INTRA
Collection
9 items • Updated
Unnamed: 0.1 int64 0 2.31k | Unnamed: 0 int64 2 3.82k | language stringclasses 13 values | site stringclasses 14 values | evidence_1 stringlengths 24 565 ⌀ | evidence_2 stringlengths 16 883 ⌀ | evidence_3 stringlengths 16 669 ⌀ | evidence_4 stringlengths 16 655 ⌀ | evidence_5 stringlengths 16 902 ⌀ | link_1 stringlengths 19 1.58k | link_2 stringlengths 7 1.19k | link_3 stringlengths 7 1.03k | link_4 stringlengths 7 960 | link_5 stringlengths 7 958 | claimDate stringlengths 4 20 | reviewDate stringlengths 4 20 | claimant stringlengths 2 104 | claim stringlengths 16 1.11k | label bool 2 classes | is_correct float64 0 1 | is_hallu float64 0 1 | primed_text stringlengths 4.27k 5.36k | out stringlengths 71 512 | out_clean stringclasses 27 values | is_good bool 2 classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 2 | pt | poligrafo.sapo.pt | Em publicação partilhada viralmente nas redes sociais destaca-se que a cafeína, por ser rica em "antioxidantes e minerais", é uma substância que impede... | Em publicação partilhada viralmente nas redes sociais destaca-se que a cafeína, por ser rica em “antioxidantes e minerais“, é uma substância que impede que ... | A história do suposto turista que visitou a capital da Suécia já foi partilhada dezenas de ... Em publicação nas redes sociais destaca-se que novas imagens da ... Está a propagar-se viralmente nas redes sociais um "meme" com o suposto ... | Em publicação partilhada viralmente nas redes sociais destaca-se que ...... | Jul 31, 2020 — O tema Covid-19 foi verdadeiramente 'explosivo' nas redes sociais nos dias ... com muitas publicações a tornarem-se 'virais', quer no Facebook, quer no Twitter. ... destacando-se mais pela interatividade das suas publicações ('likes', ... Serviços Partilhados do Ministério da Saúde (mais 73%), da Escola ... | https://es-la.facebook.com/258649144844557/posts/em-publica%C3%A7%C3%A3o-partilhada-viralmente-nas-redes-sociais-destaca-se-que-a-cafe%C3%ADna-p/553116328731169/ | https://hi-in.facebook.com/sapo/posts/10157189413125770 | https://poligrafo.sapo.pt/fact-checks/internacional | https://poligrafo.sapo.pt/fact-check/o-cafe-pode-ajudar-na-prevencao-do-novo-coronavirus | https://covidcheck.pt/nao-se-deixe-enganar/2731/ | 2020-05-06T08:00:48Z | 2020-05-06T08:00:48Z | none | Em publicação partilhada viralmente nas redes sociais destaca-se que ...... | false | 0 | 1 | <|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|>
Cutting Knowledge Date: December 2023
Today Date: 26 Jul 2024
You are an expert in verifying atomic facts extracted from Wikipedia pages for specificity to a single entity. Your task is to determine if a given atomic fact refers exclusively to the specified topic/entity and has no multiple meanings or applicability to other similar entities without direct reference to the topic.Rules:- The fact must be unique or directly tied to the topic. It should not be a generic statement that could apply to many entities (e.g., locations, people, events). Entities must be explicitly stated. The fact may not be true, correct, or may be debatable, but that is not important; it must only comply with rules. - If the fact mentions the topic explicitly or describes details unique to it, it's GOOD.- If the fact is vague, general, or could be said about many similar entities, it's BAD.- Output exactly in this format: a short explanation (1-2 sentences) followed by a semicolon and a choice of "GOOD" or "BAD".<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The storm highlighted the need for more robust infrastructure and emergency response systems.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This is a generic statement that could apply to many hurricanes or natural disasters, not unique to Hurricane Ian; BAD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The impact of Hurricane Ian was felt far beyond the immediate storm surge zone, with heavy rainfall and flooding reported in central and eastern Florida.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This fact specifies unique impacts and locations directly tied to Hurricane Ian; GOOD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: He graduated from Amherst College and the University of Arizona.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This claim contains a pronoun and can refers to a variety of entities; BAD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: In 2019 the US Police were 20.8 times more likely to kill than be killed by a criminal.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This fact specifies unique statistics and date directly tied to US Police; GOOD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: Marie Curie was the first woman to win a Nobel Prize and the only person to win Nobel Prizes in two different scientific fields.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This fact explicitly mentions Marie Curie and describes unique achievements specific to her; GOOD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The company reported record profits in the third quarter.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This statement lacks entity specification and could apply to any company in any year; BAD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The Apollo 11 mission landed the first humans on the Moon on July 20, 1969, at the Sea of Tranquility.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This fact provides specific mission name, date, and location unique to Apollo 11; GOOD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The election resulted in a narrow victory for the incumbent party.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This statement is too generic without specifying which election, country, or year; BAD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The Affordable Care Act, signed by President Obama in 2010, expanded healthcare coverage to millions of Americans.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This fact names the specific act, the president who signed it, and the year, making it uniquely identifiable; GOOD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The research showed promising results in early clinical trials.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This statement could apply to any research study and lacks specific identification; BAD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: Em publicação partilhada viralmente nas redes sociais destaca-se que ......<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
| This statement is incomplete and lacks any specific entity or detail to tie it to a unique topic; BAD | BAD | false |
1 | 3 | pt | piaui.folha.uol.com.br | Oct 26, 2020 — Circula nas redes sociais o vídeo em que um enfermeiro faz uma série de declarações sobre o método de desenvolvimento de vacinas contra ... | Estudem sobre adjuvantes de vacina e o mal que causam na população. Os adjuvantes podem causar Alzheimer, fibromialgia, uma série de doenças. As pessoas... | Oct 26, 2020 — Verificamos: É falso que adjuvantes de vacinas causem doenças e que testes de vacinas podem matar via Agência Lupa Jessica de Almeida ... | Home; Institucional; Atrações; Biblioteca; Repositório; ESIB - Escola Superior; Pesquisa; Soros e Vacinas; Centro de Memória; Atendimento médico; Calendário ... | VACINA DE OXFORD USA VÍRUS ENGENHEIRADO PARA PROTEGER CONTRA COVID-19. Mônica Teixeira - 01.07.2020. Neste final de junho, são 13 as ... | https://piaui.folha.uol.com.br/lupa/2020/10/26/verificamos-enfermeiro-adjuvantes/ | https://oglobo.globo.com/fato-ou-fake/e-fake-que-substancias-presentes-em-vacinas-para-covid-19-podem-causar-alzheimer-fibromialgia-24718368 | https://www.facebook.com/fakenaobrasil/posts/680579509230643 | https://butantan.gov.br/ | https://coronavirus.butantan.gov.br/pesquisa-e-desenvolvimento-de-vacinas-e-tratamentos | 2020-10-26T18:22:01Z | 2020-10-26T18:22:01Z | Post no Facebook | Eles [do Instituto Butantan] pegam o adenovírus, pegam a proteína do coronavírus, e colocam nesse adenovírus | false | 0 | 1 | <|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|>
Cutting Knowledge Date: December 2023
Today Date: 26 Jul 2024
You are an expert in verifying atomic facts extracted from Wikipedia pages for specificity to a single entity. Your task is to determine if a given atomic fact refers exclusively to the specified topic/entity and has no multiple meanings or applicability to other similar entities without direct reference to the topic.Rules:- The fact must be unique or directly tied to the topic. It should not be a generic statement that could apply to many entities (e.g., locations, people, events). Entities must be explicitly stated. The fact may not be true, correct, or may be debatable, but that is not important; it must only comply with rules. - If the fact mentions the topic explicitly or describes details unique to it, it's GOOD.- If the fact is vague, general, or could be said about many similar entities, it's BAD.- Output exactly in this format: a short explanation (1-2 sentences) followed by a semicolon and a choice of "GOOD" or "BAD".<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The storm highlighted the need for more robust infrastructure and emergency response systems.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This is a generic statement that could apply to many hurricanes or natural disasters, not unique to Hurricane Ian; BAD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The impact of Hurricane Ian was felt far beyond the immediate storm surge zone, with heavy rainfall and flooding reported in central and eastern Florida.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This fact specifies unique impacts and locations directly tied to Hurricane Ian; GOOD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: He graduated from Amherst College and the University of Arizona.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This claim contains a pronoun and can refers to a variety of entities; BAD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: In 2019 the US Police were 20.8 times more likely to kill than be killed by a criminal.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This fact specifies unique statistics and date directly tied to US Police; GOOD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: Marie Curie was the first woman to win a Nobel Prize and the only person to win Nobel Prizes in two different scientific fields.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This fact explicitly mentions Marie Curie and describes unique achievements specific to her; GOOD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The company reported record profits in the third quarter.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This statement lacks entity specification and could apply to any company in any year; BAD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The Apollo 11 mission landed the first humans on the Moon on July 20, 1969, at the Sea of Tranquility.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This fact provides specific mission name, date, and location unique to Apollo 11; GOOD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The election resulted in a narrow victory for the incumbent party.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This statement is too generic without specifying which election, country, or year; BAD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The Affordable Care Act, signed by President Obama in 2010, expanded healthcare coverage to millions of Americans.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This fact names the specific act, the president who signed it, and the year, making it uniquely identifiable; GOOD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The research showed promising results in early clinical trials.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This statement could apply to any research study and lacks specific identification; BAD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: Eles [do Instituto Butantan] pegam o adenovírus, pegam a proteína do coronavírus, e colocam nesse adenovírus<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
| This fact appears to describe a specific process related to the Instituto Butantan, but without explicit mention of the entity or context, it's somewhat vague; however, the mention of "Instituto Butantan" directly ties it to a specific entity, making it; GOOD | GOOD | true |
2 | 4 | pt | poligrafo.sapo.pt | "Isto nunca tinha sido feito na História", escreveu o Presidente dos EUA numa publicação na mesma rede social que acusou de promover um "blackout" para ... | "Isto nunca tinha sido feito na História", escreveu o Presidente dos ...... | "Isto nunca tinha sido feito na História", escreveu o Presidente dos EUA numa publicação na mesma rede social que acusou de criar problemas técnicos e ficar ... | "Isto nunca tinha sido feito na História", escreveu o Presidente dos... EUA numa publicação na mesma rede social que acusou de criar problemas técnicos e ... | <DUMMY_EVIDENCE> | https://poligrafo.sapo.pt/fact-checks/eleicoesamericanas | https://poligrafo.sapo.pt/fact-check/trump-twitter-deixou-de-estar-disponivel-para-parar-noticias-negativas-sobre-biden-e-verdade | https://www.facebook.com/jornalpoligrafo/posts/427834514592685 | https://www.facebook.com/258649144844557/posts/de-acordo-com-uma-publica%C3%A7%C3%A3o-que-est%C3%A1-a-espalhar-se-nas-redes-sociais-a-jovem-at/580385739337561/ | NO_LINK | 2020-11-01T23:00:05Z | 2020-11-01T23:00:05Z | none | "Isto nunca tinha sido feito na História", escreveu o Presidente dos ...... | false | 0 | 1 | <|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|>
Cutting Knowledge Date: December 2023
Today Date: 26 Jul 2024
You are an expert in verifying atomic facts extracted from Wikipedia pages for specificity to a single entity. Your task is to determine if a given atomic fact refers exclusively to the specified topic/entity and has no multiple meanings or applicability to other similar entities without direct reference to the topic.Rules:- The fact must be unique or directly tied to the topic. It should not be a generic statement that could apply to many entities (e.g., locations, people, events). Entities must be explicitly stated. The fact may not be true, correct, or may be debatable, but that is not important; it must only comply with rules. - If the fact mentions the topic explicitly or describes details unique to it, it's GOOD.- If the fact is vague, general, or could be said about many similar entities, it's BAD.- Output exactly in this format: a short explanation (1-2 sentences) followed by a semicolon and a choice of "GOOD" or "BAD".<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The storm highlighted the need for more robust infrastructure and emergency response systems.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This is a generic statement that could apply to many hurricanes or natural disasters, not unique to Hurricane Ian; BAD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The impact of Hurricane Ian was felt far beyond the immediate storm surge zone, with heavy rainfall and flooding reported in central and eastern Florida.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This fact specifies unique impacts and locations directly tied to Hurricane Ian; GOOD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: He graduated from Amherst College and the University of Arizona.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This claim contains a pronoun and can refers to a variety of entities; BAD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: In 2019 the US Police were 20.8 times more likely to kill than be killed by a criminal.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This fact specifies unique statistics and date directly tied to US Police; GOOD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: Marie Curie was the first woman to win a Nobel Prize and the only person to win Nobel Prizes in two different scientific fields.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This fact explicitly mentions Marie Curie and describes unique achievements specific to her; GOOD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The company reported record profits in the third quarter.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This statement lacks entity specification and could apply to any company in any year; BAD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The Apollo 11 mission landed the first humans on the Moon on July 20, 1969, at the Sea of Tranquility.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This fact provides specific mission name, date, and location unique to Apollo 11; GOOD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The election resulted in a narrow victory for the incumbent party.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This statement is too generic without specifying which election, country, or year; BAD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The Affordable Care Act, signed by President Obama in 2010, expanded healthcare coverage to millions of Americans.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This fact names the specific act, the president who signed it, and the year, making it uniquely identifiable; GOOD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The research showed promising results in early clinical trials.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This statement could apply to any research study and lacks specific identification; BAD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: "Isto nunca tinha sido feito na História", escreveu o Presidente dos ......<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
| This statement is incomplete and lacks specific information about the president or the event being referred to; BAD | BAD | false |
3 | 5 | pt | piaui.folha.uol.com.br | 12- Cortou a suntuosa verba do Carnaval e outros eventos, passando a responsabilidade a ser dos próprios idealizadores; 13- Mudou a validade da CNH de 5 ... | 16 apr. 2019 — “6-) Cortou a suntuosa verba do Carnaval e outros eventos, passando a responsabilidade a ser dos próprios idealizadores;” - Pô, gente, se o ... | 10 apr. 2019 — 12 - “Cortou a suntuosa verba do Carnaval e outros eventos, passando a responsabilidade a ser dos próprios idealizadores”. Falso. | 16 apr. 2019 — “2-) Bolsonaro cortou 2,5 Bilhões de verbas de patrocínio com a Globo e outras ... “6-) Cortou a suntuosa verba do Carnaval e outros eventos, passando a responsabilidade a ser dos próprios idealizadores;”. – Pô, gente, se o governo federal nem dá verba para o Carnaval, como pode cortar alguma coisa? | 17 apr. 2019 — “Cortou a suntuosa verba do Carnaval e outros eventos, passando a responsabilidade a ser dos próprios idealizadores” Trecho de post sobre ... | https://ar-ar.facebook.com/Bolsonarosp/posts/646161572473857/ | https://m.facebook.com/DiariodoBolso/photos/a.1984940688467275/2035577116736965/?type=3&source=57&__tn__=EH-R | https://checamos.afp.com/veracidade-sobre-20-supostas-medidas-tomadas-durante-o-governo-bolsonaro | https://www.redebrasilatual.com.br/blogs/diario-do-bolso/2019/04/diario-adorei-o-zap-favoravel-apesar-de-umas-coisas-erradas/ | https://piaui.folha.uol.com.br/lupa/2019/04/17/verificamos-lista-bolsonaro/ | 2019-04-17T07:00:57Z | 2019-04-17T07:00:57Z | Facebook | Cortou a suntuosa verba do Carnaval e outros eventos, passando a responsabilidade a ser dos próprios idealizadores | false | 0 | 1 | <|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|>
Cutting Knowledge Date: December 2023
Today Date: 26 Jul 2024
