workspace stringclasses 1
value | channel stringclasses 1
value | sentences stringlengths 1 3.93k | ts stringlengths 26 26 | user stringlengths 2 11 | sentence_id stringlengths 44 53 | timestamp float64 1.5B 1.56B | __index_level_0__ int64 0 106k |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
pythondev | help | I've found someone with the same exact error on stackoverflow but no answers... | 2017-11-02T23:27:51.000096 | Myong | pythondev_help_Myong_2017-11-02T23:27:51.000096 | 1,509,665,271.000096 | 99,103 |
pythondev | help | <https://stackoverflow.com/questions/43459366/pydev-debugger-gives-error-on-breakpoint> | 2017-11-02T23:27:52.000085 | Myong | pythondev_help_Myong_2017-11-02T23:27:52.000085 | 1,509,665,272.000085 | 99,104 |
pythondev | help | Okay so for some reason it would seem I had a variable `ready_queue.0` in my watchlist and by removing it I've fixed it | 2017-11-02T23:30:58.000086 | Myong | pythondev_help_Myong_2017-11-02T23:30:58.000086 | 1,509,665,458.000086 | 99,105 |
pythondev | help | <@Myong> so, you fixed it yourself? nice job! | 2017-11-03T00:00:43.000082 | Signe | pythondev_help_Signe_2017-11-03T00:00:43.000082 | 1,509,667,243.000082 | 99,106 |
pythondev | help | Yeah, honestly no clue how it happened, I knew it was looking for something due to the EOF error, but I couldn't for the life of me figure out how it got `ready_queue.0` from my `ready_queue` object | 2017-11-03T00:22:22.000006 | Myong | pythondev_help_Myong_2017-11-03T00:22:22.000006 | 1,509,668,542.000006 | 99,107 |
pythondev | help | Then saw it was just sitting in the watch list so I removed it and it works | 2017-11-03T00:22:34.000019 | Myong | pythondev_help_Myong_2017-11-03T00:22:34.000019 | 1,509,668,554.000019 | 99,108 |
pythondev | help | Hi ALL, | 2017-11-03T01:55:00.000040 | Malorie | pythondev_help_Malorie_2017-11-03T01:55:00.000040 | 1,509,674,100.00004 | 99,109 |
pythondev | help | I am trying to fir kmeans sklearn on a single feature(data frame column) | 2017-11-03T01:55:21.000101 | Malorie | pythondev_help_Malorie_2017-11-03T01:55:21.000101 | 1,509,674,121.000101 | 99,110 |
pythondev | help | using kmeans.fit(data_frame['column_name'].reshape(-1,1)) | 2017-11-03T01:55:57.000035 | Malorie | pythondev_help_Malorie_2017-11-03T01:55:57.000035 | 1,509,674,157.000035 | 99,111 |
pythondev | help | it give me the error of truth value of an array | 2017-11-03T01:56:11.000027 | Malorie | pythondev_help_Malorie_2017-11-03T01:56:11.000027 | 1,509,674,171.000027 | 99,112 |
pythondev | help | this is an internal kmeans.pyc file exception | 2017-11-03T01:56:25.000040 | Malorie | pythondev_help_Malorie_2017-11-03T01:56:25.000040 | 1,509,674,185.00004 | 99,113 |
pythondev | help | I do not understand why would kmeans not accept a single dimensional feature to predict outcomes | 2017-11-03T01:56:51.000143 | Malorie | pythondev_help_Malorie_2017-11-03T01:56:51.000143 | 1,509,674,211.000143 | 99,114 |
pythondev | help | please help | 2017-11-03T01:56:56.000088 | Malorie | pythondev_help_Malorie_2017-11-03T01:56:56.000088 | 1,509,674,216.000088 | 99,115 |
pythondev | help | hey guys, can anyway recommend a JIRA desktop app for Mac? | 2017-11-03T06:05:36.000143 | Evelin | pythondev_help_Evelin_2017-11-03T06:05:36.000143 | 1,509,689,136.000143 | 99,116 |
pythondev | help | Hey guys, maybe someone able to help me | 2017-11-03T07:05:44.000215 | Bella | pythondev_help_Bella_2017-11-03T07:05:44.000215 | 1,509,692,744.000215 | 99,117 |
pythondev | help | I need to use `regex` | 2017-11-03T07:05:57.000236 | Bella | pythondev_help_Bella_2017-11-03T07:05:57.000236 | 1,509,692,757.000236 | 99,118 |
pythondev | help | for Example:
I have `my_string = 'Copyright (c)'` | 2017-11-03T07:06:55.000016 | Bella | pythondev_help_Bella_2017-11-03T07:06:55.000016 | 1,509,692,815.000016 | 99,119 |
pythondev | help | How I can add some words, after `(c)` character, using `regex`? | 2017-11-03T07:07:38.000032 | Bella | pythondev_help_Bella_2017-11-03T07:07:38.000032 | 1,509,692,858.000032 | 99,120 |
