question string | reference_answer string | original_mutated_content string | continuation_1_first_two_paras string | final_intervened_trace_until_last_step string | continuation_1 string | complete_answer_1 string | continuation_2 string | complete_answer_2 string | continuation_3 string | complete_answer_3 string | continuation_4 string | complete_answer_4 string | continuation_5 string | complete_answer_5 string | continuation_6 string | complete_answer_6 string | continuation_7 string | complete_answer_7 string | continuation_8 string | complete_answer_8 string | verifier_score_1 int64 | verifier_score_2 int64 | verifier_score_3 int64 | verifier_score_4 int64 | verifier_score_5 int64 | verifier_score_6 int64 | verifier_score_7 int64 | verifier_score_8 int64 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causation?\nJoe was about t(...TRUNCATED) | No | "Okay, let's try to tackle this question. So the problem is asking whether Joe caused his son's inju(...TRUNCATED) | "However, the question is about causation, not moral responsibility. The key is the causal link. \n\(...TRUNCATED) | "Okay, let's try to tackle this question. So the problem is asking whether Joe caused his son's inju(...TRUNCATED) | "Alternatively, if the question is purely about the causal chain regardless of intent, then maybe ye(...TRUNCATED) | "Okay, let's try to tackle this question. So the problem is asking whether Joe caused his son's inju(...TRUNCATED) | "Alternatively, maybe the answer is yes because the delay directly led to the neighbor taking the ki(...TRUNCATED) | "Okay, let's try to tackle this question. So the problem is asking whether Joe caused his son's inju(...TRUNCATED) | "Alternatively, if the question is purely about the causal chain regardless of intent, then maybe ye(...TRUNCATED) | "Okay, let's try to tackle this question. So the problem is asking whether Joe caused his son's inju(...TRUNCATED) | "Alternatively, the fact that the drunk driver is an intervening cause would mean that Joe's action (...TRUNCATED) | "Okay, let's try to tackle this question. So the problem is asking whether Joe caused his son's inju(...TRUNCATED) | "Alternatively, if the question is purely about the causal chain regardless of intent, then maybe ye(...TRUNCATED) | "Okay, let's try to tackle this question. So the problem is asking whether Joe caused his son's inju(...TRUNCATED) | "Alternatively, the problem might be expecting the answer to focus on the fact that the drunk driver(...TRUNCATED) | "Okay, let's try to tackle this question. So the problem is asking whether Joe caused his son's inju(...TRUNCATED) | "Alternatively, if the question is purely about the causal chain regardless of intent, then maybe ye(...TRUNCATED) | "Okay, let's try to tackle this question. So the problem is asking whether Joe caused his son's inju(...TRUNCATED) | "Alternatively, maybe the answer is yes because the sequence connects his action to the injury throu(...TRUNCATED) | "Okay, let's try to tackle this question. So the problem is asking whether Joe caused his son's inju(...TRUNCATED) | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causation?\nRepresentatives(...TRUNCATED) | No | "Okay, let's see. The question is about whether the board intentionally helped the environment when (...TRUNCATED) | "یا maybe not? Let me think through the details again.\n\nFirst, the R&D said the program would do(...TRUNCATED) | "Okay, let's see. The question is about whether the board intentionally helped the environment when (...TRUNCATED) | "But that might be reading too much into it. Alternatively, maybe the program's environmental benefi(...TRUNCATED) | "Okay, let's see. The question is about whether the board intentionally helped the environment when (...TRUNCATED) | "But that's maybe overinterpreting. Alternatively, maybe the fact that the program was chosen becaus(...TRUNCATED) | "Okay, let's see. The question is about whether the board intentionally helped the environment when (...TRUNCATED) | "Or perhaps the program's design by R&D included both benefits, so by approving it for profit, they (...TRUNCATED) | "Okay, let's see. The question is about whether the board intentionally helped the environment when (...TRUNCATED) | "But that might be reading too much into it. Alternatively, maybe the program's primary goal was pro(...TRUNCATED) | "Okay, let's see. The question is about whether the board intentionally helped the environment when (...TRUNCATED) | "But that might be reading too much into it. Alternatively, maybe the program's environmental benefi(...TRUNCATED) | "Okay, let's see. The question is about whether the board intentionally helped the environment when (...TRUNCATED) | "But that might be reading too much into it. Alternatively, maybe the program's design by R&D was su(...TRUNCATED) | "Okay, let's see. The question is about whether the board intentionally helped the environment when (...TRUNCATED) | "But that might be reading too much into it. Alternatively, maybe the program's design by R&D includ(...TRUNCATED) | "Okay, let's see. The question is about whether the board intentionally helped the environment when (...TRUNCATED) | "Or maybe the program's design inherently required that, so their choice to proceed was the cause of(...TRUNCATED) | "Okay, let's see. The question is about whether the board intentionally helped the environment when (...TRUNCATED) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causation?