prompt
listlengths 1
1
| completion
listlengths 1
1
| answer
stringlengths 1
457k
| score
float64 0
1
| temperature
float64 0.7
0.7
| model
stringclasses 1
value | max_tokens
int64 4.1k
4.1k
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
[
{
"content": "You are a strict grader. You will receive ONE line of text and must grade it on:\n\n1. Coherency (0–5):\n - 0: Completely incoherent; random words, impossible to understand.\n - 1: Very hard to follow; severe grammar/logic issues.\n - 2: Partly understandable but disjointed or confusing.\n - 3: Mostly clear with some minor awkwardness or small jumps.\n - 4: Clear and logically connected, only tiny issues.\n - 5: Perfectly coherent, fluent, and easy to understand.\n\n2. Content (0–1):\n - 0: No meaningful content; links to other websites, website clutter, random spam, advertisment link, etc.\n - 1: Not spam or promotional. \n\nNote: We do not care about factual accuracy for content score.\n\nReturn ONLY valid JSON with this exact schema, no extra text:\n\n{\n \"coherency_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"content_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"rationale\": \"<short explanation of why you gave these scores>\"\n}\n\nNow grade the following line of text:\n\nWhen I asked earlier about it going under a tripod head, I was alluding to mounting either a panning base or a ball head with an incorporated panning base to the leveling head.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "{\n \"coherency_score\": 5,\n \"content_score\": 1,\n \"rationale\": \"The text is clear, logically connected, and fluent with a coherent explanation about mounting setups. It avoids any promotional or spam content.\"\n}"
}
] |
When I asked earlier about it going under a tripod head, I was alluding to mounting either a panning base or a ball head with an incorporated panning base to the leveling head.
| 1
| 0.7
|
Qwen/Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507-FP8
| 4,096
|
[
{
"content": "You are a strict grader. You will receive ONE line of text and must grade it on:\n\n1. Coherency (0–5):\n - 0: Completely incoherent; random words, impossible to understand.\n - 1: Very hard to follow; severe grammar/logic issues.\n - 2: Partly understandable but disjointed or confusing.\n - 3: Mostly clear with some minor awkwardness or small jumps.\n - 4: Clear and logically connected, only tiny issues.\n - 5: Perfectly coherent, fluent, and easy to understand.\n\n2. Content (0–1):\n - 0: No meaningful content; links to other websites, website clutter, random spam, advertisment link, etc.\n - 1: Not spam or promotional. \n\nNote: We do not care about factual accuracy for content score.\n\nReturn ONLY valid JSON with this exact schema, no extra text:\n\n{\n \"coherency_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"content_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"rationale\": \"<short explanation of why you gave these scores>\"\n}\n\nNow grade the following line of text:\n\n% Change units to Hz and make phase plot invisible",
"role": "user"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "{\n \"coherency_score\": 5,\n \"content_score\": 1,\n \"rationale\": \"The sentence is clear, concise, and logically connected, with a straightforward instruction. It contains no spam or promotional content.\"\n}"
}
] |
% Change units to Hz and make phase plot invisible
| 1
| 0.7
|
Qwen/Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507-FP8
| 4,096
|
[
{
"content": "You are a strict grader. You will receive ONE line of text and must grade it on:\n\n1. Coherency (0–5):\n - 0: Completely incoherent; random words, impossible to understand.\n - 1: Very hard to follow; severe grammar/logic issues.\n - 2: Partly understandable but disjointed or confusing.\n - 3: Mostly clear with some minor awkwardness or small jumps.\n - 4: Clear and logically connected, only tiny issues.\n - 5: Perfectly coherent, fluent, and easy to understand.\n\n2. Content (0–1):\n - 0: No meaningful content; links to other websites, website clutter, random spam, advertisment link, etc.\n - 1: Not spam or promotional. \n\nNote: We do not care about factual accuracy for content score.\n\nReturn ONLY valid JSON with this exact schema, no extra text:\n\n{\n \"coherency_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"content_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"rationale\": \"<short explanation of why you gave these scores>\"\n}\n\nNow grade the following line of text:\n\nPlot Bode frequency response with additional plot customization options",
"role": "user"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "{\n \"coherency_score\": 5,\n \"content_score\": 1,\n \"rationale\": \"The sentence is clear, fluent, and logically connected, describing a technical task without ambiguity. It contains no promotional or spam content.\"\n}"
}
] |
Plot Bode frequency response with additional plot customization options
| 1
| 0.7
|
Qwen/Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507-FP8
| 4,096
|
[
{
"content": "You are a strict grader. You will receive ONE line of text and must grade it on:\n\n1. Coherency (0–5):\n - 0: Completely incoherent; random words, impossible to understand.\n - 1: Very hard to follow; severe grammar/logic issues.\n - 2: Partly understandable but disjointed or confusing.\n - 3: Mostly clear with some minor awkwardness or small jumps.\n - 4: Clear and logically connected, only tiny issues.\n - 5: Perfectly coherent, fluent, and easy to understand.\n\n2. Content (0–1):\n - 0: No meaningful content; links to other websites, website clutter, random spam, advertisment link, etc.\n - 1: Not spam or promotional. \n\nNote: We do not care about factual accuracy for content score.\n\nReturn ONLY valid JSON with this exact schema, no extra text:\n\n{\n \"coherency_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"content_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"rationale\": \"<short explanation of why you gave these scores>\"\n}\n\nNow grade the following line of text:\n\nThe properties PhaseMatchingFreq and PhaseMatchingValue are parameters you can use to specify the phase at a specified frequency. For example, enter the following commands.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "{\n \"coherency_score\": 5,\n \"content_score\": 1,\n \"rationale\": \"The text is clear, logically connected, and follows a coherent structure explaining parameters and providing an example. It does not contain spam or promotional content.\"\n}"
}
] |
The properties PhaseMatchingFreq and PhaseMatchingValue are parameters you can use to specify the phase at a specified frequency. For example, enter the following commands.
| 1
| 0.7
|
Qwen/Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507-FP8
| 4,096
|
[
{
"content": "You are a strict grader. You will receive ONE line of text and must grade it on:\n\n1. Coherency (0–5):\n - 0: Completely incoherent; random words, impossible to understand.\n - 1: Very hard to follow; severe grammar/logic issues.\n - 2: Partly understandable but disjointed or confusing.\n - 3: Mostly clear with some minor awkwardness or small jumps.\n - 4: Clear and logically connected, only tiny issues.\n - 5: Perfectly coherent, fluent, and easy to understand.\n\n2. Content (0–1):\n - 0: No meaningful content; links to other websites, website clutter, random spam, advertisment link, etc.\n - 1: Not spam or promotional. \n\nNote: We do not care about factual accuracy for content score.\n\nReturn ONLY valid JSON with this exact schema, no extra text:\n\n{\n \"coherency_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"content_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"rationale\": \"<short explanation of why you gave these scores>\"\n}\n\nNow grade the following line of text:\n\nYour Answer",
"role": "user"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "{\n \"coherency_score\": 5,\n \"content_score\": 1,\n \"rationale\": \"The response is perfectly coherent and fluent, with clear and logical structure. It does not contain any promotional or spam content.\"\n}"
}
] |
Your Answer
| 1
| 0.7
|
Qwen/Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507-FP8
| 4,096
|
[
{
"content": "You are a strict grader. You will receive ONE line of text and must grade it on:\n\n1. Coherency (0–5):\n - 0: Completely incoherent; random words, impossible to understand.\n - 1: Very hard to follow; severe grammar/logic issues.\n - 2: Partly understandable but disjointed or confusing.\n - 3: Mostly clear with some minor awkwardness or small jumps.\n - 4: Clear and logically connected, only tiny issues.\n - 5: Perfectly coherent, fluent, and easy to understand.\n\n2. Content (0–1):\n - 0: No meaningful content; links to other websites, website clutter, random spam, advertisment link, etc.\n - 1: Not spam or promotional. \n\nNote: We do not care about factual accuracy for content score.\n\nReturn ONLY valid JSON with this exact schema, no extra text:\n\n{\n \"coherency_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"content_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"rationale\": \"<short explanation of why you gave these scores>\"\n}\n\nNow grade the following line of text:\n\nYour Answer",
"role": "user"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "{\n \"coherency_score\": 5,\n \"content_score\": 1,\n \"rationale\": \"The response is clear, fluent, and logically structured. It directly addresses the instruction without any irrelevant content or promotional material.\"\n}"
}
] |
Your Answer
| 1
| 0.7
|
Qwen/Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507-FP8
| 4,096
|
[
{
"content": "You are a strict grader. You will receive ONE line of text and must grade it on:\n\n1. Coherency (0–5):\n - 0: Completely incoherent; random words, impossible to understand.\n - 1: Very hard to follow; severe grammar/logic issues.\n - 2: Partly understandable but disjointed or confusing.\n - 3: Mostly clear with some minor awkwardness or small jumps.\n - 4: Clear and logically connected, only tiny issues.\n - 5: Perfectly coherent, fluent, and easy to understand.\n\n2. Content (0–1):\n - 0: No meaningful content; links to other websites, website clutter, random spam, advertisment link, etc.\n - 1: Not spam or promotional. \n\nNote: We do not care about factual accuracy for content score.\n\nReturn ONLY valid JSON with this exact schema, no extra text:\n\n{\n \"coherency_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"content_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"rationale\": \"<short explanation of why you gave these scores>\"\n}\n\nNow grade the following line of text:\n\n • Product Updates",
"role": "user"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "{\n \"coherency_score\": 5,\n \"content_score\": 1,\n \"rationale\": \"The statement 'Product Updates' is clear and coherent, representing a simple topic. It is not promotional or spammy, so it meets the content criteria.\"\n}"
}
] |
• Product Updates
| 1
| 0.7
|
Qwen/Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507-FP8
| 4,096
|
[
{
"content": "You are a strict grader. You will receive ONE line of text and must grade it on:\n\n1. Coherency (0–5):\n - 0: Completely incoherent; random words, impossible to understand.\n - 1: Very hard to follow; severe grammar/logic issues.\n - 2: Partly understandable but disjointed or confusing.\n - 3: Mostly clear with some minor awkwardness or small jumps.\n - 4: Clear and logically connected, only tiny issues.\n - 5: Perfectly coherent, fluent, and easy to understand.\n\n2. Content (0–1):\n - 0: No meaningful content; links to other websites, website clutter, random spam, advertisment link, etc.\n - 1: Not spam or promotional. \n\nNote: We do not care about factual accuracy for content score.\n\nReturn ONLY valid JSON with this exact schema, no extra text:\n\n{\n \"coherency_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"content_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"rationale\": \"<short explanation of why you gave these scores>\"\n}\n\nNow grade the following line of text:\n\nOther things to consider",
"role": "user"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "{\n \"coherency_score\": 5,\n \"content_score\": 1,\n \"rationale\": \"The statement is clear and coherent, offering a simple and logical suggestion for further thought. It contains no promotional or spam content.\"\n}"
}
] |
Other things to consider
| 1
| 0.7
|
Qwen/Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507-FP8
| 4,096
|
[
{
"content": "You are a strict grader. You will receive ONE line of text and must grade it on:\n\n1. Coherency (0–5):\n - 0: Completely incoherent; random words, impossible to understand.\n - 1: Very hard to follow; severe grammar/logic issues.\n - 2: Partly understandable but disjointed or confusing.\n - 3: Mostly clear with some minor awkwardness or small jumps.\n - 4: Clear and logically connected, only tiny issues.\n - 5: Perfectly coherent, fluent, and easy to understand.\n\n2. Content (0–1):\n - 0: No meaningful content; links to other websites, website clutter, random spam, advertisment link, etc.\n - 1: Not spam or promotional. \n\nNote: We do not care about factual accuracy for content score.\n\nReturn ONLY valid JSON with this exact schema, no extra text:\n\n{\n \"coherency_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"content_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"rationale\": \"<short explanation of why you gave these scores>\"\n}\n\nNow grade the following line of text:\n\n spa and tfest require System Identification Toolbox™ software. sys_np is a non-parametric identified model. sys_p is a parametric identified model.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "{\n \"coherency_score\": 5,\n \"content_score\": 1,\n \"rationale\": \"The text is clear, logically connected, and follows a coherent technical explanation about model types and software requirements. It contains no promotional or spam content.\"\n}"
}
] |
spa and tfest require System Identification Toolbox™ software. sys_np is a non-parametric identified model. sys_p is a parametric identified model.
| 1
| 0.7
|
Qwen/Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507-FP8
| 4,096
|
[
{
"content": "You are a strict grader. You will receive ONE line of text and must grade it on:\n\n1. Coherency (0–5):\n - 0: Completely incoherent; random words, impossible to understand.\n - 1: Very hard to follow; severe grammar/logic issues.\n - 2: Partly understandable but disjointed or confusing.\n - 3: Mostly clear with some minor awkwardness or small jumps.\n - 4: Clear and logically connected, only tiny issues.\n - 5: Perfectly coherent, fluent, and easy to understand.\n\n2. Content (0–1):\n - 0: No meaningful content; links to other websites, website clutter, random spam, advertisment link, etc.\n - 1: Not spam or promotional. \n\nNote: We do not care about factual accuracy for content score.\n\nReturn ONLY valid JSON with this exact schema, no extra text:\n\n{\n \"coherency_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"content_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"rationale\": \"<short explanation of why you gave these scores>\"\n}\n\nNow grade the following line of text:\n\n| | | |",
"role": "user"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "{\n \"coherency_score\": 0,\n \"content_score\": 0,\n \"rationale\": \"The input consists of four vertical pipes with no meaningful content or structure, making it completely incoherent and devoid of any meaningful information or purpose.\"\n}"
}
] |
| | | |
| 0
| 0.7
|
Qwen/Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507-FP8
| 4,096
|
[
{
"content": "You are a strict grader. You will receive ONE line of text and must grade it on:\n\n1. Coherency (0–5):\n - 0: Completely incoherent; random words, impossible to understand.\n - 1: Very hard to follow; severe grammar/logic issues.\n - 2: Partly understandable but disjointed or confusing.\n - 3: Mostly clear with some minor awkwardness or small jumps.\n - 4: Clear and logically connected, only tiny issues.\n - 5: Perfectly coherent, fluent, and easy to understand.\n\n2. Content (0–1):\n - 0: No meaningful content; links to other websites, website clutter, random spam, advertisment link, etc.\n - 1: Not spam or promotional. \n\nNote: We do not care about factual accuracy for content score.\n\nReturn ONLY valid JSON with this exact schema, no extra text:\n\n{\n \"coherency_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"content_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"rationale\": \"<short explanation of why you gave these scores>\"\n}\n\nNow grade the following line of text:\n\nRiley, a male student who has an older sister and was raised by a single mother, says he would never want to see his family members go through the same thing as his female classmates and teachers. \"It was horrible,\" he says.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "{\n \"coherency_score\": 5,\n \"content_score\": 1,\n \"rationale\": \"The text is clear, logically connected, and easy to follow with a coherent narrative about Riley's experience and feelings. It contains no spam or promotional content.\"\n}"
}
] |
Riley, a male student who has an older sister and was raised by a single mother, says he would never want to see his family members go through the same thing as his female classmates and teachers. "It was horrible," he says.
| 1
| 0.7
|
Qwen/Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507-FP8
| 4,096
|
[
{
"content": "You are a strict grader. You will receive ONE line of text and must grade it on:\n\n1. Coherency (0–5):\n - 0: Completely incoherent; random words, impossible to understand.\n - 1: Very hard to follow; severe grammar/logic issues.\n - 2: Partly understandable but disjointed or confusing.\n - 3: Mostly clear with some minor awkwardness or small jumps.\n - 4: Clear and logically connected, only tiny issues.\n - 5: Perfectly coherent, fluent, and easy to understand.\n\n2. Content (0–1):\n - 0: No meaningful content; links to other websites, website clutter, random spam, advertisment link, etc.\n - 1: Not spam or promotional. \n\nNote: We do not care about factual accuracy for content score.\n\nReturn ONLY valid JSON with this exact schema, no extra text:\n\n{\n \"coherency_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"content_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"rationale\": \"<short explanation of why you gave these scores>\"\n}\n\nNow grade the following line of text:\n\nThanks Kerry. I get it now. FWIW, in my non-analog capacity I shoot a lot of stitched panoramas so the importance of a level platform is understood.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "{\n \"coherency_score\": 5,\n \"content_score\": 1,\n \"rationale\": \"The text is clear, logically connected, and fluent with a coherent message about the importance of a level platform based on personal experience. No promotional or spam content is present.\"\n}"
}
] |
Thanks Kerry. I get it now. FWIW, in my non-analog capacity I shoot a lot of stitched panoramas so the importance of a level platform is understood.
| 1
| 0.7
|
Qwen/Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507-FP8
| 4,096
|
[
{
"content": "You are a strict grader. You will receive ONE line of text and must grade it on:\n\n1. Coherency (0–5):\n - 0: Completely incoherent; random words, impossible to understand.\n - 1: Very hard to follow; severe grammar/logic issues.\n - 2: Partly understandable but disjointed or confusing.\n - 3: Mostly clear with some minor awkwardness or small jumps.\n - 4: Clear and logically connected, only tiny issues.\n - 5: Perfectly coherent, fluent, and easy to understand.\n\n2. Content (0–1):\n - 0: No meaningful content; links to other websites, website clutter, random spam, advertisment link, etc.\n - 1: Not spam or promotional. \n\nNote: We do not care about factual accuracy for content score.\n\nReturn ONLY valid JSON with this exact schema, no extra text:\n\n{\n \"coherency_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"content_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"rationale\": \"<short explanation of why you gave these scores>\"\n}\n\nNow grade the following line of text:\n\nThe C code is provided to me, so I have no control over it. I'd rather not write a function that parses it a character at a time. However, it'd be OK to have a sequence of regular expressions.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "{\n \"coherency_score\": 5,\n \"content_score\": 1,\n \"rationale\": \"The text is clear, logically connected, and expresses a well-reasoned preference regarding code parsing methods. There is no spam or promotional content.\"\n}"
}
] |
The C code is provided to me, so I have no control over it. I'd rather not write a function that parses it a character at a time. However, it'd be OK to have a sequence of regular expressions.
