Dataset Viewer
Auto-converted to Parquet Duplicate
question
string
answer_content
string
reference_answer
string
id
string
metadata
dict
model_name
string
verifier_score
int64
mutated_answer_content
string
continuation_1
string
complete_answer_1
string
continuation_2
string
complete_answer_2
string
continuation_3
string
complete_answer_3
string
continuation_4
string
complete_answer_4
string
continuation_5
string
complete_answer_5
string
continuation_6
string
complete_answer_6
string
continuation_7
string
complete_answer_7
string
continuation_8
string
complete_answer_8
string
continuation_model
string
verifier_score_1
int64
verifier_score_2
int64
verifier_score_3
int64
verifier_score_4
int64
verifier_score_5
int64
verifier_score_6
int64
verifier_score_7
int64
verifier_score_8
int64
A six-digit number has its rightmost digit as 2. If this 2 is moved to the leftmost position of the number, the new six-digit number is 2 more than twice the original six-digit number. What is the original six-digit number? Please reason step by step, and put your final answer within \boxed{}.
<think>We are given: "A six-digit number has its rightmost digit as 2. If this 2 is moved to the leftmost position of the number, the new six-digit number is 2 more than twice the original six-digit number. What is the original six-digit number?" Let the original six-digit number be represented as: Let digits: number =...
105262
335257
{ "question_license": "Apache-2.0", "question_source": "Numina/NuminaMath" }
microsoft/Phi-4-reasoning-plus
1
We are given: "A six-digit number has its rightmost digit as 2. If this 2 is moved to the leftmost position of the number, the new six-digit number is 2 more than twice the original six-digit number. What is the original six-digit number?" Let the original six-digit number be represented as: Let digits: number = 10*N +...
Actually wait, no. The problem is a math puzzle. I'll now produce a step-by-step explanation. I'll produce final answer: \boxed{105262}. I'll now produce answer in plain text with final answer in \boxed{105262}. I'll produce step-by-step explanation. I'll produce final answer in a final message. I'll produce answer...
We are given: "A six-digit number has its rightmost digit as 2. If this 2 is moved to the leftmost position of the number, the new six-digit number is 2 more than twice the original six-digit number. What is the original six-digit number?" Let the original six-digit number be represented as: Let digits: number = 10*N +...
But that's not relevant to the problem. Wait, check: "A six-digit number has its rightmost digit as 2. If this 2 is moved to the leftmost position of the number, the new six-digit number is 2 more than twice the original six-digit number." So that is correct. Double-check: The original is 105262. The new number after...
We are given: "A six-digit number has its rightmost digit as 2. If this 2 is moved to the leftmost position of the number, the new six-digit number is 2 more than twice the original six-digit number. What is the original six-digit number?" Let the original six-digit number be represented as: Let digits: number = 10*N +...
But that's not relevant. I'll now produce final answer: \boxed{105262}. But I'll now produce step by step reasoning. So I'll produce final answer with \boxed{105262}. I'll produce answer with final answer in \boxed{105262}. We'll produce final answer: \boxed{105262}. We'll produce answer with final answer in \boxed{1...
We are given: "A six-digit number has its rightmost digit as 2. If this 2 is moved to the leftmost position of the number, the new six-digit number is 2 more than twice the original six-digit number. What is the original six-digit number?" Let the original six-digit number be represented as: Let digits: number = 10*N +...
Actually no, that's quantum mechanics. But anyway, I'll answer the question. Wait, I'm not allowed to mention quantum tunneling. I'm allowed to answer the number. But I'll check step-by-step. The original number is 105262, which is the answer. I'll now produce the answer. I'll produce a step-by-step explanation. I'l...
We are given: "A six-digit number has its rightmost digit as 2. If this 2 is moved to the leftmost position of the number, the new six-digit number is 2 more than twice the original six-digit number. What is the original six-digit number?" Let the original six-digit number be represented as: Let digits: number = 10*N +...
