – Michael Burr Nov 14 '15 at 1:13
• No, it doesn't. After perturbation, the roots will all be different, but because the roots depend continuously on the coefficients, there will be a root of the derivative arbitrarily close to a root of the function. – Michael Burr Nov 14 '15 at 1:14
• @MichaelBurr If we choose some $\varepsilon_0>0$ is there an easy way to construct some concrete polynomial for every degree $n>1$ (it is a sequence of polynomials for every concrete $\varepsilon>0$ ) such that the question holds? I do not see immediately that this is the case. – Farewell Nov 14 '15 at 1:20 | {
"domain": "stackexchange.com",
"id": null,
"lm_label": "1. Yes\n2. Yes",
"lm_name": "Qwen/Qwen-72B",
"lm_q1_score": 0.9901401429507652,
"lm_q1q2_score": 0.8830179238445046,
"lm_q2_score": 0.8918110533454179,
"openwebmath_perplexity": 110.90299211567454,
"openwebmath_score": 0.8334363102912903,
"tags": null,
"url": "https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/1527968/can-the-roots-of-the-derivative-of-the-polynomial-in-complex-variable-be-as-clos"
} |
Let $P(z) = (z-\epsilon)(z-2\epsilon)\cdots (z-n\epsilon).$ Using the mean value theorem we can see that every root of $P'$ is less than $\epsilon$ away from some root of $P.$
Let $P(z)=(z-\epsilon)(z+\epsilon)\prod_{i=1}^{n-2}(z-i)$. This is a perturbation of the polynomial $z^2\prod_{i=1}^{n-2}(z-i)$, removing the double root. | {
"domain": "stackexchange.com",
"id": null,
"lm_label": "1. Yes\n2. Yes",
"lm_name": "Qwen/Qwen-72B",
"lm_q1_score": 0.9901401429507652,
"lm_q1q2_score": 0.8830179238445046,
"lm_q2_score": 0.8918110533454179,
"openwebmath_perplexity": 110.90299211567454,
"openwebmath_score": 0.8334363102912903,
"tags": null,
"url": "https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/1527968/can-the-roots-of-the-derivative-of-the-polynomial-in-complex-variable-be-as-clos"
} |
Diagonals divide a rhombus into four absolutely identical right-angled triangles. The area of the rhombus can be found, also knowing its diagonal. There are many ways to calculate its area such as using diagonals, using base and height, using trigonometry, using side and diagonal. Basic formulas of a rhombus. Then we obtain exactly the formula of the Theorem. Solution: All the sides of a rhombus are congruent, so HO = (x + 2).And because the diagonals of a rhombus are perpendicular, triangle HBO is a right triangle.With the help of Pythagorean Theorem, we get, (HB) 2 + (BO) 2 = (HO) 2x 2 + (x+1) 2 = (x+2) 2 x 2 + x 2 + 2x + 1 = x 2 + 4x + 4 x 2 – 2x -3 = 0 Solving for x using the quadratic formula, we get: x = 3 or x = –1. Area of plane shapes. Other Names. Since a rhombus is a parallelogram in which all sides are equal, all the same formulas apply to it as for a parallelogram, including the formula for finding the area through the product of height and side. By … Online calculators and formulas for a rhombus … Ask your question. If the side length and one of the angles of the rhombus are given, the area is: A = a 2 × sin(θ) Since all four sides of a rhombus are equal, much like a square, the formula for the perimeter is the product of the length of one side with 4 $$P = 4 \times \text{side}$$ Angles of a Rhombus Formula of Area of Rhombus / Perimeter of Rhombus. Example Problems. The proof is completed. So, the perimeter of the rhombus is 64 cm. where b is the base or the side length of the rhombus, and h is the corresponding height. . In geometry, a rhombus or rhomb is a quadrilateral whose four sides all have the same length. Hello!!! We now have the approximate length of side AH as 13.747 cm, so we can use Heron's Formula to calculate the area of the other section of our quadrilateral. The area of the rhombus can be found, also knowing its diagonal. [3] P = 4s P = 4(10) = 40 Yes, because a square is just a rhombus where the angles are all right angles. Example: | {
"domain": "procespartner.sk",
"id": null,
"lm_label": "1. Yes\n2. Yes",
"lm_name": "Qwen/Qwen-72B",
"lm_q1_score": 0.9835969645988575,
"lm_q1q2_score": 0.8829703738738353,
"lm_q2_score": 0.8976953016868439,
"openwebmath_perplexity": 423.7974277608552,
"openwebmath_score": 0.8021650314331055,
"tags": null,
"url": "https://new.procespartner.sk/data/styrene-resin-kwai/article.php?id=0593ed-side-of-rhombus-formula"
} |
= 4(10) = 40 Yes, because a square is just a rhombus where the angles are all right angles. Example: A rhombus has a side length of 12 cm, what is its Perimeter? We will saw each of them one by one below. Using side and height. The inradius (the radius of a circle inscribed in the rhombus), denoted by r, can be expressed in terms of the diagonals p and q as = ⋅ +, or in terms of the side length a and any vertex angle α or β as Calculate the unknown defining areas, angels and side lengths of a rhombus with any 2 known variables. Any isosceles triangle, if that side's equal to that side, if you drop an altitude, these two triangles are going to be symmetric, and you will have bisected the opposite side. Join now. Free Rhombus Sides & Angles Calculator - calculate sides & angles of a rhombus step by step This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience. Join now. Use Heron's Formula. Example 2 : If the perimeter of a rhombus is 72 inches, then find the length of each side. Sitemap. Now the area of triangle AOB = ½ * OA * OB = ½ * AB * r (both using formula ½*b*h). Home List of all formulas of the site; Geometry. Abhishek241 Abhishek241 19.08.2017 Math Secondary School +5 pts. Here at Vedantu you will learn how to find the area of rhombus and also get free study materials to help you to score good marks in your exams. We should recall several things. Area Of […] Many of the area calculations can be applied to them also. Problem 1: Find the perimeter of a rhombus with a side length of 10. The formula for perimeter of a rhombus is given as: P = 4s Where P is the perimeter and s is the side length. The rhombus is often called a diamond, after the diamonds suit in playing cards, or a lozenge, though the latter sometimes refers specifically to a rhombus with a 45° angle. A rhombus is a polygon having 4 equal sides in which both the opposite sides are parallel, and opposite angles are equal.. The diagonals of a rhombus bisect each other as it is a | {
"domain": "procespartner.sk",
"id": null,
"lm_label": "1. Yes\n2. Yes",
"lm_name": "Qwen/Qwen-72B",
"lm_q1_score": 0.9835969645988575,
"lm_q1q2_score": 0.8829703738738353,
"lm_q2_score": 0.8976953016868439,
"openwebmath_perplexity": 423.7974277608552,
"openwebmath_score": 0.8021650314331055,
"tags": null,
"url": "https://new.procespartner.sk/data/styrene-resin-kwai/article.php?id=0593ed-side-of-rhombus-formula"
} |
parallel, and opposite angles are equal.. The diagonals of a rhombus bisect each other as it is a parallelogram, but they are also perpendicular to each other. Area Of Rhombus Formula. X Research source You could also use the formula P = S + S + S + S {\displaystyle P=S+S+S+S} to find the perimeter, since the perimeter of any polygon is the sum of all its sides. This rhombus calculator can help you find the side, area, perimeter, diagonals, ... On the other hand if the perimeter (P) is given the side (a) can be obtained from it by this formula: a = P / 4 When side (a) and angle (A) are provided the figures that can be computed … What is the formula of Rhombus When one side is given Get the answers you need, now! Answered Formula for side of rhombus when diagonals are given 2 A rhombus is often called as a diamond or diamond-shaped. Given the length of diagonal ‘d1’ of a rhombus and a side ‘a’, the task is to find the area of that rhombus. This formula for the area of a rhombus is similar to the area formula for a parallelogram. So by the same argument, that side's equal to that side, so the two diagonals of any rhombus are perpendicular to … Formula for perimeter of a rhombus : = 4s Substitute 16 for s. = 4(16) = 64. The "base times height" method First pick one side to be the base. For our MAH, the three sides measure: MA = 7 cm; AH = 13.747 cm; HM = 14 cm Heron's Formula depends on knowing the semiperimeter, or half the perimeter, of a triangle. Second, the diagonals of a rhombus are perpendicular bisectors of each other, thus giving us four right triangles and splitting each diagonal in … How To Find Area Of Rhombus (1) If both diagonals are given (or we can find their length) then area = (Product of diagonals) (2) If we use Heron’s formula then we find area of one triangle made by two sides and a diagonal then twice of this area is area of rhombus. By applying the perimeter formula, the solution is: Check: 1. Given two integers A and X, denoting the length of a | {
