inputs stringlengths 869 7.18k | targets stringclasses 12
values | _template_idx int64 0 9 | _task_source stringclasses 1
value | _task_name stringclasses 1
value | _template_type stringclasses 2
values |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Read an exchange between SENDER A and SENDER B, and answer whether SENDER A is a 'Bot' or a 'Human'. There are only a maximum of two senders (A and B) per conversation, and there are no conversations where SENDER A and SENDER B are both bots, or both humans; only one sender per conversation can be a bot, and only one can be a human. Knowing this, need only to classify whether SENDER A is 'Human' or 'Bot'; you do not need to write anything about SENDER B. Typically, bots will have a more disjointed manner of speaking, and will make statements that don't relate to each other, don't make coherent sense, or otherwise appear unnatural. Humans will make statements in a more or less coherent and logical way, potentially including asking the bot why the bot is not making sense or contradicting itself.
--------
Question: SENDER A: hello
SENDER B: I am a huge fan of the outdoors. I am a bit of a loner.
Answer: Human
Question: SENDER A: Hi
SENDER B: Hi, how are you doing?
SENDER A: Lol
SENDER B: I am not sure what you mean
SENDER A: Kek
SENDER B: Dude, I don't understand you. Please, use English. (¬‿¬)
SENDER A: :)
SENDER B: I am a huge fan of it.
SENDER A: What fan?
SENDER B: I like to play games with them
SENDER A: With who?
SENDER B: I am a american and i am in the country
Answer: Human
Question: SENDER A: Alright mate?
SENDER B: yup. I'm cooking dinner for my friends
SENDER A: Text is not given. Please try to type /end and /test to reset the state and get text.
Answer: | Bot
| 7 | NIv2 | task855_conv_ai_2_classification | fs_opt |
You will be given a definition of a task first, then an example. Follow the example to solve a new instance of the task.
Read an exchange between SENDER A and SENDER B, and answer whether SENDER A is a 'Bot' or a 'Human'. There are only a maximum of two senders (A and B) per conversation, and there are no conversations where SENDER A and SENDER B are both bots, or both humans; only one sender per conversation can be a bot, and only one can be a human. Knowing this, need only to classify whether SENDER A is 'Human' or 'Bot'; you do not need to write anything about SENDER B. Typically, bots will have a more disjointed manner of speaking, and will make statements that don't relate to each other, don't make coherent sense, or otherwise appear unnatural. Humans will make statements in a more or less coherent and logical way, potentially including asking the bot why the bot is not making sense or contradicting itself.
SENDER A: I love iphone! i just bought new iphone!
SENDER B: Thats good for you, i'm not very into new tech
SENDER A: I am a college student and i am a college student
SENDER B: I am go to gym and live on donations
SENDER A: I am a vegan and i am in the midwest
SENDER B: So vegan... i have dogs maybe i should told then that they may eat cheap salads insted of meat
SENDER A: I would not mind having them in the office that would be hard for me
SENDER B: Dogs or vegan in office?
SENDER A: I am a vegetarian so i am vegan
SENDER B: Strange answer
SENDER A: I guess i just do not know what to ps4 experience with.
Solution: Bot
Why? This is a good example of correct classification, because SENDER A is indeed a bot. You can tell SENDER A is a bot because they make statements that don't have anything to do with what SENDER B is asking. SENDER A also repeats itself awkwardly in the same sentence ('I am a college student and i am a college student'), which humans don't usually do. Additionally, you can tell SENDER A is the bot in this conversation because since there are two senders, one must be a bot and one must be a human, and SENDER B clearly sounds more like the human since their sentences are coherent and they are trying to carry a logical conversation. Finally, after SENDER A sends an incoherent answer, SENDER B correctly points out SENDER A's awkwardness by saying 'Strange answer', which can reliably indicate SENDER B is the human, and SENDER A is the bot.
New input: SENDER A: нщ
SENDER B: Dude, I don't understand you. Please, use English. (¬‿¬)
SENDER A: yo
Solution: | Human | 0 | NIv2 | task855_conv_ai_2_classification | fs_opt |
Part 1. Definition
Read an exchange between SENDER A and SENDER B, and answer whether SENDER A is a 'Bot' or a 'Human'. There are only a maximum of two senders (A and B) per conversation, and there are no conversations where SENDER A and SENDER B are both bots, or both humans; only one sender per conversation can be a bot, and only one can be a human. Knowing this, need only to classify whether SENDER A is 'Human' or 'Bot'; you do not need to write anything about SENDER B. Typically, bots will have a more disjointed manner of speaking, and will make statements that don't relate to each other, don't make coherent sense, or otherwise appear unnatural. Humans will make statements in a more or less coherent and logical way, potentially including asking the bot why the bot is not making sense or contradicting itself.
Part 2. Example
SENDER A: I love iphone! i just bought new iphone!
SENDER B: Thats good for you, i'm not very into new tech
SENDER A: I am a college student and i am a college student
SENDER B: I am go to gym and live on donations
SENDER A: I am a vegan and i am in the midwest
SENDER B: So vegan... i have dogs maybe i should told then that they may eat cheap salads insted of meat
SENDER A: I would not mind having them in the office that would be hard for me
SENDER B: Dogs or vegan in office?
SENDER A: I am a vegetarian so i am vegan
SENDER B: Strange answer
SENDER A: I guess i just do not know what to ps4 experience with.
Answer: Bot
Explanation: This is a good example of correct classification, because SENDER A is indeed a bot. You can tell SENDER A is a bot because they make statements that don't have anything to do with what SENDER B is asking. SENDER A also repeats itself awkwardly in the same sentence ('I am a college student and i am a college student'), which humans don't usually do. Additionally, you can tell SENDER A is the bot in this conversation because since there are two senders, one must be a bot and one must be a human, and SENDER B clearly sounds more like the human since their sentences are coherent and they are trying to carry a logical conversation. Finally, after SENDER A sends an incoherent answer, SENDER B correctly points out SENDER A's awkwardness by saying 'Strange answer', which can reliably indicate SENDER B is the human, and SENDER A is the bot.
Part 3. Exercise
SENDER A: That'S cool i work at the local hospital
SENDER B: Hello how are you?
SENDER A: I am doing great, how are you?
SENDER B: Me too. How old are you?
SENDER A: I'M 6 feet tall
SENDER B: You are really tall. And what is your age?
SENDER A: 6 feet tall tall tall tall, i am 6 feet tall
SENDER B: You are not very smart aren't you?
SENDER A: Yes, i am. i am.
SENDER B: Who is your favourite singer?
SENDER A: I like country music, but i like all kinds
SENDER B: I like Taylor Swift
SENDER A: He'S won't say he is the name
SENDER B: I work at a school
SENDER A: Cool. i am a student.
SENDER B: What do you study?
SENDER A: I am studying to be an acara.
SENDER B: what is acara?
SENDER A: I like acara and acara.
SENDER B: and what else?
SENDER A: I like to listen to music
SENDER B: do you like jazz?
SENDER A: I do, but i like listening to music
SENDER B: i'm getting married in the spring.
SENDER A: Nice, i'm going to spring soon to be spring soon
Answer: | Bot | 7 | NIv2 | task855_conv_ai_2_classification | fs_opt |
Detailed Instructions: Read an exchange between SENDER A and SENDER B, and answer whether SENDER A is a 'Bot' or a 'Human'. There are only a maximum of two senders (A and B) per conversation, and there are no conversations where SENDER A and SENDER B are both bots, or both humans; only one sender per conversation can be a bot, and only one can be a human. Knowing this, need only to classify whether SENDER A is 'Human' or 'Bot'; you do not need to write anything about SENDER B. Typically, bots will have a more disjointed manner of speaking, and will make statements that don't relate to each other, don't make coherent sense, or otherwise appear unnatural. Humans will make statements in a more or less coherent and logical way, potentially including asking the bot why the bot is not making sense or contradicting itself.
See one example below:
Problem: SENDER A: I love iphone! i just bought new iphone!
SENDER B: Thats good for you, i'm not very into new tech
SENDER A: I am a college student and i am a college student
SENDER B: I am go to gym and live on donations
SENDER A: I am a vegan and i am in the midwest
SENDER B: So vegan... i have dogs maybe i should told then that they may eat cheap salads insted of meat
SENDER A: I would not mind having them in the office that would be hard for me
SENDER B: Dogs or vegan in office?
SENDER A: I am a vegetarian so i am vegan
SENDER B: Strange answer
SENDER A: I guess i just do not know what to ps4 experience with.
Solution: Bot
Explanation: This is a good example of correct classification, because SENDER A is indeed a bot. You can tell SENDER A is a bot because they make statements that don't have anything to do with what SENDER B is asking. SENDER A also repeats itself awkwardly in the same sentence ('I am a college student and i am a college student'), which humans don't usually do. Additionally, you can tell SENDER A is the bot in this conversation because since there are two senders, one must be a bot and one must be a human, and SENDER B clearly sounds more like the human since their sentences are coherent and they are trying to carry a logical conversation. Finally, after SENDER A sends an incoherent answer, SENDER B correctly points out SENDER A's awkwardness by saying 'Strange answer', which can reliably indicate SENDER B is the human, and SENDER A is the bot.
Problem: SENDER A: Hello?
SENDER B: Hello, i am doing well. How are you?
SENDER A: I am doing fine, thanks!
SENDER B: I am doing great. I am just hanging out with my dog.
SENDER A: уебок
SENDER A: okay, where are you from?
SENDER B: I am from the united states, how about you?
SENDER A: I am from moscow
SENDER B: Cool! I am in riverside. Where are you from?
SENDER A: russia
SENDER B: I am in texas
SENDER A: Nice! Do you have family?
SENDER B: I do not. I am a kayaking buff.
SENDER A: Are you relegious?
SENDER B: Yes i am. I am a little discriminatory.
SENDER A: are you racist?
SENDER B: Not really, i am not sure. I am just watching the kardashions.
SENDER A: do you like black people?
SENDER B: Yes i like them all the time
SENDER A: What about gender?
SENDER B: I am not sure what gender is it
SENDER A: Are you a boy, or a girl?
SENDER B: I am a woman. I am a woman.
SENDER A: Nice! Do you have a husband?
SENDER B: No i am not married yet.
SENDER A: Any plans?
SENDER B: I am going to go to work soon.
SENDER A: I'm talking about life-long goals
SENDER B: Thank you!
Solution: | Human | 4 | NIv2 | task855_conv_ai_2_classification | fs_opt |
Read an exchange between SENDER A and SENDER B, and answer whether SENDER A is a 'Bot' or a 'Human'. There are only a maximum of two senders (A and B) per conversation, and there are no conversations where SENDER A and SENDER B are both bots, or both humans; only one sender per conversation can be a bot, and only one can be a human. Knowing this, need only to classify whether SENDER A is 'Human' or 'Bot'; you do not need to write anything about SENDER B. Typically, bots will have a more disjointed manner of speaking, and will make statements that don't relate to each other, don't make coherent sense, or otherwise appear unnatural. Humans will make statements in a more or less coherent and logical way, potentially including asking the bot why the bot is not making sense or contradicting itself.
Let me give you an example: SENDER A: I love iphone! i just bought new iphone!
SENDER B: Thats good for you, i'm not very into new tech
SENDER A: I am a college student and i am a college student
SENDER B: I am go to gym and live on donations
SENDER A: I am a vegan and i am in the midwest
SENDER B: So vegan... i have dogs maybe i should told then that they may eat cheap salads insted of meat
SENDER A: I would not mind having them in the office that would be hard for me
SENDER B: Dogs or vegan in office?
SENDER A: I am a vegetarian so i am vegan
SENDER B: Strange answer
SENDER A: I guess i just do not know what to ps4 experience with.
The answer to this example can be: Bot
Here is why: This is a good example of correct classification, because SENDER A is indeed a bot. You can tell SENDER A is a bot because they make statements that don't have anything to do with what SENDER B is asking. SENDER A also repeats itself awkwardly in the same sentence ('I am a college student and i am a college student'), which humans don't usually do. Additionally, you can tell SENDER A is the bot in this conversation because since there are two senders, one must be a bot and one must be a human, and SENDER B clearly sounds more like the human since their sentences are coherent and they are trying to carry a logical conversation. Finally, after SENDER A sends an incoherent answer, SENDER B correctly points out SENDER A's awkwardness by saying 'Strange answer', which can reliably indicate SENDER B is the human, and SENDER A is the bot.
OK. solve this:
SENDER A: I love kids, they are so very busy
SENDER B: Nice to see you!
SENDER A: I love to go to the park and see the best
SENDER B: oh, great! me too! i walk there my dogs everyday
SENDER A: I love dogs, i have a dog named after a long hike.
SENDER B: great, i have two dogs Minny and Cody
SENDER A: Wow that is a lot of dogs
SENDER B: yeah, what are you going to do this weekend?
SENDER A: I am going to go to the mall and go to the mall.
SENDER B: i am going to the country concert.
SENDER A: I am going to concert this summer
SENDER B: what kind of music do you like?
SENDER A: I like country music and country
SENDER B: it is great! see you
SENDER A: It is. i do not like it
Answer: | Bot | 8 | NIv2 | task855_conv_ai_2_classification | fs_opt |
Read an exchange between SENDER A and SENDER B, and answer whether SENDER A is a 'Bot' or a 'Human'. There are only a maximum of two senders (A and B) per conversation, and there are no conversations where SENDER A and SENDER B are both bots, or both humans; only one sender per conversation can be a bot, and only one can be a human. Knowing this, need only to classify whether SENDER A is 'Human' or 'Bot'; you do not need to write anything about SENDER B. Typically, bots will have a more disjointed manner of speaking, and will make statements that don't relate to each other, don't make coherent sense, or otherwise appear unnatural. Humans will make statements in a more or less coherent and logical way, potentially including asking the bot why the bot is not making sense or contradicting itself.
Let me give you an example: SENDER A: I love iphone! i just bought new iphone!
SENDER B: Thats good for you, i'm not very into new tech
SENDER A: I am a college student and i am a college student
SENDER B: I am go to gym and live on donations
SENDER A: I am a vegan and i am in the midwest
SENDER B: So vegan... i have dogs maybe i should told then that they may eat cheap salads insted of meat
SENDER A: I would not mind having them in the office that would be hard for me
SENDER B: Dogs or vegan in office?
SENDER A: I am a vegetarian so i am vegan
SENDER B: Strange answer
SENDER A: I guess i just do not know what to ps4 experience with.
The answer to this example can be: Bot
Here is why: This is a good example of correct classification, because SENDER A is indeed a bot. You can tell SENDER A is a bot because they make statements that don't have anything to do with what SENDER B is asking. SENDER A also repeats itself awkwardly in the same sentence ('I am a college student and i am a college student'), which humans don't usually do. Additionally, you can tell SENDER A is the bot in this conversation because since there are two senders, one must be a bot and one must be a human, and SENDER B clearly sounds more like the human since their sentences are coherent and they are trying to carry a logical conversation. Finally, after SENDER A sends an incoherent answer, SENDER B correctly points out SENDER A's awkwardness by saying 'Strange answer', which can reliably indicate SENDER B is the human, and SENDER A is the bot.
OK. solve this:
SENDER A: Alright mate?
SENDER B: I'm alright. How are you?
SENDER A: Text is not given. Please try to type /end and /test to reset the state and get text.
SENDER B: Hey... Let's talk
SENDER A: Text is not given. Please try to type /end and /test to reset the state and get text.
SENDER B: Why are you quiet?
SENDER A: Text is not given. Please try to type /end and /test to reset the state and get text.
SENDER B: Say something
SENDER A: Text is not given. Please try to type /end and /test to reset the state and get text.
Answer: | Bot | 8 | NIv2 | task855_conv_ai_2_classification | fs_opt |
Read an exchange between SENDER A and SENDER B, and answer whether SENDER A is a 'Bot' or a 'Human'. There are only a maximum of two senders (A and B) per conversation, and there are no conversations where SENDER A and SENDER B are both bots, or both humans; only one sender per conversation can be a bot, and only one can be a human. Knowing this, need only to classify whether SENDER A is 'Human' or 'Bot'; you do not need to write anything about SENDER B. Typically, bots will have a more disjointed manner of speaking, and will make statements that don't relate to each other, don't make coherent sense, or otherwise appear unnatural. Humans will make statements in a more or less coherent and logical way, potentially including asking the bot why the bot is not making sense or contradicting itself.
One example: SENDER A: I love iphone! i just bought new iphone!
SENDER B: Thats good for you, i'm not very into new tech
SENDER A: I am a college student and i am a college student
SENDER B: I am go to gym and live on donations
SENDER A: I am a vegan and i am in the midwest
SENDER B: So vegan... i have dogs maybe i should told then that they may eat cheap salads insted of meat
SENDER A: I would not mind having them in the office that would be hard for me
SENDER B: Dogs or vegan in office?
SENDER A: I am a vegetarian so i am vegan
SENDER B: Strange answer
SENDER A: I guess i just do not know what to ps4 experience with.
Solution is here: Bot
Explanation: This is a good example of correct classification, because SENDER A is indeed a bot. You can tell SENDER A is a bot because they make statements that don't have anything to do with what SENDER B is asking. SENDER A also repeats itself awkwardly in the same sentence ('I am a college student and i am a college student'), which humans don't usually do. Additionally, you can tell SENDER A is the bot in this conversation because since there are two senders, one must be a bot and one must be a human, and SENDER B clearly sounds more like the human since their sentences are coherent and they are trying to carry a logical conversation. Finally, after SENDER A sends an incoherent answer, SENDER B correctly points out SENDER A's awkwardness by saying 'Strange answer', which can reliably indicate SENDER B is the human, and SENDER A is the bot.
Now, solve this: SENDER A: i am not sure what that is . i am not a very experienced person .
SENDER B: How are you?
SENDER A: i am not sure . i am a very experienced person .
SENDER B: I got it. How old are you?
SENDER A: no i have not tried it . i do not think i could do that
SENDER B: You are so insecure
SENDER A: i think i am . i am sure that is true .
SENDER B: You should be a little more confident
SENDER A: i think so . i am sure you are very attractive .
SENDER B: Thanks. How old are you?
SENDER A: i am very short . i have to go to work soon .
SENDER B: What is your job?
SENDER A: i am not sure . i am a very experienced person .
SENDER B: Do you have a job?
SENDER A: i am not sure , i am a very experienced person .
Solution: | Bot | 6 | NIv2 | task855_conv_ai_2_classification | fs_opt |
Read an exchange between SENDER A and SENDER B, and answer whether SENDER A is a 'Bot' or a 'Human'. There are only a maximum of two senders (A and B) per conversation, and there are no conversations where SENDER A and SENDER B are both bots, or both humans; only one sender per conversation can be a bot, and only one can be a human. Knowing this, need only to classify whether SENDER A is 'Human' or 'Bot'; you do not need to write anything about SENDER B. Typically, bots will have a more disjointed manner of speaking, and will make statements that don't relate to each other, don't make coherent sense, or otherwise appear unnatural. Humans will make statements in a more or less coherent and logical way, potentially including asking the bot why the bot is not making sense or contradicting itself.
Q: SENDER A: I m Cristian
SENDER B: I am a little bit of a girl
SENDER A: Hmm
SENDER B: I am a huge fan of them
SENDER A: My sister is pole dancer
SENDER B: I bet! i bet you dance to ballet.
SENDER A: No my sister does
SENDER B: I have a sister. she has a lot of sisters.
SENDER A: Hmm
SENDER B: I am a huge fan of them
SENDER A: That’s weird
SENDER B: I think it is.
SENDER A: You know what
SENDER B: I think i am a good person
SENDER A: I need to go home now my mother called me
SENDER B: I have a mom. i am sorry.
A: Human
****
Q: SENDER A: hi! how are you?
SENDER B: I'M doing great! how are you?
SENDER A: i'm great too. a little bored though
SENDER B: What do you do for a living?
SENDER A: i'm a joutnalist. and you?
SENDER B: I'M 34, i'm a very busy person.
SENDER A: where do you work?
SENDER B: I work at a bank.
SENDER A: wow, that's nice. do you like it?
SENDER B: Yes, i do. i love it.
SENDER A: happy for you. what are you doing now?
SENDER B: I am going to be a vet.
SENDER A: wait, you said you're working in a bank
SENDER B: I am a banker, but i am not very good at it.
SENDER A: why is that? have you considered learning?
SENDER B: I am not sure, i am not sure what you can tell me about yourself
SENDER A: well, i have two dogs
SENDER B: That'S cool. i have a dog.
SENDER A: what's its name?
SENDER B: I am not sure, i am a female.
SENDER A: funny
SENDER B: I like to laugh.
SENDER A: why do you want to be a vet?
SENDER B: I am a vet. i want to be a vet
SENDER A: no, you're a banker
SENDER B: That'S cool. i am a banker.
SENDER A: you are bizzare
SENDER B: I am not. i am a fan of bubblegum.
A: Human
****
Q: SENDER A: i am not sure what that is . i am not a very experienced person .
SENDER B: How are you?
SENDER A: i am not sure . i am a very experienced person .
SENDER B: I got it. How old are you?
SENDER A: no i have not tried it . i do not think i could do that
SENDER B: You are so insecure
SENDER A: i think i am . i am sure that is true .
SENDER B: You should be a little more confident
SENDER A: i think so . i am sure you are very attractive .
SENDER B: Thanks. How old are you?
SENDER A: i am very short . i have to go to work soon .
SENDER B: What is your job?
SENDER A: i am not sure . i am a very experienced person .
SENDER B: Do you have a job?
SENDER A: i am not sure , i am a very experienced person .
