text stringlengths 1 330k |
|---|
por Werther 20 de Novembro de 2002 |
1. Object of masturbation. |
2. Object of mooseterbation. |
3. Something that performs tasks. |
Dont use your head for it, I'll use my hand! |
por Werther 23 de Setembro de 2002 |
Where you go to dispose of bodies. |
I took my cousin "down to the river" last night, I sure do miss him. |
por Werther 23 de Setembro de 2002 |
1. Object of fornication |
2. Convenient place to stab someone and store their body without those bloody police ever knowing! |
3. Large flat surface on which you perform tasks assigned to you. |
I am going to my desk to "take care" of Jennifer, my secretary. |
por Werther 19 de Setembro de 2002 |
Where I put my drug money. |
After the smash-up buisiness I did friday, I put the money in the bank. |
por Werther 23 de Setembro de 2002 |
What Snoop-Dogg does his laundry with. |
Man you need some bleeach wit does hoes! |
por Werther 07 de Outubro de 2002 |
1. Something with which to consume sustenance. |
2. On the female, something that recieves "the shaft" |
3. an object that recieves a "load" |
Man I'll take care of her face....Muwhahahahahaha |
por Werther 23 de Setembro de 2002 |
Email diário grátis |
WASHINGTON—A dispute over budget cuts that threaten dozens of smaller control towers with closure slowed Senate progress Tuesday on legislation to avoid a government shutdown on March 27. |
Sen. Jerry Moran, R-Kan., refused repeatedly to permit final passage of the measure unless Democrats first allow a vote on his plan for erasing most of the cuts aimed at towers operated by Federal Aviation Administration contract employees. |
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., just as persistently declined to give in, and other Democrats noted that House Republicans had rejected calls to give all federal agencies the type of budget flexibility that Moran was seeking. |
The test of wills endured as Republicans and Democrats in Congress struggled with two goals—ensuring there is no interruption of routine government funding while simultaneously vying for political advantage in the wake of $85 billion in across-the-board spending cuts that kicked in earlier this month. |
Across the Capitol, the Republican-controlled House began debate on a budget that promises to eliminate federal deficits in decade. The blueprint, authored by Rep. Paul Ryan, D-Wis., calls for $6.4 trillion in spending cuts and no tax increases, and is expected to clear by week's end. |
For their part, Senate Republicans kept their distance from the plan, deciding not to seek a symbolic vote on it when the Senate begins its own budget debate later in the week. |
Sensing an opportunity for political mischief, Senate Democrats vowed not to let Republicans off easy. They said they would require a vote on Ryan's budget—even though they unanimously oppose it. |
As gridlock gripped the Senate, the top U.S. commander in South America told Congress the cuts would reduce if not eliminate the entire fleet of ships used to counter drug-runners. |
Gen. John Kelly said that U.S. forces seized 150 to 200 tons of cocaine last year. If the budget cuts stand, "next year all of that will make its way ashore and into the United States," he told the Senate Armed Services Committee. |
In the Senate, Moran said, "It's not my nature to be an obstructionist" as he pressed his case. He added that his proposal has support from senators in both parties and that House Republican leaders have indicated the bill's final approval would not be jeopardized if the change were incorporated. |
Democrats responded tartly. |
"I want to restore the Head Start to 70,000 children. I want to restore 10,000 teacher jobs," countered Sen. Barbara Boxer, D-Calif., referring to the threatened impact of across-the-board cuts elsewhere in the budget. |
In general, senior members of the Senate Appropriations Committee have worked harmoniously to ease the impact of the $85 billion in spending cuts on numerous agencies. |
As drafted, the measure includes House-passed provisions to give the Pentagon and the Department of Veterans Affairs flexibility in coping with the cuts. It also extends similar leeway to the departments of Agriculture, Commerce, Justice and Homeland Security, as well as the Food and Drug Administration. |
There was no such provision for the FAA, where Moran said officials had ordered a 75 percent cut in funding for airport towers operated by contract employees even though the agency's overall reduction is 5 percent. |
The Kansan suggested strongly that Democrats were playing politics with the issue. |
"I've been trying to fathom why would the Department of Transportation, in a sense, single out this program," he said on Monday night. |
