inputs stringlengths 395 847 | targets stringclasses 12
values | _template_idx int64 0 9 | _task_source stringclasses 1
value | _task_name stringclasses 1
value | _template_type stringclasses 2
values |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Given the task definition, example input & output, solve the new input case.
You will be given a topic and an argument. Your task is to answer whether the topic and the argument are related or not. A related argument should provide more details about the outcomes of the topic. If the argument refers to or suggests a consequence related to that topic, answer with "yes"; otherwise, answer with "no".
Example: topic: DC handgun ban
argument: Worldwide the ownership of handguns has been correlated with higher homicide rates
Output: yes
The argument is refering to homicide rates as a consequence of handgun ownership. So, the answer should be "yes".
New input case for you: topic: High-speed rail
argument: High-speed rail decreases travel-time between cities.
Output: | yes | 1 | NIv2 | task514_argument_consequence_classification | fs_opt |
You will be given a topic and an argument. Your task is to answer whether the topic and the argument are related or not. A related argument should provide more details about the outcomes of the topic. If the argument refers to or suggests a consequence related to that topic, answer with "yes"; otherwise, answer with "no".
[EX Q]: topic: Banning Muslim hijab
argument: Muslim head-coverings help keep women safe.
[EX A]: yes
[EX Q]: topic: Tibet independence
argument: The right to self-determination must be offered sparingly to avoid international instability.
[EX A]: yes
[EX Q]: topic: Pickens US energy plan
argument: It is relatively cheap to convert existing cars to natural gas.
[EX A]: | yes
| 6 | NIv2 | task514_argument_consequence_classification | fs_opt |
Detailed Instructions: You will be given a topic and an argument. Your task is to answer whether the topic and the argument are related or not. A related argument should provide more details about the outcomes of the topic. If the argument refers to or suggests a consequence related to that topic, answer with "yes"; otherwise, answer with "no".
See one example below:
Problem: topic: DC handgun ban
argument: Worldwide the ownership of handguns has been correlated with higher homicide rates
Solution: yes
Explanation: The argument is refering to homicide rates as a consequence of handgun ownership. So, the answer should be "yes".
Problem: topic: Earmarks
argument: Earmarks have already been significantly reformed
Solution: | no | 4 | NIv2 | task514_argument_consequence_classification | fs_opt |
You will be given a topic and an argument. Your task is to answer whether the topic and the argument are related or not. A related argument should provide more details about the outcomes of the topic. If the argument refers to or suggests a consequence related to that topic, answer with "yes"; otherwise, answer with "no".
Input: Consider Input: topic: Abortion
argument: Legal abortion protects women with serious illnesses that are vulnerable.
Output: no
Input: Consider Input: topic: Polygamy
argument: Polygamy is traumatizing and depressing for wives
Output: yes
Input: Consider Input: topic: Earmarks
argument: Earmarks have already been significantly reformed
| Output: no
| 2 | NIv2 | task514_argument_consequence_classification | fs_opt |
Given the task definition, example input & output, solve the new input case.
You will be given a topic and an argument. Your task is to answer whether the topic and the argument are related or not. A related argument should provide more details about the outcomes of the topic. If the argument refers to or suggests a consequence related to that topic, answer with "yes"; otherwise, answer with "no".
Example: topic: DC handgun ban
argument: Worldwide the ownership of handguns has been correlated with higher homicide rates
Output: yes
The argument is refering to homicide rates as a consequence of handgun ownership. So, the answer should be "yes".
New input case for you: topic: Tibet independence
argument: Protecting Tibetan culture by opposing modernization is wrongheaded.
Output: | no | 1 | NIv2 | task514_argument_consequence_classification | fs_opt |
You will be given a definition of a task first, then an example. Follow the example to solve a new instance of the task.
You will be given a topic and an argument. Your task is to answer whether the topic and the argument are related or not. A related argument should provide more details about the outcomes of the topic. If the argument refers to or suggests a consequence related to that topic, answer with "yes"; otherwise, answer with "no".
topic: DC handgun ban
argument: Worldwide the ownership of handguns has been correlated with higher homicide rates
Solution: yes
Why? The argument is refering to homicide rates as a consequence of handgun ownership. So, the answer should be "yes".
New input: topic: Hydrogen vehicles
argument: Electric car battery technology and costs are improving rapidly
Solution: | no | 0 | NIv2 | task514_argument_consequence_classification | fs_opt |
instruction:
You will be given a topic and an argument. Your task is to answer whether the topic and the argument are related or not. A related argument should provide more details about the outcomes of the topic. If the argument refers to or suggests a consequence related to that topic, answer with "yes"; otherwise, answer with "no".
question:
topic: Geoengineering, solar shading
argument: Solar shading may warm the tropopause and lower stratosphere.
answer:
yes
question:
topic: Law school
argument: Law school aids in personal and professional decision-making
answer:
yes
question:
topic: DC handgun ban
argument: A handgun ban deprives citizens of the most commonly used weapon for self defense
answer:
| yes
| 9 | NIv2 | task514_argument_consequence_classification | fs_opt |
You will be given a topic and an argument. Your task is to answer whether the topic and the argument are related or not. A related argument should provide more details about the outcomes of the topic. If the argument refers to or suggests a consequence related to that topic, answer with "yes"; otherwise, answer with "no".
Let me give you an example: topic: DC handgun ban
argument: Worldwide the ownership of handguns has been correlated with higher homicide rates
The answer to this example can be: yes
Here is why: The argument is refering to homicide rates as a consequence of handgun ownership. So, the answer should be "yes".
OK. solve this:
topic: Colonization of the Moon
argument: Moonbase need not mean permanent colonization for visitors
Answer: | yes | 8 | NIv2 | task514_argument_consequence_classification | fs_opt |
You will be given a topic and an argument. Your task is to answer whether the topic and the argument are related or not. A related argument should provide more details about the outcomes of the topic. If the argument refers to or suggests a consequence related to that topic, answer with "yes"; otherwise, answer with "no".
Example Input: topic: Vegetarianism
argument: Vegetarians are healthy due to their health-consciousness not vegetarianism.
Example Output: no
Example Input: topic: European Union Expansion
argument: Admitting new members to the EU will increase transmission of diseases.
Example Output: yes
Example Input: topic: Vegetarianism
argument: Dominion and meat-eating can and should be excercised responsibly.
Example Output: | no
| 3 | NIv2 | task514_argument_consequence_classification | fs_opt |
You will be given a topic and an argument. Your task is to answer whether the topic and the argument are related or not. A related argument should provide more details about the outcomes of the topic. If the argument refers to or suggests a consequence related to that topic, answer with "yes"; otherwise, answer with "no".
Example: topic: DC handgun ban
argument: Worldwide the ownership of handguns has been correlated with higher homicide rates
Example solution: yes
Example explanation: The argument is refering to homicide rates as a consequence of handgun ownership. So, the answer should be "yes".
Problem: topic: Charter schools
argument: Schools are not like businesses; can't just let bad ones die
| Solution: yes | 5 | NIv2 | task514_argument_consequence_classification | fs_opt |
TASK DEFINITION: You will be given a topic and an argument. Your task is to answer whether the topic and the argument are related or not. A related argument should provide more details about the outcomes of the topic. If the argument refers to or suggests a consequence related to that topic, answer with "yes"; otherwise, answer with "no".
PROBLEM: topic: Polygamy
argument: Polygamy is traumatizing and depressing for wives
SOLUTION: yes
PROBLEM: topic: Hydrogen vehicles
argument: Electric car battery technology and costs are improving rapidly
SOLUTION: no
PROBLEM: topic: Tibet independence
argument: How could China have liberated Tibet in 1949 if it claims prior sovereignty.
SOLUTION: | no
| 8 | NIv2 | task514_argument_consequence_classification | fs_opt |
instruction:
You will be given a topic and an argument. Your task is to answer whether the topic and the argument are related or not. A related argument should provide more details about the outcomes of the topic. If the argument refers to or suggests a consequence related to that topic, answer with "yes"; otherwise, answer with "no".
question:
topic: Animal testing
argument: Animals endure tremendous stress from being locked up.
answer:
yes
question:
topic: DC handgun ban
argument: The implications of the DC handgun ban are not supported nationwide.
answer:
no
question:
topic: Charter schools
argument: Schools are not like businesses; can't just let bad ones die
answer:
| yes
| 9 | NIv2 | task514_argument_consequence_classification | fs_opt |
You will be given a topic and an argument. Your task is to answer whether the topic and the argument are related or not. A related argument should provide more details about the outcomes of the topic. If the argument refers to or suggests a consequence related to that topic, answer with "yes"; otherwise, answer with "no".
