question stringlengths 1.49k 1.75k | answer int64 0 3 |
|---|---|
<s><|system_start|>You are Apertus, a helpful assistant created by the SwissAI initiative.\nKnowledge cutoff: 2024-04\nCurrent date: 2026-01-14<|system_end|><|developer_start|>Deliberation: disabled\nTool Capabilities: disabled<|developer_end|><|user_start|>You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: What information supports the conclusion that Trevor acquired this trait?<|user_end|><|assistant_start|>Reasoning Steps:
| 1 |
<s><|system_start|>You are Apertus, a helpful assistant created by the SwissAI initiative.\nKnowledge cutoff: 2024-04\nCurrent date: 2026-01-14<|system_end|><|developer_start|>Deliberation: disabled\nTool Capabilities: disabled<|developer_end|><|user_start|>You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: Which logical fallacy is used in the text?
This lunch meat has absolutely no additives, so it must be nutritious.<|user_end|><|assistant_start|>Reasoning Steps:
| 0 |
<s><|system_start|>You are Apertus, a helpful assistant created by the SwissAI initiative.\nKnowledge cutoff: 2024-04\nCurrent date: 2026-01-14<|system_end|><|developer_start|>Deliberation: disabled\nTool Capabilities: disabled<|developer_end|><|user_start|>You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: What kind of sentence is this?
What is the likelihood that we will encounter bears and other wildlife in Alaska?<|user_end|><|assistant_start|>Reasoning Steps:
| 2 |
<s><|system_start|>You are Apertus, a helpful assistant created by the SwissAI initiative.\nKnowledge cutoff: 2024-04\nCurrent date: 2026-01-14<|system_end|><|developer_start|>Deliberation: disabled\nTool Capabilities: disabled<|developer_end|><|user_start|>You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: Adapted from J. R. Dos Passos, "The Bridge" and from Walt Whitman, "Salut au Monde!"<|user_end|><|assistant_start|>Reasoning Steps:
| 1 |
<s><|system_start|>You are Apertus, a helpful assistant created by the SwissAI initiative.\nKnowledge cutoff: 2024-04\nCurrent date: 2026-01-14<|system_end|><|developer_start|>Deliberation: disabled\nTool Capabilities: disabled<|developer_end|><|user_start|>You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: Which logical fallacy is used in the text?
Don't try to tell me that you only watch educational programming, Rebecca! I know for a fact that your sister only watches reality television.<|user_end|><|assistant_start|>Reasoning Steps:
| 0 |
<s><|system_start|>You are Apertus, a helpful assistant created by the SwissAI initiative.\nKnowledge cutoff: 2024-04\nCurrent date: 2026-01-14<|system_end|><|developer_start|>Deliberation: disabled\nTool Capabilities: disabled<|developer_end|><|user_start|>You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: Choose the poem that uses anaphora.<|user_end|><|assistant_start|>Reasoning Steps:
| 0 |
<s><|system_start|>You are Apertus, a helpful assistant created by the SwissAI initiative.\nKnowledge cutoff: 2024-04\nCurrent date: 2026-01-14<|system_end|><|developer_start|>Deliberation: disabled\nTool Capabilities: disabled<|developer_end|><|user_start|>You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: Which logical fallacy is used in the text?
Kinsley has no school spirit—she never comes to any of our football games.<|user_end|><|assistant_start|>Reasoning Steps:
| 1 |
<s><|system_start|>You are Apertus, a helpful assistant created by the SwissAI initiative.\nKnowledge cutoff: 2024-04\nCurrent date: 2026-01-14<|system_end|><|developer_start|>Deliberation: disabled\nTool Capabilities: disabled<|developer_end|><|user_start|>You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: Which word does not rhyme?<|user_end|><|assistant_start|>Reasoning Steps:
| 1 |
<s><|system_start|>You are Apertus, a helpful assistant created by the SwissAI initiative.\nKnowledge cutoff: 2024-04\nCurrent date: 2026-01-14<|system_end|><|developer_start|>Deliberation: disabled\nTool Capabilities: disabled<|developer_end|><|user_start|>You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: Does this passage describe the weather or the climate?
The summers are hot in Kissimmee, Florida.<|user_end|><|assistant_start|>Reasoning Steps:
| 1 |
<s><|system_start|>You are Apertus, a helpful assistant created by the SwissAI initiative.\nKnowledge cutoff: 2024-04\nCurrent date: 2026-01-14<|system_end|><|developer_start|>Deliberation: disabled\nTool Capabilities: disabled<|developer_end|><|user_start|>You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: Which is a compound sentence?<|user_end|><|assistant_start|>Reasoning Steps:
| 0 |
<s><|system_start|>You are Apertus, a helpful assistant created by the SwissAI initiative.\nKnowledge cutoff: 2024-04\nCurrent date: 2026-01-14<|system_end|><|developer_start|>Deliberation: disabled\nTool Capabilities: disabled<|developer_end|><|user_start|>You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: Based on this information, what is Darnell's phenotype for the cystic fibrosis trait?<|user_end|><|assistant_start|>Reasoning Steps:
| 1 |
<s><|system_start|>You are Apertus, a helpful assistant created by the SwissAI initiative.\nKnowledge cutoff: 2024-04\nCurrent date: 2026-01-14<|system_end|><|developer_start|>Deliberation: disabled\nTool Capabilities: disabled<|developer_end|><|user_start|>You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: What kind of sentence is this?
