sentence1
stringclasses
538 values
sentence2
stringlengths
12
241
labels
stringclasses
2 values
metadata
stringlengths
187
265
Religion does more harm than good
Religious Doctrine Preaches Altruism
UNDERMINE
{"claim_id": 170, "id": "170:7034", "native_cluster": [7034], "perspective_id": 7034, "split_group_id": "e29ff78249ec3974def9e3ba5014996d92d7cd2491c34b03f3a3ea954eb936ba", "votes": [0, 0, 0, 0, 3]}
Religion does more harm than good
Religion's Net Impact On The World Is A Positive One
UNDERMINE
{"claim_id": 170, "id": "170:7035", "native_cluster": [7035, 26717], "perspective_id": 7035, "split_group_id": "e29ff78249ec3974def9e3ba5014996d92d7cd2491c34b03f3a3ea954eb936ba", "votes": [0, 0, 0, 0, 3]}
Religion does more harm than good
Religion Does NOT Cause War.
UNDERMINE
{"claim_id": 170, "id": "170:7032", "native_cluster": [7032, 7033, 26714, 26715], "perspective_id": 7032, "split_group_id": "e29ff78249ec3974def9e3ba5014996d92d7cd2491c34b03f3a3ea954eb936ba", "votes": [0, 0, 0, 2, 1]}
G20 protests – at best a waste of time, at worst a dangerous disruption
Anti-Capitalist Values Not Conducive to Healthy Society
UNDERMINE
{"claim_id": 719, "id": "719:5966", "native_cluster": [5966], "perspective_id": 5966, "split_group_id": "a1975fdbf1bf0ba2cd9773de66d12c7986ea3c6c4ee7db28588967e49816286a", "votes": [0, 0, 1, 2, 0]}
The United States should ban assault weapons
Assault weapons are not used in most crimes
UNDERMINE
{"claim_id": 370, "id": "370:2756", "native_cluster": [2756], "perspective_id": 2756, "split_group_id": "b4a29c7d70ca00ae95b6e62ffc53f08aa49451796c4809246f1e1294f39be72e", "votes": [0, 0, 0, 3, 0]}
The United States should ban assault weapons
A ban on assault weapons would not work, it will simply encourage a black market
UNDERMINE
{"claim_id": 370, "id": "370:2757", "native_cluster": [2757], "perspective_id": 2757, "split_group_id": "b4a29c7d70ca00ae95b6e62ffc53f08aa49451796c4809246f1e1294f39be72e", "votes": [0, 0, 0, 3, 0]}
The United States should ban assault weapons
The Second Amendment of the US Constitution protects individual gun ownership.
UNDERMINE
{"claim_id": 370, "id": "370:4849", "native_cluster": [4849, 2754, 25286, 25287], "perspective_id": 4849, "split_group_id": "b4a29c7d70ca00ae95b6e62ffc53f08aa49451796c4809246f1e1294f39be72e", "votes": [0, 0, 0, 3, 0]}
The United States should ban assault weapons
An assault weapons ban would stop the manufacture of many of the deadliest guns.
SUPPORT
{"claim_id": 370, "id": "370:2753", "native_cluster": [2753], "perspective_id": 2753, "split_group_id": "b4a29c7d70ca00ae95b6e62ffc53f08aa49451796c4809246f1e1294f39be72e", "votes": [3, 0, 0, 0, 0]}
The United States should ban assault weapons
Assault weapons are not necessary for self defence or hunting.
SUPPORT
{"claim_id": 370, "id": "370:2751", "native_cluster": [2751, 23356, 23357], "perspective_id": 2751, "split_group_id": "b4a29c7d70ca00ae95b6e62ffc53f08aa49451796c4809246f1e1294f39be72e", "votes": [3, 0, 0, 0, 0]}
The United States should ban assault weapons
It is incoherent to ban some guns
UNDERMINE
{"claim_id": 370, "id": "370:2755", "native_cluster": [2755], "perspective_id": 2755, "split_group_id": "b4a29c7d70ca00ae95b6e62ffc53f08aa49451796c4809246f1e1294f39be72e", "votes": [0, 0, 0, 3, 0]}
The United States should ban assault weapons
A ban would save lives
SUPPORT
{"claim_id": 370, "id": "370:2750", "native_cluster": [2750, 23354, 23355], "perspective_id": 2750, "split_group_id": "b4a29c7d70ca00ae95b6e62ffc53f08aa49451796c4809246f1e1294f39be72e", "votes": [3, 0, 0, 0, 0]}
The United States should ban assault weapons
Gun control laws such as background checks and micro-stamping are an invasion of privacy.
UNDERMINE
{"claim_id": 370, "id": "370:4855", "native_cluster": [4855, 25296, 25297], "perspective_id": 4855, "split_group_id": "b4a29c7d70ca00ae95b6e62ffc53f08aa49451796c4809246f1e1294f39be72e", "votes": [0, 0, 0, 3, 0]}
The United States should ban assault weapons
Strict gun control laws do not work in Mexico, and will not work in the United States.
