instruction
stringclasses
1 value
input
stringlengths
90
9.34k
output
stringlengths
16
15.4k
__index_level_0__
int64
165k
175k
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: static int do_io_accounting(struct task_struct *task, char *buffer, int whole) { struct task_io_accounting acct = task->ioac; unsigned long flags; if (whole && lock_task_sighand(task, &flags)) { struct task_struct *t = task; task_io_accounting_add(&acct, &task->signal->ioac); while_each_thread(ta...
static int do_io_accounting(struct task_struct *task, char *buffer, int whole) { struct task_io_accounting acct = task->ioac; unsigned long flags; if (!ptrace_may_access(task, PTRACE_MODE_READ)) return -EACCES; if (whole && lock_task_sighand(task, &flags)) { struct task_struct *t = task; task_io_acco...
165,860
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: jas_seq2d_t *jas_seq2d_copy(jas_seq2d_t *x) { jas_matrix_t *y; int i; int j; y = jas_seq2d_create(jas_seq2d_xstart(x), jas_seq2d_ystart(x), jas_seq2d_xend(x), jas_seq2d_yend(x)); assert(y); for (i = 0; i < x->numrows_; ++i) { for (j = 0; j < x->numcols_; ++j) { *jas_matrix_getref(y, i, j) = ja...
jas_seq2d_t *jas_seq2d_copy(jas_seq2d_t *x) { jas_matrix_t *y; jas_matind_t i; jas_matind_t j; y = jas_seq2d_create(jas_seq2d_xstart(x), jas_seq2d_ystart(x), jas_seq2d_xend(x), jas_seq2d_yend(x)); assert(y); for (i = 0; i < x->numrows_; ++i) { for (j = 0; j < x->numcols_; ++j) { *jas_matrix_getref(y...
168,708
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: bmexec_trans (kwset_t kwset, char const *text, size_t size) { unsigned char const *d1; char const *ep, *sp, *tp; int d; int len = kwset->mind; char const *trans = kwset->trans; if (len == 0) return 0; if (len > size) return -1; if (len == 1) { tp = memchr_kwset (text, size, kwse...
bmexec_trans (kwset_t kwset, char const *text, size_t size) { unsigned char const *d1; char const *ep, *sp, *tp; int d; int len = kwset->mind; char const *trans = kwset->trans; if (len == 0) return 0; if (len > size) return -1; if (len == 1) { tp = memchr_kwset (text, size, kwset); ...
164,771
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: _zip_read_eocd64(zip_source_t *src, zip_buffer_t *buffer, zip_uint64_t buf_offset, unsigned int flags, zip_error_t *error) { zip_cdir_t *cd; zip_uint64_t offset; zip_uint8_t eocd[EOCD64LEN]; zip_uint64_t eocd_offset; zip_uint64_t size, nentry, i, eocdloc_offset; bool free_buffer; zip_u...
_zip_read_eocd64(zip_source_t *src, zip_buffer_t *buffer, zip_uint64_t buf_offset, unsigned int flags, zip_error_t *error) { zip_cdir_t *cd; zip_uint64_t offset; zip_uint8_t eocd[EOCD64LEN]; zip_uint64_t eocd_offset; zip_uint64_t size, nentry, i, eocdloc_offset; bool free_buffer; zip_uint32_...
167,771
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: CoordinatorImpl::CoordinatorImpl(service_manager::Connector* connector) : next_dump_id_(0), client_process_timeout_(base::TimeDelta::FromSeconds(15)) { process_map_ = std::make_unique<ProcessMap>(connector); DCHECK(!g_coordinator_impl); g_coordinator_impl = this; base::trace_event::MemoryDu...
CoordinatorImpl::CoordinatorImpl(service_manager::Connector* connector) : next_dump_id_(0), client_process_timeout_(base::TimeDelta::FromSeconds(15)), weak_ptr_factory_(this) { process_map_ = std::make_unique<ProcessMap>(connector); DCHECK(!g_coordinator_impl); g_coordinator_impl = this; ba...
173,211
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: void vrend_renderer_context_create_internal(uint32_t handle, uint32_t nlen, const char *debug_name) { struct vrend_decode_ctx *dctx; if (handle >= VREND_MAX_CTX) return; dctx = malloc(sizeof(struct vrend_decode_ctx)); if (!dctx) return; ...
void vrend_renderer_context_create_internal(uint32_t handle, uint32_t nlen, const char *debug_name) { struct vrend_decode_ctx *dctx; if (handle >= VREND_MAX_CTX) return; dctx = dec_ctx[handle]; if (dctx) return; dctx = malloc(sizeof(struct vr...
165,239
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: DefragReverseSimpleTest(void) { Packet *p1 = NULL, *p2 = NULL, *p3 = NULL; Packet *reassembled = NULL; int id = 12; int i; int ret = 0; DefragInit(); p1 = BuildTestPacket(id, 0, 1, 'A', 8); if (p1 == NULL) goto end; p2 = BuildTestPacket(id, 1, 1, 'B', 8); if...
DefragReverseSimpleTest(void) { Packet *p1 = NULL, *p2 = NULL, *p3 = NULL; Packet *reassembled = NULL; int id = 12; int i; int ret = 0; DefragInit(); p1 = BuildTestPacket(IPPROTO_ICMP, id, 0, 1, 'A', 8); if (p1 == NULL) goto end; p2 = BuildTestPacket(IPPROTO_ICMP, id, ...
168,302
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: bool ParamTraits<SkBitmap>::Read(const base::Pickle* m, base::PickleIterator* iter, SkBitmap* r) { const char* fixed_data; int fixed_data_size = 0; if (!iter->ReadData(&fixed_data, &fixed_data_size) || (fixed_data_size <= 0)) { r...
bool ParamTraits<SkBitmap>::Read(const base::Pickle* m, base::PickleIterator* iter, SkBitmap* r) { SkImageInfo image_info; if (!ReadParam(m, iter, &image_info)) return false; const char* bitmap_data; int bitmap_data_size = 0; if (!ite...
172,894
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: T42_Open_Face( T42_Face face ) { T42_LoaderRec loader; T42_Parser parser; T1_Font type1 = &face->type1; FT_Memory memory = face->root.memory; FT_Error error; PSAux_Service psaux = (PSAux_Service)face->psaux; t42_loader_init( &loader, face ); parser...
T42_Open_Face( T42_Face face ) { T42_LoaderRec loader; T42_Parser parser; T1_Font type1 = &face->type1; FT_Memory memory = face->root.memory; FT_Error error; PSAux_Service psaux = (PSAux_Service)face->psaux; t42_loader_init( &loader, face ); parser = &lo...
164,861
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: int SafeSock::handle_incoming_packet() { /* SOCKET_ALTERNATE_LENGTH_TYPE is void on this platform, and since noone knows what that void* is supposed to point to in recvfrom, I'm going to predict the "fromlen" variable the recvfrom uses is a size_t sized quantity since size_t is how you count bytes right...
int SafeSock::handle_incoming_packet() { /* SOCKET_ALTERNATE_LENGTH_TYPE is void on this platform, and since noone knows what that void* is supposed to point to in recvfrom, I'm going to predict the "fromlen" variable the recvfrom uses is a size_t sized quantity since size_t is how you count bytes right? Stu...
165,374
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: int vnc_hextile_send_framebuffer_update(VncState *vs, int x, int y, int w, int h) { int i, j; int has_fg, has_bg; uint8_t *last_fg, *last_bg; VncDisplay *vd = vs->vd; last_fg = (uint8_t *) g_malloc(vd->server->pf.bytes_per_pixel); last_bg = (uin...
int vnc_hextile_send_framebuffer_update(VncState *vs, int x, int y, int w, int h) { int i, j; int has_fg, has_bg; uint8_t *last_fg, *last_bg; last_fg = (uint8_t *) g_malloc(VNC_SERVER_FB_BYTES); last_bg = (uint8_t *) g_malloc(VNC_SERVER_FB_BYTES); ha...
165,459
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: int DecodeTunnel(ThreadVars *tv, DecodeThreadVars *dtv, Packet *p, uint8_t *pkt, uint32_t len, PacketQueue *pq, enum DecodeTunnelProto proto) { switch (proto) { case DECODE_TUNNEL_PPP: return DecodePPP(tv, dtv, p, pkt, len, pq); case DECODE_TUNNEL_IPV4: return...
int DecodeTunnel(ThreadVars *tv, DecodeThreadVars *dtv, Packet *p, uint8_t *pkt, uint32_t len, PacketQueue *pq, enum DecodeTunnelProto proto) { switch (proto) { case DECODE_TUNNEL_PPP: return DecodePPP(tv, dtv, p, pkt, len, pq); case DECODE_TUNNEL_IPV4: return Decod...
