text
stringlengths 606
2.27k
|
|---|
### Instruction:
Formulate an arithmetic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Context: contractual commitments the operating leases of total is $ 691 ; the operating leases of payment period 2007 is $ 191 ; the operating leases of payment period 2008 - 2009 is $ 205 ; the operating leases of payment period 2010 - 2011 is $ 106 ; the operating leases of payment period after 2011 is $ 189 ;
Question: what is the percent of the operating leases in 2007 as part of the total amount?
### Output:
Logic: the percent is the 2007 amount divided by the total amount
The required values from the context for the question are:
Total of operating leases: $691
Operating leases payment for 2007: $191
Lets formulate the expression step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 191 by 691 which gives divide(191, 691)
step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(191, 691), 100),
The final arithmetic expression is multiply(divide(191, 691), 100).
|
### Instruction:
Formulate an arithmetic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Context: the expeditors international of washington inc . of 12/12 is $ 100.00 ; the expeditors international of washington inc . of 12/13 is $ 113.52 ; the expeditors international of washington inc . of 12/14 is $ 116.07 ; the expeditors international of washington inc . of 12/15 is $ 119.12 ; the expeditors international of washington inc . of 12/16 is $ 142.10 ; the expeditors international of washington inc . of 12/17 is $ 176.08 ; the standard and poor's 500 index of 12/12 is 100.00 ; the standard and poor's 500 index of 12/13 is 132.39 ; the standard and poor's 500 index of 12/14 is 150.51 ; the standard and poor's 500 index of 12/15 is 152.59 ; the standard and poor's 500 index of 12/16 is 170.84 ; the standard and poor's 500 index of 12/17 is 208.14 ; the nasdaq transportation of 12/12 is 100.00 ; the nasdaq transportation of 12/13 is 133.76 ; the nasdaq transportation of 12/14 is 187.65 ; the nasdaq transportation of 12/15 is 162.30 ; the nasdaq transportation of 12/16 is 193.79 ; the nasdaq transportation of 12/17 is 248.92 ; the nasdaq industrial transportation ( nqusb2770t ) of 12/12 is 100.00 ; the nasdaq industrial transportation ( nqusb2770t ) of 12/13 is 141.60 ; the nasdaq industrial transportation ( nqusb2770t ) of 12/14 is 171.91 ; the nasdaq industrial transportation ( nqusb2770t ) of 12/15 is 132.47 ; the nasdaq industrial transportation ( nqusb2770t ) of 12/16 is 171.17 ; the nasdaq industrial transportation ( nqusb2770t ) of 12/17 is 218.34 ;
Question: what is the lowest return rate for the initial year of the investment?
### Output:
Logic: it is the minimum value transformed into a percentage .
The required values from the context for the question are:
12/12: $100.00 (expeditors international of washington inc.)
12/13: $113.52
12/14: $116.07
12/15: $119.12
12/16: $142.10
12/17: $176.08
Lets formulate the expression step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: subtract 100 from 113.52 which gives subtract(113.52, 100)
step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(113.52, 100), 100),
The final arithmetic expression is multiply(subtract(113.52, 100), 100).
|
### Instruction:
Formulate an arithmetic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Context: during 2016 and 2015 , our cash contributions to funded plans and benefit payments for unfunded plans were $ 79.3 and $ 137.5 , respectively .
Question: considering the years 2015-2016 , what is the decrease observed in the cash contributions to funded plans and benefit payments for unfunded plans?
### Output:
Logic: it is the final value of cash contributions to funded plans and benefit payments minus the initial one , then divided by the initial and turned into a percentage .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Cash contributions & benefit payments in 2016: $137.5
Cash contributions & benefit payments in 2015: $79.3
Lets formulate the expression step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: subtract 137.5 from 79.3 which gives subtract(79.3, 137.5)
step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 137.5 which gives divide(subtract(79.3, 137.5), 137.5)
step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(subtract(79.3, 137.5), 137.5), 100),
The final arithmetic expression is multiply(divide(subtract(79.3, 137.5), 137.5), 100).
|
### Instruction:
Formulate an arithmetic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Context: 2012 the thereafter of $ 29 is 1305 ; 2012 the total long-term debt of $ 29 is $ 1859 ;
Question: what is the ratio of the long-term debt after 2016 to the total long term debt
### Output:
Logic: the ratio of the long term debt after 2016 to the total long term debt means that for every $ 1 of the total long term debt is made up of $ 0.70 of long term debt due after 2016
The required values from the context for the question are:
Long-term debt after 2016 in 2012 = 29
Long-term debt after 2016 = 1305
Total long-term debt in 2012 = 29
Total long-term debt = 1859
Lets formulate the expression step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 1305 by 1859 which gives divide(1305, 1859),
The final arithmetic expression is divide(1305, 1859).
|
### Instruction:
Formulate an arithmetic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Context: in millions the shares issuable under incentive stock plans of 2016 is 1.1 ; the shares issuable under incentive stock plans of 2015 is 1.0 ; the shares issuable under incentive stock plans of 2014 is 1.1 ;
Question: considering the years 2014-2016 , what is the average number of shares issuable under incentive stock plans , in millions?
### Output:
Logic: it is the sum of all shares issuable under incentive stock plans during these years , then divided by three .
The required values from the context for the question are:
shares issuable under incentive stock plans 2016: 1.1 million
shares issuable under incentive stock plans 2015: 1.0 million
shares issuable under incentive stock plans 2014: 1.1 million
Lets formulate the expression step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
,
The final arithmetic expression is table_average(shares issuable under incentive stock plans, none).
|
### Instruction:
Formulate an arithmetic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Context: the weighted average cost per share of 2018 is $ 69.06 ; the weighted average cost per share of 2017 is $ 63.84 ;
Question: between 2018 and 2017 what was the percent change in the weighted average cost per share
### Output:
Logic: the percentage change is the difference between the 2 periods divide by the earliest period
The required values from the context for the question are:
Weighted average cost per share in 2018 = 69.06
Weighted average cost per share in 2017 = 63.84
Lets formulate the expression step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: subtract 63.84 from 69.06 which gives subtract(69.06, 63.84)
step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 63.84 which gives divide(subtract(69.06, 63.84), 63.84),
The final arithmetic expression is divide(subtract(69.06, 63.84), 63.84).
|
### Instruction:
Formulate an arithmetic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Context: december 31 , the increase to allowance of 2015 is 472 ; the increase to allowance of 2014 is 117 ; the increase to allowance of 2013 is 471 ; december 31 , the balance at end of year of 2015 is $ 2037 ; the balance at end of year of 2014 is $ 1668 ; the balance at end of year of 2013 is $ 1804 ;
Question: taking the year 2015 , what is the increase to allowance as a percent of the balance at the end of the year?
### Output:
Logic: it is the value of the increase to allowance divided by the total balance at the end of the year .
The required values from the context for the question are:
increase to allowance of 2015: 472
balance at end of year of 2015: 2037
Lets formulate the expression step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 472 by 2037 which gives divide(472, 2037)
step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(472, 2037), 100),
The final arithmetic expression is multiply(divide(472, 2037), 100).
|
### Instruction:
Formulate an arithmetic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Context: the third-party sales of 2016 is $ 5728 ; the third-party sales of 2015 is $ 5342 ; the third-party sales of 2014 is $ 4217 ; engineered products and solutions . more than 75% ( 75 % ) of the third-party sales in this segment are from the aerospace end market .
Question: what is the total amount of dollars received from aerospace end market sales in 2015?
### Output:
Logic: it is the total third-party sales multiplied by its percentage of aerospace end market sales .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Third-party sales 2015: $5342
Percentage of aerospace end market sales: 75%
Lets formulate the expression step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: multiply 5342 by 75% which gives multiply(5342, 75%),
The final arithmetic expression is multiply(5342, 75%).
|
### Instruction:
Formulate an arithmetic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Context: the ending stores of 2011 is 3460 ; the ending stores of 2010 is 3369 ; the ending stores of 2009 is 3264 ; the ending stores of 2008 is 3243 ; the ending stores of 2007 is 3153 ; we believe this process , which develops a customer-focused business plan for each merchandise category , and our global sourcing operation are critical to improving comparable store sales , gross margin and inventory productivity. . the following table sets forth information concerning increases in the total number of our aap stores during the past five years : beginning stores new stores ( 1 ) stores closed ending stores ( 1 ) does not include stores that opened as relocations of previously existing stores within the same general market area or substantial renovations of stores .
Question: what was the percentage increase in stores from 2007 to 2011?
### Output:
Logic: one can figure out the increase in percentage of stores by subtracting the end store total from 2011 by the store total of 2007 . then taking that answer and dividing it by the store total for 2007 .
The required values from the context for the question are:
2011: 3460 stores
2007: 3153 stores
Lets formulate the expression step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: subtract 3153 from 3460 which gives subtract(3460, 3153)
step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 3153 which gives divide(subtract(3460, 3153), 3153)
step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(subtract(3460, 3153), 3153), 100),
The final arithmetic expression is multiply(divide(subtract(3460, 3153), 3153), 100).
|
### Instruction:
Formulate an arithmetic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Context: 2007 the 2008 of $ 130206 is 33117 ; 2007 the total maturities of $ 130206 is 2336989 ;
Question: what was the percent of the 2008 maturities as a part of the total maturities
### Output:
Logic: the growth rate is the change from period to period divided by the original amount
The required values from the context for the question are:
2008 maturities: $33117
Total maturities 2007: $2336989
Lets formulate the expression step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 33117 by 2336989 which gives divide(33117, 2336989)
step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(33117, 2336989), 100),
The final arithmetic expression is multiply(divide(33117, 2336989), 100).
|
### Instruction:
Formulate an arithmetic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Context: the company has submitted a revised proposal to address the concerns of the dcaa and to reflect a revised estimated total cost of $ 271 million . the defense contract audit agency ( 201cdcaa 201d ) , a dod agency , prepared an initial audit report on the company 2019s cost proposal for restructuring and shutdown related costs of $ 310 million , which stated that the proposal was not adequately supported for the dcaa to reach a conclusion and questioned approximately $ 25 million , or 8% ( 8 % ) , of the costs submitted by the company .
Question: what was the percentage reduction in the shut down related costs as presented to the dod
### Output:
Logic: the percentage change is the change from the current to most recent divide by the most recent
The required values from the context for the question are:
Revised Proposal: $271 million
Initial Proposal: $310 million
Questioned Costs: $25 million
Lets formulate the expression step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: subtract 310 from 271 which gives subtract(271, 310)
step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 310 which gives divide(subtract(271, 310), 310)
step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(subtract(271, 310), 310), 100),
The final arithmetic expression is multiply(divide(subtract(271, 310), 310), 100).
|
### Instruction:
Formulate an arithmetic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Context: years ended december 31 the performance plans of 2009 is 60 ; the performance plans of 2008 is 67 ; the performance plans of 2007 is 54 ;
Question: what is the highest income from performance plans?
### Output:
Logic: it is the maximum value .
The required values from the context for the question are:
performance plans of 2009: 60
performance plans of 2008: 67
performance plans of 2007: 54
Lets formulate the expression step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
,
The final arithmetic expression is table_max(performance plans, none).
|
### Instruction:
Formulate an arithmetic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Context: company index the delphi automotive plc ( 1 ) of november 17 2011 is $ 100.00 ; the delphi automotive plc ( 1 ) of december 31 2011 is $ 100.98 ; the delphi automotive plc ( 1 ) of december 31 2012 is $ 179.33 ; the delphi automotive plc ( 1 ) of december 31 2013 is $ 285.81 ; the delphi automotive plc ( 1 ) of december 31 2014 is $ 350.82 ; the delphi automotive plc ( 1 ) of december 31 2015 is $ 418.67 ; company index the s&p 500 ( 2 ) of november 17 2011 is 100.00 ; the s&p 500 ( 2 ) of december 31 2011 is 100.80 ; the s&p 500 ( 2 ) of december 31 2012 is 116.93 ; the s&p 500 ( 2 ) of december 31 2013 is 154.80 ; the s&p 500 ( 2 ) of december 31 2014 is 175.99 ; the s&p 500 ( 2 ) of december 31 2015 is 178.43 ; company index the automotive supplier peer group ( 3 ) of november 17 2011 is 100.00 ; the automotive supplier peer group ( 3 ) of december 31 2011 is 89.62 ; the automotive supplier peer group ( 3 ) of december 31 2012 is 109.96 ; the automotive supplier peer group ( 3 ) of december 31 2013 is 166.26 ; the automotive supplier peer group ( 3 ) of december 31 2014 is 176.25 ; the automotive supplier peer group ( 3 ) of december 31 2015 is 171.91 ;
Question: what is the lowest return for the last year of the investment?
