instruction
stringclasses
1 value
input
stringlengths
90
9.34k
output
stringlengths
16
15.4k
__index_level_0__
int64
165k
175k
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: const SystemProfileProto& MetricsLog::RecordEnvironment( DelegatingProvider* delegating_provider) { DCHECK(!has_environment_); has_environment_ = true; SystemProfileProto* system_profile = uma_proto()->mutable_system_profile(); WriteMetricsEnableDefault(client_->GetMetricsReportingDefaultState(), ...
const SystemProfileProto& MetricsLog::RecordEnvironment( DelegatingProvider* delegating_provider) { DCHECK(!has_environment_); has_environment_ = true; SystemProfileProto* system_profile = uma_proto()->mutable_system_profile(); WriteMetricsEnableDefault(client_->GetMetricsReportingDefaultState(), ...
172,072
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: int do_remount_sb(struct super_block *sb, int flags, void *data, int force) { int retval; int remount_ro; if (sb->s_writers.frozen != SB_UNFROZEN) return -EBUSY; #ifdef CONFIG_BLOCK if (!(flags & MS_RDONLY) && bdev_read_only(sb->s_bdev)) return -EACCES; #endif if (flags & MS_RDONLY) acct_auto_close(...
int do_remount_sb(struct super_block *sb, int flags, void *data, int force) { int retval; int remount_ro; if (sb->s_writers.frozen != SB_UNFROZEN) return -EBUSY; #ifdef CONFIG_BLOCK if (!(flags & MS_RDONLY) && bdev_read_only(sb->s_bdev)) return -EACCES; #endif if (flags & MS_RDONLY) acct_auto_close(sb); ...
166,808
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: bool PermissionsData::CanCaptureVisiblePage(const GURL& document_url, int tab_id, std::string* error) const { bool has_active_tab = false; bool has_all_urls = false; url::Origin origin = url::Origin::Create(document_ur...
bool PermissionsData::CanCaptureVisiblePage(const GURL& document_url, bool PermissionsData::CanCaptureVisiblePage( const GURL& document_url, int tab_id, std::string* error, CaptureRequirement capture_requirement) const { bool has_active_tab = false; bool has_all_urls = false; bool has_page_captu...
173,010
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: const char* SegmentInfo::GetWritingAppAsUTF8() const { return m_pWritingAppAsUTF8; } Commit Message: libwebm: Pull from upstream Rolling mkvparser from upstream. Primarily for fixing a bug on parsing failures with certain Opus WebM files. Upstream commit hash of this pull: 574045edd4ecbeb802ee3f1d214b55102...
const char* SegmentInfo::GetWritingAppAsUTF8() const
174,383
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: static int pop_fetch_message(struct Context *ctx, struct Message *msg, int msgno) { void *uidl = NULL; char buf[LONG_STRING]; char path[PATH_MAX]; struct Progress progressbar; struct PopData *pop_data = (struct PopData *) ctx->data; struct PopCache *cache = NULL; struct Header *h = ctx->hdrs[msgno];...
static int pop_fetch_message(struct Context *ctx, struct Message *msg, int msgno) { void *uidl = NULL; char buf[LONG_STRING]; char path[PATH_MAX]; struct Progress progressbar; struct PopData *pop_data = (struct PopData *) ctx->data; struct PopCache *cache = NULL; struct Header *h = ctx->hdrs[msgno]; un...
169,122
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: void Part::slotOpenExtractedEntry(KJob *job) { if (!job->error()) { OpenJob *openJob = qobject_cast<OpenJob*>(job); Q_ASSERT(openJob); m_tmpExtractDirList << openJob->tempDir(); const QString fullName = openJob->validatedFilePath(); bool isWritable = m_model->archiv...
void Part::slotOpenExtractedEntry(KJob *job) { if (!job->error()) { OpenJob *openJob = qobject_cast<OpenJob*>(job); Q_ASSERT(openJob); m_tmpExtractDirList << openJob->tempDir(); const QString fullName = openJob->validatedFilePath(); bool isWritable = m_model->archive() &&...
164,992
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: static int generate_key(DH *dh) { int ok = 0; int generate_new_key = 0; unsigned l; BN_CTX *ctx; BN_MONT_CTX *mont = NULL; BIGNUM *pub_key = NULL, *priv_key = NULL; ctx = BN_CTX_new(); if (ctx == NULL) goto err; generate_new_key = 1; } else Commit Mes...
static int generate_key(DH *dh) { int ok = 0; int generate_new_key = 0; unsigned l; BN_CTX *ctx = NULL; BN_MONT_CTX *mont = NULL; BIGNUM *pub_key = NULL, *priv_key = NULL; if (BN_num_bits(dh->p) > OPENSSL_DH_MAX_MODULUS_BITS) { DHerr(DH_F_GENERATE_KEY, DH_R_MODULUS_TOO_LARGE);...
165,332
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: void FileAPIMessageFilter::OnCreateSnapshotFile( int request_id, const GURL& blob_url, const GURL& path) { DCHECK(BrowserThread::CurrentlyOn(BrowserThread::IO)); FileSystemURL url(path); base::Callback<void(const FilePath&)> register_file_callback = base::Bind(&FileAPIMessageFilter::RegisterFil...
void FileAPIMessageFilter::OnCreateSnapshotFile( int request_id, const GURL& blob_url, const GURL& path) { DCHECK(BrowserThread::CurrentlyOn(BrowserThread::IO)); FileSystemURL url(path); base::Callback<void(const FilePath&)> register_file_callback = base::Bind(&FileAPIMessageFilter::RegisterFileAsBlo...
171,586
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: PHP_FUNCTION(locale_get_primary_language ) { get_icu_value_src_php( LOC_LANG_TAG , INTERNAL_FUNCTION_PARAM_PASSTHRU ); } Commit Message: Fix bug #72241: get_icu_value_internal out-of-bounds read CWE ID: CWE-125
PHP_FUNCTION(locale_get_primary_language ) PHP_FUNCTION(locale_get_primary_language ) { get_icu_value_src_php( LOC_LANG_TAG , INTERNAL_FUNCTION_PARAM_PASSTHRU ); }
167,184
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: static int decode_frame(AVCodecContext *avctx, void *data, int *got_frame, AVPacket *avpkt) { PicContext *s = avctx->priv_data; AVFrame *frame = data; uint32_t *palette; int bits_per_plane, bpp, etype, esize, npal, pos_after_pal; int i, x, y, pla...
static int decode_frame(AVCodecContext *avctx, void *data, int *got_frame, AVPacket *avpkt) { PicContext *s = avctx->priv_data; AVFrame *frame = data; uint32_t *palette; int bits_per_plane, bpp, etype, esize, npal, pos_after_pal; int i, x, y, plane, tm...
168,249
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: static void fpm_child_init(struct fpm_worker_pool_s *wp) /* {{{ */ { fpm_globals.max_requests = wp->config->pm_max_requests; if (0 > fpm_stdio_init_child(wp) || 0 > fpm_log_init_child(wp) || 0 > fpm_status_init_child(wp) || 0 > fpm_unix_init_child(wp) || 0 > fpm_signals_init_chi...
static void fpm_child_init(struct fpm_worker_pool_s *wp) /* {{{ */ { fpm_globals.max_requests = wp->config->pm_max_requests; fpm_globals.listening_socket = dup(wp->listening_socket); if (0 > fpm_stdio_init_child(wp) || 0 > fpm_log_init_child(wp) || 0 > fpm_status_init_child(wp) || 0 > fpm_u...
169,451
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: int dtls1_get_record(SSL *s) { int ssl_major,ssl_minor; int i,n; SSL3_RECORD *rr; unsigned char *p = NULL; unsigned short version; DTLS1_BITMAP *bitmap; unsigned int is_next_epoch; rr= &(s->s3->rrec); /* The epoch may have changed. If so, process all the * pending records. This is a non-blocking o...
int dtls1_get_record(SSL *s) { int ssl_major,ssl_minor; int i,n; SSL3_RECORD *rr; unsigned char *p = NULL; unsigned short version; DTLS1_BITMAP *bitmap; unsigned int is_next_epoch; rr= &(s->s3->rrec); /* The epoch may have changed. If so, process all the * pending records. This is a non-blocking operati...
