openAI-math-dataset / lean /OAI /Computability /DegreeRigidity /Syntax /BoundedTruthRecursion.lean
roseking's picture
Add lean source and binary files (part 60)
9dbc64e verified
Raw History Blame Contribute Delete
8.89 kB
import OAI.Computability.DegreeRigidity.Representation.SourceTheory
import OAI.Computability.DegreeRigidity.Syntax.FiniteTerm
import OAI.Computability.DegreeRigidity.Syntax.BoundedFormulaRename
namespace OAI
namespace TuringRigidity.BoundedTruthRecursion
open TransitiveNameModel BoundedSetTheory
def Local (φ : Formula) (e : ℕ → ZFSet.{0}) : Prop :=
∀ D : ZFSet.{0}, Transitive D → ∀ t ∈ D, ∀ Y Z : ZFSet.{0},
(∀ s ∈ D, ZFSet.rank s < ZFSet.rank t → (s ∈ Y ↔ s ∈ Z)) →
(φ.Eval (cons t (cons Y e)) ↔ φ.Eval (cons t (cons Z e)))
def Partial (φ : Formula) (e : ℕ → ZFSet.{0}) (K D Y : ZFSet.{0}) : Prop :=
Transitive D ∧ D ⊆ K ∧ Y ⊆ D ∧
∀ t ∈ D, t ∈ Y ↔ φ.Eval (cons t (cons Y e))
theorem partial_sound (φ : Formula) (e : ℕ → ZFSet.{0}) (K D Y Z : ZFSet.{0})
(hl : Local φ e) (hp : Partial φ e K D Y)
(hz : ∀ t ∈ K, t ∈ Z ↔ φ.Eval (cons t (cons Z e))) :
∀ t ∈ D, t ∈ Y ↔ t ∈ Z := by
have wf : WellFounded (fun a b : ZFSet.{0} => ZFSet.rank a < ZFSet.rank b) :=
InvImage.wf ZFSet.rank Ordinal.lt_wf
intro t
induction t using wf.induction with
| h t ih =>
intro ht
exact (hp.2.2.2 t ht).trans ((hl D hp.1 t ht Y Z
(fun s hs hst => ih s hst hs)).trans (hz t (hp.2.1 ht)).symm)
def dropSlots : ℕ → ℕ
| 0 => 0
| 1 => 1
| n+2 => n+4
def partialFormula (φ : Formula) : Formula :=
.conj (.transitive 1) (.conj (.subset 1 2) (.conj (.subset 0 1)
(.allMem 1 (.iff (.member 0 1) (φ.rename dropSlots)))))
theorem partialFormula_spec (φ : Formula) (e : ℕ → ZFSet.{0}) (K D Y : ZFSet.{0}) :
(partialFormula φ).Eval (cons Y (cons D (cons K e))) ↔ Partial φ e K D Y := by
simp only [partialFormula,Formula.Eval,Formula.eval_transitive,Formula.eval_subset,
Formula.eval_allMem,Formula.eval_iff,Formula.eval_rename_comp,cons_zero,cons_succ,Partial]
have eq (t : ZFSet.{0}) : cons t (cons Y (cons D (cons K e))) ∘ dropSlots = cons t (cons Y e) := by
funext i; rcases i with _|_|i <;> rfl
simp only [eq]
noncomputable def domain (φ : Formula) (e : ℕ → ZFSet.{0}) (K Q : ZFSet.{0}) : ZFSet.{0} :=
K.sep (fun t => ∃ D ∈ Q, ∃ Y ∈ Q, Partial φ e K D Y ∧ t ∈ D)
noncomputable def truth (φ : Formula) (e : ℕ → ZFSet.{0}) (K Q : ZFSet.{0}) : ZFSet.{0} :=
K.sep (fun t => ∃ D ∈ Q, ∃ Y ∈ Q, Partial φ e K D Y ∧ t ∈ Y)
def candidateSlots : ℕ → ℕ
| 0 => 0
| 1 => 1
| n+2 => n+4
def unionFormula (φ : Formula) (which : ℕ) : Formula :=
.existsMem 1 (.existsMem 2 (.conj ((partialFormula φ).rename candidateSlots) (.member 2 which)))
