workspace stringclasses 1
value | channel stringclasses 1
value | sentences stringlengths 1 3.93k | ts stringlengths 26 26 | user stringlengths 2 11 | sentence_id stringlengths 44 53 | timestamp float64 1.5B 1.56B | __index_level_0__ int64 0 106k |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
pythondev | help | <@Kym> Wonderful Git Guide, thank you | 2017-10-06T12:09:41.000001 | Seema | pythondev_help_Seema_2017-10-06T12:09:41.000001 | 1,507,291,781.000001 | 96,203 |
pythondev | help | can you pass a class into a subclass and have it keep all previous properties? | 2017-10-06T12:32:44.000433 | Winnie | pythondev_help_Winnie_2017-10-06T12:32:44.000433 | 1,507,293,164.000433 | 96,204 |
pythondev | help | sure, define class properties in `__init__` | 2017-10-06T12:34:43.000048 | Meg | pythondev_help_Meg_2017-10-06T12:34:43.000048 | 1,507,293,283.000048 | 96,205 |
pythondev | help | unless the subclass overwrites them, you’ll have the superclass properties the same | 2017-10-06T12:35:02.000367 | Meg | pythondev_help_Meg_2017-10-06T12:35:02.000367 | 1,507,293,302.000367 | 96,206 |
pythondev | help | like | 2017-10-06T12:35:19.000115 | Winnie | pythondev_help_Winnie_2017-10-06T12:35:19.000115 | 1,507,293,319.000115 | 96,207 |
pythondev | help | I have a function that generates a superclass | 2017-10-06T12:35:35.000423 | Winnie | pythondev_help_Winnie_2017-10-06T12:35:35.000423 | 1,507,293,335.000423 | 96,208 |
pythondev | help | is it possible to pass that superclass into the subclass instead or repeating the function and adding more elements? | 2017-10-06T12:36:15.000291 | Winnie | pythondev_help_Winnie_2017-10-06T12:36:15.000291 | 1,507,293,375.000291 | 96,209 |
pythondev | help | uhh, generates a superclass? | 2017-10-06T12:37:04.000030 | Meg | pythondev_help_Meg_2017-10-06T12:37:04.000030 | 1,507,293,424.00003 | 96,210 |
pythondev | help | I think you’re mixing up OOP basics. | 2017-10-06T12:37:26.000266 | Meg | pythondev_help_Meg_2017-10-06T12:37:26.000266 | 1,507,293,446.000266 | 96,211 |
pythondev | help | in your init of the subclass, have it take in properties you want set. | 2017-10-06T12:37:47.000066 | Meg | pythondev_help_Meg_2017-10-06T12:37:47.000066 | 1,507,293,467.000066 | 96,212 |
pythondev | help | superclass should have fields already set via its own init | 2017-10-06T12:38:05.000529 | Meg | pythondev_help_Meg_2017-10-06T12:38:05.000529 | 1,507,293,485.000529 | 96,213 |
pythondev | help | ```
class A(object):
...
class B(A):
...
def make_A(data) -> A:
....
