workspace stringclasses 1
value | channel stringclasses 1
value | sentences stringlengths 1 3.93k | ts stringlengths 26 26 | user stringlengths 2 11 | sentence_id stringlengths 44 53 | timestamp float64 1.5B 1.56B | __index_level_0__ int64 0 106k |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
pythondev | help | not single line None checking? | 2017-12-01T10:33:09.000151 | Glinda | pythondev_help_Glinda_2017-12-01T10:33:09.000151 | 1,512,124,389.000151 | 101,803 |
pythondev | help | Because if you want to check if a value is none | 2017-12-01T10:33:22.001059 | Glinda | pythondev_help_Glinda_2017-12-01T10:33:22.001059 | 1,512,124,402.001059 | 101,804 |
pythondev | help | I don't necessarily care if it is None, I just have a value that will be either True or None and I want to save it as a False or True. Which I know of the classic `y = True if x else False` but I know I've used something along the lines of `y = if x` in the past for boolean operations like that | 2017-12-01T10:34:42.000602 | Lory | pythondev_help_Lory_2017-12-01T10:34:42.000602 | 1,512,124,482.000602 | 101,805 |
pythondev | help | `small = x if x < y else y` | 2017-12-01T10:34:49.000913 | Glinda | pythondev_help_Glinda_2017-12-01T10:34:49.000913 | 1,512,124,489.000913 | 101,806 |
pythondev | help | <https://docs.python.org/3/faq/programming.html#id23> | 2017-12-01T10:35:00.000107 | Glinda | pythondev_help_Glinda_2017-12-01T10:35:00.000107 | 1,512,124,500.000107 | 101,807 |
pythondev | help | ```def test_funct(y):
x = True if not y else False
print(x)
if __name__ == '__main__':
test_funct(None)
test_funct(1)
``` | 2017-12-01T10:36:24.000081 | Glinda | pythondev_help_Glinda_2017-12-01T10:36:24.000081 | 1,512,124,584.000081 | 101,808 |
pythondev | help | I think what you're getting at is | 2017-12-01T10:36:54.000449 | Glinda | pythondev_help_Glinda_2017-12-01T10:36:54.000449 | 1,512,124,614.000449 | 101,809 |
pythondev | help | I have two conditions I want to check, `y== True`, `y==False`. Now there's other conditions you could have to consider `y == anything else` | 2017-12-01T10:37:43.000554 | Glinda | pythondev_help_Glinda_2017-12-01T10:37:43.000554 | 1,512,124,663.000554 | 101,810 |
pythondev | help | Since you know the value "will be either True or None and you want to map `None -> True` or map `True -> False` Then you only have two actual conditions. | 2017-12-01T10:40:56.000953 | Glinda | pythondev_help_Glinda_2017-12-01T10:40:56.000953 | 1,512,124,856.000953 | 101,811 |
pythondev | help | in that case you can do this assignment: `x = True if not y else False` | 2017-12-01T10:41:37.000398 | Glinda | pythondev_help_Glinda_2017-12-01T10:41:37.000398 | 1,512,124,897.000398 | 101,812 |
pythondev | help | Yea I mean I understand all that and that's not where my confusion is. I just thought I remember there being some super shorthand way to achieve the same goal but I think I'm mistaking it with something like `x = not y` which is possible | 2017-12-01T10:43:59.000302 | Lory | pythondev_help_Lory_2017-12-01T10:43:59.000302 | 1,512,125,039.000302 | 101,813 |
pythondev | help | Looks like you can chain ternary operators, but the only case I've seen requires 3 conditions: <https://stackoverflow.com/a/2919360/8143102> | 2017-12-01T10:48:23.000983 | Glinda | pythondev_help_Glinda_2017-12-01T10:48:23.000983 | 1,512,125,303.000983 | 101,814 |
