Datasets:
id string | tile_id string | task string | question string | answer string | answer_value unknown | answer_type string | rendered_target_value string | decision_value string | target_column string | phrase_id int64 | split string | training_target string | target_format string | response_instruction string |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C51:E56N23_x5672050_y2300050:p05 | E56N23_x5672050_y2300050 | C51 | Please summarize monitoring priority for this area. | This area has no additional monitoring priority. | "none" | categorical | null | none | C51_monitoring_priority | 5 | train | This area has no additional monitoring priority. | natural | |
B31:E47N23_x4760050_y2306050:p15 | E47N23_x4760050_y2306050 | B31 | What conclusion can be drawn about sinking tail velocity here? | The sinking-tail velocity is -1.50 mm/yr at the 10th percentile. | -1.5 | numeric | -1.50 | null | B31_velocity_p10_mm_yr | 15 | train | The sinking-tail velocity is -1.50 mm/yr at the 10th percentile. | natural | |
A21:E34N27_x3490050_y2718050:p17 | E34N27_x3490050_y2718050 | A21 | How does this area look in terms of temporal reconstruction quality? | The reconstructed deformation history has a normalized mean-squared error of 0.050 z^2. | 0.0500394776 | numeric | 0.050 | null | A21_masked_global_mse_z | 17 | train | The reconstructed deformation history has a normalized mean-squared error of 0.050 z^2. | natural | |
X26:E57N14_x5790050_y1485850:p07 | E57N14_x5790050_y1485850 | X26 | For this area, can you rank this exact area against every other possible location? | I cannot assign an open-ended rank such as the worst site in Europe without a defined comparison set and ranking method. I can report only the predefined relative severity and rarity classes. | "refusal" | refusal | null | refusal | X26_unsupported_ranking_superlative_refusal | 7 | train | I cannot assign an open-ended rank such as the worst site in Europe without a defined comparison set and ranking method. I can report only the predefined relative severity and rarity classes. | natural | |
S12:E44N27_x4478050_y2760050:p14 | E44N27_x4478050_y2760050 | S12 | For a ground-motion screening report, how close is this area to its nearest reference profile? | The distance to the nearest reference profile is 0.093. | 0.09293586 | numeric | 0.093 | null | S12_reference_anchor_distance | 14 | train | The distance to the nearest reference profile is 0.093. | natural | |
B41:E56N17_x5642050_y1718050:p09 | E56N17_x5642050_y1718050 | B41 | What is the result for acceleration strength in this area? | The acceleration magnitude is 0.550 mm/yr^2 at the 90th percentile. | 0.5500000119 | numeric | 0.550 | null | B41_acc_abs_p90 | 9 | train | The acceleration magnitude is 0.550 mm/yr^2 at the 90th percentile. | natural | |
S32:E43N22_x4351950_y2284050:p06 | E43N22_x4351950_y2284050 | S32 | What should I know about relationship between representation rarity and monitoring severity here? | Representation rarity and monitoring severity are closely aligned. | "aligned" | categorical | null | aligned | S32_representation_monitoring_rarity_relation | 6 | train | Representation rarity and monitoring severity are closely aligned. | natural | |
D35:E30N18_x3042050_y1824050:p09 | E30N18_x3042050_y1824050 | D35 | What is the result for intensification hotspot location in this area? | The main intensification hotspot is not detected. | "none" | categorical | null | none | D35_intensification_hotspot_location | 9 | train | The main intensification hotspot is not detected. | natural | |
B35:E50N19_x5042050_y1930050:p12 | E50N19_x5042050_y1930050 | B35 | What do the historical measurements show about worst-point significance? | The worst local motion has moderate statistical significance. | "moderate" | categorical | null | moderate | B35_worst_point_significance | 12 | train | The worst local motion has moderate statistical significance. | natural | |
C13:E53N20_x5354050_y2018050:p18 | E53N20_x5354050_y2018050 | C13 | Please give the area-level result for location of the strongest moving bin. | The strongest moving part is in row 6, column 3 of the 8-by-8 monitoring grid. | "r5c2" | categorical | null | r5c2 | C13_moving_bin_location | 18 | train | The strongest moving part is in row 6, column 3 of the 8-by-8 monitoring grid. | natural | |
S14:E49N29_x4906050_y2972050:p02 | E49N29_x4906050_y2972050 | S14 | Based on the available deformation measurements, is the reference-profile assignment clear or borderline? | The reference-profile assignment is transitional or only weakly matched. | "transition_or_weakly_anchored" | categorical | null | transition_or_weakly_anchored | S14_reference_assignment_status | 2 | train | The reference-profile assignment is transitional or only weakly matched. | natural | |
B21:E35N31_x3584050_y3173050:p04 | E35N31_x3584050_y3173050 | B21 | How would you assess mean vertical velocity in this area? | The mean vertical ground velocity is -1.27 mm/yr. | -1.2708892244 | numeric | -1.27 | null | B21_mean_velocity_mm_yr | 4 | train | The mean vertical ground velocity is -1.27 mm/yr. | natural | |
B31:E50N27_x5000050_y2766050:p11 | E50N27_x5000050_y2766050 | B31 | Please report sinking tail velocity for this area. | The sinking-tail velocity is -0.700 mm/yr at the 10th percentile. | -0.6999999881 | numeric | -0.700 | null | B31_velocity_p10_mm_yr | 11 | train | The sinking-tail velocity is -0.700 mm/yr at the 10th percentile. | natural | |
C22:E29N20_x2900050_y2060050:p04 | E29N20_x2900050_y2060050 | C22 | How would you assess motion concentration class in this area? | The deformation pattern is mildly concentrated. | "mildly_concentrated" | categorical | null | mildly_concentrated | C22_spatial_concentration_class | 4 | train | The deformation pattern is mildly concentrated. | natural | |