169,935
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: gssrpc__svcauth_gss(struct svc_req *rqst, struct rpc_msg *msg, bool_t *no_dispatch) { enum auth_stat retstat; XDR xdrs; SVCAUTH *auth; struct svc_rpc_gss_data *gd; struct rpc_gss_cred *gc; struct rpc_gss_init_res gr; int call_stat, offset; OM_uint32 min_stat; log_debug("in svcauth_gss()")...
gssrpc__svcauth_gss(struct svc_req *rqst, struct rpc_msg *msg, bool_t *no_dispatch) { enum auth_stat retstat; XDR xdrs; SVCAUTH *auth; struct svc_rpc_gss_data *gd; struct rpc_gss_cred *gc; struct rpc_gss_init_res gr; int call_stat, offset; OM_uint32 min_stat; log_debug("in svcauth_gss()"); /*...
166,787
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: explicit SyncInternal(const std::string& name) : name_(name), weak_ptr_factory_(ALLOW_THIS_IN_INITIALIZER_LIST(this)), enable_sync_tabs_for_other_clients_(false), registrar_(NULL), change_delegate_(NULL), initialized_(false), testing_mode_(NON_TEST), ...
explicit SyncInternal(const std::string& name) : name_(name), weak_ptr_factory_(ALLOW_THIS_IN_INITIALIZER_LIST(this)), registrar_(NULL), change_delegate_(NULL), initialized_(false), testing_mode_(NON_TEST), observing_ip_address_changes_(false), traff...
170,797
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: void DataReductionProxyConfig::InitializeOnIOThread( scoped_refptr<network::SharedURLLoaderFactory> url_loader_factory, WarmupURLFetcher::CreateCustomProxyConfigCallback create_custom_proxy_config_callback, NetworkPropertiesManager* manager) { DCHECK(thread_checker_.CalledOnValidThread()); ...
void DataReductionProxyConfig::InitializeOnIOThread( scoped_refptr<network::SharedURLLoaderFactory> url_loader_factory, WarmupURLFetcher::CreateCustomProxyConfigCallback create_custom_proxy_config_callback, NetworkPropertiesManager* manager) { DCHECK(thread_checker_.CalledOnValidThread()); netwo...
172,640
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: int DH_check_pub_key(const DH *dh, const BIGNUM *pub_key, int *ret) { int ok = 0; BIGNUM *q = NULL; *ret = 0; q = BN_new(); if (q == NULL) goto err; BN_set_word(q, 1); if (BN_cmp(pub_key, q) <= 0) *ret |= DH_CHECK_PUBKEY_TOO_SMALL; BN_copy(q, dh->p); BN_...
int DH_check_pub_key(const DH *dh, const BIGNUM *pub_key, int *ret) { int ok = 0; BIGNUM *tmp = NULL; BN_CTX *ctx = NULL; *ret = 0; ctx = BN_CTX_new(); if (ctx == NULL) goto err; BN_CTX_start(ctx); tmp = BN_CTX_get(ctx); if (tmp == NULL) goto err; BN_set_wo...
165,258
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: ref_param_read_signal_error(gs_param_list * plist, gs_param_name pkey, int code) { iparam_list *const iplist = (iparam_list *) plist; iparam_loc loc; ref_param_read(iplist, pkey, &loc, -1); /* can't fail */ *loc.presult = code; switch (ref_param_read_get_policy(plist, pkey)) { ...
ref_param_read_signal_error(gs_param_list * plist, gs_param_name pkey, int code) { iparam_list *const iplist = (iparam_list *) plist; iparam_loc loc = {0}; ref_param_read(iplist, pkey, &loc, -1); if (loc.presult) *loc.presult = code; switch (ref_param_read_get_policy(plist, pkey)) { ...
164,705
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: xmlStopParser(xmlParserCtxtPtr ctxt) { if (ctxt == NULL) return; ctxt->instate = XML_PARSER_EOF; ctxt->disableSAX = 1; if (ctxt->input != NULL) { ctxt->input->cur = BAD_CAST""; ctxt->input->base = ctxt->input->cur; } } Commit Message: libxml: XML_PARSER_EOF checks from upstrea...
xmlStopParser(xmlParserCtxtPtr ctxt) { if (ctxt == NULL) return; ctxt->instate = XML_PARSER_EOF; ctxt->errNo = XML_ERR_USER_STOP; ctxt->disableSAX = 1; if (ctxt->input != NULL) { ctxt->input->cur = BAD_CAST""; ctxt->input->base = ctxt->input->cur; } }
171,310
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: wiki_handle_http_request(HttpRequest *req) { HttpResponse *res = http_response_new(req); char *page = http_request_get_path_info(req); char *command = http_request_get_query_string(req); char *wikitext = ""; util_dehttpize(page); /* remove any encoding on the reques...
wiki_handle_http_request(HttpRequest *req) { HttpResponse *res = http_response_new(req); char *page = http_request_get_path_info(req); char *command = http_request_get_query_string(req); char *wikitext = ""; util_dehttpize(page); /* remove any encoding on the requested ...
167,594
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: static void copyStereo8( short *dst, const int *const *src, unsigned nSamples, unsigned /* nChannels */) { for (unsigned i = 0; i < nSamples; ++i) { *dst++ = src[0][i] << 8; *dst++ = src[1][i] << 8; } } Commit Message: FLACExtractor: copy protect mWriteBuffer Bu...
static void copyStereo8( short *dst, const int * src[FLACParser::kMaxChannels], unsigned nSamples, unsigned /* nChannels */) { for (unsigned i = 0; i < nSamples; ++i) { *dst++ = src[0][i] << 8; *dst++ = src[1][i] << 8; } }
174,023
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: long Segment::ParseCues( long long off, long long& pos, long& len) { if (m_pCues) return 0; //success if (off < 0) return -1; long long total, avail; const int status = m_pReader->Length(&total, &avail); if (status < 0) //error return status; ...
long Segment::ParseCues( long Segment::ParseCues(long long off, long long& pos, long& len) { if (m_pCues) return 0; // success if (off < 0) return -1; long long total, avail; const int status = m_pReader->Length(&total, &avail); if (status < 0) // error return status; assert((total <...
174,421
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: int qcow2_snapshot_load_tmp(BlockDriverState *bs, const char *snapshot_id, const char *name, Error **errp) { int i, snapshot_index; BDRVQcowState *s = bs->opaque; QCowSnapshot *sn; uint64_t *new_l1_table; int n...
int qcow2_snapshot_load_tmp(BlockDriverState *bs, const char *snapshot_id, const char *name, Error **errp) { int i, snapshot_index; BDRVQcowState *s = bs->opaque; QCowSnapshot *sn; uint64_t *new_l1_table; int new_l1_...
165,406
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: update_display(struct display *dp) /* called once after the first read to update all the info, original_pp and * original_ip must have been filled in. */ { png_structp pp; png_infop ip; /* Now perform the initial read with a 0 tranform. */ read_png(dp, &dp->original_file, "original read", 0/...
update_display(struct display *dp) /* called once after the first read to update all the info, original_pp and * original_ip must have been filled in. */ { png_structp pp; png_infop ip; /* Now perform the initial read with a 0 tranform. */ read_png(dp, &dp->original_file, "original read", 0/*no tr...
173,591
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: enum nss_status _nss_mymachines_getpwnam_r( const char *name, struct passwd *pwd, char *buffer, size_t buflen, int *errnop) { _cleanup_bus_error_free_ sd_bus_error error = SD_BUS_ERROR_NULL; _cleanup_bus_message_unref_ sd_bus_message...
enum nss_status _nss_mymachines_getpwnam_r( const char *name, struct passwd *pwd, char *buffer, size_t buflen, int *errnop) { _cleanup_bus_error_free_ sd_bus_error error = SD_BUS_ERROR_NULL; _cleanup_bus_message_unref_ sd_bus_message* repl...
168,870
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: static int ng_pkt(git_pkt **out, const char *line, size_t len) { git_pkt_ng *pkt; const char *ptr; size_t alloclen; pkt = git__malloc(sizeof(*pkt)); GITERR_CHECK_ALLOC(pkt); pkt->ref = NULL; pkt->type = GIT_PKT_NG; line += 3; /* skip "ng " */ if (!(ptr = strchr(line, ' '))) goto out_err; len ...
static int ng_pkt(git_pkt **out, const char *line, size_t len) { git_pkt_ng *pkt; const char *ptr; size_t alloclen; pkt = git__malloc(sizeof(*pkt)); GITERR_CHECK_ALLOC(pkt); pkt->ref = NULL; pkt->type = GIT_PKT_NG; if (len < 3) goto out_err; line += 3; /* skip "ng " */ len -= 3; if (!(ptr = memchr(l...