def make_B(data):
B(make_A(data), data[-1])
``` | 2017-10-06T12:38:53.000500 | Winnie | pythondev_help_Winnie_2017-10-06T12:38:53.000500 | 1,507,293,533.0005 | 96,214 |
pythondev | help | in B, define an `__init__` | 2017-10-06T12:39:18.000096 | Meg | pythondev_help_Meg_2017-10-06T12:39:18.000096 | 1,507,293,558.000096 | 96,215 |
pythondev | help | that will call `super(A, self).__init__()` with the required properties | 2017-10-06T12:39:34.000194 | Meg | pythondev_help_Meg_2017-10-06T12:39:34.000194 | 1,507,293,574.000194 | 96,216 |
pythondev | help | I'm a bit confused | 2017-10-06T12:40:20.000099 | Winnie | pythondev_help_Winnie_2017-10-06T12:40:20.000099 | 1,507,293,620.000099 | 96,217 |
pythondev | help | what does passing A into super do? | 2017-10-06T12:40:29.000299 | Winnie | pythondev_help_Winnie_2017-10-06T12:40:29.000299 | 1,507,293,629.000299 | 96,218 |
pythondev | help | because the code I'm working on passes B into super (in the B class) | 2017-10-06T12:40:47.000620 | Winnie | pythondev_help_Winnie_2017-10-06T12:40:47.000620 | 1,507,293,647.00062 | 96,219 |
pythondev | help | ```class A(object):
def __init__(self, a, b, c):
self.a = a
self.b = b
self.c = c
class B(A):
def __init__(self, a, b, c, d):
super().__init(a, b, c)
self.d = d
``` | 2017-10-06T12:41:55.000287 | Meg | pythondev_help_Meg_2017-10-06T12:41:55.000287 | 1,507,293,715.000287 | 96,220 |
pythondev | help | that’s for python3 | 2017-10-06T12:42:08.000137 | Meg | pythondev_help_Meg_2017-10-06T12:42:08.000137 | 1,507,293,728.000137 | 96,221 |
pythondev | help | ```
class B(A):
def __init__(self, a, b, c, d):
super(B, self).__init(a, b, c)
self.d = d
```
that's the code I'm working with | 2017-10-06T12:43:20.000538 | Winnie | pythondev_help_Winnie_2017-10-06T12:43:20.000538 | 1,507,293,800.000538 | 96,222 |
pythondev | help | ok, so B is a subclass of A | 2017-10-06T12:43:44.000237 | Meg | pythondev_help_Meg_2017-10-06T12:43:44.000237 | 1,507,293,824.000237 | 96,223 |
pythondev | help | and you’re already instanciating properties that B inherits from A | 2017-10-06T12:43:58.000212 | Meg | pythondev_help_Meg_2017-10-06T12:43:58.000212 | 1,507,293,838.000212 | 96,224 |
pythondev | help | in addition, if you have a method defined in A that’s not replicated in B, its still accessible from B | 2017-10-06T12:44:37.000254 | Meg | pythondev_help_Meg_2017-10-06T12:44:37.000254 | 1,507,293,877.000254 | 96,225 |
pythondev | help | eg,
```class A(object):
def some_func(self, t): # do something
inst = B(...args)
inst.some_func('some_value')```
is perfectly valid | 2017-10-06T12:45:37.000182 | Meg | pythondev_help_Meg_2017-10-06T12:45:37.000182 | 1,507,293,937.000182 | 96,226 |
pythondev | help | so, unless I’m missing something here, you already have everything you need | 2017-10-06T12:45:52.000555 | Meg | pythondev_help_Meg_2017-10-06T12:45:52.000555 | 1,507,293,952.000555 | 96,227 |
pythondev | help | right | 2017-10-06T12:46:31.000110 | Winnie | pythondev_help_Winnie_2017-10-06T12:46:31.000110 | 1,507,293,991.00011 | 96,228 |
pythondev | help | I understand the OOP | 2017-10-06T12:46:38.000087 | Winnie | pythondev_help_Winnie_2017-10-06T12:46:38.000087 | 1,507,293,998.000087 | 96,229 |
pythondev | help | but I'm trying to figure out the correct syntax | 2017-10-06T12:46:49.000189 | Winnie | pythondev_help_Winnie_2017-10-06T12:46:49.000189 | 1,507,294,009.000189 | 96,230 |
pythondev | help | ```
class A(object):
...
class B(A):
...
