SQuID-Train / README.md
squid-bench-anon's picture
Upload README.md with huggingface_hub
1927bcd verified
|
Raw
History Blame Contribute Delete
1.76 kB
metadata
license: cc-by-nc-4.0
task_categories:
  - visual-question-answering
tags:
  - satellite-imagery
  - spatial-reasoning
  - training-data
  - remote-sensing
pretty_name: SQuID-Train (75,687 QA pairs)
size_categories:
  - 10K<n<100K

SQuID-Train — 75,687 Quantitative Spatial Reasoning Training Pairs

Training companion to the SQuID benchmark (https://huggingface.co/datasets/squid-bench-anon/SQuID), under review at the NeurIPS 2026 Evaluations and Datasets Track.

  • 75,687 question-answer pairs over 1,443 satellite images
  • Generated by the same pipeline as the benchmark (identical question templates, geometric definitions, minimum-area thresholds, and GSD handling), applied to the training partitions of the source datasets (DeepGlobe, EarthVQA, PV) — zero image overlap with the 2,000-question evaluation benchmark, which is built exclusively from published validation/test partitions.
  • Schema: image, question, answer, type, tier, dataset, id (exact targets; no tolerance ranges — those are an evaluation-side concept).
  • Tier distribution: Tier 1 = 19,845, Tier 2 = 50,509, Tier 3 = 5,333; 7,146 zero-valued answers for feature-absence robustness.
  • Files: qvlm_benchmark_training.json, dataset_statistics.json, images_and_masks/ (images + masks for the training partition).

Reference result

LoRA-finetuning Qwen2.5-VL-7B-Instruct on this split raises its SQuID benchmark accuracy from 16.1% to 40.7% (Tier 1: 53.5%, Tier 2: 56.0%, Tier 3: 13.2%) — end-to-end models can learn substantial metric perception from this data, while multi-step compositional reasoning (Tier 3) remains open.

Research use only (CC BY-NC 4.0; imagery licenses inherited from the public source datasets).