169,103
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: transform_range_check(png_const_structp pp, unsigned int r, unsigned int g, unsigned int b, unsigned int a, unsigned int in_digitized, double in, unsigned int out, png_byte sample_depth, double err, double limit, PNG_CONST char *name, double digitization_error) { /* Compare the scaled, digitzed, ...
transform_range_check(png_const_structp pp, unsigned int r, unsigned int g, unsigned int b, unsigned int a, unsigned int in_digitized, double in, unsigned int out, png_byte sample_depth, double err, double limit, const char *name, double digitization_error) { /* Compare the scaled, digitzed, values of ...
173,716
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: int venc_dev::venc_input_log_buffers(OMX_BUFFERHEADERTYPE *pbuffer, int fd, int plane_offset) { if (!m_debug.infile) { int size = snprintf(m_debug.infile_name, PROPERTY_VALUE_MAX, "%s/input_enc_%lu_%lu_%p.yuv", m_debug.log_loc, m_sVenc_cfg.input_width, m_sVenc_cfg.input...
int venc_dev::venc_input_log_buffers(OMX_BUFFERHEADERTYPE *pbuffer, int fd, int plane_offset) { if (venc_handle->is_secure_session()) { DEBUG_PRINT_ERROR("logging secure input buffers is not allowed!"); return -1; } if (!m_debug.infile) { int size = snprintf(m_debug.infile_name, ...
173,506
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: void PrintPreviewDataSource::StartDataRequest(const std::string& path, bool is_incognito, int request_id) { if (!EndsWith(path, "/print.pdf", true)) { ChromeWebUIDataSource::StartDataRequest(path, is_incognito, reque...
void PrintPreviewDataSource::StartDataRequest(const std::string& path, bool is_incognito, int request_id) { if (!EndsWith(path, "/print.pdf", true)) { ChromeWebUIDataSource::StartDataRequest(path, is_incognito, request_id)...
170,827
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: int trigger_fpga_config(void) { int ret = 0, init_l; /* approx 10ms */ u32 timeout = 10000; /* make sure the FPGA_can access the EEPROM */ toggle_fpga_eeprom_bus(false); /* assert CONF_SEL_L to be able to drive FPGA_PROG_L */ qrio_gpio_direction_output(GPIO_A, CONF_SEL_L, 0); /* trigger the config...
int trigger_fpga_config(void) { int ret = 0, init_l; /* approx 10ms */ u32 timeout = 10000; /* make sure the FPGA_can access the EEPROM */ toggle_fpga_eeprom_bus(false); /* assert CONF_SEL_L to be able to drive FPGA_PROG_L */ qrio_gpio_direction_output(QRIO_GPIO_A, CONF_SEL_L, 0); /* trigger the config ...
169,635
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: PHP_FUNCTION(imageloadfont) { char *file; int file_name, hdr_size = sizeof(gdFont) - sizeof(char *); int ind, body_size, n = 0, b, i, body_size_check; gdFontPtr font; php_stream *stream; if (zend_parse_parameters(ZEND_NUM_ARGS() TSRMLS_CC, "s", &file, &file_name) == FAILURE) { ...
PHP_FUNCTION(imageloadfont) { char *file; int file_name, hdr_size = sizeof(gdFont) - sizeof(char *); int ind, body_size, n = 0, b, i, body_size_check; gdFontPtr font; php_stream *stream; if (zend_parse_parameters(ZEND_NUM_ARGS() TSRMLS_CC, "p", &file, &file_name) == FAILURE) { ...
165,311
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: poly_path(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) { POLYGON *poly = PG_GETARG_POLYGON_P(0); PATH *path; int size; int i; size = offsetof(PATH, p[0]) +sizeof(path->p[0]) * poly->npts; path = (PATH *) palloc(size); SET_VARSIZE(path, size); path->npts = poly->npts; path->closed = TRUE; /* prevent instability i...
poly_path(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) { POLYGON *poly = PG_GETARG_POLYGON_P(0); PATH *path; int size; int i; /* * Never overflows: the old size fit in MaxAllocSize, and the new size is * smaller by a small constant. */ size = offsetof(PATH, p[0]) +sizeof(path->p[0]) * poly->npts; path = (PATH *) pall...
166,412
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: static inline int btif_hl_close_select_thread(void) { int result = 0; char sig_on = btif_hl_signal_select_exit; BTIF_TRACE_DEBUG("btif_hl_signal_select_exit"); result = send(signal_fds[1], &sig_on, sizeof(sig_on), 0); if (btif_is_enabled()) { /* Wait for the select_thread_id...
static inline int btif_hl_close_select_thread(void) { int result = 0; char sig_on = btif_hl_signal_select_exit; BTIF_TRACE_DEBUG("btif_hl_signal_select_exit"); result = TEMP_FAILURE_RETRY(send(signal_fds[1], &sig_on, sizeof(sig_on), 0)); if (btif_is_enabled()) { /* Wait for the se...
173,439
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: load(ImlibImage * im, ImlibProgressFunction progress, char progress_granularity, char immediate_load) { static const int intoffset[] = { 0, 4, 2, 1 }; static const int intjump[] = { 8, 8, 4, 2 }; int rc; DATA32 *ptr; GifFileType *gif; GifRowType ...
load(ImlibImage * im, ImlibProgressFunction progress, char progress_granularity, char immediate_load) { static const int intoffset[] = { 0, 4, 2, 1 }; static const int intjump[] = { 8, 8, 4, 2 }; int rc; DATA32 *ptr; GifFileType *gif; GifRowType *r...
165,340
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: static void mntput_no_expire(struct mount *mnt) { rcu_read_lock(); mnt_add_count(mnt, -1); if (likely(mnt->mnt_ns)) { /* shouldn't be the last one */ rcu_read_unlock(); return; } lock_mount_hash(); if (mnt_get_count(mnt)) { rcu_read_unlock(); unlock_mount_hash(); return; } if (unlikely(mnt->mnt....
static void mntput_no_expire(struct mount *mnt) { rcu_read_lock(); mnt_add_count(mnt, -1); if (likely(mnt->mnt_ns)) { /* shouldn't be the last one */ rcu_read_unlock(); return; } lock_mount_hash(); if (mnt_get_count(mnt)) { rcu_read_unlock(); unlock_mount_hash(); return; } if (unlikely(mnt->mnt.mnt_fl...
167,589
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: static struct page *follow_page_pte(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address, pmd_t *pmd, unsigned int flags) { struct mm_struct *mm = vma->vm_mm; struct dev_pagemap *pgmap = NULL; struct page *page; spinlock_t *ptl; pte_t *ptep, pte; retry: if (unlikely(pmd_bad(*pmd))) return no_page_table...
static struct page *follow_page_pte(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address, pmd_t *pmd, unsigned int flags) { struct mm_struct *mm = vma->vm_mm; struct dev_pagemap *pgmap = NULL; struct page *page; spinlock_t *ptl; pte_t *ptep, pte; retry: if (unlikely(pmd_bad(*pmd))) return no_page_table(vma, ...
167,164
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: static int nested_vmx_check_permission(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) { if (!to_vmx(vcpu)->nested.vmxon) { kvm_queue_exception(vcpu, UD_VECTOR); return 0; } return 1; } Commit Message: kvm: nVMX: Enforce cpl=0 for VMX instructions VMX instructions executed inside a L1 VM will always trigger a VM exit even w...
static int nested_vmx_check_permission(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) { if (vmx_get_cpl(vcpu)) { kvm_queue_exception(vcpu, UD_VECTOR); return 0; } if (!to_vmx(vcpu)->nested.vmxon) { kvm_queue_exception(vcpu, UD_VECTOR); return 0; } return 1; }
169,176
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: struct tcp_conn_t *tcp_conn_accept(struct tcp_sock_t *sock) { struct tcp_conn_t *conn = calloc(1, sizeof *conn); if (conn == NULL) { ERR("Calloc for connection struct failed"); goto error; } conn->sd = accept(sock->sd, NULL, NULL); if (conn->sd < 0) { ERR("accept failed"); goto error; } ...
struct tcp_conn_t *tcp_conn_accept(struct tcp_sock_t *sock) struct tcp_conn_t *tcp_conn_select(struct tcp_sock_t *sock, struct tcp_sock_t *sock6) { struct tcp_conn_t *conn = calloc(1, sizeof *conn); if (conn == NULL) { ERR("Calloc for connection struct failed"); goto error; } fd_set rfds; struct t...