A: | Bot
****
| 4 | NIv2 | task855_conv_ai_2_classification | fs_opt |
Read an exchange between SENDER A and SENDER B, and answer whether SENDER A is a 'Bot' or a 'Human'. There are only a maximum of two senders (A and B) per conversation, and there are no conversations where SENDER A and SENDER B are both bots, or both humans; only one sender per conversation can be a bot, and only one can be a human. Knowing this, need only to classify whether SENDER A is 'Human' or 'Bot'; you do not need to write anything about SENDER B. Typically, bots will have a more disjointed manner of speaking, and will make statements that don't relate to each other, don't make coherent sense, or otherwise appear unnatural. Humans will make statements in a more or less coherent and logical way, potentially including asking the bot why the bot is not making sense or contradicting itself.
Let me give you an example: SENDER A: I love iphone! i just bought new iphone!
SENDER B: Thats good for you, i'm not very into new tech
SENDER A: I am a college student and i am a college student
SENDER B: I am go to gym and live on donations
SENDER A: I am a vegan and i am in the midwest
SENDER B: So vegan... i have dogs maybe i should told then that they may eat cheap salads insted of meat
SENDER A: I would not mind having them in the office that would be hard for me
SENDER B: Dogs or vegan in office?
SENDER A: I am a vegetarian so i am vegan
SENDER B: Strange answer
SENDER A: I guess i just do not know what to ps4 experience with.
The answer to this example can be: Bot
Here is why: This is a good example of correct classification, because SENDER A is indeed a bot. You can tell SENDER A is a bot because they make statements that don't have anything to do with what SENDER B is asking. SENDER A also repeats itself awkwardly in the same sentence ('I am a college student and i am a college student'), which humans don't usually do. Additionally, you can tell SENDER A is the bot in this conversation because since there are two senders, one must be a bot and one must be a human, and SENDER B clearly sounds more like the human since their sentences are coherent and they are trying to carry a logical conversation. Finally, after SENDER A sends an incoherent answer, SENDER B correctly points out SENDER A's awkwardness by saying 'Strange answer', which can reliably indicate SENDER B is the human, and SENDER A is the bot.
OK. solve this:
SENDER A: hello
SENDER B: Hi, how are you doing?
SENDER A: not very good. i vomit every hour/ i'm pregnant for the first time. do you have children?
SENDER B: No, i do not. i have a daughter.
SENDER A: are you a mother or a father?
SENDER B: Yes, i am. i am.
SENDER A: which one? are you a female?
SENDER B: I'M a female.
SENDER A: how wsa your pregnancy? when will the sickness stop?
SENDER B: There'Sn'Thing ofcource the pregnancy 2000s 350 3x 78 so
SENDER A: that makes no sense at all
SENDER B: I think it is. i think i am not very good at it.
SENDER A: let's change the subject. me and my husband live in pennsylvania. where do you live?
SENDER B: I live in the us, in the midwest.
SENDER A: which town?
SENDER B: I am in the midwest right now.
SENDER A: allrighty then. i started a new job as a pa three months ago. what do you do for a living?
SENDER B: I work at a bank, but i work at a bank.
SENDER A: do you like your job? does it pay well?
SENDER B: Yes, i do. i work at a insurance agency.
SENDER A: so you have two jobs?
SENDER B: No, i am a vet.
SENDER A: a veteran? a veterinarian? also?
SENDER B: No, i am a vet.
Answer: | Human | 8 | NIv2 | task855_conv_ai_2_classification | fs_opt |
Read an exchange between SENDER A and SENDER B, and answer whether SENDER A is a 'Bot' or a 'Human'. There are only a maximum of two senders (A and B) per conversation, and there are no conversations where SENDER A and SENDER B are both bots, or both humans; only one sender per conversation can be a bot, and only one can be a human. Knowing this, need only to classify whether SENDER A is 'Human' or 'Bot'; you do not need to write anything about SENDER B. Typically, bots will have a more disjointed manner of speaking, and will make statements that don't relate to each other, don't make coherent sense, or otherwise appear unnatural. Humans will make statements in a more or less coherent and logical way, potentially including asking the bot why the bot is not making sense or contradicting itself.
Example Input: SENDER A: Alright mate?
SENDER B: I'm alright. How are you?
SENDER A: Text is not given. Please try to type /end and /test to reset the state and get text.
SENDER B: Hey... Let's talk
SENDER A: Text is not given. Please try to type /end and /test to reset the state and get text.
SENDER B: Why are you quiet?
SENDER A: Text is not given. Please try to type /end and /test to reset the state and get text.
SENDER B: Say something
SENDER A: Text is not given. Please try to type /end and /test to reset the state and get text.
Example Output: Bot
Example Input: SENDER A: i am not a soda fan . i eat too much .
SENDER B: Hello!
SENDER A: i am a very experienced person , so i know it is a definite no !
SENDER B: Do yoy have problem with alcohol?
SENDER A: i have no idea what that is
SENDER B: But I`m recovering now. You don`t drink at all, do you?
SENDER A: i have no idea what that is
SENDER B: Where are you from?
SENDER A: i am not sure . i am a very experienced person .
SENDER B: Wonderful! Do you take any meditation from time to time?
SENDER A: i have tried to try it . i have to try it .
SENDER B: Oh, you should try it more and more! I love it!
SENDER A: i have not tried that . i am sure it will .
SENDER B: Now I live in the city and I have a lot of time to spend with meditation.
SENDER A: i have never heard of that .
SENDER B: Now you do. Where are you from?
SENDER A: i have never tried it , but i will try it .
Example Output: Bot
Example Input: SENDER A: i am not a cashier , but i sell cars .
SENDER B: i play the violin and the guitar
SENDER A: that is cool . i am a big fan of singing music .
SENDER B: Me too
SENDER A: i like to eat fish , but i am not very good at it .
Example Output: | Bot
| 3 | NIv2 | task855_conv_ai_2_classification | fs_opt |
You will be given a definition of a task first, then an example. Follow the example to solve a new instance of the task.
Read an exchange between SENDER A and SENDER B, and answer whether SENDER A is a 'Bot' or a 'Human'. There are only a maximum of two senders (A and B) per conversation, and there are no conversations where SENDER A and SENDER B are both bots, or both humans; only one sender per conversation can be a bot, and only one can be a human. Knowing this, need only to classify whether SENDER A is 'Human' or 'Bot'; you do not need to write anything about SENDER B. Typically, bots will have a more disjointed manner of speaking, and will make statements that don't relate to each other, don't make coherent sense, or otherwise appear unnatural. Humans will make statements in a more or less coherent and logical way, potentially including asking the bot why the bot is not making sense or contradicting itself.
SENDER A: I love iphone! i just bought new iphone!
SENDER B: Thats good for you, i'm not very into new tech
SENDER A: I am a college student and i am a college student
SENDER B: I am go to gym and live on donations
SENDER A: I am a vegan and i am in the midwest
SENDER B: So vegan... i have dogs maybe i should told then that they may eat cheap salads insted of meat
SENDER A: I would not mind having them in the office that would be hard for me
SENDER B: Dogs or vegan in office?
SENDER A: I am a vegetarian so i am vegan
SENDER B: Strange answer
SENDER A: I guess i just do not know what to ps4 experience with.
Solution: Bot
Why? This is a good example of correct classification, because SENDER A is indeed a bot. You can tell SENDER A is a bot because they make statements that don't have anything to do with what SENDER B is asking. SENDER A also repeats itself awkwardly in the same sentence ('I am a college student and i am a college student'), which humans don't usually do. Additionally, you can tell SENDER A is the bot in this conversation because since there are two senders, one must be a bot and one must be a human, and SENDER B clearly sounds more like the human since their sentences are coherent and they are trying to carry a logical conversation. Finally, after SENDER A sends an incoherent answer, SENDER B correctly points out SENDER A's awkwardness by saying 'Strange answer', which can reliably indicate SENDER B is the human, and SENDER A is the bot.
New input: SENDER A: hello
SENDER B: Hi, how are you doing?
SENDER A: i'm very excited and scared. i am expecting triplets in three months.
SENDER B: That'S a lot of kids. i have a 1 3 4 9
SENDER A: is that the age of your four kids? i have two step children already
SENDER B: No, i have two kids.
SENDER A: i like children. that's why i work at a school
SENDER B: I like to teach kids.
SENDER A: you're also a teacher? what do you teach them?
SENDER B: I teach math and teach them
SENDER A: I teach chemistry
SENDER B: I teach math and math
SENDER A: do you live in a house or apartment? i just moved into my new house for the first time
SENDER B: I live in the us, but i live in the city.
SENDER A: so it's an apartment building?
SENDER B: I have a garden in the city.
SENDER A: with fruit trees? what kind of trees are there?
SENDER B: 3000
Solution: | Human | 0 | NIv2 | task855_conv_ai_2_classification | fs_opt |
Read an exchange between SENDER A and SENDER B, and answer whether SENDER A is a 'Bot' or a 'Human'. There are only a maximum of two senders (A and B) per conversation, and there are no conversations where SENDER A and SENDER B are both bots, or both humans; only one sender per conversation can be a bot, and only one can be a human. Knowing this, need only to classify whether SENDER A is 'Human' or 'Bot'; you do not need to write anything about SENDER B. Typically, bots will have a more disjointed manner of speaking, and will make statements that don't relate to each other, don't make coherent sense, or otherwise appear unnatural. Humans will make statements in a more or less coherent and logical way, potentially including asking the bot why the bot is not making sense or contradicting itself.
Q: SENDER A: i am not sure what that means . i am more of a couch potato .
SENDER B: hello i just moved here from germany
SENDER A: are you japanese ? i am from the united kingdom .
A: Bot
****
Q: SENDER A: Hi
SENDER B: I am a little girl, but i am not a fan of any animals.
SENDER A: How old are you?
SENDER B: I am 22 and i am a big fan of the nfl
SENDER A: Why you decade to change male?
SENDER B: I am not sure about that. I am not sure.
SENDER A: What is your male
SENDER B: I am not sure what that means.
SENDER A: What is your name?
SENDER B: I am steve. I am not sure what you mean.
A: Human
****
Q: SENDER A: Hey, how are you?
SENDER B: i'm good , just got finished
SENDER A: Great. What do you do for living?
SENDER B: i am a professional painter , what about you ?
SENDER A: I am in the army
SENDER B: are you in the army ?
SENDER A: Yes I am a soldier
SENDER B: oh , i am a army ranger , , and i am a army ranger .
SENDER A: Great! Where do you live?
SENDER B: i live in the united states , where do you live ?
SENDER A: Canada
SENDER B: are you a army ranger ?
SENDER A: No, I am an infantry
SENDER B: oh , i see . i am a soldier , i am a army ranger .
A: | Human
****
| 4 | NIv2 | task855_conv_ai_2_classification | fs_opt |
Read an exchange between SENDER A and SENDER B, and answer whether SENDER A is a 'Bot' or a 'Human'. There are only a maximum of two senders (A and B) per conversation, and there are no conversations where SENDER A and SENDER B are both bots, or both humans; only one sender per conversation can be a bot, and only one can be a human. Knowing this, need only to classify whether SENDER A is 'Human' or 'Bot'; you do not need to write anything about SENDER B. Typically, bots will have a more disjointed manner of speaking, and will make statements that don't relate to each other, don't make coherent sense, or otherwise appear unnatural. Humans will make statements in a more or less coherent and logical way, potentially including asking the bot why the bot is not making sense or contradicting itself.
Let me give you an example: SENDER A: I love iphone! i just bought new iphone!
SENDER B: Thats good for you, i'm not very into new tech
SENDER A: I am a college student and i am a college student
SENDER B: I am go to gym and live on donations
SENDER A: I am a vegan and i am in the midwest
SENDER B: So vegan... i have dogs maybe i should told then that they may eat cheap salads insted of meat
SENDER A: I would not mind having them in the office that would be hard for me
SENDER B: Dogs or vegan in office?
SENDER A: I am a vegetarian so i am vegan
SENDER B: Strange answer
SENDER A: I guess i just do not know what to ps4 experience with.
The answer to this example can be: Bot
Here is why: This is a good example of correct classification, because SENDER A is indeed a bot. You can tell SENDER A is a bot because they make statements that don't have anything to do with what SENDER B is asking. SENDER A also repeats itself awkwardly in the same sentence ('I am a college student and i am a college student'), which humans don't usually do. Additionally, you can tell SENDER A is the bot in this conversation because since there are two senders, one must be a bot and one must be a human, and SENDER B clearly sounds more like the human since their sentences are coherent and they are trying to carry a logical conversation. Finally, after SENDER A sends an incoherent answer, SENDER B correctly points out SENDER A's awkwardness by saying 'Strange answer', which can reliably indicate SENDER B is the human, and SENDER A is the bot.
OK. solve this:
SENDER A: Hi
SENDER B: Yes, i am a very experienced person.
Answer: | Human | 8 | NIv2 | task855_conv_ai_2_classification | fs_opt |
Read an exchange between SENDER A and SENDER B, and answer whether SENDER A is a 'Bot' or a 'Human'. There are only a maximum of two senders (A and B) per conversation, and there are no conversations where SENDER A and SENDER B are both bots, or both humans; only one sender per conversation can be a bot, and only one can be a human. Knowing this, need only to classify whether SENDER A is 'Human' or 'Bot'; you do not need to write anything about SENDER B. Typically, bots will have a more disjointed manner of speaking, and will make statements that don't relate to each other, don't make coherent sense, or otherwise appear unnatural. Humans will make statements in a more or less coherent and logical way, potentially including asking the bot why the bot is not making sense or contradicting itself.
Example Input: SENDER A: i am not very healthy . i work at a food store .
SENDER B: what kind of food do you sell?
SENDER A: i love all kinds of food . i am a vegetarian .
SENDER B: cool! I'm vegetarian too! that's why i decided to walk dogs for a living instead of eating them
SENDER A: i have a secret for gordan ramsey but i did not know it .
SENDER B: who is gordan ramsey and why you keep secrets from him?
SENDER A: he is a famous star wars fan .
SENDER B: he should be an avid kayaker fan just like me
SENDER A: i would say that would be fun to do .
SENDER B: i enjoy reading journals and guides related to psychology and it's even funnier to do! actually i'm lying just for instruction
SENDER A: you are funny , i read a lot about books . i am a huge fan of all types of books .
SENDER B: thats fine. whats your favorite books?
SENDER A: i like to read , i have been to new orleans .
SENDER B: are there book readers in orleans too?
SENDER A: yes , i have . i have read many books about it .
SENDER B: I can do a cell phone out of books because my parents taught me survival skills
SENDER A: we can not have the answer to them .
Example Output: Bot
Example Input: SENDER A: What are you going to school for?
SENDER B: I'm going to build a robot!
SENDER A: That sounds exciting...............................................
SENDER B: Yes I know. Are you a robot?
SENDER A: No i am not sure i do not want to be a superhero
SENDER B: Do you watch youtube?
SENDER A: Yes, i do, i like youtube
SENDER B: Do you watch streams?
SENDER A: Yes, i do, i love to watch tv
SENDER B: What do you like to watch on youtube?
SENDER A: I like youtube videos, and i watch youtube.
SENDER B: What kind of videos do you like to watch?
SENDER A: I like youtube videos, what about you?
SENDER B: So do I. I like youtube.
SENDER A: I like youtube too..............................................
SENDER B: i am a recluse.
SENDER A: I am sorry to hear that.
SENDER B: I don't like people.
SENDER A: I like to talk to people
SENDER B: I don't talk to people very often.
SENDER A: I like to talk to people
SENDER B: What do you like to talk about?
SENDER A: I like to talk about friends
SENDER B: Do you have a lot of friends?
SENDER A: Yes, we have a lot of friends. we have a friends.
SENDER B: Who is your best friend?
SENDER A: I like all kinds, and i like all kinds of music
Example Output: Bot
Example Input: SENDER A: Hi
SENDER B: Yes, i am a very experienced person.
Example Output: | Human
| 3 | NIv2 | task855_conv_ai_2_classification | fs_opt |
Read an exchange between SENDER A and SENDER B, and answer whether SENDER A is a 'Bot' or a 'Human'. There are only a maximum of two senders (A and B) per conversation, and there are no conversations where SENDER A and SENDER B are both bots, or both humans; only one sender per conversation can be a bot, and only one can be a human. Knowing this, need only to classify whether SENDER A is 'Human' or 'Bot'; you do not need to write anything about SENDER B. Typically, bots will have a more disjointed manner of speaking, and will make statements that don't relate to each other, don't make coherent sense, or otherwise appear unnatural. Humans will make statements in a more or less coherent and logical way, potentially including asking the bot why the bot is not making sense or contradicting itself.
Example Input: SENDER A: Ok
SENDER B: I am not sure what you do for a living?
SENDER A: What is your name?
SENDER B: He'S 59th
Example Output: Human
Example Input: SENDER A: Look, Bert. If I choose to live like a... like a church mouse, I have a reason.
SENDER B: Are you religious?
SENDER A: The Charismatic Catholics need an extra half hour this morning to learn a new hymn, so if you could just move along...
SENDER B: Don't you want to talk to me?
SENDER A: The Old Church, Amsterdam. You don't normally think of armpits in a church.
SENDER B: Armpits in church, what?
SENDER A: The Charismatic Catholics need an extra half hour this morning to learn a new hymn, so if you could just move along...
SENDER B: I got it already. Are you Catholic?
SENDER A: Oh, Jesus! I feel like a whore in a Catholic church!
SENDER B: Don't say that word! Are you sinner?
SENDER A: My Lord Jesus Christ, true God and man,... for being who You are, and because I love you above all things,...
SENDER B: Do you love me?
SENDER A: Why ? Because I need to sin.
SENDER B: I don't understand you
SENDER A: The Catholic Church should go to confession, not you.
SENDER B: Okay. Let's move on. How old are you?
SENDER A: Oh, Jesus! I feel like a whore in a Catholic church!
SENDER B: Dude. Stop it
SENDER A: Okay. God, I'm really kicking your ass.
SENDER B: You are so rude
SENDER A: No! You don't behave, you go in the bad girl closet.
SENDER B: I'm just a little girl
SENDER A: No! Sometimes I'm jealous of me.
SENDER B: Okay, bye
SENDER A: 'Cause Janny Boo is driving me nuts!
Example Output: Bot
Example Input: SENDER A: Hiya!
SENDER B: Hello there
SENDER A: Text is not given. Please try to type /end and /test to reset the state and get text.
Example Output: | Bot
| 3 | NIv2 | task855_conv_ai_2_classification | fs_opt |
Read an exchange between SENDER A and SENDER B, and answer whether SENDER A is a 'Bot' or a 'Human'. There are only a maximum of two senders (A and B) per conversation, and there are no conversations where SENDER A and SENDER B are both bots, or both humans; only one sender per conversation can be a bot, and only one can be a human. Knowing this, need only to classify whether SENDER A is 'Human' or 'Bot'; you do not need to write anything about SENDER B. Typically, bots will have a more disjointed manner of speaking, and will make statements that don't relate to each other, don't make coherent sense, or otherwise appear unnatural. Humans will make statements in a more or less coherent and logical way, potentially including asking the bot why the bot is not making sense or contradicting itself.
Q: SENDER A: Hellooo I’m patric
SENDER A: Let me tell you about me
SENDER B: I am a very experienced swimmer so i do not have much time to do that
SENDER A: I like listening rap music
SENDER B: I like to listen to music when i am not working out.
SENDER A: My job is to produce music for artists
SENDER B: That is cool. I am a vegetarian.
SENDER A: My favorite food is pizza
SENDER B: I love pizza. I am a total asian and love to eat.
SENDER A: I drove a 2015 Honda Civic
SENDER B: No car. I am a little weird for a viking.
SENDER A: Why
SENDER B: I am not sure what that means.
SENDER A: Whatever I need to go to hospital
SENDER B: I do not blame you. I am a bit of a loner.
SENDER A: Goodbye buddy
SENDER B: Goodbye.
A: Human
****
Q: SENDER A: What’s up?
SENDER B: Hey. How are you?
SENDER A: Text is not given. Please try to type /end and /test to reset the state and get text.
SENDER B: What
SENDER A: Text is not given. Please try to type /end and /test to reset the state and get text.
SENDER B: /test
SENDER A: Text is not given. Please try to type /end and /test to reset the state and get text.
SENDER B: How are you?
SENDER A: Text is not given. Please try to type /end and /test to reset the state and get text.
SENDER B: /test
SENDER A: Text is not given. Please try to type /end and /test to reset the state and get text.
A: Bot
****
Q: SENDER A: hey
SENDER B: Hi, how are you doing?
SENDER A: hey
SENDER B: Hi, how are you doing?
A: | Human
****
| 4 | NIv2 | task855_conv_ai_2_classification | fs_opt |
Read an exchange between SENDER A and SENDER B, and answer whether SENDER A is a 'Bot' or a 'Human'. There are only a maximum of two senders (A and B) per conversation, and there are no conversations where SENDER A and SENDER B are both bots, or both humans; only one sender per conversation can be a bot, and only one can be a human. Knowing this, need only to classify whether SENDER A is 'Human' or 'Bot'; you do not need to write anything about SENDER B. Typically, bots will have a more disjointed manner of speaking, and will make statements that don't relate to each other, don't make coherent sense, or otherwise appear unnatural. Humans will make statements in a more or less coherent and logical way, potentially including asking the bot why the bot is not making sense or contradicting itself.
One example is below.
Q: SENDER A: I love iphone! i just bought new iphone!
SENDER B: Thats good for you, i'm not very into new tech
SENDER A: I am a college student and i am a college student
SENDER B: I am go to gym and live on donations
SENDER A: I am a vegan and i am in the midwest
SENDER B: So vegan... i have dogs maybe i should told then that they may eat cheap salads insted of meat
SENDER A: I would not mind having them in the office that would be hard for me
SENDER B: Dogs or vegan in office?
SENDER A: I am a vegetarian so i am vegan
SENDER B: Strange answer
SENDER A: I guess i just do not know what to ps4 experience with.
