text stringlengths 1 654k |
|---|
• |< |
• << |
• < |
• Page 1 |
• > |
• >> |
• >| |
No. Author Recipient Title Date Context |
1 Taylor, Robert Madison, James To James Madison from Robert Taylor, 31 August 1812 1812-08-31 When I saw Genl. Moses Green last he requested me to write you and inform you that if there was a... |
2 Goodrich, Charles Madison, James To James Madison from Charles Goodrich and Others, 13 … 1813-02-13 The Subscribers Citizens of the United States residing in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts beg... |
3 Blodget, Samuel Madison, James To James Madison from Samuel Blodget, 11 April 1810 1810-04-11 On observing to several friends in Congress (who are in favour of a renewal of the Charter to the... |
4 Lincoln, Levi Madison, James To James Madison from Levi Lincoln, 15 February 1811 1811-02-15 The last papers announce the nomination of Alexander Wolcott Esqre. as an associate Jud⟨ge o⟩f... |
5 Lafayette, Marie-Joseph-Paul-Yves-Roch-Gilbert du … Madison, James To James Madison from Lafayette, 13 November 1812 1812-11-13 While You are Honorably Engaged in patriotic Concerns for which my feelings Have not Ceased,... |
6 Barbour, James Madison, James To James Madison from James Barbour, 13 June 1814 1814-06-13 Whilst the revolution which has recently occurred in Europe astonishes and confounds by its... |
7 Dallas, Alexander James Madison, James To James Madison from Alexander James Dallas, 18 … 1816-10-18 I have just received your favor of the 15t. instant, and, conforming to it, I shall cease to act... |
8 Jefferson, Thomas Madison, James To James Madison from Thomas Jefferson, 15 October 1810 1810-10-15 Tho late, I congratulate you on the revocation of the French decrees, & Congress still more; for... |
9 Gallatin, Albert Madison, James To James Madison from Albert Gallatin, 7 June 1816 1816-06-07 I have this moment received your’s of 3d. instt., an answer to which has been anticipated by my... |
10 Acheson, Thomas Madison, James To James Madison from Thomas Acheson, 1 September 1812 1812-09-01 I addressd. your excellency a few days ago on the rumourd. defeat and Surrender of Genl. Hull’s... |
11 Parker, Daniel Madison, James To James Madison from Daniel Parker, 5 August 1816 1816-08-05 I have this morning received the enclosed from General Gaines. I had before requested of Mjr.... |
12 McKenney, Thomas L. Madison, James To James Madison from Thomas L. McKenney, 2 September … 1814-09-02 When I had the pleasure of seeing you this morning you desired to know how we had succeeded in... |
13 Lowndes, William J. Madison, James To James Madison from William J. Lowndes, 20 October … 1816-10-20 I feel very sensibly the honor which you do me in offering me the charge of the War-department &... |
14 Adams, John Madison, James To James Madison from John Adams, 28 November 1814 1814-11-28 When my Son departed for Russia, I enjoined upon him to write nothing to me, which he was not... |
15 Barlow, Joel Madison, James To James Madison from Joel Barlow, 19 December 1811 1811-12-19 As an additional apology for detaining the Frigate as well as for believing that an answer... |
16 Lovett, John Madison, James To James Madison from John Lovett, 28 January 1817 1817-01-28 I have the honour to enclose the Petition of Leonard Blanchard, praying for a commission in the... |
17 Monroe, James Madison, James To James Madison from James Monroe, [ca. 1 December … 1813-12-01 It is not known that the British govt. has accepted the mediation of Russia; nothing has been... |
18 Gallatin, Albert Madison, James To James Madison from Albert Gallatin, 17 March 1812 … 1812-03-17 17 March 1812, Treasury Department. Encloses a letter from Winslow Lewis [not found] “proposing... |
19 Hall, Charles Madison, James To James Madison from Charles Hall, 8 August 1812 1812-08-08 I have conversed with several passengers who arrived here last week in the Ship William direct... |
20 Huntington, Samuel Madison, James To James Madison from Samuel Huntington, 22 February … 1810-02-22 Agreably to the request of the General Assembly of the State of Ohio, I have the honor to... |
21 Kent, Joseph Madison, James To James Madison from Joseph Kent, 11 February 1814 … 1814-02-11 § From Joseph Kent. 11 February 1814. “Hoping that it is your intention to select a character... |
22 Jefferson, Thomas Madison, James To James Madison from Thomas Jefferson, 25 May 1812 1812-05-25 The difference between a communication & sollicitation is too obvious to need suggestion. While... |
