text
stringlengths
1
330k
That's as cheap as it gets.
If you *do* teach him to knit, you'd better post pictures. Burly male knitters are always fun to see, especially when they're knitting socks.
Sorry, I wish I could help with the software, but I opened the comments to see what other people were recommending, myself. Let us know what you come up with!
People are always 'asking' me to make them stuff as soon as they hear that I sew, knit, spin, and find other ways to make tiny knots. I used to try to explain - back when I still had compassion. Now, I've moved onto complacency at best and just ignore, ignore, ignore - you know, the grown woman's version of 'la la la, ...
I'm de-lurking on this one - I resent when people say "Well, you knit, make (fill in the blank) for me." That's when I tell them how much the yarn would cost, and how much I would charge per hour to knit. They get kind of sick looks of horror on their faces and drop the subject quickly. I think it's because they're use...
I have a very dear friend who, every time she sees me knitting something, says that I could knit one of those for her. I laugh, as if it were a joke, because I just don't have enough time and money in the world to knit doubles of everything! (I did knit her a scarf for her birthday, I'm not evil, but socks frankly are ...
I'm with the teach him to knit crowd -- that'd get rid of him fast enough!
I used to use the "I'll teach you how..." line when guys would ask me to knit something for them, but then 2 of my male co-workers came in with yarn and needles and I had to make good on my word. One of them made his girlfriend (now wife) a scarf, and now she knits. The other makes hats and scarves for his family for H...
I don't have any software, but I really like Maggie Righetti's Sweater Design in Plain English.
I also checked out Aran Knitting (the Alice *more one) from the library once and it had good design-your-own stuff for cables. I ain't paying $200 for it, but the library was free and I could have it for 3 weeks. They might have the Righetti book too.
you might check out janet szabo's books-she has excellent aran stuff.
when i've had people tell me, 'you should knit me a sweater', i offer to teach them to knit, and only rarely does the person take me up on my offer. i once told someone, 'what do you think i am, a common knittitute?' i only knit for love...
Eeeshta! Large, too. Bog. Does he want it when he's 40? Oh yeah. Teach him to knit...uh, if you had the time. ;)
The Wool Works site has links on knitting software of various types (some dead):
Lot of price ranges; first one listed, for instance, starts at $200! ::thud:: Cochenille is $165. Fortunately, there are two others listed that'd do what you want:
Knitware Design, near as I can tell, is the cheapest of the "will actually design sweater" software; $50 if you d'load direct from their site. Then there's the one I have: Knitting Software's Sweater Wizard 3.0 (and two version upgrade d'loads you should also get from their site, free); $89. While I've never actually k...
Then whatever you get, grab a used copy of the Harmony Guide's 220 Aran Stitches and Patterns, which not only has scads of cables, etc., in chart and written form with excellent photos, but a fairly decent overview on how to put 'em together in a sweater.
Knitting fonts, both free:
Aire Design
Knitter's Magazine symbols font - also the key, separate d'load - find at very bottom of this page:
Hmm, I commented on a hat a customer was wearing yesterday, a nice handspun, hand knit simple hat. She somewhat apologized for the fact that she paid $20 for it. I told her that she got a bargain, just the yarn for the hats I am making my family is almost $6 each, plus my time (which as a student/fulltime worker is eve...
Just say no.
This is exactly why I live in FL. Well, I like to think it was so conveniently planned that way...
Grrr....I know he meant well but...grrrr none the less. I find it really irritating when people assume that my time is worth less than theirs.
I am with the I'll teach you to knit crowd also. I have had a few takers (very few) but hey..if they want it bad enough. Most will try a few rows, find out that it actually takes time and skill and give up, but...they never ask me to make them another thing.
Hon, your young mountainous security guard is totally hitting on you.
Gawd, he is SO hitting on you.
I am dealing with a co-worker (who is also a dear friend) commenting recently that she's never received a hand knitted object from me - this came up recently when I whipped out a shawl for another co-workers friend with cancer.
I just informed her that I have never knit something for another person who was not related to me unless they were dying.
She shut up.
I agree that the security guard should be taught to knit - then you could ask him to make YOU something in return.
Post a Comment
<< Home
This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?
SF Bay Area Indymedia indymedia
About Contact Subscribe Calendar Publish Print Donate
U.S. | Police State and Prisons
War on Terror Advocate to Head Homeland Security
by Stephen Lendman
Friday Oct 18th, 2013 11:52 PM
police state
War on Terror Advocate to Head Homeland Security
by Stephen Lendman
Obama intends to nominate former Defense Department general counsel Jeh Johnson as new DHS chief.
He's responsible for endorsing some of Washington's most lawless policies. His rap sheet reveals great cause for concern. More on him below.
Post-9/11, police state terror followed. Obama expanded it.    
It's unprecedented in size, scope and ruthlessness.
DHS is America's Gestapo. The November 25, 2002 Homeland Security Act established it. Twenty-two federal agencies were combined under one authority.
They include Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), Transportation Security, the Secret Service, FEMA, National Protection and Programs Directorate, and the Coast Guard among others.
DHS concentrates unprecedented executive branch military and law enforcement empowerment. It's a rogue agency. It's insidious.  It's a police state apparatus writ large. It's a dagger at the heart of freedom.
