inputs stringlengths 475 1.24k | targets stringclasses 12 values | _template_idx int64 0 9 | _task_source stringclasses 1 value | _task_name stringclasses 1 value | _template_type stringclasses 2 values |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.
[EX Q]: There is no reason why gun owners should have to pay taxes to support police protection for people not wanting to own guns.
[EX A]: Valid
[EX Q]: It is a power, that hath no other end but preservation, and therefore can never* have a right to destroy, enslave, or designedly to impoverish the subjects."
[EX A]: Valid
[EX Q]: First you argued that the Second Amendment was a collective rights tool designed to ensure that each state had its own private militia.
[EX A]: | Valid
| 6 | NIv2 | task150_afs_argument_quality_gun_control | fs_opt |
Detailed Instructions: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.
See one example below:
Problem: If gun bans worked there would be no gun deaths in the countries that have banned guns.
Solution: Valid
Explanation: It is an argument that claims that gun bans will not work.
Problem: First you argued that the Second Amendment was a collective rights tool designed to ensure that each state had its own private militia.
Solution: | Valid | 4 | NIv2 | task150_afs_argument_quality_gun_control | fs_opt |
Part 1. Definition
We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.
Part 2. Example
If gun bans worked there would be no gun deaths in the countries that have banned guns.
Answer: Valid
Explanation: It is an argument that claims that gun bans will not work.
Part 3. Exercise
When cornered by the inconvenient truth, they just want the gun control anyway.
Answer: | Valid | 7 | NIv2 | task150_afs_argument_quality_gun_control | fs_opt |
instruction:
We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.
question:
Well let me first get to this just so everyone will know which side of the gun issue im on, I am an avid gun owner and I support any laws that target criminals while unafecting lawfull gun owners.
answer:
Valid
question:
That most people can't be trusted, so we should have more laws against guns, which most people will abide by because they can be trusted.
answer:
Valid
question:
Is self defense therefor legal or illegal with a firearm?
answer:
| Valid
| 9 | NIv2 | task150_afs_argument_quality_gun_control | fs_opt |
Detailed Instructions: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.
See one example below:
Problem: If gun bans worked there would be no gun deaths in the countries that have banned guns.
Solution: Valid
Explanation: It is an argument that claims that gun bans will not work.
Problem: Mexican authorities have been pressing the United States to do more to help a border force they describe as overwhelmed and often intimidated.
Solution: | Invalid | 4 | NIv2 | task150_afs_argument_quality_gun_control | fs_opt |
You will be given a definition of a task first, then an example. Follow the example to solve a new instance of the task.
We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.
If gun bans worked there would be no gun deaths in the countries that have banned guns.
Solution: Valid
Why? It is an argument that claims that gun bans will not work.
New input: The right to bear arms is protected by the Constitutions of Virginia and of the United States.
Solution: | Valid | 0 | NIv2 | task150_afs_argument_quality_gun_control | fs_opt |
We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.
One example: If gun bans worked there would be no gun deaths in the countries that have banned guns.
Solution is here: Valid
Explanation: It is an argument that claims that gun bans will not work.
Now, solve this: It's quite obvious by this and as well as the SCOTUS decision that the right to keep and bear arms is not dependent on the militia part, but the other way around.
Solution: | Valid | 6 | NIv2 | task150_afs_argument_quality_gun_control | fs_opt |
We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.
One example is below.
Q: If gun bans worked there would be no gun deaths in the countries that have banned guns.
A: Valid
Rationale: It is an argument that claims that gun bans will not work.
Q: [28] Since none of Handgun Control Inc.'s Brady I or Brady II suggestions impact on the source of 93% of crime guns, their symbolic nostrums cannot be expected to do anything to reduce crime or violence.
A: | Valid | 9 | NIv2 | task150_afs_argument_quality_gun_control | fs_opt |
We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.
--------
Question: But I do not believe that a gun ban will make us any safer.
Answer: Valid
Question: Usually it is 'oh look out look out, them gun nuts are going to do something.
Answer: Valid
Question: It ain't news if it isn't a gun being used, then mass murder is fine with you lot huh?
Answer: | Valid
| 7 | NIv2 | task150_afs_argument_quality_gun_control | fs_opt |
We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.
Example Input: For instance I don't think that eliminating gun control is the only answer crime control is also needed.
Example Output: Valid
Example Input: The purpose was to demonize legitimate gun owners and gun shows, gun dealers and the entire pro rights community.
Example Output: Valid
Example Input: Collectors and people with legitimate cultural, religious or military reasons to own swords will be exempted from the ban, but must store them under lock and key and have a burglar alarm.
Example Output: | Valid
| 3 | NIv2 | task150_afs_argument_quality_gun_control | fs_opt |
Teacher: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.
Teacher: Now, understand the problem? If you are still confused, see the following example:
If gun bans worked there would be no gun deaths in the countries that have banned guns.
Solution: Valid
Reason: It is an argument that claims that gun bans will not work.
Now, solve this instance: Teachers and business professionals use them for instructional purposes, while police officers and soldiers still use them for target acquisition.
Student: | Valid | 2 | NIv2 | task150_afs_argument_quality_gun_control | fs_opt |
We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.
One example: If gun bans worked there would be no gun deaths in the countries that have banned guns.
Solution is here: Valid
Explanation: It is an argument that claims that gun bans will not work.
Now, solve this: Congress has no specific grant of authority in the Constitution to regulate private ownership of firearms.
Solution: | Valid | 6 | NIv2 | task150_afs_argument_quality_gun_control | fs_opt |
We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.
[Q]: The Second Amendment was never about individual gun ownership, it's only purpose was proper case of a government organized and controlled militia."
[A]: Valid
[Q]: I am not attacking anyone, I am just pointing out that if there were armed citizens on board, and again, we do not know if there were, they did not use their guns.
[A]: Valid
[Q]: It served to show that even under the law standard of California successful prosecution would be difficult or impossible to achieve.
[A]: | Valid
| 5 | NIv2 | task150_afs_argument_quality_gun_control | fs_opt |
We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.