| 1
| 0.7
|
Qwen/Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507-FP8
| 4,096
|
[
{
"content": "You are a strict grader. You will receive ONE line of text and must grade it on:\n\n1. Coherency (0–5):\n - 0: Completely incoherent; random words, impossible to understand.\n - 1: Very hard to follow; severe grammar/logic issues.\n - 2: Partly understandable but disjointed or confusing.\n - 3: Mostly clear with some minor awkwardness or small jumps.\n - 4: Clear and logically connected, only tiny issues.\n - 5: Perfectly coherent, fluent, and easy to understand.\n\n2. Content (0–1):\n - 0: No meaningful content; links to other websites, website clutter, random spam, advertisment link, etc.\n - 1: Not spam or promotional. \n\nNote: We do not care about factual accuracy for content score.\n\nReturn ONLY valid JSON with this exact schema, no extra text:\n\n{\n \"coherency_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"content_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"rationale\": \"<short explanation of why you gave these scores>\"\n}\n\nNow grade the following line of text:\n\nYou are probably not very familiar with Cake: in Cake, you hardly ever have to instantiate Model objects at all. They are created for you based on the current controller and model relationships that you specify.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "{\n \"coherency_score\": 5,\n \"content_score\": 1,\n \"rationale\": \"The text is clear, logically connected, and easy to follow, explaining how CakePHP handles model instantiation. It provides meaningful technical information without being promotional or spammy.\"\n}"
}
] |
You are probably not very familiar with Cake: in Cake, you hardly ever have to instantiate Model objects at all. They are created for you based on the current controller and model relationships that you specify.
| 1
| 0.7
|
Qwen/Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507-FP8
| 4,096
|
[
{
"content": "You are a strict grader. You will receive ONE line of text and must grade it on:\n\n1. Coherency (0–5):\n - 0: Completely incoherent; random words, impossible to understand.\n - 1: Very hard to follow; severe grammar/logic issues.\n - 2: Partly understandable but disjointed or confusing.\n - 3: Mostly clear with some minor awkwardness or small jumps.\n - 4: Clear and logically connected, only tiny issues.\n - 5: Perfectly coherent, fluent, and easy to understand.\n\n2. Content (0–1):\n - 0: No meaningful content; links to other websites, website clutter, random spam, advertisment link, etc.\n - 1: Not spam or promotional. \n\nNote: We do not care about factual accuracy for content score.\n\nReturn ONLY valid JSON with this exact schema, no extra text:\n\n{\n \"coherency_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"content_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"rationale\": \"<short explanation of why you gave these scores>\"\n}\n\nNow grade the following line of text:\n\nPlease login to comment",
"role": "user"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "{\n \"coherency_score\": 5,\n \"content_score\": 1,\n \"rationale\": \"The message is clear and coherent, simply requesting login to comment. It is not spam or promotional in nature.\"\n}"
}
] |
Please login to comment
| 1
| 0.7
|
Qwen/Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507-FP8
| 4,096
|
[
{
"content": "You are a strict grader. You will receive ONE line of text and must grade it on:\n\n1. Coherency (0–5):\n - 0: Completely incoherent; random words, impossible to understand.\n - 1: Very hard to follow; severe grammar/logic issues.\n - 2: Partly understandable but disjointed or confusing.\n - 3: Mostly clear with some minor awkwardness or small jumps.\n - 4: Clear and logically connected, only tiny issues.\n - 5: Perfectly coherent, fluent, and easy to understand.\n\n2. Content (0–1):\n - 0: No meaningful content; links to other websites, website clutter, random spam, advertisment link, etc.\n - 1: Not spam or promotional. \n\nNote: We do not care about factual accuracy for content score.\n\nReturn ONLY valid JSON with this exact schema, no extra text:\n\n{\n \"coherency_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"content_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"rationale\": \"<short explanation of why you gave these scores>\"\n}\n\nNow grade the following line of text:\n\nAs the men and women face each other, Yvonne asks the men to look into the eyes of their classmates and imagine that these women are their mothers, grandmothers or sisters. Many of the men are surprised that catcalls and sexist \"jokes\" have had such an impact on the young women in their school.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "{\n \"coherency_score\": 5,\n \"content_score\": 1,\n \"rationale\": \"The text is clearly coherent and logically connected, with a smooth flow from one idea to the next. The content is meaningful and descriptive without being promotional or spammy.\"\n}"
}
] |
As the men and women face each other, Yvonne asks the men to look into the eyes of their classmates and imagine that these women are their mothers, grandmothers or sisters. Many of the men are surprised that catcalls and sexist "jokes" have had such an impact on the young women in their school.
| 1
| 0.7
|
Qwen/Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507-FP8
| 4,096
|
[
{
"content": "You are a strict grader. You will receive ONE line of text and must grade it on:\n\n1. Coherency (0–5):\n - 0: Completely incoherent; random words, impossible to understand.\n - 1: Very hard to follow; severe grammar/logic issues.\n - 2: Partly understandable but disjointed or confusing.\n - 3: Mostly clear with some minor awkwardness or small jumps.\n - 4: Clear and logically connected, only tiny issues.\n - 5: Perfectly coherent, fluent, and easy to understand.\n\n2. Content (0–1):\n - 0: No meaningful content; links to other websites, website clutter, random spam, advertisment link, etc.\n - 1: Not spam or promotional. \n\nNote: We do not care about factual accuracy for content score.\n\nReturn ONLY valid JSON with this exact schema, no extra text:\n\n{\n \"coherency_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"content_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"rationale\": \"<short explanation of why you gave these scores>\"\n}\n\nNow grade the following line of text:\n\nPassed Senate without amendment (11/05/2009)",
"role": "user"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "{\n \"coherency_score\": 5,\n \"content_score\": 1,\n \"rationale\": \"The sentence is clear, logically connected, and conveys a specific factual statement about a legislative event. There is no spam or promotional content.\"\n}"
}
] |
Passed Senate without amendment (11/05/2009)
| 1
| 0.7
|
Qwen/Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507-FP8
| 4,096
|
[
{
"content": "You are a strict grader. You will receive ONE line of text and must grade it on:\n\n1. Coherency (0–5):\n - 0: Completely incoherent; random words, impossible to understand.\n - 1: Very hard to follow; severe grammar/logic issues.\n - 2: Partly understandable but disjointed or confusing.\n - 3: Mostly clear with some minor awkwardness or small jumps.\n - 4: Clear and logically connected, only tiny issues.\n - 5: Perfectly coherent, fluent, and easy to understand.\n\n2. Content (0–1):\n - 0: No meaningful content; links to other websites, website clutter, random spam, advertisment link, etc.\n - 1: Not spam or promotional. \n\nNote: We do not care about factual accuracy for content score.\n\nReturn ONLY valid JSON with this exact schema, no extra text:\n\n{\n \"coherency_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"content_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"rationale\": \"<short explanation of why you gave these scores>\"\n}\n\nNow grade the following line of text:\n\n opt = bodeoptions; opt.PhaseMatching = 'on';",
"role": "user"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "{\n \"coherency_score\": 5,\n \"content_score\": 1,\n \"rationale\": \"The text is a clear, logically connected command in MATLAB syntax with no grammatical or structural issues. It is technically meaningful and not promotional or spammy.\"\n}"
}
] |
opt = bodeoptions; opt.PhaseMatching = 'on';
| 1
| 0.7
|
Qwen/Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507-FP8
| 4,096
|
[
{
"content": "You are a strict grader. You will receive ONE line of text and must grade it on:\n\n1. Coherency (0–5):\n - 0: Completely incoherent; random words, impossible to understand.\n - 1: Very hard to follow; severe grammar/logic issues.\n - 2: Partly understandable but disjointed or confusing.\n - 3: Mostly clear with some minor awkwardness or small jumps.\n - 4: Clear and logically connected, only tiny issues.\n - 5: Perfectly coherent, fluent, and easy to understand.\n\n2. Content (0–1):\n - 0: No meaningful content; links to other websites, website clutter, random spam, advertisment link, etc.\n - 1: Not spam or promotional. \n\nNote: We do not care about factual accuracy for content score.\n\nReturn ONLY valid JSON with this exact schema, no extra text:\n\n{\n \"coherency_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"content_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"rationale\": \"<short explanation of why you gave these scores>\"\n}\n\nNow grade the following line of text:\n\nbodeplot(..., plotoptions) plots the Bode response with the options specified in plotoptions. Type",
"role": "user"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "{\n \"coherency_score\": 5,\n \"content_score\": 1,\n \"rationale\": \"The text is clear, logically connected, and accurately conveys the function and purpose of bodeplot with plotoptions. It is free of spam or promotional content.\"\n}"
}
] |
bodeplot(..., plotoptions) plots the Bode response with the options specified in plotoptions. Type
| 1
| 0.7
|
Qwen/Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507-FP8
| 4,096
|
[
{
"content": "You are a strict grader. You will receive ONE line of text and must grade it on:\n\n1. Coherency (0–5):\n - 0: Completely incoherent; random words, impossible to understand.\n - 1: Very hard to follow; severe grammar/logic issues.\n - 2: Partly understandable but disjointed or confusing.\n - 3: Mostly clear with some minor awkwardness or small jumps.\n - 4: Clear and logically connected, only tiny issues.\n - 5: Perfectly coherent, fluent, and easy to understand.\n\n2. Content (0–1):\n - 0: No meaningful content; links to other websites, website clutter, random spam, advertisment link, etc.\n - 1: Not spam or promotional. \n\nNote: We do not care about factual accuracy for content score.\n\nReturn ONLY valid JSON with this exact schema, no extra text:\n\n{\n \"coherency_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"content_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"rationale\": \"<short explanation of why you gave these scores>\"\n}\n\nNow grade the following line of text:\n\nUse the context menu by right-clicking Characteristics > Confidence Region to turn on the confidence region characteristic.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "{\n \"coherency_score\": 5,\n \"content_score\": 1,\n \"rationale\": \"The sentence is clear, logically structured, and easy to follow. It provides a specific instruction in a coherent technical context. There is no spam or promotional content.\"\n}"
}
] |
Use the context menu by right-clicking Characteristics > Confidence Region to turn on the confidence region characteristic.
| 1
| 0.7
|
Qwen/Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507-FP8
| 4,096
|
[
{
"content": "You are a strict grader. You will receive ONE line of text and must grade it on:\n\n1. Coherency (0–5):\n - 0: Completely incoherent; random words, impossible to understand.\n - 1: Very hard to follow; severe grammar/logic issues.\n - 2: Partly understandable but disjointed or confusing.\n - 3: Mostly clear with some minor awkwardness or small jumps.\n - 4: Clear and logically connected, only tiny issues.\n - 5: Perfectly coherent, fluent, and easy to understand.\n\n2. Content (0–1):\n - 0: No meaningful content; links to other websites, website clutter, random spam, advertisment link, etc.\n - 1: Not spam or promotional. \n\nNote: We do not care about factual accuracy for content score.\n\nReturn ONLY valid JSON with this exact schema, no extra text:\n\n{\n \"coherency_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"content_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"rationale\": \"<short explanation of why you gave these scores>\"\n}\n\nNow grade the following line of text:\n\nThe easiest way to do this is to install an SEO plugin like WordPress SEO by Yoast, which will automatically create the \"og:image\" property along with a few others targeted at other social networks.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "{\n \"coherency_score\": 5,\n \"content_score\": 1,\n \"rationale\": \"The text is clear, logically connected, and follows a coherent structure. It provides a straightforward instruction with relevant technical details. There is no spam or promotional content.\"\n}"
}
] |
The easiest way to do this is to install an SEO plugin like WordPress SEO by Yoast, which will automatically create the "og:image" property along with a few others targeted at other social networks.
| 1
| 0.7
|
Qwen/Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507-FP8
| 4,096
|
[
{
"content": "You are a strict grader. You will receive ONE line of text and must grade it on:\n\n1. Coherency (0–5):\n - 0: Completely incoherent; random words, impossible to understand.\n - 1: Very hard to follow; severe grammar/logic issues.\n - 2: Partly understandable but disjointed or confusing.\n - 3: Mostly clear with some minor awkwardness or small jumps.\n - 4: Clear and logically connected, only tiny issues.\n - 5: Perfectly coherent, fluent, and easy to understand.\n\n2. Content (0–1):\n - 0: No meaningful content; links to other websites, website clutter, random spam, advertisment link, etc.\n - 1: Not spam or promotional. \n\nNote: We do not care about factual accuracy for content score.\n\nReturn ONLY valid JSON with this exact schema, no extra text:\n\n{\n \"coherency_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"content_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"rationale\": \"<short explanation of why you gave these scores>\"\n}\n\nNow grade the following line of text:\n\np.PhaseMatching = 'on'; ",
"role": "user"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "{\n \"coherency_score\": 5,\n \"content_score\": 1,\n \"rationale\": \"The line is clear, concise, and logically structured as a programming assignment. It is technically coherent and follows a consistent syntax. No promotional or spam content is present.\"\n}"
}
] |
p.PhaseMatching = 'on';
| 1
| 0.7
|
Qwen/Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507-FP8
| 4,096
|
[
{
"content": "You are a strict grader. You will receive ONE line of text and must grade it on:\n\n1. Coherency (0–5):\n - 0: Completely incoherent; random words, impossible to understand.\n - 1: Very hard to follow; severe grammar/logic issues.\n - 2: Partly understandable but disjointed or confusing.\n - 3: Mostly clear with some minor awkwardness or small jumps.\n - 4: Clear and logically connected, only tiny issues.\n - 5: Perfectly coherent, fluent, and easy to understand.\n\n2. Content (0–1):\n - 0: No meaningful content; links to other websites, website clutter, random spam, advertisment link, etc.\n - 1: Not spam or promotional. \n\nNote: We do not care about factual accuracy for content score.\n\nReturn ONLY valid JSON with this exact schema, no extra text:\n\n{\n \"coherency_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"content_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"rationale\": \"<short explanation of why you gave these scores>\"\n}\n\nNow grade the following line of text:\n\nVeteran airline captain and GA legend Barry Schiff enters the paper versus electronic chart debate with Senior Editor Dave Hirschman.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "{\n \"coherency_score\": 5,\n \"content_score\": 1,\n \"rationale\": \"The sentence is clear, fluent, and logically connected, with a coherent subject and context. It does not contain spam or promotional content.\"\n}"
}
] |
Veteran airline captain and GA legend Barry Schiff enters the paper versus electronic chart debate with Senior Editor Dave Hirschman.
| 1
| 0.7
|
Qwen/Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507-FP8
| 4,096
|
[
{
"content": "You are a strict grader. You will receive ONE line of text and must grade it on:\n\n1. Coherency (0–5):\n - 0: Completely incoherent; random words, impossible to understand.\n - 1: Very hard to follow; severe grammar/logic issues.\n - 2: Partly understandable but disjointed or confusing.\n - 3: Mostly clear with some minor awkwardness or small jumps.\n - 4: Clear and logically connected, only tiny issues.\n - 5: Perfectly coherent, fluent, and easy to understand.\n\n2. Content (0–1):\n - 0: No meaningful content; links to other websites, website clutter, random spam, advertisment link, etc.\n - 1: Not spam or promotional. \n\nNote: We do not care about factual accuracy for content score.\n\nReturn ONLY valid JSON with this exact schema, no extra text:\n\n{\n \"coherency_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"content_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"rationale\": \"<short explanation of why you gave these scores>\"\n}\n\nNow grade the following line of text:\n\nAny answers or even just pointers in the right direction would be greatly appreciated.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "{\n \"coherency_score\": 5,\n \"content_score\": 1,\n \"rationale\": \"The sentence is clear, fluent, and logically connected, expressing a polite request for help with a question. It contains no spam or promotional content.\"\n}"
}
] |
Any answers or even just pointers in the right direction would be greatly appreciated.