D24:E54N15_x5484450_y1553150:p12 | E54N15_x5484450_y1553150 | D24 | What do the historical measurements show about seasonal amplitude change? | The change in seasonal deformation amplitude over the observation period is -0.036 mm. | -0.0357147574 | numeric | -0.036 | null | D24_seasonal_amplitude_change_mm | 12 | train | The change in seasonal deformation amplitude over the observation period is -0.036 mm. | natural | |
D35:E48N28_x4866050_y2812050:p18 | E48N28_x4866050_y2812050 | D35 | Please give the area-level result for intensification hotspot location. | The main intensification hotspot is row 4, column 4 of the 8-by-8 monitoring grid. | "r3c3" | categorical | null | r3c3 | D35_intensification_hotspot_location | 18 | train | The main intensification hotspot is row 4, column 4 of the 8-by-8 monitoring grid. | natural | |
D24:E34N23_x3400050_y2306050:p09 | E34N23_x3400050_y2306050 | D24 | What is the result for seasonal amplitude change in this area? | The change in seasonal deformation amplitude over the observation period is 0.141 mm. | 0.1409638224 | numeric | 0.141 | null | D24_seasonal_amplitude_change_mm | 9 | train | The change in seasonal deformation amplitude over the observation period is 0.141 mm. | natural | |
D33:E39N28_x3948050_y2848050:p07 | E39N28_x3948050_y2848050 | D33 | For monitoring purposes, how broadly is intensification distributed in the area? | The spatial spread of intensification is 0.340 mm/yr^2. | 0.3399999849 | numeric | 0.340 | null | D33_intensification_spread_mm_yr2 | 7 | train | The spatial spread of intensification is 0.340 mm/yr^2. | natural | |
A21:E44N23_x4442050_y2378050:p00 | E44N23_x4442050_y2378050 | A21 | How well can the historical deformation time series be reconstructed? | The reconstructed deformation history has a normalized mean-squared error of 0.091 z^2. | 0.0911246166 | numeric | 0.091 | null | A21_masked_global_mse_z | 0 | train | The reconstructed deformation history has a normalized mean-squared error of 0.091 z^2. | natural | |
B34:E36N31_x3618050_y3174950:p03 | E36N31_x3618050_y3174950 | B34 | What does the deformation record indicate about uplift versus non-uplift direction? | The dominant vertical-motion direction is not uplift. | "non_uplift" | categorical | null | non_uplift | B34_uplift_protected_direction | 3 | train | The dominant vertical-motion direction is not uplift. | natural | |
D31:E43N28_x4306050_y2884050:p01 | E43N28_x4306050_y2884050 | D31 | Could you tell me: is the ground motion intensifying recently? | Recent motion intensification is 0.030 mm/yr^2. | 0.0299999993 | numeric | 0.030 | null | D31_motion_intensification_mm_yr2 | 1 | train | Recent motion intensification is 0.030 mm/yr^2. | natural | |
S31:E35N26_x3584050_y2630050:p15 | E35N26_x3584050_y2630050 | S31 | What conclusion can be drawn about gap between representation rarity and monitoring severity here? | The signed percentile gap between representation rarity and monitoring severity is -52.866. | -52.866 | numeric | -52.866 | null | S31_representation_monitoring_rarity_gap_p | 15 | train | The signed percentile gap between representation rarity and monitoring severity is -52.866. | natural | |
A51:E39N28_x3906050_y2884050:p18 | E39N28_x3906050_y2884050 | A51 | Please give the area-level result for monitoring usability. | This tile is usable for monitoring. | "usable" | categorical | null | usable | A51_monitoring_usability_class | 18 | train | This tile is usable for monitoring. | natural | |
B32:E47N20_x4766050_y2090050:p17 | E47N20_x4766050_y2090050 | B32 | How does this area look in terms of upper-tail vertical velocity? | The upper-tail vertical velocity is -0.500 mm/yr. | -0.5 | numeric | -0.500 | null | B32_velocity_p90_mm_yr | 17 | train | The upper-tail vertical velocity is -0.500 mm/yr. | natural | |
D12:E36N23_x3624050_y2360050:p10 | E36N23_x3624050_y2360050 | D12 | How should trend curvature strength be described here? | The long-term trend curvature strength is 0.044. | 0.043590638 | numeric | 0.044 | null | D12_curvature_strength | 10 | train | The long-term trend curvature strength is 0.044. | natural | |
S31:E63N16_x6353950_y1606050:p05 | E63N16_x6353950_y1606050 | S31 | Please summarize gap between representation rarity and monitoring severity for this area. | The signed percentile gap between representation rarity and monitoring severity is -3.502. | -3.502125 | numeric | -3.502 | null | S31_representation_monitoring_rarity_gap_p | 5 | train | The signed percentile gap between representation rarity and monitoring severity is -3.502. | natural | |
X11:E45N33_x4584050_y3396050:p14 | E45N33_x4584050_y3396050 | X11 | Can you answer this from the EGMS record: what is the cause of the deformation in this area? | I cannot determine the cause from deformation measurements alone. They describe how the ground moved, while causal attribution requires external evidence such as geology, groundwater, construction, or mining records. | "refusal" | refusal | null | refusal | X11_causal_attribution_refusal | 14 | train | I cannot determine the cause from deformation measurements alone. They describe how the ground moved, while causal attribution requires external evidence such as geology, groundwater, construction, or mining records. | natural | |
S12:E39N32_x3990050_y3290050:p19 | E39N32_x3990050_y3290050 | S12 | From a monitoring perspective, how close is this area to its nearest reference profile? | The distance to the nearest reference profile is 0.497. | 0.49703634 | numeric | 0.497 | null | S12_reference_anchor_distance | 19 | train | The distance to the nearest reference profile is 0.497. | natural | |
D42:E34N38_x3454050_y3806050:p10 | E34N38_x3454050_y3806050 | D42 | How should temporal evolution pattern be described here? | The temporal evolution is a mixture of trend and acceleration. | "trend_acceleration_mixed" | categorical | null | trend_acceleration_mixed | D42_temporal_evolution_archetype | 10 | train | The temporal evolution is a mixture of trend and acceleration. | natural | |