169,478
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: WebNotificationData createWebNotificationData(ExecutionContext* executionContext, const String& title, const NotificationOptions& options, ExceptionState& exceptionState) { if (options.hasVibrate() && options.silent()) { exceptionState.throwTypeError("Silent notifications must not specify vibration pa...
WebNotificationData createWebNotificationData(ExecutionContext* executionContext, const String& title, const NotificationOptions& options, ExceptionState& exceptionState) { if (options.hasVibrate() && options.silent()) { exceptionState.throwTypeError("Silent notifications must not specify vibration patterns...
171,634
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: static void RemoveResolutionFromResourceBlock(StringInfo *bim_profile) { register const unsigned char *p; size_t length; unsigned char *datum; unsigned int count, long_sans; unsigned short id, short_sans; length=GetStringInfoLength(bim_profile); if (length < 16) ...
static void RemoveResolutionFromResourceBlock(StringInfo *bim_profile) { register const unsigned char *p; size_t length; unsigned char *datum; unsigned int count, long_sans; unsigned short id, short_sans; length=GetStringInfoLength(bim_profile); if (length < 16) return...
168,796
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: ikev1_sub_print(netdissect_options *ndo, u_char np, const struct isakmp_gen *ext, const u_char *ep, uint32_t phase, uint32_t doi, uint32_t proto, int depth) { const u_char *cp; int i; struct isakmp_gen e; cp = (const u_char *)ext; while (np) { ND_TCHECK(*ext); UNALIGNED_MEMCPY(&e, ext, sizeof(e...
ikev1_sub_print(netdissect_options *ndo, u_char np, const struct isakmp_gen *ext, const u_char *ep, uint32_t phase, uint32_t doi, uint32_t proto, int depth) { const u_char *cp; int i; struct isakmp_gen e; cp = (const u_char *)ext; while (np) { ND_TCHECK(*ext); UNALIGNED_MEMCPY(&e, ext, sizeof(e)); ...
167,794
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: int __ext4_journal_stop(const char *where, unsigned int line, handle_t *handle) { struct super_block *sb; int err; int rc; if (!ext4_handle_valid(handle)) { ext4_put_nojournal(handle); return 0; } if (!handle->h_transaction) { err = jbd2_journal_stop(handle); return handle->h_err ? handle->h_e...
int __ext4_journal_stop(const char *where, unsigned int line, handle_t *handle) { struct super_block *sb; int err; int rc; if (!ext4_handle_valid(handle)) { ext4_put_nojournal(handle); return 0; } err = handle->h_err; if (!handle->h_transaction) { rc = jbd2_journal_stop(handle); return err ? err : ...
167,465
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: status_t OMXNodeInstance::freeBuffer( OMX_U32 portIndex, OMX::buffer_id buffer) { Mutex::Autolock autoLock(mLock); CLOG_BUFFER(freeBuffer, "%s:%u %#x", portString(portIndex), portIndex, buffer); removeActiveBuffer(portIndex, buffer); OMX_BUFFERHEADERTYPE *header = findBufferHeader(buffe...
status_t OMXNodeInstance::freeBuffer( OMX_U32 portIndex, OMX::buffer_id buffer) { Mutex::Autolock autoLock(mLock); CLOG_BUFFER(freeBuffer, "%s:%u %#x", portString(portIndex), portIndex, buffer); removeActiveBuffer(portIndex, buffer); OMX_BUFFERHEADERTYPE *header = findBufferHeader(buffer, por...
173,529
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: static inline int l2cap_config_req(struct l2cap_conn *conn, struct l2cap_cmd_hdr *cmd, u16 cmd_len, u8 *data) { struct l2cap_conf_req *req = (struct l2cap_conf_req *) data; u16 dcid, flags; u8 rsp[64]; struct sock *sk; int len; dcid = __le16_to_cpu(req->dcid); flags = __le16_to_cpu(req->flags); BT_DBG(...
static inline int l2cap_config_req(struct l2cap_conn *conn, struct l2cap_cmd_hdr *cmd, u16 cmd_len, u8 *data) { struct l2cap_conf_req *req = (struct l2cap_conf_req *) data; u16 dcid, flags; u8 rsp[64]; struct sock *sk; int len; dcid = __le16_to_cpu(req->dcid); flags = __le16_to_cpu(req->flags); BT_DBG("dcid ...
167,622
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: ieee802_15_4_if_print(netdissect_options *ndo, const struct pcap_pkthdr *h, const u_char *p) { u_int caplen = h->caplen; u_int hdrlen; uint16_t fc; uint8_t seq; uint16_t panid = 0; if (caplen < 3) { ND_PRINT((ndo, "[|802.15.4]")); return caplen; } hdrlen = 3; fc = EXTRACT_LE_1...
ieee802_15_4_if_print(netdissect_options *ndo, const struct pcap_pkthdr *h, const u_char *p) { u_int caplen = h->caplen; u_int hdrlen; uint16_t fc; uint8_t seq; uint16_t panid = 0; if (caplen < 3) { ND_PRINT((ndo, "[|802.15.4]")); return caplen; } hdrlen = 3; fc = EXTRACT_LE_16BITS(...
167,907
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: bool IsAllowed(const scoped_refptr<const Extension>& extension, const GURL& url, PermittedFeature feature, int tab_id) { const PermissionsData* permissions_data = extension->permissions_data(); bool script = permissions_data->CanAccessPage(url...
bool IsAllowed(const scoped_refptr<const Extension>& extension, const GURL& url, PermittedFeature feature, int tab_id) { const PermissionsData* permissions_data = extension->permissions_data(); bool script = permissions_data->CanAccessPage(url, tab_...
173,003
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: static int gfs2_bmap_alloc(struct inode *inode, const sector_t lblock, struct buffer_head *bh_map, struct metapath *mp, const unsigned int sheight, const unsigned int height, const unsigned int maxlen) { struct gfs2_inode *ip = GFS2_I(inode); struct gfs2_sbd *sdp = GFS2_SB(inode); s...
static int gfs2_bmap_alloc(struct inode *inode, const sector_t lblock, struct buffer_head *bh_map, struct metapath *mp, const unsigned int sheight, const unsigned int height, const unsigned int maxlen) { struct gfs2_inode *ip = GFS2_I(inode); struct gfs2_sbd *sdp = GFS2_SB(inode); struct s...
166,210
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: write_one_file(Image *output, Image *image, int convert_to_8bit) { if (image->opts & FAST_WRITE) image->image.flags |= PNG_IMAGE_FLAG_FAST; if (image->opts & USE_STDIO) { FILE *f = tmpfile(); if (f != NULL) { if (png_image_write_to_stdio(&image->image, f, convert_to_8bit,...
write_one_file(Image *output, Image *image, int convert_to_8bit) { if (image->opts & FAST_WRITE) image->image.flags |= PNG_IMAGE_FLAG_FAST; if (image->opts & USE_STDIO) { #ifndef PNG_USE_MKSTEMP FILE *f = tmpfile(); #else /* Experimental. Coverity says tmpfile() is insecure because it ...
173,597
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: static void readpng2_end_callback(png_structp png_ptr, png_infop info_ptr) { mainprog_info *mainprog_ptr; /* retrieve the pointer to our special-purpose struct */ mainprog_ptr = png_get_progressive_ptr(png_ptr); /* let the main program know that it should flush any buffered image * data to th...
static void readpng2_end_callback(png_structp png_ptr, png_infop info_ptr) { mainprog_info *mainprog_ptr; /* retrieve the pointer to our special-purpose struct */ mainprog_ptr = png_get_progressive_ptr(png_ptr); /* let the main program know that it should flush any buffered image * data to the disp...
173,568
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: void FrameFetchContext::DispatchDidBlockRequest( const ResourceRequest& resource_request, const FetchInitiatorInfo& fetch_initiator_info, ResourceRequestBlockedReason blocked_reason) const { if (IsDetached()) return; probe::didBlockRequest(GetFrame()->GetDocument(), resource_request, ...
void FrameFetchContext::DispatchDidBlockRequest( const ResourceRequest& resource_request, const FetchInitiatorInfo& fetch_initiator_info, ResourceRequestBlockedReason blocked_reason, Resource::Type resource_type) const { if (IsDetached()) return; probe::didBlockRequest(GetFrame()->GetDocum...
