instruction
stringclasses
1 value
input
stringlengths
90
9.3k
output
stringlengths
16
15.4k
__index_level_0__
int64
165k
175k
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: TouchpadLibrary* CrosLibrary::GetTouchpadLibrary() { return touchpad_lib_.GetDefaultImpl(use_stub_impl_); } Commit Message: chromeos: Replace copy-and-pasted code with macros. This replaces a bunch of duplicated-per-library cros function definitions and comments. BUG=none TEST=built it Review URL: http://co...
TouchpadLibrary* CrosLibrary::GetTouchpadLibrary() {
170,633
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: static void UpdatePropertyHandler( void* object, const ImePropertyList& prop_list) { if (!BrowserThread::CurrentlyOn(BrowserThread::UI)) { LOG(ERROR) << "Not on UI thread"; return; } InputMethodLibraryImpl* input_method_library = static_cast<InputMethodLibraryImpl*>(o...
static void UpdatePropertyHandler( // IBusController override. virtual void OnUpdateImeProperty( const input_method::ImePropertyList& prop_list) { if (!BrowserThread::CurrentlyOn(BrowserThread::UI)) { LOG(ERROR) << "Not on UI thread"; return; } UpdateProperty(prop_list); }
170,510
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: on_unregister_handler(TCMUService1HandlerManager1 *interface, GDBusMethodInvocation *invocation, gchar *subtype, gpointer user_data) { struct tcmur_handler *handler = find_handler_by_subtype(subtype); struct dbus_info *info = handler ? handler->opaque : NULL; if (!handler) { g_dbus_m...
on_unregister_handler(TCMUService1HandlerManager1 *interface, GDBusMethodInvocation *invocation, gchar *subtype, gpointer user_data) { struct tcmur_handler *handler = find_handler_by_subtype(subtype); struct dbus_info *info = handler ? handler->opaque : NULL; if (!handler) { g_dbus_method_...
167,634
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: void StoreAccumulatedContentLength(int received_content_length, int original_content_length, bool data_reduction_proxy_was_used) { BrowserThread::PostTask(BrowserThread::UI, FROM_HERE, base::Bind(&UpdateContentLengthPrefs, ...
void StoreAccumulatedContentLength(int received_content_length, void StoreAccumulatedContentLength( int received_content_length, int original_content_length, chrome_browser_net::DataReductionRequestType data_reduction_type) { BrowserThread::PostTask(BrowserThread::UI, FROM_HERE, base::Bind(&Update...
171,333
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: static int createFromTiffRgba(TIFF * tif, gdImagePtr im) { int a; int x, y; int alphaBlendingFlag = 0; int color; int width = im->sx; int height = im->sy; uint32 *buffer; uint32 rgba; /* switch off colour merging on target gd image just while we write out * content - we want to preserve the alph...
static int createFromTiffRgba(TIFF * tif, gdImagePtr im) { int a; int x, y; int alphaBlendingFlag = 0; int color; int width = im->sx; int height = im->sy; uint32 *buffer; uint32 rgba; int success; /* switch off colour merging on target gd image just while we write out * content - we want to preserve ...
168,822
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: base::string16 GetApplicationNameForProtocol(const GURL& url) { base::string16 application_name; if (base::win::GetVersion() >= base::win::VERSION_WIN8) { application_name = GetAppForProtocolUsingAssocQuery(url); if (!application_name.empty()) return application_name; } return GetAppFo...
base::string16 GetApplicationNameForProtocol(const GURL& url) { if (base::win::GetVersion() >= base::win::VERSION_WIN8) { base::string16 application_name = GetAppForProtocolUsingAssocQuery(url); if (!application_name.empty()) return application_name; } return GetAppForProtocolUsingRegistry(url...
172,637
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: static void wdm_in_callback(struct urb *urb) { struct wdm_device *desc = urb->context; int status = urb->status; spin_lock(&desc->iuspin); clear_bit(WDM_RESPONDING, &desc->flags); if (status) { switch (status) { case -ENOENT: dev_dbg(&desc->intf->dev, "nonzero urb status received: -ENOENT"...
static void wdm_in_callback(struct urb *urb) { struct wdm_device *desc = urb->context; int status = urb->status; int length = urb->actual_length; spin_lock(&desc->iuspin); clear_bit(WDM_RESPONDING, &desc->flags); if (status) { switch (status) { case -ENOENT: dev_dbg(&desc->intf->dev, "nonzero u...
166,103
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: void jpc_qmfb_split_col(jpc_fix_t *a, int numrows, int stride, int parity) { int bufsize = JPC_CEILDIVPOW2(numrows, 1); jpc_fix_t splitbuf[QMFB_SPLITBUFSIZE]; jpc_fix_t *buf = splitbuf; register jpc_fix_t *srcptr; register jpc_fix_t *dstptr; register int n; register int m; int hstartcol; /* Get ...
void jpc_qmfb_split_col(jpc_fix_t *a, int numrows, int stride, int parity) { int bufsize = JPC_CEILDIVPOW2(numrows, 1); jpc_fix_t splitbuf[QMFB_SPLITBUFSIZE]; jpc_fix_t *buf = splitbuf; register jpc_fix_t *srcptr; register jpc_fix_t *dstptr; register int n; register int m; int hstartrow; /* Get a buff...
169,445
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: void BluetoothDeviceChooserController::OnBluetoothChooserEvent( BluetoothChooser::Event event, const std::string& device_address) { DCHECK_CURRENTLY_ON(BrowserThread::UI); DCHECK(chooser_.get()); switch (event) { case BluetoothChooser::Event::RESCAN: RecordRequestDeviceOutcome(OutcomeFrom...
void BluetoothDeviceChooserController::OnBluetoothChooserEvent( BluetoothChooser::Event event, const std::string& device_address) { DCHECK_CURRENTLY_ON(BrowserThread::UI); DCHECK(chooser_.get()); switch (event) { case BluetoothChooser::Event::RESCAN: RecordRequestDeviceOutcome(OutcomeFromChoose...
172,444
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: void Document::InitContentSecurityPolicy( ContentSecurityPolicy* csp, const ContentSecurityPolicy* policy_to_inherit, const ContentSecurityPolicy* previous_document_csp) { SetContentSecurityPolicy(csp ? csp : ContentSecurityPolicy::Create()); GetContentSecurityPolicy()->BindToExecutionContext(...
void Document::InitContentSecurityPolicy( void Document::InitContentSecurityPolicy(ContentSecurityPolicy* csp, const Document* origin_document) { SetContentSecurityPolicy(csp ? csp : ContentSecurityPolicy::Create()); GetContentSecurityPolicy()->BindToExecutionContext(thi...
173,052
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: static int tls_decrypt_ticket(SSL *s, const unsigned char *etick, int eticklen, const unsigned char *sess_id, int sesslen, SSL_SESSION **psess) { SSL_SESSION *sess; unsigned char *sdec; const unsigned char *p; int slen, mlen, renew_ticket = 0; unsigned char tick_hmac[EVP_MAX_MD_SIZE]; HMAC_CTX hctx...
static int tls_decrypt_ticket(SSL *s, const unsigned char *etick, int eticklen, const unsigned char *sess_id, int sesslen, SSL_SESSION **psess) { SSL_SESSION *sess; unsigned char *sdec; const unsigned char *p; int slen, mlen, renew_ticket = 0; unsigned char tick_hmac[EVP_MAX_MD_SIZE]; HMAC_CTX hctx; EVP...
165,159
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: header_put_be_short (SF_PRIVATE *psf, int x) { if (psf->headindex < SIGNED_SIZEOF (psf->header) - 2) { psf->header [psf->headindex++] = (x >> 8) ; psf->header [psf->headindex++] = x ; } ; } /* header_put_be_short */ Commit Message: src/ : Move to a variable length header buffer Previously, the `psf->head...
header_put_be_short (SF_PRIVATE *psf, int x) { psf->header.ptr [psf->header.indx++] = (x >> 8) ; psf->header.ptr [psf->header.indx++] = x ; } /* header_put_be_short */
170,052
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: void *hashtable_get(hashtable_t *hashtable, const char *key) { pair_t *pair; size_t hash; bucket_t *bucket; hash = hash_str(key); bucket = &hashtable->buckets[hash % num_buckets(hashtable)]; pair = hashtable_find_pair(hashtable, bucket, key, hash); if(!pair) return NULL...
void *hashtable_get(hashtable_t *hashtable, const char *key) { pair_t *pair; size_t hash; bucket_t *bucket; hash = hash_str(key); bucket = &hashtable->buckets[hash & hashmask(hashtable->order)]; pair = hashtable_find_pair(hashtable, bucket, key, hash); if(!pair) return NULL; ...