Ex Input:
After opposition from the National Rifle Association, 22 Democrats joined Republicans in a Senate vote this month to negate the District of Columbia's tough gun registration requirements and overturn its ban on rapid-fire semiautomatic weapons.
Ex Output:
Valid
Ex Input:
It is intended to require registration of all firearms in the hopes that it will either deter or prevent felons and others who cannot have a gun in the first place from having one.
Ex Output:
Valid
Ex Input:
Does anyone need to tell us what our rights are when they were written to be understood by the simple man and plainly enumerated as rights belonging to the people and without which the Constitution would have never been ratified.
Ex Output:
| Valid
| 1 | NIv2 | task150_afs_argument_quality_gun_control | fs_opt |
We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.
Example input: If gun bans worked there would be no gun deaths in the countries that have banned guns.
Example output: Valid
Example explanation: It is an argument that claims that gun bans will not work.
Q: To guarantee a right means to guarantee it against laws as well as private criminals, the best they do is guarantee it until someone gets enough political capital to make a law or control the supreme court of the land.
A: | Valid | 3 | NIv2 | task150_afs_argument_quality_gun_control | fs_opt |
We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.
Example Input: But if you can legally buy a gun for that purpose, it means that your attacker is that much more likely to be armed as well.
Example Output: Valid
Example Input: I really don't understand why Americans are convinced that guns are essential these days.
Example Output: Valid
Example Input: As questions continue to surround the shooting, Heyward's family and civil rights leaders take issue with the police response.
Example Output: | Valid
| 3 | NIv2 | task150_afs_argument_quality_gun_control | fs_opt |
We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.
We exhibit to mankind the remarkable spectacle of a people attacked by unprovoked enemies, without any imputation or even suspicion of offence.
Valid
You're STILL failing to prove that individual gun ownership is an outdated belief that should be abandoned!
Valid
If England wants to ban weapons, that is quite alright, but we should not trade with htem as long as they are violating the human rights of their citizens.
| Valid
| 0 | NIv2 | task150_afs_argument_quality_gun_control | fs_opt |
We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.
Ex Input:
It is a power, that hath no other end but preservation, and therefore can never* have a right to destroy, enslave, or designedly to impoverish the subjects."
Ex Output:
Valid
Ex Input:
A law-abiding gun nut who uses their gun in committing a crime, is a criminal, and not law-abiding.
Ex Output:
Valid
Ex Input:
Again, I don't think anybody will argue that owning a gun prevents crime.
Ex Output:
| Valid
| 1 | NIv2 | task150_afs_argument_quality_gun_control | fs_opt |
Teacher: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.
Teacher: Now, understand the problem? If you are still confused, see the following example:
If gun bans worked there would be no gun deaths in the countries that have banned guns.
Solution: Valid
Reason: It is an argument that claims that gun bans will not work.
Now, solve this instance: Perhaps once should ask why the majority of people who have challenged gun laws in the courts on Second Amendment grounds have been felons.
Student: | Valid | 2 | NIv2 | task150_afs_argument_quality_gun_control | fs_opt |
Given the task definition, example input & output, solve the new input case.
We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.
Example: If gun bans worked there would be no gun deaths in the countries that have banned guns.
Output: Valid
It is an argument that claims that gun bans will not work.
New input case for you: And (I'm going to use the high estimate this time) would you say 972,000 incidents per year that someone saves a live or prevents a murder with a gun means guns are "not effective for protection?"
Output: | Valid | 1 | NIv2 | task150_afs_argument_quality_gun_control | fs_opt |
Teacher: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.
Teacher: Now, understand the problem? If you are still confused, see the following example:
If gun bans worked there would be no gun deaths in the countries that have banned guns.
Solution: Valid
Reason: It is an argument that claims that gun bans will not work.
Now, solve this instance: Isn't that why you think that everyone should be able to carry them on board?
Student: | Valid | 2 | NIv2 | task150_afs_argument_quality_gun_control | fs_opt |
We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.
Q: Whether or not he is a felon, if you give someone a gun knowing they intend to commit a particular crime with it then you are responsible as an accessory before the fact.
A: Valid
****
Q: The bill also calls for each gun owner to be fingerprinted, have a back ground check, and to submit pass port-style photos for registration cards.
A: Valid
****
Q: There are situations where I'll be more in control of my destiny without a gun and you corner yourself and lost complete control of your destiny because of your gun.
A: | Valid
****
| 4 | NIv2 | task150_afs_argument_quality_gun_control | fs_opt |
Detailed Instructions: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.
See one example below:
Problem: If gun bans worked there would be no gun deaths in the countries that have banned guns.
Solution: Valid
Explanation: It is an argument that claims that gun bans will not work.
Problem: The difference is knives are a tool, a domestic neccesity, along with tools such as screwdrivers and domestic appliances such as toasters all of which can kill under accidental circumstances, however their benefit outweights the possible issues.
Solution: | Valid | 4 | NIv2 | task150_afs_argument_quality_gun_control | fs_opt |
We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.
Let me give you an example: If gun bans worked there would be no gun deaths in the countries that have banned guns.
The answer to this example can be: Valid
Here is why: It is an argument that claims that gun bans will not work.
OK. solve this:
To argue that there are more ethical defensive means than firearms is stupid in my opinion.
Answer: | Valid | 8 | NIv2 | task150_afs_argument_quality_gun_control | fs_opt |
instruction:
We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.
question:
The 2nd Amendment does NOT provide an individual the Right to own gun(s) for the PURPOSE OF providing for: food, self-defense, target practice, a hobby as a collector, or fun.
answer:
Valid
question:
Doesn't hold together, though - you have no evidence that criminal arms supply is unaffected by gun control.
answer:
Valid
question:
You could do a much more compelling speech as to why not have guns...especially if small children are invovled...especially when guns are so incredibly easy to get.....ask your local postman!
answer:
| Valid
| 9 | NIv2 | task150_afs_argument_quality_gun_control | fs_opt |
We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.