UNDERMINE
{"claim_id": 370, "id": "370:4860", "native_cluster": [4860], "perspective_id": 4860, "split_group_id": "b4a29c7d70ca00ae95b6e62ffc53f08aa49451796c4809246f1e1294f39be72e", "votes": [0, 0, 0, 3, 0]}
The United States should ban assault weapons
A majority of adults, including gun owners, support common sense gun control such as background checks, bans on assault weapons, and bans on high-capacity magazines.
SUPPORT
{"claim_id": 370, "id": "370:4841", "native_cluster": [4841, 25274, 25275], "perspective_id": 4841, "split_group_id": "b4a29c7d70ca00ae95b6e62ffc53f08aa49451796c4809246f1e1294f39be72e", "votes": [3, 0, 0, 0, 0]}
The United States should ban assault weapons
The Second Amendment is not an unlimited right to own guns.
SUPPORT
{"claim_id": 370, "id": "370:4834", "native_cluster": [4834, 25264, 25265], "perspective_id": 4834, "split_group_id": "b4a29c7d70ca00ae95b6e62ffc53f08aa49451796c4809246f1e1294f39be72e", "votes": [3, 0, 0, 0, 0]}
The United States should ban assault weapons
Civilians, including hunters, should not own military-grade firearms or firearm accessories.
SUPPORT
{"claim_id": 370, "id": "370:4848", "native_cluster": [4848, 25284, 25285], "perspective_id": 4848, "split_group_id": "b4a29c7d70ca00ae95b6e62ffc53f08aa49451796c4809246f1e1294f39be72e", "votes": [3, 0, 0, 0, 0]}
The United States should ban assault weapons
More gun control is not needed; education about guns and gun safety is needed to prevent accidental gun deaths.
UNDERMINE
{"claim_id": 370, "id": "370:4858", "native_cluster": [4858], "perspective_id": 4858, "split_group_id": "b4a29c7d70ca00ae95b6e62ffc53f08aa49451796c4809246f1e1294f39be72e", "votes": [0, 0, 0, 3, 0]}
The United States should ban assault weapons
More gun control is unnecessary because relatively few people are killed by guns.
UNDERMINE
{"claim_id": 370, "id": "370:4856", "native_cluster": [4856, 25299], "perspective_id": 4856, "split_group_id": "b4a29c7d70ca00ae95b6e62ffc53f08aa49451796c4809246f1e1294f39be72e", "votes": [0, 0, 0, 3, 0]}
The United States should ban assault weapons
High-capacity magazines should be banned because they too often turn murder into mass murder.
SUPPORT
{"claim_id": 370, "id": "370:4836", "native_cluster": [4836, 25268, 25269], "perspective_id": 4836, "split_group_id": "b4a29c7d70ca00ae95b6e62ffc53f08aa49451796c4809246f1e1294f39be72e", "votes": [3, 0, 0, 0, 0]}
The United States should ban assault weapons
Gun control laws and lower gun ownership rates do not prevent suicides.
UNDERMINE
{"claim_id": 370, "id": "370:4857", "native_cluster": [4857], "perspective_id": 4857, "split_group_id": "b4a29c7d70ca00ae95b6e62ffc53f08aa49451796c4809246f1e1294f39be72e", "votes": [0, 0, 0, 3, 0]}
The United States should ban assault weapons
If criminals want to obtain guns, they will no matter the laws.
UNDERMINE
{"claim_id": 370, "id": "370:25292", "native_cluster": [25292, 25293, 4853, 4859, 4863], "perspective_id": 25292, "split_group_id": "b4a29c7d70ca00ae95b6e62ffc53f08aa49451796c4809246f1e1294f39be72e", "votes": [0, 0, 0, 3, 0]}
The United States should ban assault weapons
More gun control laws would reduce gun deaths.
SUPPORT
{"claim_id": 370, "id": "370:4835", "native_cluster": [4835, 25267, 25278, 4843], "perspective_id": 4835, "split_group_id": "b4a29c7d70ca00ae95b6e62ffc53f08aa49451796c4809246f1e1294f39be72e", "votes": [3, 0, 0, 0, 0]}
The United States should ban assault weapons
The homicide rates and suicide rates are less in countries that have strict gun control, versus the US.
SUPPORT
{"claim_id": 370, "id": "370:25282", "native_cluster": [25282, 25283, 4842, 4846, 25276, 25277], "perspective_id": 25282, "split_group_id": "b4a29c7d70ca00ae95b6e62ffc53f08aa49451796c4809246f1e1294f39be72e", "votes": [3, 0, 0, 0, 0]}
The United States should ban assault weapons
More gun control laws are needed to protect women from domestic abusers and stalkers.
SUPPORT
{"claim_id": 370, "id": "370:4837", "native_cluster": [4837, 25270, 25271], "perspective_id": 4837, "split_group_id": "b4a29c7d70ca00ae95b6e62ffc53f08aa49451796c4809246f1e1294f39be72e", "votes": [3, 0, 0, 0, 0]}
The United States should ban assault weapons
Armed civilians are unlikely to stop crimes and are more likely to make dangerous situations, including mass shootings, more deadly.
