instruction
stringclasses
1 value
input
stringlengths
90
9.34k
output
stringlengths
16
15.4k
__index_level_0__
int64
165k
175k
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: static int cp2112_gpio_direction_output(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned offset, int value) { struct cp2112_device *dev = gpiochip_get_data(chip); struct hid_device *hdev = dev->hdev; u8 *buf = dev->in_out_buffer; unsigned long flags; int ret; spin_lock_irqsave(&dev->lock, flags); ret = hid_h...
static int cp2112_gpio_direction_output(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned offset, int value) { struct cp2112_device *dev = gpiochip_get_data(chip); struct hid_device *hdev = dev->hdev; u8 *buf = dev->in_out_buffer; int ret; mutex_lock(&dev->lock); ret = hid_hw_raw_request(hdev, CP2112_GPIO_CONFIG, bu...
168,209
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: static ssize_t __nfs4_get_acl_uncached(struct inode *inode, void *buf, size_t buflen) { struct page *pages[NFS4ACL_MAXPAGES] = {NULL, }; struct nfs_getaclargs args = { .fh = NFS_FH(inode), .acl_pages = pages, .acl_len = buflen, }; struct nfs_getaclres res = { .acl_len = buflen, }; struct rpc_message...
static ssize_t __nfs4_get_acl_uncached(struct inode *inode, void *buf, size_t buflen) { struct page *pages[NFS4ACL_MAXPAGES] = {NULL, }; struct nfs_getaclargs args = { .fh = NFS_FH(inode), .acl_pages = pages, .acl_len = buflen, }; struct nfs_getaclres res = { .acl_len = buflen, }; struct rpc_message msg =...
165,956
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: bool WebRequestPermissions::HideRequest( const extensions::InfoMap* extension_info_map, const extensions::WebRequestInfo& request) { if (request.is_web_view) return false; if (request.is_pac_request) return true; bool is_request_from_browser = request.render_process_id == -1; bool is_r...
bool WebRequestPermissions::HideRequest( const extensions::InfoMap* extension_info_map, const extensions::WebRequestInfo& request) { if (request.is_web_view) return false; if (request.is_pac_request) return true; bool is_request_from_browser = request.render_process_id == -1 && // B...
172,672
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: image_transform_default_add(image_transform *this, PNG_CONST image_transform **that, png_byte colour_type, png_byte bit_depth) { UNUSED(colour_type) UNUSED(bit_depth) this->next = *that; *that = this; return 1; } Commit Message: DO NOT MERGE Update libpng to 1.6.20 BUG:23265085 Change-Id: I85...
image_transform_default_add(image_transform *this, const image_transform **that, png_byte colour_type, png_byte bit_depth) { UNUSED(colour_type) UNUSED(bit_depth) this->next = *that; *that = this; return 1; }
173,620
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: bool ContextualSearchFieldTrial::IsNowOnTapBarIntegrationEnabled() { return GetBooleanParam( switches::kEnableContextualSearchNowOnTapBarIntegration, &is_now_on_tap_bar_integration_enabled_cached_, &is_now_on_tap_bar_integration_enabled_); } Commit Message: [Contextual Search] Change "Now o...
bool ContextualSearchFieldTrial::IsNowOnTapBarIntegrationEnabled() { bool ContextualSearchFieldTrial::IsContextualCardsBarIntegrationEnabled() { return GetBooleanParam( switches::kEnableContextualSearchContextualCardsBarIntegration, &is_contextual_cards_bar_integration_enabled_cached_, &is_contextu...
171,644
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: void RenderWidgetHostViewGtk::AcceleratedSurfacePostSubBuffer( const GpuHostMsg_AcceleratedSurfacePostSubBuffer_Params& params, int gpu_host_id) { RenderWidgetHostImpl::AcknowledgeBufferPresent( params.route_id, gpu_host_id, true, 0); } Commit Message: Implement TextureImageTransportSurface ...
void RenderWidgetHostViewGtk::AcceleratedSurfacePostSubBuffer( const GpuHostMsg_AcceleratedSurfacePostSubBuffer_Params& params, int gpu_host_id) { RenderWidgetHostImpl::AcknowledgeBufferPresent( params.route_id, gpu_host_id, params.surface_handle, 0); }
171,391
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: gfx::Rect AutofillPopupBaseView::CalculateClippingBounds() const { if (parent_widget_) return parent_widget_->GetClientAreaBoundsInScreen(); return PopupViewCommon().GetWindowBounds(delegate_->container_view()); } Commit Message: [Autofill] Remove AutofillPopupViewViews and associated feature. Bug: 9061...
gfx::Rect AutofillPopupBaseView::CalculateClippingBounds() const {
172,093
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: static int gs_usb_probe(struct usb_interface *intf, const struct usb_device_id *id) { struct gs_usb *dev; int rc = -ENOMEM; unsigned int icount, i; struct gs_host_config hconf = { .byte_order = 0x0000beef, }; struct gs_device_config dconf; /* send host config */ rc = usb_control_msg(interface_...
static int gs_usb_probe(struct usb_interface *intf, const struct usb_device_id *id) { struct gs_usb *dev; int rc = -ENOMEM; unsigned int icount, i; struct gs_host_config *hconf; struct gs_device_config *dconf; hconf = kmalloc(sizeof(*hconf), GFP_KERNEL); if (!hconf) return -ENOMEM; hconf->byte_order =...
168,220
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: static void enable_nmi_window(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) { struct vcpu_svm *svm = to_svm(vcpu); if ((svm->vcpu.arch.hflags & (HF_NMI_MASK | HF_IRET_MASK)) == HF_NMI_MASK) return; /* IRET will cause a vm exit */ /* * Something prevents NMI from been injected. Single step over possible * problem (IRET o...
static void enable_nmi_window(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) { struct vcpu_svm *svm = to_svm(vcpu); if ((svm->vcpu.arch.hflags & (HF_NMI_MASK | HF_IRET_MASK)) == HF_NMI_MASK) return; /* IRET will cause a vm exit */ /* * Something prevents NMI from been injected. Single step over possible * problem (IRET or exce...
166,569
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: void RunFwdTxfm(const int16_t *in, int16_t *out, int stride) { fwd_txfm_(in, out, stride, tx_type_); } Commit Message: Merge Conflict Fix CL to lmp-mr1-release for ag/849478 DO NOT MERGE - libvpx: Pull from upstream Current HEAD: 7105df53d7dc13d5e575bc8df714ec8d1da36b06 BUG=23452792 Change-Id: Ic78...
void RunFwdTxfm(const int16_t *in, int16_t *out, int stride) { void RunFwdTxfm(const int16_t *in, tran_low_t *out, int stride) { fwd_txfm_(in, out, stride, tx_type_); }
174,550
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: void AppControllerImpl::BindRequest(mojom::AppControllerRequest request) { bindings_.AddBinding(this, std::move(request)); } Commit Message: Refactor the AppController implementation into a KeyedService. This is necessary to guarantee that the AppController will not outlive the AppServiceProxy, which could ...
void AppControllerImpl::BindRequest(mojom::AppControllerRequest request) { void AppControllerService::BindRequest(mojom::AppControllerRequest request) { bindings_.AddBinding(this, std::move(request)); }
172,080
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: formUpdateBuffer(Anchor *a, Buffer *buf, FormItemList *form) { Buffer save; char *p; int spos, epos, rows, c_rows, pos, col = 0; Line *l; copyBuffer(&save, buf); gotoLine(buf, a->start.line); switch (form->type) { case FORM_TEXTAREA: case FORM_INPUT_TEXT: case FORM_INPUT_F...
formUpdateBuffer(Anchor *a, Buffer *buf, FormItemList *form) { Buffer save; char *p; int spos, epos, rows, c_rows, pos, col = 0; Line *l; copyBuffer(&save, buf); gotoLine(buf, a->start.line); switch (form->type) { case FORM_TEXTAREA: case FORM_INPUT_TEXT: case FORM_INPUT_FILE: ...
169,347
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: bool dstBufferSizeHasOverflow(ParsedOptions options) { CheckedNumeric<size_t> totalBytes = options.cropRect.width(); totalBytes *= options.cropRect.height(); totalBytes *= options.bytesPerPixel; if (!totalBytes.IsValid()) return true; if (!options.shouldScaleInput) return false; totalByte...
bool dstBufferSizeHasOverflow(ParsedOptions options) { CheckedNumeric<unsigned> totalBytes = options.cropRect.width(); totalBytes *= options.cropRect.height(); totalBytes *= options.bytesPerPixel; if (!totalBytes.IsValid()) return true; if (!options.shouldScaleInput) return false; totalBytes = ...