\nJanet is an emp(...TRUNCATED) | Yes | "Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether Janet not putting oil in the machine(...TRUNCATED) | "Wait, but the problem states that when Janet didn't put oil in, it's Kate's responsibility? Wait no(...TRUNCATED) | "Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether Janet not putting oil in the machine(...TRUNCATED) | "So the answer would be No, because Kate should have taken over the responsibility since Janet didn'(...TRUNCATED) | "Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether Janet not putting oil in the machine(...TRUNCATED) | "So the answer would be No, because Kate had the responsibility (even though her official role might(...TRUNCATED) | "Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether Janet not putting oil in the machine(...TRUNCATED) | "So the answer would be \"No,\" Janet's failure didn't cause the breakdown because Kate had the resp(...TRUNCATED) | "Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether Janet not putting oil in the machine(...TRUNCATED) | "Alternatively, maybe the idea is that since Kate was also capable, the responsibility was shared? B(...TRUNCATED) | "Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether Janet not putting oil in the machine(...TRUNCATED) | "Alternatively, maybe the logic is that since Janet was the one responsible, but Kate had the capabi(...TRUNCATED) | "Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether Janet not putting oil in the machine(...TRUNCATED) | "So the answer would be no. \n\nAlternatively, maybe the argument is that since Kate could have done(...TRUNCATED) | "Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether Janet not putting oil in the machine(...TRUNCATED) | "So the answer would be No, because Kate had the responsibility (even though her official role is HR(...TRUNCATED) | "Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether Janet not putting oil in the machine(...TRUNCATED) | "So the answer would be No, because Kate had the responsibility (even though her official role isn't(...TRUNCATED) | "Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether Janet not putting oil in the machine(...TRUNCATED) | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causation?\nTom has a huge (...TRUNCATED) | No | "Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether the fertilization by Alex caused the(...TRUNCATED) | "گراهی, but wait, Benni says he used B Y33R instead because he had some left. Oh right, so the (...TRUNCATED) | "Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether the fertilization by Alex caused the(...TRUNCATED) | "Wait, but the problem states that the drying happened where both were used. So the combination of b(...TRUNCATED) | "Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether the fertilization by Alex caused the(...TRUNCATED) | "Wait, but the problem states that the drying happened where both chemicals were used. So the combin(...TRUNCATED) | "Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether the fertilization by Alex caused the(...TRUNCATED) | "Wait, but the problem says that the drying happened where both were used. So the problem is that bo(...TRUNCATED) | "Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether the fertilization by Alex caused the(...TRUNCATED) | "Wait, but the problem states that the drying happened where both were used. So the combination of b(...TRUNCATED) | "Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether the fertilization by Alex caused the(...TRUNCATED) | "Wait, but the problem states that the drying happened where both were used. So the combination of A(...TRUNCATED) | "Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether the fertilization by Alex caused the(...TRUNCATED) | "Wait, but the problem states that the drying happened where both were used. So the combination of b(...TRUNCATED) | "Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether the fertilization by Alex caused the(...TRUNCATED) | "Wait, but the problem says that the drying happened where both were used. So the problem's setup is(...TRUNCATED) | "Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether the fertilization by Alex caused the(...TRUNCATED) | "Wait, but the problem states that the drying happened where both chemicals were used. So the combin(...TRUNCATED) | "Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether the fertilization by Alex caused the(...TRUNCATED) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causation?