workspace stringclasses 1
value | channel stringclasses 1
value | sentences stringlengths 1 3.93k | ts stringlengths 26 26 | user stringlengths 2 11 | sentence_id stringlengths 44 53 | timestamp float64 1.5B 1.56B | __index_level_0__ int64 0 106k |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
pythondev | help | I thought ORM was an abstraction over Core which by itself does nothing | 2017-09-02T06:29:46.000013 | Suellen | pythondev_help_Suellen_2017-09-02T06:29:46.000013 | 1,504,333,786.000013 | 91,803 |
pythondev | help | Or it's just too complex to sort out at once? | 2017-09-02T06:29:56.000002 | Suellen | pythondev_help_Suellen_2017-09-02T06:29:56.000002 | 1,504,333,796.000002 | 91,804 |
pythondev | help | no idea | 2017-09-02T06:30:12.000041 | Ciera | pythondev_help_Ciera_2017-09-02T06:30:12.000041 | 1,504,333,812.000041 | 91,805 |
pythondev | help | Well, if you call a function that returns some objects, that function doesn't return until the objects are available, so that counts as blocking in some sense | 2017-09-02T06:30:27.000035 | Gabriele | pythondev_help_Gabriele_2017-09-02T06:30:27.000035 | 1,504,333,827.000035 | 91,806 |
pythondev | help | I think people are trying to focus on core first as it's the most important part | 2017-09-02T06:30:56.000018 | Ciera | pythondev_help_Ciera_2017-09-02T06:30:56.000018 | 1,504,333,856.000018 | 91,807 |
pythondev | help | true that, even Core is fantastic | 2017-09-02T06:31:11.000037 | Suellen | pythondev_help_Suellen_2017-09-02T06:31:11.000037 | 1,504,333,871.000037 | 91,808 |
pythondev | help | I think Core is now async and only ORM is the problem. Also there is a great article by Mike: <http://techspot.zzzeek.org/2015/02/15/asynchronous-python-and-databases/> | 2017-09-02T06:36:47.000069 | Adalberto | pythondev_help_Adalberto_2017-09-02T06:36:47.000069 | 1,504,334,207.000069 | 91,809 |
pythondev | help | great article, in which he says he doesn't care about async and nobody should :confused: | 2017-09-02T06:37:38.000038 | Suellen | pythondev_help_Suellen_2017-09-02T06:37:38.000038 | 1,504,334,258.000038 | 91,810 |
pythondev | help | <@Suellen> yes, it's a bit strange that he says that. But he also recommends gevent to solve the same problems, and some long time Python users told me that using gevent is insane in production. | 2017-09-02T06:38:51.000051 | Adalberto | pythondev_help_Adalberto_2017-09-02T06:38:51.000051 | 1,504,334,331.000051 | 91,811 |
pythondev | help | It's pretty clear from the Core docs that it's not intrinsically an async API | 2017-09-02T06:39:23.000040 | Gabriele | pythondev_help_Gabriele_2017-09-02T06:39:23.000040 | 1,504,334,363.00004 | 91,812 |
pythondev | help | gevent isn't really insane, it has a looong history and is stable | 2017-09-02T06:39:41.000044 | Suellen | pythondev_help_Suellen_2017-09-02T06:39:41.000044 | 1,504,334,381.000044 | 91,813 |
pythondev | help | This reply: <https://groups.google.com/d/msg/pylons-discuss/hI9zY4JYBU4/yNGGbE-IAgAJ> | 2017-09-02T06:39:45.000056 | Adalberto | pythondev_help_Adalberto_2017-09-02T06:39:45.000056 | 1,504,334,385.000056 | 91,814 |
pythondev | help | but it IS a very non-native approach | 2017-09-02T06:39:53.000001 | Suellen | pythondev_help_Suellen_2017-09-02T06:39:53.000001 | 1,504,334,393.000001 | 91,815 |
pythondev | help | funny that he says it's inappropriate to use async with databases | 2017-09-02T06:42:38.000054 | Suellen | pythondev_help_Suellen_2017-09-02T06:42:38.000054 | 1,504,334,558.000054 | 91,816 |
pythondev | help | when threads are just async functions from the POV of the OS | 2017-09-02T06:42:48.000067 | Suellen | pythondev_help_Suellen_2017-09-02T06:42:48.000067 | 1,504,334,568.000067 | 91,817 |