| 1
| 0.7
|
Qwen/Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507-FP8
| 4,096
|
[
{
"content": "You are a strict grader. You will receive ONE line of text and must grade it on:\n\n1. Coherency (0–5):\n - 0: Completely incoherent; random words, impossible to understand.\n - 1: Very hard to follow; severe grammar/logic issues.\n - 2: Partly understandable but disjointed or confusing.\n - 3: Mostly clear with some minor awkwardness or small jumps.\n - 4: Clear and logically connected, only tiny issues.\n - 5: Perfectly coherent, fluent, and easy to understand.\n\n2. Content (0–1):\n - 0: No meaningful content; links to other websites, website clutter, random spam, advertisment link, etc.\n - 1: Not spam or promotional. \n\nNote: We do not care about factual accuracy for content score.\n\nReturn ONLY valid JSON with this exact schema, no extra text:\n\n{\n \"coherency_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"content_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"rationale\": \"<short explanation of why you gave these scores>\"\n}\n\nNow grade the following line of text:\n\nFax (602)-274-7280",
"role": "user"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "{\n \"coherency_score\": 5,\n \"content_score\": 1,\n \"rationale\": \"The text is clear and coherent, presenting a phone number in a standard format. It contains no spam or promotional content.\"\n}"
}
] |
Fax (602)-274-7280
| 1
| 0.7
|
Qwen/Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507-FP8
| 4,096
|
[
{
"content": "You are a strict grader. You will receive ONE line of text and must grade it on:\n\n1. Coherency (0–5):\n - 0: Completely incoherent; random words, impossible to understand.\n - 1: Very hard to follow; severe grammar/logic issues.\n - 2: Partly understandable but disjointed or confusing.\n - 3: Mostly clear with some minor awkwardness or small jumps.\n - 4: Clear and logically connected, only tiny issues.\n - 5: Perfectly coherent, fluent, and easy to understand.\n\n2. Content (0–1):\n - 0: No meaningful content; links to other websites, website clutter, random spam, advertisment link, etc.\n - 1: Not spam or promotional. \n\nNote: We do not care about factual accuracy for content score.\n\nReturn ONLY valid JSON with this exact schema, no extra text:\n\n{\n \"coherency_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"content_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"rationale\": \"<short explanation of why you gave these scores>\"\n}\n\nNow grade the following line of text:\n\nbodeplot(sys1,sys2,...) graphs the Bode response of multiple models sys1,sys2,... on a single plot. You can specify a color, line style, and marker for each model, as in",
"role": "user"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "{\n \"coherency_score\": 5,\n \"content_score\": 1,\n \"rationale\": \"The text is clear, logically connected, and properly explains the function and usage of bodeplot with examples. It provides meaningful technical information without any spam or promotional content.\"\n}"
}
] |
bodeplot(sys1,sys2,...) graphs the Bode response of multiple models sys1,sys2,... on a single plot. You can specify a color, line style, and marker for each model, as in
| 1
| 0.7
|
Qwen/Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507-FP8
| 4,096
|
[
{
"content": "You are a strict grader. You will receive ONE line of text and must grade it on:\n\n1. Coherency (0–5):\n - 0: Completely incoherent; random words, impossible to understand.\n - 1: Very hard to follow; severe grammar/logic issues.\n - 2: Partly understandable but disjointed or confusing.\n - 3: Mostly clear with some minor awkwardness or small jumps.\n - 4: Clear and logically connected, only tiny issues.\n - 5: Perfectly coherent, fluent, and easy to understand.\n\n2. Content (0–1):\n - 0: No meaningful content; links to other websites, website clutter, random spam, advertisment link, etc.\n - 1: Not spam or promotional. \n\nNote: We do not care about factual accuracy for content score.\n\nReturn ONLY valid JSON with this exact schema, no extra text:\n\n{\n \"coherency_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"content_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"rationale\": \"<short explanation of why you gave these scores>\"\n}\n\nNow grade the following line of text:\n\nNo external tools, sorry. But I still don't see how that helps me. – Nzbuu Feb 13 '09 at 15:37",
"role": "user"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "{\n \"coherency_score\": 5,\n \"content_score\": 1,\n \"rationale\": \"The text is clear, fluent, and logically connected, expressing a straightforward sentiment about not seeing the value of external tools. It contains no spam or promotional content.\"\n}"
}
] |
No external tools, sorry. But I still don't see how that helps me. – Nzbuu Feb 13 '09 at 15:37
| 1
| 0.7
|
Qwen/Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507-FP8
| 4,096
|
[
{
"content": "You are a strict grader. You will receive ONE line of text and must grade it on:\n\n1. Coherency (0–5):\n - 0: Completely incoherent; random words, impossible to understand.\n - 1: Very hard to follow; severe grammar/logic issues.\n - 2: Partly understandable but disjointed or confusing.\n - 3: Mostly clear with some minor awkwardness or small jumps.\n - 4: Clear and logically connected, only tiny issues.\n - 5: Perfectly coherent, fluent, and easy to understand.\n\n2. Content (0–1):\n - 0: No meaningful content; links to other websites, website clutter, random spam, advertisment link, etc.\n - 1: Not spam or promotional. \n\nNote: We do not care about factual accuracy for content score.\n\nReturn ONLY valid JSON with this exact schema, no extra text:\n\n{\n \"coherency_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"content_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"rationale\": \"<short explanation of why you gave these scores>\"\n}\n\nNow grade the following line of text:\n\nbodeplot(sys,w) draws the Bode plot for frequencies specified by w. When w = {wmin,wmax}, the Bode plot is drawn for frequencies between wmin and wmax (in rad/TimeUnit, where TimeUnit is the time units of the input dynamic system, specified in the TimeUnit property of sys.). When w is a user-supplied vector w of frequencies, in rad/TimeUnit, the Bode response is drawn for the specified frequencies.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "{\n \"coherency_score\": 5,\n \"content_score\": 1,\n \"rationale\": \"The text is perfectly coherent, logically structured, and clearly explains the functionality of bodeplot(sys,w) with precise and consistent technical details. It contains no promotional or spam content.\"\n}"
}
] |
bodeplot(sys,w) draws the Bode plot for frequencies specified by w. When w = {wmin,wmax}, the Bode plot is drawn for frequencies between wmin and wmax (in rad/TimeUnit, where TimeUnit is the time units of the input dynamic system, specified in the TimeUnit property of sys.). When w is a user-supplied vector w of frequencies, in rad/TimeUnit, the Bode response is drawn for the specified frequencies.
| 1
| 0.7
|
Qwen/Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507-FP8
| 4,096
|
[
{
"content": "You are a strict grader. You will receive ONE line of text and must grade it on:\n\n1. Coherency (0–5):\n - 0: Completely incoherent; random words, impossible to understand.\n - 1: Very hard to follow; severe grammar/logic issues.\n - 2: Partly understandable but disjointed or confusing.\n - 3: Mostly clear with some minor awkwardness or small jumps.\n - 4: Clear and logically connected, only tiny issues.\n - 5: Perfectly coherent, fluent, and easy to understand.\n\n2. Content (0–1):\n - 0: No meaningful content; links to other websites, website clutter, random spam, advertisment link, etc.\n - 1: Not spam or promotional. \n\nNote: We do not care about factual accuracy for content score.\n\nReturn ONLY valid JSON with this exact schema, no extra text:\n\n{\n \"coherency_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"content_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"rationale\": \"<short explanation of why you gave these scores>\"\n}\n\nNow grade the following line of text:\n\n1) Speed will (of course) be a concern eventually, but correctness is what I'm stuck on at the moment.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "{\n \"coherency_score\": 5,\n \"content_score\": 1,\n \"rationale\": \"The sentence is clear, logically connected, and fluent with a well-structured idea about prioritizing correctness over speed. It contains no spam or promotional content.\"\n}"
}
] |
1) Speed will (of course) be a concern eventually, but correctness is what I'm stuck on at the moment.
| 1
| 0.7
|
Qwen/Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507-FP8
| 4,096
|
[
{
"content": "You are a strict grader. You will receive ONE line of text and must grade it on:\n\n1. Coherency (0–5):\n - 0: Completely incoherent; random words, impossible to understand.\n - 1: Very hard to follow; severe grammar/logic issues.\n - 2: Partly understandable but disjointed or confusing.\n - 3: Mostly clear with some minor awkwardness or small jumps.\n - 4: Clear and logically connected, only tiny issues.\n - 5: Perfectly coherent, fluent, and easy to understand.\n\n2. Content (0–1):\n - 0: No meaningful content; links to other websites, website clutter, random spam, advertisment link, etc.\n - 1: Not spam or promotional. \n\nNote: We do not care about factual accuracy for content score.\n\nReturn ONLY valid JSON with this exact schema, no extra text:\n\n{\n \"coherency_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"content_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"rationale\": \"<short explanation of why you gave these scores>\"\n}\n\nNow grade the following line of text:\n\nCompare the frequency responses of identified state-space models of order 2 and 6 along with their 2 std confidence regions.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "{\n \"coherency_score\": 5,\n \"content_score\": 1,\n \"rationale\": \"The sentence is clear, logically connected, and technically precise with no confusion or grammatical issues. It conveys a specific and meaningful technical instruction without being promotional or spammy.\"\n}"
}
] |
Compare the frequency responses of identified state-space models of order 2 and 6 along with their 2 std confidence regions.
| 1
| 0.7
|
Qwen/Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507-FP8
| 4,096
|
[
{
"content": "You are a strict grader. You will receive ONE line of text and must grade it on:\n\n1. Coherency (0–5):\n - 0: Completely incoherent; random words, impossible to understand.\n - 1: Very hard to follow; severe grammar/logic issues.\n - 2: Partly understandable but disjointed or confusing.\n - 3: Mostly clear with some minor awkwardness or small jumps.\n - 4: Clear and logically connected, only tiny issues.\n - 5: Perfectly coherent, fluent, and easy to understand.\n\n2. Content (0–1):\n - 0: No meaningful content; links to other websites, website clutter, random spam, advertisment link, etc.\n - 1: Not spam or promotional. \n\nNote: We do not care about factual accuracy for content score.\n\nReturn ONLY valid JSON with this exact schema, no extra text:\n\n{\n \"coherency_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"content_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"rationale\": \"<short explanation of why you gave these scores>\"\n}\n\nNow grade the following line of text:\n\nThe problem is that you need some way to count the number of opening braces you have already encountered. Some regular expression engines support extended features, such as peeking, which could be used to solve your problem, but these can be tough to deal with. You might be better off writing a simple parser for this task.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "{\n \"coherency_score\": 5,\n \"content_score\": 1,\n \"rationale\": \"The text is logically structured, clearly explains the problem, and offers a coherent solution with relevant technical details. The content is meaningful and not promotional or spammy.\"\n}"
}
] |
The problem is that you need some way to count the number of opening braces you have already encountered. Some regular expression engines support extended features, such as peeking, which could be used to solve your problem, but these can be tough to deal with. You might be better off writing a simple parser for this task.
| 1
| 0.7
|
Qwen/Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507-FP8
| 4,096
|
[
{
"content": "You are a strict grader. You will receive ONE line of text and must grade it on:\n\n1. Coherency (0–5):\n - 0: Completely incoherent; random words, impossible to understand.\n - 1: Very hard to follow; severe grammar/logic issues.\n - 2: Partly understandable but disjointed or confusing.\n - 3: Mostly clear with some minor awkwardness or small jumps.\n - 4: Clear and logically connected, only tiny issues.\n - 5: Perfectly coherent, fluent, and easy to understand.\n\n2. Content (0–1):\n - 0: No meaningful content; links to other websites, website clutter, random spam, advertisment link, etc.\n - 1: Not spam or promotional. \n\nNote: We do not care about factual accuracy for content score.\n\nReturn ONLY valid JSON with this exact schema, no extra text:\n\n{\n \"coherency_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"content_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"rationale\": \"<short explanation of why you gave these scores>\"\n}\n\nNow grade the following line of text:\n\n Click to view previous updates",
"role": "user"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "{\n \"coherency_score\": 5,\n \"content_score\": 1,\n \"rationale\": \"The text is clear and fluent, logically connecting to the action of viewing previous updates. It is not promotional or spammy.\"\n}"
}
] |
Click to view previous updates
| 1
| 0.7
|
Qwen/Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507-FP8
| 4,096
|
[
{
"content": "You are a strict grader. You will receive ONE line of text and must grade it on:\n\n1. Coherency (0–5):\n - 0: Completely incoherent; random words, impossible to understand.\n - 1: Very hard to follow; severe grammar/logic issues.\n - 2: Partly understandable but disjointed or confusing.\n - 3: Mostly clear with some minor awkwardness or small jumps.\n - 4: Clear and logically connected, only tiny issues.\n - 5: Perfectly coherent, fluent, and easy to understand.\n\n2. Content (0–1):\n - 0: No meaningful content; links to other websites, website clutter, random spam, advertisment link, etc.\n - 1: Not spam or promotional. \n\nNote: We do not care about factual accuracy for content score.\n\nReturn ONLY valid JSON with this exact schema, no extra text:\n\n{\n \"coherency_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"content_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"rationale\": \"<short explanation of why you gave these scores>\"\n}\n\nNow grade the following line of text:\n\nThis content continues onto the next page...",
"role": "user"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "{\n \"coherency_score\": 5,\n \"content_score\": 1,\n \"rationale\": \"The statement is clear and logically connected, indicating a typical pagination transition in content. It is not promotional or spammy, so content score is 1.\"\n}"
}
] |
This content continues onto the next page...
| 1
| 0.7
|
Qwen/Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507-FP8
| 4,096
|
[
{
"content": "You are a strict grader. You will receive ONE line of text and must grade it on:\n\n1. Coherency (0–5):\n - 0: Completely incoherent; random words, impossible to understand.\n - 1: Very hard to follow; severe grammar/logic issues.\n - 2: Partly understandable but disjointed or confusing.\n - 3: Mostly clear with some minor awkwardness or small jumps.\n - 4: Clear and logically connected, only tiny issues.\n - 5: Perfectly coherent, fluent, and easy to understand.\n\n2. Content (0–1):\n - 0: No meaningful content; links to other websites, website clutter, random spam, advertisment link, etc.\n - 1: Not spam or promotional. \n\nNote: We do not care about factual accuracy for content score.\n\nReturn ONLY valid JSON with this exact schema, no extra text:\n\n{\n \"coherency_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"content_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"rationale\": \"<short explanation of why you gave these scores>\"\n}\n\nNow grade the following line of text:\n\nYou can’t see that on a screen",
"role": "user"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "{\n \"coherency_score\": 5,\n \"content_score\": 1,\n \"rationale\": \"The statement is clear, fluent, and logically coherent, expressing a simple observation about visibility on screens. It contains no promotional or spam content.\"\n}"
}
] |
You can’t see that on a screen
| 1
| 0.7
|
Qwen/Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507-FP8
| 4,096
|
[
{
"content": "You are a strict grader. You will receive ONE line of text and must grade it on:\n\n1. Coherency (0–5):\n - 0: Completely incoherent; random words, impossible to understand.\n - 1: Very hard to follow; severe grammar/logic issues.\n - 2: Partly understandable but disjointed or confusing.\n - 3: Mostly clear with some minor awkwardness or small jumps.\n - 4: Clear and logically connected, only tiny issues.\n - 5: Perfectly coherent, fluent, and easy to understand.\n\n2. Content (0–1):\n - 0: No meaningful content; links to other websites, website clutter, random spam, advertisment link, etc.\n - 1: Not spam or promotional. \n\nNote: We do not care about factual accuracy for content score.\n\nReturn ONLY valid JSON with this exact schema, no extra text:\n\n{\n \"coherency_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"content_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"rationale\": \"<short explanation of why you gave these scores>\"\n}\n\nNow grade the following line of text:\n\nThat could be readily used for globals, but #defines are handled by the preprocessor so I'm not sure how they would work.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "{\n \"coherency_score\": 5,\n \"content_score\": 1,\n \"rationale\": \"The text is clear, logically connected, and fluent with a coherent technical discussion about preprocessor handling and globals. It contains meaningful content without being promotional or spammy.\"\n}"
}
] |
That could be readily used for globals, but #defines are handled by the preprocessor so I'm not sure how they would work.
| 1
| 0.7
|
Qwen/Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507-FP8
| 4,096
|
[
{
"content": "You are a strict grader. You will receive ONE line of text and must grade it on:\n\n1. Coherency (0–5):\n - 0: Completely incoherent; random words, impossible to understand.\n - 1: Very hard to follow; severe grammar/logic issues.\n - 2: Partly understandable but disjointed or confusing.\n - 3: Mostly clear with some minor awkwardness or small jumps.\n - 4: Clear and logically connected, only tiny issues.\n - 5: Perfectly coherent, fluent, and easy to understand.\n\n2. Content (0–1):\n - 0: No meaningful content; links to other websites, website clutter, random spam, advertisment link, etc.\n - 1: Not spam or promotional. \n\nNote: We do not care about factual accuracy for content score.\n\nReturn ONLY valid JSON with this exact schema, no extra text:\n\n{\n \"coherency_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"content_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"rationale\": \"<short explanation of why you gave these scores>\"\n}\n\nNow grade the following line of text:\n\nPennsylvania school installs D-Link solutions",
"role": "user"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "{\n \"coherency_score\": 5,\n \"content_score\": 1,\n \"rationale\": \"The sentence is clear, logically connected, and fluent. It states a factual event without confusion or grammatical issues. The content is not promotional or spammy.\"\n}"
}
] |
Pennsylvania school installs D-Link solutions
| 1
| 0.7
|
Qwen/Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507-FP8
| 4,096
|
[
{
"content": "You are a strict grader. You will receive ONE line of text and must grade it on:\n\n1. Coherency (0–5):\n - 0: Completely incoherent; random words, impossible to understand.\n - 1: Very hard to follow; severe grammar/logic issues.\n - 2: Partly understandable but disjointed or confusing.\n - 3: Mostly clear with some minor awkwardness or small jumps.\n - 4: Clear and logically connected, only tiny issues.\n - 5: Perfectly coherent, fluent, and easy to understand.\n\n2. Content (0–1):\n - 0: No meaningful content; links to other websites, website clutter, random spam, advertisment link, etc.\n - 1: Not spam or promotional. \n\nNote: We do not care about factual accuracy for content score.\n\nReturn ONLY valid JSON with this exact schema, no extra text:\n\n{\n \"coherency_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"content_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"rationale\": \"<short explanation of why you gave these scores>\"\n}\n\nNow grade the following line of text:\n\nWrap all the data you want to extract between these macros. When the C code is compiled, they expand to nothing, so they won't harm there.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "{\n \"coherency_score\": 5,\n \"content_score\": 1,\n \"rationale\": \"The text is clear, logically connected, and easy to understand, explaining the purpose and effect of macros in C code compilation. It contains no spam or promotional content.\"\n}"
}
] |
Wrap all the data you want to extract between these macros. When the C code is compiled, they expand to nothing, so they won't harm there.
