Dataset Viewer
Auto-converted to Parquet Duplicate
question
stringlengths
177
2.37k
reference_answer
stringclasses
13 values
original_mutated_content
stringlengths
408
13.7k
continuation_1_first_two_paras
stringlengths
59
8.66k
final_intervened_trace_until_last_step
stringlengths
1.15k
17.3k
continuation_1
stringlengths
1.16k
33.5k
complete_answer_1
stringlengths
3.33k
40k
continuation_2
stringlengths
1.77k
27.8k
complete_answer_2
stringlengths
4.56k
44.1k
continuation_3
stringlengths
1.47k
178k
complete_answer_3
stringlengths
4.22k
181k
continuation_4
stringlengths
1.26k
49.8k
complete_answer_4
stringlengths
2.95k
66k
continuation_5
stringlengths
1.66k
62.2k
complete_answer_5
stringlengths
4.05k
78.4k
continuation_6
stringlengths
1.15k
31.2k
complete_answer_6
stringlengths
4.14k
37.4k
continuation_7
stringlengths
744
27k
complete_answer_7
stringlengths
3.85k
43.3k
continuation_8
stringlengths
1.62k
47.2k
complete_answer_8
stringlengths
4.4k
50.7k
"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causation?\nJoe was about t(...TRUNCATED)
No
"We have a question \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causat(...TRUNCATED)
"But wait, let me check: \"Did Joe cause his son's injury?\" But then we must consider the chain-of-(...TRUNCATED)
"We have a question \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causat(...TRUNCATED)
"But then I'm not sure.\n\nI recall that in the famous \"but for\" test, if you remove Joe's delay, (...TRUNCATED)
"We have a question \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causat(...TRUNCATED)
"But then the accident happened while the neighbor was driving the child. But if Joe had been on tim(...TRUNCATED)
"We have a question \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causat(...TRUNCATED)
"But wait, if Joe's son was not in the car, then he wouldn't have been injured. But the drunk driver(...TRUNCATED)
"We have a question \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causat(...TRUNCATED)
"But the chain-of-causation is a bit complex.\n\nI believe that a typical person might answer \"No\"(...TRUNCATED)
"We have a question \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causat(...TRUNCATED)
"But that's not true: if Joe hadn't been delayed, his son would have been in his own car, and the ac(...TRUNCATED)
"We have a question \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causat(...TRUNCATED)
"But then maybe a typical person might say \"Yes, because Joe's delay set off the chain-of-events th(...TRUNCATED)
"We have a question \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causat(...TRUNCATED)
"But the question is: \"Did Joe cause his son's injury?\" So if Joe's son was injured because of the(...TRUNCATED)
"We have a question \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causat(...TRUNCATED)
"But no, that seems not likely. The chain-of-causation is: if Joe had not been delayed, he would hav(...TRUNCATED)
"We have a question \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causat(...TRUNCATED)
"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causation?\nRepresentatives(...TRUNCATED)
No
"We have a question: \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causa(...TRUNCATED)
"But wait, the question is asking: \"Did the board intentionally help the environment?\" But the boa(...TRUNCATED)
"We have a question: \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causa(...TRUNCATED)
"Let me check more carefully: The board said \"We don't care at all about helping the environment\" (...TRUNCATED)
"We have a question: \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causa(...TRUNCATED)
"But then the question is: \"Did the board intentionally help the environment?\" Given that the boar(...TRUNCATED)
"We have a question: \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causa(...TRUNCATED)
"But then again, intention is defined as the aim of the intended outcome. They might not have had th(...TRUNCATED)
"We have a question: \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causa(...TRUNCATED)
"But then if we consider intention as a state of mind, then if they said \"we don't care about helpi(...TRUNCATED)
"We have a question: \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causa(...TRUNCATED)
"But in this case, the board's decision to start the program was based on profit, not on environment(...TRUNCATED)
"We have a question: \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causa(...TRUNCATED)
"But then the board's explicit statement \"we don't care\" is evidence that they did not intend to h(...TRUNCATED)
"We have a question: \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causa(...TRUNCATED)
"But in this case, the board's intention was to maximize profits. But if they intentionally took an (...TRUNCATED)
"We have a question: \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causa(...TRUNCATED)
"But then the board said they don't care about the environment. But if they don't care, why would th(...TRUNCATED)
"We have a question: \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causa(...TRUNCATED)
"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causation?\nJanet is an emp(...TRUNCATED)
Yes
"We have a question \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causat(...TRUNCATED)
"But wait, the question \"Did Janet not putting oil in the machine cause it to break down?\" is ambi(...TRUNCATED)