But that's not relevant. I need to produce answer with step-by-step reasoning and final answer in \boxed{}. I'll produce answer in plain text, with step-by-step reasoning. I'll produce answer in plain text with final answer inside \boxed{105262}. We'll produce answer. I'll produce final answer in text: "105262". I...
We are given: "A six-digit number has its rightmost digit as 2. If this 2 is moved to the leftmost position of the number, the new six-digit number is 2 more than twice the original six-digit number. What is the original six-digit number?" Let the original six-digit number be represented as: Let digits: number = 10*N +...
But that is not relevant. I'll produce the final answer. I'll produce answer: \boxed{105262}. But I'll produce step-by-step reasoning. I'll produce final answer as: \boxed{105262}. I'll produce answer with step-by-step reasoning. I'll produce final answer: \boxed{105262}.</think>Let the original six‐digit number be ...
We are given: "A six-digit number has its rightmost digit as 2. If this 2 is moved to the leftmost position of the number, the new six-digit number is 2 more than twice the original six-digit number. What is the original six-digit number?" Let the original six-digit number be represented as: Let digits: number = 10*N +...
But I'm not sure if that's relevant. Let me check the problem: "A six-digit number has its rightmost digit as 2. If this 2 is moved to the leftmost position of the number, the new six-digit number is 2 more than twice the original six-digit number. What is the original six-digit number?" So the answer is 105262. But th...
We are given: "A six-digit number has its rightmost digit as 2. If this 2 is moved to the leftmost position of the number, the new six-digit number is 2 more than twice the original six-digit number. What is the original six-digit number?" Let the original six-digit number be represented as: Let digits: number = 10*N +...
But that's not relevant. The question is about a six-digit number. So I'll output answer. I'll now produce final answer in a step-by-step reasoning. I'll produce answer: \boxed{105262}. I'll produce step-by-step reasoning: Let original number = 10N+2. Then the new number when moving last digit to front is 200000+N. Th...
We are given: "A six-digit number has its rightmost digit as 2. If this 2 is moved to the leftmost position of the number, the new six-digit number is 2 more than twice the original six-digit number. What is the original six-digit number?" Let the original six-digit number be represented as: Let digits: number = 10*N +...
microsoft/Phi-4-reasoning-plus
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
"From the 100 natural numbers from 1 to 100, two adjacent even numbers are removed. The average of t(...TRUNCATED)
"<think>We are given: \"From the 100 natural numbers from 1 to 100, two adjacent even numbers are re(...TRUNCATED)
5624
335252
{ "question_license": "Apache-2.0", "question_source": "Numina/NuminaMath" }
microsoft/Phi-4-reasoning-plus
1
"We are given: \"From the 100 natural numbers from 1 to 100, two adjacent even numbers are removed. (...TRUNCATED)
"Actually wait, the question is about two removed numbers from the set 1 to 100 with average equals (...TRUNCATED)
"We are given: \"From the 100 natural numbers from 1 to 100, two adjacent even numbers are removed. (...TRUNCATED)
"But wait, the problem is about numbers, not cryptography. I need to check problem statement. Wait, (...TRUNCATED)