One example is below.
Q: topic: DC handgun ban
argument: Worldwide the ownership of handguns has been correlated with higher homicide rates
A: yes
Rationale: The argument is refering to homicide rates as a consequence of handgun ownership. So, the answer should be "yes".
Q: topic: War on Drugs
argument: Legalizing drugs would improve quality control
A: | yes | 9 | NIv2 | task514_argument_consequence_classification | fs_opt |
instruction:
You will be given a topic and an argument. Your task is to answer whether the topic and the argument are related or not. A related argument should provide more details about the outcomes of the topic. If the argument refers to or suggests a consequence related to that topic, answer with "yes"; otherwise, answer with "no".
question:
topic: Is Wikipedia valuable?
argument: Wikipedia is not for individual prose, but superior collective knowledge.
answer:
no
question:
topic: Abortion
argument: Legal abortion protects women with serious illnesses that are vulnerable.
answer:
no
question:
topic: War on Drugs
argument: Legalizing drugs would improve quality control
answer:
| yes
| 9 | NIv2 | task514_argument_consequence_classification | fs_opt |
Given the task definition, example input & output, solve the new input case.
You will be given a topic and an argument. Your task is to answer whether the topic and the argument are related or not. A related argument should provide more details about the outcomes of the topic. If the argument refers to or suggests a consequence related to that topic, answer with "yes"; otherwise, answer with "no".
Example: topic: DC handgun ban
argument: Worldwide the ownership of handguns has been correlated with higher homicide rates
Output: yes
The argument is refering to homicide rates as a consequence of handgun ownership. So, the answer should be "yes".
New input case for you: topic: Dollarization
argument: Dollarization helps encourage foreign investment
Output: | yes | 1 | NIv2 | task514_argument_consequence_classification | fs_opt |
Detailed Instructions: You will be given a topic and an argument. Your task is to answer whether the topic and the argument are related or not. A related argument should provide more details about the outcomes of the topic. If the argument refers to or suggests a consequence related to that topic, answer with "yes"; otherwise, answer with "no".
See one example below:
Problem: topic: DC handgun ban
argument: Worldwide the ownership of handguns has been correlated with higher homicide rates
Solution: yes
Explanation: The argument is refering to homicide rates as a consequence of handgun ownership. So, the answer should be "yes".
Problem: topic: Animal testing
argument: Animals endure tremendous stress from being locked up.
Solution: | yes | 4 | NIv2 | task514_argument_consequence_classification | fs_opt |
You will be given a topic and an argument. Your task is to answer whether the topic and the argument are related or not. A related argument should provide more details about the outcomes of the topic. If the argument refers to or suggests a consequence related to that topic, answer with "yes"; otherwise, answer with "no".
One example is below.
Q: topic: DC handgun ban
argument: Worldwide the ownership of handguns has been correlated with higher homicide rates
A: yes
Rationale: The argument is refering to homicide rates as a consequence of handgun ownership. So, the answer should be "yes".
Q: topic: Tibet independence
argument: There is no international consensus on the rights of nationalities to self determination
A: | no | 9 | NIv2 | task514_argument_consequence_classification | fs_opt |
You will be given a topic and an argument. Your task is to answer whether the topic and the argument are related or not. A related argument should provide more details about the outcomes of the topic. If the argument refers to or suggests a consequence related to that topic, answer with "yes"; otherwise, answer with "no".
One example is below.
Q: topic: DC handgun ban
argument: Worldwide the ownership of handguns has been correlated with higher homicide rates
A: yes
Rationale: The argument is refering to homicide rates as a consequence of handgun ownership. So, the answer should be "yes".
Q: topic: Medical marijuana dispensaries
argument: Smoking marijuana impairs the immune system
A: | no | 9 | NIv2 | task514_argument_consequence_classification | fs_opt |
You will be given a topic and an argument. Your task is to answer whether the topic and the argument are related or not. A related argument should provide more details about the outcomes of the topic. If the argument refers to or suggests a consequence related to that topic, answer with "yes"; otherwise, answer with "no".
Ex Input:
topic: Three Gorges Dam
argument: The Three Gorges Dam is a cause of corruption.
Ex Output:
yes
Ex Input:
topic: International Criminal Court
argument: The ICC risks heavy politicization of prosecution
Ex Output:
no
Ex Input:
topic: Medical marijuana dispensaries
argument: Smoking marijuana impairs the immune system
Ex Output:
| no
| 1 | NIv2 | task514_argument_consequence_classification | fs_opt |
Given the task definition, example input & output, solve the new input case.
You will be given a topic and an argument. Your task is to answer whether the topic and the argument are related or not. A related argument should provide more details about the outcomes of the topic. If the argument refers to or suggests a consequence related to that topic, answer with "yes"; otherwise, answer with "no".
Example: topic: DC handgun ban
argument: Worldwide the ownership of handguns has been correlated with higher homicide rates
Output: yes
The argument is refering to homicide rates as a consequence of handgun ownership. So, the answer should be "yes".
New input case for you: topic: Wave power
argument: Oceans corrode wave power systems, which is costly
Output: | yes | 1 | NIv2 | task514_argument_consequence_classification | fs_opt |
You will be given a topic and an argument. Your task is to answer whether the topic and the argument are related or not. A related argument should provide more details about the outcomes of the topic. If the argument refers to or suggests a consequence related to that topic, answer with "yes"; otherwise, answer with "no".
Input: Consider Input: topic: UN Security Council veto
argument: The UN SC veto is justifiably given to nuclear powers
Output: no
Input: Consider Input: topic: Medical marijuana dispensaries
argument: The State is justified in protecting individuals from themselves
Output: no
Input: Consider Input: topic: Michigan and Florida delegates in 2008 US elections
argument: It is unclear who should pay for mail re-votes in Mich and Florida
| Output: yes
| 2 | NIv2 | task514_argument_consequence_classification | fs_opt |
You will be given a topic and an argument. Your task is to answer whether the topic and the argument are related or not. A related argument should provide more details about the outcomes of the topic. If the argument refers to or suggests a consequence related to that topic, answer with "yes"; otherwise, answer with "no".
Q: topic: Palestinian right of return
argument: Plenty of room in Israel for Palestinians to return
A: no
****
Q: topic: Mandatory labeling of genetically modified foods
argument: Unlabelled GM foods violate free right to exercise religion.
A: no
****
Q: topic: Osama Bin Laden Sea Burial
argument: Islamic law flexible to special burials such as Bin Laden's.
A: | no
****
| 4 | NIv2 | task514_argument_consequence_classification | fs_opt |
You will be given a topic and an argument. Your task is to answer whether the topic and the argument are related or not. A related argument should provide more details about the outcomes of the topic. If the argument refers to or suggests a consequence related to that topic, answer with "yes"; otherwise, answer with "no".
Example input: topic: DC handgun ban
argument: Worldwide the ownership of handguns has been correlated with higher homicide rates
Example output: yes
Example explanation: The argument is refering to homicide rates as a consequence of handgun ownership. So, the answer should be "yes".
Q: topic: Is Wikipedia valuable?
argument: Wikipedia is not for individual prose, but superior collective knowledge.
A: | no | 3 | NIv2 | task514_argument_consequence_classification | fs_opt |
You will be given a topic and an argument. Your task is to answer whether the topic and the argument are related or not. A related argument should provide more details about the outcomes of the topic. If the argument refers to or suggests a consequence related to that topic, answer with "yes"; otherwise, answer with "no".
Ex Input:
topic: Hunting for sport
argument: Hunting is dangerous, injuring and killing many humans.
Ex Output:
yes
Ex Input:
topic: Osama Bin Laden Sea Burial
argument: Islamic law flexible to special burials such as Bin Laden's.
Ex Output:
no
Ex Input:
topic: Legalization of drugs
argument: Forbidden fruit concept is nonsense.
Ex Output:
| no
| 1 | NIv2 | task514_argument_consequence_classification | fs_opt |
Detailed Instructions: You will be given a topic and an argument. Your task is to answer whether the topic and the argument are related or not. A related argument should provide more details about the outcomes of the topic. If the argument refers to or suggests a consequence related to that topic, answer with "yes"; otherwise, answer with "no".
See one example below:
Problem: topic: DC handgun ban
argument: Worldwide the ownership of handguns has been correlated with higher homicide rates
Solution: yes
Explanation: The argument is refering to homicide rates as a consequence of handgun ownership. So, the answer should be "yes".