def make_A(data) -> A:
return A(data[0], int(data[1]))
def make_B(data):
# is this possible?
B(make_A(data), data[-1])
``` | 2017-10-06T12:47:28.000074 | Winnie | pythondev_help_Winnie_2017-10-06T12:47:28.000074 | 1,507,294,048.000074 | 96,231 |
pythondev | help | what is make_A? | 2017-10-06T12:47:47.000026 | Sirena | pythondev_help_Sirena_2017-10-06T12:47:47.000026 | 1,507,294,067.000026 | 96,232 |
pythondev | help | just do `B(data)` | 2017-10-06T12:48:07.000573 | Meg | pythondev_help_Meg_2017-10-06T12:48:07.000573 | 1,507,294,087.000573 | 96,233 |
pythondev | help | if you just want an A object, `make_A(data)` should instead just be `A(data)` | 2017-10-06T12:48:19.000656 | Sirena | pythondev_help_Sirena_2017-10-06T12:48:19.000656 | 1,507,294,099.000656 | 96,234 |
pythondev | help | make_A parses a json and takes out the appropriate fields to put in the args | 2017-10-06T12:48:47.000573 | Winnie | pythondev_help_Winnie_2017-10-06T12:48:47.000573 | 1,507,294,127.000573 | 96,235 |
pythondev | help | if you want a B object that inherits A, just do B(data) and in your B.__init__(), include whatever funky manipulations you want to the vars inherited from A | 2017-10-06T12:49:13.000155 | Sirena | pythondev_help_Sirena_2017-10-06T12:49:13.000155 | 1,507,294,153.000155 | 96,236 |
pythondev | help | yah, so you probably want
```class B(A):
def __init__(self, json):
parse_my_json_and_do_things(self, json)``` | 2017-10-06T12:50:44.000199 | Sirena | pythondev_help_Sirena_2017-10-06T12:50:44.000199 | 1,507,294,244.000199 | 96,237 |
pythondev | help | there is a design pattern called a 'factory pattern' where functions return instances of objects, but I don't get the sense that is what you want in this case (I could be wrong) | 2017-10-06T12:52:11.000037 | Sirena | pythondev_help_Sirena_2017-10-06T12:52:11.000037 | 1,507,294,331.000037 | 96,238 |
pythondev | help | It's what I want, I think.
But I also think its what I can't have :stuck_out_tongue: | 2017-10-06T12:52:48.000213 | Winnie | pythondev_help_Winnie_2017-10-06T12:52:48.000213 | 1,507,294,368.000213 | 96,239 |
pythondev | help | because this repo's factories are outside the classes | 2017-10-06T12:53:08.000223 | Winnie | pythondev_help_Winnie_2017-10-06T12:53:08.000223 | 1,507,294,388.000223 | 96,240 |
pythondev | help | do you normally construct your objects from something other than json? | 2017-10-06T12:55:28.000476 | Sirena | pythondev_help_Sirena_2017-10-06T12:55:28.000476 | 1,507,294,528.000476 | 96,241 |
pythondev | help | so I guess what I was asking is, can you pass the initliasations of a class to a subclass and have it inherit them
maybe something like
```
B(**make_a(data).variables, data[-1])
``` | 2017-10-06T12:57:07.000241 | Winnie | pythondev_help_Winnie_2017-10-06T12:57:07.000241 | 1,507,294,627.000241 | 96,242 |
pythondev | help | factories are something loosely along the lines of
```class A:
def __init__(self, initdata):
class B:
def __init__(self, initdata):
def factory(type, data):
if(type == 'A'):
return A(data)
elif(type == 'B'):
return B(data)``` | 2017-10-06T12:57:13.000559 | Sirena | pythondev_help_Sirena_2017-10-06T12:57:13.000559 | 1,507,294,633.000559 | 96,243 |
pythondev | help | I think this repo does both | 2017-10-06T12:57:49.000394 | Winnie | pythondev_help_Winnie_2017-10-06T12:57:49.000394 | 1,507,294,669.000394 | 96,244 |
