benchmark_name stringclasses 6
values | target stringclasses 1
value | platform stringclasses 1
value | logical_cpus int64 12 12 | threads int64 24 96 | duration_sec float64 30 30 | total_ops int64 18.7k 734k | ops_per_sec float64 619 24.4k | total_errors int64 0 666k | total_crashes int64 0 0 | error_rate_pct float64 0 50.1 | latency_min_ms float64 0.01 2.73 | latency_mean_ms float64 0.95 77.2 | latency_max_ms float64 68.8 3.13k | latency_p50_ms float64 0.05 109 | latency_p95_ms float64 2.43 264 | latency_p99_ms float64 5.15 289 | peak_rss_mb int64 65 3.33k | cpu_utilization_pct float64 100 100 | description stringclasses 6
values | scripts_tested listlengths 2 15 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
mixed_workload | shimbabomb v1.11.0 interpreter | Windows x64 | 12 | 24 | 30 | 70,738 | 2,316.99 | 18,446 | 0 | 20.6831 | 0.0166 | 10.1464 | 94.3191 | 0.2576 | 64.63 | 70.8032 | 65 | 100 | Multi-threaded mixed workload: 14 diverse SB scripts (fibonacci, loops, strings, arrays, maps, conditionals, arithmetic, function calls) running concurrently across CPU*2 threads | [
"fibonacci_15",
"fibonacci_20",
"counting_loop_1000",
"counting_loop_10000",
"string_concat_heavy",
"nested_conditionals",
"arithmetic_stress",
"function_calls_deep",
"map_operations",
"array_operations",
"boolean_logic_chain",
"while_loop_stress",
"factorial_iterative",
"mismatched_string... |
fib_saturation | shimbabomb v1.11.0 interpreter | Windows x64 | 12 | 48 | 30 | 18,680 | 619.41 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2.7277 | 77.1622 | 206.0868 | 108.5234 | 155.8833 | 168.0198 | 73 | 100 | CPU-saturating fibonacci recursion: fib(15) and fib(20) computed across CPU*4 threads — worst-case O(2^N) exponential recursion under maximum thread pressure | [
"fibonacci_15",
"fibonacci_20"
] |
loop_throughput | shimbabomb v1.11.0 interpreter | Windows x64 | 12 | 24 | 30 | 54,907 | 1,824.57 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0336 | 13.1053 | 68.848 | 4.0416 | 45.4464 | 49.8626 | 73 | 100 | Loop throughput stress: count loops (1K, 10K iterations), while loops (500 iterations), and iterative factorial — sustained loop execution under thread saturation | [
"counting_loop_1000",
"counting_loop_10000",
"while_loop_stress",
"factorial_iterative"
] |
string_mem_stress | shimbabomb v1.11.0 interpreter | Windows x64 | 12 | 24 | 30 | 664,220 | 22,091.25 | 666,441 | 0 | 50.0835 | 0.0146 | 1.0102 | 1,775.9723 | 0.2303 | 2.4276 | 8.999 | 2,879 | 100 | String and memory stress: repeated string concatenation (100 iterations), array operations (10 elements), map lookups, and string operations — pushes memory allocator to 2.8GB peak | [
"string_concat_heavy",
"array_operations",
"map_operations",
"mismatched_strings"
] |
heavy_payload | shimbabomb v1.11.0 interpreter | Windows x64 | 12 | 24 | 30 | 733,937 | 24,357.54 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0149 | 0.9464 | 3,125.8168 | 0.0524 | 2.7119 | 5.1507 | 3,328 | 100 | Heavy payload worst-case: dynamically generated 5K-operation SB script (~125 lines of set/arithmetic), nested conditionals, and arithmetic stress — tests worst-case O(N) parsing under load, peak memory 3.3GB | [
"heavy_payload_5k",
"nested_conditionals",
"arithmetic_stress"
] |
max_threads | shimbabomb v1.11.0 interpreter | Windows x64 | 12 | 96 | 30 | 68,939 | 2,220.97 | 16,514 | 0 | 19.3252 | 0.0189 | 41.6881 | 342.0491 | 0.3043 | 264.0697 | 289.1982 | 3,328 | 100 | Maximum thread saturation: CPU*8 (96 threads) hammering all 14 scripts simultaneously — extreme concurrency stress test pushing thread scheduler and interpreter to limits | [
"fibonacci_15",
"fibonacci_20",
"counting_loop_1000",