166,530
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: void Splash::arbitraryTransformMask(SplashImageMaskSource src, void *srcData, int srcWidth, int srcHeight, SplashCoord *mat, GBool glyphMode) { SplashBitmap *scaledMask; SplashClipResult clipRes, clipRes2; SplashPipe pipe; int scaledWidth, scaledHeight, t0, t1; SplashCoord r00, r01, r10,...
void Splash::arbitraryTransformMask(SplashImageMaskSource src, void *srcData, int srcWidth, int srcHeight, SplashCoord *mat, GBool glyphMode) { SplashBitmap *scaledMask; SplashClipResult clipRes, clipRes2; SplashPipe pipe; int scaledWidth, scaledHeight, t0, t1; SplashCoord r00, r01, r10, r11, ...
164,733
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: static inline unsigned int ReadPropertyUnsignedLong(const EndianType endian, const unsigned char *buffer) { unsigned int value; if (endian == LSBEndian) { value=(unsigned int) ((buffer[3] << 24) | (buffer[2] << 16) | (buffer[1] << 8 ) | (buffer[0])); return((unsigned int) (va...
static inline unsigned int ReadPropertyUnsignedLong(const EndianType endian, const unsigned char *buffer) { unsigned int value; if (endian == LSBEndian) { value=(unsigned int) buffer[3] << 24; value|=(unsigned int) buffer[2] << 16; value|=(unsigned int) buffer[1] << 8; value|=(...
169,956
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: vc4_get_bcl(struct drm_device *dev, struct vc4_exec_info *exec) { struct drm_vc4_submit_cl *args = exec->args; void *temp = NULL; void *bin; int ret = 0; uint32_t bin_offset = 0; uint32_t shader_rec_offset = roundup(bin_offset + args->bin_cl_size, 16); uint32_t uniforms_offset = shader_rec_offset...
vc4_get_bcl(struct drm_device *dev, struct vc4_exec_info *exec) { struct drm_vc4_submit_cl *args = exec->args; void *temp = NULL; void *bin; int ret = 0; uint32_t bin_offset = 0; uint32_t shader_rec_offset = roundup(bin_offset + args->bin_cl_size, 16); uint32_t uniforms_offset = shader_rec_offset + arg...
168,384
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: int parse_rock_ridge_inode(struct iso_directory_record *de, struct inode *inode) { int result = parse_rock_ridge_inode_internal(de, inode, 0); /* * if rockridge flag was reset and we didn't look for attributes * behind eventual XA attributes, have a look there */ if ((ISOFS_SB(inode->i_sb)->s_roc...
int parse_rock_ridge_inode(struct iso_directory_record *de, struct inode *inode) int parse_rock_ridge_inode(struct iso_directory_record *de, struct inode *inode, int relocated) { int flags = relocated ? RR_RELOC_DE : 0; int result = parse_rock_ridge_inode_internal(de, inode, flags); /* * if rockridge fl...
166,270
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: static int pptp_bind(struct socket *sock, struct sockaddr *uservaddr, int sockaddr_len) { struct sock *sk = sock->sk; struct sockaddr_pppox *sp = (struct sockaddr_pppox *) uservaddr; struct pppox_sock *po = pppox_sk(sk); struct pptp_opt *opt = &po->proto.pptp; int error = 0; lock_sock(sk); opt->sr...
static int pptp_bind(struct socket *sock, struct sockaddr *uservaddr, int sockaddr_len) { struct sock *sk = sock->sk; struct sockaddr_pppox *sp = (struct sockaddr_pppox *) uservaddr; struct pppox_sock *po = pppox_sk(sk); struct pptp_opt *opt = &po->proto.pptp; int error = 0; if (sockaddr_len < sizeof(struct ...
166,560
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: static double calcerr(PNG_CONST png_modifier *pm, int in_depth, int out_depth) { /* Error in the linear composition arithmetic - only relevant when * composition actually happens (0 < alpha < 1). */ if ((pm->calculations_use_input_precision ? in_depth : out_depth) == 16) return pm->maxcalc16; els...
static double calcerr(PNG_CONST png_modifier *pm, int in_depth, int out_depth) static double calcerr(const png_modifier *pm, int in_depth, int out_depth) { /* Error in the linear composition arithmetic - only relevant when * composition actually happens (0 < alpha < 1). */ if ((pm->calculations_use_input...
173,604
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: void MemoryInstrumentation::GetVmRegionsForHeapProfiler( RequestGlobalDumpCallback callback) { const auto& coordinator = GetCoordinatorBindingForCurrentThread(); coordinator->GetVmRegionsForHeapProfiler(callback); } Commit Message: memory-infra: split up memory-infra coordinator service into two This al...
void MemoryInstrumentation::GetVmRegionsForHeapProfiler(
172,918
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: void *SoftMP3::memsetSafe(OMX_BUFFERHEADERTYPE *outHeader, int c, size_t len) { if (len > outHeader->nAllocLen) { ALOGE("memset buffer too small: got %lu, expected %zu", (unsigned long)outHeader->nAllocLen, len); android_errorWriteLog(0x534e4554, "29422022"); notify(OMX_EventError,...
void *SoftMP3::memsetSafe(OMX_BUFFERHEADERTYPE *outHeader, int c, size_t len) { if (len > outHeader->nAllocLen) { ALOGE("memset buffer too small: got %u, expected %zu", outHeader->nAllocLen, len); android_errorWriteLog(0x534e4554, "29422022"); notify(OMX_EventError, OMX_ErrorUndefined, O...
174,156
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: dophn_core(struct magic_set *ms, int clazz, int swap, int fd, off_t off, int num, size_t size, off_t fsize, int *flags) { Elf32_Phdr ph32; Elf64_Phdr ph64; size_t offset, len; unsigned char nbuf[BUFSIZ]; ssize_t bufsize; if (size != xph_sizeof) { if (file_printf(ms, ", corrupted program header size")...
dophn_core(struct magic_set *ms, int clazz, int swap, int fd, off_t off, int num, size_t size, off_t fsize, int *flags) { Elf32_Phdr ph32; Elf64_Phdr ph64; size_t offset, len; unsigned char nbuf[BUFSIZ]; ssize_t bufsize; if (size != xph_sizeof) { if (file_printf(ms, ", corrupted program header size") == -1...
166,767
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: bool SampleTable::isValid() const { return mChunkOffsetOffset >= 0 && mSampleToChunkOffset >= 0 && mSampleSizeOffset >= 0 && !mTimeToSample.empty(); } Commit Message: SampleTable.cpp: Fixed a regression caused by a fix for bug 28076789. Detail: Before the original fix (Id207f369...
bool SampleTable::isValid() const { return mChunkOffsetOffset >= 0 && mSampleToChunkOffset >= 0 && mSampleSizeOffset >= 0 && mHasTimeToSample; }
173,772
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: void ExtensionWebContentsObserver::RenderViewCreated( content::RenderViewHost* render_view_host) { const Extension* extension = GetExtension(render_view_host); if (!extension) return; content::RenderProcessHost* process = render_view_host->GetProcess(); if (type == Manifest::TYPE_EXTENSION || ...
void ExtensionWebContentsObserver::RenderViewCreated( content::RenderViewHost* render_view_host) { const Extension* extension = GetExtension(render_view_host); if (!extension) return; if (type == Manifest::TYPE_EXTENSION || type == Manifest::TYPE_LEGACY_PACKAGED_APP) { ExtensionPrefs* p...