pythondev | help | does it always end like that right now? | 2017-11-03T07:07:54.000167 | Vada | pythondev_help_Vada_2017-11-03T07:07:54.000167 | 1,509,692,874.000167 | 99,121 |
pythondev | help | in order to on output I’ll have something like `Copyright(c) Darth Vayder` | 2017-11-03T07:08:09.000439 | Bella | pythondev_help_Bella_2017-11-03T07:08:09.000439 | 1,509,692,889.000439 | 99,122 |
pythondev | help | no | 2017-11-03T07:08:10.000240 | Bella | pythondev_help_Bella_2017-11-03T07:08:10.000240 | 1,509,692,890.00024 | 99,123 |
pythondev | help | Or are you just going to get strings like 'Copyright (c}' mixed in with other letters etc. | 2017-11-03T07:08:23.000173 | Vada | pythondev_help_Vada_2017-11-03T07:08:23.000173 | 1,509,692,903.000173 | 99,124 |
pythondev | help | (and which language) | 2017-11-03T07:08:30.000070 | Vada | pythondev_help_Vada_2017-11-03T07:08:30.000070 | 1,509,692,910.00007 | 99,125 |
pythondev | help | it’s for licences
```
MIT License
Copyright (c)
Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy
of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"), to deal
in the Software without restriction, including without limitation the rights
to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, ... | 2017-11-03T07:08:30.000282 | Bella | pythondev_help_Bella_2017-11-03T07:08:30.000282 | 1,509,692,910.000282 | 99,126 |
pythondev | help | English;) | 2017-11-03T07:08:44.000050 | Bella | pythondev_help_Bella_2017-11-03T07:08:44.000050 | 1,509,692,924.00005 | 99,127 |
pythondev | help | haha | 2017-11-03T07:08:50.000044 | Vada | pythondev_help_Vada_2017-11-03T07:08:50.000044 | 1,509,692,930.000044 | 99,128 |
pythondev | help | I’m not familiar with `regex`:disappointed: | 2017-11-03T07:09:13.000387 | Bella | pythondev_help_Bella_2017-11-03T07:09:13.000387 | 1,509,692,953.000387 | 99,129 |
pythondev | help | <@Vada> It will hard to do it? | 2017-11-03T07:10:01.000360 | Bella | pythondev_help_Bella_2017-11-03T07:10:01.000360 | 1,509,693,001.00036 | 99,130 |
pythondev | help | Didn't realise I was on the python slack group hence the lang q :stuck_out_tongue: | 2017-11-03T07:10:33.000197 | Vada | pythondev_help_Vada_2017-11-03T07:10:33.000197 | 1,509,693,033.000197 | 99,131 |
pythondev | help | in python, no it's incredibly easy | 2017-11-03T07:10:38.000278 | Vada | pythondev_help_Vada_2017-11-03T07:10:38.000278 | 1,509,693,038.000278 | 99,132 |
pythondev | help | but I read something recently which is making me research another method | 2017-11-03T07:10:50.000079 | Vada | pythondev_help_Vada_2017-11-03T07:10:50.000079 | 1,509,693,050.000079 | 99,133 |
pythondev | help | 1 sec | 2017-11-03T07:10:51.000289 | Vada | pythondev_help_Vada_2017-11-03T07:10:51.000289 | 1,509,693,051.000289 | 99,134 |
pythondev | help | (and you don't need regex for this) | 2017-11-03T07:10:57.000205 | Vada | pythondev_help_Vada_2017-11-03T07:10:57.000205 | 1,509,693,057.000205 | 99,135 |
pythondev | help | <@Vada> Waiting, thanks:slightly_smiling_face: | 2017-11-03T07:11:58.000201 | Bella | pythondev_help_Bella_2017-11-03T07:11:58.000201 | 1,509,693,118.000201 | 99,136 |
pythondev | help | <@Vada> :beers: | 2017-11-03T07:12:06.000109 | Bella | pythondev_help_Bella_2017-11-03T07:12:06.000109 | 1,509,693,126.000109 | 99,137 |
pythondev | help | :slightly_smiling_face: sorry this is part of an active effort by myself to reduce my reliance on python for small menial things | 2017-11-03T07:12:58.000288 | Vada | pythondev_help_Vada_2017-11-03T07:12:58.000288 | 1,509,693,178.000288 | 99,138 |
pythondev | help | you can use sed | 2017-11-03T07:13:03.000100 | Vada | pythondev_help_Vada_2017-11-03T07:13:03.000100 | 1,509,693,183.0001 | 99,139 |
pythondev | help | which is regex based | 2017-11-03T07:13:08.000158 | Vada | pythondev_help_Vada_2017-11-03T07:13:08.000158 | 1,509,693,188.000158 | 99,140 |
pythondev | help | ```nick@polo:~$ cat BSD
Copyright (c) The Regents of the University of California.
