instruction
stringclasses
1 value
input
stringlengths
90
9.34k
output
stringlengths
16
15.4k
__index_level_0__
int64
165k
175k
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: void InitChromeDriverLogging(const CommandLine& command_line) { bool success = InitLogging( FILE_PATH_LITERAL("chromedriver.log"), logging::LOG_TO_BOTH_FILE_AND_SYSTEM_DEBUG_LOG, logging::LOCK_LOG_FILE, logging::DELETE_OLD_LOG_FILE, logging::DISABLE_DCHECK_FOR_NON_OFFICIAL_RELEASE_...
void InitChromeDriverLogging(const CommandLine& command_line) {
170,461
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: void FetchContext::DispatchWillSendRequest(unsigned long, ResourceRequest&, const ResourceResponse&, const FetchInitiatorInfo&) {} Commit Message: DevTools: send proper resource ty...
void FetchContext::DispatchWillSendRequest(unsigned long, ResourceRequest&, const ResourceResponse&, Resource::Type, const FetchInitiatorInfo&) ...
172,477
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: void PageHandler::SetRenderer(RenderProcessHost* process_host, RenderFrameHostImpl* frame_host) { if (host_ == frame_host) return; RenderWidgetHostImpl* widget_host = host_ ? host_->GetRenderWidgetHost() : nullptr; if (widget_host) { registrar_.Remove( ...
void PageHandler::SetRenderer(RenderProcessHost* process_host, void PageHandler::SetRenderer(int process_host_id, RenderFrameHostImpl* frame_host) { if (host_ == frame_host) return; RenderWidgetHostImpl* widget_host = host_ ? host_->GetRenderWidgetHost() : nullptr; if (...
172,764
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: static int jpeg_size(unsigned char* data, unsigned int data_size, int *width, int *height) { int i = 0; if (i + 3 < data_size && data[i] == 0xFF && data[i+1] == 0xD8 && data[i+2] == 0xFF && data[i+3] == 0xE0) { i += 4; if(i + 6 < data_size && ...
static int jpeg_size(unsigned char* data, unsigned int data_size, int *width, int *height) { int i = 0; if (i + 3 < data_size && data[i] == 0xFF && data[i+1] == 0xD8 && data[i+2] == 0xFF && data[i+3] == 0xE0) { i += 4; if(i + 6 < data_size && data...
169,235
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: static int key_notify_policy_flush(const struct km_event *c) { struct sk_buff *skb_out; struct sadb_msg *hdr; skb_out = alloc_skb(sizeof(struct sadb_msg) + 16, GFP_ATOMIC); if (!skb_out) return -ENOBUFS; hdr = (struct sadb_msg *) skb_put(skb_out, sizeof(struct sadb_msg)); hdr->sadb_msg_type = SADB_X_SPDF...
static int key_notify_policy_flush(const struct km_event *c) { struct sk_buff *skb_out; struct sadb_msg *hdr; skb_out = alloc_skb(sizeof(struct sadb_msg) + 16, GFP_ATOMIC); if (!skb_out) return -ENOBUFS; hdr = (struct sadb_msg *) skb_put(skb_out, sizeof(struct sadb_msg)); hdr->sadb_msg_type = SADB_X_SPDFLUSH; ...
166,073
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: static int handle_vmptrst(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) { unsigned long exit_qualification = vmcs_readl(EXIT_QUALIFICATION); u32 vmx_instruction_info = vmcs_read32(VMX_INSTRUCTION_INFO); gva_t vmcs_gva; struct x86_exception e; if (!nested_vmx_check_permission(vcpu)) return 1; if (get_vmx_mem_address(vcpu, exi...
static int handle_vmptrst(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) { unsigned long exit_qualification = vmcs_readl(EXIT_QUALIFICATION); u32 vmx_instruction_info = vmcs_read32(VMX_INSTRUCTION_INFO); gva_t vmcs_gva; struct x86_exception e; if (!nested_vmx_check_permission(vcpu)) return 1; if (get_vmx_mem_address(vcpu, exit_qual...
169,174
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: static int generate(struct crypto_rng *tfm, const u8 *src, unsigned int slen, u8 *dst, unsigned int dlen) { return crypto_old_rng_alg(tfm)->rng_make_random(tfm, dst, dlen); } Commit Message: crypto: rng - Remove old low-level rng interface Now that all rng implementations have switched over to the new in...
static int generate(struct crypto_rng *tfm, const u8 *src, unsigned int slen,
167,733
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: const char* WinPKIErrorString(void) { static char error_string[64]; DWORD error_code = GetLastError(); if ((error_code >> 16) != 0x8009) return WindowsErrorString(); switch (error_code) { case NTE_BAD_UID: return "Bad UID."; case CRYPT_E_MSG_ERROR: return "An error occurred while performing an...
const char* WinPKIErrorString(void) { static char error_string[64]; DWORD error_code = GetLastError(); if (((error_code >> 16) != 0x8009) && ((error_code >> 16) != 0x800B)) return WindowsErrorString(); switch (error_code) { case NTE_BAD_UID: return "Bad UID."; case CRYPT_E_MSG_ERROR: return "An erro...
167,816
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: long join_session_keyring(const char *name) { const struct cred *old; struct cred *new; struct key *keyring; long ret, serial; new = prepare_creds(); if (!new) return -ENOMEM; old = current_cred(); /* if no name is provided, install an anonymous keyring */ if (!name) { ret = install_session_keyring...
long join_session_keyring(const char *name) { const struct cred *old; struct cred *new; struct key *keyring; long ret, serial; new = prepare_creds(); if (!new) return -ENOMEM; old = current_cred(); /* if no name is provided, install an anonymous keyring */ if (!name) { ret = install_session_keyring_to_cr...
167,452
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: openvpn_decrypt (struct buffer *buf, struct buffer work, const struct crypto_options *opt, const struct frame* frame) { static const char error_prefix[] = "Authenticate/Decrypt packet error"; struct gc_arena gc; gc_init (&gc); if (buf->len > 0 && opt->key_ctx_bi) { struct key_ctx *ctx = &...
openvpn_decrypt (struct buffer *buf, struct buffer work, const struct crypto_options *opt, const struct frame* frame) { static const char error_prefix[] = "Authenticate/Decrypt packet error"; struct gc_arena gc; gc_init (&gc); if (buf->len > 0 && opt->key_ctx_bi) { struct key_ctx *ctx = &opt->k...
166,086
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: void InitializePrinting(content::WebContents* web_contents) { #if BUILDFLAG(ENABLE_PRINT_PREVIEW) printing::PrintViewManager::CreateForWebContents(web_contents); printing::PrintPreviewMessageHandler::CreateForWebContents(web_contents); #else printing::PrintViewManagerBasic::CreateForWebContents(web_conten...
void InitializePrinting(content::WebContents* web_contents) { #if BUILDFLAG(ENABLE_PRINT_PREVIEW) printing::PrintViewManager::CreateForWebContents(web_contents); printing::PrintPreviewMessageHandler::CreateForWebContents(web_contents); #else printing::PrintViewManagerBasic::CreateForWebContents(web_contents); ...
171,894
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: virtual void PreEncodeFrameHook(::libvpx_test::VideoSource *video, ::libvpx_test::Encoder *encoder) { if (video->frame() == 1) { encoder->Control(VP8E_SET_CPUUSED, cpu_used_); } else if (video->frame() == 3) { vpx_active_map_t map = {0}; uint8_t active_map[9 * 13] = { 1, ...
virtual void PreEncodeFrameHook(::libvpx_test::VideoSource *video, ::libvpx_test::Encoder *encoder) { if (video->frame() == 1) { encoder->Control(VP8E_SET_CPUUSED, cpu_used_); } else if (video->frame() == 3) { vpx_active_map_t map = vpx_active_map_t(); uint8_t active_map[9 * 13] = { ...
174,501
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: hcom_client_init ( OUT p_hsm_com_client_hdl_t *p_hdl, IN char *server_path, IN char *client_path, IN int max_data_len ) { hsm_com_client_hdl_t *hdl = NULL; hsm_com_errno_t res = HSM_COM_OK; if((strlen(server_path) > (HSM_COM_SVR_MAX_PATH - 1)) || (strlen(server_path) == 0)){ res...
hcom_client_init ( OUT p_hsm_com_client_hdl_t *p_hdl, IN char *server_path, IN char *client_path, IN int max_data_len ) { hsm_com_client_hdl_t *hdl = NULL; hsm_com_errno_t res = HSM_COM_OK; if((strlen(server_path) > (HSM_COM_SVR_MAX_PATH - 1)) || (strlen(server_path) == 0)){ res = HSM...