166,589
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: int uinput_create(char *name) { struct uinput_dev dev; int fd, x = 0; for(x=0; x < MAX_UINPUT_PATHS; x++) { fd = open(uinput_dev_path[x], O_RDWR); if (fd < 0) continue; break; } if (x == MAX_UINPUT_PATHS) { BTIF_TRACE_ERROR("%s ERROR: uinput device o...
int uinput_create(char *name) { struct uinput_dev dev; int fd, x = 0; for(x=0; x < MAX_UINPUT_PATHS; x++) { fd = TEMP_FAILURE_RETRY(open(uinput_dev_path[x], O_RDWR)); if (fd < 0) continue; break; } if (x == MAX_UINPUT_PATHS) { BTIF_TRACE_ERROR("%s ERROR: u...
173,452
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: zstatus(i_ctx_t *i_ctx_p) { os_ptr op = osp; switch (r_type(op)) { case t_file: { stream *s; make_bool(op, (file_is_valid(s, op) ? 1 : 0)); } return 0; case t_string: { gs_parsed_file_name_t p...
zstatus(i_ctx_t *i_ctx_p) { os_ptr op = osp; switch (r_type(op)) { case t_file: { stream *s; make_bool(op, (file_is_valid(s, op) ? 1 : 0)); } return 0; case t_string: { gs_parsed_file_name_t pname; ...
164,829
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: MediaStreamManagerTest() : thread_bundle_(content::TestBrowserThreadBundle::IO_MAINLOOP) { audio_manager_ = std::make_unique<MockAudioManager>(); audio_system_ = std::make_unique<media::AudioSystemImpl>(audio_manager_.get()); auto video_capture_provider = std::make_unique<MockVideoCapt...
MediaStreamManagerTest() : thread_bundle_(content::TestBrowserThreadBundle::IO_MAINLOOP) { audio_manager_ = std::make_unique<MockAudioManager>(); audio_system_ = std::make_unique<media::AudioSystemImpl>(audio_manager_.get()); auto video_capture_provider = std::make_unique<MockVideoCapturePro...
172,735
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: PHP_METHOD(Phar, extractTo) { char *error = NULL; php_stream *fp; php_stream_statbuf ssb; phar_entry_info *entry; char *pathto, *filename; size_t pathto_len, filename_len; int ret, i; int nelems; zval *zval_files = NULL; zend_bool overwrite = 0; PHAR_ARCHIVE_OBJECT(); if (zend_parse_p...
PHP_METHOD(Phar, extractTo) { char *error = NULL; php_stream *fp; php_stream_statbuf ssb; phar_entry_info *entry; char *pathto, *filename; size_t pathto_len, filename_len; int ret, i; int nelems; zval *zval_files = NULL; zend_bool overwrite = 0; PHAR_ARCHIVE_OBJECT(); if (zend_parse_paramet...
165,072
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: sf_open (const char *path, int mode, SF_INFO *sfinfo) { SF_PRIVATE *psf ; /* Ultimate sanity check. */ assert (sizeof (sf_count_t) == 8) ; if ((psf = calloc (1, sizeof (SF_PRIVATE))) == NULL) { sf_errno = SFE_MALLOC_FAILED ; return NULL ; } ; psf_init_files (psf) ; psf_log_printf (psf, "File ...
sf_open (const char *path, int mode, SF_INFO *sfinfo) { SF_PRIVATE *psf ; /* Ultimate sanity check. */ assert (sizeof (sf_count_t) == 8) ; if ((psf = psf_allocate ()) == NULL) { sf_errno = SFE_MALLOC_FAILED ; return NULL ; } ; psf_init_files (psf) ; psf_log_printf (psf, "File : %s\n", path) ; if ...
170,067
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: void cipso_v4_req_delattr(struct request_sock *req) { struct ip_options *opt; struct inet_request_sock *req_inet; req_inet = inet_rsk(req); opt = req_inet->opt; if (opt == NULL || opt->cipso == 0) return; cipso_v4_delopt(&req_inet->opt); } Commit Message: inet: add RCU protection to inet->opt ...
void cipso_v4_req_delattr(struct request_sock *req) { struct ip_options_rcu *opt; struct inet_request_sock *req_inet; req_inet = inet_rsk(req); opt = req_inet->opt; if (opt == NULL || opt->opt.cipso == 0) return; cipso_v4_delopt(&req_inet->opt); }
165,547
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: static int handle_vmread(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) { unsigned long field; u64 field_value; unsigned long exit_qualification = vmcs_readl(EXIT_QUALIFICATION); u32 vmx_instruction_info = vmcs_read32(VMX_INSTRUCTION_INFO); gva_t gva = 0; if (!nested_vmx_check_permission(vcpu)) return 1; if (!nested_vmx_check...
static int handle_vmread(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) { unsigned long field; u64 field_value; unsigned long exit_qualification = vmcs_readl(EXIT_QUALIFICATION); u32 vmx_instruction_info = vmcs_read32(VMX_INSTRUCTION_INFO); gva_t gva = 0; if (!nested_vmx_check_permission(vcpu)) return 1; if (!nested_vmx_check_vmcs1...
169,175
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: void SaveCardBubbleControllerImpl::ReshowBubble() { is_reshow_ = true; AutofillMetrics::LogSaveCardPromptMetric( AutofillMetrics::SAVE_CARD_PROMPT_SHOW_REQUESTED, is_uploading_, is_reshow_, pref_service_->GetInteger( prefs::kAutofillAcceptSaveCreditCardPromptState)); ShowBub...
void SaveCardBubbleControllerImpl::ReshowBubble() { // Don't show the bubble if it's already visible. if (save_card_bubble_view_) return; is_reshow_ = true; AutofillMetrics::LogSaveCardPromptMetric( AutofillMetrics::SAVE_CARD_PROMPT_SHOW_REQUESTED, is_uploading_, is_reshow_, pref_serv...
172,384
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: white_point(PNG_CONST color_encoding *encoding) { CIE_color white; white.X = encoding->red.X + encoding->green.X + encoding->blue.X; white.Y = encoding->red.Y + encoding->green.Y + encoding->blue.Y; white.Z = encoding->red.Z + encoding->green.Z + encoding->blue.Z; return white; } Commit M...
white_point(PNG_CONST color_encoding *encoding) white_point(const color_encoding *encoding) { CIE_color white; white.X = encoding->red.X + encoding->green.X + encoding->blue.X; white.Y = encoding->red.Y + encoding->green.Y + encoding->blue.Y; white.Z = encoding->red.Z + encoding->green.Z + encoding->blu...
173,718
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: bool RenderFrameHostImpl::OnMessageReceived(const IPC::Message &msg) { if (!render_frame_created_) return false; ScopedActiveURL scoped_active_url(this); bool handled = true; IPC_BEGIN_MESSAGE_MAP(RenderFrameHostImpl, msg) IPC_MESSAGE_HANDLER(FrameHostMsg_RenderProcessGone, OnRenderProcessGone) ...
bool RenderFrameHostImpl::OnMessageReceived(const IPC::Message &msg) { if (!render_frame_created_) return false; ScopedActiveURL scoped_active_url(this); bool handled = true; IPC_BEGIN_MESSAGE_MAP(RenderFrameHostImpl, msg) IPC_MESSAGE_HANDLER(FrameHostMsg_RenderProcessGone, OnRenderProcessGone) IP...
172,717
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: const Cluster* Segment::GetNext(const Cluster* pCurr) { assert(pCurr); assert(pCurr != &m_eos); assert(m_clusters); long idx = pCurr->m_index; if (idx >= 0) { assert(m_clusterCount > 0); assert(idx < m_clusterCount); assert(pCurr == m_clusters[idx]); ...
const Cluster* Segment::GetNext(const Cluster* pCurr) if (idx >= 0) { assert(m_clusterCount > 0); assert(idx < m_clusterCount); assert(pCurr == m_clusters[idx]); ++idx; if (idx >= m_clusterCount) return &m_eos; // caller will LoadCluster as desired Cluster* const pNext = m_cluster...
174,347
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: PowerLibrary* CrosLibrary::GetPowerLibrary() { return power_lib_.GetDefaultImpl(use_stub_impl_); } Commit Message: chromeos: Replace copy-and-pasted code with macros. This replaces a bunch of duplicated-per-library cros function definitions and comments. BUG=none TEST=built it Review URL: http://codereview....