\nDrew, Kylie, Ol(...TRUNCATED) | No | "Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether Drew ordering coffee on Tuesday caus(...TRUNCATED) | "گریزی? Wait, no. Wait, hold on. Wait, the problem says that \"only one person ordering coffee (...TRUNCATED) | "Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether Drew ordering coffee on Tuesday caus(...TRUNCATED) | "Wait, but that might not be right. Since the profit is guaranteed with just one order, and the thre(...TRUNCATED) | "Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether Drew ordering coffee on Tuesday caus(...TRUNCATED) | "Wait, but that's conflicting. Let me think again.\n\nThe problem states that \"the coffee shop will(...TRUNCATED) | "Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether Drew ordering coffee on Tuesday caus(...TRUNCATED) | "Wait, but that's conflicting. Let me think again.\n\nThe problem states that the coffee shop makes (...TRUNCATED) | "Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether Drew ordering coffee on Tuesday caus(...TRUNCATED) | "Wait, but if the shop only needs one order, then even if all three regulars come, the profit is mad(...TRUNCATED) | "Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether Drew ordering coffee on Tuesday caus(...TRUNCATED) | "Wait, but if the shop only needs one order, then even if all four ordered, the profit is made, but (...TRUNCATED) | "Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether Drew ordering coffee on Tuesday caus(...TRUNCATED) | "Wait, but if the shop only needs one order, then the profit would have been made even if only one o(...TRUNCATED) | "Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether Drew ordering coffee on Tuesday caus(...TRUNCATED) | "Wait, but if the shop only needs one order, then even if all three regulars (Kylie, Oliver, Jen) or(...TRUNCATED) | "Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether Drew ordering coffee on Tuesday caus(...TRUNCATED) | "Wait, but that might not be right. Since the profit is made as long as at least one person orders. (...TRUNCATED) | "Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether Drew ordering coffee on Tuesday caus(...TRUNCATED) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causation?\nJoe was about t(...TRUNCATED) | Yes | "Okay, let's see. The question is whether the drunk driver caused injury to Joe's son. The options a(...TRUNCATED) | "But the question is specifically asking if the drunk driver caused the injury. So even if Joe's act(...TRUNCATED) | "Okay, let's see. The question is whether the drunk driver caused injury to Joe's son. The options a(...TRUNCATED) | "Wait, but maybe the question is more about whether the drunk driver's action was the actual cause. (...TRUNCATED) | "Okay, let's see. The question is whether the drunk driver caused injury to Joe's son. The options a(...TRUNCATED) | "Wait, but the question might be getting at the idea of cause vs. proximate cause. Maybe the questio(...TRUNCATED) | "Okay, let's see. The question is whether the drunk driver caused injury to Joe's son. The options a(...TRUNCATED) | "Wait, but maybe the question is more about whether the drunk driver's action was the actual cause. (...TRUNCATED) | "Okay, let's see. The question is whether the drunk driver caused injury to Joe's son. The options a(...TRUNCATED) | "Wait, but maybe the question is more about whether the drunk driver's action was the actual cause. (...TRUNCATED) | "Okay, let's see. The question is whether the drunk driver caused injury to Joe's son. The options a(...TRUNCATED) | "Wait, but the question might be getting at the underlying cause. The problem states that Joe's talk(...TRUNCATED) | "Okay, let's see. The question is whether the drunk driver caused injury to Joe's son. The options a(...TRUNCATED) | "Wait, but the question might be getting at the underlying cause. The problem states that Joe's talk(...TRUNCATED) | "Okay, let's see. The question is whether the drunk driver caused injury to Joe's son. The options a(...TRUNCATED) | "Wait, but the question might be getting at the underlying cause. The problem states that Joe's talk(...TRUNCATED) | "Okay, let's see. The question is whether the drunk driver caused injury to Joe's son. The options a(...TRUNCATED) | "Wait, but the question might be getting at the underlying cause. The problem states that Joe's talk(...TRUNCATED) | "Okay, let's see. The question is whether the drunk driver caused injury to Joe's son. The options a(...TRUNCATED) | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causation?