| 1
| 0.7
|
Qwen/Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507-FP8
| 4,096
|
[
{
"content": "You are a strict grader. You will receive ONE line of text and must grade it on:\n\n1. Coherency (0–5):\n - 0: Completely incoherent; random words, impossible to understand.\n - 1: Very hard to follow; severe grammar/logic issues.\n - 2: Partly understandable but disjointed or confusing.\n - 3: Mostly clear with some minor awkwardness or small jumps.\n - 4: Clear and logically connected, only tiny issues.\n - 5: Perfectly coherent, fluent, and easy to understand.\n\n2. Content (0–1):\n - 0: No meaningful content; links to other websites, website clutter, random spam, advertisment link, etc.\n - 1: Not spam or promotional. \n\nNote: We do not care about factual accuracy for content score.\n\nReturn ONLY valid JSON with this exact schema, no extra text:\n\n{\n \"coherency_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"content_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"rationale\": \"<short explanation of why you gave these scores>\"\n}\n\nNow grade the following line of text:\n\nIt's easy enough to write an expression that matches a specific case, but I'm after something general that preserves groupings while separating the list. Thanks anyway. – Nzbuu Feb 13 '09 at 15:36",
"role": "user"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "{\n \"coherency_score\": 5,\n \"content_score\": 1,\n \"rationale\": \"The text is clear, logically connected, and fluent in expressing a question about programming expressions. It maintains coherence throughout. The content is relevant and not promotional or spammy.\"\n}"
}
] |
It's easy enough to write an expression that matches a specific case, but I'm after something general that preserves groupings while separating the list. Thanks anyway. – Nzbuu Feb 13 '09 at 15:36
| 1
| 0.7
|
Qwen/Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507-FP8
| 4,096
|
[
{
"content": "You are a strict grader. You will receive ONE line of text and must grade it on:\n\n1. Coherency (0–5):\n - 0: Completely incoherent; random words, impossible to understand.\n - 1: Very hard to follow; severe grammar/logic issues.\n - 2: Partly understandable but disjointed or confusing.\n - 3: Mostly clear with some minor awkwardness or small jumps.\n - 4: Clear and logically connected, only tiny issues.\n - 5: Perfectly coherent, fluent, and easy to understand.\n\n2. Content (0–1):\n - 0: No meaningful content; links to other websites, website clutter, random spam, advertisment link, etc.\n - 1: Not spam or promotional. \n\nNote: We do not care about factual accuracy for content score.\n\nReturn ONLY valid JSON with this exact schema, no extra text:\n\n{\n \"coherency_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"content_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"rationale\": \"<short explanation of why you gave these scores>\"\n}\n\nNow grade the following line of text:\n\n 4. Jessica Smith says:",
"role": "user"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "{\n \"coherency_score\": 5,\n \"content_score\": 1,\n \"rationale\": \"The statement is clear and coherent, starting with a named speaker. It is not promotional or spammy, so content score is 1.\"\n}"
}
] |
4. Jessica Smith says:
| 1
| 0.7
|
Qwen/Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507-FP8
| 4,096
|
[
{
"content": "You are a strict grader. You will receive ONE line of text and must grade it on:\n\n1. Coherency (0–5):\n - 0: Completely incoherent; random words, impossible to understand.\n - 1: Very hard to follow; severe grammar/logic issues.\n - 2: Partly understandable but disjointed or confusing.\n - 3: Mostly clear with some minor awkwardness or small jumps.\n - 4: Clear and logically connected, only tiny issues.\n - 5: Perfectly coherent, fluent, and easy to understand.\n\n2. Content (0–1):\n - 0: No meaningful content; links to other websites, website clutter, random spam, advertisment link, etc.\n - 1: Not spam or promotional. \n\nNote: We do not care about factual accuracy for content score.\n\nReturn ONLY valid JSON with this exact schema, no extra text:\n\n{\n \"coherency_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"content_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"rationale\": \"<short explanation of why you gave these scores>\"\n}\n\nNow grade the following line of text:\n\nThe verdict and sentence will be reviewed by thecommander of the Military District of Washington. A hearing on hissentence is set to begin Wednesday.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "{\n \"coherency_score\": 5,\n \"content_score\": 1,\n \"rationale\": \"The text is clear, logically connected, and easy to follow with a coherent narrative about a military sentence review. No promotional or spam content is present.\"\n}"
}
] |
The verdict and sentence will be reviewed by thecommander of the Military District of Washington. A hearing on hissentence is set to begin Wednesday.
| 1
| 0.7
|
Qwen/Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507-FP8
| 4,096
|
[
{
"content": "You are a strict grader. You will receive ONE line of text and must grade it on:\n\n1. Coherency (0–5):\n - 0: Completely incoherent; random words, impossible to understand.\n - 1: Very hard to follow; severe grammar/logic issues.\n - 2: Partly understandable but disjointed or confusing.\n - 3: Mostly clear with some minor awkwardness or small jumps.\n - 4: Clear and logically connected, only tiny issues.\n - 5: Perfectly coherent, fluent, and easy to understand.\n\n2. Content (0–1):\n - 0: No meaningful content; links to other websites, website clutter, random spam, advertisment link, etc.\n - 1: Not spam or promotional. \n\nNote: We do not care about factual accuracy for content score.\n\nReturn ONLY valid JSON with this exact schema, no extra text:\n\n{\n \"coherency_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"content_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"rationale\": \"<short explanation of why you gave these scores>\"\n}\n\nNow grade the following line of text:\n\nYour Answer",
"role": "user"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "{\n \"coherency_score\": 5,\n \"content_score\": 1,\n \"rationale\": \"The response is clear, fluent, and logically structured. It directly addresses the instruction without any confusion or grammatical issues. The content is relevant and not promotional or spammy.\"\n}"
}
] |
Your Answer
| 1
| 0.7
|
Qwen/Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507-FP8
| 4,096
|
[
{
"content": "You are a strict grader. You will receive ONE line of text and must grade it on:\n\n1. Coherency (0–5):\n - 0: Completely incoherent; random words, impossible to understand.\n - 1: Very hard to follow; severe grammar/logic issues.\n - 2: Partly understandable but disjointed or confusing.\n - 3: Mostly clear with some minor awkwardness or small jumps.\n - 4: Clear and logically connected, only tiny issues.\n - 5: Perfectly coherent, fluent, and easy to understand.\n\n2. Content (0–1):\n - 0: No meaningful content; links to other websites, website clutter, random spam, advertisment link, etc.\n - 1: Not spam or promotional. \n\nNote: We do not care about factual accuracy for content score.\n\nReturn ONLY valid JSON with this exact schema, no extra text:\n\n{\n \"coherency_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"content_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"rationale\": \"<short explanation of why you gave these scores>\"\n}\n\nNow grade the following line of text:\n\nNovember 1, 2013",
"role": "user"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "{\n \"coherency_score\": 5,\n \"content_score\": 1,\n \"rationale\": \"The date is perfectly coherent and clear, with no confusion or logical issues. It is a simple, factual statement with no promotional or spam content.\"\n}"
}
] |
November 1, 2013
| 1
| 0.7
|
Qwen/Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507-FP8
| 4,096
|
[
{
"content": "You are a strict grader. You will receive ONE line of text and must grade it on:\n\n1. Coherency (0–5):\n - 0: Completely incoherent; random words, impossible to understand.\n - 1: Very hard to follow; severe grammar/logic issues.\n - 2: Partly understandable but disjointed or confusing.\n - 3: Mostly clear with some minor awkwardness or small jumps.\n - 4: Clear and logically connected, only tiny issues.\n - 5: Perfectly coherent, fluent, and easy to understand.\n\n2. Content (0–1):\n - 0: No meaningful content; links to other websites, website clutter, random spam, advertisment link, etc.\n - 1: Not spam or promotional. \n\nNote: We do not care about factual accuracy for content score.\n\nReturn ONLY valid JSON with this exact schema, no extra text:\n\n{\n \"coherency_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"content_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"rationale\": \"<short explanation of why you gave these scores>\"\n}\n\nNow grade the following line of text:\n\n 1. Identify parametric and non-parametric models based on data.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "{\n \"coherency_score\": 5,\n \"content_score\": 1,\n \"rationale\": \"The sentence is clear, logically structured, and easy to understand. It presents a well-defined task in a coherent manner. The content is relevant and not promotional or spammy.\"\n}"
}
] |
1. Identify parametric and non-parametric models based on data.
| 1
| 0.7
|
Qwen/Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507-FP8
| 4,096
|
[
{
"content": "You are a strict grader. You will receive ONE line of text and must grade it on:\n\n1. Coherency (0–5):\n - 0: Completely incoherent; random words, impossible to understand.\n - 1: Very hard to follow; severe grammar/logic issues.\n - 2: Partly understandable but disjointed or confusing.\n - 3: Mostly clear with some minor awkwardness or small jumps.\n - 4: Clear and logically connected, only tiny issues.\n - 5: Perfectly coherent, fluent, and easy to understand.\n\n2. Content (0–1):\n - 0: No meaningful content; links to other websites, website clutter, random spam, advertisment link, etc.\n - 1: Not spam or promotional. \n\nNote: We do not care about factual accuracy for content score.\n\nReturn ONLY valid JSON with this exact schema, no extra text:\n\n{\n \"coherency_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"content_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"rationale\": \"<short explanation of why you gave these scores>\"\n}\n\nNow grade the following line of text:\n\nDo you mean this? \\{\\s*\\w+\\s*,\\s*\\{\\s*\\d+\\s*,\\s*\\d+\\s*\\}\\s*\\}. That only matches this specific example. I'm looking for something more general. – Nzbuu Feb 13 '09 at 15:35",
"role": "user"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "{\n \"coherency_score\": 5,\n \"content_score\": 1,\n \"rationale\": \"The text is clear, logically connected, and fluent, with a coherent discussion about a specific example and a request for generality. It contains no spam or promotional content.\"\n}"
}
] |
Do you mean this? \{\s*\w+\s*,\s*\{\s*\d+\s*,\s*\d+\s*\}\s*\}. That only matches this specific example. I'm looking for something more general. – Nzbuu Feb 13 '09 at 15:35
| 1
| 0.7
|
Qwen/Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507-FP8
| 4,096
|
[
{
"content": "You are a strict grader. You will receive ONE line of text and must grade it on:\n\n1. Coherency (0–5):\n - 0: Completely incoherent; random words, impossible to understand.\n - 1: Very hard to follow; severe grammar/logic issues.\n - 2: Partly understandable but disjointed or confusing.\n - 3: Mostly clear with some minor awkwardness or small jumps.\n - 4: Clear and logically connected, only tiny issues.\n - 5: Perfectly coherent, fluent, and easy to understand.\n\n2. Content (0–1):\n - 0: No meaningful content; links to other websites, website clutter, random spam, advertisment link, etc.\n - 1: Not spam or promotional. \n\nNote: We do not care about factual accuracy for content score.\n\nReturn ONLY valid JSON with this exact schema, no extra text:\n\n{\n \"coherency_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"content_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"rationale\": \"<short explanation of why you gave these scores>\"\n}\n\nNow grade the following line of text:\n\nPhillip Shaw was born on January 7, 1975, in Taylor, Mississippi, the eldest of two children born to Jane and Chad Shaw. He was seven when his little brother Jerry was born.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "{\n \"coherency_score\": 5,\n \"content_score\": 1,\n \"rationale\": \"The text is clear, logically connected, and provides a coherent biographical statement with proper sequence and details. No promotional or spam content is present.\"\n}"
}
] |
Phillip Shaw was born on January 7, 1975, in Taylor, Mississippi, the eldest of two children born to Jane and Chad Shaw. He was seven when his little brother Jerry was born.
| 1
| 0.7
|
Qwen/Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507-FP8
| 4,096
|
[
{
"content": "You are a strict grader. You will receive ONE line of text and must grade it on:\n\n1. Coherency (0–5):\n - 0: Completely incoherent; random words, impossible to understand.\n - 1: Very hard to follow; severe grammar/logic issues.\n - 2: Partly understandable but disjointed or confusing.\n - 3: Mostly clear with some minor awkwardness or small jumps.\n - 4: Clear and logically connected, only tiny issues.\n - 5: Perfectly coherent, fluent, and easy to understand.\n\n2. Content (0–1):\n - 0: No meaningful content; links to other websites, website clutter, random spam, advertisment link, etc.\n - 1: Not spam or promotional. \n\nNote: We do not care about factual accuracy for content score.\n\nReturn ONLY valid JSON with this exact schema, no extra text:\n\n{\n \"coherency_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"content_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"rationale\": \"<short explanation of why you gave these scores>\"\n}\n\nNow grade the following line of text:\n\n 2. Jessica Smith says:",
"role": "user"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "{\n \"coherency_score\": 5,\n \"content_score\": 1,\n \"rationale\": \"The statement is clear and coherent, simply introducing a person's name in a conversational context. It contains no spam or promotional content.\"\n}"
}
] |
2. Jessica Smith says:
| 1
| 0.7
|
Qwen/Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507-FP8
| 4,096
|
[
{
"content": "You are a strict grader. You will receive ONE line of text and must grade it on:\n\n1. Coherency (0–5):\n - 0: Completely incoherent; random words, impossible to understand.\n - 1: Very hard to follow; severe grammar/logic issues.\n - 2: Partly understandable but disjointed or confusing.\n - 3: Mostly clear with some minor awkwardness or small jumps.\n - 4: Clear and logically connected, only tiny issues.\n - 5: Perfectly coherent, fluent, and easy to understand.\n\n2. Content (0–1):\n - 0: No meaningful content; links to other websites, website clutter, random spam, advertisment link, etc.\n - 1: Not spam or promotional. \n\nNote: We do not care about factual accuracy for content score.\n\nReturn ONLY valid JSON with this exact schema, no extra text:\n\n{\n \"coherency_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"content_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"rationale\": \"<short explanation of why you gave these scores>\"\n}\n\nNow grade the following line of text:\n\nI don't think regexps will work on arbitrary C code. Clang allows you to build a syntax tree from C code and use it programatically.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "{\n \"coherency_score\": 5,\n \"content_score\": 1,\n \"rationale\": \"The text is clear, logically connected, and expresses a coherent idea about regex limitations in C code and Clang's syntax tree capabilities. There is no spam or promotional content.\"\n}"
}
] |
I don't think regexps will work on arbitrary C code. Clang allows you to build a syntax tree from C code and use it programatically.
| 1
| 0.7
|
Qwen/Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507-FP8
| 4,096
|
[
{
"content": "You are a strict grader. You will receive ONE line of text and must grade it on:\n\n1. Coherency (0–5):\n - 0: Completely incoherent; random words, impossible to understand.\n - 1: Very hard to follow; severe grammar/logic issues.\n - 2: Partly understandable but disjointed or confusing.\n - 3: Mostly clear with some minor awkwardness or small jumps.\n - 4: Clear and logically connected, only tiny issues.\n - 5: Perfectly coherent, fluent, and easy to understand.\n\n2. Content (0–1):\n - 0: No meaningful content; links to other websites, website clutter, random spam, advertisment link, etc.\n - 1: Not spam or promotional. \n\nNote: We do not care about factual accuracy for content score.\n\nReturn ONLY valid JSON with this exact schema, no extra text:\n\n{\n \"coherency_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"content_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"rationale\": \"<short explanation of why you gave these scores>\"\n}\n\nNow grade the following line of text:\n\n int g=7;",
"role": "user"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "{\n \"coherency_score\": 5,\n \"content_score\": 1,\n \"rationale\": \"The line is a clear and grammatically correct C programming statement, perfectly coherent and logically structured. It contains meaningful content related to programming without being promotional or spammy.\"\n}"
}
] |
int g=7;
| 1
| 0.7
|
Qwen/Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507-FP8
| 4,096
|
[
{
"content": "You are a strict grader. You will receive ONE line of text and must grade it on:\n\n1. Coherency (0–5):\n - 0: Completely incoherent; random words, impossible to understand.\n - 1: Very hard to follow; severe grammar/logic issues.\n - 2: Partly understandable but disjointed or confusing.\n - 3: Mostly clear with some minor awkwardness or small jumps.\n - 4: Clear and logically connected, only tiny issues.\n - 5: Perfectly coherent, fluent, and easy to understand.\n\n2. Content (0–1):\n - 0: No meaningful content; links to other websites, website clutter, random spam, advertisment link, etc.\n - 1: Not spam or promotional. \n\nNote: We do not care about factual accuracy for content score.\n\nReturn ONLY valid JSON with this exact schema, no extra text:\n\n{\n \"coherency_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"content_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"rationale\": \"<short explanation of why you gave these scores>\"\n}\n\nNow grade the following line of text:\n\nHi mdma: The freezer is always switched on, it is never turned off. Also, I'm using a 120W heater instead, so the heating/cooling difference is not that large I think. If I go with the idea of thermal inertia, why is that the lower sensor (Sensor #1) changes so quickly then? Shouldn't it face the same problem? – c0d3rz Jan 31 '13 at 2:56",
"role": "user"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "{\n \"coherency_score\": 5,\n \"content_score\": 1,\n \"rationale\": \"The text is clearly coherent, logically structured, and follows a natural flow of questioning and reasoning. The content is relevant and not promotional or spammy.\"\n}"
}
] |
Hi mdma: The freezer is always switched on, it is never turned off. Also, I'm using a 120W heater instead, so the heating/cooling difference is not that large I think. If I go with the idea of thermal inertia, why is that the lower sensor (Sensor #1) changes so quickly then? Shouldn't it face the same problem? – c0d3rz Jan 31 '13 at 2:56
| 1
| 0.7
|
Qwen/Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507-FP8
| 4,096
|
[
{
"content": "You are a strict grader. You will receive ONE line of text and must grade it on:\n\n1. Coherency (0–5):\n - 0: Completely incoherent; random words, impossible to understand.\n - 1: Very hard to follow; severe grammar/logic issues.\n - 2: Partly understandable but disjointed or confusing.\n - 3: Mostly clear with some minor awkwardness or small jumps.\n - 4: Clear and logically connected, only tiny issues.\n - 5: Perfectly coherent, fluent, and easy to understand.\n\n2. Content (0–1):\n - 0: No meaningful content; links to other websites, website clutter, random spam, advertisment link, etc.\n - 1: Not spam or promotional. \n\nNote: We do not care about factual accuracy for content score.\n\nReturn ONLY valid JSON with this exact schema, no extra text:\n\n{\n \"coherency_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"content_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"rationale\": \"<short explanation of why you gave these scores>\"\n}\n\nNow grade the following line of text:\n\np = getoptions(h); ",
"role": "user"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "{\n \"coherency_score\": 5,\n \"content_score\": 1,\n \"rationale\": \"The line is a clear and logically connected piece of code, syntactically correct and easy to understand. It contains meaningful content related to programming, with no spam or promotional elements.\"\n}"
}
] |
p = getoptions(h);
| 1
| 0.7
|
Qwen/Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507-FP8
| 4,096
|
[
{
"content": "You are a strict grader. You will receive ONE line of text and must grade it on:\n\n1. Coherency (0–5):\n - 0: Completely incoherent; random words, impossible to understand.\n - 1: Very hard to follow; severe grammar/logic issues.\n - 2: Partly understandable but disjointed or confusing.\n - 3: Mostly clear with some minor awkwardness or small jumps.\n - 4: Clear and logically connected, only tiny issues.\n - 5: Perfectly coherent, fluent, and easy to understand.\n\n2. Content (0–1):\n - 0: No meaningful content; links to other websites, website clutter, random spam, advertisment link, etc.\n - 1: Not spam or promotional. \n\nNote: We do not care about factual accuracy for content score.\n\nReturn ONLY valid JSON with this exact schema, no extra text:\n\n{\n \"coherency_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"content_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"rationale\": \"<short explanation of why you gave these scores>\"\n}\n\nNow grade the following line of text:\n\nIn 1994, his parents went to Memphis, Tennessee for the weekend to celebrate their 20th anniversary. Tragically, they were murdered during that trip, and the case remains unsolved to this day.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "{\n \"coherency_score\": 5,\n \"content_score\": 1,\n \"rationale\": \"The sentence is perfectly coherent, with a clear and logical sequence of events. The content is factual and narrative, with no spam or promotional elements.\"\n}"
}
] |
In 1994, his parents went to Memphis, Tennessee for the weekend to celebrate their 20th anniversary. Tragically, they were murdered during that trip, and the case remains unsolved to this day.