172,501
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: void VRDisplay::OnBlur() { display_blurred_ = true; vr_v_sync_provider_.reset(); navigator_vr_->EnqueueVREvent(VRDisplayEvent::Create( EventTypeNames::vrdisplayblur, true, false, this, "")); } Commit Message: WebVR: fix initial vsync Applications sometimes use window.rAF while not presenting, ...
void VRDisplay::OnBlur() { DVLOG(1) << __FUNCTION__; display_blurred_ = true; vr_v_sync_provider_.reset(); navigator_vr_->EnqueueVREvent(VRDisplayEvent::Create( EventTypeNames::vrdisplayblur, true, false, this, "")); }
171,994
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: ext2_xattr_delete_inode(struct inode *inode) { struct buffer_head *bh = NULL; struct mb_cache_entry *ce; down_write(&EXT2_I(inode)->xattr_sem); if (!EXT2_I(inode)->i_file_acl) goto cleanup; bh = sb_bread(inode->i_sb, EXT2_I(inode)->i_file_acl); if (!bh) { ext2_error(inode->i_sb, "ext2_xattr_delet...
ext2_xattr_delete_inode(struct inode *inode) { struct buffer_head *bh = NULL; down_write(&EXT2_I(inode)->xattr_sem); if (!EXT2_I(inode)->i_file_acl) goto cleanup; bh = sb_bread(inode->i_sb, EXT2_I(inode)->i_file_acl); if (!bh) { ext2_error(inode->i_sb, "ext2_xattr_delete_inode", "inode %ld: block %d ...
169,979
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: static int do_mq_notify(mqd_t mqdes, const struct sigevent *notification) { int ret; struct fd f; struct sock *sock; struct inode *inode; struct mqueue_inode_info *info; struct sk_buff *nc; audit_mq_notify(mqdes, notification); nc = NULL; sock = NULL; if (notification != NULL) { if (unlikely(notific...
static int do_mq_notify(mqd_t mqdes, const struct sigevent *notification) { int ret; struct fd f; struct sock *sock; struct inode *inode; struct mqueue_inode_info *info; struct sk_buff *nc; audit_mq_notify(mqdes, notification); nc = NULL; sock = NULL; if (notification != NULL) { if (unlikely(notification-...
168,047
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: bool initiate_stratum(struct pool *pool) { bool ret = false, recvd = false, noresume = false, sockd = false; char s[RBUFSIZE], *sret = NULL, *nonce1, *sessionid; json_t *val = NULL, *res_val, *err_val; json_error_t err; int n2size; resend: if (!setup_stratum_socket(pool)) { /* FIXME: change to LOG_DEBUG ...
bool initiate_stratum(struct pool *pool) { bool ret = false, recvd = false, noresume = false, sockd = false; char s[RBUFSIZE], *sret = NULL, *nonce1, *sessionid; json_t *val = NULL, *res_val, *err_val; json_error_t err; int n2size; resend: if (!setup_stratum_socket(pool)) { /* FIXME: change to LOG_DEBUG when i...
169,906
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: static int sanity_check_raw_super(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct buffer_head *bh) { struct f2fs_super_block *raw_super = (struct f2fs_super_block *) (bh->b_data + F2FS_SUPER_OFFSET); struct super_block *sb = sbi->sb; unsigned int blocksize; if (F2FS_SUPER_MAGIC != le32_to_cpu(raw_super->magic)) { ...
static int sanity_check_raw_super(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct buffer_head *bh) { struct f2fs_super_block *raw_super = (struct f2fs_super_block *) (bh->b_data + F2FS_SUPER_OFFSET); struct super_block *sb = sbi->sb; unsigned int blocksize; if (F2FS_SUPER_MAGIC != le32_to_cpu(raw_super->magic)) { f2fs...
168,065
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: v8::Local<v8::Value> ModuleSystem::RequireForJsInner( v8::Local<v8::String> module_name) { v8::EscapableHandleScope handle_scope(GetIsolate()); v8::Local<v8::Context> v8_context = context()->v8_context(); v8::Context::Scope context_scope(v8_context); v8::Local<v8::Object> global(context()->v8_context...
v8::Local<v8::Value> ModuleSystem::RequireForJsInner( v8::Local<v8::String> module_name) { v8::EscapableHandleScope handle_scope(GetIsolate()); v8::Local<v8::Context> v8_context = context()->v8_context(); v8::Context::Scope context_scope(v8_context); v8::Local<v8::Object> global(context()->v8_context()->Gl...
173,268
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: static int __init xfrm6_tunnel_init(void) { int rv; rv = xfrm_register_type(&xfrm6_tunnel_type, AF_INET6); if (rv < 0) goto err; rv = xfrm6_tunnel_register(&xfrm6_tunnel_handler, AF_INET6); if (rv < 0) goto unreg; rv = xfrm6_tunnel_register(&xfrm46_tunnel_handler, AF_INET); if (rv < 0) goto...
static int __init xfrm6_tunnel_init(void) { int rv; xfrm6_tunnel_spi_kmem = kmem_cache_create("xfrm6_tunnel_spi", sizeof(struct xfrm6_tunnel_spi), 0, SLAB_HWCACHE_ALIGN, NULL); if (!xfrm6_tunnel_spi_kmem) return -ENOMEM; rv = register_pernet_subsys(&xfrm6_tunnel_net_ops); if (rv < 0) ...
165,880
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: void MediaStreamDispatcherHost::DoOpenDevice( int32_t page_request_id, const std::string& device_id, MediaStreamType type, OpenDeviceCallback callback, MediaDeviceSaltAndOrigin salt_and_origin) { DCHECK_CURRENTLY_ON(BrowserThread::IO); if (!MediaStreamManager::IsOriginAllowed(render_proces...
void MediaStreamDispatcherHost::DoOpenDevice( int32_t page_request_id, const std::string& device_id, MediaStreamType type, OpenDeviceCallback callback, MediaDeviceSaltAndOrigin salt_and_origin) { DCHECK_CURRENTLY_ON(BrowserThread::IO); if (!MediaStreamManager::IsOriginAllowed(render_process_id_,...
173,095
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: DevToolsUI::DevToolsUI(content::WebUI* web_ui) : WebUIController(web_ui), bindings_(web_ui->GetWebContents()) { web_ui->SetBindings(0); Profile* profile = Profile::FromWebUI(web_ui); content::URLDataSource::Add( profile, new DevToolsDataSource(profile->GetRequestContext())); } ...
DevToolsUI::DevToolsUI(content::WebUI* web_ui) : WebUIController(web_ui) { web_ui->SetBindings(0); Profile* profile = Profile::FromWebUI(web_ui); content::URLDataSource::Add( profile, new DevToolsDataSource(profile->GetRequestContext())); GURL url = web_ui->GetWebContents()->GetVisibleURL...
172,510
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: int jas_memdump(FILE *out, void *data, size_t len) { size_t i; size_t j; uchar *dp; dp = data; for (i = 0; i < len; i += 16) { fprintf(out, "%04zx:", i); for (j = 0; j < 16; ++j) { if (i + j < len) { fprintf(out, " %02x", dp[i + j]); } } fprintf(out, "\n"); } return 0; } Commit Mes...
int jas_memdump(FILE *out, void *data, size_t len) { size_t i; size_t j; jas_uchar *dp; dp = data; for (i = 0; i < len; i += 16) { fprintf(out, "%04zx:", i); for (j = 0; j < 16; ++j) { if (i + j < len) { fprintf(out, " %02x", dp[i + j]); } } fprintf(out, "\n"); } return 0; }
168,682
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: INST_HANDLER (sts) { // STS k, Rr int r = ((buf[0] >> 4) & 0xf) | ((buf[1] & 0x1) << 4); int k = (buf[3] << 8) | buf[2]; op->ptr = k; ESIL_A ("r%d,", r); __generic_ld_st (op, "ram", 0, 1, 0, k, 1); op->cycles = 2; } Commit Message: Fix #10091 - crash in AVR analysis CWE ID: CWE-125
INST_HANDLER (sts) { // STS k, Rr if (len < 4) { return; } int r = ((buf[0] >> 4) & 0xf) | ((buf[1] & 0x1) << 4); int k = (buf[3] << 8) | buf[2]; op->ptr = k; ESIL_A ("r%d,", r); __generic_ld_st (op, "ram", 0, 1, 0, k, 1); op->cycles = 2; }
169,223
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: OMX_ERRORTYPE SoftVorbis::internalGetParameter( OMX_INDEXTYPE index, OMX_PTR params) { switch (index) { case OMX_IndexParamAudioVorbis: { OMX_AUDIO_PARAM_VORBISTYPE *vorbisParams = (OMX_AUDIO_PARAM_VORBISTYPE *)params; if (vorbisParams->nPortIndex != 0) { ...
