instruction
stringclasses
1 value
input
stringlengths
90
9.34k
output
stringlengths
16
15.4k
__index_level_0__
int64
165k
175k
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: explicit ConsoleCallbackFilter( base::Callback<void(const base::string16&)> callback) : callback_(callback) {} Commit Message: Convert FrameHostMsg_DidAddMessageToConsole to Mojo. Note: Since this required changing the test RenderViewImplTest.DispatchBeforeUnloadCanDetachFrame, I manually re-intro...
explicit ConsoleCallbackFilter(
172,489
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: PHP_FUNCTION(imageaffinematrixget) { double affine[6]; long type; zval *options; zval **tmp; int res = GD_FALSE, i; if (zend_parse_parameters(ZEND_NUM_ARGS() TSRMLS_CC, "l|z", &type, &options) == FAILURE) { return; } switch((gdAffineStandardMatrix)type) { case GD_AFFINE_TRANSLATE: case GD_AFFINE_...
PHP_FUNCTION(imageaffinematrixget) { double affine[6]; long type; zval *options; zval **tmp; int res = GD_FALSE, i; if (zend_parse_parameters(ZEND_NUM_ARGS() TSRMLS_CC, "l|z", &type, &options) == FAILURE) { return; } switch((gdAffineStandardMatrix)type) { case GD_AFFINE_TRANSLATE: case GD_AFFINE_SCALE:...
166,429
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: static inline void __file_sb_list_add(struct file *file, struct super_block *sb) { struct list_head *list; #ifdef CONFIG_SMP int cpu; cpu = smp_processor_id(); file->f_sb_list_cpu = cpu; list = per_cpu_ptr(sb->s_files, cpu); #else list = &sb->s_files; #endif list_add(&file->f_u.fu_list, list); } Commit Me...
static inline void __file_sb_list_add(struct file *file, struct super_block *sb)
166,795
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: static inline LineContribType * _gdContributionsAlloc(unsigned int line_length, unsigned int windows_size) { unsigned int u = 0; LineContribType *res; int overflow_error = 0; res = (LineContribType *) gdMalloc(sizeof(LineContribType)); if (!res) { return NULL; } res->WindowSize = windows_size; r...
static inline LineContribType * _gdContributionsAlloc(unsigned int line_length, unsigned int windows_size) { unsigned int u = 0; LineContribType *res; size_t weights_size; if (overflow2(windows_size, sizeof(double))) { return NULL; } else { weights_size = windows_size * sizeof(double); } res = (LineCon...
168,511
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: void RunCoeffCheck() { ACMRandom rnd(ACMRandom::DeterministicSeed()); const int count_test_block = 5000; DECLARE_ALIGNED_ARRAY(16, int16_t, input_block, kNumCoeffs); DECLARE_ALIGNED_ARRAY(16, int16_t, output_ref_block, kNumCoeffs); DECLARE_ALIGNED_ARRAY(16, int16_t, output_block, kNumCoef...
void RunCoeffCheck() { ACMRandom rnd(ACMRandom::DeterministicSeed()); const int count_test_block = 5000; DECLARE_ALIGNED(16, int16_t, input_block[kNumCoeffs]); DECLARE_ALIGNED(16, tran_low_t, output_ref_block[kNumCoeffs]); DECLARE_ALIGNED(16, tran_low_t, output_block[kNumCoeffs]); for (i...
174,548
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: my_object_increment_retval (MyObject *obj, gint32 x) { return x + 1; } Commit Message: CWE ID: CWE-264
my_object_increment_retval (MyObject *obj, gint32 x)
165,106
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: WebstoreBindings::WebstoreBindings(ScriptContext* context) : ObjectBackedNativeHandler(context) { RouteFunction("Install", base::Bind(&WebstoreBindings::Install, base::Unretained(this))); } Commit Message: [Extensions] Expand bindings access checks BUG=601149 BUG=601073 Review URL: ht...
WebstoreBindings::WebstoreBindings(ScriptContext* context) : ObjectBackedNativeHandler(context) { RouteFunction("Install", "webstore", base::Bind(&WebstoreBindings::Install, base::Unretained(this))); }
172,245
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: static Image *ReadMONOImage(const ImageInfo *image_info, ExceptionInfo *exception) { Image *image; MagickBooleanType status; register IndexPacket *indexes; register PixelPacket *q; register ssize_t x; size_t bit, byte; ssize_t y; /* Open image file. *...
static Image *ReadMONOImage(const ImageInfo *image_info, ExceptionInfo *exception) { Image *image; MagickBooleanType status; register IndexPacket *indexes; register PixelPacket *q; register ssize_t x; size_t bit, byte; ssize_t y; /* Open image file. */ as...
168,582
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: modify_policy_2_svc(mpol_arg *arg, struct svc_req *rqstp) { static generic_ret ret; char *prime_arg; gss_buffer_desc client_name, service_name; OM_uint32 minor_stat; kadm5_server_handle_t handl...
modify_policy_2_svc(mpol_arg *arg, struct svc_req *rqstp) { static generic_ret ret; char *prime_arg; gss_buffer_desc client_name = GSS_C_EMPTY_BUFFER; gss_buffer_desc service_name = GSS_C_EMPTY_BUFFER; OM_uint32 ...
167,520
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: PGTYPESdate_from_asc(char *str, char **endptr) { date dDate; fsec_t fsec; struct tm tt, *tm = &tt; int dtype; int nf; char *field[MAXDATEFIELDS]; int ftype[MAXDATEFIELDS]; char lowstr[MAXDATELEN + 1]; char *realptr; char **ptr = (endptr != NULL) ? endptr : &realptr; bool ...
PGTYPESdate_from_asc(char *str, char **endptr) { date dDate; fsec_t fsec; struct tm tt, *tm = &tt; int dtype; int nf; char *field[MAXDATEFIELDS]; int ftype[MAXDATEFIELDS]; char lowstr[MAXDATELEN + MAXDATEFIELDS]; char *realptr; char **ptr = (endptr != NULL) ? endptr : &realptr; ...
166,463
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: int re_yylex_init_extra(YY_EXTRA_TYPE yy_user_defined,yyscan_t* ptr_yy_globals ) { struct yyguts_t dummy_yyguts; re_yyset_extra (yy_user_defined, &dummy_yyguts); if (ptr_yy_globals == NULL){ errno = EINVAL; return 1; } *ptr_yy_globals = (yyscan_t) re_yyalloc ( sizeof( st...
int re_yylex_init_extra(YY_EXTRA_TYPE yy_user_defined,yyscan_t* ptr_yy_globals ) { struct yyguts_t dummy_yyguts; re_yyset_extra (yy_user_defined, &dummy_yyguts); if (ptr_yy_globals == NULL){ errno = EINVAL; return 1; } *ptr_yy_globals = (yyscan_t) re_yyalloc ( sizeof( struct ...
168,485
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: int kvm_iommu_map_pages(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_memory_slot *slot) { gfn_t gfn, end_gfn; pfn_t pfn; int r = 0; struct iommu_domain *domain = kvm->arch.iommu_domain; int flags; /* check if iommu exists and in use */ if (!domain) return 0; gfn = slot->base_gfn; end_gfn = gfn + slot->npages; ...
int kvm_iommu_map_pages(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_memory_slot *slot) { gfn_t gfn, end_gfn; pfn_t pfn; int r = 0; struct iommu_domain *domain = kvm->arch.iommu_domain; int flags; /* check if iommu exists and in use */ if (!domain) return 0; gfn = slot->base_gfn; end_gfn = gfn + slot->npages; flag...
166,351
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: LIBOPENMPT_MODPLUG_API unsigned int ModPlug_SampleName(ModPlugFile* file, unsigned int qual, char* buff) { const char* str; unsigned int retval; size_t tmpretval; if(!file) return 0; str = openmpt_module_get_sample_name(file->mod,qual-1); if(!str){ if(buff){ *buff = '\0'; } return 0; } tmpre...
LIBOPENMPT_MODPLUG_API unsigned int ModPlug_SampleName(ModPlugFile* file, unsigned int qual, char* buff) { const char* str; char buf[32]; if(!file) return 0; str = openmpt_module_get_sample_name(file->mod,qual-1); memset(buf,0,32); if(str){ strncpy(buf,str,31); openmpt_free_string(str); } if(buff){ ...
169,501
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: Core(const OAuthProviderInfo& info, net::URLRequestContextGetter* request_context_getter) : provider_info_(info), request_context_getter_(request_context_getter), delegate_(NULL) { } Commit Message: Remove UrlFetcher from remoting and use the one in net instead. BUG=133790 ...
