sergiopaniego HF Staff
The capture code for the Lisbon talk artefact (the trace itself lands after the run)
2ed66ed verified |
Download README.md from sergiopaniego/opencode-rollout-trace: direct link, hf CLI and curl.
- Browser
- Download file 4.13 kB
-
https://huggingface.co/datasets/sergiopaniego/opencode-rollout-trace/resolve/main/README.md
- Command line
-
hf download hf://datasets/sergiopaniego/opencode-rollout-trace/README.md
-
curl -L -o README.md https://huggingface.co/datasets/sergiopaniego/opencode-rollout-trace/resolve/main/README.md
4.13 kB
| license: apache-2.0 | |
| tags: | |
| - rl | |
| - trl | |
| - openenv | |
| - agents | |
| # One opencode rollout, as the trainer sees it | |
| The artefact behind the talk **Training a coding agent through a harness you did not write** | |
| ([Lisbon AI](https://lisbonai.org/), September 2026). | |
| An off-the-shelf coding agent, [opencode](https://github.com/sst/opencode), runs untouched in a | |
| remote sandbox. A proxy sits between it and vLLM, speaks the agent's own dialect, and records every | |
| model call the agent makes together with the exact token ids and logprobs. That recording is what | |
| gets trained on. This repo is one of those recordings, plus the code that produced it. | |
| Nothing here is a transcript. A transcript would be text, and retokenising text gives you different | |
| ids than the ones the model actually sampled. That difference is the point. | |
| ## Files | |
| | File | What it is | | |
| |---|---| | |
| | `trace.json` | the raw proxy trace: every captured model call, in order, as recorded | | |
| | `turns.json` | the real agent turns, derived exactly as training derives them (see below) | | |
| | `task.json` | the instruction the agent was given, and its task id | | |
| | `visible_tests.txt` | the example cases the agent could see, from the problem statement | | |
| | `held_out_tests.json` | the tests that produce the reward, which the agent never sees | | |
| | `summary.json` | reward, turn counts, tool counts, and how many turns training keeps | | |
| | `capture_trace.py` | drives one session and writes all of the above | | |
| | `capture_launcher.py` | serves vLLM, opens a tunnel, runs the capture, as one HF Job | | |
| ### Reading `turns.json` | |
| Each turn carries what the training path actually uses: | |
| - `prompt_ids`: the conversation sent to the model that turn, re-tokenized with its tools, so the | |
| prompt matches what the upstream rendered | |
| - `output_ids`: the ids the model generated, taken from the capture and **not** re-encoded | |
| - `per_token_logps`: the generator's logprobs for those ids | |
| - `trained`: whether the training policy keeps this turn. Here it is `has_tool_call`, so turns where | |
| the model took an action are kept and pure-text turns are not | |
| - `mask`: **derived, not recorded.** `0` for the context, `1` for the tokens the model generated. | |
| The proxy never stores a mask, the distinction is structural: only `output_ids` get a gradient. | |
| It is materialised here because that distinction is the whole reason the artefact is interesting. | |
| Turn count in `turns.json` is smaller than in `trace.json` on purpose. opencode fires extra model | |
| calls for its own bookkeeping, a title generator and a context summariser, and those are not the | |
| task. Training them with the rollout's reward would reinforce the wrong thing, so they are filtered | |
| by anchoring on the system prompt of the first tool-enabled turn. | |
| ## Reproducing it | |
| ```sh | |
| TASK_INDEX=0 PUSH_TO_DATASET=sergiopaniego/opencode-rollout-trace \ | |
| hf jobs uv run --flavor a100-large --secrets HF_TOKEN --timeout 3600s \ | |
| "https://huggingface.co/datasets/sergiopaniego/opencode-rollout-trace/resolve/main/capture_launcher.py" | |
| ``` | |
| One GPU is enough: this captures, it does not train, so there is no weight sync. The vLLM flags | |
| matter, `--return-tokens-as-token-ids` is what lets the proxy recover exact ids instead of | |
| re-encoding decoded text. | |
| `build_dataset(n_prompts, seed)` in the training example is deterministic, so `TASK_INDEX` selects a | |
| reproducible task. Keep `N_PROMPTS` equal to what the training run used and the indices line up. | |
| ## Where this comes from | |
| - Training script, maintained upstream in TRL: | |
| [`examples/async_grpo_opencode/opencode_hf_sandbox.py`](https://github.com/huggingface/trl/blob/main/examples/async_grpo_opencode/opencode_hf_sandbox.py) | |
| - Write-up: [Training a coding agent using the OpenCode harness](https://huggingface.co/blog/sergiopaniego/trl-openenv-harness-training) | |
| - Task data: [DeepCoder-Preview-Dataset](https://huggingface.co/datasets/agentica-org/DeepCoder-Preview-Dataset) | |
| - Sandbox image: `ghcr.io/huggingface/openenv-opencode-sandbox:latest` | |
| - The policy trained this way: [Qwen3-8B-opencode-deepcoder-grpo](https://huggingface.co/sergiopaniego/Qwen3-8B-opencode-deepcoder-grpo) | |