172,473
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: void BiquadDSPKernel::updateCoefficientsIfNecessary(bool useSmoothing, bool forceUpdate) { if (forceUpdate || biquadProcessor()->filterCoefficientsDirty()) { double value1; double value2; double gain; double detune; // in Cents if (biquadProcessor()->hasSampleAccu...
void BiquadDSPKernel::updateCoefficientsIfNecessary(bool useSmoothing, bool forceUpdate) void BiquadDSPKernel::updateCoefficientsIfNecessary() { if (biquadProcessor()->filterCoefficientsDirty()) { double cutoffFrequency; double Q; double gain; double detune; // in Cents ...
171,662
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: void RenderViewTest::SetUp() { blink::initialize(blink_platform_impl_.Get()); content_client_.reset(CreateContentClient()); content_browser_client_.reset(CreateContentBrowserClient()); content_renderer_client_.reset(CreateContentRendererClient()); SetContentClient(content_client_.get()); SetBrowserCl...
void RenderViewTest::SetUp() { blink::initialize(blink_platform_impl_.Get()); content_client_.reset(CreateContentClient()); content_browser_client_.reset(CreateContentBrowserClient()); content_renderer_client_.reset(CreateContentRendererClient()); SetContentClient(content_client_.get()); SetBrowserClientFo...
171,695
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: void jslTokenAsString(int token, char *str, size_t len) { if (token>32 && token<128) { assert(len>=4); str[0] = '\''; str[1] = (char)token; str[2] = '\''; str[3] = 0; return; } switch (token) { case LEX_EOF : strncpy(str, "EOF", len); return; case LEX_ID : strncpy(str, "I...
void jslTokenAsString(int token, char *str, size_t len) { assert(len>28); // size of largest string if (token>32 && token<128) { assert(len>=4); str[0] = '\''; str[1] = (char)token; str[2] = '\''; str[3] = 0; return; } switch (token) { case LEX_EOF : strcpy(str, "EOF"); return...
169,215
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: ServiceWorkerContainer* NavigatorServiceWorker::serviceWorker(Navigator& navigator, ExceptionState& exceptionState) { return NavigatorServiceWorker::from(navigator).serviceWorker(exceptionState); } Commit Message: Add ASSERT() to avoid accidental leaking ServiceWorkerContainer to cross origin context. BU...
ServiceWorkerContainer* NavigatorServiceWorker::serviceWorker(Navigator& navigator, ExceptionState& exceptionState) ServiceWorkerContainer* NavigatorServiceWorker::serviceWorker(ExecutionContext* executionContext, Navigator& navigator, ExceptionState& exceptionState) { ASSERT(!navigator.frame() || executionContext...
171,862
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: bool MultibufferDataSource::DidGetOpaqueResponseViaServiceWorker() const { return url_data()->has_opaque_data(); } Commit Message: Simplify "WouldTaintOrigin" concept in media/blink Currently WebMediaPlayer has three predicates: - DidGetOpaqueResponseFromServiceWorker - HasSingleSecurityOrigin - DidPassCO...
bool MultibufferDataSource::DidGetOpaqueResponseViaServiceWorker() const { bool MultibufferDataSource::IsCorsCrossOrigin() const { return url_data()->is_cors_cross_origin(); }
172,623
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: SPL_METHOD(SplObjectStorage, unserialize) { spl_SplObjectStorage *intern = (spl_SplObjectStorage*)zend_object_store_get_object(getThis() TSRMLS_CC); char *buf; int buf_len; const unsigned char *p, *s; php_unserialize_data_t var_hash; zval *pentry, *pmembers, *pcount = NULL, *pinf; long count; if (zend_...
SPL_METHOD(SplObjectStorage, unserialize) { spl_SplObjectStorage *intern = (spl_SplObjectStorage*)zend_object_store_get_object(getThis() TSRMLS_CC); char *buf; int buf_len; const unsigned char *p, *s; php_unserialize_data_t var_hash; zval *pentry, *pmembers, *pcount = NULL, *pinf; long count; if (zend_parse_...
165,167
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: static int read_public_key(RSA *rsa) { int r; sc_path_t path; sc_file_t *file; u8 buf[2048], *p = buf; size_t bufsize, keysize; r = select_app_df(); if (r) return 1; sc_format_path("I1012", &path); r = sc_select_file(card, &path, &file); if (r) { fprintf(stderr, "Unable to select public key file: ...
static int read_public_key(RSA *rsa) { int r; sc_path_t path; sc_file_t *file; u8 buf[2048], *p = buf; size_t bufsize, keysize; r = select_app_df(); if (r) return 1; sc_format_path("I1012", &path); r = sc_select_file(card, &path, &file); if (r) { fprintf(stderr, "Unable to select public key file: %s\n",...
169,081
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: ikev2_ID_print(netdissect_options *ndo, u_char tpay, const struct isakmp_gen *ext, u_int item_len _U_, const u_char *ep _U_, uint32_t phase _U_, uint32_t doi _U_, uint32_t proto _U_, int depth _U_) { struct ikev2_id id; int id_len, idtype_len, i; unsigned int dumpascii, dumphex; const unsigned ...
ikev2_ID_print(netdissect_options *ndo, u_char tpay, const struct isakmp_gen *ext, u_int item_len _U_, const u_char *ep _U_, uint32_t phase _U_, uint32_t doi _U_, uint32_t proto _U_, int depth _U_) { const struct ikev2_id *idp; struct ikev2_id id; int id_len, idtype_len, i; unsigned int dumpascii, dum...
167,796
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: SYSCALL_DEFINE6(recvfrom, int, fd, void __user *, ubuf, size_t, size, unsigned int, flags, struct sockaddr __user *, addr, int __user *, addr_len) { struct socket *sock; struct iovec iov; struct msghdr msg; struct sockaddr_storage address; int err, err2; int fput_needed; if (size > INT_MAX) size ...
SYSCALL_DEFINE6(recvfrom, int, fd, void __user *, ubuf, size_t, size, unsigned int, flags, struct sockaddr __user *, addr, int __user *, addr_len) { struct socket *sock; struct iovec iov; struct msghdr msg; struct sockaddr_storage address; int err, err2; int fput_needed; if (size > INT_MAX) size = INT_...
167,571
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: static Image *ReadARTImage(const ImageInfo *image_info,ExceptionInfo *exception) { Image *image; QuantumInfo *quantum_info; QuantumType quantum_type; MagickBooleanType status; size_t length; ssize_t count, y; unsigned char *pixels; /* Open image file. *...
static Image *ReadARTImage(const ImageInfo *image_info,ExceptionInfo *exception) { Image *image; QuantumInfo *quantum_info; QuantumType quantum_type; MagickBooleanType status; size_t length; ssize_t count, y; unsigned char *pixels; /* Open image file. */ as...
168,547
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: image_transform_png_set_gray_to_rgb_set(PNG_CONST image_transform *this, transform_display *that, png_structp pp, png_infop pi) { png_set_gray_to_rgb(pp); this->next->set(this->next, that, pp, pi); } Commit Message: DO NOT MERGE Update libpng to 1.6.20 BUG:23265085 Change-Id: I85199805636d771f359...
image_transform_png_set_gray_to_rgb_set(PNG_CONST image_transform *this, image_transform_png_set_gray_to_rgb_set(const image_transform *this, transform_display *that, png_structp pp, png_infop pi) { png_set_gray_to_rgb(pp); /* NOTE: this doesn't result in tRNS expansion. */ this->next->set(this->next, ...
173,637
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: xmlParseStringPEReference(xmlParserCtxtPtr ctxt, const xmlChar **str) { const xmlChar *ptr; xmlChar cur; xmlChar *name; xmlEntityPtr entity = NULL; if ((str == NULL) || (*str == NULL)) return(NULL); ptr = *str; cur = *ptr; if (cur != '%') return(NULL); ptr++; name ...
xmlParseStringPEReference(xmlParserCtxtPtr ctxt, const xmlChar **str) { const xmlChar *ptr; xmlChar cur; xmlChar *name; xmlEntityPtr entity = NULL; if ((str == NULL) || (*str == NULL)) return(NULL); ptr = *str; cur = *ptr; if (cur != '%') return(NULL); ptr++; name = xmlP...