Core(const OAuthProviderInfo& info, net::URLRequestContextGetter* request_context_getter) : provider_info_(info), request_context_getter_(request_context_getter), delegate_(NULL), url_fetcher_type_(URL_FETCHER_NONE) { }
170,805
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: static int ovl_copy_up_locked(struct dentry *workdir, struct dentry *upperdir, struct dentry *dentry, struct path *lowerpath, struct kstat *stat, struct iattr *attr, const char *link) { struct inode *wdir = workdir->d_inode; struct inode *udir = upperdir->d_inode; struct dentry *newd...
static int ovl_copy_up_locked(struct dentry *workdir, struct dentry *upperdir, struct dentry *dentry, struct path *lowerpath, struct kstat *stat, struct iattr *attr, const char *link) { struct inode *wdir = workdir->d_inode; struct inode *udir = upperdir->d_inode; struct dentry *newdentry ...
167,469
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: jbig2_image_compose_unopt(Jbig2Ctx *ctx, Jbig2Image *dst, Jbig2Image *src, int x, int y, Jbig2ComposeOp op) { int i, j; int sw = src->width; int sh = src->height; int sx = 0; int sy = 0; /* clip to the dst image boundaries */ if (x < 0) { sx += -x; sw -= -x; ...
jbig2_image_compose_unopt(Jbig2Ctx *ctx, Jbig2Image *dst, Jbig2Image *src, int x, int y, Jbig2ComposeOp op) { uint32_t i, j; uint32_t sw = src->width; uint32_t sh = src->height; uint32_t sx = 0; uint32_t sy = 0; /* clip to the dst image boundaries */ if (x < 0) { sx += -x; ...
165,490
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: status_t CameraDeviceClient::dump(int fd, const Vector<String16>& args) { String8 result; result.appendFormat("CameraDeviceClient[%d] (%p) PID: %d, dump:\n", mCameraId, getRemoteCallback()->asBinder().get(), mClientPid); result.append(" State: "); mFramePr...
status_t CameraDeviceClient::dump(int fd, const Vector<String16>& args) { return BasicClient::dump(fd, args); } status_t CameraDeviceClient::dumpClient(int fd, const Vector<String16>& args) { String8 result; result.appendFormat("CameraDeviceClient[%d] (%p) PID: %d, dump:\n", mCameraId, ...
173,939
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: void GLOutputSurfaceBufferQueueAndroid::HandlePartialSwap( const gfx::Rect& sub_buffer_rect, uint32_t flags, gpu::ContextSupport::SwapCompletedCallback swap_callback, gpu::ContextSupport::PresentationCallback presentation_callback) { DCHECK(sub_buffer_rect.IsEmpty()); context_provider_->Contex...
void GLOutputSurfaceBufferQueueAndroid::HandlePartialSwap(
172,104
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: static int jpc_dec_tiledecode(jpc_dec_t *dec, jpc_dec_tile_t *tile) { int i; int j; jpc_dec_tcomp_t *tcomp; jpc_dec_rlvl_t *rlvl; jpc_dec_band_t *band; int compno; int rlvlno; int bandno; int adjust; int v; jpc_dec_ccp_t *ccp; jpc_dec_cmpt_t *cmpt; if (jpc_dec_decodecblks(dec, tile)) { jas_eprintf...
static int jpc_dec_tiledecode(jpc_dec_t *dec, jpc_dec_tile_t *tile) { int i; int j; jpc_dec_tcomp_t *tcomp; jpc_dec_rlvl_t *rlvl; jpc_dec_band_t *band; int compno; int rlvlno; int bandno; int adjust; int v; jpc_dec_ccp_t *ccp; jpc_dec_cmpt_t *cmpt; if (jpc_dec_decodecblks(dec, tile)) { jas_eprintf("jpc_...
168,738
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: int __glXDisp_CreateContext(__GLXclientState *cl, GLbyte *pc) { xGLXCreateContextReq *req = (xGLXCreateContextReq *) pc; __GLXconfig *config; __GLXscreen *pGlxScreen; int err; if (!validGlxScreen(cl->client, req->screen, &pGlxScreen, &err)) return err; if (!validGlxVisual(cl->c...
int __glXDisp_CreateContext(__GLXclientState *cl, GLbyte *pc) { ClientPtr client = cl->client; xGLXCreateContextReq *req = (xGLXCreateContextReq *) pc; __GLXconfig *config; __GLXscreen *pGlxScreen; int err; REQUEST_SIZE_MATCH(xGLXCreateContextReq); if (!validGlxScreen(cl->client, r...
165,271
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: int create_user_ns(struct cred *new) { struct user_namespace *ns, *parent_ns = new->user_ns; kuid_t owner = new->euid; kgid_t group = new->egid; int ret; /* The creator needs a mapping in the parent user namespace * or else we won't be able to reasonably tell userspace who * created a user_namespa...
int create_user_ns(struct cred *new) { struct user_namespace *ns, *parent_ns = new->user_ns; kuid_t owner = new->euid; kgid_t group = new->egid; int ret; /* * Verify that we can not violate the policy of which files * may be accessed that is specified by the root directory, * by verifing that the root di...
166,097
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: dissect_spoolss_keybuffer(tvbuff_t *tvb, int offset, packet_info *pinfo, proto_tree *tree, dcerpc_info *di, guint8 *drep) { guint32 size; int end_offset; if (di->conformant_run) return offset; /* Dissect size and data */ offset = dissect_ndr_uint32(tvb, offset, pinfo, tree, di, drep, hf_key...
dissect_spoolss_keybuffer(tvbuff_t *tvb, int offset, packet_info *pinfo, proto_tree *tree, dcerpc_info *di, guint8 *drep) { guint32 size; int end_offset; if (di->conformant_run) return offset; /* Dissect size and data */ offset = dissect_ndr_uint32(tvb, offset, pinfo, tree, di, drep, hf_keybuffer...
167,159
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: static const SSL_METHOD *ssl23_get_server_method(int ver) { #ifndef OPENSSL_NO_SSL2 if (ver == SSL2_VERSION) return(SSLv2_server_method()); #endif if (ver == SSL3_VERSION) return(SSLv3_server_method()); else if (ver == TLS1_VERSION) return(T...
static const SSL_METHOD *ssl23_get_server_method(int ver) { #ifndef OPENSSL_NO_SSL2 if (ver == SSL2_VERSION) return(SSLv2_server_method()); #endif #ifndef OPENSSL_NO_SSL3 if (ver == SSL3_VERSION) return(SSLv3_server_method()); #endif if (ver == TLS1_VERSION) ...
165,158
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: void StreamingProcessor::releaseRecordingFrame(const sp<IMemory>& mem) { ATRACE_CALL(); status_t res; Mutex::Autolock m(mMutex); ssize_t offset; size_t size; sp<IMemoryHeap> heap = mem->getMemory(&offset, &size); if (heap->getHeapID() != mRecordingHeap->mHeap->getHeapID()) { ALOGW("%s: Camer...
void StreamingProcessor::releaseRecordingFrame(const sp<IMemory>& mem) { ATRACE_CALL(); status_t res; Mutex::Autolock m(mMutex); ssize_t offset; size_t size; sp<IMemoryHeap> heap = mem->getMemory(&offset, &size); if (heap->getHeapID() != mRecordingHeap->mHeap->getHeapID()) { ALOGW("%s: Camera %d: ...
173,512
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: static int jpc_pi_nextpcrl(register jpc_pi_t *pi) { int rlvlno; jpc_pirlvl_t *pirlvl; jpc_pchg_t *pchg; int prchind; int prcvind; int *prclyrno; int compno; jpc_picomp_t *picomp; int xstep; int ystep; uint_fast32_t trx0; uint_fast32_t try0; uint_fast32_t r; uint_fast32_t rpx; uint_fast32_t rpy; p...
static int jpc_pi_nextpcrl(register jpc_pi_t *pi) { int rlvlno; jpc_pirlvl_t *pirlvl; jpc_pchg_t *pchg; int prchind; int prcvind; int *prclyrno; int compno; jpc_picomp_t *picomp; int xstep; int ystep; uint_fast32_t trx0; uint_fast32_t try0; uint_fast32_t r; uint_fast32_t rpx; uint_fast32_t rpy; pchg = ...