Let me give you an example: If gun bans worked there would be no gun deaths in the countries that have banned guns.
The answer to this example can be: Valid
Here is why: It is an argument that claims that gun bans will not work.
OK. solve this:
2) ensure that the right to keep and bear arms for a militia is not infringed.
Answer: | Valid | 8 | NIv2 | task150_afs_argument_quality_gun_control | fs_opt |
We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.
Example Input: Henry Knox later served as sec of state and "declared" the amendments during martial law and reconstruction to be approved and ratified by the States which was impossible since those State Legislators were prevented from meeting/adjourning.
Example Output: Valid
Example Input: Countries that ban guns or implement stricter laws concerning firearms have lower crime rates.
Example Output: Valid
Example Input: 2) ensure that the right to keep and bear arms for a militia is not infringed.
Example Output: | Valid
| 3 | NIv2 | task150_afs_argument_quality_gun_control | fs_opt |
We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.
One example is below.
Q: If gun bans worked there would be no gun deaths in the countries that have banned guns.
A: Valid
Rationale: It is an argument that claims that gun bans will not work.
Q: I have never seen anyone attempt to stop a prosecution of a gun use/possession crime on 2nd.
A: | Valid | 9 | NIv2 | task150_afs_argument_quality_gun_control | fs_opt |
TASK DEFINITION: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.
PROBLEM: In order to have a 'well regulated' militia you can not bar the civilian populace of its right to keep and bear arms!
SOLUTION: Valid
PROBLEM: Gun owners would have to be evaluated by how they scored on written and firing tests, and have to pass the tests in order to own a gun.
SOLUTION: Valid
PROBLEM: If the existence and availability of weapons was truly the problem then someone shooting at the White House would have happened much sooner in our nation's history, and with much greater frequency.
SOLUTION: | Valid
| 8 | NIv2 | task150_afs_argument_quality_gun_control | fs_opt |
You will be given a definition of a task first, then an example. Follow the example to solve a new instance of the task.
We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.
If gun bans worked there would be no gun deaths in the countries that have banned guns.
Solution: Valid
Why? It is an argument that claims that gun bans will not work.
New input: Should a drug user, a felon, be banned from possessing WEAPONS, especially guns??
Solution: | Valid | 0 | NIv2 | task150_afs_argument_quality_gun_control | fs_opt |
Given the task definition, example input & output, solve the new input case.
We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.
Example: If gun bans worked there would be no gun deaths in the countries that have banned guns.
Output: Valid
It is an argument that claims that gun bans will not work.
New input case for you: Ok, so are the gun haters claiming the police department are giving the guns criminals use for crime back to the criminals?
Output: | Valid | 1 | NIv2 | task150_afs_argument_quality_gun_control | fs_opt |
TASK DEFINITION: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.
PROBLEM: If there was even a modicum of truth to their insane, illogical beliefs on gun ownership, wouldn���t they have numerous examples of violent outbreaks to point to in all the states that allow people to carry concealed handguns?
SOLUTION: Valid
PROBLEM: "Gun control" is an illegal and unConstitutional fiction for hoplophobes to cling to instead of sucking their fingers or thumb.
SOLUTION: Valid
PROBLEM: People abuse gun rights to rob places and take hostages.
SOLUTION: | Valid
| 8 | NIv2 | task150_afs_argument_quality_gun_control | fs_opt |
We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.
Example input: If gun bans worked there would be no gun deaths in the countries that have banned guns.
Example output: Valid
Example explanation: It is an argument that claims that gun bans will not work.
Q: Criminals will always find ways to get around gun laws which is why there are a lot less criminals who own and use guns in places like the UK and Australia.
A: | Valid | 3 | NIv2 | task150_afs_argument_quality_gun_control | fs_opt |
Teacher: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.
Teacher: Now, understand the problem? If you are still confused, see the following example:
If gun bans worked there would be no gun deaths in the countries that have banned guns.
Solution: Valid
Reason: It is an argument that claims that gun bans will not work.
Now, solve this instance: And if stricter gun control measures are implemented, this isn't necessarily an indication of potential government oppression, especially if the public sees fit to support such measures.
Student: | Valid | 2 | NIv2 | task150_afs_argument_quality_gun_control | fs_opt |
We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.
Example: If gun bans worked there would be no gun deaths in the countries that have banned guns.
Example solution: Valid
Example explanation: It is an argument that claims that gun bans will not work.
Problem: My point was that the theory that more gun control leaves people defenseless does not explain the lower murder rates in other developed nations.
| Solution: Valid | 5 | NIv2 | task150_afs_argument_quality_gun_control | fs_opt |
We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.
Input: Consider Input: Does anyone need to tell us what our rights are when they were written to be understood by the simple man and plainly enumerated as rights belonging to the people and without which the Constitution would have never been ratified.
Output: Valid
Input: Consider Input: Analogous to the rich liberals like the Kennedys fighting for school integration while driving their kids to all-white private schools in limosines, hence the term "limosine liberal".
Output: Valid
Input: Consider Input: The second amendment is in place to ensure that americans always have at their disposal the tools neccessary to protect themselves from tyranny.
| Output: Valid
| 2 | NIv2 | task150_afs_argument_quality_gun_control | fs_opt |
Part 1. Definition
We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.
Part 2. Example
If gun bans worked there would be no gun deaths in the countries that have banned guns.
Answer: Valid
Explanation: It is an argument that claims that gun bans will not work.
Part 3. Exercise
The second amendment is in place to ensure that americans always have at their disposal the tools neccessary to protect themselves from tyranny.
Answer: | Valid | 7 | NIv2 | task150_afs_argument_quality_gun_control | fs_opt |
Detailed Instructions: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.
See one example below:
Problem: If gun bans worked there would be no gun deaths in the countries that have banned guns.
Solution: Valid
Explanation: It is an argument that claims that gun bans will not work.
Problem: Although I think a gun-ban should be effective since you cant eliminate criminality entirely, and its the criminals, lunatics and otherwise unbalanced people that you dont want to have guns or have an easy time getting guns.
