workspace stringclasses 1
value | channel stringclasses 1
value | sentences stringlengths 1 3.93k | ts stringlengths 26 26 | user stringlengths 2 11 | sentence_id stringlengths 44 53 | timestamp float64 1.5B 1.56B | __index_level_0__ int64 0 106k |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
pythondev | help | <https://xkcd.com/936/> | 2017-08-07T11:13:51.270568 | Antionette | pythondev_help_Antionette_2017-08-07T11:13:51.270568 | 1,502,104,431.270568 | 88,803 |
pythondev | help | what's good with passwordmeter is the list of common password | 2017-08-07T11:14:09.281516 | Ciera | pythondev_help_Ciera_2017-08-07T11:14:09.281516 | 1,502,104,449.281516 | 88,804 |
pythondev | help | can't do that (easily) with regex | 2017-08-07T11:14:17.286369 | Ciera | pythondev_help_Ciera_2017-08-07T11:14:17.286369 | 1,502,104,457.286369 | 88,805 |
pythondev | help | Good point | 2017-08-07T11:15:08.317369 | Beula | pythondev_help_Beula_2017-08-07T11:15:08.317369 | 1,502,104,508.317369 | 88,806 |
pythondev | help | I wonder if I could dynamically add current username to that list | 2017-08-07T11:15:10.317990 | Suellen | pythondev_help_Suellen_2017-08-07T11:15:10.317990 | 1,502,104,510.31799 | 88,807 |
pythondev | help | some users really don't care about themselves | 2017-08-07T11:15:20.324358 | Suellen | pythondev_help_Suellen_2017-08-07T11:15:20.324358 | 1,502,104,520.324358 | 88,808 |
pythondev | help | I would make it a "rules" engine myself, test against the regex, test against the username, test against the first/last | 2017-08-07T11:15:32.332045 | Beula | pythondev_help_Beula_2017-08-07T11:15:32.332045 | 1,502,104,532.332045 | 88,809 |
pythondev | help | Username: `tommyjones`
Password: `tommyjones1` -- strong | 2017-08-07T11:15:41.337162 | Suellen | pythondev_help_Suellen_2017-08-07T11:15:41.337162 | 1,502,104,541.337162 | 88,810 |
pythondev | help | test that it's not in the top 100 most common | 2017-08-07T11:15:43.338539 | Beula | pythondev_help_Beula_2017-08-07T11:15:43.338539 | 1,502,104,543.338539 | 88,811 |
pythondev | help | best solution is auto generate password and don't authorise to change (or only regeneration) :smile: | 2017-08-07T11:16:37.371251 | Ciera | pythondev_help_Ciera_2017-08-07T11:16:37.371251 | 1,502,104,597.371251 | 88,812 |
pythondev | help | Or no password and only biometrics | 2017-08-07T11:17:13.392760 | Beula | pythondev_help_Beula_2017-08-07T11:17:13.392760 | 1,502,104,633.39276 | 88,813 |
pythondev | help | not letting users mess with passwords? I love it | 2017-08-07T11:17:52.416454 | Suellen | pythondev_help_Suellen_2017-08-07T11:17:52.416454 | 1,502,104,672.416454 | 88,814 |
pythondev | help | If you haven't seen it, NIST recently revised a lot of their password advice, some of the old wisdom seems no longer applies... Troy Hunt had a great writeup on it here <https://www.troyhunt.com/passwords-evolved-authentication-guidance-for-the-modern-era/> | 2017-08-07T11:18:06.424317 | Kenna | pythondev_help_Kenna_2017-08-07T11:18:06.424317 | 1,502,104,686.424317 | 88,815 |
pythondev | help | The TL;DR was something like:
- Stop requiring periodic password changes
- Stop requiring specific formulas of what's okay to use
- Longer is always better and the best way to make passwords strong | 2017-08-07T11:19:03.458383 | Kenna | pythondev_help_Kenna_2017-08-07T11:19:03.458383 | 1,502,104,743.458383 | 88,816 |