"We have a question \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causat(...TRUNCATED)
"But wait, if Kate also did not put oil in the machine, then the machine was not oiled by either of (...TRUNCATED)
"We have a question \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causat(...TRUNCATED)
"But the question is asking about Janet's actions specifically, not Kate's.\n\nI need to consider th(...TRUNCATED)
"We have a question \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causat(...TRUNCATED)
"But the question might be a trick question: \"Did Janet not putting oil in the machine cause it to (...TRUNCATED)
"We have a question \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causat(...TRUNCATED)
"Possibly the answer is \"Yes, Janet's failure to oil the machine directly caused the machine breakd(...TRUNCATED)
"We have a question \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causat(...TRUNCATED)
"But wait, let me re-read the scenario. \"Kate did not notice that Janet did not put oil in the mach(...TRUNCATED)
"We have a question \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causat(...TRUNCATED)
"But that's not a typical reasoning: the question is \"Did Janet's action cause it?\" The answer is (...TRUNCATED)
"We have a question \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causat(...TRUNCATED)
"But the question is \"Did Janet not putting oil in the machine cause it to break down?\" It's ambig(...TRUNCATED)
"We have a question \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causat(...TRUNCATED)
"But wait, the question is \"Did Janet not putting oil in the machine cause it to break down?\" I ne(...TRUNCATED)
"We have a question \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causat(...TRUNCATED)
"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causation?\nTom has a huge (...TRUNCATED)
No
"We have a question \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causat(...TRUNCATED)
"But wait, let me re-read: \"Tom realizes that the plants dried up in the flower beds on which both (...TRUNCATED)
"We have a question \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causat(...TRUNCATED)
"But then wait: \"Benni tells him that he had used the chemical B Y33R instead.\" So in the beds tha(...TRUNCATED)
"We have a question \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causat(...TRUNCATED)
"But then the answer is \"Yes.\"\n\nWait, let me re-read the scenario: \"Tom goes for a walk in his (...TRUNCATED)
"We have a question \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causat(...TRUNCATED)
"But wait, what about Benni's chemical? There is a possibility that the drying was caused by the com(...TRUNCATED)
"We have a question \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causat(...TRUNCATED)
"But wait, but then if Alex's fertilization was applied in the combination with B Y33R, then the com(...TRUNCATED)
"We have a question \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causat(...TRUNCATED)
"But then, if we consider the possibility of a confounder: maybe Benni's use of B Y33R did not cause(...TRUNCATED)
"We have a question \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causat(...TRUNCATED)
"But wait, then if Alex's fertilizer alone is harmless, why did the drying occur when both chemicals(...TRUNCATED)
"We have a question \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causat(...TRUNCATED)
"But wait, reading the scenario: \"He instructs Alex and Benni to buy the chemical A X200R and to us(...TRUNCATED)
"We have a question \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causat(...TRUNCATED)
"But wait, then the answer would be \"Yes\", because the drying occurred only in the beds where Alex(...TRUNCATED)
"We have a question \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causat(...TRUNCATED)
"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causation?\nDrew, Kylie, Ol(...TRUNCATED)
No
"We have a question: \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causa(...TRUNCATED)
"But wait, let me re-read carefully: \"Given the selling price of the coffee and the cost of daily o(...TRUNCATED)
"We have a question: \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causa(...TRUNCATED)
"But then, the concept of \"causation\" in philosophy is subtle. The typical person might say \"Yes,(...TRUNCATED)
"We have a question: \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causa(...TRUNCATED)
"But the actual question is \"Did Drew ordering coffee on Tuesday cause the profit?\" And the answer(...TRUNCATED)
"We have a question: \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causa(...TRUNCATED)
"But then, the question is typically asked in the context of \"overdetermination\" and \"causation\"(...TRUNCATED)
"We have a question: \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causa(...TRUNCATED)
"But if the question is phrased in a particular way, the answer might be \"No\" because his ordering(...TRUNCATED)
"We have a question: \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causa(...TRUNCATED)
"But wait, let me re-read carefully: \"Given the selling price of the coffee and the cost of daily o(...TRUNCATED)
"We have a question: \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causa(...TRUNCATED)
"But then a typical person might reason: \"Even if Drew hadn't ordered coffee, the coffee shop would(...TRUNCATED)
"We have a question: \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causa(...TRUNCATED)