Solution: | Valid | 4 | NIv2 | task150_afs_argument_quality_gun_control | fs_opt |
Given the task definition, example input & output, solve the new input case.
We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.
Example: If gun bans worked there would be no gun deaths in the countries that have banned guns.
Output: Valid
It is an argument that claims that gun bans will not work.
New input case for you: Or that the Second Amendment only keeps the federal government from passing new gun control laws?
Output: | Valid | 1 | NIv2 | task150_afs_argument_quality_gun_control | fs_opt |
We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.
One example is below.
Q: If gun bans worked there would be no gun deaths in the countries that have banned guns.
A: Valid
Rationale: It is an argument that claims that gun bans will not work.
Q: I see you always use gun crime rates as an argument, are you totally uninterested in other types of violent crimes, what happens when all guns are banned and we only have knife crimes?
A: | Valid | 9 | NIv2 | task150_afs_argument_quality_gun_control | fs_opt |
You will be given a definition of a task first, then an example. Follow the example to solve a new instance of the task.
We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.
If gun bans worked there would be no gun deaths in the countries that have banned guns.
Solution: Valid
Why? It is an argument that claims that gun bans will not work.
New input: While courts will review with exacting scrutiny alleged violations of many constitutional rights, they typically defer entirely to the legislative will when the government seeks to take private property through eminent domain."
Solution: | Valid | 0 | NIv2 | task150_afs_argument_quality_gun_control | fs_opt |
We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.
--------
Question: Pro-gunners what criminals in the street, the mall, and the neighborhood to be unarmed; and the good guys armed.
Answer: Valid
Question: (5) The Federal Gun Control Act of 1968, as amended by the Firearms Owners��� Protection Act of 1986, and the Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act of 1993, provide comprehensive Federal regulations applicable in the District of Columbia as elsewhere.
Answer: Valid
Question: Even back in the 60's gun owners were saying that if you outlaw guns, only outlaws will have guns, and gun safety being stressed, and maybe even mandatory for children will produce benefits.
Answer: | Valid
| 7 | NIv2 | task150_afs_argument_quality_gun_control | fs_opt |
Teacher: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.
Teacher: Now, understand the problem? If you are still confused, see the following example:
If gun bans worked there would be no gun deaths in the countries that have banned guns.
Solution: Valid
Reason: It is an argument that claims that gun bans will not work.
Now, solve this instance: It's just that on these forums, the words 'gun control' usually refer to extremely tight gun laws, or outright banning of guns.
Student: | Valid | 2 | NIv2 | task150_afs_argument_quality_gun_control | fs_opt |
We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.
Example: If gun bans worked there would be no gun deaths in the countries that have banned guns.
Example solution: Valid
Example explanation: It is an argument that claims that gun bans will not work.
Problem: People like Brady blame the gun and say because one man uses a gun to harm someone then no one can be trusted with guns.
| Solution: Valid | 5 | NIv2 | task150_afs_argument_quality_gun_control | fs_opt |
We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.
If I were the AG, and I were bent on trying to find out if a person has bought firearms, then I would first run a name search through a database like Accurint.
Valid
It's also worth mentioning that several of those shootings were stopped by private citizens using their own guns or kids who knew enough about guns to tackle the shooter when he had to reload.
Valid
Of course, every rational person understands that increased death penalty cases and killings results in less money for social services, services which often stop people from going down the path of violent crimes.
| Valid
| 0 | NIv2 | task150_afs_argument_quality_gun_control | fs_opt |
You will be given a definition of a task first, then an example. Follow the example to solve a new instance of the task.
We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.
If gun bans worked there would be no gun deaths in the countries that have banned guns.
Solution: Valid
Why? It is an argument that claims that gun bans will not work.
New input: (or, for those who favor the alternative collective right view, ���the right of militia members to keep and bear their militia arms when called for by the state for militia service?���)
Solution: | Valid | 0 | NIv2 | task150_afs_argument_quality_gun_control | fs_opt |
We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.
Input: Consider Input: I keep guns for the exact reason you state, when the government starts to interpret my rights for me, is when I get my gets and start shooting "them".
Output: Valid
Input: Consider Input: Do you think that a gun-ban in the long run would mean that more criminals get their hands on guns or that less criminals get their hands on guns?
Output: Valid
Input: Consider Input: Look at Washington D.C. By far the absolute strictest laws in the entire nation, they STILL need gun shot sensors because people are STILL being shot and killed on a regular basis!
| Output: Valid
| 2 | NIv2 | task150_afs_argument_quality_gun_control | fs_opt |
We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.
Example Input: The courts up to the supreme court have held that criminals can't be made to register guns.
Example Output: Valid
Example Input: Please respond to your opponents comments that you have taken "the right to keep and bear arms" statement and used it without the context specifically "the well regulated militia".
Example Output: Valid
Example Input: 5th: Criminals will always get guns becasue:::: I have got this incredible information which we simply must publish: Criminals do not obey by the laws!!
Example Output: | Valid
| 3 | NIv2 | task150_afs_argument_quality_gun_control | fs_opt |
We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.
[EX Q]: Then why are you opposed to the innocent fighting for their own lives instead of hopeing the police will get there in time?
[EX A]: Valid
[EX Q]: They will not only confiscate the guns, but then charge the owners of those guns for being terrorists.
[EX A]: Valid
[EX Q]: Although I still think that certain regulations need to be set in place in order to control the distribution of guns, complete gun control is not the answer; however, something still needs to be done.
[EX A]: | Valid
| 6 | NIv2 | task150_afs_argument_quality_gun_control | fs_opt |
We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.
Example: If gun bans worked there would be no gun deaths in the countries that have banned guns.
Example solution: Valid
Example explanation: It is an argument that claims that gun bans will not work.
Problem: If you are ready to set aside your preference for the government taking away all my firearms and both of my children then say so and we will discuss things rationally.
| Solution: Valid | 5 | NIv2 | task150_afs_argument_quality_gun_control | fs_opt |
Part 1. Definition
We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.
