text stringlengths 0 80 |
|---|
vertical_patch (222 cases). Data is variable length, minimum 111 |
observations, maximum 736. The data is split randomly into 50/50 |
default train series. The data can be resampled without bias. |
The best reported accuracy using combining rules with the XYZ data |
was achieved by the distance measure LCSS combined with the |
Complexity Invariant Distance (CID-LCSS) which achieved 79.44\% |
accuracy (measured with a 5x2 CV). See Table 9in [1] |
[1] Souza V.M.A. Asphalt pavement classification using smartphone |
accelerometer and Complexity Invariant Distance. Engineering |
Applications of Artificial Intelligence Volume 74, pp. 198-211. |
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0952197618301349 |
[2] Souza V.M.A., Cherman E.A., Rossi R.G., Souza R.A. Towards |
automatic evaluation of asphalt irregularity using smartphones |
sensors International Symposium on Intelligent Data Analysis |
(2017), pp. 322-333 |
This dataset was used in [1] and donated by the authors of that |
paper. Accelerometer data was collected on a smartphone installed |
inside a vehicle using a flexible suction holder near the |
dashboard. An expert was responsible for driving the vehicle while |
the device ran an Android application called Asfault [2], developed |
specifically to store the current asphalt condition continuously |
over time. Asfault stores the time-stamp of the collected data, |
acceleration forces in along the three physical axes, latitude, |
longitude, and velocity. |
The acceleration forces are given by the accelerometer sensor of |
the device and are the data used for the classification task. |
Latitude, longitude, and velocity are given by the GPS and are used |
to locate the collected/classified data. Each one of this |
information is a different continuous time series. A sampling rate |
of 100 Hz was used for each time series. It is important to note |
that the Android system does not guarantee a perfect precision on |
the interval between readings. This means that when we choose a |
sampling rate of 100 Hz, the device should output between 95 and |
105 observations per second. |
For this data, the (X,Y,Z) acceleration time series are treated as |
separate dimensions. A univariate version that combines the data is |
also in the archive. |
In order to obtain labeled data, the Asfault application allows the |
expert to inform the pavement condition before collecting the data. |
To guarantee the integrity of data, Asfault also records videos of |
the road over the data collection using the built-in camera. Thus, |
it is possible to perform the analysis of these videos to confirm |
the class labels assigned by the expert. |
The datasets were collected in the Brazilian cities of Sao Carlos, |
Ribeirao Preto, Araraquara, and Maringa using a medium sized |
hatchback car (Hyundai i30) and two different devices (Samsung |
Galaxy A5 and Samsung S7). |
The problem AsphaltPavementType involves three class labels: flexible pavement, |
cobblestone streets, and dirt roads. Flexible pavement can be |
defined as the one consisting of a mixture of asphaltic or |
bituminous material and aggregates placed on a bed of compacted |
granular material of appropriate quality in layers over the |
subgrade. Flexible pavements are preferred over cement concrete |
roads because they can be strengthened and improved in stages with |
the growth of traffic. |
There are 2111 cases: flexible (816 cases); cobblestone (527 |
cases); and dirt road (768 cases). Data is variable length, minimum |
66 observations, maximum 2371. The data is split randomly into |
50/50 default train series. The data can be resampled without bias. |
The best reported accuracy with this univariate data was achieved |
by the distance measure LCSS combined with the Complexity Invariant |
Distance (CID-LCSS) which achieved 88.27\% accuracy (measured with |
a 5x2 CV, see Table 7 of [1]). |
[1] Souza V.M.A. Asphalt pavement classification using smartphone |
accelerometer and Complexity Invariant Distance. Engineering |
Applications of Artificial Intelligence Volume 74, pp. 198-211. |
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0952197618301349 |
[2] Souza V.M.A., Cherman E.A., Rossi R.G., Souza R.A. Towards |
automatic evaluation of asphalt irregularity using smartphones |
sensors International Symposium on Intelligent Data Analysis |
(2017), pp. 322-333 |
This dataset was used in [1] and donated by the authors of that |
paper. Accelerometer data was collected on a smartphone installed |
inside a vehicle using a flexible suction holder near the |
dashboard. An expert was responsible for driving the vehicle while |
the device ran an Android application called Asfault [2], developed |
specifically to store the current asphalt condition continuously |
over time. Asfault stores the time-stamp of the collected data, |
acceleration forces in along the three physical axes, latitude, |
longitude, and velocity. |
The acceleration forces are given by the accelerometer sensor of |
the device and are the data used for the classification task. |
Latitude, longitude, and velocity are given by the GPS and are used |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.