OMX_ERRORTYPE SoftVorbis::internalGetParameter( OMX_INDEXTYPE index, OMX_PTR params) { switch (index) { case OMX_IndexParamAudioVorbis: { OMX_AUDIO_PARAM_VORBISTYPE *vorbisParams = (OMX_AUDIO_PARAM_VORBISTYPE *)params; if (!isValidOMXParam(vorbisParams)) { ...
174,220
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: void ColorChooserDialog::DidCloseDialog(bool chose_color, SkColor color, RunState run_state) { if (!listener_) return; EndRun(run_state); CopyCustomColors(custom_colors_, g_custom_colors); if (chose_color) listene...
void ColorChooserDialog::DidCloseDialog(bool chose_color, SkColor color, RunState run_state) { EndRun(run_state); CopyCustomColors(custom_colors_, g_custom_colors); if (listener_) { if (chose_color) listener_->OnColorCh...
171,187
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: bool asn1_write_GeneralString(struct asn1_data *data, const char *s) { asn1_push_tag(data, ASN1_GENERAL_STRING); asn1_write_LDAPString(data, s); asn1_pop_tag(data); return !data->has_error; } Commit Message: CWE ID: CWE-399
bool asn1_write_GeneralString(struct asn1_data *data, const char *s) { if (!asn1_push_tag(data, ASN1_GENERAL_STRING)) return false; if (!asn1_write_LDAPString(data, s)) return false; return asn1_pop_tag(data); }
164,589
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: DefragVlanQinQTest(void) { Packet *p1 = NULL, *p2 = NULL, *r = NULL; int ret = 0; DefragInit(); p1 = BuildTestPacket(1, 0, 1, 'A', 8); if (p1 == NULL) goto end; p2 = BuildTestPacket(1, 1, 0, 'B', 8); if (p2 == NULL) goto end; /* With no VLAN IDs set, pack...
DefragVlanQinQTest(void) { Packet *p1 = NULL, *p2 = NULL, *r = NULL; int ret = 0; DefragInit(); p1 = BuildTestPacket(IPPROTO_ICMP, 1, 0, 1, 'A', 8); if (p1 == NULL) goto end; p2 = BuildTestPacket(IPPROTO_ICMP, 1, 1, 0, 'B', 8); if (p2 == NULL) goto end; /* With...
168,305
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: gamma_test(png_modifier *pmIn, PNG_CONST png_byte colour_typeIn, PNG_CONST png_byte bit_depthIn, PNG_CONST int palette_numberIn, PNG_CONST int interlace_typeIn, PNG_CONST double file_gammaIn, PNG_CONST double screen_gammaIn, PNG_CONST png_byte sbitIn, PNG_CONST int threshold_testIn, PNG_CONST ...
gamma_test(png_modifier *pmIn, PNG_CONST png_byte colour_typeIn, gamma_test(png_modifier *pmIn, const png_byte colour_typeIn, const png_byte bit_depthIn, const int palette_numberIn, const int interlace_typeIn, const double file_gammaIn, const double screen_gammaIn, const png_byte sbitIn, const int thres...
173,614
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: long long Chapters::Atom::GetStopTime(const Chapters* pChapters) const { return GetTime(pChapters, m_stop_timecode); } Commit Message: libwebm: Pull from upstream Rolling mkvparser from upstream. Primarily for fixing a bug on parsing failures with certain Opus WebM files. Upstream commit hash of this pull:...
long long Chapters::Atom::GetStopTime(const Chapters* pChapters) const
174,357
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: int pnm_validate(jas_stream_t *in) { uchar buf[2]; int i; int n; assert(JAS_STREAM_MAXPUTBACK >= 2); /* Read the first two characters that constitute the signature. */ if ((n = jas_stream_read(in, buf, 2)) < 0) { return -1; } /* Put these characters back to the stream. */ for (i = n - 1; i >= 0;...
int pnm_validate(jas_stream_t *in) { jas_uchar buf[2]; int i; int n; assert(JAS_STREAM_MAXPUTBACK >= 2); /* Read the first two characters that constitute the signature. */ if ((n = jas_stream_read(in, buf, 2)) < 0) { return -1; } /* Put these characters back to the stream. */ for (i = n - 1; i >= 0; -...
168,728
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: void ManifestManager::FetchManifest() { manifest_url_ = render_frame()->GetWebFrame()->GetDocument().ManifestURL(); if (manifest_url_.is_empty()) { ManifestUmaUtil::FetchFailed(ManifestUmaUtil::FETCH_EMPTY_URL); ResolveCallbacks(ResolveStateFailure); return; } fetcher_.reset(new Manifest...
void ManifestManager::FetchManifest() { if (!CanFetchManifest(render_frame())) { ManifestUmaUtil::FetchFailed(ManifestUmaUtil::FETCH_FROM_UNIQUE_ORIGIN); ResolveCallbacks(ResolveStateFailure); return; } manifest_url_ = render_frame()->GetWebFrame()->GetDocument().ManifestURL(); if (manifest_ur...
172,921
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: bool_t auth_gssapi_unwrap_data( OM_uint32 *major, OM_uint32 *minor, gss_ctx_id_t context, uint32_t seq_num, XDR *in_xdrs, bool_t (*xdr_func)(), caddr_t xdr_ptr) { gss_buffer_desc in_buf, out_buf; XDR temp_xdrs; uint32_t verf_seq_num; int conf, qop; unsig...
bool_t auth_gssapi_unwrap_data( OM_uint32 *major, OM_uint32 *minor, gss_ctx_id_t context, uint32_t seq_num, XDR *in_xdrs, bool_t (*xdr_func)(), caddr_t xdr_ptr) { gss_buffer_desc in_buf, out_buf; XDR temp_xdrs; uint32_t verf_seq_num; int conf, qop; unsigned in...
166,792
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: StyleResolver::StyleResolver(Document& document) : m_document(document) , m_fontSelector(CSSFontSelector::create(&document)) , m_viewportStyleResolver(ViewportStyleResolver::create(&document)) , m_styleResourceLoader(document.fetcher()) , m_styleResolverStatsSequence(0) , m_accessCount(0...
StyleResolver::StyleResolver(Document& document) : m_document(document) , m_fontSelector(CSSFontSelector::create(&document)) , m_viewportStyleResolver(ViewportStyleResolver::create(&document)) , m_styleResourceLoader(document.fetcher()) , m_styleResolverStatsSequence(0) , m_accessCount(0) { ...
171,584
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: int read_file(struct sc_card *card, char *str_path, unsigned char **data, size_t *data_len) { struct sc_path path; struct sc_file *file; unsigned char *p; int ok = 0; int r; size_t len; sc_format_path(str_path, &path); if (SC_SUCCESS != sc_select_file(card, &path, &file)) { goto err; } len = file...
int read_file(struct sc_card *card, char *str_path, unsigned char **data, size_t *data_len) { struct sc_path path; struct sc_file *file; unsigned char *p; int ok = 0; int r; size_t len; sc_format_path(str_path, &path); if (SC_SUCCESS != sc_select_file(card, &path, &file)) { goto err; } len = file && fi...
169,082
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: sg_write(struct file *filp, const char __user *buf, size_t count, loff_t * ppos) { int mxsize, cmd_size, k; int input_size, blocking; unsigned char opcode; Sg_device *sdp; Sg_fd *sfp; Sg_request *srp; struct sg_header old_hdr; sg_io_hdr_t *hp; unsigned char cmnd[SG_MAX_CDB_SIZE]; if ((!(sfp = (Sg_f...
sg_write(struct file *filp, const char __user *buf, size_t count, loff_t * ppos) { int mxsize, cmd_size, k; int input_size, blocking; unsigned char opcode; Sg_device *sdp; Sg_fd *sfp; Sg_request *srp; struct sg_header old_hdr; sg_io_hdr_t *hp; unsigned char cmnd[SG_MAX_CDB_SIZE]; if (unlikely(segment_eq(g...
