user_q
stringlengths
3
20
question
stringlengths
20
31k
user_a
stringclasses
5 values
answer
stringlengths
18
302
Josh_Lazor
Hello all,I have a working Pytorch ConvNet program. It tests Datasets and runs rather slow, but effectively.Would anyone know how to test images separately? I want to test 1 image instead of n number of images.Thank you
ptrblck
You can load and process a single image, e.g. via PIL.Image.open and torchvision.transforms. Once you have created the image tensor for this single input image, you can add a batch dimension via x = x.unsqueeze(0) and pass it to the model. Let me know, if this works for you.
TAF
I tried this but it does not work
ptrblck
You might not have deleted all references to all parameters and tensors, so these objects might still hold the memory. Also, another application might of course use the GPU memory (but I assume you are sure that PyTorch uses it).
NIkolaStaykov
Which modules are affected by the modes except BatchNorm and Dropout? I was wondering in which cases the two modes are interchangeable.
ptrblck
The train() and eval() call change the internal self.training flag, so you could grep for it in the source folder (grep -r self.training). Currently it seems these modules are affected by it in the PyTorch core: Quantization modules Dropout InstanceNorm BatchNorm RNN (probably only if using cudnn…
algeriapy
When I tried to extract deep features using trained inception_v3 modelmodel = torchvision.models.inception_v3(pretrained=True)model.fc = nn.Linear(2048, 1)model.load_state_dict(torch.load(’./models/Beauty_inception_reg.pt’))feature_extractor = torch.nn.Sequential(*list(model.children())[:-1])I got the following error :...
ptrblck
Wrapping child modules into an nn.Sequential container will only work in simple use cases, where each module is called sequentially and no functional calls are used in the forward method. As you can seehere, the Inception model uses some functional pooling layers, conditions, dropout, and a flatte…
syomantak
I want to do a conv1D operation but on an image. Let’s say the data is of size(1,1,H,W). Treat this as a data of size(1,1,H)W times, and doConv1D(1,1,k)on each and stacking the outputs back. Basically, it is equivalent to doing a Conv2D with kernel size =(k,W), however, with each column of the kernel equal. It is like ...
ptrblck
Wouldn’t your approach be equivalent to use a nn.Conv2d with a kernel size of (k, 1)? This would also only use the height of the kernel and apply it basically to each “column”. Let me know, if I misunderstood your use case.
BlueTurtle
I have had a lots of problems with this notebook but hopefully this is the last one:I now have:All my inputs as tensorsBoth the data and model (including fc) on the GPUResized all the images to the same sizeChanged requires_grad = Truefor the fcMy model will only do one forward pass though before sitting idle. I think ...
ptrblck
Try to add a print statement in the validation loss or profile each step. The Kaggle notebook look approx. 1 second per validation step, so depending on the size of the validation dataset, this might take some time.
aarrvv
I am learning pytorch and coded a minimal classifier to play with:import torch import numpy as np import matplotlib.pyplot as plt numclasses, count = 8, 200 x = torch.randn(count, 4) y = torch.randint(0, numclasses, size=[count]) dataset = torch.utils.data.TensorDataset(x, y) dataloader = torch.utils.data.DataLoader(...
ptrblck
The larger the batch size, the less noise the parameter updates will include. Often this noise is beneficial to reach a better final accuracy, but it might depend on your use case. You could find some articles, which compare gradient descent, batch gradient descent, and stochastic gradient descent…
sgaur
HiI am trying to take weighted average of weights for last 5 epochs but all of the wights (where require_grad = True) are same.> class resnet34(nn.Module): > def __init__(self): > super(resnet34,self).__init__() > self.arch = models.resnet34(pretrained=True) > self.arch.fc = nn.Linear(self.a...
ptrblck
After you’ve stored the state_dicts you could iterate the keys of them and create a new state_dict using the mean (or any other reduction) for all parameters. This code snippet shows a small example: # Setup state_dicts = [] model = models.resnet18() optimizer = torch.optim.SGD(model.parameters(),…
ericrhenry
Valgrind is my go-to for wrangling possible memory leaks. It is a beautiful piece of software, but is unfortunately (and necessarily) imperfect. I just ran a libtorch-based application through a relatively brief optimization of a CNN model, and it generated a fair number of loss records. Fortunately, all of them appear...
ptrblck
Thanks for the analysis and I think that (same as with your last check) it would be worth creating an issue on GitHub to track it.
mayool
Hey everyone,i am currently working with the torchvision.models.segmentation.deeplabv3_resnet50() model.It consists of:a backbone (Resnet)a classifier (DeeplabHead)interpolation (biliniar to make sure output_size = input_size)what really confuesed me was the interpolation part.For testing I inserted an image of size 27...
ptrblck
Thepaperexplains the interpolation strategy as well as the usage of transposed convolutions in a couple of sections. This section might be interesting: We have adopted instead a hybrid approach that strikes a good efficiency/accuracy trade-off, using atrous convolution to increase by a factor o…
DJ_1992
Hi,I am trying to use WeightedRandomSampler in this wayclass_sample_count = [39736,949, 7807]weights = 1 / torch.Tensor(class_sample_count)weights = weights.double()sampler = torch.utils.data.sampler.WeightedRandomSampler(weights=weights,num_samples=?,replacement=False)dataloaders = {x: torch.utils.data.DataLoader(imag...
ptrblck
The weights tensor should contain a weight for each sample, not the class weights. Have a look atthis postfor an example.
chaslie
Hi,If i have a one hot vector of shape [25,6] and a data input of [25,1,260,132] how do i concatanate into a single tensor to feed in to the encoder of a convolutional VAE?like wise the lat_dim tensor is [25,100] how to concatanate to feed into the decoder of the convolutional VAE?Chaslie
ptrblck
Sorry for not being clear enough. You could pass both tensors to the forward method and concatenate the activations as seen in this dummy code: class MyModel(nn.Module): def __init__(self): super(MyModel, self).__init__() self.conv = nn.Conv2d(1, 1, 3, 1, 1) self.lin = …
Yashas
The initialization is layer-dependent. How does pytorch seed the RNGs by default?If I have to train a model N times to see the average performance of the model, do I have to have special code to ensure that the initializations are different? Can I assume that I have different initialization on each training run?
ptrblck
I don’t think PyTorch seeds the code by default, as this would mean you could get deterministic result for each run, which is not the case. You can execute this core repeatedly in your terminal and will get different values: python -c "import torch; print(torch.randn(10))"
GB_K
Hello PyTorchers.I used the word PyTorcher meaning the person uses Pytorch.I am not sure this expression is appropriate, so comment to me about this, please XDFor my task (face detection), I am using two deep learning framework, Pytorch and MXNet.Please look at the diagram below to help your understanding.image956×299 ...