171,776
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: void SharedWorkerDevToolsAgentHost::AttachSession(DevToolsSession* session) { session->AddHandler(std::make_unique<protocol::InspectorHandler>()); session->AddHandler(std::make_unique<protocol::NetworkHandler>(GetId())); session->AddHandler(std::make_unique<protocol::SchemaHandler>()); session->SetRend...
void SharedWorkerDevToolsAgentHost::AttachSession(DevToolsSession* session) { session->AddHandler(std::make_unique<protocol::InspectorHandler>()); session->AddHandler(std::make_unique<protocol::NetworkHandler>(GetId())); session->AddHandler(std::make_unique<protocol::SchemaHandler>()); session->SetRenderer(w...
172,787
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: static void TearDownTestCase() { vpx_free(input_ - 1); input_ = NULL; vpx_free(output_); output_ = NULL; } Commit Message: Merge Conflict Fix CL to lmp-mr1-release for ag/849478 DO NOT MERGE - libvpx: Pull from upstream Current HEAD: 7105df53d7dc13d5e575bc8df714ec8d1da36b06 BUG=23452...
static void TearDownTestCase() { vpx_free(input_ - 1); input_ = NULL; vpx_free(output_); output_ = NULL; vpx_free(output_ref_); output_ref_ = NULL; #if CONFIG_VP9_HIGHBITDEPTH vpx_free(input16_ - 1); input16_ = NULL; vpx_free(output16_); output16_ = NULL; vpx_free(outp...
174,507
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: void CheckFakeData(uint8* audio_data, int frames_written, double playback_rate) { size_t length = (frames_written * algorithm_.bytes_per_frame()) / algorithm_.bytes_per_channel(); switch (algorithm_.bytes_per_channel()) { case 4: DoCheckFakeData<int32>(...
void CheckFakeData(uint8* audio_data, int frames_written,
171,530
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: static void load_xref_from_plaintext(FILE *fp, xref_t *xref) { int i, buf_idx, obj_id, added_entries; char c, buf[32] = {0}; long start, pos; start = ftell(fp); /* Get number of entries */ pos = xref->end; fseek(fp, pos, SEEK_SET); while (ftell(fp) != 0) if (SAFE_F(fp, (fg...
static void load_xref_from_plaintext(FILE *fp, xref_t *xref) { int i, buf_idx, obj_id, added_entries; char c, buf[32] = {0}; long start, pos; start = ftell(fp); /* Get number of entries */ pos = xref->end; fseek(fp, pos, SEEK_SET); while (ftell(fp) != 0) if (SAFE_F(fp, (fgetc(fp...
169,569
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: static int _server_handle_vCont(libgdbr_t *g, int (*cmd_cb) (void*, const char*, char*, size_t), void *core_ptr) { char *action = NULL; if (send_ack (g) < 0) { return -1; } g->data[g->data_len] = '\0'; if (g->data[5] == '?') { return send_msg (g, "vCont;c;s"); } if (!(action = strtok (g->data, ";"))) {...
static int _server_handle_vCont(libgdbr_t *g, int (*cmd_cb) (void*, const char*, char*, size_t), void *core_ptr) { char *action = NULL; if (send_ack (g) < 0) { return -1; } g->data[g->data_len] = '\0'; if (g->data[5] == '?') { return send_msg (g, "vCont;c;s"); } if (!(action = strtok (g->data, ";"))) { ret...
168,081
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: static void esp_do_dma(ESPState *s) { uint32_t len; int to_device; len = s->dma_left; if (s->do_cmd) { trace_esp_do_dma(s->cmdlen, len); s->dma_memory_read(s->dma_opaque, &s->cmdbuf[s->cmdlen], len); return; } return; } Commit Message: CWE ID: CWE-7...
static void esp_do_dma(ESPState *s) { uint32_t len; int to_device; len = s->dma_left; if (s->do_cmd) { trace_esp_do_dma(s->cmdlen, len); assert (s->cmdlen <= sizeof(s->cmdbuf) && len <= sizeof(s->cmdbuf) - s->cmdlen); s->dma_memory_read(s->dma_opaque, &s->cmd...
164,961
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: void PushMessagingServiceImpl::DidHandleMessage( const std::string& app_id, const base::Closure& message_handled_closure) { auto in_flight_iterator = in_flight_message_deliveries_.find(app_id); DCHECK(in_flight_iterator != in_flight_message_deliveries_.end()); in_flight_message_deliveries_.erase(in...
void PushMessagingServiceImpl::DidHandleMessage( const std::string& app_id, const base::Closure& message_handled_closure) { auto in_flight_iterator = in_flight_message_deliveries_.find(app_id); DCHECK(in_flight_iterator != in_flight_message_deliveries_.end()); in_flight_message_deliveries_.erase(in_fligh...
172,941
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: bool ExtensionTtsPlatformImplChromeOs::IsSpeaking() { if (chromeos::CrosLibrary::Get()->EnsureLoaded()) { return chromeos::CrosLibrary::Get()->GetSpeechSynthesisLibrary()-> IsSpeaking(); } set_error(kCrosLibraryNotLoadedError); return false; } Commit Message: Extend TTS extension API to s...
bool ExtensionTtsPlatformImplChromeOs::IsSpeaking() { bool ExtensionTtsPlatformImplChromeOs::SendsEvent(TtsEventType event_type) { return (event_type == TTS_EVENT_START || event_type == TTS_EVENT_END || event_type == TTS_EVENT_ERROR); } void ExtensionTtsPlatformImplChromeOs::PollUntilSpeechFinish...
170,398
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: void ExtensionTtsController::OnSpeechFinished( int request_id, const std::string& error_message) { if (!current_utterance_ || request_id != current_utterance_->id()) return; current_utterance_->set_error(error_message); FinishCurrentUtterance(); SpeakNextUtterance(); } Commit Message: Extend TTS ...
void ExtensionTtsController::OnSpeechFinished(
170,383
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: int HttpProxyClientSocket::DoReadHeadersComplete(int result) { if (result < 0) return result; if (response_.headers->GetParsedHttpVersion() < HttpVersion(1, 0)) return ERR_TUNNEL_CONNECTION_FAILED; net_log_.AddEvent( NetLog::TYPE_HTTP_TRANSACTION_READ_TUNNEL_RESPONSE_HEADERS, base::Bin...
int HttpProxyClientSocket::DoReadHeadersComplete(int result) { if (result < 0) return result; if (response_.headers->GetParsedHttpVersion() < HttpVersion(1, 0)) return ERR_TUNNEL_CONNECTION_FAILED; net_log_.AddEvent( NetLog::TYPE_HTTP_TRANSACTION_READ_TUNNEL_RESPONSE_HEADERS, base::Bind(&Htt...
172,039
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: parse_range(char *str, size_t file_sz, int *nranges) { static struct range ranges[MAX_RANGES]; int i = 0; char *p, *q; /* Extract range unit */ if ((p = strchr(str, '=')) == NULL) return (NULL); *p++ = '\0'; /* Check if it's a bytes range spec */ if (strcmp(str, "bytes") != 0) return...
parse_range(char *str, size_t file_sz, int *nranges) int parse_ranges(struct client *clt, char *str, size_t file_sz) { int i = 0; char *p, *q; struct range_data *r = &clt->clt_ranges; memset(r, 0, sizeof(*r)); /* Extract range unit */ if ((p = strchr(str, '=')) == NULL) return (-1); *p++ = '\0'...
168,376
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: bool Init(const IPC::ChannelHandle& channel_handle, PP_Module pp_module, PP_GetInterface_Func local_get_interface, const ppapi::Preferences& preferences, SyncMessageStatusReceiver* status_receiver) { dispatcher_delegate_.reset(new ProxyChannelDelegate); di...
bool Init(const IPC::ChannelHandle& channel_handle,
170,735
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: void FrameFetchContext::DispatchWillSendRequest( unsigned long identifier, ResourceRequest& request, const ResourceResponse& redirect_response, const FetchInitiatorInfo& initiator_info) { if (IsDetached()) return; if (redirect_response.IsNull()) { GetFrame()->Loader().Progress()...
void FrameFetchContext::DispatchWillSendRequest( unsigned long identifier, ResourceRequest& request, const ResourceResponse& redirect_response, Resource::Type resource_type, const FetchInitiatorInfo& initiator_info) { if (IsDetached()) return; if (redirect_response.IsNull()) { Get...