23 Johnson, James B. Madison, James To James Madison from James B. Johnson, 15 June 1815 1815-06-15 Ruler the period has now arived when we are hailed by the glorious dispenser of human blessings,... |
24 Sloo, Thomas Madison, James To James Madison from Thomas Sloo and Others, [ca. 1 … 1815-09-01 § From Thomas Sloo and Others. Ca. 1 September 1815. “The undersigned inhabitants of the Circuit... |
25 Adams, John Madison, James From John Adams to James Madison, 22 October 1816 1816-10-22 Thank you for your favour of the 12th. The Anecdote mentioned in my Letter of the 4th of... |
26 Warden, David Bailie Madison, James To James Madison from David Bailie Warden, 2 July 1809 1809-07-02 I have the honor of offering, for your acceptance, the life of the Duke of Malborough lately... |
27 Willett, Marinus Madison, James To James Madison from Marinus Willett, 3 December 1813 1813-12-03 I request your patience to the talk of a man of three score & thirteen. The failure of the... |
28 Nicholas, Wilson Cary Madison, James To James Madison from Wilson Cary Nicholas, 28 April … 1816-04-28 Be pleased to accept my cordial thanks for the inquiries you have made as to an engineer for this... |
29 Blackledge, William Madison, James To James Madison from William Blackledge, 20 March 1812 1812-03-20 I have this day received a letter from my correspondent in New York (a letter from whom I did... |
30 Rush, Richard Madison, James To James Madison from Richard Rush, 12 February 1814 1814-02-12 Having received the commission of attorney general of the United states which you have been... |
Aletho News |
ΑΛΗΘΩΣ |
9/11 Whistleblowers: Kevin Ryan |
• 09/06/2019 |
TRANSCRIPT |
“But someone would have talked” say the self-styled skeptics that believe the government’s official conspiracy theory of 9/11.” After all, every major conspiracy has its whistleblowers, doesn’t it?” |
But there’s a problem with this logically fallacious non-argument. “Someone” did talk. In fact, numerous people have come out to blow the whistle on the events of September 11, 2001, and the cover up that surrounds those events. |
These are the stories of the 9/11 Whistleblowers. |
You’re tuned in to The Corbett Report. |
In 2001, Kevin Ryan was the site manager at Environmental Health Laboratories (EHL) in South Bend, Indiana. At the time, EHL was a subsidiary of Underwriters Laboratories (UL), a global safety consulting and certification corporation that tests a range of consumer and industrial products for compliance with government ... |
Just weeks after the events of September 11, 2001, UL’s then-CEO, Loring Knoblauch, visited Ryan’s EHL lab in South Bend. During his speech there, Knoblauch assured the lab’s workers that UL “had certified the steel in the World Trade Center buildings” and “that we should all be proud that the buildings had stood for s... |
But Ryan’s curiosity about UL’s role in the certification of the World Trade Center steel was piqued when, in 2003, he began to question the lies that the Bush administration had used to justify the invasion of Iraq, and, eventually, to question the official story of September 11th itself. Recalling Knoblauch’s comment... |
As Ryan began to learn more about the issues involved with the destruction of the towers and the ongoing investigation into that destruction, his concerns only grew. Why had the actual steel evidence of the towers’s destruction been illegally removed and disposed of before a proper investigation could take place? Why d... |
These concerns prompted Ryan, in October 2003, to write directly to Loring Knoblauch, outlining his thoughts and “asking what [Knoblauch] was doing to protect our reputation.” But if Ryan was expecting Knoblauch to put his mind at ease about these issues, he was sorely disappointed. Instead, Knoblauch—who included Tom ... |
KEVIN RYAN: Knoblauch copied Tom Chapin on his response to me, because it was Tom’s job as the leader of the fire resistance division to really address these kinds of things. And interestingly, Tom Chapin had written a letter to the editors at The New York Times in 2002 where he basically admitted, again, that UL’s tes... |
So Loring Knoblauch wrote back to me after my questions in—it must have been October 2003 when I wrote to him. He wrote back to me a month later and he said all these things about how the company had tested the steel components used to build the World Trade Center towers. What he meant is he we had tested samples of th... |