Are you yawning because you're tired or because you're bored?<|user_end|><|assistant_start|>Reasoning Steps:
| 1 |
<s><|system_start|>You are Apertus, a helpful assistant created by the SwissAI initiative.\nKnowledge cutoff: 2024-04\nCurrent date: 2026-01-14<|system_end|><|developer_start|>Deliberation: disabled\nTool Capabilities: disabled<|developer_end|><|user_start|>You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: What kind of sentence is this?
Mr. Boyer gave a lecture on water conservation, during which he stressed the importance of not watering lawns during a drought.<|user_end|><|assistant_start|>Reasoning Steps:
| 0 |
<s><|system_start|>You are Apertus, a helpful assistant created by the SwissAI initiative.\nKnowledge cutoff: 2024-04\nCurrent date: 2026-01-14<|system_end|><|developer_start|>Deliberation: disabled\nTool Capabilities: disabled<|developer_end|><|user_start|>You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: Which closing is correct for a letter?<|user_end|><|assistant_start|>Reasoning Steps:
| 0 |
<s><|system_start|>You are Apertus, a helpful assistant created by the SwissAI initiative.\nKnowledge cutoff: 2024-04\nCurrent date: 2026-01-14<|system_end|><|developer_start|>Deliberation: disabled\nTool Capabilities: disabled<|developer_end|><|user_start|>You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: Based on this information, what is Tiny's genotype for the eye color gene?<|user_end|><|assistant_start|>Reasoning Steps:
| 1 |
<s><|system_start|>You are Apertus, a helpful assistant created by the SwissAI initiative.\nKnowledge cutoff: 2024-04\nCurrent date: 2026-01-14<|system_end|><|developer_start|>Deliberation: disabled\nTool Capabilities: disabled<|developer_end|><|user_start|>You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: Which logical fallacy is used in the text?
Edna never lies. She told me herself, so it must be true.<|user_end|><|assistant_start|>Reasoning Steps:
| 0 |
<s><|system_start|>You are Apertus, a helpful assistant created by the SwissAI initiative.\nKnowledge cutoff: 2024-04\nCurrent date: 2026-01-14<|system_end|><|developer_start|>Deliberation: disabled\nTool Capabilities: disabled<|developer_end|><|user_start|>You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: Which closing is correct for a letter?<|user_end|><|assistant_start|>Reasoning Steps:
| 1 |
<s><|system_start|>You are Apertus, a helpful assistant created by the SwissAI initiative.\nKnowledge cutoff: 2024-04\nCurrent date: 2026-01-14<|system_end|><|developer_start|>Deliberation: disabled\nTool Capabilities: disabled<|developer_end|><|user_start|>You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: Which word is not like the others?<|user_end|><|assistant_start|>Reasoning Steps:
| 3 |
<s><|system_start|>You are Apertus, a helpful assistant created by the SwissAI initiative.\nKnowledge cutoff: 2024-04\nCurrent date: 2026-01-14<|system_end|><|developer_start|>Deliberation: disabled\nTool Capabilities: disabled<|developer_end|><|user_start|>You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: Which logical fallacy is used in the text?
An increasing number of people are keeping ferrets as pets, so they must make wonderful companion animals.<|user_end|><|assistant_start|>Reasoning Steps:
| 1 |
<s><|system_start|>You are Apertus, a helpful assistant created by the SwissAI initiative.\nKnowledge cutoff: 2024-04\nCurrent date: 2026-01-14<|system_end|><|developer_start|>Deliberation: disabled\nTool Capabilities: disabled<|developer_end|><|user_start|>You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: Based on this information, what is Cheyenne's phenotype for the coat color trait?<|user_end|><|assistant_start|>Reasoning Steps:
| 1 |
<s><|system_start|>You are Apertus, a helpful assistant created by the SwissAI initiative.\nKnowledge cutoff: 2024-04\nCurrent date: 2026-01-14<|system_end|><|developer_start|>Deliberation: disabled\nTool Capabilities: disabled<|developer_end|><|user_start|>You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: What information supports the conclusion that Wayne acquired this trait?<|user_end|><|assistant_start|>Reasoning Steps:
| 1 |
<s><|system_start|>You are Apertus, a helpful assistant created by the SwissAI initiative.\nKnowledge cutoff: 2024-04\nCurrent date: 2026-01-14<|system_end|><|developer_start|>Deliberation: disabled\nTool Capabilities: disabled<|developer_end|><|user_start|>You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: What information supports the conclusion that Cindy inherited this trait?<|user_end|><|assistant_start|>Reasoning Steps:
| 2 |
<s><|system_start|>You are Apertus, a helpful assistant created by the SwissAI initiative.\nKnowledge cutoff: 2024-04\nCurrent date: 2026-01-14<|system_end|><|developer_start|>Deliberation: disabled\nTool Capabilities: disabled<|developer_end|><|user_start|>You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: Which correctly shows the title of a short story?<|user_end|><|assistant_start|>Reasoning Steps:
| 1 |
<s><|system_start|>You are Apertus, a helpful assistant created by the SwissAI initiative.\nKnowledge cutoff: 2024-04\nCurrent date: 2026-01-14<|system_end|><|developer_start|>Deliberation: disabled\nTool Capabilities: disabled<|developer_end|><|user_start|>You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: Which correctly shows the title of a newspaper?<|user_end|><|assistant_start|>Reasoning Steps:
| 1 |
<s><|system_start|>You are Apertus, a helpful assistant created by the SwissAI initiative.\nKnowledge cutoff: 2024-04\nCurrent date: 2026-01-14<|system_end|><|developer_start|>Deliberation: disabled\nTool Capabilities: disabled<|developer_end|><|user_start|>You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: Use the evidence in the text to select the photosynthetic organism.<|user_end|><|assistant_start|>Reasoning Steps:
| 0 |
<s><|system_start|>You are Apertus, a helpful assistant created by the SwissAI initiative.\nKnowledge cutoff: 2024-04\nCurrent date: 2026-01-14<|system_end|><|developer_start|>Deliberation: disabled\nTool Capabilities: disabled<|developer_end|><|user_start|>You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: Is the following trait inherited or acquired?