172,474
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: Chunk::Chunk( ContainerChunk* parent, RIFF_MetaHandler* handler, bool skip, ChunkType c ) { chunkType = c; // base class assumption this->parent = parent; this->oldSize = 0; this->hasChange = false; // [2414649] valid assumption at creation time XMP_IO* file = handler->parent->ioRef; this->oldPos = file...
Chunk::Chunk( ContainerChunk* parent, RIFF_MetaHandler* handler, bool skip, ChunkType c ) { chunkType = c; // base class assumption this->parent = parent; this->oldSize = 0; this->hasChange = false; // [2414649] valid assumption at creation time XMP_IO* file = handler->parent->ioRef; this->oldPos = file->Offs...
165,369
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: const char *cJSON_GetErrorPtr( void ) { return ep; } Commit Message: Fix a buffer overflow / heap corruption issue that could occur if a malformed JSON string was passed on the control channel. This issue, present in the cJSON library, was already fixed upstream, so was addressed here in iperf3 by importing a ...
const char *cJSON_GetErrorPtr( void )
167,288
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: void EVP_EncodeUpdate(EVP_ENCODE_CTX *ctx, unsigned char *out, int *outl, const unsigned char *in, int inl) { int i, j; unsigned int total = 0; *outl = 0; if (inl <= 0) return; OPENSSL_assert(ctx->length <= (int)sizeof(ctx->enc_data)); if ((ctx->num + inl)...
void EVP_EncodeUpdate(EVP_ENCODE_CTX *ctx, unsigned char *out, int *outl, const unsigned char *in, int inl) { int i, j; unsigned int total = 0; *outl = 0; if (inl <= 0) return; OPENSSL_assert(ctx->length <= (int)sizeof(ctx->enc_data)); if (ctx->length - ctx->num...
165,217
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: static bool blit_is_unsafe(struct CirrusVGAState *s) { /* should be the case, see cirrus_bitblt_start */ assert(s->cirrus_blt_width > 0); assert(s->cirrus_blt_height > 0); if (blit_region_is_unsafe(s, s->cirrus_blt_dstpitch, s->cirrus_blt_dstaddr & s->cirrus_add...
static bool blit_is_unsafe(struct CirrusVGAState *s) { /* should be the case, see cirrus_bitblt_start */ assert(s->cirrus_blt_width > 0); assert(s->cirrus_blt_height > 0); if (s->cirrus_blt_width > CIRRUS_BLTBUFSIZE) { return true; } if (blit_region_is_unsafe(s, s->cirrus_blt_dstpi...
164,894
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: void LauncherView::CalculateIdealBounds(IdealBounds* bounds) { int available_size = primary_axis_coordinate(width(), height()); if (!available_size) return; int x = primary_axis_coordinate(kLeadingInset, 0); int y = primary_axis_coordinate(0, kLeadingInset); for (int i = 0; i < view_model_->vie...
void LauncherView::CalculateIdealBounds(IdealBounds* bounds) { int available_size = primary_axis_coordinate(width(), height()); if (!available_size) return; int x = primary_axis_coordinate(leading_inset(), 0); int y = primary_axis_coordinate(0, leading_inset()); for (int i = 0; i < view_model_->view_...
170,888
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: static void svc_rdma_destroy_maps(struct svcxprt_rdma *xprt) { while (!list_empty(&xprt->sc_maps)) { struct svc_rdma_req_map *map; map = list_first_entry(&xprt->sc_maps, struct svc_rdma_req_map, free); list_del(&map->free); kfree(map); } } Commit Message: Merge tag 'nfsd-4.12' of git://linux...
static void svc_rdma_destroy_maps(struct svcxprt_rdma *xprt)
168,180
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: long Tracks::Parse() { assert(m_trackEntries == NULL); assert(m_trackEntriesEnd == NULL); const long long stop = m_start + m_size; IMkvReader* const pReader = m_pSegment->m_pReader; int count = 0; long long pos = m_start; while (pos < stop) { long long id, size; con...
long Tracks::Parse()
174,408
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: void CreatePersistentHistogramAllocator() { allocator_memory_.reset(new char[kAllocatorMemorySize]); GlobalHistogramAllocator::ReleaseForTesting(); memset(allocator_memory_.get(), 0, kAllocatorMemorySize); GlobalHistogramAllocator::GetCreateHistogramResultHistogram(); GlobalHistogramAll...
void CreatePersistentHistogramAllocator() { allocator_memory_.reset(new char[kAllocatorMemorySize]); GlobalHistogramAllocator::ReleaseForTesting(); memset(allocator_memory_.get(), 0, kAllocatorMemorySize); GlobalHistogramAllocator::CreateWithPersistentMemory( allocator_memory_.get(), kAl...
172,137
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: make_random_bytes(png_uint_32* seed, void* pv, size_t size) { png_uint_32 u0 = seed[0], u1 = seed[1]; png_bytep bytes = png_voidcast(png_bytep, pv); /* There are thirty-three bits; the next bit in the sequence is bit-33 XOR * bit-20. The top 1 bit is in u1, the bottom 32 are in u0. */ si...
make_random_bytes(png_uint_32* seed, void* pv, size_t size) { png_uint_32 u0 = seed[0], u1 = seed[1]; png_bytep bytes = voidcast(png_bytep, pv); /* There are thirty-three bits; the next bit in the sequence is bit-33 XOR * bit-20. The top 1 bit is in u1, the bottom 32 are in u0. */ size_t i; f...
173,736
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: long SeekHead::Parse() { IMkvReader* const pReader = m_pSegment->m_pReader; long long pos = m_start; const long long stop = m_start + m_size; int entry_count = 0; int void_element_count = 0; while (pos < stop) { long long id, size; const long status = ParseElementHeader(pReader, pos, stop, id, size);...
long SeekHead::Parse() { IMkvReader* const pReader = m_pSegment->m_pReader; long long pos = m_start; const long long stop = m_start + m_size; int entry_count = 0; int void_element_count = 0; while (pos < stop) { long long id, size; const long status = ParseElementHeader(pReader, pos, stop, id, size); if ...
173,836
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: cJSON *cJSON_DetachItemFromObject( cJSON *object, const char *string ) { int i = 0; cJSON *c = object->child; while ( c && cJSON_strcasecmp( c->string, string ) ) { ++i; c = c->next; } if ( c ) return cJSON_DetachItemFromArray( object, i ); return 0; } Commit Message: Fix a buffer overflow / heap cor...
cJSON *cJSON_DetachItemFromObject( cJSON *object, const char *string )
167,285
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: void ChromeMockRenderThread::OnUpdatePrintSettings( int document_cookie, const base::DictionaryValue& job_settings, PrintMsg_PrintPages_Params* params) { std::string dummy_string; int margins_type = 0; if (!job_settings.GetBoolean(printing::kSettingLandscape, NULL) || !job_settings.GetBool...
void ChromeMockRenderThread::OnUpdatePrintSettings( int document_cookie, const base::DictionaryValue& job_settings, PrintMsg_PrintPages_Params* params) { std::string dummy_string; int margins_type = 0; if (!job_settings.GetBoolean(printing::kSettingLandscape, NULL) || !job_settings.GetBoolean(pr...
170,854
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: void Track::Info::Clear() { delete[] nameAsUTF8; nameAsUTF8 = NULL; delete[] language; language = NULL; delete[] codecId; codecId = NULL; delete[] codecPrivate; codecPrivate = NULL; codecPrivateSize = 0; delete[] codecNameAsUTF8; codecNameAsUTF8 = NULL; } Commit Me...
void Track::Info::Clear() if (dst) // should be NULL already return -1; const char* const src = this->*str;
174,247
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: cJSON *cJSON_CreateInt( int64_t num ) { cJSON *item = cJSON_New_Item(); if ( item ) { item->type = cJSON_Number; item->valuefloat = num; item->valueint = num; } return item; } Commit Message: Fix a buffer overflow / heap corruption issue that could occur if a malformed JSON string was passed on the con...
cJSON *cJSON_CreateInt( int64_t num )
167,274
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: static rsRetVal createSocket(instanceConf_t* info, void** sock) { int rv; sublist* sub; *sock = zsocket_new(s_context, info->type); if (!sock) { errmsg.LogError(0, RS_RET_INVALID_PARAMS, "zsocket_new failed: %s, for type %d", ...
static rsRetVal createSocket(instanceConf_t* info, void** sock) { int rv; sublist* sub; *sock = zsocket_new(s_context, info->type); if (!sock) { errmsg.LogError(0, RS_RET_INVALID_PARAMS, "zsocket_new failed: %s, for type %d", ...