pythondev | help | `1 if a > b else -1 if a < b else 0` | 2017-12-01T10:48:41.000636 | Glinda | pythondev_help_Glinda_2017-12-01T10:48:41.000636 | 1,512,125,321.000636 | 101,815 |
pythondev | help | Now since you want things as short as possible practical advice is that in many cases you don't want one line functions that do too many things, there's the programmer you today, tomorrow a month from now and next year. And next year you're going to wonder why you didn't put this single line into a separate function. N... | 2017-12-01T10:52:51.000905 | Glinda | pythondev_help_Glinda_2017-12-01T10:52:51.000905 | 1,512,125,571.000905 | 101,816 |
pythondev | help | `y = bool(x)`, however in almost all cases just using `x` is what you want. You usually don't want a `bool`, you want something that is "truthy" or "falsey", and x already is that. | 2017-12-01T11:46:09.000352 | Loris | pythondev_help_Loris_2017-12-01T11:46:09.000352 | 1,512,128,769.000352 | 101,817 |
pythondev | help | It looked like he wanted to map `True or None and I want to save it as a False or True` True => False, None => True | 2017-12-01T11:52:10.001303 | Glinda | pythondev_help_Glinda_2017-12-01T11:52:10.001303 | 1,512,129,130.001303 | 101,818 |
pythondev | help | `y = not bool(x)` | 2017-12-01T11:52:42.000567 | Glinda | pythondev_help_Glinda_2017-12-01T11:52:42.000567 | 1,512,129,162.000567 | 101,819 |
pythondev | help | Any suggestions on a way to reverse enumerate that is better than these options- replaced with file | 2017-12-01T12:24:11.000461 | Glinda | pythondev_help_Glinda_2017-12-01T12:24:11.000461 | 1,512,131,051.000461 | 101,820 |
pythondev | help | `first` is better due to preserving original index, but not sure I like the `list(....)` part. | 2017-12-01T12:25:59.001003 | Glinda | pythondev_help_Glinda_2017-12-01T12:25:59.001003 | 1,512,131,159.001003 | 101,821 |
pythondev | help | I kinda like this `third` wrapper | 2017-12-01T12:32:49.000260 | Glinda | pythondev_help_Glinda_2017-12-01T12:32:49.000260 | 1,512,131,569.00026 | 101,822 |
pythondev | help | `reversed(enumerate(my_list))`? | 2017-12-01T12:38:02.000707 | Suellen | pythondev_help_Suellen_2017-12-01T12:38:02.000707 | 1,512,131,882.000707 | 101,823 |
pythondev | help | no need for `list()` conversion in `first()` | 2017-12-01T12:38:40.000559 | Suellen | pythondev_help_Suellen_2017-12-01T12:38:40.000559 | 1,512,131,920.000559 | 101,824 |
pythondev | help | I think, if it works, `enumerate(reversed(my_list))` is better | 2017-12-01T12:38:50.001080 | Ciera | pythondev_help_Ciera_2017-12-01T12:38:50.001080 | 1,512,131,930.00108 | 101,825 |
pythondev | help | or that :stuck_out_tongue: | 2017-12-01T12:39:03.000596 | Suellen | pythondev_help_Suellen_2017-12-01T12:39:03.000596 | 1,512,131,943.000596 | 101,826 |
pythondev | help | reversed is a builtin so it should be faster than consume the `enumerate` iterator | 2017-12-01T12:39:58.000074 | Ciera | pythondev_help_Ciera_2017-12-01T12:39:58.000074 | 1,512,131,998.000074 | 101,827 |
pythondev | help | but not sure | 2017-12-01T12:40:00.000289 | Ciera | pythondev_help_Ciera_2017-12-01T12:40:00.000289 | 1,512,132,000.000289 | 101,828 |
pythondev | help | `TypeError: 'enumerate' object is not reversible` | 2017-12-01T12:41:33.001010 | Suellen | pythondev_help_Suellen_2017-12-01T12:41:33.001010 | 1,512,132,093.00101 | 101,829 |