Part 2. Example
If gun bans worked there would be no gun deaths in the countries that have banned guns.
Answer: Valid
Explanation: It is an argument that claims that gun bans will not work.
Part 3. Exercise
The figures for the number of gun related deaths in the US should be evidence enough that 'the people' cannot be trusted with guns.
Answer: | Valid | 7 | NIv2 | task150_afs_argument_quality_gun_control | fs_opt |
We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.
Ex Input:
Gun control laws do not affect criminals because criminals do not obey these laws.
Ex Output:
Valid
Ex Input:
BTW, It's weird how you always whine that the rights of criminals are violated, you're against Megan's Law, you think pedophilia should be legalized, and you want guns taken out of as many hands as possible.
Ex Output:
Valid
Ex Input:
Georgia's concealed carry law has recently been modified to allow permitted gun owners to carry concealed weapons into restuarants, on mass transit, in state parks and other venues previously off limits to any non-law-enforcement weapons.
Ex Output:
| Valid
| 1 | NIv2 | task150_afs_argument_quality_gun_control | fs_opt |
We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.
The fact that you like cars is why you will tolerate the fact that more kids are killed by cars then guns.
Valid
The Second Amendment was never about individual gun ownership, it's only purpose was proper case of a government organized and controlled militia."
Valid
If you are ready to set aside your preference for the government taking away all my firearms and both of my children then say so and we will discuss things rationally.
| Valid
| 0 | NIv2 | task150_afs_argument_quality_gun_control | fs_opt |
We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.
Example input: If gun bans worked there would be no gun deaths in the countries that have banned guns.
Example output: Valid
Example explanation: It is an argument that claims that gun bans will not work.
Q: WE AGREE THAT CRIMINALS SHOULDN'T BE ARMED, and the laws already exist on the books to punish them when convicted criminals are caught with guns.
A: | Valid | 3 | NIv2 | task150_afs_argument_quality_gun_control | fs_opt |
We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.
--------
Question: Facts are as useless at tits on a bull to anti gun nuts.
Answer: Valid
Question: You���re [apparently] 2 times more likely to robbed and 2.5 times as likely to be assaulted in the UK compared to the US.
Answer: Valid
Question: And we've already presented, countless times in the past, that all evidence points to less than 1% of guns recovered from crimes being traced back to gun shows.
Answer: | Valid
| 7 | NIv2 | task150_afs_argument_quality_gun_control | fs_opt |
Given the task definition, example input & output, solve the new input case.
We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.
Example: If gun bans worked there would be no gun deaths in the countries that have banned guns.
Output: Valid
It is an argument that claims that gun bans will not work.
New input case for you: First you tried to link the existence of the second amendment with incidents of criminal deeds.
Output: | Valid | 1 | NIv2 | task150_afs_argument_quality_gun_control | fs_opt |
We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.
Example input: If gun bans worked there would be no gun deaths in the countries that have banned guns.
Example output: Valid
Example explanation: It is an argument that claims that gun bans will not work.
Q: You're so quick at finding the exceptions in California's mandatory storage law, you should have no problem understanding the language of the basic Castle Doctrine laws.
A: | Valid | 3 | NIv2 | task150_afs_argument_quality_gun_control | fs_opt |
We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.
Q: Well, if you believe that this is a 'natural right' it only applies to non-Catholics, and is conditional by the law.
A: Valid
****
Q: However, if you carry into California then you are restricted by ���the same conditions or limitations that apply to residents of that state.���
A: Valid
****
Q: If that means gun control then so be it, but it does not.
A: | Valid
****
| 4 | NIv2 | task150_afs_argument_quality_gun_control | fs_opt |
We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.
Example Input: Given the dissenting opinions, in the future they can not reasonably argue (because their active-duty-militia-status argument failed so miserably) that there is no individual right to keep and bear arms suitable for collective defense.
Example Output: Valid
Example Input: Even gun hating knife hating, sword hating, pizza cutter hating, citizen rights hating england still allow airsoft.
Example Output: Valid
Example Input: The medium of 'free speech' has changed, but that does not affect that free speech should still exist - just as with the other constitutional points (with a few exceptions, if you believe Bush).
Example Output: | Valid
| 3 | NIv2 | task150_afs_argument_quality_gun_control | fs_opt |
instruction:
We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.
question:
The only gun control law that is needed is the law that prohibits a person from committing a crime with a gun.
answer:
Valid
question:
A lot of the most popular laws (unconstitutional in my estimation from many court cases) were examined by the CDC and NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCE and found no benefit IN ANY OF THE CURRENT ILLEGAL GUN REGULATION/BAN LAWS.
answer:
Valid
question:
Whether or not he is a felon, if you give someone a gun knowing they intend to commit a particular crime with it then you are responsible as an accessory before the fact.
answer:
| Valid
| 9 | NIv2 | task150_afs_argument_quality_gun_control | fs_opt |
You will be given a definition of a task first, then an example. Follow the example to solve a new instance of the task.
We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.
If gun bans worked there would be no gun deaths in the countries that have banned guns.
Solution: Valid
Why? It is an argument that claims that gun bans will not work.
New input: Whether or not he is a felon, if you give someone a gun knowing they intend to commit a particular crime with it then you are responsible as an accessory before the fact.
Solution: | Valid | 0 | NIv2 | task150_afs_argument_quality_gun_control | fs_opt |
Detailed Instructions: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.
See one example below:
Problem: If gun bans worked there would be no gun deaths in the countries that have banned guns.
Solution: Valid
Explanation: It is an argument that claims that gun bans will not work.
Problem: You didn't address that since we have started adding more and more gun control that violent crimes have gone up and how even though America is #1 in gun ownership it tanks only 107th in homicide rates.
Solution: | Valid | 4 | NIv2 | task150_afs_argument_quality_gun_control | fs_opt |
We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.
Example: If gun bans worked there would be no gun deaths in the countries that have banned guns.
Example solution: Valid
Example explanation: It is an argument that claims that gun bans will not work.