167,983
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: int EVP_DecodeUpdate(EVP_ENCODE_CTX *ctx, unsigned char *out, int *outl, const unsigned char *in, int inl) { int seof= -1,eof=0,rv= -1,ret=0,i,v,tmp,n,ln,exp_nl; unsigned char *d; n=ctx->num; d=ctx->enc_data; ln=ctx->line_num; exp_nl=ctx->expect_nl; /* last line of input. */ if ((inl == 0) || ((n...
int EVP_DecodeUpdate(EVP_ENCODE_CTX *ctx, unsigned char *out, int *outl, const unsigned char *in, int inl) { int seof= -1,eof=0,rv= -1,ret=0,i,v,tmp,n,ln,exp_nl; unsigned char *d; n=ctx->num; d=ctx->enc_data; ln=ctx->line_num; exp_nl=ctx->expect_nl; /* last line of input. */ if ((inl == 0) || ((n == 0)...
164,803
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: cJSON *cJSON_CreateString( const char *string ) { cJSON *item = cJSON_New_Item(); if ( item ) { item->type = cJSON_String; item->valuestring = cJSON_strdup( string ); } return item; } Commit Message: Fix a buffer overflow / heap corruption issue that could occur if a malformed JSON string was passed on t...
cJSON *cJSON_CreateString( const char *string )
167,278
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: void EglRenderingVDAClient::CreateDecoder() { CHECK(decoder_deleted()); #if defined(OS_WIN) scoped_refptr<DXVAVideoDecodeAccelerator> decoder = new DXVAVideoDecodeAccelerator(this, base::GetCurrentProcessHandle()); #else // OS_WIN scoped_refptr<OmxVideoDecodeAccelerator> decoder = new Omx...
void EglRenderingVDAClient::CreateDecoder() { CHECK(decoder_deleted()); #if defined(OS_WIN) scoped_refptr<DXVAVideoDecodeAccelerator> decoder = new DXVAVideoDecodeAccelerator(this); #else // OS_WIN scoped_refptr<OmxVideoDecodeAccelerator> decoder = new OmxVideoDecodeAccelerator(this); decoder...
170,943
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: static int netlbl_cipsov4_add_common(struct genl_info *info, struct cipso_v4_doi *doi_def) { struct nlattr *nla; int nla_rem; u32 iter = 0; doi_def->doi = nla_get_u32(info->attrs[NLBL_CIPSOV4_A_DOI]); if (nla_validate_nested(info->attrs[NLBL_CIPSOV4_A_TAGLST], NLBL_CIPSOV4_A_MAX, netlbl_ci...
static int netlbl_cipsov4_add_common(struct genl_info *info, struct cipso_v4_doi *doi_def) { struct nlattr *nla; int nla_rem; u32 iter = 0; doi_def->doi = nla_get_u32(info->attrs[NLBL_CIPSOV4_A_DOI]); if (nla_validate_nested(info->attrs[NLBL_CIPSOV4_A_TAGLST], NLBL_CIPSOV4_A_MAX, netlbl_cipsov4_...
169,874
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: virtual void PreEncodeFrameHook(::libvpx_test::VideoSource *video, ::libvpx_test::Encoder *encoder) { const vpx_rational_t tb = video->timebase(); timebase_ = static_cast<double>(tb.num) / tb.den; duration_ = 0; } Commit Message: Merge Conflict Fix CL to lmp-...
virtual void PreEncodeFrameHook(::libvpx_test::VideoSource *video, ::libvpx_test::Encoder *encoder) { if (video->frame() == 0) encoder->Control(VP8E_SET_NOISE_SENSITIVITY, denoiser_on_); if (denoiser_offon_test_) { ASSERT_GT(denoiser_offon_period_, 0) ...
174,515
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: Blob::Blob() : m_size(0) { ScriptWrappable::init(this); OwnPtr<BlobData> blobData = BlobData::create(); m_internalURL = BlobURL::createInternalURL(); ThreadableBlobRegistry::registerBlobURL(m_internalURL, blobData.release()); } Commit Message: Remove BlobRegistry indirection since there i...
Blob::Blob() : m_size(0) { ScriptWrappable::init(this); OwnPtr<BlobData> blobData = BlobData::create(); m_internalURL = BlobURL::createInternalURL(); BlobRegistry::registerBlobURL(m_internalURL, blobData.release()); }
170,674
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: irc_ctcp_dcc_filename_without_quotes (const char *filename) { int length; length = strlen (filename); if (length > 0) { if ((filename[0] == '\"') && (filename[length - 1] == '\"')) return weechat_strndup (filename + 1, length - 2); } return strdup (filename); } ...
irc_ctcp_dcc_filename_without_quotes (const char *filename) { int length; length = strlen (filename); if (length > 1) { if ((filename[0] == '\"') && (filename[length - 1] == '\"')) return weechat_strndup (filename + 1, length - 2); } return strdup (filename); }
168,206
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: static unsigned long get_seg_limit(struct pt_regs *regs, int seg_reg_idx) { struct desc_struct *desc; unsigned long limit; short sel; sel = get_segment_selector(regs, seg_reg_idx); if (sel < 0) return 0; if (user_64bit_mode(regs) || v8086_mode(regs)) return -1L; if (!sel) return 0; desc ...
static unsigned long get_seg_limit(struct pt_regs *regs, int seg_reg_idx) { struct desc_struct desc; unsigned long limit; short sel; sel = get_segment_selector(regs, seg_reg_idx); if (sel < 0) return 0; if (user_64bit_mode(regs) || v8086_mode(regs)) return -1L; if (!sel) return 0; if (!get_des...
169,608
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: void FrameSelection::MoveRangeSelection(const VisiblePosition& base_position, const VisiblePosition& extent_position, TextGranularity granularity) { SelectionInDOMTree new_selection = SelectionInDOMTree::Builder() ....
void FrameSelection::MoveRangeSelection(const VisiblePosition& base_position, const VisiblePosition& extent_position, TextGranularity granularity) { SelectionInDOMTree new_selection = SelectionInDOMTree::Builder() .SetBas...
171,757
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: static zend_bool add_post_var(zval *arr, post_var_data_t *var, zend_bool eof) { char *ksep, *vsep, *val; size_t klen, vlen; size_t new_vlen; if (var->ptr >= var->end) { return 0; } vsep = memchr(var->ptr, '&', var->end - var->ptr); if (!vsep) { if (!eof) { return 0; } else { vse...
static zend_bool add_post_var(zval *arr, post_var_data_t *var, zend_bool eof) { char *start, *ksep, *vsep, *val; size_t klen, vlen; size_t new_vlen; if (var->ptr >= var->end) { return 0; } start = var->ptr + var->already_scanned; vsep = memchr(start, '&', var->end - start); if (!vsep) { if (!eo...
170,041
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: static int rm_read_multi(AVFormatContext *s, AVIOContext *pb, AVStream *st, char *mime) { int number_of_streams = avio_rb16(pb); int number_of_mdpr; int i, ret; unsigned size2; for (i = 0; i<number_of_streams; i++) avio_rb16(pb); number_of_mdpr = avio_rb16(...
static int rm_read_multi(AVFormatContext *s, AVIOContext *pb, AVStream *st, char *mime) { int number_of_streams = avio_rb16(pb); int number_of_mdpr; int i, ret; unsigned size2; for (i = 0; i<number_of_streams; i++) avio_rb16(pb); number_of_mdpr = avio_rb16(pb); ...