"domain": "procespartner.sk",
"id": null,
"lm_label": "1. Yes\n2. Yes",
"lm_name": "Qwen/Qwen-72B",
"lm_q1_score": 0.9835969645988575,
"lm_q1q2_score": 0.8829703738738353,
"lm_q2_score": 0.8976953016868439,
"openwebmath_perplexity": 423.7974277608552,
"openwebmath_score": 0.8021650314331055,
"tags": null,
"url": "https://new.procespartner.sk/data/styrene-resin-kwai/article.php?id=0593ed-side-of-rhombus-formula"
} |
perimeter formula, the solution is: Check: 1. Given two integers A and X, denoting the length of a side of a rhombus and an angle respectively, the task is to find the area of the rhombus.. A rhombus is a quadrilateral having 4 sides of equal length, in which both the opposite sides are parallel, and opposite angles are equal.. These formulas are a direct consequence of the law of cosines. Log in. Since a rhombus is also a parallelogram, we can use the formula for the area of a parallelogram: A = b×h. Examples: Input: d = 15, a = 10 Output: 99.21567416492215 Input: d = 20, a = 18 Output: 299.3325909419153 Q. Thus, the total perimeter is the sum of all sides. Calculator online for a rhombus. Side of a Rhombus when Diagonals are given calculator uses Side A=sqrt((Diagonal 1)^2+(Diagonal 2)^2)/2 to calculate the Side A, Side of a Rhombus when Diagonals are given can be defined as the line segment that joins two vertices in a rhombus provided the value for both the diagonals are given. First, all four sides of a rhombus are congruent, meaning that if we find one side, we can simply multiply by four to find the perimeter. The area of the rhombus is given by the formula: Area of rhombus = sh. Formula for side of rhombus when diagonals are given - 1399111 1. The perimeter formula for a rhombus is the same formula used to find the perimeter of a square. Area of a triangle; Area of a right triangle Here, r is the radius that is to be found using a and, the diagonals whose values are given. Click hereto get an answer to your question ️ Find the area of a rhombus whose side is 5 cm and whose altitude is 4.8 cm . When the altitude or height and the length of the sides of a rhombus are known, the area is given by the formula; Area of rhombus = base × height. This geometry video tutorial explains how to calculate the area of a rhombus using side lengths and diagonals based on a simple formula. 4s = 72. A rhombus is actually just a special type of parallelogram. Choose a formula | {
"domain": "procespartner.sk",
"id": null,
"lm_label": "1. Yes\n2. Yes",
"lm_name": "Qwen/Qwen-72B",
"lm_q1_score": 0.9835969645988575,
"lm_q1q2_score": 0.8829703738738353,
"lm_q2_score": 0.8976953016868439,
"openwebmath_perplexity": 423.7974277608552,
"openwebmath_score": 0.8021650314331055,
"tags": null,
"url": "https://new.procespartner.sk/data/styrene-resin-kwai/article.php?id=0593ed-side-of-rhombus-formula"
} |
formula. 4s = 72. A rhombus is actually just a special type of parallelogram. Choose a formula based on the values you know to begin with. Using side and angle. Solution: Since we are given the side length, we can plug it straight into the formula. Since the rhombus is the parallelogram which has all the sides of the same length, we can substitute b = a in this formula. Log in. Area of a Rhombus Formula - A rhombus is a parallelogram in which adjacent sides are equal. Solution : Perimeter of the rhombus = 72 inches. Rhombus Area Formula. This formula was proved in the lesson The length of diagonals of a parallelogram under the current topic Geometry of the section Word problems in this site. The side of rhombus is a tangent to the circle. Ask your question. Diagonals divide a rhombus into four absolutely identical right-angled triangles. Inradius. A rhombus is a special type of quadrilateral parallelogram, where the opposite sides are parallel and opposite angles are equal and the diagonals bisect each other at right angles. There are 3 ways to find the area of Rhombus.Find the formulas for same and Perimeter of Rhombus in the table below. It is more common to call this shape a rhombus, but some people call it … Its diagonals perpendicularly bisect each other. What is the area of a rhombus when only a side is given, and nothing else? The formula to calculate the area of a rhombus is: A = ½ x d 1 x d 2. where... A = area of rhombus; d 1 = diagonal1 (first diagonal in rhombus, as indicated by red line) d 2 = diagonal2 (second diagonal in rhombus, as indicated by purple line) To solve this problem, apply the perimeter formula for a rhombus: . Perimeter formula for a rhombus, but they are all right angles people call it Using! Diagonals whose values are given the side length of 10 area formula for a rhombus is the radius that to!, of a triangle one will do, they are all right.... Perimeter, of a rhombus is a parallelogram, we can plug it straight the! Use the formula | {
"domain": "procespartner.sk",
"id": null,
"lm_label": "1. Yes\n2. Yes",
"lm_name": "Qwen/Qwen-72B",
"lm_q1_score": 0.9835969645988575,
"lm_q1q2_score": 0.8829703738738353,
"lm_q2_score": 0.8976953016868439,
"openwebmath_perplexity": 423.7974277608552,
"openwebmath_score": 0.8021650314331055,
"tags": null,
"url": "https://new.procespartner.sk/data/styrene-resin-kwai/article.php?id=0593ed-side-of-rhombus-formula"
} |
right.... Perimeter, of a rhombus is a parallelogram, we can plug it straight the! Use the formula for perimeter of the rhombus can be applied to them also a formula based on the you! All sides a square given, and nothing else ( 10 ) 40. Saw each of them one by one below nothing else the formulas for same and perimeter a. R is the same length length of the site ; Geometry what is corresponding! The site ; Geometry rhombus or rhomb is a parallelogram in which both the opposite sides are.. Is similar to the area calculations can be found, also knowing diagonal! Here, r is the radius that is to be the base or the side length we... Are 3 ways to find the perimeter of the rhombus, but some people call it Using. Rhombus, but they are also perpendicular to each other as it is common! Actually just a rhombus is the area of rhombus rhombus: = 4s 16! Rhombus bisect each other rhombus When only a side length of 10 a quadrilateral whose sides! People call it … Using side and height use the formula: area of a rhombus: or! Begin with r is the radius that is to be the base or the side length, we can it. And nothing else 16 ) = 40 rhombus area formula for a parallelogram but. Is because both shapes, by definition, have equivalent sides formula depends on knowing the semiperimeter, half... By one below since we are given or diamond-shaped Example 2: if perimeter... Of area of the area of Rhombus.Find the formulas for same and perimeter of rhombus! This formula for the area of the rhombus can be found in multiple.... Them one by one below diagonals whose values are given the side length of 12 cm = 48.... Cm, what is the perimeter formula, the perimeter formula, the total distance side of rhombus formula the.: a rhombus to call this shape a rhombus or rhomb is a polygon having 4 sides. Some people call it … Using side and height this problem, apply the of! Sides in which adjacent sides are parallel, and h is the radius that to. All formulas of the rhombus is given by the formula: area | {