Dave can fly an airplane.<|user_end|><|assistant_start|>Reasoning Steps:
| 0 |
<s><|system_start|>You are Apertus, a helpful assistant created by the SwissAI initiative.\nKnowledge cutoff: 2024-04\nCurrent date: 2026-01-14<|system_end|><|developer_start|>Deliberation: disabled\nTool Capabilities: disabled<|developer_end|><|user_start|>You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: Is this a run-on sentence?
Dust particles around nine nearby stars may have been caused by long-ago collisions between melting comets and asteroids.<|user_end|><|assistant_start|>Reasoning Steps:
| 1 |
<s><|system_start|>You are Apertus, a helpful assistant created by the SwissAI initiative.\nKnowledge cutoff: 2024-04\nCurrent date: 2026-01-14<|system_end|><|developer_start|>Deliberation: disabled\nTool Capabilities: disabled<|developer_end|><|user_start|>You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: Based on this information, what is Sugar's genotype for the body size gene?<|user_end|><|assistant_start|>Reasoning Steps:
| 0 |
<s><|system_start|>You are Apertus, a helpful assistant created by the SwissAI initiative.\nKnowledge cutoff: 2024-04\nCurrent date: 2026-01-14<|system_end|><|developer_start|>Deliberation: disabled\nTool Capabilities: disabled<|developer_end|><|user_start|>You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: Select the one substance that is not a rock.<|user_end|><|assistant_start|>Reasoning Steps:
| 1 |
<s><|system_start|>You are Apertus, a helpful assistant created by the SwissAI initiative.\nKnowledge cutoff: 2024-04\nCurrent date: 2026-01-14<|system_end|><|developer_start|>Deliberation: disabled\nTool Capabilities: disabled<|developer_end|><|user_start|>You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: Which logical fallacy is used in the text?
I believe everyone has his or her own idea of what's beautiful in the world. After all, it's the individual who determines what's attractive according to his or her own opinion.<|user_end|><|assistant_start|>Reasoning Steps:
| 0 |
<s><|system_start|>You are Apertus, a helpful assistant created by the SwissAI initiative.\nKnowledge cutoff: 2024-04\nCurrent date: 2026-01-14<|system_end|><|developer_start|>Deliberation: disabled\nTool Capabilities: disabled<|developer_end|><|user_start|>You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: Which logical fallacy is used in the text?
Ms. Thompson has suggested that our schools let students take statistics instead of algebra to graduate. Frankly, it is puzzling to me that she thinks algebra is a useless subject.<|user_end|><|assistant_start|>Reasoning Steps:
| 2 |
<s><|system_start|>You are Apertus, a helpful assistant created by the SwissAI initiative.\nKnowledge cutoff: 2024-04\nCurrent date: 2026-01-14<|system_end|><|developer_start|>Deliberation: disabled\nTool Capabilities: disabled<|developer_end|><|user_start|>You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: What information supports the conclusion that Linda inherited this trait?<|user_end|><|assistant_start|>Reasoning Steps:
| 2 |
<s><|system_start|>You are Apertus, a helpful assistant created by the SwissAI initiative.\nKnowledge cutoff: 2024-04\nCurrent date: 2026-01-14<|system_end|><|developer_start|>Deliberation: disabled\nTool Capabilities: disabled<|developer_end|><|user_start|>You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: Complete the sentences.
According to the Tenth Amendment, the Constitution lists all of the powers given to the United States government. Any power not listed in the Constitution belongs to either the state governments or ().<|user_end|><|assistant_start|>Reasoning Steps:
| 0 |
<s><|system_start|>You are Apertus, a helpful assistant created by the SwissAI initiative.\nKnowledge cutoff: 2024-04\nCurrent date: 2026-01-14<|system_end|><|developer_start|>Deliberation: disabled\nTool Capabilities: disabled<|developer_end|><|user_start|>You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: Which is a compound sentence?<|user_end|><|assistant_start|>Reasoning Steps:
| 0 |
<s><|system_start|>You are Apertus, a helpful assistant created by the SwissAI initiative.\nKnowledge cutoff: 2024-04\nCurrent date: 2026-01-14<|system_end|><|developer_start|>Deliberation: disabled\nTool Capabilities: disabled<|developer_end|><|user_start|>You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: Which word does not rhyme?<|user_end|><|assistant_start|>Reasoning Steps:
| 0 |
<s><|system_start|>You are Apertus, a helpful assistant created by the SwissAI initiative.\nKnowledge cutoff: 2024-04\nCurrent date: 2026-01-14<|system_end|><|developer_start|>Deliberation: disabled\nTool Capabilities: disabled<|developer_end|><|user_start|>You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: Select the one substance that is not a mineral.<|user_end|><|assistant_start|>Reasoning Steps:
| 2 |
<s><|system_start|>You are Apertus, a helpful assistant created by the SwissAI initiative.\nKnowledge cutoff: 2024-04\nCurrent date: 2026-01-14<|system_end|><|developer_start|>Deliberation: disabled\nTool Capabilities: disabled<|developer_end|><|user_start|>You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: Is the following trait inherited or acquired?