Problem: topic: International Criminal Court
argument: UN Security Council can check/veto ICC prosecutions
Solution: | no | 4 | NIv2 | task514_argument_consequence_classification | fs_opt |
You will be given a topic and an argument. Your task is to answer whether the topic and the argument are related or not. A related argument should provide more details about the outcomes of the topic. If the argument refers to or suggests a consequence related to that topic, answer with "yes"; otherwise, answer with "no".
[EX Q]: topic: Medical marijuana dispensaries
argument: More money for other sectors
[EX A]: yes
[EX Q]: topic: Michigan and Florida delegates in 2008 US elections
argument: It is unclear who should pay for mail re-votes in Mich and Florida
[EX A]: yes
[EX Q]: topic: Affirmative action
argument: Diversity is supplimentary to goal of fairness.
[EX A]: | no
| 6 | NIv2 | task514_argument_consequence_classification | fs_opt |
You will be given a topic and an argument. Your task is to answer whether the topic and the argument are related or not. A related argument should provide more details about the outcomes of the topic. If the argument refers to or suggests a consequence related to that topic, answer with "yes"; otherwise, answer with "no".
[Q]: topic: Abortion
argument: Legal abortion protects women with serious illnesses that are vulnerable.
[A]: no
[Q]: topic: Tibet independence
argument: Tibet can follow the East Timor model to achieving independence
[A]: no
[Q]: topic: Animal testing
argument: Alternatives cannot replace animal testing for certain objectives
[A]: | no
| 5 | NIv2 | task514_argument_consequence_classification | fs_opt |
You will be given a topic and an argument. Your task is to answer whether the topic and the argument are related or not. A related argument should provide more details about the outcomes of the topic. If the argument refers to or suggests a consequence related to that topic, answer with "yes"; otherwise, answer with "no".
[EX Q]: topic: Primaries in US elections
argument: Party bosses are legally permitted to exercise power in primaries
[EX A]: no
[EX Q]: topic: Mandatory calorie counts on menus
argument: It is difficult for restaurants to keep calorie counts consistent.
[EX A]: no
[EX Q]: topic: Prostitution
argument: State resources should not be wasted fighting prostitution
[EX A]: | no
| 6 | NIv2 | task514_argument_consequence_classification | fs_opt |
Teacher: You will be given a topic and an argument. Your task is to answer whether the topic and the argument are related or not. A related argument should provide more details about the outcomes of the topic. If the argument refers to or suggests a consequence related to that topic, answer with "yes"; otherwise, answer with "no".
Teacher: Now, understand the problem? If you are still confused, see the following example:
topic: DC handgun ban
argument: Worldwide the ownership of handguns has been correlated with higher homicide rates
Solution: yes
Reason: The argument is refering to homicide rates as a consequence of handgun ownership. So, the answer should be "yes".
Now, solve this instance: topic: Animal testing
argument: The number of animals used in experiments should be reduced by.
Student: | no | 2 | NIv2 | task514_argument_consequence_classification | fs_opt |
You will be given a topic and an argument. Your task is to answer whether the topic and the argument are related or not. A related argument should provide more details about the outcomes of the topic. If the argument refers to or suggests a consequence related to that topic, answer with "yes"; otherwise, answer with "no".
[EX Q]: topic: Manned mission to Mars
argument: Martian dust is a major risk to a manned mission
[EX A]: yes
[EX Q]: topic: Carbon capture and storage
argument: Climate change is best solved by energy efficiency, not CCS
[EX A]: no
[EX Q]: topic: Gays in the US military
argument: Costs of DADT are justified to uphold military efficacy.
[EX A]: | no
| 6 | NIv2 | task514_argument_consequence_classification | fs_opt |
You will be given a topic and an argument. Your task is to answer whether the topic and the argument are related or not. A related argument should provide more details about the outcomes of the topic. If the argument refers to or suggests a consequence related to that topic, answer with "yes"; otherwise, answer with "no".
Input: Consider Input: topic: Mandatory calorie counts on menus
argument: It is difficult for restaurants to keep calorie counts consistent.
Output: no
Input: Consider Input: topic: Nuclear energy
argument: Nuclear energy economies of scale are improving
Output: no
Input: Consider Input: topic: Pornography
argument: Porn-watching is one-sidedly dominated by men.
| Output: yes
| 2 | NIv2 | task514_argument_consequence_classification | fs_opt |
You will be given a topic and an argument. Your task is to answer whether the topic and the argument are related or not. A related argument should provide more details about the outcomes of the topic. If the argument refers to or suggests a consequence related to that topic, answer with "yes"; otherwise, answer with "no".
topic: Withdrawing from Iraq
argument: Prolonging the Iraq War will permanently damaged the US military
yes
topic: Catholic Church contraception policy
argument: Undoing ban on condoms would prevent schisms in Church.
yes
topic: Lowering US drinking age from 21 to 18
argument: Safer roads with 21 drinking laws outweighs all trade-offs
| yes
| 0 | NIv2 | task514_argument_consequence_classification | fs_opt |
You will be given a topic and an argument. Your task is to answer whether the topic and the argument are related or not. A related argument should provide more details about the outcomes of the topic. If the argument refers to or suggests a consequence related to that topic, answer with "yes"; otherwise, answer with "no".
Q: topic: Michigan and Florida delegates in 2008 US elections
argument: Republican control of Michigan legislature makes Democratic primary re-vote unlikely
A: no
****
Q: topic: Solar energy
argument: The recovery/payback period can be very short.
A: yes
****
Q: topic: Child beauty pageants
argument: Beauty pageants exist for boys.
A: | no
****
| 4 | NIv2 | task514_argument_consequence_classification | fs_opt |
Given the task definition, example input & output, solve the new input case.
You will be given a topic and an argument. Your task is to answer whether the topic and the argument are related or not. A related argument should provide more details about the outcomes of the topic. If the argument refers to or suggests a consequence related to that topic, answer with "yes"; otherwise, answer with "no".
Example: topic: DC handgun ban
argument: Worldwide the ownership of handguns has been correlated with higher homicide rates
Output: yes
The argument is refering to homicide rates as a consequence of handgun ownership. So, the answer should be "yes".
New input case for you: topic: Infant male circumcision
argument: Circumcision shortens the penis slightly
Output: | yes | 1 | NIv2 | task514_argument_consequence_classification | fs_opt |
Teacher: You will be given a topic and an argument. Your task is to answer whether the topic and the argument are related or not. A related argument should provide more details about the outcomes of the topic. If the argument refers to or suggests a consequence related to that topic, answer with "yes"; otherwise, answer with "no".
Teacher: Now, understand the problem? If you are still confused, see the following example:
topic: DC handgun ban
argument: Worldwide the ownership of handguns has been correlated with higher homicide rates
Solution: yes
Reason: The argument is refering to homicide rates as a consequence of handgun ownership. So, the answer should be "yes".
Now, solve this instance: topic: Graduated response antipiracy laws
argument: General statements supporting graduated response
Student: | no | 2 | NIv2 | task514_argument_consequence_classification | fs_opt |
You will be given a definition of a task first, then an example. Follow the example to solve a new instance of the task.
You will be given a topic and an argument. Your task is to answer whether the topic and the argument are related or not. A related argument should provide more details about the outcomes of the topic. If the argument refers to or suggests a consequence related to that topic, answer with "yes"; otherwise, answer with "no".
topic: DC handgun ban
argument: Worldwide the ownership of handguns has been correlated with higher homicide rates
Solution: yes
Why? The argument is refering to homicide rates as a consequence of handgun ownership. So, the answer should be "yes".
New input: topic: New START Treaty
argument: Delay risks dangerous non-ratification.
Solution: | no | 0 | NIv2 | task514_argument_consequence_classification | fs_opt |
You will be given a topic and an argument. Your task is to answer whether the topic and the argument are related or not. A related argument should provide more details about the outcomes of the topic. If the argument refers to or suggests a consequence related to that topic, answer with "yes"; otherwise, answer with "no".
One example is below.
Q: topic: DC handgun ban
argument: Worldwide the ownership of handguns has been correlated with higher homicide rates
A: yes
Rationale: The argument is refering to homicide rates as a consequence of handgun ownership. So, the answer should be "yes".
Q: topic: Medical marijuana dispensaries
argument: More money for other sectors
A: | yes | 9 | NIv2 | task514_argument_consequence_classification | fs_opt |
Given the task definition, example input & output, solve the new input case.