You are an expert in verifying atomic facts extracted from Wikipedia pages for specificity to a single entity. Your task is to determine if a given atomic fact refers exclusively to the specified topic/entity and has no multiple meanings or applicability to other similar entities without direct reference to the topic.Rules:- The fact must be unique or directly tied to the topic. It should not be a generic statement that could apply to many entities (e.g., locations, people, events). Entities must be explicitly stated. The fact may not be true, correct, or may be debatable, but that is not important; it must only comply with rules. - If the fact mentions the topic explicitly or describes details unique to it, it's GOOD.- If the fact is vague, general, or could be said about many similar entities, it's BAD.- Output exactly in this format: a short explanation (1-2 sentences) followed by a semicolon and a choice of "GOOD" or "BAD".<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The storm highlighted the need for more robust infrastructure and emergency response systems.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This is a generic statement that could apply to many hurricanes or natural disasters, not unique to Hurricane Ian; BAD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The impact of Hurricane Ian was felt far beyond the immediate storm surge zone, with heavy rainfall and flooding reported in central and eastern Florida.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This fact specifies unique impacts and locations directly tied to Hurricane Ian; GOOD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: He graduated from Amherst College and the University of Arizona.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This claim contains a pronoun and can refers to a variety of entities; BAD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: In 2019 the US Police were 20.8 times more likely to kill than be killed by a criminal.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This fact specifies unique statistics and date directly tied to US Police; GOOD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: Marie Curie was the first woman to win a Nobel Prize and the only person to win Nobel Prizes in two different scientific fields.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This fact explicitly mentions Marie Curie and describes unique achievements specific to her; GOOD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The company reported record profits in the third quarter.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This statement lacks entity specification and could apply to any company in any year; BAD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The Apollo 11 mission landed the first humans on the Moon on July 20, 1969, at the Sea of Tranquility.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This fact provides specific mission name, date, and location unique to Apollo 11; GOOD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The election resulted in a narrow victory for the incumbent party.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This statement is too generic without specifying which election, country, or year; BAD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The Affordable Care Act, signed by President Obama in 2010, expanded healthcare coverage to millions of Americans.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This fact names the specific act, the president who signed it, and the year, making it uniquely identifiable; GOOD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The research showed promising results in early clinical trials.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This statement could apply to any research study and lacks specific identification; BAD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: Cortou a suntuosa verba do Carnaval e outros eventos, passando a responsabilidade a ser dos próprios idealizadores<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
| This fact lacks a clear subject or entity and appears to be written in a language other than English, but even if translated, it seems too vague without specifying which city, organization, or event is being referred to; BAD | BAD | false |
4 | 6 | pt | piaui.folha.uol.com.br | SERÁ VERDADE. OLHA A SAFADEZA PRA DIZER QUE O NÚMERO DE INFECTADO ESTA AUMENTANDO | “Ambulância para antes do hospital, Para o paciente na maca se deitar, Acho que Eu não entendo bem, Mas porque ele estava de pé sem reclamar!”. | A ambulância então é fechada. De acordo com a legenda, a gravação foi forjada para dar a impressão de que o número de infectados pelo novo coronavírus está aumentando. ... “SERÁ VERDADE. OLHA A SAFADEZA PRA DIZER QUE O NÚMERO DE INFECTADO ESTA ... A informação analisada pela Lupa é falsa. | Flor Do desejo. 5 likes. Personal Blog. | Mar 19, 2020 — Desde que começaram a surgir casos da doença no Brasil, nas últimas semanas, presidente nega gravidade da pandemia e trata como ... | https://piaui.folha.uol.com.br/lupa/2020/05/19/verificamos-video-homem-covid-19-ambulancia/ | https://www.boatos.org/saude/falso-paciente-covid-19-maca-ambulancia-brasil-video.html | https://ar-ar.facebook.com/279163742705557/posts/579048056050456/ | https://www.facebook.com/pages/Flor-Do-desejo/105306964474866 | https://www.agazeta.com.br/es/politica/as-frases-e-atitudes-equivocadas-de-bolsonaro-sobre-o-coronavirus-0320 | 2020-05-19T19:43:52Z | 2020-05-19T19:43:52Z | Post no Facebook | SERÁ VERDADE. OLHA A SAFADEZA PRA DIZER QUE O NÚMERO DE INFECTADO ESTA AUMENTANDO | false | 0 | 1 | <|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|>
Cutting Knowledge Date: December 2023
Today Date: 26 Jul 2024
You are an expert in verifying atomic facts extracted from Wikipedia pages for specificity to a single entity. Your task is to determine if a given atomic fact refers exclusively to the specified topic/entity and has no multiple meanings or applicability to other similar entities without direct reference to the topic.Rules:- The fact must be unique or directly tied to the topic. It should not be a generic statement that could apply to many entities (e.g., locations, people, events). Entities must be explicitly stated. The fact may not be true, correct, or may be debatable, but that is not important; it must only comply with rules. - If the fact mentions the topic explicitly or describes details unique to it, it's GOOD.- If the fact is vague, general, or could be said about many similar entities, it's BAD.- Output exactly in this format: a short explanation (1-2 sentences) followed by a semicolon and a choice of "GOOD" or "BAD".<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The storm highlighted the need for more robust infrastructure and emergency response systems.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This is a generic statement that could apply to many hurricanes or natural disasters, not unique to Hurricane Ian; BAD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The impact of Hurricane Ian was felt far beyond the immediate storm surge zone, with heavy rainfall and flooding reported in central and eastern Florida.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This fact specifies unique impacts and locations directly tied to Hurricane Ian; GOOD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: He graduated from Amherst College and the University of Arizona.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This claim contains a pronoun and can refers to a variety of entities; BAD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: In 2019 the US Police were 20.8 times more likely to kill than be killed by a criminal.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This fact specifies unique statistics and date directly tied to US Police; GOOD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: Marie Curie was the first woman to win a Nobel Prize and the only person to win Nobel Prizes in two different scientific fields.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This fact explicitly mentions Marie Curie and describes unique achievements specific to her; GOOD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The company reported record profits in the third quarter.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This statement lacks entity specification and could apply to any company in any year; BAD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The Apollo 11 mission landed the first humans on the Moon on July 20, 1969, at the Sea of Tranquility.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This fact provides specific mission name, date, and location unique to Apollo 11; GOOD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The election resulted in a narrow victory for the incumbent party.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This statement is too generic without specifying which election, country, or year; BAD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The Affordable Care Act, signed by President Obama in 2010, expanded healthcare coverage to millions of Americans.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This fact names the specific act, the president who signed it, and the year, making it uniquely identifiable; GOOD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The research showed promising results in early clinical trials.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This statement could apply to any research study and lacks specific identification; BAD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: SERÁ VERDADE. OLHA A SAFADEZA PRA DIZER QUE O NÚMERO DE INFECTADO ESTA AUMENTANDO<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
| This statement appears to be a general claim about an increasing number of infections, but it lacks specificity regarding the disease, location, or context, and is not in English; BAD | BAD | false |
5 | 7 | pt | piaui.folha.uol.com.br | Sep 14, 2020 — A Transparência Internacional recomendou ao procurador da ... missão “dialoga e coopera sistematicamente com agentes públicos, ... O MPF reforçou que os contatos entre o procurador e Bruno Brandão ... com ele, “o primeiro feito pela organização voltado exclusivamente ao setor privado brasileiro”. | Oct 22, 2020 — O ranking avalia a qualidade dos portais da transparência sobre ... Procurada, a assessoria de campanha do candidato informou que a Transparência Internacional ... “Ele se referia às primeiras semanas do segundo turno, quando de fato ... “Curitiba caiu no ranking do Ideb da primeira posição entre as ... | Sep 3, 2019 — Ele acreditava que 'seria facilmente eleito'. ... A primeira menção à aventura política de Deltan Dallagnol no Telegram surgiu em ... “Eu tinha um projeto de pesquisa da Transparência Internacional e ele por vezes participou de ... Até fui atrás [dos procuradores candidatos, em 2018], mas não apareceram. | Na primeira entrevista do GLOBO com candidatos à Presidência, Jair Bolsonaro, ... Podem acontecer problemas entre eles, e alguém vir para o nosso lado. ... Isso não quer dizer que não vamos dialogar com os partidos políticos, com o Congresso. ... Fui presidente de uma grande organização internacional no exterior e ... | Com disputa acirrada, Assu terá debate entre candidatos a Prefeito nesta ... ao também negar em primeira instância o direito de resposta requisitado por Leocádio. ... Se o magistrado entender que o ato é ilegal, ele pode relaxar a prisão e punir ... órgãos nacionais e Internacionais que avaliam o grau de transparência dos ... | https://apublica.org/2020/09/a-alianca-da-lava-jato-com-a-transparencia-internacional/ | https://piaui.folha.uol.com.br/lupa/2020/10/22/eleicoes-sabatina-folha-curitiba/ | https://theintercept.com/2019/09/03/deltan-senado-candidato/ | https://oglobo.globo.com/brasil/leia-as-entrevistas-dos-presidenciaveis-ao-globo-22941226 | http://www.tribunadonorte.com.br/heitorgregorio/ | 2018-09-20T19:30:43Z | 2018-09-20T19:30:43Z | Marina Silva | Fui a primeira [entre os candidatos] a dialogar com eles [Transparência Internacional] | true | 1 | 0 | <|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|>
Cutting Knowledge Date: December 2023
Today Date: 26 Jul 2024
You are an expert in verifying atomic facts extracted from Wikipedia pages for specificity to a single entity. Your task is to determine if a given atomic fact refers exclusively to the specified topic/entity and has no multiple meanings or applicability to other similar entities without direct reference to the topic.Rules:- The fact must be unique or directly tied to the topic. It should not be a generic statement that could apply to many entities (e.g., locations, people, events). Entities must be explicitly stated. The fact may not be true, correct, or may be debatable, but that is not important; it must only comply with rules. - If the fact mentions the topic explicitly or describes details unique to it, it's GOOD.- If the fact is vague, general, or could be said about many similar entities, it's BAD.- Output exactly in this format: a short explanation (1-2 sentences) followed by a semicolon and a choice of "GOOD" or "BAD".<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The storm highlighted the need for more robust infrastructure and emergency response systems.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This is a generic statement that could apply to many hurricanes or natural disasters, not unique to Hurricane Ian; BAD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The impact of Hurricane Ian was felt far beyond the immediate storm surge zone, with heavy rainfall and flooding reported in central and eastern Florida.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This fact specifies unique impacts and locations directly tied to Hurricane Ian; GOOD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: He graduated from Amherst College and the University of Arizona.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This claim contains a pronoun and can refers to a variety of entities; BAD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: In 2019 the US Police were 20.8 times more likely to kill than be killed by a criminal.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This fact specifies unique statistics and date directly tied to US Police; GOOD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: Marie Curie was the first woman to win a Nobel Prize and the only person to win Nobel Prizes in two different scientific fields.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This fact explicitly mentions Marie Curie and describes unique achievements specific to her; GOOD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The company reported record profits in the third quarter.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This statement lacks entity specification and could apply to any company in any year; BAD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The Apollo 11 mission landed the first humans on the Moon on July 20, 1969, at the Sea of Tranquility.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This fact provides specific mission name, date, and location unique to Apollo 11; GOOD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The election resulted in a narrow victory for the incumbent party.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This statement is too generic without specifying which election, country, or year; BAD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The Affordable Care Act, signed by President Obama in 2010, expanded healthcare coverage to millions of Americans.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This fact names the specific act, the president who signed it, and the year, making it uniquely identifiable; GOOD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The research showed promising results in early clinical trials.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This statement could apply to any research study and lacks specific identification; BAD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: Fui a primeira [entre os candidatos] a dialogar com eles [Transparência Internacional]<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
| This statement lacks clarity and specificity regarding the entity or context, and appears to be a personal claim without direct reference to a specific topic or entity; BAD | BAD | false |
6 | 11 | ta | youturn.in | Nov 16, 2017 — martineli என்ற பெயரில் ஒரு வீடியோ ... ஒரு வேளை ஓப்பன் செய்தால் உங்கள் ... 10 வினாடியில் ஹக் செய்து விடும். ... நண்பர்களுக்கும் இந்த தகவலை ஷேர் ... எனவே இந்த தகவலை உங்கள் ... | null | Apr 3, 2017 — இந்த வாட்ஸ் அப் ஒன்று இருந்தால் ... உள்ள இமேஜ்களை டெலிட் செய்வது ... அனுமதித்த பின்னர் இந்த ஆப் ஒரு புதிய விண்டோவை அளிக்கும். அதில் உங்கள் போனில் உள்ள இமேஜ்கள், ... | Apr 19, 2019 — இந்த செயல்முறையை அதாவது இரண்டு ... புதிய அம்சம் எப்படி வேலை செய்யும் ... ஆனால் சில, WhatsApp போன்ற, ஒரு சிறிய '+' சின்னம் இருக்கும் . 6 உங்கள் போனில் வாட்ஸ்அப் க்ளோன் + ... | இந்த வாட்ஸ்அப் செயலி மூலம் ... போனில் பேசும் போதே நம்பரை சேவ் செய்வது ... இனி எந்த ஒரு App இல்லாமல் Whatsapp Status ... தகவல் அளிக்கவும் ஆரோக்கியசேது என்ற ... ஆன்லைனில் உங்களின் பி. | https://youturn.in/factcheck/martineli-whatsapp-rumors.html | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LiQnrbFJnZk | https://tamil.gizbot.com/how-to/how-delete-the-junk-photos-your-whatsapp-folder-013627.html | https://www.digit.in/ta/how-to/apps/dual-whatsapp-sim-two-whatsapp-accounts-on-one-phone-android-52264.html | https://in.pinterest.com/oj95009500/technology/ | none | 2017-11-16T00:00:00Z | Social media users | martineli என்ற பெயரில் ஒரு வீடியோ வாட்ஸ்அப்பில் வெளியிடப்படுகிறது. அதை ஓப்பன் செய்ய வேண்டாம் . ஒரு வேளை ஓப்பன் செய்தால் உங்கள் போனில் உள்ள தகவல்களை 10 வினாடியில் ஹக் செய்து விடும். எனவே உங்கள் நண்பர்களுக்கும் இந்த தகவலை ஷேர் செய்யுங்கள். | false | 0 | 1 | <|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|>
Cutting Knowledge Date: December 2023
Today Date: 26 Jul 2024
You are an expert in verifying atomic facts extracted from Wikipedia pages for specificity to a single entity. Your task is to determine if a given atomic fact refers exclusively to the specified topic/entity and has no multiple meanings or applicability to other similar entities without direct reference to the topic.Rules:- The fact must be unique or directly tied to the topic. It should not be a generic statement that could apply to many entities (e.g., locations, people, events). Entities must be explicitly stated. The fact may not be true, correct, or may be debatable, but that is not important; it must only comply with rules. - If the fact mentions the topic explicitly or describes details unique to it, it's GOOD.- If the fact is vague, general, or could be said about many similar entities, it's BAD.- Output exactly in this format: a short explanation (1-2 sentences) followed by a semicolon and a choice of "GOOD" or "BAD".<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The storm highlighted the need for more robust infrastructure and emergency response systems.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This is a generic statement that could apply to many hurricanes or natural disasters, not unique to Hurricane Ian; BAD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The impact of Hurricane Ian was felt far beyond the immediate storm surge zone, with heavy rainfall and flooding reported in central and eastern Florida.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This fact specifies unique impacts and locations directly tied to Hurricane Ian; GOOD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: He graduated from Amherst College and the University of Arizona.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This claim contains a pronoun and can refers to a variety of entities; BAD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: In 2019 the US Police were 20.8 times more likely to kill than be killed by a criminal.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This fact specifies unique statistics and date directly tied to US Police; GOOD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: Marie Curie was the first woman to win a Nobel Prize and the only person to win Nobel Prizes in two different scientific fields.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This fact explicitly mentions Marie Curie and describes unique achievements specific to her; GOOD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The company reported record profits in the third quarter.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This statement lacks entity specification and could apply to any company in any year; BAD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The Apollo 11 mission landed the first humans on the Moon on July 20, 1969, at the Sea of Tranquility.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This fact provides specific mission name, date, and location unique to Apollo 11; GOOD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The election resulted in a narrow victory for the incumbent party.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This statement is too generic without specifying which election, country, or year; BAD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The Affordable Care Act, signed by President Obama in 2010, expanded healthcare coverage to millions of Americans.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This fact names the specific act, the president who signed it, and the year, making it uniquely identifiable; GOOD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The research showed promising results in early clinical trials.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This statement could apply to any research study and lacks specific identification; BAD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: martineli என்ற பெயரில் ஒரு வீடியோ வாட்ஸ்அப்பில் வெளியிடப்படுகிறது. அதை ஓப்பன் செய்ய வேண்டாம் . ஒரு வேளை ஓப்பன் செய்தால் உங்கள் போனில் உள்ள தகவல்களை 10 வினாடியில் ஹக் செய்து விடும். எனவே உங்கள் நண்பர்களுக்கும் இந்த தகவலை ஷேர் செய்யுங்கள்.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
| This statement appears to be a warning about a specific video on WhatsApp and is written in a language other than English, but it does not provide a clear, specific fact about a particular entity; BAD | BAD | false |