166,841
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: IMPEG2D_ERROR_CODES_T impeg2d_dec_pic_hdr(dec_state_t *ps_dec) { stream_t *ps_stream; ps_stream = &ps_dec->s_bit_stream; impeg2d_bit_stream_flush(ps_stream,START_CODE_LEN); /* Flush temporal reference */ impeg2d_bit_stream_get(ps_stream,10); /* Picture type */ ps_dec->e_pic_type = (e_pic_type...
IMPEG2D_ERROR_CODES_T impeg2d_dec_pic_hdr(dec_state_t *ps_dec) { stream_t *ps_stream; ps_stream = &ps_dec->s_bit_stream; impeg2d_bit_stream_flush(ps_stream,START_CODE_LEN); /* Flush temporal reference */ impeg2d_bit_stream_get(ps_stream,10); /* Picture type */ ps_dec->e_pic_type = (e_pic_type_t)imp...
174,103
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: static int find_high_bit(unsigned int x) { int i; for(i=31;i>=0;i--) { if(x&(1<<i)) return i; } return 0; } Commit Message: Trying to fix some invalid left shift operations Fixes issue #16 CWE ID: CWE-682
static int find_high_bit(unsigned int x) { int i; for(i=31;i>=0;i--) { if(x&(1U<<(unsigned int)i)) return i; } return 0; }
168,194
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: static int ape_decode_frame(AVCodecContext *avctx, void *data, int *got_frame_ptr, AVPacket *avpkt) { AVFrame *frame = data; const uint8_t *buf = avpkt->data; APEContext *s = avctx->priv_data; uint8_t *sample8; int16_t *sample16; int32_t *sample24; int...
static int ape_decode_frame(AVCodecContext *avctx, void *data, int *got_frame_ptr, AVPacket *avpkt) { AVFrame *frame = data; const uint8_t *buf = avpkt->data; APEContext *s = avctx->priv_data; uint8_t *sample8; int16_t *sample16; int32_t *sample24; int i, ch...
168,038
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: const net::HttpRequestHeaders& request_headers() const { return request_headers_; } Commit Message: Fix ChromeResourceDispatcherHostDelegateMirrorBrowserTest.MirrorRequestHeader with network service. The functionality worked, as part of converting DICE, however the test code didn't work since it depende...
const net::HttpRequestHeaders& request_headers() const {
172,583
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: void DelegatedFrameHost::ClearDelegatedFrame() { EvictDelegatedFrame(); } Commit Message: mac: Make RWHVMac::ClearCompositorFrame clear locks Ensure that the BrowserCompositorMac not hold on to a compositor lock when requested to clear its compositor frame. This lock may be held indefinitely (if the render...
void DelegatedFrameHost::ClearDelegatedFrame() { // Ensure that we are able to swap in a new blank frame to replace any old // content. This will result in a white flash if we switch back to this // content. // https://crbug.com/739621 released_front_lock_.reset(); EvictDelegatedFrame(); }
172,954
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: static ssize_t driver_override_show(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf) { struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(dev); return sprintf(buf, "%s\n", pdev->driver_override); } Commit Message: driver core: platform: fix race condition with driver_override The dri...
static ssize_t driver_override_show(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf) { struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(dev); ssize_t len; device_lock(dev); len = sprintf(buf, "%s\n", pdev->driver_override); device_unlock(dev); return len; }
167,991
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: void TestFlashMessageLoop::RunTests(const std::string& filter) { RUN_TEST(Basics, filter); RUN_TEST(RunWithoutQuit, filter); } Commit Message: Fix PPB_Flash_MessageLoop. This CL suspends script callbacks and resource loads while running nested message loop using PPB_Flash_MessageLoop. BUG=569496 Revie...
void TestFlashMessageLoop::RunTests(const std::string& filter) { RUN_TEST(Basics, filter); RUN_TEST(RunWithoutQuit, filter); RUN_TEST(SuspendScriptCallbackWhileRunning, filter); } void TestFlashMessageLoop::DidRunScriptCallback() { // Script callbacks are not supposed to run while the Flash message loop is ...
172,125
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: void reference_32x32_dct_1d(const double in[32], double out[32], int stride) { const double kInvSqrt2 = 0.707106781186547524400844362104; for (int k = 0; k < 32; k++) { out[k] = 0.0; for (int n = 0; n < 32; n++) out[k] += in[n] * cos(kPi * (2 * n + 1) * k / 64.0); if (k == 0) out[k] = out...
void reference_32x32_dct_1d(const double in[32], double out[32], int stride) { void reference_32x32_dct_1d(const double in[32], double out[32]) { const double kInvSqrt2 = 0.707106781186547524400844362104; for (int k = 0; k < 32; k++) { out[k] = 0.0; for (int n = 0; n < 32; n++) out[k] += in[n] * cos(k...
174,532
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: image_transform_png_set_strip_16_mod(PNG_CONST image_transform *this, image_pixel *that, png_const_structp pp, PNG_CONST transform_display *display) { if (that->bit_depth == 16) { that->sample_depth = that->bit_depth = 8; if (that->red_sBIT > 8) that->red_sBIT = 8; if (that->green_sBIT >...
image_transform_png_set_strip_16_mod(PNG_CONST image_transform *this, image_transform_png_set_strip_16_mod(const image_transform *this, image_pixel *that, png_const_structp pp, const transform_display *display) { if (that->bit_depth == 16) { that->sample_depth = that->bit_depth = 8; if (that->r...
173,649
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: datum_to_json(Datum val, bool is_null, StringInfo result, JsonTypeCategory tcategory, Oid outfuncoid, bool key_scalar) { char *outputstr; text *jsontext; /* callers are expected to ensure that null keys are not passed in */ char *outputstr; text *jsontext; /* callers ...
datum_to_json(Datum val, bool is_null, StringInfo result, JsonTypeCategory tcategory, Oid outfuncoid, bool key_scalar) { char *outputstr; text *jsontext; /* callers are expected to ensure that null keys are not passed in */ char *outputstr; text *jsontext; check_stack_depth(...
164,678
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: queryin(char *buf) { QPRS_STATE state; int32 i; ltxtquery *query; int32 commonlen; ITEM *ptr; NODE *tmp; int32 pos = 0; #ifdef BS_DEBUG char pbuf[16384], *cur; #endif /* init state */ state.buf = buf; state.state = WAITOPERAND; state.count = 0; state.num = 0; state.str = NULL; /...
queryin(char *buf) { QPRS_STATE state; int32 i; ltxtquery *query; int32 commonlen; ITEM *ptr; NODE *tmp; int32 pos = 0; #ifdef BS_DEBUG char pbuf[16384], *cur; #endif /* init state */ state.buf = buf; state.state = WAITOPERAND; state.count = 0; state.num = 0; state.str = NULL; /* init...
166,408
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: check_file_permissions_reduced(i_ctx_t *i_ctx_p, const char *fname, int len, gx_io_device *iodev, const char *permitgroup) { long i; ref *permitlist = NULL; /* an empty string (first character == 0) if '\' character is */ /* recognized as a file name separator as on DOS & W...
check_file_permissions_reduced(i_ctx_t *i_ctx_p, const char *fname, int len, gx_io_device *iodev, const char *permitgroup) { long i; ref *permitlist = NULL; /* an empty string (first character == 0) if '\' character is */ /* recognized as a file name separator as on DOS & Windows...
164,708
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: void aes_crypt_ecb( aes_context *ctx, int mode, const unsigned char input[16], unsigned char output[16] ) { int i; unsigned long *RK, X0, X1, X2, X3, Y0, Y1, Y2, Y3; #if defined(XYSSL_PADLOCK_C) && defined(XYSSL_HAVE_X86) if( padlock_support...
void aes_crypt_ecb( aes_context *ctx, int mode, const unsigned char input[16], unsigned char output[16] ) { int i; unsigned long *RK, X0, X1, X2, X3, Y0, Y1, Y2, Y3; #if defined(XYSSL_PADLOCK_C) && defined(XYSSL_HAVE_X86) if( padlock_supports( PAD...