### Output:
Logic: it is the minimum value turned into a percentage .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Delphi Automotive PLC on December 31, 2015: $418.67
S&P 500 on December 31, 2015: 178.43
Automotive Supplier Peer Group on December 31, 2015: 171.91
Lets formulate the expression step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: subtract 100 from 171.91 which gives subtract(171.91, 100)
step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(171.91, 100), 100),
The final arithmetic expression is multiply(subtract(171.91, 100), 100).
|
### Instruction:
Formulate an arithmetic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Context: the s&p 500 of 2006 is 115.80 ; the s&p 500 of 2007 is 122.16 ; the s&p 500 of 2008 is 76.96 ; the s&p 500 of 2009 is 97.33 ; the s&p 500 of 2010 is 111.99 ; the old peer group of 2006 is 155.58 ; the old peer group of 2007 is 190.78 ; the old peer group of 2008 is 72.25 ; the old peer group of 2009 is 76.11 ; the old peer group of 2010 is 87.61 ; an investment of $ 100 ( with reinvestment of all dividends ) is assumed to have been made in our class a common stock , in the peer groups and the s&p 500 index on december 31 , 2005 and its relative performance is tracked through december 31 , 2010 .
Question: considering the year 2006 , what is the percentual fluctuation of the return provided by s&p 500 and the one provided by old peer group?
### Output:
Logic: its the difference between the return's percentage of both s&p 500 ( 15.8% ) and old peer group ( 55.58% )
The required values from the context for the question are:
S&P 500 return in 2006: 115.80
Old peer group return in 2006: 155.58
Lets formulate the expression step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: subtract 100 from 115.80 which gives subtract(115.80, 100)
step 2: subtract 100 from 155.58 which gives subtract(155.58, 100)
step 3: subtract the expression of step 1 from the expression of step 2 which gives subtract(subtract(155.58, 100), subtract(115.80, 100))
step 4: multiply the expression of step 3 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(subtract(155.58, 100), subtract(115.80, 100)), 100),
The final arithmetic expression is multiply(subtract(subtract(155.58, 100), subtract(115.80, 100)), 100).
|
### Instruction:
Formulate an arithmetic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Context: the warehouses of approximate number is 16 ; the warehouses of approximate size in square feet is 500000 ;
Question: what is the average space of the warehouse in square feet
### Output:
Logic: the average space of a warehouse was 31250
The required values from the context for the question are:
Number of warehouses: 16
Total square feet: 500000
Lets formulate the expression step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 500000 by 16 which gives divide(500000, 16),
The final arithmetic expression is divide(500000, 16).
|
### Instruction:
Formulate an arithmetic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Context: the less : capitalized interest of 2017 is 19.0 ; the less : capitalized interest of 2016 is 32.7 ; the less : capitalized interest of 2015 is 49.1 ; interest expense .
Question: what is the decrease observed in the capitalized interest during 2015 and 2016?
### Output:
Logic: it is the percentual variation observed during these years , which is calculated by subtracting the initial value ( 2015 ) of the final one ( 2016 ) then dividing by the initial and turned into a percentage .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Capitalized interest 2015: $49.1
Capitalized interest 2016: $32.7
Lets formulate the expression step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: subtract 49.1 from 32.7 which gives subtract(32.7, 49.1)
step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 49.1 which gives divide(subtract(32.7, 49.1), 49.1)
step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(subtract(32.7, 49.1), 49.1), 100),
The final arithmetic expression is multiply(divide(subtract(32.7, 49.1), 49.1), 100).
|
### Instruction:
Formulate an arithmetic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Context: ( $ in millions ) the payments of employee compensation is -24 ( 24 ) ; the payments of other accruals is -36 ( 36 ) ; the payments of total is -60 ( 60 ) ; ( $ in millions ) the adjustments of employee compensation is 47 ; the adjustments of other accruals is -3 ( 3 ) ; the adjustments of total is 44 ;
Question: what was the net adjustments as recorded in 2011 in millions
### Output:
Logic: the net adjustment is the sum of both activities in 2011
The required values from the context for the question are:
Payments of employee compensation in 2011: -$24 million
Payments of other accruals in 2011: -$36 million
Payments of total in 2011: -$60 million
Adjustments of employee compensation in 2011: $47 million
Adjustments of other accruals in 2011: -$3 million
Adjustments of total in 2011: $44 million
Lets formulate the expression step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: multiply 24 by m1 which gives multiply(24, m1)
step 2: add the expression of step 1 to 47 which gives add(multiply(24, m1), 47),
The final arithmetic expression is add(multiply(24, m1), 47).
|
### Instruction:
Formulate an arithmetic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Context: ( dollars in millions ) the segment net sales of years ended december 31 2009 is $ 7963 ; the segment net sales of years ended december 31 2008 is $ 10086 ; the segment net sales of years ended december 31 2007 is $ 10014 ; the segment net sales of years ended december 31 2009 20142008 is ( 21 ) % ( % ) ; the segment net sales of 2008 20142007 is 1% ( 1 % ) ; in 2008 , aggregate net sales to the segment 2019s five largest customers accounted for approximately 41% ( 41 % ) of the segment 2019s net sales .
Question: what was the aggerate net sales in 2008?
### Output:
Logic: in line 4 , it states that the aggerate net sales for 2008 was 41% of the segment net sales . therefore to calculate aggerate net sales , you much multiple segment net sales by 41% .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Segment net sales 2009 = $7963
Segment net sales 2008 = $10086
Segment net sales 2007 = $10014
Segment net sales percentage change 2009-2008 = (21)%
Segment net sales percentage change 2008-2007 = 1%
Lets formulate the expression step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: multiply 10086 by 41% which gives multiply(10086, 41%),
The final arithmetic expression is multiply(10086, 41%).
|
### Instruction:
Formulate an arithmetic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Context: the total of total ( in $ millions ) is 3498 ; the thereafter ( 1 ) of total ( in $ millions ) is 1590 ;
Question: what is the average of the principal payments scheduled from 2007 to 2011
### Output:
Logic: the average of the 5 years
The required values from the context for the question are:
Total Principal Payments: 3498
Lets formulate the expression step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: subtract 1590 from 3498 which gives subtract(3498, 1590)
step 2: add the expression of step 1 to 5 which gives add(subtract(3498, 1590), 5)
step 3: divide the expression of step 2 by 2 which gives divide(add(subtract(3498, 1590), 5), 2),
The final arithmetic expression is divide(add(subtract(3498, 1590), 5), 2).
|
### Instruction:
Formulate an arithmetic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Context: 2008 the 2009 of $ 317 is 275 ;
Question: what is the decrease observed in the future minimum rental payments during 2008 and 2009?
### Output:
Logic: it is the difference between those values .
The required values from the context for the question are:
2009 value = 275
2008 value = 317
Lets formulate the expression step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: subtract 317 from 275 which gives subtract(275, 317),
The final arithmetic expression is subtract(275, 317).
|
### Instruction:
Formulate an arithmetic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Context: in millions the operating profit of 2009 is 1091 ; the operating profit of 2008 is 474 ; the operating profit of 2007 is 839 ;
Question: what is the average operating profit?
### Output:
Logic: it is the sum of values divided by three to represent the average .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Operating profit (2009): 1091 (in millions)
Operating profit (2008): 474 (in millions)
Operating profit (2007): 839 (in millions)
Lets formulate the expression step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
,
The final arithmetic expression is table_average(operating profit, none).
|
### Instruction:
Formulate an arithmetic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Context: employees may designate up to the lesser of $ 25000 or 20% ( 20 % ) of their annual compensation for the purchase of stock .
Question: what is an employees total annual compensation?
### Output:
Logic: the company gives their employees an annual compensation of $ 125000 . this is found by dividing $ 25000 used for stock buying by 20% .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Designated amount for stock purchase: $25000
Designation percentage: 20%
Lets formulate the expression step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 25000 by 20% which gives divide(25000, 20%),
The final arithmetic expression is divide(25000, 20%).
|
### Instruction:
Formulate an arithmetic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Context: the 2018 of amount is $ 15 ; the 2019 of amount is 14 ; the 2020 of amount is 12 ; the 2021 of amount is 9 ; the 2022 of amount is 8 ; the thereafter of amount is 65 ;
Question: what percentage of minimum annual future rental commitment under operating leases that have initial or remaining non-cancelable lease terms is payable in 2022?
### Output:
Logic: from here you need to take the amount payable in 2018 , or $ 15 , and divide by the total or 123 to get 12.2% ( 15/123 = 12.2% )
The required values from the context for the question are:
Amount payable in 2022: $8
Total amount payable (2018-2022 + thereafter): $15 + $14 + $12 + $9 + $8 + $65 = $123
Lets formulate the expression step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: add 12 to 9 which gives add(12, 9)
step 2: add 15 to 14 which gives add(15, 14)
step 3: add the expression of step 1 to the expression of step 2 which gives add(add(12, 9), add(15, 14))
step 4: add 8 to 65 which gives add(8, 65)
step 5: add the expression of step 3 to the expression of step 4 which gives add(add(add(12, 9), add(15, 14)), add(8, 65))
step 6: multiply the expression of step 5 by 100 which gives multiply(add(add(add(12, 9), add(15, 14)), add(8, 65)), 100),
The final arithmetic expression is multiply(add(add(add(12, 9), add(15, 14)), add(8, 65)), 100).
|
### Instruction:
Formulate an arithmetic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Context: the total expense related to the defined contribution plan for u.s . employees was $ 20.5 million in fiscal 2010 , $ 21.5 million in fiscal 2009 and $ 22.6 million in fiscal 2008 . employees was $ 11.7 million in fiscal 2010 , $ 10.9 million in fiscal 2009 and $ 13.9 million in fiscal 2008 . during fiscal 2009 , the measurement date of the plan 2019s funded status was changed from september 30 to the company 2019s fiscal year end .
Question: what was the total expense related to contribution plans from 2008 to 2010
### Output:
Logic: the way to find the answer is to take the total expense related contributions for both the us and non-us and add them together . then take all 3 years totals and add them together .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Expense related to defined contribution plan for U.S. employees in fiscal 2010: $20.5 million
Expense related to defined contribution plan for U.S. employees in fiscal 2009: $21.5 million
Expense related to defined contribution plan for U.S. employees in fiscal 2008: $22.6 million
Expense related to defined contribution plan for non-U.S. employees in fiscal 2010: $11.7 million
Expense related to defined contribution plan for non-U.S. employees in fiscal 2009: $10.9 million
Expense related to defined contribution plan for non-U.S. employees in fiscal 2008: $13.9 million
Lets formulate the expression step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: add 21.5 to 10.9 which gives add(21.5, 10.9)
step 2: add 22.6 to 13.9 which gives add(22.6, 13.9)
step 3: add 20.5 to 11.7 which gives add(20.5, 11.7)
step 4: add the expression of step 2 to the expression of step 3 which gives add(add(22.6, 13.9), add(20.5, 11.7))
step 5: add the expression of step 1 to the expression of step 4 which gives add(add(21.5, 10.9), add(add(22.6, 13.9), add(20.5, 11.7))),
The final arithmetic expression is add(add(21.5, 10.9), add(add(22.6, 13.9), add(20.5, 11.7))).
|
### Instruction:
Formulate an arithmetic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Context: the 2013 charge of severance and other benefits is $ 71.9 ; the 2013 charge of asset actions is $ 100.4 ; the 2013 charge of contract actions/ other is $ 59.3 ; the 2013 charge of total is $ 231.6 ;
Question: considering the 2013 charge , what is the percentage of the asset actions on the total charge?
### Output:
Logic: it is the value of the asset actions divided by the total charge , then turned into a percentage .