pythondev | help | <https://github.com/carpedm20/fbchat/blob/master/fbchat/graphql.py#L106> if you're intrested | 2017-10-06T12:58:56.000247 | Winnie | pythondev_help_Winnie_2017-10-06T12:58:56.000247 | 1,507,294,736.000247 | 96,245 |
pythondev | help | I'm adding a "graphql_to_room" function, where it's a copy of the above but instead with extra fields
and idk, it just felt wrong | 2017-10-06T13:00:16.000267 | Winnie | pythondev_help_Winnie_2017-10-06T13:00:16.000267 | 1,507,294,816.000267 | 96,246 |
pythondev | help | it looks more like it's accepting a GraphQL object and returning a Group object, but the GraphQL object is mostly just a blob of query data, so it could contain all sorts of things | 2017-10-06T13:04:54.000006 | Sirena | pythondev_help_Sirena_2017-10-06T13:04:54.000006 | 1,507,295,094.000006 | 96,247 |
pythondev | help | so this is very similar to a factory, but it uses a bunch of functions rather than a class to determine which object to return | 2017-10-06T13:05:39.000341 | Sirena | pythondev_help_Sirena_2017-10-06T13:05:39.000341 | 1,507,295,139.000341 | 96,248 |
pythondev | help | if you have a graphql blob of 'room' data, then adding a graphql_to_room function would make sense, just mimic what's in most of these other functions | 2017-10-06T13:06:16.000200 | Sirena | pythondev_help_Sirena_2017-10-06T13:06:16.000200 | 1,507,295,176.0002 | 96,249 |
pythondev | help | yeah | 2017-10-06T13:06:26.000393 | Winnie | pythondev_help_Winnie_2017-10-06T13:06:26.000393 | 1,507,295,186.000393 | 96,250 |
pythondev | help | but instead of reapating code, could I get the graphql group function to do some of the work for me? | 2017-10-06T13:06:56.000210 | Winnie | pythondev_help_Winnie_2017-10-06T13:06:56.000210 | 1,507,295,216.00021 | 96,251 |
pythondev | help | it would depend on what's in your room data | 2017-10-06T13:07:50.000595 | Sirena | pythondev_help_Sirena_2017-10-06T13:07:50.000595 | 1,507,295,270.000595 | 96,252 |
pythondev | help | down at the bottom of your file it defines a bunch of graphql types | 2017-10-06T13:08:12.000450 | Sirena | pythondev_help_Sirena_2017-10-06T13:08:12.000450 | 1,507,295,292.00045 | 96,253 |
pythondev | help | there isn't one for a room, but if you add it, then you can query a room | 2017-10-06T13:08:25.000255 | Sirena | pythondev_help_Sirena_2017-10-06T13:08:25.000255 | 1,507,295,305.000255 | 96,254 |
pythondev | help | if it is meaningfully related to a group, then you might get the group function to do some work for you | 2017-10-06T13:08:38.000631 | Sirena | pythondev_help_Sirena_2017-10-06T13:08:38.000631 | 1,507,295,318.000631 | 96,255 |
pythondev | help | well, a room is just a group with some extra things, so it inherits from it | 2017-10-06T13:09:06.000553 | Winnie | pythondev_help_Winnie_2017-10-06T13:09:06.000553 | 1,507,295,346.000553 | 96,256 |
pythondev | help | but assuming a room is not a group with additions, and a group is not a room with additions, it's probably most sensible to write a separate independent function | 2017-10-06T13:09:18.000020 | Sirena | pythondev_help_Sirena_2017-10-06T13:09:18.000020 | 1,507,295,358.00002 | 96,257 |
pythondev | help | ah | 2017-10-06T13:09:22.000208 | Sirena | pythondev_help_Sirena_2017-10-06T13:09:22.000208 | 1,507,295,362.000208 | 96,258 |