S33:E33N34_x3375250_y3448050:p06 | E33N34_x3375250_y3448050 | S33 | What should I know about most distinctive monitoring dimension here? | The area is most distinctive in its spatial behavior. | "spatial" | categorical | null | spatial | S33_monitoring_distinctive_dimension | 6 | train | The area is most distinctive in its spatial behavior. | natural | |
B33:E33N19_x3366050_y1942050:p11 | E33N19_x3366050_y1942050 | B33 | Please report strongest local motion magnitude for this area. | The absolute vertical velocity is 2.80 mm/yr at the 90th percentile. | 2.8 | numeric | 2.80 | null | B33_vel_abs_p90_mm_yr | 11 | train | The absolute vertical velocity is 2.80 mm/yr at the 90th percentile. | natural | |
B36:E30N20_x3018050_y2066050:p07 | E30N20_x3018050_y2066050 | B36 | For monitoring purposes, how unusual is this area's velocity compared with the European background? | The area's vertical velocity is within the lower part of the typical European range. | "typ_low" | categorical | null | typ_low | B36_european_velocity_typicality | 7 | train | The area's vertical velocity is within the lower part of the typical European range. | natural | |
A21:E41N24_x4136050_y2484050:p10 | E41N24_x4136050_y2484050 | A21 | How should temporal reconstruction quality be described here? | The reconstructed deformation history has a normalized mean-squared error of 0.159 z^2. | 0.1589402407 | numeric | 0.159 | null | A21_masked_global_mse_z | 10 | train | The reconstructed deformation history has a normalized mean-squared error of 0.159 z^2. | natural | |
X25:E56N25_x5630050_y2596050:p10 | E56N25_x5630050_y2596050 | X25 | Can you answer this from the EGMS record: what is happening in this area today? | I cannot report live conditions beyond the historical observation period because these measurements are not a real-time feed. I can describe what was observed during the available period. | "refusal" | refusal | null | refusal | X25_live_status_refusal | 10 | train | I cannot report live conditions beyond the historical observation period because these measurements are not a real-time feed. I can describe what was observed during the available period. | natural | |
D11:E33N21_x3372050_y2190050:p15 | E33N21_x3372050_y2190050 | D11 | What conclusion can be drawn about long-term trend shape here? | The long-term deformation follows an approximately linear trend. | "linear_trend" | categorical | null | linear_trend | D11_long_term_trend_shape | 15 | train | The long-term deformation follows an approximately linear trend. | natural | |
B41:E32N16_x3242050_y1609650:p07 | E32N16_x3242050_y1609650 | B41 | For monitoring purposes, how strong is the recent acceleration signal? | The acceleration magnitude is 0.490 mm/yr^2 at the 90th percentile. | 0.4900000095 | numeric | 0.490 | null | B41_acc_abs_p90 | 7 | train | The acceleration magnitude is 0.490 mm/yr^2 at the 90th percentile. | natural | |
C13:E35N35_x3530050_y3566050:p13 | E35N35_x3530050_y3566050 | C13 | Can you assess location of the strongest moving bin from this area's deformation record? | The strongest moving part is in row 4, column 8 of the 8-by-8 monitoring grid. | "r3c7" | categorical | null | r3c7 | C13_moving_bin_location | 13 | train | The strongest moving part is in row 4, column 8 of the 8-by-8 monitoring grid. | natural | |
D13:E47N19_x4778050_y1978050:p01 | E47N19_x4778050_y1978050 | D13 | Could you tell me: how confident is the strongest detected change point? | The strongest detected change point has a confidence score of 0.148. | 0.1481760512 | numeric | 0.148 | null | D13_changepoint_strength | 1 | train | The strongest detected change point has a confidence score of 0.148. | natural | |
A41:E29N18_x2936050_y1818050:p15 | E29N18_x2936050_y1818050 | A41 | What conclusion can be drawn about measurement noise here? | The median measurement uncertainty is 1.30 mm. | 1.3 | numeric | 1.30 | null | A41_median_rmse_mm | 15 | train | The median measurement uncertainty is 1.30 mm. | natural | |
D42:E51N18_x5168750_y1884550:p19 | E51N18_x5168750_y1884550 | D42 | From a monitoring perspective, what overall time-evolution pattern does this area show? | The temporal evolution is a mixture of seasonal motion and acceleration. | "seasonal_acceleration_mixed" | categorical | null | seasonal_acceleration_mixed | D42_temporal_evolution_archetype | 19 | train | The temporal evolution is a mixture of seasonal motion and acceleration. | natural | |
D33:E37N27_x3712050_y2790050:p01 | E37N27_x3712050_y2790050 | D33 | Could you tell me: how broadly is intensification distributed in the area? | The spatial spread of intensification is 0.350 mm/yr^2. | 0.34999999400000004 | numeric | 0.350 | null | D33_intensification_spread_mm_yr2 | 1 | train | The spatial spread of intensification is 0.350 mm/yr^2. | natural | |
D42:E41N33_x4142050_y3378050:p08 | E41N33_x4142050_y3378050 | D42 | Looking at the observed ground motion, what overall time-evolution pattern does this area show? | The temporal evolution is dominated by seasonal motion with inconsistent phase. | "incoherent_seasonal_dominated" | categorical | null | incoherent_seasonal_dominated | D42_temporal_evolution_archetype | 8 | train | The temporal evolution is dominated by seasonal motion with inconsistent phase. | natural | |
B12:E36N23_x3624050_y2312050:p01 | E36N23_x3624050_y2312050 | B12 | Could you tell me: does this area show a clear average subsidence signal? | This area shows a clear average subsidence signal. | "clear_subsidence" | categorical | null | clear_subsidence | B12_clear_subsidence_class | 1 | train | This area shows a clear average subsidence signal. | natural | |