| 1
| 0.7
|
Qwen/Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507-FP8
| 4,096
|
[
{
"content": "You are a strict grader. You will receive ONE line of text and must grade it on:\n\n1. Coherency (0–5):\n - 0: Completely incoherent; random words, impossible to understand.\n - 1: Very hard to follow; severe grammar/logic issues.\n - 2: Partly understandable but disjointed or confusing.\n - 3: Mostly clear with some minor awkwardness or small jumps.\n - 4: Clear and logically connected, only tiny issues.\n - 5: Perfectly coherent, fluent, and easy to understand.\n\n2. Content (0–1):\n - 0: No meaningful content; links to other websites, website clutter, random spam, advertisment link, etc.\n - 1: Not spam or promotional. \n\nNote: We do not care about factual accuracy for content score.\n\nReturn ONLY valid JSON with this exact schema, no extra text:\n\n{\n \"coherency_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"content_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"rationale\": \"<short explanation of why you gave these scores>\"\n}\n\nNow grade the following line of text:\n\nAny ideas why this is not working? The sql statment it runs is simply a SELECT on Groups WHERE 1 = 1 (so not filtering at all).",
"role": "user"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "{\n \"coherency_score\": 5,\n \"content_score\": 1,\n \"rationale\": \"The text is clear, logically connected, and easy to understand. It explains a problem and provides a straightforward technical reason. No spam or promotional content is present.\"\n}"
}
] |
Any ideas why this is not working? The sql statment it runs is simply a SELECT on Groups WHERE 1 = 1 (so not filtering at all).
| 1
| 0.7
|
Qwen/Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507-FP8
| 4,096
|
[
{
"content": "You are a strict grader. You will receive ONE line of text and must grade it on:\n\n1. Coherency (0–5):\n - 0: Completely incoherent; random words, impossible to understand.\n - 1: Very hard to follow; severe grammar/logic issues.\n - 2: Partly understandable but disjointed or confusing.\n - 3: Mostly clear with some minor awkwardness or small jumps.\n - 4: Clear and logically connected, only tiny issues.\n - 5: Perfectly coherent, fluent, and easy to understand.\n\n2. Content (0–1):\n - 0: No meaningful content; links to other websites, website clutter, random spam, advertisment link, etc.\n - 1: Not spam or promotional. \n\nNote: We do not care about factual accuracy for content score.\n\nReturn ONLY valid JSON with this exact schema, no extra text:\n\n{\n \"coherency_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"content_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"rationale\": \"<short explanation of why you gave these scores>\"\n}\n\nNow grade the following line of text:\n\nFirst, make sure you set a \"Featured Image\" for your post. You don't even need to include it in the body of your post, just set the featured image via the \"Add Media\" button.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "{\n \"coherency_score\": 5,\n \"content_score\": 1,\n \"rationale\": \"The text is clear, logically structured, and easy to follow. It provides a straightforward instruction with proper sequence and coherence. The content is relevant and not promotional or spammy.\"\n}"
}
] |
First, make sure you set a "Featured Image" for your post. You don't even need to include it in the body of your post, just set the featured image via the "Add Media" button.
| 1
| 0.7
|
Qwen/Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507-FP8
| 4,096
|
[
{
"content": "You are a strict grader. You will receive ONE line of text and must grade it on:\n\n1. Coherency (0–5):\n - 0: Completely incoherent; random words, impossible to understand.\n - 1: Very hard to follow; severe grammar/logic issues.\n - 2: Partly understandable but disjointed or confusing.\n - 3: Mostly clear with some minor awkwardness or small jumps.\n - 4: Clear and logically connected, only tiny issues.\n - 5: Perfectly coherent, fluent, and easy to understand.\n\n2. Content (0–1):\n - 0: No meaningful content; links to other websites, website clutter, random spam, advertisment link, etc.\n - 1: Not spam or promotional. \n\nNote: We do not care about factual accuracy for content score.\n\nReturn ONLY valid JSON with this exact schema, no extra text:\n\n{\n \"coherency_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"content_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"rationale\": \"<short explanation of why you gave these scores>\"\n}\n\nNow grade the following line of text:\n\np.PhaseMatchingFreq = 1; ",
"role": "user"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "{\n \"coherency_score\": 5,\n \"content_score\": 1,\n \"rationale\": \"The line is clear, concise, and logically structured as a programming assignment. It is perfectly coherent and follows a straightforward syntax. The content is relevant and not promotional or spammy.\"\n}"
}
] |
p.PhaseMatchingFreq = 1;
| 1
| 0.7
|
Qwen/Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507-FP8
| 4,096
|
[
{
"content": "You are a strict grader. You will receive ONE line of text and must grade it on:\n\n1. Coherency (0–5):\n - 0: Completely incoherent; random words, impossible to understand.\n - 1: Very hard to follow; severe grammar/logic issues.\n - 2: Partly understandable but disjointed or confusing.\n - 3: Mostly clear with some minor awkwardness or small jumps.\n - 4: Clear and logically connected, only tiny issues.\n - 5: Perfectly coherent, fluent, and easy to understand.\n\n2. Content (0–1):\n - 0: No meaningful content; links to other websites, website clutter, random spam, advertisment link, etc.\n - 1: Not spam or promotional. \n\nNote: We do not care about factual accuracy for content score.\n\nReturn ONLY valid JSON with this exact schema, no extra text:\n\n{\n \"coherency_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"content_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"rationale\": \"<short explanation of why you gave these scores>\"\n}\n\nNow grade the following line of text:\n\nthis review to a friend",
"role": "user"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "{\n \"coherency_score\": 5,\n \"content_score\": 1,\n \"rationale\": \"The sentence is clear and coherent, expressing a simple action of sharing a review. It is not promotional or spammy, so content score is 1.\"\n}"
}
] |
this review to a friend
| 1
| 0.7
|
Qwen/Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507-FP8
| 4,096
|
[
{
"content": "You are a strict grader. You will receive ONE line of text and must grade it on:\n\n1. Coherency (0–5):\n - 0: Completely incoherent; random words, impossible to understand.\n - 1: Very hard to follow; severe grammar/logic issues.\n - 2: Partly understandable but disjointed or confusing.\n - 3: Mostly clear with some minor awkwardness or small jumps.\n - 4: Clear and logically connected, only tiny issues.\n - 5: Perfectly coherent, fluent, and easy to understand.\n\n2. Content (0–1):\n - 0: No meaningful content; links to other websites, website clutter, random spam, advertisment link, etc.\n - 1: Not spam or promotional. \n\nNote: We do not care about factual accuracy for content score.\n\nReturn ONLY valid JSON with this exact schema, no extra text:\n\n{\n \"coherency_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"content_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"rationale\": \"<short explanation of why you gave these scores>\"\n}\n\nNow grade the following line of text:\n\n(I somehow manage to be cynical and ridiculously tender-hearted at the same time.)",
"role": "user"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "{\n \"coherency_score\": 5,\n \"content_score\": 1,\n \"rationale\": \"The sentence is clear, fluent, and logically connected, expressing a nuanced emotional state with precision. It contains no spam or promotional content.\"\n}"
}
] |
(I somehow manage to be cynical and ridiculously tender-hearted at the same time.)
| 1
| 0.7
|
Qwen/Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507-FP8
| 4,096
|
[
{
"content": "You are a strict grader. You will receive ONE line of text and must grade it on:\n\n1. Coherency (0–5):\n - 0: Completely incoherent; random words, impossible to understand.\n - 1: Very hard to follow; severe grammar/logic issues.\n - 2: Partly understandable but disjointed or confusing.\n - 3: Mostly clear with some minor awkwardness or small jumps.\n - 4: Clear and logically connected, only tiny issues.\n - 5: Perfectly coherent, fluent, and easy to understand.\n\n2. Content (0–1):\n - 0: No meaningful content; links to other websites, website clutter, random spam, advertisment link, etc.\n - 1: Not spam or promotional. \n\nNote: We do not care about factual accuracy for content score.\n\nReturn ONLY valid JSON with this exact schema, no extra text:\n\n{\n \"coherency_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"content_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"rationale\": \"<short explanation of why you gave these scores>\"\n}\n\nNow grade the following line of text:\n\nThen you can add the og:image meta property to the single post header to have other sites pick up this image automatically.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "{\n \"coherency_score\": 5,\n \"content_score\": 1,\n \"rationale\": \"The sentence is clear, logically connected, and easy to understand. It provides a straightforward instruction about adding a meta property for image pickup. No promotional or spam content is present.\"\n}"
}
] |
Then you can add the og:image meta property to the single post header to have other sites pick up this image automatically.
| 1
| 0.7
|
Qwen/Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507-FP8
| 4,096
|
[
{
"content": "You are a strict grader. You will receive ONE line of text and must grade it on:\n\n1. Coherency (0–5):\n - 0: Completely incoherent; random words, impossible to understand.\n - 1: Very hard to follow; severe grammar/logic issues.\n - 2: Partly understandable but disjointed or confusing.\n - 3: Mostly clear with some minor awkwardness or small jumps.\n - 4: Clear and logically connected, only tiny issues.\n - 5: Perfectly coherent, fluent, and easy to understand.\n\n2. Content (0–1):\n - 0: No meaningful content; links to other websites, website clutter, random spam, advertisment link, etc.\n - 1: Not spam or promotional. \n\nNote: We do not care about factual accuracy for content score.\n\nReturn ONLY valid JSON with this exact schema, no extra text:\n\n{\n \"coherency_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"content_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"rationale\": \"<short explanation of why you gave these scores>\"\n}\n\nNow grade the following line of text:\n\n 6. Jessica Smith says:",
"role": "user"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "{\n \"coherency_score\": 5,\n \"content_score\": 1,\n \"rationale\": \"The statement is clear and coherent, starting with a named speaker. It is not promotional or spammy, so content score is 1.\"\n}"
}
] |
6. Jessica Smith says:
| 1
| 0.7
|
Qwen/Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507-FP8
| 4,096
|
[
{
"content": "You are a strict grader. You will receive ONE line of text and must grade it on:\n\n1. Coherency (0–5):\n - 0: Completely incoherent; random words, impossible to understand.\n - 1: Very hard to follow; severe grammar/logic issues.\n - 2: Partly understandable but disjointed or confusing.\n - 3: Mostly clear with some minor awkwardness or small jumps.\n - 4: Clear and logically connected, only tiny issues.\n - 5: Perfectly coherent, fluent, and easy to understand.\n\n2. Content (0–1):\n - 0: No meaningful content; links to other websites, website clutter, random spam, advertisment link, etc.\n - 1: Not spam or promotional. \n\nNote: We do not care about factual accuracy for content score.\n\nReturn ONLY valid JSON with this exact schema, no extra text:\n\n{\n \"coherency_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"content_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"rationale\": \"<short explanation of why you gave these scores>\"\n}\n\nNow grade the following line of text:\n\nNow you can use a very simple regexp to get the data.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "{\n \"coherency_score\": 5,\n \"content_score\": 1,\n \"rationale\": \"The sentence is clear, fluent, and logically connected. It makes a straightforward statement about using a simple regular expression to extract data. There is no spam or promotional content.\"\n}"
}
] |
Now you can use a very simple regexp to get the data.
| 1
| 0.7
|
Qwen/Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507-FP8
| 4,096
|
[
{
"content": "You are a strict grader. You will receive ONE line of text and must grade it on:\n\n1. Coherency (0–5):\n - 0: Completely incoherent; random words, impossible to understand.\n - 1: Very hard to follow; severe grammar/logic issues.\n - 2: Partly understandable but disjointed or confusing.\n - 3: Mostly clear with some minor awkwardness or small jumps.\n - 4: Clear and logically connected, only tiny issues.\n - 5: Perfectly coherent, fluent, and easy to understand.\n\n2. Content (0–1):\n - 0: No meaningful content; links to other websites, website clutter, random spam, advertisment link, etc.\n - 1: Not spam or promotional. \n\nNote: We do not care about factual accuracy for content score.\n\nReturn ONLY valid JSON with this exact schema, no extra text:\n\n{\n \"coherency_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"content_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"rationale\": \"<short explanation of why you gave these scores>\"\n}\n\nNow grade the following line of text:\n\ntypedef char *__builtin_va_list;",
"role": "user"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "{\n \"coherency_score\": 5,\n \"content_score\": 1,\n \"rationale\": \"The line is a clear and technically accurate C programming syntax definition, perfectly coherent and logically structured. It contains meaningful content related to C language internals without being promotional or spammy.\"\n}"
}
] |
typedef char *__builtin_va_list;
| 1
| 0.7
|
Qwen/Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507-FP8
| 4,096
|
[
{
"content": "You are a strict grader. You will receive ONE line of text and must grade it on:\n\n1. Coherency (0–5):\n - 0: Completely incoherent; random words, impossible to understand.\n - 1: Very hard to follow; severe grammar/logic issues.\n - 2: Partly understandable but disjointed or confusing.\n - 3: Mostly clear with some minor awkwardness or small jumps.\n - 4: Clear and logically connected, only tiny issues.\n - 5: Perfectly coherent, fluent, and easy to understand.\n\n2. Content (0–1):\n - 0: No meaningful content; links to other websites, website clutter, random spam, advertisment link, etc.\n - 1: Not spam or promotional. \n\nNote: We do not care about factual accuracy for content score.\n\nReturn ONLY valid JSON with this exact schema, no extra text:\n\n{\n \"coherency_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"content_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"rationale\": \"<short explanation of why you gave these scores>\"\n}\n\nNow grade the following line of text:\n\nint m=5;",
"role": "user"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "{\n \"coherency_score\": 5,\n \"content_score\": 1,\n \"rationale\": \"The line is a clear and syntactically correct C++ declaration of an integer variable. It is coherent and logically structured. The content is relevant and not promotional or spammy.\"\n}"
}
] |
int m=5;
| 1
| 0.7
|
Qwen/Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507-FP8
| 4,096
|
[
{
"content": "You are a strict grader. You will receive ONE line of text and must grade it on:\n\n1. Coherency (0–5):\n - 0: Completely incoherent; random words, impossible to understand.\n - 1: Very hard to follow; severe grammar/logic issues.\n - 2: Partly understandable but disjointed or confusing.\n - 3: Mostly clear with some minor awkwardness or small jumps.\n - 4: Clear and logically connected, only tiny issues.\n - 5: Perfectly coherent, fluent, and easy to understand.\n\n2. Content (0–1):\n - 0: No meaningful content; links to other websites, website clutter, random spam, advertisment link, etc.\n - 1: Not spam or promotional. \n\nNote: We do not care about factual accuracy for content score.\n\nReturn ONLY valid JSON with this exact schema, no extra text:\n\n{\n \"coherency_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"content_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"rationale\": \"<short explanation of why you gave these scores>\"\n}\n\nNow grade the following line of text:\n\nsetoptions(h,p); % Update the Bode plot.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "{\n \"coherency_score\": 5,\n \"content_score\": 1,\n \"rationale\": \"The sentence is clear, concise, and logically connected, describing a command in a programming context. It is technically coherent and follows a natural syntax. No promotional or spam content is present.\"\n}"
}
] |
setoptions(h,p); % Update the Bode plot.