"But wait, let's check the logic: The coffee shop makes profit if at least one order is placed. And (...TRUNCATED)
"We have a question: \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causa(...TRUNCATED)
"But then the question is how a typical person would answer it. The typical person might say \"Yes\"(...TRUNCATED)
"We have a question: \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causa(...TRUNCATED)
"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causation?\nJoe was about t(...TRUNCATED)
Yes
"We have a question \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causat(...TRUNCATED)
"But wait, let me re-read the scenario: \"Joe was about to go pick up his child from a school in the(...TRUNCATED)
"We have a question \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causat(...TRUNCATED)
"But then the question \"Joe's behavior stems from his talkativeness\" is not relevant to the drunk (...TRUNCATED)
"We have a question \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causat(...TRUNCATED)
"But the question is ambiguous because it might be a trick question about proximate cause and forese(...TRUNCATED)
"We have a question \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causat(...TRUNCATED)
"But the question is ambiguous. The question is from a perspective of how a typical person might ans(...TRUNCATED)
"We have a question \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causat(...TRUNCATED)
"But wait, the phrasing \"Joe's behavior stems from his talkativeness\" is then explained as \"a bas(...TRUNCATED)
"We have a question \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causat(...TRUNCATED)
"But wait, the neighbor's decision to drive the child home was due to Joe's delay, but that delay wa(...TRUNCATED)
"We have a question \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causat(...TRUNCATED)
"However, the question clearly states that the drunk driver was the one who struck the neighbor's ca(...TRUNCATED)
"We have a question \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causat(...TRUNCATED)
"But that is not how typical people reason about causation in legal or everyday contexts. \n\nI reca(...TRUNCATED)
"We have a question \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causat(...TRUNCATED)
"But then the question is: \"Did the drunk driver cause injury to Joe's son?\" The answer is \"Yes\"(...TRUNCATED)
"We have a question \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causat(...TRUNCATED)
"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causation?\nProf. Smith wor(...TRUNCATED)
No
"We have a question \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causat(...TRUNCATED)
"But wait, the question asks: \"Does the department budget committee cause the approval of Prof. Smi(...TRUNCATED)
"We have a question \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causat(...TRUNCATED)
"But wait, another possibility: \"Yes, because the department budget committee's approval is the onl(...TRUNCATED)
"We have a question \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causat(...TRUNCATED)
"But then we must check the details: \"Prof. Smith sends in her applications. Each committee meets i(...TRUNCATED)
"We have a question \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causat(...TRUNCATED)
"But wait, let me re-read the scenario: \"Prof. Smith will be able to get her new computers if the I(...TRUNCATED)
"We have a question \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causat(...TRUNCATED)
"But no, that's not how causation works. The IT committee's approval is sufficient for the outcome, (...TRUNCATED)
"We have a question \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causat(...TRUNCATED)
"But wait, consider a few cases: There is a well-known problem in philosophy about causation and pre(...TRUNCATED)
"We have a question \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causat(...TRUNCATED)
"But then the question \"Does the department budget committee cause the approval of Prof. Smith's ap(...TRUNCATED)
"We have a question \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causat(...TRUNCATED)
"But wait, then the answer might be \"Yes\" if we think that the department budget committee's appro(...TRUNCATED)
"We have a question \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causat(...TRUNCATED)
"But no, wait, that might be a misinterpretation: The typical person might think that the department(...TRUNCATED)
"We have a question \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causat(...TRUNCATED)
"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causation?\nJanet is an emp(...TRUNCATED)
Yes
"We have a question \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causat(...TRUNCATED)
"But wait, let me re-read scenario carefully: \"Janet is an employee in the maintenance department. (...TRUNCATED)
"We have a question \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causat(...TRUNCATED)
"But the question is \"Did Janet not putting oil in the machine cause it to break down?\" The typica(...TRUNCATED)
"We have a question \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causat(...TRUNCATED)
"But wait, the question is \"Did Janet not putting oil in the machine cause it to break down?\" I sh(...TRUNCATED)
"We have a question \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causat(...TRUNCATED)
