Datasets:
tasksource
/
jigsaw_toxicity

Dataset card Data Studio Files
xet
Community
1
id
stringlengths
16
16
comment_text
stringlengths
6
5k
toxic
int64
0
1
severe_toxic
int64
0
1
obscene
int64
0
1
threat
int64
0
1
insult
int64
0
1
identity_hate
int64
0
1
0d87768c543afaed
I am trying to put up a page about my hobby.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0d88cfef59f8507c
Oh man that was a close one Gang Two(2) wiki banishments in less than one hour. But I come out on top, like a true leader (be very sure to take mental note of that). I shall spend the next 48 hours mentally prepareing myself for the wiki edit on our dear leader André Brazeau. Stand strong. Godspeed.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0d88d9e8d96d25c8
Thank you. I have been trying to estimate the approx. number of rosaries made and distributed each year in the world, and the number seems to be elusive. It is most probably over 20million per year, since just one group sends out 7 million free rosaries a year. There seem to be many manufacturers in China now, although Italy has many higher end rosaries.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0d88ebd5a6d3038d
Hello Roy, what are you talking about? Where did u come from? I was just talking to crossmr to sort out the civility message he left on my user page, so where did u come from? We were having a chat!!!! Talk to him? Hello!? So, whats this block for? I never even wrote any guy a message right now!!!!!!!!!!!! I demand immediate unblocking. This is 100% an abuse of power of admins and I will certainly complain.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0d894fe7d524e5d4
Am I not allowed to write on my own user page?!?!?!!
0
0
0
0
0
0
0d89d1a6a0b9bd57
", 30 July 2007 (UTC) The link doesn't work for me. Do you have a better one? Also, please review Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines#New topics and headings on talk pages: Never address other users in a heading, and avoid provocative and pointless reverts in this regard in the future. Thanks. (talk) 04:16"
0
0
0
0
0
0
0d8a5c8eae046349
" Another user ( talk "
0
0
0
0
0
0
0d8a8a93911ec0cf
" Agnotism I read in book ""Lance Armstrong's book: It's Not About the Bike: My Journey Back to Life"" that he is Atheist,please give references for Agnotism of Armstrong "
0
0
0
0
0
0
0d8b0fb228a09ea5
" ok a direct quote from the page for fuck is ""Other uses are dysphemistic: The sexual connotation, usually connected to masturbation (in the case of ""go fuck yourself"" or ""go fuck your ass"") is invoked to incite additional disgust, or express anger or outrage. For example, ""Fuck that!"", ""Fuck no!"", or ""Fuck you!""."" thats a bit worse than saying ""masturbation is like taking a good dump"" mate come on just put it back up and quit being a douche..."
1
0
1
0
0
0
0d8bdaf524226ccf
, appreciated. Some work has already been made so it should not be so time consuming... Thanks again. '''''' 20:41, 29
0
0
0
0
0
0
0d8ce79006362d12
" The Copyeditor's Barnstar I noticed you voiced an opinion in the first discussion on a Copyeditor's Barnstar/Award which was archived without decision. If you haven't already, would you please check in with the current discussion? The !votes/opinions from the first discussion, althought noted at the top, are not being counted in the current tally. It would be great if you would also weigh in on your preference of graphic design from among the choices (currently eight different images, the last being added at around 15:23, Thursday, 1 March 2007). If you !vote, please update the tally near the top of the discussion. Thanks. Talk to me "
0
0
0
0
0
0
0d8d02ae24b11eb1
Hmm, no. Rather, I hope to highlight the citation of a series of non existent local clauses, as well as the criticism of the legitimate sources, which lead to the deletion of my article.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0d8d10956e74d5dd
How? I don't know how to do it? I found image on www.buzznet.com, could you do it for me?
0
0
0
0
0
0
0d8dad5e7f02a960
Every edit that user made was in furtherance of selling his DVD set. Using wikipedia for personal gain is against the rules. What part of this do you not understand? What's up, Doc?
0
0
0
0
0
0
0d8e5c1e6055eca9
WARNING TO EDITORS: This article is maintained with passion by an ignorant and hopeless person that does not take into consideration ANY good-faith corrections, he just reverts everything to his original. For example he did not even keep the spelling corrections even though his English is below average. DO NOT WASTE YOUR TIME THIS WILL NEVER BE A GOOD AND HONEST ARTICLE. All corrections will be wasted. THIS ARTICLE REFLECTS THE QUALITY OF THE WRITER
0
0
0
0
0
0
0d8eab92f0f8bb52
I did and do appologize for not seeing your above comments, but I will remind you that it is customary to continue the most recent discussion at the end of the talk page.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0d8f41cb680f0654
2006 (UTC) Charles Wesley's info is inaccurate. There is documented proof of Alpha Kappa Nu http://media.www.msuspokesman.com/media/storage/paper270/news/2006/02/10/CampusLife/Tribute.A.Brief.History.Of.Black.Collegiate.Fraternities.And.Sororities-1614202.shtml?sourcedomain=www.msuspokesman.com&MIIHost;=media.collegepublisher.com 00:23, 19 September
0
0
0
0
0
0
0d8fc205e235e213
Hello. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Otherwise, people might consider your edits to be vandalism. Thank you. PeaceNT
0
0
0
0
0
0
0d8fc7b96b7f6c0e
National Emergency Bush did declare national emergency on 9/11/2001, and renews it every year. You are wrong about at least one thing, Equinox. Maybe you are not infallible after all.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0d91040f22310e08
" Use of Person infobox Don't hardcode the ages of people into their infoboxes. Every single one of the many infoboxes you have done this to will now have to be updated every year. That's why we have Template:Birth date and age. Please go back and use it on all of the infoboxes where you added an age. Similarly, read Template:Infobox person to see how to use the person info box and the allowed field. You will note that ""residence"" is not spelled ""residencse"" as you have done. Please go back and fix all of the infoboxes where you made that mistake. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
0d930b2b8673fef9
" It might be ""important to show"" but then a show here must be accompanied with at least half-worthy references. And just downplaying isn't going to score one. For the reference, you might have forgotten e.g. our Venera 7 landing. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
0d93cbb6f05d0d04
should we mention that this beer nearly tops the truly disgusting beer list?