And not only that but NIST—the government agency NIST [the National Institute of Standards and Technology]—had made clear in some of their progress reports that UL had consulted with the construction companies for the World Trade Center towers, and throughout the building of the buildings that UL had provided that info... |
And Tom Chapin replied further to me that the NIST agency was doing an investigation and asked me, basically, to have patience. And I did for maybe the next year. |
In 2002, NIST began its three-year, $16 million study of the Twin Towers’ “failure.” Tom Chapin had assured Ryan that UL was cooperating with this investigation, and that his concerns would be allayed once the final report was released. But by 2004, it was already clear that there were serious problems with that report... |
RYAN: Well, it’s very important to understand that with the official accounts for the World Trade Center, there were a number of explanations given in the early years. And for the towers the one that was settled upon and that lasted for three years was the pancake theory. |
And the pancake theory was this concept where the floor assemblies had heated up and sagged and this steel had softened or weakened and then they started to collapse upon each other in a pancake fashion. And then the the columns basically just folded inward. So that was the official account, really. It was given by the... |
And UL tested the floor assemblies basically for the possibility of this in August 2004. So this was, again, nine months or ten months after I had asked my original questions. And they did so by using different assemblies with varying amounts of fireproofing. One of the assemblies had basically no fire proofing on it a... |
And they made that clear. NIST made this clear, that the pancake theory was not supported. So that left us all at that time with no explanation, in 2004, three years later. Having invaded Iraq, having done so much to invest in the official account that the World Trade Center had been destroyed by these planes. And that... |
Realizing that UL was not pressing NIST on the discrepancies in its findings, Kevin Ryan took matters into his own hands and, on November 11, 2004, wrote directly to Frank Gayle, the director of NIST’s Twin Towers investigation. That email began: |
“As I’m sure you know, the company I work for certified the steel components used in the construction of the WTC buildings. In requesting information from both our CEO and Fire Protection business manager last year, I learned that they did not agree on the essential aspects of the story, except for one thing—that the s... |
After pointing out the problems raised by NIST’s own investigation—including the tests that disproved claims that the steel in the floor area simply “melted”—Ryan got to the heart of the matter: |
“This story just does not add up. If steel from those buildings did soften or melt, I’m sure we can all agree that this was certainly not due to jet fuel fires of any kind, let alone the briefly burning fires in those towers. That fact should be of great concern to all Americans. Alternatively, the contention that this... |
“There is no question that the events of 9/11 are the emotional driving force behind the War on Terror. And the issue of the WTC collapse is at the crux of the story of 9/11. My feeling is that your metallurgical tests are at the crux of the crux of the crux. Either you can make sense of what really happened to those b... |
Predictably, if unfortunately, Gayle never responded to the email. However, Ryan made the important decision to share the email, and his concerns, with the broader public: |
RYAN: Frank did not respond, no. Actually, that letter was sent to him and then also copied to a couple of people who were trying to find more information. Trying to find the truth about what happened on 9/11. Those two included David Griffin, who had just recently written a book, and Catherine Austin Fitz, the directo... |
Dr. Griffin asked me almost immediately if he could share it publicly. And, of course, with some hesitation, but knowing the importance in believing what I wrote, I told him it was OK. And overnight there must have been tens of thousands of people reading this letter on the web and people calling our offices in South B... |