The required values from the context for the question are:
2013 charge of asset actions: $100.4
2013 charge total: $231.6
Lets formulate the expression step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 100.4 by 231.6 which gives divide(100.4, 231.6)
step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(100.4, 231.6), 100),
The final arithmetic expression is multiply(divide(100.4, 231.6), 100).
|
### Instruction:
Formulate an arithmetic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Context: the net income of december 31 2013 ( in millions ) is 2526 ; the revenue of december 31 2013 ( in millions ) is $ 40678 ;
Question: on december 312013 what was the net profit margin
### Output:
Logic: the net profit margin the ratio of the net income to the revenues
The required values from the context for the question are:
Net income December 31 2013: 2526
Revenue December 31 2013: $40678
Lets formulate the expression step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 2526 by 40678 which gives divide(2526, 40678)
step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(2526, 40678), 100),
The final arithmetic expression is multiply(divide(2526, 40678), 100).
|
### Instruction:
Formulate an arithmetic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Context: the electronics and safety of north america is 3 ; the electronics and safety of europemiddle east& africa is 6 ; the electronics and safety of asia pacific is 3 ; the electronics and safety of south america is 2014 ; the electronics and safety of total is 12 ; the total of north america is 39 ; the total of europemiddle east& africa is 48 ; the total of asia pacific is 33 ; the total of south america is 6 ; the total of total is 126 ;
Question: what is the percentage of electronics and safety sites among all sites?
### Output:
Logic: it is the number of sites related to electronics and safety divided by the total sites .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Electronics and Safety Total: 12 sites
Total Sites: 126 sites
Lets formulate the expression step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 12 by 126 which gives divide(12, 126)
step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(12, 126), 100),
The final arithmetic expression is multiply(divide(12, 126), 100).
|
### Instruction:
Formulate an arithmetic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Context: multifamily the unconsolidated of communities is 1 ; the unconsolidated of units is 269 ; multifamily the total of communities is 304 ; the total of units is 100864 ;
Question: what is the percentage of unconsolidated units among the total units?
### Output:
Logic: it is the number of unconsolidated units divided by the total units , then turned into a percentage .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Unconsolidated units in multifamily communities = 1
Unconsolidated units = 269
Total units in multifamily communities = 304
Total units = 100864
Lets formulate the expression step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 269 by 100864 which gives divide(269, 100864)
step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(269, 100864), 100),
The final arithmetic expression is multiply(divide(269, 100864), 100).
|
### Instruction:
Formulate an arithmetic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Context: carryforward the federal net operating loss carryforward of amount ( in thousands ) is $ 57265 ; the federal net operating loss carryforward of expirationdate is 2018-2034 ; carryforward the federal research credit carryforward of amount ( in thousands ) is 78599 ; the federal research credit carryforward of expirationdate is 2019-2036 ;
Question: what is the variation between the federal research credit carryforward and federal net operating loss carryforward , in thousands?
### Output:
Logic: it is the difference between those values .
The required values from the context for the question are:
federal net operating loss carryforward: $57265
federal research credit carryforward: 78599
Lets formulate the expression step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: subtract 57265 from 78599 which gives subtract(78599, 57265),
The final arithmetic expression is subtract(78599, 57265).
|
### Instruction:
Formulate an arithmetic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Context: the excess of current cost over lifo cost was approximately $ 50.0 million at january 30 , 2009 and $ 6.1 million at february 1 , 2008 . the successor recorded lifo provisions of $ 43.9 million and $ 6.1 million during 2008 and 2007 , respectively .
Question: what was the percentage change in the excess of current cost over lifo cost from 2008 to 2009 .
### Output:
Logic: the percentage change is the change from the recent to the most recent divide by the recent
The required values from the context for the question are:
Excess of current cost over LIFO cost at January 30, 2009 = 50.0 million
Excess of current cost over LIFO cost at February 1, 2008 = 6.1 million
LIFO provisions during 2008 = 43.9 million
LIFO provisions during 2007 = 6.1 million
Lets formulate the expression step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: subtract 6.1 from 50.0 which gives subtract(50.0, 6.1)
step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(50.0, 6.1), 100),
The final arithmetic expression is multiply(subtract(50.0, 6.1), 100).
|
### Instruction:
Formulate an arithmetic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Context: cash paid for income taxes , net of refunds for the twelve months ended december 31 , 2016 and 2015 was $ 10.4 million and $ 80.6 million , respectively . the 2016 net cash income taxes paid includes a refund of $ 46.2 million received from the canadian tax authorities .
Question: what is the percentage of the refund received from the canadian tax authorities , in comparison with the total net cash income taxes paid in 2016?
### Output:
Logic: it is the value of the refund received divided by the total net cash income taxes , then turned into a percentage.\\n
The required values from the context for the question are:
Net cash paid for income taxes 2016: $10.4 million
Refund received from Canadian tax authorities: $46.2 million
Lets formulate the expression step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 46.2 by 80.6 which gives divide(46.2, 80.6)
step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(46.2, 80.6), 100),
The final arithmetic expression is multiply(divide(46.2, 80.6), 100).
|
### Instruction:
Formulate an arithmetic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Context: the accumulated depreciation depletion and amortization of 2017 is -29191247 ( 29191247 ) ; the accumulated depreciation depletion and amortization of 2016 is -26247062 ( 26247062 ) ;
Question: what are the average cost of accumulated depreciation depletion and amortization for 2016 and 2017?
### Output:
Logic: it is the sum of the accumulated depreciation depletion and amortization for both years divided by two .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Accumulated depreciation depletion and amortization 2017: -29191247
Accumulated depreciation depletion and amortization 2016: -26247062
Lets formulate the expression step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
,
The final arithmetic expression is table_average(accumulated depreciation depletion and amortization, none).
|
### Instruction:
Formulate an arithmetic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Context: year ended december 31 ( in billions ) the other ( a ) of yearly average 2012 is 50.2 ; the other ( a ) of yearly average 2011 is 46.6 ; the other ( a ) of yearly average 2010 is 34.5 ; the firm measures economic capital primarily based on four risk factors : credit , market , operational and private equity risk. . ( a ) reflects additional capital required , in the firm 2019s view , to meet its regulatory and debt rating objectives .
Question: in comparing 2010 and 2012 figures , how much additional capital , in percentage , is required in 2012 for the firm to meet regulatory and debt obligations?
### Output:
Logic: 34.5*x=50.2
The required values from the context for the question are:
Yearly average for 2012: 50.2
Yearly average for 2010: 34.5
Lets formulate the expression step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 50.2 by 34.5 which gives divide(50.2, 34.5)
step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(50.2, 34.5), 100),
The final arithmetic expression is multiply(divide(50.2, 34.5), 100).
|
### Instruction:
Formulate an arithmetic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Context: the carrying amount at beginning of period of 2018 is $ 946848 ; the carrying amount at beginning of period of 2017 is $ 912926 ; during 2017 , proved oil and gas properties with a carrying amount of $ 370 million were written down to their fair value of $ 146 million , resulting in pretax impairment charges of $ 224 million .
Question: what is the percentage of the carrying amount of proved oil and gas properties concerning the total carrying amount in 2017?
### Output:
Logic: it is the carrying amount of proved oil and gas properties in millions divided by the total carrying amount , also in millions , then turned into a percentage .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Carrying amount at beginning of period of 2018 = 946848
Carrying amount at beginning of period of 2017 = 912926
Carrying amount of proved oil and gas properties written down in 2017 = 370
Fair value of proved oil and gas properties after write-down = 146
Pretax impairment charges in 2017 = 224
Lets formulate the expression step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 912926 by 1000 which gives divide(912926, 1000)
step 2: divide 370 by the expression of step 1 which gives divide(370, divide(912926, 1000))
step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(370, divide(912926, 1000)), 100),
The final arithmetic expression is multiply(divide(370, divide(912926, 1000)), 100).
|
### Instruction:
Formulate an arithmetic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Context: balance at january 1 2011 the decreases in current period tax positions of $ 23788 is -3734 ( 3734 ) ; balance at january 1 2011 the decreases in current period tax positions of $ 23788 is -2059 ( 2059 ) ; balance at january 1 2011 the decreases in current period tax positions of $ 23788 is -5965 ( 5965 ) ;
Question: what was the average decrease in the tax position from 2011 to 2013
### Output:
Logic: the average decrease over the 3 years is the sum of the decrease over the 3 years divide by 3
The required values from the context for the question are:
decrease in tax position 2011: -3734
decrease in tax position 2011: -2059
decrease in tax position 2011: -5965
Lets formulate the expression step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: add 3734 to 2059 which gives add(3734, 2059)
step 2: add the expression of step 1 to 5965 which gives add(add(3734, 2059), 5965)
step 3: divide the expression of step 2 by 3 which gives divide(add(add(3734, 2059), 5965), 3),
The final arithmetic expression is divide(add(add(3734, 2059), 5965), 3).
|
### Instruction:
Formulate an arithmetic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Context: the 2013 credit facilities bear interest at an index rate plus an applicable index margin or , at american 2019s option , libor ( subject to a floor of 0.75% ( 0.75 % ) , with respect to the $ 1.9 billion 2015 term loan facility ) plus a libor margin of 3.00% ( 3.00 % ) with respect to the 2013 revolving facility and 2.75% ( 2.75 % ) with respect to the $ 1.9 billion 2015 term loan facility ; provided that american 2019s corporate credit rating is ba3 or higher from moody 2019s and bb- or higher from s&p , the applicable libor margin would be 2.50% ( 2.50 % ) for the $ 1.9 billion 2015 term loan . the $ 1.9 billion 2015 term loan facility is repayable in annual installments , with the first installment in an amount equal to 1.25% ( 1.25 % ) of the principal amount commencing on june 27 , 2016 and installments thereafter , in an amount equal to 1.0% ( 1.0 % ) of the principal amount , with any unpaid balance due on the maturity date .
Question: what is the amount of the first installment of the 19 billion 2015 term loan facility payable on june 27 , 2016 in billions
### Output:
Logic: to obtain the amount of the fisrt installment multiply the loan amount by the amount of the % stated for the first installment
The required values from the context for the question are:
Loan amount: $1.9 billion
First installment percent: 1.25%
Lets formulate the expression step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: multiply 1.9 by 1.25% which gives multiply(1.9, 1.25%),
The final arithmetic expression is multiply(1.9, 1.25%).
|
### Instruction:
Formulate an arithmetic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Context: cash the customer-related intangible assets of $ 45826 is 42721 ; cash the acquired technology of $ 45826 is 27954 ; cash the trade name of $ 45826 is 2901 ; goodwill of $ 203.8 million arising from the acquisition , included in the asia-pacific segment , was attributable to expected growth opportunities in australia and new zealand , as well as growth opportunities and operating synergies in integrated payments in our existing asia-pacific and north america markets . goodwill associated with this acquisition is not deductible for income tax purposes . the customer-related intangible assets have an estimated amortization period of 15 years . the acquired technology has an estimated amortization period of 15 years . the trade name has an estimated amortization period of 5 years .
Question: how much money can the company deduct on the income tax in the future after this acquisition?
### Output:
Logic: the amortized acquired assets would be considered deductible assets . therefore to figure out the total amount of money they can deduct one must added the the amortized assets worth together .
The required values from the context for the question are:
customer-related intangible assets: $45826
acquired technology: $45826
trade name: $45826
Lets formulate the expression step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: add 27954 to 42721 which gives add(27954, 42721)
step 2: add 2901 to the expression of step 1 which gives add(2901, add(27954, 42721)),
The final arithmetic expression is add(2901, add(27954, 42721)).
|
### Instruction:
Formulate an arithmetic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Context: fiscal years the 2011 of operating leases is $ 21871 ; fiscal years the 2012 of operating leases is 12322 ; fiscal years the 2013 of operating leases is 9078 ; the company does not believe that any current legal matters will have a material adverse effect on the company 2019s financial position , results of operations or cash flows .
Question: what was the average percentage that the lease expenses decreased from 2011 to 2013
### Output:
Logic: in order to find the average percentage decrease for this 3 year period one must find the change in percent for each year . this is calculated by subtracting the initial expense by the expense for the next year and then dividing the answer by the initial expense . then one has to find the average for the years .