171,305
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: int get_sda(void) { return qrio_get_gpio(DEBLOCK_PORT1, DEBLOCK_SDA1); } Commit Message: Merge branch '2020-01-22-master-imports' - Re-add U8500 platform support - Add bcm968360bg support - Assorted Keymile fixes - Other assorted bugfixes CWE ID: CWE-787
int get_sda(void)
169,630
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: const CuePoint* Cues::GetLast() const { if (m_cue_points == NULL) return NULL; if (m_count <= 0) return NULL; #if 0 LoadCuePoint(); //init cues const size_t count = m_count + m_preload_count; if (count == 0) //weird return NULL; const size_t index = count - 1; CuePoint* c...
const CuePoint* Cues::GetLast() const if (m_count <= 0) return NULL; #if 0 LoadCuePoint(); //init cues const size_t count = m_count + m_preload_count; if (count == 0) //weird return NULL; const size_t index = count - 1; CuePoint* const* const pp = m_cue_points; assert(pp); CuePoint* const ...
174,339
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: bool TradQT_Manager::ParseCachedBoxes ( const MOOV_Manager & moovMgr ) { MOOV_Manager::BoxInfo udtaInfo; MOOV_Manager::BoxRef udtaRef = moovMgr.GetBox ( "moov/udta", &udtaInfo ); if ( udtaRef == 0 ) return false; for ( XMP_Uns32 i = 0; i < udtaInfo.childCount; ++i ) { MOOV_Manager::BoxInfo currInfo; MO...
bool TradQT_Manager::ParseCachedBoxes ( const MOOV_Manager & moovMgr ) { MOOV_Manager::BoxInfo udtaInfo; MOOV_Manager::BoxRef udtaRef = moovMgr.GetBox ( "moov/udta", &udtaInfo ); if ( udtaRef == 0 ) return false; for ( XMP_Uns32 i = 0; i < udtaInfo.childCount; ++i ) { MOOV_Manager::BoxInfo currInfo; MOOV_Man...
165,364
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: header_read (SF_PRIVATE *psf, void *ptr, int bytes) { int count = 0 ; if (psf->headindex >= SIGNED_SIZEOF (psf->header)) return psf_fread (ptr, 1, bytes, psf) ; if (psf->headindex + bytes > SIGNED_SIZEOF (psf->header)) { int most ; most = SIGNED_SIZEOF (psf->header) - psf->headend ; psf_fread (psf-...
header_read (SF_PRIVATE *psf, void *ptr, int bytes) { int count = 0 ; if (psf->header.indx + bytes >= psf->header.len && psf_bump_header_allocation (psf, bytes)) return count ; if (psf->header.indx + bytes > psf->header.end) { count = psf_fread (psf->header.ptr + psf->header.end, 1, bytes - (psf->header.end ...
170,061
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: bool InputWindowInfo::isTrustedOverlay() const { return layoutParamsType == TYPE_INPUT_METHOD || layoutParamsType == TYPE_INPUT_METHOD_DIALOG || layoutParamsType == TYPE_MAGNIFICATION_OVERLAY || layoutParamsType == TYPE_SECURE_SYSTEM_OVERLAY; } Commit Message: Add ne...
bool InputWindowInfo::isTrustedOverlay() const { return layoutParamsType == TYPE_INPUT_METHOD || layoutParamsType == TYPE_INPUT_METHOD_DIALOG || layoutParamsType == TYPE_MAGNIFICATION_OVERLAY || layoutParamsType == TYPE_STATUS_BAR || layoutParamsType == TYPE_NAVIG...
174,170
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: void WebContentsImpl::FocusThroughTabTraversal(bool reverse) { if (ShowingInterstitialPage()) { GetRenderManager()->interstitial_page()->FocusThroughTabTraversal(reverse); return; } RenderWidgetHostView* const fullscreen_view = GetFullscreenRenderWidgetHostView(); if (fullscreen_view) {...
void WebContentsImpl::FocusThroughTabTraversal(bool reverse) { if (ShowingInterstitialPage()) { interstitial_page_->FocusThroughTabTraversal(reverse); return; } RenderWidgetHostView* const fullscreen_view = GetFullscreenRenderWidgetHostView(); if (fullscreen_view) { fullscreen_view->Focus...
172,327
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: static int php_session_destroy(TSRMLS_D) /* {{{ */ { int retval = SUCCESS; if (PS(session_status) != php_session_active) { php_error_docref(NULL TSRMLS_CC, E_WARNING, "Trying to destroy uninitialized session"); return FAILURE; } return FAILURE; } if (PS(mod)->s_destroy(&PS...
static int php_session_destroy(TSRMLS_D) /* {{{ */ { int retval = SUCCESS; if (PS(session_status) != php_session_active) { php_error_docref(NULL TSRMLS_CC, E_WARNING, "Trying to destroy uninitialized session"); return FAILURE; } return FAILURE; } if (PS(id) && PS(mod)->s_destroy...
164,873
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: static void php_wddx_push_element(void *user_data, const XML_Char *name, const XML_Char **atts) { st_entry ent; wddx_stack *stack = (wddx_stack *)user_data; if (!strcmp(name, EL_PACKET)) { int i; if (atts) for (i=0; atts[i]; i++) { if (!strcmp(atts[i], EL_VERSION)) { /* nothing for now */ } }...
static void php_wddx_push_element(void *user_data, const XML_Char *name, const XML_Char **atts) { st_entry ent; wddx_stack *stack = (wddx_stack *)user_data; if (!strcmp(name, EL_PACKET)) { int i; if (atts) for (i=0; atts[i]; i++) { if (!strcmp(atts[i], EL_VERSION)) { /* nothing for now */ } } } el...
168,667
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: GLboolean WebGLRenderingContextBase::isShader(WebGLShader* shader) { if (!shader || isContextLost()) return 0; return ContextGL()->IsShader(shader->Object()); } Commit Message: Validate all incoming WebGLObjects. A few entry points were missing the correct validation. Tested with improved conform...
GLboolean WebGLRenderingContextBase::isShader(WebGLShader* shader) { if (!shader || isContextLost() || !shader->Validate(ContextGroup(), this)) return 0; return ContextGL()->IsShader(shader->Object()); }
173,132
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: static jobject Bitmap_createFromParcel(JNIEnv* env, jobject, jobject parcel) { if (parcel == NULL) { SkDebugf("-------- unparcel parcel is NULL\n"); return NULL; } android::Parcel* p = android::parcelForJavaObject(env, parcel); const bool isMutable = p->readInt32() != 0; const SkColorType color...
static jobject Bitmap_createFromParcel(JNIEnv* env, jobject, jobject parcel) { if (parcel == NULL) { SkDebugf("-------- unparcel parcel is NULL\n"); return NULL; } android::Parcel* p = android::parcelForJavaObject(env, parcel); const bool isMutable = p->readInt32() != 0; const SkColorType colorType =...
173,372
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: v8::Local<v8::Value> ModuleSystem::LoadModule(const std::string& module_name) { v8::EscapableHandleScope handle_scope(GetIsolate()); v8::Local<v8::Context> v8_context = context()->v8_context(); v8::Context::Scope context_scope(v8_context); v8::Local<v8::Value> source(GetSource(module_name)); if (source...
v8::Local<v8::Value> ModuleSystem::LoadModule(const std::string& module_name) { v8::EscapableHandleScope handle_scope(GetIsolate()); v8::Local<v8::Context> v8_context = context()->v8_context(); v8::Context::Scope context_scope(v8_context); v8::Local<v8::Value> source(GetSource(module_name)); if (source.IsEmp...
172,287
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: static int bmdma_prepare_buf(IDEDMA *dma, int is_write) { BMDMAState *bm = DO_UPCAST(BMDMAState, dma, dma); IDEState *s = bmdma_active_if(bm); uint32_t size; } prd; Commit Message: CWE ID: CWE-399
static int bmdma_prepare_buf(IDEDMA *dma, int is_write) /** * Return the number of bytes successfully prepared. * -1 on error. */ static int32_t bmdma_prepare_buf(IDEDMA *dma, int is_write) { BMDMAState *bm = DO_UPCAST(BMDMAState, dma, dma); IDEState *s = bmdma_active_if(bm); uint32_t size; } ...
164,840
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: int hashbin_delete( hashbin_t* hashbin, FREE_FUNC free_func) { irda_queue_t* queue; unsigned long flags = 0; int i; IRDA_ASSERT(hashbin != NULL, return -1;); IRDA_ASSERT(hashbin->magic == HB_MAGIC, return -1;); /* Synchronize */ if ( hashbin->hb_type & HB_LOCK ) { spin_lock_irqsave_nested(&hashbi...
int hashbin_delete( hashbin_t* hashbin, FREE_FUNC free_func) { irda_queue_t* queue; unsigned long flags = 0; int i; IRDA_ASSERT(hashbin != NULL, return -1;); IRDA_ASSERT(hashbin->magic == HB_MAGIC, return -1;); /* Synchronize */ if (hashbin->hb_type & HB_LOCK) spin_lock_irqsave(&hashbin->hb_spinlock, f...