theorem unionFormula_spec (φ : Formula) (e : ℕ → ZFSet.{0}) (K Q t : ZFSet.{0}) (which : ℕ) :
(unionFormula φ which).Eval (cons t (cons Q (cons K e))) ↔
∃ D ∈ Q, ∃ Y ∈ Q, Partial φ e K D Y ∧
t ∈ cons Y (cons D (cons t (cons Q (cons K e)))) which := by
simp only [unionFormula,Formula.Eval,Formula.eval_rename_comp,cons_zero,cons_succ]
have eq (D Y : ZFSet.{0}) :
cons Y (cons D (cons t (cons Q (cons K e)))) ∘ candidateSlots = cons Y (cons D (cons K e)) := by
funext i; rcases i with _|_|i <;> rfl
simp only [eq,partialFormula_spec]
theorem domain_truth_mem (M K Q : ZFSet.{0}) (hM : Transitive M) (hT : SourceT M)
(hK : K ∈ M) (hQ : Q ∈ M) (φ : Formula) (e : ℕ → ZFSet.{0}) (he : ∀ i, e i ∈ M) :
domain φ e K Q ∈ M ∧ truth φ e K Q ∈ M := by
have henv : ∀ i, cons Q (cons K e) i ∈ M := by
intro i; rcases i with _|_|i; exact hQ; exact hK; exact he i
constructor
· have hs := sep_mem M hM hT.separation.finitePrefix.bounded (unionFormula φ 1) _ henv hK
simpa only [unionFormula_spec,cons_succ,cons_zero,domain] using hs
· have hs := sep_mem M hM hT.separation.finitePrefix.bounded (unionFormula φ 0) _ henv hK
simpa only [unionFormula_spec,cons_succ,cons_zero,truth] using hs
theorem domain_transitive (φ : Formula) (e : ℕ → ZFSet.{0}) (K Q : ZFSet.{0}) :
Transitive (domain φ e K Q) := by
intro t ht s hst
obtain ⟨_,D,hD,Y,hY,hp,htD⟩ := ZFSet.mem_sep.mp ht
have hsD := hp.1 t htD s hst
exact ZFSet.mem_sep.mpr ⟨hp.2.1 hsD,D,hD,Y,hY,hp,hsD⟩
theorem truth_subset_domain (φ : Formula) (e : ℕ → ZFSet.{0}) (K Q : ZFSet.{0}) :
truth φ e K Q ⊆ domain φ e K Q := by
intro t ht
obtain ⟨htK,D,hD,Y,hY,hp,htY⟩ := ZFSet.mem_sep.mp ht
exact ZFSet.mem_sep.mpr ⟨htK,D,hD,Y,hY,hp,hp.2.2.1 htY⟩
theorem truth_agrees (φ : Formula) (e : ℕ → ZFSet.{0}) (K Q Z : ZFSet.{0})
(hl : Local φ e) (hz : ∀ t ∈ K, t ∈ Z ↔ φ.Eval (cons t (cons Z e))) :
∀ t ∈ domain φ e K Q, t ∈ truth φ e K Q ↔ t ∈ Z := by
intro t ht
constructor
· intro h
obtain ⟨_,D,_,Y,_,hp,htY⟩ := ZFSet.mem_sep.mp h
exact (partial_sound φ e K D Y Z hl hp hz t (hp.2.2.1 htY)).mp htY
· intro h
obtain ⟨htK,D,hD,Y,hY,hp,htD⟩ := ZFSet.mem_sep.mp ht
exact ZFSet.mem_sep.mpr ⟨htK,D,hD,Y,hY,hp,(partial_sound φ e K D Y Z hl hp hz t htD).mpr h⟩
theorem partial_of_agrees (φ : Formula) (e : ℕ → ZFSet.{0}) (K D Y Z : ZFSet.{0})
(hl : Local φ e) (hz : ∀ t ∈ K, t ∈ Z ↔ φ.Eval (cons t (cons Z e)))
(hD : Transitive D) (hDK : D ⊆ K) (hYD : Y ⊆ D)
(ha : ∀ t ∈ D, t ∈ Y ↔ t ∈ Z) : Partial φ e K D Y := by
refine ⟨hD,hDK,hYD,?_⟩
intro t ht
exact (ha t ht).trans ((hz t (hDK ht)).trans
(hl D hD t ht Y Z (fun s hs _ => ha s hs)).symm)
theorem truth_internal (M K Z : ZFSet.{0}) (hM : Transitive M) (hT : SourceT M)
(hKM : K ∈ M) (hK : Transitive K) (φ : Formula) (e : ℕ → ZFSet.{0})