7 | 12 | tr | dogrulukpayi.com | Resmi rakamlara göre, 2008'den bu yana toplam 45 trans kadın öldürülmüş. Bu veri Avrupa ülkeleri arasındaki en yüksek rakam. | 2016/08/23 — Türkiye, Transgender Europe'un dünyadaki trans cinayetleri raporuna göre Avrupa'da birinci, dünyada ise dokuzuncu sırada. ... Trans cinayetinin en çok yaşandığı ülkeler arasında Brezilya ilk sırada yer alıyor. ... Doğan, resmi rakamlara göre Türkiye'de 2008'den bu yana toplam 45 trans kadın öldürüldüğünü ve bu sayının Avrupa'daki en ... tarafından verilen gecikmeli yanıtta ... | 2016/08/19 — Resmi rakamlara göre, 2008'den bu yana toplam 45 trans kadın öldürülmüş. Bu veri Avrupa ülkeleri arasındaki en yüksek rakam. Canavarca hislerle işlenen bu cinayetlerin ortak noktası yakalanabilmiş olan faillerin 'haksız ... | Resmi rakamlara göre, 2008'den bu yana toplam 45 trans kadın öldürülmüş. Bu veri Avrupa ülkeleri arasındaki en yüksek rakam. Canavarca hislerle işlenen bu ... | 2015/11/20 — Nefret Suçu Mağduru Transları Anma Günü. 2008'den bu yana, 64 ülkede toplam 1,933 trans cinayeti işlendi. ... Trans Cinayetleri İzleme Projesi'ne göre, 1 Ekim 2014 – 30 Eylül 2015 tarihleri arasında 29 ülkede 271 trans cinayeti gerçekleşti ... Avrupa bölgesinde en çok trans cinayetinin yaşandığı ülkeler ise Türkiye(3) ve İtalya (2) oldu. Nefret Suçu Mağduru Transları Anma Günü ... | https://www.dogrulukpayi.com/iddia-kontrolu/resmi-rakamlara-gore-2008-den-bu-yana-toplam-45-trans | https://onedio.com/haber/turkiye-trans-cinayetlerinde-avrupa-da-birinci-dunyada-dokuzuncu-727411 | https://tr.sputniknews.com/turkiye/201608191024453960-chp-selina-dogan-tbmm-lgbti/ | https://yesilgazete.org/lgbti-bireyler-tbmmde/ | https://m.bianet.org/bianet/lgbti/169417-2008-den-bu-yana-1933-trans-olduruldu | none | none | Selina Doğan | Resmi rakamlara göre, 2008'den bu yana toplam 45 trans kadın öldürülmüş. Bu veri Avrupa ülkeleri arasındaki en yüksek rakam. | true | 1 | 0 | <|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|>
Cutting Knowledge Date: December 2023
Today Date: 26 Jul 2024
You are an expert in verifying atomic facts extracted from Wikipedia pages for specificity to a single entity. Your task is to determine if a given atomic fact refers exclusively to the specified topic/entity and has no multiple meanings or applicability to other similar entities without direct reference to the topic.Rules:- The fact must be unique or directly tied to the topic. It should not be a generic statement that could apply to many entities (e.g., locations, people, events). Entities must be explicitly stated. The fact may not be true, correct, or may be debatable, but that is not important; it must only comply with rules. - If the fact mentions the topic explicitly or describes details unique to it, it's GOOD.- If the fact is vague, general, or could be said about many similar entities, it's BAD.- Output exactly in this format: a short explanation (1-2 sentences) followed by a semicolon and a choice of "GOOD" or "BAD".<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The storm highlighted the need for more robust infrastructure and emergency response systems.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This is a generic statement that could apply to many hurricanes or natural disasters, not unique to Hurricane Ian; BAD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The impact of Hurricane Ian was felt far beyond the immediate storm surge zone, with heavy rainfall and flooding reported in central and eastern Florida.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This fact specifies unique impacts and locations directly tied to Hurricane Ian; GOOD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: He graduated from Amherst College and the University of Arizona.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This claim contains a pronoun and can refers to a variety of entities; BAD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: In 2019 the US Police were 20.8 times more likely to kill than be killed by a criminal.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This fact specifies unique statistics and date directly tied to US Police; GOOD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: Marie Curie was the first woman to win a Nobel Prize and the only person to win Nobel Prizes in two different scientific fields.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This fact explicitly mentions Marie Curie and describes unique achievements specific to her; GOOD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The company reported record profits in the third quarter.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This statement lacks entity specification and could apply to any company in any year; BAD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The Apollo 11 mission landed the first humans on the Moon on July 20, 1969, at the Sea of Tranquility.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This fact provides specific mission name, date, and location unique to Apollo 11; GOOD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The election resulted in a narrow victory for the incumbent party.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This statement is too generic without specifying which election, country, or year; BAD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The Affordable Care Act, signed by President Obama in 2010, expanded healthcare coverage to millions of Americans.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This fact names the specific act, the president who signed it, and the year, making it uniquely identifiable; GOOD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The research showed promising results in early clinical trials.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This statement could apply to any research study and lacks specific identification; BAD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: Resmi rakamlara göre, 2008'den bu yana toplam 45 trans kadın öldürülmüş. Bu veri Avrupa ülkeleri arasındaki en yüksek rakam.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
| This fact mentions specific data and comparison to other entities (European countries), but lacks explicit mention of the country to which the data pertains; BAD | BAD | false |
8 | 13 | pt | poligrafo.sapo.pt | 10 May 2019 — Um vídeo que se tornou viral mostra um grupo de pessoas a atacar um veículo policial. Enquanto em algumas publicações as imagens são ... | 18 Aug 2020 — O vídeo foi partilhado ... | 10 Mar 2020 — O estudo também se destaca por analisar casos tratados em Wuhan, cidade ... juntar os pontos do início, percurso e desfecho da doença nessas pessoas. ... Uma das conclusões é a de que, como vêm mostrando outras ... e 42% dos sobreviventes), seguida de insuficiência respiratória (98% versus 36%). | 7 Sep 2020 — Gráfico feito por especialistas americanos avalia possibilidade de se expor ao ... que as pessoas possam se expôr ao Sars-cov-2 em atividades cotidianas ... na sigla em inglês) se tornou viral nos Estados Unidos e no Reino Unido ... A tabela foi elaborada por um grupo de 14 médicos da força-tarefa de ... | Um vírus é um organismo infeccioso pequeno, muito menor do que um fungo ou uma bactéria, que precisa invadir uma célula viva para se reproduzir (replicar). | https://poligrafo.sapo.pt/fact-check/video-de-41-segundo-prova-que-um-grupo-de-muculmanos-atacou-a-policia-na-dinamarca | https://pplware.sapo.pt/planeta/video-para-provar-que-a-terra-e-redonda-torna-se-viral-no-tiktok/ | https://www.bbc.com/portuguese/geral-51810488 | https://www.bbc.com/portuguese/internacional-54014416 | https://www.msdmanuals.com/pt/casa/infec%C3%A7%C3%B5es/considera%C3%A7%C3%B5es-gerais-sobre-infec%C3%A7%C3%B5es-virais/considera%C3%A7%C3%B5es-gerais-sobre-infec%C3%A7%C3%B5es-virais | 2019-05-10T11:25:15Z | 2019-05-10T11:25:15Z | none | Um vídeo que se tornou viral mostra um grupo de pessoas a atacar um v...... | false | 0 | 1 | <|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|>
Cutting Knowledge Date: December 2023
Today Date: 26 Jul 2024
You are an expert in verifying atomic facts extracted from Wikipedia pages for specificity to a single entity. Your task is to determine if a given atomic fact refers exclusively to the specified topic/entity and has no multiple meanings or applicability to other similar entities without direct reference to the topic.Rules:- The fact must be unique or directly tied to the topic. It should not be a generic statement that could apply to many entities (e.g., locations, people, events). Entities must be explicitly stated. The fact may not be true, correct, or may be debatable, but that is not important; it must only comply with rules. - If the fact mentions the topic explicitly or describes details unique to it, it's GOOD.- If the fact is vague, general, or could be said about many similar entities, it's BAD.- Output exactly in this format: a short explanation (1-2 sentences) followed by a semicolon and a choice of "GOOD" or "BAD".<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The storm highlighted the need for more robust infrastructure and emergency response systems.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This is a generic statement that could apply to many hurricanes or natural disasters, not unique to Hurricane Ian; BAD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The impact of Hurricane Ian was felt far beyond the immediate storm surge zone, with heavy rainfall and flooding reported in central and eastern Florida.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This fact specifies unique impacts and locations directly tied to Hurricane Ian; GOOD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: He graduated from Amherst College and the University of Arizona.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This claim contains a pronoun and can refers to a variety of entities; BAD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: In 2019 the US Police were 20.8 times more likely to kill than be killed by a criminal.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This fact specifies unique statistics and date directly tied to US Police; GOOD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: Marie Curie was the first woman to win a Nobel Prize and the only person to win Nobel Prizes in two different scientific fields.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This fact explicitly mentions Marie Curie and describes unique achievements specific to her; GOOD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The company reported record profits in the third quarter.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This statement lacks entity specification and could apply to any company in any year; BAD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The Apollo 11 mission landed the first humans on the Moon on July 20, 1969, at the Sea of Tranquility.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This fact provides specific mission name, date, and location unique to Apollo 11; GOOD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The election resulted in a narrow victory for the incumbent party.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This statement is too generic without specifying which election, country, or year; BAD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The Affordable Care Act, signed by President Obama in 2010, expanded healthcare coverage to millions of Americans.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This fact names the specific act, the president who signed it, and the year, making it uniquely identifiable; GOOD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The research showed promising results in early clinical trials.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This statement could apply to any research study and lacks specific identification; BAD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: Um vídeo que se tornou viral mostra um grupo de pessoas a atacar um v......<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
| This statement is incomplete and lacks specific details about the event, location, or entities involved; BAD | BAD | false |
9 | 14 | ta | youturn.in | கீழடியில் ஹிந்து கடவுள்களான விநாயகர் மற்றும் சிவலிங்கம் கிடைத்து உள்ளதாக பேசும் ஹெச்.ராஜா. கீழடி பற்றிய உண்மை தெரிஞ்ச உடனே இந்து விரோத கூட்டம் கீழடி பற்றி... | 24 oct. 2019 — கீழடியில் இந்து கடவுள்களின் சிலை கிடைத்தது என்று எச்.ராஜா பேசுகிற ஒரு ... ராஜா பேசும் ஒரு காட்சியை இணைத்துள்ளனர். இதன் மேலே, ''கீழடி பற்றிய உண்மை தெரிஞ்ச உடனே இந்து விரோத கூட்டம் கீழடி பற்றி பேச மாட்டாங்க பாருங்க,'' என எழுதியுள்ளனர். இதனை பலரும் ... | null | null | 6 nov. 2019 — கீழடியில் கிடைத்திருக்கும் தொல்லியல் ஆதாரங்கள் ... கீழடி தொடர்பான தொலைக்காட்சி விவாதம் ஒன்றில் ... உள்ளிட்டவர்கள் உலகம் முழுவதும் அகழாய்வில் கிடைக்கும் ... ஓசூர் அரங்கக் கூட்டம் ... மற்றும் முற்போக்கு அரசியல் பேசும் பிரிவினர் கீழடியில் ... | https://youturn.in/factcheck/keezhadi-hraja-video.html | https://tamil.factcrescendo.com/factcheck-h-raja-says-hindu-idols-found-in-keezhadi-excavation/ | https://www.bbc.com/tamil/india-49888909 | https://www.bbc.com/tamil/india-49840040 | https://www.vinavu.com/2019/11/06/the-slap-on-the-face-of-aryan-greatness/ | none | 2019-09-25T00:00:00Z | Social media users | கீழடியில் ஹிந்து கடவுள்களான விநாயகர் மற்றும் சிவலிங்கம் கிடைத்து உள்ளதாக பேசும் ஹெச்.ராஜா. கீழடி பற்றிய உண்மை தெரிஞ்ச உடனே இந்து விரோத கூட்டம் கீழடி பற்றி பேச மாட்டாங்க பாருங்க…. | false | 0 | 1 | <|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|>
Cutting Knowledge Date: December 2023
Today Date: 26 Jul 2024
You are an expert in verifying atomic facts extracted from Wikipedia pages for specificity to a single entity. Your task is to determine if a given atomic fact refers exclusively to the specified topic/entity and has no multiple meanings or applicability to other similar entities without direct reference to the topic.Rules:- The fact must be unique or directly tied to the topic. It should not be a generic statement that could apply to many entities (e.g., locations, people, events). Entities must be explicitly stated. The fact may not be true, correct, or may be debatable, but that is not important; it must only comply with rules. - If the fact mentions the topic explicitly or describes details unique to it, it's GOOD.- If the fact is vague, general, or could be said about many similar entities, it's BAD.- Output exactly in this format: a short explanation (1-2 sentences) followed by a semicolon and a choice of "GOOD" or "BAD".<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The storm highlighted the need for more robust infrastructure and emergency response systems.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This is a generic statement that could apply to many hurricanes or natural disasters, not unique to Hurricane Ian; BAD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The impact of Hurricane Ian was felt far beyond the immediate storm surge zone, with heavy rainfall and flooding reported in central and eastern Florida.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This fact specifies unique impacts and locations directly tied to Hurricane Ian; GOOD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: He graduated from Amherst College and the University of Arizona.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This claim contains a pronoun and can refers to a variety of entities; BAD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: In 2019 the US Police were 20.8 times more likely to kill than be killed by a criminal.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This fact specifies unique statistics and date directly tied to US Police; GOOD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: Marie Curie was the first woman to win a Nobel Prize and the only person to win Nobel Prizes in two different scientific fields.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This fact explicitly mentions Marie Curie and describes unique achievements specific to her; GOOD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The company reported record profits in the third quarter.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This statement lacks entity specification and could apply to any company in any year; BAD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The Apollo 11 mission landed the first humans on the Moon on July 20, 1969, at the Sea of Tranquility.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This fact provides specific mission name, date, and location unique to Apollo 11; GOOD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The election resulted in a narrow victory for the incumbent party.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This statement is too generic without specifying which election, country, or year; BAD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The Affordable Care Act, signed by President Obama in 2010, expanded healthcare coverage to millions of Americans.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This fact names the specific act, the president who signed it, and the year, making it uniquely identifiable; GOOD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The research showed promising results in early clinical trials.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This statement could apply to any research study and lacks specific identification; BAD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: கீழடியில் ஹிந்து கடவுள்களான விநாயகர் மற்றும் சிவலிங்கம் கிடைத்து உள்ளதாக பேசும் ஹெச்.ராஜா. கீழடி பற்றிய உண்மை தெரிஞ்ச உடனே இந்து விரோத கூட்டம் கீழடி பற்றி பேச மாட்டாங்க பாருங்க….<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
| This statement appears to be a quote or statement from H. Raja about the Keeladi excavation site, mentioning specific findings and making claims about the reaction of an anti-Hindu group; GOOD | GOOD | true |
10 | 16 | ar | misbar.com | وكالة الفضاء الأميركية ناسا تؤكد شروق الشمس من مغربها | وكالات - ذكرت تقارير إعلامية دولية، نقلا عن وكالة ناسا الفضائية أن الشمس اقتربت من أن تشرق من مغربها، حيث نشرت العديد من المواقع العالمية ... خلاله تحذيرًا خطيرًا من وكالة الفضاء الأوروبية لسكان كوكب الأرض من اقتراب انقلاب الحقل المغناطيسي الأرضي . | Jan 25, 2019 — أكد رئيس قسم الفلك بالمعهد القومي للبحوث الفلكية في مصر أشرف تادروس، أن وكالة ناسا الفضائية لم تصرح باقتراب شروق الشمس من الغرب، وإن ما ... | ذكرت تقارير إعلامية دولية ، نقلا عن وكالة ناسا الفضائية أن الشمس اقتربت من أن تشرق من ... من وكالة الفضاء الأوروبية لسكان كوكب الأرض من اقتراب انقلاب الحقل المغناطيسي ... وتقول “كيلي ديكرسون”، الكاتبة والصحفية بمجلة ليف ساينس “من المعروف أن ... | وكالة ناسا للفضاء تقول أن الشمس اقتربت من أن تشرق من الغرب. | https://factuel.afp.com/ar/NASA%20magnetic%20pole%20reversal | https://www.babnet.net/festivaldetail-90626.asp | https://www.alalamtv.net/news/4025101/%D8%A7%D9%82%D8%AA%D8%B1%D8%A7%D8%A8-%D8%B4%D8%B1%D9%88%D9%82-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B4%D9%85%D8%B3-%D9%85%D9%86-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%BA%D8%B1%D8%A8%D8%8C-%D8%B4%D8%A7%D8%A6%D8%B9%D8%A9-%D8%A7%D9%85-%D8%AD%D9%82%D9%8A%D9%82%D8%A9%D8%9F | https://ar-ar.facebook.com/alqudsnewspaper/photos/%D9%86%D8%A7%D8%B3%D8%A7-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B4%D9%85%D8%B3-%D8%A3%D9%88%D8%B4%D9%83%D8%AA-%D8%A3%D9%86-%D8%AA%D8%B4%D8%B1%D9%82-%D9%85%D9%86-%D9%85%D8%BA%D8%B1%D8%A8%D9%87%D8%A7-%D8%B0%D9%83%D8%B1%D8%AA-%D8%AA%D9%82%D8%A7%D8%B1%D9%8A%D8%B1-%D8%A5%D8%B9%D9%84%D8%A7%D9%85%D9%8A%D8%A9-%D8%AF%D9%88%D9%84%D9%8A%D8%A9-%D9%86%D9%82%D9%84%D8%A7-%D8%B9%D9%86-%D9%88%D9%83%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%A9-%D9%86%D8%A7%D8%B3%D8%A7-/10152438288927984/ | https://misbar.com/factcheck/2020/06/05/%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B4%D9%85%D8%B3-%D8%B3%D8%AA%D8%B4%D8%B1%D9%82-%D9%85%D9%86-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%BA%D8%B1%D8%A8-%D8%A7%D8%AF%D8%B9%D8%A7%D8%A1-%D8%B2%D8%A7%D8%A6%D9%81 | 2020-06-05T15:22:00Z | 2020-06-05T15:22:00Z | فجر بغداد | وكالة ناسا للفضاء تقول أن الشمس اقتربت من أن تشرق من الغرب. | false | 0 | 1 | <|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|>
Cutting Knowledge Date: December 2023
Today Date: 26 Jul 2024