164,702
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: void SplitString(const std::wstring& str, wchar_t c, std::vector<std::wstring>* r) { SplitStringT(str, c, true, r); } Commit Message: wstring: remove wstring version of SplitString Retry of r84336. BUG=23581 Review URL: http://codereview.chromium.org/6930047 git-svn-id: sv...
void SplitString(const std::wstring& str,
170,555
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: base::ProcessHandle StartProcessWithAccess(CommandLine* cmd_line, const FilePath& exposed_dir) { const CommandLine& browser_command_line = *CommandLine::ForCurrentProcess(); content::ProcessType type; std::string type_str = cmd_line->GetSwitchValueASCII(switches::k...
base::ProcessHandle StartProcessWithAccess(CommandLine* cmd_line, const FilePath& exposed_dir) { const CommandLine& browser_command_line = *CommandLine::ForCurrentProcess(); content::ProcessType type; std::string type_str = cmd_line->GetSwitchValueASCII(switches::kProces...
170,947
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: polkit_backend_interactive_authority_check_authorization (PolkitBackendAuthority *authority, PolkitSubject *caller, PolkitSubject *subject, ...
polkit_backend_interactive_authority_check_authorization (PolkitBackendAuthority *authority, PolkitSubject *caller, PolkitSubject *subject, ...
165,288
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: create_filesystem_object(struct archive_write_disk *a) { /* Create the entry. */ const char *linkname; mode_t final_mode, mode; int r; /* We identify hard/symlinks according to the link names. */ /* Since link(2) and symlink(2) don't handle modes, we're done here. */ linkname = archive_entry_hardlin...
create_filesystem_object(struct archive_write_disk *a) { /* Create the entry. */ const char *linkname; mode_t final_mode, mode; int r; /* these for check_symlinks_fsobj */ char *linkname_copy; /* non-const copy of linkname */ struct archive_string error_string; int error_number; /* We identify hard/symli...
167,137
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: rar_read_ahead(struct archive_read *a, size_t min, ssize_t *avail) { struct rar *rar = (struct rar *)(a->format->data); const void *h = __archive_read_ahead(a, min, avail); int ret; if (avail) { if (a->archive.read_data_is_posix_read && *avail > (ssize_t)a->archive.read_data_requested) *avail ...
rar_read_ahead(struct archive_read *a, size_t min, ssize_t *avail) { struct rar *rar = (struct rar *)(a->format->data); const void *h = __archive_read_ahead(a, min, avail); int ret; if (avail) { if (a->archive.read_data_is_posix_read && *avail > (ssize_t)a->archive.read_data_requested) *avail = a->a...
168,930
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: static int rtnl_fill_ifinfo(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev, int type, u32 pid, u32 seq, u32 change, unsigned int flags, u32 ext_filter_mask) { struct ifinfomsg *ifm; struct nlmsghdr *nlh; struct rtnl_link_stats64 temp; const struct rtnl_link_stats64 *stats; struct nlattr *attr, *af...
static int rtnl_fill_ifinfo(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev, int type, u32 pid, u32 seq, u32 change, unsigned int flags, u32 ext_filter_mask) { struct ifinfomsg *ifm; struct nlmsghdr *nlh; struct rtnl_link_stats64 temp; const struct rtnl_link_stats64 *stats; struct nlattr *attr, *af_spec;...
166,056
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: InspectorResourceAgent::InspectorResourceAgent(InspectorPageAgent* pageAgent, InspectorClient* client) : InspectorBaseAgent<InspectorResourceAgent>("Network") , m_pageAgent(pageAgent) , m_client(client) , m_frontend(0) , m_resourcesData(adoptPtr(new NetworkResourcesData())) , m_isReca...
InspectorResourceAgent::InspectorResourceAgent(InspectorPageAgent* pageAgent, InspectorClient* client) InspectorResourceAgent::InspectorResourceAgent(InspectorPageAgent* pageAgent) : InspectorBaseAgent<InspectorResourceAgent>("Network") , m_pageAgent(pageAgent) , m_frontend(0) , m_resourcesData(adop...
171,345
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: static noinline void key_gc_unused_keys(struct list_head *keys) { while (!list_empty(keys)) { struct key *key = list_entry(keys->next, struct key, graveyard_link); list_del(&key->graveyard_link); kdebug("- %u", key->serial); key_check(key); /* Throw away the key data */ if (key->type->destroy...
static noinline void key_gc_unused_keys(struct list_head *keys) { while (!list_empty(keys)) { struct key *key = list_entry(keys->next, struct key, graveyard_link); list_del(&key->graveyard_link); kdebug("- %u", key->serial); key_check(key); /* Throw away the key data if the key is instantiated */ i...
166,576
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: struct key *find_keyring_by_name(const char *name, bool skip_perm_check) { struct key *keyring; int bucket; if (!name) return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL); bucket = keyring_hash(name); read_lock(&keyring_name_lock); if (keyring_name_hash[bucket].next) { /* search this hash bucket for a keyring with a matchin...
struct key *find_keyring_by_name(const char *name, bool skip_perm_check) struct key *find_keyring_by_name(const char *name, bool uid_keyring) { struct key *keyring; int bucket; if (!name) return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL); bucket = keyring_hash(name); read_lock(&keyring_name_lock); if (keyring_name_hash[bucket].ne...
169,375
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: BGD_DECLARE(gdImagePtr) gdImageCreateFromGd2Ctx (gdIOCtxPtr in) { int sx, sy; int i; int ncx, ncy, nc, cs, cx, cy; int x, y, ylo, yhi, xlo, xhi; int vers, fmt; t_chunk_info *chunkIdx = NULL; /* So we can gdFree it with impunity. */ unsigned char *chunkBuf = NULL; /* So we can gdFree it with impunity. */ i...
BGD_DECLARE(gdImagePtr) gdImageCreateFromGd2Ctx (gdIOCtxPtr in) { int sx, sy; int i; int ncx, ncy, nc, cs, cx, cy; int x, y, ylo, yhi, xlo, xhi; int vers, fmt; t_chunk_info *chunkIdx = NULL; /* So we can gdFree it with impunity. */ unsigned char *chunkBuf = NULL; /* So we can gdFree it with impunity. */ int chu...
168,510
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: static int decode_cblk(Jpeg2000DecoderContext *s, Jpeg2000CodingStyle *codsty, Jpeg2000T1Context *t1, Jpeg2000Cblk *cblk, int width, int height, int bandpos) { int passno = cblk->npasses, pass_t = 2, bpno = cblk->nonzerobits - 1, y; int clnpass_cnt = 0; i...
static int decode_cblk(Jpeg2000DecoderContext *s, Jpeg2000CodingStyle *codsty, Jpeg2000T1Context *t1, Jpeg2000Cblk *cblk, int width, int height, int bandpos) { int passno = cblk->npasses, pass_t = 2, bpno = cblk->nonzerobits - 1, y; int clnpass_cnt = 0; int bpa...
165,919
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: void BluetoothDeviceChromeOS::ConfirmPairing() { if (!agent_.get() || confirmation_callback_.is_null()) return; confirmation_callback_.Run(SUCCESS); confirmation_callback_.Reset(); } Commit Message: Refactor to support default Bluetooth pairing delegate In order to support a default pairing deleg...
void BluetoothDeviceChromeOS::ConfirmPairing() { if (!pairing_context_.get()) return; pairing_context_->ConfirmPairing(); }
171,220
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: static struct sock *unix_create1(struct net *net, struct socket *sock, int kern) { struct sock *sk = NULL; struct unix_sock *u; atomic_long_inc(&unix_nr_socks); if (atomic_long_read(&unix_nr_socks) > 2 * get_max_files()) goto out; sk = sk_alloc(net, PF_UNIX, GFP_KERNEL, &unix_proto, kern); if (!sk) go...
static struct sock *unix_create1(struct net *net, struct socket *sock, int kern) { struct sock *sk = NULL; struct unix_sock *u; atomic_long_inc(&unix_nr_socks); if (atomic_long_read(&unix_nr_socks) > 2 * get_max_files()) goto out; sk = sk_alloc(net, PF_UNIX, GFP_KERNEL, &unix_proto, kern); if (!sk) goto out...
166,833
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: juniper_atm1_print(netdissect_options *ndo, const struct pcap_pkthdr *h, register const u_char *p) { int llc_hdrlen; struct juniper_l2info_t l2info; l2info.pictype = DLT_JUNIPER_ATM1; if (juniper_parse_header(ndo, p, h, &l2info) == 0) return l2info....
juniper_atm1_print(netdissect_options *ndo, const struct pcap_pkthdr *h, register const u_char *p) { int llc_hdrlen; struct juniper_l2info_t l2info; l2info.pictype = DLT_JUNIPER_ATM1; if (juniper_parse_header(ndo, p, h, &l2info) == 0) return l2info.header...