169,440
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: image_transform_png_set_expand_set(PNG_CONST image_transform *this, transform_display *that, png_structp pp, png_infop pi) { png_set_expand(pp); this->next->set(this->next, that, pp, pi); } Commit Message: DO NOT MERGE Update libpng to 1.6.20 BUG:23265085 Change-Id: I85199805636d771f3597b691b63bc...
image_transform_png_set_expand_set(PNG_CONST image_transform *this, image_transform_png_set_expand_set(const image_transform *this, transform_display *that, png_structp pp, png_infop pi) { png_set_expand(pp); if (that->this.has_tRNS) that->this.is_transparent = 1; this->next->set(this->next, th...
173,634
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: int ff_mpeg4_decode_picture_header(Mpeg4DecContext *ctx, GetBitContext *gb) { MpegEncContext *s = &ctx->m; unsigned startcode, v; int ret; int vol = 0; /* search next start code */ align_get_bits(gb); if (!s->studio_profile && s->avctx->bits_per_raw_sample != 8) s->avctx->bit...
int ff_mpeg4_decode_picture_header(Mpeg4DecContext *ctx, GetBitContext *gb) { MpegEncContext *s = &ctx->m; unsigned startcode, v; int ret; int vol = 0; /* search next start code */ align_get_bits(gb); if (!s->studio_profile && s->avctx->bits_per_raw_sample != 8) s->avctx->bits_per_...
169,157
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: GURL DevToolsWindow::GetDevToolsURL(Profile* profile, const GURL& base_url, bool shared_worker_frontend, bool v8_only_frontend, const std::string& remote_frontend, ...
GURL DevToolsWindow::GetDevToolsURL(Profile* profile, const GURL& base_url, bool shared_worker_frontend, bool v8_only_frontend, const std::string& remote_frontend, ...
172,509
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: AccessType GetExtensionAccess(const Extension* extension, const GURL& url, int tab_id) { bool allowed_script = IsAllowedScript(extension, url, tab_id); bool allowed_capture = extension->permissions_data()->CanCaptureVisiblePage( ...
AccessType GetExtensionAccess(const Extension* extension, const GURL& url, int tab_id) { bool allowed_script = IsAllowedScript(extension, url, tab_id); bool allowed_capture = extension->permissions_data()->CanCaptureVisiblePage( url, t...
173,008
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: char **XGetFontPath( register Display *dpy, int *npaths) /* RETURN */ { xGetFontPathReply rep; unsigned long nbytes = 0; char **flist = NULL; char *ch = NULL; char *chend; int count = 0; register unsigned i; register int length; _X_UNUSED register xReq *req; LockDisplay(dpy); GetEmptyReq (GetF...
char **XGetFontPath( register Display *dpy, int *npaths) /* RETURN */ { xGetFontPathReply rep; unsigned long nbytes = 0; char **flist = NULL; char *ch = NULL; char *chend; int count = 0; register unsigned i; register int length; _X_UNUSED register xReq *req; LockDisplay(dpy); GetEmptyReq (GetFontPat...
164,748
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: static int kvm_ioctl_create_device(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_create_device *cd) { struct kvm_device_ops *ops = NULL; struct kvm_device *dev; bool test = cd->flags & KVM_CREATE_DEVICE_TEST; int ret; if (cd->type >= ARRAY_SIZE(kvm_device_ops_table)) return -ENODEV; ops = kvm_device_ops_table[cd->...
static int kvm_ioctl_create_device(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_create_device *cd) { struct kvm_device_ops *ops = NULL; struct kvm_device *dev; bool test = cd->flags & KVM_CREATE_DEVICE_TEST; int ret; if (cd->type >= ARRAY_SIZE(kvm_device_ops_table)) return -ENODEV; ops = kvm_device_ops_table[cd->type];...
169,741
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: static int __vcpu_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) { int r; struct kvm *kvm = vcpu->kvm; vcpu->srcu_idx = srcu_read_lock(&kvm->srcu); r = vapic_enter(vcpu); if (r) { srcu_read_unlock(&kvm->srcu, vcpu->srcu_idx); return r; } r = 1; while (r > 0) { if (vcpu->arch.mp_state == KVM_MP_STATE_RUNNABLE &&...
static int __vcpu_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) { int r; struct kvm *kvm = vcpu->kvm; vcpu->srcu_idx = srcu_read_lock(&kvm->srcu); r = 1; while (r > 0) { if (vcpu->arch.mp_state == KVM_MP_STATE_RUNNABLE && !vcpu->arch.apf.halted) r = vcpu_enter_guest(vcpu); else { srcu_read_unlock(&kvm->srcu, ...
165,947
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: bool xmp_init() { RESET_ERROR; try { bool result = SXMPFiles::Initialize(kXMPFiles_IgnoreLocalText); SXMPMeta::SetDefaultErrorCallback(&_xmp_error_callback, nullptr, 1); return result; SXMPMeta::SetDefaultErrorCallback(&_xmp_error_callback, nullptr, 1); return ...
bool xmp_init() { RESET_ERROR; try { // XMP SDK 5.1.2 needs this because it has been stripped off local // text conversion the one that was done in Exempi with libiconv. bool result = SXMPFiles::Initialize(kXMPFiles_IgnoreLocalText); SXMPMeta::SetDefaultErrorCallback(&_xmp_er...
165,368
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: struct bpf_map *bpf_map_get_with_uref(u32 ufd) { struct fd f = fdget(ufd); struct bpf_map *map; map = __bpf_map_get(f); if (IS_ERR(map)) return map; bpf_map_inc(map, true); fdput(f); return map; } Commit Message: bpf: fix refcnt overflow On a system with >32Gbyte of phyiscal memory and infini...
struct bpf_map *bpf_map_get_with_uref(u32 ufd) { struct fd f = fdget(ufd); struct bpf_map *map; map = __bpf_map_get(f); if (IS_ERR(map)) return map; map = bpf_map_inc(map, true); fdput(f); return map; }
167,252
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: GpuProcessHost::GpuProcessHost(int host_id, GpuProcessKind kind) : host_id_(host_id), gpu_process_(base::kNullProcessHandle), in_process_(false), software_rendering_(false), kind_(kind), process_launched_(false) { if (CommandLine::ForCurrentProcess()->HasSwitch(switches::k...
GpuProcessHost::GpuProcessHost(int host_id, GpuProcessKind kind) : host_id_(host_id), in_process_(false), software_rendering_(false), kind_(kind), process_launched_(false) { if (CommandLine::ForCurrentProcess()->HasSwitch(switches::kSingleProcess) || CommandLine::ForCurrentProce...
170,921
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: int DecodeTeredo(ThreadVars *tv, DecodeThreadVars *dtv, Packet *p, uint8_t *pkt, uint16_t len, PacketQueue *pq) { if (!g_teredo_enabled) return TM_ECODE_FAILED; uint8_t *start = pkt; /* Is this packet to short to contain an IPv6 packet ? */ if (len < IPV6_HEADER_LEN) return TM_EC...
int DecodeTeredo(ThreadVars *tv, DecodeThreadVars *dtv, Packet *p, uint8_t *pkt, uint16_t len, PacketQueue *pq) { if (!g_teredo_enabled) return TM_ECODE_FAILED; uint8_t *start = pkt; /* Is this packet to short to contain an IPv6 packet ? */ if (len < IPV6_HEADER_LEN) return TM_ECODE_FA...
169,477
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: OMX_ERRORTYPE SoftRaw::internalGetParameter( OMX_INDEXTYPE index, OMX_PTR params) { switch (index) { case OMX_IndexParamAudioPcm: { OMX_AUDIO_PARAM_PCMMODETYPE *pcmParams = (OMX_AUDIO_PARAM_PCMMODETYPE *)params; if (pcmParams->nPortIndex != 0 && pcmParams->...
OMX_ERRORTYPE SoftRaw::internalGetParameter( OMX_INDEXTYPE index, OMX_PTR params) { switch (index) { case OMX_IndexParamAudioPcm: { OMX_AUDIO_PARAM_PCMMODETYPE *pcmParams = (OMX_AUDIO_PARAM_PCMMODETYPE *)params; if (!isValidOMXParam(pcmParams)) { r...