pythondev | help | > - Longer is always better | 2017-08-07T11:19:27.472207 | Suellen | pythondev_help_Suellen_2017-08-07T11:19:27.472207 | 1,502,104,767.472207 | 88,817 |
pythondev | help | that's what she... | 2017-08-07T11:19:30.473765 | Suellen | pythondev_help_Suellen_2017-08-07T11:19:30.473765 | 1,502,104,770.473765 | 88,818 |
pythondev | help | yup and the haveibeenpwned api seems like a very useful tool | 2017-08-07T11:19:31.474421 | Tandra | pythondev_help_Tandra_2017-08-07T11:19:31.474421 | 1,502,104,771.474421 | 88,819 |
pythondev | help | Related is Jeff Atwood's: <https://blog.codinghorror.com/password-rules-are-bullshit/> | 2017-08-07T11:19:37.478377 | Beula | pythondev_help_Beula_2017-08-07T11:19:37.478377 | 1,502,104,777.478377 | 88,820 |
pythondev | help | specific formulas are no-go, alright, but what about suggestions? | 2017-08-07T11:20:03.493272 | Suellen | pythondev_help_Suellen_2017-08-07T11:20:03.493272 | 1,502,104,803.493272 | 88,821 |
pythondev | help | I'm leery of the whole emojis in passwords thing, but maybe I'm just old and emoji newfangled :wink: | 2017-08-07T11:20:09.497323 | Kenna | pythondev_help_Kenna_2017-08-07T11:20:09.497323 | 1,502,104,809.497323 | 88,822 |
pythondev | help | like, "your password is rated 0.38 (or just "weak"), and most common ways to impove it are: ..." | 2017-08-07T11:20:33.511117 | Suellen | pythondev_help_Suellen_2017-08-07T11:20:33.511117 | 1,502,104,833.511117 | 88,823 |
pythondev | help | and make a suggestion to add numbers, symbols, increase length. But no checking for specifics, just for a resulting entropy | 2017-08-07T11:21:14.536448 | Suellen | pythondev_help_Suellen_2017-08-07T11:21:14.536448 | 1,502,104,874.536448 | 88,824 |
pythondev | help | <@Suellen> I think the observation was that if you specify a formula, you're telling crackers the formula too. And since humans tend to work similarly it actually gives them a leg up. People tend to put capitals at the start. They tend to put "special symbols" and numbers at the end. Etc. If you just leave it free form... | 2017-08-07T11:21:25.543170 | Kenna | pythondev_help_Kenna_2017-08-07T11:21:25.543170 | 1,502,104,885.54317 | 88,825 |
pythondev | help | oh | 2017-08-07T11:21:55.560516 | Suellen | pythondev_help_Suellen_2017-08-07T11:21:55.560516 | 1,502,104,915.560516 | 88,826 |
pythondev | help | And they swap in numerals for letters sometimes -> `Password1` -> `P4ssword1` | 2017-08-07T11:22:16.572975 | Beula | pythondev_help_Beula_2017-08-07T11:22:16.572975 | 1,502,104,936.572975 | 88,827 |
pythondev | help | yeah, that makes sense, and that's exactly what I've been doing before keepass | 2017-08-07T11:22:25.578361 | Suellen | pythondev_help_Suellen_2017-08-07T11:22:25.578361 | 1,502,104,945.578361 | 88,828 |
pythondev | help | The lookups are simple, lots of rainbow tables do that | 2017-08-07T11:22:27.579221 | Beula | pythondev_help_Beula_2017-08-07T11:22:27.579221 | 1,502,104,947.579221 | 88,829 |
pythondev | help | But basically, require a length. For normal users discourse does 10char, for admins 15char | 2017-08-07T11:22:51.593916 | Beula | pythondev_help_Beula_2017-08-07T11:22:51.593916 | 1,502,104,971.593916 | 88,830 |