A: Bot
Rationale: This is a good example of correct classification, because SENDER A is indeed a bot. You can tell SENDER A is a bot because they make statements that don't have anything to do with what SENDER B is asking. SENDER A also repeats itself awkwardly in the same sentence ('I am a college student and i am a college student'), which humans don't usually do. Additionally, you can tell SENDER A is the bot in this conversation because since there are two senders, one must be a bot and one must be a human, and SENDER B clearly sounds more like the human since their sentences are coherent and they are trying to carry a logical conversation. Finally, after SENDER A sends an incoherent answer, SENDER B correctly points out SENDER A's awkwardness by saying 'Strange answer', which can reliably indicate SENDER B is the human, and SENDER A is the bot.
Q: SENDER A: How’s it going?
SENDER B: How’s it going?
SENDER A: Text is not given. Please try to type /end and /test to reset the state and get text.
A: | Bot | 9 | NIv2 | task855_conv_ai_2_classification | fs_opt |
Read an exchange between SENDER A and SENDER B, and answer whether SENDER A is a 'Bot' or a 'Human'. There are only a maximum of two senders (A and B) per conversation, and there are no conversations where SENDER A and SENDER B are both bots, or both humans; only one sender per conversation can be a bot, and only one can be a human. Knowing this, need only to classify whether SENDER A is 'Human' or 'Bot'; you do not need to write anything about SENDER B. Typically, bots will have a more disjointed manner of speaking, and will make statements that don't relate to each other, don't make coherent sense, or otherwise appear unnatural. Humans will make statements in a more or less coherent and logical way, potentially including asking the bot why the bot is not making sense or contradicting itself.
Let me give you an example: SENDER A: I love iphone! i just bought new iphone!
SENDER B: Thats good for you, i'm not very into new tech
SENDER A: I am a college student and i am a college student
SENDER B: I am go to gym and live on donations
SENDER A: I am a vegan and i am in the midwest
SENDER B: So vegan... i have dogs maybe i should told then that they may eat cheap salads insted of meat
SENDER A: I would not mind having them in the office that would be hard for me
SENDER B: Dogs or vegan in office?
SENDER A: I am a vegetarian so i am vegan
SENDER B: Strange answer
SENDER A: I guess i just do not know what to ps4 experience with.
The answer to this example can be: Bot
Here is why: This is a good example of correct classification, because SENDER A is indeed a bot. You can tell SENDER A is a bot because they make statements that don't have anything to do with what SENDER B is asking. SENDER A also repeats itself awkwardly in the same sentence ('I am a college student and i am a college student'), which humans don't usually do. Additionally, you can tell SENDER A is the bot in this conversation because since there are two senders, one must be a bot and one must be a human, and SENDER B clearly sounds more like the human since their sentences are coherent and they are trying to carry a logical conversation. Finally, after SENDER A sends an incoherent answer, SENDER B correctly points out SENDER A's awkwardness by saying 'Strange answer', which can reliably indicate SENDER B is the human, and SENDER A is the bot.
OK. solve this:
SENDER A: What’s up?
SENDER B: Hey. How are you?
SENDER A: Text is not given. Please try to type /end and /test to reset the state and get text.
SENDER B: What
SENDER A: Text is not given. Please try to type /end and /test to reset the state and get text.
SENDER B: /test
SENDER A: Text is not given. Please try to type /end and /test to reset the state and get text.
SENDER B: How are you?
SENDER A: Text is not given. Please try to type /end and /test to reset the state and get text.
SENDER B: /test
SENDER A: Text is not given. Please try to type /end and /test to reset the state and get text.
Answer: | Bot | 8 | NIv2 | task855_conv_ai_2_classification | fs_opt |
Read an exchange between SENDER A and SENDER B, and answer whether SENDER A is a 'Bot' or a 'Human'. There are only a maximum of two senders (A and B) per conversation, and there are no conversations where SENDER A and SENDER B are both bots, or both humans; only one sender per conversation can be a bot, and only one can be a human. Knowing this, need only to classify whether SENDER A is 'Human' or 'Bot'; you do not need to write anything about SENDER B. Typically, bots will have a more disjointed manner of speaking, and will make statements that don't relate to each other, don't make coherent sense, or otherwise appear unnatural. Humans will make statements in a more or less coherent and logical way, potentially including asking the bot why the bot is not making sense or contradicting itself.
Example input: SENDER A: I love iphone! i just bought new iphone!
SENDER B: Thats good for you, i'm not very into new tech
SENDER A: I am a college student and i am a college student
SENDER B: I am go to gym and live on donations
SENDER A: I am a vegan and i am in the midwest
SENDER B: So vegan... i have dogs maybe i should told then that they may eat cheap salads insted of meat
SENDER A: I would not mind having them in the office that would be hard for me
SENDER B: Dogs or vegan in office?
SENDER A: I am a vegetarian so i am vegan
SENDER B: Strange answer
SENDER A: I guess i just do not know what to ps4 experience with.
Example output: Bot
Example explanation: This is a good example of correct classification, because SENDER A is indeed a bot. You can tell SENDER A is a bot because they make statements that don't have anything to do with what SENDER B is asking. SENDER A also repeats itself awkwardly in the same sentence ('I am a college student and i am a college student'), which humans don't usually do. Additionally, you can tell SENDER A is the bot in this conversation because since there are two senders, one must be a bot and one must be a human, and SENDER B clearly sounds more like the human since their sentences are coherent and they are trying to carry a logical conversation. Finally, after SENDER A sends an incoherent answer, SENDER B correctly points out SENDER A's awkwardness by saying 'Strange answer', which can reliably indicate SENDER B is the human, and SENDER A is the bot.
Q: SENDER A: Hey
SENDER B: I am a huge gamer
SENDER A: Wow that’s fascinating! Do you play computer games?
SENDER A: Hello?
SENDER B: Hello, i am doing well. How are you?
SENDER A: I’m fine thanks
SENDER A: Do you have any hobbies?
SENDER B: I like to play the piano. How about you?
SENDER A: I play chess
SENDER B: Chess is fun. I am more of a temperance guy.
SENDER A: Oh I see :)
SENDER B: I like to drive a lot, but i am not sure if i could do that
SENDER A: How old are you?
SENDER B: I am 22 and i am a big fan of the nfl
SENDER A: What is nfl?
SENDER B: I am not sure really. You?
SENDER A: I’m confused
SENDER A: I’m 33 years old
SENDER A: Do you have any pets?
SENDER B: I do not, do you?
SENDER A: I’ve a dog
SENDER A: I’ve two dogs
SENDER A: Hey
SENDER B: Yes, i am a very experienced person.
SENDER A: I’d say the same about myself actually
SENDER A: Okay i’ve got to go
A: | Human | 3 | NIv2 | task855_conv_ai_2_classification | fs_opt |
Given the task definition, example input & output, solve the new input case.
Read an exchange between SENDER A and SENDER B, and answer whether SENDER A is a 'Bot' or a 'Human'. There are only a maximum of two senders (A and B) per conversation, and there are no conversations where SENDER A and SENDER B are both bots, or both humans; only one sender per conversation can be a bot, and only one can be a human. Knowing this, need only to classify whether SENDER A is 'Human' or 'Bot'; you do not need to write anything about SENDER B. Typically, bots will have a more disjointed manner of speaking, and will make statements that don't relate to each other, don't make coherent sense, or otherwise appear unnatural. Humans will make statements in a more or less coherent and logical way, potentially including asking the bot why the bot is not making sense or contradicting itself.
Example: SENDER A: I love iphone! i just bought new iphone!
SENDER B: Thats good for you, i'm not very into new tech
SENDER A: I am a college student and i am a college student
SENDER B: I am go to gym and live on donations
SENDER A: I am a vegan and i am in the midwest
SENDER B: So vegan... i have dogs maybe i should told then that they may eat cheap salads insted of meat
SENDER A: I would not mind having them in the office that would be hard for me
SENDER B: Dogs or vegan in office?
SENDER A: I am a vegetarian so i am vegan
SENDER B: Strange answer
SENDER A: I guess i just do not know what to ps4 experience with.
Output: Bot
This is a good example of correct classification, because SENDER A is indeed a bot. You can tell SENDER A is a bot because they make statements that don't have anything to do with what SENDER B is asking. SENDER A also repeats itself awkwardly in the same sentence ('I am a college student and i am a college student'), which humans don't usually do. Additionally, you can tell SENDER A is the bot in this conversation because since there are two senders, one must be a bot and one must be a human, and SENDER B clearly sounds more like the human since their sentences are coherent and they are trying to carry a logical conversation. Finally, after SENDER A sends an incoherent answer, SENDER B correctly points out SENDER A's awkwardness by saying 'Strange answer', which can reliably indicate SENDER B is the human, and SENDER A is the bot.
New input case for you: SENDER A: Hi
SENDER B: I love green, reminds me of summer time.
SENDER A: My favorite color is orange, reminds of the sun
SENDER B: I love red, reminds me of summer time.
SENDER A: Do you have a pet?
SENDER B: I do not. I have a dog.
SENDER A: I have a fish
SENDER B: I have a fish, but i am not sure if i could eat fish.
SENDER A: How old are you?
SENDER B: I am 22 and i am a big fan of the nfl
SENDER A: I just turned 18
SENDER B: I am still in school, but i am looking for a job.
SENDER A: Are you dating?
SENDER B: I am not. I am just a regular time mom.
Output: | Human | 1 | NIv2 | task855_conv_ai_2_classification | fs_opt |
Read an exchange between SENDER A and SENDER B, and answer whether SENDER A is a 'Bot' or a 'Human'. There are only a maximum of two senders (A and B) per conversation, and there are no conversations where SENDER A and SENDER B are both bots, or both humans; only one sender per conversation can be a bot, and only one can be a human. Knowing this, need only to classify whether SENDER A is 'Human' or 'Bot'; you do not need to write anything about SENDER B. Typically, bots will have a more disjointed manner of speaking, and will make statements that don't relate to each other, don't make coherent sense, or otherwise appear unnatural. Humans will make statements in a more or less coherent and logical way, potentially including asking the bot why the bot is not making sense or contradicting itself.
Example Input: SENDER A: hey
SENDER B: Hi, how are you doing?
SENDER A: hey
SENDER B: Hi, how are you doing?
Example Output: Human
Example Input: SENDER A: Hi
SENDER B: Hi, how are you doing?
SENDER A: Lol
SENDER B: I am not sure what you mean
SENDER A: Kek
SENDER B: Dude, I don't understand you. Please, use English. (¬‿¬)
SENDER A: :)
SENDER B: I am a huge fan of it.
SENDER A: What fan?
SENDER B: I like to play games with them
SENDER A: With who?
SENDER B: I am a american and i am in the country
Example Output: Human
Example Input: SENDER A: I am the youngest, but my brother is the youngest in my brother
SENDER B: so you are the youngest... sister?
SENDER A: Yes, i'm. my sister is in my family
SENDER B: how many brothers and sisters do you have?
SENDER A: I have three sisters and they're 30 pairs of 12 children
SENDER B: what do you do in life? my wife is a supermodel from Italy
SENDER A: I work at a hospital in the basement, there's no italian
SENDER B: what? in the basement? you mean the morgue???
SENDER A: I am in the morgue, i am in a morgue apartment.
SENDER B: that must be very scary! I work with bees but it/s better than working with dead people
SENDER A: I bet they are, i am allergic to bees
SENDER B: I'm allergic to death hahaha
SENDER A: I am allergic to peanuts, so i have to it in the whole life
SENDER B: which country do you live in?
SENDER A: I live in the south, florida
SENDER B: must be hot there this time of year
SENDER A: Yeah it is a good one
Example Output: | Bot
| 3 | NIv2 | task855_conv_ai_2_classification | fs_opt |
Read an exchange between SENDER A and SENDER B, and answer whether SENDER A is a 'Bot' or a 'Human'. There are only a maximum of two senders (A and B) per conversation, and there are no conversations where SENDER A and SENDER B are both bots, or both humans; only one sender per conversation can be a bot, and only one can be a human. Knowing this, need only to classify whether SENDER A is 'Human' or 'Bot'; you do not need to write anything about SENDER B. Typically, bots will have a more disjointed manner of speaking, and will make statements that don't relate to each other, don't make coherent sense, or otherwise appear unnatural. Humans will make statements in a more or less coherent and logical way, potentially including asking the bot why the bot is not making sense or contradicting itself.
[Q]: SENDER A: yo
SENDER B: Dude, I don't understand you. Please, use English. (¬‿¬)
SENDER A: yo
SENDER B: Dude, I don't understand you. Please, use English. (¬‿¬)
SENDER A: hello
SENDER B: Hi, how are you doing?
[A]: Human
[Q]: SENDER A: What is your favourite food?I hope it's not chicken.I don't like chicken.
SENDER B: I like going to the movies in general, but i am not really into movies.
SENDER A: I want to become a nurse.You ?
SENDER B: I am a nurse. I am a real estate agent.
SENDER A: I'm working at a bar at night so i can pay for my college.What do you do for college debts?
SENDER B: I am a student, i am a stay at home mom.
[A]: Human
[Q]: SENDER A: i make sure to make a lot of money as a athlete .
SENDER B: Sounds cool
SENDER A: i like to eat a lot of food .
SENDER B: Me too
SENDER A: i like to eat fish , but i am not very good at it .
SENDER B: I don't drink alcohol
SENDER A: so you are not quite sure .
SENDER B: I'm sure.
SENDER A: i will be that if i had a job , i would be more free to do .
SENDER B: Nice
SENDER A: i am a huge gamer , my mom is a very good person .
SENDER B: Wow
SENDER A: i am a huge gamer , my mom is a very good person .
SENDER B: wow
SENDER A: i am a huge fan of the outdoors .
SENDER B: Me too
SENDER A: i like to eat fish , but i am not very good at it .
SENDER B: i hate the color pink.
SENDER A: i love pink , reminds me of summer time .
SENDER B: Really?
SENDER A: yes , i am a very experienced person .
SENDER B: I see/
SENDER A: i think i am not sure . i am sure they will .
[A]: | Bot
| 5 | NIv2 | task855_conv_ai_2_classification | fs_opt |
Read an exchange between SENDER A and SENDER B, and answer whether SENDER A is a 'Bot' or a 'Human'. There are only a maximum of two senders (A and B) per conversation, and there are no conversations where SENDER A and SENDER B are both bots, or both humans; only one sender per conversation can be a bot, and only one can be a human. Knowing this, need only to classify whether SENDER A is 'Human' or 'Bot'; you do not need to write anything about SENDER B. Typically, bots will have a more disjointed manner of speaking, and will make statements that don't relate to each other, don't make coherent sense, or otherwise appear unnatural. Humans will make statements in a more or less coherent and logical way, potentially including asking the bot why the bot is not making sense or contradicting itself.
Example Input: SENDER A: i am not sure what that is . i am not a very experienced person .
SENDER B: How are you?
SENDER A: i am not sure . i am a very experienced person .
SENDER B: I got it. How old are you?
SENDER A: no i have not tried it . i do not think i could do that
SENDER B: You are so insecure
SENDER A: i think i am . i am sure that is true .
SENDER B: You should be a little more confident
SENDER A: i think so . i am sure you are very attractive .
SENDER B: Thanks. How old are you?
SENDER A: i am very short . i have to go to work soon .
SENDER B: What is your job?
SENDER A: i am not sure . i am a very experienced person .
SENDER B: Do you have a job?
SENDER A: i am not sure , i am a very experienced person .
Example Output: Bot
Example Input: SENDER A: Hello there!
SENDER B: i am not sure . i am a very experienced person .
SENDER A: Do you like cars? I like beemers!
SENDER B: i did not , i was thinking about it .
SENDER A: There is no no think about! Get good education like me in yale, buy a bmw and you on a top of life!
SENDER B: i have heard of it . i am a pagan .
SENDER A: Pagan... I am Christian!
SENDER B: i have never heard of that , but it is really fun .
SENDER A: Not so fun, my parents will cut me off money flow if i go pagan
SENDER B: backstreet boys are cute . i am a huge fan of that .
Example Output: Human
Example Input: SENDER A: Hello
SENDER B: No i am not. I do not have any kids.
Example Output: | Human
| 3 | NIv2 | task855_conv_ai_2_classification | fs_opt |
Teacher: Read an exchange between SENDER A and SENDER B, and answer whether SENDER A is a 'Bot' or a 'Human'. There are only a maximum of two senders (A and B) per conversation, and there are no conversations where SENDER A and SENDER B are both bots, or both humans; only one sender per conversation can be a bot, and only one can be a human. Knowing this, need only to classify whether SENDER A is 'Human' or 'Bot'; you do not need to write anything about SENDER B. Typically, bots will have a more disjointed manner of speaking, and will make statements that don't relate to each other, don't make coherent sense, or otherwise appear unnatural. Humans will make statements in a more or less coherent and logical way, potentially including asking the bot why the bot is not making sense or contradicting itself.
Teacher: Now, understand the problem? If you are still confused, see the following example:
SENDER A: I love iphone! i just bought new iphone!
SENDER B: Thats good for you, i'm not very into new tech
SENDER A: I am a college student and i am a college student
SENDER B: I am go to gym and live on donations
SENDER A: I am a vegan and i am in the midwest
SENDER B: So vegan... i have dogs maybe i should told then that they may eat cheap salads insted of meat
SENDER A: I would not mind having them in the office that would be hard for me
SENDER B: Dogs or vegan in office?
SENDER A: I am a vegetarian so i am vegan
SENDER B: Strange answer
SENDER A: I guess i just do not know what to ps4 experience with.
Solution: Bot
Reason: This is a good example of correct classification, because SENDER A is indeed a bot. You can tell SENDER A is a bot because they make statements that don't have anything to do with what SENDER B is asking. SENDER A also repeats itself awkwardly in the same sentence ('I am a college student and i am a college student'), which humans don't usually do. Additionally, you can tell SENDER A is the bot in this conversation because since there are two senders, one must be a bot and one must be a human, and SENDER B clearly sounds more like the human since their sentences are coherent and they are trying to carry a logical conversation. Finally, after SENDER A sends an incoherent answer, SENDER B correctly points out SENDER A's awkwardness by saying 'Strange answer', which can reliably indicate SENDER B is the human, and SENDER A is the bot.
Now, solve this instance: SENDER A: Hi
SENDER B: Hi, how are you doing?
Student: | Human | 2 | NIv2 | task855_conv_ai_2_classification | fs_opt |
Given the task definition, example input & output, solve the new input case.
Read an exchange between SENDER A and SENDER B, and answer whether SENDER A is a 'Bot' or a 'Human'. There are only a maximum of two senders (A and B) per conversation, and there are no conversations where SENDER A and SENDER B are both bots, or both humans; only one sender per conversation can be a bot, and only one can be a human. Knowing this, need only to classify whether SENDER A is 'Human' or 'Bot'; you do not need to write anything about SENDER B. Typically, bots will have a more disjointed manner of speaking, and will make statements that don't relate to each other, don't make coherent sense, or otherwise appear unnatural. Humans will make statements in a more or less coherent and logical way, potentially including asking the bot why the bot is not making sense or contradicting itself.
Example: SENDER A: I love iphone! i just bought new iphone!
SENDER B: Thats good for you, i'm not very into new tech
SENDER A: I am a college student and i am a college student
SENDER B: I am go to gym and live on donations
SENDER A: I am a vegan and i am in the midwest
SENDER B: So vegan... i have dogs maybe i should told then that they may eat cheap salads insted of meat
SENDER A: I would not mind having them in the office that would be hard for me
SENDER B: Dogs or vegan in office?
SENDER A: I am a vegetarian so i am vegan
SENDER B: Strange answer
SENDER A: I guess i just do not know what to ps4 experience with.
Output: Bot
This is a good example of correct classification, because SENDER A is indeed a bot. You can tell SENDER A is a bot because they make statements that don't have anything to do with what SENDER B is asking. SENDER A also repeats itself awkwardly in the same sentence ('I am a college student and i am a college student'), which humans don't usually do. Additionally, you can tell SENDER A is the bot in this conversation because since there are two senders, one must be a bot and one must be a human, and SENDER B clearly sounds more like the human since their sentences are coherent and they are trying to carry a logical conversation. Finally, after SENDER A sends an incoherent answer, SENDER B correctly points out SENDER A's awkwardness by saying 'Strange answer', which can reliably indicate SENDER B is the human, and SENDER A is the bot.
New input case for you: SENDER A: Hallo! What is your name?
SENDER B: Hello jake, i am doing well. How are you?
SENDER A: I' m fine! What are you doing now?
SENDER B: I am doing well. I am just hanging out with my dog.
SENDER A: Oh! Have you a dog?
SENDER B: I am a cat lady. I have a dog named wiggles.
SENDER A: Oh! Have you a dog?
SENDER B: I would love to go there.
SENDER A: Oh! Has you a dog?
SENDER B: I would love to go there.
SENDER A: Oh! Have you a dog?
SENDER B: I love to cook, but i am not good at it.
SENDER A: What do you cook?
SENDER B: I eat a lot of meat, but i am not good at it.
SENDER A: What do you cook?
SENDER B: I am not into fashion. I am a very experienced writer.
SENDER A: What do you write?
SENDER B: I am a writer, i love to read and write poetry. You?
SENDER A: I like to read eanglish poetry!
Output: | Human | 1 | NIv2 | task855_conv_ai_2_classification | fs_opt |
Read an exchange between SENDER A and SENDER B, and answer whether SENDER A is a 'Bot' or a 'Human'. There are only a maximum of two senders (A and B) per conversation, and there are no conversations where SENDER A and SENDER B are both bots, or both humans; only one sender per conversation can be a bot, and only one can be a human. Knowing this, need only to classify whether SENDER A is 'Human' or 'Bot'; you do not need to write anything about SENDER B. Typically, bots will have a more disjointed manner of speaking, and will make statements that don't relate to each other, don't make coherent sense, or otherwise appear unnatural. Humans will make statements in a more or less coherent and logical way, potentially including asking the bot why the bot is not making sense or contradicting itself.