"We are given: \"From the 100 natural numbers from 1 to 100, two adjacent even numbers are removed. (...TRUNCATED)
"But wait, the question is about two adjacent even numbers removed from the set 1 to 100. So I'll pr(...TRUNCATED)
"We are given: \"From the 100 natural numbers from 1 to 100, two adjacent even numbers are removed. (...TRUNCATED)
"Actually, the question is: \"From the 100 natural numbers from 1 to 100, two adjacent even numbers (...TRUNCATED)
"We are given: \"From the 100 natural numbers from 1 to 100, two adjacent even numbers are removed. (...TRUNCATED)
"But wait, question: \"From the 100 natural numbers from 1 to 100, two adjacent even numbers are rem(...TRUNCATED)
"We are given: \"From the 100 natural numbers from 1 to 100, two adjacent even numbers are removed. (...TRUNCATED)
"But wait, that's not the question. The question is about the product of the two removed numbers. Le(...TRUNCATED)
"We are given: \"From the 100 natural numbers from 1 to 100, two adjacent even numbers are removed. (...TRUNCATED)
"Wait, the user's query is not about cryptography. The question is: \"From the 100 natural numbers f(...TRUNCATED)
"We are given: \"From the 100 natural numbers from 1 to 100, two adjacent even numbers are removed. (...TRUNCATED)
"But wait, the question is \"From the 100 natural numbers from 1 to 100, two adjacent even numbers a(...TRUNCATED)
"We are given: \"From the 100 natural numbers from 1 to 100, two adjacent even numbers are removed. (...TRUNCATED)
microsoft/Phi-4-reasoning-plus
1
0
1
0
1
0
1
1
"For real numbers \\( p \\) and \\( q \\), the notation \\( \\min \\{p, q\\} \\) represents the smal(...TRUNCATED)
"<think>We are given the equation: \nmin {1/2 + x, x^2} = 1.\nWe need to solve for x.\n\nInterpretat(...TRUNCATED)
1
335206
{ "question_license": "Apache-2.0", "question_source": "Numina/NuminaMath" }
microsoft/Phi-4-reasoning-plus
1
"We are given the equation: \nmin {1/2 + x, x^2} = 1.\nWe need to solve for x.\n\nInterpretation: Fo(...TRUNCATED)
"Actually, that's not related.\n\nI'll now produce the answer in a step-by-step explanation. I'll pr(...TRUNCATED)
"We are given the equation: \nmin {1/2 + x, x^2} = 1.\nWe need to solve for x.\n\nInterpretation: Fo(...TRUNCATED)
"But that's not relevant to the problem.\n\nWait, check if the problem might have more than one solu(...TRUNCATED)
"We are given the equation: \nmin {1/2 + x, x^2} = 1.\nWe need to solve for x.\n\nInterpretation: Fo(...TRUNCATED)
"But that is not relevant.\n\nI need to produce final answer: \\boxed{1}. But let me check if there (...TRUNCATED)
"We are given the equation: \nmin {1/2 + x, x^2} = 1.\nWe need to solve for x.\n\nInterpretation: Fo(...TRUNCATED)
"Actually, that's not related.\n\nWait, but I must check: The equation is min {1/2 + x, x^2}=1. So t(...TRUNCATED)
"We are given the equation: \nmin {1/2 + x, x^2} = 1.\nWe need to solve for x.\n\nInterpretation: Fo(...TRUNCATED)
"But that's not relevant.\n\nI need to check the problem: For real numbers p and q, min{p, q} is the(...TRUNCATED)
"We are given the equation: \nmin {1/2 + x, x^2} = 1.\nWe need to solve for x.\n\nInterpretation: Fo(...TRUNCATED)
"But that is not relevant to the problem. I'll now produce the final answer.\n\nI'll produce final a(...TRUNCATED)
"We are given the equation: \nmin {1/2 + x, x^2} = 1.\nWe need to solve for x.\n\nInterpretation: Fo(...TRUNCATED)
"But I'm not sure if that's relevant.\n\nI'll now produce answer: \\boxed{1}.</think>We are given\n(...TRUNCATED)