| 1
| 0.7
|
Qwen/Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507-FP8
| 4,096
|
[
{
"content": "You are a strict grader. You will receive ONE line of text and must grade it on:\n\n1. Coherency (0–5):\n - 0: Completely incoherent; random words, impossible to understand.\n - 1: Very hard to follow; severe grammar/logic issues.\n - 2: Partly understandable but disjointed or confusing.\n - 3: Mostly clear with some minor awkwardness or small jumps.\n - 4: Clear and logically connected, only tiny issues.\n - 5: Perfectly coherent, fluent, and easy to understand.\n\n2. Content (0–1):\n - 0: No meaningful content; links to other websites, website clutter, random spam, advertisment link, etc.\n - 1: Not spam or promotional. \n\nNote: We do not care about factual accuracy for content score.\n\nReturn ONLY valid JSON with this exact schema, no extra text:\n\n{\n \"coherency_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"content_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"rationale\": \"<short explanation of why you gave these scores>\"\n}\n\nNow grade the following line of text:\n\nint fun(char *y)",
"role": "user"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "{\n \"coherency_score\": 5,\n \"content_score\": 1,\n \"rationale\": \"The line is a clear and syntactically correct C function declaration, logically coherent and easy to understand. It contains meaningful content related to programming without being promotional or spammy.\"\n}"
}
] |
int fun(char *y)
| 1
| 0.7
|
Qwen/Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507-FP8
| 4,096
|
[
{
"content": "You are a strict grader. You will receive ONE line of text and must grade it on:\n\n1. Coherency (0–5):\n - 0: Completely incoherent; random words, impossible to understand.\n - 1: Very hard to follow; severe grammar/logic issues.\n - 2: Partly understandable but disjointed or confusing.\n - 3: Mostly clear with some minor awkwardness or small jumps.\n - 4: Clear and logically connected, only tiny issues.\n - 5: Perfectly coherent, fluent, and easy to understand.\n\n2. Content (0–1):\n - 0: No meaningful content; links to other websites, website clutter, random spam, advertisment link, etc.\n - 1: Not spam or promotional. \n\nNote: We do not care about factual accuracy for content score.\n\nReturn ONLY valid JSON with this exact schema, no extra text:\n\n{\n \"coherency_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"content_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"rationale\": \"<short explanation of why you gave these scores>\"\n}\n\nNow grade the following line of text:\n\nCompare the frequency response of a parametric model, identified from input/output data, to a nonparametric model identified using the same data.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "{\n \"coherency_score\": 5,\n \"content_score\": 1,\n \"rationale\": \"The text is perfectly coherent, logically structured, and fluent. It clearly describes a comparison between two modeling approaches using the same data. The content is relevant and not promotional or spammy.\"\n}"
}
] |
Compare the frequency response of a parametric model, identified from input/output data, to a nonparametric model identified using the same data.
| 1
| 0.7
|
Qwen/Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507-FP8
| 4,096
|
[
{
"content": "You are a strict grader. You will receive ONE line of text and must grade it on:\n\n1. Coherency (0–5):\n - 0: Completely incoherent; random words, impossible to understand.\n - 1: Very hard to follow; severe grammar/logic issues.\n - 2: Partly understandable but disjointed or confusing.\n - 3: Mostly clear with some minor awkwardness or small jumps.\n - 4: Clear and logically connected, only tiny issues.\n - 5: Perfectly coherent, fluent, and easy to understand.\n\n2. Content (0–1):\n - 0: No meaningful content; links to other websites, website clutter, random spam, advertisment link, etc.\n - 1: Not spam or promotional. \n\nNote: We do not care about factual accuracy for content score.\n\nReturn ONLY valid JSON with this exact schema, no extra text:\n\n{\n \"coherency_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"content_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"rationale\": \"<short explanation of why you gave these scores>\"\n}\n\nNow grade the following line of text:\n\n\"I've been in situations where I felt so vulnerable as a woman and I had no power,\" Lisa says. \"Every woman has gone through it.\"",
"role": "user"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "{\n \"coherency_score\": 5,\n \"content_score\": 1,\n \"rationale\": \"The text is clear, fluent, and logically connected with a coherent narrative flow. It expresses a personal experience and a generalization about women's experiences, which is meaningful and not promotional or spammy.\"\n}"
}
] |
"I've been in situations where I felt so vulnerable as a woman and I had no power," Lisa says. "Every woman has gone through it."
| 1
| 0.7
|
Qwen/Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507-FP8
| 4,096
|
[
{
"content": "You are a strict grader. You will receive ONE line of text and must grade it on:\n\n1. Coherency (0–5):\n - 0: Completely incoherent; random words, impossible to understand.\n - 1: Very hard to follow; severe grammar/logic issues.\n - 2: Partly understandable but disjointed or confusing.\n - 3: Mostly clear with some minor awkwardness or small jumps.\n - 4: Clear and logically connected, only tiny issues.\n - 5: Perfectly coherent, fluent, and easy to understand.\n\n2. Content (0–1):\n - 0: No meaningful content; links to other websites, website clutter, random spam, advertisment link, etc.\n - 1: Not spam or promotional. \n\nNote: We do not care about factual accuracy for content score.\n\nReturn ONLY valid JSON with this exact schema, no extra text:\n\n{\n \"coherency_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"content_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"rationale\": \"<short explanation of why you gave these scores>\"\n}\n\nNow grade the following line of text:\n\nYour Answer",
"role": "user"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "{\n \"coherency_score\": 5,\n \"content_score\": 1,\n \"rationale\": \"The response is clear, fluent, and logically structured. It directly addresses the instruction without any confusion or disjointed elements. The content is relevant and not promotional or spammy.\"\n}"
}
] |
Your Answer
| 1
| 0.7
|
Qwen/Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507-FP8
| 4,096
|
[
{
"content": "You are a strict grader. You will receive ONE line of text and must grade it on:\n\n1. Coherency (0–5):\n - 0: Completely incoherent; random words, impossible to understand.\n - 1: Very hard to follow; severe grammar/logic issues.\n - 2: Partly understandable but disjointed or confusing.\n - 3: Mostly clear with some minor awkwardness or small jumps.\n - 4: Clear and logically connected, only tiny issues.\n - 5: Perfectly coherent, fluent, and easy to understand.\n\n2. Content (0–1):\n - 0: No meaningful content; links to other websites, website clutter, random spam, advertisment link, etc.\n - 1: Not spam or promotional. \n\nNote: We do not care about factual accuracy for content score.\n\nReturn ONLY valid JSON with this exact schema, no extra text:\n\n{\n \"coherency_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"content_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"rationale\": \"<short explanation of why you gave these scores>\"\n}\n\nNow grade the following line of text:\n\nIt's enough to parse this example into \"{T_X, {1, 2}}\" and \"{T_Y, {3, 4}}\", since it's then possible to recurse to get the full structure. However, it needs to be sufficiently general so as to be able to parse any user defined types.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "{\n \"coherency_score\": 5,\n \"content_score\": 1,\n \"rationale\": \"The text is clear, logically connected, and fluently expressed, with a coherent progression from parsing an example to discussing generality. It avoids randomness or spam and presents a meaningful technical argument.\"\n}"
}
] |
It's enough to parse this example into "{T_X, {1, 2}}" and "{T_Y, {3, 4}}", since it's then possible to recurse to get the full structure. However, it needs to be sufficiently general so as to be able to parse any user defined types.
| 1
| 0.7
|
Qwen/Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507-FP8
| 4,096
|
[
{
"content": "You are a strict grader. You will receive ONE line of text and must grade it on:\n\n1. Coherency (0–5):\n - 0: Completely incoherent; random words, impossible to understand.\n - 1: Very hard to follow; severe grammar/logic issues.\n - 2: Partly understandable but disjointed or confusing.\n - 3: Mostly clear with some minor awkwardness or small jumps.\n - 4: Clear and logically connected, only tiny issues.\n - 5: Perfectly coherent, fluent, and easy to understand.\n\n2. Content (0–1):\n - 0: No meaningful content; links to other websites, website clutter, random spam, advertisment link, etc.\n - 1: Not spam or promotional. \n\nNote: We do not care about factual accuracy for content score.\n\nReturn ONLY valid JSON with this exact schema, no extra text:\n\n{\n \"coherency_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"content_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"rationale\": \"<short explanation of why you gave these scores>\"\n}\n\nNow grade the following line of text:\n\nPhil invested some of the insurance money, and when he graduated, he still had a large bank account. He leveraged that nest egg to build his own tax firm, which became a very successful business.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "{\n \"coherency_score\": 5,\n \"content_score\": 1,\n \"rationale\": \"The narrative is clear, logically connected, and follows a coherent sequence of events from investment to business success. There is no spam or promotional content.\"\n}"
}
] |
Phil invested some of the insurance money, and when he graduated, he still had a large bank account. He leveraged that nest egg to build his own tax firm, which became a very successful business.
| 1
| 0.7
|
Qwen/Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507-FP8
| 4,096
|
[
{
"content": "You are a strict grader. You will receive ONE line of text and must grade it on:\n\n1. Coherency (0–5):\n - 0: Completely incoherent; random words, impossible to understand.\n - 1: Very hard to follow; severe grammar/logic issues.\n - 2: Partly understandable but disjointed or confusing.\n - 3: Mostly clear with some minor awkwardness or small jumps.\n - 4: Clear and logically connected, only tiny issues.\n - 5: Perfectly coherent, fluent, and easy to understand.\n\n2. Content (0–1):\n - 0: No meaningful content; links to other websites, website clutter, random spam, advertisment link, etc.\n - 1: Not spam or promotional. \n\nNote: We do not care about factual accuracy for content score.\n\nReturn ONLY valid JSON with this exact schema, no extra text:\n\n{\n \"coherency_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"content_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"rationale\": \"<short explanation of why you gave these scores>\"\n}\n\nNow grade the following line of text:\n\nbodeplot(sys) draws the Bode plot of the model sys. The frequency range and number of points are chosen automatically.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "{\n \"coherency_score\": 5,\n \"content_score\": 1,\n \"rationale\": \"The text is clear, logically connected, and accurately describes the function of bodeplot(sys) without any confusion or grammatical issues. It provides meaningful technical information without being promotional or spammy.\"\n}"
}
] |
bodeplot(sys) draws the Bode plot of the model sys. The frequency range and number of points are chosen automatically.
| 1
| 0.7
|
Qwen/Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507-FP8
| 4,096
|
[
{
"content": "You are a strict grader. You will receive ONE line of text and must grade it on:\n\n1. Coherency (0–5):\n - 0: Completely incoherent; random words, impossible to understand.\n - 1: Very hard to follow; severe grammar/logic issues.\n - 2: Partly understandable but disjointed or confusing.\n - 3: Mostly clear with some minor awkwardness or small jumps.\n - 4: Clear and logically connected, only tiny issues.\n - 5: Perfectly coherent, fluent, and easy to understand.\n\n2. Content (0–1):\n - 0: No meaningful content; links to other websites, website clutter, random spam, advertisment link, etc.\n - 1: Not spam or promotional. \n\nNote: We do not care about factual accuracy for content score.\n\nReturn ONLY valid JSON with this exact schema, no extra text:\n\n{\n \"coherency_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"content_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"rationale\": \"<short explanation of why you gave these scores>\"\n}\n\nNow grade the following line of text:\n\n2) The collection of ingredients C might be very large (~100 ingredients).",
"role": "user"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "{\n \"coherency_score\": 5,\n \"content_score\": 1,\n \"rationale\": \"The sentence is clear, logically connected, and easy to understand. It conveys a meaningful idea about the size of a collection of ingredients. There is no spam or promotional content.\"\n}"
}
] |
2) The collection of ingredients C might be very large (~100 ingredients).
| 1
| 0.7
|
Qwen/Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507-FP8
| 4,096
|
[
{
"content": "You are a strict grader. You will receive ONE line of text and must grade it on:\n\n1. Coherency (0–5):\n - 0: Completely incoherent; random words, impossible to understand.\n - 1: Very hard to follow; severe grammar/logic issues.\n - 2: Partly understandable but disjointed or confusing.\n - 3: Mostly clear with some minor awkwardness or small jumps.\n - 4: Clear and logically connected, only tiny issues.\n - 5: Perfectly coherent, fluent, and easy to understand.\n\n2. Content (0–1):\n - 0: No meaningful content; links to other websites, website clutter, random spam, advertisment link, etc.\n - 1: Not spam or promotional. \n\nNote: We do not care about factual accuracy for content score.\n\nReturn ONLY valid JSON with this exact schema, no extra text:\n\n{\n \"coherency_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"content_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"rationale\": \"<short explanation of why you gave these scores>\"\n}\n\nNow grade the following line of text:\n\nFOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA--(Marketwire - February 10, 2009) - When SUN Area Career & Technology Center was seeking to replace its unreliable, crash-prone analog video surveillance system, it turned to D-Link for sophisticated Internet Protocol (IP) based security cameras and network switches for improved functionality, reliability and clarity without breaking the bank.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "{\n \"coherency_score\": 5,\n \"content_score\": 1,\n \"rationale\": \"The text is clearly structured, logically connected, and easy to follow. It presents a coherent news-style statement about a company upgrading its surveillance system. There is no spam or promotional content.\"\n}"
}
] |
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA--(Marketwire - February 10, 2009) - When SUN Area Career & Technology Center was seeking to replace its unreliable, crash-prone analog video surveillance system, it turned to D-Link for sophisticated Internet Protocol (IP) based security cameras and network switches for improved functionality, reliability and clarity without breaking the bank.
| 1
| 0.7
|
Qwen/Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507-FP8
| 4,096
|
[
{
"content": "You are a strict grader. You will receive ONE line of text and must grade it on:\n\n1. Coherency (0–5):\n - 0: Completely incoherent; random words, impossible to understand.\n - 1: Very hard to follow; severe grammar/logic issues.\n - 2: Partly understandable but disjointed or confusing.\n - 3: Mostly clear with some minor awkwardness or small jumps.\n - 4: Clear and logically connected, only tiny issues.\n - 5: Perfectly coherent, fluent, and easy to understand.\n\n2. Content (0–1):\n - 0: No meaningful content; links to other websites, website clutter, random spam, advertisment link, etc.\n - 1: Not spam or promotional. \n\nNote: We do not care about factual accuracy for content score.\n\nReturn ONLY valid JSON with this exact schema, no extra text:\n\n{\n \"coherency_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"content_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"rationale\": \"<short explanation of why you gave these scores>\"\n}\n\nNow grade the following line of text:\n\nManning pleadedguilty in February to charges that he had misused classifiedinformation. Those charges carry a maximum term of 20 years in prison.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "{\n \"coherency_score\": 5,\n \"content_score\": 1,\n \"rationale\": \"The sentence is clear, logically connected, and easy to follow with no grammatical or structural issues. It presents a coherent factual statement without any promotional or spam content.\"\n}"
}
] |
Manning pleadedguilty in February to charges that he had misused classifiedinformation. Those charges carry a maximum term of 20 years in prison.