ptrblck
Thanks for the information. In that case you are adding synchronizations, as numpy uses CPU arrays. Your workflow would therefore probably be: load data on CPU -> transfer to GPU and use MXNet model -> transfer back to CPU -> transform to PyTorch tensor and transfer back to GPU -> use forward pas…
s_n
Hi,I have a class for my model that uses some other model in it. For example:class Mynet1(nn.Module):definit(self):super(NN_model, self).init()self.fc1 = nn.Linear(4160, 500)class Mynet2(nn.Module):definit(self, Mynet):super(NN_model, self).init()self.fc1 = nn.Linear(4160, 500)self.layer = Mynet(…)mynet1=Mynet1()model ...
ptrblck
nn.DataParallel will split the input tensor in dim0 and will send each chunk to the corresponding model replica on a specific device. I.e. your model’s forward will get an input of the shape [batch_size//nb_gpus, *]. If you need to create y1 and y2 inside the forward method, you should also consi…
LeErnst
Hello together,i have a ReLU-NN class as follows20 class ReLU_NN(tr.nn.Module): 21 ''' 22 Class for a ReLU-NN with variable size. 23 Inpu...
ptrblck
You have a recursion in your code, as you are overriding PyTorch’s load_state_dict method and are calling it inside via: model.load_state_dict(tr.load(PATH)) which will call the method again with the state_dict instead of the PATH. Rename your method to my_load_state_dict or any other name and it…
Ahmed_Abdelaziz
Hi all,I am trying to convert this tensorflow code into pytorch. For example, I converted the below tensorflow codetf.get_variable("char_embeddings", [len(data.char_dict), data.char_embedding_size]), char_index) # [num_sentences, max_sentence_length, max_word_length, emb]intoclass CharEmbeddings(nn.Module): def _...
ptrblck
Probably yes, but you should compare the default arguments to both methods, as each framework might use other defaults. self.embeddings is not created as an nn.Parameter, so Autograd won’t calculate the gradients for this tensor. You could use: emb = torch.empty(len(...)) nn.init.xqavier_uni…
Vatsal_Malaviya
I have not changed any gradient explicitly to false in grad_fn of tensors.Refer Link for all the code fileCode Linkmain.py as follows:import torch from DataLoader import * from model import * from torchvision import transforms from torch.utils.data import DataLoaderPreformatted text import os #HYPER-PARAMETERS batchs...
ptrblck
The output of torch.argmax doesn’t have a backward function, so you are breaking the computation graph in: output = torch.argmax(output,dim=1) Try to pass the model output directly to the criterion instead.
Cirets0h
Due to certain data I want my network to only learn on losses that are lower than 1. For that I use the following code:def train(img, label): x = self.net(img) loss_val = self.loss(x, label) self.optimizer.zero_grad() if loss_val < 1: loss_val.backward() self.optimizer.step()Is t...
ptrblck
Each forward pass will create a new computation graph. To double check your use case, you can print the gradients via: for name, param in net.named_parameters(): print(name, param.grad) You can print it at different places to see, if the gradients are valid or have been zeroed out.
phiwei
Hi,I have noticed that my dataloader gets slower if I add more workers compared to num_workers=0.My dataset definition is quite simple:class Dataset(torch.utils.data.Dataset): def __init__(self, file_paths, labels, transform=None): self.file_paths = file_paths self.labels = labels self.tran...
ptrblck
If you are using multiple workers, the Dataset will be copied, if I’m not mistaken. The first iteration would include these copies as well as the first batch creation in each process, which might be slow. However, the following iterations should be faster. Are you consistently seeing a slowdown u…
Haimin_Hunter_Zhang
I have read the documentation of torch.nn.AdaptiveAvgPool2d, and I understand how to use this function now. But I don’t get how this function works. Can help be provided to explain the algorithm of AdaptiveAvgPool2d?Much appreciated.
ptrblck
@tomexplains it beautifully inthis post.
Qu_Yukun
I try to train a two-stram network. I have two models, and I hope I can use the sum output of the two models to update the two models.Now I have two models, get their loss respectively: they are loss1 and loss2.And then I add the two loss values: loss = loss1 + loss2.The question is that:loss.backward() will update wic...
ptrblck
The loss.backward() call will let Autograd calculate the gradients for both models, as the final loss is a sum of both partial losses. You can also verify it by printing the gradients of some parameters of these models after the backward call.
Absurd
Supports that x is a tensor with shape = [batch_size, channel_number, height, width], some may be positive value and others may be 0. And I only want to keep the value of top 10% positive values of each channel and make others 0. But the problem is that the number of pixels of positive value in each channel is differen...
ptrblck
It shouldn’t matter, if some values are positive and others zero, since the result tensor would also contain zeros. So even if the top 10% includes zeros (if not enough positive values were found), you wouldn’t change the output, would you? If that’s the case, this code should work: # Setup x = to…
sebastienwood
Hi,I am considering the use of gradient checkpointing to lessen the VRAM load. From what I understand there were some issues with stochastic nodes (e.g. Dropout) at some point in time to apply gradient checkpointing.However I have a kind of Bayesian Neural Network which needs quite a bit of memory, hence I am intereste...
ptrblck
Thanks for the link! While this notebook gives you a really good example of the usage, note that it’s a bit outdated by now and if I’m not mistaken,@mcarilli’sPRshould have enabled the bitwise accuracy between standard models and checkpointed models.These testsalso should verify this behavior…
yeedTorch
I am just starting out with libtorch and pytorch as well, so I apologize if I haven’t searched enough for an answer before posting.Looking at some examplary code found online and trying that on my own machine I have stumbled upon this expression: target.eq(pred).sum().template item<int64_t>();I have never seen a .templ...
ptrblck
The template keyword is to disambiguate the actual call, as otherwise the expression might be understood by the compiler as item less-than int64_t greater-than ().This postgoes into detail and can explain it way better than I can.
ed-fish
I have a multi-label problem where I need to calculate the F1 Metric, currently using SKLearn Metrics f1_score with samples as average.Is it correct that I need to add the f1 score for each batch and then divide by the length of the dataset to get the correct value. Currently I am getting a 40% f1 accuracy which seems ...
ptrblck
I don’t think you can simply calculate the average of the F1 score, as shown in this small dummy example: preds = np.random.randint(0, 2, (100,)) targets = np.random.randint(0, 2, (100,)) f1_ref = f1_score(targets, preds) f1_running = 0 batch_size = 10 for i in range(0, preds.shape[0], batch_siz…
LeErnst
Hello together,lets say we have aReLU-NNclass and for the training phase atraining_backendclass which handles all the optimization data and so on. Within thetraining_backend__init__method there are the following assignments:self.model = model # a NN-model of class ReLU-NN self.optimizer = torch.optim.LBFGS(self.model.p...
ptrblck
Yes, you would need to create a new optimizer for the new model, as the old optimizer stores references to the initially passed parameters. Alternatively, you could add the new parameters via add_param_group, but I don’t think you would have any benefit from it.