Problem: He'd be more of a threat to the police (than an unarmed individual) because the more guns there are at a scene, the more they have to deal with.
| Solution: Valid | 5 | NIv2 | task150_afs_argument_quality_gun_control | fs_opt |
Teacher: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.
Teacher: Now, understand the problem? If you are still confused, see the following example:
If gun bans worked there would be no gun deaths in the countries that have banned guns.
Solution: Valid
Reason: It is an argument that claims that gun bans will not work.
Now, solve this instance: * The "Ingestion of food, object" category is underreported in the first column since the NSC did not include death rates for "5 to 14 Years."
Student: | Invalid | 2 | NIv2 | task150_afs_argument_quality_gun_control | fs_opt |
We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.
Example: If gun bans worked there would be no gun deaths in the countries that have banned guns.
Example solution: Valid
Example explanation: It is an argument that claims that gun bans will not work.
Problem: Furthermore, the Founders envisioned people being armed with much less powerful weapons when they wrote the Second Amendment.
| Solution: Valid | 5 | NIv2 | task150_afs_argument_quality_gun_control | fs_opt |
We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.
Let me give you an example: If gun bans worked there would be no gun deaths in the countries that have banned guns.
The answer to this example can be: Valid
Here is why: It is an argument that claims that gun bans will not work.
OK. solve this:
The NRA boasts that almost all states grant handgun permits to people with clean criminal and psychological records.
Answer: | Valid | 8 | NIv2 | task150_afs_argument_quality_gun_control | fs_opt |
We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.
Input: Consider Input: Also: More people are killed in car accidents than are killed by guns.
Output: Valid
Input: Consider Input: The legal market for firearms gets killed off in hopes of hindering criminals, and instead the criminals continue buying from the black market, importing them illegally, or making their weapons themselves.
Output: Valid
Input: Consider Input: What would happen would essentially be declaring war against the American people, telling them that they have no right to live should they ever face danger, that their only legal recourse is to lay down and die.
| Output: Valid
| 2 | NIv2 | task150_afs_argument_quality_gun_control | fs_opt |
We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.
Q: they are in disarray and grasping for any stick to hold onto in the flood of falling gun control agenda and laws.
A: Valid
****
Q: Funny they weren't interested when 'they' were buying guns to give cartels by the truckload and were notified by the dealers.
A: Valid
****
Q: * The "Ingestion of food, object" category is underreported in the first column since the NSC did not include death rates for "5 to 14 Years."
A: | Invalid
****
| 4 | NIv2 | task150_afs_argument_quality_gun_control | fs_opt |
We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.
[EX Q]: If there were a certain number of cases involving concealed carriers having their guns stolen right off of their person, then it might be worth noting.
[EX A]: Valid
[EX Q]: Again, the researchers found no protective benefits of gun ownership.
[EX A]: Valid
[EX Q]: Removal of rights was never an issue for citizens of this Republic.
[EX A]: | Invalid
| 6 | NIv2 | task150_afs_argument_quality_gun_control | fs_opt |
instruction:
We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.
question:
Why do people that want what they call reasonable limits on the right to bear arms demand laws that only law abiding citizens will obey?
answer:
Valid
question:
So in the classroom (where ammunition is prohibited) students handle firearms, and practice "dry firing" them (pulling the trigger when there is no ammunition in the gun.
answer:
Valid
question:
1) Protection - The argument suggests that guns protect us from dangerous individuals.
answer:
| Valid
| 9 | NIv2 | task150_afs_argument_quality_gun_control | fs_opt |
We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.
One example: If gun bans worked there would be no gun deaths in the countries that have banned guns.
Solution is here: Valid
Explanation: It is an argument that claims that gun bans will not work.
Now, solve this: Is there any justification for preventing people with no criminal record from acquiring post-'86 models, when the pre-'86 models aren't being used for committing crimes?
Solution: | Valid | 6 | NIv2 | task150_afs_argument_quality_gun_control | fs_opt |
We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.
Example: If gun bans worked there would be no gun deaths in the countries that have banned guns.
Example solution: Valid
Example explanation: It is an argument that claims that gun bans will not work.
Problem: The embraced anti-gun rights interpretation of the 2nd was that it was a provision that had but one function and intent, to protect the "state right" to organize and control their militia from federal interference.
| Solution: Valid | 5 | NIv2 | task150_afs_argument_quality_gun_control | fs_opt |
We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.
Q: It involved a ban of guns within a certain proximity to schools.
A: Valid
****
Q: For Madison, a bill of rights provided a second chance for his pet project: to obtain the congressional veto of state laws that he had tried, but failed, to achieve at the 1787 Convention.
A: Invalid
****
Q: One can examine 19th century legal treates and find "When words of the enacting clause are clear and positive, recourse must not be had to the preamble."
A: | Valid
****
| 4 | NIv2 | task150_afs_argument_quality_gun_control | fs_opt |
We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.
[Q]: It is a power, that hath no other end but preservation, and therefore can never* have a right to destroy, enslave, or designedly to impoverish the subjects."
[A]: Valid
[Q]: It is interesting to note that the DOJ stats reveal our crimes and murders dropped 63% during the time that the newly "gun free" nations increased and while we were adding many more guns and passing carry laws.
[A]: Valid
[Q]: Switzerland where every male over 18 has a "military" firearm has the lowest crime rates anywhere in the world.
[A]: | Valid
| 5 | NIv2 | task150_afs_argument_quality_gun_control | fs_opt |
We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.
Example: If gun bans worked there would be no gun deaths in the countries that have banned guns.
Example solution: Valid
Example explanation: It is an argument that claims that gun bans will not work.
Problem: We measured firearm protection as an attempted or completed crime in which the victim reported using a gun to attack or threaten an offender.
| Solution: Valid | 5 | NIv2 | task150_afs_argument_quality_gun_control | fs_opt |
We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.
Example input: If gun bans worked there would be no gun deaths in the countries that have banned guns.
Example output: Valid
Example explanation: It is an argument that claims that gun bans will not work.