"It's hard for me to fathom a good answer to that question, and the closest I can come is there are those in Washington, D.C., who want to demonstrate that we can't cut a dime—we can't cut $85 billion in federal spending from $3.6 trillion, just 28 days of spending—at all," added Moran, who doubles as chairman of the S... |
In the case of the FAA, Moran's office circulated a list of 173 facilities that could be closed. Seven were in the senator's home state and the rest scattered around the country. Most if not all are smaller or medium-size locations. |
Moran's proposal calls for transferring $50 million to the contract tower program from FAA accounts that have unspent funds. His office said the shift would leave the contract tower program with the same 5 percent cut that other parts of the agency must absorb. |
FAA Administrator Michael P. Huerta told Congress recently that when it came to deciding where to cut, the agency tried to "minimize inconvenience for the maximum of travelers." |
The two political parties have sought for weeks to avoid blame for any public inconvenience that results from the budget cuts, known in Washington-speak as a sequester, and it's likely they will accelerate their efforts as the cuts begin to bite. |
So far, much of the back and forth has focused on relatively minor matters, including the decision to cancel White House tours and House Speaker John Boehner's periodic reminders to the public that the Capitol is open as usual for out-of-towners to visit. |
By contrast, hundreds of thousands of federal employees face unpaid furloughs beginning next month. |
Associated Press writer Lolita C. Baldor contributed to this report. |
Take the 2-minute tour × |
I'm trying to install a Cisco VPN software (for my work) on my home computer. I'm running Windows 8 Pro 64-bit, and I'm told that this software works fine on Windows 8 Pro. However, during installation, my computer blue-screened. Now when I try to re-install, it says: |
You must first uninstall the Cisco VPN software in Control Panel -> Remove Programs |
The problem is, the software wasn't ever installed completely so it doesn't show up in my Control Panel list of programs. There also isn't an Add/Remove option from the installer itself. |
I went ahead and removed the folder & files that were created out at C:\Program Files\ for the software, but that didn't "fully remove it" apparently. |
Has anyone encountered something like this before? I'd really prefer not to reformat my hard drive because I have tons of stuff that I don't feel like re-installing. |
How can I fully remove this software so that I can attempt to reinstall? |
I ended up restoring my computer back to a previous point in time (there was actually a restore point called "Before Cisco VPN Software was installed" so I chose that. After that, I was able to reinstall - and had no problems this time. |
share|improve this question |
Most likely you will have to remove its entries from the registry. I dont have the Cisco VPN software, so I cant tell you what to delete. – Keltari Jan 31 '13 at 19:25 |
Is there any way to even find out what entries were added? – lhan Jan 31 '13 at 19:31 |
you can install it on another machine and look for the differences. This is not an easy task if you dont know what to look for. Have you tried contacting Cisco support? – Keltari Jan 31 '13 at 19:36 |
Nope, I haven't. I'll probably try and installing it on another machine. Then if it does work, I'll look for the differences. – lhan Jan 31 '13 at 19:38 |
You can use Process Monitor by Sysinternals to capture the file (including registry) IO calls made when you try to run setup. Somewhere in there you'll find what registry key it's checking. You can get it here: technet.microsoft.com/en-us/sysinternals/bb896645 – Mark Allen Feb 1 '13 at 3:51 |
1 Answer 1 |
Agreed that it sounds like a hosed registry. Tools such as CCleaner or Revo Uninstaller should be able to clean it up nice for you. |
share|improve this answer |
Thank you! I'll give this a try tonight and let you know! – lhan Jan 31 '13 at 19:50 |
@lhan16 Did you give it a try? How did it go? – Kruug Feb 1 '13 at 4:38 |
Yep, creating a restore point allowed me to reinstall. Thanks! – lhan Feb 5 '13 at 0:19 |
Your Answer |
Take the 2-minute tour × |
I'm having a problem where our Windows Server 2003 domain controller assigns my Windows 7 computer one IP address (x.x.x.75) via DHCP, but reports another (x.x.x.84) via DNS. This causes some interesting behavior on the network. If I change my adapter settings to get IP and DNS addresses from DHCP, I can access the int... |
I know that we have some old, invalid reverse DNS pointers hanging around (a reverse lookup on an IP address often gives more than one result, usually not including the one that is correct), so that could be contributing, but my problem is recent, and the invalid reverse pointers have been around a long time. |
What's going on, and how do I fix it? |
share|improve this question |
2 Answers 2 |