168,344
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: void ntlm_populate_message_header(NTLM_MESSAGE_HEADER* header, UINT32 MessageType) { CopyMemory(header->Signature, NTLM_SIGNATURE, sizeof(NTLM_SIGNATURE)); header->MessageType = MessageType; } Commit Message: Fixed CVE-2018-8789 Thanks to Eyal Itkin from Check Point Software Technologies. CWE ID: CWE-125
void ntlm_populate_message_header(NTLM_MESSAGE_HEADER* header, UINT32 MessageType) static void ntlm_populate_message_header(NTLM_MESSAGE_HEADER* header, UINT32 MessageType) { CopyMemory(header->Signature, NTLM_SIGNATURE, sizeof(NTLM_SIGNATURE)); header->MessageType = MessageType; }
169,273
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: PHP_FUNCTION(imagecrop) { zval *IM; gdImagePtr im; gdImagePtr im_crop; gdRect rect; zval *z_rect; zval **tmp; if (zend_parse_parameters(ZEND_NUM_ARGS() TSRMLS_CC, "ra", &IM, &z_rect) == FAILURE) { return; } ZEND_FETCH_RESOURCE(im, gdImagePtr, &IM, -1, "Image", le_gd); if (zend_hash_find(HASH_OF...
PHP_FUNCTION(imagecrop) { zval *IM; gdImagePtr im; gdImagePtr im_crop; gdRect rect; zval *z_rect; zval **tmp; if (zend_parse_parameters(ZEND_NUM_ARGS() TSRMLS_CC, "ra", &IM, &z_rect) == FAILURE) { return; } ZEND_FETCH_RESOURCE(im, gdImagePtr, &IM, -1, "Image", le_gd); if (zend_hash_find(HASH_OF(z_rec...
166,427
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: unsigned long Segment::GetCount() const { return m_clusterCount; } Commit Message: libwebm: Pull from upstream Rolling mkvparser from upstream. Primarily for fixing a bug on parsing failures with certain Opus WebM files. Upstream commit hash of this pull: 574045edd4ecbeb802ee3f1d214b5510269852ae The diff ...
unsigned long Segment::GetCount() const
174,299
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: void ServiceWorkerPaymentInstrument::OnPaymentAppInvoked( mojom::PaymentHandlerResponsePtr response) { DCHECK(delegate_); if (delegate_ != nullptr) { delegate_->OnInstrumentDetailsReady(response->method_name, response->stringified_details); delegate_ = ...
void ServiceWorkerPaymentInstrument::OnPaymentAppInvoked( mojom::PaymentHandlerResponsePtr response) { if (delegate_ != nullptr) { delegate_->OnInstrumentDetailsReady(response->method_name, response->stringified_details); delegate_ = nullptr; } }
172,964
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: video_usercopy(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg, v4l2_kioctl func) { char sbuf[128]; void *mbuf = NULL; void *parg = NULL; long err = -EINVAL; int is_ext_ctrl; size_t ctrls_size = 0; void __user *user_ptr = NULL; is_ext_ctrl = (cmd == VIDIOC_S_EXT_CTRLS || cmd == VIDIOC_G_...
video_usercopy(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg,
168,916
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: int InternalPageInfoBubbleView::GetDialogButtons() const { return ui::DIALOG_BUTTON_NONE; } Commit Message: Desktop Page Info/Harmony: Show close button for internal pages. The Harmony version of Page Info for internal Chrome pages (chrome://, chrome-extension:// and view-source:// pages) show a close button....
int InternalPageInfoBubbleView::GetDialogButtons() const {
172,297
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: xmlParseStringEntityRef(xmlParserCtxtPtr ctxt, const xmlChar ** str) { xmlChar *name; const xmlChar *ptr; xmlChar cur; xmlEntityPtr ent = NULL; if ((str == NULL) || (*str == NULL)) return(NULL); ptr = *str; cur = *ptr; if (cur != '&') return(NULL); ptr++; name = ...
xmlParseStringEntityRef(xmlParserCtxtPtr ctxt, const xmlChar ** str) { xmlChar *name; const xmlChar *ptr; xmlChar cur; xmlEntityPtr ent = NULL; if ((str == NULL) || (*str == NULL)) return(NULL); ptr = *str; cur = *ptr; if (cur != '&') return(NULL); ptr++; name = xmlPar...
171,304
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: main(int argc, char **argv) { int i, gn; int test = 0; char *action = NULL, *cmd; char *output = NULL; #ifdef HAVE_EEZE_MOUNT Eina_Bool mnt = EINA_FALSE; const char *act; #endif gid_t gid, gl[65536], egid; for (i = 1; i < argc; i++) { if ((!strcmp(argv[i], "-h")) || ...
main(int argc, char **argv) { int i, gn; int test = 0; char *action = NULL, *cmd; char *output = NULL; #ifdef HAVE_EEZE_MOUNT Eina_Bool mnt = EINA_FALSE; const char *act; #endif gid_t gid, gl[65536], egid; for (i = 1; i < argc; i++) { if ((!strcmp(argv[i], "-h")) || ...
165,513
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: void SoftMPEG2::setDecodeArgs( ivd_video_decode_ip_t *ps_dec_ip, ivd_video_decode_op_t *ps_dec_op, OMX_BUFFERHEADERTYPE *inHeader, OMX_BUFFERHEADERTYPE *outHeader, size_t timeStampIx) { size_t sizeY = outputBufferWidth() * outputBufferHeight(); size_t sizeUV;...
void SoftMPEG2::setDecodeArgs( bool SoftMPEG2::setDecodeArgs( ivd_video_decode_ip_t *ps_dec_ip, ivd_video_decode_op_t *ps_dec_op, OMX_BUFFERHEADERTYPE *inHeader, OMX_BUFFERHEADERTYPE *outHeader, size_t timeStampIx) { size_t sizeY = outputBufferWidth() * outputBufferHeig...
174,184
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: static void _out_result(conn_t out, nad_t nad) { int attr; jid_t from, to; char *rkey; int rkeylen; attr = nad_find_attr(nad, 0, -1, "from", NULL); if(attr < 0 || (from = jid_new(NAD_AVAL(nad, attr), NAD_AVAL_L(nad, attr))) == NULL) { log_debug(ZONE, "missing or invalid from on db...
static void _out_result(conn_t out, nad_t nad) { int attr; jid_t from, to; char *rkey; int rkeylen; attr = nad_find_attr(nad, 0, -1, "from", NULL); if(attr < 0 || (from = jid_new(NAD_AVAL(nad, attr), NAD_AVAL_L(nad, attr))) == NULL) { log_debug(ZONE, "missing or invalid from on db resul...
165,576
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: static int cxusb_ctrl_msg(struct dvb_usb_device *d, u8 cmd, u8 *wbuf, int wlen, u8 *rbuf, int rlen) { struct cxusb_state *st = d->priv; int ret, wo; if (1 + wlen > MAX_XFER_SIZE) { warn("i2c wr: len=%d is too big!\n", wlen); return -EOPNOTSUPP; } wo = (rbuf == NULL || rlen == 0); /* write...
static int cxusb_ctrl_msg(struct dvb_usb_device *d, u8 cmd, u8 *wbuf, int wlen, u8 *rbuf, int rlen) { struct cxusb_state *st = d->priv; int ret; if (1 + wlen > MAX_XFER_SIZE) { warn("i2c wr: len=%d is too big!\n", wlen); return -EOPNOTSUPP; } if (rlen > MAX_XFER_SIZE) { warn("i2c rd: len=%d i...
168,223
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: struct mapped_device *dm_get_from_kobject(struct kobject *kobj) { struct mapped_device *md; md = container_of(kobj, struct mapped_device, kobj_holder.kobj); if (test_bit(DMF_FREEING, &md->flags) || dm_deleting_md(md)) return NULL; dm_get(md); return md; } Commit Message: dm: fix race between ...
struct mapped_device *dm_get_from_kobject(struct kobject *kobj) { struct mapped_device *md; md = container_of(kobj, struct mapped_device, kobj_holder.kobj); spin_lock(&_minor_lock); if (test_bit(DMF_FREEING, &md->flags) || dm_deleting_md(md)) { md = NULL; goto out; } dm_get(md); out: spin_unlock(&_mino...
