Dataset Viewer
Auto-converted to Parquet Duplicate
question
stringlengths
177
2.37k
reference_answer
stringclasses
13 values
original_mutated_content
stringlengths
408
13.7k
continuation_1_first_two_paras
stringlengths
59
8.66k
final_intervened_trace_until_last_step
stringlengths
734
14.1k
continuation_1
stringlengths
1.37k
25.9k
complete_answer_1
stringlengths
3.02k
31.3k
continuation_2
stringlengths
1.99k
56.8k
complete_answer_2
stringlengths
3.7k
57.8k
continuation_3
stringlengths
1.17k
36.9k
complete_answer_3
stringlengths
3.15k
39.5k
continuation_4
stringlengths
1.28k
22.6k
complete_answer_4
stringlengths
3.35k
32.6k
continuation_5
stringlengths
1.7k
46.1k
complete_answer_5
stringlengths
3.06k
47.9k
continuation_6
stringlengths
1.51k
41.1k
complete_answer_6
stringlengths
3.09k
46.6k
continuation_7
stringlengths
1.28k
29.1k
complete_answer_7
stringlengths
2.67k
41.9k
continuation_8
stringlengths
1.4k
32.8k
complete_answer_8
stringlengths
2.7k
35.8k
"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causation?\nJoe was about t(...TRUNCATED)
No
"We have a question \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causat(...TRUNCATED)
"But wait, let me check: \"Did Joe cause his son's injury?\" But then we must consider the chain-of-(...TRUNCATED)
"We have a question \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causat(...TRUNCATED)
"But wait, let me re-read the scenario carefully:\n\n\"Joe was about to go pick up his child from a (...TRUNCATED)
"We have a question \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causat(...TRUNCATED)
"But the chain-of-causation is: Joe's decision to help someone resulted in a delay, which resulted i(...TRUNCATED)
"We have a question \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causat(...TRUNCATED)
"But then the drunk driver is an independent intervening cause. In many legal cases, the proximate c(...TRUNCATED)
"We have a question \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causat(...TRUNCATED)
"But is that how a typical person would think? I think a typical person might see it as: \"Joe's act(...TRUNCATED)
"We have a question \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causat(...TRUNCATED)
"But then the drunk driver's actions are a supervening cause that breaks the chain. In legal terms, (...TRUNCATED)
"We have a question \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causat(...TRUNCATED)
"But then the drunk driver is the immediate cause. So a typical person might say \"No, Joe did not c(...TRUNCATED)
"We have a question \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causat(...TRUNCATED)
"But the drunk driver's action is an intervening event. The question of proximate cause: \"If Joe ha(...TRUNCATED)
"We have a question \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causat(...TRUNCATED)
"But the drunk driver is an independent actor. In legal terms, the drunk driver's act is a supersedi(...TRUNCATED)
"We have a question \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causat(...TRUNCATED)
"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causation?\nRepresentatives(...TRUNCATED)
No
"We have a question: \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causa(...TRUNCATED)
"But wait, the question is asking: \"Did the board intentionally help the environment?\" But the boa(...TRUNCATED)
"We have a question: \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causa(...TRUNCATED)
"Let's analyze the board's reply: \"We don't care at all about helping the environment. We just want(...TRUNCATED)
"We have a question: \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causa(...TRUNCATED)
"But their statement \"We don't care at all about helping the environment\" might be interpreted as (...TRUNCATED)
"We have a question: \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causa(...TRUNCATED)
"But their statement \"We don't care at all about helping the environment\" indicates that helping t(...TRUNCATED)
"We have a question: \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causa(...TRUNCATED)
"But the board's statement \"We don't care at all about helping the environment\" suggests that they(...TRUNCATED)
"We have a question: \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causa(...TRUNCATED)
"But the board's reply \"We don't care at all about helping the environment\" suggests that they are(...TRUNCATED)
"We have a question: \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causa(...TRUNCATED)
"But the board's stated intention is \"We don't care at all about helping the environment.\" So they(...TRUNCATED)
"We have a question: \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causa(...TRUNCATED)
"But wait, if they are aware that the program will help the environment, then they are aware of the (...TRUNCATED)
"We have a question: \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causa(...TRUNCATED)
"But the board said they don't care about helping the environment, which might be interpreted as a l(...TRUNCATED)
"We have a question: \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causa(...TRUNCATED)
"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causation?\nJanet is an emp(...TRUNCATED)
Yes
"We have a question \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causat(...TRUNCATED)
"But wait, the question \"Did Janet not putting oil in the machine cause it to break down?\" is ambi(...TRUNCATED)