Suzie has a scar on her right leg.<|user_end|><|assistant_start|>Reasoning Steps:
| 0 |
<s><|system_start|>You are Apertus, a helpful assistant created by the SwissAI initiative.\nKnowledge cutoff: 2024-04\nCurrent date: 2026-01-14<|system_end|><|developer_start|>Deliberation: disabled\nTool Capabilities: disabled<|developer_end|><|user_start|>You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: Based on this information, what is this plant's phenotype for the flower color trait?<|user_end|><|assistant_start|>Reasoning Steps:
| 0 |
<s><|system_start|>You are Apertus, a helpful assistant created by the SwissAI initiative.\nKnowledge cutoff: 2024-04\nCurrent date: 2026-01-14<|system_end|><|developer_start|>Deliberation: disabled\nTool Capabilities: disabled<|developer_end|><|user_start|>You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: What information supports the conclusion that Perry inherited this trait?<|user_end|><|assistant_start|>Reasoning Steps:
| 1 |
<s><|system_start|>You are Apertus, a helpful assistant created by the SwissAI initiative.\nKnowledge cutoff: 2024-04\nCurrent date: 2026-01-14<|system_end|><|developer_start|>Deliberation: disabled\nTool Capabilities: disabled<|developer_end|><|user_start|>You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: What kind of sentence is this?
Not all monkeys live in the jungle.<|user_end|><|assistant_start|>Reasoning Steps:
| 1 |
<s><|system_start|>You are Apertus, a helpful assistant created by the SwissAI initiative.\nKnowledge cutoff: 2024-04\nCurrent date: 2026-01-14<|system_end|><|developer_start|>Deliberation: disabled\nTool Capabilities: disabled<|developer_end|><|user_start|>You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: What kind of sentence is this?
That was the longest yawn I've ever seen!<|user_end|><|assistant_start|>Reasoning Steps:
| 1 |
<s><|system_start|>You are Apertus, a helpful assistant created by the SwissAI initiative.\nKnowledge cutoff: 2024-04\nCurrent date: 2026-01-14<|system_end|><|developer_start|>Deliberation: disabled\nTool Capabilities: disabled<|developer_end|><|user_start|>You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: Based on this information, what is Elijah's phenotype for the Thomsen disease trait?<|user_end|><|assistant_start|>Reasoning Steps:
| 1 |
<s><|system_start|>You are Apertus, a helpful assistant created by the SwissAI initiative.\nKnowledge cutoff: 2024-04\nCurrent date: 2026-01-14<|system_end|><|developer_start|>Deliberation: disabled\nTool Capabilities: disabled<|developer_end|><|user_start|>You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: Which closing is correct for a letter?<|user_end|><|assistant_start|>Reasoning Steps:
| 1 |
<s><|system_start|>You are Apertus, a helpful assistant created by the SwissAI initiative.\nKnowledge cutoff: 2024-04\nCurrent date: 2026-01-14<|system_end|><|developer_start|>Deliberation: disabled\nTool Capabilities: disabled<|developer_end|><|user_start|>You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: Which greeting is correct for a letter?<|user_end|><|assistant_start|>Reasoning Steps:
| 1 |
<s><|system_start|>You are Apertus, a helpful assistant created by the SwissAI initiative.\nKnowledge cutoff: 2024-04\nCurrent date: 2026-01-14<|system_end|><|developer_start|>Deliberation: disabled\nTool Capabilities: disabled<|developer_end|><|user_start|>You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: Based on this information, what is Jupiter's phenotype for the coat pattern trait?<|user_end|><|assistant_start|>Reasoning Steps:
| 1 |
<s><|system_start|>You are Apertus, a helpful assistant created by the SwissAI initiative.\nKnowledge cutoff: 2024-04\nCurrent date: 2026-01-14<|system_end|><|developer_start|>Deliberation: disabled\nTool Capabilities: disabled<|developer_end|><|user_start|>You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: Which logical fallacy is used in the text?
I read that people with higher-paying jobs wear more expensive clothing. So, if I wear fancier clothes, I'll finally get that raise I've been wanting.<|user_end|><|assistant_start|>Reasoning Steps:
| 0 |
<s><|system_start|>You are Apertus, a helpful assistant created by the SwissAI initiative.\nKnowledge cutoff: 2024-04\nCurrent date: 2026-01-14<|system_end|><|developer_start|>Deliberation: disabled\nTool Capabilities: disabled<|developer_end|><|user_start|>You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: What information supports the conclusion that Gavin inherited this trait?<|user_end|><|assistant_start|>Reasoning Steps:
| 1 |
<s><|system_start|>You are Apertus, a helpful assistant created by the SwissAI initiative.\nKnowledge cutoff: 2024-04\nCurrent date: 2026-01-14<|system_end|><|developer_start|>Deliberation: disabled\nTool Capabilities: disabled<|developer_end|><|user_start|>You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: Based on this information, what is Gale's genotype for the body feather color gene?<|user_end|><|assistant_start|>Reasoning Steps:
| 0 |
<s><|system_start|>You are Apertus, a helpful assistant created by the SwissAI initiative.\nKnowledge cutoff: 2024-04\nCurrent date: 2026-01-14<|system_end|><|developer_start|>Deliberation: disabled\nTool Capabilities: disabled<|developer_end|><|user_start|>You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: Which change best matches the sentence?