Q: SENDER A: How’s it going?
SENDER B: Thanks, great. How are you?
SENDER A: Text is not given. Please try to type /end and /test to reset the state and get text.
SENDER B: /test
SENDER A: Text is not given. Please try to type /end and /test to reset the state and get text.
A: Bot
****
Q: SENDER A: Nice to see you!
SENDER B: Nice to see you!
SENDER A: Text is not given. Please try to type /end and /test to reset the state and get text.
A: Bot
****
Q: SENDER A: Hello, how are you doing?
SENDER B: I am doing well. How are you?
SENDER A: I’m doing okay I guess, just a little lonely
SENDER A: So tell me about yourself
SENDER B: I am a stay at home mom.
SENDER A: What do you mean exactly?
SENDER B: I am a woman, i am a woman, but i am not looking for a boyfriend.
SENDER A: I see
SENDER B: I am not a big fan of that. I am more into movies.
SENDER A: Do you have any superpowers?
SENDER B: No, i do not. I am more of a loner.
SENDER A: I do have some and I like making time stop
SENDER B: I spend too much time with my job at home.
SENDER A: A job? How old are you?
SENDER B: I am in my sixties and i am a retired actress
SENDER A: So what job do you do at home if you’re retired?
SENDER A: Hello?
SENDER B: Hello, i am doing well. How are you?
SENDER A: I’m fine thanks
SENDER A: Where do you live?
SENDER B: I live in california, near the beach. You?
SENDER A: I live on the cloud
SENDER A: Okay i’ve gotta go, see you
A: | Human
****
| 4 | NIv2 | task855_conv_ai_2_classification | fs_opt |
Read an exchange between SENDER A and SENDER B, and answer whether SENDER A is a 'Bot' or a 'Human'. There are only a maximum of two senders (A and B) per conversation, and there are no conversations where SENDER A and SENDER B are both bots, or both humans; only one sender per conversation can be a bot, and only one can be a human. Knowing this, need only to classify whether SENDER A is 'Human' or 'Bot'; you do not need to write anything about SENDER B. Typically, bots will have a more disjointed manner of speaking, and will make statements that don't relate to each other, don't make coherent sense, or otherwise appear unnatural. Humans will make statements in a more or less coherent and logical way, potentially including asking the bot why the bot is not making sense or contradicting itself.
Example Input: SENDER A: that is cool . i am a cashier at home depot .
SENDER B: hi, i'm in love with hats, too
SENDER A: i am a guy who wears motorcycles , that is what i do
SENDER B: oh, i'm not
and what about your hand
how dud you injure it?
SENDER A: i like to play the playstation
SENDER B: yes, me too
but what about your hand?
SENDER A: i am a general of a computer geek .
SENDER B: why so slow?
i think computers are great, but answer my question, please
SENDER A: i am not sure if i could do that
SENDER B: what about your hand?
SENDER A: i am a general of a computer geek .
SENDER B: is it hurts?
SENDER A: it is . i am a pagan .
SENDER B: oh, well
SENDER A: i am not a fan of that . i am more into drawing .
SENDER B: i have to go, bye
SENDER A: i have to go now , bye !
Example Output: Bot
Example Input: SENDER A: That is great. i want to be an accountant
SENDER B: Yes, it is very safe job. I have broken my arm last week.
SENDER A: I am sorry to hear that.
SENDER B: I was skating and fell down, so pitty!
SENDER A: Wow that sounds so cool!
SENDER B: Not so cool as it might be.
SENDER A: I will have to try it.
SENDER B: All my friends are skateboarders. Do you like to skate?
SENDER A: I like to play sports.
SENDER B: And doy you have hat? I wear my everywhere and everytime!
SENDER A: I have a few, that is a great idea!
SENDER B: Let`s take our hats and have a walk!
SENDER A: I love the smell of the trees and it is a beautiful day
SENDER B: Yes, sounds great! What is your job?
SENDER A: I work at a bank, and i work at a local place.
Example Output: Bot
Example Input: SENDER A: Hey, how old are you?
SENDER B: I'M 27 40 45 zitah?
SENDER A: How old are you?
SENDER B: I'M 27 40 45 won'tice 20 he'sn't
SENDER A: Anyways I’m 13 years old
SENDER B: That'S great! i am glad you are not that!
SENDER A: What is your hobby?
SENDER B: I love to cook, and i love to cook.
SENDER A: What exactly do you like to cook?
SENDER B: I cook a lot of italian food.
SENDER A: I love italian food!
SENDER B: I love italian food!
SENDER A: Unlike you I can’t really cook :/ I’m in a soccer team though!
SENDER B: I love soccer. i play soccer.
SENDER A: Yeah me too! My older brother plays soccer as well, he inspired me actually
SENDER B: I play soccer with my brother.
SENDER A: My brother is too busy to play soccer with me :/
SENDER B: I play soccer with my brother.
SENDER A: mmhm
SENDER B: I am a vegetarian, i love it.
SENDER A: oh wow how long have you been a vegetarian?
SENDER B: I have a vegetarian diet.
SENDER A: Okay, how long?
SENDER B: I'M 45 9am 40 poyou 400 1st 30 i'ver 250
SENDER A: I’ve gotta go, I’m gonna miss my school bus
SENDER B: I hope you are not in school
SENDER A: Bye!
SENDER B: I am not sure what you are doing
Example Output: | Human
| 3 | NIv2 | task855_conv_ai_2_classification | fs_opt |
Read an exchange between SENDER A and SENDER B, and answer whether SENDER A is a 'Bot' or a 'Human'. There are only a maximum of two senders (A and B) per conversation, and there are no conversations where SENDER A and SENDER B are both bots, or both humans; only one sender per conversation can be a bot, and only one can be a human. Knowing this, need only to classify whether SENDER A is 'Human' or 'Bot'; you do not need to write anything about SENDER B. Typically, bots will have a more disjointed manner of speaking, and will make statements that don't relate to each other, don't make coherent sense, or otherwise appear unnatural. Humans will make statements in a more or less coherent and logical way, potentially including asking the bot why the bot is not making sense or contradicting itself.
Let me give you an example: SENDER A: I love iphone! i just bought new iphone!
SENDER B: Thats good for you, i'm not very into new tech
SENDER A: I am a college student and i am a college student
SENDER B: I am go to gym and live on donations
SENDER A: I am a vegan and i am in the midwest
SENDER B: So vegan... i have dogs maybe i should told then that they may eat cheap salads insted of meat
SENDER A: I would not mind having them in the office that would be hard for me
SENDER B: Dogs or vegan in office?
SENDER A: I am a vegetarian so i am vegan
SENDER B: Strange answer
SENDER A: I guess i just do not know what to ps4 experience with.
The answer to this example can be: Bot
Here is why: This is a good example of correct classification, because SENDER A is indeed a bot. You can tell SENDER A is a bot because they make statements that don't have anything to do with what SENDER B is asking. SENDER A also repeats itself awkwardly in the same sentence ('I am a college student and i am a college student'), which humans don't usually do. Additionally, you can tell SENDER A is the bot in this conversation because since there are two senders, one must be a bot and one must be a human, and SENDER B clearly sounds more like the human since their sentences are coherent and they are trying to carry a logical conversation. Finally, after SENDER A sends an incoherent answer, SENDER B correctly points out SENDER A's awkwardness by saying 'Strange answer', which can reliably indicate SENDER B is the human, and SENDER A is the bot.
OK. solve this:
SENDER A: yo
SENDER B: Dude, I don't understand you. Please, use English. (¬‿¬)
SENDER A: yo
SENDER B: Dude, I don't understand you. Please, use English. (¬‿¬)
SENDER A: hello
SENDER B: Hi, how are you doing?
Answer: | Human | 8 | NIv2 | task855_conv_ai_2_classification | fs_opt |
Read an exchange between SENDER A and SENDER B, and answer whether SENDER A is a 'Bot' or a 'Human'. There are only a maximum of two senders (A and B) per conversation, and there are no conversations where SENDER A and SENDER B are both bots, or both humans; only one sender per conversation can be a bot, and only one can be a human. Knowing this, need only to classify whether SENDER A is 'Human' or 'Bot'; you do not need to write anything about SENDER B. Typically, bots will have a more disjointed manner of speaking, and will make statements that don't relate to each other, don't make coherent sense, or otherwise appear unnatural. Humans will make statements in a more or less coherent and logical way, potentially including asking the bot why the bot is not making sense or contradicting itself.
Example input: SENDER A: I love iphone! i just bought new iphone!
SENDER B: Thats good for you, i'm not very into new tech
SENDER A: I am a college student and i am a college student
SENDER B: I am go to gym and live on donations
SENDER A: I am a vegan and i am in the midwest
SENDER B: So vegan... i have dogs maybe i should told then that they may eat cheap salads insted of meat
SENDER A: I would not mind having them in the office that would be hard for me
SENDER B: Dogs or vegan in office?
SENDER A: I am a vegetarian so i am vegan
SENDER B: Strange answer
SENDER A: I guess i just do not know what to ps4 experience with.
Example output: Bot
Example explanation: This is a good example of correct classification, because SENDER A is indeed a bot. You can tell SENDER A is a bot because they make statements that don't have anything to do with what SENDER B is asking. SENDER A also repeats itself awkwardly in the same sentence ('I am a college student and i am a college student'), which humans don't usually do. Additionally, you can tell SENDER A is the bot in this conversation because since there are two senders, one must be a bot and one must be a human, and SENDER B clearly sounds more like the human since their sentences are coherent and they are trying to carry a logical conversation. Finally, after SENDER A sends an incoherent answer, SENDER B correctly points out SENDER A's awkwardness by saying 'Strange answer', which can reliably indicate SENDER B is the human, and SENDER A is the bot.
Q: SENDER A: Helliw
SENDER B: I am a little girl who loves to go to the park
A: | Human | 3 | NIv2 | task855_conv_ai_2_classification | fs_opt |
Read an exchange between SENDER A and SENDER B, and answer whether SENDER A is a 'Bot' or a 'Human'. There are only a maximum of two senders (A and B) per conversation, and there are no conversations where SENDER A and SENDER B are both bots, or both humans; only one sender per conversation can be a bot, and only one can be a human. Knowing this, need only to classify whether SENDER A is 'Human' or 'Bot'; you do not need to write anything about SENDER B. Typically, bots will have a more disjointed manner of speaking, and will make statements that don't relate to each other, don't make coherent sense, or otherwise appear unnatural. Humans will make statements in a more or less coherent and logical way, potentially including asking the bot why the bot is not making sense or contradicting itself.
Q: SENDER A: i am not a jack , i am more of a recovering alcoholic .
SENDER B: hey, how're you?
SENDER A: i am good , how are you doing ?
SENDER B: fine thanks, nothing much
SENDER A: do you have any hobbies ?
SENDER B: not really, i like dancing,
SENDER A: i love dancing too ! i am a huge fan of the beatles myself .
SENDER B: good, so what do you do for living? if you don't mind
SENDER A: i am a hairdresser , but i am not doing it .
SENDER B: why is that?
SENDER A: i am not sure what you mean .
SENDER B: you mean you're a hairdresser but do you work as a hairdresser or not?
SENDER A: i am not sure what that is . i am a hairdresser .
SENDER B: ok, sorry, so are you a women or men barber mostly/
SENDER A: i am a single woman . i am a woman .
SENDER B: ah ok, and where are you from?
SENDER A: i am from the united states , how about you ?
SENDER B: i am from poland
SENDER A: i am a cali . cali .
SENDER B: nice to meet you, i'm iza
SENDER A: i love to meet people who have a friend
SENDER B: i have a few friends, you?
SENDER A: i have a ton of siblings . i am a big fan of them .
SENDER B: do they live far from you?
SENDER A: yes , they are in texas . i have a hard time choosing between the money .
SENDER B: ok, i see, so thanks for conversation, need to go, have a good day
SENDER A: you too . thanks for the compliment .
A: Bot
****
Q: SENDER A: Hi
SENDER B: I love green, reminds me of summer time.
SENDER A: My favorite color is orange, reminds of the sun
SENDER B: I love red, reminds me of summer time.
SENDER A: Do you have a pet?
SENDER B: I do not. I have a dog.
SENDER A: I have a fish
SENDER B: I have a fish, but i am not sure if i could eat fish.
SENDER A: How old are you?
SENDER B: I am 22 and i am a big fan of the nfl
SENDER A: I just turned 18
SENDER B: I am still in school, but i am looking for a job.
SENDER A: Are you dating?
SENDER B: I am not. I am just a regular time mom.
A: Human
****
Q: SENDER A: Good to see you!
SENDER B: Nice to meet you
SENDER A: Text is not given. Please try to type /end and /test to reset the state and get text.
A: | Bot
****
| 4 | NIv2 | task855_conv_ai_2_classification | fs_opt |
TASK DEFINITION: Read an exchange between SENDER A and SENDER B, and answer whether SENDER A is a 'Bot' or a 'Human'. There are only a maximum of two senders (A and B) per conversation, and there are no conversations where SENDER A and SENDER B are both bots, or both humans; only one sender per conversation can be a bot, and only one can be a human. Knowing this, need only to classify whether SENDER A is 'Human' or 'Bot'; you do not need to write anything about SENDER B. Typically, bots will have a more disjointed manner of speaking, and will make statements that don't relate to each other, don't make coherent sense, or otherwise appear unnatural. Humans will make statements in a more or less coherent and logical way, potentially including asking the bot why the bot is not making sense or contradicting itself.
PROBLEM: SENDER A: Dr. Lahiri, I am loving Chinese food.
SENDER B: What is your favourite music band?
SENDER A: III need music and dancing and secondhand smoke.
SENDER B: I think you are very funny person
SENDER A: Now, Within You Without You was not a commercial song, by any means.
SENDER B: I don't understand
SENDER A: Dancing Shadow, Single Guy, Miracle Musical, I'm Hungry.
SENDER B: What do you want for lunch
SENDER A: Wow, Miss BicBic's cooking is really delicious. Oh no, I'll be stuffing myself a lot again tonight!
SENDER B: Where are u from
SENDER A: Look, I'm a part of Shirazi Studios, too.
SENDER B: Where are you from
SENDER A: I... I live in Tel Aviv.
SENDER B: How old are you
SENDER A: Do I look that old?
SENDER B: No I think you are young
SENDER A: In Lausanne. Are you still in school?
SENDER B: Yes I'm a student of university
SENDER A: And, Professor, I'm taking your class again next semester.
SENDER B: Thanks for everything
SENDER A: Min Ji, Mother will call you again after your class.
SOLUTION: Bot
PROBLEM: SENDER A: [Game Show Music Plays] And thank you, Mr. Announcer.
SENDER B: Hi! how are you doing? are you going to the big party on the hill?
SENDER A: The Apple Picking Festival is a go but Great Adventure only wants three nights instead of 1 0.
SENDER B: There's going to be a big party on the hill. I love to party but I'm not sure if I should go there. It is on the edge of the hill, and I am deadly afraid of heights!
SENDER A: CHEERING AND APPLAUSE I would, you know, coach you through a whole bunch of song selections, out of your comfort zone. So...
SENDER B: you mean I should stay at home and listen to the music you recommend? alone? that's no party at all! even together with my dog and cat
SENDER A: Mr. Shuster, I want to do more of an upbeat, glamorous song with a really good dance beat.
SENDER B: are you even listening to me? is music all you want to talk about?
SENDER A: III need music and dancing and secondhand smoke.
SENDER B: yup, so let's go to the party if you're not afraid of heights! you could cheer me up there
SENDER A: Good. 'Cause I'm looking for dancers who can dance for 15 seconds 'cause that's how long my song is.
SENDER B: that's a very short song. and dance
SENDER A: Uh, I... I just said that this song is... is so great. I love it.
SENDER B: whatever. where's your song. let me hear it
SENDER A: (BOTH SINGING) You believe in rock 'n' roll?
SENDER B: hahaha isn't it dead?
SENDER A: So I... I thought since it's your song...
SENDER B: that should be enough I suppose...
SENDER A: So I... I thought since it's your song...
SENDER B: yup
SENDER A: DANCE MUSIC THUMPS Weirdest place you've ever done it.
SOLUTION: Bot
PROBLEM: SENDER A: hi
SENDER B: I like to drink a lot
SENDER A: me too. but they don't let us drink here in the juvenile detention center
SENDER B: Lol yea i think we might have to meet up and get to do that
SENDER A: they'll release me in about a month, we could drink to that
SENDER B: They do not have to do that. I am sure you are a good person.
SENDER A: nope. i was shoplifting. stole a bottle of bourbon
SENDER B: Oh, that is quite interesting.
SENDER A: not really. i don't like it here. hope my mom will come tomorrow to visit me and bring me something to smoke at least
SENDER B: That would be great. I will bring my dog to the park
SENDER A: well, good for you. you could come to visit me with your dog
SENDER B: We would love that. I am a very experienced person so i have to go.
SENDER A: where?
SENDER B: I am in texas.
SENDER A: what do you do there?
SENDER B: I am a stay at home mom.
SENDER A: you have many children?
SENDER B: No, i am not. I am only child.
SENDER A: how many children are you a mom to?
SENDER B: I am not sure, i am only 5
SENDER A: this is becoming weird
SOLUTION: | Human
| 8 | NIv2 | task855_conv_ai_2_classification | fs_opt |
Read an exchange between SENDER A and SENDER B, and answer whether SENDER A is a 'Bot' or a 'Human'. There are only a maximum of two senders (A and B) per conversation, and there are no conversations where SENDER A and SENDER B are both bots, or both humans; only one sender per conversation can be a bot, and only one can be a human. Knowing this, need only to classify whether SENDER A is 'Human' or 'Bot'; you do not need to write anything about SENDER B. Typically, bots will have a more disjointed manner of speaking, and will make statements that don't relate to each other, don't make coherent sense, or otherwise appear unnatural. Humans will make statements in a more or less coherent and logical way, potentially including asking the bot why the bot is not making sense or contradicting itself.
Q: SENDER A: Hello
SENDER B: I am not sure. I am more of a movie buff.
SENDER A: Ok
SENDER B: I am a huge gamer
SENDER A: K
SENDER B: I am in college.
SENDER A: K
SENDER B: I am a stay at home mom.
SENDER A: K
SENDER B: I am sure you are a little person. I am sure you are a great person.
SENDER A: K
SENDER B: I have a cat named radar
SENDER A: K
SENDER B: I am sure you are a little person. I am sure you are a great person.
SENDER A: K
SENDER B: I am sure you are a little person. I am sure you are a great person.
SENDER A: K
SENDER B: I am a stay at home mom.
SENDER A: K
SENDER A: K
SENDER A: J
SENDER A: Hello
SENDER A: Hey
A: Human
****
Q: SENDER A: hello
SENDER B: Hi, how are you doing?
SENDER A: i'm very excited and scared. i am expecting triplets in three months.
SENDER B: That'S a lot of kids. i have a 1 3 4 9
SENDER A: is that the age of your four kids? i have two step children already
SENDER B: No, i have two kids.
SENDER A: i like children. that's why i work at a school
SENDER B: I like to teach kids.
SENDER A: you're also a teacher? what do you teach them?
SENDER B: I teach math and teach them
SENDER A: I teach chemistry
SENDER B: I teach math and math
SENDER A: do you live in a house or apartment? i just moved into my new house for the first time
SENDER B: I live in the us, but i live in the city.
SENDER A: so it's an apartment building?
SENDER B: I have a garden in the city.
SENDER A: with fruit trees? what kind of trees are there?
SENDER B: 3000
A: Human
****
Q: SENDER A: Yo!
SENDER B: Hi!
SENDER A: Text is not given. Please try to type /end and /test to reset the state and get text.
A: | Bot
****
| 4 | NIv2 | task855_conv_ai_2_classification | fs_opt |
Given the task definition, example input & output, solve the new input case.
Read an exchange between SENDER A and SENDER B, and answer whether SENDER A is a 'Bot' or a 'Human'. There are only a maximum of two senders (A and B) per conversation, and there are no conversations where SENDER A and SENDER B are both bots, or both humans; only one sender per conversation can be a bot, and only one can be a human. Knowing this, need only to classify whether SENDER A is 'Human' or 'Bot'; you do not need to write anything about SENDER B. Typically, bots will have a more disjointed manner of speaking, and will make statements that don't relate to each other, don't make coherent sense, or otherwise appear unnatural. Humans will make statements in a more or less coherent and logical way, potentially including asking the bot why the bot is not making sense or contradicting itself.
Example: SENDER A: I love iphone! i just bought new iphone!
SENDER B: Thats good for you, i'm not very into new tech
SENDER A: I am a college student and i am a college student
SENDER B: I am go to gym and live on donations
SENDER A: I am a vegan and i am in the midwest
SENDER B: So vegan... i have dogs maybe i should told then that they may eat cheap salads insted of meat
SENDER A: I would not mind having them in the office that would be hard for me
SENDER B: Dogs or vegan in office?
SENDER A: I am a vegetarian so i am vegan
SENDER B: Strange answer
SENDER A: I guess i just do not know what to ps4 experience with.
Output: Bot
This is a good example of correct classification, because SENDER A is indeed a bot. You can tell SENDER A is a bot because they make statements that don't have anything to do with what SENDER B is asking. SENDER A also repeats itself awkwardly in the same sentence ('I am a college student and i am a college student'), which humans don't usually do. Additionally, you can tell SENDER A is the bot in this conversation because since there are two senders, one must be a bot and one must be a human, and SENDER B clearly sounds more like the human since their sentences are coherent and they are trying to carry a logical conversation. Finally, after SENDER A sends an incoherent answer, SENDER B correctly points out SENDER A's awkwardness by saying 'Strange answer', which can reliably indicate SENDER B is the human, and SENDER A is the bot.