174,218
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: bool ReceiverWasAdded(const RtpTransceiverState& transceiver_state) { uintptr_t receiver_id = RTCRtpReceiver::getId( transceiver_state.receiver_state()->webrtc_receiver().get()); for (const auto& receiver : handler_->rtp_receivers_) { if (receiver->Id() == receiver_id) return f...
bool ReceiverWasAdded(const RtpTransceiverState& transceiver_state) { DCHECK(handler_); uintptr_t receiver_id = RTCRtpReceiver::getId( transceiver_state.receiver_state()->webrtc_receiver().get()); for (const auto& receiver : handler_->rtp_receivers_) { if (receiver->Id() == receiver_id) ...
173,076
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: INLINE UWORD8 impeg2d_bit_stream_get_bit(stream_t *ps_stream) { UWORD32 u4_bit,u4_offset,u4_temp; UWORD32 u4_curr_bit; u4_offset = ps_stream->u4_offset; u4_curr_bit = u4_offset & 0x1F; u4_bit = ps_stream->u4_buf; /* Move the current bit rea...
INLINE UWORD8 impeg2d_bit_stream_get_bit(stream_t *ps_stream) { UWORD32 u4_bit,u4_offset,u4_temp; UWORD32 u4_curr_bit; u4_offset = ps_stream->u4_offset; u4_curr_bit = u4_offset & 0x1F; u4_bit = ps_stream->u4_buf; /* Move the current bit read from...
173,942
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: config_monitor( config_tree *ptree ) { int_node *pfilegen_token; const char *filegen_string; const char *filegen_file; FILEGEN *filegen; filegen_node *my_node; attr_val *my_opts; int filegen_type; int filegen_flag; /* Set the statistics directory */ if (ptree->stats_dir) stats_config(STATS_STATSDIR...
config_monitor( config_tree *ptree ) { int_node *pfilegen_token; const char *filegen_string; const char *filegen_file; FILEGEN *filegen; filegen_node *my_node; attr_val *my_opts; int filegen_type; int filegen_flag; /* Set the statistics directory */ if (ptree->stats_dir) stats_config(STATS_STATSDIR, ptre...
168,875
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: long mkvparser::UnserializeInt( IMkvReader* pReader, long long pos, long size, long long& result) { assert(pReader); assert(pos >= 0); assert(size > 0); assert(size <= 8); { signed char b; const long status = pReader->Read(pos, 1, (unsigned char*)&b); ...
long mkvparser::UnserializeInt( if (size_ >= LONG_MAX) // we need (size+1) chars return E_FILE_FORMAT_INVALID; const long size = static_cast<long>(size_); str = new (std::nothrow) char[size + 1]; if (str == NULL) return -1; unsigned char* const buf = reinterpret_cast<unsigned char*>(str); ...
174,448
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: static int em_sysenter(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt) { const struct x86_emulate_ops *ops = ctxt->ops; struct desc_struct cs, ss; u64 msr_data; u16 cs_sel, ss_sel; u64 efer = 0; ops->get_msr(ctxt, MSR_EFER, &efer); /* inject #GP if in real mode */ if (ctxt->mode == X86EMUL_MODE_REAL) return emulate_gp(...
static int em_sysenter(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt) { const struct x86_emulate_ops *ops = ctxt->ops; struct desc_struct cs, ss; u64 msr_data; u16 cs_sel, ss_sel; u64 efer = 0; ops->get_msr(ctxt, MSR_EFER, &efer); /* inject #GP if in real mode */ if (ctxt->mode == X86EMUL_MODE_REAL) return emulate_gp(ctxt, ...
166,742
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: void AppCacheHost::SelectCache(const GURL& document_url, const int64 cache_document_was_loaded_from, const GURL& manifest_url) { DCHECK(pending_start_update_callback_.is_null() && pending_swap_cache_callback_.is_null() && pendi...
void AppCacheHost::SelectCache(const GURL& document_url, bool AppCacheHost::SelectCache(const GURL& document_url, const int64 cache_document_was_loaded_from, const GURL& manifest_url) { if (was_select_cache_called_) return false; DCHECK(pending_s...
171,740
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: hstore_from_arrays(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) { int32 buflen; HStore *out; Pairs *pairs; Datum *key_datums; bool *key_nulls; int key_count; Datum *value_datums; bool *value_nulls; int value_count; ArrayType *key_array; ArrayType *value_array; int i; if (PG_ARGISNULL(0)) PG_RETURN...
hstore_from_arrays(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) { int32 buflen; HStore *out; Pairs *pairs; Datum *key_datums; bool *key_nulls; int key_count; Datum *value_datums; bool *value_nulls; int value_count; ArrayType *key_array; ArrayType *value_array; int i; if (PG_ARGISNULL(0)) PG_RETURN_NULL(...
166,397
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: copy_thread(unsigned long clone_flags, unsigned long stack_start, unsigned long stk_sz, struct task_struct *p) { struct thread_info *thread = task_thread_info(p); struct pt_regs *childregs = task_pt_regs(p); memset(&thread->cpu_context, 0, sizeof(struct cpu_context_save)); if (likely(!(p->flags & PF_KT...
copy_thread(unsigned long clone_flags, unsigned long stack_start, unsigned long stk_sz, struct task_struct *p) { struct thread_info *thread = task_thread_info(p); struct pt_regs *childregs = task_pt_regs(p); memset(&thread->cpu_context, 0, sizeof(struct cpu_context_save)); if (likely(!(p->flags & PF_KTHREAD)...
167,579
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: void HTMLFormControlElement::updateVisibleValidationMessage() { Page* page = document().page(); if (!page) return; String message; if (layoutObject() && willValidate()) message = validationMessage().stripWhiteSpace(); m_hasValidationMessage = true; ValidationMessageClient* client = &page...
void HTMLFormControlElement::updateVisibleValidationMessage() { Page* page = document().page(); if (!page || !page->isPageVisible()) return; String message; if (layoutObject() && willValidate()) message = validationMessage().stripWhiteSpace(); m_hasValidationMessage = true; ValidationMessageCl...
172,492
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: static int snd_ctl_elem_write(struct snd_card *card, struct snd_ctl_file *file, struct snd_ctl_elem_value *control) { struct snd_kcontrol *kctl; struct snd_kcontrol_volatile *vd; unsigned int index_offset; int result; down_read(&card->controls_rwsem); kctl = snd_ctl_find_id(card, &control->id); i...
static int snd_ctl_elem_write(struct snd_card *card, struct snd_ctl_file *file, struct snd_ctl_elem_value *control) { struct snd_kcontrol *kctl; struct snd_kcontrol_volatile *vd; unsigned int index_offset; int result; down_read(&card->controls_rwsem); kctl = snd_ctl_find_id(card, &control->id); if (kct...
166,293
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: static Image *ReadCLIPBOARDImage(const ImageInfo *image_info, ExceptionInfo *exception) { Image *image; register ssize_t x; register PixelPacket *q; ssize_t y; assert(image_info != (const ImageInfo *) NULL); assert(image_info->signature == MagickSignature); if (image_info->debu...
static Image *ReadCLIPBOARDImage(const ImageInfo *image_info, ExceptionInfo *exception) { Image *image; register ssize_t x; register PixelPacket *q; ssize_t y; assert(image_info != (const ImageInfo *) NULL); assert(image_info->signature == MagickSignature); if (image_info->debug != M...
168,552
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: findoprnd(ITEM *ptr, int32 *pos) { #ifdef BS_DEBUG elog(DEBUG3, (ptr[*pos].type == OPR) ? "%d %c" : "%d %d", *pos, ptr[*pos].val); #endif if (ptr[*pos].type == VAL) { ptr[*pos].left = 0; (*pos)--; } else if (ptr[*pos].val == (int32) '!') { ptr[*pos].left = -1; (*pos)--; findoprnd(ptr, po...
findoprnd(ITEM *ptr, int32 *pos) { /* since this function recurses, it could be driven to stack overflow. */ check_stack_depth(); #ifdef BS_DEBUG elog(DEBUG3, (ptr[*pos].type == OPR) ? "%d %c" : "%d %d", *pos, ptr[*pos].val); #endif if (ptr[*pos].type == VAL) { ptr[*pos].left = 0; (*pos)--; } else...
166,403
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: netscreen_seek_read(wtap *wth, gint64 seek_off, struct wtap_pkthdr *phdr, Buffer *buf, int *err, gchar **err_info) { int pkt_len; char line[NETSCREEN_LINE_LENGTH]; char cap_int[NETSCREEN_MAX_INT_NAME_LENGTH]; gboolean cap_dir; char cap_dst[13]; if (file_seek(wth->random_fh, seek_off, SEEK_SET, ...
netscreen_seek_read(wtap *wth, gint64 seek_off, struct wtap_pkthdr *phdr, Buffer *buf, int *err, gchar **err_info) { char line[NETSCREEN_LINE_LENGTH]; if (file_seek(wth->random_fh, seek_off, SEEK_SET, err) == -1) { return FALSE; } if (file_gets(line, NETSCREEN_LINE_LENGTH, wth->random_fh) == NULL) { ...