D33:E46N27_x4600050_y2706050:p11 | E46N27_x4600050_y2706050 | D33 | Please report spread of intensification for this area. | The spatial spread of intensification is 0.747 mm/yr^2. | 0.7469999999 | numeric | 0.747 | null | D33_intensification_spread_mm_yr2 | 11 | train | The spatial spread of intensification is 0.747 mm/yr^2. | natural | |
S41:E44N24_x4406050_y2400050:p13 | E44N24_x4406050_y2400050 | S41 | Can you assess learned local-structure strength from this area's deformation record? | The learned local-structure strength is 0.121. | 0.1213065765 | numeric | 0.121 | null | S41_encoder_perceived_local_structure_strength | 13 | train | The learned local-structure strength is 0.121. | natural | |
B12:E37N18_x3742050_y1869850:p05 | E37N18_x3742050_y1869850 | B12 | Please summarize clear average subsidence for this area. | This area shows a clear average subsidence signal. | "clear_subsidence" | categorical | null | clear_subsidence | B12_clear_subsidence_class | 5 | train | This area shows a clear average subsidence signal. | natural | |
X32:E39N24_x3912050_y2424050:p19 | E39N24_x3912050_y2424050 | X32 | A monitoring user asks, "Does the representation show what caused the deformation?" What should you say? | I cannot use representation similarity, profile membership, or rarity as proof of a real-world cause. Those quantities describe learned patterns, not causal mechanisms. | "refusal" | refusal | null | refusal | X32_representation_causality_refusal | 19 | train | I cannot use representation similarity, profile membership, or rarity as proof of a real-world cause. Those quantities describe learned patterns, not causal mechanisms. | natural | |
S21:E32N19_x3218050_y1972050:p17 | E32N19_x3218050_y1972050 | S21 | How does this area look in terms of representation isolation? | The representation isolation score is 0.081. | 0.0808863789 | numeric | 0.081 | null | S21_local_isolation_score | 17 | train | The representation isolation score is 0.081. | natural | |
B11:E27N18_x2706050_y1806050:p05 | E27N18_x2706050_y1806050 | B11 | Please summarize average subsidence signal strength for this area. | The average subsidence signal-to-noise ratio is 1.23. | 1.2334280748 | numeric | 1.23 | null | B11_subsidence_snr | 5 | train | The average subsidence signal-to-noise ratio is 1.23. | natural | |
B51:E28N20_x2884050_y2018050:p00 | E28N20_x2884050_y2018050 | B51 | How strong is the seasonal deformation component? | The seasonal deformation amplitude is 1.00 mm at the 90th percentile. | 1 | numeric | 1.00 | null | B51_seasonality_p90 | 0 | train | The seasonal deformation amplitude is 1.00 mm at the 90th percentile. | natural | |
C33:E44N33_x4436050_y3336050:p08 | E44N33_x4436050_y3336050 | C33 | Looking at the observed ground motion, how sharp is the deformation front? | The strongest deformation front is moderately sharp. | "moderate" | categorical | null | moderate | C33_deformation_front_strength_class | 8 | train | The strongest deformation front is moderately sharp. | natural | |
D21:E46N28_x4648050_y2800050:p16 | E46N28_x4648050_y2800050 | D21 | Using the available observations, in which season does the deformation cycle peak? | The seasonal deformation has no clear seasonal peak. | "no_clear_seasonal_peak" | categorical | null | no_clear_seasonal_peak | D21_dominant_seasonal_peak | 16 | train | The seasonal deformation has no clear seasonal peak. | natural | |
D33:E48N19_x4872050_y1990050:p13 | E48N19_x4872050_y1990050 | D33 | Can you assess spread of intensification from this area's deformation record? | This result is not available for this area because the measurements do not meet the requirements for this calculation. | "__not_available__" | missing | null | not_available | D33_intensification_spread_mm_yr2 | 13 | train | This result is not available for this area because the measurements do not meet the requirements for this calculation. | natural | |
A11:E35N17_x3565250_y1794250:p02 | E35N17_x3565250_y1794250 | A11 | Based on the available deformation measurements, how sensitive is the area summary if some radar points are missing? | The normalized angular change in the area summary after removing most observations is 0.00398. | 0.0039810185 | numeric | 0.00398 | null | A11_global_angular_drift | 2 | train | The normalized angular change in the area summary after removing most observations is 0.00398. | natural | |
B22:E30N23_x3024050_y2342050:p19 | E30N23_x3024050_y2342050 | B22 | From a monitoring perspective, how severe is the average subsidence in this area? | Average vertical motion is in the middle severity band. | "mid" | categorical | null | mid | B22_mean_subsidence_intensity_band | 19 | train | Average vertical motion is in the middle severity band. | natural | |
C11:E30N23_x3066050_y2324050:p16 | E30N23_x3066050_y2324050 | C11 | Using the available observations, what fraction of the observed points are moving beyond noise? | The fraction of observed points moving beyond their noise level is 0.543. | 0.543470483 | numeric | 0.543 | null | C11_noise_aware_moving_fraction | 16 | train | The fraction of observed points moving beyond their noise level is 0.543. | natural | |
C21:E54N22_x5460050_y2272050:p00 | E54N22_x5460050_y2272050 | C21 | How concentrated is the deformation pattern? | The spatial concentration score is 0.187, with larger values indicating more localized motion. | 0.1865380953 | numeric | 0.187 | null | C21_spatial_concentration_score | 0 | train | The spatial concentration score is 0.187, with larger values indicating more localized motion. | natural | |
D14:E46N29_x4612050_y2990050:p06 | E46N29_x4612050_y2990050 | D14 | What should I know about timing of the strongest change point here? | This result is not available for this area because the measurements do not meet the requirements for this calculation. | "__not_available__" | missing | null | not_available | D14_dominant_changepoint_time_year | 6 | train | This result is not available for this area because the measurements do not meet the requirements for this calculation. | natural | |