170,129
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: nfs4_atomic_open(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry, struct nameidata *nd) { struct path path = { .mnt = nd->path.mnt, .dentry = dentry, }; struct dentry *parent; struct iattr attr; struct rpc_cred *cred; struct nfs4_state *state; struct dentry *res; if (nd->flags & LOOKUP_CREATE) { att...
nfs4_atomic_open(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry, struct nameidata *nd) { struct path path = { .mnt = nd->path.mnt, .dentry = dentry, }; struct dentry *parent; struct iattr attr; struct rpc_cred *cred; struct nfs4_state *state; struct dentry *res; fmode_t fmode = nd->intent.open.flags & (FMODE_R...
165,688
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: IMPEG2D_ERROR_CODES_T impeg2d_dec_d_slice(dec_state_t *ps_dec) { UWORD32 i; yuv_buf_t *ps_cur_frm_buf = &ps_dec->s_cur_frm_buf; stream_t *ps_stream = &ps_dec->s_bit_stream; UWORD8 *pu1_vld_buf; WORD16 i2_dc_diff; UWORD32 u4_frame_width = ps_dec->u2_frame_width; UWORD32 u4_frm_offs...
IMPEG2D_ERROR_CODES_T impeg2d_dec_d_slice(dec_state_t *ps_dec) { UWORD32 i; yuv_buf_t *ps_cur_frm_buf = &ps_dec->s_cur_frm_buf; stream_t *ps_stream = &ps_dec->s_bit_stream; UWORD8 *pu1_vld_buf; WORD16 i2_dc_diff; UWORD32 u4_frame_width = ps_dec->u2_frame_width; UWORD32 u4_frm_offset = 0...
173,943
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: static ssize_t lbs_debugfs_write(struct file *f, const char __user *buf, size_t cnt, loff_t *ppos) { int r, i; char *pdata; char *p; char *p0; char *p1; char *p2; struct debug_data *d = f->private_data; pdata = kmalloc(cnt, GFP_KERNEL); if (pdata == NULL) return 0; if (copy_from_user(pd...
static ssize_t lbs_debugfs_write(struct file *f, const char __user *buf, size_t cnt, loff_t *ppos) { int r, i; char *pdata; char *p; char *p0; char *p1; char *p2; struct debug_data *d = f->private_data; if (cnt == 0) return 0; pdata = kmalloc(cnt + 1, GFP_KERNEL); if (pdata == NULL) return 0...
165,942
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: interlace_row(png_bytep buffer, png_const_bytep imageRow, unsigned int pixel_size, png_uint_32 w, int pass) { png_uint_32 xin, xout, xstep; /* Note that this can, trivially, be optimized to a memcpy on pass 7, the * code is presented this way to make it easier to understand. In practice * consul...
interlace_row(png_bytep buffer, png_const_bytep imageRow,
173,659
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: bool TabsCaptureVisibleTabFunction::RunImpl() { PrefService* service = profile()->GetPrefs(); if (service->GetBoolean(prefs::kDisableScreenshots)) { error_ = keys::kScreenshotsDisabled; return false; } WebContents* web_contents = NULL; if (!GetTabToCapture(&web_contents)) return false; i...
bool TabsCaptureVisibleTabFunction::RunImpl() { PrefService* service = profile()->GetPrefs(); if (service->GetBoolean(prefs::kDisableScreenshots)) { error_ = keys::kScreenshotsDisabled; return false; } WebContents* web_contents = NULL; if (!GetTabToCapture(&web_contents)) return false; image_f...
171,268
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: xmlXPtrEvalXPtrPart(xmlXPathParserContextPtr ctxt, xmlChar *name) { xmlChar *buffer, *cur; int len; int level; if (name == NULL) name = xmlXPathParseName(ctxt); if (name == NULL) XP_ERROR(XPATH_EXPR_ERROR); if (CUR != '(') XP_ERROR(XPATH_EXPR_ERROR); NEXT; level = 1; l...
xmlXPtrEvalXPtrPart(xmlXPathParserContextPtr ctxt, xmlChar *name) { xmlChar *buffer, *cur; int len; int level; if (name == NULL) name = xmlXPathParseName(ctxt); if (name == NULL) XP_ERROR(XPATH_EXPR_ERROR); if (CUR != '(') XP_ERROR(XPATH_EXPR_ERROR); NEXT; level = 1; len = x...
171,059
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: void CL_InitRef( void ) { refimport_t ri; refexport_t *ret; #ifdef USE_RENDERER_DLOPEN GetRefAPI_t GetRefAPI; char dllName[MAX_OSPATH]; #endif Com_Printf( "----- Initializing Renderer ----\n" ); #ifdef USE_RENDERER_DLOPEN cl_renderer = Cvar_Get("cl_renderer", "opengl2", CVAR_ARCHIVE | CVAR_LATCH); ...
void CL_InitRef( void ) { refimport_t ri; refexport_t *ret; #ifdef USE_RENDERER_DLOPEN GetRefAPI_t GetRefAPI; char dllName[MAX_OSPATH]; #endif Com_Printf( "----- Initializing Renderer ----\n" ); #ifdef USE_RENDERER_DLOPEN cl_renderer = Cvar_Get("cl_renderer", "opengl2", CVAR_ARCHIVE | CVAR_LATCH | CVAR_PR...
170,089
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: void ChromeOSSetImePropertyActivated( InputMethodStatusConnection* connection, const char* key, bool activated) { DLOG(INFO) << "SetImePropertyeActivated: " << key << ": " << activated; DCHECK(key); g_return_if_fail(connection); connection->SetImePropertyActivated(key, activated); } Commit Message: R...
void ChromeOSSetImePropertyActivated(
170,527
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: char *my_asctime(time_t t) { struct tm *tm; char *str; int len; tm = localtime(&t); str = g_strdup(asctime(tm)); len = strlen(str); if (len > 0) str[len-1] = '\0'; return str; } Commit Message: Merge branch 'security' into 'master' Security Closes #10 See merge request !17 CWE ID...
char *my_asctime(time_t t) { struct tm *tm; char *str; int len; tm = localtime(&t); if (tm == NULL) return g_strdup("???"); str = g_strdup(asctime(tm)); len = strlen(str); if (len > 0) str[len-1] = '\0'; return str; }
168,056
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: XpmCreateDataFromXpmImage( char ***data_return, XpmImage *image, XpmInfo *info) { /* calculation variables */ int ErrorStatus; char buf[BUFSIZ]; char **header = NULL, **data, **sptr, **sptr2, *s; unsigned int header_size, header_nlines; unsigned int data_size, data_nlines; ...
XpmCreateDataFromXpmImage( char ***data_return, XpmImage *image, XpmInfo *info) { /* calculation variables */ int ErrorStatus; char buf[BUFSIZ]; char **header = NULL, **data, **sptr, **sptr2, *s; unsigned int header_size, header_nlines; unsigned int data_size, data_nlines; un...
165,238
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: bool GDataDirectory::FromProto(const GDataDirectoryProto& proto) { DCHECK(proto.gdata_entry().file_info().is_directory()); DCHECK(!proto.gdata_entry().has_file_specific_info()); for (int i = 0; i < proto.child_files_size(); ++i) { scoped_ptr<GDataFile> file(new GDataFile(NULL, directory_service_)); ...
bool GDataDirectory::FromProto(const GDataDirectoryProto& proto) { DCHECK(proto.gdata_entry().file_info().is_directory()); DCHECK(!proto.gdata_entry().has_file_specific_info()); for (int i = 0; i < proto.child_files_size(); ++i) { scoped_ptr<GDataFile> file(directory_service_->CreateGDataFile()); if ...
171,487
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: static int mif_process_cmpt(mif_hdr_t *hdr, char *buf) { jas_tvparser_t *tvp; mif_cmpt_t *cmpt; int id; cmpt = 0; tvp = 0; if (!(cmpt = mif_cmpt_create())) { goto error; } cmpt->tlx = 0; cmpt->tly = 0; cmpt->sampperx = 0; cmpt->samppery = 0; cmpt->width = 0; cmpt->height = 0; cmpt->prec = 0; cm...
static int mif_process_cmpt(mif_hdr_t *hdr, char *buf) { jas_tvparser_t *tvp; mif_cmpt_t *cmpt; int id; cmpt = 0; tvp = 0; if (!(cmpt = mif_cmpt_create())) { goto error; } cmpt->tlx = 0; cmpt->tly = 0; cmpt->sampperx = 0; cmpt->samppery = 0; cmpt->width = 0; cmpt->height = 0; cmpt->prec = 0; cmpt->sg...