pythondev | help | yours is best, <@Ciera> :)) | 2017-12-01T12:41:44.000649 | Suellen | pythondev_help_Suellen_2017-12-01T12:41:44.000649 | 1,512,132,104.000649 | 101,830 |
pythondev | help | yeah it's something I discovered not to long ago. You can define a `__reverse__` dunder | 2017-12-01T12:42:54.000861 | Ciera | pythondev_help_Ciera_2017-12-01T12:42:54.000861 | 1,512,132,174.000861 | 101,831 |
pythondev | help | if not it will consume everything and then reverse it | 2017-12-01T12:43:14.000718 | Ciera | pythondev_help_Ciera_2017-12-01T12:43:14.000718 | 1,512,132,194.000718 | 101,832 |
pythondev | help | :open_mouth: | 2017-12-01T12:43:22.000724 | Suellen | pythondev_help_Suellen_2017-12-01T12:43:22.000724 | 1,512,132,202.000724 | 101,833 |
pythondev | help | Not sure why I wrote it in such a way | 2017-12-01T12:43:41.001133 | Suellen | pythondev_help_Suellen_2017-12-01T12:43:41.001133 | 1,512,132,221.001133 | 101,834 |
pythondev | help | It's more logical to reverse and then enumerate | 2017-12-01T12:44:10.000538 | Suellen | pythondev_help_Suellen_2017-12-01T12:44:10.000538 | 1,512,132,250.000538 | 101,835 |
pythondev | help | less work %) | 2017-12-01T12:44:15.000021 | Suellen | pythondev_help_Suellen_2017-12-01T12:44:15.000021 | 1,512,132,255.000021 | 101,836 |
pythondev | help | But now the index doesn't correspond to the original index. | 2017-12-01T12:51:41.000140 | Glinda | pythondev_help_Glinda_2017-12-01T12:51:41.000140 | 1,512,132,701.00014 | 101,837 |
pythondev | help | I am trying to write a code which involves these two lines | 2017-12-01T13:18:25.000815 | Arla | pythondev_help_Arla_2017-12-01T13:18:25.000815 | 1,512,134,305.000815 | 101,838 |
pythondev | help | In this case, is the array traversed twice or once and is there a way of combining these two statements? | 2017-12-01T13:18:58.000091 | Arla | pythondev_help_Arla_2017-12-01T13:18:58.000091 | 1,512,134,338.000091 | 101,839 |
pythondev | help | twice | 2017-12-01T13:20:42.000094 | Ciera | pythondev_help_Ciera_2017-12-01T13:20:42.000094 | 1,512,134,442.000094 | 101,840 |
pythondev | help | Hi, I am trying to install a python library using PIP on my macOS sierra (10.12.3).. using pip install vspk command .. it’s throwing an error as: could not create error: could not create ‘/System/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.7/vspk’: Operation not permitted … I have python 2.7.10 version installed o... | 2017-12-01T13:24:40.000553 | Moses | pythondev_help_Moses_2017-12-01T13:24:40.000553 | 1,512,134,680.000553 | 101,841 |
pythondev | help | <@Ciera> then is there a way to reduce it to one traversal? | 2017-12-01T13:25:05.000296 | Arla | pythondev_help_Arla_2017-12-01T13:25:05.000296 | 1,512,134,705.000296 | 101,842 |
pythondev | help | <@Arla> if you want a single line, you can look up zip, ex: <https://stackoverflow.com/questions/9826867/python-values-of-multiple-lists-in-one-list-comprehension>
But if you want the most readable with a single loop:
```list1 = list2 = []
for item in valid_stud:
list1.append(item.attribute1)
list2.append(it... | 2017-12-01T13:34:38.001049 | Glinda | pythondev_help_Glinda_2017-12-01T13:34:38.001049 | 1,512,135,278.001049 | 101,843 |
pythondev | help | thanks a lot <@Glinda> | 2017-12-01T13:59:01.000414 | Arla | pythondev_help_Arla_2017-12-01T13:59:01.000414 | 1,512,136,741.000414 | 101,844 |