So Dr. Gayle did not respond. He’s never responded. Maybe one day I will talk to him personally and find out what he thinks. But, you know, these things are clear in terms of job—this is not really just a career decision, although it is. It’s a career decision. It’s more than that, it’s a decision about, you know, what... |
Ryan did not engage in these actions naively. He knew that allowing his concerns to go public would focus public attention on himself and on UL, and that such actions would have ramifications for his employment. |
But if he was bracing himself for those ramifications, he didn’t have long to wait. His email to Frank Gayle was sent on Thursday, November 11, 2004. It was published on the web the following day. Immediately, Ryan’s phone was ringing off the hook and UL was being contacted for comment. That weekend, the company reache... |
RYAN: The Human Resources folks called me that weekend and asked if I would contact the people on the web who had published it and asked that it be taken down. And I refused to do that and told them that I didn’t think that was the right thing to do. And I think it was at that very point then they started making the pl... |
So I had actually taken the next Monday off of work and that was convenient. It allowed me to get my thoughts together. And then on Tuesday when I came in—which I believe was the 16th—the leaders from the Northbrook, Chicago office were there, and they had told me they would be: “Please make sure you’re there.” They br... |
So, yeah, that was a tough spot for my family and I. But my wife has been supportive. She knows the idealistic nature of her husband, I think, and she knew why it was important. And we’ve done fine, we’ve gotten by and gotten other jobs. And that’s—I believe people should recognize that it’s not the end of the world to... |
Not for courting controversy, but merely for pointing out the glaring truth, Ryan was fired from his job. Like so many other whistleblowers in so many other stories, Ryan paid a price for doing what his conscience demanded. |
Also like many other brave men and women who have been thrust into the position of blowing the whistle, Ryan has found a way to thrive despite the setbacks. Rather than keeping quiet and moving on with his life, Ryan has doubled down on his efforts, founding several action groups, editing the Journal of 9/11 Studies, w... |
In the end, despite the high price he paid career-wise, Ryan feels that his decision to blow the whistle and call out the self-contradictions of the NIST investigation was worth it. After all, it is only when those who know the truth are unafraid to step up and speak it, regardless of the personal consequences, that we... |
RYAN: What I’ve been able to benefit from is understanding a lot more about society, history, politics, being better at communicating myself. And I’ve met a lot of great people. We’ve worked together to raise awareness and try to bring justice for 9/11. You know, I’ve met and presented with 9/11 victims’ family members... |
It’s a personal decision, of course, and it has to be motivated by trying to do some good. If it’s not motivated by trying to do some good then you’re doing the wrong thing. |
September 7, 2019 - Posted by | Deception, False Flag Terrorism, Timeless or most popular, Video | , |
2 Comments » |
1. When “trying to do some good” also involves willful silence about WHO did 9-11, IMO, Kevin Ryan is doing the wrong thing. |
Comment by John Edward Kendrick | September 7, 2019 | Reply |
2. The “GRENFELL TOWER” in London UK, a 25 story residential tower, was engulfed in flames for 60 hours, and it is still standing today. |
The “9/11” story is so full of holes it is totally ridiculous, and no argument pointing out the “bleeding obvious” has been allowed. |
The Owner of Tower 7 has even publicly admitted that HE “Pulled the building”!!…….WTF? |
Comment by Brian Harry, Australia | September 7, 2019 | Reply |
Leave a Reply |
Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: |
WordPress.com Logo |
You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change ) |
Google photo |
You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out / Change ) |
Twitter picture |
You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change ) |
Facebook photo |
You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change ) |
Connecting to %s |
This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed. |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.