PowerLibrary* CrosLibrary::GetPowerLibrary() {
170,628
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: void SetUp() { ASSERT_TRUE(temp_dir_.CreateUniqueTempDir()); SyncCredentials credentials; credentials.email = "foo@bar.com"; credentials.sync_token = "sometoken"; sync_notifier_mock_ = new StrictMock<SyncNotifierMock>(); EXPECT_CALL(*sync_notifier_mock_, AddObserver(_)). WillOn...
void SetUp() { ASSERT_TRUE(temp_dir_.CreateUniqueTempDir()); SyncCredentials credentials; credentials.email = "foo@bar.com"; credentials.sync_token = "sometoken"; sync_notifier_mock_ = new StrictMock<SyncNotifierMock>(); EXPECT_CALL(*sync_notifier_mock_, AddObserver(_)). WillOnce(Inv...
170,799
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: pvscsi_ring_init_data(PVSCSIRingInfo *m, PVSCSICmdDescSetupRings *ri) { int i; uint32_t txr_len_log2, rxr_len_log2; uint32_t req_ring_size, cmp_ring_size; m->rs_pa = ri->ringsStatePPN << VMW_PAGE_SHIFT; if ((ri->reqRingNumPages > PVSCSI_SETUP_RINGS_MAX_NUM_PAGES) || (ri->cmpRing...
pvscsi_ring_init_data(PVSCSIRingInfo *m, PVSCSICmdDescSetupRings *ri) { int i; uint32_t txr_len_log2, rxr_len_log2; uint32_t req_ring_size, cmp_ring_size; m->rs_pa = ri->ringsStatePPN << VMW_PAGE_SHIFT; req_ring_size = ri->reqRingNumPages * PVSCSI_MAX_NUM_REQ_ENTRIES_PER_PAGE; cmp_ring_...
164,937
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: static size_t safecat(char *buffer, size_t bufsize, size_t pos, PNG_CONST char *cat) { while (pos < bufsize && cat != NULL && *cat != 0) buffer[pos++] = *cat++; if (pos >= bufsize) pos = bufsize-1; buffer[pos] = 0; return pos; } Commit Message: DO NOT MERGE Update libpng to 1.6.20 B...
static size_t safecat(char *buffer, size_t bufsize, size_t pos, const char *cat) { while (pos < bufsize && cat != NULL && *cat != 0) buffer[pos++] = *cat++; if (pos >= bufsize) pos = bufsize-1; buffer[pos] = 0; return pos; }
173,689
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: test_size(png_modifier* PNG_CONST pm, png_byte PNG_CONST colour_type, int bdlo, int PNG_CONST bdhi) { /* Run the tests on each combination. * * NOTE: on my 32 bit x86 each of the following blocks takes * a total of 3.5 seconds if done across every combo of bit depth * width and height....
test_size(png_modifier* PNG_CONST pm, png_byte PNG_CONST colour_type, test_size(png_modifier* const pm, png_byte const colour_type, int bdlo, int const bdhi) { /* Run the tests on each combination. * * NOTE: on my 32 bit x86 each of the following blocks takes * a total of 3.5 seconds if done acros...
173,709
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: bool LayoutSVGResourceMarker::calculateLocalTransform() { return selfNeedsLayout(); } Commit Message: Avoid using forced layout to trigger paint invalidation for SVG containers Currently, SVG containers in the LayoutObject hierarchy force layout of their children if the transform changes. The main reason ...
bool LayoutSVGResourceMarker::calculateLocalTransform() LayoutSVGContainer::TransformChange LayoutSVGResourceMarker::calculateLocalTransform() { return selfNeedsLayout() ? TransformChange::Full : TransformChange::None; }
171,665
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: s_aes_process(stream_state * ss, stream_cursor_read * pr, stream_cursor_write * pw, bool last) { stream_aes_state *const state = (stream_aes_state *) ss; const unsigned char *limit; const long in_size = pr->limit - pr->ptr; const long out_size = pw->limit - pw->ptr; unsigned ...
s_aes_process(stream_state * ss, stream_cursor_read * pr, stream_cursor_write * pw, bool last) { stream_aes_state *const state = (stream_aes_state *) ss; const unsigned char *limit; const long in_size = pr->limit - pr->ptr; const long out_size = pw->limit - pw->ptr; unsigned char t...
164,703
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: PHP_FUNCTION(mcrypt_ofb) { zval **mode; char *cipher, *key, *data, *iv = NULL; int cipher_len, key_len, data_len, iv_len = 0; MCRYPT_GET_CRYPT_ARGS convert_to_long_ex(mode); php_mcrypt_do_crypt(cipher, key, key_len, data, data_len, "ofb", iv, iv_len, ZEND_NUM_ARGS(), Z_LVAL_PP(mode), return_value TS...
PHP_FUNCTION(mcrypt_ofb) { zval **mode; char *cipher, *key, *data, *iv = NULL; int cipher_len, key_len, data_len, iv_len = 0; MCRYPT_GET_CRYPT_ARGS convert_to_long_ex(mode); php_mcrypt_do_crypt(cipher, key, key_len, data, data_len, "ofb", iv, iv_len, ZEND_NUM_ARGS(), Z_LVAL_PP(mode), return_value TSRMLS_...
167,110
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: status_t SampleTable::setTimeToSampleParams( off64_t data_offset, size_t data_size) { if (mTimeToSample != NULL || data_size < 8) { return ERROR_MALFORMED; } uint8_t header[8]; if (mDataSource->readAt( data_offset, header, sizeof(header)) < (ssize_t)sizeof(header)) ...
status_t SampleTable::setTimeToSampleParams( off64_t data_offset, size_t data_size) { if (!mTimeToSample.empty() || data_size < 8) { return ERROR_MALFORMED; } uint8_t header[8]; if (mDataSource->readAt( data_offset, header, sizeof(header)) < (ssize_t)sizeof(header)) { re...
174,173
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: int __sys_recvmmsg(int fd, struct mmsghdr __user *mmsg, unsigned int vlen, unsigned int flags, struct timespec *timeout) { int fput_needed, err, datagrams; struct socket *sock; struct mmsghdr __user *entry; struct compat_mmsghdr __user *compat_entry; struct msghdr msg_sys; struct timespec end_time; i...
int __sys_recvmmsg(int fd, struct mmsghdr __user *mmsg, unsigned int vlen, unsigned int flags, struct timespec *timeout) { int fput_needed, err, datagrams; struct socket *sock; struct mmsghdr __user *entry; struct compat_mmsghdr __user *compat_entry; struct msghdr msg_sys; struct timespec end_time; if (tim...
166,961
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: status_t SampleTable::setTimeToSampleParams( off64_t data_offset, size_t data_size) { if (mTimeToSample != NULL || data_size < 8) { return ERROR_MALFORMED; } uint8_t header[8]; if (mDataSource->readAt( data_offset, header, sizeof(header)) < (ssize_t)sizeof(header)) { return ERROR_IO; } ...
status_t SampleTable::setTimeToSampleParams( off64_t data_offset, size_t data_size) { if (mTimeToSample != NULL || data_size < 8) { return ERROR_MALFORMED; } uint8_t header[8]; if (mDataSource->readAt( data_offset, header, sizeof(header)) < (ssize_t)sizeof(header)) { return ERROR_IO; } if (U3...
173,339
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: static double outerr(PNG_CONST png_modifier *pm, int in_depth, int out_depth) { /* There is a serious error in the 2 and 4 bit grayscale transform because * the gamma table value (8 bits) is simply shifted, not rounded, so the * error in 4 bit grayscale gamma is up to the value below. This is a hac...
static double outerr(PNG_CONST png_modifier *pm, int in_depth, int out_depth) static double outerr(const png_modifier *pm, int in_depth, int out_depth) { /* There is a serious error in the 2 and 4 bit grayscale transform because * the gamma table value (8 bits) is simply shifted, not rounded, so the * err...
173,674
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: parse_netscreen_rec_hdr(struct wtap_pkthdr *phdr, const char *line, char *cap_int, gboolean *cap_dir, char *cap_dst, int *err, gchar **err_info) { int sec; int dsec, pkt_len; char direction[2]; char cap_src[13]; phdr->rec_type = REC_TYPE_PACKET; phdr->presence_flags = WTAP_HAS_TS|WTAP_HAS_CAP_LEN; ...
parse_netscreen_rec_hdr(struct wtap_pkthdr *phdr, const char *line, char *cap_int, static gboolean parse_netscreen_packet(FILE_T fh, struct wtap_pkthdr *phdr, Buffer* buf, char *line, int *err, gchar **err_info) { int sec; int dsec; char cap_int[NETSCREEN_MAX_INT_NAME_LENGTH]; char direction[2]; guint pk...