168,874
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: static void utee_param_to_param(struct tee_ta_param *p, struct utee_params *up) { size_t n; uint32_t types = up->types; p->types = types; for (n = 0; n < TEE_NUM_PARAMS; n++) { uintptr_t a = up->vals[n * 2]; size_t b = up->vals[n * 2 + 1]; switch (TEE_PARAM_TYPE_GET(types, n)) { case TEE_PAR...
static void utee_param_to_param(struct tee_ta_param *p, struct utee_params *up) static TEE_Result utee_param_to_param(struct user_ta_ctx *utc, struct tee_ta_param *p, struct utee_params *up) { size_t n; uint32_t types = up->types; p->types = types; for (n = 0; n < TEE_NUM_PARAMS; n++) { ...
169,471
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: void WebSocketJob::Wakeup() { if (!waiting_) return; waiting_ = false; DCHECK(callback_); MessageLoopForIO::current()->PostTask( FROM_HERE, NewRunnableMethod(this, &WebSocketJob::RetryPendingIO)); } Commit Message: Use ScopedRunnableMethodFactory in WebSocketJob Don't post SendPendin...
void WebSocketJob::Wakeup() { if (!waiting_) return; waiting_ = false; DCHECK(callback_); MessageLoopForIO::current()->PostTask( FROM_HERE, method_factory_.NewRunnableMethod(&WebSocketJob::RetryPendingIO)); }
170,307
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: ikev1_n_print(netdissect_options *ndo, u_char tpay _U_, const struct isakmp_gen *ext, u_int item_len, const u_char *ep, uint32_t phase _U_, uint32_t doi0 _U_, uint32_t proto0 _U_, int depth _U_) { const struct ikev1_pl_n *p; struct ikev1_pl_n n; const u_char *cp; const u_char *ep2; uint3...
ikev1_n_print(netdissect_options *ndo, u_char tpay _U_, const struct isakmp_gen *ext, u_int item_len, const u_char *ep, uint32_t phase _U_, uint32_t doi0 _U_, uint32_t proto0 _U_, int depth _U_) { const struct ikev1_pl_n *p; struct ikev1_pl_n n; const u_char *cp; const u_char *ep2; uint32_t do...
167,841
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: bool f2fs_init_extent_tree(struct inode *inode, struct f2fs_extent *i_ext) { struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi = F2FS_I_SB(inode); struct extent_tree *et; struct extent_node *en; struct extent_info ei; if (!f2fs_may_extent_tree(inode)) { /* drop largest extent */ if (i_ext && i_ext->len) { i_ext->len = 0; ...
bool f2fs_init_extent_tree(struct inode *inode, struct f2fs_extent *i_ext) static bool __f2fs_init_extent_tree(struct inode *inode, struct f2fs_extent *i_ext) { struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi = F2FS_I_SB(inode); struct extent_tree *et; struct extent_node *en; struct extent_info ei; if (!f2fs_may_extent_tree(inode)) ...
169,416
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: static int asf_read_marker(AVFormatContext *s, int64_t size) { AVIOContext *pb = s->pb; ASFContext *asf = s->priv_data; int i, count, name_len, ret; char name[1024]; avio_rl64(pb); // reserved 16 bytes avio_rl64(pb); // ... count = avio_rl32(pb); // markers c...
static int asf_read_marker(AVFormatContext *s, int64_t size) { AVIOContext *pb = s->pb; ASFContext *asf = s->priv_data; int i, count, name_len, ret; char name[1024]; avio_rl64(pb); // reserved 16 bytes avio_rl64(pb); // ... count = avio_rl32(pb); // markers count ...
167,775
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: network_init () { #ifdef HAVE_GNUTLS char *ca_path, *ca_path2; gnutls_global_init (); gnutls_certificate_allocate_credentials (&gnutls_xcred); ca_path = string_expand_home (CONFIG_STRING(config_network_gnutls_ca_file)); if (ca_path) { ca_path2 = string_replace (ca_path, "%h",...
network_init () { #ifdef HAVE_GNUTLS char *ca_path, *ca_path2; gnutls_global_init (); gnutls_certificate_allocate_credentials (&gnutls_xcred); ca_path = string_expand_home (CONFIG_STRING(config_network_gnutls_ca_file)); if (ca_path) { ca_path2 = string_replace (ca_path, "%h", weech...
164,712
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: swabHorDiff16(TIFF* tif, uint8* cp0, tmsize_t cc) { uint16* wp = (uint16*) cp0; tmsize_t wc = cc / 2; horDiff16(tif, cp0, cc); TIFFSwabArrayOfShort(wp, wc); } Commit Message: * libtiff/tif_predict.h, libtiff/tif_predict.c: Replace assertions by runtime checks to avoid assertions in debu...
swabHorDiff16(TIFF* tif, uint8* cp0, tmsize_t cc) { uint16* wp = (uint16*) cp0; tmsize_t wc = cc / 2; if( !horDiff16(tif, cp0, cc) ) return 0; TIFFSwabArrayOfShort(wp, wc); return 1; }
166,890
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: image_transform_png_set_expand_gray_1_2_4_to_8_add(image_transform *this, PNG_CONST image_transform **that, png_byte colour_type, png_byte bit_depth) { return image_transform_png_set_expand_add(this, that, colour_type, bit_depth); } Commit Message: DO NOT MERGE Update libpng to 1.6.20 BUG:2326...
image_transform_png_set_expand_gray_1_2_4_to_8_add(image_transform *this, const image_transform **that, png_byte colour_type, png_byte bit_depth) { #if PNG_LIBPNG_VER < 10700 return image_transform_png_set_expand_add(this, that, colour_type, bit_depth); #else UNUSED(bit_depth) this->next = *that...
173,630
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: pgp_enumerate_blob(sc_card_t *card, pgp_blob_t *blob) { const u8 *in; int r; if (blob->files != NULL) return SC_SUCCESS; if ((r = pgp_read_blob(card, blob)) < 0) return r; in = blob->data; while ((int) blob->len > (in - blob->data)) { unsigned int cla, tag, tmptag; size_t len; const u8 *dat...
pgp_enumerate_blob(sc_card_t *card, pgp_blob_t *blob) { const u8 *in; int r; if (blob->files != NULL) return SC_SUCCESS; if ((r = pgp_read_blob(card, blob)) < 0) return r; in = blob->data; while ((int) blob->len > (in - blob->data)) { unsigned int cla, tag, tmptag; size_t len; const u8 *data = in...
169,060
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: static u32 __ipv6_select_ident(struct net *net, u32 hashrnd, const struct in6_addr *dst, const struct in6_addr *src) { u32 hash, id; hash = __ipv6_addr_jhash(dst, hashrnd); hash = __ipv6_addr_jhash(src, hash); hash ^= net_hash_mix(net); /* Treat id of 0 as unset and if we get 0 b...
static u32 __ipv6_select_ident(struct net *net, u32 hashrnd, static u32 __ipv6_select_ident(struct net *net, const struct in6_addr *dst, const struct in6_addr *src) { const struct { struct in6_addr dst; struct in6_addr src; } __aligned(SIPHASH_ALIGNMENT) combined = { .dst = *dst, .src =...
169,717
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: _pyfribidi_log2vis (PyObject * self, PyObject * args, PyObject * kw) { PyObject *logical = NULL; /* input unicode or string object */ FriBidiParType base = FRIBIDI_TYPE_RTL; /* optional direction */ const char *encoding = "utf-8"; /* optional input string encoding */ int clean = 0; /* optional flag to clean ...
_pyfribidi_log2vis (PyObject * self, PyObject * args, PyObject * kw) unicode_log2vis (PyUnicodeObject* string, FriBidiParType base_direction, int clean, int reordernsm) { int i; int length = string->length; FriBidiChar *logical = NULL; /* input fribidi unicode buffer */ FriBidiChar *vi...