pythondev | help | np | 2017-12-01T13:59:38.000465 | Glinda | pythondev_help_Glinda_2017-12-01T13:59:38.000465 | 1,512,136,778.000465 | 101,845 |
pythondev | help | <@Moses> sounds like you need to call pip with sudo because you don't have permissions to write to that folder. | 2017-12-01T14:07:58.000157 | Sirena | pythondev_help_Sirena_2017-12-01T14:07:58.000157 | 1,512,137,278.000157 | 101,846 |
pythondev | help | possibly it's a sign that you didn't set permissions correctly when you installed python | 2017-12-01T14:08:41.000900 | Sirena | pythondev_help_Sirena_2017-12-01T14:08:41.000900 | 1,512,137,321.0009 | 101,847 |
pythondev | help | `pip install --user ...` | 2017-12-01T14:09:53.000305 | Suellen | pythondev_help_Suellen_2017-12-01T14:09:53.000305 | 1,512,137,393.000305 | 101,848 |
pythondev | help | will install to the directory owned by the user | 2017-12-01T14:10:05.000087 | Suellen | pythondev_help_Suellen_2017-12-01T14:10:05.000087 | 1,512,137,405.000087 | 101,849 |
pythondev | help | <@Arla> not sure what your motivation to replace these 2 lines. Please note that constructing a new list with list comprehensions is usually (much) faster than iterating and append. //cc: wmont
```In[14]: def append(l):
...: l1 = []
...: l2 = []
...: for e in l:
...: l1.append(e[0])
.... | 2017-12-01T14:42:57.001191 | Ethyl | pythondev_help_Ethyl_2017-12-01T14:42:57.001191 | 1,512,139,377.001191 | 101,850 |
pythondev | help | all other things aside, please please please don't name a variable `l1` | 2017-12-01T14:45:43.000826 | Sirena | pythondev_help_Sirena_2017-12-01T14:45:43.000826 | 1,512,139,543.000826 | 101,851 |
pythondev | help | they should be `il, li, 1i, 1l, l1` and so on... :slightly_smiling_face: | 2017-12-01T14:46:33.000991 | Suellen | pythondev_help_Suellen_2017-12-01T14:46:33.000991 | 1,512,139,593.000991 | 101,852 |
pythondev | help | ... or `O0` in case anyone was considering it | 2017-12-01T14:46:35.001059 | Sirena | pythondev_help_Sirena_2017-12-01T14:46:35.001059 | 1,512,139,595.001059 | 101,853 |
pythondev | help | yes, in the real code you want meaningful names | 2017-12-01T14:46:53.001207 | Ethyl | pythondev_help_Ethyl_2017-12-01T14:46:53.001207 | 1,512,139,613.001207 | 101,854 |
pythondev | help | Good point on the speed alex, didn't think about that consideration. | 2017-12-01T14:51:20.000467 | Glinda | pythondev_help_Glinda_2017-12-01T14:51:20.000467 | 1,512,139,880.000467 | 101,855 |
pythondev | help | Really though 2 list comprehensions is more readable. | 2017-12-01T14:51:37.000392 | Glinda | pythondev_help_Glinda_2017-12-01T14:51:37.000392 | 1,512,139,897.000392 | 101,856 |
pythondev | help | so I have a performance question, if anyone cares to weigh in | 2017-12-01T14:53:34.000851 | Sirena | pythondev_help_Sirena_2017-12-01T14:53:34.000851 | 1,512,140,014.000851 | 101,857 |
pythondev | help | I have a problem like this: | 2017-12-01T14:53:47.000052 | Sirena | pythondev_help_Sirena_2017-12-01T14:53:47.000052 | 1,512,140,027.000052 | 101,858 |
pythondev | help | yes I agree if I use --user it will install correctly but while using it aftewards it throws an error as ```
* Error running command 'python activate_vm.py --host 10.21.0.10 --port 443 --user administrator@vsphere.local --password Nuage-R0ck5! --vmname lab_328ae7ea_jumpbox --nuageEnterprise VMware --nuageUser admin --... | 2017-12-01T14:54:52.000712 | Moses | pythondev_help_Moses_2017-12-01T14:54:52.000712 | 1,512,140,092.000712 | 101,859 |