167,149
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: int test_mod_exp(BIO *bp, BN_CTX *ctx) { BIGNUM *a, *b, *c, *d, *e; int i; a = BN_new(); b = BN_new(); c = BN_new(); d = BN_new(); e = BN_new(); BN_one(a); BN_one(b); BN_zero(c); if (BN_mod_exp(d, a, b, c, ctx)) { fprintf(stderr, "BN_mod_exp with zero modulus ...
int test_mod_exp(BIO *bp, BN_CTX *ctx) { BIGNUM *a, *b, *c, *d, *e; int i; a = BN_new(); b = BN_new(); c = BN_new(); d = BN_new(); e = BN_new(); BN_one(a); BN_one(b); BN_zero(c); if (BN_mod_exp(d, a, b, c, ctx)) { fprintf(stderr, "BN_mod_exp with zero modulus succee...
164,721
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: static int enable(void) { LOG_INFO("%s", __func__); if (!interface_ready()) return BT_STATUS_NOT_READY; stack_manager_get_interface()->start_up_stack_async(); return BT_STATUS_SUCCESS; } Commit Message: Add guest mode functionality (2/3) Add a flag to enable() to start Bluetooth in restricted mo...
static int enable(void) { static int enable(bool start_restricted) { LOG_INFO(LOG_TAG, "%s: start restricted = %d", __func__, start_restricted); restricted_mode = start_restricted; if (!interface_ready()) return BT_STATUS_NOT_READY; stack_manager_get_interface()->start_up_stack_async(); return BT_STA...
173,551
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: Chapters::Edition::~Edition() { } Commit Message: libwebm: Pull from upstream Rolling mkvparser from upstream. Primarily for fixing a bug on parsing failures with certain Opus WebM files. Upstream commit hash of this pull: 574045edd4ecbeb802ee3f1d214b5510269852ae The diff is so huge because there were some s...
Chapters::Edition::~Edition() Chapters::Atom::~Atom() {} unsigned long long Chapters::Atom::GetUID() const { return m_uid; } const char* Chapters::Atom::GetStringUID() const { return m_string_uid; } long long Chapters::Atom::GetStartTimecode() const { return m_start_timecode; } long long Chapters::Atom::GetStopTime...
174,466
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: sec_decrypt(uint8 * data, int length) { if (g_sec_decrypt_use_count == 4096) { sec_update(g_sec_decrypt_key, g_sec_decrypt_update_key); rdssl_rc4_set_key(&g_rc4_decrypt_key, g_sec_decrypt_key, g_rc4_key_len); g_sec_decrypt_use_count = 0; } rdssl_rc4_crypt(&g_rc4_decrypt_key, data, data, length); ...
sec_decrypt(uint8 * data, int length) { if (length <= 0) return; if (g_sec_decrypt_use_count == 4096) { sec_update(g_sec_decrypt_key, g_sec_decrypt_update_key); rdssl_rc4_set_key(&g_rc4_decrypt_key, g_sec_decrypt_key, g_rc4_key_len); g_sec_decrypt_use_count = 0; } rdssl_rc4_crypt(&g_rc4_decrypt_key,...
169,810
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: void pin_remove(struct fs_pin *pin) { spin_lock(&pin_lock); hlist_del(&pin->m_list); hlist_del(&pin->s_list); spin_unlock(&pin_lock); spin_lock_irq(&pin->wait.lock); pin->done = 1; wake_up_locked(&pin->wait); spin_unlock_irq(&pin->wait.lock); } Commit Message: fs_pin: Allow for the possibility that...
void pin_remove(struct fs_pin *pin) { spin_lock(&pin_lock); hlist_del_init(&pin->m_list); hlist_del_init(&pin->s_list); spin_unlock(&pin_lock); spin_lock_irq(&pin->wait.lock); pin->done = 1; wake_up_locked(&pin->wait); spin_unlock_irq(&pin->wait.lock); }
167,562
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: void BluetoothDeviceChromeOS::RequestPinCode( const dbus::ObjectPath& device_path, const PinCodeCallback& callback) { DCHECK(agent_.get()); DCHECK(device_path == object_path_); VLOG(1) << object_path_.value() << ": RequestPinCode"; UMA_HISTOGRAM_ENUMERATION("Bluetooth.PairingMethod", ...
void BluetoothDeviceChromeOS::RequestPinCode(
171,237
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: void DownloadItemImpl::OnIntermediatePathDetermined( DownloadFileManager* file_manager, const FilePath& intermediate_path, bool ok_to_overwrite) { DownloadFileManager::RenameCompletionCallback callback = base::Bind(&DownloadItemImpl::OnDownloadRenamedToIntermediateName, weak_...
void DownloadItemImpl::OnIntermediatePathDetermined( DownloadFileManager* file_manager, const FilePath& intermediate_path, bool ok_to_overwrite) { DownloadFileManager::RenameCompletionCallback callback = base::Bind(&DownloadItemImpl::OnDownloadRenamedToIntermediateName, weak_ptr_fa...
170,884
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: bool HasPermissionsForFile(const FilePath& file, int permissions) { FilePath current_path = file.StripTrailingSeparators(); FilePath last_path; while (current_path != last_path) { if (file_permissions_.find(current_path) != file_permissions_.end()) return (file_permissions_[current...
bool HasPermissionsForFile(const FilePath& file, int permissions) { FilePath current_path = file.StripTrailingSeparators(); FilePath last_path; int skip = 0; while (current_path != last_path) { FilePath base_name = current_path.BaseName(); if (base_name.value() == FilePath::kParentDir...
170,673
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: ApiDefinitionsNatives::ApiDefinitionsNatives(Dispatcher* dispatcher, ScriptContext* context) : ObjectBackedNativeHandler(context), dispatcher_(dispatcher) { RouteFunction( "GetExtensionAPIDefinitionsForTest", base::Bind(&ApiDefinitionsNatives::Get...
ApiDefinitionsNatives::ApiDefinitionsNatives(Dispatcher* dispatcher, ScriptContext* context) : ObjectBackedNativeHandler(context), dispatcher_(dispatcher) { RouteFunction( "GetExtensionAPIDefinitionsForTest", "test", base::Bind(&ApiDefinitionsNatives::G...
172,246
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: void BluetoothDeviceChromeOS::OnRegisterAgent( const base::Closure& callback, const ConnectErrorCallback& error_callback) { VLOG(1) << object_path_.value() << ": Agent registered, now pairing"; DBusThreadManager::Get()->GetBluetoothDeviceClient()-> Pair(object_path_, base::Bind(&Bluet...
void BluetoothDeviceChromeOS::OnRegisterAgent(
171,229
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: bool GDataCache::CreateCacheDirectories( const std::vector<FilePath>& paths_to_create) { bool success = true; for (size_t i = 0; i < paths_to_create.size(); ++i) { if (file_util::DirectoryExists(paths_to_create[i])) continue; if (!file_util::CreateDirectory(paths_to_create[i])) { succe...
bool GDataCache::CreateCacheDirectories(
170,861
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: static int mcryptd_create_hash(struct crypto_template *tmpl, struct rtattr **tb, struct mcryptd_queue *queue) { struct hashd_instance_ctx *ctx; struct ahash_instance *inst; struct hash_alg_common *halg; struct crypto_alg *alg; u32 type = 0; u32 mask = 0; int err; mcryptd_check_internal(tb, &t...
static int mcryptd_create_hash(struct crypto_template *tmpl, struct rtattr **tb, struct mcryptd_queue *queue) { struct hashd_instance_ctx *ctx; struct ahash_instance *inst; struct hash_alg_common *halg; struct crypto_alg *alg; u32 type = 0; u32 mask = 0; int err; if (!mcryptd_check_internal(tb, &ty...
168,521
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: exsltStrXpathCtxtRegister (xmlXPathContextPtr ctxt, const xmlChar *prefix) { if (ctxt && prefix && !xmlXPathRegisterNs(ctxt, prefix, (const xmlChar *) EXSLT_STRINGS_NAMESPACE) && !xmlXPathRegisterFuncNS(ctxt, ...
exsltStrXpathCtxtRegister (xmlXPathContextPtr ctxt, const xmlChar *prefix) { if (ctxt && prefix && !xmlXPathRegisterNs(ctxt, prefix, (const xmlChar *) EXSLT_STRINGS_NAMESPACE) && !xmlXPathRegisterFuncNS(ctxt, ...