167,147
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: static OPJ_BOOL bmp_read_info_header(FILE* IN, OPJ_BITMAPINFOHEADER* header) { memset(header, 0, sizeof(*header)); /* INFO HEADER */ /* ------------- */ header->biSize = (OPJ_UINT32)getc(IN); header->biSize |= (OPJ_UINT32)getc(IN) << 8; header->biSize |= (OPJ_UINT32)getc(IN) << 16; he...
static OPJ_BOOL bmp_read_info_header(FILE* IN, OPJ_BITMAPINFOHEADER* header) { memset(header, 0, sizeof(*header)); /* INFO HEADER */ /* ------------- */ header->biSize = (OPJ_UINT32)getc(IN); header->biSize |= (OPJ_UINT32)getc(IN) << 8; header->biSize |= (OPJ_UINT32)getc(IN) << 16; header->...
167,932
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: static void nfs_set_open_stateid(struct nfs4_state *state, nfs4_stateid *stateid, int open_flags) { write_seqlock(&state->seqlock); nfs_set_open_stateid_locked(state, stateid, open_flags); write_sequnlock(&state->seqlock); } Commit Message: NFSv4: Convert the open and close ops to use fmode Signed-off-by...
static void nfs_set_open_stateid(struct nfs4_state *state, nfs4_stateid *stateid, int open_flags) static void nfs_set_open_stateid(struct nfs4_state *state, nfs4_stateid *stateid, fmode_t fmode) { write_seqlock(&state->seqlock); nfs_set_open_stateid_locked(state, stateid, fmode); write_sequnlock(&state->seqlock);...
165,705
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: static void reply_sesssetup_and_X_spnego(struct smb_request *req) { const uint8 *p; DATA_BLOB blob1; size_t bufrem; char *tmp; const char *native_os; const char *native_lanman; const char *primary_domain; const char *p2; uint16 data_blob_len = SVAL(req->vwv+7, 0); enum remote_arch_types ra_type = get_re...
static void reply_sesssetup_and_X_spnego(struct smb_request *req) { const uint8 *p; DATA_BLOB blob1; size_t bufrem; char *tmp; const char *native_os; const char *native_lanman; const char *primary_domain; const char *p2; uint16 data_blob_len = SVAL(req->vwv+7, 0); enum remote_arch_types ra_type = get_remote_a...
165,054
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: void ShellWindowFrameView::OnPaint(gfx::Canvas* canvas) { SkPaint paint; paint.setAntiAlias(false); paint.setStyle(SkPaint::kFill_Style); paint.setColor(SK_ColorWHITE); gfx::Path path; const int radius = 1; path.moveTo(0, radius); path.lineTo(radius, 0); path.lineTo(width() - radius - 1, 0); ...
void ShellWindowFrameView::OnPaint(gfx::Canvas* canvas) { if (is_frameless_) return; SkPaint paint; paint.setAntiAlias(false); paint.setStyle(SkPaint::kFill_Style); paint.setColor(SK_ColorWHITE); gfx::Path path; const int radius = 1; path.moveTo(0, radius); path.lineTo(radius, 0); path.lineTo...
170,717
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: static void v9fs_attach(void *opaque) { V9fsPDU *pdu = opaque; V9fsState *s = pdu->s; int32_t fid, afid, n_uname; V9fsString uname, aname; V9fsFidState *fidp; size_t offset = 7; V9fsQID qid; ssize_t err; v9fs_string_init(&uname); v9fs_string_init(&aname); err = pdu_unm...
static void v9fs_attach(void *opaque) { V9fsPDU *pdu = opaque; V9fsState *s = pdu->s; int32_t fid, afid, n_uname; V9fsString uname, aname; V9fsFidState *fidp; size_t offset = 7; V9fsQID qid; ssize_t err; v9fs_string_init(&uname); v9fs_string_init(&aname); err = pdu_unmarshal...
164,938
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: ImageLoader::ImageLoader(Element* element) : m_element(element), m_derefElementTimer(this, &ImageLoader::timerFired), m_hasPendingLoadEvent(false), m_hasPendingErrorEvent(false), m_imageComplete(true), m_loadingImageDocument(false), m_elementIsProtected(false), m...
ImageLoader::ImageLoader(Element* element) : m_element(element), m_derefElementTimer(TaskRunnerHelper::get(TaskType::Networking, element->document().frame()), this, &ImageLoader::timerFired), m_hasPend...
171,974
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: static ssize_t aio_setup_vectored_rw(int type, struct kiocb *kiocb, bool compat) { ssize_t ret; #ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT if (compat) ret = compat_rw_copy_check_uvector(type, (struct compat_iovec __user *)kiocb->ki_buf, kiocb->ki_nbytes, 1, &kiocb->ki_inline_vec, &kiocb->ki_iovec, 1); else #endif r...
static ssize_t aio_setup_vectored_rw(int type, struct kiocb *kiocb, bool compat) { ssize_t ret; #ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT if (compat) ret = compat_rw_copy_check_uvector(type, (struct compat_iovec __user *)kiocb->ki_buf, kiocb->ki_nbytes, 1, &kiocb->ki_inline_vec, &kiocb->ki_iovec, 1); else #endif ret = r...
167,613
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: validate_as_request(kdc_realm_t *kdc_active_realm, register krb5_kdc_req *request, krb5_db_entry client, krb5_db_entry server, krb5_timestamp kdc_time, const char **status, krb5_pa_data ***e_data) { int errcode; krb5_error_code ret; /* ...
validate_as_request(kdc_realm_t *kdc_active_realm, register krb5_kdc_req *request, krb5_db_entry client, krb5_db_entry server, krb5_timestamp kdc_time, const char **status, krb5_pa_data ***e_data) { int errcode; krb5_error_code ret; /* * If a...
167,378
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: png_get_uint_31(png_structp png_ptr, png_bytep buf) { #ifdef PNG_READ_BIG_ENDIAN_SUPPORTED png_uint_32 i = png_get_uint_32(buf); #else /* Avoid an extra function call by inlining the result. */ png_uint_32 i = ((png_uint_32)(*buf) << 24) + ((png_uint_32)(*(buf + 1)) << 16) + ((png_uint_32)...
png_get_uint_31(png_structp png_ptr, png_bytep buf) { #ifdef PNG_READ_BIG_ENDIAN_SUPPORTED png_uint_32 i = png_get_uint_32(buf); #else /* Avoid an extra function call by inlining the result. */ png_uint_32 i = ((png_uint_32)((*(buf )) & 0xff) << 24) + ((png_uint_32)((*(buf + 1)) & 0xff...
172,175
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: fbPictureInit (ScreenPtr pScreen, PictFormatPtr formats, int nformats) { srcRepeat = FALSE; if (maskTransform) maskRepeat = FALSE; if (!miComputeCompositeRegion (&region, pSrc, pMask, pDst, xSrc, ySrc, xMask, yMask, xDst, yDst, width, height)) return; n = REGION_NUM_RECTS (&regi...
fbPictureInit (ScreenPtr pScreen, PictFormatPtr formats, int nformats) { srcRepeat = FALSE; if (maskTransform) maskRepeat = FALSE; fbWalkCompositeRegion (op, pSrc, pMask, pDst, xSrc, ySrc, xMask, yMask, xDst, yDst, width, height, srcRepeat, maskRepeat, func); }
165,130
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: header_put_be_int (SF_PRIVATE *psf, int x) { if (psf->headindex < SIGNED_SIZEOF (psf->header) - 4) { psf->header [psf->headindex++] = (x >> 24) ; psf->header [psf->headindex++] = (x >> 16) ; psf->header [psf->headindex++] = (x >> 8) ; psf->header [psf->headindex++] = x ; } ; } /* header_put_be_int */ ...
header_put_be_int (SF_PRIVATE *psf, int x) { psf->header.ptr [psf->header.indx++] = (x >> 24) ; psf->header.ptr [psf->header.indx++] = (x >> 16) ; psf->header.ptr [psf->header.indx++] = (x >> 8) ; psf->header.ptr [psf->header.indx++] = x ; } /* header_put_be_int */
170,051
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: void DatabaseMessageFilter::OnDatabaseOpened(const string16& origin_identifier, const string16& database_name, const string16& description, int64 estimated_size) { DCHECK(Bro...
void DatabaseMessageFilter::OnDatabaseOpened(const string16& origin_identifier, const string16& database_name, const string16& description, int64 estimated_size) { DCHECK(BrowserTh...