pythondev | help | I need a function that accepts an ID and a value, and returns a tag | 2017-12-01T14:55:47.001261 | Sirena | pythondev_help_Sirena_2017-12-01T14:55:47.001261 | 1,512,140,147.001261 | 101,860 |
pythondev | help | yes i had tried that using --user after looking at this bug suggestion .. <https://github.com/gevent/gevent/issues/679> ... but while running my script using vspk library it can't seem to find command related to that | 2017-12-01T14:55:57.001279 | Moses | pythondev_help_Moses_2017-12-01T14:55:57.001279 | 1,512,140,157.001279 | 101,861 |
pythondev | help | but it seems quite slow to do this by text matching | 2017-12-01T14:56:15.001164 | Sirena | pythondev_help_Sirena_2017-12-01T14:56:15.001164 | 1,512,140,175.001164 | 101,862 |
pythondev | help | anyone know a design pattern, or library, or something like that which might offer a bit of a boost. I'm looking to run this probably thousands or hundreds of thousands of times in a typical use | 2017-12-01T14:57:11.000928 | Sirena | pythondev_help_Sirena_2017-12-01T14:57:11.000928 | 1,512,140,231.000928 | 101,863 |
pythondev | help | how big is the size of this dataset? | 2017-12-01T14:59:18.000248 | Suellen | pythondev_help_Suellen_2017-12-01T14:59:18.000248 | 1,512,140,358.000248 | 101,864 |
pythondev | help | looks like.... maybe 8000 rows? | 2017-12-01T15:00:38.000676 | Sirena | pythondev_help_Sirena_2017-12-01T15:00:38.000676 | 1,512,140,438.000676 | 101,865 |
pythondev | help | I honestly have no experience with OS X | 2017-12-01T15:00:52.000454 | Suellen | pythondev_help_Suellen_2017-12-01T15:00:52.000454 | 1,512,140,452.000454 | 101,866 |
pythondev | help | definitely fits in memory with ease | 2017-12-01T15:01:00.000821 | Sirena | pythondev_help_Sirena_2017-12-01T15:01:00.000821 | 1,512,140,460.000821 | 101,867 |
pythondev | help | trying to translate a big heap of ID/value pairs into essentially enum strings | 2017-12-01T15:02:54.000762 | Sirena | pythondev_help_Sirena_2017-12-01T15:02:54.000762 | 1,512,140,574.000762 | 101,868 |
pythondev | help | I mean, I would just load into in-memory sqlite database and query that. Blazing fast even at 100k rows probably | 2017-12-01T15:03:00.000922 | Suellen | pythondev_help_Suellen_2017-12-01T15:03:00.000922 | 1,512,140,580.000922 | 101,869 |
pythondev | help | you happen to have a link handy for sqlite for dummies? I'm not especially experienced with it | 2017-12-01T15:05:04.001071 | Sirena | pythondev_help_Sirena_2017-12-01T15:05:04.001071 | 1,512,140,704.001071 | 101,870 |
pythondev | help | Sure: <https://docs.python.org/3/library/sqlite3.html> | 2017-12-01T15:05:26.000237 | Suellen | pythondev_help_Suellen_2017-12-01T15:05:26.000237 | 1,512,140,726.000237 | 101,871 |
pythondev | help | or you could just make a dict where a key is an ID, so that you can narrow down from 8000 to a way smaller number of entries in O(1) time | 2017-12-01T15:06:07.000117 | Suellen | pythondev_help_Suellen_2017-12-01T15:06:07.000117 | 1,512,140,767.000117 | 101,872 |
pythondev | help | yah, that was sorta where I was starting | 2017-12-01T15:06:22.000999 | Sirena | pythondev_help_Sirena_2017-12-01T15:06:22.000999 | 1,512,140,782.000999 | 101,873 |