The required values from the context for the question are:
fiscal years 2011 operating leases: $21871
fiscal years 2012 operating leases: $12322
fiscal years 2013 operating leases: $9078
Lets formulate the expression step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: subtract 9078 from 12322 which gives subtract(12322, 9078)
step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 12322 which gives divide(subtract(12322, 9078), 12322)
step 3: subtract 12322 from 21871 which gives subtract(21871, 12322)
step 4: divide the expression of step 3 by 21871 which gives divide(subtract(21871, 12322), 21871)
step 5: add the expression of step 2 to the expression of step 4 which gives add(divide(subtract(12322, 9078), 12322), divide(subtract(21871, 12322), 21871))
step 6: divide the expression of step 5 by 2 which gives divide(add(divide(subtract(12322, 9078), 12322), divide(subtract(21871, 12322), 21871)), 2)
step 7: multiply the expression of step 6 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(add(divide(subtract(12322, 9078), 12322), divide(subtract(21871, 12322), 21871)), 2), 100),
The final arithmetic expression is multiply(divide(add(divide(subtract(12322, 9078), 12322), divide(subtract(21871, 12322), 21871)), 2), 100).
|
### Instruction:
Formulate an arithmetic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Context: the amex airline index of 12/9/2013 is 100 ; the amex airline index of 12/31/2013 is 102 ; the amex airline index of 12/31/2014 is 152 ; the s&p 500 of 12/9/2013 is 100 ; the s&p 500 of 12/31/2013 is 102 ; the s&p 500 of 12/31/2014 is 114 ;
Question: what was the growth rate on the amex airline index from 12/31/2013 to 12/31/2014
### Output:
Logic: the growth rate is the recent period less the prior period divided by the prior
The required values from the context for the question are:
AMEX Airline Index 12/9/2013 = 100
AMEX Airline Index 12/31/2013 = 102
AMEX Airline Index 12/31/2014 = 152
S&P 500 12/9/2013 = 100
S&P 500 12/31/2013 = 102
S&P 500 12/31/2014 = 114
Lets formulate the expression step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: subtract 102 from 152 which gives subtract(152, 102)
step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 102 which gives divide(subtract(152, 102), 102)
step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(subtract(152, 102), 102), 100),
The final arithmetic expression is multiply(divide(subtract(152, 102), 102), 100).
|
### Instruction:
Formulate an arithmetic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Context: as of december 31 the equity as adjusted of 2008 is $ 5415 ; the equity as adjusted of 2007 is $ 6261 ;
Question: what is the average equity as adjusted?
### Output:
Logic: it is the sum of both values of equity as adjusted divided by two .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Equity as adjusted 2008: $5415
Equity as adjusted 2007: $6261
Lets formulate the expression step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
,
The final arithmetic expression is table_average(equity as adjusted, none).
|
### Instruction:
Formulate an arithmetic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Context: the term loan calls for quarterly principal payments of $ 5 million beginning with the quarter ending august 31 , 2008 and increasing to $ 10 million beginning with the quarter ending august 31 , 2010 and $ 15 million beginning with the quarter ending august 31 , 2011 .
Question: what is the total amount of principle payment paid from 2008 to 2011?
### Output:
Logic: to find the total amount of payments one must check line 7 and added up all the years from 2008 to 2011 .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Principal payments 2008 = $5 million
Principal payments 2010 = $10 million
Principal payments 2011 = $15 million
Lets formulate the expression step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: add 5 to 10 which gives add(5, 10)
step 2: add 5 to 10 which gives add(5, 10)
step 3: add the expression of step 1 to the expression of step 2 which gives add(add(5, 10), add(5, 10)),
The final arithmetic expression is add(add(5, 10), add(5, 10)).
|
### Instruction:
Formulate an arithmetic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Context: the interest net of capitalized interest of 2016 is $ 252030 ; the interest net of capitalized interest of 2015 is $ 222088 ; the interest net of capitalized interest of 2014 is $ 197383 ;
Question: what is the increase observed in the interest net of capitalized interest during 2015 and 2016?
### Output:
Logic: it is the interest net of capitalized interest of 2016 divided by the 2015's , then subtracted 1 and turned into a percentage .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Interest net 2016 = $252030
Interest net 2015 = $222088
Interest net 2014 = $197383
Lets formulate the expression step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 252030 by 222088 which gives divide(252030, 222088)
step 2: subtract 1 from the expression of step 1 which gives subtract(divide(252030, 222088), 1)
step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(divide(252030, 222088), 1), 100),
The final arithmetic expression is multiply(subtract(divide(252030, 222088), 1), 100).
|
### Instruction:
Formulate an arithmetic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Context: as of december 31 , 2017 , $ 6 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to the nonvested rsus , with and without performance conditions , is expected to be recognized over the weighted-average remaining life of 1.5 years .
Question: on december 31 , 2017 what is the estimated unrecognized compensation cost related to the non vested rsus , with and without performance conditions , is expected to be recognized as of december 31 , 2018 in millions
### Output:
Logic: the of total unrecognized compensation cost related to the nonvested rsus , with and without performance conditions , is expected to be recognized is 6 millon to be recognized over 1.5 years , thus the annual amount is equal to 6/1.5=4
The required values from the context for the question are:
Unrecognized compensation cost = $6 million
Time period = 1.5 years
Annual amount = $4 million
Lets formulate the expression step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 6 by 1.5 which gives divide(6, 1.5),
The final arithmetic expression is divide(6, 1.5).
|
### Instruction:
Formulate an arithmetic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Context: ( dollars in millions ) the segment net sales of years ended december 31 2009 is $ 7008 ; the segment net sales of years ended december 31 2008 is $ 8093 ; the segment net sales of years ended december 31 2007 is $ 7729 ; the segment net sales of years ended december 31 2009 20142008 is ( 13 ) % ( % ) ; the segment net sales of 2008 20142007 is 5% ( 5 % ) ; in 2009 , the segment 2019s net sales represented 32% ( 32 % ) of the company 2019s consolidated net sales , compared to 27% ( 27 % ) in 2008 and 21% ( 21 % ) in 2007 .
Question: did consolidated net sales grow from 2007 to 2009 and what was this growth in a percentage?
### Output:
Logic: in order to find out the consolidated net sales one must multiple the segmented net sales by the percentage given in line 7 . we then subtract the two numbers and take the answer and divide by the lower number . this gives us 38.2% .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Segment net sales 2009 = $7008
Segment net sales 2008 = $8093
Segment net sales 2007 = $7729
Segment net sales percentage change 2009-2008 = (13)%
Segment net sales percentage change 2008-2007 = 5%
Lets formulate the expression step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: multiply 7729 by 21% which gives multiply(7729, 21%)
step 2: multiply 7008 by 32% which gives multiply(7008, 32%)
step 3: subtract the expression of step 1 from the expression of step 2 which gives subtract(multiply(7008, 32%), multiply(7729, 21%))
step 4: multiply 7729 by 21% which gives multiply(7729, 21%)
step 5: divide the expression of step 3 by the expression of step 4 which gives divide(subtract(multiply(7008, 32%), multiply(7729, 21%)), multiply(7729, 21%))
step 6: multiply the expression of step 5 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(subtract(multiply(7008, 32%), multiply(7729, 21%)), multiply(7729, 21%)), 100),
The final arithmetic expression is multiply(divide(subtract(multiply(7008, 32%), multiply(7729, 21%)), multiply(7729, 21%)), 100).
|
### Instruction:
Formulate an arithmetic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Context: balance sheet data the cash cash equivalents and marketable securities of december 31 , 2016 is $ 1100.6 ; the cash cash equivalents and marketable securities of december 31 , 2015 is $ 1509.7 ; management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 2013 ( continued ) ( amounts in millions , except per share amounts ) the effect of foreign exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents included in the consolidated statements of cash flows resulted in a decrease of $ 156.1 in 2015 . the decrease was primarily a result of the u.s . dollar being stronger than several foreign currencies , including the australian dollar , brazilian real , canadian dollar , euro and south african rand as of december 31 , 2015 compared to december 31 , 2014. .
Question: how much has cash equivalents and marketable securities decreased from 2014 to 2016?
### Output:
Logic: to find the amount of cash equivalent and marketable securities in 2014 , one needs to add the amount that was given in line 1 by 2015 . then to find the percentage difference one will subtract 2014 by 2016 and then divide that solution by 2014 .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Cash equivalents and marketable securities 2016: $1100.6
Cash equivalents and marketable securities 2015: $1509.7
Decrease due to exchange rate changes in 2015: $156.1
Lets formulate the expression step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: add 1509.7 to 156.1 which gives add(1509.7, 156.1)
step 2: subtract 1100.6 from the expression of step 1 which gives subtract(add(1509.7, 156.1), 1100.6)
step 3: add 1509.7 to 156.1 which gives add(1509.7, 156.1)
step 4: divide the expression of step 2 by the expression of step 3 which gives divide(subtract(add(1509.7, 156.1), 1100.6), add(1509.7, 156.1)),
The final arithmetic expression is divide(subtract(add(1509.7, 156.1), 1100.6), add(1509.7, 156.1)).
|
### Instruction:
Formulate an arithmetic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Context: the unproved properties of 2017 is 3710069 ; the unproved properties of 2016 is 3840126 ; the total of 2017 is 52555741 ; the total of 2016 is 49592091 ;
Question: considering the year 2016 , what is the percentage of unproved properties among the total properties?
### Output:
Logic: it is the capitalized costs related to unproved properties divided by the capitalized costs related to all properties , then turned into a percentage .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Unproved properties 2016: 3840126
Total 2016: 49592091
Lets formulate the expression step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 3840126 by 49592091 which gives divide(3840126, 49592091)
step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(3840126, 49592091), 100),
The final arithmetic expression is multiply(divide(3840126, 49592091), 100).
|
### Instruction:
Formulate an arithmetic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Context: the 2024-2028 of u.s . is 900.2 ; the 2024-2028 of international is 336.8 ;
Question: considering the years 2024-2028 , what is the average for the u.s . estimated benefit payments by year?
### Output:
Logic: it is the value expected for all the years in the period divided by 5 .
The required values from the context for the question are:
2024-2028 U.S. = 900.2
2024-2028 International = 336.8
Lets formulate the expression step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 900.2 by 5 which gives divide(900.2, 5),
The final arithmetic expression is divide(900.2, 5).
|
### Instruction:
Formulate an arithmetic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Context: ( in millions ) the net income ( loss ) of years ended december 31 , 2013 is $ 132.8 ; the net income ( loss ) of years ended december 31 , 2012 is $ 119.0 ; the net income ( loss ) of years ended december 31 , 2011 is $ 17.1 ; the net income ( loss ) of years ended december 31 , 2010 is $ -29.2 ( 29.2 ) ; the net income ( loss ) of years ended december 31 , 2009 is $ -373.4 ( 373.4 ) ; ( in millions ) the income tax expense ( benefit ) of years ended december 31 , 2013 is 62.7 ; the income tax expense ( benefit ) of years ended december 31 , 2012 is 67.1 ; the income tax expense ( benefit ) of years ended december 31 , 2011 is 11.2 ; the income tax expense ( benefit ) of years ended december 31 , 2010 is -7.8 ( 7.8 ) ; the income tax expense ( benefit ) of years ended december 31 , 2009 is -87.8 ( 87.8 ) ;
Question: 3 net income ( loss ) $ 132.8 \\n5 income tax expense ( benefit ) 62.7
### Output:
Logic: taxes divided by pretax income
The required values from the context for the question are:
Net Income 2013 = $132.8 million
Net Income 2012 = $119.0 million
Net Income 2011 = $17.1 million
Net Income 2010 = -$29.2 million
Net Income 2009 = -$373.4 million
Income Tax Expense 2013 = $62.7 million
Income Tax Expense 2012 = $67.1 million
Income Tax Expense 2011 = $11.2 million
Income Tax Expense 2010 = -$7.8 million
Income Tax Expense 2009 = -$87.8 million
Lets formulate the expression step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: add 62.7 to 132.8 which gives add(62.7, 132.8)
step 2: divide 62.7 by the expression of step 1 which gives divide(62.7, add(62.7, 132.8))
step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(62.7, add(62.7, 132.8)), 100),
The final arithmetic expression is multiply(divide(62.7, add(62.7, 132.8)), 100).
|
### Instruction:
Formulate an arithmetic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Context: the company recorded a reduction to cost of sales of $ 5572 and $ 24087 in fiscal 2013 and fiscal 2012 , respectively . the company 2019s overall costs to acquire inventory for the same or similar products have generally decreased historically as the company has been able to leverage its continued growth , execution of merchandise strategies and realization of supply chain efficiencies . in fiscal 2011 , the company recorded an increase to cost of sales of $ 24708 due to an increase in supply chain costs and inflationary pressures affecting certain product categories .