GB_K
Hello. I am newbie for PyTorch.I think I fall in love with PyTorch these days, but I don’t know why XD.I coded softmax classifier. But I am not sure it is trained correctly.I get weird accuracy and loss values from the plot.My model code is as follows:import numpy as np import torch use_cuda = torch.cuda.is_available...
ptrblck
nn.CrossEntropyLoss() expects raw logits as the model output, as internally F.log_softmax and nn.NLLLoss will be applied, so you should remove the F.softmax in your model. Also, the target is expected to have the shape [batch_size] and contain class indices in the range [0, nb_classes-1], so these …
John_J_Watson
I am trying to build a small siamese network (with an aim to get encodings from the last/pre-last layer) and would like to use a pretrained model + the extra layers needed to get the encodings.I have something like this at the moment, but the results dont look great, so I now wonder if this is the correct way to build ...
ptrblck
Your new use case seems to use the penultimate activation tensors as an extracted feature. While your approach would return the feature tensor before the pooling layer (which will thus be bigger), my proposed approach would apply the pooling and thus yield a smaller activation. I don’t know, how y…
ActonMartin
when I use a pytorch-template for my dataset, some errors just like monster on the way. When I solve one, another one is coming and say hello to me. But this error make me feel wondering.I just write my dataset dataloader in dataloader/dataloaders.py;make a new loss in model/loss.pyTHE ERROR HINTS ISTrainable parameter...
ptrblck
It seems that img is a ByteTensor, which you are trying to normalize with floating point values. This simple code snippet will raise the same issue: img = torch.randint(0, 255, (3, 24, 24)).byte() img.add_(torch.tensor(1.)) Try to transform img to a FloatTensor via img = img.float() before normal…
henry_Kang
Hello. I am currently using the 2 GPU machines in the lab.The first one, it has 2 Titan V.Second, the other has 4 Titan V.When I train the same dataset but 2 times bigger batch size but 2 titan V result is better.The network is Mobilenet V3 based network.I have read some articles, and they said that Sync batch normaliz...
ptrblck
I’ve seen some experiments for large scale systems, where the learning rate was adapted to the batch size as seen inTraining ImageNet in 1 hour. However, this effect should be much smaller in your setup. Might still be worth a try to lower it and see, if it changes the convergence.
Michael-Equi
Hello,I am new to pytorch and am trying to implement a custom neural network that includes and LSTM for a robot navigation task. I need to initialize the LSTM’s hidden state with the output of an upstream model. When I try to set the initial hidden state I get the errorIndexError: index 1 is out of bounds for dimension...
ptrblck
nn.LSTM expects the a tuple with the hidden_state and cell_state as the second argument, so this code should work: x, hidden = self.lstm(actions, (torch.zeros(1, 2, 128), torch.zeros(1, 2, 128))) Unrelated to this problem, but note that you are reassigning x and this the output of self.input_fc wi…
Valerio_Biscione
When I want to do transfer learning, I set the require_grad = False and only pass the other parameters to the optimizer. But what happens if I only do one of these two steps?What happens if I set several modules’ reguire_grad = False but then I pass all net.parameters() to the optimize.What happens if I keep the requir...
ptrblck
They will yield the equivalent results, yes. Filtering out the parameters is explicit and could thus increase the code readability and will also avoid iterating over parameters without a grad attribute in the step method. Approach (1) would allow you to unfreeze the parameters later in training di…
mohit117
I was going through thefollowing informationon reducing learning rates in PyTorch to really low value like 1e-9.And I am amazed why doingloss = loss/100is equivalent to reducing learning rate by 100? The full snippet is below.outputs = model(batch) loss = criterion(outputs, targets) # Equivalent to lowering the learni...
ptrblck
If you scale the loss, you’ll also scale the gradients. In a simple use case, this can be used instead of changing the learning rate, as seen here: # Setup torch.manual_seed(2809) lin = nn.Linear(2, 2, bias=False) x = torch.randn(1, 2) # Standard approach out = lin(x) loss = out.sum() print(loss…
Qinru_Li
Say in the forward() pass, I generate the network predictions like the followingdef forward(self, input): conditions = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5] out_dict = {} for c in conditions: output = self.network( (input, c) ) out_dict[index of c] = output return out_dictNow from the ground truth, we ...
ptrblck
The print statement might be buggy, if you are directly printing c in the lambda expression as explainedhere, so you might need to assign the value of c as a new argument to the lambda function via: lambda grad, c=c: print(c, grad)
lkchenxicvi
I wanto update BatchNorm2D after loss.backward.But this problem cannot be solved.Code show as below.def updateBN():for m in model.modules():if isinstance(m, nn.BatchNorm2d):m.weight.grad.data.add_(0.001*torch.sign(m.weight.data)) # L1train:model.zero_grad()output= model(input)loss = nn.BCEloss(output,target)loss.backw...
ptrblck
This dummy code snippet seems to work, if I use updateBN and BN_grad_zero after the backward call: def updateBN(): for m in model.modules(): if isinstance(m, nn.BatchNorm2d): m.weight.grad.add_(torch.sign(m.weight)) def BN_grad_zero(): for m in model.modules(): …
MUnique
Hello,I have a tensor in size of (BTCHW) in which B is the batch size, T is the number of frames of the video, C the number of channels, and H,W the spatial size. This tensor is the extracted feature map of testing some videos on a pre-trained network. As the number of frames may vary from a video to another I wanted t...
ptrblck
You could permute the dimensions and use the temporal dimension as a “fake” spatial dimension. Afterwards you could permute it back to the original shape. Let me know, if this would work for you.