167,948
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: static void nalm_dump(FILE * trace, char *data, u32 data_size) { GF_BitStream *bs; Bool rle, large_size; u32 entry_count; if (!data) { fprintf(trace, "<NALUMap rle=\"\" large_size=\"\">\n"); fprintf(trace, "<NALUMapEntry NALU_startNumber=\"\" groupID=\"\"/>\n"); fprintf(trace, "</NALUMap>\n"); ret...
static void nalm_dump(FILE * trace, char *data, u32 data_size) { GF_BitStream *bs; Bool rle, large_size; u32 entry_count; if (!data) { fprintf(trace, "<NALUMap rle=\"\" large_size=\"\">\n"); fprintf(trace, "<NALUMapEntry NALU_startNumber=\"\" groupID=\"\"/>\n"); fprintf(trace, "</NALUMap>\n"); return; ...
169,169
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: bool asn1_write_BOOLEAN(struct asn1_data *data, bool v) { asn1_push_tag(data, ASN1_BOOLEAN); asn1_write_uint8(data, v ? 0xFF : 0); asn1_pop_tag(data); return !data->has_error; } Commit Message: CWE ID: CWE-399
bool asn1_write_BOOLEAN(struct asn1_data *data, bool v) { if (!asn1_push_tag(data, ASN1_BOOLEAN)) return false; if (!asn1_write_uint8(data, v ? 0xFF : 0)) return false; return asn1_pop_tag(data); }
164,585
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: cJSON *cJSON_DetachItemFromArray( cJSON *array, int which ) { cJSON *c = array->child; while ( c && which > 0 ) { c = c->next; --which; } if ( ! c ) return 0; if ( c->prev ) c->prev->next = c->next; if ( c->next ) c->next->prev = c->prev; if ( c == array->child ) array->child = c->next; c->prev ...
cJSON *cJSON_DetachItemFromArray( cJSON *array, int which )
167,284
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: static int nl80211_start_sched_scan(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info) { struct cfg80211_sched_scan_request *request; struct cfg80211_registered_device *rdev = info->user_ptr[0]; struct net_device *dev = info->user_ptr[1]; struct nlattr *attr; struct wiphy *wiphy; int err, tmp, n_ssids = 0...
static int nl80211_start_sched_scan(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info) { struct cfg80211_sched_scan_request *request; struct cfg80211_registered_device *rdev = info->user_ptr[0]; struct net_device *dev = info->user_ptr[1]; struct nlattr *attr; struct wiphy *wiphy; int err, tmp, n_ssids = 0, n_ch...
165,857
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: void MemBackendImpl::EvictIfNeeded() { if (current_size_ <= max_size_) return; int target_size = std::max(0, max_size_ - kDefaultEvictionSize); base::LinkNode<MemEntryImpl>* entry = lru_list_.head(); while (current_size_ > target_size && entry != lru_list_.end()) { MemEntryImpl* to_doom = ent...
void MemBackendImpl::EvictIfNeeded() { if (current_size_ <= max_size_) return; int target_size = std::max(0, max_size_ - kDefaultEvictionSize); base::LinkNode<MemEntryImpl>* entry = lru_list_.head(); while (current_size_ > target_size && entry != lru_list_.end()) { MemEntryImpl* to_doom = entry->va...
172,700
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: spnego_gss_inquire_context( OM_uint32 *minor_status, const gss_ctx_id_t context_handle, gss_name_t *src_name, gss_name_t *targ_name, OM_uint32 *lifetime_rec, gss_OID *mech_type, OM_uint32 *ctx_flags, int *locally_initiated, int *opened) { OM_uint32 ret = GSS_S_COMPLETE; ret = ...
spnego_gss_inquire_context( OM_uint32 *minor_status, const gss_ctx_id_t context_handle, gss_name_t *src_name, gss_name_t *targ_name, OM_uint32 *lifetime_rec, gss_OID *mech_type, OM_uint32 *ctx_flags, int *locally_initiated, int *opened) { OM_uint32 ret = GSS_S_COMPLETE; spnego_gss_ctx...
166,661
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: int snmp_version(void *context, size_t hdrlen, unsigned char tag, const void *data, size_t datalen) { if (*(unsigned char *)data > 1) return -ENOTSUPP; return 1; } Commit Message: netfilter: nf_nat_snmp_basic: add missing length checks in ASN.1 cbs The generic ASN.1 decoder infrastructure doesn't g...
int snmp_version(void *context, size_t hdrlen, unsigned char tag, const void *data, size_t datalen) { if (datalen != 1) return -EINVAL; if (*(unsigned char *)data > 1) return -ENOTSUPP; return 1; }
169,724
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: ssize_t socket_bytes_available(const socket_t *socket) { assert(socket != NULL); int size = 0; if (ioctl(socket->fd, FIONREAD, &size) == -1) return -1; return size; } Commit Message: DO NOT MERGE Fix potential DoS caused by delivering signal to BT process Bug: 28885210 Change-Id: I63866d894b...
ssize_t socket_bytes_available(const socket_t *socket) { assert(socket != NULL); int size = 0; if (TEMP_FAILURE_RETRY(ioctl(socket->fd, FIONREAD, &size)) == -1) return -1; return size; }
173,485
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: std::unique_ptr<SiteCharacteristicsDataReader> GetReaderForOrigin( Profile* profile, const url::Origin& origin) { SiteCharacteristicsDataStore* data_store = LocalSiteCharacteristicsDataStoreFactory::GetForProfile(profile); EXPECT_TRUE(data_store); std::unique_ptr<SiteCharacteris...
std::unique_ptr<SiteCharacteristicsDataReader> GetReaderForOrigin( Profile* profile, const url::Origin& origin) { SiteCharacteristicsDataStore* data_store = LocalSiteCharacteristicsDataStoreFactory::GetForProfile(profile); EXPECT_TRUE(data_store); std::unique_ptr<SiteCharacteristicsDa...
172,215
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: static inline __u32 dccp_v6_init_sequence(struct sk_buff *skb) { return secure_dccpv6_sequence_number(ipv6_hdr(skb)->daddr.s6_addr32, ipv6_hdr(skb)->saddr.s6_addr32, dccp_hdr(skb)->dccph_dport, dccp_hdr(skb)->dccph_sport ); } Commit Message: net: Compute protocol sequence n...
static inline __u32 dccp_v6_init_sequence(struct sk_buff *skb) static inline __u64 dccp_v6_init_sequence(struct sk_buff *skb) { return secure_dccpv6_sequence_number(ipv6_hdr(skb)->daddr.s6_addr32, ipv6_hdr(skb)->saddr.s6_addr32, dccp_hdr(skb)->dccph_dport, dccp_hdr(skb)->dccph_sport ...
165,771
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: static struct mobj *alloc_ta_mem(size_t size) { #ifdef CFG_PAGED_USER_TA return mobj_paged_alloc(size); #else struct mobj *mobj = mobj_mm_alloc(mobj_sec_ddr, size, &tee_mm_sec_ddr); if (mobj) memset(mobj_get_va(mobj, 0), 0, size); return mobj; #endif } Commit Message: core: clear the entire TA area ...
static struct mobj *alloc_ta_mem(size_t size) { #ifdef CFG_PAGED_USER_TA return mobj_paged_alloc(size); #else struct mobj *mobj = mobj_mm_alloc(mobj_sec_ddr, size, &tee_mm_sec_ddr); if (mobj) { size_t granularity = BIT(tee_mm_sec_ddr.shift); /* Round up to allocation granularity size */ memset(mobj_get_va...
169,472
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: void SecureProxyChecker::CheckIfSecureProxyIsAllowed( SecureProxyCheckerCallback fetcher_callback) { net::NetworkTrafficAnnotationTag traffic_annotation = net::DefineNetworkTrafficAnnotation( "data_reduction_proxy_secure_proxy_check", R"( semantics { sender: "D...
void SecureProxyChecker::CheckIfSecureProxyIsAllowed( SecureProxyCheckerCallback fetcher_callback) { DCHECK(!params::IsIncludedInHoldbackFieldTrial()); net::NetworkTrafficAnnotationTag traffic_annotation = net::DefineNetworkTrafficAnnotation( "data_reduction_proxy_secure_proxy_check", R"( ...