SUPPORT
{"claim_id": 370, "id": "370:4845", "native_cluster": [4845, 25280, 25281], "perspective_id": 4845, "split_group_id": "b4a29c7d70ca00ae95b6e62ffc53f08aa49451796c4809246f1e1294f39be72e", "votes": [3, 0, 0, 0, 0]}
The United States should ban assault weapons
Gun control laws, especially those that try to ban "assault weapons," infringe upon the right to own guns for hunting and sport.
UNDERMINE
{"claim_id": 370, "id": "370:4852", "native_cluster": [4852, 25290], "perspective_id": 4852, "split_group_id": "b4a29c7d70ca00ae95b6e62ffc53f08aa49451796c4809246f1e1294f39be72e", "votes": [0, 0, 0, 3, 0]}
The United States should ban assault weapons
Gun control laws would reduce the societal costs associated with gun violence.
SUPPORT
{"claim_id": 370, "id": "370:4840", "native_cluster": [4840, 25272, 25273], "perspective_id": 4840, "split_group_id": "b4a29c7d70ca00ae95b6e62ffc53f08aa49451796c4809246f1e1294f39be72e", "votes": [3, 0, 0, 0, 0]}
The United States should ban assault weapons
The presence of a gun makes a conflict more likely to become violent.
SUPPORT
{"claim_id": 370, "id": "370:4844", "native_cluster": [4844], "perspective_id": 4844, "split_group_id": "b4a29c7d70ca00ae95b6e62ffc53f08aa49451796c4809246f1e1294f39be72e", "votes": [3, 0, 0, 0, 0]}
The United States should ban assault weapons
Gun control laws give too much power to the government and may result in government tyranny and the government taking away all guns from citizens.
UNDERMINE
{"claim_id": 370, "id": "370:4854", "native_cluster": [4854, 25294, 25295], "perspective_id": 4854, "split_group_id": "b4a29c7d70ca00ae95b6e62ffc53f08aa49451796c4809246f1e1294f39be72e", "votes": [0, 0, 1, 2, 0]}
The United States should ban assault weapons
Gun control laws infringe upon the right to self-defense and deny people a sense of safety.
UNDERMINE
{"claim_id": 370, "id": "370:4851", "native_cluster": [4851, 25288, 25289], "perspective_id": 4851, "split_group_id": "b4a29c7d70ca00ae95b6e62ffc53f08aa49451796c4809246f1e1294f39be72e", "votes": [0, 0, 0, 3, 0]}
The teaching of Shakespeare should be compulsory
It relates to our lives now
SUPPORT
{"claim_id": 670, "id": "670:5574", "native_cluster": [5574, 25877, 25878], "perspective_id": 5574, "split_group_id": "52851e8f36ecad9573e49c20302bc7d6adef3c5043fecc8d5fa53ac9af073905", "votes": [2, 1, 0, 0, 0]}
The teaching of Shakespeare should be compulsory
Shakespeare as national treasure
SUPPORT
{"claim_id": 670, "id": "670:5572", "native_cluster": [5572, 25873, 25874], "perspective_id": 5572, "split_group_id": "52851e8f36ecad9573e49c20302bc7d6adef3c5043fecc8d5fa53ac9af073905", "votes": [2, 1, 0, 0, 0]}
The teaching of Shakespeare should be compulsory
Shakespeare isn't the best poet ever
UNDERMINE
{"claim_id": 670, "id": "670:5578", "native_cluster": [5578, 25881, 25882], "perspective_id": 5578, "split_group_id": "52851e8f36ecad9573e49c20302bc7d6adef3c5043fecc8d5fa53ac9af073905", "votes": [0, 0, 1, 2, 0]}
The teaching of Shakespeare should be compulsory
Shakespeare enriches our language
SUPPORT
{"claim_id": 670, "id": "670:5571", "native_cluster": [5571, 25871, 25872], "perspective_id": 5571, "split_group_id": "52851e8f36ecad9573e49c20302bc7d6adef3c5043fecc8d5fa53ac9af073905", "votes": [2, 1, 0, 0, 0]}
The teaching of Shakespeare should be compulsory
Shakespeare can be innapropriate for younger readers.
UNDERMINE
{"claim_id": 670, "id": "670:5579", "native_cluster": [5579, 25883, 25884], "perspective_id": 5579, "split_group_id": "52851e8f36ecad9573e49c20302bc7d6adef3c5043fecc8d5fa53ac9af073905", "votes": [0, 0, 0, 3, 0]}
The teaching of Shakespeare should be compulsory
Shakespeare is too advanced
UNDERMINE
{"claim_id": 670, "id": "670:5577", "native_cluster": [5577, 25879, 25880], "perspective_id": 5577, "split_group_id": "52851e8f36ecad9573e49c20302bc7d6adef3c5043fecc8d5fa53ac9af073905", "votes": [0, 0, 2, 1, 0]}
The teaching of Shakespeare should be compulsory
As a tool for cultural integration
SUPPORT
{"claim_id": 670, "id": "670:5573", "native_cluster": [5573, 25875, 25876], "perspective_id": 5573, "split_group_id": "52851e8f36ecad9573e49c20302bc7d6adef3c5043fecc8d5fa53ac9af073905", "votes": [1, 2, 0, 0, 0]}
I believe in the Right to be forgotten
It is unfair for people to suffer for silly past mistakes
SUPPORT
{"claim_id": 137, "id": "137:1007", "native_cluster": [1007, 21793, 21794], "perspective_id": 1007, "split_group_id": "f79dc549666868f2f72590f2f9a754690bb87c4b5087c80c269567a888e51db4", "votes": [4, 0, 0, 0, 0]}
I believe in the Right to be forgotten
The internet does not need additional rights to those in the real world
UNDERMINE
{"claim_id": 137, "id": "137:1010", "native_cluster": [1010], "perspective_id": 1010, "split_group_id": "f79dc549666868f2f72590f2f9a754690bb87c4b5087c80c269567a888e51db4", "votes": [0, 0, 0, 4, 0]}
Homosexuals should be able to adopt
Gay people have the right to a family life.