165,638
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: void LauncherView::OnBoundsChanged(const gfx::Rect& previous_bounds) { LayoutToIdealBounds(); FOR_EACH_OBSERVER(LauncherIconObserver, observers_, OnLauncherIconPositionsChanged()); } Commit Message: ash: Add launcher overflow bubble. - Host a LauncherView in bubble to display overfl...
void LauncherView::OnBoundsChanged(const gfx::Rect& previous_bounds) { LayoutToIdealBounds(); FOR_EACH_OBSERVER(LauncherIconObserver, observers_, OnLauncherIconPositionsChanged()); if (IsShowingOverflowBubble()) overflow_bubble_->Hide(); }
170,894
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: pax_decode_header (struct tar_sparse_file *file) { if (file->stat_info->sparse_major > 0) { uintmax_t u; char nbuf[UINTMAX_STRSIZE_BOUND]; union block *blk; char *p; size_t i; off_t start; #define COPY_BUF(b,buf,src) do \ { ...
pax_decode_header (struct tar_sparse_file *file) { if (file->stat_info->sparse_major > 0) { uintmax_t u; char nbuf[UINTMAX_STRSIZE_BOUND]; union block *blk; char *p; size_t i; off_t start; #define COPY_BUF(b,buf,src) do \ { ...
164,776
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: void InspectorNetworkAgent::WillSendRequestInternal( ExecutionContext* execution_context, unsigned long identifier, DocumentLoader* loader, const ResourceRequest& request, const ResourceResponse& redirect_response, const FetchInitiatorInfo& initiator_info) { String request_id = Ident...
void InspectorNetworkAgent::WillSendRequestInternal( ExecutionContext* execution_context, unsigned long identifier, DocumentLoader* loader, const ResourceRequest& request, const ResourceResponse& redirect_response, const FetchInitiatorInfo& initiator_info, InspectorPageAgent::ResourceType...
172,468
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: HRESULT WaitForLoginUIAndGetResult( CGaiaCredentialBase::UIProcessInfo* uiprocinfo, std::string* json_result, DWORD* exit_code, BSTR* status_text) { LOGFN(INFO); DCHECK(uiprocinfo); DCHECK(json_result); DCHECK(exit_code); DCHECK(status_text); const int kBufferSize = 4096; std::vecto...
HRESULT WaitForLoginUIAndGetResult( CGaiaCredentialBase::UIProcessInfo* uiprocinfo, std::string* json_result, DWORD* exit_code, BSTR* status_text) { LOGFN(INFO); DCHECK(uiprocinfo); DCHECK(json_result); DCHECK(exit_code); DCHECK(status_text); const int kBufferSize = 4096; std::vector<char...
172,102
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: PluginModule::PluginModule(const std::string& name, const FilePath& path, PluginDelegate::ModuleLifetime* lifetime_delegate) : lifetime_delegate_(lifetime_delegate), callback_tracker_(new ::ppapi::CallbackTracker), is_in_destructor_(false), ...
PluginModule::PluginModule(const std::string& name, const FilePath& path, PluginDelegate::ModuleLifetime* lifetime_delegate) : lifetime_delegate_(lifetime_delegate), callback_tracker_(new ::ppapi::CallbackTracker), is_in_destructor_(false), is_...
170,747
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: void FrameFetchContext::DispatchWillSendRequest( unsigned long identifier, ResourceRequest& request, const ResourceResponse& redirect_response, const FetchInitiatorInfo& initiator_info) { if (IsDetached()) return; if (redirect_response.IsNull()) { GetFrame()->Loader().Progress()...
void FrameFetchContext::DispatchWillSendRequest( unsigned long identifier, ResourceRequest& request, const ResourceResponse& redirect_response, Resource::Type resource_type, const FetchInitiatorInfo& initiator_info) { if (IsDetached()) return; if (redirect_response.IsNull()) { Get...
172,474
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: void AcceleratedStaticBitmapImage::EnsureMailbox(MailboxSyncMode mode, GLenum filter) { if (!texture_holder_->IsMailboxTextureHolder()) { TRACE_EVENT0("blink", "AcceleratedStaticBitmapImage::EnsureMailbox"); if (!original_skia_image_) { Retain...
void AcceleratedStaticBitmapImage::EnsureMailbox(MailboxSyncMode mode, GLenum filter) { DCHECK_CALLED_ON_VALID_THREAD(thread_checker_); if (!texture_holder_->IsMailboxTextureHolder()) { TRACE_EVENT0("blink", "AcceleratedStaticBitmapImage::EnsureMailbox"); ...
172,595
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: static jlong Region_createFromParcel(JNIEnv* env, jobject clazz, jobject parcel) { if (parcel == NULL) { return NULL; } android::Parcel* p = android::parcelForJavaObject(env, parcel); SkRegion* region = new SkRegion; size_t size = p->readInt32(); region->readFromMemory(p->readInplace(siz...
static jlong Region_createFromParcel(JNIEnv* env, jobject clazz, jobject parcel) { if (parcel == NULL) { return NULL; } android::Parcel* p = android::parcelForJavaObject(env, parcel); const size_t size = p->readInt32(); const void* regionData = p->readInplace(size); if (regionData == NULL) { ...
173,341
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: int rds_cmsg_atomic(struct rds_sock *rs, struct rds_message *rm, struct cmsghdr *cmsg) { struct page *page = NULL; struct rds_atomic_args *args; int ret = 0; if (cmsg->cmsg_len < CMSG_LEN(sizeof(struct rds_atomic_args)) || rm->atomic.op_active) return -EINVAL; args = CMSG_DATA(cmsg); /* Nonmask...
int rds_cmsg_atomic(struct rds_sock *rs, struct rds_message *rm, struct cmsghdr *cmsg) { struct page *page = NULL; struct rds_atomic_args *args; int ret = 0; if (cmsg->cmsg_len < CMSG_LEN(sizeof(struct rds_atomic_args)) || rm->atomic.op_active) return -EINVAL; args = CMSG_DATA(cmsg); /* Nonmasked & m...
169,353
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: int irssi_ssl_handshake(GIOChannel *handle) { GIOSSLChannel *chan = (GIOSSLChannel *)handle; int ret, err; X509 *cert; const char *errstr; ret = SSL_connect(chan->ssl); if (ret <= 0) { err = SSL_get_error(chan->ssl, ret); switch (err) { case SSL_ERROR_WANT_READ: return 1; case SSL_ERROR_WANT_...
int irssi_ssl_handshake(GIOChannel *handle) { GIOSSLChannel *chan = (GIOSSLChannel *)handle; int ret, err; X509 *cert; const char *errstr; ret = SSL_connect(chan->ssl); if (ret <= 0) { err = SSL_get_error(chan->ssl, ret); switch (err) { case SSL_ERROR_WANT_READ: return 1; case SSL_ERROR_WANT_WRITE:...
165,517
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: static int check_alu_op(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn) { struct bpf_reg_state *regs = cur_regs(env); u8 opcode = BPF_OP(insn->code); int err; if (opcode == BPF_END || opcode == BPF_NEG) { if (opcode == BPF_NEG) { if (BPF_SRC(insn->code) != 0 || insn->src_reg != BPF_REG_0 || ...
static int check_alu_op(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn) { struct bpf_reg_state *regs = cur_regs(env); u8 opcode = BPF_OP(insn->code); int err; if (opcode == BPF_END || opcode == BPF_NEG) { if (opcode == BPF_NEG) { if (BPF_SRC(insn->code) != 0 || insn->src_reg != BPF_REG_0 || ...
167,660
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: ExtensionsGuestViewMessageFilter::MaybeCreateThrottle( NavigationHandle* handle) { DCHECK(content::MimeHandlerViewMode::UsesCrossProcessFrame()); if (!handle->GetParentFrame()) { return nullptr; } int32_t parent_process_id = handle->GetParentFrame()->GetProcess()->GetID(); auto& map = *GetProces...
ExtensionsGuestViewMessageFilter::MaybeCreateThrottle(
173,044
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: static void skel(const char *homedir, uid_t u, gid_t g) { char *fname; if (!arg_shell_none && (strcmp(cfg.shell,"/usr/bin/zsh") == 0 || strcmp(cfg.shell,"/bin/zsh") == 0)) { if (asprintf(&fname, "%s/.zshrc", homedir) == -1) errExit("asprintf"); struct stat s; if (stat(fname, &s) == 0) return; ...
static void skel(const char *homedir, uid_t u, gid_t g) { char *fname; if (!arg_shell_none && (strcmp(cfg.shell,"/usr/bin/zsh") == 0 || strcmp(cfg.shell,"/bin/zsh") == 0)) { if (asprintf(&fname, "%s/.zshrc", homedir) == -1) errExit("asprintf"); struct stat s; if (stat(fname, &s) == 0) return; if (is_...