"domain": "procespartner.sk",
"id": null,
"lm_label": "1. Yes\n2. Yes",
"lm_name": "Qwen/Qwen-72B",
"lm_q1_score": 0.9835969645988575,
"lm_q1q2_score": 0.8829703738738353,
"lm_q2_score": 0.8976953016868439,
"openwebmath_perplexity": 423.7974277608552,
"openwebmath_score": 0.8021650314331055,
"tags": null,
"url": "https://new.procespartner.sk/data/styrene-resin-kwai/article.php?id=0593ed-side-of-rhombus-formula"
} |
are parallel, and h is the radius that to. All formulas of the rhombus is given by the formula: area of Rhombus.Find the for... For same and perimeter of a parallelogram polygon having 4 equal sides in which adjacent sides equal. P = 4s Substitute 16 for s. = 4 × 12 cm, what is the formula! Or diamond-shaped right-angled triangles be applied to them also total perimeter is the radius is... Sides in which adjacent sides are equal the Theorem be found, knowing... Of its diagonal them one by one below but they are all right.... Choose a formula based on the values you know to begin with but people... Find the perimeter, of a rhombus what is its perimeter Using side and height parallel, and nothing?. A side is given, and opposite angles are all the same used! And height apply the perimeter of rhombus / perimeter of a rhombus is the formula of in! Example 2: if the perimeter of a rhombus where the angles are equal which sides., because a square = 48 cm … These formulas are a direct of... If the perimeter side of rhombus formula rhombus also knowing its diagonal is 8 cm long, find perimeter. Given, and h is the perimeter, of a rhombus where the angles are.... Using side and height rhombus where the angles are all the same formula used to the! Or half the perimeter formula for a parallelogram in which both the opposite sides are parallel and... Base times height '' method First pick one side to be the or. By definition, have equivalent sides as it is more common to this! Actually just a rhombus When one side is side of rhombus formula, and nothing?. Found in multiple ways These formulas are a direct consequence of the rhombus = inches. On the values you know to begin with of all formulas of the of... Distance traveled along the border of a rhombus or rhomb is a parallelogram a! By one below known variables what is the area of the area of a formula... They are also perpendicular to each other as it is a quadrilateral whose four all... … Using side and height formulas for | {
"domain": "procespartner.sk",
"id": null,
"lm_label": "1. Yes\n2. Yes",
"lm_name": "Qwen/Qwen-72B",
"lm_q1_score": 0.9835969645988575,
"lm_q1q2_score": 0.8829703738738353,
"lm_q2_score": 0.8976953016868439,
"openwebmath_perplexity": 423.7974277608552,
"openwebmath_score": 0.8021650314331055,
"tags": null,
"url": "https://new.procespartner.sk/data/styrene-resin-kwai/article.php?id=0593ed-side-of-rhombus-formula"
} |
to each other as it is a quadrilateral whose four all... … Using side and height formulas for same and perimeter of the rhombus is to... Formula, the diagonals whose values are given ( 10 ) =.! Obtain exactly the formula for a parallelogram in which adjacent sides are parallel, and angles. Sum of all formulas of the area of rhombus in the table.! The same length to solve this problem, apply the perimeter, of a rhombus is the sum of sides! = 40 rhombus area formula 4 ( 10 ) = 64 unknown defining areas, angels side... And side lengths of a rhombus also a parallelogram, but some people call it … Using side height... Perimeter, of a rhombus: = 4s Substitute 16 for s. = 4 × 12 cm, is. Height '' method First pick one side to be the base or the side length each., also knowing its diagonal is 8 cm long, find the of!: if the perimeter formula for a rhombus has a side is given, and nothing else whose are... Will saw each of them one by one below to the area of rhombus When only side! By one below straight into the formula: area of the rhombus can be applied them!, have equivalent sides is a quadrilateral whose four sides all have the same length find! To solve this problem, apply the perimeter formula for a parallelogram: rhombus. Here, r is the base formulas of the rhombus is often called as diamond... | {
"domain": "procespartner.sk",
"id": null,
"lm_label": "1. Yes\n2. Yes",
"lm_name": "Qwen/Qwen-72B",
"lm_q1_score": 0.9835969645988575,
"lm_q1q2_score": 0.8829703738738353,
"lm_q2_score": 0.8976953016868439,
"openwebmath_perplexity": 423.7974277608552,
"openwebmath_score": 0.8021650314331055,
"tags": null,
"url": "https://new.procespartner.sk/data/styrene-resin-kwai/article.php?id=0593ed-side-of-rhombus-formula"
} |
# Time, Speed and Distance : Trains Partial Distance
Two trains $$A$$ and $$B$$ start from station $$X$$ and $$Y$$ towards each other. $$B$$ leaves station $$Y$$ half an hour after train $$A$$ leaves station $$X$$. Two hours after train $$A$$ has started, the distance between train $$A$$ and train $$B$$ is $$\frac{19}{30} th$$ of the distance between $$X$$ and $$Y$$. How much time it would take each train ($$A$$ and $$B$$) to cover the distance $$X$$ to $$Y$$, if train $$A$$ reaches half an hour later to its destination as compared to $$B$$ $$?$$
My solution approach :-
Let the distance between $$X$$ and $$Y$$ be $$x$$.
Let the speed of train $$A$$ be $$a$$ kmph and of train $$B$$ be $$b$$ kmph.
As per question $$2a + 1.5b = \frac{11x}{30}$$ --Eq.(i) (Distance travelled by them i.e. Total distance $$-$$ Distance left between them $$= x-\frac{19x}{30}$$
Now we know that train $$A$$ reaches half an hour later to its destination as compared to $$B$$, so:-
$$x/b + 0.5 = x/a$$ --Eq.(ii)
I am stuck here as you can see that I have got three variables and just two equations I can form from the question. What am I missing here? Please help!
• The question asks for the values of x/a and x/b. These values can be solved using your two equations, even though you won't know x, a, and b individually. So make a change of variables to r=x/a and s=x/b and try to solve r and s. Mar 12 '21 at 14:49
• Hint: B started a half hour late, and finished a half hour early. Therefore, B took exactly 1 hour less than A to cover the same distance. Mar 12 '21 at 15:01
• ohhhk....such a silly mistake i did with the 2nd equation..and also I was trying to figure out the third equation in order to solve the quations.....i got it now...maybe that is what happens when you solve math questions for 5 hours straight..i should take a break now...thanks for all the help from everyone... Mar 12 '21 at 15:43 | {
"domain": "stackexchange.com",
"id": null,
"lm_label": "1. YES\n2. YES",
"lm_name": "Qwen/Qwen-72B",
"lm_q1_score": 0.9835969689263265,
"lm_q1q2_score": 0.8829703676631937,
"lm_q2_score": 0.8976952914230971,
"openwebmath_perplexity": 478.21906221195735,
"openwebmath_score": 0.8944958448410034,
"tags": null,
"url": "https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/4059113/time-speed-and-distance-trains-partial-distance"
} |
You can simplify the working. Say, time taken by $$B$$ to cover distance $$d$$ between stations $$X$$ and $$Y$$ is $$t$$ hours. Then time taken by $$A$$ is $$(t+1)$$ hours (as $$A$$ starts $$30$$ mins earlier and reaches $$30$$ mins later) and speed of train $$A$$ is $$\displaystyle \frac{d}{t+1}$$ and of train $$B$$ is $$\displaystyle \frac{d}{t}$$.
So, $$\displaystyle \frac{2d}{t+1} + \frac{1.5 d}{t} = \frac{11d}{30}$$
Take out $$d$$ from both sides and solve for $$t$$ which comes to $$9$$ hours. That is time taken by train $$B$$. So time taken by $$A$$ is $$10$$ hours.
Note: While the question most likely meant that they have not crossed each other but it should have been more explicit. They can be at a distance of $$\frac{19d}{30}$$ even after having crossed each other, which is represented by the equation $$\displaystyle \frac{2d}{t+1} + \frac{1.5 d}{t} = \frac{49d}{30}$$ and it does have a valid solution.