pythondev | help | Where if you make the length arbitrary and encourage longer passwords, it adds a lot of cracking time. The NIST recommendation was to support up to either 128 or 256 char passwords I believe. It specified a minimum of 8, which IMO is probably low, but it's aimed at the average user, so... | 2017-08-07T11:23:07.602967 | Kenna | pythondev_help_Kenna_2017-08-07T11:23:07.602967 | 1,502,104,987.602967 | 88,831 |
pythondev | help | and checking agains the 100,000 most common password | 2017-08-07T11:23:11.605155 | Beula | pythondev_help_Beula_2017-08-07T11:23:11.605155 | 1,502,104,991.605155 | 88,832 |
pythondev | help | damn, 128 | 2017-08-07T11:23:55.632145 | Suellen | pythondev_help_Suellen_2017-08-07T11:23:55.632145 | 1,502,105,035.632145 | 88,833 |
pythondev | help | It's weird that anyone thought it was a good idea to start demanding special characters, because most people are just going to add 1 of them to meet the requirement, whereas simply making the password longer by a few characters would have a stronger benefit with no effect on how easy it is to remember | 2017-08-07T11:24:05.637735 | Gabriele | pythondev_help_Gabriele_2017-08-07T11:24:05.637735 | 1,502,105,045.637735 | 88,834 |
pythondev | help | holy guacamole | 2017-08-07T11:24:07.639258 | Suellen | pythondev_help_Suellen_2017-08-07T11:24:07.639258 | 1,502,105,047.639258 | 88,835 |
pythondev | help | 256 char passwords ? that require a password manager | 2017-08-07T11:24:48.663340 | Ciera | pythondev_help_Ciera_2017-08-07T11:24:48.663340 | 1,502,105,088.66334 | 88,836 |
pythondev | help | If you want Jeff's suggestions (not the angry rant) -> start here: <https://blog.codinghorror.com/password-rules-are-bullshit/#1passwordrulesarebullshit> | 2017-08-07T11:24:50.664622 | Beula | pythondev_help_Beula_2017-08-07T11:24:50.664622 | 1,502,105,090.664622 | 88,837 |
pythondev | help | which is by itself a security risk | 2017-08-07T11:24:55.668084 | Ciera | pythondev_help_Ciera_2017-08-07T11:24:55.668084 | 1,502,105,095.668084 | 88,838 |
pythondev | help | I think the idea is _up to_ 256 characters. With most online web apps you can just use a varchar or equivalent | 2017-08-07T11:25:54.703409 | Gabriele | pythondev_help_Gabriele_2017-08-07T11:25:54.703409 | 1,502,105,154.703409 | 88,839 |
pythondev | help | good thing postgres doesn't enforce length on varchars | 2017-08-07T11:26:09.712175 | Suellen | pythondev_help_Suellen_2017-08-07T11:26:09.712175 | 1,502,105,169.712175 | 88,840 |
pythondev | help | Basically:
1. Rules are dumb
2. Enforce a minimum unicode length (emoji -> 1 "character" in many length checkers... is the example)
3. Check against the common password (approx 30% of people have a password from the top 10,000)
4. Check of entropy
5. Check special cases (containing username, first, or last) | 2017-08-07T11:26:17.717072 | Beula | pythondev_help_Beula_2017-08-07T11:26:17.717072 | 1,502,105,177.717072 | 88,841 |
pythondev | help | Just use TEXT with postgres :stuck_out_tongue: | 2017-08-07T11:26:29.724677 | Beula | pythondev_help_Beula_2017-08-07T11:26:29.724677 | 1,502,105,189.724677 | 88,842 |
pythondev | help | <@Suellen> You hash the password so it gets down to a predictable, probably fixed, length anyway | 2017-08-07T11:26:45.735029 | Kenna | pythondev_help_Kenna_2017-08-07T11:26:45.735029 | 1,502,105,205.735029 | 88,843 |
pythondev | help | <https://stackoverflow.com/a/4849030/1584762> | 2017-08-07T11:26:47.736310 | Beula | pythondev_help_Beula_2017-08-07T11:26:47.736310 | 1,502,105,207.73631 | 88,844 |