168,924
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: static pfunc check_literal(struct jv_parser* p) { if (p->tokenpos == 0) return 0; const char* pattern = 0; int plen; jv v; switch (p->tokenbuf[0]) { case 't': pattern = "true"; plen = 4; v = jv_true(); break; case 'f': pattern = "false"; plen = 5; v = jv_false(); break; case 'n': pattern = "null"...
static pfunc check_literal(struct jv_parser* p) { if (p->tokenpos == 0) return 0; const char* pattern = 0; int plen; jv v; switch (p->tokenbuf[0]) { case 't': pattern = "true"; plen = 4; v = jv_true(); break; case 'f': pattern = "false"; plen = 5; v = jv_false(); break; case 'n': pattern = "null"; plen...
167,476
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: long Chapters::Edition::Parse(IMkvReader* pReader, long long pos, long long size) { const long long stop = pos + size; while (pos < stop) { long long id, size; long status = ParseElementHeader(pReader, pos, stop, id, size); if (status < 0) // error return status; if (size == 0) // weird continue; i...
long Chapters::Edition::Parse(IMkvReader* pReader, long long pos, long long size) { const long long stop = pos + size; while (pos < stop) { long long id, size; long status = ParseElementHeader(pReader, pos, stop, id, size); if (status < 0) // error return status; if (size == 0) // weird continue; if (id ...
173,839
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: views::NonClientFrameView* ShellWindowViews::CreateNonClientFrameView( views::Widget* widget) { ShellWindowFrameView* frame_view = new ShellWindowFrameView(); frame_view->Init(window_); return frame_view; } Commit Message: [views] Remove header bar on shell windows created with {frame: none}. BUG...
views::NonClientFrameView* ShellWindowViews::CreateNonClientFrameView( views::Widget* widget) { ShellWindowFrameView* frame_view = new ShellWindowFrameView(use_custom_frame_); frame_view->Init(window_); return frame_view; }
170,710
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: OmniboxPopupViewGtk::OmniboxPopupViewGtk(const gfx::Font& font, OmniboxView* omnibox_view, AutocompleteEditModel* edit_model, GtkWidget* location_bar) : model_(new AutocompletePopupMod...
OmniboxPopupViewGtk::OmniboxPopupViewGtk(const gfx::Font& font, OmniboxView* omnibox_view, AutocompleteEditModel* edit_model, GtkWidget* location_bar) : signal_registrar_(new ui::GtkSignalRe...
171,048
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: static int msg_parse_fetch(struct ImapHeader *h, char *s) { char tmp[SHORT_STRING]; char *ptmp = NULL; if (!s) return -1; while (*s) { SKIPWS(s); if (mutt_str_strncasecmp("FLAGS", s, 5) == 0) { s = msg_parse_flags(h, s); if (!s) return -1; } else if (mutt_s...
static int msg_parse_fetch(struct ImapHeader *h, char *s) { char tmp[SHORT_STRING]; char *ptmp = NULL; if (!s) return -1; while (*s) { SKIPWS(s); if (mutt_str_strncasecmp("FLAGS", s, 5) == 0) { s = msg_parse_flags(h, s); if (!s) return -1; } else if (mutt_str_str...
169,132
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: OMX_ERRORTYPE omx_vdec::component_deinit(OMX_IN OMX_HANDLETYPE hComp) { (void) hComp; #ifdef _ANDROID_ if (iDivXDrmDecrypt) { delete iDivXDrmDecrypt; iDivXDrmDecrypt=NULL; } #endif //_ANDROID_ unsigned i = 0; if (OMX_StateLoaded != m_state) { DEBUG_PRINT_ERROR("WARNING:Rxd DeInit,OMX not i...
OMX_ERRORTYPE omx_vdec::component_deinit(OMX_IN OMX_HANDLETYPE hComp) { (void) hComp; #ifdef _ANDROID_ if (iDivXDrmDecrypt) { delete iDivXDrmDecrypt; iDivXDrmDecrypt=NULL; } #endif //_ANDROID_ unsigned i = 0; if (OMX_StateLoaded != m_state) { DEBUG_PRINT_ERROR("WARNING:Rxd DeInit,OMX not in LOAD...
173,784
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: int EVP_EncryptUpdate(EVP_CIPHER_CTX *ctx, unsigned char *out, int *outl, const unsigned char *in, int inl) { int i, j, bl; if (ctx->cipher->flags & EVP_CIPH_FLAG_CUSTOM_CIPHER) { i = ctx->cipher->do_cipher(ctx, out, in, inl); if (i < 0) return 0; ...
int EVP_EncryptUpdate(EVP_CIPHER_CTX *ctx, unsigned char *out, int *outl, const unsigned char *in, int inl) { int i, j, bl; if (ctx->cipher->flags & EVP_CIPH_FLAG_CUSTOM_CIPHER) { i = ctx->cipher->do_cipher(ctx, out, in, inl); if (i < 0) return 0; else ...
165,216
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: my_object_rec_arrays (MyObject *obj, GPtrArray *in, GPtrArray **ret, GError **error) { char **strs; GArray *ints; guint v_UINT; if (in->len != 2) { g_set_error (error, MY_OBJECT_ERROR, MY_OBJECT_ERROR_FOO, "invalid array len"); return FALSE; } strs = g_ptr_array_index ...
my_object_rec_arrays (MyObject *obj, GPtrArray *in, GPtrArray **ret, GError **error)
165,116
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: bool WorkerProcessLauncherTest::LaunchProcess( IPC::Listener* delegate, ScopedHandle* process_exit_event_out) { process_exit_event_.Set(CreateEvent(NULL, TRUE, FALSE, NULL)); if (!process_exit_event_.IsValid()) return false; channel_name_ = GenerateIpcChannelName(this); if (!CreateIpcChann...
bool WorkerProcessLauncherTest::LaunchProcess( IPC::Listener* delegate, ScopedHandle* process_exit_event_out) { process_exit_event_.Set(CreateEvent(NULL, TRUE, FALSE, NULL)); if (!process_exit_event_.IsValid()) return false; channel_name_ = GenerateIpcChannelName(this); ScopedHandle pipe; if (...
171,551
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: void sum_init(int csum_type, int seed) { char s[4]; if (csum_type < 0) csum_type = parse_csum_name(NULL, 0); cursum_type = csum_type; switch (csum_type) { case CSUM_MD5: md5_begin(&md); break; case CSUM_MD4: mdfour_begin(&md); sumresidue = 0; break; case CSUM_MD4_OLD: br...
void sum_init(int csum_type, int seed) { char s[4]; if (csum_type < 0) csum_type = parse_csum_name(NULL, 0); cursum_type = csum_type; switch (csum_type) { case CSUM_MD5: md5_begin(&md); break; case CSUM_MD4: mdfour_begin(&md); sumresidue = 0; break; case CSUM_MD4_OLD: break; ...
164,646
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: status_t OMXNodeInstance::createGraphicBufferSource( OMX_U32 portIndex, sp<IGraphicBufferConsumer> bufferConsumer, MetadataBufferType *type) { status_t err; const sp<GraphicBufferSource>& surfaceCheck = getGraphicBufferSource(); if (surfaceCheck != NULL) { if (portIndex < NELEM(...
status_t OMXNodeInstance::createGraphicBufferSource( OMX_U32 portIndex, sp<IGraphicBufferConsumer> bufferConsumer, MetadataBufferType *type) { status_t err; // only allow graphic source on input port, when there are no allocated buffers yet if (portIndex != kPortIndexInput) { android_er...
174,132
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: void TestPlaybackRate(double playback_rate, int buffer_size_in_frames, int total_frames_requested) { int initial_bytes_enqueued = bytes_enqueued_; int initial_bytes_buffered = algorithm_.bytes_buffered(); algorithm_.SetPlaybackRate(static_cast<float>(...
void TestPlaybackRate(double playback_rate, int buffer_size_in_frames, int total_frames_requested) { int initial_bytes_enqueued = bytes_enqueued_; int initial_bytes_buffered = algorithm_.bytes_buffered(); algorithm_.SetPlaybackRate(static_cast<float>(playba...