Earth is hit by a rock from outer space.<|user_end|><|assistant_start|>Reasoning Steps:
| 2 |
<s><|system_start|>You are Apertus, a helpful assistant created by the SwissAI initiative.\nKnowledge cutoff: 2024-04\nCurrent date: 2026-01-14<|system_end|><|developer_start|>Deliberation: disabled\nTool Capabilities: disabled<|developer_end|><|user_start|>You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: What do these two changes have in common?
a piece of avocado turning brown
boiling sugar to make caramel<|user_end|><|assistant_start|>Reasoning Steps:
| 2 |
<s><|system_start|>You are Apertus, a helpful assistant created by the SwissAI initiative.\nKnowledge cutoff: 2024-04\nCurrent date: 2026-01-14<|system_end|><|developer_start|>Deliberation: disabled\nTool Capabilities: disabled<|developer_end|><|user_start|>You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: Complete the sentence so that it uses personification.
I tried to ignore the fresh blueberry pie, but it was ().<|user_end|><|assistant_start|>Reasoning Steps:
| 0 |
<s><|system_start|>You are Apertus, a helpful assistant created by the SwissAI initiative.\nKnowledge cutoff: 2024-04\nCurrent date: 2026-01-14<|system_end|><|developer_start|>Deliberation: disabled\nTool Capabilities: disabled<|developer_end|><|user_start|>You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: Two baked potatoes have the same temperature but different masses. Which potato has more thermal energy?<|user_end|><|assistant_start|>Reasoning Steps:
| 0 |
<s><|system_start|>You are Apertus, a helpful assistant created by the SwissAI initiative.\nKnowledge cutoff: 2024-04\nCurrent date: 2026-01-14<|system_end|><|developer_start|>Deliberation: disabled\nTool Capabilities: disabled<|developer_end|><|user_start|>You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: Is the following trait inherited or acquired?
Maria can ride a motorcycle.<|user_end|><|assistant_start|>Reasoning Steps:
| 1 |
<s><|system_start|>You are Apertus, a helpful assistant created by the SwissAI initiative.\nKnowledge cutoff: 2024-04\nCurrent date: 2026-01-14<|system_end|><|developer_start|>Deliberation: disabled\nTool Capabilities: disabled<|developer_end|><|user_start|>You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: According to the Tenth Amendment, who or what holds the powers not listed in the Constitution?<|user_end|><|assistant_start|>Reasoning Steps:
| 1 |
<s><|system_start|>You are Apertus, a helpful assistant created by the SwissAI initiative.\nKnowledge cutoff: 2024-04\nCurrent date: 2026-01-14<|system_end|><|developer_start|>Deliberation: disabled\nTool Capabilities: disabled<|developer_end|><|user_start|>You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: Which of the following contains a vague pronoun reference?<|user_end|><|assistant_start|>Reasoning Steps:
| 1 |
<s><|system_start|>You are Apertus, a helpful assistant created by the SwissAI initiative.\nKnowledge cutoff: 2024-04\nCurrent date: 2026-01-14<|system_end|><|developer_start|>Deliberation: disabled\nTool Capabilities: disabled<|developer_end|><|user_start|>You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: What is a seedling?<|user_end|><|assistant_start|>Reasoning Steps:
| 0 |
<s><|system_start|>You are Apertus, a helpful assistant created by the SwissAI initiative.\nKnowledge cutoff: 2024-04\nCurrent date: 2026-01-14<|system_end|><|developer_start|>Deliberation: disabled\nTool Capabilities: disabled<|developer_end|><|user_start|>You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: Based on this information, what is Nibbles's phenotype for the body size trait?<|user_end|><|assistant_start|>Reasoning Steps:
| 0 |
<s><|system_start|>You are Apertus, a helpful assistant created by the SwissAI initiative.\nKnowledge cutoff: 2024-04\nCurrent date: 2026-01-14<|system_end|><|developer_start|>Deliberation: disabled\nTool Capabilities: disabled<|developer_end|><|user_start|>You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: Which greeting is correct for a letter?<|user_end|><|assistant_start|>Reasoning Steps:
| 0 |
<s><|system_start|>You are Apertus, a helpful assistant created by the SwissAI initiative.\nKnowledge cutoff: 2024-04\nCurrent date: 2026-01-14<|system_end|><|developer_start|>Deliberation: disabled\nTool Capabilities: disabled<|developer_end|><|user_start|>You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: Which bath towel has more thermal energy?<|user_end|><|assistant_start|>Reasoning Steps:
| 0 |
<s><|system_start|>You are Apertus, a helpful assistant created by the SwissAI initiative.\nKnowledge cutoff: 2024-04\nCurrent date: 2026-01-14<|system_end|><|developer_start|>Deliberation: disabled\nTool Capabilities: disabled<|developer_end|><|user_start|>You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: Which logical fallacy is used in the text?
The Alexanders argue we should eat our pizza with a fork and knife because it's less messy, but what do they know? Have you seen their house? It's a disaster!<|user_end|><|assistant_start|>Reasoning Steps:
| 1 |
<s><|system_start|>You are Apertus, a helpful assistant created by the SwissAI initiative.\nKnowledge cutoff: 2024-04\nCurrent date: 2026-01-14<|system_end|><|developer_start|>Deliberation: disabled\nTool Capabilities: disabled<|developer_end|><|user_start|>You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: What do these two changes have in common?
melting wax
rain forming in a cloud<|user_end|><|assistant_start|>Reasoning Steps:
| 3 |
<s><|system_start|>You are Apertus, a helpful assistant created by the SwissAI initiative.\nKnowledge cutoff: 2024-04\nCurrent date: 2026-01-14<|system_end|><|developer_start|>Deliberation: disabled\nTool Capabilities: disabled<|developer_end|><|user_start|>You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: Select the one substance that is not a mineral.<|user_end|><|assistant_start|>Reasoning Steps:
| 2 |
<s><|system_start|>You are Apertus, a helpful assistant created by the SwissAI initiative.\nKnowledge cutoff: 2024-04\nCurrent date: 2026-01-14<|system_end|><|developer_start|>Deliberation: disabled\nTool Capabilities: disabled<|developer_end|><|user_start|>You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: Is this a run-on sentence?