SUPPORT
{"claim_id": 118, "id": "118:871", "native_cluster": [871], "perspective_id": 871, "split_group_id": "ead484808db17aa8ba095772f4e2ff624d232422348c1576e07971d7f6d20a68", "votes": [3, 0, 0, 0, 0]}
Homosexuals should be able to adopt
The government's interest in protecting traditional families.
UNDERMINE
{"claim_id": 118, "id": "118:873", "native_cluster": [873, 21693, 21694], "perspective_id": 873, "split_group_id": "ead484808db17aa8ba095772f4e2ff624d232422348c1576e07971d7f6d20a68", "votes": [0, 0, 0, 3, 0]}
Homosexuals should be able to adopt
Where same-sex households exist, they should have equal rights as opposite-sex households.
SUPPORT
{"claim_id": 118, "id": "118:868", "native_cluster": [868, 21691, 21692], "perspective_id": 868, "split_group_id": "ead484808db17aa8ba095772f4e2ff624d232422348c1576e07971d7f6d20a68", "votes": [3, 0, 0, 0, 0]}
The West should invade Syria
Invasion is not yet justified.
UNDERMINE
{"claim_id": 277, "id": "277:2047", "native_cluster": [2047, 22824], "perspective_id": 2047, "split_group_id": "bc713d82eb6ca1fc4519d3cf7afd7d9dce04a874c880c16ce4a735427b29f02c", "votes": [0, 0, 1, 2, 0]}
The West should invade Syria
We have a duty to launch a humanitarian intervention in Syria.
SUPPORT
{"claim_id": 277, "id": "277:2045", "native_cluster": [2045], "perspective_id": 2045, "split_group_id": "bc713d82eb6ca1fc4519d3cf7afd7d9dce04a874c880c16ce4a735427b29f02c", "votes": [2, 1, 0, 0, 0]}
The West should invade Syria
The nature of the opposition movements makes this an unwinnable war.
UNDERMINE
{"claim_id": 277, "id": "277:2048", "native_cluster": [2048, 22825, 22826], "perspective_id": 2048, "split_group_id": "bc713d82eb6ca1fc4519d3cf7afd7d9dce04a874c880c16ce4a735427b29f02c", "votes": [0, 0, 0, 3, 0]}
The West should invade Syria
Success depends on military intervention.
SUPPORT
{"claim_id": 277, "id": "277:2046", "native_cluster": [2046, 22821, 22822], "perspective_id": 2046, "split_group_id": "bc713d82eb6ca1fc4519d3cf7afd7d9dce04a874c880c16ce4a735427b29f02c", "votes": [1, 2, 0, 0, 0]}
Women are the key to Africa’s economic future
Women provide a platform for economic development
SUPPORT
{"claim_id": 472, "id": "472:3509", "native_cluster": [3509, 23958, 23959], "perspective_id": 3509, "split_group_id": "8889ed5cea7c774ca5064261028d5a2094d0ce39b0447e26f9f7e43ae1a347cb", "votes": [3, 0, 0, 0, 0]}
Women are the key to Africa’s economic future
There is greater potential for African women
SUPPORT
{"claim_id": 472, "id": "472:3510", "native_cluster": [3510, 23960, 23961], "perspective_id": 3510, "split_group_id": "8889ed5cea7c774ca5064261028d5a2094d0ce39b0447e26f9f7e43ae1a347cb", "votes": [3, 0, 0, 0, 0]}
Women are the key to Africa’s economic future
Women are not the future for Africa’s economy
UNDERMINE
{"claim_id": 472, "id": "472:3512", "native_cluster": [3512, 23962, 23963], "perspective_id": 3512, "split_group_id": "8889ed5cea7c774ca5064261028d5a2094d0ce39b0447e26f9f7e43ae1a347cb", "votes": [0, 0, 0, 3, 0]}
Women are the key to Africa’s economic future
Women are the backbone of Africa’s agriculture
SUPPORT
{"claim_id": 472, "id": "472:3508", "native_cluster": [3508, 23957], "perspective_id": 3508, "split_group_id": "8889ed5cea7c774ca5064261028d5a2094d0ce39b0447e26f9f7e43ae1a347cb", "votes": [1, 2, 0, 0, 0]}
Unilateral nuclear disarmament is the best way to create a safer world
Disarmament is impossible, rendering efforts to disarm pointless and simply wasteful
UNDERMINE
{"claim_id": 687, "id": "687:5264", "native_cluster": [5264, 5708], "perspective_id": 5264, "split_group_id": "a5cf976c0767d5e7fa284f5eec742056ff0f7261b868957fba5ee984e6a0df19", "votes": [0, 0, 0, 3, 0]}
Unilateral nuclear disarmament is the best way to create a safer world
There will be less nuclear weapons
SUPPORT
{"claim_id": 687, "id": "687:5707", "native_cluster": [5707], "perspective_id": 5707, "split_group_id": "a5cf976c0767d5e7fa284f5eec742056ff0f7261b868957fba5ee984e6a0df19", "votes": [2, 1, 0, 0, 0]}
Unilateral nuclear disarmament is the best way to create a safer world
The potential for a safer world.