171,536
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: static noinline void key_gc_unused_keys(struct list_head *keys) { while (!list_empty(keys)) { struct key *key = list_entry(keys->next, struct key, graveyard_link); list_del(&key->graveyard_link); kdebug("- %u", key->serial); key_check(key); /* Throw away the key data */ if (key->type->destroy...
static noinline void key_gc_unused_keys(struct list_head *keys) { while (!list_empty(keys)) { struct key *key = list_entry(keys->next, struct key, graveyard_link); list_del(&key->graveyard_link); kdebug("- %u", key->serial); key_check(key); /* Throw away the key data if the key is instantiated */ i...
166,576
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: void ChromeWebContentsDelegateAndroid::AddNewContents( WebContents* source, WebContents* new_contents, WindowOpenDisposition disposition, const gfx::Rect& initial_rect, bool user_gesture, bool* was_blocked) { DCHECK_NE(disposition, SAVE_TO_DISK); DCHECK_NE(disposition, CURRENT_TAB); ...
void ChromeWebContentsDelegateAndroid::AddNewContents( WebContents* source, WebContents* new_contents, WindowOpenDisposition disposition, const gfx::Rect& initial_rect, bool user_gesture, bool* was_blocked) { DCHECK_NE(disposition, SAVE_TO_DISK); DCHECK_NE(disposition, CURRENT_TAB); TabHe...
171,137
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: MagickExport void RemoveDuplicateLayers(Image **images, ExceptionInfo *exception) { register Image *curr, *next; RectangleInfo bounds; assert((*images) != (const Image *) NULL); assert((*images)->signature == MagickCoreSignature); if ((*images)->debug != MagickFalse) (void) ...
MagickExport void RemoveDuplicateLayers(Image **images, MagickExport void RemoveDuplicateLayers(Image **images,ExceptionInfo *exception) { RectangleInfo bounds; register Image *image, *next; assert((*images) != (const Image *) NULL); assert((*images)->signature == MagickCoreSignature); if...
170,192
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: mp_capable_print(netdissect_options *ndo, const u_char *opt, u_int opt_len, u_char flags) { const struct mp_capable *mpc = (const struct mp_capable *) opt; if (!(opt_len == 12 && flags & TH_SYN) && !(opt_len == 20 && (flags & (TH_SYN | TH_ACK)) == TH_ACK)) ...
mp_capable_print(netdissect_options *ndo, const u_char *opt, u_int opt_len, u_char flags) { const struct mp_capable *mpc = (const struct mp_capable *) opt; if (!(opt_len == 12 && (flags & TH_SYN)) && !(opt_len == 20 && (flags & (TH_SYN | TH_ACK)) == TH_ACK)) ...
167,835
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: void AppControllerImpl::OnAppUpdate(const apps::AppUpdate& update) { if (!update.StateIsNull() && !update.NameChanged() && !update.ReadinessChanged()) { return; } if (client_) { client_->OnAppChanged(CreateAppPtr(update)); } } Commit Message: Refactor the AppController implementation i...
void AppControllerImpl::OnAppUpdate(const apps::AppUpdate& update) { void AppControllerService::OnAppUpdate(const apps::AppUpdate& update) { if (!update.StateIsNull() && !update.NameChanged() && !update.ReadinessChanged()) { return; } if (client_) { client_->OnAppChanged(CreateAppPtr(update)); ...
172,087
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: long long SegmentInfo::GetTimeCodeScale() const { return m_timecodeScale; } Commit Message: libwebm: Pull from upstream Rolling mkvparser from upstream. Primarily for fixing a bug on parsing failures with certain Opus WebM files. Upstream commit hash of this pull: 574045edd4ecbeb802ee3f1d214b5510269852ae ...
long long SegmentInfo::GetTimeCodeScale() const
174,368
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: int rpc_type_of_NPNVariable(int variable) { int type; switch (variable) { case NPNVjavascriptEnabledBool: case NPNVasdEnabledBool: case NPNVisOfflineBool: case NPNVSupportsXEmbedBool: case NPNVSupportsWindowless: type = RPC_TYPE_BOOLEAN; break; case NPNVToolkit: case NPNVnetscapeWindow: ...
int rpc_type_of_NPNVariable(int variable) { int type; switch (variable) { case NPNVjavascriptEnabledBool: case NPNVasdEnabledBool: case NPNVisOfflineBool: case NPNVSupportsXEmbedBool: case NPNVSupportsWindowless: case NPNVprivateModeBool: case NPNVsupportsAdvancedKeyHandling: type = RPC_TYPE_BOOL...
165,862
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: mark_context_stack(mrb_state *mrb, struct mrb_context *c) { size_t i; size_t e; if (c->stack == NULL) return; e = c->stack - c->stbase; if (c->ci) e += c->ci->nregs; if (c->stbase + e > c->stend) e = c->stend - c->stbase; for (i=0; i<e; i++) { mrb_value v = c->stbase[i]; if (!mrb_...
mark_context_stack(mrb_state *mrb, struct mrb_context *c) { size_t i; size_t e; mrb_value nil; if (c->stack == NULL) return; e = c->stack - c->stbase; if (c->ci) e += c->ci->nregs; if (c->stbase + e > c->stend) e = c->stend - c->stbase; for (i=0; i<e; i++) { mrb_value v = c->stbase[i]; ...
168,094
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: AccessibilityOrientation AXNodeObject::orientation() const { const AtomicString& ariaOrientation = getAOMPropertyOrARIAAttribute(AOMStringProperty::kOrientation); AccessibilityOrientation orientation = AccessibilityOrientationUndefined; if (equalIgnoringCase(ariaOrientation, "horizontal")) ori...
AccessibilityOrientation AXNodeObject::orientation() const { const AtomicString& ariaOrientation = getAOMPropertyOrARIAAttribute(AOMStringProperty::kOrientation); AccessibilityOrientation orientation = AccessibilityOrientationUndefined; if (equalIgnoringASCIICase(ariaOrientation, "horizontal")) orie...
171,920
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: void BaseRenderingContext2D::Reset() { ValidateStateStack(); UnwindStateStack(); state_stack_.resize(1); state_stack_.front() = CanvasRenderingContext2DState::Create(); path_.Clear(); if (PaintCanvas* c = ExistingDrawingCanvas()) { DCHECK_EQ(c->getSaveCount(), 2); c->restore(); c->save(); ...
void BaseRenderingContext2D::Reset() { ValidateStateStack(); UnwindStateStack(); state_stack_.resize(1); state_stack_.front() = CanvasRenderingContext2DState::Create(); path_.Clear(); if (PaintCanvas* c = ExistingDrawingCanvas()) { DCHECK_EQ(c->getSaveCount(), 2); c->restore(); c->save(); DC...
172,906
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: PHP_FUNCTION(mcrypt_enc_get_supported_key_sizes) { int i, count = 0; int *key_sizes; MCRYPT_GET_TD_ARG array_init(return_value); key_sizes = mcrypt_enc_get_supported_key_sizes(pm->td, &count); for (i = 0; i < count; i++) { add_index_long(return_value, i, key_sizes[i]); } mcrypt_free(key_sizes);...
PHP_FUNCTION(mcrypt_enc_get_supported_key_sizes) { int i, count = 0; int *key_sizes; MCRYPT_GET_TD_ARG array_init(return_value); key_sizes = mcrypt_enc_get_supported_key_sizes(pm->td, &count); for (i = 0; i < count; i++) { add_index_long(return_value, i, key_sizes[i]); } mcrypt_free(key_sizes); }
167,093
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: gfx::Size ShellWindowFrameView::GetMaximumSize() { gfx::Size max_size = frame_->client_view()->GetMaximumSize(); if (!max_size.IsEmpty()) { gfx::Rect client_bounds = GetBoundsForClientView(); max_size.Enlarge(0, client_bounds.y()); } return max_size; } Commit Message: [views] Remove header b...
gfx::Size ShellWindowFrameView::GetMaximumSize() { gfx::Size max_size = frame_->client_view()->GetMaximumSize(); if (is_frameless_) return max_size; if (!max_size.IsEmpty()) { gfx::Rect client_bounds = GetBoundsForClientView(); max_size.Enlarge(0, client_bounds.y()); } return max_size; }
170,712
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: static int ext4_dax_mkwrite(struct vm_area_struct *vma, struct vm_fault *vmf) { return dax_mkwrite(vma, vmf, ext4_get_block_dax, ext4_end_io_unwritten); } Commit Message: ext4: fix races between page faults and hole punching Currently, page faults and hole punching are completely unsynchronized. This ca...
static int ext4_dax_mkwrite(struct vm_area_struct *vma, struct vm_fault *vmf) { int err; struct inode *inode = file_inode(vma->vm_file); sb_start_pagefault(inode->i_sb); file_update_time(vma->vm_file); down_read(&EXT4_I(inode)->i_mmap_sem); err = __dax_mkwrite(vma, vmf, ext4_get_block_dax, ext4_end_io_u...