You will be given a topic and an argument. Your task is to answer whether the topic and the argument are related or not. A related argument should provide more details about the outcomes of the topic. If the argument refers to or suggests a consequence related to that topic, answer with "yes"; otherwise, answer with "no".
Example: topic: DC handgun ban
argument: Worldwide the ownership of handguns has been correlated with higher homicide rates
Output: yes
The argument is refering to homicide rates as a consequence of handgun ownership. So, the answer should be "yes".
New input case for you: topic: Israeli military assault in Gaza
argument: Proportional response from Israel only prolongs conflict
Output: | yes | 1 | NIv2 | task514_argument_consequence_classification | fs_opt |
Detailed Instructions: You will be given a topic and an argument. Your task is to answer whether the topic and the argument are related or not. A related argument should provide more details about the outcomes of the topic. If the argument refers to or suggests a consequence related to that topic, answer with "yes"; otherwise, answer with "no".
See one example below:
Problem: topic: DC handgun ban
argument: Worldwide the ownership of handguns has been correlated with higher homicide rates
Solution: yes
Explanation: The argument is refering to homicide rates as a consequence of handgun ownership. So, the answer should be "yes".
Problem: topic: Medical marijuana dispensaries
argument: The State is justified in protecting individuals from themselves
Solution: | no | 4 | NIv2 | task514_argument_consequence_classification | fs_opt |
You will be given a topic and an argument. Your task is to answer whether the topic and the argument are related or not. A related argument should provide more details about the outcomes of the topic. If the argument refers to or suggests a consequence related to that topic, answer with "yes"; otherwise, answer with "no".
[EX Q]: topic: Animal testing
argument: Tested animals are treated humanely.
[EX A]: no
[EX Q]: topic: Pickens US energy plan
argument: It is relatively cheap to convert existing cars to natural gas.
[EX A]: yes
[EX Q]: topic: Withdrawing from Iraq
argument: Iran's influence in Iraq would grow significantly if the United States withdraws.
[EX A]: | yes
| 6 | NIv2 | task514_argument_consequence_classification | fs_opt |
You will be given a topic and an argument. Your task is to answer whether the topic and the argument are related or not. A related argument should provide more details about the outcomes of the topic. If the argument refers to or suggests a consequence related to that topic, answer with "yes"; otherwise, answer with "no".
One example is below.
Q: topic: DC handgun ban
argument: Worldwide the ownership of handguns has been correlated with higher homicide rates
A: yes
Rationale: The argument is refering to homicide rates as a consequence of handgun ownership. So, the answer should be "yes".
Q: topic: European Union Expansion
argument: Integration is not prevented by EU expansion.
A: | no | 9 | NIv2 | task514_argument_consequence_classification | fs_opt |
You will be given a topic and an argument. Your task is to answer whether the topic and the argument are related or not. A related argument should provide more details about the outcomes of the topic. If the argument refers to or suggests a consequence related to that topic, answer with "yes"; otherwise, answer with "no".
[Q]: topic: Abortion
argument: Abortion may have a positive or neutral impact on the emotions of the women
[A]: no
[Q]: topic: Bullfighting
argument: Bullfighting is not that big of a tourist draw.
[A]: yes
[Q]: topic: Catholic Church contraception policy
argument: Undoing ban on condoms would prevent schisms in Church.
[A]: | yes
| 5 | NIv2 | task514_argument_consequence_classification | fs_opt |
You will be given a topic and an argument. Your task is to answer whether the topic and the argument are related or not. A related argument should provide more details about the outcomes of the topic. If the argument refers to or suggests a consequence related to that topic, answer with "yes"; otherwise, answer with "no".
Example: topic: DC handgun ban
argument: Worldwide the ownership of handguns has been correlated with higher homicide rates
Example solution: yes
Example explanation: The argument is refering to homicide rates as a consequence of handgun ownership. So, the answer should be "yes".
Problem: topic: Joint JD/MBA degree
argument: Other joint degrees sometimes better than JD/MBA.
| Solution: no | 5 | NIv2 | task514_argument_consequence_classification | fs_opt |
You will be given a topic and an argument. Your task is to answer whether the topic and the argument are related or not. A related argument should provide more details about the outcomes of the topic. If the argument refers to or suggests a consequence related to that topic, answer with "yes"; otherwise, answer with "no".
[Q]: topic: Public health insurance option
argument: There are not enough votes to pass a public insurance plan.
[A]: no
[Q]: topic: Assassination of a Dictator
argument: People would support Israel's assassinations if they lived in Israel
[A]: no
[Q]: topic: Joint JD/MBA degree
argument: Other joint degrees sometimes better than JD/MBA.
[A]: | no
| 5 | NIv2 | task514_argument_consequence_classification | fs_opt |
You will be given a topic and an argument. Your task is to answer whether the topic and the argument are related or not. A related argument should provide more details about the outcomes of the topic. If the argument refers to or suggests a consequence related to that topic, answer with "yes"; otherwise, answer with "no".
[Q]: topic: Animal testing
argument: Tested animals are treated humanely.
[A]: no
[Q]: topic: Hydrogen vehicles
argument: Electric car battery technology and costs are improving rapidly
[A]: no
[Q]: topic: Assassination of a Dictator
argument: Assassinations protect publics from terrorism; even while it's hard to measure
[A]: | yes
| 5 | NIv2 | task514_argument_consequence_classification | fs_opt |
You will be given a topic and an argument. Your task is to answer whether the topic and the argument are related or not. A related argument should provide more details about the outcomes of the topic. If the argument refers to or suggests a consequence related to that topic, answer with "yes"; otherwise, answer with "no".
[Q]: topic: Nuclear energy
argument: Nuclear energy economies of scale are improving
[A]: no
[Q]: topic: Colonization of the Moon
argument: Moonbase need not mean permanent colonization for visitors
[A]: yes
[Q]: topic: Cluster bomb ban
argument: Cluster bomb ban will put US soldiers at risk
[A]: | yes
| 5 | NIv2 | task514_argument_consequence_classification | fs_opt |
instruction:
You will be given a topic and an argument. Your task is to answer whether the topic and the argument are related or not. A related argument should provide more details about the outcomes of the topic. If the argument refers to or suggests a consequence related to that topic, answer with "yes"; otherwise, answer with "no".
question:
topic: Graduated response antipiracy laws
argument: Graduated response helps avoid litigating against consumers.
answer:
no
question:
topic: Animal testing
argument: Alternatives cannot replace animal testing for certain objectives
answer:
no
question:
topic: Republika Srpska secession from Bosnia and Herzegovina
argument: Dayton/Bosnia failures give cause to Republika Srpska secession
answer:
| no
| 9 | NIv2 | task514_argument_consequence_classification | fs_opt |
Part 1. Definition
You will be given a topic and an argument. Your task is to answer whether the topic and the argument are related or not. A related argument should provide more details about the outcomes of the topic. If the argument refers to or suggests a consequence related to that topic, answer with "yes"; otherwise, answer with "no".
Part 2. Example
topic: DC handgun ban
argument: Worldwide the ownership of handguns has been correlated with higher homicide rates
Answer: yes
Explanation: The argument is refering to homicide rates as a consequence of handgun ownership. So, the answer should be "yes".
Part 3. Exercise
topic: Republika Srpska secession from Bosnia and Herzegovina
argument: Dayton/Bosnia failures give cause to Republika Srpska secession
Answer: | no | 7 | NIv2 | task514_argument_consequence_classification | fs_opt |
You will be given a topic and an argument. Your task is to answer whether the topic and the argument are related or not. A related argument should provide more details about the outcomes of the topic. If the argument refers to or suggests a consequence related to that topic, answer with "yes"; otherwise, answer with "no".
topic: Constitutionality of US health insurance mandates
argument: Driving is not a choice for many; buying insurance is mandatory.
no
topic: Vegetarianism
argument: Dominion and meat-eating can and should be excercised responsibly.
no
topic: Vehicle fuel economy standards
argument: CAFE standards have strong history of reducing US emissions
| yes
| 0 | NIv2 | task514_argument_consequence_classification | fs_opt |
Detailed Instructions: You will be given a topic and an argument. Your task is to answer whether the topic and the argument are related or not. A related argument should provide more details about the outcomes of the topic. If the argument refers to or suggests a consequence related to that topic, answer with "yes"; otherwise, answer with "no".
See one example below:
Problem: topic: DC handgun ban
argument: Worldwide the ownership of handguns has been correlated with higher homicide rates
Solution: yes
Explanation: The argument is refering to homicide rates as a consequence of handgun ownership. So, the answer should be "yes".