1
0
0
0
0
0
0d93d3153f134cda
" ""NDP-affiliated"" I added a fact tag to the four-times-reinserted modifier ""NDP-affiliated"" to the mention of Bill Tieleman; other journalists are not generally singled out by party affiliation/loyalty, nor are publishers such as CanWest (which is widely seen as a propaganda arm of the BC Liberal Party, also one of the party's major financial contributors). It's not that Tieleman isn't an NDPer, but his credentials go beyond his NDP politicking and he is increasingly a critic of that party, also. I'm responding partly, also to [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Christy_Clark&action;=historysubmit&diff;=401129881&oldid;=401095803 this edit by ). I've puzzled long and hard over my own real-world COI on BC political articles, but I see no reason to recuse myself from participation in BC political arti9cles, though generally I give them as wide a berth as possible; but when I recognize POV political activity/wording, as a responsible Wikipedian I can't not say something about it, or challenge the POVism - and COI/spin edits - when I see them. My interest here is to prevent Wikipedia from being used as part of any campaign p.r. machine (of any party), and to make sure Wikipedia principles are observed - particularly by party operatives who have no reason to respect Wikipedia guidelines or concepts like WP:NPOV. In the case of this item about BC Rail, there's lots missing, including the search of the Clark-Marrissen home during the opening of the investigation (and that curious telephone call thelling them the police were coming, and why no warrant was needed....vs. all the other highly suspect/irregular warrants to do with that case). But there's also lots of other commentators, particularly from smalltown papers or independently syndicated, but also notable bloggers/indepednent reserachers like Sean Holman, Laila Yuile and BC Mary who have similarly spoken out about Clark's involvement in the BC Rail matter and how it weights against her in the eyes of the public, and of the ""informed media"". She may have been out of teh way for the HST fracas, and the Big Media have pronounced her ""clean"" of that - but he Big Media also have maintained a veil of silence over BC Rail. The current text says that she resigned for family reasons; but it's well-citable that the timing of her resignation was seen to have to do with the BC Rail affair. And about the Tieleman thing, unless every time Conservative-affiliated columnists or BC Liberal-affiliated columnists and media outlets are similarly tagged in articles mentioning their opninions and claims (often false), it's not fair to single out Tieleman for this; that's the reason for the cite tag; Tieleman's own byline says only ""Bill Tieleman is one of BC's best known communicators, political commentators and strategists. Bill writes a politics column Tuesdays in 24 Hours newspaper and The Tyee online magazine. Bill has been Communications Director in the B.C. Premier's Office and at the BC Federation of Labour. Bill owns West Star Communications, a consulting firm providing strategy and communication services for labour, business, non-profits and government."" And frankly, seeing whats going on with the NDP and teh things the Party Council/James supporter types have been calling him, he may not be ""NDP-affiliated"" much longer.... "
0
0
0
0
0
0
0d945447ce661d0b
Major Error I have removed the last paragraph on Beth Phoenix's main profile about her return to RAW. This has not been confirmed by WWE.com or any other wrestling affiliated websites. The MySpace thing is not concreate evidence that this is true.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0d946cc5c540d6a1
December 2009 Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Klystron, you will be blocked from editing. If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0d9680d55e8f912f
Assumption School's IP address == Sorry for the influx in vandalism. it is due to a recent article i made, on Assumption College School. A few colleaques discovered it, and began adding information and vandalism to it. Most of it was not acceptable, so it was reverted. THey continued to do so, so I watched the page. But ther is something wrong with the feature, so I dont know when they edit it. ==
0
0
0
0
0
0
0d96a807fcba8696
I agree with and commend all of that, except for the phrase 'not symbols.' The clear truth of the matter is that most of us, East or West, who are cognizant of modern history and the use of symbols herein, would run a mile before agreeing to the use of swastikas/fylfots for our favorite social movement. The politically restrained people of contemporary China are somewhat in the unfortunate position indicated by the old saw 'Beggars can't be choosers.'
0
0
0
0
0
0
0d96a902770ddfed
Page deletion Following your blanking of the page and request for deletion, I have taken the appropriate steps to ensure speedy deletion. It should be gone in a day or two. Thank you very much for being so co-operative. It is tempting to use Wikipedia for advertitising, but it destroys its value as an encyclopedia, so it is nice when people help out like you have. Please feel free to contribute elsewhere in Wikipedia. Regards,
0
0
0
0
0
0
0d98a587c46605a5
I was blocked for personal attacks, not 3RR. Why then was the grounds refused based on 3RR?
0
0
0
0
0
0
0d9a4a50ec22b2c6
. The only way you would know that i had added links to a planet and Kater mIddle ton would be if you were the bully who removec evreyone of my links,. You have judged every single one of my links on the same basis, and you have not helped me I felt suicidal after what you did it is devastating therte was no mercy it was just bang and destroy. You have not even read any i repaet any of my pages. The people who make the intial choice to accept a page accepted my pages so you are wrong to say they are spam you just looked out every page i added a link to and removed them you are destructive and vindictive and cruel
0
0
0
0
0
0
0d9ac8d7b6ec58ff
Im not posting their, he never provided proof or anything why not give him hell! July 14 2006 UTC
1
0
0
0
0
0
0d9b4fef71450bd1
this user wonders why calgarians brag about chinooks. do edmontonians brag about snow? or how half of the flames' roster was born in edmonton?