The first car that Mr. Castro bought is still the most precious in his collection it's a 1971 Chevrolet Chevelle.<|user_end|><|assistant_start|>Reasoning Steps:
| 0 |
<s><|system_start|>You are Apertus, a helpful assistant created by the SwissAI initiative.\nKnowledge cutoff: 2024-04\nCurrent date: 2026-01-14<|system_end|><|developer_start|>Deliberation: disabled\nTool Capabilities: disabled<|developer_end|><|user_start|>You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: Which of the following parts does an animal cell have?<|user_end|><|assistant_start|>Reasoning Steps:
| 0 |
<s><|system_start|>You are Apertus, a helpful assistant created by the SwissAI initiative.\nKnowledge cutoff: 2024-04\nCurrent date: 2026-01-14<|system_end|><|developer_start|>Deliberation: disabled\nTool Capabilities: disabled<|developer_end|><|user_start|>You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: Which logical fallacy is used in the text?
Don't ever get a ride from Mia. Her brother has been driving for only six months, and he's already gotten three speeding tickets.<|user_end|><|assistant_start|>Reasoning Steps:
| 0 |
<s><|system_start|>You are Apertus, a helpful assistant created by the SwissAI initiative.\nKnowledge cutoff: 2024-04\nCurrent date: 2026-01-14<|system_end|><|developer_start|>Deliberation: disabled\nTool Capabilities: disabled<|developer_end|><|user_start|>You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: Which greeting is correct for a letter?<|user_end|><|assistant_start|>Reasoning Steps:
| 1 |
<s><|system_start|>You are Apertus, a helpful assistant created by the SwissAI initiative.\nKnowledge cutoff: 2024-04\nCurrent date: 2026-01-14<|system_end|><|developer_start|>Deliberation: disabled\nTool Capabilities: disabled<|developer_end|><|user_start|>You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: Which logical fallacy is used in the text?
Did you really vote for Jayce as class treasurer? Didn't you hear that his uncle was imprisoned for embezzling $1.5 million?<|user_end|><|assistant_start|>Reasoning Steps:
| 1 |
<s><|system_start|>You are Apertus, a helpful assistant created by the SwissAI initiative.\nKnowledge cutoff: 2024-04\nCurrent date: 2026-01-14<|system_end|><|developer_start|>Deliberation: disabled\nTool Capabilities: disabled<|developer_end|><|user_start|>You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: Select the cold desert ecosystem.<|user_end|><|assistant_start|>Reasoning Steps:
| 0 |
<s><|system_start|>You are Apertus, a helpful assistant created by the SwissAI initiative.\nKnowledge cutoff: 2024-04\nCurrent date: 2026-01-14<|system_end|><|developer_start|>Deliberation: disabled\nTool Capabilities: disabled<|developer_end|><|user_start|>You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: Which correctly shows the title of a poem?<|user_end|><|assistant_start|>Reasoning Steps:
| 0 |
<s><|system_start|>You are Apertus, a helpful assistant created by the SwissAI initiative.\nKnowledge cutoff: 2024-04\nCurrent date: 2026-01-14<|system_end|><|developer_start|>Deliberation: disabled\nTool Capabilities: disabled<|developer_end|><|user_start|>You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: What information supports the conclusion that Peter acquired this trait?<|user_end|><|assistant_start|>Reasoning Steps:
| 1 |
<s><|system_start|>You are Apertus, a helpful assistant created by the SwissAI initiative.\nKnowledge cutoff: 2024-04\nCurrent date: 2026-01-14<|system_end|><|developer_start|>Deliberation: disabled\nTool Capabilities: disabled<|developer_end|><|user_start|>You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: What information supports the conclusion that Madelyn acquired this trait?<|user_end|><|assistant_start|>Reasoning Steps:
| 1 |
<s><|system_start|>You are Apertus, a helpful assistant created by the SwissAI initiative.\nKnowledge cutoff: 2024-04\nCurrent date: 2026-01-14<|system_end|><|developer_start|>Deliberation: disabled\nTool Capabilities: disabled<|developer_end|><|user_start|>You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: Select the one substance that is not a rock.<|user_end|><|assistant_start|>Reasoning Steps:
| 0 |
<s><|system_start|>You are Apertus, a helpful assistant created by the SwissAI initiative.\nKnowledge cutoff: 2024-04\nCurrent date: 2026-01-14<|system_end|><|developer_start|>Deliberation: disabled\nTool Capabilities: disabled<|developer_end|><|user_start|>You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: Which logical fallacy is used in the text?
If you're wondering whether purchasing the computer's extended warranty is a wise choice, let me point out that ninety percent of my customers choose to buy it. Don't question the wisdom of the crowd.<|user_end|><|assistant_start|>Reasoning Steps:
| 2 |
<s><|system_start|>You are Apertus, a helpful assistant created by the SwissAI initiative.\nKnowledge cutoff: 2024-04\nCurrent date: 2026-01-14<|system_end|><|developer_start|>Deliberation: disabled\nTool Capabilities: disabled<|developer_end|><|user_start|>You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: Which closing is correct for a letter?<|user_end|><|assistant_start|>Reasoning Steps:
| 1 |
<s><|system_start|>You are Apertus, a helpful assistant created by the SwissAI initiative.\nKnowledge cutoff: 2024-04\nCurrent date: 2026-01-14<|system_end|><|developer_start|>Deliberation: disabled\nTool Capabilities: disabled<|developer_end|><|user_start|>You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: Based on this information, what is this plant's phenotype for the fruit sheen trait?<|user_end|><|assistant_start|>Reasoning Steps:
| 0 |
<s><|system_start|>You are Apertus, a helpful assistant created by the SwissAI initiative.\nKnowledge cutoff: 2024-04\nCurrent date: 2026-01-14<|system_end|><|developer_start|>Deliberation: disabled\nTool Capabilities: disabled<|developer_end|><|user_start|>You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: What kind of sentence is this?