You are an expert in verifying atomic facts extracted from Wikipedia pages for specificity to a single entity. Your task is to determine if a given atomic fact refers exclusively to the specified topic/entity and has no multiple meanings or applicability to other similar entities without direct reference to the topic.Rules:- The fact must be unique or directly tied to the topic. It should not be a generic statement that could apply to many entities (e.g., locations, people, events). Entities must be explicitly stated. The fact may not be true, correct, or may be debatable, but that is not important; it must only comply with rules. - If the fact mentions the topic explicitly or describes details unique to it, it's GOOD.- If the fact is vague, general, or could be said about many similar entities, it's BAD.- Output exactly in this format: a short explanation (1-2 sentences) followed by a semicolon and a choice of "GOOD" or "BAD".<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The storm highlighted the need for more robust infrastructure and emergency response systems.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This is a generic statement that could apply to many hurricanes or natural disasters, not unique to Hurricane Ian; BAD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The impact of Hurricane Ian was felt far beyond the immediate storm surge zone, with heavy rainfall and flooding reported in central and eastern Florida.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This fact specifies unique impacts and locations directly tied to Hurricane Ian; GOOD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: He graduated from Amherst College and the University of Arizona.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This claim contains a pronoun and can refers to a variety of entities; BAD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: In 2019 the US Police were 20.8 times more likely to kill than be killed by a criminal.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This fact specifies unique statistics and date directly tied to US Police; GOOD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: Marie Curie was the first woman to win a Nobel Prize and the only person to win Nobel Prizes in two different scientific fields.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This fact explicitly mentions Marie Curie and describes unique achievements specific to her; GOOD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The company reported record profits in the third quarter.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This statement lacks entity specification and could apply to any company in any year; BAD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The Apollo 11 mission landed the first humans on the Moon on July 20, 1969, at the Sea of Tranquility.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This fact provides specific mission name, date, and location unique to Apollo 11; GOOD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The election resulted in a narrow victory for the incumbent party.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This statement is too generic without specifying which election, country, or year; BAD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The Affordable Care Act, signed by President Obama in 2010, expanded healthcare coverage to millions of Americans.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This fact names the specific act, the president who signed it, and the year, making it uniquely identifiable; GOOD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The research showed promising results in early clinical trials.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This statement could apply to any research study and lacks specific identification; BAD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: وكالة ناسا للفضاء تقول أن الشمس اقتربت من أن تشرق من الغرب.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
| This statement mentions a specific entity (ناسا, NASA) but the claim about the sun is not unique or tied to a specific event or discovery made by NASA; BAD | BAD | false |
11 | 17 | pt | poligrafo.sapo.pt | May 24, 2019 — O debate sobre o preconceito racial, a propósito da Grande Reportagem SIC ... Vacina da Pfizer é uma das que Portugal "prevê adquirir”. 0:51 ... | Em TRÊS GRANDES REPORTAGENS sobre preconceito étnico ouvimos ... também os rostos que estão a dar visibilidade à luta dos negros em Portugal. ... O terceiro e último trabalho da Grande Reportagem SIC sobre preconceito racial. | Comentando uma reportagem da SIC sobre preconceito racial em Portugal...... | Preconceito Racial – Escolas – Brasil I. Abramovay, Miriam II. ... pejorativo sobre fenótipos étnico-raciais, e antes de tudo, cuidar como se relaciona (sic) com os ... (Entrevista com mãe negra do ensino médio, escola pública, Salvador). ... O Saeb aplica testes de língua portuguesa e matemática a alunos de 4ª e 8ª séries do ... | Dec 1, 2017 — mulheres negras em Portugal e no Brasil, abordando o contexto social, ... preconceito racial; eles aparentam ter aversão ao racismo". ... Em 2016, a SIC apresentou uma série de reportagens e debates denominada ... Pensava ter saído bem na entrevista, até que ouviu a entrevistadora comentando. | https://sicnoticias.pt/programas/visiveis/2019-05-23-Debate-sobre-o-preconceito-racial | https://sicnoticias.pt/programas/visiveis | https://poligrafo.sapo.pt/fact-check/nogueira-leite-ex-secretario-de-estado-fez-uma-declaracao-racista-no-twitter | https://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0014/001459/145993por.pdf | https://run.unl.pt/bitstream/10362/60399/1/Tese_ClaudiaCambraia.pdf | 2019-06-25T18:45:47Z | 2019-06-25T18:45:47Z | none | Comentando uma reportagem da SIC sobre preconceito racial em Portugal...... | true | 1 | 0 | <|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|>
Cutting Knowledge Date: December 2023
Today Date: 26 Jul 2024
You are an expert in verifying atomic facts extracted from Wikipedia pages for specificity to a single entity. Your task is to determine if a given atomic fact refers exclusively to the specified topic/entity and has no multiple meanings or applicability to other similar entities without direct reference to the topic.Rules:- The fact must be unique or directly tied to the topic. It should not be a generic statement that could apply to many entities (e.g., locations, people, events). Entities must be explicitly stated. The fact may not be true, correct, or may be debatable, but that is not important; it must only comply with rules. - If the fact mentions the topic explicitly or describes details unique to it, it's GOOD.- If the fact is vague, general, or could be said about many similar entities, it's BAD.- Output exactly in this format: a short explanation (1-2 sentences) followed by a semicolon and a choice of "GOOD" or "BAD".<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The storm highlighted the need for more robust infrastructure and emergency response systems.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This is a generic statement that could apply to many hurricanes or natural disasters, not unique to Hurricane Ian; BAD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The impact of Hurricane Ian was felt far beyond the immediate storm surge zone, with heavy rainfall and flooding reported in central and eastern Florida.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This fact specifies unique impacts and locations directly tied to Hurricane Ian; GOOD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: He graduated from Amherst College and the University of Arizona.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This claim contains a pronoun and can refers to a variety of entities; BAD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: In 2019 the US Police were 20.8 times more likely to kill than be killed by a criminal.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This fact specifies unique statistics and date directly tied to US Police; GOOD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: Marie Curie was the first woman to win a Nobel Prize and the only person to win Nobel Prizes in two different scientific fields.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This fact explicitly mentions Marie Curie and describes unique achievements specific to her; GOOD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The company reported record profits in the third quarter.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This statement lacks entity specification and could apply to any company in any year; BAD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The Apollo 11 mission landed the first humans on the Moon on July 20, 1969, at the Sea of Tranquility.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This fact provides specific mission name, date, and location unique to Apollo 11; GOOD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The election resulted in a narrow victory for the incumbent party.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This statement is too generic without specifying which election, country, or year; BAD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The Affordable Care Act, signed by President Obama in 2010, expanded healthcare coverage to millions of Americans.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This fact names the specific act, the president who signed it, and the year, making it uniquely identifiable; GOOD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The research showed promising results in early clinical trials.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This statement could apply to any research study and lacks specific identification; BAD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: Comentando uma reportagem da SIC sobre preconceito racial em Portugal......<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
| This statement appears to be the start of a commentary on a news report by SIC regarding racial prejudice in Portugal, but it does not provide a complete fact; BAD | BAD | false |
12 | 18 | pt | piaui.folha.uol.com.br | 7 days ago — “Eu sou o primeiro secretário no Brasil a criar uma ala LGBT dentro do presídio” Wallber Virgolino (Patriota), candidato a prefeito de João ... | <DUMMY_EVIDENCE> | <DUMMY_EVIDENCE> | <DUMMY_EVIDENCE> | <DUMMY_EVIDENCE> | https://piaui.folha.uol.com.br/lupa/2020/11/05/joao-pessoa-wallber-virgolino-lgbt-presidios/ | NO_LINK | NO_LINK | NO_LINK | NO_LINK | 2020-11-05T15:00:03Z | 2020-11-05T15:00:03Z | Wallber Virgolino (Patriota) | “Eu sou o primeiro secretário no Brasil a criar uma ala LGBT dentro do presídio” | false | 0 | 1 | <|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|>
Cutting Knowledge Date: December 2023
Today Date: 26 Jul 2024
You are an expert in verifying atomic facts extracted from Wikipedia pages for specificity to a single entity. Your task is to determine if a given atomic fact refers exclusively to the specified topic/entity and has no multiple meanings or applicability to other similar entities without direct reference to the topic.Rules:- The fact must be unique or directly tied to the topic. It should not be a generic statement that could apply to many entities (e.g., locations, people, events). Entities must be explicitly stated. The fact may not be true, correct, or may be debatable, but that is not important; it must only comply with rules. - If the fact mentions the topic explicitly or describes details unique to it, it's GOOD.- If the fact is vague, general, or could be said about many similar entities, it's BAD.- Output exactly in this format: a short explanation (1-2 sentences) followed by a semicolon and a choice of "GOOD" or "BAD".<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The storm highlighted the need for more robust infrastructure and emergency response systems.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This is a generic statement that could apply to many hurricanes or natural disasters, not unique to Hurricane Ian; BAD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The impact of Hurricane Ian was felt far beyond the immediate storm surge zone, with heavy rainfall and flooding reported in central and eastern Florida.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This fact specifies unique impacts and locations directly tied to Hurricane Ian; GOOD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: He graduated from Amherst College and the University of Arizona.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This claim contains a pronoun and can refers to a variety of entities; BAD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: In 2019 the US Police were 20.8 times more likely to kill than be killed by a criminal.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This fact specifies unique statistics and date directly tied to US Police; GOOD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: Marie Curie was the first woman to win a Nobel Prize and the only person to win Nobel Prizes in two different scientific fields.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This fact explicitly mentions Marie Curie and describes unique achievements specific to her; GOOD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The company reported record profits in the third quarter.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This statement lacks entity specification and could apply to any company in any year; BAD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The Apollo 11 mission landed the first humans on the Moon on July 20, 1969, at the Sea of Tranquility.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This fact provides specific mission name, date, and location unique to Apollo 11; GOOD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The election resulted in a narrow victory for the incumbent party.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This statement is too generic without specifying which election, country, or year; BAD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The Affordable Care Act, signed by President Obama in 2010, expanded healthcare coverage to millions of Americans.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This fact names the specific act, the president who signed it, and the year, making it uniquely identifiable; GOOD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The research showed promising results in early clinical trials.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This statement could apply to any research study and lacks specific identification; BAD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: “Eu sou o primeiro secretário no Brasil a criar uma ala LGBT dentro do presídio”<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
| This quote, although in Portuguese, explicitly mentions a unique action ("criar uma ala LGBT dentro do presídio") attributed to a specific role ("o primeiro secretário no Brasil"), implying a direct reference to a particular entity, but without a clear subject, it's still somewhat vague; BAD | BAD | false |
13 | 20 | tr | dogrulukpayi.com | 15 ile 64 yaş arası Türkiye’de hayatında 1 kere uyuşturucu denemiş kişilerin oranı yüzde 2,7 | Oct 4, 2018 — Buna göre Türkiye'de alkol kullanım oranı yüzde 22. ... yapılan araştırmada 15 ile 64 yaş arasındaki hane halkına yüz yüze sorular soruldu. | Apr 23, 2018 — Onlarca tedavi yöntemi denemiş. ... Dr. Tanju Sürmeli uyuşturucu bağımlılığının bir beyin hastalığı ... 1. Görerek, 2. Genetik faktörler. Görerek öğreniyor ama genetik ... Harvard Üniversitesinin yaptığı araştırma, bir kere esrar içmenin ... Avrupa Birliğinin rakamlarına göre 15 - 64 yaş grubu arasında yüzde 5 ... | Apr 15, 2015 — Türkiye'de bu yıl 7. ... Türkiye'de gençler arasında uyuşturucu deneme oranının yüzde 8 ile yüzde ... “Ortalama olarak toplumdaki her bin kişiden 2'si madde bağımlısı. ... 38 YAŞINDAKİ F.S.: Aile hayatı bonzai nedeniyle sona ermek ... 1 ay önce aileme olan sevgim ağır bastı ve tedavi olmaya karar verdim. | Nov 9, 2019 — Tablo 1: Uyuşturucu ile Mücadele Alanında Yapılan Kamu ... esrar kullanım oranının % 1,1 olduğuna işaret etmektedir. ... 2016 yılında dünyada yaklaşık olarak 15-64 yaş arası nüfusun %. 5.6'sını ... 450.000 kişi hayatını kaybetmiştir. ... Bağımlılık ile Mücadele ile ilgili 2019/2 sayılı Cumhurbaşkanlığı Genel-. | https://www.dogrulukpayi.com/iddia-kontrolu/15-ile-64-yas-arasi-turkiye-de-hayatinda-1-kere | https://www.haberturk.com/iste-turkiye-nin-alkol-ve-uyusturucu-raporu-2167255 | https://www.milliyet.com.tr/pembenar/papatya-somer/bagimliliktan-nasil-kurtuluruz-2654951 | https://www.milliyet.com.tr/gundem/genclerin-yuzde-15-i-uyusturucu-denemis-2044189 | https://www.pa.edu.tr/Upload/editor/files/T%C3%BCrkiyede_ve_D%C3%BCnyada_Uyusturucu_ile_M%C3%BCcadele_Raporu.pdf | none | none | Necdet Ünüvar | 15 ile 64 yaş arası Türkiye’de hayatında 1 kere uyuşturucu denemiş kişilerin oranı yüzde 2,7 | true | 1 | 0 | <|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|>
Cutting Knowledge Date: December 2023
Today Date: 26 Jul 2024
You are an expert in verifying atomic facts extracted from Wikipedia pages for specificity to a single entity. Your task is to determine if a given atomic fact refers exclusively to the specified topic/entity and has no multiple meanings or applicability to other similar entities without direct reference to the topic.Rules:- The fact must be unique or directly tied to the topic. It should not be a generic statement that could apply to many entities (e.g., locations, people, events). Entities must be explicitly stated. The fact may not be true, correct, or may be debatable, but that is not important; it must only comply with rules. - If the fact mentions the topic explicitly or describes details unique to it, it's GOOD.- If the fact is vague, general, or could be said about many similar entities, it's BAD.- Output exactly in this format: a short explanation (1-2 sentences) followed by a semicolon and a choice of "GOOD" or "BAD".<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The storm highlighted the need for more robust infrastructure and emergency response systems.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This is a generic statement that could apply to many hurricanes or natural disasters, not unique to Hurricane Ian; BAD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The impact of Hurricane Ian was felt far beyond the immediate storm surge zone, with heavy rainfall and flooding reported in central and eastern Florida.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This fact specifies unique impacts and locations directly tied to Hurricane Ian; GOOD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: He graduated from Amherst College and the University of Arizona.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This claim contains a pronoun and can refers to a variety of entities; BAD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: In 2019 the US Police were 20.8 times more likely to kill than be killed by a criminal.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This fact specifies unique statistics and date directly tied to US Police; GOOD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: Marie Curie was the first woman to win a Nobel Prize and the only person to win Nobel Prizes in two different scientific fields.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This fact explicitly mentions Marie Curie and describes unique achievements specific to her; GOOD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The company reported record profits in the third quarter.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This statement lacks entity specification and could apply to any company in any year; BAD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The Apollo 11 mission landed the first humans on the Moon on July 20, 1969, at the Sea of Tranquility.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This fact provides specific mission name, date, and location unique to Apollo 11; GOOD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The election resulted in a narrow victory for the incumbent party.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This statement is too generic without specifying which election, country, or year; BAD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The Affordable Care Act, signed by President Obama in 2010, expanded healthcare coverage to millions of Americans.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This fact names the specific act, the president who signed it, and the year, making it uniquely identifiable; GOOD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The research showed promising results in early clinical trials.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This statement could apply to any research study and lacks specific identification; BAD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: 15 ile 64 yaş arası Türkiye’de hayatında 1 kere uyuşturucu denemiş kişilerin oranı yüzde 2,7<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
| This fact specifies a unique statistic related to a particular age group and country (Turkey), making it directly tied to that entity; GOOD | GOOD | true |
14 | 21 | pt | piaui.folha.uol.com.br | Sep 22, 2020 — “Dubai, espalha bandeira do Brasil pelo país (…)” Texto de foto em post publicado no Facebook que, até as 17h de 22 de setembro de 2020, ... | Oct 27, 2019 — Bolsonaro mostrou a homenagem em vídeo. Disse que é reconhecimento ao Brasil: 'Importância que tem para o mundo árabe'. Leia no ... | “Dubai, espalha bandeira do Brasil pelo país (…)” Texto de foto em post publicado no Facebook que, até as 17h de 22 de setembro de 2020, tinha mais de 1 mil ... | Oct 27, 2019 — Esse é 1 reconhecimento da importância que o Brasil tem para o ... O Brasil brevemente estará no local de destaque que ele merece", disse. | Confira a seguir o trabalho de verificação da Lupa: imagem22-09-2020-23-09-48. “Dubai, espalha bandeira do Brasil pelo país (…). Continuar lendo. | https://piaui.folha.uol.com.br/lupa/2020/09/22/verificamos-bandeira-brasileira-dubai/ | https://www.poder360.com.br/governo/emirados-arabes-homenageiam-brasil-com-projecao-de-bandeira/ | https://ar-ar.facebook.com/fakenaobrasil/posts/656972501591344/ | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y3pAD60cG50 | https://jornews.com.br/agencia-lupa-verificamos-e-falso-que-bandeira-brasileira-foi-espalhada-por-dubai-gracas-a-bolsonaro/ | 2020-09-22T19:58:35Z | 2020-09-22T19:58:35Z | Post no Facebook | Dubai, espalha bandeira do Brasil pelo país | false | 0 | 1 | <|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|>