0
0
0
0
0
0
0d9bd4997a04887b
" Presumably only someone born in 1971 (Ben Zimmer) can consider 1975 to be ancient history? It seems everyone has lost interest here but I made an effort to make some sense of this. The article was confusing 3 entirely separate uses of the term, a red line (a line in the sand), a Thin Red Line (a brave and defiant stand against great odds) and to redline (meaning to go beyond an engine's maximum safe performance level). I am sorry to say it, but for someone who claims to be a""lexicographer"" and language editor, Mr Zimmer ought to be ashamed. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
0d9bea08890a83f8
Thanks, but some texts, like the breed standard are the same everywhere. My English is not too good but I have a lot of information about this breed and I want to share it with others. If you can help me on this one I would be grateful. Thank you very much.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0d9c1fa666ddaf8f
" I've come across variations on draughts, as I've always called it - we had a compendium of games that came in a cube - it had six sides on it, one of which was a checkered board for playing chess and draughts on. With draughts, apart from the traditional version, there were the following variations: Dammspiel - that's what the manual called it - I think it's also called Damenspiel - you set them up a bit like chess, but they were placed one square forward (hard to explain) - the pieces moved almost identical to regular draughts - diagonally, one square - I think the kings could move multiple squares - a bit like the ""Flying Kings"" rule people have mentioned - except that you stop short of capturing - my memory is hazy on the issue. Turkish Checkers - similar set-tup to Dammspiel/Damenspiel - it looks a bit like chess with draughts pieces, the set-up being on the same squares you'd use for draughts - pieces move one square forwards, and, if I remember rigtly, capture diagonally, like standard draughts - the kings, I believe, move like rooks in chess and jump only once in a straight line - again, my memory is hazy regarding the rules. One game not listed in the manual was a game known by one of three names - Arrow Draughts, Dagger Draughts or Kings. Played similar to standard draughts - you play it corner-to-corner and set the pieces up as kings in the shape of an arrow or dagger - you then play it like regular draughts. I have played draughts with at least three opponents - a relative, somebody at school and somebody I once shared a house with - and they were convinced that a single man can't take a king. Apparently, according to this page, that's the rules in Italian draughts."
0
0
0
0
0
0
0d9c529d195c652e
" Since I'm not this banned editor ""HarveyCarter"" this is all irrelevant. (92.12.20.168 )"
0
0
0
0
0
0
0d9e50012d62fe75
I would say yes that's what he's saying, since there is an asymptote there. Which brings me to a question for you guys. You say x≠0 for f(x)=1/x but you would say x=0 for f(x)=(1-(1/x)), since x=0 is the only way you'll get a value of 1. I'm not trying to be difficult, I'm really trying to see it, but I just see too many flaws and this causes my disbelief in .999...=1.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0da0ac13832a1117
Well I pretty much agree with you except for the removal of Shadowcat. I'd rather stick with her than someone like Ghost Girl. Aren't we supposed to linger with the original characters first, then use up others? (talk • edits)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0da0b4af9487c9f9
So far Suicide has used D.O.A. only once, in his first appearance, when he was played by Kazarian. When Daniels uses it, it will be added to the list.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0da1ce8d7e8efde6
Thank you for the help. They really trumped up the charges and made up ones out of thin air. Like sock-puppeting...no proof whatsoever. They didn't care to remove that charge either.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0da1f32e4004442e
REDIRECT Talk:Brian Smith (defensive end)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0da46f8a201f8b69
Why you all not understanding,my opinion is not against Promotions.Pls understand.Im against that above mentioned paragraph.Hello,Hahc21 you had read edited version of page.First read previous versions then you'll understand my words.The phase doesn't talk about promotion.It talks about someone predictions and thoughts of her team. like for this her team thought to shoot documentaries seeing to other artists to promote her and it further her team wants to separate her from other Bollywood actress as they can only lipsync ....hello those are actors who hasn't pursued singing ,it doesn't need to highlight. Also someone's prediction that she will be a pioneer does it talk about promotion....huh...pls understand,we don't need to include someone's thought and PR skills.where are documentaries????only 1 behind the scenes video???? Is it new no....every next star releases these stuffs which are not nee.( )
0
0
0
0
0
0
0da4a336d737a08c
" @Lobsterthermidor: . The list of all requirements is sitting at WP:CSD#F8. (t • c) "
0
0
0
0
0
0
0da4a36341396351
" @: I just had a question! We have been discussing the matter in our personal talk pages. So I can't go for a 3O or a dispute resolution. What can I do? (Sorry for disturbing. I know that you are quite busy) "
0
0
0
0
0
0
0da4c03c7c327e24
By the way I would like to point out Nick made a mistake in his own original lyrics in this performance' which should say - My GOOD hand tattooed EVIL across his Brothers fist and those filthy five did nothing to challenge or resist. So you can hopefully now understand - when he says - My killing hand called EVIL bears a wedding band that's good it has been a long suffering shackle collaring my REBEL BLOOD.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0da59e5a3240dea3
3rd Unblock Request
0
0
0
0
0
0
0da65d6085606cee
Yes, it's accurate enough and potentially less contentious.—
0
0
0
0
0
0
0da6a405ab2953b9
" Is that the best you can say? WOW! Making a little speech in my user talk page really shows how immature you are. God, you are such a child. How old are you? 15? And those aliases are from video games in case you haven't figured that out. And you've been blocked twice before. The fact is you are anal retentive and cry like a little baby everytime things don't go your way. You're just like Daymee. Now why don't you do us both a favor and deal with your new stalker friend instead of bothering me. P By the way, what the hell does the B in your username stand for? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.127.205.121 "
0
0
0
0
0
0
0da77b45bc934744
" Regarding her anarchism & religious beliefs Well, I added the anarchist tag, because in the linear notes of 'Anthem', she states: ""As an anarchist, freak and queer..."" She then goes on to say, ""who believes in god (probably not what you are thinking) i find this totally disgusting. I believe that ""god"" is the force in the universe that inspires us to fight for change, healing, justice and freedom i don't give a shit about the ""afterlife"" i am committed to making this life the best thing it can possibly be."" What religious belief system would that be? 71.59.189.46 "
0
0
0
0
0
0
0da82611afa95c95
"Further to the above, I've just reverted further self-promotion by editor calling themselves ""Doriethurston"", added in Jan and Feb of this year: if you check their contributions, you'll see that, at the time of writing, every single one has been to the Alliteration article, for the same purpose. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
0da88073ec620c2d
" Calvin Coolidge, a Progressive? ""So you put some conservatives, e.g., Huckabee and the neoconservatives into the progressive tradition. Calvin Coolidge was also a progressive."" Could someone here please go to this user talk page and please comment that Calvin Coolidge is not a progressive. This user continues to edit progressive articles believing that progressivism is modern day conservatism, and it is causing problems. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
0da983f07dc0e926
" Yea, it would be on the talk page. The only reason I threw in a flair of sternness in the template was because of some of the questionable interpretations I just came across: ""This sonnet has suggestions of references to masturbation Then, beauteous niggard, why dost thou abuse. The suggestion is that the male in the sonnet should be procreation to preserve his beauty rather than engaging in self-pleasure."". Don't you love that? "
1
0
0
0
0
0
0daadaa11dffa075
Gays are disgusting It's just my opinion but gays are disgusting.