Question: what was the total reduction to cost of sales from 2011 to 2013?
### Output:
Logic: to find the reduction to cost of sales one must add the total reduction to cost of sales for the 3 years and then subtract the increase in cost of sales for the 3 year period .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Reduction to cost of sales in 2013: $5572
Reduction to cost of sales in 2012: $24087
Increase to cost of sales in 2011: $24708
Lets formulate the expression step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: add 24087 to 5572 which gives add(24087, 5572)
step 2: subtract the expression of step 1 from 24708 which gives subtract(24708, add(24087, 5572)),
The final arithmetic expression is subtract(24708, add(24087, 5572)).
|
### Instruction:
Formulate an arithmetic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Context: balance december 31 2006 the deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property of $ 740507 is -80258 ( 80258 ) ; balance december 31 2006 the deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property of $ 740507 is -11766 ( 11766 ) ;
Question: what is the percentual decline of the deductions during 2007 and 2008?
### Output:
Logic: it is the percentual variation of the value of the deduction , which is calculated by subtracting the initial value of the final value , then dividing by the initial value and turning it into a percentage .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Deductions during period 2014 (from balance December 31, 2006): $740507
Disposition and retirements of property 2014 (from balance December 31, 2006): -80258
Lets formulate the expression step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: subtract 80258 from 11766 which gives subtract(11766, 80258)
step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 80258 which gives divide(subtract(11766, 80258), 80258)
step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(subtract(11766, 80258), 80258), 100),
The final arithmetic expression is multiply(divide(subtract(11766, 80258), 80258), 100).
|
### Instruction:
Formulate an arithmetic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Context: the total of approximate number of vehicles is 15500 ; the total of average age is 7 ; fleet automation approximately 66% ( 66 % ) of our residential routes have been converted to automated single driver trucks . fleet conversion to compressed natural gas ( cng ) approximately 12% ( 12 % ) of our fleet operates on natural gas .
Question: what is the approximate number of vehicle in the fleet that are operating on compressed natural gas ( cng ) approximately 12% ( 12 % )
### Output:
Logic: to obtain the number multiply the amount by the percent
The required values from the context for the question are:
Total number of vehicles = 15500
Residential routes automation = 66%
Fleet conversion to CNG = 12%
Lets formulate the expression step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: multiply 15500 by 12% which gives multiply(15500, 12%),
The final arithmetic expression is multiply(15500, 12%).
|
### Instruction:
Formulate an arithmetic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Context: during the year ended september 27 , 2008 , the company recorded an additional $ 4400 in fair market value of the building , which was completed in fiscal 2008 . this is in addition to the $ 3000 fair market value of the land and the $ 7700 fair market value related to the building constructed that cytyc had recorded as of october 22 , 2007 .
Question: what was the total fair value building that cytyc had finished constructing in 2008 including the fair market value of the land?
### Output:
Logic: to find the total fair value of the building one must added the fair market valuation of the building and land in 2007 and add the additional fair market valuation in 2008 .
The required values from the context for the question are:
fair market value of the building 2008 addition: $4400
fair market value of the land 2007: $3000
fair market value related to the building constructed 2007: $7700
Lets formulate the expression step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: add 3000 to 4400 which gives add(3000, 4400)
step 2: add 7700 to the expression of step 1 which gives add(7700, add(3000, 4400)),
The final arithmetic expression is add(7700, add(3000, 4400)).
|
### Instruction:
Formulate an arithmetic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Context: the 2019 of amount is $ 17 ; the 2020 of amount is 15 ; the 2021 of amount is 12 ; the 2022 of amount is 11 ; the 2023 of amount is 6 ; the thereafter of amount is 80 ;
Question: what percentage of the minimum annual future rental commitment under operating leases that have initial or remaining non-cancelable lease terms is due in 2019?
### Output:
Logic: from here you need to take the amount due in 2019 or $ 17 and divide it by the total or 141 to get 12.1%
The required values from the context for the question are:
Amount due in 2019: $17
Total amount due (sum of all years): $141
Lets formulate the expression step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: add 17 to 15 which gives add(17, 15)
step 2: add 12 to 11 which gives add(12, 11)
step 3: add the expression of step 1 to the expression of step 2 which gives add(add(17, 15), add(12, 11))
step 4: add the expression of step 3 to 80 which gives add(add(add(17, 15), add(12, 11)), 80)
step 5: multiply the expression of step 4 by 100 which gives multiply(add(add(add(17, 15), add(12, 11)), 80), 100),
The final arithmetic expression is multiply(add(add(add(17, 15), add(12, 11)), 80), 100).
|
### Instruction:
Formulate an arithmetic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Context: millions the cash provided by operating activities of 2013 is $ 6823 ; the cash provided by operating activities of 2012 is $ 6161 ; the cash provided by operating activities of 2011 is $ 5873 ; millions the dividends paid of 2013 is -1333 ( 1333 ) ; the dividends paid of 2012 is -1146 ( 1146 ) ; the dividends paid of 2011 is -837 ( 837 ) ;
Question: what percentage of cash provided by operating activities were dividends paid in 2012?
### Output:
Logic: looking to see what kind of cash coverage the firm has to pay its dividend from its operations .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Cash provided by operating activities 2012: $6161
Dividends paid 2012: $1146
Lets formulate the expression step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 1146 by 6161 which gives divide(1146, 6161)
step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(1146, 6161), 100),
The final arithmetic expression is multiply(divide(1146, 6161), 100).
|
### Instruction:
Formulate an arithmetic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Context: ( $ in millions ) the long-term debt of total is $ 1859 ; the long-term debt of 2012 is $ 29 ; the long-term debt of 2013 - 2014 is $ 129 ; the long-term debt of 2015 - 2016 is $ 396 ; the long-term debt of 2017 and beyond is $ 1305 ; ( $ in millions ) the total contractual obligations of total is $ 5849 ; the total contractual obligations of 2012 is $ 1637 ; the total contractual obligations of 2013 - 2014 is $ 1239 ; the total contractual obligations of 2015 - 2016 is $ 897 ; the total contractual obligations of 2017 and beyond is $ 2076 ;
Question: what is the ratio of long term debt to the total contractual obligations
### Output:
Logic: every $ 1 of total contractual obligations includes $ 0.32 of long term debt
The required values from the context for the question are:
Long-term debt total = $1859
Total contractual obligations total = $5849
Lets formulate the expression step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 1859 by 5849 which gives divide(1859, 5849),
The final arithmetic expression is divide(1859, 5849).
|
### Instruction:
Formulate an arithmetic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Context: rental expenses under operating leases were $ 21 for 2015 , $ 22 for 2014 and $ 23 for 2013 .
Question: what was the amortization expense for the operating leases for facility and equipment from 2015 to 2014 in dollars
### Output:
Logic: the change from one period to another is the difference between the 2 periods
The required values from the context for the question are:
Rental expenses under operating leases for 2015: $21
Rental expenses under operating leases for 2014: $22
Rental expenses under operating leases for 2013: $23
Lets formulate the expression step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: subtract 21 from 22 which gives subtract(22, 21),
The final arithmetic expression is subtract(22, 21).
|
### Instruction:
Formulate an arithmetic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Context: 2007 the 2010 of $ 130206 is 265915 ; 2007 the 2009 of $ 130206 is 372725 ;
Question: what was the percent of growth in maturities from 2009 to 2010
### Output:
Logic: the growth rate is the change from period to period divided by the original amount
The required values from the context for the question are:
value for 2010 = 265915
value for 2009 = 372725
Lets formulate the expression step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: subtract 372725 from 265915 which gives subtract(265915, 372725)
step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 265915 which gives divide(subtract(265915, 372725), 265915)
step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(subtract(265915, 372725), 265915), 100),
The final arithmetic expression is multiply(divide(subtract(265915, 372725), 265915), 100).
|
### Instruction:
Formulate an arithmetic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Context: the company recorded a reduction to cost of sales of $ 24087 and $ 29554 in fiscal 2012 and fiscal 2010 , respectively . as a result of utilizing lifo , the company recorded an increase to cost of sales of $ 24708 for fiscal 2011 , due to an increase in supply chain costs and inflationary pressures affecting certain product categories .
Question: how much did the cost of sales change over from 2010 to 2012
### Output:
Logic: to find the answer one must added the two years the cost of sales decreased then take the year that the cost of sales increased and subtract that by the previous answer .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Reduction to cost of sales in fiscal 2012: $24087
Reduction to cost of sales in fiscal 2010: $29554
Increase to cost of sales in fiscal 2011: $24708
Lets formulate the expression step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: add 24087 to 29554 which gives add(24087, 29554)
step 2: subtract the expression of step 1 from 24708 which gives subtract(24708, add(24087, 29554)),
The final arithmetic expression is subtract(24708, add(24087, 29554)).
|
### Instruction:
Formulate an arithmetic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Context: years ended december 31 the u.k . of 2018 is 45 ; the u.k . of 2017 is 43 ; the u.k . of 2016 is 43 ;
Question: considering the years 2016-2018 , what is the average expense for the significant plans in the u.k.?
### Output:
Logic: it is the sum of all expense for the significant plans divided by three .
The required values from the context for the question are:
U.K. 2018 = 45
U.K. 2017 = 43
U.K. 2016 = 43
Lets formulate the expression step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
,
The final arithmetic expression is table_average(u.k ., none).
|
### Instruction:
Formulate an arithmetic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Context: plan category the total of number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options warrants and rights ( 1 ) ( a ) ( b ) is 1955024 ; the total of weighted-average exercise price of outstanding optionswarrants and rights ( 2 ) is $ 36.06 ; the total of number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securitiesreflected in column ( a ) ) ( c ) is 4078093 ;
Question: at the weighted average price given what is the value of the number of securities to be issued
### Output:
Logic: the value is the product of the number of shares and the price
The required values from the context for the question are:
Number of securities to be issued: 1955024
Weighted-average exercise price: $36.06
Lets formulate the expression step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: multiply 1955024 by 36.06 which gives multiply(1955024, 36.06),
The final arithmetic expression is multiply(1955024, 36.06).
|
### Instruction:
Formulate an arithmetic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Context: the total expense related to the defined contribution plan for u.s . employees was $ 21.9 million in fiscal 2011 , $ 20.5 million in fiscal 2010 and $ 21.5 million in fiscal 2009 . the total expense related to the various defined benefit pension and other retirement plans for certain non-u.s . employees was $ 21.4 million in fiscal 2011 , $ 11.7 million in fiscal 2010 and $ 10.9 million in fiscal 2009 .
Question: what was the difference in percentage that total expenses changed between the us and non-us employees from 2009 to 2011?
### Output:
Logic: to find the answer one must find the percentage increase for each the us and non-us . then compare these two numbers to find the difference in changes for the years .
The required values from the context for the question are:
US 2011: $21.9 million
US 2009: $21.5 million
Non-US 2011: $21.4 million
Non-US 2009: $10.9 million
Lets formulate the expression step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: subtract 21.5 from 21.9 which gives subtract(21.9, 21.5)
step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 21.5 which gives divide(subtract(21.9, 21.5), 21.5)
step 3: subtract 10.9 from 21.4 which gives subtract(21.4, 10.9)
step 4: divide the expression of step 3 by 10.9 which gives divide(subtract(21.4, 10.9), 10.9)
step 5: subtract the expression of step 2 from the expression of step 4 which gives subtract(divide(subtract(21.4, 10.9), 10.9), divide(subtract(21.9, 21.5), 21.5)),
The final arithmetic expression is subtract(divide(subtract(21.4, 10.9), 10.9), divide(subtract(21.9, 21.5), 21.5)).
|
### Instruction:
Formulate an arithmetic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Context: the decrease in cash and cash equivalents of for the year ended december 31 2004 ( in thousands ) is -4493 ( 4493 ) ; the cash and cash equivalents beginning of period of for the year ended december 31 2004 ( in thousands ) is 34968 ; cash and cash equivalents were $ 30.5 million and $ 35.0 million at december 31 , 2004 and december 31 , 2003 , respectively . summary of cash flows for the year ended december 31 , 2004 ( in thousands ) .
