Datasets:
diary_no stringlengths 2 11 | Judgement_type stringclasses 2
values | case_no stringlengths 1 42 | pet unknown | res stringlengths 1 103 ⌀ | pet_adv stringlengths 1 33 ⌀ | res_adv stringlengths 4 33 ⌀ | bench stringlengths 1 256 ⌀ | judgement_by stringclasses 70
values | judgment_dates stringdate 1950-02-22 00:00:00 2024-02-22 00:00:00 | temp_link stringlengths 17 93 | language stringclasses 14
values | csv_id stringlengths 1 109 | status stringclasses 1
value | text_length int64 336 2.54M | is_short_order bool 2
classes | outcome stringclasses 10
values | has_citation bool 2
classes | citation_extracted stringlengths 0 49 | sections_cited stringlengths 2 4.28k | articles_cited stringlengths 2 1.83k | full_text stringlengths 337 2.54M |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
-0 | J | Appeal (crl.) 197 of 198 197_198 - | "HAJI KHAN" | STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH | null | null | null | null | 23-11-2005 | jonew/judis/16556.pdf | null | 16556 | success | 24,396 | false | set aside | false | [] | ['Art.226'] | http://JUDIS.NIC.IN
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Page 1 of 8
PETITIONER:
COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
Vs.
RESPONDENT:
CAMBATTA AVIATION LTD. & ORS
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 31/01/2000
BENCH:
G.T.Nanavati, S.N.Phukan
JUDGMENT:
JUDGEMENT
G.T.NANAVATI
Both these appeals arise out of the judgment of Kerala
Hi... | |
-1178 | J | - | null | null | null | null | M. M. PUNCHHI,V. N. KHARE | null | 08-08-1997 | jonew/judis/13858.pdf | null | 13858 | success | 15,127 | false | dismissed | false | ['S.302', 'S.161'] | [] | http://JUDIS.NIC.IN
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Page 1 of 5
PETITIONER:
STATE OF U.P.
Vs.
RESPONDENT:
BHAGWAN AND OTHERS
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 08/08/1997
BENCH:
M. M. PUNCHHI, V. N. KHARE
ACT:
HEADNOTE:
JUDGMENT:
J U D G M E N T
KHARE, J.
By the present appeals the appellant, State ... | |
-1218 | J | - | null | null | null | null | MANOHAR SUJATA V. (J) | null | 01-03-1996 | jonew/judis/15903.pdf | null | 15903 | success | 21,293 | false | dismissed | false | ['S.230A Income Tax Act'] | [] | http://JUDIS.NIC.IN
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Page 1 of 7
PETITIONER:
M/S.P.R. DEB AND ASSOCIATES
Vs.
RESPONDENT:
SUNANDA ROY
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 01/03/1996
BENCH:
MANOHAR SUJATA V. (J)
BENCH:
MANOHAR SUJATA V. (J)
FAIZAN UDDIN (J)
CITATION:
1996 AIR 1504 1996 SCC (4) 423
JT 1996 (2) 684 ... | |
-1398 | J | - | null | null | null | null | null | null | 04-08-2003 | jonew/judis/20763.pdf | null | 20763 | success | 20,500 | false | disposed of | false | "['S.109', 'S.109 Transfer of Property Act', 'S.109 Transfer of\\nproperty Act', 'S.109 Transfer of\(...TRUNCATED) | [] | http://JUDIS.NIC.IN
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Page 1 of 6
CASE NO.:
Appeal (civil) 5485-86 of 1993
PETITIONER:
SHEIKH NOOR AND ANR.
RESPONDENT:
SHEIKH G.S. IBRAHIM (DEAD) BY LRS.
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 04/08/2003
BENCH:
R.C. LAHOTI & ASHOK BHAN
JUDGMENT:
JUDGMENT
2003 Supp(2) SCR 204
The Judgment of the Court was deliver... | |
-1428 | J | - | null | null | null | null | PUNCHHI,M.M. | null | 14-01-1993 | jonew/judis/12254.pdf | null | 12254 | success | 27,152 | false | dismissed | false | ['S.11', 'S.12', 'S.63', 'S.63 the Act', 'S.11 the Act', 'S.11 aforesaid Act', 'S.63 the Act'] | ['Art.226', 'Art.14'] | http://JUDIS.NIC.IN
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Page 1 of 8
PETITIONER:
YASHWANT SINGH KOTHARI ETC. ETC.
Vs.
RESPONDENT:
STATE BANK OF INDORE AND ORS.
DATE OF JUDGMENT14/01/1993
BENCH:
PUNCHHI, M.M.
BENCH:
PUNCHHI, M.M.
AHMADI, A.M. (J)
CITATION:
1993 SCR (1) 208 1993 SCC Supl. (2) 592
JT 1993 (1) 24... | |
-1908 | J | - | null | null | null | null | S. RAJENDRA BABU,S.N. VARIAVA | null | 10-09-2001 | jonew/judis/17982.pdf | null | 17982 | success | 27,953 | false | dismissed | false | ['S.511', 'S.63', 'S.80', 'S.70 the Act', 'S.69 the Act', 'S.6'] | [] | http://JUDIS.NIC.IN
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Page 1 of 7
CASE NO.:
Appeal (civil) 4972 of 1993
PETITIONER:
S. PITCHAI GANAPATHY & ORS.
Vs.