1
0
0
0
1
1
0daf53fc2ed26f93
"=""color:#4682b4"">Coldplay Expért]] Let's talk This talk page is for discussing the article, not World War II history in general. Summary of Consequences I believe that in an article one must state the consequences of historical events, and in a summary article, one must summarize the consequences. My edit, stating that ""as a result of the Franco-British action on Czechoslovakia, the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact was signed"" is a factual statement. This is not ""Stalin's arguments"" this is not a ""Soviet Apologist stance"" this is a direct and undeniable consequence of said event. In the Spanish Civil War the Red Army fought side by side with the Abraham Lincoln Brigade. Prior to the Franco-British assisted Nazi Sudetenland Grab, relations between Nazi Germany and Soviet Union were icy. When the Nazis were declaring war on Czechoslovakia, the USSR was hard at work putting together an anti-Nazi coalition. Only after seeing the British and French backed down in the face of naked anti-Slavic aggression, did the Soviets begin to look for other allies. There is no mass conspiracy here, as the search began right after the event. This is not a motive, it's a statement of facts. If there are no more objections, I will reinsert the statement into the article, as it is merely cause and effect. Respectfully disagree. The statement ""as a result of the Franco-British action on Czechoslovakia, the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact was signed"" pretends to describe a casual linkage, although in actuality, the linkage was not so obvious, and the scholars' opinion on that vary dramatically. One school thinks that the only and sincere Soviet Union's desire was to establish a collective security system and an anti-Hitler's coalition. Another school believes that the only Stalin's aim was the alliance with Hitler. The third version (the most reasonable, in my opinion) is that the USSR was almost equally suspicious and hostile towards most European powers (that was, at least partially, justified), and considered all possibilities to avoid a direct war against Germany with other major powers playing a role of neutral observers (and, to expand its territory). The statement you tried to introduce into the article is a POV of the leftist part of the first group scholars. We cannot present it here as a sole interpretation of the events. We have either to tell a full story (that is impossible because of space limitations) or to abstain from any interpretations.Interestingly, your statement may be even simply incorrect, because, according to my sources, Hitler's occupation of Czechoslovakia lead to rapprochement between the USSR, UK and France, and could lead to signing of Anti-Hitler triple alliance. In only a month after occupation of Czechoslovakia these three powers started consultations that lead to full scale political and military talks. Had Chamberlain and Stalin have a little bit less prejudice against each other, and had Ribbentrop been little bit less active, WWII could be prevented.Re: ""This is not a motive, it's a statement of facts."" No. All these facts had already been in the article before your edits. Your wording looks like a description of motives, not statement of facts.If you still disagree, try to propose another wording that takes into account all what I wrote. In addition, a consensus exists among those who edit this article that all significant changes are being discussed on the talk page before they are introduced into the article. Try to follow this unwritten rule. That saves a lot of time and efforts. As there are multiple different interpretations of most key events of World War II and Wikipedia's guidelines require that all non-fringe views be given equal weight, it isn't feasible for this high-level article to discuss casual links between events. What Nick said, also the USSR wanting to be neutral argument falls apart, because historical evidence clearly shows that had France honored its alliance with Czechoslovakia, USSR would have intervened as well. USSR secured a passage from Romania in order to assist Czechoslovakia. USSR placed all of its divisions west of the Urals on High Alert. After the seizure of Czechoslovakia, the USSR held the UK partially responsible, and frankly did not trust them, or the French, as allies. If France failed to uphold their defensive treaty with Czechoslovakia, why would a defensive treaty with USSR
0
0
0
0
0
0
0db0775ecdfa6d2b
" June & July 2007 Signpost updated for June 4th, 2007. Weekly Delivery Volume 3, Issue 23 4 June 2007 About the Signpost From the editor Sockpuppeting administrator desysopped, banned Admin restored after desysopping; dispute centers on suitability of certain biographies Controversial RFA suspended, results pending Dutch government provides freely licensed photos WikiWorld comic: ""John Hodgman"" News and notes: Another Wikipedian dies, brand survey, milestones Features and admins Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News The Report on Lengthy Litigation Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut WP:POST You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Re: SommerWiki Hey Katalaveno... (I know I shouldn't be talking about this here... but I couldn't wait to tell you the news)... I got back home about 20 minutes ago... and in the first 15... I netinstalled Fedora Core 7 (but let's not forget that my computer's $3000 P) and in the last 5... I installed XAMPP and MediaWiki in 5 MINUTES!!!!. I'm not sure if I'm dreaming or if this is really true... but I thought that you might want to know. (talk••contribs) (P.S. I know I shouldn't be talking about this here, and you have my word that it'll never happen again D ) (P.S.S. And it's working now, too! Now, I'll have time to make a logo!!!!) Hey that's great! And, you're right... this isn't really the place to talk about it. But it's okay... You are at least discussing Mediawiki. BTW - Does this mean that you are donating your Alienware computer now? ;-) TC Actually... I'm quite pissed (excuse my language) at Alienware... their parent company... Dell (go figure) is being sued for their shifty practises (can I get in on that lawsuit?????) And... i've had to make 23 SUPPORT CALLS becuase of their poor design and manufacturing. So,
0
0
0
0
0
0
0db385b7855e3c30
" Literary Content The section entitled ""2005: The Final Chapter of the Informix Story"" reads more like a newspaper article than an encyclopedia entry. The section gives some opinionated statements in a sensationalist fashion, and a lot of ""shoulds"" where a factual article should contain sentences worded in a more definition, factual manner."
