Fix `license` metadata
#1
by
julien-c
HF Staff
- opened
README.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,122 +1,122 @@
|
|
| 1 |
-
---
|
| 2 |
-
annotations_creators:
|
| 3 |
-
- expert-generated
|
| 4 |
-
language_creators:
|
| 5 |
-
- machine-generated
|
| 6 |
-
|
| 7 |
-
- en
|
| 8 |
-
|
| 9 |
-
- agpl-3.0
|
| 10 |
-
multilinguality:
|
| 11 |
-
- monolingual
|
| 12 |
-
pretty_name: STAN Large
|
| 13 |
-
size_categories:
|
| 14 |
-
- unknown
|
| 15 |
-
source_datasets:
|
| 16 |
-
- original
|
| 17 |
-
task_categories:
|
| 18 |
-
- structure-prediction
|
| 19 |
-
task_ids:
|
| 20 |
-
- structure-prediction-other-word-segmentation
|
| 21 |
-
---
|
| 22 |
-
|
| 23 |
-
# Dataset Card for STAN Large
|
| 24 |
-
|
| 25 |
-
## Table of Contents
|
| 26 |
-
- [Table of Contents](#table-of-contents)
|
| 27 |
-
- [Dataset Description](#dataset-description)
|
| 28 |
-
- [Dataset Summary](#dataset-summary)
|
| 29 |
-
- [Languages](#languages)
|
| 30 |
-
- [Dataset Structure](#dataset-structure)
|
| 31 |
-
- [Data Instances](#data-instances)
|
| 32 |
-
- [Data Fields](#data-fields)
|
| 33 |
-
- [Dataset Creation](#dataset-creation)
|
| 34 |
-
- [Additional Information](#additional-information)
|
| 35 |
-
- [Citation Information](#citation-information)
|
| 36 |
-
- [Contributions](#contributions)
|
| 37 |
-
|
| 38 |
-
## Dataset Description
|
| 39 |
-
|
| 40 |
-
- **Repository:** [mounicam/hashtag_master](https://github.com/mounicam/hashtag_master)
|
| 41 |
-
- **Paper:** [Multi-task Pairwise Neural Ranking for Hashtag Segmentation](https://aclanthology.org/P19-1242/)
|
| 42 |
-
|
| 43 |
-
### Dataset Summary
|
| 44 |
-
|
| 45 |
-
The description below was taken from the paper "Multi-task Pairwise Neural Ranking for Hashtag Segmentation"
|
| 46 |
-
by Maddela et al..
|
| 47 |
-
|
| 48 |
-
"STAN large, our new expert curated dataset, which includes all 12,594 unique English hashtags and their
|
| 49 |
-
associated tweets from the same Stanford dataset.
|
| 50 |
-
|
| 51 |
-
STAN small is the most commonly used dataset in previous work. However, after reexamination, we found annotation
|
| 52 |
-
errors in 6.8% of the hashtags in this dataset, which is significant given that the error rate of the state-of-the art
|
| 53 |
-
models is only around 10%. Most of the errors were related to named entities. For example, #lionhead,
|
| 54 |
-
which refers to the “Lionhead” video game company, was labeled as “lion head”.
|
| 55 |
-
|
| 56 |
-
We therefore constructed the STAN large dataset of 12,594 hashtags with additional quality control for human annotations."
|
| 57 |
-
|
| 58 |
-
### Languages
|
| 59 |
-
|
| 60 |
-
English
|
| 61 |
-
|
| 62 |
-
## Dataset Structure
|
| 63 |
-
|
| 64 |
-
### Data Instances
|
| 65 |
-
|
| 66 |
-
```
|
| 67 |
-
{
|
| 68 |
-
"index": 15,
|
| 69 |
-
"hashtag": "PokemonPlatinum",
|
| 70 |
-
"segmentation": "Pokemon Platinum",
|
| 71 |
-
"alternatives": {
|
| 72 |
-
"segmentation": [
|
| 73 |
-
"Pokemon platinum"
|
| 74 |
-
]
|
| 75 |
-
}
|
| 76 |
-
}
|
| 77 |
-
```
|
| 78 |
-
|
| 79 |
-
### Data Fields
|
| 80 |
-
|
| 81 |
-
- `index`: a numerical index.
|
| 82 |
-
- `hashtag`: the original hashtag.
|
| 83 |
-
- `segmentation`: the gold segmentation for the hashtag.
|
| 84 |
-
- `alternatives`: other segmentations that are also accepted as a gold segmentation.
|
| 85 |
-
|
| 86 |
-
Although `segmentation` has exactly the same characters as `hashtag` except for the spaces, the segmentations inside `alternatives` may have characters corrected to uppercase.
|
| 87 |
-
|
| 88 |
-
## Dataset Creation
|
| 89 |
-
|
| 90 |
-
- All hashtag segmentation and identifier splitting datasets on this profile have the same basic fields: `hashtag` and `segmentation` or `identifier` and `segmentation`.
|
| 91 |
-
|
| 92 |
-
- The only difference between `hashtag` and `segmentation` or between `identifier` and `segmentation` are the whitespace characters. Spell checking, expanding abbreviations or correcting characters to uppercase go into other fields.