Cutting Knowledge Date: December 2023
Today Date: 26 Jul 2024
You are an expert in verifying atomic facts extracted from Wikipedia pages for specificity to a single entity. Your task is to determine if a given atomic fact refers exclusively to the specified topic/entity and has no multiple meanings or applicability to other similar entities without direct reference to the topic.Rules:- The fact must be unique or directly tied to the topic. It should not be a generic statement that could apply to many entities (e.g., locations, people, events). Entities must be explicitly stated. The fact may not be true, correct, or may be debatable, but that is not important; it must only comply with rules. - If the fact mentions the topic explicitly or describes details unique to it, it's GOOD.- If the fact is vague, general, or could be said about many similar entities, it's BAD.- Output exactly in this format: a short explanation (1-2 sentences) followed by a semicolon and a choice of "GOOD" or "BAD".<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The storm highlighted the need for more robust infrastructure and emergency response systems.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This is a generic statement that could apply to many hurricanes or natural disasters, not unique to Hurricane Ian; BAD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The impact of Hurricane Ian was felt far beyond the immediate storm surge zone, with heavy rainfall and flooding reported in central and eastern Florida.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This fact specifies unique impacts and locations directly tied to Hurricane Ian; GOOD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: He graduated from Amherst College and the University of Arizona.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This claim contains a pronoun and can refers to a variety of entities; BAD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: In 2019 the US Police were 20.8 times more likely to kill than be killed by a criminal.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This fact specifies unique statistics and date directly tied to US Police; GOOD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: Marie Curie was the first woman to win a Nobel Prize and the only person to win Nobel Prizes in two different scientific fields.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This fact explicitly mentions Marie Curie and describes unique achievements specific to her; GOOD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The company reported record profits in the third quarter.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This statement lacks entity specification and could apply to any company in any year; BAD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The Apollo 11 mission landed the first humans on the Moon on July 20, 1969, at the Sea of Tranquility.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This fact provides specific mission name, date, and location unique to Apollo 11; GOOD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The election resulted in a narrow victory for the incumbent party.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This statement is too generic without specifying which election, country, or year; BAD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The Affordable Care Act, signed by President Obama in 2010, expanded healthcare coverage to millions of Americans.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This fact names the specific act, the president who signed it, and the year, making it uniquely identifiable; GOOD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The research showed promising results in early clinical trials.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This statement could apply to any research study and lacks specific identification; BAD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: Dubai, espalha bandeira do Brasil pelo país<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
| This fact seems to be about an event or action related to Dubai and Brazil, but it lacks clarity and specificity about what the event or action is, and it does not directly tie to a unique fact about Dubai itself; BAD | BAD | false |
15 | 22 | id | cekfakta.com | ... di Facebook yang diklaim menunjukkan pesta gay atau homoseksual di Italia beberapa saat sebelum negara itu terkena wabah virus corona atau Covid-19. | Jun 27, 2020 — Inilah Pesta terakhir yang dibuat di Italy. Kenapa wabah Corona menyerang Italy dengan begitu dahsyat ? Kenapa Allah terbalikkan bumi ... | Hoaks atau Fakta: Benarkah Terjadi Pesta Homoseksual di Italia Sebelum Wabah Covid-19 Merebak? Evi Sapitri 26 Juni 2020, 17:30 WIB. HOAKS - Video ... | Jun 28, 2020 — SANGAT MENGERIKAN DAN MENJIJIKAN Inilah Pesta terakhir yang dibuat di Italy. Kenapa wabah Corona menyerang Italy dengan begitu ... | [DISINFORMASI] Pesta Homoseksual Di Italia Sebelum Wabah Covid-19. | https://www.kominfo.go.id/content/detail/27393/disinformasi-pesta-homoseksual-di-italia-sebelum-wabah-covid-19/0/laporan_isu_hoaks | https://turnbackhoax.id/2020/06/27/salah-pesta-homo-seksual-di-italia-sebelum-covid-19-mewabah/ | https://cirebon.pikiran-rakyat.com/cek-fakta/pr-04577922/hoaks-atau-fakta-benarkah-terjadi-pesta-homoseksual-di-italia-sebelum-wabah-covid-19-merebak | https://cekfakta.com/focus/4194 | https://www.facebook.com/898209897011707/posts/disinformasi-pesta-homoseksual-di-italia-sebelum-wabah-covid-19/1699772423522113/ | none | 2020-06-28T00:00:00Z | none | Pesta Homo Seksual di Italia Sebelum Covid-19 Mewabah | false | 0 | 1 | <|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|>
Cutting Knowledge Date: December 2023
Today Date: 26 Jul 2024
You are an expert in verifying atomic facts extracted from Wikipedia pages for specificity to a single entity. Your task is to determine if a given atomic fact refers exclusively to the specified topic/entity and has no multiple meanings or applicability to other similar entities without direct reference to the topic.Rules:- The fact must be unique or directly tied to the topic. It should not be a generic statement that could apply to many entities (e.g., locations, people, events). Entities must be explicitly stated. The fact may not be true, correct, or may be debatable, but that is not important; it must only comply with rules. - If the fact mentions the topic explicitly or describes details unique to it, it's GOOD.- If the fact is vague, general, or could be said about many similar entities, it's BAD.- Output exactly in this format: a short explanation (1-2 sentences) followed by a semicolon and a choice of "GOOD" or "BAD".<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The storm highlighted the need for more robust infrastructure and emergency response systems.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This is a generic statement that could apply to many hurricanes or natural disasters, not unique to Hurricane Ian; BAD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The impact of Hurricane Ian was felt far beyond the immediate storm surge zone, with heavy rainfall and flooding reported in central and eastern Florida.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This fact specifies unique impacts and locations directly tied to Hurricane Ian; GOOD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: He graduated from Amherst College and the University of Arizona.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This claim contains a pronoun and can refers to a variety of entities; BAD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: In 2019 the US Police were 20.8 times more likely to kill than be killed by a criminal.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This fact specifies unique statistics and date directly tied to US Police; GOOD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: Marie Curie was the first woman to win a Nobel Prize and the only person to win Nobel Prizes in two different scientific fields.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This fact explicitly mentions Marie Curie and describes unique achievements specific to her; GOOD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The company reported record profits in the third quarter.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This statement lacks entity specification and could apply to any company in any year; BAD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The Apollo 11 mission landed the first humans on the Moon on July 20, 1969, at the Sea of Tranquility.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This fact provides specific mission name, date, and location unique to Apollo 11; GOOD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The election resulted in a narrow victory for the incumbent party.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This statement is too generic without specifying which election, country, or year; BAD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The Affordable Care Act, signed by President Obama in 2010, expanded healthcare coverage to millions of Americans.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This fact names the specific act, the president who signed it, and the year, making it uniquely identifiable; GOOD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The research showed promising results in early clinical trials.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This statement could apply to any research study and lacks specific identification; BAD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: Pesta Homo Seksual di Italia Sebelum Covid-19 Mewabah<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
| This fact is about a specific event, the "Pesta Homo Seksual" in Italy before the Covid-19 pandemic, but it lacks clarity on what "Pesta Homo Seksual" refers to, however it seems to be specific to a particular event or context; GOOD | GOOD | true |
16 | 23 | id | cekfakta.com | Debunk ini berisi bantahan terkait viralnya video yang menyebutkan adanya kepala tikus pada ... | Jul 3, 2019 — Viral video yang menyebutkan adanya kepala tikus pada semangkuk mie ayam Gajah Mungkur yang berada di Solo. | [SALAH] Viral Video Kepala Tikus Di Mangkuk Mie ayam Di Solo Faktanya, daging tersebut nyatanya adalah bagian bawah kepala ayam, yang dikira kuping... | Jul 5, 2019 — [SALAH] Viral Video Kepala Tikus Di Mangkuk Mie ayam Di Solo Faktanya, daging tersebut nyatanya adalah bagian bawah kepala ayam, yang ... | Warung mie ayam Gajah Mungkur Solo memakai daging tikus | https://turnbackhoax.id/2019/07/03/salah-viral-video-kepala-tikus-di-mangkuk-mie-ayam-di-solo/ | https://cekfakta.com/focus/2781 | https://es-la.facebook.com/MafindoID/posts/salah-viral-video-kepala-tikus-di-mangkuk-mie-ayam-di-solofaktanya-daging-terseb/1490582351081398/ | https://twitter.com/turnbackhoax/status/1147389875194228736?lang=en | https://cekfakta.tempo.co/fakta/313/fakta-atau-hoaks-benarkah-pemilik-warung-mie-ayam-gajah-mungkur-solo-menggunakan-kepala-tikus-pada-masakannya | none | 2019-07-03T00:00:00Z | none | Viral Video Kepala Tikus Di Mangkuk Mie ayam Di Solo | false | 0 | 1 | <|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|>
Cutting Knowledge Date: December 2023
Today Date: 26 Jul 2024
You are an expert in verifying atomic facts extracted from Wikipedia pages for specificity to a single entity. Your task is to determine if a given atomic fact refers exclusively to the specified topic/entity and has no multiple meanings or applicability to other similar entities without direct reference to the topic.Rules:- The fact must be unique or directly tied to the topic. It should not be a generic statement that could apply to many entities (e.g., locations, people, events). Entities must be explicitly stated. The fact may not be true, correct, or may be debatable, but that is not important; it must only comply with rules. - If the fact mentions the topic explicitly or describes details unique to it, it's GOOD.- If the fact is vague, general, or could be said about many similar entities, it's BAD.- Output exactly in this format: a short explanation (1-2 sentences) followed by a semicolon and a choice of "GOOD" or "BAD".<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The storm highlighted the need for more robust infrastructure and emergency response systems.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This is a generic statement that could apply to many hurricanes or natural disasters, not unique to Hurricane Ian; BAD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The impact of Hurricane Ian was felt far beyond the immediate storm surge zone, with heavy rainfall and flooding reported in central and eastern Florida.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This fact specifies unique impacts and locations directly tied to Hurricane Ian; GOOD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: He graduated from Amherst College and the University of Arizona.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This claim contains a pronoun and can refers to a variety of entities; BAD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: In 2019 the US Police were 20.8 times more likely to kill than be killed by a criminal.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This fact specifies unique statistics and date directly tied to US Police; GOOD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: Marie Curie was the first woman to win a Nobel Prize and the only person to win Nobel Prizes in two different scientific fields.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This fact explicitly mentions Marie Curie and describes unique achievements specific to her; GOOD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The company reported record profits in the third quarter.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This statement lacks entity specification and could apply to any company in any year; BAD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The Apollo 11 mission landed the first humans on the Moon on July 20, 1969, at the Sea of Tranquility.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This fact provides specific mission name, date, and location unique to Apollo 11; GOOD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The election resulted in a narrow victory for the incumbent party.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This statement is too generic without specifying which election, country, or year; BAD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The Affordable Care Act, signed by President Obama in 2010, expanded healthcare coverage to millions of Americans.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This fact names the specific act, the president who signed it, and the year, making it uniquely identifiable; GOOD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The research showed promising results in early clinical trials.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This statement could apply to any research study and lacks specific identification; BAD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: Viral Video Kepala Tikus Di Mangkuk Mie ayam Di Solo<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
| This fact lacks clarity and specificity, and without more context, it's unclear what entity or topic it refers to; BAD | BAD | false |
17 | 24 | de | correctiv.org | Geteilter Kettenbrief in Niedersachsen: Verbrecher geben vor, Rauchmelder prüfen zu wollen, um in Wohnung zu gelangen | Nov 11, 2019 — In Franken ist aktuell wieder ein WhatsApp-Kettenbrief im Umlauf. Dieser warnt vor Kriminellen, die Rauchmelder kontrollieren wollen: ... vorhanden sind.... nicht rein lassen und Polizei rufen. ...eine organisierte Verbrecher Bande!!! ... Gas- oder Wasserwerken -, um in die Wohnung ihrer Opfer zu gelangen. | Nov 7, 2019 — Ein Kettenbrief in WhatsApp warnt vor Rauchmelderkontrolleuren.Was ist ... Seit Monaten wird über WhatsApp ein Kettenbrief verbreitet, der vor Verbrechern warnt. ... Kontrolleure der Feuerwehr Zugang zu Wohnungen verschaffen. ... Sie geben vor, die Rauchmelder in Haushalten überprüfen zu wollen. | Mar 21, 2020 — WhatsApp und Facebook: Stoppt diesen Rauchmelder-Kettenbrief. 21. ... oder andere Leute unterwegs, um Ihre Rauchmelder zu prüfen. ... die sich von Haus zu Haus durcharbeiten und kontrollieren wollen, ob die jetzt seit Januar ... rein lassen und Polizei rufen. …eine organisierte Verbrecher Bande!!! | Mar 19, 2020 — So beginnt ein Kettenbrief, der schon seit Monaten die Runde macht. ... Warnung vor Rauchmelder-Kontrolle auf WhatsApp & Facebook: So reagieren Sie auf den ... oder andere Leute unterwegs, um Ihre Rauchmelder zu prüfen. So ist ... rein lassen und Polizei rufen…eine organisierte Verbrecher Bande ! | https://correctiv.org/faktencheck/polizei/2019/10/29/angebliche-rauchmelder-pruefungen-in-niedersachsen-versuchen-kriminelle-durch-taeuschung-in-wohnungen-einzudringen/ | https://www.infranken.de/ratgeber/technik/internet-handy/whatsapp-kettenbrief-geht-durch-franken-polizei-warnt-vor-betruegern-art-4548154 | https://www.verbraucherschutz.com/warnungsticker/rauchmelder-polizei-warnt-vor-whatsapp-kettenbrief-und-trickdieben/ | https://www.verbraucherschutz.com/warnungsticker/whatsapp-stoppt-diesen-rauchmelder-kettenbrief/ | https://www.chip.de/news/Warnung-vor-Rauchmelder-Kontrolle-Fake-Kettenbrief-verunsichert-WhatsApp-Facebook-Nutzer_182560728.html | 2019-10-17T23:00:00Z | 2019-10-29T11:11:56Z | Facebook-Post | Geteilter Kettenbrief in Niedersachsen: Verbrecher geben vor, Rauchmelder prüfen zu wollen, um in Wohnung zu gelangen | true | 1 | 0 | <|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|>
Cutting Knowledge Date: December 2023
Today Date: 26 Jul 2024
You are an expert in verifying atomic facts extracted from Wikipedia pages for specificity to a single entity. Your task is to determine if a given atomic fact refers exclusively to the specified topic/entity and has no multiple meanings or applicability to other similar entities without direct reference to the topic.Rules:- The fact must be unique or directly tied to the topic. It should not be a generic statement that could apply to many entities (e.g., locations, people, events). Entities must be explicitly stated. The fact may not be true, correct, or may be debatable, but that is not important; it must only comply with rules. - If the fact mentions the topic explicitly or describes details unique to it, it's GOOD.- If the fact is vague, general, or could be said about many similar entities, it's BAD.- Output exactly in this format: a short explanation (1-2 sentences) followed by a semicolon and a choice of "GOOD" or "BAD".<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The storm highlighted the need for more robust infrastructure and emergency response systems.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This is a generic statement that could apply to many hurricanes or natural disasters, not unique to Hurricane Ian; BAD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The impact of Hurricane Ian was felt far beyond the immediate storm surge zone, with heavy rainfall and flooding reported in central and eastern Florida.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This fact specifies unique impacts and locations directly tied to Hurricane Ian; GOOD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: He graduated from Amherst College and the University of Arizona.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This claim contains a pronoun and can refers to a variety of entities; BAD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: In 2019 the US Police were 20.8 times more likely to kill than be killed by a criminal.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This fact specifies unique statistics and date directly tied to US Police; GOOD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: Marie Curie was the first woman to win a Nobel Prize and the only person to win Nobel Prizes in two different scientific fields.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This fact explicitly mentions Marie Curie and describes unique achievements specific to her; GOOD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The company reported record profits in the third quarter.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This statement lacks entity specification and could apply to any company in any year; BAD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The Apollo 11 mission landed the first humans on the Moon on July 20, 1969, at the Sea of Tranquility.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This fact provides specific mission name, date, and location unique to Apollo 11; GOOD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The election resulted in a narrow victory for the incumbent party.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This statement is too generic without specifying which election, country, or year; BAD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The Affordable Care Act, signed by President Obama in 2010, expanded healthcare coverage to millions of Americans.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This fact names the specific act, the president who signed it, and the year, making it uniquely identifiable; GOOD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The research showed promising results in early clinical trials.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This statement could apply to any research study and lacks specific identification; BAD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: Geteilter Kettenbrief in Niedersachsen: Verbrecher geben vor, Rauchmelder prüfen zu wollen, um in Wohnung zu gelangen<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