SUPPORT
{"claim_id": 687, "id": "687:5706", "native_cluster": [5706], "perspective_id": 5706, "split_group_id": "a5cf976c0767d5e7fa284f5eec742056ff0f7261b868957fba5ee984e6a0df19", "votes": [3, 0, 0, 0, 0]}
Unilateral nuclear disarmament is the best way to create a safer world
Nuclear waste disposal is rarely safe/efficient; it is too much to expect a sqeaky clean disposal/disarmament of nuclear weapons
SUPPORT
{"claim_id": 687, "id": "687:5265", "native_cluster": [5265], "perspective_id": 5265, "split_group_id": "a5cf976c0767d5e7fa284f5eec742056ff0f7261b868957fba5ee984e6a0df19", "votes": [1, 1, 0, 0, 0]}
Unilateral nuclear disarmament is the best way to create a safer world
Disarmament would actually cause increased insecurity among nations, as there can never be any guarantee that a nation has disarmed
UNDERMINE
{"claim_id": 687, "id": "687:5262", "native_cluster": [5262, 25670, 25671], "perspective_id": 5262, "split_group_id": "a5cf976c0767d5e7fa284f5eec742056ff0f7261b868957fba5ee984e6a0df19", "votes": [0, 0, 0, 2, 0]}
Unilateral nuclear disarmament is the best way to create a safer world
The abolition of nuclear weapons would actually incentivize the development and use of even more dangerous weapons, such as chemical and biological weapons
UNDERMINE
{"claim_id": 687, "id": "687:5263", "native_cluster": [5263], "perspective_id": 5263, "split_group_id": "a5cf976c0767d5e7fa284f5eec742056ff0f7261b868957fba5ee984e6a0df19", "votes": [0, 0, 0, 2, 0]}
Unilateral nuclear disarmament is the best way to create a safer world
Proliferation of nuclear weapons increases the chances of nuclear accidents
SUPPORT
{"claim_id": 687, "id": "687:5257", "native_cluster": [5257], "perspective_id": 5257, "split_group_id": "a5cf976c0767d5e7fa284f5eec742056ff0f7261b868957fba5ee984e6a0df19", "votes": [2, 0, 0, 0, 0]}
Unilateral nuclear disarmament is the best way to create a safer world
Irrational leaders make the possession of nuclear weapons dangerous
SUPPORT
{"claim_id": 687, "id": "687:5256", "native_cluster": [5256], "perspective_id": 5256, "split_group_id": "a5cf976c0767d5e7fa284f5eec742056ff0f7261b868957fba5ee984e6a0df19", "votes": [2, 0, 0, 0, 0]}
Unilateral nuclear disarmament is the best way to create a safer world
It is immoral to use the threat of nuclear annihilation in order to achieve foreign policy aims
SUPPORT
{"claim_id": 687, "id": "687:5258", "native_cluster": [5258], "perspective_id": 5258, "split_group_id": "a5cf976c0767d5e7fa284f5eec742056ff0f7261b868957fba5ee984e6a0df19", "votes": [2, 0, 0, 0, 0]}
Unilateral nuclear disarmament is the best way to create a safer world
Nuclear weapons can fall into the wrong hands.