pythondev | help | and then iterate over (lower, upper) and check if it's in range | 2017-12-01T15:06:25.000887 | Suellen | pythondev_help_Suellen_2017-12-01T15:06:25.000887 | 1,512,140,785.000887 | 101,874 |
pythondev | help | and if it is - you got it | 2017-12-01T15:06:30.000526 | Suellen | pythondev_help_Suellen_2017-12-01T15:06:30.000526 | 1,512,140,790.000526 | 101,875 |
pythondev | help | I don't think I have many (maybe 0?) sub-tables bigger than like 16 entries | 2017-12-01T15:06:56.001093 | Sirena | pythondev_help_Sirena_2017-12-01T15:06:56.001093 | 1,512,140,816.001093 | 101,876 |
pythondev | help | oh, then it's going to be fast | 2017-12-01T15:07:10.000582 | Suellen | pythondev_help_Suellen_2017-12-01T15:07:10.000582 | 1,512,140,830.000582 | 101,877 |
pythondev | help | alright, thanks for the tips | 2017-12-01T15:08:48.000047 | Sirena | pythondev_help_Sirena_2017-12-01T15:08:48.000047 | 1,512,140,928.000047 | 101,878 |
pythondev | help | Hey guys! Question: If I start to use `async/await` from python 3, does `uwsgi` (or other `wsgi` implementation) support it? I heard about `asgi` from django channels, but don't know exactly if it is specific to channels or could be used with it. :slightly_smiling_face: | 2017-12-01T15:51:10.000466 | Juliette | pythondev_help_Juliette_2017-12-01T15:51:10.000466 | 1,512,143,470.000466 | 101,879 |
pythondev | help | everyone__, i got a threading code block. I realize they keep overwriting each other.. so the both fail.. is the a way to run one after the other in the queue. | 2017-12-01T16:13:26.000547 | Cammy | pythondev_help_Cammy_2017-12-01T16:13:26.000547 | 1,512,144,806.000547 | 101,880 |
pythondev | help | ```
for job in <http://CONFIG.jobs|CONFIG.jobs>:
second_ = job.schedule.get("second", None)
minute_ = job.schedule.get("minute", None)
SCHED.add_job(process_job, 'cron', second=second_, minute=minute_, args=(job.name,))
``` | 2017-12-01T16:13:51.000559 | Cammy | pythondev_help_Cammy_2017-12-01T16:13:51.000559 | 1,512,144,831.000559 | 101,881 |
pythondev | help | <@Cammy> once you want to run 2 jobs sequentially what is the reason to have a thread per job? | 2017-12-01T16:24:25.001111 | Ethyl | pythondev_help_Ethyl_2017-12-01T16:24:25.001111 | 1,512,145,465.001111 | 101,882 |
pythondev | help | Because am running two blocks concurrently... | 2017-12-01T16:27:52.000540 | Cammy | pythondev_help_Cammy_2017-12-01T16:27:52.000540 | 1,512,145,672.00054 | 101,883 |
pythondev | help | Do you let cron to run your jobs? If the answer is yes, you can use synchronization mechanism provided by your OS (take a look here: <http://blog.vmfarms.com/2011/03/cross-process-locking-and.html>). If you have 2 python threads, use Lock or Semaphore. | 2017-12-01T16:45:45.000906 | Ethyl | pythondev_help_Ethyl_2017-12-01T16:45:45.000906 | 1,512,146,745.000906 | 101,884 |
pythondev | help | But if I ha to run 2 jobs sequentially I would put everything in one thread. | 2017-12-01T16:47:38.000393 | Ethyl | pythondev_help_Ethyl_2017-12-01T16:47:38.000393 | 1,512,146,858.000393 | 101,885 |
pythondev | help | oh okay thank you for your help though .. i might try using virtual env on OS X | 2017-12-01T17:55:38.000021 | Moses | pythondev_help_Moses_2017-12-01T17:55:38.000021 | 1,512,150,938.000021 | 101,886 |