Q: And why would the Pennsylvanians include an individual right to bear arms in their Constitution at about the same time they included this restriction if they were were so worried about loyalists owning guns?"
A: | Valid | 3 | NIv2 | task150_afs_argument_quality_gun_control | fs_opt |
We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.
Input: Consider Input: Like I said before, claiming that semi-automatic rifles get a lower level of constitutional protection than handguns because they are less useful for self defense seems absurd from historical point of view.
Output: Valid
Input: Consider Input: If I were the AG, and I were bent on trying to find out if a person has bought firearms, then I would first run a name search through a database like Accurint.
Output: Valid
Input: Consider Input: Who's going to file a lawsuit and allege that a person doesn't have a right to own a gun for any reason?
| Output: Valid
| 2 | NIv2 | task150_afs_argument_quality_gun_control | fs_opt |
Given the task definition, example input & output, solve the new input case.
We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.
Example: If gun bans worked there would be no gun deaths in the countries that have banned guns.
Output: Valid
It is an argument that claims that gun bans will not work.
New input case for you: Gun owners don't drive into crowds of people simply because they had a gun in their car.
Output: | Valid | 1 | NIv2 | task150_afs_argument_quality_gun_control | fs_opt |
Given the task definition, example input & output, solve the new input case.
We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.
Example: If gun bans worked there would be no gun deaths in the countries that have banned guns.
Output: Valid
It is an argument that claims that gun bans will not work.
New input case for you: I will agree with you on one point though; A heart of evil resides in those who would presume they can undermine, subvert, or take away another indivdiual's rights as are enumerated in the U.S. Constitution...
Output: | Valid | 1 | NIv2 | task150_afs_argument_quality_gun_control | fs_opt |
TASK DEFINITION: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.
PROBLEM: After opposition from the National Rifle Association, 22 Democrats joined Republicans in a Senate vote this month to negate the District of Columbia's tough gun registration requirements and overturn its ban on rapid-fire semiautomatic weapons.
SOLUTION: Valid
PROBLEM: And what Hitler did was change Germany gun control laws to explicitly disarm the jewish population based on religion.
SOLUTION: Valid
PROBLEM: Now, if we could agree on that basic premise, then the prudence of the law in question could be discussed from the perspective of whether or not its shortcomings justify the intentionally long and arduous process of changing The Constitution.
SOLUTION: | Valid
| 8 | NIv2 | task150_afs_argument_quality_gun_control | fs_opt |
Detailed Instructions: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.
See one example below:
Problem: If gun bans worked there would be no gun deaths in the countries that have banned guns.
Solution: Valid
Explanation: It is an argument that claims that gun bans will not work.
Problem: Are you gonna claim that he too was brainwashed by the right wing conservatives?
Solution: | Valid | 4 | NIv2 | task150_afs_argument_quality_gun_control | fs_opt |
Teacher: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.
Teacher: Now, understand the problem? If you are still confused, see the following example:
If gun bans worked there would be no gun deaths in the countries that have banned guns.
Solution: Valid
Reason: It is an argument that claims that gun bans will not work.
Now, solve this instance: Law abiding citizens are not criminals, therefore, they have no reason to use these weapons unless for self defense of oneself or others.
Student: | Valid | 2 | NIv2 | task150_afs_argument_quality_gun_control | fs_opt |
We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.
One example: If gun bans worked there would be no gun deaths in the countries that have banned guns.
Solution is here: Valid
Explanation: It is an argument that claims that gun bans will not work.
Now, solve this: We're talking about deadly lethal weapons that are way more powerful than what the authors of the Second Amendment had in mind.
Solution: | Valid | 6 | NIv2 | task150_afs_argument_quality_gun_control | fs_opt |
We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.
Let me give you an example: If gun bans worked there would be no gun deaths in the countries that have banned guns.
The answer to this example can be: Valid
Here is why: It is an argument that claims that gun bans will not work.
OK. solve this:
So if they thought that the 2nd amendment was being misinterpreted as severely as you claim, then they would have accepted that case, or they would have defeated their own purpose.
Answer: | Valid | 8 | NIv2 | task150_afs_argument_quality_gun_control | fs_opt |
We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.
Input: Consider Input: Would you really want a public with an armed force of unknown size, strength, mobilty, location, organizational structure and intention anywhere in your country?
Output: Valid
Input: Consider Input: But guns aren't likely to do anything whatsoever, any more than cars are likely to drive or hammers are likely to strike.
Output: Valid
Input: Consider Input: We're talking about deadly lethal weapons that are way more powerful than what the authors of the Second Amendment had in mind.
| Output: Valid
| 2 | NIv2 | task150_afs_argument_quality_gun_control | fs_opt |
Detailed Instructions: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.
See one example below:
Problem: If gun bans worked there would be no gun deaths in the countries that have banned guns.
Solution: Valid
Explanation: It is an argument that claims that gun bans will not work.
Problem: In this thread, we see how some people will raise the bar when their opponent is making an argument but lower the bar when they themselves are making an argument.
Solution: | Invalid | 4 | NIv2 | task150_afs_argument_quality_gun_control | fs_opt |
Detailed Instructions: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.
See one example below:
Problem: If gun bans worked there would be no gun deaths in the countries that have banned guns.
Solution: Valid
Explanation: It is an argument that claims that gun bans will not work.
Problem: Gun nuts are obviously so unstable and irritable, that should one wanting a gun should be automatically disqualified from ownership.
Solution: | Valid | 4 | NIv2 | task150_afs_argument_quality_gun_control | fs_opt |
TASK DEFINITION: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.
PROBLEM: There is no reason why gun owners should have to pay taxes to support police protection for people not wanting to own guns.
SOLUTION: Valid
PROBLEM: Obviously gun control is doing nothing to make California any safer, otherwise these numbers wouldn't be able to take place in such an alarmingly easy manner.
SOLUTION: Valid
PROBLEM: I'd love to know what firearms are made and sold but have no constitutional protection for ownership.