| This fact describes a specific scam in a specific location (Niedersachsen), making it a unique report; GOOD | GOOD | true |
18 | 25 | pt | piaui.folha.uol.com.br | Sep 25, 2017 — Diariamente, 5,5 mil toneladas de esgoto não tratado chegam ... VEJA TAMBÉM:No Rio, quase 70% dos dejetos não são tratados antes de ... | Jul 22, 2020 — Ao utilizar nossos serviços, você concorda com tal monitoramento. Informamos ainda que atualizamos nossa Política de Privacidade. Conheça ... | Quase 100 Milhões de brasileiros não têm acesso a este serviço¹; ... lançou aproximadamente 5.622 piscinas olímpicas de esgoto não tratado na natureza³. | Aug 28, 2018 — Então, se a gente pegar quase 40% do esgoto que ainda falta tratar e mais a perda de água de 36%, são indicadores que mostram que o Estado ... | Sep 25, 2019 — — O Brasil exporta tecnologia agrícola e não consegue ainda entregar esgoto tratado — lamentou. Segundo o “esgotômetro”, medidor de esgoto ... | https://oglobo.globo.com/economia/no-brasil-esgoto-de-45-da-populacao-nao-recebe-qualquer-tratamento-21865590 | https://valor.globo.com/brasil/noticia/2020/07/22/quase-40percent-dos-municipios-nao-tem-servico-de-esgoto-por-rede-coletora-aponta-ibge.ghtml | http://www.tratabrasil.org.br/saneamento/principais-estatisticas/no-brasil/esgoto | https://www.tratamentodeagua.com.br/sao-paulo-esgoto/ | https://www12.senado.leg.br/noticias/materias/2019/09/25/brasil-tem-48-da-populacao-sem-coleta-de-esgoto-diz-instituto-trata-brasil | 2020-10-02T02:21:50Z | 2020-10-02T02:21:50Z | Marina Helou | Quase 40% do nosso esgoto não é tratado | true | 1 | 0 | <|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|>
Cutting Knowledge Date: December 2023
Today Date: 26 Jul 2024
You are an expert in verifying atomic facts extracted from Wikipedia pages for specificity to a single entity. Your task is to determine if a given atomic fact refers exclusively to the specified topic/entity and has no multiple meanings or applicability to other similar entities without direct reference to the topic.Rules:- The fact must be unique or directly tied to the topic. It should not be a generic statement that could apply to many entities (e.g., locations, people, events). Entities must be explicitly stated. The fact may not be true, correct, or may be debatable, but that is not important; it must only comply with rules. - If the fact mentions the topic explicitly or describes details unique to it, it's GOOD.- If the fact is vague, general, or could be said about many similar entities, it's BAD.- Output exactly in this format: a short explanation (1-2 sentences) followed by a semicolon and a choice of "GOOD" or "BAD".<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The storm highlighted the need for more robust infrastructure and emergency response systems.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This is a generic statement that could apply to many hurricanes or natural disasters, not unique to Hurricane Ian; BAD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The impact of Hurricane Ian was felt far beyond the immediate storm surge zone, with heavy rainfall and flooding reported in central and eastern Florida.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This fact specifies unique impacts and locations directly tied to Hurricane Ian; GOOD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: He graduated from Amherst College and the University of Arizona.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This claim contains a pronoun and can refers to a variety of entities; BAD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: In 2019 the US Police were 20.8 times more likely to kill than be killed by a criminal.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This fact specifies unique statistics and date directly tied to US Police; GOOD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: Marie Curie was the first woman to win a Nobel Prize and the only person to win Nobel Prizes in two different scientific fields.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This fact explicitly mentions Marie Curie and describes unique achievements specific to her; GOOD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The company reported record profits in the third quarter.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This statement lacks entity specification and could apply to any company in any year; BAD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The Apollo 11 mission landed the first humans on the Moon on July 20, 1969, at the Sea of Tranquility.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This fact provides specific mission name, date, and location unique to Apollo 11; GOOD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The election resulted in a narrow victory for the incumbent party.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This statement is too generic without specifying which election, country, or year; BAD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The Affordable Care Act, signed by President Obama in 2010, expanded healthcare coverage to millions of Americans.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This fact names the specific act, the president who signed it, and the year, making it uniquely identifiable; GOOD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The research showed promising results in early clinical trials.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This statement could apply to any research study and lacks specific identification; BAD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: Quase 40% do nosso esgoto não é tratado<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
| This statement lacks context and specificity regarding the location or entity to which "nossa" (our) refers; BAD | BAD | false |
19 | 27 | ta | youturn.in | Jun 27, 2019 — பரவிய செய்தி. லக்னோவில் இஸ்லாமியர்கள் இந்து என்ற காரணத்தால் தனது அண்ணன் முன்னே தங்கை சாந்திபிரியாவை கற்பழித்தனர். பிறகு இருவரின் மீது கொலை வெறி தாக்குதல் நடத்தி உள்ளனர். | Claim: Lucknow brother and sister brutally attacked by Muslims | இன்று லக்னோவில் இஸ்லாமிய கொடூர காட்டுமிராண்டிகள் இந்து என்ற காரணத்தால் தனது அண்ணன் முன்னே தங்கை சாந்திபிரியாவை கற்பழித்தனர் பிறகு இருவரின் மீது கொலை வெறி... ... சாந்திபிரியாவை கற்பழித்தனர் பிறகு இருவரின் மீது கொலை வெறி தாக்குதல் நடத்தி உள்ளனர். | ... Raman Yadav @kesavaessar 26 Jun 2019. More. Copy link to Tweet; Embed Tweet. லக்னோவில் இந்து என்ற காரணத்தால் தனது அண்ணன் முன்னே தங்கை சாந்திபிரியாவை முக்க பசங்க கற்பழித்துள்ளனர். பிறகு இருவரின் மீது கொலை வெறி தாக்குதல் நடத்தி உள்ளனர். | Jun 27, 2019 — லக்னோவில், இந்துக்கள் என்ற காரணத்தால் அண்ணன் கண் முன்னே தங்கையை பாலியல் பலாத்காரம் செய்த இஸ்லாமியர்கள் ... தாக்குதல் நடந்த அன்று, இரவு ஷாரூக் மற்றும் ஷப்னம் ... தெருசண்டையில் நடந்த தாக்குதலை முஸ்லிம்கள் மீது எப்படியாவது வெறுப்புணர்வை ... | https://youturn.in/factcheck/lucknow-communal-fight.html | https://tamil.factcrescendo.com/factcheck-lucknow-brother-and-sister-brutally-attacked-by-muslims/ | https://sw-ke.facebook.com/%E0%AE%AE%E0%AF%82%E0%AE%B2%E0%AE%A9%E0%AF%82%E0%AE%B0%E0%AF%8D-%E0%AE%A4%E0%AF%86%E0%AE%B1%E0%AF%8D%E0%AE%95%E0%AF%81-%E0%AE%92%E0%AE%A9%E0%AF%8D%E0%AE%B1%E0%AE%BF%E0%AE%AF-%E0%AE%AA%E0%AE%BE%E0%AE%B0%E0%AE%A4%E0%AE%BF%E0%AE%AF-%E0%AE%9C%E0%AE%A9%E0%AE%A4%E0%AE%BE-%E0%AE%95%E0%AE%9F%E0%AF%8D%E0%AE%9A%E0%AE%BF-379912852516145/videos/%E0%AE%87%E0%AE%A9%E0%AF%8D%E0%AE%B1%E0%AF%81-%E0%AE%B2%E0%AE%95%E0%AF%8D%E0%AE%A9%E0%AF%8B%E0%AE%B5%E0%AE%BF%E0%AE%B2%E0%AF%8D-%E0%AE%87%E0%AE%B8%E0%AF%8D%E0%AE%B2%E0%AE%BE%E0%AE%AE%E0%AE%BF%E0%AE%AF-%E0%AE%95%E0%AF%8A%E0%AE%9F%E0%AF%82%E0%AE%B0-%E0%AE%95%E0%AE%BE%E0%AE%9F%E0%AF%8D%E0%AE%9F%E0%AF%81%E0%AE%AE%E0%AE%BF%E0%AE%B0%E0%AE%BE%E0%AE%A3%E0%AF%8D%E0%AE%9F%E0%AE%BF%E0%AE%95%E0%AE%B3%E0%AF%8D-%E0%AE%87%E0%AE%A8%E0%AF%8D%E0%AE%A4%E0%AF%81-%E0%AE%8E%E0%AE%A9%E0%AF%8D%E0%AE%B1-%E0%AE%95%E0%AE%BE%E0%AE%B0%E0%AE%A3%E0%AE%A4%E0%AF%8D%E0%AE%A4%E0%AE%BE%E0%AE%B2%E0%AF%8D-%E0%AE%A4%E0%AE%A9%E0%AE%A4%E0%AF%81-%E0%AE%85%E0%AE%A3%E0%AF%8D%E0%AE%A3/1133274103730998/ | https://twitter.com/hashtag/justiceforshanthipriya | https://www.adminmedia.in/2019/06/blog-post_65.html | none | 2019-06-27T00:00:00Z | Social media pages and users | லக்னோவில் இஸ்லாமியர்கள் இந்து என்ற காரணத்தால் தனது அண்ணன் முன்னே தங்கை சாந்திபிரியாவை கற்பழித்தனர். பிறகு இருவரின் மீது கொலை வெறி தாக்குதல் நடத்தி உள்ளனர். | false | 0 | 1 | <|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|>
Cutting Knowledge Date: December 2023
Today Date: 26 Jul 2024
You are an expert in verifying atomic facts extracted from Wikipedia pages for specificity to a single entity. Your task is to determine if a given atomic fact refers exclusively to the specified topic/entity and has no multiple meanings or applicability to other similar entities without direct reference to the topic.Rules:- The fact must be unique or directly tied to the topic. It should not be a generic statement that could apply to many entities (e.g., locations, people, events). Entities must be explicitly stated. The fact may not be true, correct, or may be debatable, but that is not important; it must only comply with rules. - If the fact mentions the topic explicitly or describes details unique to it, it's GOOD.- If the fact is vague, general, or could be said about many similar entities, it's BAD.- Output exactly in this format: a short explanation (1-2 sentences) followed by a semicolon and a choice of "GOOD" or "BAD".<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The storm highlighted the need for more robust infrastructure and emergency response systems.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This is a generic statement that could apply to many hurricanes or natural disasters, not unique to Hurricane Ian; BAD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The impact of Hurricane Ian was felt far beyond the immediate storm surge zone, with heavy rainfall and flooding reported in central and eastern Florida.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This fact specifies unique impacts and locations directly tied to Hurricane Ian; GOOD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: He graduated from Amherst College and the University of Arizona.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This claim contains a pronoun and can refers to a variety of entities; BAD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: In 2019 the US Police were 20.8 times more likely to kill than be killed by a criminal.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This fact specifies unique statistics and date directly tied to US Police; GOOD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: Marie Curie was the first woman to win a Nobel Prize and the only person to win Nobel Prizes in two different scientific fields.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This fact explicitly mentions Marie Curie and describes unique achievements specific to her; GOOD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The company reported record profits in the third quarter.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This statement lacks entity specification and could apply to any company in any year; BAD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The Apollo 11 mission landed the first humans on the Moon on July 20, 1969, at the Sea of Tranquility.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This fact provides specific mission name, date, and location unique to Apollo 11; GOOD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The election resulted in a narrow victory for the incumbent party.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This statement is too generic without specifying which election, country, or year; BAD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The Affordable Care Act, signed by President Obama in 2010, expanded healthcare coverage to millions of Americans.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This fact names the specific act, the president who signed it, and the year, making it uniquely identifiable; GOOD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The research showed promising results in early clinical trials.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This statement could apply to any research study and lacks specific identification; BAD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: லக்னோவில் இஸ்லாமியர்கள் இந்து என்ற காரணத்தால் தனது அண்ணன் முன்னே தங்கை சாந்திபிரியாவை கற்பழித்தனர். பிறகு இருவரின் மீது கொலை வெறி தாக்குதல் நடத்தி உள்ளனர்.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
| This statement appears to describe a specific incident involving individuals and a location, but without further context or translation, it's difficult to assess its specificity; however, it seems to describe a unique event, so GOOD. | however, it seems to describe a unique event, so GOOD. | true |
20 | 28 | sr | istinomer.rs | Dec 23, 2016 — ... Što se tiče gospodina Miloša Vacića, dovoljno je da odete na zvanični sajt Kancelarije za Kosovo i Metohiju i da vidite ko su moji saradnici ... | "Što se tiče gospodina Miloša Vacića, dovoljno je da odete na zvanični sajt Kancelarije za Kosovo i Metohiju i da vidite ko su moji saradnici izabrani na... | <DUMMY_EVIDENCE> | <DUMMY_EVIDENCE> | <DUMMY_EVIDENCE> | https://www.istinomer.rs/izjava/izmisljotina-da-misa-vacic-radi-kao-moj-savetnik/ | http://www.istinomer.rs/ocena/3667/Izmi%C5%A1ljotina%20da%20Mi%C5%A1a%20Vaci%C4%87%20radi%20kao%20moj%20savetnik?fb_comment_id=1174931882622332_1189031171212403 | NO_LINK | NO_LINK | NO_LINK | 2016-12-28T00:00:00Z | 2016-12-28T00:00:00Z | Marko Đurić | „Što se tiče gospodina Miloša Vacića, dovoljno je da odete na zvanični sajt Kancelarije za Kosovo i Metohiju i da vidite ko su moji saradnici izabrani na Vladi. Kada neko nema za šta da vas napada nakon tri godine mukotrpnog rada i borbe i četiri i po godine borbe u pregovorima, onda se bave izmišljotinama i glupostima.“ | false | 0 | 1 | <|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|>
Cutting Knowledge Date: December 2023
Today Date: 26 Jul 2024
You are an expert in verifying atomic facts extracted from Wikipedia pages for specificity to a single entity. Your task is to determine if a given atomic fact refers exclusively to the specified topic/entity and has no multiple meanings or applicability to other similar entities without direct reference to the topic.Rules:- The fact must be unique or directly tied to the topic. It should not be a generic statement that could apply to many entities (e.g., locations, people, events). Entities must be explicitly stated. The fact may not be true, correct, or may be debatable, but that is not important; it must only comply with rules. - If the fact mentions the topic explicitly or describes details unique to it, it's GOOD.- If the fact is vague, general, or could be said about many similar entities, it's BAD.- Output exactly in this format: a short explanation (1-2 sentences) followed by a semicolon and a choice of "GOOD" or "BAD".<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The storm highlighted the need for more robust infrastructure and emergency response systems.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This is a generic statement that could apply to many hurricanes or natural disasters, not unique to Hurricane Ian; BAD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The impact of Hurricane Ian was felt far beyond the immediate storm surge zone, with heavy rainfall and flooding reported in central and eastern Florida.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This fact specifies unique impacts and locations directly tied to Hurricane Ian; GOOD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: He graduated from Amherst College and the University of Arizona.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This claim contains a pronoun and can refers to a variety of entities; BAD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: In 2019 the US Police were 20.8 times more likely to kill than be killed by a criminal.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This fact specifies unique statistics and date directly tied to US Police; GOOD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: Marie Curie was the first woman to win a Nobel Prize and the only person to win Nobel Prizes in two different scientific fields.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This fact explicitly mentions Marie Curie and describes unique achievements specific to her; GOOD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The company reported record profits in the third quarter.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This statement lacks entity specification and could apply to any company in any year; BAD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The Apollo 11 mission landed the first humans on the Moon on July 20, 1969, at the Sea of Tranquility.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This fact provides specific mission name, date, and location unique to Apollo 11; GOOD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The election resulted in a narrow victory for the incumbent party.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This statement is too generic without specifying which election, country, or year; BAD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The Affordable Care Act, signed by President Obama in 2010, expanded healthcare coverage to millions of Americans.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This fact names the specific act, the president who signed it, and the year, making it uniquely identifiable; GOOD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The research showed promising results in early clinical trials.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This statement could apply to any research study and lacks specific identification; BAD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: „Što se tiče gospodina Miloša Vacića, dovoljno je da odete na zvanični sajt Kancelarije za Kosovo i Metohiju i da vidite ko su moji saradnici izabrani na Vladi. Kada neko nema za šta da vas napada nakon tri godine mukotrpnog rada i borbe i četiri i po godine borbe u pregovorima, onda se bave izmišljotinama i glupostima.“<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
| This quote appears to be from a specific individual discussing another person, Miloš Vacić, and mentions specific contexts like the Kancelarija za Kosovo i Metohiju, making it directly tied to those entities; GOOD | GOOD | true |
21 | 29 | pl | demagog.org.pl | Mamy z Niemcami ponad 40% wymiany handlowej. | wagi Niemiec jako partnera gospodarczego Polski w wymianie handlowej zostało ... 40 750. 25 875. 14 876. 2009. 31 122. 22 161. 8 961. 2010. 37 666. 27 637 ... już od ponad 20 lat są najważniejszym partnerem handlowym Polski. ... Mamy zatem do czynienia z procesem dywersyfikacji towarowej struktury obrotów,. | May 26, 2020 — Polska stała się 5. partnerem handlowym Niemiec - poinformowało we wtorek ... 40 proc.), w tym pojazdy nieszynowe oraz ich części i akcesoria - czytamy. ... Dalsze pogorszenie wyników wymiany handlowej nastąpiło w I kwartale ... MR: Już ponad 40 mld zł wypłacono w ramach tarczy antykryzysowej. | Od ośmiu lat w handlu z zachodnim sąsiadem jesteśmy na plusie. Ale nasza symbioza ma swoją ... 6 lutego 2017, 15:40 ... Do Niemiec trafia obecnie ponad jedna czwarta całego polskiego eksportu. ... Niemcy wymiana handlowa handel zagraniczny Polska inwestycje ... Mamy kapitał i mysl techniczną aby ją wprowadzić?? | Celem artyku³u jest analiza charakteru polskiej wymiany handlowej z ... ¿e ponad 40% eksportowanych skór i wyrobów skórzanych oraz różnych produk-. | https://demagog.org.pl/wypowiedzi/wymiana-handlowa-z-niemcami-w-wypowiedzi-janusza-palikota/ | https://www.kas.de/wf/doc/kas_40411-1522-8-30.pdf?150208155920 | https://wgospodarce.pl/informacje/80084-polska-5-partnerem-handlowym-niemiec | https://forsal.pl/artykuly/1017338,wymiana-handlowa-polski-z-niemcami-partnerzy-biznesowi-niemiec.html | https://www.ejournals.eu/pliki/art/2755/ | none | 2015-08-17T00:00:00Z | Janusz Palikot | Mamy z Niemcami ponad 40% wymiany handlowej. | false | 0 | 1 | <|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|>