up vote 11 down vote accepted |
Do you have DNS aging and/or DNS scavenging properly configured? As you said yourself, it sounds like you have too many old DNS records hanging around on your domain controller. My suggestion is to look into setting up DNS scavenging or at the very least, delete the old A record (x.x.x.84) and then renew your workstati... |
DNS scavenging will periodically remove the old DNS records that were dynamically generated when a client received a DHCP lease. This is a Good Thing (TM). DNS records are only good (and useful) if they are actually fresh. Having a bunch of records that point to clients that are no longer there isn't useful. |
You might also want to look at your DHCP lease TTL to make sure that it appropriately matches your DNS TTL and "aging" policy. A contrived example: if your TTL for DHCP leases is 12 hours and your DNS aging policy is to keep records for three weeks, you're just setting yourself up for trouble. |
The earlier mentioned technet blog post is a good place to start. |
share|improve this answer |
I don't think we have either of those really set up, but I'll look into it; it would probably be beneficial. I deleted both DNS records for my workstation (forward and reverse), then released and renewed my IP. DNS and DHCP now match, and everything appears to be working. – Mr. Jefferson Jun 21 '11 at 21:38 |
Your problem, as stated, is that the name→address DNS lookup for your computer results in a different IP address to the one that the computer actually has. This has nothing to do with PTR resource records, which are not involved in name→address DNS lookups. (They are used for address→name lookups.) Cleaning up your PTR... |
What will fix your problem is finding out why the name→address DNS lookups aren't correct. Since you are using DHCP, your DNS database should be being dynamically updated with the name→address maps as the DHCP server hands out leases. For best results, one configures one's DHCP server to talk to the DNS server directly... |
But some people have their DHCP clients do this. In which case one can run into various permissions problems, such as DHCP clients not having appropriate update permissions, or not being able to update records in the database that they don't have the access rights to, or being able to hijack special-use domain names th... |
So find out whether your DHCP server or your DHCP clients are sending the updates to the (content) DNS server. Ensure that the access controls let whichever is performing the updates do so, ensure that the server is recieving the update traffic, ensure that the appropriate parts of the namespace are updatable, ensure t... |
share|improve this answer |
The poster specifically mentioned issues with reverse DNS lookups as well, but you are correct in that the 1st part of the question has nothing to do with PTR records. I've update my answer to try and be more correct. – kce Jun 22 '11 at 16:23 |
I know what the questioner mentioned. I addressed it in the first paragraph. Xe didn't mention PTR resource records as a problem. Xe suggested it as a potential cause of the actual problem, which of course it isn't. The questioner even supposed as much xyrself. – JdeBP Jun 22 '11 at 16:31 |
Your Answer |
Arts and Entertainment your connection to The Boston Globe |
A mad, sad tale lives up to its title in 'Crazy Love' |
Every neighborhood has its freak-show married couple -- the two who call each other names at parties, break things, toss their emotional trash all over the lawn. You wince and look away, maybe wondering how two people who hate each other so much can need each other so much. At the same time, part of you is grateful for... |
"Crazy Love" more or less nominates Burt and Linda Pugach as New York City's most dysfunctional couple of all time, which is astounding when you consider the competition. But the documentary backs it up. Directors Dan Klores and Fisher Stevens (the latter officially credited as "co-director," whatever that means) trace... |
Don't be fooled. How many sweet old men at the deli once hired goons to blind their girlfriends with lye, served jail time, then married them when they got out? |
When he spied the 18-year-old Linda Riss at the beach in 1957, Pugach, then 30, had to have her. An ambulance chaser with a brisk law practice, Pugach liked to live large. The naive Linda was dazzled. So what if he looked like movie nerd Arnold Stang ? "He owned a nightclub. He was a lawyer. He had a plane," recalls on... |
The fact that he was already married, for one thing. Pathological jealousy, for another. When Linda dumped him after learning of his wife, Burt lay on the floor and wailed like a 2-year-old. Then he grew a scary beard. Then he called Herb and Al . "If I can't have her, no one can," he said -- the eternal cry of the spu... |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.