pythondev | help | I store password in JSONB :troll: | 2017-08-07T11:26:50.737700 | Ciera | pythondev_help_Ciera_2017-08-07T11:26:50.737700 | 1,502,105,210.7377 | 88,845 |
pythondev | help | `varchar` without `max_length` is a `text` as far as pg is concerned | 2017-08-07T11:26:50.737882 | Suellen | pythondev_help_Suellen_2017-08-07T11:26:50.737882 | 1,502,105,210.737882 | 88,846 |
pythondev | help | so that's good | 2017-08-07T11:26:56.741628 | Suellen | pythondev_help_Suellen_2017-08-07T11:26:56.741628 | 1,502,105,216.741628 | 88,847 |
pythondev | help | > To sum it all up:
>
> char(n) – takes too much space when dealing with values shorter than n, and can lead to subtle errors because of adding trailing spaces, plus it is problematic to change the limit
> varchar(n) – it's problematic to change the limit in live environment
> varchar – just like text
&... | 2017-08-07T11:27:36.765864 | Beula | pythondev_help_Beula_2017-08-07T11:27:36.765864 | 1,502,105,256.765864 | 88,848 |
pythondev | help | although, why am I even talking about database types, when you shouldn't be storing them in the DB... let me get some more caffeine before I say anything else | 2017-08-07T11:27:53.775977 | Gabriele | pythondev_help_Gabriele_2017-08-07T11:27:53.775977 | 1,502,105,273.775977 | 88,849 |
pythondev | help | oh oh | 2017-08-07T11:28:19.792109 | Suellen | pythondev_help_Suellen_2017-08-07T11:28:19.792109 | 1,502,105,299.792109 | 88,850 |
pythondev | help | <@Ciera> NSCS/GCHQ (UK) is officially recommending password managers now, also mentioned in Troy's post | 2017-08-07T11:28:36.802703 | Kenna | pythondev_help_Kenna_2017-08-07T11:28:36.802703 | 1,502,105,316.802703 | 88,851 |
pythondev | help | btw, since there's a great discussion going on: is bcrypt still good enough? | 2017-08-07T11:28:59.816484 | Suellen | pythondev_help_Suellen_2017-08-07T11:28:59.816484 | 1,502,105,339.816484 | 88,852 |
pythondev | help | <@Kenna> because they have access to them ? :troll: | 2017-08-07T11:29:26.832567 | Ciera | pythondev_help_Ciera_2017-08-07T11:29:26.832567 | 1,502,105,366.832567 | 88,853 |
pythondev | help | am sure they are good but it's still a problem if someone get access to it | 2017-08-07T11:29:52.848444 | Ciera | pythondev_help_Ciera_2017-08-07T11:29:52.848444 | 1,502,105,392.848444 | 88,854 |
pythondev | help | Yes | 2017-08-07T11:30:09.858914 | Beula | pythondev_help_Beula_2017-08-07T11:30:09.858914 | 1,502,105,409.858914 | 88,855 |
pythondev | help | (even more in companies where you can just do a dump before get fired / leaving) | 2017-08-07T11:30:13.861584 | Ciera | pythondev_help_Ciera_2017-08-07T11:30:13.861584 | 1,502,105,413.861584 | 88,856 |
pythondev | help | <@Ciera> Lolz... but seriously my take is, if your adversary is a nation-state, you're probably doomed already... I ignore them and worry about the garden variety opponents... :slightly_smiling_face: | 2017-08-07T11:30:14.862115 | Kenna | pythondev_help_Kenna_2017-08-07T11:30:14.862115 | 1,502,105,414.862115 | 88,857 |
pythondev | help | `bcrypt` seems to be the standard still in most places | 2017-08-07T11:32:06.932475 | Beula | pythondev_help_Beula_2017-08-07T11:32:06.932475 | 1,502,105,526.932475 | 88,858 |