171,477
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: void SaveCardBubbleControllerImpl::ShowBubbleForUpload( const CreditCard& card, std::unique_ptr<base::DictionaryValue> legal_message, bool should_cvc_be_requested, const base::Closure& save_card_callback) { is_uploading_ = true; is_reshow_ = false; should_cvc_be_requested_ = should_cvc...
void SaveCardBubbleControllerImpl::ShowBubbleForUpload( const CreditCard& card, std::unique_ptr<base::DictionaryValue> legal_message, bool should_cvc_be_requested, const base::Closure& save_card_callback) { // Don't show the bubble if it's already visible. if (save_card_bubble_view_) return; ...
172,386
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: static struct page *follow_pmd_mask(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address, pud_t *pudp, unsigned int flags, struct follow_page_context *ctx) { pmd_t *pmd, pmdval; spinlock_t *ptl; struct page *page; struct mm_struct *mm = vma->vm_mm; pmd = pmd_offset(pudp, address); /* ...
static struct page *follow_pmd_mask(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address, pud_t *pudp, unsigned int flags, struct follow_page_context *ctx) { pmd_t *pmd, pmdval; spinlock_t *ptl; struct page *page; struct mm_struct *mm = vma->vm_mm; pmd = pmd_offset(pudp, address); /* * The...
170,223
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: void PromoResourceService::PromoResourceStateChange() { web_resource_update_scheduled_ = false; content::NotificationService* service = content::NotificationService::current(); service->Notify(chrome::NOTIFICATION_PROMO_RESOURCE_STATE_CHANGED, content::Source<WebResourceService>(...
void PromoResourceService::PromoResourceStateChange() { content::NotificationService* service = content::NotificationService::current(); service->Notify(chrome::NOTIFICATION_PROMO_RESOURCE_STATE_CHANGED, content::Source<WebResourceService>(this), content::NotificationSe...
170,783
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: static char *ps_files_path_create(char *buf, size_t buflen, ps_files *data, const char *key) { { size_t len; const char *p; char c; int ret = 1; for (p = key; (c = *p); p++) { /* valid characters are a..z,A..Z,0..9 */ if (!((c >= 'a' && c <= 'z') || (c >= 'A' && c <= 'Z') || (c >= '0' && c <= ...
static char *ps_files_path_create(char *buf, size_t buflen, ps_files *data, const char *key) { { size_t len; const char *p; char c; int ret = 1; for (p = key; (c = *p); p++) { /* valid characters are a..z,A..Z,0..9 */ if (!((c >= 'a' && c <= 'z') || (c >= 'A' && c <= 'Z') || (c >= '0' && c <= '9') ...
164,870
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: void RenderThreadImpl::Shutdown() { FOR_EACH_OBSERVER( RenderProcessObserver, observers_, OnRenderProcessShutdown()); ChildThread::Shutdown(); if (memory_observer_) { message_loop()->RemoveTaskObserver(memory_observer_.get()); memory_observer_.reset(); } if (webkit_platform_support_) ...
void RenderThreadImpl::Shutdown() { FOR_EACH_OBSERVER( RenderProcessObserver, observers_, OnRenderProcessShutdown()); ChildThread::Shutdown(); if (memory_observer_) { message_loop()->RemoveTaskObserver(memory_observer_.get()); memory_observer_.reset(); } if (webkit_platform_support_) { ...
171,176
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: static int __init acpi_custom_method_init(void) { if (!acpi_debugfs_dir) return -ENOENT; cm_dentry = debugfs_create_file("custom_method", S_IWUSR, acpi_debugfs_dir, NULL, &cm_fops); if (!cm_dentry) return -ENODEV; return 0; } Commit Message: ACPI: Split out custom_method functionality into an own dr...
static int __init acpi_custom_method_init(void)
165,901
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: bool NaClProcessHost::StartNaClExecution() { NaClBrowser* nacl_browser = NaClBrowser::GetInstance(); nacl::NaClStartParams params; params.validation_cache_enabled = nacl_browser->ValidationCacheIsEnabled(); params.validation_cache_key = nacl_browser->GetValidationCacheKey(); params.version = chrome::Ve...
bool NaClProcessHost::StartNaClExecution() { NaClBrowser* nacl_browser = NaClBrowser::GetInstance(); nacl::NaClStartParams params; params.validation_cache_enabled = nacl_browser->ValidationCacheIsEnabled(); params.validation_cache_key = nacl_browser->GetValidationCacheKey(); params.version = chrome::VersionI...
170,729
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: static opj_bool pi_next_cprl(opj_pi_iterator_t * pi) { opj_pi_comp_t *comp = NULL; opj_pi_resolution_t *res = NULL; long index = 0; if (!pi->first) { comp = &pi->comps[pi->compno]; goto LABEL_SKIP; } else { pi->first = 0; } for (pi->compno = pi->poc.compno0; p...
static opj_bool pi_next_cprl(opj_pi_iterator_t * pi) { opj_pi_comp_t *comp = NULL; opj_pi_resolution_t *res = NULL; long index = 0; if (!pi->first) { comp = &pi->comps[pi->compno]; goto LABEL_SKIP; } else { pi->first = 0; } for (pi->compno = pi->poc.compno0; pi->com...
169,772
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: AXObjectInclusion AXLayoutObject::defaultObjectInclusion( IgnoredReasons* ignoredReasons) const { if (!m_layoutObject) { if (ignoredReasons) ignoredReasons->push_back(IgnoredReason(AXNotRendered)); return IgnoreObject; } if (m_layoutObject->style()->visibility() != EVisibility::kVisible...
AXObjectInclusion AXLayoutObject::defaultObjectInclusion( IgnoredReasons* ignoredReasons) const { if (!m_layoutObject) { if (ignoredReasons) ignoredReasons->push_back(IgnoredReason(AXNotRendered)); return IgnoreObject; } if (m_layoutObject->style()->visibility() != EVisibility::kVisible) { ...
171,903
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: png_set_tIME(png_structp png_ptr, png_infop info_ptr, png_timep mod_time) { png_debug1(1, "in %s storage function", "tIME"); if (png_ptr == NULL || info_ptr == NULL || (png_ptr->mode & PNG_WROTE_tIME)) return; png_memcpy(&(info_ptr->mod_time), mod_time, png_sizeof(png_time)); info_...
png_set_tIME(png_structp png_ptr, png_infop info_ptr, png_timep mod_time) { png_debug1(1, "in %s storage function", "tIME"); if (png_ptr == NULL || info_ptr == NULL || (png_ptr->mode & PNG_WROTE_tIME)) return; if (mod_time->month == 0 || mod_time->month > 12 || mod_time->day == 0 ...
172,184
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: gfx::Size LockScreenMediaControlsView::CalculatePreferredSize() const { return gfx::Size(kMediaControlsTotalWidthDp, kMediaControlsTotalHeightDp); } Commit Message: [Lock Screen Media Controls] Tweak UI based on new mocks This CL rearranges the different components of the CrOS lock screen media controls bas...
gfx::Size LockScreenMediaControlsView::CalculatePreferredSize() const { return contents_view_->GetPreferredSize(); }
172,338
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: ~SessionRestoreImpl() { STLDeleteElements(&windows_); CHECK(profiles_getting_restored); CHECK(profiles_getting_restored->find(profile_) != profiles_getting_restored->end()); profiles_getting_restored->erase(profile_); if (profiles_getting_restored->empty()) { delete profi...
~SessionRestoreImpl() { STLDeleteElements(&windows_); active_session_restorers->erase(this); if (active_session_restorers->empty()) { delete active_session_restorers; active_session_restorers = NULL; } g_browser_process->ReleaseModule(); }
171,038
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: const char* Chapters::Display::GetString() const { return m_string; } Commit Message: libwebm: Pull from upstream Rolling mkvparser from upstream. Primarily for fixing a bug on parsing failures with certain Opus WebM files. Upstream commit hash of this pull: 574045edd4ecbeb802ee3f1d214b5510269852ae The di...
const char* Chapters::Display::GetString() const
174,359
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: WebString WebPageSerializer::generateMarkOfTheWebDeclaration(const WebURL& url) { return String::format("\n<!-- saved from url=(%04d)%s -->\n", static_cast<int>(url.spec().length()), url.spec().data()); } Commit Message: Escape "--" in the page URL at pa...