Problem: topic: Law school
argument: Legal work requires sitting at a desk for long hours.
Solution: | no | 4 | NIv2 | task514_argument_consequence_classification | fs_opt |
You will be given a topic and an argument. Your task is to answer whether the topic and the argument are related or not. A related argument should provide more details about the outcomes of the topic. If the argument refers to or suggests a consequence related to that topic, answer with "yes"; otherwise, answer with "no".
Ex Input:
topic: High-speed rail
argument: High-speed trains: costly govt project in search of need
Ex Output:
no
Ex Input:
topic: Israeli raid on Gaza flotilla
argument: Israeli raid in international waters violates i-law
Ex Output:
yes
Ex Input:
topic: Law school
argument: Legal work requires sitting at a desk for long hours.
Ex Output:
| no
| 1 | NIv2 | task514_argument_consequence_classification | fs_opt |
You will be given a topic and an argument. Your task is to answer whether the topic and the argument are related or not. A related argument should provide more details about the outcomes of the topic. If the argument refers to or suggests a consequence related to that topic, answer with "yes"; otherwise, answer with "no".
One example is below.
Q: topic: DC handgun ban
argument: Worldwide the ownership of handguns has been correlated with higher homicide rates
A: yes
Rationale: The argument is refering to homicide rates as a consequence of handgun ownership. So, the answer should be "yes".
Q: topic: Dollarization
argument: Dollarization will not help nations with sound economic policies
A: | no | 9 | NIv2 | task514_argument_consequence_classification | fs_opt |
Part 1. Definition
You will be given a topic and an argument. Your task is to answer whether the topic and the argument are related or not. A related argument should provide more details about the outcomes of the topic. If the argument refers to or suggests a consequence related to that topic, answer with "yes"; otherwise, answer with "no".
Part 2. Example
topic: DC handgun ban
argument: Worldwide the ownership of handguns has been correlated with higher homicide rates
Answer: yes
Explanation: The argument is refering to homicide rates as a consequence of handgun ownership. So, the answer should be "yes".
Part 3. Exercise
topic: Airport security profiling
argument: Profiling will help avoid invasive scanners and pat-downs.
Answer: | no | 7 | NIv2 | task514_argument_consequence_classification | fs_opt |
You will be given a topic and an argument. Your task is to answer whether the topic and the argument are related or not. A related argument should provide more details about the outcomes of the topic. If the argument refers to or suggests a consequence related to that topic, answer with "yes"; otherwise, answer with "no".
Example input: topic: DC handgun ban
argument: Worldwide the ownership of handguns has been correlated with higher homicide rates
Example output: yes
Example explanation: The argument is refering to homicide rates as a consequence of handgun ownership. So, the answer should be "yes".
Q: topic: Tibet independence
argument: Tibet can follow the East Timor model to achieving independence
A: | no | 3 | NIv2 | task514_argument_consequence_classification | fs_opt |
Teacher: You will be given a topic and an argument. Your task is to answer whether the topic and the argument are related or not. A related argument should provide more details about the outcomes of the topic. If the argument refers to or suggests a consequence related to that topic, answer with "yes"; otherwise, answer with "no".
Teacher: Now, understand the problem? If you are still confused, see the following example:
topic: DC handgun ban
argument: Worldwide the ownership of handguns has been correlated with higher homicide rates
Solution: yes
Reason: The argument is refering to homicide rates as a consequence of handgun ownership. So, the answer should be "yes".
Now, solve this instance: topic: Ban on human reproductive cloning
argument: Cloning will involve the creation of children for predetermined roles.
Student: | yes | 2 | NIv2 | task514_argument_consequence_classification | fs_opt |
instruction:
You will be given a topic and an argument. Your task is to answer whether the topic and the argument are related or not. A related argument should provide more details about the outcomes of the topic. If the argument refers to or suggests a consequence related to that topic, answer with "yes"; otherwise, answer with "no".
question:
topic: Kyoto Protocol
argument: It is unimportant for the US to join Kyoto now
answer:
no
question:
topic: Banning Muslim hijab
argument: Muslim head-coverings help keep women safe.
answer:
yes
question:
topic: Legalization of Marijuana
argument: Marijuana use can lead to cancer
answer:
| yes
| 9 | NIv2 | task514_argument_consequence_classification | fs_opt |
Teacher: You will be given a topic and an argument. Your task is to answer whether the topic and the argument are related or not. A related argument should provide more details about the outcomes of the topic. If the argument refers to or suggests a consequence related to that topic, answer with "yes"; otherwise, answer with "no".
Teacher: Now, understand the problem? If you are still confused, see the following example:
topic: DC handgun ban
argument: Worldwide the ownership of handguns has been correlated with higher homicide rates
Solution: yes
Reason: The argument is refering to homicide rates as a consequence of handgun ownership. So, the answer should be "yes".
Now, solve this instance: topic: Ground zero mosque
argument: Defending mosque honors constitution first responders were protecting.
Student: | no | 2 | NIv2 | task514_argument_consequence_classification | fs_opt |
TASK DEFINITION: You will be given a topic and an argument. Your task is to answer whether the topic and the argument are related or not. A related argument should provide more details about the outcomes of the topic. If the argument refers to or suggests a consequence related to that topic, answer with "yes"; otherwise, answer with "no".
PROBLEM: topic: DC handgun ban
argument: 2nd amendment combines right to militia and individual arms
SOLUTION: yes
PROBLEM: topic: Hydroelectric dams
argument: Dams last over a hundred years; good return on investment
SOLUTION: no
PROBLEM: topic: Right to bear arms in the US
argument: America's modern military makes the militia unnecessary for national security.
SOLUTION: | no
| 8 | NIv2 | task514_argument_consequence_classification | fs_opt |
You will be given a topic and an argument. Your task is to answer whether the topic and the argument are related or not. A related argument should provide more details about the outcomes of the topic. If the argument refers to or suggests a consequence related to that topic, answer with "yes"; otherwise, answer with "no".
Example Input: topic: Network neutrality
argument: Insufficient broadband market choice to deter bad behavior
Example Output: no
Example Input: topic: Prostitution
argument: Legalization will increase prostitution and subsequently worsen public health.
Example Output: yes
Example Input: topic: Bush economic stimulus plan
argument: Tax Rate Cuts, Not Tax Rebates, Stimulate the Economy
Example Output: | yes
| 3 | NIv2 | task514_argument_consequence_classification | fs_opt |
You will be given a topic and an argument. Your task is to answer whether the topic and the argument are related or not. A related argument should provide more details about the outcomes of the topic. If the argument refers to or suggests a consequence related to that topic, answer with "yes"; otherwise, answer with "no".
[EX Q]: topic: Tibet independence
argument: There is no international consensus on the rights of nationalities to self determination
[EX A]: no
[EX Q]: topic: UN Security Council veto
argument: The UN SC veto is justifiably given to nuclear powers
[EX A]: no
[EX Q]: topic: Polygamy
argument: Polygamy is common in some apes; from which humans descended
[EX A]: | no
| 6 | NIv2 | task514_argument_consequence_classification | fs_opt |
You will be given a topic and an argument. Your task is to answer whether the topic and the argument are related or not. A related argument should provide more details about the outcomes of the topic. If the argument refers to or suggests a consequence related to that topic, answer with "yes"; otherwise, answer with "no".
[EX Q]: topic: Animal testing
argument: Tested animals are treated humanely.
[EX A]: no
[EX Q]: topic: Airport security profiling
argument: Profiling will help avoid invasive scanners and pat-downs.
[EX A]: no
[EX Q]: topic: Tibet independence
argument: China is highly unlikely to agree to any negotiations without ruling out Tibet independence
[EX A]: | no
| 6 | NIv2 | task514_argument_consequence_classification | fs_opt |
You will be given a topic and an argument. Your task is to answer whether the topic and the argument are related or not. A related argument should provide more details about the outcomes of the topic. If the argument refers to or suggests a consequence related to that topic, answer with "yes"; otherwise, answer with "no".
[Q]: topic: Prostitution
argument: By worsening HIV/AIDS, prostitution will devastate societies
[A]: no
[Q]: topic: Animal testing
argument: Tested animals are treated humanely.
[A]: no
[Q]: topic: Charter schools
argument: Charter schools do not achieve economies of scale
[A]: | yes
| 5 | NIv2 | task514_argument_consequence_classification | fs_opt |
You will be given a topic and an argument. Your task is to answer whether the topic and the argument are related or not. A related argument should provide more details about the outcomes of the topic. If the argument refers to or suggests a consequence related to that topic, answer with "yes"; otherwise, answer with "no".