0
0
0
0
0
0
0db414bff4e1fccc
Good luck with that.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0db5fe99fb6dad5d
" A problem with ""English Patriot Man"" and his sockpuppets Hi. Lately I've seen you blocking some sockpuppets of a user named: ""English Patriot Man"". I see that this man is nearly obsessed with Polish people. He seems to spread his anti-Polish propaganda by distorting the historical truth concerning World War II, nazism in Europe and racism against Poles. He is totally denying the sufferings of the Polish nation. Thank you so much for taking care of him, and taking care of the articles that are his main targets. However, now he might create another sock and log in from some other computer or place, so that his personal data and IP address would be totally different. This is why I suggest us to patrol the articles that are his main targets like: Racism in Poland Racial policy of Nazi Germany War crimes in occupied Poland during World War II Nazi crimes against the Polish nation Invasion of Poland Collaboration with the Axis Powers during World War II Nazism and race Untermensch Master race White supremacy Racial hygiene Nuremberg Laws Aryan race Aryanization Aryan paragraph Honorary Aryan White nationalism Holocaust victims Racial_segregation Nazi Germany Persecution of black people in Nazi Germany Occupation of Poland (1939–45) Polish decrees Kidnapping of children by Nazi Germany Forced labour under German rule during World War II Extermination through labor Anti-Polish sentiment Anti-Slavic sentiment Polish question Polish joke Ahnenpass Anschluss Lebensraum Rassenschande Adolf Hitler Nazism Racism Scientific racism Themes in Nazi propaganda Germanisation Reverse racism Relations between Nazi Germany and the Arab world Glossary of Nazi Germany This guy is using multiple sockpuppet accounts to delete all the information about Poles being percieved as ""subhumans"" or ""non-Aryans"" by the nazis. In fact the only ""Aryan-looking"" Poles that were accepted by Nazi Germany at the time, were kidnapped as children and underwent ""Germanisation"", they were like 0.05% of the whole nation. The rest of the Poles were ""insufficient"" to be a part of the nazi-ruled nation, and were treated only slightly better that the Jews. This guy, he spreads lies all across Wikipedia, therefore I thank you for your quick and effective actions Diannaa. If you'd need any kind of help in restoring the data which ""English Patriot Man"" destroyed, just tell me. I will also try to patrol the articles about Poles. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
0db7443d19de30f2
Sir: My meager edits were factual, direct authors' quotes and in context. Doc's edits were and remain out of context and reflect that he never read the articles he is mentioning, which puts the procedure in a negative light. I am sorry to ask but have you read the information to see the actual facts? Vandalism by the Wiki definition speaks to the repetitive introduction of inaccurate information for no constructive purpose. Please review my posts and show me what was inaccurate or out of context. I am not afraid to admit when I am wrong. I have had a number of physicians and lay people review the history and they were also amazed and dismayed, as I was. You need to stop making this personal and focus on the published facts, otherwise Wiki as a resource is doomed. Finally, I am the just the last in a long line of contributors, both individuals and corporations, that have questioned his motives and accuracy. Questions make many feel uncomfortable. I have also privately shared my exact written comments to Doc with some colleagues both in the US, the EU and Canada, and I was told by everyone that I was spot on. Sorry again for all the trouble.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0db78fc942e358bb
" Congratulations! Congratulations, Jeraphine Gryphon, you have won the asshole of the year award! You have won this award by saying mean things about and to other people! In order to claim your award, you must call 1-800-Asshole(1-800-277-4653)! Once again, congratulations for your win! 142.163.76.125 You won this for being rude to other contributers by the way. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.163.76.125 "
1
0
1
0
0
0
0db7bdd048da59ff
" Good policy suggestion on class assignments. My sympathies about your encountering a class assignment that has gone badly awry. I think your looks like a good idea, and I support it. It's especially regrettable that we are not receiving more well sourced, thoughtful edits to psychology articles here, as most of those articles badly need better sourcing and more coherent editing to represent current established knowledge from a neutral point of view. Keep up the good work. (talk, ) An appology is in order Dear Colin, I am not sure if you will have the chance to read this, or if you'll have a moment to respond, but I am a student in the University of Toronto and specifically one of the 1700 psychology students mentioned in the article. However before I go any further, may I express my most sincere and deepest appologies to you and everyone involved. I will not try to make excuses for my actions, nor will I try to do so for my fellow students as I do not speek for them. I realise (and no doubt others will too) that what we left behind was unbecoming of a sutdent at U of T. And most importantly, I realise that we did as future scholars was wrong. I know that you and you colleagues are considering taking extreme measures to ensure the content of Wikipedia stays secure as a responce to our actions. Though I can understand where you are coming from, I do not believe that this will solve any of your problems and will only make things worse in the long-run. I see this situation as a systemic error on both of our sides, but as a first year student I have very little educational and social clout to enforce my statement. I am asking as both an avid reader of Wikipedia and as a lover of knowledge, please do not black-out our privaleges to use and edit articles. Let us both use this experience as a steping stone to learn how to go about doing this in a constructive manner benefits Wikipedia and my school. Looking to make this a better place, CivCodex Thanks. We have no issues with people who are interested in Wikipedia coming to edit Wikipedia. What seems to be the issue is when we have a large group of students editing Wikipedia not for the love of knowledge but simply for marks. These students do not stay around and seem to plagiarize at a high rate. (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) Have replied on your talk page. °Talk Proposed new policy I'd like to advertise this (very draft) proposed new policy: . Comments please. °Talk I think the central dillema is this: a student could make a poor-quality contribution that harms Wikipedia but then recieve partial or full credit. If the grading rubric was accurate, a student would receive 0 or negative credit. My personal solution has been to engage with professors to try and influence the assignment, increase their Wikipedia knowedge, and improve the grading rubrics themselves. I'm fairly proud of Education Program:Saint Louis University/Signal Transduction (SP13), which I helped write. You might want to ask There should also be some sort of policy re: how the community reacts to profs and students. The active community is more likely to be aware of and act on policies, in the first place; and we are often more unkind than necessary, in the second. I proposed an alternative idea on the assignments talk page - as an example of the sort of implementation that I would hope is compatible with any policy we adopt. –  + Barnstars {| style=""border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;"" |rowspan=""2"" valign=""middle"" | |rowspan=""2"" | |style=""font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;"" | '''The Barnstar
0
0
0
0
0
0
0db7ee5e302c2ade