pythondev | help | then yah | 2017-10-06T13:09:24.000381 | Sirena | pythondev_help_Sirena_2017-10-06T13:09:24.000381 | 1,507,295,364.000381 | 96,259 |
pythondev | help | The problem is, I don't know *how* to get it to do some work for me :stuck_out_tongue: | 2017-10-06T13:09:53.000354 | Winnie | pythondev_help_Winnie_2017-10-06T13:09:53.000354 | 1,507,295,393.000354 | 96,260 |
pythondev | help | what does your `class Room:` look like? | 2017-10-06T13:11:06.000516 | Sirena | pythondev_help_Sirena_2017-10-06T13:11:06.000516 | 1,507,295,466.000516 | 96,261 |
pythondev | help | not to be confused with `classroom` | 2017-10-06T13:11:34.000592 | Patty | pythondev_help_Patty_2017-10-06T13:11:34.000592 | 1,507,295,494.000592 | 96,262 |
pythondev | help | and then what does your graphql room query look like? | 2017-10-06T13:19:53.000353 | Sirena | pythondev_help_Sirena_2017-10-06T13:19:53.000353 | 1,507,295,993.000353 | 96,263 |
pythondev | help | I think it's likely that you'll not be able to reuse graphql_to_group because it's returning a Group object from a group query, and you're going to have to write a new query for a room object | 2017-10-06T13:22:08.000212 | Sirena | pythondev_help_Sirena_2017-10-06T13:22:08.000212 | 1,507,296,128.000212 | 96,264 |
pythondev | help | <https://github.com/ekohilas/fbchat/blob/rooms/fbchat/graphql.py#L121> | 2017-10-06T13:22:27.000330 | Winnie | pythondev_help_Winnie_2017-10-06T13:22:27.000330 | 1,507,296,147.00033 | 96,265 |
pythondev | help | and I don't know the ins and outs of how that all works, but it seems like the graphql queries don't exactly have inheritance | 2017-10-06T13:22:43.000369 | Sirena | pythondev_help_Sirena_2017-10-06T13:22:43.000369 | 1,507,296,163.000369 | 96,266 |
pythondev | help | my idea is that I call the data on the graphql_room and then just unpack it's data into Room()? | 2017-10-06T13:23:44.000577 | Winnie | pythondev_help_Winnie_2017-10-06T13:23:44.000577 | 1,507,296,224.000577 | 96,267 |
pythondev | help | yeah, I see why you might want to have some code reuse, and I suppose it's a little bit of a style question, but I think it will end up less readable | 2017-10-06T13:25:25.000025 | Sirena | pythondev_help_Sirena_2017-10-06T13:25:25.000025 | 1,507,296,325.000025 | 96,268 |
pythondev | help | at times, it can be a tough balancing act between competing priorities | 2017-10-06T13:26:16.000321 | Meg | pythondev_help_Meg_2017-10-06T13:26:16.000321 | 1,507,296,376.000321 | 96,269 |
pythondev | help | DRY, style, readability, etc | 2017-10-06T13:26:37.000279 | Meg | pythondev_help_Meg_2017-10-06T13:26:37.000279 | 1,507,296,397.000279 | 96,270 |
pythondev | help | you might get by with something like
```def graphql_to_room_or_group(rog):
if rog.get('image') is None:
rog['image'] = {}
c_info = get_customization_info(rog)
if(rog.get('thread_admins')):
return Room(many args)
else: # not a room
return Group(many args)``` | 2017-10-06T13:31:58.000346 | Sirena | pythondev_help_Sirena_2017-10-06T13:31:58.000346 | 1,507,296,718.000346 | 96,271 |
pythondev | help | but it's still going to be a lot of similar code duplicated | 2017-10-06T13:32:17.000679 | Sirena | pythondev_help_Sirena_2017-10-06T13:32:17.000679 | 1,507,296,737.000679 | 96,272 |
pythondev | help | alternately, you could modify your Room.__init() to include a Group argument | 2017-10-06T13:33:48.000177 | Sirena | pythondev_help_Sirena_2017-10-06T13:33:48.000177 | 1,507,296,828.000177 | 96,273 |