One example is below.
Q: topic: DC handgun ban
argument: Worldwide the ownership of handguns has been correlated with higher homicide rates
A: yes
Rationale: The argument is refering to homicide rates as a consequence of handgun ownership. So, the answer should be "yes".
Q: topic: Kyoto Protocol
argument: Opponents of Kyoto are pandering to the energy industry
A: | no | 9 | NIv2 | task514_argument_consequence_classification | fs_opt |
Teacher: You will be given a topic and an argument. Your task is to answer whether the topic and the argument are related or not. A related argument should provide more details about the outcomes of the topic. If the argument refers to or suggests a consequence related to that topic, answer with "yes"; otherwise, answer with "no".
Teacher: Now, understand the problem? If you are still confused, see the following example:
topic: DC handgun ban
argument: Worldwide the ownership of handguns has been correlated with higher homicide rates
Solution: yes
Reason: The argument is refering to homicide rates as a consequence of handgun ownership. So, the answer should be "yes".
Now, solve this instance: topic: UN Security Council veto
argument: The UN SC veto is justifiably given to nuclear powers
Student: | no | 2 | NIv2 | task514_argument_consequence_classification | fs_opt |
instruction:
You will be given a topic and an argument. Your task is to answer whether the topic and the argument are related or not. A related argument should provide more details about the outcomes of the topic. If the argument refers to or suggests a consequence related to that topic, answer with "yes"; otherwise, answer with "no".
question:
topic: Michigan and Florida delegates in 2008 US elections
argument: It is unclear who should pay for mail re-votes in Mich and Florida
answer:
yes
question:
topic: Medical marijuana dispensaries
argument: Smoking marijuana impairs the immune system
answer:
no
question:
topic: Prostitution
argument: Many libertarian feminists consider that prostitution reflects the independence and dominance of modern women.
answer:
| no
| 9 | NIv2 | task514_argument_consequence_classification | fs_opt |
You will be given a topic and an argument. Your task is to answer whether the topic and the argument are related or not. A related argument should provide more details about the outcomes of the topic. If the argument refers to or suggests a consequence related to that topic, answer with "yes"; otherwise, answer with "no".
Input: Consider Input: topic: Hunting for sport
argument: Hunting is dangerous, injuring and killing many humans.
Output: yes
Input: Consider Input: topic: Single-payer universal health care
argument: US health care costs more because Americans pay to avoid waiting.
Output: yes
Input: Consider Input: topic: Single-payer universal health care
argument: US health care costs more because Americans pay to avoid waiting.
| Output: yes
| 2 | NIv2 | task514_argument_consequence_classification | fs_opt |
You will be given a topic and an argument. Your task is to answer whether the topic and the argument are related or not. A related argument should provide more details about the outcomes of the topic. If the argument refers to or suggests a consequence related to that topic, answer with "yes"; otherwise, answer with "no".
Example input: topic: DC handgun ban
argument: Worldwide the ownership of handguns has been correlated with higher homicide rates
Example output: yes
Example explanation: The argument is refering to homicide rates as a consequence of handgun ownership. So, the answer should be "yes".
Q: topic: Three Gorges Dam
argument: The Three Gorges Dam is a cause of corruption.
A: | yes | 3 | NIv2 | task514_argument_consequence_classification | fs_opt |
You will be given a topic and an argument. Your task is to answer whether the topic and the argument are related or not. A related argument should provide more details about the outcomes of the topic. If the argument refers to or suggests a consequence related to that topic, answer with "yes"; otherwise, answer with "no".
Example Input: topic: Abolition of nuclear weapons
argument: Nuclear weapons could fall into terrorists' hands
Example Output: yes
Example Input: topic: DC handgun ban
argument: A handgun ban deprives citizens of the most commonly used weapon for self defense
Example Output: yes
Example Input: topic: Public health insurance option
argument: There are not enough votes to pass a public insurance plan.
Example Output: | no
| 3 | NIv2 | task514_argument_consequence_classification | fs_opt |
You will be given a topic and an argument. Your task is to answer whether the topic and the argument are related or not. A related argument should provide more details about the outcomes of the topic. If the argument refers to or suggests a consequence related to that topic, answer with "yes"; otherwise, answer with "no".
Let me give you an example: topic: DC handgun ban
argument: Worldwide the ownership of handguns has been correlated with higher homicide rates
The answer to this example can be: yes
Here is why: The argument is refering to homicide rates as a consequence of handgun ownership. So, the answer should be "yes".
OK. solve this:
topic: Single-payer universal health care
argument: Universal health care lowers long-term health costs
Answer: | yes | 8 | NIv2 | task514_argument_consequence_classification | fs_opt |
Part 1. Definition
You will be given a topic and an argument. Your task is to answer whether the topic and the argument are related or not. A related argument should provide more details about the outcomes of the topic. If the argument refers to or suggests a consequence related to that topic, answer with "yes"; otherwise, answer with "no".
Part 2. Example
topic: DC handgun ban
argument: Worldwide the ownership of handguns has been correlated with higher homicide rates
Answer: yes
Explanation: The argument is refering to homicide rates as a consequence of handgun ownership. So, the answer should be "yes".
Part 3. Exercise
topic: Catholic Church contraception policy
argument: Undoing ban on condoms would prevent schisms in Church.
Answer: | yes | 7 | NIv2 | task514_argument_consequence_classification | fs_opt |
You will be given a definition of a task first, then an example. Follow the example to solve a new instance of the task.
You will be given a topic and an argument. Your task is to answer whether the topic and the argument are related or not. A related argument should provide more details about the outcomes of the topic. If the argument refers to or suggests a consequence related to that topic, answer with "yes"; otherwise, answer with "no".
topic: DC handgun ban
argument: Worldwide the ownership of handguns has been correlated with higher homicide rates
Solution: yes
Why? The argument is refering to homicide rates as a consequence of handgun ownership. So, the answer should be "yes".
New input: topic: Falkland Islands, return of
argument: Relations with Argentina are not important to Britain.
Solution: | no | 0 | NIv2 | task514_argument_consequence_classification | fs_opt |
You will be given a topic and an argument. Your task is to answer whether the topic and the argument are related or not. A related argument should provide more details about the outcomes of the topic. If the argument refers to or suggests a consequence related to that topic, answer with "yes"; otherwise, answer with "no".
Example input: topic: DC handgun ban
argument: Worldwide the ownership of handguns has been correlated with higher homicide rates
Example output: yes
Example explanation: The argument is refering to homicide rates as a consequence of handgun ownership. So, the answer should be "yes".
Q: topic: DC handgun ban
argument: Alternative measures can be taken in place of a ban to stem crime and murder.
A: | no | 3 | NIv2 | task514_argument_consequence_classification | fs_opt |
instruction:
You will be given a topic and an argument. Your task is to answer whether the topic and the argument are related or not. A related argument should provide more details about the outcomes of the topic. If the argument refers to or suggests a consequence related to that topic, answer with "yes"; otherwise, answer with "no".
question:
topic: Solar energy
argument: The recovery/payback period can be very short.
answer:
yes
question:
topic: Infant male circumcision
argument: Circumcision shortens the penis slightly
answer:
yes
question:
topic: Democratic peace theory
argument: Democracies are founded on similar principles so they should not go to war.
answer:
| no
| 9 | NIv2 | task514_argument_consequence_classification | fs_opt |
Detailed Instructions: You will be given a topic and an argument. Your task is to answer whether the topic and the argument are related or not. A related argument should provide more details about the outcomes of the topic. If the argument refers to or suggests a consequence related to that topic, answer with "yes"; otherwise, answer with "no".
See one example below:
Problem: topic: DC handgun ban
argument: Worldwide the ownership of handguns has been correlated with higher homicide rates
Solution: yes
Explanation: The argument is refering to homicide rates as a consequence of handgun ownership. So, the answer should be "yes".
Problem: topic: High-speed rail
argument: High-speed trains: costly govt project in search of need
Solution: | no | 4 | NIv2 | task514_argument_consequence_classification | fs_opt |
You will be given a topic and an argument. Your task is to answer whether the topic and the argument are related or not. A related argument should provide more details about the outcomes of the topic. If the argument refers to or suggests a consequence related to that topic, answer with "yes"; otherwise, answer with "no".
Example input: topic: DC handgun ban
argument: Worldwide the ownership of handguns has been correlated with higher homicide rates
Example output: yes
Example explanation: The argument is refering to homicide rates as a consequence of handgun ownership. So, the answer should be "yes".