(he : ∀ i, e i ∈ M) (hl : Local φ e)
(hz : ∀ t ∈ K, t ∈ Z ↔ φ.Eval (cons t (cons Z e))) :
K.sep (fun t => t ∈ Z) ∈ M := by
classical
obtain ⟨Q,hQM,hQ⟩ := internal_power M hM hT.powerSet hKM
let D := domain φ e K Q
let Y := truth φ e K Q
obtain ⟨hDM,hYM⟩ := domain_truth_mem M K Q hM hT hKM hQM φ e he
have hD : Transitive D := domain_transitive φ e K Q
have hDK : D ⊆ K := fun _ h => (ZFSet.mem_sep.mp h).1
have hYD : Y ⊆ D := truth_subset_domain φ e K Q
have ha : ∀ t ∈ D, t ∈ Y ↔ t ∈ Z := truth_agrees φ e K Q Z hl hz
have hcover (t : ZFSet.{0}) : t ∈ K → t ∈ D := by
induction t using ZFSet.inductionOn with
| h t ih =>
intro htK
by_cases htD : t ∈ D
· exact htD
have hchildren : t ⊆ D := fun s hs => ih s hs (hK t htK s hs)
let D' := D ∪ ({t} : ZFSet.{0})
let Y' := if t ∈ Z then Y ∪ ({t} : ZFSet.{0}) else Y
have hDD' : D ⊆ D' := fun _ h => ZFSet.mem_union.mpr (Or.inl h)
have htD' : t ∈ D' := ZFSet.mem_union.mpr (Or.inr (ZFSet.mem_singleton.mpr rfl))
have hD' : Transitive D' := by
intro a ha b hb
rcases ZFSet.mem_union.mp ha with ha | ha
· exact hDD' (hD a ha b hb)
· have ha := ZFSet.mem_singleton.mp ha
subst a
exact hDD' (hchildren hb)
have hD'K : D' ⊆ K := by
intro a ha
rcases ZFSet.mem_union.mp ha with ha | ha
· exact hDK ha
· exact (ZFSet.mem_singleton.mp ha) ▸ htK
have hY'D' : Y' ⊆ D' := by
intro a ha
dsimp [Y'] at ha
split_ifs at ha
· rcases ZFSet.mem_union.mp ha with ha | ha
· exact hDD' (hYD ha)
· exact (ZFSet.mem_singleton.mp ha) ▸ htD'
· exact hDD' (hYD ha)
have ha' : ∀ a ∈ D', a ∈ Y' ↔ a ∈ Z := by
intro a haD'
by_cases hat : a = t
· subst a
have htY : t ∉ Y := fun h => htD (hYD h)
simp only [Y']
split_ifs with htZ <;> simp [htZ,htY]
· have haD : a ∈ D := (ZFSet.mem_union.mp haD').resolve_right (fun h => hat (ZFSet.mem_singleton.mp h))
have hae := ha a haD
dsimp [Y']
split_ifs <;> simpa only [ZFSet.mem_union,ZFSet.mem_singleton,hat,or_false] using hae
have htM := hM K hKM t htK
have hsM := singleton_mem M hM hT.pairing htM
have hD'M : D' ∈ M := binary_union_mem M hM hT.pairing hT.union hDM hsM
have hY'M : Y' ∈ M := by
dsimp [Y']; split_ifs
· exact binary_union_mem M hM hT.pairing hT.union hYM hsM
· exact hYM
exact ZFSet.mem_sep.mpr ⟨htK,D',(hQ _).mpr ⟨hD'M,hD'K⟩,
Y',(hQ _).mpr ⟨hY'M,fun _ h => hD'K (hY'D' h)⟩,
partial_of_agrees φ e K D' Y' Z hl hz hD' hD'K hY'D' ha',htD'⟩
have eq : Y = K.sep (fun t => t ∈ Z) := by
apply ZFSet.ext; intro t
constructor
· intro ht
exact ZFSet.mem_sep.mpr ⟨hDK (hYD ht),(ha t (hYD ht)).mp ht⟩
· intro ht
obtain ⟨htK,htZ⟩ := ZFSet.mem_sep.mp ht
exact (ha t (hcover t htK)).mpr htZ
exact eq ▸ hYM
end TuringRigidity.BoundedTruthRecursion
end OAI