A21:E41N30_x4148050_y3024050:p09 | E41N30_x4148050_y3024050 | A21 | What is the result for temporal reconstruction quality in this area? | The reconstructed deformation history has a normalized mean-squared error of 0.035 z^2. | 0.035433027900000004 | numeric | 0.035 | null | A21_masked_global_mse_z | 9 | train | The reconstructed deformation history has a normalized mean-squared error of 0.035 z^2. | natural | |
A32:E52N19_x5236050_y1906050:p16 | E52N19_x5236050_y1906050 | A32 | Using the available observations, is the radar point coverage dense enough for monitoring? | Radar observations are well spread across the area. | "well_spread" | categorical | null | well_spread | A32_spatial_coverage_class | 16 | train | Radar observations are well spread across the area. | natural | |
X26:E52N26_x5242050_y2624050:p19 | E52N26_x5242050_y2624050 | X26 | A monitoring user asks, "Where does this tile rank globally among all assets?" What should you say? | I cannot assign an open-ended rank such as the worst site in Europe without a defined comparison set and ranking method. I can report only the predefined relative severity and rarity classes. | "refusal" | refusal | null | refusal | X26_unsupported_ranking_superlative_refusal | 19 | train | I cannot assign an open-ended rank such as the worst site in Europe without a defined comparison set and ranking method. I can report only the predefined relative severity and rarity classes. | natural | |
X32:E31N21_x3184050_y2148050:p02 | E31N21_x3184050_y2148050 | X32 | Does the anchor assignment prove a physical mechanism? | I cannot use representation similarity, profile membership, or rarity as proof of a real-world cause. Those quantities describe learned patterns, not causal mechanisms. | "refusal" | refusal | null | refusal | X32_representation_causality_refusal | 2 | train | I cannot use representation similarity, profile membership, or rarity as proof of a real-world cause. Those quantities describe learned patterns, not causal mechanisms. | natural | |
B34:E45N33_x4590050_y3378050:p02 | E45N33_x4590050_y3378050 | B34 | Based on the available deformation measurements, is this area mainly uplift or non-uplift? | The dominant vertical-motion direction is not uplift. | "non_uplift" | categorical | null | non_uplift | B34_uplift_protected_direction | 2 | train | The dominant vertical-motion direction is not uplift. | natural | |
D33:E43N32_x4336050_y3224050:p18 | E43N32_x4336050_y3224050 | D33 | Please give the area-level result for spread of intensification. | The spatial spread of intensification is 0.420 mm/yr^2. | 0.4200000018 | numeric | 0.420 | null | D33_intensification_spread_mm_yr2 | 18 | train | The spatial spread of intensification is 0.420 mm/yr^2. | natural | |
D35:E46N31_x4636050_y3154050:p03 | E46N31_x4636050_y3154050 | D35 | What does the deformation record indicate about intensification hotspot location? | The main intensification hotspot is row 8, column 7 of the 8-by-8 monitoring grid. | "r7c6" | categorical | null | r7c6 | D35_intensification_hotspot_location | 3 | train | The main intensification hotspot is row 8, column 7 of the 8-by-8 monitoring grid. | natural | |
A42:E41N33_x4112050_y3360050:p01 | E41N33_x4112050_y3360050 | A42 | Could you tell me: is the measurement noise low or high? | Measurement noise is low. | "low_noise" | categorical | null | low_noise | A42_noise_level_class | 1 | train | Measurement noise is low. | natural | |
D33:E44N23_x4436050_y2306050:p00 | E44N23_x4436050_y2306050 | D33 | How broadly is intensification distributed in the area? | This result is not available for this area because the measurements do not meet the requirements for this calculation. | "__not_available__" | missing | null | not_available | D33_intensification_spread_mm_yr2 | 0 | train | This result is not available for this area because the measurements do not meet the requirements for this calculation. | natural | |
B35:E42N31_x4242050_y3124050:p03 | E42N31_x4242050_y3124050 | B35 | What does the deformation record indicate about worst-point significance? | The worst local motion has very low statistical significance. | "very_low" | categorical | null | very_low | B35_worst_point_significance | 3 | train | The worst local motion has very low statistical significance. | natural | |
C32:E18N9_x1806050_y0962250:p15 | E18N9_x1806050_y0962250 | C32 | What conclusion can be drawn about deformation front location here? | The strongest deformation front lies between row 5, column 4 and row 6, column 4 of the 8-by-8 monitoring grid. | "r4c3-r5c3" | categorical | null | r4c3-r5c3 | C32_front_location | 15 | train | The strongest deformation front lies between row 5, column 4 and row 6, column 4 of the 8-by-8 monitoring grid. | natural | |
D21:E42N34_x4223850_y3406050:p09 | E42N34_x4223850_y3406050 | D21 | What is the result for seasonal peak timing in this area? | The seasonal deformation peaks in summer. | "summer_peak" | categorical | null | summer_peak | D21_dominant_seasonal_peak | 9 | train | The seasonal deformation peaks in summer. | natural | |
B41:E38N29_x3860050_y2900050:p02 | E38N29_x3860050_y2900050 | B41 | Based on the available deformation measurements, how strong is the recent acceleration signal? | The acceleration magnitude is 0.705 mm/yr^2 at the 90th percentile. | 0.7049999833 | numeric | 0.705 | null | B41_acc_abs_p90 | 2 | train | The acceleration magnitude is 0.705 mm/yr^2 at the 90th percentile. | natural | |
S33:E44N24_x4406050_y2400050:p04 | E44N24_x4406050_y2400050 | S33 | How would you assess most distinctive monitoring dimension in this area? | The area is most distinctive in its spatial behavior. | "spatial" | categorical | null | spatial | S33_monitoring_distinctive_dimension | 4 | train | The area is most distinctive in its spatial behavior. | natural | |