Q: topic: Natural gas vehicles
argument: Existing gasoline-powered vehicles may be converted to CNG
A: | no | 3 | NIv2 | task514_argument_consequence_classification | fs_opt |
You will be given a topic and an argument. Your task is to answer whether the topic and the argument are related or not. A related argument should provide more details about the outcomes of the topic. If the argument refers to or suggests a consequence related to that topic, answer with "yes"; otherwise, answer with "no".
[EX Q]: topic: Catholic Church contraception policy
argument: Removing Church objections to condoms would increase attendance at Church.
[EX A]: yes
[EX Q]: topic: Corporate personhood
argument: How do corps. exercise right to life, marriage, etc?
[EX A]: yes
[EX Q]: topic: Nuclear energy
argument: Nuclear energy economies of scale are improving
[EX A]: | no
| 6 | NIv2 | task514_argument_consequence_classification | fs_opt |
Teacher: You will be given a topic and an argument. Your task is to answer whether the topic and the argument are related or not. A related argument should provide more details about the outcomes of the topic. If the argument refers to or suggests a consequence related to that topic, answer with "yes"; otherwise, answer with "no".
Teacher: Now, understand the problem? If you are still confused, see the following example:
topic: DC handgun ban
argument: Worldwide the ownership of handguns has been correlated with higher homicide rates
Solution: yes
Reason: The argument is refering to homicide rates as a consequence of handgun ownership. So, the answer should be "yes".
Now, solve this instance: topic: Bullfighting
argument: Bullfighting is not that big of a tourist draw.
Student: | yes | 2 | NIv2 | task514_argument_consequence_classification | fs_opt |
instruction:
You will be given a topic and an argument. Your task is to answer whether the topic and the argument are related or not. A related argument should provide more details about the outcomes of the topic. If the argument refers to or suggests a consequence related to that topic, answer with "yes"; otherwise, answer with "no".
question:
topic: No-fly zone over Libya
argument: Libyans cannot oust Gaddafi on their own
answer:
no
question:
topic: Colonization of the Moon
argument: Moonbase need not mean permanent colonization for visitors
answer:
yes
question:
topic: Bullfighting
argument: Bullfighting is not that big of a tourist draw.
answer:
| yes
| 9 | NIv2 | task514_argument_consequence_classification | fs_opt |
Detailed Instructions: You will be given a topic and an argument. Your task is to answer whether the topic and the argument are related or not. A related argument should provide more details about the outcomes of the topic. If the argument refers to or suggests a consequence related to that topic, answer with "yes"; otherwise, answer with "no".
See one example below:
Problem: topic: DC handgun ban
argument: Worldwide the ownership of handguns has been correlated with higher homicide rates
Solution: yes
Explanation: The argument is refering to homicide rates as a consequence of handgun ownership. So, the answer should be "yes".
Problem: topic: Corporate free speech
argument: Citizens United favors Dems as much as Republicans
Solution: | no | 4 | NIv2 | task514_argument_consequence_classification | fs_opt |
You will be given a topic and an argument. Your task is to answer whether the topic and the argument are related or not. A related argument should provide more details about the outcomes of the topic. If the argument refers to or suggests a consequence related to that topic, answer with "yes"; otherwise, answer with "no".
topic: Bailout of US automakers
argument: Low-interest loans to automakers will not solve their problems.
yes
topic: Corporate personhood
argument: How do corps. exercise right to life, marriage, etc?
yes
topic: High-speed rail
argument: High-speed rail decreases travel-time between cities.
| yes
| 0 | NIv2 | task514_argument_consequence_classification | fs_opt |
instruction:
You will be given a topic and an argument. Your task is to answer whether the topic and the argument are related or not. A related argument should provide more details about the outcomes of the topic. If the argument refers to or suggests a consequence related to that topic, answer with "yes"; otherwise, answer with "no".
question:
topic: EU constitution reform treaty (Lisbon Treaty)
argument: Opponents of the Lisbon Treaty often spread misinformation
answer:
yes
question:
topic: Dollarization
argument: Dollarization will not help nations with sound economic policies
answer:
no
question:
topic: MBA
argument: Some employers see MBA grads as too expensive
answer:
| yes
| 9 | NIv2 | task514_argument_consequence_classification | fs_opt |
You will be given a topic and an argument. Your task is to answer whether the topic and the argument are related or not. A related argument should provide more details about the outcomes of the topic. If the argument refers to or suggests a consequence related to that topic, answer with "yes"; otherwise, answer with "no".
Example Input: topic: Animal testing
argument: Alternatives cannot replace animal testing for certain objectives
Example Output: no
Example Input: topic: Corporate personhood
argument: Corporations have a right to defend their interests
Example Output: no
Example Input: topic: Tibet independence
argument: Protecting Tibetan culture by opposing modernization is wrongheaded.
Example Output: | no
| 3 | NIv2 | task514_argument_consequence_classification | fs_opt |
You will be given a topic and an argument. Your task is to answer whether the topic and the argument are related or not. A related argument should provide more details about the outcomes of the topic. If the argument refers to or suggests a consequence related to that topic, answer with "yes"; otherwise, answer with "no".
[Q]: topic: Falkland Islands, return of
argument: Britain exploiting Falkland Islands for natural resources
[A]: no
[Q]: topic: Falkland Islands, return of
argument: Relations with Argentina are not important to Britain.
[A]: no
[Q]: topic: Network neutrality
argument: Insufficient broadband market choice to deter bad behavior
[A]: | no
| 5 | NIv2 | task514_argument_consequence_classification | fs_opt |
TASK DEFINITION: You will be given a topic and an argument. Your task is to answer whether the topic and the argument are related or not. A related argument should provide more details about the outcomes of the topic. If the argument refers to or suggests a consequence related to that topic, answer with "yes"; otherwise, answer with "no".
PROBLEM: topic: Prostitution
argument: Many libertarian feminists consider that prostitution reflects the independence and dominance of modern women.
SOLUTION: no
PROBLEM: topic: Constitutionality of US health insurance mandates
argument: Driving is not a choice for many; buying insurance is mandatory.
SOLUTION: no
PROBLEM: topic: Hydrogen vehicles
argument: Electric car battery technology and costs are improving rapidly
SOLUTION: | no
| 8 | NIv2 | task514_argument_consequence_classification | fs_opt |
You will be given a topic and an argument. Your task is to answer whether the topic and the argument are related or not. A related argument should provide more details about the outcomes of the topic. If the argument refers to or suggests a consequence related to that topic, answer with "yes"; otherwise, answer with "no".
One example: topic: DC handgun ban
argument: Worldwide the ownership of handguns has been correlated with higher homicide rates
Solution is here: yes
Explanation: The argument is refering to homicide rates as a consequence of handgun ownership. So, the answer should be "yes".
Now, solve this: topic: Assassination of a Dictator
argument: Targeted assassinations are consistent with international law
Solution: | no | 6 | NIv2 | task514_argument_consequence_classification | fs_opt |
You will be given a topic and an argument. Your task is to answer whether the topic and the argument are related or not. A related argument should provide more details about the outcomes of the topic. If the argument refers to or suggests a consequence related to that topic, answer with "yes"; otherwise, answer with "no".
[Q]: topic: Natural gas vehicles
argument: Natural gas utilities have a long record of safety
[A]: no
[Q]: topic: Natural gas
argument: Natural gas has very diverse applications in the home.
[A]: no
[Q]: topic: Colonization of the Moon
argument: Moonbase need not mean permanent colonization for visitors
[A]: | yes
| 5 | NIv2 | task514_argument_consequence_classification | fs_opt |
You will be given a topic and an argument. Your task is to answer whether the topic and the argument are related or not. A related argument should provide more details about the outcomes of the topic. If the argument refers to or suggests a consequence related to that topic, answer with "yes"; otherwise, answer with "no".
Let me give you an example: topic: DC handgun ban
argument: Worldwide the ownership of handguns has been correlated with higher homicide rates
The answer to this example can be: yes
Here is why: The argument is refering to homicide rates as a consequence of handgun ownership. So, the answer should be "yes".