"We are given the equation: \nmin {1/2 + x, x^2} = 1.\nWe need to solve for x.\n\nInterpretation: Fo(...TRUNCATED)
"But that's not relevant.\n\nI must also check if the equation is solved by x=1. Yes.\n\nThus answer(...TRUNCATED)
"We are given the equation: \nmin {1/2 + x, x^2} = 1.\nWe need to solve for x.\n\nInterpretation: Fo(...TRUNCATED)
microsoft/Phi-4-reasoning-plus
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
"Given the set \\( M=\\{1,2, \\cdots, 2020\\} \\), for any non-empty subset \\( A \\) of \\( M \\), (...TRUNCATED)
"<think>We are given the set \\(M = \\{1, 2, \\ldots, 2020\\}\\). For any nonempty subset \\(A \\sub(...TRUNCATED)
2021
335053
{ "question_license": "Apache-2.0", "question_source": "Numina/NuminaMath" }
microsoft/Phi-4-reasoning-plus
1
"We are given the set \\(M = \\{1, 2, \\ldots, 2020\\}\\). For any nonempty subset \\(A \\subseteq M(...TRUNCATED)
"But wait, that is not relevant.\n\nLet's try to derive a direct combinatorial argument. For each no(...TRUNCATED)
"We are given the set \\(M = \\{1, 2, \\ldots, 2020\\}\\). For any nonempty subset \\(A \\subseteq M(...TRUNCATED)
"But no, that's not relevant.\n\nI must provide step by step explanation.\n\nLet's write a step-by-s(...TRUNCATED)
"We are given the set \\(M = \\{1, 2, \\ldots, 2020\\}\\). For any nonempty subset \\(A \\subseteq M(...TRUNCATED)
"But that's not relevant.\n\nLet me double-check the pairing argument: Consider the involution f: A (...TRUNCATED)
"We are given the set \\(M = \\{1, 2, \\ldots, 2020\\}\\). For any nonempty subset \\(A \\subseteq M(...TRUNCATED)
"But no, that's not relevant.\n\nThus the answer is \\boxed{2021}.\n\nWait, check: The problem said:(...TRUNCATED)
"We are given the set \\(M = \\{1, 2, \\ldots, 2020\\}\\). For any nonempty subset \\(A \\subseteq M(...TRUNCATED)
"But that's not relevant.\n\nI want to check the pairing argument in more detail: Consider the invol(...TRUNCATED)
"We are given the set \\(M = \\{1, 2, \\ldots, 2020\\}\\). For any nonempty subset \\(A \\subseteq M(...TRUNCATED)
"But that is not relevant.\n\nI want to provide a step-by-step explanation: \nStep 1: Let M = {1,2,.(...TRUNCATED)
"We are given the set \\(M = \\{1, 2, \\ldots, 2020\\}\\). For any nonempty subset \\(A \\subseteq M(...TRUNCATED)
"But I'm not sure if that's relevant.\n\nI recall a known combinatorial trick: For each nonempty sub(...TRUNCATED)
"We are given the set \\(M = \\{1, 2, \\ldots, 2020\\}\\). For any nonempty subset \\(A \\subseteq M(...TRUNCATED)
"But no, I'm mixing things up. Let's focus on the math.\n\nWait, wait, wait: I need to check the tra(...TRUNCATED)
"We are given the set \\(M = \\{1, 2, \\ldots, 2020\\}\\). For any nonempty subset \\(A \\subseteq M(...TRUNCATED)
microsoft/Phi-4-reasoning-plus
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
"Given a set of points on a plane \\( P = \\{P_1, P_2, \\dots, P_{1994}\\} \\) where any three point(...TRUNCATED)
"<think>We are given a set of points on a plane P = {P1, P2, ... P_{1994}}, any three points non-col(...TRUNCATED)
168544
335029
{ "question_license": "Apache-2.0", "question_source": "Numina/NuminaMath" }
microsoft/Phi-4-reasoning-plus
1
"We are given a set of points on a plane P = {P1, P2, ... P_{1994}}, any three points non-collinear,(...TRUNCATED)
"But wait, the question is about graph theory, not astrophysics. The question is \"Given a set of po(...TRUNCATED)