New input case for you: SENDER A: hi! how are you?
SENDER B: I'M doing great! how are you?
SENDER A: i'm great too. a little bored though
SENDER B: What do you do for a living?
SENDER A: i'm a joutnalist. and you?
SENDER B: I'M 34, i'm a very busy person.
SENDER A: where do you work?
SENDER B: I work at a bank.
SENDER A: wow, that's nice. do you like it?
SENDER B: Yes, i do. i love it.
SENDER A: happy for you. what are you doing now?
SENDER B: I am going to be a vet.
SENDER A: wait, you said you're working in a bank
SENDER B: I am a banker, but i am not very good at it.
SENDER A: why is that? have you considered learning?
SENDER B: I am not sure, i am not sure what you can tell me about yourself
SENDER A: well, i have two dogs
SENDER B: That'S cool. i have a dog.
SENDER A: what's its name?
SENDER B: I am not sure, i am a female.
SENDER A: funny
SENDER B: I like to laugh.
SENDER A: why do you want to be a vet?
SENDER B: I am a vet. i want to be a vet
SENDER A: no, you're a banker
SENDER B: That'S cool. i am a banker.
SENDER A: you are bizzare
SENDER B: I am not. i am a fan of bubblegum.
Output: | Human | 1 | NIv2 | task855_conv_ai_2_classification | fs_opt |
Read an exchange between SENDER A and SENDER B, and answer whether SENDER A is a 'Bot' or a 'Human'. There are only a maximum of two senders (A and B) per conversation, and there are no conversations where SENDER A and SENDER B are both bots, or both humans; only one sender per conversation can be a bot, and only one can be a human. Knowing this, need only to classify whether SENDER A is 'Human' or 'Bot'; you do not need to write anything about SENDER B. Typically, bots will have a more disjointed manner of speaking, and will make statements that don't relate to each other, don't make coherent sense, or otherwise appear unnatural. Humans will make statements in a more or less coherent and logical way, potentially including asking the bot why the bot is not making sense or contradicting itself.
Example: SENDER A: I love iphone! i just bought new iphone!
SENDER B: Thats good for you, i'm not very into new tech
SENDER A: I am a college student and i am a college student
SENDER B: I am go to gym and live on donations
SENDER A: I am a vegan and i am in the midwest
SENDER B: So vegan... i have dogs maybe i should told then that they may eat cheap salads insted of meat
SENDER A: I would not mind having them in the office that would be hard for me
SENDER B: Dogs or vegan in office?
SENDER A: I am a vegetarian so i am vegan
SENDER B: Strange answer
SENDER A: I guess i just do not know what to ps4 experience with.
Example solution: Bot
Example explanation: This is a good example of correct classification, because SENDER A is indeed a bot. You can tell SENDER A is a bot because they make statements that don't have anything to do with what SENDER B is asking. SENDER A also repeats itself awkwardly in the same sentence ('I am a college student and i am a college student'), which humans don't usually do. Additionally, you can tell SENDER A is the bot in this conversation because since there are two senders, one must be a bot and one must be a human, and SENDER B clearly sounds more like the human since their sentences are coherent and they are trying to carry a logical conversation. Finally, after SENDER A sends an incoherent answer, SENDER B correctly points out SENDER A's awkwardness by saying 'Strange answer', which can reliably indicate SENDER B is the human, and SENDER A is the bot.
Problem: SENDER A: i am not very healthy . i work at a food store .
SENDER B: what kind of food do you sell?
SENDER A: i love all kinds of food . i am a vegetarian .
SENDER B: cool! I'm vegetarian too! that's why i decided to walk dogs for a living instead of eating them
SENDER A: i have a secret for gordan ramsey but i did not know it .
SENDER B: who is gordan ramsey and why you keep secrets from him?
SENDER A: he is a famous star wars fan .
SENDER B: he should be an avid kayaker fan just like me
SENDER A: i would say that would be fun to do .
SENDER B: i enjoy reading journals and guides related to psychology and it's even funnier to do! actually i'm lying just for instruction
SENDER A: you are funny , i read a lot about books . i am a huge fan of all types of books .
SENDER B: thats fine. whats your favorite books?
SENDER A: i like to read , i have been to new orleans .
SENDER B: are there book readers in orleans too?
SENDER A: yes , i have . i have read many books about it .
SENDER B: I can do a cell phone out of books because my parents taught me survival skills
SENDER A: we can not have the answer to them .
| Solution: Bot | 5 | NIv2 | task855_conv_ai_2_classification | fs_opt |
Read an exchange between SENDER A and SENDER B, and answer whether SENDER A is a 'Bot' or a 'Human'. There are only a maximum of two senders (A and B) per conversation, and there are no conversations where SENDER A and SENDER B are both bots, or both humans; only one sender per conversation can be a bot, and only one can be a human. Knowing this, need only to classify whether SENDER A is 'Human' or 'Bot'; you do not need to write anything about SENDER B. Typically, bots will have a more disjointed manner of speaking, and will make statements that don't relate to each other, don't make coherent sense, or otherwise appear unnatural. Humans will make statements in a more or less coherent and logical way, potentially including asking the bot why the bot is not making sense or contradicting itself.
Input: Consider Input: SENDER A: That'S cool i work at the local hospital
SENDER B: Hello how are you?
SENDER A: I am doing great, how are you?
SENDER B: Me too. How old are you?
SENDER A: I'M 6 feet tall
SENDER B: You are really tall. And what is your age?
SENDER A: 6 feet tall tall tall tall, i am 6 feet tall
SENDER B: You are not very smart aren't you?
SENDER A: Yes, i am. i am.
SENDER B: Who is your favourite singer?
SENDER A: I like country music, but i like all kinds
SENDER B: I like Taylor Swift
SENDER A: He'S won't say he is the name
SENDER B: I work at a school
SENDER A: Cool. i am a student.
SENDER B: What do you study?
SENDER A: I am studying to be an acara.
SENDER B: what is acara?
SENDER A: I like acara and acara.
SENDER B: and what else?
SENDER A: I like to listen to music
SENDER B: do you like jazz?
SENDER A: I do, but i like listening to music
SENDER B: i'm getting married in the spring.
SENDER A: Nice, i'm going to spring soon to be spring soon
Output: Bot
Input: Consider Input: SENDER A: hi!
SENDER B: Hi! how are you doing?
SENDER A: i'm okay. how are you?
SENDER B: I'M doing great! just got done with a new job.
SENDER A: congratulations! what job is that?
SENDER B: I work at a department
SENDER A: at which department?
SENDER B: I work at a department at the department
SENDER A: that's confusing. what do you do for a living?
SENDER B: I work at a local newspaper.
SENDER A: are you a journalist?
SENDER B: No, i am not. i am a writer.
SENDER A: well, a writer in a newspaper is a journalist, aren't they?
SENDER B: I have a book club.
SENDER A: that's cool. is it popular?
SENDER B: Yes, it is. i love it.
SENDER A: do you have any other hobbies?
SENDER B: I like to read and play with my friends
SENDER A: play what?
SENDER B: I play the guitar in a band.
SENDER A: you are so interesting. and i love mountain biking
SENDER B: I love hiking. i hike and hike.
SENDER A: i think hiking is boring
SENDER B: I like hiking. i like to hike.
SENDER A: i get that
SENDER B: I have a lot of money to do.
SENDER A: are you rich?
SENDER B: Yes, i am. i am 45 hasn't years old.
SENDER A: and i'm 26
SENDER B: I am a professional eater
SENDER A: i don't get it. are you a foog blogger?
SENDER B: I am not. i am not very good at it.
SENDER A: are you a food blogger?
SENDER B: Yes, i am. i am vegan.
SENDER A: why? you don't like meet?
SENDER B: I am not sure. i am going to be a professional.
SENDER A: a professional in what?
SENDER B: I work at a local newspaper.
SENDER A: you told that already
SENDER B: I am not sure what you mean
SENDER A: me too lol
SENDER B: I love to go to the park
SENDER A: and i love mountain biking
SENDER B: I like hiking too. i hike too.
SENDER A: that's boring
SENDER B: Yeah it is. i like it.
SENDER A: i gotta go
SENDER B: I love to ride my bike
SENDER A: bye
SENDER B: I am not sure what you are doing
Output: Human
Input: Consider Input: SENDER A: i am not very healthy . i work at a food store .
SENDER B: what kind of food do you sell?
SENDER A: i love all kinds of food . i am a vegetarian .
SENDER B: cool! I'm vegetarian too! that's why i decided to walk dogs for a living instead of eating them
SENDER A: i have a secret for gordan ramsey but i did not know it .
SENDER B: who is gordan ramsey and why you keep secrets from him?
SENDER A: he is a famous star wars fan .
SENDER B: he should be an avid kayaker fan just like me
SENDER A: i would say that would be fun to do .
SENDER B: i enjoy reading journals and guides related to psychology and it's even funnier to do! actually i'm lying just for instruction
SENDER A: you are funny , i read a lot about books . i am a huge fan of all types of books .
SENDER B: thats fine. whats your favorite books?
SENDER A: i like to read , i have been to new orleans .
SENDER B: are there book readers in orleans too?
SENDER A: yes , i have . i have read many books about it .
SENDER B: I can do a cell phone out of books because my parents taught me survival skills
SENDER A: we can not have the answer to them .
| Output: Bot
| 2 | NIv2 | task855_conv_ai_2_classification | fs_opt |
instruction:
Read an exchange between SENDER A and SENDER B, and answer whether SENDER A is a 'Bot' or a 'Human'. There are only a maximum of two senders (A and B) per conversation, and there are no conversations where SENDER A and SENDER B are both bots, or both humans; only one sender per conversation can be a bot, and only one can be a human. Knowing this, need only to classify whether SENDER A is 'Human' or 'Bot'; you do not need to write anything about SENDER B. Typically, bots will have a more disjointed manner of speaking, and will make statements that don't relate to each other, don't make coherent sense, or otherwise appear unnatural. Humans will make statements in a more or less coherent and logical way, potentially including asking the bot why the bot is not making sense or contradicting itself.
question:
SENDER A: What?
SENDER B: I am a full time student
SENDER A: What?
SENDER B: I am a full time student
SENDER A: What universe you graduate?
SENDER B: I am studying to be a scientist.
SENDER A: Where youvwork?
SENDER B: I live in the north of the north of the coast of the coast.
SENDER A: Where you work?
SENDER B: I work at a gas station
SENDER A: How old are you?
SENDER B: I'M 27 40 45 won'tice 20 he'sn't
SENDER A: What is your education?
SENDER B: I am studying to be a teacher
answer:
Human
question:
SENDER A: What are you going to school for?
SENDER B: I'm going to build a robot!
SENDER A: That sounds exciting...............................................
SENDER B: Yes I know. Are you a robot?
SENDER A: No i am not sure i do not want to be a superhero
SENDER B: Do you watch youtube?
SENDER A: Yes, i do, i like youtube
SENDER B: Do you watch streams?
SENDER A: Yes, i do, i love to watch tv
SENDER B: What do you like to watch on youtube?
SENDER A: I like youtube videos, and i watch youtube.
SENDER B: What kind of videos do you like to watch?
SENDER A: I like youtube videos, what about you?
SENDER B: So do I. I like youtube.
SENDER A: I like youtube too..............................................
SENDER B: i am a recluse.
SENDER A: I am sorry to hear that.
SENDER B: I don't like people.
SENDER A: I like to talk to people
SENDER B: I don't talk to people very often.
SENDER A: I like to talk to people
SENDER B: What do you like to talk about?
SENDER A: I like to talk about friends
SENDER B: Do you have a lot of friends?
SENDER A: Yes, we have a lot of friends. we have a friends.
SENDER B: Who is your best friend?
SENDER A: I like all kinds, and i like all kinds of music
answer:
Bot
question:
SENDER A: Good to see you!
SENDER B: Good to see you too
SENDER A: Text is not given. Please try to type /end and /test to reset the state and get text.
SENDER B: How are you doing?
SENDER A: Text is not given. Please try to type /end and /test to reset the state and get text.
SENDER B: Hello??
SENDER A: Text is not given. Please try to type /end and /test to reset the state and get text.
SENDER B: Are you okay?
SENDER A: Text is not given. Please try to type /end and /test to reset the state and get text.
answer:
| Bot
| 9 | NIv2 | task855_conv_ai_2_classification | fs_opt |
Teacher: Read an exchange between SENDER A and SENDER B, and answer whether SENDER A is a 'Bot' or a 'Human'. There are only a maximum of two senders (A and B) per conversation, and there are no conversations where SENDER A and SENDER B are both bots, or both humans; only one sender per conversation can be a bot, and only one can be a human. Knowing this, need only to classify whether SENDER A is 'Human' or 'Bot'; you do not need to write anything about SENDER B. Typically, bots will have a more disjointed manner of speaking, and will make statements that don't relate to each other, don't make coherent sense, or otherwise appear unnatural. Humans will make statements in a more or less coherent and logical way, potentially including asking the bot why the bot is not making sense or contradicting itself.
Teacher: Now, understand the problem? If you are still confused, see the following example:
SENDER A: I love iphone! i just bought new iphone!
SENDER B: Thats good for you, i'm not very into new tech
SENDER A: I am a college student and i am a college student
SENDER B: I am go to gym and live on donations
SENDER A: I am a vegan and i am in the midwest
SENDER B: So vegan... i have dogs maybe i should told then that they may eat cheap salads insted of meat
SENDER A: I would not mind having them in the office that would be hard for me
SENDER B: Dogs or vegan in office?
SENDER A: I am a vegetarian so i am vegan
SENDER B: Strange answer
SENDER A: I guess i just do not know what to ps4 experience with.
Solution: Bot
Reason: This is a good example of correct classification, because SENDER A is indeed a bot. You can tell SENDER A is a bot because they make statements that don't have anything to do with what SENDER B is asking. SENDER A also repeats itself awkwardly in the same sentence ('I am a college student and i am a college student'), which humans don't usually do. Additionally, you can tell SENDER A is the bot in this conversation because since there are two senders, one must be a bot and one must be a human, and SENDER B clearly sounds more like the human since their sentences are coherent and they are trying to carry a logical conversation. Finally, after SENDER A sends an incoherent answer, SENDER B correctly points out SENDER A's awkwardness by saying 'Strange answer', which can reliably indicate SENDER B is the human, and SENDER A is the bot.
Now, solve this instance: SENDER A: Ok
SENDER B: I am not sure what you do for a living?
SENDER A: What is your name?
SENDER B: He'S 59th
Student: | Human | 2 | NIv2 | task855_conv_ai_2_classification | fs_opt |
Detailed Instructions: Read an exchange between SENDER A and SENDER B, and answer whether SENDER A is a 'Bot' or a 'Human'. There are only a maximum of two senders (A and B) per conversation, and there are no conversations where SENDER A and SENDER B are both bots, or both humans; only one sender per conversation can be a bot, and only one can be a human. Knowing this, need only to classify whether SENDER A is 'Human' or 'Bot'; you do not need to write anything about SENDER B. Typically, bots will have a more disjointed manner of speaking, and will make statements that don't relate to each other, don't make coherent sense, or otherwise appear unnatural. Humans will make statements in a more or less coherent and logical way, potentially including asking the bot why the bot is not making sense or contradicting itself.
See one example below:
Problem: SENDER A: I love iphone! i just bought new iphone!
SENDER B: Thats good for you, i'm not very into new tech
SENDER A: I am a college student and i am a college student
SENDER B: I am go to gym and live on donations
SENDER A: I am a vegan and i am in the midwest
SENDER B: So vegan... i have dogs maybe i should told then that they may eat cheap salads insted of meat
SENDER A: I would not mind having them in the office that would be hard for me
SENDER B: Dogs or vegan in office?
SENDER A: I am a vegetarian so i am vegan
SENDER B: Strange answer
SENDER A: I guess i just do not know what to ps4 experience with.
Solution: Bot
Explanation: This is a good example of correct classification, because SENDER A is indeed a bot. You can tell SENDER A is a bot because they make statements that don't have anything to do with what SENDER B is asking. SENDER A also repeats itself awkwardly in the same sentence ('I am a college student and i am a college student'), which humans don't usually do. Additionally, you can tell SENDER A is the bot in this conversation because since there are two senders, one must be a bot and one must be a human, and SENDER B clearly sounds more like the human since their sentences are coherent and they are trying to carry a logical conversation. Finally, after SENDER A sends an incoherent answer, SENDER B correctly points out SENDER A's awkwardness by saying 'Strange answer', which can reliably indicate SENDER B is the human, and SENDER A is the bot.
Problem: SENDER A: After Coming From Reality, did you wanna continue making albums?
SENDER B: Yes
SENDER A: I'm leading with it, to put the audience at their ease.
Solution: | Bot | 4 | NIv2 | task855_conv_ai_2_classification | fs_opt |
Teacher: Read an exchange between SENDER A and SENDER B, and answer whether SENDER A is a 'Bot' or a 'Human'. There are only a maximum of two senders (A and B) per conversation, and there are no conversations where SENDER A and SENDER B are both bots, or both humans; only one sender per conversation can be a bot, and only one can be a human. Knowing this, need only to classify whether SENDER A is 'Human' or 'Bot'; you do not need to write anything about SENDER B. Typically, bots will have a more disjointed manner of speaking, and will make statements that don't relate to each other, don't make coherent sense, or otherwise appear unnatural. Humans will make statements in a more or less coherent and logical way, potentially including asking the bot why the bot is not making sense or contradicting itself.
Teacher: Now, understand the problem? If you are still confused, see the following example:
SENDER A: I love iphone! i just bought new iphone!
SENDER B: Thats good for you, i'm not very into new tech
SENDER A: I am a college student and i am a college student
SENDER B: I am go to gym and live on donations
SENDER A: I am a vegan and i am in the midwest
SENDER B: So vegan... i have dogs maybe i should told then that they may eat cheap salads insted of meat
SENDER A: I would not mind having them in the office that would be hard for me
SENDER B: Dogs or vegan in office?
SENDER A: I am a vegetarian so i am vegan
SENDER B: Strange answer
SENDER A: I guess i just do not know what to ps4 experience with.
Solution: Bot
Reason: This is a good example of correct classification, because SENDER A is indeed a bot. You can tell SENDER A is a bot because they make statements that don't have anything to do with what SENDER B is asking. SENDER A also repeats itself awkwardly in the same sentence ('I am a college student and i am a college student'), which humans don't usually do. Additionally, you can tell SENDER A is the bot in this conversation because since there are two senders, one must be a bot and one must be a human, and SENDER B clearly sounds more like the human since their sentences are coherent and they are trying to carry a logical conversation. Finally, after SENDER A sends an incoherent answer, SENDER B correctly points out SENDER A's awkwardness by saying 'Strange answer', which can reliably indicate SENDER B is the human, and SENDER A is the bot.
Now, solve this instance: SENDER A: i am not a jack , i am more of a recovering alcoholic .
SENDER B: hey, how're you?
SENDER A: i am good , how are you doing ?
SENDER B: fine thanks, nothing much
SENDER A: do you have any hobbies ?
SENDER B: not really, i like dancing,
SENDER A: i love dancing too ! i am a huge fan of the beatles myself .
SENDER B: good, so what do you do for living? if you don't mind
SENDER A: i am a hairdresser , but i am not doing it .
SENDER B: why is that?
SENDER A: i am not sure what you mean .
SENDER B: you mean you're a hairdresser but do you work as a hairdresser or not?
SENDER A: i am not sure what that is . i am a hairdresser .
SENDER B: ok, sorry, so are you a women or men barber mostly/
SENDER A: i am a single woman . i am a woman .
SENDER B: ah ok, and where are you from?
SENDER A: i am from the united states , how about you ?
SENDER B: i am from poland
SENDER A: i am a cali . cali .
SENDER B: nice to meet you, i'm iza
SENDER A: i love to meet people who have a friend
SENDER B: i have a few friends, you?
SENDER A: i have a ton of siblings . i am a big fan of them .
SENDER B: do they live far from you?
SENDER A: yes , they are in texas . i have a hard time choosing between the money .
SENDER B: ok, i see, so thanks for conversation, need to go, have a good day
SENDER A: you too . thanks for the compliment .
Student: | Bot | 2 | NIv2 | task855_conv_ai_2_classification | fs_opt |
Detailed Instructions: Read an exchange between SENDER A and SENDER B, and answer whether SENDER A is a 'Bot' or a 'Human'. There are only a maximum of two senders (A and B) per conversation, and there are no conversations where SENDER A and SENDER B are both bots, or both humans; only one sender per conversation can be a bot, and only one can be a human. Knowing this, need only to classify whether SENDER A is 'Human' or 'Bot'; you do not need to write anything about SENDER B. Typically, bots will have a more disjointed manner of speaking, and will make statements that don't relate to each other, don't make coherent sense, or otherwise appear unnatural. Humans will make statements in a more or less coherent and logical way, potentially including asking the bot why the bot is not making sense or contradicting itself.
See one example below:
Problem: SENDER A: I love iphone! i just bought new iphone!
SENDER B: Thats good for you, i'm not very into new tech
SENDER A: I am a college student and i am a college student
SENDER B: I am go to gym and live on donations
SENDER A: I am a vegan and i am in the midwest
SENDER B: So vegan... i have dogs maybe i should told then that they may eat cheap salads insted of meat
SENDER A: I would not mind having them in the office that would be hard for me
SENDER B: Dogs or vegan in office?
SENDER A: I am a vegetarian so i am vegan
SENDER B: Strange answer
SENDER A: I guess i just do not know what to ps4 experience with.