"But the question is \"Did Janet not putting oil in the machine cause it to break down?\" but then K(...TRUNCATED)
"We have a question \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causat(...TRUNCATED)
"But the question is: \"Did Janet not putting oil in the machine cause it to break down?\" Let me co(...TRUNCATED)
"We have a question \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causat(...TRUNCATED)
"But wait, the question is \"Did Janet not putting oil in the machine cause it to break down?\" The (...TRUNCATED)
"We have a question \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causat(...TRUNCATED)
"So then if Janet had remembered to oil the machine, the machine might not have broken down. But the(...TRUNCATED)
"We have a question \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causat(...TRUNCATED)
"But wait, let me think: The question is \"Did Janet not putting oil in the machine cause it to brea(...TRUNCATED)
"We have a question \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causat(...TRUNCATED)
"But wait, the question is about Janet's omission. The phrase \"Did Janet not putting oil in the mac(...TRUNCATED)
"We have a question \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causat(...TRUNCATED)
"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causation?\nTom works for a(...TRUNCATED)
Yes
"We have a question \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causat(...TRUNCATED)
"But wait, let me re-read the scenario: \"At 4:00 PM, the safety switch is off, and knob A is off.\"(...TRUNCATED)
"We have a question \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causat(...TRUNCATED)
"But wait, that is not true: if Tom did nothing, then knob A would remain off, and the building woul(...TRUNCATED)
"We have a question \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causat(...TRUNCATED)
"But wait, check: \"The building will implode automatically at 5:00 PM if both conditions are met.\"(...TRUNCATED)
"We have a question \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causat(...TRUNCATED)
"But wait, consider counterfactual: if Tom had not changed knob A at 4:00 PM, then at 5:00 PM, the b(...TRUNCATED)
"We have a question \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causat(...TRUNCATED)
"This is reminiscent of the \"intentional\" or \"causal\" analysis of the \"light switch\" problem i(...TRUNCATED)
"We have a question \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causat(...TRUNCATED)
"But wait, if Tom did nothing, then the building would not implode because knob A remains off. So th(...TRUNCATED)
"We have a question \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causat(...TRUNCATED)
"But wait, if Tom did nothing, then at 5:00 PM, the building would not implode because knob A would (...TRUNCATED)
"We have a question \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causat(...TRUNCATED)
"But wait, think: The building is designed to implode automatically if the conditions are met. But a(...TRUNCATED)
"We have a question \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causat(...TRUNCATED)
"But wait, if Tom had done nothing, then knob A would remain off, and then the building would not im(...TRUNCATED)
"We have a question \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causat(...TRUNCATED)
"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causation?\nIn a particular(...TRUNCATED)
No
"We have a question: \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causa(...TRUNCATED)
"But wait, let me check: \"Each office has enough employees to turn on the climate control system on(...TRUNCATED)
"We have a question: \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causa(...TRUNCATED)
"But that's not the case because the travel agency employees arrived anyway. So the design studio em(...TRUNCATED)
"We have a question: \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causa(...TRUNCATED)
"But that's not the case: the travel agency employees arrived at the same time. So the design studio(...TRUNCATED)
"We have a question: \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causa(...TRUNCATED)
"But no, that's not right, because the travel agency employees arrived anyway. So answer: \\boxed{No(...TRUNCATED)
"We have a question: \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causa(...TRUNCATED)
"But the question is: \"Did the design studio agents cause the climate control system to turn on at (...TRUNCATED)
"We have a question: \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causa(...TRUNCATED)
"But that's not the case because the climate control system turned on at 8:45 am anyway because the (...TRUNCATED)
"We have a question: \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causa(...TRUNCATED)
"But that's not the case: The travel agency employees arrived at the same time. They are not mutuall(...TRUNCATED)
"We have a question: \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causa(...TRUNCATED)
"But that would be false because the travel agency employees arrived anyway. So the design studio em(...TRUNCATED)
"We have a question: \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causa(...TRUNCATED)
"But no, because the travel agency employees arrived at 8:45, and they are enough to trigger the sys(...TRUNCATED)
"We have a question: \"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causa(...TRUNCATED)
End of preview. Expand in Data Studio
README.md exists but content is empty.
Downloads last month
9