pythondev | help | what was the problem? | 2017-12-01T20:03:35.000068 | Winnie | pythondev_help_Winnie_2017-12-01T20:03:35.000068 | 1,512,158,615.000068 | 101,887 |
pythondev | help | Any idea why someone would get 'access is denied' they they try to run `pip --version` | 2017-12-01T22:26:15.000160 | Staci | pythondev_help_Staci_2017-12-01T22:26:15.000160 | 1,512,167,175.00016 | 101,888 |
pythondev | help | I tried to google but all the results that come back are for specific packages | 2017-12-01T22:26:42.000566 | Staci | pythondev_help_Staci_2017-12-01T22:26:42.000566 | 1,512,167,202.000566 | 101,889 |
pythondev | help | pip install this or that | 2017-12-01T22:26:51.000357 | Staci | pythondev_help_Staci_2017-12-01T22:26:51.000357 | 1,512,167,211.000357 | 101,890 |
pythondev | help | they can run python, but even if they cd into the /path/to/python/scripts directory and try to run pip from there, they still get access is denied | 2017-12-01T22:27:48.000063 | Staci | pythondev_help_Staci_2017-12-01T22:27:48.000063 | 1,512,167,268.000063 | 101,891 |
pythondev | help | what does stat /path/to/python/scripts/pip say? | 2017-12-01T22:36:02.000569 | Winnie | pythondev_help_Winnie_2017-12-01T22:36:02.000569 | 1,512,167,762.000569 | 101,892 |
pythondev | help | What's the standard for using secrets within flask applications? | 2017-12-01T22:36:24.000681 | Winnie | pythondev_help_Winnie_2017-12-01T22:36:24.000681 | 1,512,167,784.000681 | 101,893 |
pythondev | help | I don't have access to the pc atm, I was helping them earlier | 2017-12-01T22:39:22.000525 | Staci | pythondev_help_Staci_2017-12-01T22:39:22.000525 | 1,512,167,962.000525 | 101,894 |
pythondev | help | what should I be looking for with the stat command? | 2017-12-01T22:39:34.000588 | Staci | pythondev_help_Staci_2017-12-01T22:39:34.000588 | 1,512,167,974.000588 | 101,895 |
pythondev | help | and sorry, I'm a Django man myself, but I typically use a .env file | 2017-12-01T22:40:40.000193 | Staci | pythondev_help_Staci_2017-12-01T22:40:40.000193 | 1,512,168,040.000193 | 101,896 |
pythondev | help | maybe there's something wrong with the permissions of the actual pip script? | 2017-12-01T22:41:34.000221 | Winnie | pythondev_help_Winnie_2017-12-01T22:41:34.000221 | 1,512,168,094.000221 | 101,897 |
pythondev | help | It should be the standard pip that's included with Python 3.6.3, would it make sense to try and reinstall python? | 2017-12-01T22:42:15.000414 | Staci | pythondev_help_Staci_2017-12-01T22:42:15.000414 | 1,512,168,135.000414 | 101,898 |
pythondev | help | also it's Windows 10, I'm typically on Windows 7 but I've helped lots of people get their Python envs setup and never run into this particular issue | 2017-12-01T22:42:53.000588 | Staci | pythondev_help_Staci_2017-12-01T22:42:53.000588 | 1,512,168,173.000588 | 101,899 |
pythondev | help | Also, I hadn't mentioned, but we tried in an elevated command prompt with the same results | 2017-12-01T22:43:22.000037 | Staci | pythondev_help_Staci_2017-12-01T22:43:22.000037 | 1,512,168,202.000037 | 101,900 |
pythondev | help | windows is weird | 2017-12-01T22:53:16.000597 | Winnie | pythondev_help_Winnie_2017-12-01T22:53:16.000597 | 1,512,168,796.000597 | 101,901 |
pythondev | help | you're not wrong | 2017-12-01T22:53:35.000268 | Staci | pythondev_help_Staci_2017-12-01T22:53:35.000268 | 1,512,168,815.000268 | 101,902 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.