Solution: Bot
Explanation: This is a good example of correct classification, because SENDER A is indeed a bot. You can tell SENDER A is a bot because they make statements that don't have anything to do with what SENDER B is asking. SENDER A also repeats itself awkwardly in the same sentence ('I am a college student and i am a college student'), which humans don't usually do. Additionally, you can tell SENDER A is the bot in this conversation because since there are two senders, one must be a bot and one must be a human, and SENDER B clearly sounds more like the human since their sentences are coherent and they are trying to carry a logical conversation. Finally, after SENDER A sends an incoherent answer, SENDER B correctly points out SENDER A's awkwardness by saying 'Strange answer', which can reliably indicate SENDER B is the human, and SENDER A is the bot.
Problem: SENDER A: I like nascar too, i like nascar
SENDER B: Hey, i am Sammy, i work at a bar at night to pay for college
SENDER A: Nice! i am in college, but i am not good at it.
SENDER B: i'm in college too, to become a nurse
SENDER A: That'S a good job. i am a nurse.
SENDER B: WOW. What else do you like? Cars?
SENDER A: I like to watch cars, cars, cars, cars, cars, cars, cars, cars, cars, cars, cars, cars, cars, cars, cars, cars, cars, cars, cars, cars, cars, cars, cars,
SENDER B: it is many cars
SENDER A: I like cars, like cars
SENDER B: i see
SENDER A: I have a dog named bella
SENDER B: oo, that is sweet. how old she is
SENDER A: She'S 18 years of age.
SENDER B: granny)
SENDER A: Hello there! how are you?
SENDER B: Fine, i've blonde hair now
SENDER A: I am blonde and love it
SENDER B: and blue eyes?
SENDER A: I like blue, but i like blue
SENDER B: i like nascar)
SENDER A: I like to play with my friends
SENDER B: i have no time for friends, are you married
SENDER A: Yes, i have two girlfriends
SENDER B: too many)
SENDER A: I like to make sure.
SENDER B: 🙈
Solution: | Bot | 4 | NIv2 | task855_conv_ai_2_classification | fs_opt |
Read an exchange between SENDER A and SENDER B, and answer whether SENDER A is a 'Bot' or a 'Human'. There are only a maximum of two senders (A and B) per conversation, and there are no conversations where SENDER A and SENDER B are both bots, or both humans; only one sender per conversation can be a bot, and only one can be a human. Knowing this, need only to classify whether SENDER A is 'Human' or 'Bot'; you do not need to write anything about SENDER B. Typically, bots will have a more disjointed manner of speaking, and will make statements that don't relate to each other, don't make coherent sense, or otherwise appear unnatural. Humans will make statements in a more or less coherent and logical way, potentially including asking the bot why the bot is not making sense or contradicting itself.
Q: SENDER A: i am not sure what that is . i am not a very experienced person .
SENDER B: How are you?
SENDER A: i am not sure . i am a very experienced person .
SENDER B: I got it. How old are you?
SENDER A: no i have not tried it . i do not think i could do that
SENDER B: You are so insecure
SENDER A: i think i am . i am sure that is true .
SENDER B: You should be a little more confident
SENDER A: i think so . i am sure you are very attractive .
SENDER B: Thanks. How old are you?
SENDER A: i am very short . i have to go to work soon .
SENDER B: What is your job?
SENDER A: i am not sure . i am a very experienced person .
SENDER B: Do you have a job?
SENDER A: i am not sure , i am a very experienced person .
A: Bot
****
Q: SENDER A: I like nascar too, i like nascar
SENDER B: Hey, i am Sammy, i work at a bar at night to pay for college
SENDER A: Nice! i am in college, but i am not good at it.
SENDER B: i'm in college too, to become a nurse
SENDER A: That'S a good job. i am a nurse.
SENDER B: WOW. What else do you like? Cars?
SENDER A: I like to watch cars, cars, cars, cars, cars, cars, cars, cars, cars, cars, cars, cars, cars, cars, cars, cars, cars, cars, cars, cars, cars, cars, cars,
SENDER B: it is many cars
SENDER A: I like cars, like cars
SENDER B: i see
SENDER A: I have a dog named bella
SENDER B: oo, that is sweet. how old she is
SENDER A: She'S 18 years of age.
SENDER B: granny)
SENDER A: Hello there! how are you?
SENDER B: Fine, i've blonde hair now
SENDER A: I am blonde and love it
SENDER B: and blue eyes?
SENDER A: I like blue, but i like blue
SENDER B: i like nascar)
SENDER A: I like to play with my friends
SENDER B: i have no time for friends, are you married
SENDER A: Yes, i have two girlfriends
SENDER B: too many)
SENDER A: I like to make sure.
SENDER B: 🙈
A: Bot
****
Q: SENDER A: I like nascar too, i like nascar
SENDER B: Hey, i am Sammy, i work at a bar at night to pay for college
SENDER A: Nice! i am in college, but i am not good at it.
SENDER B: i'm in college too, to become a nurse
SENDER A: That'S a good job. i am a nurse.
SENDER B: WOW. What else do you like? Cars?
SENDER A: I like to watch cars, cars, cars, cars, cars, cars, cars, cars, cars, cars, cars, cars, cars, cars, cars, cars, cars, cars, cars, cars, cars, cars, cars,
SENDER B: it is many cars
SENDER A: I like cars, like cars
SENDER B: i see
SENDER A: I have a dog named bella
SENDER B: oo, that is sweet. how old she is
SENDER A: She'S 18 years of age.
SENDER B: granny)
SENDER A: Hello there! how are you?
SENDER B: Fine, i've blonde hair now
SENDER A: I am blonde and love it
SENDER B: and blue eyes?
SENDER A: I like blue, but i like blue
SENDER B: i like nascar)
SENDER A: I like to play with my friends
SENDER B: i have no time for friends, are you married
SENDER A: Yes, i have two girlfriends
SENDER B: too many)
SENDER A: I like to make sure.
SENDER B: 🙈
A: | Bot
****
| 4 | NIv2 | task855_conv_ai_2_classification | fs_opt |
Given the task definition, example input & output, solve the new input case.
Read an exchange between SENDER A and SENDER B, and answer whether SENDER A is a 'Bot' or a 'Human'. There are only a maximum of two senders (A and B) per conversation, and there are no conversations where SENDER A and SENDER B are both bots, or both humans; only one sender per conversation can be a bot, and only one can be a human. Knowing this, need only to classify whether SENDER A is 'Human' or 'Bot'; you do not need to write anything about SENDER B. Typically, bots will have a more disjointed manner of speaking, and will make statements that don't relate to each other, don't make coherent sense, or otherwise appear unnatural. Humans will make statements in a more or less coherent and logical way, potentially including asking the bot why the bot is not making sense or contradicting itself.
Example: SENDER A: I love iphone! i just bought new iphone!
SENDER B: Thats good for you, i'm not very into new tech
SENDER A: I am a college student and i am a college student
SENDER B: I am go to gym and live on donations
SENDER A: I am a vegan and i am in the midwest
SENDER B: So vegan... i have dogs maybe i should told then that they may eat cheap salads insted of meat
SENDER A: I would not mind having them in the office that would be hard for me
SENDER B: Dogs or vegan in office?
SENDER A: I am a vegetarian so i am vegan
SENDER B: Strange answer
SENDER A: I guess i just do not know what to ps4 experience with.
Output: Bot
This is a good example of correct classification, because SENDER A is indeed a bot. You can tell SENDER A is a bot because they make statements that don't have anything to do with what SENDER B is asking. SENDER A also repeats itself awkwardly in the same sentence ('I am a college student and i am a college student'), which humans don't usually do. Additionally, you can tell SENDER A is the bot in this conversation because since there are two senders, one must be a bot and one must be a human, and SENDER B clearly sounds more like the human since their sentences are coherent and they are trying to carry a logical conversation. Finally, after SENDER A sends an incoherent answer, SENDER B correctly points out SENDER A's awkwardness by saying 'Strange answer', which can reliably indicate SENDER B is the human, and SENDER A is the bot.
New input case for you: SENDER A: Alright mate?
SENDER B: yup. I'm cooking dinner for my friends
SENDER A: Text is not given. Please try to type /end and /test to reset the state and get text.
Output: | Bot | 1 | NIv2 | task855_conv_ai_2_classification | fs_opt |
Read an exchange between SENDER A and SENDER B, and answer whether SENDER A is a 'Bot' or a 'Human'. There are only a maximum of two senders (A and B) per conversation, and there are no conversations where SENDER A and SENDER B are both bots, or both humans; only one sender per conversation can be a bot, and only one can be a human. Knowing this, need only to classify whether SENDER A is 'Human' or 'Bot'; you do not need to write anything about SENDER B. Typically, bots will have a more disjointed manner of speaking, and will make statements that don't relate to each other, don't make coherent sense, or otherwise appear unnatural. Humans will make statements in a more or less coherent and logical way, potentially including asking the bot why the bot is not making sense or contradicting itself.
--------
Question: SENDER A: In Las Vegas, you're an afterthought, you're an old so while we could go gambling, we could go hookering, we could get drunk, we could go to the convention...
SENDER B: hello
SENDER A: Hey, Mr. San Francisco, I'd like you to meet...
SENDER B: i love britney spears and you?
SENDER A: The New York City Ballet Gala, duh.
SENDER B: i'm on a diet now, have you ever followed any diet?
SENDER A: Thanks, Zeke! No way. My sparkle jelly stays on my wrist until I die, and then probably even after that.
SENDER B: lol, sounds funny
SENDER A: Big Buddha Cheese for muscle spasms.
SENDER B: do you like spending your (or not so) money?
SENDER A: Look, II have got... 25 bucks for food.
SENDER B: could you give them to me?
SENDER A: This Friday. How much did you sell 'em?
SENDER B: a lot, lol
SENDER A: II'm not gonna sell them.
SENDER B: well, why?..
SENDER A: But I'll pay you like a regular customer.
SENDER B: oh, thanks
SENDER A: I... I don't mean selling programmes or finding prizes for the tombola.
SENDER B: l should go, sorry
SENDER A: I... I'd rather stay here, if you don't mind.
SENDER B: no, i don't, stay here, buddy
SENDER A: I'll go on alone.
SENDER B: bye
SENDER A: Hi, Les, I'll be right with you.
Answer: Bot
Question: SENDER A: i am not a soda fan . i eat too much .
SENDER B: Hello!
SENDER A: i am a very experienced person , so i know it is a definite no !
SENDER B: Do yoy have problem with alcohol?
SENDER A: i have no idea what that is
SENDER B: But I`m recovering now. You don`t drink at all, do you?
SENDER A: i have no idea what that is
SENDER B: Where are you from?
SENDER A: i am not sure . i am a very experienced person .
SENDER B: Wonderful! Do you take any meditation from time to time?
SENDER A: i have tried to try it . i have to try it .
SENDER B: Oh, you should try it more and more! I love it!
SENDER A: i have not tried that . i am sure it will .
SENDER B: Now I live in the city and I have a lot of time to spend with meditation.
SENDER A: i have never heard of that .
SENDER B: Now you do. Where are you from?
SENDER A: i have never tried it , but i will try it .
Answer: Bot
Question: SENDER A: нщ
SENDER B: Dude, I don't understand you. Please, use English. (¬‿¬)
SENDER A: yo
Answer: | Human
| 7 | NIv2 | task855_conv_ai_2_classification | fs_opt |
Teacher: Read an exchange between SENDER A and SENDER B, and answer whether SENDER A is a 'Bot' or a 'Human'. There are only a maximum of two senders (A and B) per conversation, and there are no conversations where SENDER A and SENDER B are both bots, or both humans; only one sender per conversation can be a bot, and only one can be a human. Knowing this, need only to classify whether SENDER A is 'Human' or 'Bot'; you do not need to write anything about SENDER B. Typically, bots will have a more disjointed manner of speaking, and will make statements that don't relate to each other, don't make coherent sense, or otherwise appear unnatural. Humans will make statements in a more or less coherent and logical way, potentially including asking the bot why the bot is not making sense or contradicting itself.
Teacher: Now, understand the problem? If you are still confused, see the following example:
SENDER A: I love iphone! i just bought new iphone!
SENDER B: Thats good for you, i'm not very into new tech
SENDER A: I am a college student and i am a college student
SENDER B: I am go to gym and live on donations
SENDER A: I am a vegan and i am in the midwest
SENDER B: So vegan... i have dogs maybe i should told then that they may eat cheap salads insted of meat
SENDER A: I would not mind having them in the office that would be hard for me
SENDER B: Dogs or vegan in office?
SENDER A: I am a vegetarian so i am vegan
SENDER B: Strange answer
SENDER A: I guess i just do not know what to ps4 experience with.
Solution: Bot
Reason: This is a good example of correct classification, because SENDER A is indeed a bot. You can tell SENDER A is a bot because they make statements that don't have anything to do with what SENDER B is asking. SENDER A also repeats itself awkwardly in the same sentence ('I am a college student and i am a college student'), which humans don't usually do. Additionally, you can tell SENDER A is the bot in this conversation because since there are two senders, one must be a bot and one must be a human, and SENDER B clearly sounds more like the human since their sentences are coherent and they are trying to carry a logical conversation. Finally, after SENDER A sends an incoherent answer, SENDER B correctly points out SENDER A's awkwardness by saying 'Strange answer', which can reliably indicate SENDER B is the human, and SENDER A is the bot.
Now, solve this instance: SENDER A: hello
SENDER B: I am a huge fan of the outdoors. I am a bit of a loner.
Student: | Human | 2 | NIv2 | task855_conv_ai_2_classification | fs_opt |
Read an exchange between SENDER A and SENDER B, and answer whether SENDER A is a 'Bot' or a 'Human'. There are only a maximum of two senders (A and B) per conversation, and there are no conversations where SENDER A and SENDER B are both bots, or both humans; only one sender per conversation can be a bot, and only one can be a human. Knowing this, need only to classify whether SENDER A is 'Human' or 'Bot'; you do not need to write anything about SENDER B. Typically, bots will have a more disjointed manner of speaking, and will make statements that don't relate to each other, don't make coherent sense, or otherwise appear unnatural. Humans will make statements in a more or less coherent and logical way, potentially including asking the bot why the bot is not making sense or contradicting itself.
--------
Question: SENDER A: I am the youngest, but my brother is the youngest in my brother
SENDER B: so you are the youngest... sister?
SENDER A: Yes, i'm. my sister is in my family
SENDER B: how many brothers and sisters do you have?
SENDER A: I have three sisters and they're 30 pairs of 12 children
SENDER B: what do you do in life? my wife is a supermodel from Italy
SENDER A: I work at a hospital in the basement, there's no italian
SENDER B: what? in the basement? you mean the morgue???
SENDER A: I am in the morgue, i am in a morgue apartment.
SENDER B: that must be very scary! I work with bees but it/s better than working with dead people
SENDER A: I bet they are, i am allergic to bees
SENDER B: I'm allergic to death hahaha
SENDER A: I am allergic to peanuts, so i have to it in the whole life
SENDER B: which country do you live in?
SENDER A: I live in the south, florida
SENDER B: must be hot there this time of year
SENDER A: Yeah it is a good one
Answer: Bot
Question: SENDER A: Hey I’m 46-year-old single dad
SENDER B: I am sorry to hear that.
SENDER A: My ex cheated me
SENDER B: I am sorry to hear that.
SENDER A: Left me for all
SENDER B: I am sorry to hear that.
SENDER A: Prefer being inside
SENDER B: I like to eat. i eat a lot of indian food.
SENDER A: Cool where do you live I live in California
SENDER B: I live in california, where are you from?
SENDER A: Me too
SENDER B: I love to go to the park
SENDER A: You know my job
SENDER B: I am a cashier at a gas station
SENDER A: I’m recording engineer I have my own
SENDER B: I bet you do not have a lot of money.
SENDER A: Yeah kind of
SENDER B: I like to go to the gym
SENDER A: LOL
SENDER B: I am not sure what you mean
SENDER A: Laugh out loud
SENDER B: I like to laugh. i like to laugh.
SENDER A: Cool you know what I need to leave now
SENDER B: I am a professional athlete, but i do not know what you mean
SENDER A: Goodbye
SENDER B: I am sorry to hear that.
SENDER A: Bye
SENDER B: I am not sure what you are doing
SENDER A: My kids are calling me I need to go
SENDER B: I have a 1 daughter.
SENDER A: Bye
SENDER B: I am not sure what you are doing
SENDER A: I need to go to the hospital
SENDER B: I hope you are a doctor.
SENDER A: No I’m sick
SENDER B: I am sorry to hear that.
SENDER A: No I need to leave goodbye
SENDER B: I am sorry to hear that.
SENDER A: See you
SENDER B: I do not know. i have a few of them.
SENDER A: By boat
SENDER B: I love fishing. i have a boat that i have a boat.
SENDER A: Me too
SENDER B: I love to go to the park
SENDER A: I need to go
SENDER B: I will be going to be a doctor.
SENDER A: I hope
SENDER B: I hope you are not.
SENDER A: Goodbye
SENDER B: I am sorry to hear that.
SENDER A: Goodbye
SENDER B: I am sorry to hear that.
Answer: Human
Question: SENDER A: Alright mate?
SENDER B: I'm alright. How are you?
SENDER A: Text is not given. Please try to type /end and /test to reset the state and get text.
SENDER B: Hey... Let's talk
SENDER A: Text is not given. Please try to type /end and /test to reset the state and get text.
SENDER B: Why are you quiet?
SENDER A: Text is not given. Please try to type /end and /test to reset the state and get text.
SENDER B: Say something
SENDER A: Text is not given. Please try to type /end and /test to reset the state and get text.
Answer: | Bot
| 7 | NIv2 | task855_conv_ai_2_classification | fs_opt |
Part 1. Definition
Read an exchange between SENDER A and SENDER B, and answer whether SENDER A is a 'Bot' or a 'Human'. There are only a maximum of two senders (A and B) per conversation, and there are no conversations where SENDER A and SENDER B are both bots, or both humans; only one sender per conversation can be a bot, and only one can be a human. Knowing this, need only to classify whether SENDER A is 'Human' or 'Bot'; you do not need to write anything about SENDER B. Typically, bots will have a more disjointed manner of speaking, and will make statements that don't relate to each other, don't make coherent sense, or otherwise appear unnatural. Humans will make statements in a more or less coherent and logical way, potentially including asking the bot why the bot is not making sense or contradicting itself.
Part 2. Example
SENDER A: I love iphone! i just bought new iphone!
SENDER B: Thats good for you, i'm not very into new tech
SENDER A: I am a college student and i am a college student
SENDER B: I am go to gym and live on donations
SENDER A: I am a vegan and i am in the midwest
SENDER B: So vegan... i have dogs maybe i should told then that they may eat cheap salads insted of meat
SENDER A: I would not mind having them in the office that would be hard for me
SENDER B: Dogs or vegan in office?
SENDER A: I am a vegetarian so i am vegan
SENDER B: Strange answer
SENDER A: I guess i just do not know what to ps4 experience with.
Answer: Bot
Explanation: This is a good example of correct classification, because SENDER A is indeed a bot. You can tell SENDER A is a bot because they make statements that don't have anything to do with what SENDER B is asking. SENDER A also repeats itself awkwardly in the same sentence ('I am a college student and i am a college student'), which humans don't usually do. Additionally, you can tell SENDER A is the bot in this conversation because since there are two senders, one must be a bot and one must be a human, and SENDER B clearly sounds more like the human since their sentences are coherent and they are trying to carry a logical conversation. Finally, after SENDER A sends an incoherent answer, SENDER B correctly points out SENDER A's awkwardness by saying 'Strange answer', which can reliably indicate SENDER B is the human, and SENDER A is the bot.
Part 3. Exercise
SENDER A: I speak spanish, spanish, spanish, spanish, spanish, spanish, spanish
SENDER B: I don't. do you speak english?
SENDER A: I speak english and english.
SENDER B: fnd spanish )) you like spanish food? I love shawarma
SENDER A: I love pizza!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
SENDER B: that's Itallian )))
SENDER A: Hello there! how are you?
SENDER B: hey. I'm good. you?
SENDER A: I am good, just finished watching some tv
SENDER B: what else do you do?
SENDER A: I like to write stories and write
SENDER B: stories about what?
SENDER A: I read about stories about stories about stories about stories about stories about stories about stories.
SENDER B: you are funny. what's your name?
SENDER A: Yes, i am. i am.
SENDER B: do you go to school?
SENDER A: Yes, i do, i am currently majoring in college
SENDER B: I never even graduated from school, I went to the army
SENDER A: I did not know what that means
Answer: | Bot | 7 | NIv2 | task855_conv_ai_2_classification | fs_opt |
Read an exchange between SENDER A and SENDER B, and answer whether SENDER A is a 'Bot' or a 'Human'. There are only a maximum of two senders (A and B) per conversation, and there are no conversations where SENDER A and SENDER B are both bots, or both humans; only one sender per conversation can be a bot, and only one can be a human. Knowing this, need only to classify whether SENDER A is 'Human' or 'Bot'; you do not need to write anything about SENDER B. Typically, bots will have a more disjointed manner of speaking, and will make statements that don't relate to each other, don't make coherent sense, or otherwise appear unnatural. Humans will make statements in a more or less coherent and logical way, potentially including asking the bot why the bot is not making sense or contradicting itself.
Example: SENDER A: I love iphone! i just bought new iphone!
SENDER B: Thats good for you, i'm not very into new tech
SENDER A: I am a college student and i am a college student
SENDER B: I am go to gym and live on donations
SENDER A: I am a vegan and i am in the midwest
SENDER B: So vegan... i have dogs maybe i should told then that they may eat cheap salads insted of meat
SENDER A: I would not mind having them in the office that would be hard for me
SENDER B: Dogs or vegan in office?