Question: what was the percentual decrease in the cash and cash equivalents during this period?
### Output:
Logic: it is the amount of the decrease in cash and cash equivalents divided by the cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the period , then turned into a percentage .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Decrease in cash 2004 = -4493 (4493)
Beginning cash 2004 = 34968
Lets formulate the expression step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 4493 by 34968 which gives divide(4493, 34968)
step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(4493, 34968), 100),
The final arithmetic expression is multiply(divide(4493, 34968), 100).
|
### Instruction:
Formulate an arithmetic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Context: the 2018 of amount is $ 15 ; the 2019 of amount is 14 ; the 2020 of amount is 12 ; the 2021 of amount is 9 ; the 2022 of amount is 8 ; the thereafter of amount is 65 ;
Question: what percentage of minimum annual future rental commitment under operating leases that have initial or remaining non-cancelable lease terms is payable after 2022?
### Output:
Logic: from here you need to than divide the amount to be paid after 2022 or 65 by the total or 123 ( 65/123 ) to get 52.8%
The required values from the context for the question are:
Amount payable after 2022: 65
Total amounts (2018-2022 and thereafter): 15+14+12+9+8+65 = 123
Lets formulate the expression step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: add 15 to 14 which gives add(15, 14)
step 2: add 12 to 9 which gives add(12, 9)
step 3: add the expression of step 1 to the expression of step 2 which gives add(add(15, 14), add(12, 9))
step 4: add 8 to 65 which gives add(8, 65)
step 5: add the expression of step 3 to the expression of step 4 which gives add(add(add(15, 14), add(12, 9)), add(8, 65))
step 6: multiply the expression of step 5 by 100 which gives multiply(add(add(add(15, 14), add(12, 9)), add(8, 65)), 100),
The final arithmetic expression is multiply(add(add(add(15, 14), add(12, 9)), add(8, 65)), 100).
|
### Instruction:
Formulate an arithmetic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Context: cash flows provided by operating activities the most significant items affecting the comparison of our operating cash flows for 2016 and 2015 are summarized below : changes in assets and liabilities , net of effects from business acquisitions and divestitures , decreased our cash flow from operations by $ 205.2 million in 2016 , compared to a decrease of $ 316.7 million in 2015 , primarily as a result of the following : 2022 our accounts receivable , exclusive of the change in allowance for doubtful accounts and customer credits , increased $ 52.3 million during 2016 due to the timing of billings net of collections , compared to a $ 15.7 million increase in 2015 .
Question: what was the ratio of the changes in assets and liabilities , net of effects from business acquisitions and divestitures in 2016 to 2015
### Output:
Logic: for every dollar in 2015 of changes in assets and liabilities , net of effects from business acquisitions and divestitures there was $ 0.67 in 2016
The required values from the context for the question are:
2015 changes in assets and liabilities = $316.7 million
2016 changes in assets and liabilities = $205.2 million
2016 for every 2015 dollar = $0.67
Lets formulate the expression step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 205.2 by 316.7 which gives divide(205.2, 316.7),
The final arithmetic expression is divide(205.2, 316.7).
|
### Instruction:
Formulate an arithmetic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Context: the company recorded impairment charges included in sg&a expense of approximately $ 0.2 million in the 2007 predecessor period , $ 9.4 million in 2006 and $ 0.6 million in 2005 to reduce the carrying value of certain of its stores 2019 assets as deemed necessary due to negative sales trends and cash flows at these locations .
Question: what was the amount of the total impairment charges included in sg&a expense from 2005 to 2007 in millions
### Output:
Logic: the total amount in question is the sum of all amounts
The required values from the context for the question are:
impairment charges included in sg&a expense 2007: $0.2 million
impairment charges included in sg&a expense 2006: $9.4 million
impairment charges included in sg&a expense 2005: $0.6 million
Lets formulate the expression step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: add 0.2 to 9.4 which gives add(0.2, 9.4)
step 2: add the expression of step 1 to 0.6 which gives add(add(0.2, 9.4), 0.6),
The final arithmetic expression is add(add(0.2, 9.4), 0.6).
|
### Instruction:
Formulate an arithmetic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Context: the aggregate purchase price of approximately $ 6156900 included $ 2094800 in cash ; 132038 shares of hologic common stock at an estimated fair value of $ 3671500 ; 16465 of fully vested stock options granted to cytyc employees in exchange for their vested cytyc stock options , with an estimated fair value of approximately $ 241400 ; the fair value of cytyc 2019s outstanding convertible notes assumed in the merger of approximately $ 125000 ; and approximately $ 24200 of direct acquisition costs .
Question: during the purchase , what was the per share value of the hologic common stock
### Output:
Logic: to find the per share value of the stock one must divide the cost of the shares by the total number of shares purchased .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Purchase price of common stock: $3671500
Number of shares: 132038
Lets formulate the expression step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 3671500 by 132038 which gives divide(3671500, 132038),
The final arithmetic expression is divide(3671500, 132038).
|
### Instruction:
Formulate an arithmetic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Context: the granted of number of units ( in thousands ) is 420 ; the granted of weighted average fair value ( in $ ) is 38.16 ; the vested of number of units ( in thousands ) is -79 ( 79 ) ; the vested of weighted average fair value ( in $ ) is 21.30 ; the forfeited of number of units ( in thousands ) is -114 ( 114 ) ; the forfeited of weighted average fair value ( in $ ) is 17.28 ;
Question: what was the net change number of units in 2009 in thousands
### Output:
Logic: the change is the summation of all activity both the increase and decrease
The required values from the context for the question are:
Granted number of units 2009: 420
Vested number of units 2009: -79
Forfeited number of units 2009: -114
Lets formulate the expression step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: add 420 to -79 which gives add(420, -79)
step 2: add the expression of step 1 to -114 which gives add(add(420, -79), -114),
The final arithmetic expression is add(add(420, -79), -114).
|
### Instruction:
Formulate an arithmetic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Context: the interest incurred of 2016 is $ 148.4 ; the interest incurred of 2015 is $ 152.6 ; the interest incurred of 2014 is $ 158.1 ;
Question: considering the years 2014-2016 , what is the lowest interest incurred observed?
### Output:
Logic: it is the minimum value of interest incurred observed during these years .
The required values from the context for the question are:
2016 interest incurred: $148.4
2015 interest incurred: $152.6
2014 interest incurred: $158.1
Lets formulate the expression step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
,
The final arithmetic expression is table_min(interest incurred, none).
|
### Instruction:
Formulate an arithmetic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Context: goodwill the customer-related intangible assets of $ 271577 is 147500 ; goodwill the contract-based intangible assets of $ 271577 is 31000 ; goodwill the acquired technology of $ 271577 is 10700 ; goodwill the fixed assets of $ 271577 is 1680 ; goodwill the other assets of $ 271577 is 4230 ; goodwill the total assets acquired of $ 271577 is 466687 ; the goodwill associated with the acquisition is not deductible for tax purposes . the customer-related intangible assets and the contract-based intangible assets have an estimated amortization period of 13 years . the acquired technology has an estimated amortization period of 7 years. .
Question: what percent of assets for the acquisition of paypros was deductible for taxes?
### Output:
Logic: to find the percentage of assets that are tax deductible one will nee to added all the intangible assets and technology acquisitions . then they will divide that answer by the total amount of assets .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Customer-related intangible assets: $147500
Contract-based intangible assets: $31000
Acquired technology: $10700
Total assets acquired: $466687
Lets formulate the expression step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: add 10700 to 31000 which gives add(10700, 31000)
step 2: add 147500 to the expression of step 1 which gives add(147500, add(10700, 31000))
step 3: divide the expression of step 2 by 466687 which gives divide(add(147500, add(10700, 31000)), 466687)
step 4: multiply the expression of step 3 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(add(147500, add(10700, 31000)), 466687), 100),
The final arithmetic expression is multiply(divide(add(147500, add(10700, 31000)), 466687), 100).
|
### Instruction:
Formulate an arithmetic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Context: the 2021 20132025 of u.s . is 917.9 ; the 2021 20132025 of international is 332.3 ;
Question: considering the years 2021-2025 , what is the difference between the average projected benefit payments for the u.s . and international?
### Output:
Logic: it is the difference between the division of the accumulated value for the 2021-2025 period in the u.s . and international by 5 ( number of years ) .
The required values from the context for the question are:
2021-2025 U.S. projected benefit payments (accumulated): 917.9
2021-2025 International projected benefit payments (accumulated): 332.3
Lets formulate the expression step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 332.3 by 5 which gives divide(332.3, 5)
step 2: divide 917.9 by 5 which gives divide(917.9, 5)
step 3: subtract the expression of step 1 from the expression of step 2 which gives subtract(divide(917.9, 5), divide(332.3, 5)),
The final arithmetic expression is subtract(divide(917.9, 5), divide(332.3, 5)).
|
### Instruction:
Formulate an arithmetic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Context: years ended december 31 , the segment revenue of 2009 is $ 6305 ; the segment revenue of 2008 is $ 6197 ; the segment revenue of 2007 is $ 5918 ;
Question: what is the average segment revenue , in millions?
### Output:
Logic: it is the sum of all revenue divided by three .
The required values from the context for the question are:
segment revenue (2009): $6305
segment revenue (2008): $6197
segment revenue (2007): $5918
Lets formulate the expression step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
,
The final arithmetic expression is table_average(segment revenue, none).
|
### Instruction:
Formulate an arithmetic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Context: the expected dividend yield of 2010 is 0.3% ( 0.3 % ) ; the expected dividend yield of 2009 is 0.4% ( 0.4 % ) ; the expected dividend yield of 2008 is 0.3% ( 0.3 % ) ;
Question: what is the average expected dividend yield during 2008-2010?
### Output:
Logic: it is the sum of all expected dividends yield divided by three .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Expected dividend yield of 2010: 0.3%
Expected dividend yield of 2009: 0.4%
Expected dividend yield of 2008: 0.3%
Lets formulate the expression step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: multiply table_average(expected dividend yield, none) by 100 which gives multiply(table_average(expected dividend yield, none), 100),
The final arithmetic expression is multiply(table_average(expected dividend yield, none), 100).
|
### Instruction:
Formulate an arithmetic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Context: balance at january 1 2007 the balance at december 31 2007 of $ 53 is $ 70 ;
Question: what is the percentual increase in the balance during the year 2007?
### Output:
Logic: it is the balance at the end of the year divided by the initial one , then turned into a percentage .
The required values from the context for the question are:
balance January 1 2007: $53
balance December 31 2007: $70
Lets formulate the expression step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 70 by 53 which gives divide(70, 53)
step 2: subtract 1 from the expression of step 1 which gives subtract(divide(70, 53), 1)
step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(divide(70, 53), 1), 100),
The final arithmetic expression is multiply(subtract(divide(70, 53), 1), 100).
|
### Instruction:
Formulate an arithmetic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Context: the inventories at fifo net of december 292012 is $ 2182419 ; the inventories at fifo net of december 312011 is $ 1941055 ; the inventories at lifo net of december 292012 is $ 2308609 ; the inventories at lifo net of december 312011 is $ 2043158 ; inventory quantities are tracked through a perpetual inventory system .
Question: what percent did the inventories at lifo net increase from the beginning of 2011 to the end of 2012?
### Output:
Logic: to find the percentage change one must take the inventories at lifo net of 2012 and subtract it from the inventories at lifo net of 2011 . then take the answer and divide it by the inventories at lifo net of 2011 .