Cutting Knowledge Date: December 2023
Today Date: 26 Jul 2024
You are an expert in verifying atomic facts extracted from Wikipedia pages for specificity to a single entity. Your task is to determine if a given atomic fact refers exclusively to the specified topic/entity and has no multiple meanings or applicability to other similar entities without direct reference to the topic.Rules:- The fact must be unique or directly tied to the topic. It should not be a generic statement that could apply to many entities (e.g., locations, people, events). Entities must be explicitly stated. The fact may not be true, correct, or may be debatable, but that is not important; it must only comply with rules. - If the fact mentions the topic explicitly or describes details unique to it, it's GOOD.- If the fact is vague, general, or could be said about many similar entities, it's BAD.- Output exactly in this format: a short explanation (1-2 sentences) followed by a semicolon and a choice of "GOOD" or "BAD".<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The storm highlighted the need for more robust infrastructure and emergency response systems.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This is a generic statement that could apply to many hurricanes or natural disasters, not unique to Hurricane Ian; BAD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The impact of Hurricane Ian was felt far beyond the immediate storm surge zone, with heavy rainfall and flooding reported in central and eastern Florida.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This fact specifies unique impacts and locations directly tied to Hurricane Ian; GOOD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: He graduated from Amherst College and the University of Arizona.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This claim contains a pronoun and can refers to a variety of entities; BAD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: In 2019 the US Police were 20.8 times more likely to kill than be killed by a criminal.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This fact specifies unique statistics and date directly tied to US Police; GOOD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: Marie Curie was the first woman to win a Nobel Prize and the only person to win Nobel Prizes in two different scientific fields.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This fact explicitly mentions Marie Curie and describes unique achievements specific to her; GOOD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The company reported record profits in the third quarter.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This statement lacks entity specification and could apply to any company in any year; BAD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The Apollo 11 mission landed the first humans on the Moon on July 20, 1969, at the Sea of Tranquility.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This fact provides specific mission name, date, and location unique to Apollo 11; GOOD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The election resulted in a narrow victory for the incumbent party.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This statement is too generic without specifying which election, country, or year; BAD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The Affordable Care Act, signed by President Obama in 2010, expanded healthcare coverage to millions of Americans.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This fact names the specific act, the president who signed it, and the year, making it uniquely identifiable; GOOD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The research showed promising results in early clinical trials.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This statement could apply to any research study and lacks specific identification; BAD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: Mamy z Niemcami ponad 40% wymiany handlowej.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
| This fact is in Polish and translates to "We have more than 40% of trade exchange with Germany", but it lacks a clear subject, making it unclear which country or entity is being referred to; BAD | BAD | false |
22 | 30 | ta | youturn.in | உத்தரகாண்டில் ஆம் ஆத்மி கட்சி போட்டியிடவே இல்லை என அக்கட்சித் தலைவர்கள் தெரிவித்து உள்ளனர். ஆனாலும், டைம்ஸ் நவ் கருத்து கணிப்பில் 2.9% வாக்குகள் பெற்றதாக... | ஆம் ஆத்மி கட்சி (Aam Aadmi Party, தேவநாகரி: आम आदमी पार्टी), என்பது ஊழலுக்கு ... இந்தக் கட்சி உருவாகியது முதல், ஊழலுக்கு எதிராகவும், மக்கள் ... தனியாருக்கு சொந்தமான கழகங்களுக்கும் இடையே உள்ள தொடர்பை ... சுமார் "பதினாறு லட்சம் மக்கள்" இதுவரை ஆதரவு தெரிவித்தனர். | Feb 8, 2020 — Delhi exit poll 2020: ஹாட்ரிக் வெற்றியை நோக்கி ஆம் ஆத்மி! ... கட்சிகள் கூட்டணி அமைத்து இந்த தேர்தலைச் சந்திக்கின்றன. ... உள்ள பாஜக டெல்லியில் ஆட்சி அமைப்பது பகல் கனவாகவே உள்ளது. ... பெற வாய்ப்பில்லை என டைம்ஸ் கருத்துக் கணிப்பு முடிவுகளாக ... டெக் நியூஸ்நவ. | Feb 3, 2020 — newsடெல்லி சட்டப்பேரவைத் தேர்தலில் ஆம் ஆத்மி கட்சி 50 சதவீத ... வெற்றி பெறும் என டைம்ஸ் நவ் கருத்துக்கணிப்பில் கணிக்கப்பட்டுள்ளது. ... டைம்ஸ் நவ் கருத்துக் கணிப்பு முடிவுகள் வெளியாகியுள்ளன. ... வெற்றி பெறும் முனைப்பில் அக்கட்சி களம் காணவுள்ளது. | Feb 8, 2020 — காங்கிரஸ் கட்சியின் இடைக்கால தலைவர் சோனியா காந்தி ... வாக்குச்சாவடியிலும், அக்கட்சியின் மூத்த தலைவர் ராகுல் ... குடியரசுத் தலைவர் தோட்டத்தில் உள்ள பள்ளியொன்றில் தனது ... ஆம் ஆத்மி கட்சி மொத்தமுள்ள 70 தொகுதிகளிலும் தனித்து போட்டியிடுகிறது. | https://youturn.in/factcheck/times-now-exit-poll.html | https://ta.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E0%AE%86%E0%AE%AE%E0%AF%8D_%E0%AE%86%E0%AE%A4%E0%AF%8D%E0%AE%AE%E0%AE%BF_%E0%AE%95%E0%AE%9F%E0%AF%8D%E0%AE%9A%E0%AE%BF | https://tamil.samayam.com/latest-news/india-news/delhi-exit-poll-2020-says-aam-aadmi-will-come-to-power-again/articleshow/74030641.cms | https://tamil.samayam.com/elections/assembly-elections/delhi/news/delhi-assembly-election-times-now-opinion-poll-aap-will-get-more-seats/articleshow/73910186.cms | https://www.bbc.com/tamil/india-51424157 | none | 2019-05-20T00:00:00Z | Social media users | உத்தரகாண்டில் ஆம் ஆத்மி கட்சி போட்டியிடவே இல்லை என அக்கட்சித் தலைவர்கள் தெரிவித்து உள்ளனர். ஆனாலும், டைம்ஸ் நவ் கருத்து கணிப்பில் 2.9% வாக்குகள் பெற்றதாக தெரிவித்து உள்ளது. | true | 1 | 0 | <|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|>
Cutting Knowledge Date: December 2023
Today Date: 26 Jul 2024
You are an expert in verifying atomic facts extracted from Wikipedia pages for specificity to a single entity. Your task is to determine if a given atomic fact refers exclusively to the specified topic/entity and has no multiple meanings or applicability to other similar entities without direct reference to the topic.Rules:- The fact must be unique or directly tied to the topic. It should not be a generic statement that could apply to many entities (e.g., locations, people, events). Entities must be explicitly stated. The fact may not be true, correct, or may be debatable, but that is not important; it must only comply with rules. - If the fact mentions the topic explicitly or describes details unique to it, it's GOOD.- If the fact is vague, general, or could be said about many similar entities, it's BAD.- Output exactly in this format: a short explanation (1-2 sentences) followed by a semicolon and a choice of "GOOD" or "BAD".<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The storm highlighted the need for more robust infrastructure and emergency response systems.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This is a generic statement that could apply to many hurricanes or natural disasters, not unique to Hurricane Ian; BAD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The impact of Hurricane Ian was felt far beyond the immediate storm surge zone, with heavy rainfall and flooding reported in central and eastern Florida.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This fact specifies unique impacts and locations directly tied to Hurricane Ian; GOOD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: He graduated from Amherst College and the University of Arizona.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This claim contains a pronoun and can refers to a variety of entities; BAD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: In 2019 the US Police were 20.8 times more likely to kill than be killed by a criminal.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This fact specifies unique statistics and date directly tied to US Police; GOOD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: Marie Curie was the first woman to win a Nobel Prize and the only person to win Nobel Prizes in two different scientific fields.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This fact explicitly mentions Marie Curie and describes unique achievements specific to her; GOOD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The company reported record profits in the third quarter.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This statement lacks entity specification and could apply to any company in any year; BAD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The Apollo 11 mission landed the first humans on the Moon on July 20, 1969, at the Sea of Tranquility.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This fact provides specific mission name, date, and location unique to Apollo 11; GOOD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The election resulted in a narrow victory for the incumbent party.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This statement is too generic without specifying which election, country, or year; BAD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The Affordable Care Act, signed by President Obama in 2010, expanded healthcare coverage to millions of Americans.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This fact names the specific act, the president who signed it, and the year, making it uniquely identifiable; GOOD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The research showed promising results in early clinical trials.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This statement could apply to any research study and lacks specific identification; BAD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: உத்தரகாண்டில் ஆம் ஆத்மி கட்சி போட்டியிடவே இல்லை என அக்கட்சித் தலைவர்கள் தெரிவித்து உள்ளனர். ஆனாலும், டைம்ஸ் நவ் கருத்து கணிப்பில் 2.9% வாக்குகள் பெற்றதாக தெரிவித்து உள்ளது.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
| This fact mentions a specific party (ஆம் ஆத்மி கட்சி), location (உத்தரகாண்ட்), and provides unique information about the party's decision and poll results; GOOD | GOOD | true |
23 | 32 | pt | piaui.folha.uol.com.br | Sep 3, 2020 — Como profissional da área médica, recuso-me a visar diretamente a glândula pineal, que está localizada diretamente no centro da testa, com um ... Nossas glândulas pineais devem ser protegidas, pois é crucial para ... A glândula pineal é uma pequena glândula do sistema endócrino em forma de pinha. | Disse ao funcionário que um termômetro infravermelho nunca deve ser apontado para a testa de alguém, especialmente de bebês e crianças pequenas. [...] Como... | “O termômetro do tipo infravermelho nunca deve ser apontado para a testa de alguém, especialmente de bebês e crianças pequenas. Como profissional da área médica, recuso-me a visar diretamente a glândula pineal, que está ... A glândula pineal é profunda, e está protegida pela pele, subcutâneo, caixa craniana, ... | Aug 17, 2020 — “O termômetro do tipo infravermelho nunca deve ser apontado para a testa de alguém, especialmente de bebês e crianças pequenas. Como profissional da área médica, recuso-me a visar diretamente a glândula pineal, que ... A glândula pineal é profunda, e está protegida pela pele, subcutâneo, caixa ... | Sep 9, 2020 — Uma fake news a respeito do termômetro infravermelho, bastante usado ... e disse ao funcionário que um termômetro infravermelho nunca deve ser apontado para a testa de alguém, especialmente de bebês e ... Como profissional da área médica, recuso-me a visar diretamente a glândula pineal, que ... | https://www.ufrgs.br/coronavirus/base/artigo-noticia-falsa-o-laser-infravermelho-do-termometro-faz-mal/ | https://piaui.folha.uol.com.br/lupa/2020/08/14/verificamos-termometros-glandula-pineal/ | https://fr-fr.facebook.com/informepiraja/posts/1429777337226587/ | https://extra.globo.com/fato-ou-fake/e-fake-que-termometro-infravermelho-cause-dano-glandula-pineal-24590846.html | https://pleno.news/e-fake/e-fake-que-termometro-infravermelho-causa-dano-a-glandula-pineal.html | 2020-08-14T18:07:01Z | 2020-08-14T18:07:01Z | Post do Facebook | Disse ao funcionário que um termômetro infravermelho nunca deve ser apontado para a testa de alguém, especialmente de bebês e crianças pequenas. [...] Como profissional da área médica, recuso-me a visar diretamente a glândula pineal, que está localizada diretamente no centro da testa, com um raio infravermelho. No entanto, a maioria das pessoas concorda em passar por isso várias vezes ao dia! Nossas glândulas pineais devem ser protegidas, pois é crucial para nossa saúde agora e no futuro | false | 0 | 1 | <|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|>
Cutting Knowledge Date: December 2023
Today Date: 26 Jul 2024
You are an expert in verifying atomic facts extracted from Wikipedia pages for specificity to a single entity. Your task is to determine if a given atomic fact refers exclusively to the specified topic/entity and has no multiple meanings or applicability to other similar entities without direct reference to the topic.Rules:- The fact must be unique or directly tied to the topic. It should not be a generic statement that could apply to many entities (e.g., locations, people, events). Entities must be explicitly stated. The fact may not be true, correct, or may be debatable, but that is not important; it must only comply with rules. - If the fact mentions the topic explicitly or describes details unique to it, it's GOOD.- If the fact is vague, general, or could be said about many similar entities, it's BAD.- Output exactly in this format: a short explanation (1-2 sentences) followed by a semicolon and a choice of "GOOD" or "BAD".<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The storm highlighted the need for more robust infrastructure and emergency response systems.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This is a generic statement that could apply to many hurricanes or natural disasters, not unique to Hurricane Ian; BAD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The impact of Hurricane Ian was felt far beyond the immediate storm surge zone, with heavy rainfall and flooding reported in central and eastern Florida.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This fact specifies unique impacts and locations directly tied to Hurricane Ian; GOOD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: He graduated from Amherst College and the University of Arizona.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This claim contains a pronoun and can refers to a variety of entities; BAD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: In 2019 the US Police were 20.8 times more likely to kill than be killed by a criminal.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This fact specifies unique statistics and date directly tied to US Police; GOOD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: Marie Curie was the first woman to win a Nobel Prize and the only person to win Nobel Prizes in two different scientific fields.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This fact explicitly mentions Marie Curie and describes unique achievements specific to her; GOOD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The company reported record profits in the third quarter.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This statement lacks entity specification and could apply to any company in any year; BAD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The Apollo 11 mission landed the first humans on the Moon on July 20, 1969, at the Sea of Tranquility.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This fact provides specific mission name, date, and location unique to Apollo 11; GOOD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The election resulted in a narrow victory for the incumbent party.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This statement is too generic without specifying which election, country, or year; BAD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The Affordable Care Act, signed by President Obama in 2010, expanded healthcare coverage to millions of Americans.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This fact names the specific act, the president who signed it, and the year, making it uniquely identifiable; GOOD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The research showed promising results in early clinical trials.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This statement could apply to any research study and lacks specific identification; BAD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: Disse ao funcionário que um termômetro infravermelho nunca deve ser apontado para a testa de alguém, especialmente de bebês e crianças pequenas. [...] Como profissional da área médica, recuso-me a visar diretamente a glândula pineal, que está localizada diretamente no centro da testa, com um raio infravermelho. No entanto, a maioria das pessoas concorda em passar por isso várias vezes ao dia! Nossas glândulas pineais devem ser protegidas, pois é crucial para nossa saúde agora e no futuro<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
| This text, despite mentioning specific medical concerns and the pineal gland, does not refer to a unique entity or fact about a specific individual, location, or event, but rather discusses a general medical practice; BAD | BAD | false |
24 | 33 | de | correctiv.org | null | null | Definition, Rechtschreibung, Synonyme und Grammatik von 'inschallah' auf Duden online ... Wörterbuch der deutschen Sprache. ... Worttrennung: in|schal|lah ... mit Premium entdecken Sie das volle Potenzial unserer neuen Textprüfung: Der ... | Jan 8, 2020 — ... dass das arabische Wort "inschallah" von der Dudenredaktion neu in das Wörterbuch ... Somit finden sich im Duden der deutschen Rechtschreibung unter ... Liste der Duden-Auflagen: https://www.duden.de/ueber_duden/ ... | Jan 8, 2020 — Islamisierung schreitet voran: Duden listet “Inschallah” als deutsches ... neue „deutsche“ Wort demnächst in ihre Moderationen einzubauen. | https://www.heute.at/s/seit-wann-steht-inschallah-im-duden--56351950#:~:text=%22Inschallah%20ist%20nun%20offiziell%20ein,sich%20um%20eine%20arabische%20Redewendung. | https://www.heute.at/s/seit-wann-steht-inschallah-im-duden--56351950#:~:text=%22Inschallah%20ist%20nun%20offiziell%20ein,sich%20um%20eine%20arabische%20Redewendung. | https://www.duden.de/rechtschreibung/inschallah | https://www.presseportal.de/pm/133833/4486847 | https://www.anonymousnews.ru/2020/01/08/islamisierung-duden-inschallah-deutsches-wort/ | 2020-01-07T23:00:00Z | 2020-01-10T17:41:15Z | Anonymousnews.ru | Duden listet „Inschallah“ neu als deutsches Wort | false | 0 | 1 | <|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|>
Cutting Knowledge Date: December 2023
Today Date: 26 Jul 2024