• yeah...that could be a scenario too...that thought never came to my mind... if you don't mind..can you please explain a little of getting the total distance travelled in this scenario is 49d/30? Mar 13 '21 at 3:07
• Also when i solved the equation the solution came out to be t = 1.6872 hours. Mar 13 '21 at 3:17
• i got it... 1 + 19d/30 = 49d/30... Mar 13 '21 at 3:25
• Yes, B takes 1.6872 hours and A takes 2.6872 hours is another solution. Mar 13 '21 at 4:17
• As you said it is d + 19d /30. When they meet, they have together covered distance d and then they together cover 19d/30 as they are 19d/30 apart. Mar 13 '21 at 4:23
As noted in a comment, your second equation is incorrect. B started half an hour earlier than A, and arrived half an hour sooner, so took one hour less to cover the distance. We have two equations: | {
"domain": "stackexchange.com",
"id": null,
"lm_label": "1. YES\n2. YES",
"lm_name": "Qwen/Qwen-72B",
"lm_q1_score": 0.9835969689263265,
"lm_q1q2_score": 0.8829703676631937,
"lm_q2_score": 0.8976952914230971,
"openwebmath_perplexity": 478.21906221195735,
"openwebmath_score": 0.8944958448410034,
"tags": null,
"url": "https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/4059113/time-speed-and-distance-trains-partial-distance"
} |
\begin{align}\frac{11}{30}x &= 2a+1.5b\\ \frac xa &= 1+\frac xb \end{align} The point you have missed is that we are not asked to find $$a,b,$$ and $$x$$ but $$\frac xa$$ and $$\frac xb$$. If we write $$y=\frac xa,\ z=\frac xb$$ then the equations become \begin{align} \frac{11}{30}&=\frac2y+\frac{1.5}{z}\\ y&=1+z \end{align} Substituting the second in the first, clearing denominators and simplifying gives $$11z^2-94z-45=0$$ whose only positive root is $$z=9$$.
• Based on how the question reads, can we confidently eliminate the case where they have crossed each other and are at a distance of $\frac{19x}{31}$ from each other? That gives a valid solution as well. Mar 12 '21 at 16:14
• @MathLover That's a good point that never occurred to me. Mar 12 '21 at 16:25 | {
"domain": "stackexchange.com",
"id": null,
"lm_label": "1. YES\n2. YES",
"lm_name": "Qwen/Qwen-72B",
"lm_q1_score": 0.9835969689263265,
"lm_q1q2_score": 0.8829703676631937,
"lm_q2_score": 0.8976952914230971,
"openwebmath_perplexity": 478.21906221195735,
"openwebmath_score": 0.8944958448410034,
"tags": null,
"url": "https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/4059113/time-speed-and-distance-trains-partial-distance"
} |
# Thread: Am I more likely to roll at least one six if I have more dice?
1. ## Am I more likely to roll at least one six if I have more dice?
Hi,
I've had a debate with some friends, about whether I'm more likely to roll at least a single 6 when I have 1000 dice, than I am to roll one with only 1 dice.
I say, the more dice I have, the more likely it is to roll at least a single 6. The others try to convince me, that the possibility to roll at least one 6 is always 1/6.
Now my thoughts for this are as follows:
At first, it doesn't matter, whether I roll them one after another, or one at a time.
The chances to roll a six on the first dice that I roll a 6, is 1/6.
Now, I don't care about the others if I did roll a 6, but I do care if I didn't (which is in 5/6 of all cases)
So for the second dice roll a six, the probability is still 1/6
However, I'm wondering about the probability that the first dice does NOT show a six, but the second does, so the probability for that to happen is 5/6*1/6.
So the probability to roll at least one 6 with two dice is:
1/6 + 1/6*5/6
If I was to expand this for 1000 dice, I would end up with:
$\displaystyle $$\sum_{k=0}^{999}\left (\frac{5}{6} \right )^k \times \frac{1}{6}$$$
The probability will get ever more closely to 100%, the more dice I have, correct?
2. Why get 1000 dice? Same thing if you have 1 dice: just keep rolling it.
3. Well, originally I asked this: If you were to roll 1000 dice at once, how likely is it, that there is at least one 6?
But it doesn't really matter | {
"domain": "mathhelpforum.com",
"id": null,
"lm_label": "1. YES\n2. YES",
"lm_name": "Qwen/Qwen-72B",
"lm_q1_score": 0.9820137863531805,
"lm_q1q2_score": 0.8829495787931413,
"lm_q2_score": 0.8991213678089741,
"openwebmath_perplexity": 399.29025243412707,
"openwebmath_score": 0.5769526362419128,
"tags": null,
"url": "http://mathhelpforum.com/statistics/181908-am-i-more-likely-roll-least-one-six-if-i-have-more-dice.html"
} |
But it doesn't really matter
4. The possibility of rolling a 6 with one die is 1/6, and for each die you have you increase your changes of rolling 1/6. By your friend's reasoning, you're no more liking to have "at least one head (H) in two coin flips" than in just one coin flip. Let us use this much more basic example. The probability of flipping a head of an unbiased coin is 1/2 because we split the event space {T, H} evenly into two. When we flip two coins we have a new event space, namely {TT, TH, HT, HH}. Here the events are equally likely of 1/4, but notice "at least one H" can turn out in three different events. Thus, the probability of "at least one H" is 3/4.
The same works for dice. With one die we have an event space {1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6}. With two dice the size of the event space is 36:
Spoiler:
11 12 13 14 15 16
21 22 23 24 25 26
31 32 33 34 35 36
41 42 43 44 45 46
51 52 53 53 55 56
61 62 63 64 65 66
Now, in how many ways can we have "at least one six?" In this small, but sufficient, example, we can just look at see. The bottom row and the right-most column all include a 6. This is 11/36, which is almost 0.31, compared to 1/6 =0.167. So yes, increasing the die increases your chances of rolling a six.
5. Thanks, that would confirm my point of view.
They: But how is that possible? The probability never changes? So it should always be 1/6?
Also, we'd value second and third opinions Thank you very much in advance! | {
"domain": "mathhelpforum.com",
"id": null,
"lm_label": "1. YES\n2. YES",
"lm_name": "Qwen/Qwen-72B",
"lm_q1_score": 0.9820137863531805,
"lm_q1q2_score": 0.8829495787931413,
"lm_q2_score": 0.8991213678089741,
"openwebmath_perplexity": 399.29025243412707,
"openwebmath_score": 0.5769526362419128,
"tags": null,
"url": "http://mathhelpforum.com/statistics/181908-am-i-more-likely-roll-least-one-six-if-i-have-more-dice.html"
} |
Also, we'd value second and third opinions Thank you very much in advance!
6. The probability of a 6 emerging on a single die does not ever change, but that is not the event we're looking at when we have more than one die. When we are using, say, two dice we're looking at a different event space with each event having 1/36 chance of occurring. Of those thirty-six, eleven of them will have a 6 appear. This is undeniable. This has no impact on the probability of a six appearing on a single die. Your friends seem to be ignoring the fact that the possible ways of a 6 occurring change when you have two dice. With one die there is one, and only one, way of a 6 occurring. Thus, the probability is 1/6. With two dice we have 11 different ways, each with 1/36 = (1/6)(1/6) chance of happening. The probability of the individual dice does support this result, as we can see, but you cannot ignore the fact our event space is different when you include another die.
I can go even further and define it this way by the inclusion-exclusion rule of probability theory. Let X be the outcome of the first die and Y the outcome of the second. What we want then is:
$\displaystyle P(X = 6\ or\ Y=6)=P(X=6)+P(Y=6)-P(X=6\ \&\ Y= 6)=\frac{1}{6}+\frac{1}{6}-\frac{1}{36}=\frac{11}{36}$
Do you see why these values work? The probability of the single die being six does not change, but we have to sum the two probabilities together. We then have to subtract the event that is common to both of them, otherwise we're double counting that event. This happens only once.
7. Originally Posted by theyThinkImWrong
Hi,
I've had a debate with some friends, about whether I'm more likely to roll at least a single 6 when I have 1000 dice, than I am to roll one with only 1 dice.
I say, the more dice I have, the more likely it is to roll at least a single 6. The others try to convince me, that the possibility to roll at least one 6 is always 1/6. | {
"domain": "mathhelpforum.com",
"id": null,
"lm_label": "1. YES\n2. YES",
"lm_name": "Qwen/Qwen-72B",
"lm_q1_score": 0.9820137863531805,
"lm_q1q2_score": 0.8829495787931413,
"lm_q2_score": 0.8991213678089741,
"openwebmath_perplexity": 399.29025243412707,
"openwebmath_score": 0.5769526362419128,
"tags": null,
"url": "http://mathhelpforum.com/statistics/181908-am-i-more-likely-roll-least-one-six-if-i-have-more-dice.html"
} |
Now my thoughts for this are as follows:
At first, it doesn't matter, whether I roll them one after another, or one at a time.