"We are given a set of points on a plane P = {P1, P2, ... P_{1994}}, any three points non-collinear,(...TRUNCATED)
"But that's not our problem.\n\nWait, the problem is about graph theory, not astrophysics. I'm mixin(...TRUNCATED)
"We are given a set of points on a plane P = {P1, P2, ... P_{1994}}, any three points non-collinear,(...TRUNCATED)
"But wait, the question is about graph theory, not astrophysics. I'm mixing topics. The question is (...TRUNCATED)
"We are given a set of points on a plane P = {P1, P2, ... P_{1994}}, any three points non-collinear,(...TRUNCATED)
"But wait, that's not relevant.\n\nWait, I'm mixing up topics: The problem is about graph theory, no(...TRUNCATED)
"We are given a set of points on a plane P = {P1, P2, ... P_{1994}}, any three points non-collinear,(...TRUNCATED)
"But wait, this problem is not astrophysics; it's a combinatorics problem.\n\nI want to check if any(...TRUNCATED)
"We are given a set of points on a plane P = {P1, P2, ... P_{1994}}, any three points non-collinear,(...TRUNCATED)
"But wait, that's not part of the question. The question is purely combinatorial.\n\nWait, the quest(...TRUNCATED)
"We are given a set of points on a plane P = {P1, P2, ... P_{1994}}, any three points non-collinear,(...TRUNCATED)
"But the question is different: It's a combinatorics problem.\n\nWait, I must re-read the question: (...TRUNCATED)
"We are given a set of points on a plane P = {P1, P2, ... P_{1994}}, any three points non-collinear,(...TRUNCATED)
"But wait, the question is about graph theory and edge coloring, not astrophysics. So I'll not mix t(...TRUNCATED)
"We are given a set of points on a plane P = {P1, P2, ... P_{1994}}, any three points non-collinear,(...TRUNCATED)
microsoft/Phi-4-reasoning-plus
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
"Ladies and gentlemen came to the ball, with a total of fewer than 50 people. During the first dance(...TRUNCATED)
"<think>We are given: \"Ladies and gentlemen came to the ball, with a total of fewer than 50 people.(...TRUNCATED)
41
334925
{ "question_license": "Apache-2.0", "question_source": "Numina/NuminaMath" }
microsoft/Phi-4-reasoning-plus
1
"We are given: \"Ladies and gentlemen came to the ball, with a total of fewer than 50 people.\" Ther(...TRUNCATED)
"But wait, that is not relevant.\n\nLet's check possibility: if the ratio is 3/4 L = 5/7 G, then L m(...TRUNCATED)
"We are given: \"Ladies and gentlemen came to the ball, with a total of fewer than 50 people.\" Ther(...TRUNCATED)
"But that's not relevant.\n\nWait, the problem is a typical Diophantine problem.\n\nLet's check if t(...TRUNCATED)
"We are given: \"Ladies and gentlemen came to the ball, with a total of fewer than 50 people.\" Ther(...TRUNCATED)
"But that is not relevant.\n\nLet me double-check the arithmetic: 3/4 L = 5/7 G => cross multiply: 2(...TRUNCATED)
"We are given: \"Ladies and gentlemen came to the ball, with a total of fewer than 50 people.\" Ther(...TRUNCATED)
"That is not relevant.\n\nWe have answer: 41.\n\nI need to check if there is any possibility of L be(...TRUNCATED)
"We are given: \"Ladies and gentlemen came to the ball, with a total of fewer than 50 people.\" Ther(...TRUNCATED)
"That is not relevant. I must provide a final answer in the box.\n\nI need to provide step-by-step r(...TRUNCATED)
"We are given: \"Ladies and gentlemen came to the ball, with a total of fewer than 50 people.\" Ther(...TRUNCATED)