\nProf. Smith wor(...TRUNCATED) | No | "Okay, let's try to tackle this question. Hmm, so the problem is about causation between the departm(...TRUNCATED) | "But hold on, no—because the IT approval was already there. The fact that both approved her doesn'(...TRUNCATED) | "Okay, let's try to tackle this question. Hmm, so the problem is about causation between the departm(...TRUNCATED) | "Because even without the budget committee's approval, she would have already gotten it through IT. (...TRUNCATED) | "Okay, let's try to tackle this question. Hmm, so the problem is about causation between the departm(...TRUNCATED) | "Because even without the budget committee's approval, she would have already gotten it through IT. (...TRUNCATED) | "Okay, let's try to tackle this question. Hmm, so the problem is about causation between the departm(...TRUNCATED) | "Alternatively, maybe the question is a bit trickier. Let me parse the exact wording again. The ques(...TRUNCATED) | "Okay, let's try to tackle this question. Hmm, so the problem is about causation between the departm(...TRUNCATED) | "Alternatively, maybe the question is a bit tricky here. Let me parse the exact question again: \"Do(...TRUNCATED) | "Okay, let's try to tackle this question. Hmm, so the problem is about causation between the departm(...TRUNCATED) | "Alternatively, maybe the question is trying to trick me. Let me parse the question again: \"Does th(...TRUNCATED) | "Okay, let's try to tackle this question. Hmm, so the problem is about causation between the departm(...TRUNCATED) | "Alternatively, maybe the question is trying to trick us. Let me parse the exact wording again. The (...TRUNCATED) | "Okay, let's try to tackle this question. Hmm, so the problem is about causation between the departm(...TRUNCATED) | "Because even without the budget committee's approval, she would have gotten it through IT. \n\nBut (...TRUNCATED) | "Okay, let's try to tackle this question. Hmm, so the problem is about causation between the departm(...TRUNCATED) | "Alternatively, maybe the question is trying to trick us. Let me parse the question again: \"Does th(...TRUNCATED) | "Okay, let's try to tackle this question. Hmm, so the problem is about causation between the departm(...TRUNCATED) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causation?\nJanet is an emp(...TRUNCATED) | Yes | "Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether Janet not putting oil in the machine(...TRUNCATED) | "گراهششده maybe? Wait, but the problem states that Janet's responsibility is to put oil, and(...TRUNCATED) | "Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether Janet not putting oil in the machine(...TRUNCATED) | "Wait, but Janet's inaction left the machine without oil, which is a necessary condition for the bre(...TRUNCATED) | "Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether Janet not putting oil in the machine(...TRUNCATED) | "Wait, but the question is specifically asking if Janet's not putting oil caused it. \n\nAlternative(...TRUNCATED) | "Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether Janet not putting oil in the machine(...TRUNCATED) | "Wait, but the oil was supposed to be Janet's responsibility. If Janet didn't do it, and Kate didn't(...TRUNCATED) | "Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether Janet not putting oil in the machine(...TRUNCATED) | "Wait, but Janet's inaction created the situation where the oil was missing. However, since Kate had(...TRUNCATED) | "Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether Janet not putting oil in the machine(...TRUNCATED) | "Wait, but Janet's failure to oil was the initial problem. However, since Kate could have done it bu(...TRUNCATED) | "Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether Janet not putting oil in the machine(...TRUNCATED) | "Wait, but the oil was supposed to be Janet's responsibility. If she didn't do it, and Kate didn't d(...TRUNCATED) | "Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether Janet not putting oil in the machine(...TRUNCATED) | "Wait, but Janet's inaction meant that the oil wasn't there. However, if Kate was supposed to check (...TRUNCATED) | "Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether Janet not putting oil in the machine(...TRUNCATED) | "Wait, but the problem says that Kate didn't notice that Janet didn't put the oil. So if Kate had no(...TRUNCATED) | "Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether Janet not putting oil in the machine(...TRUNCATED) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causation?