"counting_loop_10000",
"string_concat_heavy",
"nested_conditionals",
"arithmetic_stress",
"function_calls_deep",
"map_operations",
"array_operations",
"boolean_logic_chain",
"while_loop_stress",
"factorial_iterative",
"mismatched_string... |
YAML Metadata Warning:The task_categories "benchmarking" is not in the official list: text-classification, token-classification, table-question-answering, question-answering, zero-shot-classification, translation, summarization, feature-extraction, text-generation, fill-mask, sentence-similarity, text-to-speech, text-to-audio, automatic-speech-recognition, audio-to-audio, audio-classification, audio-text-to-text, voice-activity-detection, depth-estimation, image-classification, object-detection, image-segmentation, text-to-image, image-to-text, image-to-image, image-to-video, unconditional-image-generation, video-classification, reinforcement-learning, robotics, tabular-classification, tabular-regression, tabular-to-text, table-to-text, multiple-choice, text-ranking, text-retrieval, time-series-forecasting, text-to-video, image-text-to-text, image-text-to-image, image-text-to-video, visual-question-answering, document-question-answering, zero-shot-image-classification, graph-ml, mask-generation, zero-shot-object-detection, text-to-3d, image-to-3d, image-feature-extraction, video-text-to-text, keypoint-detection, visual-document-retrieval, any-to-any, video-to-video, other
YAML Metadata Warning:The task_ids "interpreter-stress-test" is not in the official list: acceptability-classification, entity-linking-classification, fact-checking, intent-classification, language-identification, multi-class-classification, multi-label-classification, multi-input-text-classification, natural-language-inference, semantic-similarity-classification, sentiment-classification, topic-classification, semantic-similarity-scoring, sentiment-scoring, sentiment-analysis, hate-speech-detection, text-scoring, named-entity-recognition, part-of-speech, parsing, lemmatization, word-sense-disambiguation, coreference-resolution, extractive-qa, open-domain-qa, closed-domain-qa, news-articles-summarization, news-articles-headline-generation, dialogue-modeling, dialogue-generation, conversational, language-modeling, text-simplification, explanation-generation, abstractive-qa, open-domain-abstractive-qa, closed-domain-qa, open-book-qa, closed-book-qa, text2text-generation, slot-filling, masked-language-modeling, keyword-spotting, speaker-identification, audio-intent-classification, audio-emotion-recognition, audio-language-identification, multi-label-image-classification, multi-class-image-classification, face-detection, vehicle-detection, instance-segmentation, semantic-segmentation, panoptic-segmentation, image-captioning, image-inpainting, image-colorization, super-resolution, grasping, task-planning, tabular-multi-class-classification, tabular-multi-label-classification, tabular-single-column-regression, rdf-to-text, multiple-choice-qa, multiple-choice-coreference-resolution, document-retrieval, utterance-retrieval, entity-linking-retrieval, fact-checking-retrieval, univariate-time-series-forecasting, multivariate-time-series-forecasting, visual-question-answering, document-question-answering, pose-estimation
ShimbaBomb Interpreter Extreme Stress Benchmark
Overview
Benchmark results from extreme stress testing of the ShimbaBomb (SB) v1.11.0 interpreter — an English-like scripting language that compiles to native C.
The benchmark suite spawns CPU_Logical_Cores * 2 (or higher) threads to saturate the interpreter engine, running diverse SB scripts simultaneously for 30-second sustained windows per phase.