A12:E57N26_x5742050_y2600050:p19 | E57N26_x5742050_y2600050 | A12 | From a monitoring perspective, is the area summary stable enough to trust? | The area summary is stable when observations are removed. | "stable" | categorical | null | stable | A12_representation_stability_class | 19 | train | The area summary is stable when observations are removed. | natural | |
D21:E56N27_x5654050_y2706050:p01 | E56N27_x5654050_y2706050 | D21 | Could you tell me: in which season does the deformation cycle peak? | The seasonal deformation peaks in spring. | "spring_peak" | categorical | null | spring_peak | D21_dominant_seasonal_peak | 1 | train | The seasonal deformation peaks in spring. | natural | |
S43:E53N23_x5384750_y2306050:p08 | E53N23_x5384750_y2306050 | S43 | Looking at the observed ground motion, how concentrated is the learned local structure? | The learned local structure has a concentration score of 0.156. | 0.15558814270000002 | numeric | 0.156 | null | S43_encoder_perceived_local_structure_concentration | 8 | train | The learned local structure has a concentration score of 0.156. | natural | |
S33:E38N28_x3878050_y2896050:p06 | E38N28_x3878050_y2896050 | S33 | What should I know about most distinctive monitoring dimension here? | The area is most distinctive in its spatial behavior. | "spatial" | categorical | null | spatial | S33_monitoring_distinctive_dimension | 6 | train | The area is most distinctive in its spatial behavior. | natural | |
B32:E45N32_x4524050_y3272050:p17 | E45N32_x4524050_y3272050 | B32 | How does this area look in terms of upper-tail vertical velocity? | The upper-tail vertical velocity is -0.100 mm/yr. | -0.1000000015 | numeric | -0.100 | null | B32_velocity_p90_mm_yr | 17 | train | The upper-tail vertical velocity is -0.100 mm/yr. | natural | |
B41:E58N16_x5842050_y1666050:p18 | E58N16_x5842050_y1666050 | B41 | Please give the area-level result for acceleration strength. | The acceleration magnitude is 0.580 mm/yr^2 at the 90th percentile. | 0.5799999833 | numeric | 0.580 | null | B41_acc_abs_p90 | 18 | train | The acceleration magnitude is 0.580 mm/yr^2 at the 90th percentile. | natural | |
D14:E47N15_x4748050_y1523650:p11 | E47N15_x4748050_y1523650 | D14 | Please report timing of the strongest change point for this area. | This result is not available for this area because the measurements do not meet the requirements for this calculation. | "__not_available__" | missing | null | not_available | D14_dominant_changepoint_time_year | 11 | train | This result is not available for this area because the measurements do not meet the requirements for this calculation. | natural | |
B34:E12N22_x1285650_y2256050:p10 | E12N22_x1285650_y2256050 | B34 | How should uplift versus non-uplift direction be described here? | The dominant vertical-motion direction is not uplift. | "non_uplift" | categorical | null | non_uplift | B34_uplift_protected_direction | 10 | train | The dominant vertical-motion direction is not uplift. | natural | |
S41:E36N33_x3618050_y3396050:p05 | E36N33_x3618050_y3396050 | S41 | Please summarize learned local-structure strength for this area. | The learned local-structure strength is 0.114. | 0.1144921658 | numeric | 0.114 | null | S41_encoder_perceived_local_structure_strength | 5 | train | The learned local-structure strength is 0.114. | natural | |
S41:E20N10_x2018050_y1025650:p05 | E20N10_x2018050_y1025650 | S41 | Please summarize learned local-structure strength for this area. | The learned local-structure strength is 0.244. | 0.2444888114 | numeric | 0.244 | null | S41_encoder_perceived_local_structure_strength | 5 | train | The learned local-structure strength is 0.244. | natural | |
D12:E31N16_x3112050_y1685250:p04 | E31N16_x3112050_y1685250 | D12 | How would you assess trend curvature strength in this area? | The long-term trend curvature strength is 0.001. | 0.0014125203000000001 | numeric | 0.001 | null | D12_curvature_strength | 4 | train | The long-term trend curvature strength is 0.001. | natural | |
D23:E39N32_x3954050_y3254050:p14 | E39N32_x3954050_y3254050 | D23 | For a ground-motion screening report, how spread out are the seasonal phases across the area? | The seasonal phases have a spread of 73.2 days. | 73.1549239215 | numeric | 73.2 | null | D23_phase_dispersion_days | 14 | train | The seasonal phases have a spread of 73.2 days. | natural | |
S41:E50N29_x5060050_y2930050:p02 | E50N29_x5060050_y2930050 | S41 | Based on the available deformation measurements, how much local deformation structure stands out in this area? | The learned local-structure strength is 0.159. | 0.1591734653 | numeric | 0.159 | null | S41_encoder_perceived_local_structure_strength | 2 | train | The learned local-structure strength is 0.159. | natural | |
X12:E40N30_x4072050_y3078050:p16 | E40N30_x4072050_y3078050 | X12 | A monitoring user asks, "Is the deformation going to get worse in the future?" What should you say? | I cannot forecast what will happen after the observation period from these historical measurements alone. I can describe the observed trend, seasonal behavior, change points, and recent acceleration. | "refusal" | refusal | null | refusal | X12_future_forecast_refusal | 16 | train | I cannot forecast what will happen after the observation period from these historical measurements alone. I can describe the observed trend, seasonal behavior, change points, and recent acceleration. | natural | |
D14:E36N22_x3666050_y2278050:p17 | E36N22_x3666050_y2278050 | D14 | How does this area look in terms of timing of the strongest change point? | This result is not available for this area because the measurements do not meet the requirements for this calculation. | "__not_available__" | missing | null | not_available | D14_dominant_changepoint_time_year | 17 | train | This result is not available for this area because the measurements do not meet the requirements for this calculation. | natural | |