pythondev | help | did you hear the sad story of scrypt? it's not the story infosec people would tell you... | 2017-08-07T11:33:07.970401 | Suellen | pythondev_help_Suellen_2017-08-07T11:33:07.970401 | 1,502,105,587.970401 | 88,859 |
pythondev | help | what went on with scrypt? | 2017-08-07T11:37:57.148463 | Meg | pythondev_help_Meg_2017-08-07T11:37:57.148463 | 1,502,105,877.148463 | 88,860 |
pythondev | help | it was invented and named "better bcrypt", but wasn't used much | 2017-08-07T11:41:03.258281 | Suellen | pythondev_help_Suellen_2017-08-07T11:41:03.258281 | 1,502,106,063.258281 | 88,861 |
pythondev | help | and starting to use scrypt now wouldn't make much sense because of argon2 | 2017-08-07T11:41:38.278552 | Suellen | pythondev_help_Suellen_2017-08-07T11:41:38.278552 | 1,502,106,098.278552 | 88,862 |
pythondev | help | I was just looking through the django docs on what they use by default - and they suggest argon2 as well | 2017-08-07T11:43:10.333444 | Beula | pythondev_help_Beula_2017-08-07T11:43:10.333444 | 1,502,106,190.333444 | 88,863 |
pythondev | help | oh cool | 2017-08-07T11:43:45.354740 | Suellen | pythondev_help_Suellen_2017-08-07T11:43:45.354740 | 1,502,106,225.35474 | 88,864 |
pythondev | help | wait, is there a python implementation / bindings? | 2017-08-07T11:44:02.364917 | Suellen | pythondev_help_Suellen_2017-08-07T11:44:02.364917 | 1,502,106,242.364917 | 88,865 |
pythondev | help | I searched for it, but only found a lonely github repo and it wasn't updated much | 2017-08-07T11:44:58.398887 | Suellen | pythondev_help_Suellen_2017-08-07T11:44:58.398887 | 1,502,106,298.398887 | 88,866 |
pythondev | help | `argon2_cffi` | 2017-08-07T11:45:25.415169 | Suellen | pythondev_help_Suellen_2017-08-07T11:45:25.415169 | 1,502,106,325.415169 | 88,867 |
pythondev | help | Looks like that's the one they link to as well: <https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/1.11/topics/auth/passwords/#using-argon2-with-django> | 2017-08-07T11:46:58.470692 | Beula | pythondev_help_Beula_2017-08-07T11:46:58.470692 | 1,502,106,418.470692 | 88,868 |
pythondev | help | must be good enough then | 2017-08-07T11:47:37.493716 | Suellen | pythondev_help_Suellen_2017-08-07T11:47:37.493716 | 1,502,106,457.493716 | 88,869 |
pythondev | help | grrrreat | 2017-08-07T11:47:41.496064 | Suellen | pythondev_help_Suellen_2017-08-07T11:47:41.496064 | 1,502,106,461.496064 | 88,870 |
pythondev | help | > . The Password Hashing Competition panel, however, recommends immediate use of Argon2 rather than the other algorithms supported by Django. | 2017-08-07T11:47:49.501023 | Beula | pythondev_help_Beula_2017-08-07T11:47:49.501023 | 1,502,106,469.501023 | 88,871 |
pythondev | help | Saw the password stuff from earlier. So much of the web, and business, is doing passwords so wrong. If there is a length limitation it is scary, because length doesn't matter much if it is hashed anyway. | 2017-08-07T15:02:11.920167 | Meghan | pythondev_help_Meghan_2017-08-07T15:02:11.920167 | 1,502,118,131.920167 | 88,872 |
pythondev | help | or you're dealing with a crappy legacy system | 2017-08-07T15:04:04.980438 | Meg | pythondev_help_Meg_2017-08-07T15:04:04.980438 | 1,502,118,244.980438 | 88,873 |
pythondev | help | and/or clueless management | 2017-08-07T15:04:13.984780 | Meg | pythondev_help_Meg_2017-08-07T15:04:13.984780 | 1,502,118,253.98478 | 88,874 |