System
| Parameter | Value |
|---|---|
| Platform | Windows x64 |
| Logical CPUs | 12 |
| Compiler | GCC 15.2.0 (MSYS2 UCRT64) |
| Optimization | -O2 -march=x86-64 -mtune=native |
| Build Flags | SB_NO_GUI, SB_NO_CURL |
Phases
| Phase | Name | Threads | Duration | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | mixed_workload | 24 | 30s | 14 diverse scripts (fib, loops, strings, arrays, maps, conditionals, arithmetic, function calls) |
| 2 | fib_saturation | 48 | 30s | CPU*4 threads running fibonacci O(2^N) recursion |
| 3 | loop_throughput | 24 | 30s | count/while loops with 500-10000 iterations |
| 4 | string_mem_stress | 24 | 30s | String concat, array ops, map lookups — memory-intensive |
| 5 | heavy_payload | 24 | 30s | Dynamically generated 5K-operation scripts — worst-case O(N) parsing |
| 6 | max_threads | 96 | 30s | CPU*8 extreme concurrency across all 14 scripts |
Key Results
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Grand Total Operations | 1,611,421 |
| Overall Throughput | 8,830.3 ops/sec |
| Peak Memory | 3,328 MB |
| CPU Utilization | 100% (all phases) |
| Crashes | 0 (zero fatal crashes) |
| Total Runtime | 182.49 seconds |
Latency Summary
| Benchmark | Min (ms) | Mean (ms) | P50 (ms) | P95 (ms) | P99 (ms) | Max (ms) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| mixed_workload | 0.017 | 10.146 | 0.258 | 64.630 | 70.803 | 94.319 |
| fib_saturation | 2.728 | 77.162 | 108.523 | 155.883 | 168.020 | 206.087 |
| loop_throughput | 0.034 | 13.105 | 4.042 | 45.446 | 49.863 | 68.848 |
| string_mem_stress | 0.015 | 1.010 | 0.230 | 2.428 | 8.999 | 1,775.972 |
| heavy_payload | 0.015 | 0.946 | 0.052 | 2.712 | 5.151 | 3,125.817 |
| max_threads | 0.019 | 41.688 | 0.304 | 264.070 | 289.198 | 342.049 |
Throughput by Phase
| Benchmark | Ops/sec | Error Rate |
|---|---|---|
| heavy_payload | 24,357.5 | 0.00% |
| string_mem_stress | 22,091.3 | 50.08% |
| mixed_workload | 2,317.0 | 20.68% |
| max_threads | 2,221.0 | 19.33% |
| loop_throughput | 1,824.6 | 0.00% |
| fib_saturation | 619.4 | 0.00% |
Files
hard_stress_benchmark.c— C source for the benchmark runnerbenchmark_results.json— Full JSON reporthf_dataset.jsonl— HuggingFace-compatible JSONL dataset
How to Reproduce
# Build SB interpreter (Windows/MSYS2)
cd shimbabomb
gcc -std=c11 -O2 -DSB_NO_GUI -DSB_NO_CURL -DSB_STD_DIR="std" -DSB_SRC_DIR="std" \
-o build/sb.exe src/*.c -lm -lws2_32
# Build benchmark
cd benchmark
gcc -std=c11 -O2 -I../src -DSB_NO_GUI -DSB_NO_CURL \
-DSB_STD_DIR="<path>/std" -DSB_SRC_DIR="<path>/std" \
-o hard_stress_benchmark.exe hard_stress_benchmark.c ../src/*.c -lm -lws2_32 -lpsapi
# Run
./hard_stress_benchmark.exe
Citation
@misc{shimbabomb_benchmark_2026,
title={ShimbaBomb Interpreter Extreme Stress Benchmark},
author={Shimba-crypto},
year={2026},
howpublished={\\url{https://github.com/Shimba-crypto/shimbabomb}}
}
- Downloads last month
- 19