Romina_Baila
Hi there!I am fairly new to Pytorch and I am trying to provide a different learning rate for the parameters from BERT, and the rest of the model’s parameters to have the same lr.My model class looks like this (it’s from a tutorial):class BERTGRUModel(nn.Module): def __init__(self, bert, ...
ptrblck
The dropout layer doesn’t have trainable parameters, but besides that the code looks alright. Since your model is training with the “standard” approach, could you use your per-parameter optimizer with the same learning rate for all parameters, as you’ve used in the working approach? Assuming your …
complexfilter
import torchx = torch.tensor(5., requires_grad=True)y = 2xxx.data*=6y.backward()print(x.grad)
ptrblck
The manipulation of the .data attribute cannot be tracked by Autograd and can yield wrong results (as in this case) and other unexpected side effects. Remove the x.data manipulation and it should work.
tirthasheshpatel
I have been trying to implement convolutional VAE in PyTorch for a while now and am somehow not able to correctly train my network. Here’s the encoder, decoder, and training loop. I am training the model on MNIST dataset.Encoder output: Two tensors (loc, logvar) of shape[batch_size, latent_dims]Decoder output: Image of...
ptrblck
You are right and it shouldn’t make a difference, as the computation graph will be the same. It might be a typo or copy-paste issue, but your optimizer in the first approach takes the parameters from model, which is undefined. It should get the parameters of encoder and decoder so that it can upda…
julioeu99
a=[] for ne, naa in zip(ne, naa): de+=distance.euclidean(naa,ne) a.append(de/size_batch) print(*a, sep = ", ")I wanted to put all data inside the array, and print whats inside it.I think the array is overwriting, and its stuck on the first position. How can i store all values in this array?I tried this to:v=0 a.ins...
ptrblck
Ah sorry, I missed the errors. You are currently overwriting ne and naa in the loop, so use other variable names for the single elements and also move the a.append call inside the loop: for ne_, naa_ in zip(ne, naa): de+=distance.euclidean(naa_,ne_) a.append(de/size_batch)
sh0416
Is the Adam’s state dict work correct when we use DDP???I think there is no sync for the optimizer. Do I have to make code for this manually?Thanks,
ptrblck
DDP should synchronize the gradients in the backward using AllReduce operations, such that each optimizer should use the same model parameters as well as gradients, thus also creating the same internal states. I don’t think there is a need to synchronize the optimizer’s state, but@mrshenlimight c…
henry_Kang
Hello. I am dealing with the multi-class segmentation.I used to handle the binary class for semantic segmentation.In the binary, I use the binary mask as the target.However in the multi-class, it looks like I need some change.DSC_39741280×720 1.62 KBThis is my mask.I have 5 classes which are Red, Green,Blue, white and ...
ptrblck
Assuming pipe is a DataLoader object, you could iterate it once and collect all targets via: targets = [] for _, target in pipe: targets.append(target) targets = torch.stack(targets) and calculate the class distribution later. I hope that the target tensors are not too big to fit into your RA…
Neofytos
I have reimplemented BatchNorm1D based on the implementation provided by@ptrblck(greatly appreciated!), here:pytorch_misc/batch_norm_manual.py at master · ptrblck/pytorch_misc · GitHubIn order to verify identical behaviour with the nn.BatchNorm equivalent, I initiate 2 models (as well as 2 optimizers), one using MyBatc...
ptrblck
Ah OK. The backward pass of repeat_interleave is not deterministic as explained in the linked docs: Additionally, the backward path for repeat_interleave() operates nondeterministically on the CUDA backend because repeat_interleave() is implemented using index_select() , the backward path fo…
ryoma
How can I assign forward-adaptive learning rates to modules in sequential?I know in normal case, we can use optimizer and make this like"params" : model.a.parameters(), 'lr' : lr / 100, but I wanna use different learning-rate for loss1 and loss2 which went through the same module.class X(nn.Module): def __init__(sel...
ptrblck
The loss calculation is independent from the optimization step (parameter update) in general. You could create two optimizers with the specified learning rates and apply them sequentially, if that would fit your use case: optimizer1.zero_grad() loss1.backward(retain_graph=True) # calculate gradien…
feiland
Hi there,I am using code from a CIFAR classification problem (num_classes = 10) and want to use the code for my dataset (CheXpert with num_classes = 3). Therefore, I changed the num_classes in the ResNet model from 10 to 3.class ResNet(FitModule): def __init__(self, block, num_blocks, num_classes=3): #changed fr...
ptrblck
For 3 classes, your target should have the shape [batch_size] (which seems to be correct) and contain the values [0, 1, 2]. It seems you are using a value of 3, which will raise this error, as this would mean you are using 4 classes (note that the class index starts at 0).
mohit117
Hello,I am confused when to use conv.weight.data VS conv.weight. For example the followingcodeuses,nn.init.kaiming_normal_(m.weight, mode='fan_out', nonlinearity='relu')but I also see at many placesnn.init.kaiming_normal_(m.weight.DATA, mode='fan_out', nonlinearity='relu')Whic one to use? I am using PYTORCH 1.3.1.To in...
ptrblck
Don’t use the .data attribute as it might yield unwanted side effects. While you will be able to manipulate the underlying data without raising an error, Autograd won’t be able to track these operations and you might run into a variety of issues later (we had quite a few of these issues already her…
sh0416
Code:model0 = nn.Linear(10, 10) model1 = nn.Linear(10, 10) model2 = nn.Linear(10, 10) model3 = nn.Linear(10, 10) input = torch.rand(128 ,10) output = model3(model2(model1(model0(input)))) model0.to('cuda:0') model1.to('cuda:1') model2.to('cuda:2') model3.to('cuda:3') pred = model3(model2(model1(model0(input.to('cuda:0'...
ptrblck
This small difference is most likely a result of the limited floating point precision, which can be seen e.g. by changing the order of operations: x = torch.randn(10, 10, 10) sum1 = x.sum() sum2 = x.sum(0).sum(0).sum(0) print(sum1 - sum2) > tensor(-3.8147e-06) Avoiding these differences is espec…
David_Hresko
Hi I am trying to use thishttps://pytorch.org/tutorials/intermediate/memory_format_tutorial.htmlon my model. But the channels are still not converted. Can you help me ? Is it even possible to convert ?Here is my GAN generator model:class UNetDown(nn.Module): def __init__(self, input_size: int, output_filters: int, ...
ptrblck
Thanks for the update! There seems to be a small misunderstanding. You should still create the tensors in the default format [N, C, H, W] and just call to(memory_format=torch.channels_last) on it, so that your code changes would be minimal. This code works for me: model = Generator((2048, 1, 2))…
cevvalu
Hi, i am trying to get next predicted word in the sequence. Is it possible to get maximum value from dense layer’s output without softmax since i am not doing any classification
ptrblck
That is correct. It will apply F.log_softmax internally, so you shouldn’t add a softmax layer in your model.
vdw
I’m trying my hands on Siamese Network models. After searching for some examples, this seems to be the common way to set up the modelclass SiameseNetwork(nn.Module): def __init__(self, core_model): super(SiameseNetwork, self).__init__() # Define layers self.layer1 = ... self.layer2 = ... ... ...