You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. If you wish to make useful contributions, you are welcome to come back after the block expires. t • @
0
0
0
0
0
0
0db8793ff38f7f6b
" The harassment, insults, and accusations continue: see the history of this talk page, and this link: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrator_intervention_against_vandalism where he is still calling me a ""vandal"" and a ""sock"". 193.109.199.35 "
0
0
0
0
0
0
0db8c9182f941c84
" I guess both memorials must have gone by that name. By the way, I read that there are soviet soldier graves in the background of the memorial, i.e. not under the statue, but either in the monument behind, or in th park behind that. (My German is a bit rusty, so I'm not quite sure what was meant by background"", any idea how many they are? Talk "
0
0
0
0
0
0
0db8fe7abf15e543
"Even the image itself contains a copyright notice that is clearly not CC. This is pushing ""fair use"" a bit far. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
0db96335988ad607
" The word ""troll"" and the word ""vandalise"" are verbs. NPA says to comment on ""actions"". Verbs are ""actions"". There is no way to confuse the issue here. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
0dbb71a3393e0869
You're a nice guy Irishpunktom. It takes guts to speak against bullies.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0dbbc3108249c48d
"Would you mind explaining to me why my making a few observations about Gwen Gale (in this thread) is different from you making a few observations about this other person who you described as having ""habitual, unrepentant, and seemingly reflexive incivility"". If anything, your comments seem more severe than mine. 90.213.182.228 "
0
0
0
0
0
0
0dbbf3f57eab41b4
Semi-protected edit request on 30 January 2014 On January 30th 2014 Amanda Knox and Sollecito were convicted for a second time for the murder of Meredith Kercher. 131.109.225.35
0
0
0
0
0
0
0dbd4b76333ae9df
Consensus isn't truth. People can vote that ghosts exist, it doesn't make it true.158.36.232.201
0
0
0
0
0
0
0dbdfec08bea83f5
I looked at the vandalism page, and I have not vandalized the Big O and Dukes page. Vandalism is any addition, removal, or change of content made in a deliberate attempt to compromise the integrity of Wikipedia. The most common types of vandalism include the addition of obscenities or crude humor, page blanking, or the insertion of nonsense into articles. Any good-faith effort to improve the encyclopedia, even if misguided or ill-considered, is not vandalism. Even harmful edits that are not explicitly made in bad faith are not considered vandalism. For example, adding a personal opinion to an article once is not vandalism — it's just not helpful, and should be removed or restated. Not all vandalism is obvious, nor are all massive or controversial changes vandalism. Careful attention needs to be given to whether changes made are beneficial, detrimental but well intended, or outright vandalism. Committing blatant vandalism violates Wikipedia policy. If you find that another user has vandalized Wikipedia, you should revert the changes and warn the user (see below for specific instructions). Users who vandalize Wikipedia repeatedly, despite warnings to stop, should be reported to Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism, and administrators may block them.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0dbe52e8f6bf22ef
"As for the change in ""Romanian"" to ""Reich"", yes it is difficult to work out what Caldwell is referring to. It seems this particular mission was a diversion to the synthetic oil plants in W.Germany (not Polesti). RAF Bomber Command used an attack by the 8AF to attack this target. The days loses were as already given. Specifically Spitfire claims were not discussed, so the Spitfire's percentage of the kill total is unknown, which is conveyed in the article. More importantly, citations have been given for for the Order of Battle figures. Your lack of understanding of how any historian presents his work work is palpable. OOB are given in lists, as you should know, so your ""give me a quote"" tone is rather silly. Caldwell makes it quit clear that these lists are incomplete with regard to strength returns given. He gives known strength returns. As for Total German day fighter strength, again this estimated by Caldwell (as strength returns for all 6 years are obviously incomplete). He points out, and totally refutes your claim that the bulk of these machines were deployed against the oilfields in September 1944. 1,000 in the defence of central Europe were available for operations at this time, while 1,800 alone were available for combat in the west. German fighter units in Romania in September 1944 were mixed in with Eastern front units by June 1944, making it impossible to tell just how many fighters were operating in the ""oil"" capacity at this time. Even considering that all E.F fighters were at some point deployed in Romania they only reach a combined total of 2,250 compared to a total of 1,800 plus 1,000 for the other two fronts (negating even the Med. Theatre). So your generalisation of a ""quote"", if this indeed is what it is, makes the Bulk of the German fighter force concentrated in Romania false. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
0dbee16b81f652ce
Hamas You Just restored a contested edit to the Hamas article. This is the third time you've tried to put this in the article in 3 days, despite knowing you do not have consensus for the edit. Kindly self-revert or I will report you for edit warring. Please read WP:EW and WP:BRD before replying.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0dbf477496af3167
@AnnieHall, what separates this from capitalism is state terrorism conducted against its own citizens and others under its jurisdiction, whether legitimate or not, as a matter of policy. And for capitalism we have the Holocaust et al. for Nazi Germany, etc., so you cannot say that Communism is being POV singled out. To NOT have this article would be POV. ►TALK
0
0
0
0
0
0
0dbf6cd7622fb8e4
! ROBBIE MONCINO LIKES THESE KIND OF PEOPLE ESPICALLY LITTLE BOYS !
0
0
0
0
0
0
0dc1a9a8417aeae9
Bricked has an entry in wikipedia (as you can see), its a common term.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0dc1c50f2c287539
Um... that wasn't me, Jonathan, i was at church at that time, and that ain't my IP address... why accuse me?
0
0
0
0
0
0
0dc543e83c13f4da
" I don't think Adam killed her but he is involved in something with Patty. My goal is to make pages from 2000, 2001 and over. But under 2000, i want to make it into decades as there aren't enough characters or information. Thankyou excited to see the page. Yes i'm busy to finding sources etc. ) These pages aren't easy there is a lot of cleaning up, re-writing etc. Alot lol ) Also i have a funny feeling Ronan might be killed. I don't know..its just that he is leaving and in the preview for the next episode he seemed in danger. - TALK? "
0
0
0
0
0
0
0dc550ca9b10feea
The Sims 3 expansion and stuff packs listing together? Since the Good Article review suggested that The Sims 3 expansion packs and stuff packs be on its own listing, my question is this, if we decide to split The Sims 3 games, i.e. core game with expansion and stuff packs, onto one listing, should we remove The Sims 3: Stuff Packs article and merge it into a new article with core / expansion pack / stuff pack article listing? I think the core / expansion pack / stuff pack article is wise, and thus, eliminating the stuff pack article (in my honest opinion) because we don't need two lists of stuff packs. So, this is a public vote! (and note the good article review is in the Archive 3 article page; see archive list above for link). Sundogs talk page sandbox
0
0
0
0
0
0
0dc615baec91af01
" I just know neither of them met the guidelines they needed to meet. TALK! "
0
0
0
0
0
0
0dca3c7cf3c1b24c
OH GREAT LEAVE ME ALONE I CANT FREAKING CONTRIBUTE BECAUSE I AM FREAKING BLOCKED OK?! AND WHERE DO YOU GET PERMISSION TO TALK ON MY PAGE??!!!!