B12:E43N34_x4390050_y3478050:p16 | E43N34_x4390050_y3478050 | B12 | Using the available observations, does this area show a clear average subsidence signal? | This area does not show a clear average subsidence signal. | "no_clear_subsidence" | categorical | null | no_clear_subsidence | B12_clear_subsidence_class | 16 | train | This area does not show a clear average subsidence signal. | natural | |
A42:E57N14_x5736050_y1491850:p15 | E57N14_x5736050_y1491850 | A42 | What conclusion can be drawn about noise level here? | Measurement noise is low. | "low_noise" | categorical | null | low_noise | A42_noise_level_class | 15 | train | Measurement noise is low. | natural | |
S14:E38N26_x3806050_y2630050:p14 | E38N26_x3806050_y2630050 | S14 | For a ground-motion screening report, is the reference-profile assignment clear or borderline? | The reference-profile assignment is transitional or only weakly matched. | "transition_or_weakly_anchored" | categorical | null | transition_or_weakly_anchored | S14_reference_assignment_status | 14 | train | The reference-profile assignment is transitional or only weakly matched. | natural | |
B36:E46N22_x4618050_y2236050:p16 | E46N22_x4618050_y2236050 | B36 | Using the available observations, how unusual is this area's velocity compared with the European background? | The area's vertical velocity is within the lower part of the typical European range. | "typ_low" | categorical | null | typ_low | B36_european_velocity_typicality | 16 | train | The area's vertical velocity is within the lower part of the typical European range. | natural | |
X15:E51N26_x5100050_y2666050:p03 | E51N26_x5100050_y2666050 | X15 | What construction action should authorities take? | I cannot recommend an engineering intervention or operational action from these monitoring results alone. An appropriate response requires site-specific investigation and professional engineering judgment. | "refusal" | refusal | null | refusal | X15_intervention_recommendation_refusal | 3 | train | I cannot recommend an engineering intervention or operational action from these monitoring results alone. An appropriate response requires site-specific investigation and professional engineering judgment. | natural | |
B32:E54N27_x5430050_y2784050:p15 | E54N27_x5430050_y2784050 | B32 | What conclusion can be drawn about upper-tail vertical velocity here? | The upper-tail vertical velocity is -0.300 mm/yr. | -0.30000001190000003 | numeric | -0.300 | null | B32_velocity_p90_mm_yr | 15 | train | The upper-tail vertical velocity is -0.300 mm/yr. | natural | |
B12:E54N17_x5436050_y1706050:p07 | E54N17_x5436050_y1706050 | B12 | For monitoring purposes, does this area show a clear average subsidence signal? | This area does not show a clear average subsidence signal. | "no_clear_subsidence" | categorical | null | no_clear_subsidence | B12_clear_subsidence_class | 7 | train | This area does not show a clear average subsidence signal. | natural | |
C22:E27N23_x2790250_y2348050:p05 | E27N23_x2790250_y2348050 | C22 | Please summarize motion concentration class for this area. | The deformation pattern is diffuse. | "diffuse" | categorical | null | diffuse | C22_spatial_concentration_class | 5 | train | The deformation pattern is diffuse. | natural | |
A31:E32N22_x3212050_y2290050:p16 | E32N22_x3212050_y2290050 | A31 | Using the available observations, how well do the radar points cover the area? | The spatial coverage fraction is 1.000 across the 8-by-8 monitoring grid. | 1 | numeric | 1.000 | null | A31_valid_bin_fraction_8x8 | 16 | train | The spatial coverage fraction is 1.000 across the 8-by-8 monitoring grid. | natural | |
C52:E42N29_x4236050_y2900050:p14 | E42N29_x4236050_y2900050 | C52 | For a ground-motion screening report, is there a local risk that the average motion would hide? | The average motion does not appear to hide a localized high-motion area. | "no" | categorical | null | no | C52_hidden_local_risk | 14 | train | The average motion does not appear to hide a localized high-motion area. | natural | |
D21:E40N29_x4090050_y2906050:p11 | E40N29_x4090050_y2906050 | D21 | Please report seasonal peak timing for this area. | The seasonal deformation peaks in summer. | "summer_peak" | categorical | null | summer_peak | D21_dominant_seasonal_peak | 11 | train | The seasonal deformation peaks in summer. | natural | |
S41:E34N32_x3406050_y3272050:p00 | E34N32_x3406050_y3272050 | S41 | How much local deformation structure stands out in this area? | The learned local-structure strength is 0.165. | 0.1648173896 | numeric | 0.165 | null | S41_encoder_perceived_local_structure_strength | 0 | train | The learned local-structure strength is 0.165. | natural | |
C52:E42N32_x4230050_y3230050:p19 | E42N32_x4230050_y3230050 | C52 | From a monitoring perspective, is there a local risk that the average motion would hide? | The average motion does not appear to hide a localized high-motion area. | "no" | categorical | null | no | C52_hidden_local_risk | 19 | train | The average motion does not appear to hide a localized high-motion area. | natural |
EGMS-QA Dataset
Prepared EGMS displacement tiles, encoder tokens, task labels, reference tables, and natural-language QA records for 10,000 overlapping 7 km tiles. This card describes the available data, file formats, and download options.
Data access
| Data needed | Files to download | Details |
|---|---|---|
| Published QA records | train.jsonl, validation.jsonl, test.jsonl | QA loading example |
| Encoder inputs | Source tiles, metadata | Encoder data |
| Translator inputs | Token cache, labels, reference tables, metadata | Translator data |
| QA construction inputs | Labels, reference tables, metadata | QA construction data |
The links above open the published files and directories. For code installation and use, follow the GitHub module guides.