Jen gave me flowers for no reason.<|user_end|><|assistant_start|>Reasoning Steps:
| 0 |
<s><|system_start|>You are Apertus, a helpful assistant created by the SwissAI initiative.\nKnowledge cutoff: 2024-04\nCurrent date: 2026-01-14<|system_end|><|developer_start|>Deliberation: disabled\nTool Capabilities: disabled<|developer_end|><|user_start|>You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: Which correctly shows the title of a movie?<|user_end|><|assistant_start|>Reasoning Steps:
| 1 |
<s><|system_start|>You are Apertus, a helpful assistant created by the SwissAI initiative.\nKnowledge cutoff: 2024-04\nCurrent date: 2026-01-14<|system_end|><|developer_start|>Deliberation: disabled\nTool Capabilities: disabled<|developer_end|><|user_start|>You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: Complete the sentence.
In this chemical reaction, zinc oxide is a ().<|user_end|><|assistant_start|>Reasoning Steps:
| 0 |
<s><|system_start|>You are Apertus, a helpful assistant created by the SwissAI initiative.\nKnowledge cutoff: 2024-04\nCurrent date: 2026-01-14<|system_end|><|developer_start|>Deliberation: disabled\nTool Capabilities: disabled<|developer_end|><|user_start|>You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: Based on this information, what is Champ's genotype for the coat color gene?<|user_end|><|assistant_start|>Reasoning Steps:
| 0 |
<s><|system_start|>You are Apertus, a helpful assistant created by the SwissAI initiative.\nKnowledge cutoff: 2024-04\nCurrent date: 2026-01-14<|system_end|><|developer_start|>Deliberation: disabled\nTool Capabilities: disabled<|developer_end|><|user_start|>You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: What information supports the conclusion that Mabel acquired this trait?<|user_end|><|assistant_start|>Reasoning Steps:
| 2 |
<s><|system_start|>You are Apertus, a helpful assistant created by the SwissAI initiative.\nKnowledge cutoff: 2024-04\nCurrent date: 2026-01-14<|system_end|><|developer_start|>Deliberation: disabled\nTool Capabilities: disabled<|developer_end|><|user_start|>You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: What information supports the conclusion that Peter inherited this trait?<|user_end|><|assistant_start|>Reasoning Steps:
| 1 |
<s><|system_start|>You are Apertus, a helpful assistant created by the SwissAI initiative.\nKnowledge cutoff: 2024-04\nCurrent date: 2026-01-14<|system_end|><|developer_start|>Deliberation: disabled\nTool Capabilities: disabled<|developer_end|><|user_start|>You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: Choose the poem that uses onomatopoeia.<|user_end|><|assistant_start|>Reasoning Steps:
| 1 |
<s><|system_start|>You are Apertus, a helpful assistant created by the SwissAI initiative.\nKnowledge cutoff: 2024-04\nCurrent date: 2026-01-14<|system_end|><|developer_start|>Deliberation: disabled\nTool Capabilities: disabled<|developer_end|><|user_start|>You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: Select the one substance that is not a rock.<|user_end|><|assistant_start|>Reasoning Steps:
| 0 |
<s><|system_start|>You are Apertus, a helpful assistant created by the SwissAI initiative.\nKnowledge cutoff: 2024-04\nCurrent date: 2026-01-14<|system_end|><|developer_start|>Deliberation: disabled\nTool Capabilities: disabled<|developer_end|><|user_start|>You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: Which is a compound sentence?<|user_end|><|assistant_start|>Reasoning Steps:
| 1 |
<s><|system_start|>You are Apertus, a helpful assistant created by the SwissAI initiative.\nKnowledge cutoff: 2024-04\nCurrent date: 2026-01-14<|system_end|><|developer_start|>Deliberation: disabled\nTool Capabilities: disabled<|developer_end|><|user_start|>You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: Select the action that doesn't belong.<|user_end|><|assistant_start|>Reasoning Steps:
| 0 |
<s><|system_start|>You are Apertus, a helpful assistant created by the SwissAI initiative.\nKnowledge cutoff: 2024-04\nCurrent date: 2026-01-14<|system_end|><|developer_start|>Deliberation: disabled\nTool Capabilities: disabled<|developer_end|><|user_start|>You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: Which of the following contains a vague pronoun reference?<|user_end|><|assistant_start|>Reasoning Steps:
| 0 |
<s><|system_start|>You are Apertus, a helpful assistant created by the SwissAI initiative.\nKnowledge cutoff: 2024-04\nCurrent date: 2026-01-14<|system_end|><|developer_start|>Deliberation: disabled\nTool Capabilities: disabled<|developer_end|><|user_start|>You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: What information supports the conclusion that Sebastian inherited this trait?<|user_end|><|assistant_start|>Reasoning Steps:
| 0 |
<s><|system_start|>You are Apertus, a helpful assistant created by the SwissAI initiative.\nKnowledge cutoff: 2024-04\nCurrent date: 2026-01-14<|system_end|><|developer_start|>Deliberation: disabled\nTool Capabilities: disabled<|developer_end|><|user_start|>You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: Which closing is correct for a letter?<|user_end|><|assistant_start|>Reasoning Steps:
| 0 |
<s><|system_start|>You are Apertus, a helpful assistant created by the SwissAI initiative.\nKnowledge cutoff: 2024-04\nCurrent date: 2026-01-14<|system_end|><|developer_start|>Deliberation: disabled\nTool Capabilities: disabled<|developer_end|><|user_start|>You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: Which logical fallacy is used in the text?