RESPONDENT:
COMMISSIONER,
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 10/09/2001
BENCH:
S. Rajendra Babu & S.N. Variava
JUDGMENT:
J U D G M E N T
RAJENDRA BABU, J. :
This app... | |
-2000 | J | - | null | null | null | null | null | null | 07-02-2001 | jonew/judis/17575.pdf | null | 17575 | success | 5,391 | false | disposed of | false | "['S.6', 'S.50 Land Acquisition Act', 'S.4 Land Acquisition Act 1894', 'S.18', 'S.50 Land Acquisit(...TRUNCATED) | [] | http://JUDIS.NIC.IN
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Page 1 of 2
CASE NO.:
Appeal (civil) 1085 of 2001
PETITIONER:
AGRA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
Vs.
RESPONDENT:
SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER & ORS.
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 07/02/2001
BENCH:
S. Rajendra Babu. & S.N. Variava.
JUDGMENT:
S. N. VARIAVA, J.
L...I...T.......... | |
-2338 | J | - | null | null | null | null | MADAN MOHAN PUNCHHI,K.T. THOMAS | null | 24-01-1997 | jonew/judis/14486.pdf | null | 14486 | success | 12,771 | false | convicted | false | ['S.302', 'S.201', 'S.34 Indian Penal Code', 'S.34'] | [] | http://JUDIS.NIC.IN
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Page 1 of 4
PETITIONER:
TEJA SINGH
Vs.
RESPONDENT:
STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 24/01/1997
BENCH:
MADAN MOHAN PUNCHHI, K.T. THOMAS
ACT:
HEADNOTE:
JUDGMENT:
J U D G M E N T
Thomas J.
This appeal is by special ... | |
-2478 | J | - | null | null | null | null | B.P. JEEVAN REDDY,K.S. PARIPOORNAN | null | 12-03-1997 | jonew/judis/14247.pdf | null | 14247 | success | 5,915 | false | set aside | false | [] | [] | http://JUDIS.NIC.IN
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Page 1 of 2
PETITIONER:
UNION OF INDIA & ANR.
Vs.
RESPONDENT:
P.V.HARIHARAN & ANR.
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 12/03/1997
BENCH:
B.P. JEEVAN REDDY, K.S. PARIPOORNAN
ACT:
HEADNOTE:
JUDGMENT:
J U D G M E N T
B.P. JEEVAN REDDY, J.
This appeal is preferred against the judgem... | |
-2498 | J | - | null | null | null | null | S. SAGHIR AHMAD,G.B. PATTANAIK | null | 11-02-1998 | jonew/judis/13434.pdf | null | 13434 | success | 38,960 | false | dismissed | false | [] | ['Art.309', 'Art.226'] | http://JUDIS.NIC.IN
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Page 1 of 13
PETITIONER:
STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS
Vs.
RESPONDENT:
SHIVANANDA PATHAK & ORS
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 11/02/1998
BENCH:
S. SAGHIR AHMAD, G.B. PATTANAIK
ACT:
HEADNOTE:
JUDGMENT:
WITH
CIVIL APPEAL NO 2567 OF 19... |
End of preview. Expand in Data Studio
Indian Supreme Court Judgments (Structured JSON)
About Dataset
This dataset contains fully extracted, structured JSON data for Indian Supreme Court judgments. This is a parsed, machine-readable version of the raw PDF repository, designed specifically for Natural Language Processing (NLP), RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation), and legal tech machine learning applications.
The dataset is provided in .jsonl (JSON Lines) format. Each row represents a single case and contains rich metadata alongside the actual extracted text, including fields like full_text, sections_cited, and articles_cited.
Source & Provenance
The original source for these judgments is the Indian Supreme Court government website API (https://main.sci.gov.in/).
The raw, unparsed PDF files that this text was extracted from are available in a separate companion dataset here: 👉 [Comming Soon]
Extraction Notes & Data Quality
- Extraction Pipeline: The text was extracted utilizing a hybrid pipeline based on PyMuPDF to convert PDF structure into clean JSON. You can find the scraping and extraction pipeline code on GitHub.
- Scanned/Photo Documents: Some of the original PDFs provided by the court API are scanned images or photos of older judgments. In cases where text extraction failed or OCR could not confidently extract the text, the
full_textfield may be empty. If you need to manually review these, their original PDF documents are still available in the raw PDF dataset linked above. - Languages: Judgments in vernacular languages are also available in this database. The metadata contains a
languagecolumn. - Identifiers: There is no specific unique ID provided natively by the court API for the judgments.
diary-noandcase-noare not strictly unique, as there can be multiple judgments for each case or diary number. Some data doesn't have a diary number; the court API assigns a-0for all such judgments. - Duplicates/Metadata Anomalies: Metadata also contains examples where the same judgment is part of multiple years. For example, diary-no
17050-2006appears with two judgment dates while the judgment PDF link is exactly the same. Some links in the raw metadata needed to be prefixed withjonew/to get a correct URL.
Usage
Because the data is in .jsonl format, it is extremely memory efficient to load using the Hugging Face datasets library:
from datasets import load_dataset
# Load the dataset
dataset = load_dataset("json", data_files="laww_dataset.jsonl", split="train")
# Print the full text of the first case
print(dataset[0]['full_text'])
- Downloads last month
- 110