169,411
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: int mutt_b64_decode(char *out, const char *in) { int len = 0; unsigned char digit4; do { const unsigned char digit1 = in[0]; if ((digit1 > 127) || (base64val(digit1) == BAD)) return -1; const unsigned char digit2 = in[1]; if ((digit2 > 127) || (base64val(digit2) == BAD)) re...
int mutt_b64_decode(char *out, const char *in) int mutt_b64_decode(char *out, const char *in, size_t olen) { int len = 0; unsigned char digit4; do { const unsigned char digit1 = in[0]; if ((digit1 > 127) || (base64val(digit1) == BAD)) return -1; const unsigned char digit2 = in[1]; if (...
169,128
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: long long BlockGroup::GetDurationTimeCode() const { return m_duration; } Commit Message: libwebm: Pull from upstream Rolling mkvparser from upstream. Primarily for fixing a bug on parsing failures with certain Opus WebM files. Upstream commit hash of this pull: 574045edd4ecbeb802ee3f1d214b5510269852ae The...
long long BlockGroup::GetDurationTimeCode() const
174,308
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: void fdct4x4_ref(const int16_t *in, int16_t *out, int stride, int tx_type) { vp9_fdct4x4_c(in, out, stride); } Commit Message: Merge Conflict Fix CL to lmp-mr1-release for ag/849478 DO NOT MERGE - libvpx: Pull from upstream Current HEAD: 7105df53d7dc13d5e575bc8df714ec8d1da36b06 BUG=23452792 Change-Id: Ic7...
void fdct4x4_ref(const int16_t *in, int16_t *out, int stride, int tx_type) { void fdct4x4_ref(const int16_t *in, tran_low_t *out, int stride, int tx_type) { vpx_fdct4x4_c(in, out, stride); }
174,557
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: check_entry_size_and_hooks(struct ipt_entry *e, struct xt_table_info *newinfo, const unsigned char *base, const unsigned char *limit, const unsigned int *hook_entries, const unsigned int *underflows, unsigned int valid_hooks) { unsigned int h; int err; if ((unsigned long)e ...
check_entry_size_and_hooks(struct ipt_entry *e, struct xt_table_info *newinfo, const unsigned char *base, const unsigned char *limit, const unsigned int *hook_entries, const unsigned int *underflows, unsigned int valid_hooks) { unsigned int h; int err; if ((unsigned long)e % __al...
167,218
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: static int logi_dj_ll_raw_request(struct hid_device *hid, unsigned char reportnum, __u8 *buf, size_t count, unsigned char report_type, int reqtype) { struct dj_device *djdev = hid->driver_data; struct dj_receiver_dev *djrcv_dev = djdev->dj_receiver_dev; u8 *out_buf; int ret; if (buf[0] != ...
static int logi_dj_ll_raw_request(struct hid_device *hid, unsigned char reportnum, __u8 *buf, size_t count, unsigned char report_type, int reqtype) { struct dj_device *djdev = hid->driver_data; struct dj_receiver_dev *djrcv_dev = djdev->dj_receiver_dev; u8 *out_buf; int ret; if (buf[0] != REPORT...
166,376
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: int ShellBrowserMain(const content::MainFunctionParams& parameters) { bool layout_test_mode = CommandLine::ForCurrentProcess()->HasSwitch(switches::kDumpRenderTree); base::ScopedTempDir browser_context_path_for_layout_tests; if (layout_test_mode) { CHECK(browser_context_path_for_layout_tests.Crea...
int ShellBrowserMain(const content::MainFunctionParams& parameters) { bool layout_test_mode = CommandLine::ForCurrentProcess()->HasSwitch(switches::kDumpRenderTree); base::ScopedTempDir browser_context_path_for_layout_tests; if (layout_test_mode) { CHECK(browser_context_path_for_layout_tests.CreateUniq...
171,469
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: void qrio_prstcfg(u8 bit, u8 mode) { u32 prstcfg; u8 i; void __iomem *qrio_base = (void *)CONFIG_SYS_QRIO_BASE; prstcfg = in_be32(qrio_base + PRSTCFG_OFF); for (i = 0; i < 2; i++) { if (mode & (1<<i)) set_bit(2*bit+i, &prstcfg); else clear_bit(2*bit+i, &prstcfg); } out_be32(qrio_base + ...
void qrio_prstcfg(u8 bit, u8 mode) { u32 prstcfg; u8 i; void __iomem *qrio_base = (void *)CONFIG_SYS_QRIO_BASE; prstcfg = in_be32(qrio_base + PRSTCFG_OFF); for (i = 0; i < 2; i++) { if (mode & (1 << i)) set_bit(2 * bit + i, &prstcfg); else clear_bit(2 * bit + i, &prstcfg); } out_be32(qrio_bas...
169,625
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: ber_parse_header(STREAM s, int tagval, int *length) { int tag, len; if (tagval > 0xff) { in_uint16_be(s, tag); } else { in_uint8(s, tag); } if (tag != tagval) { logger(Core, Error, "ber_parse_header(), expected tag %d, got %d", tagval, tag); return False; } in_uint8(s, len); if (len & 0...
ber_parse_header(STREAM s, int tagval, int *length) ber_parse_header(STREAM s, int tagval, uint32 *length) { int tag, len; if (tagval > 0xff) { in_uint16_be(s, tag); } else { in_uint8(s, tag); } if (tag != tagval) { logger(Core, Error, "ber_parse_header(), expected tag %d, got %d", tagval, tag); r...
169,794
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: static int skcipher_accept_parent(void *private, struct sock *sk) { struct skcipher_ctx *ctx; struct alg_sock *ask = alg_sk(sk); unsigned int len = sizeof(*ctx) + crypto_skcipher_reqsize(private); ctx = sock_kmalloc(sk, len, GFP_KERNEL); if (!ctx) return -ENOMEM; ctx->iv = sock_kmalloc(sk, crypt...
static int skcipher_accept_parent(void *private, struct sock *sk) { struct skcipher_ctx *ctx; struct alg_sock *ask = alg_sk(sk); struct skcipher_tfm *tfm = private; struct crypto_skcipher *skcipher = tfm->skcipher; unsigned int len = sizeof(*ctx) + crypto_skcipher_reqsize(skcipher); if (!tfm->has_key) retur...
167,454
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: static int __sys_sendmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr __user *msg, struct msghdr *msg_sys, unsigned flags, struct used_address *used_address) { struct compat_msghdr __user *msg_compat = (struct compat_msghdr __user *)msg; struct sockaddr_storage address; struct iovec iovstack[UIO_FASTIOV], *...
static int __sys_sendmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr __user *msg, struct msghdr *msg_sys, unsigned flags, struct used_address *used_address) { struct compat_msghdr __user *msg_compat = (struct compat_msghdr __user *)msg; struct sockaddr_storage address; struct iovec iovstack[UIO_FASTIOV], *iov = ...
165,680
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: uint32 ResourceTracker::GetLiveObjectsForInstance( PP_Instance instance) const { InstanceMap::const_iterator found = instance_map_.find(instance); if (found == instance_map_.end()) return 0; return static_cast<uint32>(found->second->resources.size() + found->second->...
uint32 ResourceTracker::GetLiveObjectsForInstance( PP_Instance instance) const { InstanceMap::const_iterator found = instance_map_.find(instance); if (found == instance_map_.end()) return 0; return static_cast<uint32>(found->second->ref_resources.size() + found->second->ob...
170,418
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: static int caif_seqpkt_recvmsg(struct kiocb *iocb, struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *m, size_t len, int flags) { struct sock *sk = sock->sk; struct sk_buff *skb; int ret; int copylen; ret = -EOPNOTSUPP; if (m->msg_flags&MSG_OOB) goto read_error; skb = skb_recv_datagram(sk, flags, 0 , &ret); ...
static int caif_seqpkt_recvmsg(struct kiocb *iocb, struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *m, size_t len, int flags) { struct sock *sk = sock->sk; struct sk_buff *skb; int ret; int copylen; ret = -EOPNOTSUPP; if (m->msg_flags&MSG_OOB) goto read_error; m->msg_namelen = 0; skb = skb_recv_datagram(sk, fl...
166,040
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: static int efx_probe_all(struct efx_nic *efx) { int rc; rc = efx_probe_nic(efx); if (rc) { netif_err(efx, probe, efx->net_dev, "failed to create NIC\n"); goto fail1; } rc = efx_probe_port(efx); if (rc) { netif_err(efx, probe, efx->net_dev, "failed to create port\n"); goto fail2; } efx->rxq_...
static int efx_probe_all(struct efx_nic *efx) { int rc; rc = efx_probe_nic(efx); if (rc) { netif_err(efx, probe, efx->net_dev, "failed to create NIC\n"); goto fail1; } rc = efx_probe_port(efx); if (rc) { netif_err(efx, probe, efx->net_dev, "failed to create port\n"); goto fail2; } BUILD_BUG_ON(EFX...