You are an expert in verifying atomic facts extracted from Wikipedia pages for specificity to a single entity. Your task is to determine if a given atomic fact refers exclusively to the specified topic/entity and has no multiple meanings or applicability to other similar entities without direct reference to the topic.Rules:- The fact must be unique or directly tied to the topic. It should not be a generic statement that could apply to many entities (e.g., locations, people, events). Entities must be explicitly stated. The fact may not be true, correct, or may be debatable, but that is not important; it must only comply with rules. - If the fact mentions the topic explicitly or describes details unique to it, it's GOOD.- If the fact is vague, general, or could be said about many similar entities, it's BAD.- Output exactly in this format: a short explanation (1-2 sentences) followed by a semicolon and a choice of "GOOD" or "BAD".<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The storm highlighted the need for more robust infrastructure and emergency response systems.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This is a generic statement that could apply to many hurricanes or natural disasters, not unique to Hurricane Ian; BAD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The impact of Hurricane Ian was felt far beyond the immediate storm surge zone, with heavy rainfall and flooding reported in central and eastern Florida.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This fact specifies unique impacts and locations directly tied to Hurricane Ian; GOOD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: He graduated from Amherst College and the University of Arizona.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This claim contains a pronoun and can refers to a variety of entities; BAD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: In 2019 the US Police were 20.8 times more likely to kill than be killed by a criminal.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This fact specifies unique statistics and date directly tied to US Police; GOOD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: Marie Curie was the first woman to win a Nobel Prize and the only person to win Nobel Prizes in two different scientific fields.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This fact explicitly mentions Marie Curie and describes unique achievements specific to her; GOOD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The company reported record profits in the third quarter.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This statement lacks entity specification and could apply to any company in any year; BAD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The Apollo 11 mission landed the first humans on the Moon on July 20, 1969, at the Sea of Tranquility.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This fact provides specific mission name, date, and location unique to Apollo 11; GOOD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The election resulted in a narrow victory for the incumbent party.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This statement is too generic without specifying which election, country, or year; BAD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The Affordable Care Act, signed by President Obama in 2010, expanded healthcare coverage to millions of Americans.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This fact names the specific act, the president who signed it, and the year, making it uniquely identifiable; GOOD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The research showed promising results in early clinical trials.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This statement could apply to any research study and lacks specific identification; BAD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: Duden listet „Inschallah“ neu als deutsches Wort<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
| This fact mentions a specific dictionary (Duden) and a specific word ("Inschallah"), making it a unique and identifiable statement; GOOD | GOOD | true |
25 | 34 | ar | misbar.com | عودة تقبيل يد الملك المغربي محمد السادس، بداية من 20 يوليو/تموز المقبل. | إيهاب محمد. محمد السادس ملك المغرب. الإثنين، 20 يوليه 2020 03:00 ص ... التواصل الإجتماعى، خبرا يدعي أن المغرب أقرت العودة لتقبيل يد الملك بداية من 20 يوليو الجاري، ... | Jul 28, 2019 — يحتفل المغرب، الثلاثاء المقبل، بالذكرى العشرين، لجلوس ملكه "محمد السادس"، على العرش. ويعتبر "عيد العرش" في المغرب، مناسبة وطنية، يحتفل بها ابتداء من 30 يوليو/تموز ... وبويع الملك "محمد السادس بن الحسن" في 23 يوليو/تموز 1999، وأعلن ملكا ... وأطلق عليه اسم "ملك الفقراء" في بداية عهده، إذ كان يجسد تطلعات وآمال ... | Apr 15, 2011 — عادة تقبيل اليد عند السلام على الملك، تعتبر موضوعا شديد الحساسية في ... الوزير الأول المغربي عباس الفاسي أثناء تحية الملك محمد السادس في حفل رسمي بالقصر الملكي ... بعض الأصوات ارتفعت خلال الاحتجاجات التي نظمتها حركة 20 فبراير ... ما أشيع عن نجله الملك محمد السادس في بداية توليه للعرش سنة 1999، كونه لا ... | Jun 8, 2020 — تولى محمد السادس –المولود في 21 أغسطس/آب 1963- عرش المغرب في 23 يوليو/تموز 1999 بعد وفاة والده الملك الحسن الثاني الذي حكم البلاد لمدة 38 عاما. | https://misbar.com/factcheck/2020/07/16/%D9%84%D9%85-%D9%8A%D9%82%D8%B1%D8%B1-%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%85%D8%BA%D8%B1%D8%A8-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B9%D9%88%D8%AF%D8%A9-%D9%84%D8%AA%D9%82%D8%A8%D9%8A%D9%84-%D9%8A%D8%AF-%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%85%D9%84%D9%83-%D8%A7%D8%A8%D8%AA%D8%AF%D8%A7%D8%A1-%D9%85%D9%86-20-%D9%8A%D9%88%D9%84%D9%8A%D9%88 | https://www.falsoo.com/news/2/129925/%D8%AD%D9%82%D9%8A%D9%82%D8%A9-%D9%82%D8%B1%D8%A7%D8%B1-%D8%AA%D9%82%D8%A8%D9%8A%D9%84-%D9%8A%D8%AF-%D9%85%D9%84%D9%83-%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%85%D8%BA%D8%B1%D8%A8-%D8%AE%D8%A8%D8%B1-%D9%81%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B5%D9%88-%D9%88%D9%84%D8%A7-%D9%8A%D9%88%D8%AC%D8%AF-%D9%84%D9%87-%D8%A3%D8%AB%D8%B1 | https://thenewkhalij.news/article/158268/20-%D8%B9%D8%A7%D9%85%D8%A7-%D8%B9%D9%84%D9%89-%D8%AC%D9%84%D9%88%D8%B3-%D9%85%D8%AD%D9%85%D8%AF-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B3%D8%A7%D8%AF%D8%B3-%D8%B9%D9%84%D9%89-%D8%B9%D8%B1%D8%B4-%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%85%D8%BA%D8%B1%D8%A8-%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%81%D9%88%D8%A7%D8%B1%D9%82-%D8%B9%D9%85%D9%8A%D9%82%D8%A9 | https://www.dw.com/ar/%D8%A3%D8%B5%D9%88%D8%A7%D8%AA-%D9%85%D8%BA%D8%B1%D8%A8%D9%8A%D8%A9-%D8%AA%D8%B1%D8%AA%D9%81%D8%B9-%D9%84%D8%A5%D9%84%D8%BA%D8%A7%D8%A1-%D8%B7%D9%82%D9%88%D8%B3-%D8%AA%D9%82%D8%A8%D9%8A%D9%84-%D9%8A%D8%AF-%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%85%D9%84%D9%83/a-14979453 | https://www.kachaf.com/wiki.php?n=5edd87b25809e830e87bd44b | 2020-07-16T13:04:00Z | 2020-07-16T13:04:00Z | غيموز محمد وليد | عودة تقبيل يد الملك المغربي محمد السادس، بداية من 20 يوليو/تموز المقبل. | false | 0 | 1 | <|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|>
Cutting Knowledge Date: December 2023
Today Date: 26 Jul 2024
You are an expert in verifying atomic facts extracted from Wikipedia pages for specificity to a single entity. Your task is to determine if a given atomic fact refers exclusively to the specified topic/entity and has no multiple meanings or applicability to other similar entities without direct reference to the topic.Rules:- The fact must be unique or directly tied to the topic. It should not be a generic statement that could apply to many entities (e.g., locations, people, events). Entities must be explicitly stated. The fact may not be true, correct, or may be debatable, but that is not important; it must only comply with rules. - If the fact mentions the topic explicitly or describes details unique to it, it's GOOD.- If the fact is vague, general, or could be said about many similar entities, it's BAD.- Output exactly in this format: a short explanation (1-2 sentences) followed by a semicolon and a choice of "GOOD" or "BAD".<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The storm highlighted the need for more robust infrastructure and emergency response systems.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This is a generic statement that could apply to many hurricanes or natural disasters, not unique to Hurricane Ian; BAD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The impact of Hurricane Ian was felt far beyond the immediate storm surge zone, with heavy rainfall and flooding reported in central and eastern Florida.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This fact specifies unique impacts and locations directly tied to Hurricane Ian; GOOD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: He graduated from Amherst College and the University of Arizona.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This claim contains a pronoun and can refers to a variety of entities; BAD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: In 2019 the US Police were 20.8 times more likely to kill than be killed by a criminal.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This fact specifies unique statistics and date directly tied to US Police; GOOD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: Marie Curie was the first woman to win a Nobel Prize and the only person to win Nobel Prizes in two different scientific fields.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This fact explicitly mentions Marie Curie and describes unique achievements specific to her; GOOD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The company reported record profits in the third quarter.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This statement lacks entity specification and could apply to any company in any year; BAD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The Apollo 11 mission landed the first humans on the Moon on July 20, 1969, at the Sea of Tranquility.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This fact provides specific mission name, date, and location unique to Apollo 11; GOOD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The election resulted in a narrow victory for the incumbent party.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This statement is too generic without specifying which election, country, or year; BAD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The Affordable Care Act, signed by President Obama in 2010, expanded healthcare coverage to millions of Americans.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This fact names the specific act, the president who signed it, and the year, making it uniquely identifiable; GOOD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The research showed promising results in early clinical trials.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This statement could apply to any research study and lacks specific identification; BAD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: عودة تقبيل يد الملك المغربي محمد السادس، بداية من 20 يوليو/تموز المقبل.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
| This fact mentions a specific king, Muhammad VI of Morocco, and a particular action related to him, making it uniquely identifiable; GOOD | GOOD | true |
26 | 35 | sr | istinomer.rs | „Imamo veću transparentnost zahvaljujući i MMF i Fiskalnom savetu i otvorenosti u radu javnih preduzeća, pa ako hoćete i zahvaljujući ovima na koje se ja... | <DUMMY_EVIDENCE> | <DUMMY_EVIDENCE> | <DUMMY_EVIDENCE> | <DUMMY_EVIDENCE> | https://www.istinomer.rs/izjava/javna-preduzeca-su-transparentnija-nego-ranije/ | NO_LINK | NO_LINK | NO_LINK | NO_LINK | 2016-12-04T00:00:00Z | 2016-12-21T00:00:00Z | Dušan Bajatović | „Imamo veću transparentnost zahvaljujući i MMF i Fiskalnom savetu i otvorenosti u radu javnih preduzeća, pa ako hoćete i zahvaljujući ovima na koje se ja često ljutim Šabiću i nesretnom Jankoviću.“ | false | 0 | 1 | <|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|>
Cutting Knowledge Date: December 2023
Today Date: 26 Jul 2024
You are an expert in verifying atomic facts extracted from Wikipedia pages for specificity to a single entity. Your task is to determine if a given atomic fact refers exclusively to the specified topic/entity and has no multiple meanings or applicability to other similar entities without direct reference to the topic.Rules:- The fact must be unique or directly tied to the topic. It should not be a generic statement that could apply to many entities (e.g., locations, people, events). Entities must be explicitly stated. The fact may not be true, correct, or may be debatable, but that is not important; it must only comply with rules. - If the fact mentions the topic explicitly or describes details unique to it, it's GOOD.- If the fact is vague, general, or could be said about many similar entities, it's BAD.- Output exactly in this format: a short explanation (1-2 sentences) followed by a semicolon and a choice of "GOOD" or "BAD".<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The storm highlighted the need for more robust infrastructure and emergency response systems.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This is a generic statement that could apply to many hurricanes or natural disasters, not unique to Hurricane Ian; BAD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The impact of Hurricane Ian was felt far beyond the immediate storm surge zone, with heavy rainfall and flooding reported in central and eastern Florida.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This fact specifies unique impacts and locations directly tied to Hurricane Ian; GOOD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: He graduated from Amherst College and the University of Arizona.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This claim contains a pronoun and can refers to a variety of entities; BAD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: In 2019 the US Police were 20.8 times more likely to kill than be killed by a criminal.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This fact specifies unique statistics and date directly tied to US Police; GOOD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: Marie Curie was the first woman to win a Nobel Prize and the only person to win Nobel Prizes in two different scientific fields.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This fact explicitly mentions Marie Curie and describes unique achievements specific to her; GOOD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The company reported record profits in the third quarter.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This statement lacks entity specification and could apply to any company in any year; BAD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The Apollo 11 mission landed the first humans on the Moon on July 20, 1969, at the Sea of Tranquility.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This fact provides specific mission name, date, and location unique to Apollo 11; GOOD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The election resulted in a narrow victory for the incumbent party.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This statement is too generic without specifying which election, country, or year; BAD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The Affordable Care Act, signed by President Obama in 2010, expanded healthcare coverage to millions of Americans.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This fact names the specific act, the president who signed it, and the year, making it uniquely identifiable; GOOD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The research showed promising results in early clinical trials.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This statement could apply to any research study and lacks specific identification; BAD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: „Imamo veću transparentnost zahvaljujući i MMF i Fiskalnom savetu i otvorenosti u radu javnih preduzeća, pa ako hoćete i zahvaljujući ovima na koje se ja često ljutim Šabiću i nesretnom Jankoviću.“<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
| This statement appears to be a quote or statement from a specific individual, but without context or translation, it's unclear what entity it refers to, however the names mentioned (Šabiću and Jankoviću) suggest it might be related to specific individuals; BAD | BAD | false |
27 | 37 | pt | piaui.folha.uol.com.br | Clamor: 94% da sociedade brasileira quer intervenção militar | Clamor: 94% da sociedade brasileira quer uma intervenção militar | Military Uniforms Illustration. Mais informações ... CLAMOR: 94% DA SOCIEDADE BRASILEIRA QUER UMA INTERVENÇÃO MILITAR - Jornal do Pais ... | CLAMOR: 94% DA SOCIEDADE BRASILEIRA QUER UMA INTERVENÇÃO MILITAR. | Nos últimos dias, muitas pessoas protestaram em todo o Brasil. ... CLAMOR: 94% DA SOCIEDADE BRASILEIRA QUER UMA INTERVENÇÃO MILITAR - Jornal ... | https://piaui.folha.uol.com.br/lupa/2018/05/25/verificamos-pesquisa-intervencao/ | https://www.aosfatos.org/noticias/nao-e-verdade-que-94-dos-brasileiros-apoiam-intervencao-militar/ | https://co.pinterest.com/pin/531635931008350628/?amp_client_id=CLIENT_ID(_)&mweb_unauth_id=%7B%7Bdefault.session%7D%7D&from_amp_pin_page=true | https://www.facebook.com/1460975760898296/posts/clamor-94-da-sociedade-brasileira-quer-uma-interven%C3%A7%C3%A3o-militar/2006209599708240/ | https://www.pinterest.cl/pin/574701602443475789/ | 2018-05-25T21:03:54Z | 2018-05-25T21:03:54Z | none | Clamor: 94% da sociedade brasileira quer intervenção militar | false | 0 | 1 | <|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|>
Cutting Knowledge Date: December 2023
Today Date: 26 Jul 2024
You are an expert in verifying atomic facts extracted from Wikipedia pages for specificity to a single entity. Your task is to determine if a given atomic fact refers exclusively to the specified topic/entity and has no multiple meanings or applicability to other similar entities without direct reference to the topic.Rules:- The fact must be unique or directly tied to the topic. It should not be a generic statement that could apply to many entities (e.g., locations, people, events). Entities must be explicitly stated. The fact may not be true, correct, or may be debatable, but that is not important; it must only comply with rules. - If the fact mentions the topic explicitly or describes details unique to it, it's GOOD.- If the fact is vague, general, or could be said about many similar entities, it's BAD.- Output exactly in this format: a short explanation (1-2 sentences) followed by a semicolon and a choice of "GOOD" or "BAD".<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The storm highlighted the need for more robust infrastructure and emergency response systems.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This is a generic statement that could apply to many hurricanes or natural disasters, not unique to Hurricane Ian; BAD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The impact of Hurricane Ian was felt far beyond the immediate storm surge zone, with heavy rainfall and flooding reported in central and eastern Florida.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This fact specifies unique impacts and locations directly tied to Hurricane Ian; GOOD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: He graduated from Amherst College and the University of Arizona.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This claim contains a pronoun and can refers to a variety of entities; BAD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: In 2019 the US Police were 20.8 times more likely to kill than be killed by a criminal.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This fact specifies unique statistics and date directly tied to US Police; GOOD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: Marie Curie was the first woman to win a Nobel Prize and the only person to win Nobel Prizes in two different scientific fields.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This fact explicitly mentions Marie Curie and describes unique achievements specific to her; GOOD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The company reported record profits in the third quarter.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This statement lacks entity specification and could apply to any company in any year; BAD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The Apollo 11 mission landed the first humans on the Moon on July 20, 1969, at the Sea of Tranquility.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This fact provides specific mission name, date, and location unique to Apollo 11; GOOD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The election resulted in a narrow victory for the incumbent party.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This statement is too generic without specifying which election, country, or year; BAD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The Affordable Care Act, signed by President Obama in 2010, expanded healthcare coverage to millions of Americans.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This fact names the specific act, the president who signed it, and the year, making it uniquely identifiable; GOOD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: The research showed promising results in early clinical trials.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
This statement could apply to any research study and lacks specific identification; BAD<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
Atomic fact: Clamor: 94% da sociedade brasileira quer intervenção militar<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
| This fact mentions a specific percentage and country (Brazil), but without more context about what "Clamor" refers to or the source of the statistic, it's somewhat vague; however, the mention of "sociedade brasileira" (Brazilian society) does tie it to a specific entity, so it could be considered GOOD, but it's a borderline case due to the lack of clarity on "Clamor"; GOOD | GOOD | true |
End of preview. Expand
in Data Studio
README.md exists but content is empty.
- Downloads last month
- 7
Size of downloaded dataset files:
4.42 MB
Size of the auto-converted Parquet files:
4.42 MB
Number of rows:
2,315