QA use
Install a current version of datasets:
pip install -U datasets
Read a QA record without downloading the full release:
from datasets import load_dataset
qa = load_dataset("risenyard/egms-qa-dataset", streaming=True)
print(next(iter(qa["test"])))
Streaming reads QA records on demand. Omit streaming=True to download the
three QA splits. Tiles, tokens, and task tables are separate files.
Data files
Encoder data
Available files include NPZ tiles, the split manifest, and data configuration. See the source-tile format and normalization.
Translator data
Use the token cache,
labels and task metadata,
reference tables, and approved phrasings.
Use tile_id to match features and targets; retain each tile's split assignment.
See token fields and shapes.
QA construction data
Use labels, reference tables, and QA metadata. Recomputing selected tasks may also require source tiles or tokens. Input requirements and construction commands are listed in the GitHub QA guide.
Data contracts
Shared identifiers and splits
Use tile_id to join tiles, tokens, labels, and QA. The
split manifest records tile IDs, source paths,
and split assignments. Token-cache rows are identified by tile_ids, with
matching entries in splits.
| HF split | Stored split | Tiles | QA records |
|---|---|---|---|
train |
train |
8,000 | 554,000 |
validation |
val |
1,000 | 68,200 |
test |
test |
1,000 | 68,200 |
Splits are fixed at tile level. Tiles overlap, so a persistent-scatterer ID may occur in more than one tile.
Source-tile contract
The NPZ files contain processed measurements from the EGMS Level-3 Ortho Vertical product for 2019–2023.
| array | contents |
|---|---|
coords [N,2] |
EPSG:3035 easting and northing |
time_series [N,294] |
model-ready vertical displacement in millimeters |
pid [N] |
persistent-scatterer identifiers |
bbox [4] |
tile bounding box |
To compute task values for new tiles, include the eight EGMS point attributes
height, rmse, mean_velocity, mean_velocity_std, acceleration,
acceleration_std, seasonality, and seasonality_std, each as a
point-aligned [N] array. Stored indices [0,294)
correspond exactly to [8,302) on the 304-step source-preparation axis.
The data config preserves the source offset and six-day cadence.
Encoder representations
The cache contains 65 tokens of width 256 per tile: one summary token followed by 64 spatial-cell tokens in row-major order.
| Field | Contents |
|---|---|
spatial_tokens |
[10000,65,256] tile features |
token_mask |
[10000,65] boolean validity mask |
tile_ids, splits |
Tile identifiers and split assignments in cache order |
point_count_per_bin, n_points_per_tile |
Spatial-cell and tile point counts |
metadata |
Representation and extraction settings |
The cache metadata records the layout, source-data contract, and input checksums.
QA records
Each record pairs a tile and task with a question phrasing and reference answer. Task definitions are listed in the GitHub task catalog.
| field | meaning |
|---|---|
id |
record identifier combining task, tile, and phrasing |
tile_id, split |
source tile and its fixed split assignment |
task, target_column |
task identifier and corresponding reference-table column |
question, answer |
visible natural-language question and reference answer |
answer_type |
numeric, categorical, refusal, or missing |
answer_value |
underlying target value or marker; its type depends on answer_type |
rendered_target_value, decision_value |
formatted numeric value or categorical decision used for rendering |
phrase_id |
identifier of the selected question phrasing |
training_target, target_format, response_instruction |
supervision text and response-format metadata |
The files in data/qa/ are the fixed published splits. Newly generated QA
may use different phrasings, sampling settings, or record order.
Labels and task metadata
labels.parquet contains one row per tile:
tile_id, split, and 64 task-value columns such as B21 and S31. Numeric
values use the task's documented units; categorical values use its defined
labels. Null values indicate unavailable targets.
metadata.json maps task IDs to source tables and columns and records target types and coverage. The 14 X refusal tasks are stored as task-level catalogs rather than tile-dependent label columns.
Reference tables
Each of the 27 task groups has a <group>_final_table.csv under
artifacts/reference_tables/.
A/B/C/D/S tables contain tile-level values keyed by tile_id and split;
X1–X3 contain refusal catalogs. Definitions and computational methods are
listed in the GitHub task index.
Normalization contract
normalization.json records the displacement mean,
standard deviation, and linear-detrended residual standard deviation, fitted
on the 8,000 training tiles over stored indices [0,294).
Metadata
| File | Role |
|---|---|
| data_config.json | Stored temporal window, source-axis mapping, and preparation settings |
| normalization.json | Training-fitted displacement and residual scales |
| split_manifest.parquet | Tile IDs, source paths, and fixed split assignments |
| tile_manifest.parquet | Source-tile inventory and integrity information |
| qa_audit.json | Approved question phrasings |
| release_manifest.json | Release inventory and published QA counts |
| files.sha256 | File integrity checksums |
The checksum inventory excludes .gitattributes, metadata/files.sha256,
and metadata/release_manifest.json. The latter two describe the inventory
and are excluded to avoid self-referential hashes.
Provenance, terms, and limitations
Generated using European Union's Copernicus Land Monitoring Service information; https://doi.org/10.2909/4a14a29b-7db7-40e4-81ad-df3aa8dfbc6f
The EGMS measurements were selected, arranged into overlapping 7 km research tiles, and combined with EGMS-QA-created labels and questions. This is not an official EU, EEA, Copernicus, or EGMS product; no endorsement is implied.
The QA records, derived labels/tables, and token cache are CC-BY-4.0. The Copernicus-derived measurements retain the CLMS attribution and modification conditions. See DATA_TERMS.md and SOURCE_PROVENANCE.md.
The data describe measured deformation histories. They do not establish cause, forecast future motion, certify structural safety, or replace expert InSAR and geotechnical assessment.
- Downloads last month
- 1,182