Its four main mandates include:
• border and transportation security;
• emergency and disaster preparedness;
• developing nuclear, chemical and biological weapons countermeasures; and
• centralizing storage and analysis of potential threat information.
US Northern Command (NORTHCOM) was established months earlier (April 25, 2002). Doing so was unprecedented.
For the first time, America's mainland, Alaska, Canada, Mexico, Gulf waters, Florida straits, and portions of the Caribbean were militarized. Troops may be deployed on US streets.
Doing so violates core 1807 Insurrection Act and 1878 Posse Comitatus Act principles.
They prohibit using federal and National Guard forces for domestic law enforcement except as constitutionally allowed or expressly authorized by Congress in times of insurrection or other national emergency.
No longer. Usurped diktat authority lets presidents claim emergency powers, declare martial law, suspend the Constitution, and deploy federal and/or National Guard troops on US streets to suppress whatever is called disorder.
Fundamental freedoms are endangered. First Amendment ones matter most. Without them all others are at risk. They include free expression, assembly, religion, and right to petition government for redress.
Police state ruthlessness defines today's America. International, constitutional and US statute laws no longer matter. They lie in history's dustbin.
Diktat power replaced them. No one any longer is safe. Doing the right thing is dangerous. Guilt by accusation is policy.
Anyone can be arrested, held uncharged, and detained indefinitely. Due process, judicial fairness, and other civil rights no longer protect.
If confirmed, Johnson will replace Janet Napolitano. She reflected the worst of repressive governance. Throughout her tenure, she violated fundamental rule of law principles.
She terrorized Latino immigrants. She waged war on Occupy Wall Street. She obstructed FOIA requests.
She advanced America toward full-blown tyranny. Expect Johnson to pick up where she left off. His record gives pause for concern.
His legal career combined private and government service. From 1989 - 1991, he was GHW Bush's Assistant US Attorney for the Southern District of New York.
From 1998 - 2001, he was Clinton's Air Force Department general counsel. He's currently a Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison partner.
His former Defense Department responsibilities included legal review and approval of all military related operations.
An unnamed senior Obama administration official said:
It includes defending military commission prosecutions. They're for so-called "unprivileged enemy belligerents." Bush called them "unlawful enemy combatants."
Johnson supports all of the above. Doing so qualifies him to head DHS. He endorses targeted assassinations by drones or other means.
He defends lawless NSA spying. He champions waging war on terror at home and abroad.
On November 30, 2012, he addressed the Oxford Union in London. He titled his talk "The Conflict Against Al Qaeda and its Affiliates: How Will It End?"
He claimed credit for working with Congress "to enact the Military Commissions Act (MCA) of 2009." It renewed its initial 2006 authorization.
It scrapped habeas protection. It granted sweeping police state powers. They're unchanged today. MCA states:
With or without evidence, "Any person is punishable who aids, abets, counsels, commands, procures," or in any way provides "material support" to alleged terrorists.
Charged suspects are guilty by accusation. Enhanced interrogations (aka torture) are authorized.
So is denying detainees international law protections. Presidents can authorize military commissions at their discretion.
Torture coerced confessions are admissible. Hearsay and secret evidence is permitted. Kangaroo court justice follows.
Johnson vowed to keep fighting Al Qaeda. "(W)e are taking the fight directly to AQAP (Al Qaeda on the Arabian Peninsula)," he said.
He omitted explaining that Washington uses Al Qaeda and similar groups strategically as enemies and allies.
He called targeting Al Qaeda "a new kind of war. It is an unconventional war against an unconventional enemy."
He implied that old rules don't apply. Waging war on Al Qaeda won't "end in conventional terms," he said.
The most "unconventional" tactics are used. Fundamental rule of law principles are violated doing so.
On February 16, 2012, New York City Bar President Samuel Seymour wrote Johnson, saying:
"(W)e write to express our concern with the Order Governing Written Communications Management for Detainees Involved in Military Commissions, dated December 27, 2011."
"The Association is alarmed at the dramatic impingement on the attorney-client privilege resulting from the procedures set forth in the Order."
"The sanctity of the attorney-client privilege is fundamental to our system of justice."
"If the Order is implemented, (it) will be gravely undermined."
"We urge the appropriate authority to vacate the Order and (replace it with) a (proper) legal framework."
It's in stark contrast to civil proceedings. It's fundamentally unfair and unjust.
Seymour's letter was comprehensive. It was lengthy. It ran nine pages.
He concluded saying "the Association believes the Written Communications Order is problematic because it invades the attorney-client privilege, inappropriately inserts outsiders into the defense team, and reverses the presumption that the privilege should be respected, all on a blanket basis and without any particulari...
"We believe the Order threatens to undermine the proper functioning of the adversary system and" helps delegitimize military commission prosecutions.
On March 18, 2013, Johnson spoke at the Center on National Security at Fordham Law School." He titled his address "A 'Drone Court:' Some Pros and Cons."
He claimed "appropriate lethal force" made America's homeland safer. It's never been less safe.
He advocates drone killings. He asked what about establishing a drone court? He's comfortable about an authority acting as judge, jury and executioner.
He wants it kept within the executive branch. Targeted assassination authorizations aren't suited for judicial review. Quick action is needed to implement them.