text
stringlengths
0
234
Multiple_Instance_Found := False;
Temp_Major_Pointer := The_Relationship_List;
Major_Loop:
while (not Multiple_Instance_Found) and then Temp_Major_Pointer /= null loop
Temp_Minor_Pointer := Temp_Major_Pointer.Completion_List;
Minor_Loop:
while (not Multiple_Instance_Found) and then Temp_Minor_Pointer /= null loop
Multiple_Instance_Found := (Temp_Minor_Pointer.Multiple = Multiple_Instance);
if Multiple_Instance_Found then
Associative_Instance := Temp_Minor_Pointer.Associative;
Single_Instance := Temp_Major_Pointer.Single;
else
-- Prevent access if we have got what we are after
-- Bailing out of the search loop is a neater solution, but test team defects
-- have been raised against this sort of thing.
Temp_Minor_Pointer := Temp_Minor_Pointer.Next;
end if;
end loop Minor_Loop;
-- Prevent the possibility that the next entry in the major queue is null causing an access error
if not Multiple_Instance_Found then
Temp_Major_Pointer := Temp_Major_Pointer.Next;
end if;
end loop Major_Loop;
end Check_List_For_Multiple;
------------------------------------------------------------------------
procedure Check_List_For_Associative (
Associative_Instance : in Root_Object.Object_Access;
Multiple_Instance : out Root_Object.Object_Access;
Single_Instance : out Root_Object.Object_Access;
Associative_Instance_Found : out Boolean) is
Temp_Minor_Pointer : Relationship_Pair_Access_Type;
Temp_Major_Pointer : Relationship_Entry_Access_Type;
begin
Associative_Instance_Found := False;
Temp_Major_Pointer := The_Relationship_List;
Major_Loop:
while (not Associative_Instance_Found) and then Temp_Major_Pointer /= null loop
Temp_Minor_Pointer := Temp_Major_Pointer.Completion_List;
Minor_Loop:
while (not Associative_Instance_Found) and then Temp_Minor_Pointer /= null loop
Associative_Instance_Found := (Temp_Minor_Pointer.Associative = Associative_Instance);
if Associative_Instance_Found then
Multiple_Instance := Temp_Minor_Pointer.Multiple;
Single_Instance := Temp_Major_Pointer.Single;
else
-- Prevent access if we have got what we are after
-- Bailing out of the search loop is a neater solution, but test team defects
-- have been raised against this sort of thing.
Temp_Minor_Pointer := Temp_Minor_Pointer.Next;
end if;
end loop Minor_Loop;
-- Prevent the possibility that the next entry in the major queue is null causing an access error
if not Associative_Instance_Found then
Temp_Major_Pointer := Temp_Major_Pointer.Next;
end if;
end loop Major_Loop;
end Check_List_For_Associative;
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
procedure Do_Link (
Multiple_Instance : in Root_Object.Object_Access;
Single_Instance : in Root_Object.Object_Access;
Associative_Instance : in Root_Object.Object_Access) is
Temp_Minor_Pointer : Relationship_Pair_Access_Type;
Temp_Major_Pointer : Relationship_Entry_Access_Type;
Found : Boolean := False;
begin
Temp_Major_Pointer := The_Relationship_List;
while (not Found) and then Temp_Major_Pointer /= null loop
Found := (Temp_Major_Pointer.Single = Single_Instance);
if not Found then -- grab the next item
Temp_Major_Pointer := Temp_Major_Pointer.Next;