All rights reserved.
Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions
are met:
1. Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
n... | 2017-11-03T07:13:21.000059 | Vada | pythondev_help_Vada_2017-11-03T07:13:21.000059 | 1,509,693,201.000059 | 99,141 |
pythondev | help | Reduced license a bit to make it clearer | 2017-11-03T07:14:07.000129 | Vada | pythondev_help_Vada_2017-11-03T07:14:07.000129 | 1,509,693,247.000129 | 99,142 |
pythondev | help | this does not check to see if you have already written "Darth Vader" after the copyright line | 2017-11-03T07:14:26.000339 | Vada | pythondev_help_Vada_2017-11-03T07:14:26.000339 | 1,509,693,266.000339 | 99,143 |
pythondev | help | so it could dplicate it easily | 2017-11-03T07:14:30.000213 | Vada | pythondev_help_Vada_2017-11-03T07:14:30.000213 | 1,509,693,270.000213 | 99,144 |
pythondev | help | Haha, really!! | 2017-11-03T07:14:38.000281 | Bella | pythondev_help_Bella_2017-11-03T07:14:38.000281 | 1,509,693,278.000281 | 99,145 |
pythondev | help | ```
out_put_license = re.sub(r'Wizi Generator', author_name, license_content)
``` | 2017-11-03T07:14:44.000212 | Bella | pythondev_help_Bella_2017-11-03T07:14:44.000212 | 1,509,693,284.000212 | 99,146 |
pythondev | help | just to replace words | 2017-11-03T07:14:48.000298 | Bella | pythondev_help_Bella_2017-11-03T07:14:48.000298 | 1,509,693,288.000298 | 99,147 |
pythondev | help | :grinning: | 2017-11-03T07:14:52.000090 | Bella | pythondev_help_Bella_2017-11-03T07:14:52.000090 | 1,509,693,292.00009 | 99,148 |
pythondev | help | <@Vada> thanks) | 2017-11-03T07:14:59.000006 | Bella | pythondev_help_Bella_2017-11-03T07:14:59.000006 | 1,509,693,299.000006 | 99,149 |
pythondev | help | `sub` function works pretty well | 2017-11-03T07:15:59.000086 | Bella | pythondev_help_Bella_2017-11-03T07:15:59.000086 | 1,509,693,359.000086 | 99,150 |
pythondev | help | yep that should work too | 2017-11-03T07:17:02.000120 | Vada | pythondev_help_Vada_2017-11-03T07:17:02.000120 | 1,509,693,422.00012 | 99,151 |
pythondev | help | although you can also just do a straight up `.replace` | 2017-11-03T07:17:10.000007 | Vada | pythondev_help_Vada_2017-11-03T07:17:10.000007 | 1,509,693,430.000007 | 99,152 |
pythondev | help | no `re` | 2017-11-03T07:17:21.000045 | Vada | pythondev_help_Vada_2017-11-03T07:17:21.000045 | 1,509,693,441.000045 | 99,153 |
pythondev | help | <@Vada> yeah, nice solution.. sometimes, easy things:thinking_face: looks hard | 2017-11-03T07:21:30.000205 | Bella | pythondev_help_Bella_2017-11-03T07:21:30.000205 | 1,509,693,690.000205 | 99,154 |
pythondev | help | If someone will have a free time, could you review my little project? And if you will write some suggestions, or notices, it’s would be really awesome!