168,371
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: static int readContigTilesIntoBuffer (TIFF* in, uint8* buf, uint32 imagelength, uint32 imagewidth, uint32 tw, uint32 tl, tsample_t spp, uint16 bps) { int s...
static int readContigTilesIntoBuffer (TIFF* in, uint8* buf, uint32 imagelength, uint32 imagewidth, uint32 tw, uint32 tl, tsample_t spp, uint16 bps) { int status ...
166,864
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: static void controloptions (lua_State *L, int opt, const char **fmt, Header *h) { switch (opt) { case ' ': return; /* ignore white spaces */ case '>': h->endian = BIG; return; case '<': h->endian = LITTLE; return; case '!': { int a = getnum(L, fmt, MAXALIGN...
static void controloptions (lua_State *L, int opt, const char **fmt, Header *h) { switch (opt) { case ' ': return; /* ignore white spaces */ case '>': h->endian = BIG; return; case '<': h->endian = LITTLE; return; case '!': { int a = getnum(fmt, MAXALIGN); ...
170,164
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: krb5_gss_pseudo_random(OM_uint32 *minor_status, gss_ctx_id_t context, int prf_key, const gss_buffer_t prf_in, ssize_t desired_output_len, gss_buffer_t prf_out) { krb5_error_code code; krb5_ke...
krb5_gss_pseudo_random(OM_uint32 *minor_status, gss_ctx_id_t context, int prf_key, const gss_buffer_t prf_in, ssize_t desired_output_len, gss_buffer_t prf_out) { krb5_error_code code; krb5_key key ...
166,822
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: void BluetoothDeviceChromeOS::AuthorizeService( const dbus::ObjectPath& device_path, const std::string& uuid, const ConfirmationCallback& callback) { callback.Run(CANCELLED); } Commit Message: Refactor to support default Bluetooth pairing delegate In order to support a default pairing delegate we ...
void BluetoothDeviceChromeOS::AuthorizeService(
171,216
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: const Chapters::Edition* Chapters::GetEdition(int idx) const { if (idx < 0) return NULL; if (idx >= m_editions_count) return NULL; return m_editions + idx; } Commit Message: libwebm: Pull from upstream Rolling mkvparser from upstream. Primarily for fixing a bug on parsing failur...
const Chapters::Edition* Chapters::GetEdition(int idx) const const int size = (m_editions_size == 0) ? 1 : 2 * m_editions_size; Edition* const editions = new (std::nothrow) Edition[size]; if (editions == NULL) return false; for (int idx = 0; idx < m_editions_count; ++idx) { m_editions[idx].ShallowC...
174,310
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: SWFShape_setLeftFillStyle(SWFShape shape, SWFFillStyle fill) { ShapeRecord record; int idx; if ( shape->isEnded || shape->isMorph ) return; if(fill == NOFILL) { record = addStyleRecord(shape); record.record.stateChange->leftFill = 0; record.record.stateChange->flags |= SWF_SHAPE_FILLSTYLE0FLAG; ...
SWFShape_setLeftFillStyle(SWFShape shape, SWFFillStyle fill) { ShapeRecord record; int idx; if ( shape->isEnded || shape->isMorph ) return; if(fill == NOFILL) { record = addStyleRecord(shape); record.record.stateChange->leftFill = 0; record.record.stateChange->flags |= SWF_SHAPE_FILLSTYLE0FLAG; return...
169,647
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: void set_task_blockstep(struct task_struct *task, bool on) { unsigned long debugctl; /* * Ensure irq/preemption can't change debugctl in between. * Note also that both TIF_BLOCKSTEP and debugctl should * be changed atomically wrt preemption. * FIXME: this means that set/clear TIF_BLOCKSTEP is simply...
void set_task_blockstep(struct task_struct *task, bool on) { unsigned long debugctl; /* * Ensure irq/preemption can't change debugctl in between. * Note also that both TIF_BLOCKSTEP and debugctl should * be changed atomically wrt preemption. * * NOTE: this means that set/clear TIF_BLOCKSTEP is only safe...
166,135
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: PHP_FUNCTION(imageaffinematrixget) { double affine[6]; long type; zval *options = NULL; zval **tmp; int res = GD_FALSE, i; if (zend_parse_parameters(ZEND_NUM_ARGS() TSRMLS_CC, "l|z", &type, &options) == FAILURE) { return; } switch((gdAffineStandardMatrix)type) { case GD_AFFINE_TRANSLATE: case GD_...
PHP_FUNCTION(imageaffinematrixget) { double affine[6]; long type; zval *options = NULL; zval **tmp; int res = GD_FALSE, i; if (zend_parse_parameters(ZEND_NUM_ARGS() TSRMLS_CC, "l|z", &type, &options) == FAILURE) { return; } switch((gdAffineStandardMatrix)type) { case GD_AFFINE_TRANSLATE: case GD_AFFINE...
166,954
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: static Image *ReadRGFImage(const ImageInfo *image_info,ExceptionInfo *exception) { Image *image; MagickBooleanType status; register IndexPacket *indexes; register PixelPacket *q; register ssize_t i, x; register unsigned char *p; size_t bit, byte; ssize_t ...
static Image *ReadRGFImage(const ImageInfo *image_info,ExceptionInfo *exception) { Image *image; MagickBooleanType status; register IndexPacket *indexes; register PixelPacket *q; register ssize_t i, x; register unsigned char *p; size_t bit, byte; ssize_t y;...
168,598
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: OMX_ERRORTYPE SoftVPXEncoder::setConfig( OMX_INDEXTYPE index, const OMX_PTR _params) { switch (index) { case OMX_IndexConfigVideoIntraVOPRefresh: { OMX_CONFIG_INTRAREFRESHVOPTYPE *params = (OMX_CONFIG_INTRAREFRESHVOPTYPE *)_params; if (params->nPortIndex !=...
OMX_ERRORTYPE SoftVPXEncoder::setConfig( OMX_INDEXTYPE index, const OMX_PTR _params) { switch (index) { case OMX_IndexConfigVideoIntraVOPRefresh: { OMX_CONFIG_INTRAREFRESHVOPTYPE *params = (OMX_CONFIG_INTRAREFRESHVOPTYPE *)_params; if (!isValidOMXParam(params)) { ...
174,215
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: hash_foreach_prepend_string (gpointer key, gpointer val, gpointer user_data) { HashAndString *data = (HashAndString*) user_data; gchar *in = (gchar*) val; g_hash_table_insert (data->hash, g_strdup ((gchar*) key), g_strjoin (" ", data->string, in, NULL)); } Commit Message: CWE ID: CW...
hash_foreach_prepend_string (gpointer key, gpointer val, gpointer user_data)
165,086
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: SPL_METHOD(RecursiveDirectoryIterator, getChildren) { zval *zpath, *zflags; spl_filesystem_object *intern = (spl_filesystem_object*)zend_object_store_get_object(getThis() TSRMLS_CC); spl_filesystem_object *subdir; char slash = SPL_HAS_FLAG(intern->flags, SPL_FILE_DIR_UNIXPATHS) ? '/' : DEFAULT_SLASH; if ...
SPL_METHOD(RecursiveDirectoryIterator, getChildren) { zval *zpath, *zflags; spl_filesystem_object *intern = (spl_filesystem_object*)zend_object_store_get_object(getThis() TSRMLS_CC); spl_filesystem_object *subdir; char slash = SPL_HAS_FLAG(intern->flags, SPL_FILE_DIR_UNIXPATHS) ? '/' : DEFAULT_SLASH; if (zend...
167,045
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: static int ne2000_buffer_full(NE2000State *s) { int avail, index, boundary; index = s->curpag << 8; boundary = s->boundary << 8; if (index < boundary) return 1; return 0; } Commit Message: CWE ID: CWE-20
static int ne2000_buffer_full(NE2000State *s) { int avail, index, boundary; if (s->stop <= s->start) { return 1; } index = s->curpag << 8; boundary = s->boundary << 8; if (index < boundary) return 1; return 0; }
165,184
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: linkaddr_string(netdissect_options *ndo, const u_char *ep, const unsigned int type, const unsigned int len) { register u_int i; register char *cp; register struct enamemem *tp; if (len == 0) return ("<empty>"); if (type == LINKADDR_ETHER && len == ETHER_ADDR_LEN) return (etheraddr_string(ndo, e...
linkaddr_string(netdissect_options *ndo, const u_char *ep, const unsigned int type, const unsigned int len) { register u_int i; register char *cp; register struct bsnamemem *tp; if (len == 0) return ("<empty>"); if (type == LINKADDR_ETHER && len == ETHER_ADDR_LEN) return (etheraddr_string(ndo, ep)); ...