173,297
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: check_compat_entry_size_and_hooks(struct compat_ipt_entry *e, struct xt_table_info *newinfo, unsigned int *size, const unsigned char *base, const unsigned char *limit, const unsigned int *hook_entries, const unsigned int *underflows, const char *name) { struct xt_entry_m...
check_compat_entry_size_and_hooks(struct compat_ipt_entry *e, struct xt_table_info *newinfo, unsigned int *size, const unsigned char *base, const unsigned char *limit, const unsigned int *hook_entries, const unsigned int *underflows, const char *name) { struct xt_entry_match *...
167,211
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: void TabletModeWindowManager::ForgetWindow(aura::Window* window, bool destroyed) { added_windows_.erase(window); window->RemoveObserver(this); WindowToState::iterator it = window_state_map_.find(window); if (it == window_state_map_.end()) return; if (...
void TabletModeWindowManager::ForgetWindow(aura::Window* window, bool destroyed, bool was_in_overview) { added_windows_.erase(window); window->RemoveObserver(this); WindowToState::iterator it = window_state_map_.find(window...
172,400
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: long vorbis_book_decodev_add(codebook *book,ogg_int32_t *a, oggpack_buffer *b,int n,int point){ if(book->used_entries>0){ ogg_int32_t *v = book->dec_buf;//(ogg_int32_t *)alloca(sizeof(*v)*book->dim); int i,j; if (!v) return -1; for(i=0;i<n;){ if(decode_map(book,b,v,point))...
long vorbis_book_decodev_add(codebook *book,ogg_int32_t *a, oggpack_buffer *b,int n,int point){ if(book->used_entries>0){ ogg_int32_t *v = book->dec_buf;//(ogg_int32_t *)alloca(sizeof(*v)*book->dim); int i,j; if (!v) return -1; for(i=0;i<n;){ if(decode_map(b...
173,986
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: static php_mb_regex_t *php_mbregex_compile_pattern(const char *pattern, int patlen, OnigOptionType options, OnigEncoding enc, OnigSyntaxType *syntax TSRMLS_DC) { int err_code = 0; int found = 0; php_mb_regex_t *retval = NULL, **rc = NULL; OnigErrorInfo err_info; OnigUChar err_str[ONIG_MAX_ERROR_MESSAGE_LEN];...
static php_mb_regex_t *php_mbregex_compile_pattern(const char *pattern, int patlen, OnigOptionType options, OnigEncoding enc, OnigSyntaxType *syntax TSRMLS_DC) { int err_code = 0; int found = 0; php_mb_regex_t *retval = NULL, **rc = NULL; OnigErrorInfo err_info; OnigUChar err_str[ONIG_MAX_ERROR_MESSAGE_LEN]; fou...
167,123
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: BrightnessLibrary* CrosLibrary::GetBrightnessLibrary() { return brightness_lib_.GetDefaultImpl(use_stub_impl_); } Commit Message: chromeos: Replace copy-and-pasted code with macros. This replaces a bunch of duplicated-per-library cros function definitions and comments. BUG=none TEST=built it Review URL: htt...
BrightnessLibrary* CrosLibrary::GetBrightnessLibrary() {
170,620
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: MagickExport int LocaleUppercase(const int c) { #if defined(MAGICKCORE_LOCALE_SUPPORT) if (c_locale != (locale_t) NULL) return(toupper_l((int) ((unsigned char) c),c_locale)); #endif return(toupper((int) ((unsigned char) c))); } Commit Message: ... CWE ID: CWE-125
MagickExport int LocaleUppercase(const int c) { if (c < 0) return(c); #if defined(MAGICKCORE_LOCALE_SUPPORT) if (c_locale != (locale_t) NULL) return(toupper_l((int) ((unsigned char) c),c_locale)); #endif return(toupper((int) ((unsigned char) c))); }
169,712
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: int user_match(const struct key *key, const struct key_match_data *match_data) { return strcmp(key->description, match_data->raw_data) == 0; } Commit Message: KEYS: Remove key_type::match in favour of overriding default by match_preparse A previous patch added a ->match_preparse() method to the key type. This...
int user_match(const struct key *key, const struct key_match_data *match_data)
168,443
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: ExtensionFunction* ExtensionFunctionDispatcher::CreateExtensionFunction( const ExtensionHostMsg_Request_Params& params, const Extension* extension, int requesting_process_id, const extensions::ProcessMap& process_map, extensions::ExtensionAPI* api, void* profile, IPC::Sender* ipc_sen...
ExtensionFunction* ExtensionFunctionDispatcher::CreateExtensionFunction( const ExtensionHostMsg_Request_Params& params, const Extension* extension, int requesting_process_id, const extensions::ProcessMap& process_map, extensions::ExtensionAPI* api, void* profile, IPC::Sender* ipc_sender, ...
171,350
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: const Cluster* Segment::GetFirst() const { if ((m_clusters == NULL) || (m_clusterCount <= 0)) return &m_eos; Cluster* const pCluster = m_clusters[0]; assert(pCluster); return pCluster; } Commit Message: libwebm: Pull from upstream Rolling mkvparser from upstream. Primarily for fixing a...
const Cluster* Segment::GetFirst() const Cluster* const pCluster = m_clusters[0]; assert(pCluster); return pCluster; }
174,322
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: InRegionScrollableArea::InRegionScrollableArea(WebPagePrivate* webPage, RenderLayer* layer) : m_webPage(webPage) , m_layer(layer) { ASSERT(webPage); ASSERT(layer); m_isNull = false; RenderObject* layerRenderer = layer->renderer(); ASSERT(layerRenderer); if (layerRenderer->isRend...
InRegionScrollableArea::InRegionScrollableArea(WebPagePrivate* webPage, RenderLayer* layer) : m_webPage(webPage) , m_layer(layer) { ASSERT(webPage); ASSERT(layer); m_isNull = false; RenderObject* layerRenderer = layer->renderer(); ASSERT(layerRenderer); if (layerRenderer->isRenderView...
170,431
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: void Verify_MakeGroupObsolete() { EXPECT_TRUE(delegate()->obsoleted_success_); EXPECT_EQ(group_.get(), delegate()->obsoleted_group_.get()); EXPECT_TRUE(group_->is_obsolete()); EXPECT_TRUE(storage()->usage_map_.empty()); AppCacheDatabase::GroupRecord group_record; AppCacheDatabase::Cache...
void Verify_MakeGroupObsolete() { EXPECT_TRUE(delegate()->obsoleted_success_); EXPECT_EQ(group_.get(), delegate()->obsoleted_group_.get()); EXPECT_TRUE(group_->is_obsolete()); EXPECT_TRUE(storage()->usage_map_.empty()); AppCacheDatabase::GroupRecord group_record; AppCacheDatabase::CacheRecord...
172,992
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: void Document::InitContentSecurityPolicy(ContentSecurityPolicy* csp) { //// the first parameter specifies a policy to use as the document csp meaning //// the document will take ownership of the policy //// the second parameter specifies a policy to inherit meaning the document //// will attempt to copy over the ...
void Document::InitContentSecurityPolicy(ContentSecurityPolicy* csp) { //// the first parameter specifies a policy to use as the document csp meaning //// the document will take ownership of the policy //// the second parameter specifies a policy to inherit meaning the document //// will attempt to copy over the policy...
172,299
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: int snd_usbmidi_create(struct snd_card *card, struct usb_interface *iface, struct list_head *midi_list, const struct snd_usb_audio_quirk *quirk) { struct snd_usb_midi *umidi; struct snd_usb_midi_endpoint_info endpoints[MIDI_MAX_ENDPOINTS]; int out_ports, in_ports; int i, err; umid...
int snd_usbmidi_create(struct snd_card *card, struct usb_interface *iface, struct list_head *midi_list, const struct snd_usb_audio_quirk *quirk) { struct snd_usb_midi *umidi; struct snd_usb_midi_endpoint_info endpoints[MIDI_MAX_ENDPOINTS]; int out_ports, in_ports; int i, err; umidi = kz...