pythondev | help | fyi this might be more a topic for <#C07G5276F|async> :slightly_smiling_face: | 2017-09-02T06:43:16.000041 | Ciera | pythondev_help_Ciera_2017-09-02T06:43:16.000041 | 1,504,334,596.000041 | 91,818 |
pythondev | help | sorry mr admin | 2017-09-02T06:43:50.000009 | Suellen | pythondev_help_Suellen_2017-09-02T06:43:50.000009 | 1,504,334,630.000009 | 91,819 |
pythondev | help | haha well it's also that I'm sure some people in <#C07G5276F|async> might have good arguments on this topic and not sure they are all in here | 2017-09-02T06:59:13.000021 | Ciera | pythondev_help_Ciera_2017-09-02T06:59:13.000021 | 1,504,335,553.000021 | 91,820 |
pythondev | help | anyone have a full proof method installing ffmpeg and opencv on a mac using make or brew combination that actually works? | 2017-09-02T09:55:22.000003 | Johana | pythondev_help_Johana_2017-09-02T09:55:22.000003 | 1,504,346,122.000003 | 91,821 |
pythondev | help | hmm, what’s the error you are getting? | 2017-09-02T10:08:41.000006 | Junita | pythondev_help_Junita_2017-09-02T10:08:41.000006 | 1,504,346,921.000006 | 91,822 |
pythondev | help | (what about docker though?) | 2017-09-02T10:09:29.000001 | Suellen | pythondev_help_Suellen_2017-09-02T10:09:29.000001 | 1,504,346,969.000001 | 91,823 |
pythondev | help | yeah that was my first thought too. :slightly_smiling_face: | 2017-09-02T10:09:44.000015 | Junita | pythondev_help_Junita_2017-09-02T10:09:44.000015 | 1,504,346,984.000015 | 91,824 |
pythondev | help | <https://stackoverflow.com/questions/46015606/pil-set-pixel-as-transparent-blank> | 2017-09-02T12:04:29.000003 | Beverley | pythondev_help_Beverley_2017-09-02T12:04:29.000003 | 1,504,353,869.000003 | 91,825 |
pythondev | help | Does `print(img.mode)` show ARGB? | 2017-09-02T12:05:48.000101 | Suellen | pythondev_help_Suellen_2017-09-02T12:05:48.000101 | 1,504,353,948.000101 | 91,826 |
pythondev | help | it's rgb | 2017-09-02T12:06:37.000017 | Beverley | pythondev_help_Beverley_2017-09-02T12:06:37.000017 | 1,504,353,997.000017 | 91,827 |
pythondev | help | `img = img.convert('ARGB')` | 2017-09-02T12:07:25.000064 | Suellen | pythondev_help_Suellen_2017-09-02T12:07:25.000064 | 1,504,354,045.000064 | 91,828 |
pythondev | help | otherwise there is no transparency channel | 2017-09-02T12:07:36.000055 | Suellen | pythondev_help_Suellen_2017-09-02T12:07:36.000055 | 1,504,354,056.000055 | 91,829 |
pythondev | help | is this before or after saving, note I have two saves; one for creating the file the other for editing to transparent | 2017-09-02T12:09:50.000018 | Beverley | pythondev_help_Beverley_2017-09-02T12:09:50.000018 | 1,504,354,190.000018 | 91,830 |
pythondev | help | what do you mean? | 2017-09-02T12:10:03.000087 | Suellen | pythondev_help_Suellen_2017-09-02T12:10:03.000087 | 1,504,354,203.000087 | 91,831 |
pythondev | help | you can't set a transparent pixel on an image that doesn't have a transparency (alpha) channel | 2017-09-02T12:10:22.000001 | Suellen | pythondev_help_Suellen_2017-09-02T12:10:22.000001 | 1,504,354,222.000001 | 91,832 |
pythondev | help | you need to convert from RBG to ARBG before you put a tranparent pixel there | 2017-09-02T12:10:58.000045 | Suellen | pythondev_help_Suellen_2017-09-02T12:10:58.000045 | 1,504,354,258.000045 | 91,833 |
pythondev | help | and obviously when you save, you should use a format that supports alpha channels. For example png. | 2017-09-02T12:11:29.000024 | Suellen | pythondev_help_Suellen_2017-09-02T12:11:29.000024 | 1,504,354,289.000024 | 91,834 |
pythondev | help | ValueError: conversion from RGB to ARGB not supported | 2017-09-02T12:11:48.000007 | Beverley | pythondev_help_Beverley_2017-09-02T12:11:48.000007 | 1,504,354,308.000007 | 91,835 |