|
| 93 |
-
|
| 94 |
-
- There is always whitespace between an alphanumeric character and a sequence of any special characters ( such as `_` , `:`, `~` ).
|
| 95 |
-
|
| 96 |
-
- If there are any annotations for named entity recognition and other token classification tasks, they are given in a `spans` field.
|
| 97 |
-
|
| 98 |
-
## Additional Information
|
| 99 |
-
|
| 100 |
-
### Citation Information
|
| 101 |
-
|
| 102 |
-
```
|
| 103 |
-
@inproceedings{maddela-etal-2019-multi,
|
| 104 |
-
title = "Multi-task Pairwise Neural Ranking for Hashtag Segmentation",
|
| 105 |
-
author = "Maddela, Mounica and
|
| 106 |
-
Xu, Wei and
|
| 107 |
-
Preo{\c{t}}iuc-Pietro, Daniel",
|
| 108 |
-
booktitle = "Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics",
|
| 109 |
-
month = jul,
|
| 110 |
-
year = "2019",
|
| 111 |
-
address = "Florence, Italy",
|
| 112 |
-
publisher = "Association for Computational Linguistics",
|
| 113 |
-
url = "https://aclanthology.org/P19-1242",
|
| 114 |
-
doi = "10.18653/v1/P19-1242",
|
| 115 |
-
pages = "2538--2549",
|
| 116 |
-
abstract = "Hashtags are often employed on social media and beyond to add metadata to a textual utterance with the goal of increasing discoverability, aiding search, or providing additional semantics. However, the semantic content of hashtags is not straightforward to infer as these represent ad-hoc conventions which frequently include multiple words joined together and can include abbreviations and unorthodox spellings. We build a dataset of 12,594 hashtags split into individual segments and propose a set of approaches for hashtag segmentation by framing it as a pairwise ranking problem between candidate segmentations. Our novel neural approaches demonstrate 24.6{\%} error reduction in hashtag segmentation accuracy compared to the current state-of-the-art method. Finally, we demonstrate that a deeper understanding of hashtag semantics obtained through segmentation is useful for downstream applications such as sentiment analysis, for which we achieved a 2.6{\%} increase in average recall on the SemEval 2017 sentiment analysis dataset.",
|
| 117 |
-
}
|
| 118 |
-
```
|
| 119 |
-
|
| 120 |
-
### Contributions
|
| 121 |
-
|
| 122 |
This dataset was added by [@ruanchaves](https://github.com/ruanchaves) while developing the [hashformers](https://github.com/ruanchaves/hashformers) library.
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
+
---
|
| 2 |
+
annotations_creators:
|
| 3 |
+
- expert-generated
|
| 4 |
+
language_creators:
|
| 5 |
+
- machine-generated
|
| 6 |
+
language:
|
| 7 |
+
- en
|
| 8 |
+
license:
|
| 9 |
+
- agpl-3.0
|
| 10 |
+
multilinguality:
|
| 11 |
+
- monolingual
|
| 12 |
+
pretty_name: STAN Large
|
| 13 |
+
size_categories:
|
| 14 |
+
- unknown
|
| 15 |
+
source_datasets:
|
| 16 |
+
- original
|
| 17 |
+
task_categories:
|
| 18 |
+
- structure-prediction
|
| 19 |
+
task_ids:
|
| 20 |
+
- structure-prediction-other-word-segmentation
|
| 21 |
+
---
|
| 22 |
+
|
| 23 |
+
# Dataset Card for STAN Large
|
| 24 |
+
|
| 25 |
+
## Table of Contents
|
| 26 |
+
- [Table of Contents](#table-of-contents)
|
| 27 |
+
- [Dataset Description](#dataset-description)
|
| 28 |
+
- [Dataset Summary](#dataset-summary)
|
| 29 |
+
- [Languages](#languages)
|
| 30 |
+
- [Dataset Structure](#dataset-structure)
|
| 31 |
+
- [Data Instances](#data-instances)
|
| 32 |
+
- [Data Fields](#data-fields)
|
| 33 |
+
- [Dataset Creation](#dataset-creation)
|
| 34 |
+
- [Additional Information](#additional-information)
|
| 35 |
+
- [Citation Information](#citation-information)
|
| 36 |
+
- [Contributions](#contributions)
|
| 37 |
+
|
| 38 |
+
## Dataset Description
|
| 39 |
+
|
| 40 |
+
- **Repository:** [mounicam/hashtag_master](https://github.com/mounicam/hashtag_master)
|
| 41 |
+
- **Paper:** [Multi-task Pairwise Neural Ranking for Hashtag Segmentation](https://aclanthology.org/P19-1242/)
|
| 42 |
+
|
| 43 |
+
### Dataset Summary
|
| 44 |
+
|
| 45 |
+
The description below was taken from the paper "Multi-task Pairwise Neural Ranking for Hashtag Segmentation"
|
| 46 |
+
by Maddela et al..
|
| 47 |
+
|
| 48 |
+
"STAN large, our new expert curated dataset, which includes all 12,594 unique English hashtags and their
|
| 49 |
+
associated tweets from the same Stanford dataset.