<https://github.com/MichaelYusko/wizi>
in two words about `wizi`: little package which will generate project template for you;) | 2017-11-03T07:28:03.000407 | Bella | pythondev_help_Bella_2017-11-03T07:28:03.000407 | 1,509,694,083.000407 | 99,155 |
pythondev | help | And have a nice day, guys. | 2017-11-03T07:28:11.000323 | Bella | pythondev_help_Bella_2017-11-03T07:28:11.000323 | 1,509,694,091.000323 | 99,156 |
pythondev | help | any thoughts on best practice for variable names during a for each loop in python?
for i in items:
```
i is a terrible name because it's generally used for the index
```
for item in items
```
item is a poor choice because:
- refactoring tools may or may not be able to figure out 'item' needs to be changed if 'items' ... | 2017-11-03T08:12:51.000439 | Rob | pythondev_help_Rob_2017-11-03T08:12:51.000439 | 1,509,696,771.000439 | 99,157 |
pythondev | help | uhm | 2017-11-03T08:14:16.000261 | Meg | pythondev_help_Meg_2017-11-03T08:14:16.000261 | 1,509,696,856.000261 | 99,158 |
pythondev | help | I really don’t care, tbh. as long as its obvious what is the variable and what is the data structure | 2017-11-03T08:14:38.000034 | Meg | pythondev_help_Meg_2017-11-03T08:14:38.000034 | 1,509,696,878.000034 | 99,159 |
pythondev | help | and the data structure name is appropriate | 2017-11-03T08:15:08.000181 | Meg | pythondev_help_Meg_2017-11-03T08:15:08.000181 | 1,509,696,908.000181 | 99,160 |
pythondev | help | yeah, and I gotta say, I’m actually a huge fan of the plural vs singular thing. I think that adds more clarity, not less | 2017-11-03T08:15:30.000126 | Junita | pythondev_help_Junita_2017-11-03T08:15:30.000126 | 1,509,696,930.000126 | 99,161 |
pythondev | help | for example, `item in items` is pretty easy to figure out, because one is plural and the other is singular | 2017-11-03T08:15:39.000108 | Meg | pythondev_help_Meg_2017-11-03T08:15:39.000108 | 1,509,696,939.000108 | 99,162 |
pythondev | help | then, when using `enumerate`, I do `for idx, val in enumerate(some_data_structure):` | 2017-11-03T08:16:14.000090 | Meg | pythondev_help_Meg_2017-11-03T08:16:14.000090 | 1,509,696,974.00009 | 99,163 |
pythondev | help | yup. also, in general, probably not worth overthinking | 2017-11-03T08:16:50.000178 | Junita | pythondev_help_Junita_2017-11-03T08:16:50.000178 | 1,509,697,010.000178 | 99,164 |
pythondev | help | if it’s generally clear what’s going on, and there are no obvious problems, then it’s good to go | 2017-11-03T08:17:17.000020 | Junita | pythondev_help_Junita_2017-11-03T08:17:17.000020 | 1,509,697,037.00002 | 99,165 |
pythondev | help | :thumbsup: for not overthinking | 2017-11-03T08:19:11.000250 | Meg | pythondev_help_Meg_2017-11-03T08:19:11.000250 | 1,509,697,151.00025 | 99,166 |
pythondev | help | inevitably you’ll be back there in a couple months anyway and go, “geez this is total crap, who wrote this!” *runs git blame* “oh” | 2017-11-03T08:20:00.000164 | Junita | pythondev_help_Junita_2017-11-03T08:20:00.000164 | 1,509,697,200.000164 | 99,167 |
pythondev | help | for ? in my_list_with_a_specific_name:
what we doing here? | 2017-11-03T08:34:11.000033 | Rob | pythondev_help_Rob_2017-11-03T08:34:11.000033 | 1,509,698,051.000033 | 99,168 |
pythondev | help | fwiw, i’m only over thinking this because i keep having to think about it when coding, i’d rather stick to something consistent and never think about it. | 2017-11-03T08:35:28.000322 | Rob | pythondev_help_Rob_2017-11-03T08:35:28.000322 | 1,509,698,128.000322 | 99,169 |
pythondev | help | i think for item in items is perfectly fine, and probably a poor example. in reality it’s never usually that simple, and the list won’t necessarily even have a singular name. i guess it doesn’t really matter overall, just feels like i shouldn’t be thinking about this lol. if i had to come up with a unique variable name... | 2017-11-03T08:38:22.000429 | Rob | pythondev_help_Rob_2017-11-03T08:38:22.000429 | 1,509,698,302.000429 | 99,170 |