pythondev | help | img.convert('ARGB')
img.save(random_name, "PNG") | 2017-09-02T12:11:58.000135 | Beverley | pythondev_help_Beverley_2017-09-02T12:11:58.000135 | 1,504,354,318.000135 | 91,836 |
pythondev | help | try RGBA | 2017-09-02T12:12:36.000065 | Suellen | pythondev_help_Suellen_2017-09-02T12:12:36.000065 | 1,504,354,356.000065 | 91,837 |
pythondev | help | I forgot a proper name :slightly_smiling_face: | 2017-09-02T12:12:46.000094 | Suellen | pythondev_help_Suellen_2017-09-02T12:12:46.000094 | 1,504,354,366.000094 | 91,838 |
pythondev | help | `img.convert('RGBA')` -- the image gets converted to RGBA and you throw the result away | 2017-09-02T12:21:41.000011 | Suellen | pythondev_help_Suellen_2017-09-02T12:21:41.000011 | 1,504,354,901.000011 | 91,839 |
pythondev | help | `img = img.convert('RGBA')` | 2017-09-02T12:21:50.000080 | Suellen | pythondev_help_Suellen_2017-09-02T12:21:50.000080 | 1,504,354,910.00008 | 91,840 |
pythondev | help | yes that was it works :slightly_smiling_face: | 2017-09-02T12:24:21.000045 | Beverley | pythondev_help_Beverley_2017-09-02T12:24:21.000045 | 1,504,355,061.000045 | 91,841 |
pythondev | help | I am writing a Python program part of which authenticates with OAuth 1.0 to access a privileged API. I have figured out how to get the authorization URL. After signing in, the browser redirects to <http://localhost> which I registered as the callback with the provider. How do I get the request to localhost and continue with my bot? I figure I need to have a http server of some sort. I would rather not install a full Apache server. What is a lightweight alternative that can receive the request and forward the token to my bot code to continue with API calls? | 2017-09-02T18:03:24.000007 | Sidney | pythondev_help_Sidney_2017-09-02T18:03:24.000007 | 1,504,375,404.000007 | 91,842 |
pythondev | help | <@Sidney> <https://docs.python.org/3/library/http.server.html#module-http.server> | 2017-09-02T18:12:14.000001 | Suellen | pythondev_help_Suellen_2017-09-02T18:12:14.000001 | 1,504,375,934.000001 | 91,843 |
pythondev | help | you can spin up a simple http server using only stdlib | 2017-09-02T18:12:28.000003 | Suellen | pythondev_help_Suellen_2017-09-02T18:12:28.000003 | 1,504,375,948.000003 | 91,844 |
pythondev | help | are you sure you even need to accept a request at all? | 2017-09-02T18:13:47.000064 | Suellen | pythondev_help_Suellen_2017-09-02T18:13:47.000064 | 1,504,376,027.000064 | 91,845 |
pythondev | help | AFAIK, yes, the result of the authorization comes to me as a HTTP request to the callback URL. | 2017-09-02T18:14:46.000062 | Sidney | pythondev_help_Sidney_2017-09-02T18:14:46.000062 | 1,504,376,086.000062 | 91,846 |
pythondev | help | There's a chance I misunderstand how OAuth 1.0 works. | 2017-09-02T18:15:48.000014 | Sidney | pythondev_help_Sidney_2017-09-02T18:15:48.000014 | 1,504,376,148.000014 | 91,847 |
pythondev | help | I only ask because, for example, you can auth on Reddit using OAuth without a redirect or a callback | 2017-09-02T18:16:09.000026 | Suellen | pythondev_help_Suellen_2017-09-02T18:16:09.000026 | 1,504,376,169.000026 | 91,848 |
pythondev | help | Is it OAuth 1.0 or 2.0? | 2017-09-02T18:16:27.000011 | Sidney | pythondev_help_Sidney_2017-09-02T18:16:27.000011 | 1,504,376,187.000011 | 91,849 |
pythondev | help | 2.0 | 2017-09-02T18:16:45.000021 | Suellen | pythondev_help_Suellen_2017-09-02T18:16:45.000021 | 1,504,376,205.000021 | 91,850 |
pythondev | help | That might be one of the differences. | 2017-09-02T18:16:54.000022 | Sidney | pythondev_help_Sidney_2017-09-02T18:16:54.000022 | 1,504,376,214.000022 | 91,851 |