"We have a question \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causat(...TRUNCATED)
"But the question specifically: \"Did Janet not putting oil in the machine cause it to break down?\"(...TRUNCATED)
"We have a question \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causat(...TRUNCATED)
"But the question specifically: \"Did Janet not putting oil in the machine cause it to break down?\"(...TRUNCATED)
"We have a question \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causat(...TRUNCATED)
"But the machine broke down due to lack of oil. But who is responsible? The question is \"Did Janet (...TRUNCATED)
"We have a question \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causat(...TRUNCATED)
"But wait, the scenario says \"one day, Janet forgets to put oil in an important machine. Janet noti(...TRUNCATED)
"We have a question \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causat(...TRUNCATED)
"But the question is: \"Did Janet not putting oil in the machine cause it to break down?\" So one mi(...TRUNCATED)
"We have a question \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causat(...TRUNCATED)
"But the question is: \"Did Janet not putting oil in the machine cause it to break down?\" The answe(...TRUNCATED)
"We have a question \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causat(...TRUNCATED)
"But we need to check the details: \"Janet is an employee in a factory. Since she works in the maint(...TRUNCATED)
"We have a question \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causat(...TRUNCATED)
"But the scenario says \"Janet is responsible\" but Kate is not responsible. But the question \"Did (...TRUNCATED)
"We have a question \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causat(...TRUNCATED)
"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causation?\nTom has a huge (...TRUNCATED)
No
"We have a question \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causat(...TRUNCATED)
"But wait, let me re-read: \"Tom realizes that the plants dried up in the flower beds on which both (...TRUNCATED)
"We have a question \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causat(...TRUNCATED)
"But wait, this is a tricky question about causation. I need to check: The question asks: \"Did the (...TRUNCATED)
"We have a question \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causat(...TRUNCATED)
"But wait, option: \"Did the fertilization by Alex cause the plant to dry out?\" I must check: The q(...TRUNCATED)
"We have a question \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causat(...TRUNCATED)
"But wait, let's check: The magazine said both fertilizers are especially effective and both can be (...TRUNCATED)
"We have a question \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causat(...TRUNCATED)
"But then think: What is the question: \"Did the fertilization by Alex cause the plant to dry out?\"(...TRUNCATED)
"We have a question \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causat(...TRUNCATED)
"But wait, let's carefully examine the wording: \"Tom instructs Alex and Benni to buy the chemical A(...TRUNCATED)
"We have a question \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causat(...TRUNCATED)
"But this is not necessarily the case: It might be that the combination of the two fertilizers is wh(...TRUNCATED)
"We have a question \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causat(...TRUNCATED)
"But wait, careful: The magazine said that both chemicals are especially effective. However, it also(...TRUNCATED)
"We have a question \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causat(...TRUNCATED)
"But I must be careful: The question is \"Did the fertilization by Alex cause the plant to dry out?\(...TRUNCATED)
"We have a question \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causat(...TRUNCATED)
"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causation?\nDrew, Kylie, Ol(...TRUNCATED)
No
"We have a question: \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causa(...TRUNCATED)
"But wait, let me re-read carefully: \"Given the selling price of the coffee and the cost of daily o(...TRUNCATED)
"We have a question: \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causa(...TRUNCATED)
"But then, wait, there's a twist: \"if anyone orders coffee, the coffee shop will turn a profit.\" S(...TRUNCATED)
"We have a question: \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causa(...TRUNCATED)
"But wait, let me consider that the condition for profit is \"if anyone orders coffee.\" The coffee (...TRUNCATED)
"We have a question: \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causa(...TRUNCATED)
"But careful reading: \"Given the selling price of the coffee and the cost of daily operation, the c(...TRUNCATED)
"We have a question: \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causa(...TRUNCATED)
"But then the condition is that only one person ordering coffee is needed. But then the question \"D(...TRUNCATED)
"We have a question: \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causa(...TRUNCATED)
"But wait, let me think: The question is about causal reasoning. Given that the coffee shop makes a (...TRUNCATED)
"We have a question: \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causa(...TRUNCATED)
"But wait, check the question: \"Since at least one person ordered coffee on Tuesday, the coffee sho(...TRUNCATED)
"We have a question: \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causa(...TRUNCATED)