ptrblck
That’s a weird issue. I tried to reproduce it using your code snippets, but they seem to work fine: class SiameseNetwork(nn.Module): def __init__(self): super(SiameseNetwork, self).__init__() # Define layers self.layer1 = nn.Linear(1, 1) self.layer2 = nn.Linear(…
Jack_Rolph
I have to perform the operation:I have two tensors that I want to multiply in this way,AandB:A = torch.randn(B,C,j,i) B = torch.randn(B,C,j,k) C = AxB C.shape = torch.Size(B,C,j,i,k)Where I have assumed the shape of the output tensor based on the indices of the equation.What is the function that I should use to produce...
ptrblck
Would this code work? B, C, i, j, k = 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 A = torch.randn(B,C,j,i) B = torch.randn(B,C,j,k) C = torch.matmul(A.unsqueeze(4), B.unsqueeze(3)) print(C.shape)
Arjun_Gupta
From the documentation: “brightness_factor is chosen uniformly from [max(0, 1 - brightness), 1 + brightness]”brightness by default is set to 0. This means that the brightness factor is chosen uniformly from [1, 1] meaning that brightness factor=1. The other parameters (contrast, saturation, hue) also seem to be constan...
ptrblck
You could use the staticmethod get_params to apply the same “random” transformation via: img = transforms.ToPILImage()(torch.randn(3, 224, 224)) color_jitter = transforms.ColorJitter(brightness=0.1, contrast=0.1, saturation=0.1, hue=0.1) transform = transforms.ColorJitter.get_params( color_jit…
mathematics
As official doc gives example to upscale the imagepixel_shuffle = nn.PixelShuffle(3) input = torch.randn(1, 9, 4, 4) output = pixel_shuffle(input) # torch.Size([1, 1, 12, 12])As it mutilplies by input, I wanted to use 2 or any other input , giving erorRuntimeError: invalid argument 2: size ‘[1 x 2 x 2 x 2 x 4 x 4]’ is ...
ptrblck
You won’t be able to convert 512 channels to 3 given the formula fromthe docs. input [N, L=C*factor**2, H_in, W_in] output [N, C, H_out=H_in*factor, W_out=W_in*factor] For your setup you would need to calculate: 3 * factor**2 = 512 factor**2 = 512/3 factor = sqrt(512/3) factor ~= 13.07 # not an …
Landu
i’m using both of save_image() and Summarywriter.add_image()i made an image from several images. ( N,C,H,W->C,HN,WN)but i found that MNIST (1,H,W) works well in both, but color image doesn’t work wellhere’s the images스크린샷, 2020-05-25 07-36-27808×396 466 KBthe left one is using add_image() (on tensorboard)and the righ...
ptrblck
save_image “unnormalizes” the image via: ndarr = grid.mul(255).add_(0.5).clamp_(0, 255).permute(1, 2, 0).to('cpu', torch.uint8).numpy() I don’t know, if add_image of TensorBoard does the same, but it looks like the colors might be clipped, so you could try to apply the same method as in save_image.…
vaseline555
Dear folks,hello, I am a quite newbie in deep learning with PyTorch…I am trying to build an image classification model using PyTorch,but in the process of pre-processing dataset, I’ve stuck with a problem.Problem)I want to read a bunch of.npyfiles in a directory (e.g. ‘/training’)One of the.npyfiles consists of tensors...
ptrblck
There are different way of handling this use case. The simplest would be to load the complete data into memory and just use some conditions on the index to select the right numpy array where the current sample is located to load it. The other approach would be to create a separate Dataset for each…
saluei
I have two functions for calculating entropy in first one (named: ImageEntropy_gpu) use torch.histc function and run it in GPU (nvidia 2070) and in second one (named: ImageEntropy_cpu) use numpy library and run at CPU (i7-7800x)def ImageEntropy_gpu(img):sz=img.view(-1).size()[0]hist_probability=torch.histc(img.view(-1...
ptrblck
The performance will depend on the workload you are deploying to the device. While small workloads will be faster on the CPU due to the kernel launch latency on the GPU, you should see a speedup for bigger sizes. Using this code: nb_iters = 100 for device in ['cpu', 'cuda']: for s in torch.l…
collinarnett
I’m reading this paper on a DCGAN and the authors write:For upsampling by the generator, we use strided convolution transpose operations instead of pixelshuffling [43] or interpolation, as we found this to work better in practice. We set the slope of theLeakyReLU units to 0.2 and the dropout rate to 0.1 during training...
ptrblck
I don’t think “downscaling” is referring to the spatial size, but to a multiplicative factor. Here normalization is mentioned: which seems to point towards using a constant factor for the downscaling via: act = act * 1/factor
darylnak
Suppose I have the following tensors:x = [[1,2,3], [4,5,6], [7,8,9]] y = [[11,21,31], [41,51,61], [71,81,91]] z= [[1], [2], [0]]Wherex,yare both(h,w)andzis(h,1). I want to create a new tensorkthat it is a copy ofxexcept I want to copy thez[i][0]column at rowifromyinto rowiat columnz[i][0]inx. Thus, using the ...
ptrblck
A combination of gather and scatter_ should work: x = torch.tensor([[1,2,3], [4,5,6], [7,8,9]]) y = torch.tensor([[11,21,31], [41,51,61], [71,81,91]]) z = torch.tensor([[1], [2], [0]]) k …
Naveen
I am getting above error my torch error, my torch version are torch 1.4.0+cputorchvision 0.5.0+cpu.any help?Thanks
ptrblck
This method was introduced in 1.5.0 so you would need to update PyTorch to the latest stable version.
Aaditya_Chandrasekha
I am trying to invoke a gradient clipping in C++ similar to this line of code in Python :torch.nn.utils.clip_grad_norm_(Net.parameters(),0.2)In C++ I am callingtorch::nn::utils::clip_grad_norm_(Net->parameters(), 0.2);Can anyone kindly verify that this is the right call ?
ptrblck
The usage look correct and is also used in this way inthis test.