pythondev | help | what I usually do I name list with a plural so when doing `for i in my_list` I can use the singular | 2017-11-03T08:40:19.000090 | Ciera | pythondev_help_Ciera_2017-11-03T08:40:19.000090 | 1,509,698,419.00009 | 99,171 |
pythondev | help | `for message in messages` | 2017-11-03T08:40:32.000140 | Ciera | pythondev_help_Ciera_2017-11-03T08:40:32.000140 | 1,509,698,432.00014 | 99,172 |
pythondev | help | you won’t always be able to come up with a natural sounding name that has a singular version though, and even trying to do it in the first place bugs me a bit. i guess i’ll just stop being so obsessive over the little things :wink: | 2017-11-03T08:42:42.000234 | Rob | pythondev_help_Rob_2017-11-03T08:42:42.000234 | 1,509,698,562.000234 | 99,173 |
pythondev | help | it's not possible some time but most yes | 2017-11-03T08:43:22.000262 | Ciera | pythondev_help_Ciera_2017-11-03T08:43:22.000262 | 1,509,698,602.000262 | 99,174 |
pythondev | help | but yeah if you can find something good enough it's probably :thumbsup: | 2017-11-03T08:43:56.000066 | Ciera | pythondev_help_Ciera_2017-11-03T08:43:56.000066 | 1,509,698,636.000066 | 99,175 |
pythondev | help | you can also rename later | 2017-11-03T08:44:03.000160 | Ciera | pythondev_help_Ciera_2017-11-03T08:44:03.000160 | 1,509,698,643.00016 | 99,176 |
pythondev | help | that’s the thing though, i don’t want to have to rename shit later haha, i’d rather just stick it as some single letter constant and never think about it again in my life | 2017-11-03T08:44:45.000234 | Rob | pythondev_help_Rob_2017-11-03T08:44:45.000234 | 1,509,698,685.000234 | 99,177 |
pythondev | help | always using the same letter for indices will get confusing sometime | 2017-11-03T08:45:45.000452 | Ciera | pythondev_help_Ciera_2017-11-03T08:45:45.000452 | 1,509,698,745.000452 | 99,178 |
pythondev | help | what if you have two loops ? | 2017-11-03T08:45:54.000002 | Ciera | pythondev_help_Ciera_2017-11-03T08:45:54.000002 | 1,509,698,754.000002 | 99,179 |
pythondev | help | then i would give them descriptive names | 2017-11-03T08:46:08.000122 | Rob | pythondev_help_Rob_2017-11-03T08:46:08.000122 | 1,509,698,768.000122 | 99,180 |
pythondev | help | but that case is rare enough that i don’t care, and i think in that case it actually adds a lot of value to be descriptive | 2017-11-03T08:46:45.000105 | Rob | pythondev_help_Rob_2017-11-03T08:46:45.000105 | 1,509,698,805.000105 | 99,181 |
pythondev | help | > adds a lot of value to be descriptive
In any case it add value | 2017-11-03T08:47:05.000461 | Ciera | pythondev_help_Ciera_2017-11-03T08:47:05.000461 | 1,509,698,825.000461 | 99,182 |
pythondev | help | i’m mostly talking about 1 level deep loops no longer than 10 lines. they come up all the time and i don’t think a descriptive name adds any value to the code at all | 2017-11-03T08:48:04.000309 | Rob | pythondev_help_Rob_2017-11-03T08:48:04.000309 | 1,509,698,884.000309 | 99,183 |
pythondev | help | then the convention is to use `i` and `k, v` for dict | 2017-11-03T08:48:44.000060 | Ciera | pythondev_help_Ciera_2017-11-03T08:48:44.000060 | 1,509,698,924.00006 | 99,184 |
pythondev | help | can we use i there? i’ve wanted to, i just haven’t because i thought it would be conflicting with the tradition of calling the index i | 2017-11-03T08:49:47.000095 | Rob | pythondev_help_Rob_2017-11-03T08:49:47.000095 | 1,509,698,987.000095 | 99,185 |
pythondev | help | k, v i like a lot, consistent and easy :slightly_smiling_face: | 2017-11-03T08:50:35.000051 | Rob | pythondev_help_Rob_2017-11-03T08:50:35.000051 | 1,509,699,035.000051 | 99,186 |
pythondev | help | i think i’m going to go with ‘i’ and if people complain i’ll blame you :wink: | 2017-11-03T08:51:48.000126 | Rob | pythondev_help_Rob_2017-11-03T08:51:48.000126 | 1,509,699,108.000126 | 99,187 |