167,959
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: static double ipow( double n, int exp ) { double r; if ( exp < 0 ) return 1.0 / ipow( n, -exp ); r = 1; while ( exp > 0 ) { if ( exp & 1 ) r *= n; exp >>= 1; n *= n; } return r; } Commit Message: Fix a buffer overflow / heap corruption issue that could occur if a malformed JSON string was pa...
static double ipow( double n, int exp ) /* Parse the input text to generate a number, and populate the result into item. */ static const char *parse_number(cJSON *item,const char *num) { double n=0,sign=1,scale=0;int subscale=0,signsubscale=1; if (*num=='-') sign=-1,num++; /* Has sign? */ if (*num=='0') num++; ...
167,300
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: static ssize_t stellaris_enet_receive(NetClientState *nc, const uint8_t *buf, size_t size) { stellaris_enet_state *s = qemu_get_nic_opaque(nc); int n; uint8_t *p; uint32_t crc; if ((s->rctl & SE_RCTL_RXEN) == 0) return -1; if (s->np >= 31) { return 0; } DPRINTF("R...
static ssize_t stellaris_enet_receive(NetClientState *nc, const uint8_t *buf, size_t size) { stellaris_enet_state *s = qemu_get_nic_opaque(nc); int n; uint8_t *p; uint32_t crc; if ((s->rctl & SE_RCTL_RXEN) == 0) return -1; if (s->np >= 31) { return 0; } DPRINTF("Receive...
165,078
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: static void update_open_stateflags(struct nfs4_state *state, mode_t open_flags) { switch (open_flags) { case FMODE_WRITE: state->n_wronly++; break; case FMODE_READ: state->n_rdonly++; break; case FMODE_READ|FMODE_WRITE: state->n_rdwr++; } nfs4_state_set_mode_locked(state, state->sta...
static void update_open_stateflags(struct nfs4_state *state, mode_t open_flags) static void update_open_stateflags(struct nfs4_state *state, fmode_t fmode) { switch (fmode) { case FMODE_WRITE: state->n_wronly++; break; case FMODE_READ: state->n_rdonly++; break; case FMODE_READ|FMODE_WRITE: s...
165,707
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: decode_bundle(bool load, const struct nx_action_bundle *nab, const struct vl_mff_map *vl_mff_map, uint64_t *tlv_bitmap, struct ofpbuf *ofpacts) { static struct vlog_rate_limit rl = VLOG_RATE_LIMIT_INIT(1, 5); struct ofpact_bundle *bundle; uint32_t slave_type; size_t sla...
decode_bundle(bool load, const struct nx_action_bundle *nab, const struct vl_mff_map *vl_mff_map, uint64_t *tlv_bitmap, struct ofpbuf *ofpacts) { static struct vlog_rate_limit rl = VLOG_RATE_LIMIT_INIT(1, 5); struct ofpact_bundle *bundle; uint32_t slave_type; size_t slaves_si...
169,023
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: static void svc_rdma_get_write_arrays(struct rpcrdma_msg *rmsgp, struct rpcrdma_write_array **write, struct rpcrdma_write_array **reply) { __be32 *p; p = (__be32 *)&rmsgp->rm_body.rm_chunks[0]; /* Read list */ while (*p++ != xdr_zero) p += 5; /* Write list */ if (*p != xdr...
static void svc_rdma_get_write_arrays(struct rpcrdma_msg *rmsgp, static void svc_rdma_get_write_arrays(__be32 *rdma_argp, __be32 **write, __be32 **reply) { __be32 *p; p = rdma_argp + rpcrdma_fixed_maxsz; /* Read list */ while (*p++ != xdr_zero) p += 5; /* Write list */ if (*p != xdr_zero)...
168,172
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: status_t OMXNodeInstance::allocateBuffer( OMX_U32 portIndex, size_t size, OMX::buffer_id *buffer, void **buffer_data) { Mutex::Autolock autoLock(mLock); BufferMeta *buffer_meta = new BufferMeta(size); OMX_BUFFERHEADERTYPE *header; OMX_ERRORTYPE err = OMX_AllocateBuffer( ...
status_t OMXNodeInstance::allocateBuffer( OMX_U32 portIndex, size_t size, OMX::buffer_id *buffer, void **buffer_data) { Mutex::Autolock autoLock(mLock); BufferMeta *buffer_meta = new BufferMeta(size, portIndex); OMX_BUFFERHEADERTYPE *header; OMX_ERRORTYPE err = OMX_AllocateBuff...
173,524
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: image_transform_png_set_@_mod(PNG_CONST image_transform *this, image_pixel *that, png_const_structp pp, PNG_CONST transform_display *display) { this->next->mod(this->next, that, pp, display); } Commit Message: DO NOT MERGE Update libpng to 1.6.20 BUG:23265085 Change-Id: I85199805636d771f3597b691b63bc...
image_transform_png_set_@_mod(PNG_CONST image_transform *this,
173,601
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: static int futex_wait_requeue_pi(u32 __user *uaddr, unsigned int flags, u32 val, ktime_t *abs_time, u32 bitset, u32 __user *uaddr2) { struct hrtimer_sleeper timeout, *to = NULL; struct rt_mutex_waiter rt_waiter; struct rt_mutex *pi_mutex = NULL; struct futex_hash_bucket *hb; union futex_key key2 = ...
static int futex_wait_requeue_pi(u32 __user *uaddr, unsigned int flags, u32 val, ktime_t *abs_time, u32 bitset, u32 __user *uaddr2) { struct hrtimer_sleeper timeout, *to = NULL; struct rt_mutex_waiter rt_waiter; struct rt_mutex *pi_mutex = NULL; struct futex_hash_bucket *hb; union futex_key key2 = FUTEX_...
166,548
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: MagickExport MagickBooleanType SetImageType(Image *image,const ImageType type) { const char *artifact; ImageInfo *image_info; MagickBooleanType status; QuantizeInfo *quantize_info; assert(image != (Image *) NULL); if (image->debug != MagickFalse) (void) LogMagickEvent(TraceEven...
MagickExport MagickBooleanType SetImageType(Image *image,const ImageType type) { const char *artifact; ImageInfo *image_info; MagickBooleanType status; QuantizeInfo *quantize_info; assert(image != (Image *) NULL); if (image->debug != MagickFalse) (void) LogMagickEvent(TraceEvent,GetM...
168,776
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: GetOutboundPinholeTimeout(struct upnphttp * h, const char * action, const char * ns) { int r; static const char resp[] = "<u:%sResponse " "xmlns:u=\"%s\">" "<OutboundPinholeTimeout>%d</OutboundPinholeTimeout>" "</u:%sResponse>"; char body[512]; int bodylen; struct NameValueParserData data; char * ...
GetOutboundPinholeTimeout(struct upnphttp * h, const char * action, const char * ns) { int r; static const char resp[] = "<u:%sResponse " "xmlns:u=\"%s\">" "<OutboundPinholeTimeout>%d</OutboundPinholeTimeout>" "</u:%sResponse>"; char body[512]; int bodylen; struct NameValueParserData data; char * int_ip...
169,667
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: int get_scl(void) { return qrio_get_gpio(DEBLOCK_PORT1, DEBLOCK_SCL1); } Commit Message: Merge branch '2020-01-22-master-imports' - Re-add U8500 platform support - Add bcm968360bg support - Assorted Keymile fixes - Other assorted bugfixes CWE ID: CWE-787
int get_scl(void)
169,629
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: logger_get_mask_expanded (struct t_gui_buffer *buffer, const char *mask) { char *mask2, *mask_decoded, *mask_decoded2, *mask_decoded3, *mask_decoded4; char *mask_decoded5; const char *dir_separator; int length; time_t seconds; struct tm *date_tmp; mask2 = NULL; mask_decode...
logger_get_mask_expanded (struct t_gui_buffer *buffer, const char *mask) { char *mask2, *mask3, *mask4, *mask5, *mask6, *mask7; const char *dir_separator; int length; time_t seconds; struct tm *date_tmp; mask2 = NULL; mask3 = NULL; mask4 = NULL; mask5 = NULL; mask6 = NUL...