SUPPORT
{"claim_id": 687, "id": "687:1984", "native_cluster": [1984, 5254, 5255, 22728, 22727], "perspective_id": 1984, "split_group_id": "a5cf976c0767d5e7fa284f5eec742056ff0f7261b868957fba5ee984e6a0df19", "votes": [2, 0, 0, 0, 0]}
Unilateral nuclear disarmament is the best way to create a safer world
Humanitarian intervention becomes impossible in states that possess nuclear weapons
SUPPORT
{"claim_id": 687, "id": "687:1573", "native_cluster": [1573, 22362, 22364], "perspective_id": 1573, "split_group_id": "a5cf976c0767d5e7fa284f5eec742056ff0f7261b868957fba5ee984e6a0df19", "votes": [0, 3, 0, 0, 0]}
Unilateral nuclear disarmament is the best way to create a safer world
The threat of a state developing nuclear weapons could instigate pre-emptive strikes from its neighbours and rivals to prevent the acquisition of such weapons
SUPPORT
{"claim_id": 687, "id": "687:1575", "native_cluster": [1575, 22369, 22370, 22372], "perspective_id": 1575, "split_group_id": "a5cf976c0767d5e7fa284f5eec742056ff0f7261b868957fba5ee984e6a0df19", "votes": [0, 2, 1, 0, 0]}
Unilateral nuclear disarmament is the best way to create a safer world
Public acknowledgement of the right to nuclear deterrence will benefit the public regulation of nuclear weapons generally
UNDERMINE
{"claim_id": 687, "id": "687:1570", "native_cluster": [1570], "perspective_id": 1570, "split_group_id": "a5cf976c0767d5e7fa284f5eec742056ff0f7261b868957fba5ee984e6a0df19", "votes": [0, 0, 0, 1, 2]}
Unilateral nuclear disarmament is the best way to create a safer world
Nuclear weapons give states valuable agenda-setting power on the international stage
UNDERMINE
{"claim_id": 687, "id": "687:1568", "native_cluster": [1568, 22357, 22359], "perspective_id": 1568, "split_group_id": "a5cf976c0767d5e7fa284f5eec742056ff0f7261b868957fba5ee984e6a0df19", "votes": [0, 0, 0, 1, 2]}
Unilateral nuclear disarmament is the best way to create a safer world
All countries have a right to defend themselves with nuclear weapons, even when they lack the capacity in conventional weapons
UNDERMINE
{"claim_id": 687, "id": "687:1566", "native_cluster": [1566, 22353, 22354, 22355, 22356], "perspective_id": 1566, "split_group_id": "a5cf976c0767d5e7fa284f5eec742056ff0f7261b868957fba5ee984e6a0df19", "votes": [0, 0, 0, 1, 2]}
Unilateral nuclear disarmament is the best way to create a safer world
Possessing nuclear weapons will be counter to the peaceful interests of states
SUPPORT
{"claim_id": 687, "id": "687:1574", "native_cluster": [1574], "perspective_id": 1574, "split_group_id": "a5cf976c0767d5e7fa284f5eec742056ff0f7261b868957fba5ee984e6a0df19", "votes": [0, 2, 1, 0, 0]}
Improving access to contraception will lower the number of teenage pregnancies
Can’t throw money at the problem
UNDERMINE
{"claim_id": 712, "id": "712:5911", "native_cluster": [5911], "perspective_id": 5911, "split_group_id": "a0cc427341a5811cd7f730451c44601143441d1dad0e70fd83f42b48a4ff5585", "votes": [0, 0, 1, 2, 0]}
Improving access to contraception will lower the number of teenage pregnancies
Lack of access to contraceptives is not the main reason for unprotected sex
UNDERMINE
{"claim_id": 712, "id": "712:5912", "native_cluster": [5912], "perspective_id": 5912, "split_group_id": "a0cc427341a5811cd7f730451c44601143441d1dad0e70fd83f42b48a4ff5585", "votes": [0, 0, 1, 2, 0]}
Improving access to contraception will lower the number of teenage pregnancies
No it has proved opposite.
UNDERMINE
{"claim_id": 712, "id": "712:5914", "native_cluster": [5914, 26064], "perspective_id": 5914, "split_group_id": "a0cc427341a5811cd7f730451c44601143441d1dad0e70fd83f42b48a4ff5585", "votes": [0, 0, 0, 3, 0]}
Improving access to contraception will lower the number of teenage pregnancies
poor access to contracptives is not the main problem
UNDERMINE
{"claim_id": 712, "id": "712:5913", "native_cluster": [5913, 26060, 26061, 26062, 26063], "perspective_id": 5913, "split_group_id": "a0cc427341a5811cd7f730451c44601143441d1dad0e70fd83f42b48a4ff5585", "votes": [0, 0, 0, 3, 0]}
Improving access to contraception will lower the number of teenage pregnancies
Young people want to have kids
UNDERMINE
{"claim_id": 712, "id": "712:5909", "native_cluster": [5909], "perspective_id": 5909, "split_group_id": "a0cc427341a5811cd7f730451c44601143441d1dad0e70fd83f42b48a4ff5585", "votes": [0, 0, 1, 2, 0]}
The Church of England should be separated from the British state.
The church’s involvement undermines the role of the state.
SUPPORT
{"claim_id": 174, "id": "174:1287", "native_cluster": [1287, 22011, 22012], "perspective_id": 1287, "split_group_id": "e5ed5aebc812d8504ccf1a64e12ad241e202053a45e9d34bb1db3151421128c4", "votes": [3, 0, 0, 0, 0]}
The Church of England should be separated from the British state.
Separation would show non-religious people that their contributions to the state are valued.
SUPPORT
{"claim_id": 174, "id": "174:1289", "native_cluster": [1289, 22015, 22016], "perspective_id": 1289, "split_group_id": "e5ed5aebc812d8504ccf1a64e12ad241e202053a45e9d34bb1db3151421128c4", "votes": [3, 0, 0, 0, 0]}
The Church of England should be separated from the British state.
Disestablishment sidelines all religious people.
UNDERMINE
{"claim_id": 174, "id": "174:1293", "native_cluster": [1293], "perspective_id": 1293, "split_group_id": "e5ed5aebc812d8504ccf1a64e12ad241e202053a45e9d34bb1db3151421128c4", "votes": [0, 0, 0, 3, 0]}
The Church of England should be separated from the British state.