pythondev | help | Or more likely, I'm completely misunderstanding how this works. | 2017-09-02T18:17:26.000015 | Sidney | pythondev_help_Sidney_2017-09-02T18:17:26.000015 | 1,504,376,246.000015 | 91,852 |
pythondev | help | <@Suellen> Thanks for the link. Keeping everything in python and in the same codebase will definitely make this easier to manage. I'll look into that library further. | 2017-09-02T18:28:11.000039 | Sidney | pythondev_help_Sidney_2017-09-02T18:28:11.000039 | 1,504,376,891.000039 | 91,853 |
pythondev | help | <@Sidney> There are often 2 different authentication flows available - one for clients, and one for servers. Make sure you're using the right one for your situation | 2017-09-02T19:47:55.000034 | Gabriele | pythondev_help_Gabriele_2017-09-02T19:47:55.000034 | 1,504,381,675.000034 | 91,854 |
pythondev | help | <@Gabriele> I don't follow. From what I understand all authentication flows require a client **and** a server, each playing a different role in the exchange. | 2017-09-02T21:17:03.000015 | Sidney | pythondev_help_Sidney_2017-09-02T21:17:03.000015 | 1,504,387,023.000015 | 91,855 |
pythondev | help | I'm in the middle of writing a simple process priority script, and I'm running into "access is denied" even in an admin cmd window for processes that are ran by System. Would anyone be able to access me? | 2017-09-02T22:00:48.000050 | Taryn | pythondev_help_Taryn_2017-09-02T22:00:48.000050 | 1,504,389,648.00005 | 91,856 |
pythondev | help | assist rather | 2017-09-02T22:01:46.000024 | Taryn | pythondev_help_Taryn_2017-09-02T22:01:46.000024 | 1,504,389,706.000024 | 91,857 |
pythondev | help | I need a little help with Django... please ping me | 2017-09-03T01:18:59.000006 | Galen | pythondev_help_Galen_2017-09-03T01:18:59.000006 | 1,504,401,539.000006 | 91,858 |
pythondev | help | anybody in here use jetbrains products? | 2017-09-03T02:57:08.000032 | Clarine | pythondev_help_Clarine_2017-09-03T02:57:08.000032 | 1,504,407,428.000032 | 91,859 |
pythondev | help | yes | 2017-09-03T03:35:24.000032 | Eliza | pythondev_help_Eliza_2017-09-03T03:35:24.000032 | 1,504,409,724.000032 | 91,860 |
pythondev | help | <@Clarine> | 2017-09-03T03:35:34.000012 | Eliza | pythondev_help_Eliza_2017-09-03T03:35:34.000012 | 1,504,409,734.000012 | 91,861 |
pythondev | help | can anybody help me with Interpretabiliy models in Deep Learning?? | 2017-09-03T05:45:18.000054 | Augusta | pythondev_help_Augusta_2017-09-03T05:45:18.000054 | 1,504,417,518.000054 | 91,862 |
pythondev | help | What's up with people not just posting their problems? :grimacing: how is anyone supposed to help that way | 2017-09-03T06:32:27.000052 | Ramona | pythondev_help_Ramona_2017-09-03T06:32:27.000052 | 1,504,420,347.000052 | 91,863 |
pythondev | help | right | 2017-09-03T06:52:43.000054 | Suellen | pythondev_help_Suellen_2017-09-03T06:52:43.000054 | 1,504,421,563.000054 | 91,864 |
pythondev | help | <@Galen> post in <#C0LMFRMB5|django>, they are much more likely to help | 2017-09-03T06:53:32.000034 | Suellen | pythondev_help_Suellen_2017-09-03T06:53:32.000034 | 1,504,421,612.000034 | 91,865 |
pythondev | help | <@Augusta> also we have a <#C2J4B66PK|machine_learning> channel where you can post your problem | 2017-09-03T06:54:03.000046 | Suellen | pythondev_help_Suellen_2017-09-03T06:54:03.000046 | 1,504,421,643.000046 | 91,866 |
pythondev | help | <@Suellen> thanks for the lead brother :) | 2017-09-03T06:55:36.000015 | Galen | pythondev_help_Galen_2017-09-03T06:55:36.000015 | 1,504,421,736.000015 | 91,867 |