pythondev | help | haha :thumbsup: | 2017-11-03T08:52:37.000417 | Ciera | pythondev_help_Ciera_2017-11-03T08:52:37.000417 | 1,509,699,157.000417 | 99,188 |
pythondev | help | I use i, j and k,v when the values are non-obvious, as you describe. | 2017-11-03T09:31:22.000132 | Junita | pythondev_help_Junita_2017-11-03T09:31:22.000132 | 1,509,701,482.000132 | 99,189 |
pythondev | help | specific names otherwise | 2017-11-03T09:31:25.000407 | Junita | pythondev_help_Junita_2017-11-03T09:31:25.000407 | 1,509,701,485.000407 | 99,190 |
pythondev | help | having written a good bit of c++, I often use 'it' which works for 'item' or 'iterator'. or sometimes I just use i, j, k or x, y, z in nested loops. It's mostly just style since the loop items/indexes are very local and not 'in scope' after a dozen-ish lines or less | 2017-11-03T09:55:56.000184 | Sirena | pythondev_help_Sirena_2017-11-03T09:55:56.000184 | 1,509,702,956.000184 | 99,191 |
pythondev | help | bash scripting question, anyone ever use the ImageMagick command line tool? Trying to center one image over another and getting mixed results | 2017-11-03T12:03:32.000426 | Lory | pythondev_help_Lory_2017-11-03T12:03:32.000426 | 1,509,710,612.000426 | 99,192 |
pythondev | help | mixed results how | 2017-11-03T12:06:39.000056 | Meg | pythondev_help_Meg_2017-11-03T12:06:39.000056 | 1,509,710,799.000056 | 99,193 |
pythondev | help | horizontal or vertical offset working? | 2017-11-03T12:06:46.000408 | Meg | pythondev_help_Meg_2017-11-03T12:06:46.000408 | 1,509,710,806.000408 | 99,194 |
pythondev | help | I was getting incorrect dimensions but I am just now realizing that I had the order of images wrong so I was overlaying the background on top of the foreground image, and since it was transparent it just looked like nothing was happening | 2017-11-03T12:08:01.000187 | Lory | pythondev_help_Lory_2017-11-03T12:08:01.000187 | 1,509,710,881.000187 | 99,195 |
pythondev | help | Alright now I really don't know what's going on with this bash script if anyone can help out. If I specify a `-d` option, then my output file variable is an empty string which breaks on the `mkdir -p`, if I don't specify the default holds correctly but then `convert -size "${w}"x"${h}" canvas:"${color}" "${out}"/"${img... | 2017-11-03T13:50:59.000302 | Lory | pythondev_help_Lory_2017-11-03T13:50:59.000302 | 1,509,717,059.000302 | 99,196 |
pythondev | help | this is just a simple script for making images square, it takes two optional arguments, a color for the background (defaults to transparent) and a name for the output directory (defaults to `square_out`) | 2017-11-03T13:52:12.000044 | Lory | pythondev_help_Lory_2017-11-03T13:52:12.000044 | 1,509,717,132.000044 | 99,197 |
pythondev | help | Actually I fixed it, changed `while getopts "dc:" opt; do` to `while getopts ":d:c:" opt; do` was all I was missing | 2017-11-03T14:23:26.000359 | Lory | pythondev_help_Lory_2017-11-03T14:23:26.000359 | 1,509,719,006.000359 | 99,198 |
pythondev | help | Any idea why I am getting that error? | 2017-11-03T14:54:46.000015 | Enid | pythondev_help_Enid_2017-11-03T14:54:46.000015 | 1,509,720,886.000015 | 99,199 |
pythondev | help | you're missing a closing `)` | 2017-11-03T14:57:02.000441 | Lory | pythondev_help_Lory_2017-11-03T14:57:02.000441 | 1,509,721,022.000441 | 99,200 |
pythondev | help | look at the end of `print(random.randint(min_income,max_income)` | 2017-11-03T14:57:14.000031 | Lory | pythondev_help_Lory_2017-11-03T14:57:14.000031 | 1,509,721,034.000031 | 99,201 |
pythondev | help | should be `print(random.randint(min_income,max_income))` | 2017-11-03T14:57:21.000306 | Lory | pythondev_help_Lory_2017-11-03T14:57:21.000306 | 1,509,721,041.000306 | 99,202 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.