Separation would show acceptance of other religions.
SUPPORT
{"claim_id": 174, "id": "174:1288", "native_cluster": [1288, 22013, 22014], "perspective_id": 1288, "split_group_id": "e5ed5aebc812d8504ccf1a64e12ad241e202053a45e9d34bb1db3151421128c4", "votes": [3, 0, 0, 0, 0]}
The Church of England should be separated from the British state.
Separation would create animosity towards immigrants and non-Christians.
UNDERMINE
{"claim_id": 174, "id": "174:1292", "native_cluster": [1292, 22020], "perspective_id": 1292, "split_group_id": "e5ed5aebc812d8504ccf1a64e12ad241e202053a45e9d34bb1db3151421128c4", "votes": [0, 0, 0, 3, 0]}
The Church of England should be separated from the British state.
Separating Church and State in England would be harmful to national identity.
UNDERMINE
{"claim_id": 174, "id": "174:1291", "native_cluster": [1291, 22017, 22018], "perspective_id": 1291, "split_group_id": "e5ed5aebc812d8504ccf1a64e12ad241e202053a45e9d34bb1db3151421128c4", "votes": [0, 0, 0, 3, 0]}
Sanctuary cities are beneficial
Sanctuary cities harbor criminals, creating a dangerous environment for US citizens.
UNDERMINE
{"claim_id": 603, "id": "603:5047", "native_cluster": [5047, 25487, 25488], "perspective_id": 5047, "split_group_id": "8ec70081dd8d19c3da46e70ee0eb3bad63353fa3807ac66ddbd375d66e9660ca", "votes": [0, 0, 0, 3, 0]}
Sanctuary cities are beneficial
Sanctuary cities are safer because they encourage good relationships between undocumented immigrants and law enforcement.
SUPPORT
{"claim_id": 603, "id": "603:5044", "native_cluster": [5044, 25485], "perspective_id": 5044, "split_group_id": "8ec70081dd8d19c3da46e70ee0eb3bad63353fa3807ac66ddbd375d66e9660ca", "votes": [3, 0, 0, 0, 0]}
Sanctuary cities are beneficial
Sanctuary cities are needed to protect undocumented immigrants against federal immigration laws.
SUPPORT
{"claim_id": 603, "id": "603:5046", "native_cluster": [5046], "perspective_id": 5046, "split_group_id": "8ec70081dd8d19c3da46e70ee0eb3bad63353fa3807ac66ddbd375d66e9660ca", "votes": [2, 1, 0, 0, 0]}
Sanctuary cities are beneficial
Sanctuary policies defy federal laws to which state and local governments are bound.
UNDERMINE
{"claim_id": 603, "id": "603:5048", "native_cluster": [5048, 25489, 25490], "perspective_id": 5048, "split_group_id": "8ec70081dd8d19c3da46e70ee0eb3bad63353fa3807ac66ddbd375d66e9660ca", "votes": [0, 0, 0, 3, 0]}
Sanctuary cities are beneficial
Sanctuary policies are legal and protected by the Tenth Amendment.
SUPPORT
{"claim_id": 603, "id": "603:5045", "native_cluster": [5045], "perspective_id": 5045, "split_group_id": "8ec70081dd8d19c3da46e70ee0eb3bad63353fa3807ac66ddbd375d66e9660ca", "votes": [2, 1, 0, 0, 0]}
Sanctuary cities are beneficial
Sanctuary policies prevent local and state police officers from doing their jobs.
UNDERMINE
{"claim_id": 603, "id": "603:5049", "native_cluster": [5049, 25492], "perspective_id": 5049, "split_group_id": "8ec70081dd8d19c3da46e70ee0eb3bad63353fa3807ac66ddbd375d66e9660ca", "votes": [0, 0, 0, 3, 0]}
Swearing should be illegal
Waste of Police Time
UNDERMINE
{"claim_id": 708, "id": "708:5879", "native_cluster": [5879], "perspective_id": 5879, "split_group_id": "eb623afb4d012e2342bee58862d125175dccd0bf1a3bea6386aab5fb8670d7f9", "votes": [0, 0, 0, 3, 0]}
Swearing should be illegal
No, people are entitled to their free speech!
UNDERMINE
{"claim_id": 708, "id": "708:5877", "native_cluster": [5877], "perspective_id": 5877, "split_group_id": "eb623afb4d012e2342bee58862d125175dccd0bf1a3bea6386aab5fb8670d7f9", "votes": [0, 0, 0, 3, 0]}
Remotely Controlled Weapons Systems Should Not Be Used In Combat
We put in danger less people in the combat
UNDERMINE
{"claim_id": 858, "id": "858:7001", "native_cluster": [7001, 26683, 26684], "perspective_id": 7001, "split_group_id": "9a0ade779f5876de242b32d2322763b13819c9c851660012a94d6a10c4453f2b", "votes": [0, 0, 0, 2, 0]}
Books will be replaced at some point
books do not need constant maintenance and repair is cheaper
UNDERMINE
{"claim_id": 750, "id": "750:6181", "native_cluster": [6181], "perspective_id": 6181, "split_group_id": "276e6243d96ddbcf53d8c40521109075683bc80c079cd3695218ec81958710a4", "votes": [0, 0, 1, 1, 0]}
Books will be replaced at some point
e-books use up far less storage space
SUPPORT
{"claim_id": 750, "id": "750:6173", "native_cluster": [6173], "perspective_id": 6173, "split_group_id": "276e6243d96ddbcf53d8c40521109075683bc80c079cd3695218ec81958710a4", "votes": [1, 1, 0, 0, 0]}
Books will be replaced at some point
Books are more durable than computers.