pythondev | help | does anybody use PyCharm? When I switch tabs, I want Run/Debug in the upper right corner to change automatically. Now I have to manually select the file which I want to Run/Debug everytime I switch a tab. | 2017-09-03T09:18:16.000061 | Monty | pythondev_help_Monty_2017-09-03T09:18:16.000061 | 1,504,430,296.000061 | 91,868 |
pythondev | help | it won’t | 2017-09-03T09:19:30.000052 | Meg | pythondev_help_Meg_2017-09-03T09:19:30.000052 | 1,504,430,370.000052 | 91,869 |
pythondev | help | pycharm usually has the last run execution as the top option in the dropdown | 2017-09-03T09:19:54.000016 | Meg | pythondev_help_Meg_2017-09-03T09:19:54.000016 | 1,504,430,394.000016 | 91,870 |
pythondev | help | but you can right click in the file after changing the tab and select Run or Debug | 2017-09-03T09:20:17.000012 | Meg | pythondev_help_Meg_2017-09-03T09:20:17.000012 | 1,504,430,417.000012 | 91,871 |
pythondev | help | if that’s something that you would find handy to have, you can submit a feature request at <https://youtrack.jetbrains.com/issues/PY> | 2017-09-03T09:22:06.000026 | Meg | pythondev_help_Meg_2017-09-03T09:22:06.000026 | 1,504,430,526.000026 | 91,872 |
pythondev | help | but a major problem for that is most run configurations are project based, not file based | 2017-09-03T09:25:59.000024 | Meg | pythondev_help_Meg_2017-09-03T09:25:59.000024 | 1,504,430,759.000024 | 91,873 |
pythondev | help | yes, but don't you agree that it is silly for PyCharm, which is one of the best Python IDE's, to not have that option? | 2017-09-03T09:27:02.000008 | Monty | pythondev_help_Monty_2017-09-03T09:27:02.000008 | 1,504,430,822.000008 | 91,874 |
pythondev | help | ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ | 2017-09-03T09:27:23.000081 | Meg | pythondev_help_Meg_2017-09-03T09:27:23.000081 | 1,504,430,843.000081 | 91,875 |
pythondev | help | make a feature request | 2017-09-03T09:27:30.000050 | Meg | pythondev_help_Meg_2017-09-03T09:27:30.000050 | 1,504,430,850.00005 | 91,876 |
pythondev | help | How many times have I ran the wrong file :slightly_smiling_face: | 2017-09-03T09:27:46.000044 | Monty | pythondev_help_Monty_2017-09-03T09:27:46.000044 | 1,504,430,866.000044 | 91,877 |
pythondev | help | right click -> run | 2017-09-03T09:27:55.000083 | Meg | pythondev_help_Meg_2017-09-03T09:27:55.000083 | 1,504,430,875.000083 | 91,878 |
pythondev | help | and then the list will be re-ordered | 2017-09-03T09:28:07.000052 | Meg | pythondev_help_Meg_2017-09-03T09:28:07.000052 | 1,504,430,887.000052 | 91,879 |
pythondev | help | yeah, I know, I'am using that option...I will submit a request | 2017-09-03T09:29:13.000043 | Monty | pythondev_help_Monty_2017-09-03T09:29:13.000043 | 1,504,430,953.000043 | 91,880 |
pythondev | help | for me, it would be an absolutely useless feature | 2017-09-03T09:29:19.000057 | Meg | pythondev_help_Meg_2017-09-03T09:29:19.000057 | 1,504,430,959.000057 | 91,881 |
pythondev | help | because I’m project-based, not file based | 2017-09-03T09:29:26.000059 | Meg | pythondev_help_Meg_2017-09-03T09:29:26.000059 | 1,504,430,966.000059 | 91,882 |
pythondev | help | why is that? | 2017-09-03T09:29:31.000060 | Monty | pythondev_help_Monty_2017-09-03T09:29:31.000060 | 1,504,430,971.00006 | 91,883 |
pythondev | help | so, if I keep changing files and tabs in a project, I don’t want to run the current file | 2017-09-03T09:29:44.000006 | Meg | pythondev_help_Meg_2017-09-03T09:29:44.000006 | 1,504,430,984.000006 | 91,884 |
pythondev | help | I want to run the entire project | 2017-09-03T09:29:52.000041 | Meg | pythondev_help_Meg_2017-09-03T09:29:52.000041 | 1,504,430,992.000041 | 91,885 |