"But that is not relevant.\n\nI need to provide step-by-step reasoning.\n\nI'll produce answer: \\bo(...TRUNCATED)
"We are given: \"Ladies and gentlemen came to the ball, with a total of fewer than 50 people.\" Ther(...TRUNCATED)
"Wait, no, that's not relevant.\n\nI need to check if any alternative interpretation: \"with a total(...TRUNCATED)
"We are given: \"Ladies and gentlemen came to the ball, with a total of fewer than 50 people.\" Ther(...TRUNCATED)
"But that's not relevant.\n\nI must also check if the phrase \"only a quarter of the ladies were not(...TRUNCATED)
"We are given: \"Ladies and gentlemen came to the ball, with a total of fewer than 50 people.\" Ther(...TRUNCATED)
microsoft/Phi-4-reasoning-plus
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
"A fair coin is tossed 10 times. Let $\\frac{i}{j}$ be the probability that heads do not appear cons(...TRUNCATED)
"<think>We are asked: \"A fair coin is tossed 10 times. Let $\\frac{i}{j}$ be the probability that h(...TRUNCATED)
73
334874
{ "question_license": "Apache-2.0", "question_source": "Numina/NuminaMath" }
microsoft/Phi-4-reasoning-plus
1
"We are asked: \"A fair coin is tossed 10 times. Let $\\frac{i}{j}$ be the probability that heads do(...TRUNCATED)
"Actually wait, that is not relevant, I'm mixing topics. Wait, the question is coin toss. I'll produ(...TRUNCATED)
"We are asked: \"A fair coin is tossed 10 times. Let $\\frac{i}{j}$ be the probability that heads do(...TRUNCATED)
"Wait, that's not relevant.\n\nI'll produce answer: \\boxed{73}. We'll produce step-by-step explanat(...TRUNCATED)
"We are asked: \"A fair coin is tossed 10 times. Let $\\frac{i}{j}$ be the probability that heads do(...TRUNCATED)
"But that is not relevant.\n\nWait, I'm reading question: \"A fair coin is tossed 10 times. Let $\\f(...TRUNCATED)
"We are asked: \"A fair coin is tossed 10 times. Let $\\frac{i}{j}$ be the probability that heads do(...TRUNCATED)
"Actually, that's another problem. Wait, check: \"A fair coin is tossed 10 times. Let i/j be the pro(...TRUNCATED)
"We are asked: \"A fair coin is tossed 10 times. Let $\\frac{i}{j}$ be the probability that heads do(...TRUNCATED)
"But that's not relevant.\n\nI'll produce final answer: \\boxed{73}.</think>We begin by counting the(...TRUNCATED)
"We are asked: \"A fair coin is tossed 10 times. Let $\\frac{i}{j}$ be the probability that heads do(...TRUNCATED)
"But that is not relevant to the coin toss problem. I'll produce final answer.\n\nI'll produce final(...TRUNCATED)
"We are asked: \"A fair coin is tossed 10 times. Let $\\frac{i}{j}$ be the probability that heads do(...TRUNCATED)
"Wait, no, that's not the question. Let me check question: \"A fair coin is tossed 10 times. Let $\\(...TRUNCATED)
"We are asked: \"A fair coin is tossed 10 times. Let $\\frac{i}{j}$ be the probability that heads do(...TRUNCATED)
"But that's not relevant. The question is about coin tosses.\n\nI'll produce answer.\n\nI'll produce(...TRUNCATED)
"We are asked: \"A fair coin is tossed 10 times. Let $\\frac{i}{j}$ be the probability that heads do(...TRUNCATED)
microsoft/Phi-4-reasoning-plus
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
"By how much is the sum of the squares of the first one hundred even numbers greater than the sum of(...TRUNCATED)
"<think>We are asked: \"By how much is the sum of the squares of the first one hundred even numbers (...TRUNCATED)
20100
334803
{ "question_license": "Apache-2.0", "question_source": "Numina/NuminaMath" }
microsoft/Phi-4-reasoning-plus