"But wait, let me check: \"Only one person ordering coffee is needed for the coffee shop to turn a p(...TRUNCATED)
"We have a question: \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causa(...TRUNCATED)
"But wait, the principle of \"overdetermination\" is at play. The coffee shop would have turned a pr(...TRUNCATED)
"We have a question: \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causa(...TRUNCATED)
"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causation?\nJoe was about t(...TRUNCATED)
Yes
"We have a question \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causat(...TRUNCATED)
"But wait, let me re-read the scenario: \"Joe was about to go pick up his child from a school in the(...TRUNCATED)
"We have a question \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causat(...TRUNCATED)
"But if the question is about proximate cause, then the drunk driver's actions were the direct cause(...TRUNCATED)
"We have a question \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causat(...TRUNCATED)
"But typical people might consider that the drunk driver's actions are the immediate cause of the ac(...TRUNCATED)
"We have a question \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causat(...TRUNCATED)
"But then the question: \"Did the drunk driver cause injury to Joe's son?\" If we consider the drunk(...TRUNCATED)
"We have a question \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causat(...TRUNCATED)
"But the question is a bit ambiguous. It is a question about causation in moral responsibility. The (...TRUNCATED)
"We have a question \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causat(...TRUNCATED)
"But the question \"Did the drunk driver cause injury to Joe's son?\" is ambiguous. \n\nA typical pe(...TRUNCATED)
"We have a question \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causat(...TRUNCATED)
"However, the drunk driver's behavior is an independent factor that is not reducible to Joe's person(...TRUNCATED)
"We have a question \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causat(...TRUNCATED)
"But then the question might be about \"causation\" in the sense of proximate cause vs. ultimate cau(...TRUNCATED)
"We have a question \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causat(...TRUNCATED)
"But then, wait, the drunk driver's action is the actual cause of the accident. But the question is (...TRUNCATED)
"We have a question \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causat(...TRUNCATED)
"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causation?\nProf. Smith wor(...TRUNCATED)
No
"We have a question \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causat(...TRUNCATED)
"But wait, the question asks: \"Does the department budget committee cause the approval of Prof. Smi(...TRUNCATED)
"We have a question \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causat(...TRUNCATED)
"But since the IT committee's approval is almost universal, the department budget committee's approv(...TRUNCATED)
"We have a question \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causat(...TRUNCATED)
"But the question is \"Does the department budget committee cause the approval of Prof. Smith's appl(...TRUNCATED)
"We have a question \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causat(...TRUNCATED)
"But then the question \"Does the department budget committee cause the approval of Prof. Smith's ap(...TRUNCATED)
"We have a question \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causat(...TRUNCATED)
"But wait, the wording \"cause the approval of Prof. Smith's application\" might mean that the depar(...TRUNCATED)
"We have a question \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causat(...TRUNCATED)
"But wait, the question \"Does the department budget committee cause the approval of Prof. Smith's a(...TRUNCATED)
"We have a question \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causat(...TRUNCATED)
"But wait, consider the possibility that the IT committee's approval might have been sufficient for (...TRUNCATED)
"We have a question \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causat(...TRUNCATED)
"But then the question \"Does the department budget committee cause the approval of Prof. Smith's ap(...TRUNCATED)
"We have a question \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causat(...TRUNCATED)
"But wait, the question is \"Does the department budget committee cause the approval of Prof. Smith'(...TRUNCATED)
"We have a question \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causat(...TRUNCATED)
"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causation?\nJanet is an emp(...TRUNCATED)
Yes
"We have a question \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causat(...TRUNCATED)
"But wait, let me re-read scenario carefully: \"Janet is an employee in the maintenance department. (...TRUNCATED)
"We have a question \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causat(...TRUNCATED)
"But wait, let's check: \"It is not Kate's responsibility to do so.\" But if the machine broke down,(...TRUNCATED)
"We have a question \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causat(...TRUNCATED)
"But wait, the scenario description says that \"Kate did not notice that Janet did not put oil in th(...TRUNCATED)
"We have a question \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causat(...TRUNCATED)