pythondev | help | Length does matter with hashing, each additional character increases the hash entropy significantly - as far as I understand it | 2017-08-07T15:04:40.999380 | Beula | pythondev_help_Beula_2017-08-07T15:04:40.999380 | 1,502,118,280.99938 | 88,875 |
pythondev | help | Sure the end hash is the same length | 2017-08-07T15:04:48.003836 | Beula | pythondev_help_Beula_2017-08-07T15:04:48.003836 | 1,502,118,288.003836 | 88,876 |
pythondev | help | I meant with storage. | 2017-08-07T15:04:50.004693 | Meghan | pythondev_help_Meghan_2017-08-07T15:04:50.004693 | 1,502,118,290.004693 | 88,877 |
pythondev | help | Ah | 2017-08-07T15:04:53.006175 | Beula | pythondev_help_Beula_2017-08-07T15:04:53.006175 | 1,502,118,293.006175 | 88,878 |
pythondev | help | ok | 2017-08-07T15:04:53.006544 | Beula | pythondev_help_Beula_2017-08-07T15:04:53.006544 | 1,502,118,293.006544 | 88,879 |
pythondev | help | I want to be able to paste the text of the bible with emoji thrown in at random into a password field and have it work. :slightly_smiling_face: | 2017-08-07T15:05:12.016428 | Meghan | pythondev_help_Meghan_2017-08-07T15:05:12.016428 | 1,502,118,312.016428 | 88,880 |
pythondev | help | emojis are a must nowadays | 2017-08-07T15:05:31.025887 | Suellen | pythondev_help_Suellen_2017-08-07T15:05:31.025887 | 1,502,118,331.025887 | 88,881 |
pythondev | help | I think KeePass can be set to generate passwords with ascii characters that aren't on a keyboard. | 2017-08-07T15:06:17.049300 | Meghan | pythondev_help_Meghan_2017-08-07T15:06:17.049300 | 1,502,118,377.0493 | 88,882 |
pythondev | help | It refers to them as High ANSI, so not ascii, but close. | 2017-08-07T15:07:04.073211 | Meghan | pythondev_help_Meghan_2017-08-07T15:07:04.073211 | 1,502,118,424.073211 | 88,883 |
pythondev | help | Hi All, Does anyone know any course or training on python with facebook? I have been trying a lot, but I didnt get anything on it | 2017-08-07T22:01:16.564028 | Donnetta | pythondev_help_Donnetta_2017-08-07T22:01:16.564028 | 1,502,143,276.564028 | 88,884 |
pythondev | help | <@Donnetta>
> course or training on python with facebook
can you give an example of what you want to do? | 2017-08-07T23:13:32.358973 | Deedee | pythondev_help_Deedee_2017-08-07T23:13:32.358973 | 1,502,147,612.358973 | 88,885 |
pythondev | help | Hello, | 2017-08-07T23:46:26.685775 | Trudi | pythondev_help_Trudi_2017-08-07T23:46:26.685775 | 1,502,149,586.685775 | 88,886 |
pythondev | help | I'm new to the programming world and am wondering if anyone has any good python resources for new beginners? | 2017-08-07T23:48:32.706471 | Trudi | pythondev_help_Trudi_2017-08-07T23:48:32.706471 | 1,502,149,712.706471 | 88,887 |
pythondev | help | i would suggest: <https://www.udemy.com/complete-python-bootcamp/> | 2017-08-08T00:38:05.197989 | Donnetta | pythondev_help_Donnetta_2017-08-08T00:38:05.197989 | 1,502,152,685.197989 | 88,888 |
pythondev | help | I am new to “facebook with python”. My main intention is to delete/post photos and posts with a python script. I have been trying for this, but i m not successful. I was only able to read/get one post and it might be very difficult to get all posts in this manner reading one post by post. So thinking on a course or tu... | 2017-08-08T00:45:24.268375 | Donnetta | pythondev_help_Donnetta_2017-08-08T00:45:24.268375 | 1,502,153,124.268375 | 88,889 |