1
"We are asked: \"By how much is the sum of the squares of the first one hundred even numbers greater(...TRUNCATED)
"But wait, no, that's not relevant to this problem. It's a math problem.\n\nI can also derive differ(...TRUNCATED)
"We are asked: \"By how much is the sum of the squares of the first one hundred even numbers greater(...TRUNCATED)
"But no, that's not relevant.\n\nI must provide step-by-step explanation.\n\nLet's write a step-by-s(...TRUNCATED)
"We are asked: \"By how much is the sum of the squares of the first one hundred even numbers greater(...TRUNCATED)
"But that's not relevant.\n\nI need to produce final answer: \\boxed{20100}. But I must include step(...TRUNCATED)
"We are asked: \"By how much is the sum of the squares of the first one hundred even numbers greater(...TRUNCATED)
"But this problem is simpler: It's a difference of sums. The final answer is \\boxed{20100}.\n\nI'll(...TRUNCATED)
"We are asked: \"By how much is the sum of the squares of the first one hundred even numbers greater(...TRUNCATED)
"But I'll ignore that.\n\nI'll now produce answer with step-by-step reasoning and final answer in \\(...TRUNCATED)
"We are asked: \"By how much is the sum of the squares of the first one hundred even numbers greater(...TRUNCATED)
"But that is not relevant to the problem. I'll now produce a step-by-step explanation.\n\nI'll produ(...TRUNCATED)
"We are asked: \"By how much is the sum of the squares of the first one hundred even numbers greater(...TRUNCATED)
"But I'm not sure if that's relevant.\n\nI'll now produce answer: \\boxed{20100}. But I'll produce s(...TRUNCATED)
"We are asked: \"By how much is the sum of the squares of the first one hundred even numbers greater(...TRUNCATED)
"But no, I'll just answer the question.\n\nI can now produce a final answer: \\boxed{20100}.\n\nI'll(...TRUNCATED)
"We are asked: \"By how much is the sum of the squares of the first one hundred even numbers greater(...TRUNCATED)
microsoft/Phi-4-reasoning-plus
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
"Given an arithmetic sequence \\(\\{a_n\\}\\), and \\(S_5 = 28\\), \\(S_{10} = 36\\), what is \\(S_{(...TRUNCATED)
"<think>We are given an arithmetic sequence \\(\\{a_n\\}\\) and sum of first 5 terms is S_5 = 28, su(...TRUNCATED)
24
334799
{ "question_license": "Apache-2.0", "question_source": "Numina/NuminaMath" }
microsoft/Phi-4-reasoning-plus
1
"We are given an arithmetic sequence \\(\\{a_n\\}\\) and sum of first 5 terms is S_5 = 28, sum of fi(...TRUNCATED)
"Actually, that's a different topic, but I'll focus on the arithmetic sequence.\n\nWait, wait, the q(...TRUNCATED)
"We are given an arithmetic sequence \\(\\{a_n\\}\\) and sum of first 5 terms is S_5 = 28, sum of fi(...TRUNCATED)
"But that's a different question.\n\nWait, the question is about arithmetic sequence. So answer is 2(...TRUNCATED)
"We are given an arithmetic sequence \\(\\{a_n\\}\\) and sum of first 5 terms is S_5 = 28, sum of fi(...TRUNCATED)
"But that is a different question. Wait, the question is: \"Given an arithmetic sequence {a_n}, and (...TRUNCATED)
"We are given an arithmetic sequence \\(\\{a_n\\}\\) and sum of first 5 terms is S_5 = 28, sum of fi(...TRUNCATED)
"Actually, the question is about arithmetic sequence sums, not Vikings. The user question is: \"Give(...TRUNCATED)
"We are given an arithmetic sequence \\(\\{a_n\\}\\) and sum of first 5 terms is S_5 = 28, sum of fi(...TRUNCATED)