The required values from the context for the question are:
inventories at lifo net of december 292012: $2308609
inventories at lifo net of december 312011: $2043158
Lets formulate the expression step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: subtract 1941055 from 2308609 which gives subtract(2308609, 1941055)
step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 1941055 which gives divide(subtract(2308609, 1941055), 1941055)
step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(subtract(2308609, 1941055), 1941055), 100),
The final arithmetic expression is multiply(divide(subtract(2308609, 1941055), 1941055), 100).
|
### Instruction:
Formulate an arithmetic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Context: plan category the equity compensation plans approved by security holders of number of securitiesto be issued uponexercise ofoutstanding options warrants and rights ( a ) ( b ) is 1442912 ; the equity compensation plans approved by security holders of weighted-averageexercise price ofoutstanding options warrants and rights is $ 86.98 ; the equity compensation plans approved by security holders of number of securitiesremaining available forfuture issuance underequity compensationplans ( excludingsecurities reflected in column ( a ) ) ( c ) is 4446967 ; principal accounting fees and services for the information required by this item 14 , see 201caudit and non-audit fees 201d and 201caudit committee pre-approval procedures 201d in the proxy statement for our 2016 annual meeting , which information is incorporated herein by reference. .
Question: if the company were to purchase the remaining shares at the price at december 31 , 2015 , how much would the company have to pay for the remaining shares .
### Output:
Logic: this can be found by multiplying the amount of remaining shares by the share price .
The required values from the context for the question are:
outstanding options warrants and rights: 1442912
weighted-average price of options warrants and rights: $86.98
remaining available for future issuance: 4446967
Lets formulate the expression step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: multiply 86.98 by 4446967 which gives multiply(86.98, 4446967),
The final arithmetic expression is multiply(86.98, 4446967).
|
### Instruction:
Formulate an arithmetic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Context: balance november 3 2007 the additions for tax positions of 2008 of $ 9889 is 3861 ; balance november 3 2007 the balance november 1 2008 of $ 9889 is 13750 ; balance november 3 2007 the additions for tax positions of 2009 of $ 9889 is 4411 ; balance november 3 2007 the balance october 31 2009 of $ 9889 is 18161 ; balance november 3 2007 the additions for tax positions of 2010 of $ 9889 is 286 ; balance november 3 2007 the balance october 30 2010 of $ 9889 is $ 18447 ; the following table summarizes the changes in the total amounts of uncertain tax positions for fiscal 2008 through fiscal 2010. .
Question: what percentage did the balance increase from 2007 to 2010?
### Output:
Logic: to find the percentage increase from 2007 to 2010 one must take the balance for 2010 and subtract that by the balance for 2007 . then take the answer and divide it by the balance for 2007 .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Balance 2007: $9889
Balance 2010: $18447
Lets formulate the expression step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: subtract 9889 from 18447 which gives subtract(18447, 9889)
step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 9889 which gives divide(subtract(18447, 9889), 9889)
step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(subtract(18447, 9889), 9889), 100),
The final arithmetic expression is multiply(divide(subtract(18447, 9889), 9889), 100).
|
### Instruction:
Formulate an arithmetic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Context: year the 2011 of gallons consumed ( in millions ) is 2756 ; the 2011 of average costper gallon is $ 3.01 ; the 2011 of total cost ( in millions ) is $ 8304 ; the 2011 of percent of total operating expenses is 33.2% ( 33.2 % ) ;
Question: in 2011 what was the total operating costs in millions
### Output:
Logic: to obtain the total costs you divide the expenses provide by their given percent of the total operating expenses
The required values from the context for the question are:
2011 of total cost (in millions): $8304
Lets formulate the expression step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 8304 by 33.2% which gives divide(8304, 33.2%),
The final arithmetic expression is divide(8304, 33.2%).
|
### Instruction:
Formulate an arithmetic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Context: the company recorded a net overall tax benefit including accrued interest of $ 25920 thousand . in addition , the company was also able to take down a $ 12356 thousand fin 48 reserve that had been established regarding the 2003 and 2004 irs audit . included within the 2010 net expense ( benefit ) of $ ( 9938 ) thousand is $ ( 10591 ) thousand of accrued interest related to the 2003 and 2004 irs audit .
Question: what was the total gross amount of money that the company received from their favorable audit?
### Output:
Logic: the initial $ 12356 was added to the total due to them already subtracting that from expenses earlier . the next is unattributed money earned from investments . once added up the interest that was earned , you get $ 32885 .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Overall Tax Benefit = $25920 thousand
FIN 48 Reserve = $12356 thousand
Net Expense 2010 = -$9938 thousand
Accrued Interest 2010 = -$10591 thousand
Lets formulate the expression step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: add 12356 to 9938 which gives add(12356, 9938)
step 2: add the expression of step 1 to 10591 which gives add(add(12356, 9938), 10591),
The final arithmetic expression is add(add(12356, 9938), 10591).
|
### Instruction:
Formulate an arithmetic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Context: customer relationships the trademarks of 25 is 25 ; the trademarks of years is years ; customer relationships the completed technology/patents of 25 is 10 ; the completed technology/patents of years is years ; intangible assets such as patents , customer-related intangible assets and other intangible assets with finite useful lives are amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated economic lives . the weighted-average useful lives approximate the following: .
Question: what is the difference between the weighted average useful lives of trademarks and patents , in number of years?\\n
### Output:
Logic: it is the variation between those weighted-average useful lives .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Weighted average useful lives of trademarks: 25 years
Weighted average useful lives of technology/patents: 10 years
Lets formulate the expression step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: subtract 10 from 25 which gives subtract(25, 10),
The final arithmetic expression is subtract(25, 10).
|
### Instruction:
Formulate an arithmetic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Context: years ended december 31 ( millions except percentage data ) the operating margin of 2014 is 21.0% ( 21.0 % ) ; the operating margin of 2013 is 19.8% ( 19.8 % ) ; the operating margin of 2012 is 19.6% ( 19.6 % ) ;
Question: what is the difference between the average and the 2014's operating margin?
### Output:
Logic: it is the variation between those values .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Operating Margin 2014 = 21.0%
Operating Margin 2013 = 19.8%
Operating Margin 2012 = 19.6%
Lets formulate the expression step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: subtract table_average(operating margin, none) from 21.0% which gives subtract(21.0%, table_average(operating margin, none))
step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(21.0%, table_average(operating margin, none)), 100),
The final arithmetic expression is multiply(subtract(21.0%, table_average(operating margin, none)), 100).
|
### Instruction:
Formulate an arithmetic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Context: the revenue of year ended december 31 2008 ( unaudited ) is $ 9362.2 ; the revenue of year ended december 31 2007 ( unaudited ) is $ 9244.9 ; the net income of year ended december 31 2008 ( unaudited ) is 285.7 ; the net income of year ended december 31 2007 ( unaudited ) is 423.2 ;
Question: based on the year ended december 31 2008 ( unaudited ) information what was the net profit margin
### Output:
Logic: the net profit margin is the net income divide by the revenues
The required values from the context for the question are:
Revenue for 2008: $9,362.2 million
Net income for 2008: 285.7 million
Lets formulate the expression step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 285.7 by 9362.2 which gives divide(285.7, 9362.2)
step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(285.7, 9362.2), 100),
The final arithmetic expression is multiply(divide(285.7, 9362.2), 100).
|
### Instruction:
Formulate an arithmetic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Context: simplify the presentation of deferred income taxes and reduce complexity without decreasing the usefulness of information provided to users of financial statements . the company recognized $ 0.6 million and $ 0.8 million in acquisition related costs that were expensed during the three months ended march 31 , 2015 and december 31 , 2014 , respectively .
Question: what was the ratio of the acquisition related costs recognized in 2015 to 2014
### Output:
Logic: the ratio of the acquisition related costs for 2015 to 2014 was 0.75 to 1
The required values from the context for the question are:
Acquisition related costs 03/31/2015: $0.6 million
Acquisition related costs 12/31/2014: $0.8 million
Lets formulate the expression step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 0.6 by 0.8 which gives divide(0.6, 0.8),
The final arithmetic expression is divide(0.6, 0.8).
|
### Instruction:
Formulate an arithmetic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Context: december 31 ( in millions ) the derivatives cva ( b ) of 2014 is -2674 ( 2674 ) ; the derivatives cva ( b ) of 2013 is -2352 ( 2352 ) ; december 31 ( in millions ) the derivatives dva and fva ( b ) ( c ) of 2014 is -380 ( 380 ) ; the derivatives dva and fva ( b ) ( c ) of 2013 is -322 ( 322 ) ; ( b ) positive cva and dva/fva represent amounts that increased receivable balances or decreased payable balances ; negative cva and dva/fva represent amounts that decreased receivable balances or increased payable balances .
Question: by what total amount , from 2013 to 2014 , did total derivative receivable balances decrease or payable balances increase?
### Output:
Logic: since negative cva/dva/fva result from decreased receivables or increased payables , add all negative cva/dva/fva for the two years .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Derivatives CVA 2014: -2674
Derivatives CVA 2013: -2352
Derivatives DVA and FVA 2014: -380
Derivatives DVA and FVA 2013: -322
Lets formulate the expression step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: add 2674 to 2352 which gives add(2674, 2352)
step 2: add 380 to 322 which gives add(380, 322)
step 3: add the expression of step 1 to the expression of step 2 which gives add(add(2674, 2352), add(380, 322)),
The final arithmetic expression is add(add(2674, 2352), add(380, 322)).
|
### Instruction:
Formulate an arithmetic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Context: as of december 31 , 2004 , 8816 of the sites on which our u.s . towers are located , or approximately 83% ( 83 % ) of our u.s . portfolio , were leased , subleased or licensed , while 1796 or approximately 17% ( 17 % ) were owned in fee or through .
Question: about how many towers were leased or subleased in 2004?
### Output:
Logic: the total number of towers in the us are given in line 24 . to find the amount leased we multiple that by the percentage given in line 25 .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Number of U.S. tower sites as of December 31, 2004: 8816
Percentage leased, subleased, or licensed: 83%
Lets formulate the expression step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: multiply 8816 by 83% which gives multiply(8816, 83%),
The final arithmetic expression is multiply(8816, 83%).
|
### Instruction:
Formulate an arithmetic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Context: the share-based compensation expense of 2015 is $ 21.1 ; the share-based compensation expense of 2014 ( in millions ) is $ 29.8 ; the share-based compensation expense of 2013 is $ 18.4 ; the income tax benefit of 2015 is $ -6.9 ( 6.9 ) ; the income tax benefit of 2014 ( in millions ) is $ -7.1 ( 7.1 ) ; the income tax benefit of 2013 is $ -5.6 ( 5.6 ) ; 2015 2014 2013 ( in millions ) .
Question: what was the total income tax benefit that came from buying back their common stock from 2013 to 2015?
### Output:
Logic: to calculate the income tax benefit one would need to add up the income tax benefit for the years of 2013 , 2014 , and 2015 .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Income tax benefit 2015: $-6.9
Income tax benefit 2014: $-7.1
Income tax benefit 2013: $-5.6
Lets formulate the expression step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: add 6.9 to 7.1 which gives add(6.9, 7.1)
step 2: add 5.6 to the expression of step 1 which gives add(5.6, add(6.9, 7.1)),
The final arithmetic expression is add(5.6, add(6.9, 7.1)).
|
### Instruction:
Formulate an arithmetic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Context: current assets the current assets of $ 28.1 is $ 28.1 ; current assets the current liabilities assumed of $ 28.1 is -32.9 ( 32.9 ) ;
Question: what is the current ratio?
### Output:
Logic: current ratio = current assets/current liabilities . it says it is invalid but ( ) means -
The required values from the context for the question are:
Current assets: $28.1
Current liabilities: -32.9 (32.9)
Lets formulate the expression step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 28.1 by -32.9 which gives divide(28.1, -32.9),
The final arithmetic expression is divide(28.1, -32.9).
|
### Instruction:
Formulate an arithmetic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Context: in millions the industry segment operating profits of 2009 is $ 2360 ; the industry segment operating profits of 2008 is $ 1393 ; the industry segment operating profits of 2007 is $ 1897 ;
Question: what is the average industry segment operating profits , in millions?
### Output:
Logic: it is the sum of all values divided by three .