pythondev | help | so if I have a django or flask project going on, and I edit the models file. I don’t want the run configuration to automatically switch to running that file, vs the project run configuration I already have active | 2017-09-03T09:30:56.000020 | Meg | pythondev_help_Meg_2017-09-03T09:30:56.000020 | 1,504,431,056.00002 | 91,886 |
pythondev | help | ohh...I am a absolute beginner, so I find that lack of option strange and unintuitive | 2017-09-03T09:31:26.000024 | Monty | pythondev_help_Monty_2017-09-03T09:31:26.000024 | 1,504,431,086.000024 | 91,887 |
pythondev | help | ah, ok. for you, it might make more sense to have that kind of option. But I would suspect that for the vast majority of pycharm users, that would result in unintended side effects like how I described above | 2017-09-03T09:32:45.000004 | Meg | pythondev_help_Meg_2017-09-03T09:32:45.000004 | 1,504,431,165.000004 | 91,888 |
pythondev | help | also, consider the fact that each file might have different interpreter and run arguments | 2017-09-03T09:33:00.000014 | Meg | pythondev_help_Meg_2017-09-03T09:33:00.000014 | 1,504,431,180.000014 | 91,889 |
pythondev | help | so that would require you to create a run configuration for each file | 2017-09-03T09:33:15.000073 | Meg | pythondev_help_Meg_2017-09-03T09:33:15.000073 | 1,504,431,195.000073 | 91,890 |
pythondev | help | if you switch over to a file that has no configuration set up, how would it behave? | 2017-09-03T09:34:05.000043 | Meg | pythondev_help_Meg_2017-09-03T09:34:05.000043 | 1,504,431,245.000043 | 91,891 |
pythondev | help | different interpreter? Why would someone want to change the interpreter? | 2017-09-03T09:35:14.000028 | Monty | pythondev_help_Monty_2017-09-03T09:35:14.000028 | 1,504,431,314.000028 | 91,892 |
pythondev | help | one file runs on 3.5 | 2017-09-03T09:35:25.000006 | Meg | pythondev_help_Meg_2017-09-03T09:35:25.000006 | 1,504,431,325.000006 | 91,893 |
pythondev | help | other runs on 3.6.2 | 2017-09-03T09:35:29.000063 | Meg | pythondev_help_Meg_2017-09-03T09:35:29.000063 | 1,504,431,329.000063 | 91,894 |
pythondev | help | or you need to pass in a different argument to the interpreter | 2017-09-03T09:35:47.000028 | Meg | pythondev_help_Meg_2017-09-03T09:35:47.000028 | 1,504,431,347.000028 | 91,895 |
pythondev | help | backward compatible? | 2017-09-03T09:36:00.000035 | Monty | pythondev_help_Monty_2017-09-03T09:36:00.000035 | 1,504,431,360.000035 | 91,896 |
pythondev | help | so, what pycharm lets you do is define interpreter configurations, where you can define interpeter executable paths or virtualenvs | 2017-09-03T09:37:11.000025 | Meg | pythondev_help_Meg_2017-09-03T09:37:11.000025 | 1,504,431,431.000025 | 91,897 |
pythondev | help | and then apply in run config | 2017-09-03T09:37:16.000060 | Meg | pythondev_help_Meg_2017-09-03T09:37:16.000060 | 1,504,431,436.00006 | 91,898 |
pythondev | help | so, for one project, if you need it to be backwards compatible, you can have a run config pointing to your 3.6 environment | 2017-09-03T09:37:46.000034 | Meg | pythondev_help_Meg_2017-09-03T09:37:46.000034 | 1,504,431,466.000034 | 91,899 |
pythondev | help | named `project 3.6` | 2017-09-03T09:37:54.000058 | Meg | pythondev_help_Meg_2017-09-03T09:37:54.000058 | 1,504,431,474.000058 | 91,900 |
pythondev | help | and another `project 3.5` | 2017-09-03T09:38:02.000056 | Meg | pythondev_help_Meg_2017-09-03T09:38:02.000056 | 1,504,431,482.000056 | 91,901 |
pythondev | help | now, if you’re flipping from file to file intending to run it against a specific interpreter version, re-ordering the run configuration options will mess you up | 2017-09-03T09:38:44.000055 | Meg | pythondev_help_Meg_2017-09-03T09:38:44.000055 | 1,504,431,524.000055 | 91,902 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.