167,745
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: void PageSerializer::serializeFrame(Frame* frame) { Document* document = frame->document(); KURL url = document->url(); if (!url.isValid() || url.isBlankURL()) { url = urlForBlankFrame(frame); } if (m_resourceURLs.contains(url)) { return; } if (document->isImageDoc...
void PageSerializer::serializeFrame(Frame* frame) { Document* document = frame->document(); KURL url = document->url(); if (!url.isValid() || url.isBlankURL()) { url = urlForBlankFrame(frame); } if (m_resourceURLs.contains(url)) { return; } Vector<Node*> nodes; Seri...
171,570
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: static int packet_set_ring(struct sock *sk, union tpacket_req_u *req_u, int closing, int tx_ring) { struct pgv *pg_vec = NULL; struct packet_sock *po = pkt_sk(sk); int was_running, order = 0; struct packet_ring_buffer *rb; struct sk_buff_head *rb_queue; __be16 num; int err = -EINVAL; /* Added to avoid ...
static int packet_set_ring(struct sock *sk, union tpacket_req_u *req_u, int closing, int tx_ring) { struct pgv *pg_vec = NULL; struct packet_sock *po = pkt_sk(sk); int was_running, order = 0; struct packet_ring_buffer *rb; struct sk_buff_head *rb_queue; __be16 num; int err = -EINVAL; /* Added to avoid minima...
166,909
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: int gdAlphaBlend (int dst, int src) { int src_alpha = gdTrueColorGetAlpha(src); int dst_alpha, alpha, red, green, blue; int src_weight, dst_weight, tot_weight; /* -------------------------------------------------------------------- */ /* Simple cases we want to handle fast. ...
int gdAlphaBlend (int dst, int src) { int src_alpha = gdTrueColorGetAlpha(src); int dst_alpha, alpha, red, green, blue; int src_weight, dst_weight, tot_weight; /* -------------------------------------------------------------------- */ /* Simple cases we want to handle fast. ...
167,124
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: static int t220_frontend_attach(struct dvb_usb_adapter *d) { u8 obuf[3] = { 0xe, 0x87, 0 }; u8 ibuf[] = { 0 }; if (dvb_usb_generic_rw(d->dev, obuf, 3, ibuf, 1, 0) < 0) err("command 0x0e transfer failed."); obuf[0] = 0xe; obuf[1] = 0x86; obuf[2] = 1; if (dvb_usb_generic_rw(d->dev, obuf, 3, ibuf, 1...
static int t220_frontend_attach(struct dvb_usb_adapter *d) static int t220_frontend_attach(struct dvb_usb_adapter *adap) { struct dvb_usb_device *d = adap->dev; struct dw2102_state *state = d->priv; mutex_lock(&d->data_mutex); state->data[0] = 0xe; state->data[1] = 0x87; state->data[2] = 0x0; if (dvb_usb_ge...
168,228
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: static int futex_wait_requeue_pi(u32 __user *uaddr, unsigned int flags, u32 val, ktime_t *abs_time, u32 bitset, u32 __user *uaddr2) { struct hrtimer_sleeper timeout, *to = NULL; struct rt_mutex_waiter rt_waiter; struct rt_mutex *pi_mutex = NULL; struct futex_hash_bucket *hb; union futex_key key2 = ...
static int futex_wait_requeue_pi(u32 __user *uaddr, unsigned int flags, u32 val, ktime_t *abs_time, u32 bitset, u32 __user *uaddr2) { struct hrtimer_sleeper timeout, *to = NULL; struct rt_mutex_waiter rt_waiter; struct rt_mutex *pi_mutex = NULL; struct futex_hash_bucket *hb; union futex_key key2 = FUTEX_...
166,382
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: void SetManualFallbacksForFilling(bool enabled) { if (enabled) { scoped_feature_list_.InitAndEnableFeature( password_manager::features::kEnableManualFallbacksFilling); } else { scoped_feature_list_.InitAndDisableFeature( password_manager::features::kEnableManualFallb...
void SetManualFallbacksForFilling(bool enabled) { if (enabled) { scoped_feature_list_.InitAndEnableFeature( password_manager::features::kManualFallbacksFilling); } else { scoped_feature_list_.InitAndDisableFeature( password_manager::features::kManualFallbacksFilling); ...
171,750
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: uint8_t* FAST_FUNC udhcp_get_option32(struct dhcp_packet *packet, int code) { uint8_t *r = udhcp_get_option(packet, code); if (r) { if (r[-1] != 4) r = NULL; } return r; } Commit Message: CWE ID: CWE-125
uint8_t* FAST_FUNC udhcp_get_option32(struct dhcp_packet *packet, int code) { uint8_t *r = udhcp_get_option(packet, code); if (r) { if (r[-OPT_DATA + OPT_LEN] != 4) r = NULL; } return r; }
164,942
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: static long vop_ioctl(struct file *f, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg) { struct vop_vdev *vdev = f->private_data; struct vop_info *vi = vdev->vi; void __user *argp = (void __user *)arg; int ret; switch (cmd) { case MIC_VIRTIO_ADD_DEVICE: { struct mic_device_desc dd, *dd_config; if (copy_from_user...
static long vop_ioctl(struct file *f, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg) { struct vop_vdev *vdev = f->private_data; struct vop_info *vi = vdev->vi; void __user *argp = (void __user *)arg; int ret; switch (cmd) { case MIC_VIRTIO_ADD_DEVICE: { struct mic_device_desc dd, *dd_config; if (copy_from_user(&dd, ...
167,132
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: long AudioTrack::Parse(Segment* pSegment, const Info& info, long long element_start, long long element_size, AudioTrack*& pResult) { if (pResult) return -1; if (info.type != Track::kAudio) return -1; IMkvReader* const pReader = pSegment->m_pReader; const Settings& s = info.settings; assert(s.start >=...
long AudioTrack::Parse(Segment* pSegment, const Info& info, long long element_start, long long element_size, AudioTrack*& pResult) { if (pResult) return -1; if (info.type != Track::kAudio) return -1; IMkvReader* const pReader = pSegment->m_pReader; const Settings& s = info.settings; assert(s.start >= 0); ...
173,844
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: int tls1_mac(SSL *ssl, SSL3_RECORD *rec, unsigned char *md, int send) { unsigned char *seq; EVP_MD_CTX *hash; size_t md_size; int i; EVP_MD_CTX *hmac = NULL, *mac_ctx; unsigned char header[13]; int stream_mac = (send ? (ssl->mac_flags & SSL_MAC_FLAG_WRITE_MAC_STREAM) ...
int tls1_mac(SSL *ssl, SSL3_RECORD *rec, unsigned char *md, int send) { unsigned char *seq; EVP_MD_CTX *hash; size_t md_size; int i; EVP_MD_CTX *hmac = NULL, *mac_ctx; unsigned char header[13]; int stream_mac = (send ? (ssl->mac_flags & SSL_MAC_FLAG_WRITE_MAC_STREAM) : ...
168,424
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: static int64_t http_seek_internal(URLContext *h, int64_t off, int whence, int force_reconnect) { HTTPContext *s = h->priv_data; URLContext *old_hd = s->hd; int64_t old_off = s->off; uint8_t old_buf[BUFFER_SIZE]; int old_buf_size, ret; AVDictionary *options = NULL; if (whence == ...
static int64_t http_seek_internal(URLContext *h, int64_t off, int whence, int force_reconnect) { HTTPContext *s = h->priv_data; URLContext *old_hd = s->hd; uint64_t old_off = s->off; uint8_t old_buf[BUFFER_SIZE]; int old_buf_size, ret; AVDictionary *options = NULL; if (whence == AVSEE...
168,502
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: foreach_nfs_shareopt(const char *shareopts, nfs_shareopt_callback_t callback, void *cookie) { char *shareopts_dup, *opt, *cur, *value; int was_nul, rc; if (shareopts == NULL) return (SA_OK); shareopts_dup = strdup(shareopts); if (shareopts_dup == NULL) return (SA_NO_MEMORY); opt = shareopts_dup; wa...
foreach_nfs_shareopt(const char *shareopts,
170,133
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: void OmniboxEditModel::RestoreState(const State* state) { controller_->GetToolbarModel()->set_url_replacement_enabled( !state || state->url_replacement_enabled); permanent_text_ = controller_->GetToolbarModel()->GetText(); view_->RevertWithoutResettingSearchTermReplacement(); input_ = state ? sta...
void OmniboxEditModel::RestoreState(const State* state) { bool url_replacement_enabled = !state || state->url_replacement_enabled; controller_->GetToolbarModel()->set_url_replacement_enabled( url_replacement_enabled); controller_->GetToolbarModel()->set_origin_chip_enabled( url_replacement_enabled);...