1
0
0
0
0
0
0dca89bcb5662c77
All fucking talk huh?
1
0
1
0
0
0
0dcade4c68e98528
WP:FTC for DMC series Hey. I was scanning the FA VG article external links checker here, and noticed that the 3 FA articles in the FTC, DMC series have dead external links. Game #1 and #2 have 3 dead external links each, while #3 has 2. Oddly, though, the two GA articles have no dead links. () Anyway, they should be fixed.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0dcbe9d6d3605d49
"I'm not sure that this section represents fact over speculation properly. Both of the section ""Discourages turnout and participation"" and ""Neutralizes turnout disparities between states"" offer a speculative opinion without factual backup yet their unabridged existence in this article assumes both sections to consist of factual statements. These should probably be quoted, sourced, or begin similar to ""Supports of the electoral college may argue"" or ""Supports of electoral college reform may argue"". "
0
0
0
0
0
0
0dcd7cd52ca3ed62
Dispute notice Hi, Cirt. I've started a discussion on the dispute resolution noticeboard about this monring's activity. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution_noticeboard
0
0
0
0
0
0
0dcdeb32fb0ce60c
" I think noone is saying with ""failed state"", that there are no parts of the state where organization has resulted in quite a livable situation. But that seems to be not due to, but sometimes (in the case of Somaliland) despite the fact that there is no permanent central government who has an ligitimate monopoly on power. The fact that there are promising things happening in Somalia outside the central government is a good thing, but that only stresses that the state as such at this moment can be characterized a failed state. If definitions for Somalia have been used differently, please provide a source... Environment Just read through the environment section. Apart from the nuclear waste issue down, the problems seem to be not mentioned explicitly (only the solutions -planting tree campaigns etc- and their actors -the first env org., prize winning people etc). Could someone knowledgeble on the subject make an introduction to that paragraph in which the main problems are discussed (and maybe also reduce the env. activism part)? "
0
0
0
0
0
0
0dceee157cf3b671
" Narciso Yepes Please refrain from making edits to subjects you clearly know very little about. Yepes collaborated with Ramirez, not Bernabe, to invent his guitar. Bernabe (an apprentice of Ramirez) later formed his own shop and Yepes subsequently played a Bernabe 10-string. As for your comment about Yepes's hands, this is simply ignorant as to the true reasons why Yepes invented his guitar as well as the technique of playing it (which was NOT to use open basses to simplify technique as some nitwits think - including 10-string guitarists and clueless former students of Yepes). I have the autograph manuscripts to prove that more often than not he used fretted basses rather than open ones even when the open ones were available, depending on what best served the music. Do you have these proofs??? NO. So please stick to what you actually know. (FYI Yepes had extended techniques that enabled him to fret the first string's D together with the low G on the 6th string by using the left hand thumb. Again, we have the proof of this. It was even published in one of his old Scarlatti editions.) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.94.133.166 Your discussion at Narciso Yepes First, you added information that was NOT CORRECT, except for the reason you gave for Yepes's death. And it is not constructive to to add biased, unneutral opinions like Yepes was the most ""notorious""... Second, it is a well-established fact that RAMIREZ and Yepes invented his ten-string guitar. As I said, Bernabe was an apprentice at the Ramirez shop then, but the first Yepes-type ten-string guitar was a RAMIREZ guitar. Moreover, Ramirez had the idea to construct a guitarra d'amor with multiple string resonators INSIDE the body of the guitar. This was rejected by both Segovia and Yepes as impractical. It was Yepes who solved the theoretical and technical problems by adding only 4 strings tuned a very specific way (C, A#, G#, F#) alongside the normal 6 strings. You want a verifiable source? Here: Ramirez III, Jose. 1994. ""The Ten-String Guitar"" in Things About the Guitar. Bold Strummer. pp. 137-141. [ISBN-10: 8487969402] Third, I clearly said Yepes fretted bass notes even when the same bass notes were available as open strings! F# or G# are very often played fretted rather than open! I have this in his own handwriting and own fingering yet you will presume to know better and call this fact ""worthless"" because it disproves your ignorant (unconstructive) remark about Yepes' ""short hands"" being a reason for playing a 10-string guitar. Furthermore, Yepes frequently uses the 7th fretted (because it is the lowest string), but not ""frequently"" the 8th (as you mistakenly claim), which is a minor 7th higher than the 7th string. Moreover, these strings can be used to voice chords as originally written in the urtexts by non-guitarist composers like Ponce or Rodrigo that are impossible on the 6-string (except in the edited versions). Being able to use open strings as ""crutches"" for a lack of technique was certainly NOT part of Yepes's entirely musical reasons for inventing his guitar - though (I will add) many ten-string guitarists today (who are second-rate guitariats in general) have adopted the instrument to make up for weak techniques. This has NOTHING to do with Yepes's own performance practice on his instrument. As someone who has studied for over a decade with one of Yepes's leading (long-term) students, as someone who has thoroughly researched all aspects of the 10-string guitar, as someone who has access to many many unpublished manuscripts and annotations, I can safely say that I know what I am talking about. Yepes even frets A2 and G2# on the 10th string rather than play them on the open A2 and G2# strings (5 and 9) in an example I have in his own handwriting, and the reasons for doing so are in the context entirely MUSICAL and not about any technical limitations, which exist only in your imagination! , you know nothing."