Shubhankar
FeatureIt would be really helpful if we can implementsetattrmethods in respective classes (say transforms.transform.Normalize) so that attributes of objects can be set recursively say for example by using a loop.MotivationIt would be helpful to loop through multiple attributes and set them on the fly in order to compar...
ptrblck
You should be able to directly access the attributes of the transformations, as they are implemented as Python classes: norm = transforms.Normalize(mean=torch.tensor([0.5, 0.5, 0.5]), std=torch.tensor([0.5, 0.5, 0.5])) print(norm) norm.mean = torch.tensor([1.5, 1.5, 1.5]…
justanhduc
Hello. How can I tile/repeat a tensor in such a way that each value is tiled/repeated a different number of times other than looping then concatenating?For e.g., fromtorch.Tensor([0, 1]), how can I tile the first value two times and the second three times to gettorch.Tensor([0, 0, 1, 1, 1]). Thanks in advance!
ptrblck
torch.repeat_interleave should work: x = torch.tensor([0, 1]) print(torch.repeat_interleave(x, torch.tensor([2, 3]))) > tensor([0, 0, 1, 1, 1])
cevvalu
Hi, trying to plot training and test loss in same graph, any advice?
ptrblck
You could use matplotlib.pylot to plot multiple graphs in the same plot. Alternatively, PyTorch has also TensorBoard as well as Visdom support.
Hari_Krishnan
I’m trying to implement a variant of capsule network where the matrix multiplication is replaced by element-wise multiplication with a vector. During training (mostly after the first backpropagation) the outputs become nan. I tried using gradient clipping, but it didn’ work. I’m working with MNIST dataset and I’m norma...
ptrblck
The values of squared_norm in PrimaryCaps explode and create the NaNs. In the last iteration before the NaNs are raised PrimaryCaps creates tensors with these statistics: print(squared_norm.min(), squared_norm.max()) > tensor(1.4527e+20, device='cuda:0', grad_fn=<MinBackward1>) tensor(5.3600e+26, …
CesMak
Hey there,I get the following runntime error:Traceback (most recent call last): File "ppo_witches_multi2.py", line 420, in <module> learn_single(ppo1, update_timestep, eps_decay, env) File "ppo_witches_multi2.py", line 269, in learn_single ppo.my_update(memory) File "ppo_witches_multi2.py", line 174, in m...
ptrblck
You would have to lower the memory footprint e.g. by reducing the batch size during training or using a smaller model. However, let’s first make sure you are not leaking memory. Are you running out of memory in the first iteration or are you seeing an increase in the memory usage during training? …
rsomani95
I’m trying to combine multiple related datasets and models into one giant model. Here’s what the architecture looks like:Screenshot 2020-05-23 at 11.58.54 PM732×470 8.73 KBFor eachhead, there’s a dataset with the following structure:Screenshot 2020-05-24 at 12.01.52 AM360×652 7.43 KBI’ve referred to the following 2 sou...
ptrblck
One possible approach would be to create two separate DataLoader and use their iterators directly via: dataset_head1 = TensorDataset(torch.randn(10, 1), torch.randn(10, 1)) dataset_head2 = TensorDataset(torch.randn(10, 1), torch.randn(10, 1)) for epoch in range(2): print('epoch ', epoch) #…
Anuj_Daga
RuntimeError Traceback (most recent call last) <ipython-input-3-0c9f361b4bf0> in <module> 260 if __name__ == "__main__": 261 for epoch in range(1, epochs + 1): --> 262 train(epoch) <ipython-input-3-0c9f361b4bf0> in train(epoch) 239 240 --> 241 loss.bac...
ptrblck
Just for the same of debugging, I would split the pow operations, which are applying a root to the input, and add an assert statement for the input to check for negative values.
fulltopic
Hi,I had pre-trained a RNN with BatchNormalization with collected data. In training, the input was in sizes of {batchSize, seqLen, others} so that the num_features of BatchNorm layer is seqLen (a fixed number). Then I want to transfer the RNN into A3C and train it online. In this case, the input is {1, 1, others} in r...
ptrblck
If you are dealing with a different number of features for the batchnorm layer, you could add a condition into your model, which would then pick the right batchnorm layer for the current input. I’m not familiar with your use case, but maybe it would also make sense to slice and copy the batchnorm l…
Enric_Moreu
Hello!For the last 2 weeks I’ve been stuck trying to count balls from a synthetic dataset I generated.When I set a batch size higher than 1, the network predicts the average value all the time.Otherwise, the network works great in train/valDataset: 5000 images with grey background and blue balls of the same size around...
ptrblck
Thanks for the executable code, that was really helpful. You are accidentally broadcasting the loss, since you have a mismatch in the output and target tensors. While your output has the shape [batch_size, 1], the target has [batch_size]. This yields to a broadcasting as seen here: # your code w…
KeisukeShimokawa
After reproducing the FQGAN implementation, CUDA out of memory occurred while training the model.However, when I removed the feature quantization part that I implemented myself and ran it, no error occurred.This means that the error occurs either in the model I implemented or in the FQ part where the loss value is adde...
ptrblck
One possibility of an increased memory usage might be the storage of the computation graph. embed, cluster_size, and ema_embed are created as buffers, which would register the tensors without making them trainable (their requires_grad attribute would be False). However, in the forward method you a…
themoonboy
Let me use a simple example to show the caseimport torch a = torch.rand(10000, 10000).cuda() # memory size: 865 MiB del a torch.cuda.empty_cache() # still have 483 MiBThat seems very strange, even though I use “del Tensor” + torch.cuda.empty_cache(), there are still more than half memory left in CUDA side (483 MB i...
ptrblck
If you are checking the memory via nvidia-smi, note that the CUDA context will also use memory. The allocated and cached memory will be freed using your code snippet: print(torch.cuda.memory_allocated()) print(torch.cuda.memory_cached()) > 0 > 0 a = torch.rand(10000, 10000).cuda() print(torch.c…
themoonboy
Hi, here is one toy code about this issue:import torch torch.cuda.set_device(3) a = torch.rand(10000, 10000).cuda() # monitor cuda:3 by "watch -n 0.01 nvidia-smi" a = torch.add(a, 0.0) # keep monitoringWhen using same variable name “a” in torch.add, I find the old a’s memory is not freed in cuda, it still exists even...
ptrblck
a will be freed automatically, if no reference points to this variable. Note that PyTorch uses a memory caching mechanism, so nvidia-smi will show all allocated and cached memory as well as the memory used by the CUDA context. Here is a small example to demonstrate this behavior: # Should be empt…
cijerezg
I have the following code:for count, params in enumerate(agent.actor.parameters()): print(params.grad)where agent is a class that has the neural network: actor. If I run that code, it prints the gradients, which is a tensor of size 4x5. Now, if I do something like this:for count, params in enumerate(agent.actor.pa...
ptrblck
The operations such as torch.sum and torch.abs shouldn’t change any behavior and I assume you might have used the code snippets in different parts of your original code. Before the first backward call, all .grad attributes are set to None. After the gradients were calculated for the very first tim…
ericrhenry
After laying down a lot of infrastructure (C++ frontend), I am just launching into attempting to train. I am working with a 4-class image classification problem, with several thousand 41X41 images. The model is a couple of chained convolutions with rectifiers in between, followed by a MaxPool and flattening to feed int...
ptrblck
Thanks for the detailed explanation and I think your “sanity check” makes sense. Note that I don’t have a background in numerical mathematics, so please take this post with a grain of salt. Yes, this is correct. The optimizer stores references to all parameters and you could inspect the id() of t…
mohit117
Hello,I know settingtorch.backends.cudnnfor fixed input size improves performance for GPU inference. But if i want to speed up inference just on CPU does this help (for fixed input size)?
ptrblck
No, cudnn is a library on top of CUDA and works only on GPUs. For CPU performance improvement, you could use e.g. MKL.