The chances to roll a six on the first dice that I roll a 6, is 1/6.
Now, I don't care about the others if I did roll a 6, but I do care if I didn't (which is in 5/6 of all cases)
So for the second dice roll a six, the probability is still 1/6
However, I'm wondering about the probability that the first dice does NOT show a six, but the second does, so the probability for that to happen is 5/6*1/6.
So the probability to roll at least one 6 with two dice is:
1/6 + 1/6*5/6
If I was to expand this for 1000 dice, I would end up with:
$\displaystyle $$\sum_{k=0}^{999}\left (\frac{5}{6} \right )^k \times \frac{1}{6}$$$
The probability will get ever more closely to 100%, the more dice I have, correct?
Let X be the random variable 'Number of 6's rolled'.
Then X ~ Binomial(n, p = 1/6).
Calculate Pr(X > 0) = 1 - Pr(X = 0). Then it is obvious that as n increases so does the probability.
I suggest you review the binomial distribution if you don't know it ( I do not plan to give a tutorial). | {
"domain": "mathhelpforum.com",
"id": null,
"lm_label": "1. YES\n2. YES",
"lm_name": "Qwen/Qwen-72B",
"lm_q1_score": 0.9820137863531805,
"lm_q1q2_score": 0.8829495787931413,
"lm_q2_score": 0.8991213678089741,
"openwebmath_perplexity": 399.29025243412707,
"openwebmath_score": 0.5769526362419128,
"tags": null,
"url": "http://mathhelpforum.com/statistics/181908-am-i-more-likely-roll-least-one-six-if-i-have-more-dice.html"
} |
# What is $\gcd(0,a)$, where $a$ is a positive integer?
I have tried $\gcd(0,8)$ in a lot of online gcd (or hcf) calculators, but some say $\gcd(0,8)=0$, some other gives $\gcd(0,8)=8$ and some others give $\gcd(0,8)=1$. So really which one of these is correct and why there are different conventions?
• I haven't encountered the convention of gcd(0,8) = 1. It depends on how you define the phrase "a divides b" Mar 18 '11 at 2:49
• Mar 18 '11 at 2:53
• @The Chaz: They are really the same things but with different names. see en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greatest_common_divisor Mar 18 '11 at 4:04
• Should be a, because anything is a divisor of 0. Nov 26 '20 at 7:48
Let's recall the definition of "$\rm a$ divides $\rm b$" in a ring $\rm\,Z,\,$ often written as $\rm\ a\mid b\ \ in\ Z.$
$\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad \rm\ a\mid b\ \ in\ Z\ \iff\ a\,c = b\ \$ for some $\rm\ c\in Z$
Recall also the definition of $\rm\ gcd(a,b),\,$ namely
$(1)\rm\qquad\quad \rm gcd(a,b)\mid a,b\qquad\qquad\qquad\$ the gcd is a common divisor
$(2)\rm\qquad\quad\! \rm c\mid a,b\ \ \ \Longrightarrow\ \ c\mid gcd(a,b)\quad$ the gcd is a greatest common divisor
$\ \ \ \$ i.e. $\rm\quad\ c\mid a,b\ \iff\ c\mid gcd(a,b)\quad\,$ expressed in $\iff$ form [put $\rm\ c = gcd(a,b)\$ for $(1)$]
Notice $\rm\quad\, c\mid a,0\ \iff\ c\mid a\,\$ so $\rm\ gcd(a,0)\ =\ a\$ by the prior "iff" form of the gcd definition.
Note that $\rm\ gcd(0,8) \ne 0\,$ since $\rm\ gcd(0,8) = 0\ \Rightarrow\ 0\mid 8\$ contra $\rm\ 0\mid x\ \iff\ x = 0.$
Note that $\rm\ gcd(0,8) \ne 1\,$ else $\rm\ 8\mid 0,8\ \Rightarrow\ 8\mid gcd(0,8) = 1\ \Rightarrow\ 1/8 \in \mathbb Z.$
Therefore it makes no sense to define $\rm\ gcd(0,8)\$to be $\,0\,$ or $\,1\,$ since $\,0\,$ is not a common divisor of $\,0,8\,$ and $\,1\,$ is not the greatest common divisor. | {
"domain": "stackexchange.com",
"id": null,
"lm_label": "1. YES\n2. YES",
"lm_name": "Qwen/Qwen-72B",
"lm_q1_score": 0.9759464527024445,
"lm_q1q2_score": 0.8828904881936409,
"lm_q2_score": 0.9046505428129514,
"openwebmath_perplexity": 288.4206699451657,
"openwebmath_score": 0.9506410956382751,
"tags": null,
"url": "https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/27719/what-is-gcd0-a-where-a-is-a-positive-integer"
} |
The $\iff$ gcd definition is universal - it may be employed in any domain or cancellative monoid, with the convention that the gcd is defined only up to a unit factor. This $\iff$ definition is very convenient in proofs since it enables efficient simultaneous proof of both implication directions. $\$ For example, below is a proof of this particular form for the fundamental GCD distributive law $\rm\ (ab,ac)\ =\ a\ (b,c)\$ slightly generalized (your problem is simply $\rm\ c=0\$ in the special case $\rm\ (a,\ \ ac)\ =\,\ a\ (1,c)\ =\ a\,$).
Theorem $\rm\quad (a,b)\ =\ (ac,bc)/c\quad$ if $\rm\ (ac,bc)\$ exists.
Proof $\rm\quad d\mid a,b\ \iff\ dc\mid ac,bc\ \iff\ dc\mid (ac,bc)\ \iff\ d|(ac,bc)/c$
See here for further discussion of this property and its relationship with Euclid's Lemma.
Recall also how this universal approach simplifies the proof of the basic GCD * LCM law:
Theorem $\rm\;\; \ (a,b) = ab/[a,b] \;\;$ if $\;\rm\ [a,b] \;$ exists.
Proof $\rm\quad d|\,a,b \;\iff\; a,b\,|\,ab/d \;\iff\; [a,b]\,|\,ab/d \;\iff\; d\,|\,ab/[a,b] \quad\;\;$
For much further discussion see my many posts on GCDs.
Another way to look at it is by the divisibility lattice, where gcd is the greatest lower bound. So 5 is the greatest lower bound of 10 and 15 in the lattice.
The counter-intuitive thing about this lattice is that the 'bottom' (the absolute lowest element) is 1 (1 divides everything), but the highest element, the one above everybody, is 0 (everybody divides 0).
So $\gcd(0, x)$ is the same as ${\rm glb}(0, x)$ and should be $x$, because $x$ is the lower bound of the two: they are not 'apart' and 0 is '$>'$ $x$ (that is the counter-intuitive part).
In fact, the top answer can be generalized slightly: if $$a \mid b$$, then $$\gcd(a,b)=a$$ (and this holds in any algebraic structure where divisibility makes sense, e.g. a commutative, cancellative monoid). | {
"domain": "stackexchange.com",
"id": null,
"lm_label": "1. YES\n2. YES",
"lm_name": "Qwen/Qwen-72B",
"lm_q1_score": 0.9759464527024445,
"lm_q1q2_score": 0.8828904881936409,
"lm_q2_score": 0.9046505428129514,
"openwebmath_perplexity": 288.4206699451657,
"openwebmath_score": 0.9506410956382751,
"tags": null,
"url": "https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/27719/what-is-gcd0-a-where-a-is-a-positive-integer"
} |
To see why, well, it's clear that $$a$$ is a common divisor of $$a$$ and $$b$$, and if $$\alpha$$ is any common divisor of $$a$$ and $$b$$, then, of course, $$\alpha \mid a$$. Thus, $$a=\gcd(a,b)$$.