0
0
0
0
0
0
0dcf5c0c70563468
REDIRECT Talk:The Dark Eyes of London (film)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0dd0c7d6dee1f1a0
File:MerseysideKnowlsey.png listed for deletion A file that you uploaded or altered, File:MerseysideKnowlsey.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0dd1799763252b81
You should investigate the actions of Malik Shabazz. You know the reputation that Wikipedia and specific biased admins have concerning Israel and the Jews. There's no need to be intimidated by them.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0dd236585d420a17
The Liber Pontificalis is not Sacred Scripture, and not I but the source quoted said that the decree attributed to Saint Peter's first successor is probably apocryphal. Is anything else attributed to Pope Linus? Or was this the most important thing he did as Pope? By all means mention that the Liber Pontificalis is said to contain that information. It was by oversight that I omitted the mention of the Liber Pontificalis, though the fact that I have no way of checking that the Liber Pontificalis contains that statement probably hd some subconscious part in my forgetfulness. The question of women wearing pants came to mind because of the probability that the decree attributed to Pope Linus is aprocryphal. The letter of Pope Nicholas I is certainly genuine. I should indeed have stated explicitly that traditionalist women are, I think, less likely to go to Mass wearing pants than without a veil, and so the question of pants deserves to be listed among traditionalist practices as much as the question of the veil. If the pants question disappears from the footnote, I will certainly consider putting it in the body of the article. By all means add the point that I regrettably forgot to mention: that traditionalists do not like women in pants at Mass.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0dd46225547770c4
Waste dumping New user has twice removed material from the Waste dumping section. To prevent this new editor getting blocked, I've semi-protected the article for six hours in order to force discussion here. Autobeat, I suggest that you raise any objections to material in the waste dumping section here for discussion.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0dd47ea93d47e518
Re-adding anti-barnstar Anti-Barnstar
0
0
0
0
0
0
0dd5a89e4cb2ad48
Whoops, missed the fact that I needed to log in to agree with being renamed. Since I'm the one that requested it, I DO agree with being renamed. - user talk:Fischesw 15:22, 1 August 2010
0
0
0
0
0
0
0dd77b41f5da54d3
Anne & George I were 2nd cousins, not 1st cousins once removed. Since Anne and George I share the same great grandfather in James I they are second cousins not first cousins once removed. George I’s mother Sophia and Anne’s father James II were first cousins since they share the same grandfather in James I. That would make Sophia and Anne first cousins once removed. I have changed the article accordingly.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0dd847c9cdbdce7c
" Caution Please take care. Regardless of right or wrong, you will only get yourself blocked if you get involved in another edit war. It's not worth it. (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits "
0
0
0
0
0
0
0dd84a151c244d2a
" Dear Wikinews, Wikipedia since “conflict of interest” “neutral” is an important subject since “conflict of interest” is being herald by wikinews / wikipedia staff and volunteers, including being used by wikipedia/wikinews administrators and editors with which to have an article /story be deleted, and is grounds for action against a contributor, then please immediately provide documentation that editors, administrators and people providing articles and information to wikipedia and wikinews have no conflict of interest to the articles and stories they create, edit, supervise and/or contribute. For example, did any editor have sexual relationship with a porn star or purchase movies or magazines of a porn star whose bio is listed on wikipedia? This is a conflict of interest. Another example, does any administrator, editor or volunteer of Wikinews and Wikipedia including “BlackPearl14"", “SVTCobra”, “Chris Mann” and “Whoville” own Disney stock, have gone to any Disney theme park, watch Disney movies and/or buy Disney products? Then “BlackPearl14"", “SVTCobra” and “Whoville” and all of these editors and administrators are in conflict of interest. Does the people involved with the wikinews articles about fossilized fish found in Canada, or with scientific discoveries or with lawsuits, have any connection to these products, places or businesses? Then this is a conflict of interest. What kind of verification did Wikinews and Wikipedia use to determine that volunteers including “BlackPearl14"", “SVTCobra” and “Whoville” don’t sell Disney products and have no business with the Walt Disney Company and their affiliates? As documented volunteers including “BlackPearl14"", “SVTCobra” and “Whoville” together claim “conflict of interest” and delete any contribution in regards to Pirates of the Caribbean for either wikinews or wikipedia, and control it by upholding double standards. Thus first we must verify wikinews / wikipedia enforcement of their policy of “conflict of interest” and “neutral”. Wikipedia and Wikinews editors don't follow Wikinews' own written polices... “Do you know of an issue that has been forgotten?”. Then you generate and justify reason after reason to state that the above article is not newsworthy, and that wiki does not write old news. You even say one thing, and then later change that to be different claims to justify deletion. You keep throwing different claims at an article you have targeted because someone had shown the charges to be untrue. Wikinews and Wikipedia continues to uphold double standards, and then make statements with which to justify it. Incredible, you ignore any details provided to your counter your claims, and then accuse the person of not acknowledging your control and your new set of claims. Are you aware that Wikinews editors and wikipedia are in conflict of interest as well? They proven that they have a network of supporting friends, using double standards, without following Wikinews and wikipedia's own written polices, and such. Wikinews and wikipedia allows editors “fans” to be bias, controlling whatever they choose to write even placing things like porn stars penis size, (copies of that have been documented as well) and to write articles that are one sided, promotional and links to various sites that further promote their cause, yet the editors delete anything that is added that they don’t approve from other people, and then justify reason after reason, such as claiming other people as being a conflict of interest, not being neutral and such if they write or contribute. It's against wikinews and wikipedia policies to simple delete ""when in doubt don't delete"" and not to show respect when communicating. Yet you simply deleted the entire talk and all related pages and justify various statements calling it whatever you want to get your friends to sign off on your control. If you don’t abide by wikinews and wikipedia’s own written policies, then remove all of the polices and stop tell the public to follow standards which are double standards and more.. Does the owner of the company know you are doing stuff like this?"
0
0
0
0
0
0
0dd87f8936ced157
Is John Delaney a fanatic Roman Catholic? Some people associated with John Delaney are expressing extreme pro-vatican views and attacking non-catholic christian churches online. Xenophobic and Racist manipulation of historical articles are being made. John Delaney is a white supremacist, xenophobic, and a fanatic roman catholic. 122.172.118.114
1
0
0
0
0
0
0dd89223c129d0d4
Who are you showing it to?
0
0
0
0
0
0
0dda047c7de0a9e3
Sure Can Say That Again This is really smart. There's an entry saying someone blanked a page. How clever. But I am using this IP and I certainly didn't blank any page. Wiki's omniscient henchmen suggest registering an account. It's no longer a wiki then is it? Registering an account is not a good idea anyway. Far better is to stop blocking IPs like this. Most people are on non-static IPs anyway so the idea is 'last millennium'. What you really need is to filter out the junk that gets people pissed off in the first place. If Wikipedia had any quality at all - and not just a bunch of do-nothings who patrol and feel tough about it - and there wouldn't be any vandalism at all. People would be proud and respectful of the place. But that's not going to happen and we all know it. The middle echelon at Wikipedia have long ago taken it to the dogs. How's the new money raising campaign going?
0
0
0
0
0
0