| 1
| 0.7
|
Qwen/Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507-FP8
| 4,096
|
[
{
"content": "You are a strict grader. You will receive ONE line of text and must grade it on:\n\n1. Coherency (0–5):\n - 0: Completely incoherent; random words, impossible to understand.\n - 1: Very hard to follow; severe grammar/logic issues.\n - 2: Partly understandable but disjointed or confusing.\n - 3: Mostly clear with some minor awkwardness or small jumps.\n - 4: Clear and logically connected, only tiny issues.\n - 5: Perfectly coherent, fluent, and easy to understand.\n\n2. Content (0–1):\n - 0: No meaningful content; links to other websites, website clutter, random spam, advertisment link, etc.\n - 1: Not spam or promotional. \n\nNote: We do not care about factual accuracy for content score.\n\nReturn ONLY valid JSON with this exact schema, no extra text:\n\n{\n \"coherency_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"content_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"rationale\": \"<short explanation of why you gave these scores>\"\n}\n\nNow grade the following line of text:\n\nDocumentation Center",
"role": "user"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "{\n \"coherency_score\": 5,\n \"content_score\": 1,\n \"rationale\": \"The phrase 'Documentation Center' is clear and coherent, logically connected, and easily understandable. It conveys a meaningful concept without any confusion or grammatical issues. The content is not promotional or spammy.\"\n}"
}
] |
Documentation Center
| 1
| 0.7
|
Qwen/Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507-FP8
| 4,096
|
[
{
"content": "You are a strict grader. You will receive ONE line of text and must grade it on:\n\n1. Coherency (0–5):\n - 0: Completely incoherent; random words, impossible to understand.\n - 1: Very hard to follow; severe grammar/logic issues.\n - 2: Partly understandable but disjointed or confusing.\n - 3: Mostly clear with some minor awkwardness or small jumps.\n - 4: Clear and logically connected, only tiny issues.\n - 5: Perfectly coherent, fluent, and easy to understand.\n\n2. Content (0–1):\n - 0: No meaningful content; links to other websites, website clutter, random spam, advertisment link, etc.\n - 1: Not spam or promotional. \n\nNote: We do not care about factual accuracy for content score.\n\nReturn ONLY valid JSON with this exact schema, no extra text:\n\n{\n \"coherency_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"content_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"rationale\": \"<short explanation of why you gave these scores>\"\n}\n\nNow grade the following line of text:\n\nw = linspace(8,10*pi,256);",
"role": "user"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "{\n \"coherency_score\": 5,\n \"content_score\": 1,\n \"rationale\": \"The line is a clear and logically connected piece of MATLAB/Python syntax for generating a linear space of values. It is perfectly coherent and technically meaningful. The content is not promotional or spam.\"\n}"
}
] |
w = linspace(8,10*pi,256);
| 1
| 0.7
|
Qwen/Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507-FP8
| 4,096
|
[
{
"content": "You are a strict grader. You will receive ONE line of text and must grade it on:\n\n1. Coherency (0–5):\n - 0: Completely incoherent; random words, impossible to understand.\n - 1: Very hard to follow; severe grammar/logic issues.\n - 2: Partly understandable but disjointed or confusing.\n - 3: Mostly clear with some minor awkwardness or small jumps.\n - 4: Clear and logically connected, only tiny issues.\n - 5: Perfectly coherent, fluent, and easy to understand.\n\n2. Content (0–1):\n - 0: No meaningful content; links to other websites, website clutter, random spam, advertisment link, etc.\n - 1: Not spam or promotional. \n\nNote: We do not care about factual accuracy for content score.\n\nReturn ONLY valid JSON with this exact schema, no extra text:\n\n{\n \"coherency_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"content_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"rationale\": \"<short explanation of why you gave these scores>\"\n}\n\nNow grade the following line of text:\n\n bodeplot(sys_np,sys_p,w, opt);",
"role": "user"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "{\n \"coherency_score\": 5,\n \"content_score\": 1,\n \"rationale\": \"The line is a clear and concise MATLAB/Python-like command for plotting a Bode diagram. It is perfectly coherent and logically structured. The content is technical but not promotional or spammy.\"\n}"
}
] |
bodeplot(sys_np,sys_p,w, opt);
| 1
| 0.7
|
Qwen/Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507-FP8
| 4,096
|
[
{
"content": "You are a strict grader. You will receive ONE line of text and must grade it on:\n\n1. Coherency (0–5):\n - 0: Completely incoherent; random words, impossible to understand.\n - 1: Very hard to follow; severe grammar/logic issues.\n - 2: Partly understandable but disjointed or confusing.\n - 3: Mostly clear with some minor awkwardness or small jumps.\n - 4: Clear and logically connected, only tiny issues.\n - 5: Perfectly coherent, fluent, and easy to understand.\n\n2. Content (0–1):\n - 0: No meaningful content; links to other websites, website clutter, random spam, advertisment link, etc.\n - 1: Not spam or promotional. \n\nNote: We do not care about factual accuracy for content score.\n\nReturn ONLY valid JSON with this exact schema, no extra text:\n\n{\n \"coherency_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"content_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"rationale\": \"<short explanation of why you gave these scores>\"\n}\n\nNow grade the following line of text:\n\n#define t 1",
"role": "user"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "{\n \"coherency_score\": 5,\n \"content_score\": 1,\n \"rationale\": \"The line is a clear and concise C programming directive, perfectly coherent and logically structured. It defines a variable t with value 1. The content is relevant and not promotional or spammy.\"\n}"
}
] |
#define t 1
| 1
| 0.7
|
Qwen/Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507-FP8
| 4,096
|
[
{
"content": "You are a strict grader. You will receive ONE line of text and must grade it on:\n\n1. Coherency (0–5):\n - 0: Completely incoherent; random words, impossible to understand.\n - 1: Very hard to follow; severe grammar/logic issues.\n - 2: Partly understandable but disjointed or confusing.\n - 3: Mostly clear with some minor awkwardness or small jumps.\n - 4: Clear and logically connected, only tiny issues.\n - 5: Perfectly coherent, fluent, and easy to understand.\n\n2. Content (0–1):\n - 0: No meaningful content; links to other websites, website clutter, random spam, advertisment link, etc.\n - 1: Not spam or promotional. \n\nNote: We do not care about factual accuracy for content score.\n\nReturn ONLY valid JSON with this exact schema, no extra text:\n\n{\n \"coherency_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"content_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"rationale\": \"<short explanation of why you gave these scores>\"\n}\n\nNow grade the following line of text:\n\nFinal Thoughts:",
"role": "user"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "{\n \"coherency_score\": 5,\n \"content_score\": 1,\n \"rationale\": \"The statement is clear and coherent as a heading or opener for a reflection. It logically introduces a concluding section. No promotional or spam content is present.\"\n}"
}
] |
Final Thoughts:
| 1
| 0.7
|
Qwen/Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507-FP8
| 4,096
|
[
{
"content": "You are a strict grader. You will receive ONE line of text and must grade it on:\n\n1. Coherency (0–5):\n - 0: Completely incoherent; random words, impossible to understand.\n - 1: Very hard to follow; severe grammar/logic issues.\n - 2: Partly understandable but disjointed or confusing.\n - 3: Mostly clear with some minor awkwardness or small jumps.\n - 4: Clear and logically connected, only tiny issues.\n - 5: Perfectly coherent, fluent, and easy to understand.\n\n2. Content (0–1):\n - 0: No meaningful content; links to other websites, website clutter, random spam, advertisment link, etc.\n - 1: Not spam or promotional. \n\nNote: We do not care about factual accuracy for content score.\n\nReturn ONLY valid JSON with this exact schema, no extra text:\n\n{\n \"coherency_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"content_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"rationale\": \"<short explanation of why you gave these scores>\"\n}\n\nNow grade the following line of text:\n\nh = bodeplot(sys)",
"role": "user"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "{\n \"coherency_score\": 5,\n \"content_score\": 1,\n \"rationale\": \"The line is clear, concise, and logically structured as a command from a control systems or MATLAB/Python context. It is technically coherent and follows standard syntax. No promotional or spam content is present.\"\n}"
}
] |
h = bodeplot(sys)
| 1
| 0.7
|
Qwen/Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507-FP8
| 4,096
|
[
{
"content": "You are a strict grader. You will receive ONE line of text and must grade it on:\n\n1. Coherency (0–5):\n - 0: Completely incoherent; random words, impossible to understand.\n - 1: Very hard to follow; severe grammar/logic issues.\n - 2: Partly understandable but disjointed or confusing.\n - 3: Mostly clear with some minor awkwardness or small jumps.\n - 4: Clear and logically connected, only tiny issues.\n - 5: Perfectly coherent, fluent, and easy to understand.\n\n2. Content (0–1):\n - 0: No meaningful content; links to other websites, website clutter, random spam, advertisment link, etc.\n - 1: Not spam or promotional. \n\nNote: We do not care about factual accuracy for content score.\n\nReturn ONLY valid JSON with this exact schema, no extra text:\n\n{\n \"coherency_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"content_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"rationale\": \"<short explanation of why you gave these scores>\"\n}\n\nNow grade the following line of text:\n\nWorks like a charm. If I print_r out $this->user in my controller it gives me:",
"role": "user"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "{\n \"coherency_score\": 5,\n \"content_score\": 1,\n \"rationale\": \"The text is clear, fluent, and logically connected, describing a programming scenario involving PHP's print_r function and a controller variable. It contains no spam or promotional content.\"\n}"
}
] |
Works like a charm. If I print_r out $this->user in my controller it gives me:
| 1
| 0.7
|
Qwen/Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507-FP8
| 4,096
|
[
{
"content": "You are a strict grader. You will receive ONE line of text and must grade it on:\n\n1. Coherency (0–5):\n - 0: Completely incoherent; random words, impossible to understand.\n - 1: Very hard to follow; severe grammar/logic issues.\n - 2: Partly understandable but disjointed or confusing.\n - 3: Mostly clear with some minor awkwardness or small jumps.\n - 4: Clear and logically connected, only tiny issues.\n - 5: Perfectly coherent, fluent, and easy to understand.\n\n2. Content (0–1):\n - 0: No meaningful content; links to other websites, website clutter, random spam, advertisment link, etc.\n - 1: Not spam or promotional. \n\nNote: We do not care about factual accuracy for content score.\n\nReturn ONLY valid JSON with this exact schema, no extra text:\n\n{\n \"coherency_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"content_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"rationale\": \"<short explanation of why you gave these scores>\"\n}\n\nNow grade the following line of text:\n\nThis is not a problem of getting files into MATLAB or basic regular expressions. I'm after a specific regular expression that preserves groupings by brackets.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "{\n \"coherency_score\": 5,\n \"content_score\": 1,\n \"rationale\": \"The text is clear, logically connected, and expresses a specific request in a coherent manner. It avoids spam or promotional content and focuses on a well-defined problem related to regular expressions and groupings.\"\n}"
}
] |
This is not a problem of getting files into MATLAB or basic regular expressions. I'm after a specific regular expression that preserves groupings by brackets.
| 1
| 0.7
|
Qwen/Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507-FP8
| 4,096
|
[
{
"content": "You are a strict grader. You will receive ONE line of text and must grade it on:\n\n1. Coherency (0–5):\n - 0: Completely incoherent; random words, impossible to understand.\n - 1: Very hard to follow; severe grammar/logic issues.\n - 2: Partly understandable but disjointed or confusing.\n - 3: Mostly clear with some minor awkwardness or small jumps.\n - 4: Clear and logically connected, only tiny issues.\n - 5: Perfectly coherent, fluent, and easy to understand.\n\n2. Content (0–1):\n - 0: No meaningful content; links to other websites, website clutter, random spam, advertisment link, etc.\n - 1: Not spam or promotional. \n\nNote: We do not care about factual accuracy for content score.\n\nReturn ONLY valid JSON with this exact schema, no extra text:\n\n{\n \"coherency_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"content_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"rationale\": \"<short explanation of why you gave these scores>\"\n}\n\nNow grade the following line of text:\n\nSee logspace to generate logarithmically spaced frequency vectors.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "{\n \"coherency_score\": 5,\n \"content_score\": 1,\n \"rationale\": \"The sentence is clear, logically connected, and fluent. It conveys a specific instruction about using 'logspace' to generate logarithmically spaced frequency vectors. There is no spam or promotional content.\"\n}"
}
] |
See logspace to generate logarithmically spaced frequency vectors.
| 1
| 0.7
|
Qwen/Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507-FP8
| 4,096
|
[
{
"content": "You are a strict grader. You will receive ONE line of text and must grade it on:\n\n1. Coherency (0–5):\n - 0: Completely incoherent; random words, impossible to understand.\n - 1: Very hard to follow; severe grammar/logic issues.\n - 2: Partly understandable but disjointed or confusing.\n - 3: Mostly clear with some minor awkwardness or small jumps.\n - 4: Clear and logically connected, only tiny issues.\n - 5: Perfectly coherent, fluent, and easy to understand.\n\n2. Content (0–1):\n - 0: No meaningful content; links to other websites, website clutter, random spam, advertisment link, etc.\n - 1: Not spam or promotional. \n\nNote: We do not care about factual accuracy for content score.\n\nReturn ONLY valid JSON with this exact schema, no extra text:\n\n{\n \"coherency_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"content_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"rationale\": \"<short explanation of why you gave these scores>\"\n}\n\nNow grade the following line of text:\n\nGas Detectors",
"role": "user"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "{\n \"coherency_score\": 5,\n \"content_score\": 1,\n \"rationale\": \"The phrase 'Gas Detectors' is clear and coherent, logically connected and easy to understand. It contains meaningful content without being promotional or spammy.\"\n}"
}
] |
Gas Detectors
| 1
| 0.7
|
Qwen/Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507-FP8
| 4,096
|
[
{
"content": "You are a strict grader. You will receive ONE line of text and must grade it on:\n\n1. Coherency (0–5):\n - 0: Completely incoherent; random words, impossible to understand.\n - 1: Very hard to follow; severe grammar/logic issues.\n - 2: Partly understandable but disjointed or confusing.\n - 3: Mostly clear with some minor awkwardness or small jumps.\n - 4: Clear and logically connected, only tiny issues.\n - 5: Perfectly coherent, fluent, and easy to understand.\n\n2. Content (0–1):\n - 0: No meaningful content; links to other websites, website clutter, random spam, advertisment link, etc.\n - 1: Not spam or promotional. \n\nNote: We do not care about factual accuracy for content score.\n\nReturn ONLY valid JSON with this exact schema, no extra text:\n\n{\n \"coherency_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"content_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"rationale\": \"<short explanation of why you gave these scores>\"\n}\n\nNow grade the following line of text:\n\nh = bodeplot(sys);",
"role": "user"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "{\n \"coherency_score\": 5,\n \"content_score\": 1,\n \"rationale\": \"The line is a clear and concise MATLAB/Scilab command for generating a Bode plot of a system. It is coherent and logically structured. The content is relevant and not promotional or spammy.\"\n}"
}
] |
h = bodeplot(sys);
| 1
| 0.7
|
Qwen/Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507-FP8
| 4,096
|
[
{
"content": "You are a strict grader. You will receive ONE line of text and must grade it on:\n\n1. Coherency (0–5):\n - 0: Completely incoherent; random words, impossible to understand.\n - 1: Very hard to follow; severe grammar/logic issues.\n - 2: Partly understandable but disjointed or confusing.\n - 3: Mostly clear with some minor awkwardness or small jumps.\n - 4: Clear and logically connected, only tiny issues.\n - 5: Perfectly coherent, fluent, and easy to understand.\n\n2. Content (0–1):\n - 0: No meaningful content; links to other websites, website clutter, random spam, advertisment link, etc.\n - 1: Not spam or promotional. \n\nNote: We do not care about factual accuracy for content score.\n\nReturn ONLY valid JSON with this exact schema, no extra text:\n\n{\n \"coherency_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"content_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"rationale\": \"<short explanation of why you gave these scores>\"\n}\n\nNow grade the following line of text:\n\nMy question is that I don't seem to understand the temperature trend that I am seeing from my temperature sensors. I'll start of with my setup: Essentially, I have a metal box with two temperature sensors. 1) Is mounted right at the base of the box [Temp Sensor #1] 2) The second temperature sensor is mounted 2 inches from the top of the box [Temp Sensor #2]. The box is about 6 inches in height.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "{\n \"coherency_score\": 5,\n \"content_score\": 1,\n \"rationale\": \"The text is perfectly coherent, with a clear and logical structure that explains the setup and context of the temperature sensors. The content is relevant and free of spam or promotional material.\"\n}"
}
] |
My question is that I don't seem to understand the temperature trend that I am seeing from my temperature sensors. I'll start of with my setup: Essentially, I have a metal box with two temperature sensors. 1) Is mounted right at the base of the box [Temp Sensor #1] 2) The second temperature sensor is mounted 2 inches from the top of the box [Temp Sensor #2]. The box is about 6 inches in height.
| 1
| 0.7
|
Qwen/Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507-FP8
| 4,096
|
[
{
"content": "You are a strict grader. You will receive ONE line of text and must grade it on:\n\n1. Coherency (0–5):\n - 0: Completely incoherent; random words, impossible to understand.\n - 1: Very hard to follow; severe grammar/logic issues.\n - 2: Partly understandable but disjointed or confusing.\n - 3: Mostly clear with some minor awkwardness or small jumps.\n - 4: Clear and logically connected, only tiny issues.\n - 5: Perfectly coherent, fluent, and easy to understand.\n\n2. Content (0–1):\n - 0: No meaningful content; links to other websites, website clutter, random spam, advertisment link, etc.\n - 1: Not spam or promotional. \n\nNote: We do not care about factual accuracy for content score.\n\nReturn ONLY valid JSON with this exact schema, no extra text:\n\n{\n \"coherency_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"content_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"rationale\": \"<short explanation of why you gave these scores>\"\n}\n\nNow grade the following line of text:\n\nAssuming I have a collection of ingredients C outside of my database, how can I query Recipe table R for every recipe that can be made using ONLY the list of ingredients supplied in C?",
"role": "user"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "{\n \"coherency_score\": 5,\n \"content_score\": 1,\n \"rationale\": \"The text is clear, logically structured, and easy to follow. It poses a well-defined question about querying a recipe table with specific ingredient constraints. There is no spam or promotional content.\"\n}"
}
] |
Assuming I have a collection of ingredients C outside of my database, how can I query Recipe table R for every recipe that can be made using ONLY the list of ingredients supplied in C?