165,584
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: parse_asntime_into_isotime (unsigned char const **buf, size_t *len, ksba_isotime_t isotime) { struct tag_info ti; gpg_error_t err; err = _ksba_ber_parse_tl (buf, len, &ti); if (err) ; else if ( !(ti.class == CLASS_UNIVERSAL && (ti.tag == TYPE_UTC_TIME || t...
parse_asntime_into_isotime (unsigned char const **buf, size_t *len, ksba_isotime_t isotime) { struct tag_info ti; gpg_error_t err; err = _ksba_ber_parse_tl (buf, len, &ti); if (err) ; else if ( !(ti.class == CLASS_UNIVERSAL && (ti.tag == TYPE_UTC_TIME || ti.tag ...
165,030
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: static ssize_t eth_rx(NetClientState *nc, const uint8_t *buf, size_t size) { struct xlx_ethlite *s = qemu_get_nic_opaque(nc); unsigned int rxbase = s->rxbuf * (0x800 / 4); /* DA filter. */ if (!(buf[0] & 0x80) && memcmp(&s->conf.macaddr.a[0], buf, 6)) return size; if (s->regs[rxbase...
static ssize_t eth_rx(NetClientState *nc, const uint8_t *buf, size_t size) { struct xlx_ethlite *s = qemu_get_nic_opaque(nc); unsigned int rxbase = s->rxbuf * (0x800 / 4); /* DA filter. */ if (!(buf[0] & 0x80) && memcmp(&s->conf.macaddr.a[0], buf, 6)) return size; if (s->regs[rxbase + R_R...
164,933
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: void LiveSyncTest::SetupMockGaiaResponses() { username_ = "user@gmail.com"; password_ = "password"; factory_.reset(new FakeURLFetcherFactory()); factory_->SetFakeResponse(kClientLoginUrl, "SID=sid\nLSID=lsid", true); factory_->SetFakeResponse(kGetUserInfoUrl, "email=user@gmail.com", true); facto...
void LiveSyncTest::SetupMockGaiaResponses() { username_ = "user@gmail.com"; password_ = "password"; integration_factory_.reset(new URLFetcherFactory()); factory_.reset(new FakeURLFetcherFactory(integration_factory_.get())); factory_->SetFakeResponse(kClientLoginUrl, "SID=sid\nLSID=lsid", true); factory...
170,430
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: void HTMLFormElement::scheduleFormSubmission(FormSubmission* submission) { DCHECK(submission->method() == FormSubmission::PostMethod || submission->method() == FormSubmission::GetMethod); DCHECK(submission->data()); DCHECK(submission->form()); if (submission->action().isEmpty()) return; if ...
void HTMLFormElement::scheduleFormSubmission(FormSubmission* submission) { DCHECK(submission->method() == FormSubmission::PostMethod || submission->method() == FormSubmission::GetMethod); DCHECK(submission->data()); DCHECK(submission->form()); if (submission->action().isEmpty()) return; if (docum...
172,545
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: set_umask(const char *optarg) { long umask_long; mode_t umask_val; char *endptr; umask_long = strtoll(optarg, &endptr, 0); if (*endptr || umask_long < 0 || umask_long & ~0777L) { fprintf(stderr, "Invalid --umask option %s", optarg); return; } umask_val = umask_long & 0777; umask(umask_val); ...
set_umask(const char *optarg) { long umask_long; mode_t umask_val; char *endptr; umask_long = strtoll(optarg, &endptr, 0); if (*endptr || umask_long < 0 || umask_long & ~0777L) { fprintf(stderr, "Invalid --umask option %s", optarg); return 0; } umask_val = umask_long & 0777; umask(umask_val); uma...
170,158
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: void UserSelectionScreen::OnBeforeUserRemoved(const AccountId& account_id) { for (user_manager::UserList::iterator it = users_.begin(); it != users_.end(); ++it) { if ((*it)->GetAccountId() == account_id) { users_.erase(it); break; } } } Commit Message: cros: Check initial auth...
void UserSelectionScreen::OnBeforeUserRemoved(const AccountId& account_id) { for (auto it = users_.cbegin(); it != users_.cend(); ++it) { if ((*it)->GetAccountId() == account_id) { users_.erase(it); break; } } }
172,202
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: ethertype_print(netdissect_options *ndo, u_short ether_type, const u_char *p, u_int length, u_int caplen, const struct lladdr_info *src, const struct lladdr_info *dst) { switch (ether_type) { case ETHERTYPE_IP: ip_print(ndo, p, length); return (1); c...
ethertype_print(netdissect_options *ndo, u_short ether_type, const u_char *p, u_int length, u_int caplen, const struct lladdr_info *src, const struct lladdr_info *dst) { switch (ether_type) { case ETHERTYPE_IP: ip_print(ndo, p, length); return (1); case ET...
167,944
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: my_object_do_nothing (MyObject *obj, GError **error) { return TRUE; } Commit Message: CWE ID: CWE-264
my_object_do_nothing (MyObject *obj, GError **error)
165,092
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: Response DOMHandler::SetFileInputFiles( std::unique_ptr<protocol::Array<std::string>> files, Maybe<DOM::NodeId> node_id, Maybe<DOM::BackendNodeId> backend_node_id, Maybe<String> in_object_id) { if (host_) { for (size_t i = 0; i < files->length(); i++) { #if defined(OS_WIN) ChildP...
Response DOMHandler::SetFileInputFiles( std::unique_ptr<protocol::Array<std::string>> files, Maybe<DOM::NodeId> node_id, Maybe<DOM::BackendNodeId> backend_node_id, Maybe<String> in_object_id) { if (!allow_file_access_) return Response::Error("Not allowed"); if (host_) { for (size_t i = ...
173,113
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: void ForeignSessionHelper::SetInvalidationsForSessionsEnabled( JNIEnv* env, const JavaParamRef<jobject>& obj, jboolean enabled) { browser_sync::ProfileSyncService* service = ProfileSyncServiceFactory::GetInstance()->GetForProfile(profile_); if (!service) return; service->SetInva...
void ForeignSessionHelper::SetInvalidationsForSessionsEnabled( JNIEnv* env, const JavaParamRef<jobject>& obj, jboolean enabled) { syncer::SyncService* service = ProfileSyncServiceFactory::GetSyncServiceForProfile(profile_); if (!service) return; service->SetInvalidationsForSessionsEna...
172,058
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: Accelerator GetAccelerator(KeyboardCode code, int mask) { return Accelerator(code, mask & (1 << 0), mask & (1 << 1), mask & (1 << 2)); } Commit Message: accelerators: Remove deprecated Accelerator ctor that takes booleans. BUG=128242 R=ben@chromium.org Review URL: https://chromiumcodereview.appspot.com/103...
Accelerator GetAccelerator(KeyboardCode code, int mask) { return Accelerator(code, mask); }
170,907
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: ASN1_INTEGER *BN_to_ASN1_INTEGER(const BIGNUM *bn, ASN1_INTEGER *ai) { ASN1_INTEGER *ret; int len, j; if (ai == NULL) ret = M_ASN1_INTEGER_new(); else ret = ai; if (ret == NULL) { ASN1err(ASN1_F_BN_TO_ASN1_INTEGER, ERR_R_NESTED_ASN1_ERROR); goto err; A...
ASN1_INTEGER *BN_to_ASN1_INTEGER(const BIGNUM *bn, ASN1_INTEGER *ai) { ASN1_INTEGER *ret; int len, j; if (ai == NULL) ret = M_ASN1_INTEGER_new(); else ret = ai; if (ret == NULL) { ASN1err(ASN1_F_BN_TO_ASN1_INTEGER, ERR_R_NESTED_ASN1_ERROR); goto err; ASN1err...
165,209
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: static u64 __skb_get_nlattr_nest(u64 ctx, u64 A, u64 X, u64 r4, u64 r5) { struct sk_buff *skb = (struct sk_buff *)(long) ctx; struct nlattr *nla; if (skb_is_nonlinear(skb)) return 0; if (A > skb->len - sizeof(struct nlattr)) return 0; nla = (struct nlattr *) &skb->data[A]; if (nla->nla_len > A...
static u64 __skb_get_nlattr_nest(u64 ctx, u64 A, u64 X, u64 r4, u64 r5) { struct sk_buff *skb = (struct sk_buff *)(long) ctx; struct nlattr *nla; if (skb_is_nonlinear(skb)) return 0; if (skb->len < sizeof(struct nlattr)) return 0; if (A > skb->len - sizeof(struct nlattr)) return 0; nla = (struct ...