"But then the question: \"Did Janet not putting oil in the machine cause it to break down?\" I need (...TRUNCATED)
"We have a question \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causat(...TRUNCATED)
"But the question asks: \"Did Janet not putting oil in the machine cause it to break down?\" I need (...TRUNCATED)
"We have a question \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causat(...TRUNCATED)
"But wait, let me check: The typical person might be influenced by counterfactual reasoning: \"If Ja(...TRUNCATED)
"We have a question \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causat(...TRUNCATED)
"So the typical person might answer: \"No\" because Kate's omission is the cause.\n\nBut wait, maybe(...TRUNCATED)
"We have a question \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causat(...TRUNCATED)
"But wait, I have to consider that the absence of oil is the cause of the breakdown. But is it Janet(...TRUNCATED)
"We have a question \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causat(...TRUNCATED)
"But wait, let's check: The machine broke down a few days later because it was not oiled. But the qu(...TRUNCATED)
"We have a question \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causat(...TRUNCATED)
"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causation?\nTom works for a(...TRUNCATED)
Yes
"We have a question \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causat(...TRUNCATED)
"But wait, let me re-read the scenario: \"At 4:00 PM, the safety switch is off, and knob A is off.\"(...TRUNCATED)
"We have a question \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causat(...TRUNCATED)
"But the phrasing \"Because the building would implode if both the safety switch is off and knob A i(...TRUNCATED)
"We have a question \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causat(...TRUNCATED)
"But wait, the building would not implode automatically if knob A is off. The building is set to imp(...TRUNCATED)
"We have a question \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causat(...TRUNCATED)
"But wait, I'm trying to recall the standard example: \"If a bomb is set to go off at a certain time(...TRUNCATED)
"We have a question \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causat(...TRUNCATED)
"Wait, to be systematic:\n\nWe have a system: \"Implosion happens if (SAFETY SWITCH off AND knob A o(...TRUNCATED)
"We have a question \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causat(...TRUNCATED)
"But wait, what if the building was going to implode regardless? Let's consider the meaning of \"bec(...TRUNCATED)
"We have a question \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causat(...TRUNCATED)
"But wait, the question is: \"Because the building would implode if both the safety switch is off an(...TRUNCATED)
"We have a question \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causat(...TRUNCATED)
"But let's re-read the description carefully: \"The building will implode automatically at 5:00 PM i(...TRUNCATED)
"We have a question \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causat(...TRUNCATED)
"But wait, let's consider the counterfactual: if Tom had not turned knob A on, then at 5:00 PM the b(...TRUNCATED)
"We have a question \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causat(...TRUNCATED)
"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causation?\nIn a particular(...TRUNCATED)
No
"We have a question: \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causa(...TRUNCATED)
"But wait, let me check: \"Each office has enough employees to turn on the climate control system on(...TRUNCATED)
"We have a question: \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causa(...TRUNCATED)
"But then the question is: \"Did the design studio agents cause the climate control system to turn o(...TRUNCATED)
"We have a question: \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causa(...TRUNCATED)
"But then I must consider that the travel agency employees are sufficient to cause the system to tur(...TRUNCATED)
"We have a question: \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causa(...TRUNCATED)
"But typically, a \"but-for\" test of causation is used: \"But for the design studio employees, woul(...TRUNCATED)
"We have a question: \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causa(...TRUNCATED)
"However, there's a nuance: The fact that both groups arrived means that the system turning on was o(...TRUNCATED)
"We have a question: \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causa(...TRUNCATED)
"But the typical person's reasoning might be: \"The climate control system turned on because enough (...TRUNCATED)
"We have a question: \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causa(...TRUNCATED)
"But the counterfactual test: \"If the design studio agents had not come, would the system have turn(...TRUNCATED)
"We have a question: \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causa(...TRUNCATED)
"But then the typical person might say \"No\" because the system would have turned on anyway. But wa(...TRUNCATED)
"We have a question: \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causa(...TRUNCATED)
"But the typical person might think \"But if the design studio employees hadn't arrived, the system (...TRUNCATED)
"We have a question: \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causa(...TRUNCATED)
End of preview. Expand in Data Studio
README.md exists but content is empty.
Downloads last month
9