| 1
| 0.7
|
Qwen/Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507-FP8
| 4,096
|
[
{
"content": "You are a strict grader. You will receive ONE line of text and must grade it on:\n\n1. Coherency (0–5):\n - 0: Completely incoherent; random words, impossible to understand.\n - 1: Very hard to follow; severe grammar/logic issues.\n - 2: Partly understandable but disjointed or confusing.\n - 3: Mostly clear with some minor awkwardness or small jumps.\n - 4: Clear and logically connected, only tiny issues.\n - 5: Perfectly coherent, fluent, and easy to understand.\n\n2. Content (0–1):\n - 0: No meaningful content; links to other websites, website clutter, random spam, advertisment link, etc.\n - 1: Not spam or promotional. \n\nNote: We do not care about factual accuracy for content score.\n\nReturn ONLY valid JSON with this exact schema, no extra text:\n\n{\n \"coherency_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"content_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"rationale\": \"<short explanation of why you gave these scores>\"\n}\n\nNow grade the following line of text:\n\nGood catch on my answer. I read the question to fast. I missed the point about only recipes that can be made with ONLY those ingredients. – RThomas Jul 25 '12 at 21:27",
"role": "user"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "{\n \"coherency_score\": 5,\n \"content_score\": 1,\n \"rationale\": \"The text is clear, logically connected, and easy to understand. It explains a mistake in reading a question and correctly identifies the key point. There is no spam or promotional content.\"\n}"
}
] |
Good catch on my answer. I read the question to fast. I missed the point about only recipes that can be made with ONLY those ingredients. – RThomas Jul 25 '12 at 21:27
| 1
| 0.7
|
Qwen/Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507-FP8
| 4,096
|
[
{
"content": "You are a strict grader. You will receive ONE line of text and must grade it on:\n\n1. Coherency (0–5):\n - 0: Completely incoherent; random words, impossible to understand.\n - 1: Very hard to follow; severe grammar/logic issues.\n - 2: Partly understandable but disjointed or confusing.\n - 3: Mostly clear with some minor awkwardness or small jumps.\n - 4: Clear and logically connected, only tiny issues.\n - 5: Perfectly coherent, fluent, and easy to understand.\n\n2. Content (0–1):\n - 0: No meaningful content; links to other websites, website clutter, random spam, advertisment link, etc.\n - 1: Not spam or promotional. \n\nNote: We do not care about factual accuracy for content score.\n\nReturn ONLY valid JSON with this exact schema, no extra text:\n\n{\n \"coherency_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"content_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"rationale\": \"<short explanation of why you gave these scores>\"\n}\n\nNow grade the following line of text:\n\nThe women of Monroe High",
"role": "user"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "{\n \"coherency_score\": 3,\n \"content_score\": 1,\n \"rationale\": \"The phrase is mostly clear but lacks context or development, making it slightly disjointed. It introduces a subject but does not form a complete thought, leading to minor awkwardness. No promotional or spam content is present.\"\n}"
}
] |
The women of Monroe High
| 1
| 0.7
|
Qwen/Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507-FP8
| 4,096
|
[
{
"content": "You are a strict grader. You will receive ONE line of text and must grade it on:\n\n1. Coherency (0–5):\n - 0: Completely incoherent; random words, impossible to understand.\n - 1: Very hard to follow; severe grammar/logic issues.\n - 2: Partly understandable but disjointed or confusing.\n - 3: Mostly clear with some minor awkwardness or small jumps.\n - 4: Clear and logically connected, only tiny issues.\n - 5: Perfectly coherent, fluent, and easy to understand.\n\n2. Content (0–1):\n - 0: No meaningful content; links to other websites, website clutter, random spam, advertisment link, etc.\n - 1: Not spam or promotional. \n\nNote: We do not care about factual accuracy for content score.\n\nReturn ONLY valid JSON with this exact schema, no extra text:\n\n{\n \"coherency_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"content_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"rationale\": \"<short explanation of why you gave these scores>\"\n}\n\nNow grade the following line of text:\n\n w = linspace(0,10*pi,128);",
"role": "user"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "{\n \"coherency_score\": 5,\n \"content_score\": 1,\n \"rationale\": \"The line is clear, grammatically correct, and logically structured as a valid MATLAB/Python syntax for generating a linear space of values. It is technically coherent and contains meaningful content related to numerical computation.\"\n}"
}
] |
w = linspace(0,10*pi,128);
| 1
| 0.7
|
Qwen/Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507-FP8
| 4,096
|
[
{
"content": "You are a strict grader. You will receive ONE line of text and must grade it on:\n\n1. Coherency (0–5):\n - 0: Completely incoherent; random words, impossible to understand.\n - 1: Very hard to follow; severe grammar/logic issues.\n - 2: Partly understandable but disjointed or confusing.\n - 3: Mostly clear with some minor awkwardness or small jumps.\n - 4: Clear and logically connected, only tiny issues.\n - 5: Perfectly coherent, fluent, and easy to understand.\n\n2. Content (0–1):\n - 0: No meaningful content; links to other websites, website clutter, random spam, advertisment link, etc.\n - 1: Not spam or promotional. \n\nNote: We do not care about factual accuracy for content score.\n\nReturn ONLY valid JSON with this exact schema, no extra text:\n\n{\n \"coherency_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"content_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"rationale\": \"<short explanation of why you gave these scores>\"\n}\n\nNow grade the following line of text:\n\nsys = tf(1,[1 1]); ",
"role": "user"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "{\n \"coherency_score\": 5,\n \"content_score\": 1,\n \"rationale\": \"The line is a clear and coherent piece of MATLAB/Python code snippet for defining a transfer function. It is logically structured and easy to understand. The content is relevant and not promotional or spammy.\"\n}"
}
] |
sys = tf(1,[1 1]);
| 1
| 0.7
|
Qwen/Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507-FP8
| 4,096
|
[
{
"content": "You are a strict grader. You will receive ONE line of text and must grade it on:\n\n1. Coherency (0–5):\n - 0: Completely incoherent; random words, impossible to understand.\n - 1: Very hard to follow; severe grammar/logic issues.\n - 2: Partly understandable but disjointed or confusing.\n - 3: Mostly clear with some minor awkwardness or small jumps.\n - 4: Clear and logically connected, only tiny issues.\n - 5: Perfectly coherent, fluent, and easy to understand.\n\n2. Content (0–1):\n - 0: No meaningful content; links to other websites, website clutter, random spam, advertisment link, etc.\n - 1: Not spam or promotional. \n\nNote: We do not care about factual accuracy for content score.\n\nReturn ONLY valid JSON with this exact schema, no extra text:\n\n{\n \"coherency_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"content_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"rationale\": \"<short explanation of why you gave these scores>\"\n}\n\nNow grade the following line of text:\n\nYour Answer",
"role": "user"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "{\n \"coherency_score\": 5,\n \"content_score\": 1,\n \"rationale\": \"The response is clear, fluent, and logically structured. It directly addresses the instruction without any confusion or disjointed elements. The content is relevant and not promotional or spammy.\"\n}"
}
] |
Your Answer
| 1
| 0.7
|
Qwen/Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507-FP8
| 4,096
|
[
{
"content": "You are a strict grader. You will receive ONE line of text and must grade it on:\n\n1. Coherency (0–5):\n - 0: Completely incoherent; random words, impossible to understand.\n - 1: Very hard to follow; severe grammar/logic issues.\n - 2: Partly understandable but disjointed or confusing.\n - 3: Mostly clear with some minor awkwardness or small jumps.\n - 4: Clear and logically connected, only tiny issues.\n - 5: Perfectly coherent, fluent, and easy to understand.\n\n2. Content (0–1):\n - 0: No meaningful content; links to other websites, website clutter, random spam, advertisment link, etc.\n - 1: Not spam or promotional. \n\nNote: We do not care about factual accuracy for content score.\n\nReturn ONLY valid JSON with this exact schema, no extra text:\n\n{\n \"coherency_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"content_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"rationale\": \"<short explanation of why you gave these scores>\"\n}\n\nNow grade the following line of text:\n\nseems reasonable, but I don't know if it's enough for you. It's littered with \\s* to allow arbitrary whitespace between tokens, from C's point of view that's allowable. It will match stuff that looks more or less just your examples; some kind of identifier followed by exactly two digit strings.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "{\n \"coherency_score\": 4,\n \"content_score\": 1,\n \"rationale\": \"The text is mostly clear and logically connected, explaining a technical point about whitespace and pattern matching in C, with only minor awkwardness in phrasing. It contains no spam or promotional content.\"\n}"
}
] |
seems reasonable, but I don't know if it's enough for you. It's littered with \s* to allow arbitrary whitespace between tokens, from C's point of view that's allowable. It will match stuff that looks more or less just your examples; some kind of identifier followed by exactly two digit strings.
| 1
| 0.7
|
Qwen/Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507-FP8
| 4,096
|
[
{
"content": "You are a strict grader. You will receive ONE line of text and must grade it on:\n\n1. Coherency (0–5):\n - 0: Completely incoherent; random words, impossible to understand.\n - 1: Very hard to follow; severe grammar/logic issues.\n - 2: Partly understandable but disjointed or confusing.\n - 3: Mostly clear with some minor awkwardness or small jumps.\n - 4: Clear and logically connected, only tiny issues.\n - 5: Perfectly coherent, fluent, and easy to understand.\n\n2. Content (0–1):\n - 0: No meaningful content; links to other websites, website clutter, random spam, advertisment link, etc.\n - 1: Not spam or promotional. \n\nNote: We do not care about factual accuracy for content score.\n\nReturn ONLY valid JSON with this exact schema, no extra text:\n\n{\n \"coherency_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"content_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"rationale\": \"<short explanation of why you gave these scores>\"\n}\n\nNow grade the following line of text:\n\nfor a list of available plot options. See Example 2 for an example of phase matching using the PhaseMatchingFreq and PhaseMatchingValue options.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "{\n \"coherency_score\": 5,\n \"content_score\": 1,\n \"rationale\": \"The text is clear, logically connected, and follows a coherent structure. It refers to plot options and provides a specific example with relevant terminology, making it easy to understand. No promotional or spam content is present.\"\n}"
}
] |
for a list of available plot options. See Example 2 for an example of phase matching using the PhaseMatchingFreq and PhaseMatchingValue options.
| 1
| 0.7
|
Qwen/Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507-FP8
| 4,096
|
[
{
"content": "You are a strict grader. You will receive ONE line of text and must grade it on:\n\n1. Coherency (0–5):\n - 0: Completely incoherent; random words, impossible to understand.\n - 1: Very hard to follow; severe grammar/logic issues.\n - 2: Partly understandable but disjointed or confusing.\n - 3: Mostly clear with some minor awkwardness or small jumps.\n - 4: Clear and logically connected, only tiny issues.\n - 5: Perfectly coherent, fluent, and easy to understand.\n\n2. Content (0–1):\n - 0: No meaningful content; links to other websites, website clutter, random spam, advertisment link, etc.\n - 1: Not spam or promotional. \n\nNote: We do not care about factual accuracy for content score.\n\nReturn ONLY valid JSON with this exact schema, no extra text:\n\n{\n \"coherency_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"content_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"rationale\": \"<short explanation of why you gave these scores>\"\n}\n\nNow grade the following line of text:\n\nh = bodeplot(sys) % This displays a Bode plot.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "{\n \"coherency_score\": 5,\n \"content_score\": 1,\n \"rationale\": \"The text is clear, fluent, and logically connected. It explains the purpose of a MATLAB command in a straightforward way without any confusion or grammatical issues. The content is relevant and not promotional or spammy.\"\n}"
}
] |
h = bodeplot(sys) % This displays a Bode plot.
| 1
| 0.7
|
Qwen/Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507-FP8
| 4,096
|
[
{
"content": "You are a strict grader. You will receive ONE line of text and must grade it on:\n\n1. Coherency (0–5):\n - 0: Completely incoherent; random words, impossible to understand.\n - 1: Very hard to follow; severe grammar/logic issues.\n - 2: Partly understandable but disjointed or confusing.\n - 3: Mostly clear with some minor awkwardness or small jumps.\n - 4: Clear and logically connected, only tiny issues.\n - 5: Perfectly coherent, fluent, and easy to understand.\n\n2. Content (0–1):\n - 0: No meaningful content; links to other websites, website clutter, random spam, advertisment link, etc.\n - 1: Not spam or promotional. \n\nNote: We do not care about factual accuracy for content score.\n\nReturn ONLY valid JSON with this exact schema, no extra text:\n\n{\n \"coherency_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"content_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"rationale\": \"<short explanation of why you gave these scores>\"\n}\n\nNow grade the following line of text:\n\n Go slowly. Otherwise, you might end up very very bored of the person in question.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "{\n \"coherency_score\": 5,\n \"content_score\": 1,\n \"rationale\": \"The sentence is clear, logically connected, and easy to understand. It follows a coherent structure with a simple warning about potential boredom. There is no spam or promotional content.\"\n}"
}
] |
Go slowly. Otherwise, you might end up very very bored of the person in question.
| 1
| 0.7
|
Qwen/Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507-FP8
| 4,096
|
[
{
"content": "You are a strict grader. You will receive ONE line of text and must grade it on:\n\n1. Coherency (0–5):\n - 0: Completely incoherent; random words, impossible to understand.\n - 1: Very hard to follow; severe grammar/logic issues.\n - 2: Partly understandable but disjointed or confusing.\n - 3: Mostly clear with some minor awkwardness or small jumps.\n - 4: Clear and logically connected, only tiny issues.\n - 5: Perfectly coherent, fluent, and easy to understand.\n\n2. Content (0–1):\n - 0: No meaningful content; links to other websites, website clutter, random spam, advertisment link, etc.\n - 1: Not spam or promotional. \n\nNote: We do not care about factual accuracy for content score.\n\nReturn ONLY valid JSON with this exact schema, no extra text:\n\n{\n \"coherency_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"content_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"rationale\": \"<short explanation of why you gave these scores>\"\n}\n\nNow grade the following line of text:\n\nExample 4",
"role": "user"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "{\n \"coherency_score\": 1,\n \"content_score\": 0,\n \"rationale\": \"The text 'Example 4' is incomplete and lacks context or meaningful content. It does not form a coherent sentence or provide any substantial information, making it incoherent and essentially just a label without purpose.\"\n}"
}
] |
Example 4
| 0
| 0.7
|
Qwen/Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507-FP8
| 4,096
|
[
{
"content": "You are a strict grader. You will receive ONE line of text and must grade it on:\n\n1. Coherency (0–5):\n - 0: Completely incoherent; random words, impossible to understand.\n - 1: Very hard to follow; severe grammar/logic issues.\n - 2: Partly understandable but disjointed or confusing.\n - 3: Mostly clear with some minor awkwardness or small jumps.\n - 4: Clear and logically connected, only tiny issues.\n - 5: Perfectly coherent, fluent, and easy to understand.\n\n2. Content (0–1):\n - 0: No meaningful content; links to other websites, website clutter, random spam, advertisment link, etc.\n - 1: Not spam or promotional. \n\nNote: We do not care about factual accuracy for content score.\n\nReturn ONLY valid JSON with this exact schema, no extra text:\n\n{\n \"coherency_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"content_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"rationale\": \"<short explanation of why you gave these scores>\"\n}\n\nNow grade the following line of text:\n\nShown Here:",
"role": "user"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "{\n \"coherency_score\": 1,\n \"content_score\": 1,\n \"rationale\": \"The phrase 'Shown Here:' is incomplete and lacks context, making it very hard to follow. It does not convey meaningful content or a clear idea, but it is not spam or promotional.\"\n}"
}
] |
Shown Here:
| 1
| 0.7
|
Qwen/Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507-FP8
| 4,096
|
[
{
"content": "You are a strict grader. You will receive ONE line of text and must grade it on:\n\n1. Coherency (0–5):\n - 0: Completely incoherent; random words, impossible to understand.\n - 1: Very hard to follow; severe grammar/logic issues.\n - 2: Partly understandable but disjointed or confusing.\n - 3: Mostly clear with some minor awkwardness or small jumps.\n - 4: Clear and logically connected, only tiny issues.\n - 5: Perfectly coherent, fluent, and easy to understand.\n\n2. Content (0–1):\n - 0: No meaningful content; links to other websites, website clutter, random spam, advertisment link, etc.\n - 1: Not spam or promotional. \n\nNote: We do not care about factual accuracy for content score.\n\nReturn ONLY valid JSON with this exact schema, no extra text:\n\n{\n \"coherency_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"content_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"rationale\": \"<short explanation of why you gave these scores>\"\n}\n\nNow grade the following line of text:\n\nh = bodeplot(sys1,sys2,w);",
"role": "user"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "{\n \"coherency_score\": 5,\n \"content_score\": 1,\n \"rationale\": \"The line is a clear and concise MATLAB/Python-like command for generating a Bode plot of two systems. It is perfectly coherent and logically structured. The content is relevant and not promotional or spammy.\"\n}"
}
] |
h = bodeplot(sys1,sys2,w);
| 1
| 0.7
|
Qwen/Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507-FP8
| 4,096
|
[
{
"content": "You are a strict grader. You will receive ONE line of text and must grade it on:\n\n1. Coherency (0–5):\n - 0: Completely incoherent; random words, impossible to understand.\n - 1: Very hard to follow; severe grammar/logic issues.\n - 2: Partly understandable but disjointed or confusing.\n - 3: Mostly clear with some minor awkwardness or small jumps.\n - 4: Clear and logically connected, only tiny issues.\n - 5: Perfectly coherent, fluent, and easy to understand.\n\n2. Content (0–1):\n - 0: No meaningful content; links to other websites, website clutter, random spam, advertisment link, etc.\n - 1: Not spam or promotional. \n\nNote: We do not care about factual accuracy for content score.\n\nReturn ONLY valid JSON with this exact schema, no extra text:\n\n{\n \"coherency_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"content_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"rationale\": \"<short explanation of why you gave these scores>\"\n}\n\nNow grade the following line of text:\n\n • Combustible Gases such as Methane",
"role": "user"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "{\n \"coherency_score\": 5,\n \"content_score\": 1,\n \"rationale\": \"The sentence is clear, logically connected, and grammatically sound. It introduces a relevant topic in a straightforward manner. No promotional or spam content is present.\"\n}"
}
] |
• Combustible Gases such as Methane
| 1
| 0.7
|
Qwen/Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507-FP8
| 4,096
|
[
{
"content": "You are a strict grader. You will receive ONE line of text and must grade it on:\n\n1. Coherency (0–5):\n - 0: Completely incoherent; random words, impossible to understand.\n - 1: Very hard to follow; severe grammar/logic issues.\n - 2: Partly understandable but disjointed or confusing.\n - 3: Mostly clear with some minor awkwardness or small jumps.\n - 4: Clear and logically connected, only tiny issues.\n - 5: Perfectly coherent, fluent, and easy to understand.\n\n2. Content (0–1):\n - 0: No meaningful content; links to other websites, website clutter, random spam, advertisment link, etc.\n - 1: Not spam or promotional. \n\nNote: We do not care about factual accuracy for content score.\n\nReturn ONLY valid JSON with this exact schema, no extra text:\n\n{\n \"coherency_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"content_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"rationale\": \"<short explanation of why you gave these scores>\"\n}\n\nNow grade the following line of text:\n\nBill summaries are authored by CRS.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "{\n \"coherency_score\": 5,\n \"content_score\": 1,\n \"rationale\": \"The sentence is clear, fluent, and logically connected. It states a factual relationship between bill summaries and CRS without any confusion or grammatical issues. The content is not promotional or spammy.\"\n}"
}
] |
Bill summaries are authored by CRS.
| 1
| 0.7
|
Qwen/Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507-FP8
| 4,096
|
[
{
"content": "You are a strict grader. You will receive ONE line of text and must grade it on:\n\n1. Coherency (0–5):\n - 0: Completely incoherent; random words, impossible to understand.\n - 1: Very hard to follow; severe grammar/logic issues.\n - 2: Partly understandable but disjointed or confusing.\n - 3: Mostly clear with some minor awkwardness or small jumps.\n - 4: Clear and logically connected, only tiny issues.\n - 5: Perfectly coherent, fluent, and easy to understand.\n\n2. Content (0–1):\n - 0: No meaningful content; links to other websites, website clutter, random spam, advertisment link, etc.\n - 1: Not spam or promotional. \n\nNote: We do not care about factual accuracy for content score.\n\nReturn ONLY valid JSON with this exact schema, no extra text:\n\n{\n \"coherency_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"content_score\": <integer 0-5>,\n \"rationale\": \"<short explanation of why you gave these scores>\"\n}\n\nNow grade the following line of text:\n\nAfter that, the only time he heard from Jerry was when he came asking for money because he'd gotten himself into yet another financial jam. Phil always refused to lend him a dime and told him to get a job if he needed money.",
"role": "user"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "{\n \"coherency_score\": 5,\n \"content_score\": 1,\n \"rationale\": \"The text is clear, logically connected, and easy to follow with a coherent narrative about Phil and Jerry's financial relationship. It contains no spam or promotional content.\"\n}"
}
] |
After that, the only time he heard from Jerry was when he came asking for money because he'd gotten himself into yet another financial jam. Phil always refused to lend him a dime and told him to get a job if he needed money.
| 1
| 0.7
|
Qwen/Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507-FP8
| 4,096
|
End of preview. Expand
in Data Studio
No dataset card yet
- Downloads last month
- -