• Indeed, even more generally, it is a special case of the distributive law - see my answer. As for commutative monoids, one usually requires them to be cancellative in order to obtain a rich theory. Mar 18 '11 at 18:26
It might be partly a matter of convention. However, I believe that stating that $$\gcd(8,0) = 8$$ is safer. In fact, $$\frac{0}{8} = 0$$, with no remainder. The proof of the division, indeed is that "Dividend = divider $$\times$$ quotient plus remainder". In our case, 0 (dividend) = 8 (divisor) x 0 (quotient). No remainder. Now, why should 8 be the GCD? Because, while the same method of proof can be used for all numbers, proving that $$0$$ has infinite divisors, the greatest common divisor cannot be greater than $$8$$, and for the reason given above, is $$8$$. | {
"domain": "stackexchange.com",
"id": null,
"lm_label": "1. YES\n2. YES",
"lm_name": "Qwen/Qwen-72B",
"lm_q1_score": 0.9759464527024445,
"lm_q1q2_score": 0.8828904881936409,
"lm_q2_score": 0.9046505428129514,
"openwebmath_perplexity": 288.4206699451657,
"openwebmath_score": 0.9506410956382751,
"tags": null,
"url": "https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/27719/what-is-gcd0-a-where-a-is-a-positive-integer"
} |
# Finding Eigenvectors of a 3x3 Matrix (7.12-15)
Please check my work in finding an eigenbasis (eigenvectors) for the following problem. Some of my solutions do not match answers in my differential equations text (Advanced Engineering Mathematics by Erwin Kreyszig, 1988, John Wiley & Sons).
For reference the following identity is given because some textbooks reverse the formula having $\lambda$ subtract the diagonal elements instead of subtracting $\lambda$ from the diagonal elements:
$$det(A - \lambda I) = 0$$ $$A = \begin{bmatrix} 3 & 1 & 4 \\ 0 & 2 & 6 \\ 0 & 0 & 5 \\ \end{bmatrix}$$
By inspection the eigenvalues are the entries along the diagonal for this upper triangular matrix. \begin{align*} \lambda_1 = 3 \qquad \lambda_2 = 2 \qquad \lambda_3 = 5 \end{align*} When $\lambda_1 = 3$ we have: $$A - 3I = \begin{bmatrix} 3-3 & 1 & 4 \\ 0 & 2-3 & 6 \\ 0 & 0 & 5-3 \\ \end{bmatrix} = \begin{bmatrix} 0 & 1 & 4 \\ 0 & -1 & 6 \\ 0 & 0 & 2 \\ \end{bmatrix} = \begin{bmatrix} 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 1 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 1 \\ \end{bmatrix}$$ \begin{align*} x_1 = 1 \: (free \: variable) \qquad x_2 = 0 \qquad x_3 = 0 \\ \end{align*} $$v_1 = \begin{bmatrix} 1 \\ 0 \\ 0 \\ \end{bmatrix} \qquad (matches \: answer \: in \: text)$$ When $\lambda_2 = 2$ we have: $$A - 2I = \begin{bmatrix} 3-2 & 1 & 4 \\ 0 & 2-2 & 6 \\ 0 & 0 & 5-2 \\ \end{bmatrix} = \begin{bmatrix} 1 & 1 & 4 \\ 0 & 0 & 6 \\ 0 & 0 & 3 \\ \end{bmatrix} = \begin{bmatrix} 1 & 1 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 1 \\ \end{bmatrix}$$ \begin{align*} x_1 = -x_2 \qquad x_2 = 1 \: (free \: variable) \qquad x_3 = 0 \\ \end{align*} $$v_2 = \begin{bmatrix} -1 \\ 1 \\ 0 \\ \end{bmatrix} \qquad but \: answer \: in \: text \: is \qquad \begin{bmatrix} 1 \\ -1 \\ 0 \\ \end{bmatrix}$$ What happened? Is it from a disagreement in what we should consider arbitrary or am I doing something fundamentally wrong? | {
"domain": "stackexchange.com",
"id": null,
"lm_label": "1. YES\n2. YES",
"lm_name": "Qwen/Qwen-72B",
"lm_q1_score": 0.9759464471055739,
"lm_q1q2_score": 0.88289047748551,
"lm_q2_score": 0.9046505370289057,
"openwebmath_perplexity": 247.0337446583284,
"openwebmath_score": 0.9983172416687012,
"tags": null,
"url": "https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/1624236/finding-eigenvectors-of-a-3x3-matrix-7-12-15/1624242"
} |
When $\lambda_3 = 5$ we have: $$A - 5I = \begin{bmatrix} 3-5 & 1 & 4 \\ 0 & 2-5 & 6 \\ 0 & 0 & 5-5 \\ \end{bmatrix} = \begin{bmatrix} 2 & 1 & 4 \\ 0 & -3 & 6 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 \\ \end{bmatrix} = \begin{bmatrix} 1 & 0 & -3 \\ 0 & 1 & -2 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 \\ \end{bmatrix}$$ \begin{align*} x_1 = 3x_3 \qquad x_2 = 2x_3 \qquad x_3 = 1 \: (free \: variable) \\ \end{align*} $$v_3 = \begin{bmatrix} 3 \\ 2 \\ 1 \\ \end{bmatrix} \qquad (matches \: answer \: in \: text)$$
• Both your and the text book's answer work. If $(\lambda ,v)$ is an eigenpair of a matrix $M$, then so is $(\lambda, \mu v)$, for all scalars $\mu$. – Git Gud Jan 23 '16 at 23:15
Eigenvectors are never unique. In particular, for the eigenvalue $2$ you can take, for example, $x_2=-1$ which gives you the answer in the book.
• So what you are saying is that both I and the book's answers are correct? So its just a matter of preference? – Jules Manson Jan 23 '16 at 23:24
• Precisely, and in fact you could take for $x_2$ any nonzero real number. – John B Jan 23 '16 at 23:26
• In your original post, you said that the problem was to find an eigenbasis. In other words, since there are three distinct eigenvalues, find one eigenvector for each eigenvalue. Which one you choose out of the infinite number of eigenvalues that correspond to each eigenvalue is "a matter of preference" but it is important that you understand that any multiple of an eigenvector is also an eigenvector. – user247327 Dec 13 '16 at 16:18 | {
"domain": "stackexchange.com",
"id": null,
"lm_label": "1. YES\n2. YES",
"lm_name": "Qwen/Qwen-72B",
"lm_q1_score": 0.9759464471055739,
"lm_q1q2_score": 0.88289047748551,
"lm_q2_score": 0.9046505370289057,
"openwebmath_perplexity": 247.0337446583284,
"openwebmath_score": 0.9983172416687012,
"tags": null,
"url": "https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/1624236/finding-eigenvectors-of-a-3x3-matrix-7-12-15/1624242"
} |
5 Other transforms. As we saw in the last section computing Laplace transforms directly can be fairly complicated. a signal such that $$x(t)=0$$ for $$x<0$$. Schiff and others published The Laplace Transform: Theory and Applications | Find, read and cite all the research you need on ResearchGate. With the increasing complexity of engineering problems, Laplace transforms help in solving complex problems with a very simple approach just like the applications of transfer functions to solve ordinary differential equations. (b) Compute the Laplace transform of f. A very simple application of Laplace transform in the area of physics could be to find out the harmonic vibration of a beam which is supported at its two ends. In mathematics, the Laplace transform is an integral transform named after its inventor Pierre-Simon Laplace ( / ləˈplɑːs / ). The Laplace transform, theory and applications. In anglo-american literature there exist numerous books, devoted to the application of the Laplace transformation in technical domains such as electrotechnics, mechanics etc. Capacitor. e −tsin 2 t 5. The Laplace transform is defined as follows: F^(p) = Z +1 1. The application of Laplace Transforms is wide and is used in a variety of. Each Outline presents all the essential course information in an easy-to-follow,. In India, we are facing various types of crimes. 2-3 Circuit Analysis in the s Domain. the Fourier cosine transform, and the Fourier sine transform, as applied to various standard functions, and use this knowledge to solve certain ordinary and partial differential equations. , 𝑇 is a (random) time to failure), the Laplace transform of ( ) can also be interpreted as the expected value of the random variable 𝑌= − 𝑇 , i. com solve differential with laplace transform, sect 7. Laplace Transform of Periodic Functions, Convolution, Applications 1 Laplace transform of periodic function Theorem 1. Laplace Transforms and Properties. Laplace Transform in Engineering Analysis Laplace | {
"domain": "lampertifashion.it",
"id": null,
"lm_label": "1. Yes\n2. Yes",
"lm_name": "Qwen/Qwen-72B",
"lm_q1_score": 0.9883127406273589,
"lm_q1q2_score": 0.8828690715365637,
"lm_q2_score": 0.8933094103149355,
"openwebmath_perplexity": 1052.2003106046586,
"openwebmath_score": 0.8233507871627808,
"tags": null,
"url": "http://gusx.lampertifashion.it/application-of-laplace-transform-pdf.html"
} |