167,487
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: int ssl3_send_alert(SSL *s, int level, int desc) { /* Map tls/ssl alert value to correct one */ desc = s->method->ssl3_enc->alert_value(desc); if (s->version == SSL3_VERSION && desc == SSL_AD_PROTOCOL_VERSION) desc = SSL_AD_HANDSHAKE_FAILURE; /* SSL 3.0 does not have ...
int ssl3_send_alert(SSL *s, int level, int desc) { /* Map tls/ssl alert value to correct one */ desc = s->method->ssl3_enc->alert_value(desc); if (s->version == SSL3_VERSION && desc == SSL_AD_PROTOCOL_VERSION) desc = SSL_AD_HANDSHAKE_FAILURE; /* SSL 3.0 does not have ...
165,141
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: GC_INNER void * GC_generic_malloc_ignore_off_page(size_t lb, int k) { void *result; size_t lg; size_t lb_rounded; word n_blocks; GC_bool init; DCL_LOCK_STATE; if (SMALL_OBJ(lb)) return(GC_generic_malloc((word)lb, k)); lg = ROUNDED_UP_GRANULES(lb); lb_rounded = GRANU...
GC_INNER void * GC_generic_malloc_ignore_off_page(size_t lb, int k) { void *result; size_t lg; size_t lb_rounded; word n_blocks; GC_bool init; DCL_LOCK_STATE; if (SMALL_OBJ(lb)) return(GC_generic_malloc((word)lb, k)); lg = ROUNDED_UP_GRANULES(lb); lb_rounded = GRANULES_TO...
169,879
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: get_policy_2_svc(gpol_arg *arg, struct svc_req *rqstp) { static gpol_ret ret; kadm5_ret_t ret2; char *prime_arg, *funcname; gss_buffer_desc client_name, service_name; OM_uint32 minor_stat; kadm5_principal...
get_policy_2_svc(gpol_arg *arg, struct svc_req *rqstp) { static gpol_ret ret; kadm5_ret_t ret2; char *prime_arg, *funcname; gss_buffer_desc client_name = GSS_C_EMPTY_BUFFER; gss_buffer_desc service_name = GSS_C_EMPTY_BUFFER; ...
167,513
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: long Track::Seek( long long time_ns, const BlockEntry*& pResult) const { const long status = GetFirst(pResult); if (status < 0) //buffer underflow, etc return status; assert(pResult); if (pResult->EOS()) return 0; const Cluster* pCluster = pResult->GetCluster()...
long Track::Seek( long Track::Seek(long long time_ns, const BlockEntry*& pResult) const { const long status = GetFirst(pResult); if (status < 0) // buffer underflow, etc return status; assert(pResult); if (pResult->EOS()) return 0; const Cluster* pCluster = pResult->GetCluster(); assert(pCl...
174,435
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: krb5_gss_inquire_sec_context_by_oid (OM_uint32 *minor_status, const gss_ctx_id_t context_handle, const gss_OID desired_object, gss_buffer_set_t *data_set) { krb5_gss_ctx_id_rec *ctx; size_t i; ...
krb5_gss_inquire_sec_context_by_oid (OM_uint32 *minor_status, const gss_ctx_id_t context_handle, const gss_OID desired_object, gss_buffer_set_t *data_set) { krb5_gss_ctx_id_rec *ctx; size_t i; if ...
166,815
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: image_transform_png_set_expand_mod(PNG_CONST image_transform *this, image_pixel *that, png_const_structp pp, PNG_CONST transform_display *display) { /* The general expand case depends on what the colour type is: */ if (that->colour_type == PNG_COLOR_TYPE_PALETTE) image_pixel_convert_PLTE(t...
image_transform_png_set_expand_mod(PNG_CONST image_transform *this, image_transform_png_set_expand_mod(const image_transform *this, image_pixel *that, png_const_structp pp, const transform_display *display) { /* The general expand case depends on what the colour type is: */ if (that->colour_type == PN...
173,633
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: long long mkvparser::UnserializeUInt( IMkvReader* pReader, long long pos, long long size) { assert(pReader); assert(pos >= 0); if ((size <= 0) || (size > 8)) return E_FILE_FORMAT_INVALID; long long result = 0; for (long long i = 0; i < size; ++i) { unsigne...
long long mkvparser::UnserializeUInt( if ((size_ != 4) && (size_ != 8)) return E_FILE_FORMAT_INVALID; const long size = static_cast<long>(size_); unsigned char buf[8]; const int status = pReader->Read(pos, size, buf); if (status < 0) // error return status; if (size == 4) { union { ...
174,450
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: BlockGroup::BlockGroup( Cluster* pCluster, long idx, long long block_start, long long block_size, long long prev, long long next, long long duration, long long discard_padding) : BlockEntry(pCluster, idx), m_block(block_start, block_size, discard_padding), m_prev(prev),...
BlockGroup::BlockGroup(
174,242
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: void Huff_transmit (huff_t *huff, int ch, byte *fout) { int i; if (huff->loc[ch] == NULL) { /* node_t hasn't been transmitted, send a NYT, then the symbol */ Huff_transmit(huff, NYT, fout); for (i = 7; i >= 0; i--) { add_bit((char)((ch >> i) & 0x1), fout); } } else { send(huff->loc[ch], NU...
void Huff_transmit (huff_t *huff, int ch, byte *fout) { void Huff_transmit (huff_t *huff, int ch, byte *fout, int maxoffset) { int i; if (huff->loc[ch] == NULL) { /* node_t hasn't been transmitted, send a NYT, then the symbol */ Huff_transmit(huff, NYT, fout, maxoffset); for (i = 7; i >= 0; i--) { add_...
167,996
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: void PluginModule::InitAsProxiedNaCl( scoped_ptr<PluginDelegate::OutOfProcessProxy> out_of_process_proxy, PP_Instance instance) { nacl_ipc_proxy_ = true; InitAsProxied(out_of_process_proxy.release()); out_of_process_proxy_->AddInstance(instance); PluginInstance* plugin_instance = host_globals->...
void PluginModule::InitAsProxiedNaCl( PluginDelegate::OutOfProcessProxy* out_of_process_proxy, PP_Instance instance) { InitAsProxied(out_of_process_proxy); out_of_process_proxy_->AddInstance(instance); PluginInstance* plugin_instance = host_globals->GetInstance(instance); if (!plugin_instance) re...
170,745
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: static size_t hash_str(const void *ptr) { const char *str = (const char *)ptr; size_t hash = 5381; size_t c; while((c = (size_t)*str)) { hash = ((hash << 5) + hash) + c; str++; } return hash; } Commit Message: CVE-2013-6401: Change hash function, randomize hashes ...
static size_t hash_str(const void *ptr) extern volatile uint32_t hashtable_seed; /* Implementation of the hash function */ #include "lookup3.h"
166,526
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: static int hci_sock_getname(struct socket *sock, struct sockaddr *addr, int *addr_len, int peer) { struct sockaddr_hci *haddr = (struct sockaddr_hci *) addr; struct sock *sk = sock->sk; struct hci_dev *hdev = hci_pi(sk)->hdev; BT_DBG("sock %p sk %p", sock, sk); if (!hdev) return -EBADFD; lock_so...
static int hci_sock_getname(struct socket *sock, struct sockaddr *addr, int *addr_len, int peer) { struct sockaddr_hci *haddr = (struct sockaddr_hci *) addr; struct sock *sk = sock->sk; struct hci_dev *hdev = hci_pi(sk)->hdev; BT_DBG("sock %p sk %p", sock, sk); if (!hdev) return -EBADFD; lock_sock(sk)...
169,900