172,422
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: int mbedtls_x509_crt_verify_with_profile( mbedtls_x509_crt *crt, mbedtls_x509_crt *trust_ca, mbedtls_x509_crl *ca_crl, const mbedtls_x509_crt_profile *profile, const char *cn, uint32_t *flags, int (*f_vrfy)(vo...
int mbedtls_x509_crt_verify_with_profile( mbedtls_x509_crt *crt, mbedtls_x509_crt *trust_ca, mbedtls_x509_crl *ca_crl, const mbedtls_x509_crt_profile *profile, const char *cn, uint32_t *flags, int (*f_vrfy)(void *, ...
167,783
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: bool Chapters::Edition::ExpandAtomsArray() { if (m_atoms_size > m_atoms_count) return true; // nothing else to do const int size = (m_atoms_size == 0) ? 1 : 2 * m_atoms_size; Atom* const atoms = new (std::nothrow) Atom[size]; if (atoms == NULL) return false; for (int i...
bool Chapters::Edition::ExpandAtomsArray() IMkvReader* const pReader = m_pSegment->m_pReader; long long pos = m_start; const long long stop = m_start + m_size; m_timecodeScale = 1000000; m_duration = -1; while (pos < stop) { long long id, size; const long status = ParseElementHeader(pReader,...
174,274
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: OMX_BUFFERHEADERTYPE *OMXNodeInstance::findBufferHeader(OMX::buffer_id buffer) { if (buffer == 0) { return NULL; } Mutex::Autolock autoLock(mBufferIDLock); ssize_t index = mBufferIDToBufferHeader.indexOfKey(buffer); if (index < 0) { CLOGW("findBufferHeader: buffer %u not found", bu...
OMX_BUFFERHEADERTYPE *OMXNodeInstance::findBufferHeader(OMX::buffer_id buffer) { OMX_BUFFERHEADERTYPE *OMXNodeInstance::findBufferHeader( OMX::buffer_id buffer, OMX_U32 portIndex) { if (buffer == 0) { return NULL; } Mutex::Autolock autoLock(mBufferIDLock); ssize_t index = mBufferIDToBufferH...
173,528
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: mojom::AppPtr AppControllerImpl::CreateAppPtr(const apps::AppUpdate& update) { auto app = chromeos::kiosk_next_home::mojom::App::New(); app->app_id = update.AppId(); app->type = update.AppType(); app->display_name = update.Name(); app->readiness = update.Readiness(); if (app->type == apps::mojom::...
mojom::AppPtr AppControllerImpl::CreateAppPtr(const apps::AppUpdate& update) { mojom::AppPtr AppControllerService::CreateAppPtr( const apps::AppUpdate& update) { auto app = chromeos::kiosk_next_home::mojom::App::New(); app->app_id = update.AppId(); app->type = update.AppType(); app->display_name = update...
172,081
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: void Chapters::Edition::Clear() { while (m_atoms_count > 0) { Atom& a = m_atoms[--m_atoms_count]; a.Clear(); } delete[] m_atoms; m_atoms = NULL; m_atoms_size = 0; } Commit Message: libwebm: Pull from upstream Rolling mkvparser from upstream. Primarily for fixing a b...
void Chapters::Edition::Clear() while (m_displays_count > 0) { Display& d = m_displays[--m_displays_count]; d.Clear(); } delete[] m_displays; m_displays = NULL; m_displays_size = 0; } long Chapters::Atom::Parse(IMkvReader* pReader, long long pos, long long size) { const long long stop = pos + siz...
174,244
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: ssh_packet_get_compress_state(struct sshbuf *m, struct ssh *ssh) { struct session_state *state = ssh->state; struct sshbuf *b; int r; if ((b = sshbuf_new()) == NULL) return SSH_ERR_ALLOC_FAIL; if (state->compression_in_started) { if ((r = sshbuf_put_string(b, &state->compression_in_stream, sizeof(s...
ssh_packet_get_compress_state(struct sshbuf *m, struct ssh *ssh)
168,652
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: PixarLogDecode(TIFF* tif, uint8* op, tmsize_t occ, uint16 s) { static const char module[] = "PixarLogDecode"; TIFFDirectory *td = &tif->tif_dir; PixarLogState* sp = DecoderState(tif); tmsize_t i; tmsize_t nsamples; int llen; uint16 *up; switch (sp->user_datafmt) { case PIXARLOGDATAFMT_FLOAT: nsamples ...
PixarLogDecode(TIFF* tif, uint8* op, tmsize_t occ, uint16 s) { static const char module[] = "PixarLogDecode"; TIFFDirectory *td = &tif->tif_dir; PixarLogState* sp = DecoderState(tif); tmsize_t i; tmsize_t nsamples; int llen; uint16 *up; switch (sp->user_datafmt) { case PIXARLOGDATAFMT_FLOAT: nsamples = occ ...
169,449
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: void MediaStreamManager::OpenDevice(int render_process_id, int render_frame_id, int page_request_id, const std::string& device_id, MediaStreamType type, ...
void MediaStreamManager::OpenDevice(int render_process_id, int render_frame_id, int requester_id, int page_request_id, const std::string& device_id, ...
173,105
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: bool HTMLFormControlElement::isAutofocusable() const { if (!fastHasAttribute(autofocusAttr)) return false; if (hasTagName(inputTag)) return !toHTMLInputElement(this)->isInputTypeHidden(); if (hasTagName(selectTag)) return true; if (hasTagName(keygenTag)) return tru...
bool HTMLFormControlElement::isAutofocusable() const bool HTMLFormControlElement::supportsAutofocus() const { return false; }
171,343
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: static void fwnet_receive_broadcast(struct fw_iso_context *context, u32 cycle, size_t header_length, void *header, void *data) { struct fwnet_device *dev; struct fw_iso_packet packet; __be16 *hdr_ptr; __be32 *buf_ptr; int retval; u32 length; u16 source_node_id; u32 specifier_id; u32 ver; unsign...
static void fwnet_receive_broadcast(struct fw_iso_context *context, u32 cycle, size_t header_length, void *header, void *data) { struct fwnet_device *dev; struct fw_iso_packet packet; __be16 *hdr_ptr; __be32 *buf_ptr; int retval; u32 length; unsigned long offset; unsigned long flags; dev = data; h...
166,917
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: bool WebGLRenderingContextBase::ValidateHTMLImageElement( const SecurityOrigin* security_origin, const char* function_name, HTMLImageElement* image, ExceptionState& exception_state) { if (!image || !image->CachedImage()) { SynthesizeGLError(GL_INVALID_VALUE, function_name, "no image"); r...
bool WebGLRenderingContextBase::ValidateHTMLImageElement( const SecurityOrigin* security_origin, const char* function_name, HTMLImageElement* image, ExceptionState& exception_state) { if (!image || !image->CachedImage()) { SynthesizeGLError(GL_INVALID_VALUE, function_name, "no image"); return ...
172,690
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: SPL_METHOD(SplFileInfo, getFilename) { spl_filesystem_object *intern = (spl_filesystem_object*)zend_object_store_get_object(getThis() TSRMLS_CC); int path_len; if (zend_parse_parameters_none() == FAILURE) { return; } spl_filesystem_object_get_path(intern, &path_len TSRMLS_CC); if (path_len && pa...
SPL_METHOD(SplFileInfo, getFilename) { spl_filesystem_object *intern = (spl_filesystem_object*)zend_object_store_get_object(getThis() TSRMLS_CC); int path_len; if (zend_parse_parameters_none() == FAILURE) { return; } spl_filesystem_object_get_path(intern, &path_len TSRMLS_CC); if (path_len && path_l...
167,032
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: rt6_print(netdissect_options *ndo, register const u_char *bp, const u_char *bp2 _U_) { register const struct ip6_rthdr *dp; register const struct ip6_rthdr0 *dp0; register const u_char *ep; int i, len; register const struct in6_addr *addr; dp = (const struct ip6_rthdr *)bp; len = dp->ip6r_len; /* '...
rt6_print(netdissect_options *ndo, register const u_char *bp, const u_char *bp2 _U_) { register const struct ip6_rthdr *dp; register const struct ip6_rthdr0 *dp0; register const u_char *ep; int i, len; register const struct in6_addr *addr; dp = (const struct ip6_rthdr *)bp; /* 'ep' points to the end of av...
167,784
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: static MagickBooleanType ConcatenateImages(int argc,char **argv, ExceptionInfo *exception ) { FILE *input, *output; int c; register ssize_t i; if (ExpandFilenames(&argc,&argv) == MagickFalse) ThrowFileException(exception,ResourceLimitError,"MemoryAllocationFailed", ...
static MagickBooleanType ConcatenateImages(int argc,char **argv, ExceptionInfo *exception ) { FILE *input, *output; MagickBooleanType status; int c; register ssize_t i; if (ExpandFilenames(&argc,&argv) == MagickFalse) ThrowFileException(exception,ResourceLimitError,"M...