|
| 50 |
+
|
| 51 |
+
STAN small is the most commonly used dataset in previous work. However, after reexamination, we found annotation
|
| 52 |
+
errors in 6.8% of the hashtags in this dataset, which is significant given that the error rate of the state-of-the art
|
| 53 |
+
models is only around 10%. Most of the errors were related to named entities. For example, #lionhead,
|
| 54 |
+
which refers to the “Lionhead” video game company, was labeled as “lion head”.
|
| 55 |
+
|
| 56 |
+
We therefore constructed the STAN large dataset of 12,594 hashtags with additional quality control for human annotations."
|
| 57 |
+
|
| 58 |
+
### Languages
|
| 59 |
+
|
| 60 |
+
English
|
| 61 |
+
|
| 62 |
+
## Dataset Structure
|
| 63 |
+
|
| 64 |
+
### Data Instances
|
| 65 |
+
|
| 66 |
+
```
|
| 67 |
+
{
|
| 68 |
+
"index": 15,
|
| 69 |
+
"hashtag": "PokemonPlatinum",
|
| 70 |
+
"segmentation": "Pokemon Platinum",
|
| 71 |
+
"alternatives": {
|
| 72 |
+
"segmentation": [
|
| 73 |
+
"Pokemon platinum"
|
| 74 |
+
]
|
| 75 |
+
}
|
| 76 |
+
}
|
| 77 |
+
```
|
| 78 |
+
|
| 79 |
+
### Data Fields
|
| 80 |
+
|
| 81 |
+
- `index`: a numerical index.
|
| 82 |
+
- `hashtag`: the original hashtag.
|
| 83 |
+
- `segmentation`: the gold segmentation for the hashtag.
|
| 84 |
+
- `alternatives`: other segmentations that are also accepted as a gold segmentation.
|
| 85 |
+
|
| 86 |
+
Although `segmentation` has exactly the same characters as `hashtag` except for the spaces, the segmentations inside `alternatives` may have characters corrected to uppercase.
|
| 87 |
+
|
| 88 |
+
## Dataset Creation
|
| 89 |
+
|
| 90 |
+
- All hashtag segmentation and identifier splitting datasets on this profile have the same basic fields: `hashtag` and `segmentation` or `identifier` and `segmentation`.
|
| 91 |
+
|
| 92 |
+
- The only difference between `hashtag` and `segmentation` or between `identifier` and `segmentation` are the whitespace characters. Spell checking, expanding abbreviations or correcting characters to uppercase go into other fields.
|
| 93 |
+
|
| 94 |
+
- There is always whitespace between an alphanumeric character and a sequence of any special characters ( such as `_` , `:`, `~` ).
|
| 95 |
+
|
| 96 |
+
- If there are any annotations for named entity recognition and other token classification tasks, they are given in a `spans` field.
|
| 97 |
+
|
| 98 |
+
## Additional Information
|
| 99 |
+
|
| 100 |
+
### Citation Information
|
| 101 |
+
|
| 102 |
+
```
|
| 103 |
+
@inproceedings{maddela-etal-2019-multi,
|
| 104 |
+
title = "Multi-task Pairwise Neural Ranking for Hashtag Segmentation",
|
| 105 |
+
author = "Maddela, Mounica and
|
| 106 |
+
Xu, Wei and
|
| 107 |
+
Preo{\c{t}}iuc-Pietro, Daniel",
|
| 108 |
+
booktitle = "Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics",
|
| 109 |
+
month = jul,
|
| 110 |
+
year = "2019",
|
| 111 |
+
address = "Florence, Italy",
|
| 112 |
+
publisher = "Association for Computational Linguistics",
|
| 113 |
+
url = "https://aclanthology.org/P19-1242",
|
| 114 |
+
doi = "10.18653/v1/P19-1242",
|
| 115 |
+
pages = "2538--2549",
|
| 116 |
+
abstract = "Hashtags are often employed on social media and beyond to add metadata to a textual utterance with the goal of increasing discoverability, aiding search, or providing additional semantics. However, the semantic content of hashtags is not straightforward to infer as these represent ad-hoc conventions which frequently include multiple words joined together and can include abbreviations and unorthodox spellings. We build a dataset of 12,594 hashtags split into individual segments and propose a set of approaches for hashtag segmentation by framing it as a pairwise ranking problem between candidate segmentations. Our novel neural approaches demonstrate 24.6{\%} error reduction in hashtag segmentation accuracy compared to the current state-of-the-art method. Finally, we demonstrate that a deeper understanding of hashtag semantics obtained through segmentation is useful for downstream applications such as sentiment analysis, for which we achieved a 2.6{\%} increase in average recall on the SemEval 2017 sentiment analysis dataset.",
|
| 117 |
+
}
|
| 118 |
+
```
|
| 119 |
+
|
| 120 |
+
### Contributions
|
| 121 |
+
|
| 122 |
This dataset was added by [@ruanchaves](https://github.com/ruanchaves) while developing the [hashformers](https://github.com/ruanchaves/hashformers) library.
|