167,412
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: void ChromeRenderMessageFilter::OnWriteTcmallocHeapProfile( const FilePath::StringType& filepath, const std::string& output) { VLOG(0) << "Writing renderer heap profile dump to: " << filepath; file_util::WriteFile(FilePath(filepath), output.c_str(), output.size()); } Commit Message: Disable tcmalloc ...
void ChromeRenderMessageFilter::OnWriteTcmallocHeapProfile(
170,664
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: http_dissect_hdrs(struct worker *w, struct http *hp, int fd, char *p, const struct http_conn *htc) { char *q, *r; txt t = htc->rxbuf; if (*p == '\r') p++; hp->nhd = HTTP_HDR_FIRST; hp->conds = 0; r = NULL; /* For FlexeLint */ for (; p < t.e; p = r) { /* Find end of next header */ q = r = p;...
http_dissect_hdrs(struct worker *w, struct http *hp, int fd, char *p, const struct http_conn *htc) { char *q, *r; txt t = htc->rxbuf; if (*p == '\r') p++; hp->nhd = HTTP_HDR_FIRST; hp->conds = 0; r = NULL; /* For FlexeLint */ for (; p < t.e; p = r) { /* Find end of next header */ q = r = p; wh...
169,997
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: void WebViewTestClient::DidFocus() { test_runner()->SetFocus(web_view_test_proxy_base_->web_view(), true); } Commit Message: If a page calls |window.focus()|, kick it out of fullscreen. BUG=776418, 800056 Change-Id: I1880fe600e4814c073f247c43b1c1ac80c8fc017 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource...
void WebViewTestClient::DidFocus() { void WebViewTestClient::DidFocus(blink::WebLocalFrame* calling_frame) { test_runner()->SetFocus(web_view_test_proxy_base_->web_view(), true); }
172,721
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: bool DebuggerDetachFunction::RunAsync() { std::unique_ptr<Detach::Params> params(Detach::Params::Create(*args_)); EXTENSION_FUNCTION_VALIDATE(params.get()); CopyDebuggee(&debuggee_, params->target); if (!InitClientHost()) return false; client_host_->Close(); SendResponse(true); return tr...
bool DebuggerDetachFunction::RunAsync() { std::unique_ptr<Detach::Params> params(Detach::Params::Create(*args_)); EXTENSION_FUNCTION_VALIDATE(params.get()); CopyDebuggee(&debuggee_, params->target); if (!InitClientHost()) return false; client_host_->RespondDetachedToPendingRequests(); client_host_...
173,240
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: void WorkerFetchContext::DispatchWillSendRequest( unsigned long identifier, ResourceRequest& request, const ResourceResponse& redirect_response, const FetchInitiatorInfo& initiator_info) { probe::willSendRequest(global_scope_, identifier, nullptr, request, redirect_...
void WorkerFetchContext::DispatchWillSendRequest( unsigned long identifier, ResourceRequest& request, const ResourceResponse& redirect_response, Resource::Type resource_type, const FetchInitiatorInfo& initiator_info) { probe::willSendRequest(global_scope_, identifier, nullptr, request, ...
172,476
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: bool ATSParser::PSISection::isCRCOkay() const { if (!isComplete()) { return false; } uint8_t* data = mBuffer->data(); if ((data[1] & 0x80) == 0) { return true; } unsigned sectionLength = U16_AT(data + 1) & 0xfff; ALOGV("sectionLength %u, skip %u", sectionLength, mSkipBytes); sectionLeng...
bool ATSParser::PSISection::isCRCOkay() const { if (!isComplete()) { return false; } uint8_t* data = mBuffer->data(); if ((data[1] & 0x80) == 0) { return true; } unsigned sectionLength = U16_AT(data + 1) & 0xfff; ALOGV("sectionLength %u, skip %u", sectionLength, mSkipBytes); if(sectionLength ...
173,769
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: void CameraSource::dataCallbackTimestamp(int64_t timestampUs, int32_t msgType __unused, const sp<IMemory> &data) { ALOGV("dataCallbackTimestamp: timestamp %lld us", (long long)timestampUs); Mutex::Autolock autoLock(mLock); if (!mStarted || (mNumFramesReceived == 0 && timestampUs < mStartTimeUs)) { ...
void CameraSource::dataCallbackTimestamp(int64_t timestampUs, int32_t msgType __unused, const sp<IMemory> &data) { ALOGV("dataCallbackTimestamp: timestamp %lld us", (long long)timestampUs); Mutex::Autolock autoLock(mLock); if (!mStarted || (mNumFramesReceived == 0 && timestampUs < mStartTimeUs)) { ALOGV(...
173,508
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: static int jpc_siz_getparms(jpc_ms_t *ms, jpc_cstate_t *cstate, jas_stream_t *in) { jpc_siz_t *siz = &ms->parms.siz; unsigned int i; uint_fast8_t tmp; /* Eliminate compiler warning about unused variables. */ cstate = 0; if (jpc_getuint16(in, &siz->caps) || jpc_getuint32(in, &siz->width) || j...
static int jpc_siz_getparms(jpc_ms_t *ms, jpc_cstate_t *cstate, jas_stream_t *in) { jpc_siz_t *siz = &ms->parms.siz; unsigned int i; uint_fast8_t tmp; siz->comps = 0; /* Eliminate compiler warning about unused variables. */ cstate = 0; if (jpc_getuint16(in, &siz->caps) || jpc_getuint32(in, &siz->wi...
168,731
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: void BindSkiaToInProcessGL() { static bool host_StubGL_installed = false; if (!host_StubGL_installed) { GrGLBinding binding; switch (gfx::GetGLImplementation()) { case gfx::kGLImplementationNone: NOTREACHED(); return; case gfx::kGLImplementationDesktopGL: binding = ...
void BindSkiaToInProcessGL() { static bool host_StubGL_installed = false; if (!host_StubGL_installed) { GrGLBinding binding; switch (gfx::GetGLImplementation()) { case gfx::kGLImplementationNone: NOTREACHED(); return; case gfx::kGLImplementationDesktopGL: binding = kDeskt...
170,371
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: long keyctl_update_key(key_serial_t id, const void __user *_payload, size_t plen) { key_ref_t key_ref; void *payload; long ret; ret = -EINVAL; if (plen > PAGE_SIZE) goto error; /* pull the payload in if one was supplied */ payload = NULL; if (_payload) { ret = -ENOMEM; paylo...
long keyctl_update_key(key_serial_t id, const void __user *_payload, size_t plen) { key_ref_t key_ref; void *payload; long ret; ret = -EINVAL; if (plen > PAGE_SIZE) goto error; /* pull the payload in if one was supplied */ payload = NULL; if (plen) { ret = -ENOMEM; payload = kmall...
167,727
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: static int sgi_clock_set(clockid_t clockid, struct timespec *tp) { u64 nsec; u64 rem; nsec = rtc_time() * sgi_clock_period; sgi_clock_offset.tv_sec = tp->tv_sec - div_long_long_rem(nsec, NSEC_PER_SEC, &rem); if (rem <= tp->tv_nsec) sgi_clock_offset.tv_nsec = tp->tv_sec - rem; else { sgi_cl...
static int sgi_clock_set(clockid_t clockid, struct timespec *tp) { u64 nsec; u32 rem; nsec = rtc_time() * sgi_clock_period; sgi_clock_offset.tv_sec = tp->tv_sec - div_u64_rem(nsec, NSEC_PER_SEC, &rem); if (rem <= tp->tv_nsec) sgi_clock_offset.tv_nsec = tp->tv_sec - rem; else { sgi_clock_offset.t...
165,750
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: int svc_rdma_handle_bc_reply(struct rpc_xprt *xprt, struct rpcrdma_msg *rmsgp, struct xdr_buf *rcvbuf) { struct rpcrdma_xprt *r_xprt = rpcx_to_rdmax(xprt); struct kvec *dst, *src = &rcvbuf->head[0]; struct rpc_rqst *req; unsigned long cwnd; u32 credits; size_t len; __be32 xid; __be32 *p; int r...
int svc_rdma_handle_bc_reply(struct rpc_xprt *xprt, struct rpcrdma_msg *rmsgp, /** * svc_rdma_handle_bc_reply - Process incoming backchannel reply * @xprt: controlling backchannel transport * @rdma_resp: pointer to incoming transport header * @rcvbuf: XDR buffer into which to decode the reply * * Returns: * %0 i...
168,158
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: char *ldb_dn_escape_value(TALLOC_CTX *mem_ctx, struct ldb_val value) { char *dst; if (!value.length) return NULL; /* allocate destination string, it will be at most 3 times the source */ dst = talloc_array(mem_ctx, char, value.length * 3 + 1); if ( ! dst) { talloc_free(dst...
char *ldb_dn_escape_value(TALLOC_CTX *mem_ctx, struct ldb_val value) { char *dst; size_t len; if (!value.length) return NULL; /* allocate destination string, it will be at most 3 times the source */ dst = talloc_array(mem_ctx, char, value.length * 3 + 1); if ( ! dst) { ta...
164,674