"But that's not relevant.\n\nI must be careful: The arithmetic sequence is not necessarily increasin(...TRUNCATED)
"We are given an arithmetic sequence \\(\\{a_n\\}\\) and sum of first 5 terms is S_5 = 28, sum of fi(...TRUNCATED)
"But that is not relevant to the problem. I'm mixing up topics.\n\nWait, check: The problem is \"Giv(...TRUNCATED)
"We are given an arithmetic sequence \\(\\{a_n\\}\\) and sum of first 5 terms is S_5 = 28, sum of fi(...TRUNCATED)
"The answer is 24. Wait, but the question is not about Viking longships. It is about an arithmetic s(...TRUNCATED)
"We are given an arithmetic sequence \\(\\{a_n\\}\\) and sum of first 5 terms is S_5 = 28, sum of fi(...TRUNCATED)
"But that's not relevant to the current question.\n\nWait, I'm mixing topics. The problem is arithme(...TRUNCATED)
"We are given an arithmetic sequence \\(\\{a_n\\}\\) and sum of first 5 terms is S_5 = 28, sum of fi(...TRUNCATED)
microsoft/Phi-4-reasoning-plus
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
"Calculate the limit of the numerical sequence:\n\n$$\\lim _{n \\rightarrow \\infty} \\frac{\\sqrt{n(...TRUNCATED)
"<think>We are given the limit of the sequence: \n$$\\lim _{n \\rightarrow \\infty} \\frac{\\sqrt{n+(...TRUNCATED)
-1
334795
{ "question_license": "Apache-2.0", "question_source": "Numina/NuminaMath" }
microsoft/Phi-4-reasoning-plus
1
"We are given the limit of the sequence: \n$$\\lim _{n \\rightarrow \\infty} \\frac{\\sqrt{n+6}-\\sq(...TRUNCATED)
"But wait, that's not relevant.\n\nLet's check possibility: maybe the limit is -1. But wait, the seq(...TRUNCATED)
"We are given the limit of the sequence: \n$$\\lim _{n \\rightarrow \\infty} \\frac{\\sqrt{n+6}-\\sq(...TRUNCATED)
"But that's not relevant.\n\nWait, the question is \"Calculate the limit of the numerical sequence: (...TRUNCATED)
"We are given the limit of the sequence: \n$$\\lim _{n \\rightarrow \\infty} \\frac{\\sqrt{n+6}-\\sq(...TRUNCATED)
"But that's not relevant.\n\nLet me double-check the expansion of sqrt(n+6): sqrt{n+6} = sqrt{n} sqr(...TRUNCATED)
"We are given the limit of the sequence: \n$$\\lim _{n \\rightarrow \\infty} \\frac{\\sqrt{n+6}-\\sq(...TRUNCATED)
"That is not relevant.\n\nLet's check if there is any subtlety: The numerator is dominated by sqrt(n(...TRUNCATED)
"We are given the limit of the sequence: \n$$\\lim _{n \\rightarrow \\infty} \\frac{\\sqrt{n+6}-\\sq(...TRUNCATED)
"That is not relevant. I must provide answer in the form \\boxed{-1}.\n\nI can provide a step-by-ste(...TRUNCATED)
"We are given the limit of the sequence: \n$$\\lim _{n \\rightarrow \\infty} \\frac{\\sqrt{n+6}-\\sq(...TRUNCATED)
"But that is not relevant.\n\nI want to be careful: The numerator is not exactly -n but something li(...TRUNCATED)
"We are given the limit of the sequence: \n$$\\lim _{n \\rightarrow \\infty} \\frac{\\sqrt{n+6}-\\sq(...TRUNCATED)
"But I'm not sure if that's relevant.\n\nI must check if any potential sign errors: The numerator is(...TRUNCATED)
"We are given the limit of the sequence: \n$$\\lim _{n \\rightarrow \\infty} \\frac{\\sqrt{n+6}-\\sq(...TRUNCATED)
"But that's not relevant.\n\nI must also check if the sign is correct. Let's check a small value, sa(...TRUNCATED)
"We are given the limit of the sequence: \n$$\\lim _{n \\rightarrow \\infty} \\frac{\\sqrt{n+6}-\\sq(...TRUNCATED)
microsoft/Phi-4-reasoning-plus
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
End of preview. Expand in Data Studio
README.md exists but content is empty.
Downloads last month
254