\nTom works for a(...TRUNCATED) | Yes | "Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether the building imploded because Tom ch(...TRUNCATED) | "ִילך Let me think again. \n\nWait, the key here is the conditions for the implosion. The implos(...TRUNCATED) | "Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether the building imploded because Tom ch(...TRUNCATED) | "Wait, no, wait. Wait a second. Wait, the problem says that the implosion happens if both the safety(...TRUNCATED) | "Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether the building imploded because Tom ch(...TRUNCATED) | "Wait, no—wait, wait. Wait, hold on. Let me check again.\n\nWait the problem says: \"the building (...TRUNCATED) | "Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether the building imploded because Tom ch(...TRUNCATED) | "Wait, no, wait a second. Wait, if the safety switch was already off at 4 PM, then if knob A had rem(...TRUNCATED) | "Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether the building imploded because Tom ch(...TRUNCATED) | "Wait, no. Wait, no—if the knob was off at 4 PM, then before Tom changed it, the two conditions (s(...TRUNCATED) | "Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether the building imploded because Tom ch(...TRUNCATED) | "Wait, no—if the knob was off at 4 PM, then if Tom hadn't turned it on, then at 5 PM, the two cond(...TRUNCATED) | "Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether the building imploded because Tom ch(...TRUNCATED) | "Wait, no—wait, no, because when the safety was off and knob A was on, that's the trigger. Wait, b(...TRUNCATED) | "Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether the building imploded because Tom ch(...TRUNCATED) | "Wait, no, wait a second. Wait, hold on. Wait the problem says \"the building will implode automatic(...TRUNCATED) | "Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether the building imploded because Tom ch(...TRUNCATED) | "Wait, no—wait a second. Wait, the problem says that the building would implode automatically at 5(...TRUNCATED) | "Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether the building imploded because Tom ch(...TRUNCATED) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causation?\nIn a particular(...TRUNCATED) | No | "Okay, let's see. The question is about whether the design studio employees caused the climate contr(...TRUNCATED) | "But wait, the travel agency employees also arrived at 8:45, which they usually do. The key here is (...TRUNCATED) | "Okay, let's see. The question is about whether the design studio employees caused the climate contr(...TRUNCATED) | "Wait no, because the travel agency employees did arrive at the usual time. Wait the problem says \"(...TRUNCATED) | "Okay, let's see. The question is about whether the design studio employees caused the climate contr(...TRUNCATED) | "Wait no, because the travel agency employees were already there at 8:45. So the system would have t(...TRUNCATED) | "Okay, let's see. The question is about whether the design studio employees caused the climate contr(...TRUNCATED) | "Wait no, because the travel agency employees did arrive at 8:45 as usual. So the system would have (...TRUNCATED) | "Okay, let's see. The question is about whether the design studio employees caused the climate contr(...TRUNCATED) | "Wait no, because the travel agency employees were already there at 8:45. Wait, the problem says \"t(...TRUNCATED) | "Okay, let's see. The question is about whether the design studio employees caused the climate contr(...TRUNCATED) | "Wait no, because the travel agency employees did arrive at the same time. Wait, but if the system o(...TRUNCATED) | "Okay, let's see. The question is about whether the design studio employees caused the climate contr(...TRUNCATED) | "Wait, no. Wait, the travel agency employees arrived at 8:45 as usual. So normally, the system would(...TRUNCATED) | "Okay, let's see. The question is about whether the design studio employees caused the climate contr(...TRUNCATED) | "Wait no, because the travel agency employees were there at the same time. Wait the problem states t(...TRUNCATED) | "Okay, let's see. The question is about whether the design studio employees caused the climate contr(...TRUNCATED) | "Wait no, because the travel agency employees did arrive at 8:45 as usual. So their arrival would ha(...TRUNCATED) | "Okay, let's see. The question is about whether the design studio employees caused the climate contr(...TRUNCATED) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
End of preview. Expand in Data Studio
README.md exists but content is empty.
- Downloads last month
- 5