WebString WebPageSerializer::generateMarkOfTheWebDeclaration(const WebURL& url) { StringBuilder builder; builder.append("\n<!-- "); builder.append(PageSerializer::markOfTheWebDeclaration(url)); builder.append(" -->\n"); return builder.toString(); }
171,787
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: nfs41_callback_svc(void *vrqstp) { struct svc_rqst *rqstp = vrqstp; struct svc_serv *serv = rqstp->rq_server; struct rpc_rqst *req; int error; DEFINE_WAIT(wq); set_freezable(); while (!kthread_should_stop()) { if (try_to_freeze()) continue; prepare_to_wait(&serv->sv_cb_waitq, &wq, TASK_INTER...
nfs41_callback_svc(void *vrqstp) { struct svc_rqst *rqstp = vrqstp; struct svc_serv *serv = rqstp->rq_server; struct rpc_rqst *req; int error; DEFINE_WAIT(wq); set_freezable(); while (!kthread_freezable_should_stop(NULL)) { if (signal_pending(current)) flush_signals(current); prepare_to_wait(&ser...
168,137
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: void WebGraphicsContext3DCommandBufferImpl::FlipVertically( uint8* framebuffer, unsigned int width, unsigned int height) { uint8* scanline = scanline_.get(); if (!scanline) return; unsigned int row_bytes = width * 4; unsigned int count = height / 2; for (unsigned int i = 0; i < c...
void WebGraphicsContext3DCommandBufferImpl::FlipVertically( uint8* framebuffer, unsigned int width, unsigned int height) { if (width == 0) return; scanline_.resize(width * 4); uint8* scanline = &scanline_[0]; unsigned int row_bytes = width * 4; unsigned int count = height / 2; for (u...
171,063
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: static TEE_Result set_rmem_param(const struct optee_msg_param_rmem *rmem, struct param_mem *mem) { uint64_t shm_ref = READ_ONCE(rmem->shm_ref); mem->mobj = mobj_reg_shm_get_by_cookie(shm_ref); if (!mem->mobj) return TEE_ERROR_BAD_PARAMETERS; mem->offs = READ_ONCE(rmem->offs); mem->size = REA...
static TEE_Result set_rmem_param(const struct optee_msg_param_rmem *rmem, struct param_mem *mem) { size_t req_size = 0; uint64_t shm_ref = READ_ONCE(rmem->shm_ref); mem->mobj = mobj_reg_shm_get_by_cookie(shm_ref); if (!mem->mobj) return TEE_ERROR_BAD_PARAMETERS; mem->offs = READ_ONCE(rmem->offs); ...
169,474
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: void OnSuggestionModelAdded(UiScene* scene, UiBrowserInterface* browser, Model* model, SuggestionBinding* element_binding) { auto icon = base::MakeUnique<VectorIcon>(100); icon->SetDrawPhase(kPhaseForeground); icon->SetType(...
void OnSuggestionModelAdded(UiScene* scene, UiBrowserInterface* browser, Model* model, SuggestionBinding* element_binding) { auto icon = base::MakeUnique<VectorIcon>(100); icon->SetDrawPhase(kPhaseForeground); icon->SetType(kTypeO...
173,221
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: void PaintLayerScrollableArea::UpdateCompositingLayersAfterScroll() { PaintLayerCompositor* compositor = GetLayoutBox()->View()->Compositor(); if (!compositor->InCompositingMode()) return; if (UsesCompositedScrolling()) { DCHECK(Layer()->HasCompositedLayerMapping()); ScrollingCoordinator* scr...
void PaintLayerScrollableArea::UpdateCompositingLayersAfterScroll() { PaintLayerCompositor* compositor = GetLayoutBox()->View()->Compositor(); if (!compositor->InCompositingMode()) return; if (UsesCompositedScrolling()) { DCHECK(Layer()->HasCompositedLayerMapping()); ScrollingCoordinator* scrolling...
172,047
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: get_endpoints(struct usbtest_dev *dev, struct usb_interface *intf) { int tmp; struct usb_host_interface *alt; struct usb_host_endpoint *in, *out; struct usb_host_endpoint *iso_in, *iso_out; struct usb_host_endpoint *int_in, *int_out; struct usb_device *udev; for (tmp = 0; tmp < intf->num_altsetting; t...
get_endpoints(struct usbtest_dev *dev, struct usb_interface *intf) { int tmp; struct usb_host_interface *alt; struct usb_host_endpoint *in, *out; struct usb_host_endpoint *iso_in, *iso_out; struct usb_host_endpoint *int_in, *int_out; struct usb_device *udev; for (tmp = 0; tmp < intf->num_altsetting; tmp++) ...
167,678
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: int jffs2_set_acl(struct inode *inode, struct posix_acl *acl, int type) { int rc, xprefix; switch (type) { case ACL_TYPE_ACCESS: xprefix = JFFS2_XPREFIX_ACL_ACCESS; if (acl) { umode_t mode = inode->i_mode; rc = posix_acl_equiv_mode(acl, &mode); if (rc < 0) return rc; if (inode->i_mode...
int jffs2_set_acl(struct inode *inode, struct posix_acl *acl, int type) { int rc, xprefix; switch (type) { case ACL_TYPE_ACCESS: xprefix = JFFS2_XPREFIX_ACL_ACCESS; if (acl) { umode_t mode; rc = posix_acl_update_mode(inode, &mode, &acl); if (rc) return rc; if (inode->i_mode != mode) { ...
166,974
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: my_object_error_get_type (void) { static GType etype = 0; if (etype == 0) { static const GEnumValue values[] = { ENUM_ENTRY (MY_OBJECT_ERROR_FOO, "Foo"), ENUM_ENTRY (MY_OBJECT_ERROR_BAR, "Bar"), { 0, 0, 0 } }; etype = g_enum_register_static ("MyObjectError", values); } return etype; } Commi...
my_object_error_get_type (void)
165,097
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: bool NavigationControllerImpl::RendererDidNavigate( RenderFrameHostImpl* rfh, const FrameHostMsg_DidCommitProvisionalLoad_Params& params, LoadCommittedDetails* details, bool is_navigation_within_page, NavigationHandleImpl* navigation_handle) { is_initial_navigation_ = false; bool overridi...
bool NavigationControllerImpl::RendererDidNavigate( RenderFrameHostImpl* rfh, const FrameHostMsg_DidCommitProvisionalLoad_Params& params, LoadCommittedDetails* details, bool is_navigation_within_page, NavigationHandleImpl* navigation_handle) { is_initial_navigation_ = false; bool overriding_use...
172,932
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: pdf_dict_put(fz_context *ctx, pdf_obj *obj, pdf_obj *key, pdf_obj *val) { int i; RESOLVE(obj); if (!OBJ_IS_DICT(obj)) fz_throw(ctx, FZ_ERROR_GENERIC, "not a dict (%s)", pdf_objkindstr(obj)); if (!val) val = PDF_OBJ_NULL; if (DICT(obj)->len > 100 && !(obj->flags & PD...
pdf_dict_put(fz_context *ctx, pdf_obj *obj, pdf_obj *key, pdf_obj *val) static void pdf_dict_get_put(fz_context *ctx, pdf_obj *obj, pdf_obj *key, pdf_obj *val, pdf_obj **old_val) { int i; if (old_val) *old_val = NULL; RESOLVE(obj); if (!OBJ_IS_DICT(obj)) ...
165,260
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: static void Sp_split_regexp(js_State *J) { js_Regexp *re; const char *text; int limit, len, k; const char *p, *a, *b, *c, *e; Resub m; text = checkstring(J, 0); re = js_toregexp(J, 1); limit = js_isdefined(J, 2) ? js_tointeger(J, 2) : 1 << 30; js_newarray(J); len = 0; e = text + strlen(text); /*...
static void Sp_split_regexp(js_State *J) { js_Regexp *re; const char *text; int limit, len, k; const char *p, *a, *b, *c, *e; Resub m; text = checkstring(J, 0); re = js_toregexp(J, 1); limit = js_isdefined(J, 2) ? js_tointeger(J, 2) : 1 << 30; js_newarray(J); len = 0; e = text + strlen(text); /* split...