pythondev | help | <@Donnetta>, I suggest spending some time learning how to navigate the graph API. Facebook now has excellent documentation how to do this and they also have a graph explorer tool where you can directly query their server and view responses. | 2017-08-08T00:59:05.401242 | Winnifred | pythondev_help_Winnifred_2017-08-08T00:59:05.401242 | 1,502,153,945.401242 | 88,890 |
pythondev | help | <https://developers.facebook.com/docs/graph-api/using-graph-api/#deleting> | 2017-08-08T00:59:09.401874 | Winnifred | pythondev_help_Winnifred_2017-08-08T00:59:09.401874 | 1,502,153,949.401874 | 88,891 |
pythondev | help | <https://developers.facebook.com/docs/graph-api/using-graph-api/#reading> | 2017-08-08T00:59:18.403528 | Winnifred | pythondev_help_Winnifred_2017-08-08T00:59:18.403528 | 1,502,153,958.403528 | 88,892 |
pythondev | help | <https://developers.facebook.com/tools/explorer/> | 2017-08-08T00:59:37.406778 | Winnifred | pythondev_help_Winnifred_2017-08-08T00:59:37.406778 | 1,502,153,977.406778 | 88,893 |
pythondev | help | <@Winnifred> Thats what exactly i have been trying from the beginning, but in the links that you gave, there is nothing on python, how can I integrate those GET commands with python? | 2017-08-08T01:01:05.423071 | Donnetta | pythondev_help_Donnetta_2017-08-08T01:01:05.423071 | 1,502,154,065.423071 | 88,894 |
pythondev | help | You can construct the calls using <http://docs.python-requests.org/en/master/>. | 2017-08-08T01:02:28.437654 | Winnifred | pythondev_help_Winnifred_2017-08-08T01:02:28.437654 | 1,502,154,148.437654 | 88,895 |
pythondev | help | There is `requests` package BTW | 2017-08-08T01:02:34.438653 | Shelly | pythondev_help_Shelly_2017-08-08T01:02:34.438653 | 1,502,154,154.438653 | 88,896 |
pythondev | help | <@Winnifred> this should help.. i will give it a try. <@Shelly> thank you. I will look on it too.. Thank you both. | 2017-08-08T01:04:08.454379 | Donnetta | pythondev_help_Donnetta_2017-08-08T01:04:08.454379 | 1,502,154,248.454379 | 88,897 |
pythondev | help | There is a little bit of a learning curve on how to use `requests`, but if you use the URL structure in the facebook docs and supply the right auth credentials, you should be able to `GET` and `POST` just fine. | 2017-08-08T01:05:34.469107 | Winnifred | pythondev_help_Winnifred_2017-08-08T01:05:34.469107 | 1,502,154,334.469107 | 88,898 |
pythondev | help | who want to practice coding in hackerrank ? | 2017-08-08T07:14:19.039476 | Gala | pythondev_help_Gala_2017-08-08T07:14:19.039476 | 1,502,176,459.039476 | 88,899 |
pythondev | help | I am facing one problem on Django framework that is In Django Models i want id is Autofilled but i don't want primary_key any one help me how to fix it | 2017-08-08T07:51:46.733057 | Verlie | pythondev_help_Verlie_2017-08-08T07:51:46.733057 | 1,502,178,706.733057 | 88,900 |
pythondev | help | <@Verlie> you should post this in <#C0LMFRMB5|django> but the answer is primary_key=False | 2017-08-08T07:53:04.757581 | Tandra | pythondev_help_Tandra_2017-08-08T07:53:04.757581 | 1,502,178,784.757581 | 88,901 |
pythondev | help | but i put primary_key is Flase it rise exception Autofilled must have primary_key = True | 2017-08-08T07:53:54.773599 | Verlie | pythondev_help_Verlie_2017-08-08T07:53:54.773599 | 1,502,178,834.773599 | 88,902 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.