2hyes
Hello.I want to detect the fabric defect using autoencoder.Actually, data size is too small to do ML, so I cropped images to patches.number of nodefect images: 85number of patch of a image: 172Then I trained the autoencoder.During training time, loss is computed for every patches, maybe # of losses are (num_epoch * # o...
ptrblck
I’m not sure if you really need to compute the mean of the losses of all patches from the same image and I would assume that you could directly use each patch separately. During validation you would have to use all patches from the image, apply your threshold, and classify the image based on the cl…
Jack_Rolph
Suppose I have two tensors:a = torch.randn(10, 1000, 1, 4) b = torch.randn(10, 1000, 6, 4)Where the third index is the index of a vector.I want to take the dot product between each vector inbwith respect to the vector ina.To illustrate, this is what I mean:dots = torch.Tensor(10, 1000, 6, 1) for b in range(10): fo...
ptrblck
This code should work: a = torch.randn(10, 1000, 1, 4) b = torch.randn(10, 1000, 6, 4) dots = torch.Tensor(10, 1000, 6, 1) for x in range(10): for y in range(1000): for z in range(6): dots[x,y,z] = torch.dot(b[x,y,z], a[x,y,0]) ret = torch.matmul(b, a.permute(0, 1, 3,…
John_J_Watson
I am trying to use the ImageFolder class to read a bunch of images which are arranged this way:0(folder) image01 image01 1(folder) image01 image01 2(folder) image01 image01Then I do something lilke:ds = torchvision.datasets.ImageFolder( root=path_to, transform=p )I can see the list of class...
ptrblck
That is expected and the target should contain the class indices, not the names. So e.g. for three folders your target should contain values in [0, 1, 2]These target values are used to index the output of the model during the loss calculation, so they are used as numerical values instead of the…
GeoffNN
I have a 2d TensorAof shape(d, d)and I want to get the indices of its maximal element.torch.argmaxonly returns a single index. For now I got the result doing the following, but it seems involuted.vals, row_idx = A.max(0) col_idx = vals.argmax(0)And then,A[row_idx, col_idx]is the correct maximal value. Is there any more...
ptrblck
Alternatively, this code should also work: x = torch.randn(10, 10) print((x==torch.max(x)).nonzero())
sjt524
Sorry for my poor English.This is my code:trainset = datasets.MNIST(‘data’, train=True, download=False, transform=transform)trainloader = torch.utils.data.DataLoader(trainset,batch_size=32, shuffle=True)Now I want to choose a part of train sets(like 3000 images and labels) from shuffled datasets every epoch. I want to ...
ptrblck
You could manually shuffle the indices using: indices = torch.randperm(len(train_dataset))[:3000] and pass these indices to a RandomSubsetSampler, which can then be passed to the DataLoader.
jc711
I am trying to reuse some of the resnet layers for a custom architecture and ran into a issue I can’t figure out. Here is a simplified example; when I run:import torch from torchvision import models from torchsummary import summary def convrelu(in_channels, out_channels, kernel, padding): return nn.Sequential( ...
ptrblck
I assume summary loops over all registered modules inside the model and prints them out. Since you’ve registered resnet18 as self.base_model and again its first three layers as self.layer0 in an nn.Sequential container, these modules will be printed as duplicates.
Sam_Lerman
I need a Resnet pretrained on COCO, so I opted to use:models.detection.fasterrcnn_resnet50_fpn(pretrained=True)However, all I need are the Resnet components for simple classification. How do I isolate that model without all of the extra FasterRCNN parts?
ptrblck
Yeah, but not out of the box. Note that the FasterRCNN ResNet backbone uses FrozenBatchNorm layers, while you would most likely want to use the trainable batchnorm layers. Also, the last linear layer is missing and the output is different. However, there might be a hacky way to grab the backbone’…
ptrblck
Assuming your current target is one-hot encoded in the channel dimension, i.e. it uses a 1 for the “active” class in that channel while all other channels contain zeros, you could use:target = torch.argmax(target, dim=1)to create the target with the expected class indices.If that doesn’t work for you, could you post an...
ptrblck
Assuming that you are working with 3 classes (based on the last edit of the post with the shape information), your model output should have the shape [batch_size, nb_classes=3, height, width]. To get the predicted class indices, you can use the same method: preds = torch.argmax(output, dim=1)
Abdulrahman
When i tried to reimplement MSELoss proposed hereLoss Pytroch Implementationwith a real example, it givesRuntimeError: derivative for argmax is not implementedalthough i take argmax with nn.MSELoss and worked.Code def my_MSELoss(predict, true):return ((predict - true)**2).mean()for epoch in range(5):losses = 0.0for da...
ptrblck
y_preds is still the argmax. You could get the gradients for the first output (which is the max value). In that case max would be differentiable and the gradients would just flow back to the maximum value while all other values will get a 0 gradient. Argmax on the other hand is not differentiable …
Prasad_Raghavendra
I have been using PyTorch since about 2 weeks now (mainly due to the computing courses I have taken). But, I am not able to debug and figure out why my network is not learning.If I flatten both target and prediction, I am getting some error. If I convert both to one hot, I get multi-target not supported error. Now I am...
ptrblck
You are detaching the prediction tensor here: y_pred1 = y_pred.data.numpy().astype("int") Don’t use the .data attribute, as it may have unwanted side effects. Also, once you leave PyTorch and use other libraries such as numpy, Autograd won’t be able to automatically create the backward pass for y…
Deeply
A simple model like this one:model = torch.nn.Sequential(torch.nn.Linear(10, 1, bias=False))
ptrblck
You would just need to wrap it in a torch.no_grad() block and manipulate the parameters as you want: model = torch.nn.Sequential(nn.Linear(10, 1, bias=False)) with torch.no_grad(): model[0].weight = nn.Parameter(torch.ones_like(model[0].weight)) model[0].weight[0, 0] = 2. model[0].weig…
John_J_Watson
I am quite new to pytorch, and I am trying to create data within a dataloader and my code looks like so:a=[] .. within a for loop self.a.append(torch.stack([b[ith_idx][j], \ b[ith_idx][rnd_dist], \ b[rnd_cls_idx][rnd_dist_rnd_cls]]\ )) self.c.append([1,0])where, b is a python list of tensors. For example, the first ele...