169,701
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: void ChromeContentRendererClient::RenderViewCreated(RenderView* render_view) { ContentSettingsObserver* content_settings = new ContentSettingsObserver(render_view); new DevToolsAgent(render_view); new ExtensionHelper(render_view, extension_dispatcher_.get()); new PageLoadHistograms(render_view,...
void ChromeContentRendererClient::RenderViewCreated(RenderView* render_view) { ContentSettingsObserver* content_settings = new ContentSettingsObserver(render_view); new ExtensionHelper(render_view, extension_dispatcher_.get()); new PageLoadHistograms(render_view, histogram_snapshots_.get()); new Pri...
170,324
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: scoped_ptr<cc::CompositorFrame> TestSynchronousCompositor::DemandDrawHw( gfx::Size surface_size, const gfx::Transform& transform, gfx::Rect viewport, gfx::Rect clip, gfx::Rect viewport_rect_for_tile_priority, const gfx::Transform& transform_for_tile_priority) { return hardware_frame_...
scoped_ptr<cc::CompositorFrame> TestSynchronousCompositor::DemandDrawHw( const gfx::Size& surface_size, const gfx::Transform& transform, const gfx::Rect& viewport, const gfx::Rect& clip, const gfx::Rect& viewport_rect_for_tile_priority, const gfx::Transform& transform_for_tile_priority) { ...
171,620
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: xmlParseElementMixedContentDecl(xmlParserCtxtPtr ctxt, int inputchk) { xmlElementContentPtr ret = NULL, cur = NULL, n; const xmlChar *elem = NULL; GROW; if (CMP7(CUR_PTR, '#', 'P', 'C', 'D', 'A', 'T', 'A')) { SKIP(7); SKIP_BLANKS; SHRINK; if (RAW == ')') { if ((ctxt->validate) && (ctxt->...
xmlParseElementMixedContentDecl(xmlParserCtxtPtr ctxt, int inputchk) { xmlElementContentPtr ret = NULL, cur = NULL, n; const xmlChar *elem = NULL; GROW; if (CMP7(CUR_PTR, '#', 'P', 'C', 'D', 'A', 'T', 'A')) { SKIP(7); SKIP_BLANKS; SHRINK; if (RAW == ')') { if ((ctxt->validate) && (ctxt->input-...
171,286
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: X11SurfaceFactory::GetAllowedGLImplementations() { std::vector<gl::GLImplementation> impls; impls.push_back(gl::kGLImplementationEGLGLES2); impls.push_back(gl::kGLImplementationDesktopGL); impls.push_back(gl::kGLImplementationOSMesaGL); return impls; } Commit Message: Add ThreadChecker for Ozone X1...
X11SurfaceFactory::GetAllowedGLImplementations() { DCHECK(thread_checker_.CalledOnValidThread()); std::vector<gl::GLImplementation> impls; impls.push_back(gl::kGLImplementationEGLGLES2); impls.push_back(gl::kGLImplementationDesktopGL); impls.push_back(gl::kGLImplementationOSMesaGL); return impls; }
171,602
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: void AppControllerImpl::SetClient(mojom::AppControllerClientPtr client) { client_ = std::move(client); } Commit Message: Refactor the AppController implementation into a KeyedService. This is necessary to guarantee that the AppController will not outlive the AppServiceProxy, which could happen before during...
void AppControllerImpl::SetClient(mojom::AppControllerClientPtr client) { void AppControllerService::SetClient(mojom::AppControllerClientPtr client) { client_ = std::move(client); }
172,088
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: u_char *_our_safe_pcap_next(pcap_t *pcap, struct pcap_pkthdr *pkthdr, const char *funcname, const int line, const char *file) { u_char *pktdata = (u_char *)pcap_next(pcap, pkthdr); if (pktdata) { if (pkthdr->len > MAXPACKET) { fprintf(stderr, "safe_pcap_next ERROR: Invalid pa...
u_char *_our_safe_pcap_next(pcap_t *pcap, struct pcap_pkthdr *pkthdr, const char *funcname, const int line, const char *file) { u_char *pktdata = (u_char *)pcap_next(pcap, pkthdr); if (pktdata) { if (pkthdr->len > MAXPACKET) { fprintf(stderr, "safe_pcap_next ERROR: Invalid packet l...
168,946
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: print_prefix(netdissect_options *ndo, const u_char *prefix, u_int max_length) { int plenbytes; char buf[sizeof("xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx::/128")]; if (prefix[0] >= 96 && max_length >= IPV4_MAPPED_HEADING_LEN + 1 && is_ipv4_mapped_address(&prefix[1])) { struct in_addr ad...
print_prefix(netdissect_options *ndo, const u_char *prefix, u_int max_length) { int plenbytes; char buf[sizeof("xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx::/128")]; if (prefix[0] >= 96 && max_length >= IPV4_MAPPED_HEADING_LEN + 1 && is_ipv4_mapped_address(&prefix[1])) { struct in_addr addr; ...
169,820
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: xsltIf(xsltTransformContextPtr ctxt, xmlNodePtr contextNode, xmlNodePtr inst, xsltStylePreCompPtr castedComp) { int res = 0; #ifdef XSLT_REFACTORED xsltStyleItemIfPtr comp = (xsltStyleItemIfPtr) castedComp; #else xsltStylePreCompPtr comp = castedComp; #endif if ((ctxt == NULL) || (co...
xsltIf(xsltTransformContextPtr ctxt, xmlNodePtr contextNode, xmlNodePtr inst, xsltStylePreCompPtr castedComp) { int res = 0; #ifdef XSLT_REFACTORED xsltStyleItemIfPtr comp = (xsltStyleItemIfPtr) castedComp; #else xsltStylePreCompPtr comp = castedComp; #endif if ((ctxt == NULL) || (contextN...
173,328
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: void CreateFile(const FilePath& file_path) { const std::string kFoo = "foo"; ASSERT_TRUE(file_util::WriteFile(file_path, kFoo.data(), kFoo.size())) << ": " << file_path.value(); } Commit Message: Revert 144993 - gdata: Remove invalid files in the cache directories Broke linux_chromeos_valgri...
void CreateFile(const FilePath& file_path) {
170,869
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: static jas_image_cmpt_t *jas_image_cmpt_create(int_fast32_t tlx, int_fast32_t tly, int_fast32_t hstep, int_fast32_t vstep, int_fast32_t width, int_fast32_t height, uint_fast16_t depth, bool sgnd, uint_fast32_t inmem) { jas_image_cmpt_t *cmpt; size_t size; cmpt = 0; if (width < 0 || height < 0 || h...
static jas_image_cmpt_t *jas_image_cmpt_create(int_fast32_t tlx, int_fast32_t tly, int_fast32_t hstep, int_fast32_t vstep, int_fast32_t width, int_fast32_t height, uint_fast16_t depth, bool sgnd, uint_fast32_t inmem) { jas_image_cmpt_t *cmpt; size_t size; JAS_DBGLOG(100, ( "jas_image_cmpt_create(%ld, %l...
168,693
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: void filter_block2d_8_c(const uint8_t *src_ptr, const unsigned int src_stride, const int16_t *HFilter, const int16_t *VFilter, uint8_t *dst_ptr, unsigned int dst_stride, unsigned int output_width, unsigned int output_height) { const int kInterp_Extend = 4; const unsigned int intermediate_height = ...
void filter_block2d_8_c(const uint8_t *src_ptr, const unsigned int src_stride, const int16_t *HFilter, const int16_t *VFilter, uint8_t *dst_ptr, unsigned int dst_stride, unsigned int output_width, unsigned int output_height) { const int kInterp_Extend = 4; const unsigned int intermediate_height = (...
174,509
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: cib_timeout_handler(gpointer data) { struct timer_rec_s *timer = data; timer_expired = TRUE; crm_err("Call %d timed out after %ds", timer->call_id, timer->timeout); /* Always return TRUE, never remove the handler * We do that after the while-loop in cib_native_perform_op() */ return ...
cib_timeout_handler(gpointer data)
166,154
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: const BlockEntry* Cluster::GetEntry(const CuePoint& cp, const CuePoint::TrackPosition& tp) const { assert(m_pSegment); #if 0 LoadBlockEntries(); if (m_entries == NULL) return NULL; const long long count = m_entries_count; if (count <= 0) ret...
const BlockEntry* Cluster::GetEntry(const CuePoint& cp, const CuePoint::TrackPosition& tp) const { assert(m_pSegment); const long long tc = cp.GetTimeCode(); if (tp.m_block > 0) { const long block = static_cast<long>(tp.m_block); const long index = block - 1; while (...
173,817