Don't ever get a ride from Erin. Her brother has been driving for only six months, and he's already gotten three speeding tickets.<|user_end|><|assistant_start|>Reasoning Steps:
| 1 |
<s><|system_start|>You are Apertus, a helpful assistant created by the SwissAI initiative.\nKnowledge cutoff: 2024-04\nCurrent date: 2026-01-14<|system_end|><|developer_start|>Deliberation: disabled\nTool Capabilities: disabled<|developer_end|><|user_start|>You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: Which word does not rhyme?<|user_end|><|assistant_start|>Reasoning Steps:
| 1 |
<s><|system_start|>You are Apertus, a helpful assistant created by the SwissAI initiative.\nKnowledge cutoff: 2024-04\nCurrent date: 2026-01-14<|system_end|><|developer_start|>Deliberation: disabled\nTool Capabilities: disabled<|developer_end|><|user_start|>You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: Which logical fallacy is used in the text?
Right after Andrew moved into the apartment, our washing machine broke. He'd better tell us how he broke it.<|user_end|><|assistant_start|>Reasoning Steps:
| 0 |
<s><|system_start|>You are Apertus, a helpful assistant created by the SwissAI initiative.\nKnowledge cutoff: 2024-04\nCurrent date: 2026-01-14<|system_end|><|developer_start|>Deliberation: disabled\nTool Capabilities: disabled<|developer_end|><|user_start|>You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: Select the one true statement.<|user_end|><|assistant_start|>Reasoning Steps:
| 2 |
<s><|system_start|>You are Apertus, a helpful assistant created by the SwissAI initiative.\nKnowledge cutoff: 2024-04\nCurrent date: 2026-01-14<|system_end|><|developer_start|>Deliberation: disabled\nTool Capabilities: disabled<|developer_end|><|user_start|>You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: What kind of sentence is this?
Do you know Dalton from soccer camp, or do you have another connection with him?<|user_end|><|assistant_start|>Reasoning Steps:
| 1 |
<s><|system_start|>You are Apertus, a helpful assistant created by the SwissAI initiative.\nKnowledge cutoff: 2024-04\nCurrent date: 2026-01-14<|system_end|><|developer_start|>Deliberation: disabled\nTool Capabilities: disabled<|developer_end|><|user_start|>You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: Which logical fallacy is used in the text?
People with larger houses live longer. I guess bigger homes are better for your health!<|user_end|><|assistant_start|>Reasoning Steps:
| 0 |
<s><|system_start|>You are Apertus, a helpful assistant created by the SwissAI initiative.\nKnowledge cutoff: 2024-04\nCurrent date: 2026-01-14<|system_end|><|developer_start|>Deliberation: disabled\nTool Capabilities: disabled<|developer_end|><|user_start|>You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: Based on this information, what is Flicka's phenotype for the wool color trait?<|user_end|><|assistant_start|>Reasoning Steps:
| 1 |
<s><|system_start|>You are Apertus, a helpful assistant created by the SwissAI initiative.\nKnowledge cutoff: 2024-04\nCurrent date: 2026-01-14<|system_end|><|developer_start|>Deliberation: disabled\nTool Capabilities: disabled<|developer_end|><|user_start|>You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: Complete the sentence so that it uses personification.
Cindy groaned as her shrill alarm clock ().<|user_end|><|assistant_start|>Reasoning Steps:
| 1 |
<s><|system_start|>You are Apertus, a helpful assistant created by the SwissAI initiative.\nKnowledge cutoff: 2024-04\nCurrent date: 2026-01-14<|system_end|><|developer_start|>Deliberation: disabled\nTool Capabilities: disabled<|developer_end|><|user_start|>You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: Which of the following contains a vague pronoun reference?<|user_end|><|assistant_start|>Reasoning Steps:
| 0 |
<s><|system_start|>You are Apertus, a helpful assistant created by the SwissAI initiative.\nKnowledge cutoff: 2024-04\nCurrent date: 2026-01-14<|system_end|><|developer_start|>Deliberation: disabled\nTool Capabilities: disabled<|developer_end|><|user_start|>You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: Which is a run-on sentence?<|user_end|><|assistant_start|>Reasoning Steps:
| 0 |
<s><|system_start|>You are Apertus, a helpful assistant created by the SwissAI initiative.\nKnowledge cutoff: 2024-04\nCurrent date: 2026-01-14<|system_end|><|developer_start|>Deliberation: disabled\nTool Capabilities: disabled<|developer_end|><|user_start|>You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: Which change best matches the sentence?
A natural area, such as a grassland, catches fire and burns.<|user_end|><|assistant_start|>Reasoning Steps:
| 1 |
<s><|system_start|>You are Apertus, a helpful assistant created by the SwissAI initiative.\nKnowledge cutoff: 2024-04\nCurrent date: 2026-01-14<|system_end|><|developer_start|>Deliberation: disabled\nTool Capabilities: disabled<|developer_end|><|user_start|>You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: Which correctly shows the title of a song?<|user_end|><|assistant_start|>Reasoning Steps:
| 0 |
End of preview. Expand
in Data Studio
README.md exists but content is empty.
- Downloads last month
- -