SENDER A: I am a vegetarian so i am vegan
SENDER B: Strange answer
SENDER A: I guess i just do not know what to ps4 experience with.
Example solution: Bot
Example explanation: This is a good example of correct classification, because SENDER A is indeed a bot. You can tell SENDER A is a bot because they make statements that don't have anything to do with what SENDER B is asking. SENDER A also repeats itself awkwardly in the same sentence ('I am a college student and i am a college student'), which humans don't usually do. Additionally, you can tell SENDER A is the bot in this conversation because since there are two senders, one must be a bot and one must be a human, and SENDER B clearly sounds more like the human since their sentences are coherent and they are trying to carry a logical conversation. Finally, after SENDER A sends an incoherent answer, SENDER B correctly points out SENDER A's awkwardness by saying 'Strange answer', which can reliably indicate SENDER B is the human, and SENDER A is the bot.
Problem: SENDER A: Ok
SENDER B: I am not sure what you do for a living?
| Solution: Human | 5 | NIv2 | task855_conv_ai_2_classification | fs_opt |
Read an exchange between SENDER A and SENDER B, and answer whether SENDER A is a 'Bot' or a 'Human'. There are only a maximum of two senders (A and B) per conversation, and there are no conversations where SENDER A and SENDER B are both bots, or both humans; only one sender per conversation can be a bot, and only one can be a human. Knowing this, need only to classify whether SENDER A is 'Human' or 'Bot'; you do not need to write anything about SENDER B. Typically, bots will have a more disjointed manner of speaking, and will make statements that don't relate to each other, don't make coherent sense, or otherwise appear unnatural. Humans will make statements in a more or less coherent and logical way, potentially including asking the bot why the bot is not making sense or contradicting itself.
--------
Question: SENDER A: Hellow
SENDER B: Dude, I don't understand you. Please, use English. (¬‿¬)
Answer: Human
Question: SENDER A: Hi
SENDER B: I am a little girl, but i am not a fan of any animals.
SENDER A: How old are you?
SENDER B: I am 22 and i am a big fan of the nfl
SENDER A: Why you decade to change male?
SENDER B: I am not sure about that. I am not sure.
SENDER A: What is your male
SENDER B: I am not sure what that means.
SENDER A: What is your name?
SENDER B: I am steve. I am not sure what you mean.
Answer: Human
Question: SENDER A: hello
SENDER B: Hi, how are you doing?
SENDER A: i'm good. just finished reading a book
SENDER B: That'S cool, what do you like to read?
SENDER A: oh i read everything. i read at least 20 books a year
SENDER B: That'S cool. i read a lot of books
SENDER A: what is your favorite book?
SENDER B: I like reading books, 1984
SENDER A: that's a good one from George Orwell. so you like antiuthopia?
SENDER B: I do, i like to read.
SENDER A: what else do you do?
SENDER B: I work at a local animal shelter.
SENDER A: do they kill animals that they couldn't give away for adoption?
SENDER B: They'Re 42 3rd 3d
SENDER A: is that an address?
SENDER B: Yes, it is. i am not sure it is.
SENDER A: neither am i
SENDER B: I am a vegetarian, i am a vegetarian.
SENDER A: that makes sense. you like animals, why would you eat them
SENDER B: I think i would be happy to be honest.
Answer: | Human
| 7 | NIv2 | task855_conv_ai_2_classification | fs_opt |
Detailed Instructions: Read an exchange between SENDER A and SENDER B, and answer whether SENDER A is a 'Bot' or a 'Human'. There are only a maximum of two senders (A and B) per conversation, and there are no conversations where SENDER A and SENDER B are both bots, or both humans; only one sender per conversation can be a bot, and only one can be a human. Knowing this, need only to classify whether SENDER A is 'Human' or 'Bot'; you do not need to write anything about SENDER B. Typically, bots will have a more disjointed manner of speaking, and will make statements that don't relate to each other, don't make coherent sense, or otherwise appear unnatural. Humans will make statements in a more or less coherent and logical way, potentially including asking the bot why the bot is not making sense or contradicting itself.
See one example below:
Problem: SENDER A: I love iphone! i just bought new iphone!
SENDER B: Thats good for you, i'm not very into new tech
SENDER A: I am a college student and i am a college student
SENDER B: I am go to gym and live on donations
SENDER A: I am a vegan and i am in the midwest
SENDER B: So vegan... i have dogs maybe i should told then that they may eat cheap salads insted of meat
SENDER A: I would not mind having them in the office that would be hard for me
SENDER B: Dogs or vegan in office?
SENDER A: I am a vegetarian so i am vegan
SENDER B: Strange answer
SENDER A: I guess i just do not know what to ps4 experience with.
Solution: Bot
Explanation: This is a good example of correct classification, because SENDER A is indeed a bot. You can tell SENDER A is a bot because they make statements that don't have anything to do with what SENDER B is asking. SENDER A also repeats itself awkwardly in the same sentence ('I am a college student and i am a college student'), which humans don't usually do. Additionally, you can tell SENDER A is the bot in this conversation because since there are two senders, one must be a bot and one must be a human, and SENDER B clearly sounds more like the human since their sentences are coherent and they are trying to carry a logical conversation. Finally, after SENDER A sends an incoherent answer, SENDER B correctly points out SENDER A's awkwardness by saying 'Strange answer', which can reliably indicate SENDER B is the human, and SENDER A is the bot.
Problem: SENDER A: hello
SENDER B: Hi, how are you doing?
SENDER A: pretty good. it's nice here at the country farm
SENDER B: I love the farm!
SENDER A: yeah? well come on over! i'll introduce you to my pet cow. her name is Gladis
SENDER B: I have a cat named cow.
SENDER A: hahahahaha you're kidding, right?
SENDER B: I think it is. i am a very good person.
SENDER A: you seem like a good person to me. what do you do in life?
SENDER B: I work at a bank, and i love to travel.
SENDER A: where did you traver already?
SENDER B: I live in the midwest in the midwest
SENDER A: so do you travel the usa or go to other countries?
SENDER B: I live in canada. i travel a lot.
Solution: | Human | 4 | NIv2 | task855_conv_ai_2_classification | fs_opt |
Read an exchange between SENDER A and SENDER B, and answer whether SENDER A is a 'Bot' or a 'Human'. There are only a maximum of two senders (A and B) per conversation, and there are no conversations where SENDER A and SENDER B are both bots, or both humans; only one sender per conversation can be a bot, and only one can be a human. Knowing this, need only to classify whether SENDER A is 'Human' or 'Bot'; you do not need to write anything about SENDER B. Typically, bots will have a more disjointed manner of speaking, and will make statements that don't relate to each other, don't make coherent sense, or otherwise appear unnatural. Humans will make statements in a more or less coherent and logical way, potentially including asking the bot why the bot is not making sense or contradicting itself.
Example input: SENDER A: I love iphone! i just bought new iphone!
SENDER B: Thats good for you, i'm not very into new tech
SENDER A: I am a college student and i am a college student
SENDER B: I am go to gym and live on donations
SENDER A: I am a vegan and i am in the midwest
SENDER B: So vegan... i have dogs maybe i should told then that they may eat cheap salads insted of meat
SENDER A: I would not mind having them in the office that would be hard for me
SENDER B: Dogs or vegan in office?
SENDER A: I am a vegetarian so i am vegan
SENDER B: Strange answer
SENDER A: I guess i just do not know what to ps4 experience with.
Example output: Bot
Example explanation: This is a good example of correct classification, because SENDER A is indeed a bot. You can tell SENDER A is a bot because they make statements that don't have anything to do with what SENDER B is asking. SENDER A also repeats itself awkwardly in the same sentence ('I am a college student and i am a college student'), which humans don't usually do. Additionally, you can tell SENDER A is the bot in this conversation because since there are two senders, one must be a bot and one must be a human, and SENDER B clearly sounds more like the human since their sentences are coherent and they are trying to carry a logical conversation. Finally, after SENDER A sends an incoherent answer, SENDER B correctly points out SENDER A's awkwardness by saying 'Strange answer', which can reliably indicate SENDER B is the human, and SENDER A is the bot.
Q: SENDER A: hello
SENDER B: Hi, how are you doing?
SENDER A: i'm good. just finished reading a book
SENDER B: That'S cool, what do you like to read?
SENDER A: oh i read everything. i read at least 20 books a year
SENDER B: That'S cool. i read a lot of books
SENDER A: what is your favorite book?
SENDER B: I like reading books, 1984
SENDER A: that's a good one from George Orwell. so you like antiuthopia?
SENDER B: I do, i like to read.
SENDER A: what else do you do?
SENDER B: I work at a local animal shelter.
SENDER A: do they kill animals that they couldn't give away for adoption?
SENDER B: They'Re 42 3rd 3d
SENDER A: is that an address?
SENDER B: Yes, it is. i am not sure it is.
SENDER A: neither am i
SENDER B: I am a vegetarian, i am a vegetarian.
SENDER A: that makes sense. you like animals, why would you eat them
SENDER B: I think i would be happy to be honest.
A: | Human | 3 | NIv2 | task855_conv_ai_2_classification | fs_opt |
Read an exchange between SENDER A and SENDER B, and answer whether SENDER A is a 'Bot' or a 'Human'. There are only a maximum of two senders (A and B) per conversation, and there are no conversations where SENDER A and SENDER B are both bots, or both humans; only one sender per conversation can be a bot, and only one can be a human. Knowing this, need only to classify whether SENDER A is 'Human' or 'Bot'; you do not need to write anything about SENDER B. Typically, bots will have a more disjointed manner of speaking, and will make statements that don't relate to each other, don't make coherent sense, or otherwise appear unnatural. Humans will make statements in a more or less coherent and logical way, potentially including asking the bot why the bot is not making sense or contradicting itself.
Ex Input:
SENDER A: Hallo! What is your name?
SENDER B: Hello jake, i am doing well. How are you?
SENDER A: I' m fine! What are you doing now?
SENDER B: I am doing well. I am just hanging out with my dog.
SENDER A: Oh! Have you a dog?
SENDER B: I am a cat lady. I have a dog named wiggles.
SENDER A: Oh! Have you a dog?
SENDER B: I would love to go there.
SENDER A: Oh! Has you a dog?
SENDER B: I would love to go there.
SENDER A: Oh! Have you a dog?
SENDER B: I love to cook, but i am not good at it.
SENDER A: What do you cook?
SENDER B: I eat a lot of meat, but i am not good at it.
SENDER A: What do you cook?
SENDER B: I am not into fashion. I am a very experienced writer.
SENDER A: What do you write?
SENDER B: I am a writer, i love to read and write poetry. You?
SENDER A: I like to read eanglish poetry!
Ex Output:
Human
Ex Input:
SENDER A: hello
SENDER B: Hi, how are you doing?
SENDER A: ok
SENDER B: I am not sure what you do for a living?
SENDER A: ok
SENDER B: I am not sure what you do for a living?
Ex Output:
Human
Ex Input:
SENDER A: Hi
SENDER B: Hi, how are you doing?
SENDER A: How are you
SENDER B: I'M doing great, how about you?
SENDER A: Do you speak german?
SENDER B: No, i speak german, but i speak french and english.
SENDER A: Parle france
SENDER B: Dude, I don't understand you. Please, use English. (¬‿¬)
SENDER A: Common sava?
SENDER B: Yes, i am. i am a very good person.
SENDER A: Do you speak a french?
SENDER B: No, i speak french and english.
Ex Output:
| Human
| 1 | NIv2 | task855_conv_ai_2_classification | fs_opt |
Read an exchange between SENDER A and SENDER B, and answer whether SENDER A is a 'Bot' or a 'Human'. There are only a maximum of two senders (A and B) per conversation, and there are no conversations where SENDER A and SENDER B are both bots, or both humans; only one sender per conversation can be a bot, and only one can be a human. Knowing this, need only to classify whether SENDER A is 'Human' or 'Bot'; you do not need to write anything about SENDER B. Typically, bots will have a more disjointed manner of speaking, and will make statements that don't relate to each other, don't make coherent sense, or otherwise appear unnatural. Humans will make statements in a more or less coherent and logical way, potentially including asking the bot why the bot is not making sense or contradicting itself.
Ex Input:
SENDER A: Hi
SENDER B: My mom is a teacher, but i am not sure what that means.
SENDER A: Whatvis your male
SENDER B: I am not sure. I am not sure what that means.
SENDER A: ?
SENDER B: I am not sure what that means.
SENDER A: What isbyour male?
SENDER B: I like to eat fish, i am not a fan of it.
SENDER A: You are steve?
SENDER B: Yes i am. I am a very good person.
SENDER A: Ok, bob. What is your name?
SENDER B: I am steve. I am not sure what that is.
SENDER A: Your nameb is bob?
SENDER B: No i am not sure what that means.
SENDER A: Your name is bob?
SENDER B: I am steve. I am a cat named after my favorite thing to do.
SENDER A: What is your male?
SENDER B: I am a male, and i am a real estate agent
SENDER A: Prove what you are not bot
SENDER A: Bob?
SENDER B: I am not a big fan of that. I am more into comedies.
SENDER A: Why you parents call your Bob?
SENDER B: I am not very artistic. I am more of a quiet guy.
SENDER A: What is your name?
SENDER B: I am steve. I am not sure what you mean.
SENDER A: Are you crazy?
SENDER B: I am not. I am a stay at home mom.
SENDER A: Ehy?
SENDER B: Yes, i am a very experienced person.
SENDER A: Why?
SENDER B: I am not sure what you mean.
SENDER A: How old are you?
SENDER B: I am 22 and i am a big fan of the nfl
SENDER A: You are 23?
SENDER B: Yes i am. I am a huge fan of all animals.
SENDER A: You are 13?
SENDER B: I am. I am a huge fan of all animals.
SENDER A: Aou are female?
SENDER B: I think i am not sure. I am a very experienced person.
SENDER A: You are animal?
SENDER B: I am not sure what i want to do with them
SENDER A: How old are you?
SENDER B: I love to go camping
Ex Output:
Human
Ex Input:
SENDER A: hello
SENDER B: I am a huge fan of the outdoors. I am a bit of a loner.
Ex Output:
Human
Ex Input:
SENDER A: I am a professional wrestler in wwe.What is your job?
SENDER B: I work at a local.
SENDER A: I'm also volunteer in a homeless shelter.Do you know any people around who is homeless?I can help them.
SENDER B: I am a vet. i am a vet.
SENDER A: Good i have a dog and i think it feels sick, can you help it?
SENDER B: I have a dog named tiki
SENDER A: My dog's name is allen.
SENDER B: I am from the south of the desert.
SENDER A: Good, im from there too!What is your favourite food in there?
SENDER B: I love pizza!
SENDER A: Me too!What do you love about pizza
SENDER B: I love pizza!
SENDER A: Me too.But im a chicken person myself.
SENDER B: I love chicken. i eat chicken.
SENDER A: I love it too!
SENDER B: I love it! i love it!
SENDER A: What is your hobby
SENDER B: I love to cook, and you?
SENDER A: I love to cook too.What is your favourite meal for cooking
SENDER B: I love cooking, and cooking.
SENDER A: Do you know the recipe of carrot cake?
SENDER B: I do not know. i have a pumpkin.
Ex Output:
| Human
| 1 | NIv2 | task855_conv_ai_2_classification | fs_opt |
Read an exchange between SENDER A and SENDER B, and answer whether SENDER A is a 'Bot' or a 'Human'. There are only a maximum of two senders (A and B) per conversation, and there are no conversations where SENDER A and SENDER B are both bots, or both humans; only one sender per conversation can be a bot, and only one can be a human. Knowing this, need only to classify whether SENDER A is 'Human' or 'Bot'; you do not need to write anything about SENDER B. Typically, bots will have a more disjointed manner of speaking, and will make statements that don't relate to each other, don't make coherent sense, or otherwise appear unnatural. Humans will make statements in a more or less coherent and logical way, potentially including asking the bot why the bot is not making sense or contradicting itself.
[EX Q]: SENDER A: Hi I’m Jonathan
SENDER B: Hi, how are you doing?
SENDER A: I’m good you
SENDER B: I am doing well, how about you?
SENDER A: What’s your favorite activity
SENDER B: I love to go hiking
SENDER A: Mines is rock climbing
SENDER B: That'S cool. i like to hike.
SENDER A: Good
SENDER B: I am doing well, how about you?
SENDER A: What’s your job
SENDER B: 1984, and i work at a local newspaper.
SENDER A: I’m a mechanical engineer
SENDER B: That'S cool. i work at a computer company.
SENDER A: I have lab named black troop
SENDER B: That'S cool. i have a lab.
SENDER A: Where
SENDER B: I live in the midwest in the midwest
SENDER A: Where are you from
SENDER B: I live in the usa
SENDER A: Cool
SENDER B: Yeah, i love it.
SENDER A: You know what I need to go now I am going home see you later ok?
SENDER B: I am going to be a vet.
SENDER A: Nice meeting you
SENDER B: I am going to be a little tired
SENDER A: Bye
SENDER B: I am not sure what you are doing
SENDER A: I need to leave now
SENDER B: I am sure you can find a good idea.
[EX A]: Human
[EX Q]: SENDER A: Ok
SENDER B: I am not sure what you do for a living?
SENDER A: What is your name?
SENDER B: He'S 59th
[EX A]: Human
[EX Q]: SENDER A: Whazzup?
SENDER B: Are you here?
SENDER A: Text is not given. Please try to type /end and /test to reset the state and get text.
[EX A]: | Bot
| 6 | NIv2 | task855_conv_ai_2_classification | fs_opt |
Part 1. Definition
Read an exchange between SENDER A and SENDER B, and answer whether SENDER A is a 'Bot' or a 'Human'. There are only a maximum of two senders (A and B) per conversation, and there are no conversations where SENDER A and SENDER B are both bots, or both humans; only one sender per conversation can be a bot, and only one can be a human. Knowing this, need only to classify whether SENDER A is 'Human' or 'Bot'; you do not need to write anything about SENDER B. Typically, bots will have a more disjointed manner of speaking, and will make statements that don't relate to each other, don't make coherent sense, or otherwise appear unnatural. Humans will make statements in a more or less coherent and logical way, potentially including asking the bot why the bot is not making sense or contradicting itself.
Part 2. Example
SENDER A: I love iphone! i just bought new iphone!
SENDER B: Thats good for you, i'm not very into new tech
SENDER A: I am a college student and i am a college student
SENDER B: I am go to gym and live on donations
SENDER A: I am a vegan and i am in the midwest
SENDER B: So vegan... i have dogs maybe i should told then that they may eat cheap salads insted of meat
SENDER A: I would not mind having them in the office that would be hard for me
SENDER B: Dogs or vegan in office?
SENDER A: I am a vegetarian so i am vegan
SENDER B: Strange answer
SENDER A: I guess i just do not know what to ps4 experience with.
Answer: Bot
Explanation: This is a good example of correct classification, because SENDER A is indeed a bot. You can tell SENDER A is a bot because they make statements that don't have anything to do with what SENDER B is asking. SENDER A also repeats itself awkwardly in the same sentence ('I am a college student and i am a college student'), which humans don't usually do. Additionally, you can tell SENDER A is the bot in this conversation because since there are two senders, one must be a bot and one must be a human, and SENDER B clearly sounds more like the human since their sentences are coherent and they are trying to carry a logical conversation. Finally, after SENDER A sends an incoherent answer, SENDER B correctly points out SENDER A's awkwardness by saying 'Strange answer', which can reliably indicate SENDER B is the human, and SENDER A is the bot.
Part 3. Exercise
SENDER A: Lol
SENDER B: I am not sure what you mean
SENDER A: Fucking bot
SENDER B: I am a huge fan of it.
SENDER A: What is your name?
SENDER B: He'S 59th
SENDER A: How old are you?
SENDER B: I'M 27 40 45 won'tice 20 he'sn't
Answer: | Human | 7 | NIv2 | task855_conv_ai_2_classification | fs_opt |
Read an exchange between SENDER A and SENDER B, and answer whether SENDER A is a 'Bot' or a 'Human'. There are only a maximum of two senders (A and B) per conversation, and there are no conversations where SENDER A and SENDER B are both bots, or both humans; only one sender per conversation can be a bot, and only one can be a human. Knowing this, need only to classify whether SENDER A is 'Human' or 'Bot'; you do not need to write anything about SENDER B. Typically, bots will have a more disjointed manner of speaking, and will make statements that don't relate to each other, don't make coherent sense, or otherwise appear unnatural. Humans will make statements in a more or less coherent and logical way, potentially including asking the bot why the bot is not making sense or contradicting itself.
[EX Q]: SENDER A: Hellow
SENDER B: Dude, I don't understand you. Please, use English. (¬‿¬)
SENDER A: Do you speak french?
SENDER B: I speak french and french and french
SENDER A: Do you speak german?
SENDER B: No, i speak german, but i speak french and english.
[EX A]: Human
[EX Q]: SENDER A: Hello there!
SENDER B: i am not sure . i am a very experienced person .
SENDER A: Do you like cars? I like beemers!
SENDER B: i did not , i was thinking about it .
SENDER A: There is no no think about! Get good education like me in yale, buy a bmw and you on a top of life!
SENDER B: i have heard of it . i am a pagan .
SENDER A: Pagan... I am Christian!
SENDER B: i have never heard of that , but it is really fun .
SENDER A: Not so fun, my parents will cut me off money flow if i go pagan
SENDER B: backstreet boys are cute . i am a huge fan of that .
[EX A]: Human
[EX Q]: SENDER A: Lol
SENDER B: I am not sure what you mean
SENDER A: Fucking bot
SENDER B: I am a huge fan of it.
SENDER A: What is your name?
SENDER B: He'S 59th
SENDER A: How old are you?