166,384
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: void GDataCacheMetadataMap::ScanCacheDirectory( const std::vector<FilePath>& cache_paths, GDataCache::CacheSubDirectoryType sub_dir_type, CacheMap* cache_map, ResourceIdToFilePathMap* processed_file_map) { DCHECK(cache_map); DCHECK(processed_file_map); file_util::FileEnumerator enumerato...
void GDataCacheMetadataMap::ScanCacheDirectory( const std::vector<FilePath>& cache_paths, GDataCache::CacheSubDirectoryType sub_dir_type, CacheMap* cache_map) { file_util::FileEnumerator enumerator( cache_paths[sub_dir_type], false, // not recursive static_cast<file_util::FileEnum...
170,868
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: TEE_Result syscall_cryp_obj_populate(unsigned long obj, struct utee_attribute *usr_attrs, unsigned long attr_count) { TEE_Result res; struct tee_ta_session *sess; struct tee_obj *o; const struct tee_cryp_obj_type_props *type_props; TEE_Attribute *attrs = NULL; res = tee_ta_get_current_session(&sess);...
TEE_Result syscall_cryp_obj_populate(unsigned long obj, struct utee_attribute *usr_attrs, unsigned long attr_count) { TEE_Result res; struct tee_ta_session *sess; struct tee_obj *o; const struct tee_cryp_obj_type_props *type_props; TEE_Attribute *attrs = NULL; res = tee_ta_get_current_session(&sess); if (...
169,469
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: static void msleep(uint64_t ms) { usleep(ms * 1000); } Commit Message: DO NOT MERGE Fix potential DoS caused by delivering signal to BT process Bug: 28885210 Change-Id: I63866d894bfca47464d6e42e3fb0357c4f94d360 Conflicts: btif/co/bta_hh_co.c btif/src/btif_core.c Merge conflict resolution of ag/1161415 (...
static void msleep(uint64_t ms) { TEMP_FAILURE_RETRY(usleep(ms * 1000)); }
173,489
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: static int set_geometry(unsigned int cmd, struct floppy_struct *g, int drive, int type, struct block_device *bdev) { int cnt; /* sanity checking for parameters. */ if (g->sect <= 0 || g->head <= 0 || g->track <= 0 || g->track > UDP->tracks >> STRETCH(g) || /* check if reserved bi...
static int set_geometry(unsigned int cmd, struct floppy_struct *g, int drive, int type, struct block_device *bdev) { int cnt; /* sanity checking for parameters. */ if (g->sect <= 0 || g->head <= 0 || /* check for zero in F_SECT_PER_TRACK */ (unsigned char)((g->sect << 2) >> FD_SIZECODE(g...
169,585
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: P2PQuicStreamTest() : connection_( new quic::test::MockQuicConnection(&connection_helper_, &alarm_factory_, quic::Perspective::IS_CLIENT)), session_(connection_) { session_.Initialize(...
P2PQuicStreamTest() : connection_( new quic::test::MockQuicConnection(&connection_helper_, &alarm_factory_, quic::Perspective::IS_CLIENT)), session_(connection_) { session_.Initialize(); ...
172,264
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: static int mem_resize(jas_stream_memobj_t *m, int bufsize) { unsigned char *buf; assert(bufsize >= 0); JAS_DBGLOG(100, ("mem_resize(%p, %d)\n", m, bufsize)); if (!(buf = jas_realloc2(m->buf_, bufsize, sizeof(unsigned char))) && bufsize) { JAS_DBGLOG(100, ("mem_resize realloc failed\n")); retur...
static int mem_resize(jas_stream_memobj_t *m, int bufsize) static int mem_resize(jas_stream_memobj_t *m, size_t bufsize) { unsigned char *buf; //assert(bufsize >= 0); JAS_DBGLOG(100, ("mem_resize(%p, %zu)\n", m, bufsize)); if (!bufsize) { jas_eprintf( "mem_resize was not really designed to handle a buffe...
168,750
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: GBool SplashFTFont::makeGlyph(int c, int xFrac, int yFrac, SplashGlyphBitmap *bitmap, int x0, int y0, SplashClip *clip, SplashClipResult *clipRes) { SplashFTFontFile *ff; FT_Vector offset; FT_GlyphSlot slot; FT_UInt gid; int rowSize; Guchar *p, *q; int i; ff = (SplashFTFontFile *)fontFil...
GBool SplashFTFont::makeGlyph(int c, int xFrac, int yFrac, SplashGlyphBitmap *bitmap, int x0, int y0, SplashClip *clip, SplashClipResult *clipRes) { SplashFTFontFile *ff; FT_Vector offset; FT_GlyphSlot slot; FT_UInt gid; int rowSize; Guchar *p, *q; int i; ff = (SplashFTFontFile *)fontFile; ...
164,621
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: poly_in(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) { char *str = PG_GETARG_CSTRING(0); POLYGON *poly; int npts; int size; int isopen; char *s; if ((npts = pair_count(str, ',')) <= 0) ereport(ERROR, (errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_TEXT_REPRESENTATION), errmsg("invalid input syntax for type polygon: \"%s\...
poly_in(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) { char *str = PG_GETARG_CSTRING(0); POLYGON *poly; int npts; int size; int base_size; int isopen; char *s; if ((npts = pair_count(str, ',')) <= 0) ereport(ERROR, (errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_TEXT_REPRESENTATION), errmsg("invalid input syntax for type po...
166,411
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: gamma_display_init(gamma_display *dp, png_modifier *pm, png_uint_32 id, double file_gamma, double screen_gamma, png_byte sbit, int threshold_test, int use_input_precision, int scale16, int expand16, int do_background, PNG_CONST png_color_16 *pointer_to_the_background_color, double background_g...
gamma_display_init(gamma_display *dp, png_modifier *pm, png_uint_32 id, double file_gamma, double screen_gamma, png_byte sbit, int threshold_test, int use_input_precision, int scale16, int expand16, int do_background, const png_color_16 *pointer_to_the_background_color, double background_gamma) { ...
173,611
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: void GpuChannel::OnInitialize(base::ProcessHandle renderer_process) { DCHECK(!renderer_process_); if (base::GetProcId(renderer_process) == renderer_pid_) renderer_process_ = renderer_process; } Commit Message: Convert plugin and GPU process to brokered handle duplication. BUG=119250 Review URL: https://...
void GpuChannel::OnInitialize(base::ProcessHandle renderer_process) {
170,934
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: void Splash::vertFlipImage(SplashBitmap *img, int width, int height, int nComps) { Guchar *lineBuf; Guchar *p0, *p1; int w; w = width * nComps; Guchar *lineBuf; Guchar *p0, *p1; int w; w = width * nComps; lineBuf = (Guchar *)gmalloc(w); p0 += width, p1 -= width) { memcpy(li...
void Splash::vertFlipImage(SplashBitmap *img, int width, int height, int nComps) { Guchar *lineBuf; Guchar *p0, *p1; int w; w = width * nComps; Guchar *lineBuf; Guchar *p0, *p1; int w; if (unlikely(img->data == NULL)) { error(errInternal, -1, "img->data is NULL in Splash::vertFlipImage"...
164,736
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: std::string SanitizeRevision(const std::string& revision) { for (size_t i = 0; i < revision.length(); i++) { if (!(revision[i] == '@' && i == 0) && !(revision[i] >= '0' && revision[i] <= '9') && !(revision[i] >= 'a' && revision[i] <= 'z') && !(revision[i] >= 'A' && revision[i] <= 'Z'...
std::string SanitizeRevision(const std::string& revision) {
172,464
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: void btm_sec_pin_code_request (UINT8 *p_bda) { tBTM_SEC_DEV_REC *p_dev_rec; tBTM_CB *p_cb = &btm_cb; #ifdef PORCHE_PAIRING_CONFLICT UINT8 default_pin_code_len = 4; PIN_CODE default_pin_code = {0x30, 0x30, 0x30, 0x30}; #endif BTM_TRACE_EVENT ("btm_sec_pin_code_request() State: %...
void btm_sec_pin_code_request (UINT8 *p_bda) { tBTM_SEC_DEV_REC *p_dev_rec; tBTM_CB *p_cb = &btm_cb; BTM_TRACE_EVENT ("btm_sec_pin_code_request() State: %s, BDA:%04x%08x", btm_pair_state_descr(btm_cb.pairing_state), (p_bda[0]<<8)+p_bda[1], (p_bda...
173,902