OK. solve this:
topic: Abolition of nuclear weapons
argument: Nuclear weapons could fall into terrorists' hands
Answer: | yes | 8 | NIv2 | task514_argument_consequence_classification | fs_opt |
You will be given a topic and an argument. Your task is to answer whether the topic and the argument are related or not. A related argument should provide more details about the outcomes of the topic. If the argument refers to or suggests a consequence related to that topic, answer with "yes"; otherwise, answer with "no".
topic: Bush economic stimulus plan
argument: Tax Rate Cuts, Not Tax Rebates, Stimulate the Economy
yes
topic: Tibet independence
argument: The United Nations does charter discourages disruptions of national unity such as a move to Tibetan Independence.
no
topic: Abolition of nuclear weapons
argument: Nuclear weapons could fall into terrorists' hands
| yes
| 0 | NIv2 | task514_argument_consequence_classification | fs_opt |
instruction:
You will be given a topic and an argument. Your task is to answer whether the topic and the argument are related or not. A related argument should provide more details about the outcomes of the topic. If the argument refers to or suggests a consequence related to that topic, answer with "yes"; otherwise, answer with "no".
question:
topic: Prostitution
argument: Legalization will increase prostitution and subsequently worsen public health.
answer:
yes
question:
topic: Prostitution
argument: By worsening HIV/AIDS, prostitution will devastate societies
answer:
no
question:
topic: Falkland Islands, return of
argument: Strategically, the islands is a NATO airbase in the south Atlantic.
answer:
| no
| 9 | NIv2 | task514_argument_consequence_classification | fs_opt |
Part 1. Definition
You will be given a topic and an argument. Your task is to answer whether the topic and the argument are related or not. A related argument should provide more details about the outcomes of the topic. If the argument refers to or suggests a consequence related to that topic, answer with "yes"; otherwise, answer with "no".
Part 2. Example
topic: DC handgun ban
argument: Worldwide the ownership of handguns has been correlated with higher homicide rates
Answer: yes
Explanation: The argument is refering to homicide rates as a consequence of handgun ownership. So, the answer should be "yes".
Part 3. Exercise
topic: Tibet independence
argument: How could China have liberated Tibet in 1949 if it claims prior sovereignty.
Answer: | no | 7 | NIv2 | task514_argument_consequence_classification | fs_opt |
You will be given a topic and an argument. Your task is to answer whether the topic and the argument are related or not. A related argument should provide more details about the outcomes of the topic. If the argument refers to or suggests a consequence related to that topic, answer with "yes"; otherwise, answer with "no".
[EX Q]: topic: Hydroelectric dams
argument: Dams last over a hundred years; good return on investment
[EX A]: no
[EX Q]: topic: Graduated response antipiracy laws
argument: General statements supporting graduated response
[EX A]: no
[EX Q]: topic: Three Gorges Dam
argument: The Three Gorges Dam has submerged mines, resulting in pollution
[EX A]: | yes
| 6 | NIv2 | task514_argument_consequence_classification | fs_opt |
Given the task definition, example input & output, solve the new input case.
You will be given a topic and an argument. Your task is to answer whether the topic and the argument are related or not. A related argument should provide more details about the outcomes of the topic. If the argument refers to or suggests a consequence related to that topic, answer with "yes"; otherwise, answer with "no".
Example: topic: DC handgun ban
argument: Worldwide the ownership of handguns has been correlated with higher homicide rates
Output: yes
The argument is refering to homicide rates as a consequence of handgun ownership. So, the answer should be "yes".
New input case for you: topic: European Monetary Fund
argument: The EMF cannot be set up without a new treaty
Output: | yes | 1 | NIv2 | task514_argument_consequence_classification | fs_opt |
You will be given a topic and an argument. Your task is to answer whether the topic and the argument are related or not. A related argument should provide more details about the outcomes of the topic. If the argument refers to or suggests a consequence related to that topic, answer with "yes"; otherwise, answer with "no".
One example is below.
Q: topic: DC handgun ban
argument: Worldwide the ownership of handguns has been correlated with higher homicide rates
A: yes
Rationale: The argument is refering to homicide rates as a consequence of handgun ownership. So, the answer should be "yes".
Q: topic: Kangaroo culling in Australia
argument: The Code of Practice in the ACT helps ensures culls are humane.
A: | no | 9 | NIv2 | task514_argument_consequence_classification | fs_opt |
You will be given a topic and an argument. Your task is to answer whether the topic and the argument are related or not. A related argument should provide more details about the outcomes of the topic. If the argument refers to or suggests a consequence related to that topic, answer with "yes"; otherwise, answer with "no".
Example: topic: DC handgun ban
argument: Worldwide the ownership of handguns has been correlated with higher homicide rates
Example solution: yes
Example explanation: The argument is refering to homicide rates as a consequence of handgun ownership. So, the answer should be "yes".
Problem: topic: Animal testing
argument: Animals would depict humans as the devil if they could
| Solution: no | 5 | NIv2 | task514_argument_consequence_classification | fs_opt |
instruction:
You will be given a topic and an argument. Your task is to answer whether the topic and the argument are related or not. A related argument should provide more details about the outcomes of the topic. If the argument refers to or suggests a consequence related to that topic, answer with "yes"; otherwise, answer with "no".
question:
topic: Infant male circumcision
argument: Circumcision shortens the penis slightly
answer:
yes
question:
topic: Airport security profiling
argument: Profiling will help avoid invasive scanners and pat-downs.
answer:
no
question:
topic: No Child Left Behind Act
argument: No Child Left Behind effectively penalizes diversity in schools.
answer:
| yes
| 9 | NIv2 | task514_argument_consequence_classification | fs_opt |
You will be given a topic and an argument. Your task is to answer whether the topic and the argument are related or not. A related argument should provide more details about the outcomes of the topic. If the argument refers to or suggests a consequence related to that topic, answer with "yes"; otherwise, answer with "no".
[EX Q]: topic: Nuclear energy
argument: Nuclear energy economies of scale are improving
[EX A]: no
[EX Q]: topic: Single-payer universal health care
argument: US health care costs more because Americans pay to avoid waiting.
[EX A]: yes
[EX Q]: topic: College football playoffs
argument: More teams win and finish season happy in BCS
[EX A]: | no
| 6 | NIv2 | task514_argument_consequence_classification | fs_opt |
instruction:
You will be given a topic and an argument. Your task is to answer whether the topic and the argument are related or not. A related argument should provide more details about the outcomes of the topic. If the argument refers to or suggests a consequence related to that topic, answer with "yes"; otherwise, answer with "no".
question:
topic: Assisted suicide
argument: Euthanasia is mainly utilized by non-vulnerable, well-educated groups
answer:
yes
question:
topic: Medical marijuana dispensaries
argument: More money for other sectors
answer:
yes
question:
topic: International Criminal Court
argument: The ICC risks heavy politicization of prosecution
answer:
| no
| 9 | NIv2 | task514_argument_consequence_classification | fs_opt |
You will be given a topic and an argument. Your task is to answer whether the topic and the argument are related or not. A related argument should provide more details about the outcomes of the topic. If the argument refers to or suggests a consequence related to that topic, answer with "yes"; otherwise, answer with "no".
One example is below.
Q: topic: DC handgun ban
argument: Worldwide the ownership of handguns has been correlated with higher homicide rates
A: yes
Rationale: The argument is refering to homicide rates as a consequence of handgun ownership. So, the answer should be "yes".
Q: topic: Abortion
argument: Pro-life militant groups act violently in opposition to abortion.
A: | yes | 9 | NIv2 | task514_argument_consequence_classification | fs_opt |
You will be given a topic and an argument. Your task is to answer whether the topic and the argument are related or not. A related argument should provide more details about the outcomes of the topic. If the argument refers to or suggests a consequence related to that topic, answer with "yes"; otherwise, answer with "no".
--------
Question: topic: Right to bear arms in the US
argument: America's modern military makes the militia unnecessary for national security.
Answer: no
Question: topic: Corporate personhood
argument: How do corps. exercise right to life, marriage, etc?
Answer: yes
Question: topic: Abortion
argument: Pro-life militant groups act violently in opposition to abortion.
Answer: | yes
| 7 | NIv2 | task514_argument_consequence_classification | fs_opt |
TASK DEFINITION: You will be given a topic and an argument. Your task is to answer whether the topic and the argument are related or not. A related argument should provide more details about the outcomes of the topic. If the argument refers to or suggests a consequence related to that topic, answer with "yes"; otherwise, answer with "no".
PROBLEM: topic: High-speed rail
argument: High-speed trains: costly govt project in search of need
SOLUTION: no
PROBLEM: topic: Legalization of Marijuana
argument: Marijuana use can lead to cancer
SOLUTION: yes
PROBLEM: topic: Mandatory calorie counts on menus
argument: It is difficult for restaurants to keep calorie counts consistent.
SOLUTION: | no
| 8 | NIv2 | task514_argument_consequence_classification | fs_opt |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.