171,175
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: uint64_t esp_reg_read(ESPState *s, uint32_t saddr) { uint32_t old_val; trace_esp_mem_readb(saddr, s->rregs[saddr]); switch (saddr) { case ESP_FIFO: if (s->ti_size > 0) { s->ti_size--; if ((s->rregs[ESP_RSTAT] & STAT_PIO_MASK) == 0) { /* Data out...
uint64_t esp_reg_read(ESPState *s, uint32_t saddr) { uint32_t old_val; trace_esp_mem_readb(saddr, s->rregs[saddr]); switch (saddr) { case ESP_FIFO: if ((s->rregs[ESP_RSTAT] & STAT_PIO_MASK) == 0) { /* Data out. */ qemu_log_mask(LOG_UNIMP, "esp: PIO data read not impl...
165,012
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: static void *arm_coherent_dma_alloc(struct device *dev, size_t size, dma_addr_t *handle, gfp_t gfp, struct dma_attrs *attrs) { pgprot_t prot = __get_dma_pgprot(attrs, pgprot_kernel); void *memory; if (dma_alloc_from_coherent(dev, size, handle, &memory)) return memory; return __dma_alloc(dev, size, ...
static void *arm_coherent_dma_alloc(struct device *dev, size_t size, dma_addr_t *handle, gfp_t gfp, struct dma_attrs *attrs) { pgprot_t prot = __get_dma_pgprot(attrs, PAGE_KERNEL); void *memory; if (dma_alloc_from_coherent(dev, size, handle, &memory)) return memory; return __dma_alloc(dev, size, handle, ...
167,577
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: static int dns_parse_callback(void *c, int rr, const void *data, int len, const void *packet) { char tmp[256]; struct dpc_ctx *ctx = c; switch (rr) { case RR_A: if (len != 4) return -1; ctx->addrs[ctx->cnt].scopeid = 0; memcpy(ctx->addrs[ctx->cnt++].addr, data, 4); break; case RR_AAAA: if (le...
static int dns_parse_callback(void *c, int rr, const void *data, int len, const void *packet) { char tmp[256]; struct dpc_ctx *ctx = c; if (ctx->cnt >= MAXADDRS) return -1; switch (rr) { case RR_A: if (len != 4) return -1; ctx->addrs[ctx->cnt].scopeid = 0; memcpy(ctx->addrs[ctx->cnt++].addr, data, 4); ...
164,652
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: Compositor::Compositor(const viz::FrameSinkId& frame_sink_id, ui::ContextFactory* context_factory, ui::ContextFactoryPrivate* context_factory_private, scoped_refptr<base::SingleThreadTaskRunner> task_runner, bool enable_su...
Compositor::Compositor(const viz::FrameSinkId& frame_sink_id, ui::ContextFactory* context_factory, ui::ContextFactoryPrivate* context_factory_private, scoped_refptr<base::SingleThreadTaskRunner> task_runner, bool enable_surface_...
172,562
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: usage(const char *prog) { /* ANSI C-90 limits strings to 509 characters, so use a string array: */ size_t i; static const char *usage_string[] = { " Tests, optimizes and optionally fixes the zlib header in PNG files.", " Optionally, when fixing, strips ancilliary chunks from the file.", 0, "OPTIONS", " OPER...
usage(const char *prog) { /* ANSI C-90 limits strings to 509 characters, so use a string array: */ size_t i; static const char *usage_string[] = { " Tests, optimizes and optionally fixes the zlib header in PNG files.", " Optionally, when fixing, strips ancilliary chunks from the file.", 0, "OPTIONS", " OPERATION"...
173,739
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: ExtensionTtsController* ExtensionTtsController::GetInstance() { return Singleton<ExtensionTtsController>::get(); } Commit Message: Extend TTS extension API to support richer events returned from the engine to the client. Previously we just had a completed event; this adds start, word boundary, sentence boundar...
ExtensionTtsController* ExtensionTtsController::GetInstance() {
170,379
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: static inline int mk_vhost_fdt_open(int id, unsigned int hash, struct session_request *sr) { int i; int fd; struct vhost_fdt_hash_table *ht = NULL; struct vhost_fdt_hash_chain *hc; if (config->fdt == MK_FALSE) { return open(sr->real_path.data, sr->f...
static inline int mk_vhost_fdt_open(int id, unsigned int hash, struct session_request *sr) { int i; int fd; struct vhost_fdt_hash_table *ht = NULL; struct vhost_fdt_hash_chain *hc; if (config->fdt == MK_FALSE) { return open(sr->real_path.data, sr->file_in...
166,279
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: void WT_VoiceFilter (S_FILTER_CONTROL *pFilter, S_WT_INT_FRAME *pWTIntFrame) { EAS_PCM *pAudioBuffer; EAS_I32 k; EAS_I32 b1; EAS_I32 b2; EAS_I32 z1; EAS_I32 z2; EAS_I32 acc0; EAS_I32 acc1; EAS_I32 numSamples; /* initialize some local variables */ numSamples = pWTIn...
void WT_VoiceFilter (S_FILTER_CONTROL *pFilter, S_WT_INT_FRAME *pWTIntFrame) { EAS_PCM *pAudioBuffer; EAS_I32 k; EAS_I32 b1; EAS_I32 b2; EAS_I32 z1; EAS_I32 z2; EAS_I32 acc0; EAS_I32 acc1; EAS_I32 numSamples; /* initialize some local variables */ numSamples = pWTIntFrame...
173,921
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: void DaemonProcess::OnChannelConnected() { DCHECK(caller_task_runner()->BelongsToCurrentThread()); DeleteAllDesktopSessions(); next_terminal_id_ = 0; SendToNetwork( new ChromotingDaemonNetworkMsg_Configuration(serialized_config_)); } Commit Message: Validate and report peer's PID to WorkerPro...
void DaemonProcess::OnChannelConnected() { void DaemonProcess::OnChannelConnected(int32 peer_pid) { DCHECK(caller_task_runner()->BelongsToCurrentThread()); DeleteAllDesktopSessions(); next_terminal_id_ = 0; SendToNetwork( new ChromotingDaemonNetworkMsg_Configuration(serialized_config_)); }
171,540
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: ID3::getAlbumArt(size_t *length, String8 *mime) const { *length = 0; mime->setTo(""); Iterator it( *this, (mVersion == ID3_V2_3 || mVersion == ID3_V2_4) ? "APIC" : "PIC"); while (!it.done()) { size_t size; const uint8_t *data = it.getData(&size); if (!data) { return NULL; } if (mVersio...
ID3::getAlbumArt(size_t *length, String8 *mime) const { *length = 0; mime->setTo(""); Iterator it( *this, (mVersion == ID3_V2_3 || mVersion == ID3_V2_4) ? "APIC" : "PIC"); while (!it.done()) { size_t size; const uint8_t *data = it.getData(&size); if (!data) { return NULL; } if (mVersion == I...
174,062
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: static void exitErrorHandler(jpeg_common_struct *error) { j_decompress_ptr cinfo = (j_decompress_ptr)error; str_src_mgr * src = (struct str_src_mgr *)cinfo->src; src->abort = true; } Commit Message: CWE ID: CWE-20
static void exitErrorHandler(jpeg_common_struct *error) { j_decompress_ptr cinfo = (j_decompress_ptr)error; str_src_mgr * src = (struct str_src_mgr *)cinfo->src; longjmp(src->setjmp_buffer, 1); }
165,392
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: bool IsIDNComponentSafe(base::StringPiece16 label) { return g_idn_spoof_checker.Get().Check(label); } Commit Message: Block domain labels made of Cyrillic letters that look alike Latin Block a label made entirely of Latin-look-alike Cyrillic letters when the TLD is not an IDN (i.e. this check is ON only for ...
bool IsIDNComponentSafe(base::StringPiece16 label) { bool IsIDNComponentSafe(base::StringPiece16 label, bool is_tld_ascii) { return g_idn_spoof_checker.Get().Check(label, is_tld_ascii); }
172,392