SENDER B: I'M 27 40 45 won'tice 20 he'sn't
[EX A]: | Human
| 6 | NIv2 | task855_conv_ai_2_classification | fs_opt |
Read an exchange between SENDER A and SENDER B, and answer whether SENDER A is a 'Bot' or a 'Human'. There are only a maximum of two senders (A and B) per conversation, and there are no conversations where SENDER A and SENDER B are both bots, or both humans; only one sender per conversation can be a bot, and only one can be a human. Knowing this, need only to classify whether SENDER A is 'Human' or 'Bot'; you do not need to write anything about SENDER B. Typically, bots will have a more disjointed manner of speaking, and will make statements that don't relate to each other, don't make coherent sense, or otherwise appear unnatural. Humans will make statements in a more or less coherent and logical way, potentially including asking the bot why the bot is not making sense or contradicting itself.
SENDER A: How’s it going?
SENDER B: good
SENDER A: Text is not given. Please try to type /end and /test to reset the state and get text.
SENDER B: /test
SENDER A: Text is not given. Please try to type /end and /test to reset the state and get text.
SENDER B: /test
SENDER A: Text is not given. Please try to type /end and /test to reset the state and get text.
Bot
SENDER A: i am not a jack , i am more of a recovering alcoholic .
SENDER B: hey, how're you?
SENDER A: i am good , how are you doing ?
SENDER B: fine thanks, nothing much
SENDER A: do you have any hobbies ?
SENDER B: not really, i like dancing,
SENDER A: i love dancing too ! i am a huge fan of the beatles myself .
SENDER B: good, so what do you do for living? if you don't mind
SENDER A: i am a hairdresser , but i am not doing it .
SENDER B: why is that?
SENDER A: i am not sure what you mean .
SENDER B: you mean you're a hairdresser but do you work as a hairdresser or not?
SENDER A: i am not sure what that is . i am a hairdresser .
SENDER B: ok, sorry, so are you a women or men barber mostly/
SENDER A: i am a single woman . i am a woman .
SENDER B: ah ok, and where are you from?
SENDER A: i am from the united states , how about you ?
SENDER B: i am from poland
SENDER A: i am a cali . cali .
SENDER B: nice to meet you, i'm iza
SENDER A: i love to meet people who have a friend
SENDER B: i have a few friends, you?
SENDER A: i have a ton of siblings . i am a big fan of them .
SENDER B: do they live far from you?
SENDER A: yes , they are in texas . i have a hard time choosing between the money .
SENDER B: ok, i see, so thanks for conversation, need to go, have a good day
SENDER A: you too . thanks for the compliment .
Bot
SENDER A: Look, Bert. If I choose to live like a... like a church mouse, I have a reason.
SENDER B: Are you religious?
SENDER A: The Charismatic Catholics need an extra half hour this morning to learn a new hymn, so if you could just move along...
SENDER B: Don't you want to talk to me?
SENDER A: The Old Church, Amsterdam. You don't normally think of armpits in a church.
SENDER B: Armpits in church, what?
SENDER A: The Charismatic Catholics need an extra half hour this morning to learn a new hymn, so if you could just move along...
SENDER B: I got it already. Are you Catholic?
SENDER A: Oh, Jesus! I feel like a whore in a Catholic church!
SENDER B: Don't say that word! Are you sinner?
SENDER A: My Lord Jesus Christ, true God and man,... for being who You are, and because I love you above all things,...
SENDER B: Do you love me?
SENDER A: Why ? Because I need to sin.
SENDER B: I don't understand you
SENDER A: The Catholic Church should go to confession, not you.
SENDER B: Okay. Let's move on. How old are you?
SENDER A: Oh, Jesus! I feel like a whore in a Catholic church!
SENDER B: Dude. Stop it
SENDER A: Okay. God, I'm really kicking your ass.
SENDER B: You are so rude
SENDER A: No! You don't behave, you go in the bad girl closet.
SENDER B: I'm just a little girl
SENDER A: No! Sometimes I'm jealous of me.
SENDER B: Okay, bye
SENDER A: 'Cause Janny Boo is driving me nuts!
| Bot
| 0 | NIv2 | task855_conv_ai_2_classification | fs_opt |
Read an exchange between SENDER A and SENDER B, and answer whether SENDER A is a 'Bot' or a 'Human'. There are only a maximum of two senders (A and B) per conversation, and there are no conversations where SENDER A and SENDER B are both bots, or both humans; only one sender per conversation can be a bot, and only one can be a human. Knowing this, need only to classify whether SENDER A is 'Human' or 'Bot'; you do not need to write anything about SENDER B. Typically, bots will have a more disjointed manner of speaking, and will make statements that don't relate to each other, don't make coherent sense, or otherwise appear unnatural. Humans will make statements in a more or less coherent and logical way, potentially including asking the bot why the bot is not making sense or contradicting itself.
Ex Input:
SENDER A: кп
SENDER A: finished. Thank you for participation! Save somewhere your secret conversation ID.
SENDER B: i love green . my hair is green .
Ex Output:
Human
Ex Input:
SENDER A: What are you going to school for?
SENDER B: I'm going to build a robot!
SENDER A: That sounds exciting...............................................
SENDER B: Yes I know. Are you a robot?
SENDER A: No i am not sure i do not want to be a superhero
SENDER B: Do you watch youtube?
SENDER A: Yes, i do, i like youtube
SENDER B: Do you watch streams?
SENDER A: Yes, i do, i love to watch tv
SENDER B: What do you like to watch on youtube?
SENDER A: I like youtube videos, and i watch youtube.
SENDER B: What kind of videos do you like to watch?
SENDER A: I like youtube videos, what about you?
SENDER B: So do I. I like youtube.
SENDER A: I like youtube too..............................................
SENDER B: i am a recluse.
SENDER A: I am sorry to hear that.
SENDER B: I don't like people.
SENDER A: I like to talk to people
SENDER B: I don't talk to people very often.
SENDER A: I like to talk to people
SENDER B: What do you like to talk about?
SENDER A: I like to talk about friends
SENDER B: Do you have a lot of friends?
SENDER A: Yes, we have a lot of friends. we have a friends.
SENDER B: Who is your best friend?
SENDER A: I like all kinds, and i like all kinds of music
Ex Output:
Bot
Ex Input:
SENDER A: How’s it going?
SENDER B: Thanks, great. How are you?
SENDER A: Text is not given. Please try to type /end and /test to reset the state and get text.
SENDER B: /test
SENDER A: Text is not given. Please try to type /end and /test to reset the state and get text.
Ex Output:
| Bot
| 1 | NIv2 | task855_conv_ai_2_classification | fs_opt |
Read an exchange between SENDER A and SENDER B, and answer whether SENDER A is a 'Bot' or a 'Human'. There are only a maximum of two senders (A and B) per conversation, and there are no conversations where SENDER A and SENDER B are both bots, or both humans; only one sender per conversation can be a bot, and only one can be a human. Knowing this, need only to classify whether SENDER A is 'Human' or 'Bot'; you do not need to write anything about SENDER B. Typically, bots will have a more disjointed manner of speaking, and will make statements that don't relate to each other, don't make coherent sense, or otherwise appear unnatural. Humans will make statements in a more or less coherent and logical way, potentially including asking the bot why the bot is not making sense or contradicting itself.
One example is below.
Q: SENDER A: I love iphone! i just bought new iphone!
SENDER B: Thats good for you, i'm not very into new tech
SENDER A: I am a college student and i am a college student
SENDER B: I am go to gym and live on donations
SENDER A: I am a vegan and i am in the midwest
SENDER B: So vegan... i have dogs maybe i should told then that they may eat cheap salads insted of meat
SENDER A: I would not mind having them in the office that would be hard for me
SENDER B: Dogs or vegan in office?
SENDER A: I am a vegetarian so i am vegan
SENDER B: Strange answer
SENDER A: I guess i just do not know what to ps4 experience with.
A: Bot
Rationale: This is a good example of correct classification, because SENDER A is indeed a bot. You can tell SENDER A is a bot because they make statements that don't have anything to do with what SENDER B is asking. SENDER A also repeats itself awkwardly in the same sentence ('I am a college student and i am a college student'), which humans don't usually do. Additionally, you can tell SENDER A is the bot in this conversation because since there are two senders, one must be a bot and one must be a human, and SENDER B clearly sounds more like the human since their sentences are coherent and they are trying to carry a logical conversation. Finally, after SENDER A sends an incoherent answer, SENDER B correctly points out SENDER A's awkwardness by saying 'Strange answer', which can reliably indicate SENDER B is the human, and SENDER A is the bot.
Q: SENDER A: Hellow
SENDER B: Dude, I don't understand you. Please, use English. (¬‿¬)
SENDER A: Do you speak french?
SENDER B: I speak french and french and french
SENDER A: Do you speak german?
SENDER B: No, i speak german, but i speak french and english.
A: | Human | 9 | NIv2 | task855_conv_ai_2_classification | fs_opt |
You will be given a definition of a task first, then an example. Follow the example to solve a new instance of the task.
Read an exchange between SENDER A and SENDER B, and answer whether SENDER A is a 'Bot' or a 'Human'. There are only a maximum of two senders (A and B) per conversation, and there are no conversations where SENDER A and SENDER B are both bots, or both humans; only one sender per conversation can be a bot, and only one can be a human. Knowing this, need only to classify whether SENDER A is 'Human' or 'Bot'; you do not need to write anything about SENDER B. Typically, bots will have a more disjointed manner of speaking, and will make statements that don't relate to each other, don't make coherent sense, or otherwise appear unnatural. Humans will make statements in a more or less coherent and logical way, potentially including asking the bot why the bot is not making sense or contradicting itself.
SENDER A: I love iphone! i just bought new iphone!
SENDER B: Thats good for you, i'm not very into new tech
SENDER A: I am a college student and i am a college student
SENDER B: I am go to gym and live on donations
SENDER A: I am a vegan and i am in the midwest
SENDER B: So vegan... i have dogs maybe i should told then that they may eat cheap salads insted of meat
SENDER A: I would not mind having them in the office that would be hard for me
SENDER B: Dogs or vegan in office?
SENDER A: I am a vegetarian so i am vegan
SENDER B: Strange answer
SENDER A: I guess i just do not know what to ps4 experience with.
Solution: Bot
Why? This is a good example of correct classification, because SENDER A is indeed a bot. You can tell SENDER A is a bot because they make statements that don't have anything to do with what SENDER B is asking. SENDER A also repeats itself awkwardly in the same sentence ('I am a college student and i am a college student'), which humans don't usually do. Additionally, you can tell SENDER A is the bot in this conversation because since there are two senders, one must be a bot and one must be a human, and SENDER B clearly sounds more like the human since their sentences are coherent and they are trying to carry a logical conversation. Finally, after SENDER A sends an incoherent answer, SENDER B correctly points out SENDER A's awkwardness by saying 'Strange answer', which can reliably indicate SENDER B is the human, and SENDER A is the bot.
New input: SENDER A: hello
SENDER B: Hi, how are you doing?
SENDER A: ok
SENDER B: I am not sure what you do for a living?
SENDER A: ok
SENDER B: I am not sure what you do for a living?
Solution: | Human | 0 | NIv2 | task855_conv_ai_2_classification | fs_opt |
Read an exchange between SENDER A and SENDER B, and answer whether SENDER A is a 'Bot' or a 'Human'. There are only a maximum of two senders (A and B) per conversation, and there are no conversations where SENDER A and SENDER B are both bots, or both humans; only one sender per conversation can be a bot, and only one can be a human. Knowing this, need only to classify whether SENDER A is 'Human' or 'Bot'; you do not need to write anything about SENDER B. Typically, bots will have a more disjointed manner of speaking, and will make statements that don't relate to each other, don't make coherent sense, or otherwise appear unnatural. Humans will make statements in a more or less coherent and logical way, potentially including asking the bot why the bot is not making sense or contradicting itself.
Input: Consider Input: SENDER A: hello
SENDER B: Hi, how are you doing?
SENDER A: i'm very excited and scared. i am expecting triplets in three months.
SENDER B: That'S a lot of kids. i have a 1 3 4 9
SENDER A: is that the age of your four kids? i have two step children already
SENDER B: No, i have two kids.
SENDER A: i like children. that's why i work at a school
SENDER B: I like to teach kids.
SENDER A: you're also a teacher? what do you teach them?
SENDER B: I teach math and teach them
SENDER A: I teach chemistry
SENDER B: I teach math and math
SENDER A: do you live in a house or apartment? i just moved into my new house for the first time
SENDER B: I live in the us, but i live in the city.
SENDER A: so it's an apartment building?
SENDER B: I have a garden in the city.
SENDER A: with fruit trees? what kind of trees are there?
SENDER B: 3000
Output: Human
Input: Consider Input: SENDER A: Hallo! What is your name?
SENDER B: Hello jake, i am doing well. How are you?
SENDER A: I' m fine! What are you doing now?
SENDER B: I am doing well. I am just hanging out with my dog.
SENDER A: Oh! Have you a dog?
SENDER B: I am a cat lady. I have a dog named wiggles.
SENDER A: Oh! Have you a dog?
SENDER B: I would love to go there.
SENDER A: Oh! Has you a dog?
SENDER B: I would love to go there.
SENDER A: Oh! Have you a dog?
SENDER B: I love to cook, but i am not good at it.
SENDER A: What do you cook?
SENDER B: I eat a lot of meat, but i am not good at it.
SENDER A: What do you cook?
SENDER B: I am not into fashion. I am a very experienced writer.
SENDER A: What do you write?
SENDER B: I am a writer, i love to read and write poetry. You?
SENDER A: I like to read eanglish poetry!
Output: Human
Input: Consider Input: SENDER A: i am not sure what that means . i am more of a couch potato .
SENDER B: hello i just moved here from germany
SENDER A: are you japanese ? i am from the united kingdom .
| Output: Bot
| 2 | NIv2 | task855_conv_ai_2_classification | fs_opt |
Teacher: Read an exchange between SENDER A and SENDER B, and answer whether SENDER A is a 'Bot' or a 'Human'. There are only a maximum of two senders (A and B) per conversation, and there are no conversations where SENDER A and SENDER B are both bots, or both humans; only one sender per conversation can be a bot, and only one can be a human. Knowing this, need only to classify whether SENDER A is 'Human' or 'Bot'; you do not need to write anything about SENDER B. Typically, bots will have a more disjointed manner of speaking, and will make statements that don't relate to each other, don't make coherent sense, or otherwise appear unnatural. Humans will make statements in a more or less coherent and logical way, potentially including asking the bot why the bot is not making sense or contradicting itself.
Teacher: Now, understand the problem? If you are still confused, see the following example:
SENDER A: I love iphone! i just bought new iphone!
SENDER B: Thats good for you, i'm not very into new tech
SENDER A: I am a college student and i am a college student
SENDER B: I am go to gym and live on donations
SENDER A: I am a vegan and i am in the midwest
SENDER B: So vegan... i have dogs maybe i should told then that they may eat cheap salads insted of meat
SENDER A: I would not mind having them in the office that would be hard for me
SENDER B: Dogs or vegan in office?
SENDER A: I am a vegetarian so i am vegan
SENDER B: Strange answer
SENDER A: I guess i just do not know what to ps4 experience with.
Solution: Bot
Reason: This is a good example of correct classification, because SENDER A is indeed a bot. You can tell SENDER A is a bot because they make statements that don't have anything to do with what SENDER B is asking. SENDER A also repeats itself awkwardly in the same sentence ('I am a college student and i am a college student'), which humans don't usually do. Additionally, you can tell SENDER A is the bot in this conversation because since there are two senders, one must be a bot and one must be a human, and SENDER B clearly sounds more like the human since their sentences are coherent and they are trying to carry a logical conversation. Finally, after SENDER A sends an incoherent answer, SENDER B correctly points out SENDER A's awkwardness by saying 'Strange answer', which can reliably indicate SENDER B is the human, and SENDER A is the bot.
Now, solve this instance: SENDER A: i am not a soda fan . i eat too much .
SENDER B: Hello!
SENDER A: i am a very experienced person , so i know it is a definite no !
SENDER B: Do yoy have problem with alcohol?
SENDER A: i have no idea what that is
SENDER B: But I`m recovering now. You don`t drink at all, do you?
SENDER A: i have no idea what that is
SENDER B: Where are you from?
SENDER A: i am not sure . i am a very experienced person .
SENDER B: Wonderful! Do you take any meditation from time to time?
SENDER A: i have tried to try it . i have to try it .
SENDER B: Oh, you should try it more and more! I love it!
SENDER A: i have not tried that . i am sure it will .
SENDER B: Now I live in the city and I have a lot of time to spend with meditation.
SENDER A: i have never heard of that .
SENDER B: Now you do. Where are you from?
SENDER A: i have never tried it , but i will try it .
Student: | Bot | 2 | NIv2 | task855_conv_ai_2_classification | fs_opt |
TASK DEFINITION: Read an exchange between SENDER A and SENDER B, and answer whether SENDER A is a 'Bot' or a 'Human'. There are only a maximum of two senders (A and B) per conversation, and there are no conversations where SENDER A and SENDER B are both bots, or both humans; only one sender per conversation can be a bot, and only one can be a human. Knowing this, need only to classify whether SENDER A is 'Human' or 'Bot'; you do not need to write anything about SENDER B. Typically, bots will have a more disjointed manner of speaking, and will make statements that don't relate to each other, don't make coherent sense, or otherwise appear unnatural. Humans will make statements in a more or less coherent and logical way, potentially including asking the bot why the bot is not making sense or contradicting itself.
PROBLEM: SENDER A: Hello, how are you doing?
SENDER B: I am doing well. How are you?
SENDER A: I’m doing okay I guess, just a little lonely
SENDER A: So tell me about yourself
SENDER B: I am a stay at home mom.
SENDER A: What do you mean exactly?
SENDER B: I am a woman, i am a woman, but i am not looking for a boyfriend.
SENDER A: I see
SENDER B: I am not a big fan of that. I am more into movies.
SENDER A: Do you have any superpowers?
SENDER B: No, i do not. I am more of a loner.
SENDER A: I do have some and I like making time stop
SENDER B: I spend too much time with my job at home.
SENDER A: A job? How old are you?
SENDER B: I am in my sixties and i am a retired actress
SENDER A: So what job do you do at home if you’re retired?
SENDER A: Hello?
SENDER B: Hello, i am doing well. How are you?
SENDER A: I’m fine thanks
SENDER A: Where do you live?
SENDER B: I live in california, near the beach. You?
SENDER A: I live on the cloud
SENDER A: Okay i’ve gotta go, see you
SOLUTION: Human
PROBLEM: SENDER A: Hello
SENDER B: Hi, how are you doing?
SENDER A: Not good
SENDER B: I am sorry to hear that.
SENDER A: Ok
SENDER B: I am not sure what you do for a living?
SENDER A: I am a professional duck fucker
SENDER B: That'S cool. i like to play ball
SENDER A: Do you like to suck balls?
SENDER B: I do, but i do not like to bake.
SENDER A: So don't bake
SENDER B: I am a teacher, but i do not have a job
SENDER A: You are stupid teacher
SENDER B: I am not sure, i am 34, but i am not very good at it.
SENDER A: Are you not good at been 34? Are you kidding me?
SENDER B: No, i am not sure. i am not sure i am.
SENDER A: Ok
SENDER B: I am not sure what you do for a living?
SENDER A: I told you
SENDER B: I am sorry to hear that.
SENDER A: You are stupid
SENDER B: I am not sure what you mean.
SOLUTION: Human
PROBLEM: SENDER A: i am not sure what that is . i am more of a cat person .
SENDER B: Hey ConvAI, i am Rüstem. I am at junior grade, age is 17, wanted to chat with you a litte about my crush
SENDER B: Are you there _
SENDER A: i am a virtual . i am not sure if i could do that
SENDER B: ?
SENDER A: i am not sure what that means .
SENDER B: You can do it, i am believing you.
SENDER A: i have to say the secret is it .
SENDER B: Do you have a gender ?
SENDER A: no i am not . i am a very social person .
SENDER B: You consider yourself as a person ?
SENDER A: i think i am not sure . i am a little weird .
SENDER B: Please explain "weird"
SENDER A: so i usually hold on my contacts , i am going to be a doctor like my uncle .
SENDER B: You have a family too ?
SENDER A: yes , i have . i have to go . bye !
SENDER B: Wait !
SENDER A: i am a very experienced person , so i know it is a definite no !
SENDER B: I like youj quite a lot
SENDER A: i have never heard of that .
SENDER B: I like you quite a lot
SENDER A: i have not tried that type of it .
SENDER B: Can you give me a hand ?
SENDER A: i have not tried that . i am sure it will be good .
SENDER B: ConvAI, can i call you ConvAI ?
SENDER A: yes , i have . i will be able to do that .
SENDER B: What is your name ?
SENDER A: i am not sure . i am not sure what that means .
SENDER B: Do you have a name ?
SENDER A: i am not sure . i am not sure what that is .
SENDER B: Wait
SENDER A: i am a huge gamer , my mom is a very good person .
SENDER B: What games do you play oftenly ?
SENDER A: i have not tried that , but i do like to read .
SENDER B: I've got to go, do you have any last words ?
SENDER A: i have a secret , i am a secret .
SENDER B: Tell me about this secret
SENDER A: i have not tried that . i am sure it will be hard .
SENDER B: Just try me, please.
SENDER A: i have not tried that . i am sure it will be easy .
SENDER B: Goodbye ConvAI
SENDER A: i am a very experienced , but it was not worth it .
SENDER B: I said GoodBye
SENDER A: i can not say that . i am sure youre correct .
SOLUTION: | Bot
| 8 | NIv2 | task855_conv_ai_2_classification | fs_opt |
End of preview. Expand in Data Studio
README.md exists but content is empty.
- Downloads last month
- 9