ptrblck
Since you are passing two values to self.c, your expected shape would be [N, 2]. Could you explain a bit what your use case is and how self.c should be stacked to create a [500] tensor?
nima_rafiee
HiI have an index vector like:idx_v = [1,2,4,0,3]A = [1, 1, 1, 1, 11, 1, 1, 1, 11, 1, 1, 1, 11, 1, 1, 1, 11, 1, 1, 1, 1]I want to set all elements of matrix A located before elements of idx_v vector to zero within each rowlike:At = [0, 1, 1, 1, 10, 0, 1, 1, 10, 0, 0, 0, 11, 1, 1, 1, 10, 0, 0, 1, 1]Is there any way to...
ptrblck
This code should work: idx_v = torch.tensor([1,2,4,0,3]) A = torch.tensor([[1, 1, 1, 1, 1], [1, 1, 1, 1, 1], [1, 1, 1, 1, 1], [1, 1, 1, 1, 1], [1, 1, 1, 1, 1]]) torch.arange(idx_v) res = torch.zeros_like(A).scatter_(1, idx_v.u…
AlvinZheng
I run the following code:import torch import torchvision net = torchvision.models.resnet18() optimizer = torch.optim.SGD(net.parameters(), lr=1) lr_sche = torch.optim.lr_scheduler.StepLR(optimizer, step_size=1, gamma=0.1) data = torch.rand(1, 3, 224, 224) for epoch in range(5): optimizer.step() print('...
ptrblck
You should get a warning stating that you should use get_last_lr() instead of get_lr(): UserWarning: To get the last learning rate computed by the scheduler, please use get_last_lr(). This should give you the expected learning rates: for epoch in range(5): optimizer.step() print…
dachosen1
I have a dataset with two classes and a severe class imbalance.I tried to use the weighed sampler to equalize the classes for training but only class showed during training. What did i do wrong?My dataset contains individual CSV , not images.def csv_loader(path: str) -> torch.Tensor: data = np.array(pd.read_csv(pat...
ptrblck
The weigths tensor should contain the weight for each sample in your dataset, nor the class weights only. Have a look atthis examplewhich shows a dummy use case.
s_n
Is it possible that two instances of a convolutional layer in myinitmethod can share same set of weights?Ex:self.conv1 = nn.Conv2d(…)self.conv2 = MycustomConvFunction(…)So I want self.conv1 and self.conv2 to share same set of weights.Actually I want self.conv2 for inference and self.conv1 for training.
ptrblck
The most elegant way would probably be the functional API, which would only create a single weight parameter and just use it when it’s needed. Alternatively, you could assign the weight parameter to your modules as describedhere.
csblacknet
I tried the stackoverflow and other threads in forum but still my issues wasn’t resolved. I am a starter please help me understand what went wrong.id_2_token = dict(enumerate(set(n for name in names for n in name),1)) token_2_id = {value:key for key,value in id_2_token.items()} print(len(id_2_token)) print(len(token_2_...
ptrblck
You cannot pass indices higher than embedding_dim-1, since the embedding layer is working as a lookup table. The input is used to index the corresponding embedding vector, so you should set embedding_dim as the highest value you would expect in your use case.
SubhankarHalder
Hello!I am using Squeezenet 1_1 Model pretrained model to train a custom dataset with 4 classes. I used the following commands to instantiate the modelMODEL = models.squeezenet1_1(pretrained=True) MODEL.classifier[1] = nn.Conv2d(512, self.num_classes, kernel_size=(1, 1), stride=(1, 1))Then, I write my training script, ...
ptrblck
Since you didn’t freeze any parameters, all should be trained as long as you pass them to the optimizers. Pooling layers do not have any parameters. You can check the updated parameters by creating a deepcopy of the state_dict before training and compare it to the state_dict after training: state…
Abhishek_Kishore
I read some posts about ModuleList and all of them said that adding modules to ModuleList gives access to parameters of the Neural Network but in “Training a classifier” example of 60 mins pytorch tutorial the modules are not added to any ModuleList and still the parameters could be accessed usingoptimizer = optim.SGD(...
ptrblck
Yes, that’s the difference between a Python list and an nn.ModuleList. As explained in the linked topics, the parameters wrapped in a plain list won’t be registered, while the parameters from all modules inside an nn.ModuleList will be registered. So if you want to use a list-like container, then …
chetan06
I am currently working on wheat detection challenge and was going through a notebook. And read something that am not gettingclass WheatTestDataset(Dataset): def __init__(self, dataframe, image_dir, transforms=None): super().__init__() self.image_ids = dataframe['image_id'].unique() self.df...
ptrblck
You can pass arbitrary numbers of arguments to a function using **kwargs as explainedhere.
luminoussin
Hello, this is the first time I implement BCElogitLoss and I was wondering if my input is correct or not because I experienced a sudden spike of loss in during my training for classification loss. I read fromLogit Explanationthat the input should be [-inf, inf] and I check my input is something like this :torch.Size([1...
ptrblck
The input and target shapes look as if you were dealing with a multi-label classification use case, i.e. each sample might belong to zero, one, or more classes. If that’s the case, then your approach should be correct. However, the example targets seem to be one-hot encoded, which looks like a mul…
martinr
Hi! I have a problem that one layer in my model takes up ca 6 GB of GPU RAM for forward pass, so I am unable to run batch sizes larger than 1 on my GPU.Of course, I am not interested in running the model with batch_size 1 and looking how to improve.I was thinking about “emulating” larger batch size. E.g., passing 10 si...
ptrblck
This postgives you some examples with advantages and shortcomings.
olisp
I am trying to assign different weights to different classes, so I have modified my loss criterion as such:I had to convert the weight tensor to doubletorch.DoubleTensor(weight)since mymodelis already moved todouble().Am I doing this correctly ?weights = [0.4,0.8,1.0] class_weights = torch.DoubleTensor(weights).cuda()...
ptrblck
This should be correct, yes. Are you seeing any issues using this code?
arianhf
I am trying to implementthispaper.I have written the following code but since this is my first try, I am not sure about the code I have written.class myDataset(Dataset): ... def __getitem__(self, idx): self.item = self.sequences_1[idx] + self.sequences_2[idx] return self.item, self.labels[idx], ...
ptrblck
nn.CrossEntropyLoss expects raw logits as the model outputs, so you should remove the last softmax layer in your model. Do you have any other doubts regarding a specific part of the code?