168,628
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: void PrintPreviewDataService::GetDataEntry( const std::string& preview_ui_addr_str, int index, scoped_refptr<base::RefCountedBytes>* data_bytes) { *data_bytes = NULL; PreviewDataStoreMap::iterator it = data_store_map_.find(preview_ui_addr_str); if (it != data_store_map_.end()) it->seco...
void PrintPreviewDataService::GetDataEntry( int32 preview_ui_id, int index, scoped_refptr<base::RefCountedBytes>* data_bytes) { *data_bytes = NULL; PreviewDataStoreMap::const_iterator it = data_store_map_.find(preview_ui_id); if (it != data_store_map_.end()) it->second->GetPreviewDataForInde...
170,821
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: int mif_validate(jas_stream_t *in) { uchar buf[MIF_MAGICLEN]; uint_fast32_t magic; int i; int n; assert(JAS_STREAM_MAXPUTBACK >= MIF_MAGICLEN); /* Read the validation data (i.e., the data used for detecting the format). */ if ((n = jas_stream_read(in, buf, MIF_MAGICLEN)) < 0) { return -1; } ...
int mif_validate(jas_stream_t *in) { jas_uchar buf[MIF_MAGICLEN]; uint_fast32_t magic; int i; int n; assert(JAS_STREAM_MAXPUTBACK >= MIF_MAGICLEN); /* Read the validation data (i.e., the data used for detecting the format). */ if ((n = jas_stream_read(in, buf, MIF_MAGICLEN)) < 0) { return -1; } /*...
168,725
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: bool ChromeDownloadManagerDelegate::IsDangerousFile( const DownloadItem& download, const FilePath& suggested_path, bool visited_referrer_before) { DCHECK(BrowserThread::CurrentlyOn(BrowserThread::UI)); if (download.GetTransitionType() & content::PAGE_TRANSITION_FROM_ADDRESS_BAR) return fal...
bool ChromeDownloadManagerDelegate::IsDangerousFile( const DownloadItem& download, const FilePath& suggested_path, bool visited_referrer_before) { DCHECK(BrowserThread::CurrentlyOn(BrowserThread::UI)); if (extensions::FeatureSwitch::easy_off_store_install()->IsEnabled() && download_crx_util::I...
171,393
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: void LocalSiteCharacteristicsWebContentsObserver::DidFinishNavigation( content::NavigationHandle* navigation_handle) { DCHECK_CALLED_ON_VALID_SEQUENCE(sequence_checker_); DCHECK(navigation_handle); if (!navigation_handle->IsInMainFrame() || navigation_handle->IsSameDocument()) { return; } ...
void LocalSiteCharacteristicsWebContentsObserver::DidFinishNavigation( content::NavigationHandle* navigation_handle) { DCHECK_CALLED_ON_VALID_SEQUENCE(sequence_checker_); DCHECK(navigation_handle); if (!navigation_handle->IsInMainFrame() || navigation_handle->IsSameDocument()) { return; } firs...
172,216
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: static void InputMethodChangedHandler( void* object, const chromeos::InputMethodDescriptor& current_input_method) { if (!BrowserThread::CurrentlyOn(BrowserThread::UI)) { LOG(ERROR) << "Not on UI thread"; return; } InputMethodLibraryImpl* input_method_library = sta...
static void InputMethodChangedHandler( // IBusController override. virtual void OnCurrentInputMethodChanged( const input_method::InputMethodDescriptor& current_input_method) { if (!BrowserThread::CurrentlyOn(BrowserThread::UI)) { LOG(ERROR) << "Not on UI thread"; return; } Change...
170,495
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: void RenderViewImpl::OnSwapOut(const ViewMsg_SwapOut_Params& params) { OnStop(); if (!is_swapped_out_) { SyncNavigationState(); webview()->dispatchUnloadEvent(); SetSwappedOut(true); WebURLRequest request(GURL("about:swappedout")); webview()->mainFrame()->loadRequest(request); } ...
void RenderViewImpl::OnSwapOut(const ViewMsg_SwapOut_Params& params) { OnStop(); if (!is_swapped_out_) { SyncNavigationState(); webview()->dispatchUnloadEvent(); SetSwappedOut(true); // to chrome::kSwappedOutURL. If that happens to be to the page we had been GURL swappedOutURL(chrome::kSwa...
171,031
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: PHPAPI int php_var_unserialize(UNSERIALIZE_PARAMETER) { const unsigned char *cursor, *limit, *marker, *start; zval **rval_ref; limit = max; cursor = *p; if (YYCURSOR >= YYLIMIT) { return 0; } if (var_hash && cursor[0] != 'R') { var_push(var_hash, rval); } start = cursor; ...
PHPAPI int php_var_unserialize(UNSERIALIZE_PARAMETER) { const unsigned char *cursor, *limit, *marker, *start; zval **rval_ref; limit = max; cursor = *p; if (YYCURSOR >= YYLIMIT) { return 0; } if (var_hash && cursor[0] != 'R') { var_push(var_hash, rval); } start = cursor; #li...
164,892
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: long long Segment::ParseHeaders() { long long total, available; const int status = m_pReader->Length(&total, &available); if (status < 0) // error return status; assert((total < 0) || (available <= total)); const long long segment_stop = (m_size < 0) ? -1 : m_start + m_size; assert((segme...
long long Segment::ParseHeaders() { long long total, available; const int status = m_pReader->Length(&total, &available); if (status < 0) // error return status; if (total > 0 && available > total) return E_FILE_FORMAT_INVALID; const long long segment_stop = (m_size < 0) ? -1 : m_start + m_si...
173,856
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: static void coroutine_fn v9fs_link(void *opaque) { V9fsPDU *pdu = opaque; int32_t dfid, oldfid; V9fsFidState *dfidp, *oldfidp; V9fsString name; size_t offset = 7; int err = 0; v9fs_string_init(&name); err = pdu_unmarshal(pdu, offset, "dds", &dfid, &oldfid, &name); if (err < 0)...
static void coroutine_fn v9fs_link(void *opaque) { V9fsPDU *pdu = opaque; int32_t dfid, oldfid; V9fsFidState *dfidp, *oldfidp; V9fsString name; size_t offset = 7; int err = 0; v9fs_string_init(&name); err = pdu_unmarshal(pdu, offset, "dds", &dfid, &oldfid, &name); if (err < 0) { ...
164,907
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: static unsigned xen_netbk_tx_build_gops(struct xen_netbk *netbk) { struct gnttab_copy *gop = netbk->tx_copy_ops, *request_gop; struct sk_buff *skb; int ret; while (((nr_pending_reqs(netbk) + MAX_SKB_FRAGS) < MAX_PENDING_REQS) && !list_empty(&netbk->net_schedule_list)) { struct xenvif *vif; struct xen_n...
static unsigned xen_netbk_tx_build_gops(struct xen_netbk *netbk) { struct gnttab_copy *gop = netbk->tx_copy_ops, *request_gop; struct sk_buff *skb; int ret; while (((nr_pending_reqs(netbk) + MAX_SKB_FRAGS) < MAX_PENDING_REQS) && !list_empty(&netbk->net_schedule_list)) { struct xenvif *vif; struct xen_netif_t...
166,175
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: IMPEG2D_ERROR_CODES_T impeg2d_dec_seq_hdr(dec_state_t *ps_dec) { stream_t *ps_stream; ps_stream = &ps_dec->s_bit_stream; UWORD16 u2_height; UWORD16 u2_width; if (impeg2d_bit_stream_nxt(ps_stream,START_CODE_LEN) != SEQUENCE_HEADER_CODE) { impeg2d_bit_stream_flush(ps_stream,START_CODE_LEN); ...
IMPEG2D_ERROR_CODES_T impeg2d_dec_seq_hdr(dec_state_t *ps_dec) { stream_t *ps_stream; ps_stream = &ps_dec->s_bit_stream; UWORD16 u2_height; UWORD16 u2_width; if (impeg2d_bit_stream_nxt(ps_stream,START_CODE_LEN) != SEQUENCE_HEADER_CODE) { impeg2d_bit_stream_flush(ps_stream,START_CODE_LEN); retur...
174,036