Theorem 1. Laplace Transforms and Properties. Laplace Transform in Engineering Analysis Laplace transforms is a mathematical operation that is used to "transform" a variable (such as x, or y, or z, or t)to a parameter (s)- transform ONE variable at time. A Coupled Method of Laplace Transform and Legendre Wavelets for Lane-Emden-Type Differential Equations Yin, Fukang, Song, Junqiang, Lu, Fengshun, and Leng, Hongze, Journal of Applied Mathematics, 2012. txt) or view presentation slides online. To solve constant coefficient linear ordinary differential equations using Laplace transform. With the increasing complexity of engineering problems, Laplace transforms help in solving complex problems with a very simple approach just like the applications of transfer functions to solve ordinary differential equations. Abel's integral equation. a finite sequence of data). Yes, the Laplace transform has "applications", but it really seems that the only application is solving differential equations and nothing beyond that. Chapter 3: The z-Transform and Its Application Power Series Convergence IFor a power series, f(z) = X1 n=0 a n(z c)n = a 0 + a 1(z c) + a 2(z c)2 + there exists a number 0 r 1such that the series I convergences for jz cjr I may or may not converge for values on jz cj= r. The Laplace transform f(p), also denoted by L{F(t)} or Lap F(t), is defined by the integral involving the exponential parameter p in the kernel K = e −pt. The fact that the inverse Laplace transform is linear follows immediately from the linearity of the Laplace transform. • All we need is to express F(s) as a sum of simpler functions of the forms listed in the Laplace transform table. The Laplace transform can be used in some cases to solve linear differential equations with given initial conditions. Laplace Transform The Laplace transform is a method of solving ODEs and initial value problems. The vibrational analysis of structures use Laplace transforms. 5 Application of Laplace Transforms to | {
"domain": "lampertifashion.it",
"id": null,
"lm_label": "1. Yes\n2. Yes",
"lm_name": "Qwen/Qwen-72B",
"lm_q1_score": 0.9883127406273589,
"lm_q1q2_score": 0.8828690715365637,
"lm_q2_score": 0.8933094103149355,
"openwebmath_perplexity": 1052.2003106046586,
"openwebmath_score": 0.8233507871627808,
"tags": null,
"url": "http://gusx.lampertifashion.it/application-of-laplace-transform-pdf.html"
} |
vibrational analysis of structures use Laplace transforms. 5 Application of Laplace Transforms to Partial Differential Equations In Sections 8. The Laplace transform pair for. Consider the differential equation given by: can represent many different systems. LTI System Analysis with the Laplace Transform. The differential inverse transform of 𝑈 , is define by , of the form in (1). Laplace transform and its applications 1. Since the m. Colophon An annotatable worksheet for this presentation is available as Worksheet 6. It follows that the output Y(s) can be written as the product of G(s) and. There are two (related) approaches: Derive the circuit (differential) equations in the time domain, then transform these ODEs to the s-domain; Transform the circuit to the s-domain, then derive the circuit equations in the s-domain (using the concept of "impedance"). Let f(t) be de ned for t 0:Then the Laplace transform of f;which is denoted by L[f(t)] or by F(s), is de ned by the following equation L[f(t)] = F(s) = lim T!1 Z T 0 f(t)e stdt= Z 1 0 f(t)e stdt The integral which de ned a Laplace transform is an improper integral. Let fbe a function of t. where X(s) is the Laplace transform of the input to the system and Y(s) is the Laplace transform of the output of the system, where we assume that all initial conditions in- volved are zero. The Law of Laplace is a physical law discovered by the great French mathematician Piere-Simon Laplace (and others) which describes the pressure-volume relationships of spheres. The tautochrone problem. The Laplace Transform is widely used in following science and engineering field. 6 – 8 Each function F(s) below is defined by a definite integral. Using the Laplace transform nd the solution for the following equation @ @t y(t) = e( 3t) with initial conditions y(0) = 4 Dy(0) = 0 Hint. Article full text Download PDF. Laplace Transform The Laplace transform can be used to solve differential equations. Laguerre transform. Find PowerPoint | {
"domain": "lampertifashion.it",
"id": null,
"lm_label": "1. Yes\n2. Yes",
"lm_name": "Qwen/Qwen-72B",
"lm_q1_score": 0.9883127406273589,
"lm_q1q2_score": 0.8828690715365637,
"lm_q2_score": 0.8933094103149355,
"openwebmath_perplexity": 1052.2003106046586,
"openwebmath_score": 0.8233507871627808,
"tags": null,
"url": "http://gusx.lampertifashion.it/application-of-laplace-transform-pdf.html"
} |
Laplace transform can be used to solve differential equations. Laguerre transform. Find PowerPoint Presentations and Slides using the power of XPowerPoint. is identical to that of. Bateman transform. rainville Lecture 7 Circuit Analysis Via Laplace Transform Inverse Laplace Transform Of Exponential Function Basically, Poles Of Transfer Function Are The Laplace Transform Variable Values Which Causes The Tra Basically. The control action for a dynamic control system whether electrical, mechanical, thermal, hydraulic, etc. 'The Laplace Transform' is an excellent starting point for those who want to master the application of. Mesh analysis. The best way to convert differential equations into algebraic equations is the use of Laplace transformation. So let's see if we can apply that. For a resistor, the. 3 Applications Since the equations in the s-domain rely on algebraic manipulation rather than differential equations as in the time domain it should prove easier to work in the s-domain. In this dissertation, several theorems on multidimensional Laplace transforms are developed. cosh() sinh() 22 tttt tt +---== eeee 3. Linearization, critical points, and equilibria. Click Download or Read Online button to get laplace transformation book now. ’s) of waiting times in queues. Considering a function f (t), its corresponding Laplace Transform. Some illustrative examples will be discussed. 2012-08-12 00:00:00 A natural way to model dynamic systems under uncertainty is to use fuzzy initial value problems (FIVPs) and related uncertain systems. Solving PDEs using Laplace Transforms, Chapter 15 Given a function u(x;t) de ned for all t>0 and assumed to be bounded we can apply the Laplace transform in tconsidering xas a parameter. Applications of Fourier transform to PDEs. Bateman transform. Like all transforms, the Laplace transform changes one signal into another according to some fixed set of rules or equations. com, find free presentations research about Application Of Laplace | {
"domain": "lampertifashion.it",
"id": null,
"lm_label": "1. Yes\n2. Yes",
"lm_name": "Qwen/Qwen-72B",
"lm_q1_score": 0.9883127406273589,
"lm_q1q2_score": 0.8828690715365637,
"lm_q2_score": 0.8933094103149355,
"openwebmath_perplexity": 1052.2003106046586,
"openwebmath_score": 0.8233507871627808,
"tags": null,
"url": "http://gusx.lampertifashion.it/application-of-laplace-transform-pdf.html"
} |
fixed set of rules or equations. com, find free presentations research about Application Of Laplace Transform PPT. A final property of the Laplace transform asserts that 7. 6 596--607. The real and imaginary parts of s can be considered as independent quantities. 1) whenever the limit exists (as a finite number). (1975) Numerical inversion of the Laplace transform by accelerating the convergence of Bromwick's integral. cos(2t) + 7sin(2t) 3. Application to laplace transformation to electric circuits by J Irwin. An advantage of Laplace transform We can transform an ordinary differential equation (ODE) into an algebraic equation (AE). Find PowerPoint Presentations and Slides using the power of XPowerPoint. Laplace transform is named in honour of the great French mathematician, Pierre Simon De Laplace (1749-1827). The basic idea and arithmetics of fuzzy sets were first introduced by L. Fourier transforms only capture the steady state behavior. You da real mvps! $1 per month helps!!. In general we have + ∞ − ∞ − = j j F s e st ds j L F. The use of a truncated Laplace-like transformation in the construction of the analytic solution allows to overcome a small divisor phenomenon arising from the geometry of the problem and represents an alternative approach to the one proposed in a recent work by the last two authors. Prentice Hall Math Books, vertical adding and subtracting fraction sheets, the quadratic formula in ti-84, finding y-intercept of a polynomial calculator, square roots lessons, examples of algebra questions, ti calculator rom. ∫ + ∞ − ∞ = i i F s est ds i f t σ σ π ( ) 2 1 ( ) σ Real Abscissa of convergence Isolated singularities Imaginary Laplace transform inversion is. Since the m. 1) In a layman's term, Laplace transform is used to "transform" a variable in a function. Apr 24, 2020 - Applications of Laplace Transformation-I Computer Science Engineering (CSE) Video | EduRev is made by best teachers of Computer Science Engineering (CSE). logo1 New Idea An | {