SOLUTION: | Valid
| 8 | NIv2 | task150_afs_argument_quality_gun_control | fs_opt |
We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.
Let me give you an example: If gun bans worked there would be no gun deaths in the countries that have banned guns.
The answer to this example can be: Valid
Here is why: It is an argument that claims that gun bans will not work.
OK. solve this:
The antis like to think if they can get a federal court to undo this contract the States will be bound to follow unConstitutional law.
Answer: | Valid | 8 | NIv2 | task150_afs_argument_quality_gun_control | fs_opt |
TASK DEFINITION: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.
PROBLEM: Gun prohibitionists argue that the Second Amendment confers a right to bear arms only on duly enrolled members of a state militia.
SOLUTION: Valid
PROBLEM: I doubt gun activists would be impressed if I claimed they were wrong and then provided a link to Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence as support.
SOLUTION: Valid
PROBLEM: Even if you just figure kids under five who live in homes where guns are kept, coffee tables are a bigger killer.
SOLUTION: | Valid
| 8 | NIv2 | task150_afs_argument_quality_gun_control | fs_opt |
Given the task definition, example input & output, solve the new input case.
We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.
Example: If gun bans worked there would be no gun deaths in the countries that have banned guns.
Output: Valid
It is an argument that claims that gun bans will not work.
New input case for you: Especially since one of your arguments is that the Second Amendment only protects arms suitable for militia duties, which would be all semi-automatic firearms in existence!
Output: | Valid | 1 | NIv2 | task150_afs_argument_quality_gun_control | fs_opt |
We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.
[EX Q]: A protracted campaign is out of the question, the US government would be able to lockdown and fight a war of attrition as they are doing in Iraq.
[EX A]: Valid
[EX Q]: This is just further proof that gun control does not equal crime control and there are no "reasonable" nor "responsible" gun control laws.
[EX A]: Valid
[EX Q]: The antis like to think if they can get a federal court to undo this contract the States will be bound to follow unConstitutional law.
[EX A]: | Valid
| 6 | NIv2 | task150_afs_argument_quality_gun_control | fs_opt |
We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.
A lot of the most popular laws (unconstitutional in my estimation from many court cases) were examined by the CDC and NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCE and found no benefit IN ANY OF THE CURRENT ILLEGAL GUN REGULATION/BAN LAWS.
Valid
Prohibition led to an increase in organized crime, but that hasn't seemed to happen in nations that have banned guns.
Valid
Think you are missing the point, there is no way that you can really argue a gun ban within the constitution as is (whether the thing is really valid is another discusion entirely).
| Valid
| 0 | NIv2 | task150_afs_argument_quality_gun_control | fs_opt |
We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.
One example is below.
Q: If gun bans worked there would be no gun deaths in the countries that have banned guns.
A: Valid
Rationale: It is an argument that claims that gun bans will not work.
Q: Is there any proof that would show how making it punishable by law to not report your gun lost or stolen, has actually helped the police recover it?
A: | Valid | 9 | NIv2 | task150_afs_argument_quality_gun_control | fs_opt |
TASK DEFINITION: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.
PROBLEM: Long the dominant view of the Second Amendment, and widely accepted by the federal courts, the collective rights model has recently come under strong criticism from individual rights advocates.
SOLUTION: Valid
PROBLEM: It's also worth mentioning that several of those shootings were stopped by private citizens using their own guns or kids who knew enough about guns to tackle the shooter when he had to reload.
SOLUTION: Valid
PROBLEM: Gun grabbers are woefully ignorant and sometimes find an unwitting accompliice in corrupt courts and prosecutors who ignore the law in favor of their own prejudices.
SOLUTION: | Valid
| 8 | NIv2 | task150_afs_argument_quality_gun_control | fs_opt |
We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.
--------
Question: Now he is getting off topic on an argument he cannot sustain by trying to discredit the militia clause of the Second Amendment and argue for less rights and more gun control.
Answer: Valid
Question: There is no need to go crazy and ban guns, which would probably kill more than it saves, not to mention the infringement on our civil liberties.
Answer: Valid
Question: Since animals can operate them, gun owners obviously need sufficient training to make sure they are used safely.
Answer: | Valid
| 7 | NIv2 | task150_afs_argument_quality_gun_control | fs_opt |
Part 1. Definition
We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.
Part 2. Example
If gun bans worked there would be no gun deaths in the countries that have banned guns.
Answer: Valid
Explanation: It is an argument that claims that gun bans will not work.
Part 3. Exercise
In England, where currently the private ownership of hand guns by the law abiding is absolutely prohibited, crimes involving the use of guns are rapidly increasing: only the criminals have access to them.
Answer: | Valid | 7 | NIv2 | task150_afs_argument_quality_gun_control | fs_opt |
We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.
One example: If gun bans worked there would be no gun deaths in the countries that have banned guns.
Solution is here: Valid
Explanation: It is an argument that claims that gun bans will not work.
Now, solve this: If a politician intends to ban guns, then there is indication of an inflated ego, he/she has the "I'm more trustworthy than you."
Solution: | Valid | 6 | NIv2 | task150_afs_argument_quality_gun_control | fs_opt |
We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.
Example input: If gun bans worked there would be no gun deaths in the countries that have banned guns.
Example output: Valid
Example explanation: It is an argument that claims that gun bans will not work.
Q: Are you going to try and suggest that armed robbery is carried out by people who have a strong conscious and wouldn't harm the helpless?
A: | Valid | 3 | NIv2 | task150_afs_argument_quality_gun_control | fs_opt |
You will be given a definition of a task first, then an example. Follow the example to solve a new instance of the task.
We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.
If gun bans worked there would be no gun deaths in the countries that have banned guns.
Solution: Valid
Why? It is an argument that claims that gun bans will not work.
New input: Well, owning handguns for personal home protection is different that carrying guns in a concealed fashion for protection.
Solution: | Valid | 0 | NIv2 | task150_afs_argument_quality_gun_control | fs_opt |
End of preview. Expand
in Data Studio
README.md exists but content is empty.
- Downloads last month
- 5