pythondev | help | isn't there a way to get the fields from a group and just put them into a room as **kwargs | 2017-10-06T13:35:19.000378 | Winnie | pythondev_help_Winnie_2017-10-06T13:35:19.000378 | 1,507,296,919.000378 | 96,274 |
pythondev | help | ```class Room(Group):
def __init__(normal args, group=None):
if group is not None:
init_using_group_object()
else: # us normal args to construct superclass values
init_using_normal_args()
self.admits = admins
# . . . etc with the other room-specific args``` | 2017-10-06T13:35:23.000414 | Sirena | pythondev_help_Sirena_2017-10-06T13:35:23.000414 | 1,507,296,923.000414 | 96,275 |
pythondev | help | wait what if I did | 2017-10-06T13:40:41.000581 | Winnie | pythondev_help_Winnie_2017-10-06T13:40:41.000581 | 1,507,297,241.000581 | 96,276 |
pythondev | help | ```
def graphql_to_room(room):
return Room(
room['thread_key']['thread_fbid'],
**vars(graphql_to_group(room)),
admins = set([node.get('id') for node in room.get('thread_admins')]),
approval_mode = bool(room.get('approval_mode')),
approval_requests = set([node.get('id') for node in room['thread_queue_metatdata'].get('approval_requests')),
join_link = room['joinable_mode'].get('link'),
privacy_mode = bool(room.get('privacy_mode')),
)
``` | 2017-10-06T13:41:59.000033 | Winnie | pythondev_help_Winnie_2017-10-06T13:41:59.000033 | 1,507,297,319.000033 | 96,277 |
pythondev | help | that would probably work too, I think | 2017-10-06T13:46:20.000168 | Sirena | pythondev_help_Sirena_2017-10-06T13:46:20.000168 | 1,507,297,580.000168 | 96,278 |
pythondev | help | as long as you don't reuse any argument names in both classes or anything surprising like that | 2017-10-06T13:48:50.000489 | Sirena | pythondev_help_Sirena_2017-10-06T13:48:50.000489 | 1,507,297,730.000489 | 96,279 |
pythondev | help | Sublime Text 3, has anyone used it / does anyone currently use it? Anything that caught your attention good or bad? | 2017-10-06T14:32:45.000233 | Seema | pythondev_help_Seema_2017-10-06T14:32:45.000233 | 1,507,300,365.000233 | 96,280 |
pythondev | help | <@Seema> we have <#C5CAD2J67|editors> where people chat about them, mostly it comes down to personal preference | 2017-10-06T14:45:00.000286 | Patty | pythondev_help_Patty_2017-10-06T14:45:00.000286 | 1,507,301,100.000286 | 96,281 |
pythondev | help | Oh, interesting, it didn't show up in my channel list, I'll check it out. | 2017-10-06T14:45:48.000516 | Seema | pythondev_help_Seema_2017-10-06T14:45:48.000516 | 1,507,301,148.000516 | 96,282 |
pythondev | help | I like to imagine that channel is just one continuous vim vs emacs flame war | 2017-10-06T14:46:42.000502 | Junita | pythondev_help_Junita_2017-10-06T14:46:42.000502 | 1,507,301,202.000502 | 96,283 |
pythondev | help | its vim heavy, which is why im not in it :slightly_smiling_face: | 2017-10-06T14:47:10.000605 | Patty | pythondev_help_Patty_2017-10-06T14:47:10.000605 | 1,507,301,230.000605 | 96,284 |
pythondev | help | better find some fireproof underwear first before heading in there :slightly_smiling_face: | 2017-10-06T14:47:12.000306 | Meg | pythondev_help_Meg_2017-10-06T14:47:12.000306 | 1,507,301,232.000306 | 96,285 |
pythondev | help | hahaha | 2017-10-06T14:47:24.000025 | Seema | pythondev_help_Seema_2017-10-06T14:47:24.000025 | 1,507,301,244.000025 | 96,286 |