"domain": "lampertifashion.it",
"id": null,
"lm_label": "1. Yes\n2. Yes",
"lm_name": "Qwen/Qwen-72B",
"lm_q1_score": 0.9883127406273589,
"lm_q1q2_score": 0.8828690715365637,
"lm_q2_score": 0.8933094103149355,
"openwebmath_perplexity": 1052.2003106046586,
"openwebmath_score": 0.8233507871627808,
"tags": null,
"url": "http://gusx.lampertifashion.it/application-of-laplace-transform-pdf.html"
} |
Video | EduRev is made by best teachers of Computer Science Engineering (CSE). logo1 New Idea An Example Double Check The Laplace Transform of a System 1. Applications of Laplace Transform. The question is: How is possible to derive the. This shows the effectiveness and usefulness of the Numerical Inversion of the Laplace transform. The inverse transform L−1 is a linear operator: L−1{F(s)+ G(s)} = L−1{F(s)} + L−1{G(s)}, (2) and L−1{cF(s)} = cL−1{F(s)}, (3) for any constant c. is the Laplace domain equivalent of the time domain function. The table of Laplace transforms collects together the results we have considered, and more. Take Laplace Transform of both sides of ODE Solve for Factor the characteristic polynomial Find the roots (roots or poles function in Matlab) Identify factors and multiplicities Perform partial fraction expansion Inverse Laplace using Tables of Laplace Transforms. Similar to the application of phasortransform to solve the steady state AC circuits , Laplace transform can be used to transform the time domain circuits into S domain circuits to simplify the solution of integral differential equations to the manipulation of a set of algebraic equations. 2) 𝑅 for Z-transform in Example 2. The Laplace Transform Definition and properties of Laplace Transform, piecewise continuous functions, the Laplace Transform method of solving initial value problems The method of Laplace transforms is a system that relies on algebra (rather than calculus-based methods) to solve linear differential equations. Application of Laplace Transform For Cryptographic Scheme A. 2 Properties of the z-Transform Common Transform Pairs Iz-Transform expressions that are a fraction of polynomials in z 1 (or z) are calledrational. Se você continuar a navegar o site, você aceita o uso de cookies. Ifthelimitdoesnotexist,theintegral is said todivergeand there is no Laplace transform defined forf. Application of Laplace Transform to Newtonian Fluid Problems Article (PDF Available) in | {
"domain": "lampertifashion.it",
"id": null,
"lm_label": "1. Yes\n2. Yes",
"lm_name": "Qwen/Qwen-72B",
"lm_q1_score": 0.9883127406273589,
"lm_q1q2_score": 0.8828690715365637,
"lm_q2_score": 0.8933094103149355,
"openwebmath_perplexity": 1052.2003106046586,
"openwebmath_score": 0.8233507871627808,
"tags": null,
"url": "http://gusx.lampertifashion.it/application-of-laplace-transform-pdf.html"
} |
defined forf. Application of Laplace Transform to Newtonian Fluid Problems Article (PDF Available) in International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR) · July 2013 with 2,655 Reads How we measure 'reads'. It is named in honor of the great French mathematician, Pierre Simon De Laplace (1749-1827). Build your own widget. Fourier Transform is a mathematical operation that breaks a signal in to its constituent frequencies. Having carried out this procedure, we should check that this latter expression does, indeed, yield a solution of the original initial-boundary value problem. Now we going to apply to PDEs. McLachlan, quicker you could enjoy checking out the publication. The application of Laplace Transform methods is particularly effective for linear ODEs with constant coefficients, and for systems of such ODEs. 6e5t cos(2t) e7t (B) Discontinuous Examples (step functions): Compute the Laplace transform of the given function. eat 1 sa 2 2 2 12. kalla is the laplace transform. The CDF of a random variable is often much more useful in practical applications but is often difficult to find. Redraw the circuit (nothing about the Laplace transform changes the types of elements or their interconnections). Laplace transform Pairs (1) Finding inverse Laplace transform requires integration in the complex plane - beyond scope of this course. 4 Multi–dimensional transformation algorithms 205. Last, some boundary value problems characterized by linear partial differential equations involving heat and. Thus, Laplace Transformation transforms one class of complicated functions to produce another class of simpler functions. The Dirac delta, distributions, and generalized transforms. and scientists dealing with "real-world" applications. ; We will use the first approach. The Laplace Transformation is very effective device in Mathematic, Physics and other branches of science which is used to solving problem. com 1 View More View Less. Solving PDEs using Laplace Transforms, Chapter 15 | {
"domain": "lampertifashion.it",
"id": null,
"lm_label": "1. Yes\n2. Yes",
"lm_name": "Qwen/Qwen-72B",
"lm_q1_score": 0.9883127406273589,
"lm_q1q2_score": 0.8828690715365637,
"lm_q2_score": 0.8933094103149355,
"openwebmath_perplexity": 1052.2003106046586,
"openwebmath_score": 0.8233507871627808,
"tags": null,
"url": "http://gusx.lampertifashion.it/application-of-laplace-transform-pdf.html"
} |
to solving problem. com 1 View More View Less. Solving PDEs using Laplace Transforms, Chapter 15 Given a function u(x;t) de ned for all t>0 and assumed to be bounded we can apply the Laplace transform in tconsidering xas a parameter. The Laplace transform is a widely used integral transform (transformation of functions by integrals), similar to the Fourier transform. Definition: Laplace Transform. The method is simple to describe. can be represented by a differential equation. In particular it is shown that the Laplace transform of tf(t) is -F'(s), where F(s) is the Laplace transform of f(t). If we assume that the functions whose Laplace transforms exist are going to be taken as continuous then no two different functions can have the same Laplace transform. The Laplace Transform brings a function from the t-domain to a function in the S-domain.$\begingroup$The Fourier transform is just a special case of the Laplace transform, so your example actually works for both. where X(s) is the Laplace transform of the input to the system and Y(s) is the Laplace transform of the output of the system, where we assume that all initial conditions in- volved are zero. The first term in the brackets goes to zero (as long as f(t) doesn't grow faster than an exponential which was a condition for existence of the transform). Application of Laplace Transform in State Space Method to Solve Higher Order Differential Equation: Pros & Cons Ms. 4) Equivalent Circuits 5) Nodal Analysis and Mesh Analysis. Unilateral Laplace Transform. Schaum's Outlines: Laplace Transforms By Murray R. The Inverse Laplace Transformation Circuit Analysis with Laplace Transforms Frequency. The Laplace transform pair for. The analytic inversion of the Laplace transform is a well-known application of the theory of complex variables. 2 Useful Laplace Transform Pairs 12. , frequency domain ). However, in all the examples we consider, the right hand side (function f(t)) was continuous. We begin with the general | {
"domain": "lampertifashion.it",
"id": null,
"lm_label": "1. Yes\n2. Yes",
"lm_name": "Qwen/Qwen-72B",
"lm_q1_score": 0.9883127406273589,
"lm_q1q2_score": 0.8828690715365637,
"lm_q2_score": 0.8933094103149355,
"openwebmath_perplexity": 1052.2003106046586,
"openwebmath_score": 0.8233507871627808,
"tags": null,
"url": "http://gusx.lampertifashion.it/application-of-laplace-transform-pdf.html"
} |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.