UNDERMINE
{"claim_id": 750, "id": "750:6179", "native_cluster": [6179], "perspective_id": 6179, "split_group_id": "276e6243d96ddbcf53d8c40521109075683bc80c079cd3695218ec81958710a4", "votes": [0, 0, 0, 2, 0]}
Books will be replaced at some point
digital media has too many copyright issues and is less trustworthy
UNDERMINE
{"claim_id": 750, "id": "750:6180", "native_cluster": [6180, 26184, 26185], "perspective_id": 6180, "split_group_id": "276e6243d96ddbcf53d8c40521109075683bc80c079cd3695218ec81958710a4", "votes": [0, 0, 0, 2, 0]}
Books will be replaced at some point
Go Green with Ebooks
SUPPORT
{"claim_id": 750, "id": "750:6177", "native_cluster": [6177], "perspective_id": 6177, "split_group_id": "276e6243d96ddbcf53d8c40521109075683bc80c079cd3695218ec81958710a4", "votes": [2, 0, 0, 0, 0]}
Books will be replaced at some point
textbooks are geting more and more expensive whilst universities are bringing the goods online
SUPPORT
{"claim_id": 750, "id": "750:6176", "native_cluster": [6176], "perspective_id": 6176, "split_group_id": "276e6243d96ddbcf53d8c40521109075683bc80c079cd3695218ec81958710a4", "votes": [2, 0, 0, 0, 0]}
Children Should Have The Right To Vote In Elections
Children may not understand politics well, but neither do most voters
SUPPORT
{"claim_id": 869, "id": "869:7072", "native_cluster": [7072], "perspective_id": 7072, "split_group_id": "a3f4748e8a96fa5df898305f58e4c296ca43d3a2321630f97e1a4638d49de478", "votes": [1, 2, 0, 0, 0]}
Children Should Have The Right To Vote In Elections
Sixteen years would be a better option in developed countries
SUPPORT
{"claim_id": 869, "id": "869:25672", "native_cluster": [25672, 25674, 25675, 5269, 7071], "perspective_id": 25672, "split_group_id": "a3f4748e8a96fa5df898305f58e4c296ca43d3a2321630f97e1a4638d49de478", "votes": [1, 1, 0, 0, 0]}
Children Should Have The Right To Vote In Elections
Voting at a lower age would increase participation
SUPPORT
{"claim_id": 869, "id": "869:2560", "native_cluster": [2560, 23262, 23263], "perspective_id": 2560, "split_group_id": "a3f4748e8a96fa5df898305f58e4c296ca43d3a2321630f97e1a4638d49de478", "votes": [2, 1, 0, 0, 0]}
Children Should Have The Right To Vote In Elections
Young people would be more likely to misuse their vote
UNDERMINE
{"claim_id": 869, "id": "869:2564", "native_cluster": [2564, 23266, 23267], "perspective_id": 2564, "split_group_id": "a3f4748e8a96fa5df898305f58e4c296ca43d3a2321630f97e1a4638d49de478", "votes": [0, 0, 1, 2, 0]}
Children Should Have The Right To Vote In Elections
Parents are guardians and should be trusted to vote in their children’s interests
UNDERMINE
{"claim_id": 869, "id": "869:2562", "native_cluster": [2562, 23264, 23265], "perspective_id": 2562, "split_group_id": "a3f4748e8a96fa5df898305f58e4c296ca43d3a2321630f97e1a4638d49de478", "votes": [0, 0, 1, 2, 0]}
The African Union can meet its pledge to end all war on the continent by 2020
Progress in ending conflict in Africa
SUPPORT
{"claim_id": 328, "id": "328:2436", "native_cluster": [2436, 23164, 23165], "perspective_id": 2436, "split_group_id": "4877683feac97dfa4de9c304002f65ad8aeb610495b3ee97fb35e1705545f8c4", "votes": [2, 1, 0, 0, 0]}
The African Union can meet its pledge to end all war on the continent by 2020
No mechanism to prevent crises and war exists
UNDERMINE
{"claim_id": 328, "id": "328:2442", "native_cluster": [2442, 23172, 23173], "perspective_id": 2442, "split_group_id": "4877683feac97dfa4de9c304002f65ad8aeb610495b3ee97fb35e1705545f8c4", "votes": [0, 0, 0, 3, 0]}
The African Union can meet its pledge to end all war on the continent by 2020
War is in human nature
UNDERMINE
{"claim_id": 328, "id": "328:2439", "native_cluster": [2439, 23168], "perspective_id": 2439, "split_group_id": "4877683feac97dfa4de9c304002f65ad8aeb610495b3ee97fb35e1705545f8c4", "votes": [0, 0, 1, 2, 0]}