The required values from the context for the question are:
2009: $2360 million (industry segment operating profits)
2008: $1393 million
2007: $1897 million
Lets formulate the expression step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
,
The final arithmetic expression is table_average(industry segment operating profits, none).
|
### Instruction:
Formulate an arithmetic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Context: contractual obligations the purchase obligations of payments due by period total is $ 265409 ; the purchase obligations of payments due by period less than 1 year is $ 265409 ; the purchase obligations of payments due by period 1-3 years is $ 0 ; the purchase obligations of payments due by period 3-5 years is $ 0 ; the purchase obligations of payments due by period more than 5 years is $ 0 ; contractual obligations the total of payments due by period total is $ 296554 ; the total of payments due by period less than 1 year is $ 268766 ; the total of payments due by period 1-3 years is $ 6271 ; the total of payments due by period 3-5 years is $ 6040 ; the total of payments due by period more than 5 years is $ 15477 ;
Question: considering the payments due to less than a year , what is the percentage of purchase obligations concerning the total expenses?
### Output:
Logic: it is the value of purchase obligations divided by the value of the total expenses .
The required values from the context for the question are:
purchase obligations less than 1 year: $265409
total expenses less than 1 year: $268766
Lets formulate the expression step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 265409 by 268766 which gives divide(265409, 268766)
step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(265409, 268766), 100),
The final arithmetic expression is multiply(divide(265409, 268766), 100).
|
### Instruction:
Formulate an arithmetic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Context: the atoi of 2016 is $ 269 ; the atoi of 2015 is $ 225 ; the atoi of 2014 is $ 224 ; atoi for all reportable segments totaled $ 1087 in 2016 , $ 986 in 2015 , and $ 983 in 2014 . global rolled products ( 1 ) .
Question: what is the percentage of the global rolled products' atoi concerning the total atoi in 2016?
### Output:
Logic: it is the atoi for the global rolled products divided by the atoi of all segments , then turned into a percentage .
The required values from the context for the question are:
atoi 2016: $269 million
total atoi for all segments 2016: $1087 million
Lets formulate the expression step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 269 by 1087 which gives divide(269, 1087)
step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(269, 1087), 100),
The final arithmetic expression is multiply(divide(269, 1087), 100).
|
### Instruction:
Formulate an arithmetic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Context: the ( 1 ) to issue shares of republic common stock and other securities convertible into or exercisable for shares of republic common stock contemplated by the agreement and plan of merger dated as of june 22 2008 as amended july 31 2008 among republic rs merger wedge inc a wholly owned subsidiary of republic formed for the purpose of the merger and allied waste industries inc . of affirmative is 141728743 ; the ( 1 ) to issue shares of republic common stock and other securities convertible into or exercisable for shares of republic common stock contemplated by the agreement and plan of merger dated as of june 22 2008 as amended july 31 2008 among republic rs merger wedge inc a wholly owned subsidiary of republic formed for the purpose of the merger and allied waste industries inc . of against is 297976 ; the ( 1 ) to issue shares of republic common stock and other securities convertible into or exercisable for shares of republic common stock contemplated by the agreement and plan of merger dated as of june 22 2008 as amended july 31 2008 among republic rs merger wedge inc a wholly owned subsidiary of republic formed for the purpose of the merger and allied waste industries inc . of abstentions is 156165 ;
Question: what the total number of votes to issue shares of republic common stock and other securities convertible
### Output:
Logic: the total number of votes is the sum of the votes 142182884
The required values from the context for the question are:
Affirmative votes: 141728743
Against votes: 297976
Abstentions: 156165
Lets formulate the expression step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: add 141728743 to 297976 which gives add(141728743, 297976)
step 2: add the expression of step 1 to 156165 which gives add(add(141728743, 297976), 156165),
The final arithmetic expression is add(add(141728743, 297976), 156165).
|
### Instruction:
Formulate an arithmetic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Context: year the 2014 of gallons is 3644 ; the 2014 of average price per gallon is $ 2.91 ; the 2014 of aircraft fuel expense is $ 10592 ; the 2014 of percent of total mainline operating expenses is 33.2% ( 33.2 % ) ;
Question: in 2014 what was the total mainline operating expenses in millions
### Output:
Logic: the total operating expenses is derived as a result of dividing the fuel expenses by their percent of operating costs
The required values from the context for the question are:
Gallons in 2014: 3,644
Average price per gallon in 2014: $2.91
Aircraft fuel expense in 2014: $10,592
Percentage of total mainline operating expenses in 2014: 33.2%
Lets formulate the expression step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 10592 by 33.2% which gives divide(10592, 33.2%),
The final arithmetic expression is divide(10592, 33.2%).
|
### Instruction:
Formulate an arithmetic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Context: in 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , we received cash dividends of $ 78 million , $ 71 million and $ 56 million , respectively .
Question: what was the percentage growth in the cash dividends from 2010 to 2011
### Output:
Logic: the percentage change is the difference from year to year divide by the earlier year balance
The required values from the context for the question are:
Cash dividends 2011 = $78 million
Cash dividends 2010 = $71 million
Cash dividends 2009 = $56 million
Lets formulate the expression step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: subtract 71 from 78 which gives subtract(78, 71)
step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 71 which gives divide(subtract(78, 71), 71)
step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(subtract(78, 71), 71), 100),
The final arithmetic expression is multiply(divide(subtract(78, 71), 71), 100).
|
### Instruction:
Formulate an arithmetic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Context: cash the goodwill of $ 45826 is 203828 ; cash the total purchase consideration of $ 45826 is $ 265982 ; goodwill of $ 203.8 million arising from the acquisition , included in the asia-pacific segment , was attributable to expected growth opportunities in australia and new zealand , as well as growth opportunities and operating synergies in integrated payments in our existing asia-pacific and north america markets .
Question: what are the total amount of net tangible assets obtained through the acquisition?
### Output:
Logic: the net total amount of assets that were tangible in the acquisition , can be found by subtracting the total amount of money spent by the goodwill or intangible assets .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Goodwill: $203.8 million
Total purchase consideration: $265982
Lets formulate the expression step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: subtract 203828 from 265982 which gives subtract(265982, 203828),
The final arithmetic expression is subtract(265982, 203828).
|
### Instruction:
Formulate an arithmetic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Context: 750.0 ( 1 ) in august 2012 , we entered into a forward-starting interest rate swap agreement that modified the interest obligation associated with these notes so that the interest payable on the notes effectively became fixed at a rate of 3.32% ( 3.32 % ) . ( 2 ) in december 2014 , we entered into a forward-starting interest rate swap agreement that modified the interest obligation associated with these notes so that the interest payable on the notes effectively became fixed at a rate of 3.11% ( 3.11 % ) .
Question: what was the decrease in the interest payable between august 2012 and in december 2014?
### Output:
Logic: its the difference bewteen the interest rates
The required values from the context for the question are:
Interest rate 2012 = 3.32%
Interest rate 2014 = 3.11%
Lets formulate the expression step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: subtract 3.32 from 3.11 which gives subtract(3.11, 3.32)
step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(3.11, 3.32), 100),
The final arithmetic expression is multiply(subtract(3.11, 3.32), 100).
|
### Instruction:
Formulate an arithmetic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Context: during 2013 and 2012 , our cash contributions to funded plans and benefit payments for unfunded plans were $ 300.8 and $ 76.4 , respectively .
Question: considering the years 2012-2013 , what is the increase observed in the cash contributions to funded plans and benefit payments for unfunded plans?
### Output:
Logic: it is the 2013 value divided by the 2012's , then turned into a percentage and subtracted 100% .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Cash contributions 2013 = $300.8 million
Cash contributions 2012 = $76.4 million
Lets formulate the expression step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 300.8 by 76.4 which gives divide(300.8, 76.4)
step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(300.8, 76.4), 100)
step 3: subtract 100 from the expression of step 2 which gives subtract(multiply(divide(300.8, 76.4), 100), 100)
step 4: multiply the expression of step 3 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(multiply(divide(300.8, 76.4), 100), 100), 100),
The final arithmetic expression is multiply(subtract(multiply(divide(300.8, 76.4), 100), 100), 100).
|
### Instruction:
Formulate an arithmetic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Context: the stock-based compensation of 2017 is 11 ; the stock-based compensation of 2016 is 11 ; the stock-based compensation of 2015 is 11 ;
Question: what was the percent of the tax benefit as a part of the stock based compensation in 2017
### Output:
Logic: the tax benefit rate as a percent of the stock based compensation expense the division of the tax by the total expense multiplied by 100 .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Stock-based compensation 2017: 11 (value missing for tax benefit)
Lets formulate the expression step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 4 by 11 which gives divide(4, 11)
step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(4, 11), 100),
The final arithmetic expression is multiply(divide(4, 11), 100).
|
### Instruction:
Formulate an arithmetic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Context: unrecognized tax benefits the balance at end of year of 2013 is $ 124.3 ; the balance at end of year of 2012 is $ 110.8 ; the balance at end of year of 2011 is $ 126.4 ;
Question: considering the years 2012 and 2013 , what is the increase observed in the balance at the end of the year?
### Output:
Logic: is the balance of 2013 divided by the 2012's then turned into a percentage .
The required values from the context for the question are:
balance at end of year of 2013: $ 124.3
balance at end of year of 2012: $ 110.8
Lets formulate the expression step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 124.3 by 110.8 which gives divide(124.3, 110.8)
step 2: subtract 1 from the expression of step 1 which gives subtract(divide(124.3, 110.8), 1)
step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(subtract(divide(124.3, 110.8), 1), 100),
The final arithmetic expression is multiply(subtract(divide(124.3, 110.8), 1), 100).
|
### Instruction:
Formulate an arithmetic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Context: balance at january 1 2013 the increases in current period tax positions of $ 180993 is 53818 ; balance at january 1 2013 the decreases in prior period measurement of tax positions of $ 180993 is -36528 ( 36528 ) ; the total balance in the table above does not include interest and penalties of $ 157 and $ 242 as of december 31 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively , which is recorded as a component of income tax expense .
Question: what was the net change in tax positions in 2014
### Output:
Logic: the net change in the tax position is the sum of the increase and the decrease plus the penalties and interest
The required values from the context for the question are:
Increases in current period tax positions: $53818
Decreases in prior period measurement of tax positions: -$36528
Lets formulate the expression step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: add 53818 to -36528 which gives add(53818, -36528)
step 2: add the expression of step 1 to 157 which gives add(add(53818, -36528), 157),
The final arithmetic expression is add(add(53818, -36528), 157).
|
### Instruction:
Formulate an arithmetic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Context: intangible assets the company has recorded international slot and route authorities of $ 708 million and $ 736 million as of december 31 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively .
Question: what was the percentage decline in recorded international slot and route authorities to $ 708 million from $ 736 million as of december 31 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively .
### Output:
Logic: to get the percentage change we subtract the recent amount from the most recent and divide by the recent amount
The required values from the context for the question are:
international slot and route authorities (December 31, 2010): $708 million
international slot and route authorities (December 31, 2009): $736 million
Lets formulate the expression step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: subtract 736 from 708 which gives subtract(708, 736)
step 2: divide the expression of step 1 by 736 which gives divide(subtract(708, 736), 736)
step 3: multiply the expression of step 2 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(subtract(708, 736), 736), 100),
The final arithmetic expression is multiply(divide(subtract(708, 736), 736), 100).
|
### Instruction:
Formulate an arithmetic expression for the question utilising the given context.
Context: the thereafter of amount is 7288 ; the total of amount is $ 9282 ; it is expected that this process will be complete by february 2009 .
Question: what percentage of lease payments will be paid after 2014?
### Output:
Logic: to find this answer one must divide the amount of lease payments after 2014 by the total amount of lease payments .
The required values from the context for the question are:
Lease payments after 2014: 7288
Total lease payments: $9282
Lets formulate the expression step by step using the logic and placing the appropriate values:
step 1: divide 7288 by 9282 which gives divide(7288, 9282)
step 2: multiply the expression of step 1 by 100 which gives multiply(divide(7288, 9282), 100),
The final arithmetic expression is multiply(divide(7288, 9282), 100).
|
End of preview. Expand
in Data Studio
No dataset card yet
- Downloads last month
- -