pythondev | help | besides, psh. vim, emacs, etc | 2017-10-06T14:47:38.000464 | Meg | pythondev_help_Meg_2017-10-06T14:47:38.000464 | 1,507,301,258.000464 | 96,287 |
pythondev | help | `ed` is where its at | 2017-10-06T14:47:43.000368 | Meg | pythondev_help_Meg_2017-10-06T14:47:43.000368 | 1,507,301,263.000368 | 96,288 |
pythondev | help | :smile: | 2017-10-06T14:47:55.000012 | Meg | pythondev_help_Meg_2017-10-06T14:47:55.000012 | 1,507,301,275.000012 | 96,289 |
pythondev | help | if you can actually use ed to get work done, I'll pay to watch | 2017-10-06T14:49:20.000451 | Sirena | pythondev_help_Sirena_2017-10-06T14:49:20.000451 | 1,507,301,360.000451 | 96,290 |
pythondev | help | I've had to use it for minor edits once or twice, and it was painful | 2017-10-06T14:49:39.000027 | Sirena | pythondev_help_Sirena_2017-10-06T14:49:39.000027 | 1,507,301,379.000027 | 96,291 |
pythondev | help | nah, just kidding. FWIW, I use vim by default when on the server | 2017-10-06T14:51:51.000017 | Meg | pythondev_help_Meg_2017-10-06T14:51:51.000017 | 1,507,301,511.000017 | 96,292 |
pythondev | help | but just mainly text entry, cut and paste | 2017-10-06T14:52:00.000398 | Meg | pythondev_help_Meg_2017-10-06T14:52:00.000398 | 1,507,301,520.000398 | 96,293 |
pythondev | help | the higher functionality is just :whoosh: over my head | 2017-10-06T14:52:13.000275 | Meg | pythondev_help_Meg_2017-10-06T14:52:13.000275 | 1,507,301,533.000275 | 96,294 |
pythondev | help | Hey everybody! I have a question on mocking... I have a function where I want to mock a DBSession.flush() method inside it to a time.sleep(30), to test a race condition there. Do you think that is possible? | 2017-10-06T17:20:05.000055 | Juliette | pythondev_help_Juliette_2017-10-06T17:20:05.000055 | 1,507,310,405.000055 | 96,295 |
pythondev | help | if you're testing a race condition, might want to `time.sleep(random.randint(low, high))` | 2017-10-06T17:24:09.000033 | Sirena | pythondev_help_Sirena_2017-10-06T17:24:09.000033 | 1,507,310,649.000033 | 96,296 |
pythondev | help | unless you're pretty sure 30 is the magic number | 2017-10-06T17:24:15.000253 | Sirena | pythondev_help_Sirena_2017-10-06T17:24:15.000253 | 1,507,310,655.000253 | 96,297 |
pythondev | help | I haven't tried it, but mock the flush method with a side_effect pointing to a function where you call time.sleep? | 2017-10-06T17:27:09.000162 | Tanya | pythondev_help_Tanya_2017-10-06T17:27:09.000162 | 1,507,310,829.000162 | 96,298 |
pythondev | help | <https://docs.python.org/3/library/unittest.mock-examples.html#side-effect-functions-and-iterables> | 2017-10-06T17:27:13.000260 | Tanya | pythondev_help_Tanya_2017-10-06T17:27:13.000260 | 1,507,310,833.00026 | 96,299 |
pythondev | help | Thank you guys | 2017-10-06T17:49:19.000223 | Juliette | pythondev_help_Juliette_2017-10-06T17:49:19.000223 | 1,507,312,159.000223 | 96,300 |
pythondev | help | :slightly_smiling_face: | 2017-10-06T17:49:30.000009 | Juliette | pythondev_help_Juliette_2017-10-06T17:49:30.000009 | 1,507,312,170.000009 | 96,301 |
pythondev | help | Getting this error when attempting to create a sqlalchemy db table | 2017-10-06T18:47:44.000050 | Myong | pythondev_help_Myong_2017-10-06T18:47:44.000050 | 1,507,315,664.00005 | 96,302 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.